Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1954-09-21PLACE: TIME: CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: PROTEST HEARING AIlt~ORT BLVD. SEWER DISTRICT: RESOLUTION NO. 2O68 ORDERING WOBK SO. AIRPORT BLVD. SEWER DISTRICT: ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF I~E CITY OF SO~ SAN FRANCISCO mD T~ESDAY, SEPT. 21, 1954 Council Chambers, City Hall 3:00 p. m. The meeting w~s called to order at 3:25 P. m. by Mayor Smith. Present: Absent: Councilman Francis Lucchio, Emilio Corte.~i, Richard Caslon, Telford Smith, Andrew Rocca None Mayor Smith opened the protest hearing on the Airport Boulevard Sanitary Sewer District, asking i~ there were any protests. City 01erk Ro~n~i stated that written protests had been receive~ from the South San Francisco Land & Improvement Co. and the San Francisco Bridge Co. At the request of Mayor Smith these protests were rea4 as well as a communication from the San Francisco Bridge Co. authorizing E. P. Wil~ey to represent them at the mseti~g. Mayor Smith t~n asked Mr. E. P. Kauffmaun, present, if he wished to remark regarding his written protest. He stated that his protest was on the basis that the sewer would not be a benefit to the~, suggesting that the other property owners should bear t_be coat for this. Mayor Smith t~n remarked that for the record, w~s t~ L~ Co~ny objecting to this assessment to which he replied that they were. Mayor Smith then aS~s~ if the Land Co. would sign a covenant running with the land to the effect that in the event they found it w~s necessary to use the sewer that they would pay for such use. He replied that they would. Counci~ma~u Lucchio then brought up the question of the Land Coa~any, s privilege of using the sewer. Oity Attorney Lyons remarked that the privilege first belongs to those w~o are paying for the work. Ee also said that they could refuse use to ~hose who were not in the assessment area if the system were not adequate to carry the load. In other word~, the district has the first call and if the line is adequate to handle t]~ city can give them permission to hook on with a charge to be made. City Attorney Lyons asked Mr. Randlett if the work being done on the line now is adequate to handle the anticipated area to which he replied that it %ms not desig~ to handle the extra load. Ke further stated that the Industrial Sewer District was designed to acc~modate the area plus anticipated development. If heavy users come in the outfall won't accomodate the Land Co. area outside. If a light user comes in, -~he Land Co. could use the line. Mr. E. P. Wilsey then registered an oral protest of the San Francisco Bridge Co. He stated that e~ra length of lines would have to he laid. He also ~aid ~bat t~y did not object to the pa~nt of the pumping plaut. He said that t~e Bridge Co. did uot feel that they should pay for the sewers that run in the opposite direction and from which they do uot get any benefi~. An explanation was then given by Director of Publi-. Works Goss on how the assessment w~s determined after which Mr. Schwmining explained the method of handling waste from the Bridge Co. which is now unsatisfactory. Mr. Wilsey stated that the reason for the Bridge Co.'s protes~ was that they would have to pay so much to get to the plant and that they had no plans for the development of the land south of the canal. A brief discussion was then held regarding the method of changing the boundaries in the assessment area. City Attorney Lycms stated ~he work could be started and a determination of the boundaries maple later as well as the assessments. Mr. Sc r~ining, Supt. of the Sewage Disposal Plant, remarked that when the industrial sewers a~e finished the Bridge 0o. will have to be shut off as this would then create a heavier load that the plant could not handle. A discussion ~as then hel~ relative to including the land o~ the San Francisco Bridge Co. in the district which would be cut off from disposal service, Mayor Smith asking Mark Senal~i, Louis Pcletti, and Ken Royce, property owners in- volved mhd present, if they would object if this ~ssessment district inolu6ed all the Bridge Co. laad, to which they replied that they had no objection. City Attorney Lyons stated that if any shanges ware made all parties would have to be notified as they would have the priv- ilege o~ being heard. This, he stated, however would not prevent the project from being starts4. Mayor Smith then said that the question before the council at this time is whether the South San Francisco Land & Imp. Co. shoul~ be removed from the assessment district as A discussion ~as then held as to whether or not t~e Land Co. property wo~ld benefit. Mayor Smith asked Louis Poletti, Ken Royce and Mark Senaldi if they wis~md to express their opinion as to whether or not they felt the Laud Co. prope~y wo~ld benefit. Lo~Is Poletti stated he felt the Laud Co. would get beuefit, remarking that he felt fewer pumping stations would mean less upkeep for the city. Ken Royce 8tate~ he felt the value w~ t2aere for the Land Co. to be inclnded.. Mark Senaldi said that the Land Co. would gain some ~,m~diate benefits. That this would be higher priced property when sold. Mayor Smith remarked that there w~s one point to consider which was the Land Co. property also remarking on the industrial sub- division ordinance to cover developmentof these properties. This would include placement of streets, sidew~lw~-, sewers, etc. ~ayor Smith. ~k~ if it was the council's desire to eliminate the Land Co. and have a covenant rmnnin~ with the land re6arding future hookup. CounciLman Lucchio then moved that the protest of the Land Co. be overruled. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. E. P. Wilsey remarked on the validity of the project if the Land 0o. was not included, stating that it might be subject to attack in court. He suggested that ~ thought be given to this before action was taken. After ~cme discussion, Councilman Lucobio moved, ~econded by Mayor Smith, that the pro,est of th- South San Francisco Land & Imp. Co. be ove.--rule~. Under the question, 0ouncilman 0otto ~i stated that he felt the motion w~s out of or,er. 0ouncilman Rocca asked if the prote.~ was being ovexTuled~ SO aS to set up a basis on which to start proceeding to which City A~torney Lyons replied yes. Motion as mszle ~nd secon~sd wss regularly carried. Coun- cilman Lucchio then moved, seconde~ by 0ouncilmmn Roses and regulmrl~ carried, that the protes~ of the San Francisco Bridge Go. be overruled. City A~torney Lyons reported that a resolution had been prepared ordering the work to be done. CounciLman Gamlen introduced a resolution of the "~ity Council of the 0ity of South San Fran- cisco ordering the work for i~provement of the industrial area in the vicinity of Freeway Stree~ a~d South Airport Blvd. and the installation of an industrial sanitary sewerage system and an industrial sewage pumping station, and directing the work to be done under the super- vision of C. E. Randlett, as engineer. Roll call vote was as fo/lows: Ayes, Councilmen Rocca, Lucchio, Smith, Cortesi, Gemlen. ~so~oN NO. AWARD OF CO~TRACT SEWER DISTRICT: t~S0LUTION NO. 2O7O D IRE~ %VI'NG ASSESSMENT TO BE MADE, AIRPORT BLVD. SEWER DISTRICT: ,5 ,,',,'~' Director of Public Works Goss at this time gave a summary of bids as made, explaining that the low bidder w~s the Bay Pacific Construction & Engineering Co. on South Linden Arenas, South S~n Francisco, with a bid of $32,9~6.80. He recon-~ended the a~ard of the bid to the Bay Pacific Construction & Engineering 0o. City At$or~ey Lyons stated a resolution had been prepare~. Councilman Cortesi then introduced a reselution of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco awarding the contract to perform the work described in Resolution of Intentio~ No. 20~. Roll call vote w~ as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Rocca, IAtcchio, Smith, Cortesi, Gamlen. City At-~rney Lyons next explained the resolution prepared setting forth that t~ Director of Public Works make the assessment. Councilman Luechio introduced a resolmt~on directing the ase, ss~ent to be made and signed by the Director of Public Works. Roll call vote was as follows: A~s, Councilmen Rocca, Lucchio, Smith, Cortesi~ Gmmleu. A brief discussion was then held regarding the chau~o on the assessmemt. City Attorney Lyons sug~este~ holding this over until all the problem na~ been taken care of. Nm also suggested that the engineer consult with Mr. Wilsey re~aaxling this matter. Mayor Smith then stated that if -are were no objections this method would me carried forth. There Being no further business, the meeting was adjourned until Monday evening, 81$t~ %r 27, 19~ at 7:30 p. m. Time of ~d~ournment - 5:08 p. m. Eespectf-11 y submitted ci~ ADJOURNED MEEtinG OF %~E CIT"f C0Ut~IL ~F %~E CIT~ OF 8OUT~ SAN FRANCIS00 W~.~ MO]DAY, S~. ~7, 19~ PLACE: TIME: Council Chambers, City Hall 7:30 p. m. CArJ, T9 0~DER: The meeting was called to order at 7:33 P. m. by Mayor Smith ROLL CALL: Present: Absent: Councilmen Andrew Rocca, Francis Lucchio, Telford Smith, ~nilio Cortesi, Richard Gamlen None RESOL~TION NO. 2071 RENAMING PECK'S EEIGRTS & PECK'S S~B TO CEESTVIE~ TERRACE: ~/$/ Mayor Smith explained the request as received from the mew owners of ~k's Heights who asked that -~me name be changed to 0restview Terrmce. Councilman Corteei asked that the whole area have ~he name oha~. This would take in Peckts Lots aa well. Mayor Smith maid ~ 9umstio~ before the council is whether or not the council would allow the n~ae eh~. City Attorney Lyons explained the resolution prepared. Councilm~n Rocca introduced a resolution of the Cit~ Council of the City of South San Francisco renaming the subdivisions known as "Peck's N~ts' "Peck'$ Heights No. 2", "Peck's Heights No. ~", smd a portio~ of '~eck's Subdivision No. 1", the m,~ name to be "Crestview Terrace". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Lucchio, Rocca, Gamlen, Smith; Noes, Councilman Cortesi. Mayor Smith asked Councilman Cortesi if his no vote was because he desire~ all of the subdi- vision to have a name change to which he he rmpld~ yes that was why. Mayor ~nith then sug- g~ste~ referring this matter as suited By Councilman Cortesi to the Planning Commission for study and ret~mrt back. Councilman Rocca r~ to Councilman Cortesi that no request had been reoeiw~d from the property owners to chan~e the ne~e in Peck' s Lots. After sc~e discussion it was decided th~_t the referral to the Planning Commission re~ing name changiu would be held for a study meeting. RESOLUTION NO. 2072 APPROVING OFFICIAL ASSESSOR'S MAP: City Attorney Lyons then reported that he had another resolution prepared regarding the approval and adoption of au Assessor's Ma~. After a brief explanation, Councilman Lucehio iutr~_uced a resolution of the City Council of t~e City of South San Francisco approving.and adopting an official Assessor's Map. Roll call vo+~ was as follows: A~es, 0ouncilmen Rocca, Lueck~o, Smith, Cortesi, Gamlen. Approval of the minutes of the previous meeting ~s waived. ESC P~K~BAOH CORPORATION YARD SHACK: WINSTON MA~OR ~C SIGNALS: COUNTRY CLUB IMPGIND- ING AREA: ~"$$ ~ Coune'_lman Lucchio then asked t._~e City Attorney .~lative to the status of Mr. Eschelback~s corp~.~ation yard sheik. City Attorney Lyons rer~rked that he has not yet been able to con- tact Mr. Eschelbach but w~e still trying. Councilm~n Lucchio then asked regarding the edwin. eer~ ~ report on the chs~nel. City Attorney Lyome replied that he had talked with the Direct~ of Pm%lic Works but th8t no report had yet been smbmitted. He mentiuned the ordinance that w~s ~ded for filling, excavating, etc. A discussion was then had on the building that presently exists as a corporation y~ shed. City Attorney Lyons explained the condemnation proce,dings that can be instituted ~nd that a te~orary permit had originally been given to Mr. ESchelbach for this shed. After so~e discussion, Mayor Smith asked City Manager McClung for a report on the traffic signals on E1 Casino Beel in tbs vi~x~ity of Winston Manor. Cit: Mane~er M~Clung reported that a meeting of Joint High, my District ~10 ~s to be held, statim that it might be held this Thursday but that he w~s supposed to be notified. Mayor Smith asked City Manager McClung to inform the council when the meeting is ced.led for. M~yor Smith then asked relative to the impou~img area in Country Club area. City Attorney Lyons explained the conference and report as giwen to him by Director of Public Works Goss. Aum. iform right of way was to Be presented to the property owners. Me~vor Smith asked City Attorney Lyons if the uniform right of way would be ready for Monday night to which he repli that it would. Theme being no further business, the meeting was adjourned to Oct. 4, 1954 at 8 p. m.  !ime of Adjournment - 8:0~ p. m. ~ that +_.b~_ en~imeer consult with Mr. Wilsey regarding this matter. Mayor Smith then stated that if there ~re no objections this method would be carried forth. There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned until Monday evening, September 27, 195~ at 7:30 P. m. Time of Adjournment - 5:08 p. m. Respectfully submitted, city Clerk ADJOgRh~D MEETING OF T~ CITY COUNCIL GF THE CITY OF SO~TN BAN I~RANOlS~O ~.~ MOI~)AY, SEPT. ~7, 1954 PLACE: TIME: Council Chambers, City NAIl 7:~0 p. m. The ~etin6 ~ ea].l~l to order at 7:33 P. m. by MaFor S~ith ROE,L Pre~ent: Absent: Co~neilmen Anctrew Rocca, Francis Lucchio, Telford Smith, ~ailio Cortesi, Richard I~ES~ON NO. 2071 RENAMING PECK'S PECK~S SUB TO Ci~PI'V'IE~ g/ May~r Sazi~h e~i~ the request as received from the mew ow&ere of ~.ck's Heights who asked that the name be chaaged to Crestview Terrace. Councilman Cortasi asked that the whole area have the na~e eh~. This woml~ take ia Peek~a Lot. as ~.11. Mayor Smith acid the questioz before the c~il is whether or not the co,nell womld allow ~h. ~ ch~. City Attorney Lycra. explained the resolution prepared. Councilman Roes& introduced a resolution of the Cit~ Council of the City of South San Francisco renaazing the subdivisions known as "Peck's N.~hts" "Peck's Heights No. 2", "Peck's Heights No. 3", and a portion of '~eck's Subdivision No. 1", the new name to be "Crestview Terrace". Roll call vote w&s as follo~m: Ayes, Councilmen Lucchio, Rocca, Gamlen, Smith; Noes, Councilman Cortesi. Mayor Smith asked Oounc~]mau Cortesi if his us vote w~. because he desired all of the sulEli- vision to have a name change to which' he he replied yes that was why. Mayor ~th then aug- geared referring this matter as suggested by Comncilman Corteai to the Planning Ccmnission for study and r~ back. Councilman ~occa remarked to 0ouncilman Cortesi that no request had been received from the property owners to c~ the ~ in Peck's Lots. After sc~e discussion it was decided that tbs_ referral to the Planning Commission regarding na~e changin~ wo~ld be held for a stmdy meeting. RESO~ON NO. 2072 APPROVING OFFICIAL ASSESSOR'S MAP: 0ity Attorney Lyons then reported that he had anot-b~_r resolution prepared regarding the aPProval and adoption of an Assessorts Map. After a brief explanation, Councilman Lmcchio introduced a resolution of the 0ity Council of the City of So~th San Francisco approving and adopting an official Assessor's Nap. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Rocca, Lucchio, Smith, Cortesi, Gamlen. Approval of the minutes of the previous meeting was waived. ESC~m~.RAOH OO~PCRATION Councilman Lucchio then asked the City Attormey relative to the status of Mr. Escbelback's YArD SHACK: co~tion yard shack. City Attorney Lyons remarked that he has not yet Been able to con- · -/~ tact Mr. Eschelbach but ~ still trying. Councilman Lucchio then asked regarding the engin- eer*8 report on the channel. City Attorney Lyons repliod that he had talked with the Direetox of Public Works but t~t no report had yet been submitted. He mentiuned the ordinance that was needed for filling, excavating, etc. A discussion w~s then had on the building that presently exists as a corporation yard shed. City Attorney Lyon. explained the condemnation proceedings that can be instituted and that a temporary permit had originally been given to Mr. Eschelbach for this shed. After some dissuasion, Mayor Smith asked City M~ger McClmng WIN5~ MA~0R for a report on the traffic signals on E1 Ca&ins Reel in the viminity of Winston Manor. City TRAFFIC SIGNALS: Manager MeOlung reported that a meeting of Joint Highway District ~10 w~s to be held, stating ~-/ $-/ that it might be held this Thursday but that he w~s suPPosed to be notified. Mayor Smith asked City Manager McClung to inform the council when the meeting is called for. COULWIIUf CLUB IMPGJND- Mayor Smith then asked relative to the ! ~.-~.-~mding area in Country Club area. City Attorney ING AREA: ~-~$ F Lyons explained the c~ference and report as given to him by Director of Public Works Goss. ~-/~ F A uniform right of way was to be presented to the property owners. Mayor Smith asked City ~/7/ Attorney Lyons if the uniform right of way would be ready for ~onday night to which he replie~ that it womld. ADJ~trR~P: There being no further business, the meeting ~as adjourned to Oct. 4, 1954 at 8 p. m. ~'~\ ~.Time of Adjournment - 8:03 p.m. ,~~ ~.~~ APPNOVED: .r Respectftully Submitted ~ ~ Mayor City Clerk