Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1971-05-17REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO HELD MONDAY, MAY 17, 1971 TIME: PLACE: _ 8:00 p.m. Little Theater, El Camino High School. CALL TO ORDER:.. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Borba at 8:05 p.m. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited after which the Invocation was given by Reverend Wallace Huckabee of the Immanuel Baptist Church. ROLL CALL: Present: Absent: Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Frank J. Bertuc¢l~.li, William A. Borba, F. Frank Mammini and Warren Steinkamp None MINUTES: Mayor Borba asked if there was a motion approving the Minutes of the special meeting of April 28, 1971 and the regular meeting of May 3, 1971. Councilman Steinkamp moved, seconded by Councilman Mammini and regularly carried, that the Minutes of the special meeting of April 28, 1971 and the regular meeting of May 3, 1971 be approved as submitted. CLAIMS: Mayor Borba then asked if there was a motion approving the regular claims as submitted for payment. Councilman Ahern moved, seconded by Councilman Mammini that the regular claims, totaling $104,157.87, be approved for payment. Councilman Bertucelli at this time stated that a warrant which had been issued to him in the amount of $100 for attendance to the League of California Cities Sacramento Con- ference had been cancelled and returned to the City and was,' therefore, deiCed from the list of regular claims for approval this evening. Motion as made and seconded was regularly carried, PARKING DISTRICT NO. I CLAIMS: Mayor Borba then asked if there was a motion approving the claims as submitted for Parking District No. I for payment. Councilman Mammini moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for Parking District No. I, totaling $10.49, be approved for payment. CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK, UNIT NO. 2 CLAIM: Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2 Claim: Wilsey & Ham claim dated April 22, 1971 for Invoice No. 1209 in the amount of $64.80 for Engineering Services. Councilman Bertucelli moved, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2, be approved for payment. CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK, UNIT NO. 2A CLAIM: Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2A Claim: Wilsey & Ham claim dated April 22, 1971 for Invoice No. 1209 in the amount of $64.81 for Engineering Services. Councilman Steinkamp moved, seconded by Councilman Bertucelli and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2A, be approved for payment. EL CAMINO REAL SIDEWALK PROJECT (ARROYO TO CHEST- NUT) CLAIM: El Camino Real Sidewalk Project, Arroyo to Chestnut, Assessment District Claim: Enterprise-Journal claim dated April 14, 1971 in the amount of $25.00 for Legal Advertising. STONEGATE RIDGE Councilman Steinkamp moved, seconded by Councilman Mammini and regularly carried, that the ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CLAIM: claim as submitted for El Camino Real Sidewalk Project, Arroyo to Chestnut, Assessment District, be approved for payment. Stonegate Ridge Assessment District Claim: Wilson, Jones, Morton & Lynch claim dated April 26, 1971 in the amount of $459.50 for Legal Services rendered. Councilman Mammini moved, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for Stonega~e Ridge Assessment District be approved for payment. PUBLIC HEARINGS: Mayor Borba stated that, if there were no objections, the following Public Hearings: NOTICE OF HEARING - AMENDMENT OF ORDINANCE 575 AS AMENDED TO PERMIT A°ARTMENT HOUSES AND DWELLING GROUPS WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL DISTRICT OR ZONE; and NOTICE OF HEARING - AMEND- MENT OF PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT ORDINANCE 511 AND PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT ORDINANCE would be held until such time as Mr. Daniel Pass, City Planner had returned from a meeting of the Planning Commission. ?? PUBLIC HEARINGS: (CONT I NUED) ? RESOLUTION NO..5.567 CALLING FOR BIDS ON SALE OF IMPROVEMENT BONDS EL CAM INO REAL SIDEWALK PROJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 5568 RELAT I NG TO A I RCRAFT NOISE: ORDINANCE NO. 615 AMENDING ORD. NO. 611 PROHIBITING THE SALE OF CERTA I N NON-RETURNABLE OR DISPOSABUE BEVERAGE CONTA I NERS: ? There being no objections, it was so ordered. City Attorney Noonan explained the first resolution as one calling for bids on sale of improvement bonds for the El Camino Real Sidewalk Project a~ter which Councilman Ahern introduced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR BIDS ON SALE OF IMPROVE- MENT BONDS EL CAMINO REAL SIDEWALK PROJECT (Arroyo to Chestnut) ASSESSMENT DISTRICT." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Frank J. Bertucelli, William A. Borba, F. Frank Mammini and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained the second resolution relating to reduction of aircraft noise in the assist after which Councilman Bertucelli introduced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION RELATING TO AIRCRAFT NOISE." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Frank J. Bertucelli, William A. Borba, F. Frank Mammini and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained the ordinance which was before Council for its second reading and adoption and the procedure for its adoption, stating that this ordinance merely changed the operative date of Ordinance No. 611. Mayor Borba ordered the title of the ordinance read. The title of the ordinance was read. Councilman Steinkamp moved reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that the ordinance be passed and adopted by reading title only, seconded by Councilman Ahern and passed by unanimous vote. Councilman Ahern moved that the ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 611, PASSED JANUARY 18, 1971, ENTITLED, 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA, PROHIBITING THE SALE OF CERTAIN NON-RETURNABLE OR DISPOSABLE BEVERAGE CONTAINERS WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO,'" the entire reading of which has been duly waived, be passed and adopted. Councilman Mammani at this time requested an explanation as to the amendment of the ordinance and its effect. City Attorney Noonan remarked that this had no effect on the previous ordinance which remains in effect as passed, but extends the time for enforcement until September 30, 1971. Lengthy discussion then followed at which time Mayor Borba explained to Mr. Tony Montoya the procedure concerning consideration of the ordinance before the City Council. He then remarked that Council would listen to the proponents and opponents of the previously adopted ordinance, allowing the speakers twenty minutes' time to offer their comments, with ten minutes' rebuttal. Mr. James McCauley, 2930 Dublin Drive, asked if the Mayor had the right to place a time limit on speakers to which the City Attorney replied that the Chairman would have the right to stipulate a time limit for the presentation of those who wished to speak. Councilmen Steinkamp and Mammini concurred in the Mayor's time allotment as being reasonabl Councilman Ahern stated that the Mayor was attempting to avoid repetition on what had already been presented at previous meetings, that the proposed ordinance set a ninety-day moratorium time which was agreed upon by the proponents of the previous ordinance. The first speaker was Mr. David Fassler, 454 Valencia Drive, who read from a prepared statement setting forth the reasons why they felt the ordinance in its present form should be allowed to stand. Mr. Fassler was followed by Messrs Kenneth Bishop, 536 Yosemite Drive, and John Kasumo, 502 Larch Avenue, who stated that they were workers at the recycling center, had circulate< peti~ons to people who brought their materials for recycling, stating that the present recycling center was not adequate and that those who signed the pa~itions favored the enforcement of the ordinance which had previously been passed, Mrs. Mary McClure 1236 Lerida Way, Pacifica, spoke and brought to the attention of the City Council and those present in the audience, the operations of their recycling center and the problems'which they had encountered in this regard. Mr. Chuck Schmidt, Director of Community Pride, commented on the recycling centers in the East Bay, their operations, the precentage of materials which was brought in, the employment of ex-convicts, handicapped people and part-time students in this regard. Mr. Dennis Rosaia, 536 Orange Avenue, a local merchant, stated that he was speaking for the local merchants affected and commended the students for their program, stating that they as well were concerned about doing something about the present problem but that the ninety-day moratorium would give time for further study, He likewise commented on the economic effect this would huve on business. Mr. Steven Basarab,. 1525 Los Montes Drive, Burlingame, Plant Manager for M & T Chemical Corporation, gave a background on the fifty years of operation which his plant Was engaged in the recycling of scrap metals and the economic effect and the unemployment which would result by the banning of non-returnable bottles and cans, pointing out that this would affect a number of local employees. Mr. Raymond Fornibul, consultant to the American Can Company and representative of various can manufacturers, urged the ninety-day extension to allow time to gather more information for a proper solution in this regard. He likewise remarked on the products which could be reused through a recycling program. ORDINANCE NO. 615 (CONTI NUED) RECESS: Mr. Bud Getchel of the Dr. Pepper Bottling Company in Daly City remarked on the econ- omic effect this ordinance would have on his organization, remarking that it was not proper to ban only non-returnable bottles and cans for soft drinks and beer, asking as to why the ordinance did not ban other non-returnable containers. Miss Maureen Kirwin, 478 Corrido Way, at this time presented to the members of the City Council petitions which she~ated contained 829 signatures, urging the banning of non- returnable bottles and cans. Mr. Bob Bowen, 2412 Unwin Court, urged the Council not to adopt the ordinance for a postponement, that the ordinance previously adopted be allowed to become effective, stating that Council, as representatives of the citizens of the City, had this duty. Mayor Borba at this time discussed with Mr. Fassler his earlier statment at the meeting of May 3, 1971, at which time Mr. Fassler stated that the City of Novato had passed an ordinance in this regard. Mr. Fassler stated that it would not be known whether or not the present ordinance would work unless it were tried. Mr. Robert Vans, West Coast Manager of the Glass Conainers Manufacturers' Institute, stated that, at the previous Council meeting, the students had agreed to a ninety-day moratorium, and now had reversed their previous statement, remarking that he felt they should abide by their earlier agreement. Councilman Mammini, commenting on earlier statements which had been made concerning the unemployment of people and the economic effect on businesses, recited an article which recently appeared at which time the Ford Company, because of restrictions imposed on the manufacture of automobiles, reversed their statement due to a second imposition of additonal taxes to some cars which they manufactured. He stated that the ordinance which the Council had already adopted should be allowed to become effective to see whether or not it would work. Councilman Steinkamp remarked that the discussions concerned only one item, at this time bringing to the attention of the~Ci~y Council the matter of garbage disposal sites which were fast being used up and exhausted. Councilman Bertucelli at this time read excerpts from the Minutes of the meeting of May 3, 1971, at which time it was indicated that there was no desire to rescind the ordinance but only attempt to find another solution and that this proposal had been agreeable to the students. At the request of Mayor Borba the communication from the Citizens for Responsible Government, over the signature of Mr. Robert Albright, was read after which Mr. Albright stated that this was not from the Citizens for Responsible Government as a body but from the Board of Directors. City Clerk Rodondi likewise read, at the request of the Mayor, an Inter-Office Memorandum from Mr. Leon Dillenburg as addressed to the Mayor, as well as a INter-Office Memorandum from Mr. Chuck Holmes, dated May 5, 1971, concerning the matter of the legislation in the City of Novato. Discussion followed during which time City Attorney Noonan explained the amendment to establish the operative date of September 30, 1971, after which Councilman Bertucelli seconded Councilman Ahern's motion. Further discussion followed at which time Councilmen Mammini and Steinkamp asked as to the crt~teria for the meetings and the meeting dates at which time Mayor Borba stated that he had appointed Councilman Bertucelli as Chairman to conduct the meetings. Councilman Bertucelli stated that he would be pleased to hold a committee meeting in the Council Study Room, City Hall, on May 24, 1971 at 7:00 p.m. Mrs. Betty Higgins, 701 Hillside Boulevard, suggested that the ordinance which had presently been adopted, be allowed to become effective. Mr. Phillip John, 106 Ramona Avenue, requested that the time alloted to speak on the subject be waived and that everyone who was interested in speaking, be permitted to speak. Mr. James McCauley, 2930 Dublin Drive, stated that a moratorium would only cause the present ordinance to eventually die and that others should be allowed the right to be heard. Mr. Tony Montoya, 1125 Miller Avenue, urged that the ordinance which had been adopted be allowed to become effective and tested legally. Mr. Eugene Mullins, 229 Alta Loma Drive, questioned the criteria for the committee members, remarking that he found the vote would favor the banning of the ordinance; further commenting on the meeting which had been held in the Mayor's office prior to the last City Council meeting and that the students who proposed the previous ordinance should have been notified. City Manager Dreisbach remarked that his secretary had notified as many of those that she could contact all day Monday in order to alert them that the matter washoutS'come before the City Council that evening. Further discussion followed concerning the matter of the criteria for the committee after which Mayor Borba declared a recess at 10:05 p.m. ORDINANCE NO. 615 (CONT I NUED ) RECALL TO ORDER: PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENT OF ORD. 575 TO PERMIT APARTMENT HOUSES WITHIN COMMER- CIAL DISTRICT: PUBLIC HEARING AMENDMENT OF PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT ORD. 511 & PLANNED DISTRICT ORD. 575: ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION VI-A.I(a) OF ORDINANCE 575 AS AMENDED & ORDINANCE 353, AS AMENDED: Ist Reading/Introduction ORDINANCE AMENDING PLANNED COM- MUNITY ORD. 511 (I.28 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND): Ist Reading/Introduction ORDINANCE AMENDING PLANNED COM- MUNITY ORD. 575 (I.28 ACRE PARCEL OF LAND): Ist Reading/Introduction The meeting was recalled to order at 10:21 p.m. at which time further discussion followed concerning the notification to reach certain individuals at which time Councilmen Steinkamp and Mammini stated that they had not received notification and heard of the amending ordinance for the first time at the meeting that evening at 8:00 p.m. Further discussion followed after which roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Frank J. Bertucelli, and William A. Borba. Noes, Councilmen F. Frank Mammini and Warren Steinkamp. Absent, none. Council at this time considered the Public Hearing on the Amendment of Ordinance No. 575 as amended to permit Apartment Houses and Dwelling Groups within the Commercial District or Zone. Mayor Borba declared the Public Hearing opened, asking if any written prot~s had been received to which City Clerk Rodondi replied that none had been received by his office Mayor Borba then asked if anyone wished to make an oral protest. Mr. Robert Albright, 2501Albright Way, spoke, commenting on the matter which was before the City Council some two years' prior. He also remarked that he was a member of the com- mittee which had been requested to make a study of this matter, the time which had been devoted to the study and that the residents of the area did not want any more service stations. City Planner Daniel M. Pass explained the amendment before Council at this time, re- marking that it was not the one that Mr. Albright was referring to. Mr. August Chevalier stated that he likewise was a member of the committee which made a study of the development in this area and that further gas stations were not desired. At the request of Councilman Steinkamp, City Clerk Rodondi read the Notice after which City Planner Pass further explained the development and location after which Mr. Albright stated that he would withdraw the remarks which he had made. There bei~ng~nothing further, Mayor Borba declared the Public Hearing closed. Mayor Borba declared the Public Hearing opened on the Notice of Hearing - Amendment of Planned Community District Ordinance 511 and Planned Community District Ordinance 575, asking if any written,protests had been received to which City Clerk Rodondi replied that none had been received. Mr. Robert Albright reiterated his comments concerning the residents' not wanting any more service stations in their area, suggesting that the property be left in its present state. City Planner Pass in detail explained the rezoning, remarking that a Use Permit would have to follow for this development. He further explained the off ramp which was to be constructed for the Skyline Boulevard and restricted permitted use in this location. Mr. Chevalier at this time spoke on the development of land which was on the San Andreas earthquake fault, explaining as to What could take place with an earthquake such as recently happened in the Los Angeles area. There being nothing further, Mayor Borba declared the Public Hearing closed. Mayor Borba ordered the title of the ordinance read. The title of the ordinance was read. City Attorney Noonan then explained the ordinance and advised the Council regarding proce- dure for introduction. Councilman Steinkamp moved that reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that the ordinance be introduced and read for the first time by reading title only, seconded by Councilman Ahern and passed by a unanimous vote. Councilman Steinkamp moved that the ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION VI-A.I(a) OF ORDINANCE 575, AS AMENDED, AND ORDINANCE 353, AS AMENDED," the entire reading of which has been duly waived, be introduced, seconded by Councilman Mammini and passed by the following roll call vote. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Frank J. Bertucelli, William A. Borba, F. Frank Mammini and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none, Absent, none. Mayor Borba ordered the title of the ordinance read. The title of the ordinance was read. City Attorney Noonan then explained the ordinance and advised the Council regarding procedure for introduction. Councilman Bertucelli moved that reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived, and that the ordinance be introduced and read for the first time by reading title only, seconded by Councilman Ahern and passed by a unanimous vote. Councilman Bertucelli moved that the ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 511 - PLANNED'COMMUNITY DISTRICT, AND. ORDINANCE 353, AS'AMENDED," ~ the entire reading of which has been duly waived, be introduced, seconded by Councilman Ahem and passed by the following roll call vote. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Frank J. Bertucelli, William A. Borba, F. Frank Mammini and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. Mayor Borba ordered the title of the ordinance read. The title of the ordinance was read. City Attorney Noonan then explained the ordinance and advised the Council regarding procedure for introduction. Councilman Steinkamp moved that reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that the ordinance be introduced and read for the first time by reading title only, seconded by Councilman Ahern and passed by unanimous vote. ORDINANCE 52,5,]~AS AMENDED","(PLANNED COMMUB:~T¥,:DISTRICT).~AND]~ORD!I~ANCE 3531, AS;AMEBBED.,~!ithe entire AMENDING PLANNED COM- reading of which has been duly waived, be introduced, seconded by Councilman Ahern and MUNITY ORD. 575: passed by the following roll call vote. (CONTINUED) c~~ J/~/~ Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Frank J. Bertucelli, ~-~ William A. Borba, F. Frank Mammini and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. CLAIM AS FILED BY FRANK R. SAUCEDO,SR., ON BEHALF OF HIS SON, FRANK R. SAUCEDO, JR.: The next item was the claim as filed against the City by Mr. Frank R. Saucedo, S~., on behalf of his son, Frank R. Saucedo, Jr., alleging personal damages as a result of recreational activity. Councilman Bertucelli moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the claim as filed by Mr. Frank R. Saucedo, Sr., on behalf of his son, Frank R. SAucedo, Jr., be rejected and_. .referred to the City's insurance carrier and to the office of the City Attorney; and Notice be given to claimant in accordance with Government Code Section 913915.4 and related sections of the Government Code. REQUEST FOR ISSUANCE OF PURCI~ASE ORDER - SOUTH AIRPORT BLVD. WIDENING: The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated May II, 1971 from the Director of Public Works recommending issuance of Purchase Order to the firm of Cooper-Clark and Associates for Soils Engineering Services - South Airport Boulevard Widening. Accompanying was the communication dated May 5, 1971 from Cooper-Clark and Associates submitting their proposal. Councilman Steinkamp moved, seconded by Councilman Bertucelli that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works be approved and accepted. In answer to Councilman Ahern's inquiry, Director of Public Works Goss stated that the County was to share in one-half of the cost. Motion as made and seconded was regularly carried. COMMUNICATIONS CONCERN- ING MENTAL HEALTH BUDGET: The next two items listed on the evening agenda were concerned with mental health budget and were the communication dated April 30, 1971 from Mr. Dion Dubois, Member of Steering Committee, North County Citizens Advisory Committee for Mental Health Services, requesting a resolution petitioning San Mateo County Board of Supervisors to increase the proposed mental health budget; and communication dated May 4, 1971 from Dr. Rudie Tretten, Chairman, North County Citizens Advisory Committee for Mental Health Services, sub- mitting the resolution concerning mental health budget crisis. RESOLUTION NO. 5569 REGARDING MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES: At the request of Mayor Borba, City Clerk Rodondi read in its entirety the resolution which had been prepared after which Councilman Steinkamp introduced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION REGARDING MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES." Discussion followed during which time Mr. Dion Dubois, 2217 Delvin Way, Member of the Steering Committee for Mental Health, explained to Council the budget cuts which would eliminate I00 staff members and, in answer to Councilman Ahern's inquiry, requested that the mental health program not be cut, but that the level be maintained and urged Council to forward their feelings to State Legislators. City Attorney Noonan suggested that, in accordance with Council's wishes, he would correct the resolution to read "maintain" the current program instead of "Increase" and this would accomplish the same result. Further discussion followed during which time Councilman Mammini stated that should mental health budget be cut, police activities would be increased in proportion. Mr. Patrick Cannon, resident of South San Francisco, Member of the Northern County Citizens Advisory Committee, explained that in the proposed County budget cuts, the most vulnerable to be released would be the most recent employees and these were I00 to 150 mental health staff. Further discussion followed concerning the increase of tax rate after which Mayor Borba called for a roll call vote, which was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahern, Frank J. Bertucelli, William A. Borba, F. Frank Mammini and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none, Absent, none. ITEMS FROM STAFF: There being no items from Staff, Mayor Borba asked if there were any items from the Council. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL: DISCUSSION CONCERNING IMPROVEMENT OF HILLSIDE AND RANDOLPH TO FREEWAY: INOUIRY CONCERNING YOUTH AND NARCOTICS: Councilman Steinkamp remarked that there had been discussions by the County for the improvement of Hickey Boulevard to Hillside Boulevard and questioned as to who determined the road need with the City. He stated that efforts should be made for the improvement of Hillside Boulevard and Randolph Avenue to the Freeway as these streets were quite narrow and created a bottleneck for traffic. He suggested that a request be made of the State Highway Commission and County Board of Supervisors to conduct public hearings for the solution of this traffic problem. Mayor Borba at this time brought up the suggestion of students as were present this evening becoming involved in the narcotics program. This involvement by students was explained by Mr. Patrick Cannon. Councilman Mammini remarked that he understood that the Youth Advisory Council was organized for this purpose. INQUIRY CONCERNING RE- Mrs. Betty Higgins at this time brought to the attention of the City Council recent dis- APPORTIONMENT OF SENATORS: cussions which had taken place at Sacramento at which time she was in attendance concerning the reapportionment of Senators which would involve San Francisco's sharing the Senator ~--/~ from Marin County or San Mateo, suggesting that someone pursue this through Senator Gregorio. There being no objections, Mayor Borba instructed the City Attorney to check l~to the matter and report to Council. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL: (CONTINUED) REQUEST TO NEGOTIATE WITH PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH FOR ANNEXATION: ADJOURNMENT IN MEMORY OF POLl CE CHI EF LAGOMARSINO, TOWN OF COLMA, DECEASED: City Attorney Noonan at this time brought up the matter of the Poletti Annexation which was now proposed to include the Presbyterian Church property. He reported that at the time that the church requested permission to connect to the City's sewer line, they had agreed to annex to the City. Further, he stated that they had constructed a sewer line at their own expense. He requested that the City be permitted to negotiate with the church regarding this annexation and to also take up with them the dedication of this sewer line and some form of credit for the line in question. Councilman Ahern moved, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that the City Manager be authorized to make such negotiations. Councilman Bertucelli then moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the meeting be adjourned in memory of Police Chief Lagomarsino of the Town of Colma. Time of adjournment: 11:45 p.m. APPROVED: RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, *The remarks contained in these Minutes are excerpts and not verbatim.