Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Meeting 09-21-17 (Reso 2809-2017) - Small Cell RESOLUTION NO. 2809-2017 PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION MAKING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPT AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ZONING ORDINANCE, RELATED TO SMALL CELL WIRELESS FACILITIES CITYWIDE. WHEREAS, in July of 2010, the City Council for the City of South San Francisco adopted a comprehensive update to the City’s zoning ordinance, which repealed the then-existing Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code (“Zoning Ordinance”), and replaced it with an entirely new Title that, among other actions, established new zoning districts, revised and reformatted many then-existing zoning provisions, eliminated inconsistent and outdated provisions, and codified entirely new zoning provisions, including new land use regulations and development standards; and, WHEREAS, as part of the 2010 Zoning Ordinance Update, the City adopted Section 20.350.035, which allows accessory dwelling units on properties with single-unit dwellings throughout the City; and, WHEREAS, the availability of housing is a substantial concern for individuals of all demographics, ages, and economic backgrounds in communities throughout the State of California; and WHEREAS, accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units offer lower cost housing to meet the needs of existing and future residents within existing neighborhoods, while respecting architectural character; and WHEREAS, in September 2016, the Legislature passed new laws including AB 2299, SB 1069, and AB 2406 intended to increase the number of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units by simplifying the approval process and reducing costs associated with their creation, developing new standards and regulations, and modifying the City’s ability to regulate accessory dwelling units; and WHEREAS, the State of California has established that a local agency may adopt a local ordinance to provide for the creation of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units in single family residential zones and the ordinance must designate areas within the jurisdiction where accessory dwelling units may be permitted; and WHEREAS, accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units are residential uses consistent with existing residential zoning and General Plan designations; and WHEREAS, the proposed accessory dwelling unit and junior accessory dwelling unit provisions and standards would implement Housing Element, Policy I-6, “The City shall support and facilitate the development of second units on single-family designated and zoned parcels”; and WHEREAS, the proposed Zoning Ordinance amendments comply with the California legislative amendments that were made in 2016 to Government Code Section 65852.2, which establish standards for the development of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units designed to increase the supply of smaller and affordable housing while ensuring that such housing remain compatible with the existing neighborhood; and WHEREAS, the City has prepared an amendment (“Amendment”) to the City’s Zoning Ordinance, including refinements to Section 20.350.035 of the Zoning Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance was adopted after preparation, circulation, consideration, and adoption of an Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration (“IS/MND”) in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq. (“CEQA”), in which the IS/MND analyzed the environmental impacts of adopting the Zoning Ordinance and concluded that adoption of the Zoning Ordinance could not have a significant effect on the environment because none of the impacts required to be analyzed under CEQA would exceed established thresholds of significance; and WHEREAS, the refinements, clarifications, and/or corrections set forth in this Amendment, as they relate to accessory dwelling unit and junior accessory dwelling unit regulations are minor in nature, the adoption of which would not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified effects beyond those disclosed and analyzed in the IS/MND prepared for the Zoning Ordinance, nor do the refinements, clarifications, and/or corrections constitute a change in the project or change in circumstances that would require additional environmental review; and WHEREAS, on July 6, 2017 the Planning Commission for the City of South San Francisco held a lawfully noticed public hearing to solicit public comment and consider the proposed Amendment, take public testimony, and make a recommendation to the City Council on the project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based on the entirety of the record before it, which includes without limitation, the California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code §21000, et seq. (“CEQA”) and the CEQA Guidelines, 14 California Code of Regulations §15000, et seq.; the South San Francisco General Plan and General Plan EIR, including all amendments and updates thereto; the South San Francisco Municipal Code; all reports, minutes, and public testimony submitted as part of the Planning Commission’s duly noticed July 6, 2017 meeting and any other evidence (within the meaning of Public Resources Code §21080(e) and §21082.2), the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco hereby finds as follows: SECTION 1 FINDINGS I. General Findings 1. The foregoing recitals are true and correct and made a part of this Resolution. 2. The Record for these proceedings, and upon which this Resolution is based, includes without limitation, Federal and State law; the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code §§ 21000, et seq. (“CEQA”)) and the CEQA Guidelines (14 California Code of Regulations § 15000, et seq.); the South San Francisco General Plan and General Plan EIR, including all amendments and updates thereto; the South San Francisco Municipal Code, all reports, minutes, and public testimony submitted as part of the Planning Commission’s duly noticed July 6, 2017 meeting and any other evidence (within the meaning of Public Resources Code §21080(e) and §21082.2). 3. The refinements, clarifications, and/or corrections set forth in this Amendment, as they relate to accessory dwelling unit and junior accessory dwelling unit regulations are minor in nature, the adoption of which would not result in any new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of any previously identified effects beyond those disclosed and analyzed in the IS/MND prepared for the Zoning Ordinance, nor do the refinements, clarifications, and/or corrections constitute a change in the project or change in circumstances that would require additional environmental review. 4. The documents and other material constituting the record for these proceedings are located at the Planning Division for the City of South San Francisco, 315 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco, CA 94080, and in the custody of Chief Planner, Sailesh Mehra. II. Zoning Text Amendment Findings 1. The proposed Zoning Amendment meets the purpose of the Zoning Ordinance and is consistent with the adopted General Plan because the Zoning Amendment will reinforce the General Plan policies, is consistent with the relevant specific plans, and is consistent with the City’s overall vision for providing a diversity of housing types responsive to household size, income, and age needs. None of the new or revised requirements for accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units will conflict with or impede achievement of any of the goals, policies, or land use designations established in the General Plan. 2. The Zoning Amendments would encourage the creation of accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units on residentially zoned properties to provide opportunities for affordable housing stock. The zoning districts where accessory dwelling units and junior accessory dwelling units are permitted are generally suitable in terms of access, size of parcel, relationship to similar or related uses, and other considerations as deemed relevant by the Planning Commission and City Council because the proposed uses are consistent with General Plan policies, specifically those policies which promote developing a diverse housing stock. 3. The proposed revisions and additions to the accessory dwelling unit regulations will not be detrimental to the use of land in any adjacent zone because the Zoning Amendment will refine existing performance standards and introduce new standards for accessory dwelling units to ensure that any future accessory dwelling units are compatible with surrounding single-family residential uses. SECTION II. AMENDMENTS. The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt the draft Ordinance attached as Exhibit A. Sections and subsections that are not amended by the draft Ordinance in Exhibit A shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 2 RECOMMENDATION NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco hereby makes the findings contained in this Resolution, and recommends that the South San Francisco City Council adopt an Ordinance amending the South San Francisco Municipal Code as shown in Exhibit A including revisions to Tables 20.080.002, 20.090.002, 20.100.002, 20.280.003, 20.330.004, 20.330.007 and Sections 20.300.002, 20.320.004, 20.350.035, 20.440.008, 20.480.003, and 20.620.002 and the proposed revision to Section 20.350.035(K)(1)(c). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its passage and adoption. * * * * * * * I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting held on the 21st day of September, 2017 by the following vote: AYES: Chairperson Faria, Vice Chairperson Nagales, Commissioner Shihadeh, Commissioner Ruiz, Commissioner Murphy, Commissioner Tzang NOES: ABSTENTIONS:__ Commissioner Wong ABSENT: Attest_/s/Sailesh Mehra__________ Secretary to the Planning Commission