HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1980-05-21Mayor Ronald G. Acosta
Vice Mayor Nicolopu!os
Council:
Mark N. Addiego
Emanuele N. Damonte
Roberta Cerri Teglia
AGENDA
Regular Meeting
CALL TO ORDER: (TF-O01 Side l)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Birkelo Requested: - Continue Item #23, Staff needs more
information.
- Hear as Item #23a,Census Services.
- Item #19 move to Item #8a.
- Hear as Item #26 Par~-time Employee
Compensation.
- Hear as Item #27 Discussion of
General Legislation
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of the Special Meeting of
2/27/80.
e
Claim as filed by Mr. Jerry Yim, on
behalf of Pacific Telephone Co.
alleging damages as the result of
road construction. Motion to deny
and refer to the City's Insurance
Adjuster and to the office of the
City Attorney.
3. Staff Report 5/21/80 recommending -
an agreement with the County for the
cost of placing sewer charges on the
County tax rolls.
4. Staff Report 5/21/80 recommending -
a Public Hearing date of 6/4/80 be
set to consider adoption of an amend-
ment to the Open Space Element of the
General Plan.
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
249
W. Orange Avenue Library Aduitorium
May 21, 1980
ACTION TAKEN
Regular Meeting
7:42 p.m. Mayor Acosta presiding
Council present: Nicolopulos,. Addiego,
Damonte, Teglia and
Mayor Acosta.
Council absent: None.
Recited.
AGENDA REVIEW
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
CONSENT CALENDAR
So ordered.
Removed from the Consent Calendar by
Councilwoman Teglia.
So ordered.
So ordered.
5/21/8o
Page 1
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
5. Staff Report 5/21/80 recommending -
a Motion to reject the bid received
for the Exercises Courses and
authorize the Purchasing Officer to
readvertise for bids.
6. Staff Report 5/21/80 recommending - a
Motion to authorize the Purchasing
Officer to advertise for bids on the
Common Greens Maintenance Contract.
7. Staff Report 5/21/80 recommending -
a Motion to authorize the Purchasing
Officer to advertise for bids for the
Quarterly Leisure Brochure.
e
Claim as filed by Mr. Jerry Yim, on
behalf of Pacific Telephone Co,
alleging damages as the result of
road construction. Motion to deny
and refer to the City's Insurance
Adjuster and to the office of the
City Attorney.
CONSENT CALENDAR
So ordered.
So ordered.
M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - Consent
Calendar be approved.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilwoman Teglia questioned why the
City was involved in this matter when
it was a matter of the Telephone Co.
and a Contractor.
City Attorney Noonan responded that
the Telephone Co. is claiming against
the City because it is in the street
and right-of-way and that improvement
is being done pursuant to a subdivision
agreement. However, in that agreement
we have hold harmless provisions and
also require the filing of insurance
policies with the City. This is the
second claim of this nature and the
City has tendered the defense of it
and the responsibility for it to the
Developer.
Director of Public Services Yee said
he had spoke to Mr. Yim several weeks
ago and had told him that the particu-
lar project was W. W. Dean and that
the City had nothing to do with the
Contractor nor the Developer, and no
control of his Subcontractor. Mr. Yim
responded that it was Pacific Telephone
Co. procedure to go ahead and file the
claim, subsequent to that Mr. Yim
wrote a letter saying he had withdrawn
his claim.
5/21/80
Page 2
AGENDA ACT ]' ON TAKEN
2. Claim - Continued.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
8. Regular Bills of May 21, 1980.
PUBLIC SERVICES
8a.
Staff Report 5/21/80 - recommending
a Motion authorizing the Director of
Public Services to execute a Change
Order for the Municipal Services
Building Project No. PB-78-1.
(This item had been numbered 19.)
City Attorney Noonan stated that since
a withdrawal of the claim had been
received by the City there was no
action to be taken by Council.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
M/S Teglia/Damonte - To approve bills.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilman Addiego did not participate
in the vote on the bill for Brentwood
Market.
PUBLIC SERVICES
City Manager Birkelo stated there were
five items contained in the Change
Order No. 2, i.e., conduits and conduc-
tors for TV cameras and security doors,
concrete stairs, conduits and TV cables,
conduits and conductors, cinch anchors
for a total of $36,067.69.
Mr. Conant, Architect, gave a detailed
description of each of the five items
in the Change Order.
Councilwoman Teglia questioned the
absence of the Police lunchroom.
City Manager Birkelo said there would
be a meeting with the Interior Committee
and this item would be discussed in
connection with the final plans.
A discussion followed on the TV cables
for the Police/Fire/Senior lounge, closed
circuit TV for Police training, request
from the Chamber of Commerce to rent
space, funds remaining in the contin-
gency fund.
M/S Teglia/Damonte - To approve the
Change Order.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
5/21/80
Page 3
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (TF-119)
9. Public Hearing - Amendment to Rural
Estates Zone continued from 5/7/80.
Staff Report 5/21/80 - recommending
l) Open the Public Hearing and incor-
porate any testimony from 5/7/80
meeting; 2) Close the Public Hearing;
3) Waive the reading of the Ordinance
in its entirety and that the Ordinance
be passed and adopted by reading title
only; 4) That the Ordinance be passed
and adopted, an Ordinance establish-
ing Rural Estates Zone Regulations.
2nd Reading/Adoption
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RURAL ESTATES
ZONE REGULATIONS, AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 353, AS AMENDED, ENTITLED "ZONING
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO" TO SO PROVIDE AND REPEAL-
ING ORDINANCE NO. 788-79.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Director of Community Relations
Dell'Angela stated that this proposal
amends the R-E Rural Estates Zone.
There was a Hearing held on the 7th
of this month and this Ordinance was
introduced and the Planning Commission
had reviewed this proposal. This is
intended to cover the Country Club
Park area and only other areas that might
be appropriate in the future. He
spoke of the prior discussion of lot
splits or whether the lots should be
retained in tact and splits prevented
in the future. Also discussed were
minor changes to the wording submitted
by a representative of the Country
Club Park area for the Ordinance.
He continued, Mrs. Stevenson had
requested a clarification on whether
the intent of the Regulations was to
set a limit on smaller types of
animals, i.e. sheep, pigs and raised
the question on a limit on birds or
aviaries. Staff agrees with the
suggested changes, #2, #3 and #4 but
there was some question on the limit
of small animals by the Planning
Commission. He continued, discussing
parks and playgrounds, use permits
in the zone for nursery schools and
churches, accessory buildings con-
figuration with a maximum sidewall
height of 12 feet and the grandfather-
ing in of animals in the Country
Club Park area.
He continued that one of the major
questions dealt with the lot split
question and Staff felt that the
residents did not want lot splits.
R-E Zoning was designed with 3/4
acre lots and putting provisions in
for animals and such. The residents
felt that only those lot splits that
were allowed by the DC&Rs, covenants
adopted in 1941, should be allowed
5/21/80
Page 4
A G E N DA A C T I 0 N TA K E N ~5~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
9. Public Hearing - Continued.
(TF-250)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
and no other lots should be allowed
to be split. Mr. Dell'Angela felt
that to exempt certain lots from the
ability to split and include others
creates a checkerboard type of
development package and tends to
support the Staff's position that
there should be a rule governing the
entire area on lot splits.. He
stated that Staff had sent a
questionnaire to the residents of
Country Club Park asking~ "Are you in
favor of lot splits in your area or
are you opposed to lot splits?"
Fifty-seven questionnaires were mailed
and 27 returned:13 said, no lot splits,
lO said yes to lot splits, 4 said yes
to splits if it was a corner lot.
Councilwoman Teglia questioned the
wordage and clarity of the question-
naire and made reference to a petition
that Mrs. Stevenson had circulated on
splits of corner lots and the majority
of residents concurred in that type
of split - this she found in contra-
diction to Staff's survey.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela put a map on the board of
Country Club Park illustrating its
boundaries that will be subject to
annexation to South San Francisco and
he pointed out those lots which had
been split. He gave an in-depth des-
cription of the lots that could be
split through the 1941 covenants and
pointed out the lots that were illegally
split and spoke of a compromise of
splitting lots and retaining the
rural atmosphere.
Mayor Acosta opened the Public Hearing
and invited those to speak in favor of
the Amendment of the R-E Zone.
Mr. D. H. Wesson, 305 Alta Vista Dr.,
stated he had been a resident of the
area for 32 years and has fought
annexation for 20 years because there
were never assurances from the City
that the residents would have adequate
5/21/80
Page 5
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
9. Public Hearing - Continued.
(TF-298)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Police and Fire services. He contin-
ued, that at an earlier meeting a man from
the Staff of the Health Department stated
that the septic tank system in Country Club
Park was superior to the South San Francisco
sewer system and Mr. Wesson had agreed. He
stated he had not answered the questionnaire
because it was so vague and resented the
coded envelope which identified the person
answering the questionnaire when it was
supposed to be anonymous and he stated he
was not for lot splits. He said he did not
want changes in the area of street repair
and lighting and felt what the area had was
adequate, he felt that the wear and tear on
streets was from the transients and not
from the residents.
Mr. Wesson stated that he was on a fixed
income and was very concerned that if the
taxes escalated through annexation he would
be forced to sell his property and go into
a home. He stated that he had two parrots
that many years ago he had brought into
this Country from South America which took
a great deal of paperwork and he resented
having to go through the time and expense
involved in having the birds re-examined
by the City.
Mayor Acosta stated that the City was not
going to charge a fee for people keeping
birds and stated that the examination was
required by the Public Health Department.
Mrs. Elaine Stevenson, 297 Alta Vista Dr.,
rebutted the issue raised of illegal splits
and stated there were only seven lots re-
maining that could be split. She explained
that the petition addressed the whole issue
of lot splits, i.e., the whole area torn
up; just the corner lots split; nothing
split. She stated that Staff's questionnaire
gave only two choices: split or no splits,
and believed that was the reason for the
low return of questionnaires. She stated
that the Country Club petition had received
32 signatures to date approving corner lots
to be split; four signatures that say no
5/21/80
Page 6
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
9. Public Hearing - Continued
(TF-330)
(TF-349)
(TF-378)
(TF-389)
(TF-399)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
splits and seven that want splits with-
out identifying what kind of splits -
that leaves ten property owners who
have not signed the petition. She
felt this showed that the majority of
residents wanted the corner lots to
have the option to split.
Ms. Gladys Beck, 255 Country Club
Drive, did not feel it was fair that
she had to keep her property in tact
when all around her the parcels had
been split and felt everyone should
be allowed to split by the DCC&Rs of
the County or no one should split
which would give equal rights. She
felt that Staf~Council and the
Planners had worked very hard with the
committies of Country Club Park in
trying to settle this and stated this
had been going on since Sept. 1978,
and wanted the zoning and annexation
expedited.
Ronald Brown, 217 Country Club Drive,
stated that only corner lots can be
split and the questionnaire proved
that the residents did not want lot
splits. He felt that only the residents
should decide if there are to be lot
splits based on the 1941 covenants.
Ms. Velma Sirovatka, 205 Country Club
Drive, was in favor of splits only if
it retained its rural setting and was
not happy with the transients driving
through to their apartment houses and
creating damage to fences in the
Country Club area.
Mr. Mont'Eton, 226 Country Club Drive,
expressed concern over the piecemeal
annexation in the area and he
stated that the residents wanted the
area left as is with the 1941 covenants
and controlled by the residents.
Adolph Coruccini, 223 Country Club
Drive, stated that the residents were
most happy when there were no decisions
5/21/80
Page 7
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
9. Public Hearing - Continued
(TF-405)
(TF-413)
(TF-416)
RECESS
RECALL TO ORDER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
to make, they moved into the area and
knew what to expect. He suggested
making the annexation transition with-
out changes to the area and he felt
it would be a smooth transition.
Mr. Nadir Amer, 210 Alta Vista Drive,
expressed concern with the weekend
traffic driving through Country Club
Park at 35-40 miles per hour and felt
it was a hazard to children in the area.
Mayor Acosta invited anyone to speak who
was in opposition to the amendment to
the R-E Zoning or had comments they
wished to make.
Mayor Acosta said he would not close
the public Hearing because there were
other items that pertained to this and
invited Council discussion to make a
final determination of lot splits, no
splits, DCC&Rs, etc.
Mrs. Lillian O'Rourke, 264 Country Club
Drive, did not think there was a deci-
sion to be made, the residents were
always told that the residents were
always ruled by what the majority
wanted - the petition signifies what
the majority wants.
Mayor Acosta called a recess at
9:15 p.m.
Mayor Acosta recalled the meeting to
order at 9:35 p.m. All Council
present.
Councilwoman Teglia stated she did not
have a problem splitting lots under
the DCC&Rs and felt that the petition
clearly stated the position of the
residents.
Councilman Addiego stated he would also
like to run with the DCC&Rs and asked
the City Attorney if there would be a
problem with staying with the DCC&Rs
as they apply to lot splits.
5/21/ o
Page
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 257
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
9. Public Hearing - Continued
(TF-452)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City Attorney Noonan stated that the
covenants are private in nature, and
they are contractual and they burden
the land of all of those who own those
parcels of land. Covenants can pre-
scribe a plan which is non-uniform
but when you pass a zoning Ordinance
it is supposed to have by State Code
Uniform Regulations for a particular
type zone. So if you had a rural
Estate zone your regulatory action by
way of an Ordinance would call for
reasonably uniform regulations, so
you really cannot adopt covenants as
the rule for the administration of
lot splits in that area. One way you
could regulate instead of strictly
thru the R-E Zone is a specific plan,
which he felt was what the Planner
had in mind. He stated that he knew
of no way to use the covenants existing
as the force of law in that place.
Right now the people in Country Club
hava a little private government with
their own DC&Rs and they administer
them, he stated he knew of no way under
the zoning powers that the City can
lift that body of law and say this
shall be the public law of the City
of South San Francisco with respect
to that area.
Councilwoman Teglia asked the City
Attorney if the lots already split
would be grandfathered in.
City Attorney Noonan said they would
be non-conforming to the present R-E
zone regulations but they would be a
matter-of-fact.
A discussion followed on whether the
City could go to the County and request
the lot splits as a preliminary to
annexation and have them be grand-
fathered in; the results of the petition
survey, if it was decided to pursue
5~2]/80
Page 9
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
9. Public Hearing - Continued
(TF-544)
(TF-613) ~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
the Ordinance and someone did not
agree the person could sue to invalidate
the Ordinance; uniform regulations that
do not parallel the covenants.
Vice Mayor Nicolopolus asked if the
City would be in violation of the
covenants if the City circumvented
them.
City Attorney Noonan stated the coven-
ants do not regulate the city, only
the property owners do they regulate.
They are private covenants between
some land developer and now passing
down to their successors, the private
owners. He explained that the City
was trying to get a uniform regulation,
called a Rural Estates Zone, in an
attempt to get something that will be
valid.
A discussion followed on flag split
lots, modifying the animal Ordinance,
existing covenants, sizes of lots,
explomwith the County a way to let
Country Club xist as it is, the
MORGA Act being extended another year,
police and fire protection, upkeep
of streets by the County.
Mr. Sherman Coffman, Executive Officer
of the Local Formation Commission dis-
cussed the question of the Country
Club area having an option to retain
unincorporated and have its own self
government and stated that based on
LAFCO law he did not believe that
possible.
He continued, LAFCO hoped that an
equitable agreement could be reached
between the City and the Country Club
residents and then proceed with the
annexation without an election under the
island provisions of MORGA and failing
this it would still be LAFCO'S re-
commendation that the area come into
South San Francisco as it is.
5/21/80
Page 10
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
9. Public Hearing - Continued
(TF-619)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Vice Mayor Nicolopulos asked if the
Country Club area and the City had
an option in accepting one another.
Mr. Sherman stated that the law says
that an island of less than 100
acres must be annexed to the City
without a vote of the citizens and
without a right of protest by the
City Council. After LAFCO approves
it, it must go to the Board of Super-
visors and a second Hearing is held.
He stated that this is one case where
the Board of Supervisors can review
the action of the LAFCO decis~on and
that there were two members of the
Board of Supervisors on the Formation
Commission.
Vice Mayor Nicolopulos asked if the
Country Club area could be annexed
the way it is right now.
Mr. Sherman stated yes, they could be
annexed the way it is.
Director of Comm, Dev. Dell'Angela
stated that was his understanding but
that the area had to be prezoned.
Vice Mayor Nicolopulos asked what the
alternative was if the City had to
accept them as they are.
City Attorney Noonan asked Mr. Coffman
if the City should annex and do exactly
as Country Club Park residents want
and leave the area as it is and permit
the lot splits according to code.
Mr. Sherman stated it was his under~
standing that if it§ annexed under the
the County zoning, which is the zoning
it has now, when it is annexed it comes
in with the same zoning.
City Attorney Noonan stated that he was
thinking of the private covenants and
understood the City could annex it as
5/21/80
Page 11
AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
9. Public Hearing - Continued
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
it is, yet what he read in Mr. Coffman's
statements was that the City could annex
and the corner lots could split by cov-
enants irrespective of City regulations.
Mr. Sherman responded that was not what
he meant.
City Attorney Noonan said he understood
and respected what LAFCO wants, however
it was emphasized that it was LAFCO's
policy and the law. LAFCO's present
stance on 3 or 4 contested annexations
by way of lawsuits. He could say "well
that means its a hopeless task" or say
"I still would like to explore it". ]He
felt that the remarks made so far fore-
close the option possibility.
Mr. Sherman stated that for many years
he had heard the Country Club Residents
say, "we have our animal~ a life style of
rural atmosphere and we want it that way".
M/S Teglia/Addiego to uphold Planning
Commission in there being no lot splits.
Councilman Demonte stated that for many
years the only way to get out of Avalon
Park was thru Country Club Park, however
now there were many egresses and ingresses
and it had reduced the traffic flow thru
Country Club compared to what it had been
25 years ago and felt they were better
off now.
Mayor Acosta and Vice Mayor Nicolopulos
were in agreement that the Country Club
people should have the option to split or
not to split.
Director of Community Development Dell'-
Angela suggested Council adopt the Plann-
ing Commissions recommendation in terms
of the no splits or the 3/4 minimum acre
lot sizes and then consider variance
requests based on the DC&Rs in the future
to handle those particular hardship cases.
He felt this was the most practical solu-
tion to create uniformity and allow some
flexibility.
5/21/80
Page 12
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 261
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
9. Public Hearing - Continued
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City Attorney Noonan felt this could not
be done that the City had to have variance
standards usually based on the nature of
the land and not on hardship of the indi-
vidual.
A discussion followed on the the DC&Rs
having no bearing on the zoning, uniform
standards throughout the City.
Councilwoman Teglia suggested an alterna-'
tive~that of canvassing the area and
having the residents vote on the issue of
splits or no splits. Either everyone
has the option to split or no one can
split. No one should be excluded from
this vote and the canvas should be door-
to-door.
A discussion followed on assigning a
member of the Planning Department to canvas
the 57 property owners on the two options.
Councilman Addiego stated that there had
been two canvasses already and they were
challenged and yet Council wants a third
but wi~ll that satisify the Council.
Mayor Acosta thought that the surv
should show the different ways to split
lots and how many animals would be allowed
on the square footage.
Councilwoman Teglia stated that the pro-
perties that have already split should be
excluded and have the two option~ splits
or no splits.
Councilman Damonte stated that those pro-
perty owners that have split cannot split
and it would not be fair if they voted
against splits to the other property
owners.
Mrs. Stevenson asked if the representatives
of the Country Club Park Committee could
go with the person doing the canvas.
5/21/80
Page 13
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 262
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
9. Public Hearing - Continued,
RECESS: (TF-807)
RECALL TO ORDER:
10.
ll.
Public Hearing - General Plan Amendment
for Country Club Park area - GP-80-11/
Negative Declaration No. 259.
Staff Report 5/7/80 - recon~ending
Open the Public Hearing and incorpor-
ate any testimony from 5/7/80 meet-
ing; 2) Close the Public Hearing.
Public Hearing - vrezonlng of Country
Club Park - RZ-80-61/Negative Declar-
ation No. 260.
Staff Report 5/7/80 - recommending
Open the Public Hearing and incor-
porate any testimony from 5/7/80
meeting; 2) Close the Public
Hearing; 3) Waive the reading of
the Ordinance in its entirety and
that the Ordinance be passed and
adopted by reading title only;
4) That the Ordinance be passed and
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Councilwoman Teglia suggested sending
the survey by certified mail and return
receipt with a time limit to mail or
walk in the completed form.
Mr. Ronald Brown said he agreed with
Councilwoman Teglia's suggestion and said
his Committee would alert the residents
that a survey would be forthcoming by
registered mail as the people were
difficult to contact.
The Motion and Second were withdrawn by
Councilwoman Teglia and Councilman Addiego
on no splits.
M/S Teglia/Addiego - those lots that have
not already been split in the Country
Club Park area be convassed by certified
mail, asking whether or not the owners
in that area want to split or want no
splits.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Mayor Acosta called a recess at 10:35 p.m.
Mayor Acosta recalled the meeting to order
at 10:48 p.m., all Council present.
Mayor Acosta stated that l0 days would
be given for the certified mailing and
return of the Country Club Park area
canvas and stated that Items 9, 10 and
11 be placed on the Agenda of June 4, 1980
meeting.
See the above caption.
5/21/80
Page 14
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
263
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ll. Staff Report - Continued.
adopted, an Ordinance prezoning the
Country Club Park area to the R-E
Rural Estates Zone.
12.
2nd Reading/Adoption
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO PREZONING A DESIGNATED POR-
TION OF THE COUNTRY CLUB PARK AREA AS
A RURAL ESTATES ZONE (RZ-80-61)
Public Mearlng - Ordinance extending
Ordinance No. 792-79 an Urgency
Ordinance for one year.
Staff Report 5/7/80 - recommending 1)
Open the Public Hearing; 2) Close the
Public Hearing; 3) Waive the reading
of the Ordinance in its entirety; 4)
Introduce and pass the Ordinance
extending Ordinance No. 792-79,
entitled "An Interim Ordinance Prohib-
iting uses which may conflict with
zoning proposals related to General
Plan Amendments." (TF-823)
1st Reading/Adoption
AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 792-79 ENTITLED, "AN INTERIM
ORDINANCE PROHIBITING USES WHICH MAY
CONFLICT WITH ZONING PROPOSALS
RELATED TO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS"
(TF-830)
13. Public Hearing UP-79-529 The Southland
Corporation (7-11 Food Store)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Mayor Acosta declared the Public Hearing
open.
Director of Community Development Dell'Angelo
stated that the original purpose of this
Interim Ordinance, which expires 6/5/80,
was to allow Staff the opportunity to
review specific uses that may be in conflict
with the General Plan proposal that Staff
has been working on. He continued, since
the General Plan has not been completed
Staff is asking a year's extension of the
Ordinance to review said uses.
Mayor Acosta invited anyone who wished to
speak in favor of this matter - no one
spoke. He then asked anyone who wished to
speak against this matter to speak - no
one.spoke.
Mayor. Acosta closed the Hearing.
M/S Teglia/Damonte - that the reading of
the Ordinance in its entirety be waived
and that the Ordinance be passed and adopted
by reading title only.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - That the Ordinance
be passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 817-80
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Mayor Acosta declared the Public Hearing
open.
5/21/80
Page 15
AGENDA A ¢ T I 0 N T A K E N 264
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
13. Public Hearing - Continued.
Staff Report 5/21/80 - Appeal of the
Planning Commission decision UP-79-529
and Negative Declaration No. 251 to
construct a 7-11 convenience store
on the north side of Mission Road at
Holly Avenue.
(TF-887)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Senior Planner Christians explained that
this was an appeal of the 7-11 Food Store
on the northside of Mission Road at Holly
Avenue and cited the 6 findings of the
Planning Commission supporting their denial
of UP-79-529. He read from a Police report
on the traffic hazards and the amount of
crime investigation within the area.
City Attorney Noonan asked for a Motion
incorporating the Planning Commission's
procedings by reference to be passed so
that all of the procedings before the
Planning Commission become part of the
record.
Teglia/Nicolopulos - to incorporate all
of the Planning Commission's procedings
into the record.
Carried by unanimous vote.
Mayor Acosta invited the Appellant to speak
in favor of his appeal.
Ben Mortara, Esq., attorney for the 7-11
Division of Southland Corp., gave a slide
presentation and rebutted the Planning
Commission's findings and believed that
a 5 & 10¢ store would have the same problem
with juveniles and shoplifting as the 7-11
Stores face. He proposed a median to
prevent drivers from making a left turn on
Mission Road and felt this would alleviate
traffic problems. He stated that high
pressure sodium lights in the parking lot
for the customers safety and was willing
to plant trees in the back of the structure.
Mr. Hugh Bobbala, 1124 Mission Road, owner
of the 7-11 Store, stated that his findings
of the crimes in 7-11 Stores for the past
twelve years had been averaging once a
month which he believed was a good record.
He felt that 7-11 Stores being open for
24 hours a day aided the residents in shop-
ping.
5/21/8o
Page 16
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - Continued
13. Public Hearing - Continued (TF-1108)
(TF-1139)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Mayor Acosta invited the opponents to
speak.
Mr. Ray Latham, 495 Holly Avenue, was
concerned about the traffic congestion
and wanted to know what use was to be
made of the vacant store. He also won~
dered if there would be manueverability
in turning vehicles if landscaping was
put in front of the 7-11 Store.
A discussion followed on the set back,
landscaping and those meeting the zoning
requirement.
Ms. Pat Martinson, 1288 Morningside Avenue,
voiced concern that the condos, businesses
and apartment complexes all empty out on
Holly where it joins Mission Road and
that the kids hang out around the Garden
Club and scatter debree and are a nuisi-
ance. She stated she was against granting
a permit for the 7-11 Store because traffic
was terrible and 7-11 would compound the
problem.
Mrs. Doris Agee, 819 Ridge Court, expressed
concern that when the vacant property is
leased there would then be two stores
creating greater traffic problems.
Mr. Joe Keogh, Real Estate Manager of
Southland Corp., stated that the zoning is
for commercial use and even if an office
building went into the vacant property it
would still create traffic problems. He
rebutted the findings of the Police Depart-
ment in the crimes co~itted.
Senior Planner read into the record a
letter from Dr. Bonna, D.D.S. who was
concerned about the vandalism and traffic
congestion from the 7-11 Store in the area.
Mayor Acosta closed the Public Hearing.
5/21/80
Page 17
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - Continued
13. Public Hearing - Continued (TF-1218)
(TF-1359)
(TF-1652)
14.
Staff Report 5/21/80 - Final envi-
ronmental determination on the 36
Unit Condominium Project on Blondin
Way (Habitat).
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Councilman Damonte expressed concern in
the egress and ingress to the 7-11 Store.
A discussion followed on the traffic circu-
lation,amount of customers throughout the
24 hour period, safety of the customers.
Police Chief Datzman explained that there
was confusion over the Police report be-
cause it covered a 12 year period and did
not feel that the 7-11 Store was the con-
tributing factor in the crime in the area.
A discussion followed on traffic accidents
and whether the 7-11 Store was contributing
to the rear enders and the sale of alcohol
on a 24 hour basis.
M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - to send this appeal
back to the Planning Commission to look at
a buffer in landscapping.
Mayor Acosta stated it was up to the Council,
based on the facts and findings of the
Planning Commission, to deny the appeal
or approve the appeal - not keep sending
it back to the Planning Commission.
Carried by majority roll call vote, Mayor
Acosta and Councilman Damonte voting no.
Mayor Acosta asked if this was a Public
Hearing.
City Attorney Noonan stated that he believed
the Public Hearing had been continued and
the matter had been sent back to the Plan-
ning Commission for them to file a supple-
mental report.
Mayor Acosta opened the Public Hearing.
Director of Community Development Dell'Angelo
stated that on May 7th Council had considered
an appeal from the Planning Commission for
an EIR for a 36 unit Condominium Project
on Blondin Way and sent it back to the
5/21/80
Page 18
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - Continued
14. Staff Report 5/21/80 - Continued.
(TF-1720)
(TF-1769)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Commission for further input. The Plan-
ning Commission at their meeting of
May 13th and deadlocked 3 to~3 on a
Motion to file a supplemental reco~endation
on an environmental determination for this
project and also a 3 to 3 vote deadlock
on a Motion to approve the project.
Mr. David Van Atta, reP_resenting the
appellant, felt that his client's case had
been well stated at the 5/7/80 Council
meeting and did not feel a need for further
input relative to the issue fefore Council.
Ronald Brown, 217 Country Club Drive, stated
that his home was at the junction of Blondin
Way and Country Club Drive and felt that
increased traffic because of the condo
project was a threat to his home and well
being. He asked that if this project
was given approval to procede that a pro-
tective barrier he put up, by the County
or the City,or the Developer, in front of
his premises and be compatible to the area.
City Manager Birkelo read the Mitigation
Plan for Basin No. 9 Sanitary Sewer System
into the record and the count of homes in
that basin would yield a $250.00 additional
new connection charge. He requested that
the mitigation plan be considered in
Council's action on this item.
City Attorney stated that he, the City
Manager and the Director of Public Services
would draft an Ordinance surcharging the
homes in the basin.
M/S Damonte/Nicolopulos - to incorporate
the Mitigation.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilwoman Teglia requested that the
barricade for Mr. Brown be a condition
of the Use Permit if approved as a
Mitigation Measure.
5/21/80
Page 19
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - Continued
14. Staff Report 5/21/80 - Continued.
(SIDE 2-TF-O01)
RECESS:
RECALL TO ORDER:
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Mayor Acosta stated that the whole RPD
process has to go back to the Planning
Commission and make the baricade one of
the conditions of approval at that time.
Mayor Acosta declared a recess at 12:35 a.m.
Mayor Acosta recalled the meeting to order
at 12:45 a.m.
Vice Mayor Nicolopulos asked Councilwoman
Teglia, "In 1977 when you were chairperson
of the Planning Commission at that time
Rotary Plaza petitioned the City for a re-
zoning of an unclassified zoning to clas-
sified zone, R-3, at that time it was all
one parcel of land that included this pro-
posed 36 unit condo property. On May 10,
1977 the Planning Commission unanimously
with one member absent, voted to rezone
that property from unclassified to R-3.
He asked Councilwoman Teglia's rationale
for that action".
Councilwoman Teglia suggested it might be
helpful if the Vice Mayor heard the tapes
of those meetings and heard what the
Planner and the applicant presented to the
Commission at that time. Her remembrance
at that time it was being presented to
facilitate the expansion of Rotary Plaza,
a Senior Citizens Center, which everyone in
the Community recognized was a very positive
thing to happen.
Vice Mayor Nicolopulos said that the Resol-
ution does not state that, it says "Whereas
the Planning Commission at the conclusion
of a Public Hearing adopted the following
findings: 1) that the proposed rezoning
would be consistent with the City of South
San Francisco's General Plan; 2) that the
elimination of (u) unclassified zone
districts is in keeping with the General
purpose and intent of the City of South
San Francisco Zoning Ordinance, and 3)
the location of the property adjacent to
high density residence make the expansion
5/21/8o
Page 20
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - Continued
14. Staff Report 5/21/80 - Continued.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
of high density multiple family residental
units !and uses practical and consistent
with the established goals and policies of
the City of South San Francisco General
Plan." He continued, that those were the
only issues addressed...
Councilwoman Teglia stated that was what
was written as the findings and the testi-
mony that led to that was specifically
for the extension of Rotary Plaza, but
perhaps it should have been incorporated
into the Resolution. She again suggested
that the Vice Mayor listen to the testimony
on the tape and come to your own conclusion.
Mayor Acosta stated this discussion was not
germane to the §ubject that the property
had been zoned. He stated that the Mitiga-
tion Program which has been voted on to
incorporate it and the part about the
buffer, barricade, for Mr. Brown's property
which can be done thru the RPD itself. He
asked for a Motion on the environmental
determination and what was recommended by
Staff, the facts and findings.
M/S Nicolopulos/Damonte - that Staff's
recommendations grant the appeal and
approve the Threshold Report on the condition
that the Mitigating measure as specified
with the Master Sewer ~lan be undertaken
to process RPD-79-13 and SA-79-63 including
approval of Negative Declaration No. 245.
Councilman Addiego expressed concern that
three Planning Commissioners wanted to file
supplemental recommendations and three other
members choosing not to allow that informa-
tion to reach the Council.
Mayor Acosta stated that this had been re-
solved amongst the Planning Commission at
the Joint Council Session because initally
they did not have sufficient information
because of the draft report of the Sewer
Master Plan and then the Final report not.
being available. These reports they have
5/21/80
Page 21
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - Continued
14. Continued
(TF-O052)
POLICE DEPARTMENT
15.
Staff Report 5/21/80 - recommending
adoption of an Ordinance amending
Ordinance No. 783-79 providing for
the abatement and removal as public
nuisances of abandoned, wrecked,
vehicles; 1) Waive the reading of the
Ordinace in its entirety; 2) Intro-
duce and read for the first time
an Ordinance amending Ordinance
No. 783-79.
1st. Reading/Introduction
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOR ABATEMENT
AND REMOVAL AS PUBLIC NUISANCES OF
ABANDONED, WRECKED, DISMANTLED
OR INOPERATIVE VEHICLES OR PARTS
THEREOF FROM PRIVATE PROPERTY OR
PUBLIC PROPERTY NOT INCLUDING HIGH-
WAYS, AND RECOVERY OF COST OF ADMIN-
ISTRATION THEREOF AS AUTHORIZED BY
SECTION 22660 VEHICLE CODE
PUBLIC SERVICES(TF-O092)
16. Public Hearing - Consideration of
establishing sewer charges.
Staff Report 5/21/80 - recommending
open the Public Hearing and incor-
porate any testimony from 5/7/80
meeting; 2) Close the Public Hearing;
3) Waive the reading of the Ordin-
ance in its entirety and that the
Ordinance be passed and adopted by
reading title only; 4) That the
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - Continued
received and the Commission is in agree-
ment at this time.
Director of Community Development Dell'Angelo
stated that the action the three members
wanted to take was to reiterate the Commis-
sioners feelings that the env~romental
impact report was still required.
Mayor Acosta called for a roll call vote.
Carried by majority roll call vote, Council-
woman Teglia and Councilman Damonte voting no.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
City Manager Birkelo stated that this amend-
ment to the Abondoned Vehicle Ordinance
raises the value of the vehicle from $50.00
to $200.00.
M/S Teglia/Damonte - that the reading of the
ordinance in its entirety be waived and
that the Ordinance be introduced and read
for the first time by reading title only.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Damonte/Nicolopulos - that the Ordinance
be introduced by reading title only.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
PUBLIC SERVICES
Mayor Acosta declared the Public Hearing
open.
City Manager Birkelo stated that the new
charges reflect the higher salaries of the
Treatment Plant employees and the increases
for materials and energy, as well as a
reserve for capital improvements of sewer
line projects. He stated that the increases
would still be below averages for North
County Cities.
5/21/80
Page 22
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
PUBLIC SERVICES
16. Public Hearing - Continued.
Ordinance be passed and adopted an
Ordinance establishing sewer charges.
2nd Reading/Adoption
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING SEWER
CHARGES AND PROCEDURES RELATED THERE-
TO AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 396,
AS AMENDED.
(TF-OIO5)
17.
Staff Report 5/21/80 - recommending
adoption of an Ordinance amending
Ordinance No. 491, establishing
speed limits; 1) Waive the reading
of the Ordinance in its entirety
and that the Ordinance be passed
and adopted by reading title only;
2) That the Ordinance be passed and
adopted an Ordinance establishing
speed limits for certain streets.
2nd Reading/Adoption
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 491,
AS AMENDED, AND ESTABLISHING SPEED
LIMITS FOR CERTAIN STREETS OR
PORTIONS THEREOF IN ACCORDANCE WITH
AN ENGINEERING AND TRAFFIC SURVEY
(TF-O!51)
PUBLIC SERVICES
Mayor Acosta invited anyone to speak in
favor - no one spoke. He then invited
those wishing to speak in opposition -
no one spoke.
Mayor Acosta closed the Public Hearing.
M/S Nicolopulos/Damonte - That the reading
of the Ordinance in its entirety be waived
and that the Ordinance be passed and
adopted by reading title only.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Damonte/Nicolopulos - That the Ordinance
be passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 818-80
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - That the reading
of the Ordinance in its entirety be waived
and that the Ordinance be passed and adopted
by reading title only.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Mr. Ken Chiatello, 744 Larch Avenue, stated
that two stop signs have been erected on
Hillside which have helped the traffic
problems. He expressed concern that from
the proposed 35 mph this limit might be
raised at some future date and believed if
this happened it would again create traffic
problems for the residents.
Director of Public Services explained the
criteria used to establish the speed limits
on Hillside by traffic engineers and
stated this Ordinance would be in effect
for five years before another speed survey
would be made.
M/S Damonte/Nicolopulos - That the Ordinance
be passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 819-80
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
5/21/8o
Page 23
A G E N D A A_C_T__I~O_N_N_ ZA_ K E N ~?~
PUBLIC SERVICES
18.
Staff Report 5/21/80 - recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
plans and specifications, author-
izing the work and calling bids for
the Municipal Parking Lot No. 9
Improvement Project No. PB-79-2
(formerly the Schumann property).
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS AUTHORIZING THE
WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR MUNICIPAL
PARKING LOT NO. 9 IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. PB-79-2
19. Staff Report 5/21/80 - recommending
a Motion authorizing the Director
of Public Services to execute a
Change Order for the Municipal
Services Building Project No. PB-78-1
COMMUNICATIONS ~/~3
20.
Letter 5/15/80 requesting reconsidera,
tion of the Colma Developer's request
for a sewer connection. (TF-163)
PUBLIC SERVICES
City Manager Birkelo stated this item
called for bids to improve the municipal
parking lot formerly owned by Mr. Schumann.
Motion by Councilwoman Teglia - That the
Resolution be adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 54-80
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
This item was heard as Item No. 8a.
COMMUNICATIONS
City Manager Birkelo stated this had been
discussed by Council on a previous request
and Council had approved a single family
sewer connection and that the letter asked
for reconsideration of a duplex sewer
hookup.
Mr. Latham, 495 Holly Avenue, read a
detailed history of this property and the
resultant requests for sewer hookups. He
spoke of the present threat by the Developer
to build a warehouse on the property which
would not need a sewer hookup. He requested
Council again deny the duplex sewer hookup.
Councilman Addiego expressed concern over
the absence of the principals from Colma
to answer questions by Council.
A discussion followed on the ambiguity of
the request as to whether it was a new
duplex on a different parcel or the same
request renewed.
M/S Damonte/Addiego - To table any discussion
of a duplex sewer connection hookup and
reiteration of the approval of a single
family sewer connection hookup.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
5/21/8o
Page 24
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ITEMS FROM STAFF
21.
Consideration of concept of a
Joint Powers Authority Committee
(JPAC). (TF-316)
22. Discussion of Mr. Elmore's concern
over Use Permits. (TF-330)
ITEMS FROM STAFF
City Manager Birkelo stated he had received
a letter from the Mayor of Millbrae suggest-
ing a meeting with the Councils of the
four cities in relation to the Joint Powers
Authority Committee (JPAC) to be held in
the library in Millbrae either on June 7th
or June 14th at 9:00 a.m.
Consensus of Council was to hold the meeting
Saturday, June 7, 1980, at 9:00 a.m. in
Millbrae.
Senior Planner Christians responded to the
questions raised by Mr. 'Elmore at the 5/7/80
Council meeting regarding Use Permits at
640 Commercial and 357 Tamarack Lane. He
stated that Staff advised the applicant at
640 Commercial to either revise his plans
to reflect the original approval or submit
the plans back to the Planning Commission
for a hearing on the modification. He
continued, at 357 Tamarack Lane this was
brought before the Planning Commission and
had been granted a slight modification to
the original Use Permit since Planning had
determined that the 6" modification on
the side yard setbacks of the garage would
have no detrimental effects on the sur-
rounding properties.
Mr. Elmore stated he had not been informed
that this matter was on the agenda and did
not discover it until 11:30 this evening.
He stated that a Stop Work Order had been
placed on 640 Commercial and asked if it
had been removed.
Senior Planner Christians stated that to
the best of his knowledge the Stop Work
Order had not been removed.
Mr. Elmore said a gas line was put in 80
foot plus and nailed to the fence and then
the man had applied for a plumbing permit
and Mr. Elmore had been assured that a
permit would not be issued until it was
straightened out. He continued, it now
has a gas approved sticker on it and the
gas meter has been relocated -- he questioned
if it had been tested with a pressure test.
5/21/80
Page 25
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
2?4
ITEMS FROM STAFF
22. Mr. Elmore - Continued.
(TF-400)
23.
23a.
Staff Report 5/21/80 - RPD-79-12/
SA-79-62 Appian Village Unit #1,
Broadmore Homes request to waive
certain provisions of the Subdiv-
ision Ordinance to allow building
permits to be issued for model
units prior to recordation of the
Final Subdivision Map~
Discussion of a contract with
Menkin-Lucero & Associates for
1980 Census.
24.
(TF-461)
Staff Report 5/21/80 - Request for
an appropriation transfer of
$200,000 for the Olympic Drive
Investigation Program.
ITEMS FROM STAFF
Mr. Elmore talked in-depth concerning
violations of permits and plan checks
that had not been approved and Staff not
doing its work and ignoring violations.
City Attorney Noonan asked Mr. Elmore to
visit his office and document where a Stop
Work Order had been violated and he would
take appropriate action.
Mayor Acosta assured Mr. Elmore that when
he came in to City Hall he personally would
get to the bottom of the matter with the
Building and Zoning Departments and hold a
hearing.
This item was continued under Agenda Review.
City Manager Birkelo stated that the time-
table given along with the proposal was
a very tight schedule and the success of
it depends on whether the City gets its
data in order before the field crews move
out so that corrections can be made while
they are still at work. This work is
investigative of every person who is under
counted in the census in the community
which would cost the City $65.00 per capita.
He explained at length the benefits of
having the census exceeding 50,000 in
count through financial advantages in
Federal programs to the City. He stated
this initial cost for the service~would
pay for itself in five years.
M/S Damonte/Nicolopulos - To employ the
census service for $9,250.00.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
City Manager Birkelo asked that the amount
of money be altered to $100,000 which is
the amount of expenditures that have been
made to date and Staff would come back at a
later date with a request for approval of
5/21/80
Pa9e 26
AGENDA
ITEMS FROM STAFF
24. Staff Report - Continued.
(TF-482)
25. Review of Qantel computer status.
26. Staff Report 5/21/80 - requesting
a Motion for consideration of the
compensation proposal for part-
time employees.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
27. Discussion of Legislative Bills
SB-1962 and SB-462.
(TF-510)
ACTION TAKEN
ITEMS FROM STAFF
additional expenditures. He stated that in
the interim the City would make application
through the State Office of Emergency Services
for State and Federal Disaster Relief Funds.
Motion by Teglia - To approve the $100,000
expenditures for Olympic Drive.
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
City Attorney Noonan stated that it would be
difficult to assert the claims and assessing
the cost of damages and that he was pursuing
a different tack, an approach to the liability
standpoint, in hopes that the City and the
homeowners might recover their losses.
Mayor Acosta asked that this item be deferred
to a later meeting, so ordered.
Assistant to City Manager Wilson explained
that this would crea~ broad ranges for
part-time employees and appropriate titles.
M/S Teglia/Damonte - To approve the compen-
sation proposal for part-time employees.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Councilwoman Teglia recommended the following
bills be opposed and that communications to
that effect should be mailed: SB-1962 -
mobile homes on permanent foundations and
single family zones; SB-462 - pre-empting
City controls over Bill Board advances, and
these be mailed to the Assembly.
Councilwoman Teglia presented a petition
from the residents in Buri~ Buri Park requesting
more Police patrols to counter the young
adults drinking and smoking pot in the park.
Police Chief Datzman stated that there were
three people working overtime surveiling
the park and that he was working with the
Park Supervisors looking for alternatives
in handling the matters in Buri Buri Park
and Orange Park.
5/21/8o
Page 27
A.GE,N_DA A CT I O N T A K E N
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
GOOD AND WELFARE
(TF-585)
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Councilwoman Teglia questioned if there was
representation on the EIR hearings on the
Flying Tigers increase of service on night
flights.
Councilman Addiego stated that the South
San Francisco Library had a program for
shut-ins and anyone requesting information
should contact Jean Altizio, President of
the Library Board.
Mayor Acosta stated that the Citizens Action
League was having a Candidates Night on
5/27/80 at 230 Grand Avenue for the Office
of Supervisor.
GOOD AND WELFARE
Mr. Latham asked for an interpretation on
the term tabling in reference to the Colma
hookup.
City Attorney Noonan in response to the
attorney for the Habitat Group explained
a 3 to 3 vote as no action taken but does
raise the right of appeal, however feels
it should not come to Council until after
the Planning Commission meets on 6/10/80
and could change the earlier vote.
Mr. Elmore asked if the Good and Welfare
portion of the 5/7/80 meeting was not on
tape.
City Clerk Battaya said yes, it was not on
tape but it would be tape recorded from
the Western Cable's tape of that meeting
and the tape twisted and did not record.
City Attorney Noonan reiterated that the
Habitat Appeal should be continued and
let the matter pend before the Planning
Commission at their next meeting.
The Attorney for the Habitat Group stated
that under the law when there is a 3 to 3
vote then the Motion failed and an Appeal
is taken from that and felt this put his
Group at a disadvantage.
City Attorney Noonan responded that this
was not so according to the Rules of Order.
5/21/80
Page 28
A G E N DA A CT I 0 N TA K E N 277
ADJOURNMENT
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
M/S Teglia/Damonte - That the meeting be
adjourned to Wednesday, the 28th day of
May, 1980 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council
Conference Room, City Hall.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Time of adjournment: 2:50 a.m.
APPROVED:
'Barbara A. Battaya, C,i~l~y Clerk
City of South San Francisco
Ronald G. Acosta, Mayor
City of South San Francisco
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to
dispose of the item. Oral presentations, arguments, and comments are recorded on
tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the office of
the City Clerk and available for inspection, review and copying.
5/21/8o
Page 29