Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 2013-08-05MINUTES y SPECIAL MEETING J O CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, California 94083 None. None. Meeting to be held at: CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM 400 GRAND AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA MONDAY, AUGUST 5, 2013 4 :15 P.M. 1. Call to Order. Time: 4:15 p.m. 2. Roll Call. Present: Councilmernbers Addiego, Garbarino, Gupta, Mayor Pro Tern Matsumoto and Mayor Gonzalez. Absent: None, 3. Public Comments — comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting Agenda. 4. Agenda Review. 5. Closed Session: Conference with Legal Counsel — Anticipated Litigation Significant Exposure to Litigation (Pursuant to Government Code §54956.9(b)) One Case. Time entered Closed Session: 4:16 p.m. Open Session resumed: 4 :49 p,m. Report out of Closed Session: No reportable action, direction given. 6. Public Hearing: Consideration of potential ballot measure seeking voter authorization to amend the City's existing business license tax for general fund purposes, establishing policies and procedures in connection with such an election, and requesting that the San Mateo County Chief Elections Officer conduct such an election. Resolution establishing November 5, 2013 as the date for a Municipal Election on a proposed Ballot Measure seeking voter authorization to amend the City's existing business license tax for general fund purposes, establishing policies and procedures in connection with such an election, and requesting that the San Mateo County Chief Elections Officer conduct such an election. Assistant City Manager Van Duyn provided the Council with a revised staff report covering some matters that had been brought up including: the fairness of the proposed ballot measure on the basis of all tax revenue generated by the business license tax being disproportionate to the overall business license tax. They amended the staff report to demonstrate how relative taxing entities selected business types were taxed by current city tax revenue estimates and the percentage of those as applied to the overall relationship to business taxes throughout the city. Finance Director Steele provided supporting material. This new business license category would generate less than 4% of the current total business taxes on an estimated annual basis. Staff has had additional discussions with representatives from Clear Channel and provided Council with that support material. City Attorney Mattas added that on the analysis that Finance Director Steel prepared, the estimated tax percentage on the companies within the category, billboards in particular, would be 4 -5 %. Those companies presently pay 0.4% and on a comparative basis, even the 5% is substantially less than other business industries in the city. Public Hearing opened: 4:53 p.m. Public Hearing closed: 4:58 p.m. Bruce Qualls, a representative for Clear Channel Outdoor, thanked the Council for granting them the extra time to work with city staff on a solution. He opined that billboards did not create any traffic, crime or require the use of the Fire Department. He suggested that there was a risk associated with the tax for First Amendment reasons. They had a long term relationship with the city and wished to foster something positive in going forward. They could see the pressures on the community to balance the budget and the pressure on the City Council to make the right decisions for the community. One of the things they talked about was the creation of a benefits district with funding provided for advertising programs that would help foster public safety in the community. He believed that the proposal before them would be without dispute and would provide the city with funds sooner than a tax would. He concluded that, regardless of the outcome they had tremendous respect for the City Council, city staff and the community. Addressing the City Council, City Attorney Mattas stated that given that they had two public sessions on this item, they had two choices. At this point Council could continue the 'item through Wednesday, which would be staff's recommendation, or alternatively, they could elect to put the ballot measure on by adopting the Resolution included in their packet. In response to Councilmember Addiego's inquiry into whether this was their last, best and final offer, Bruce Qualls, Clear Channel representative, stated that they had been able to go through the SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 5, 2013 MINUTES PAGE 2 negotiations because of the confidentiality agreement and that the figures and detailed information they went over with staff was proprietary. With that caveat, he fixrther stated that the offer was as far as he would be allowed to go. City Council decided to adjourn and convene a new special meeting on Wednesday, August 7ch at 10:30 a.m. 7. Adj ournment. Being no further business, Mayor Gonzalez adjourned the meeting at 5:06 p.m. Submitted: proved: r Is/ Krista J. Martinelli, City Clerk ae a Gonz ez, ayo City of South San Francisco City of South San Francisco SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING AUGUST 5, 2013 MINUTES PAGE 2