HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1980-10-15Mayor Ronald G. Acosta
Vice Mayor Gus Nicolopulos
Council:
Mark N. Addiego
Emanuele N. Damonte
Roberta Cerri Teglia
AGENDA
Regular Meeting
CALL TO ORDER:
(Side 1 TF-O01)
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Councilwoman Teglia arrives:
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Birkelo Requested:
- Executive Session following the
meeting for litigation.
- Item #14 be deleted.
- Item #19 be added, a report on
roof rat abatement.
- Item #20 be added, consideration
of moving the microwave system from
W. Orange Avenue Library to the new
Municipal Services Building.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(TF-O17)
MINUTES 150
CITY COUNCIL
W. Orange Avenue Library Auditorium
October 15, 1980
ACTION TAKEN
Regular Meeting
7:35 p.m. Mayor Acosta presiding.
Council present: Damonte, Nicolopulos,
Addiego and Acosta.
Council absent: Teglia.
Recited.
Councilwoman Teglia arrived at
7:42 p.m.
AGENDA REVIEW
So ordered.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Hazel Nastrini, South San Francisco
Chamber of Commerce, requested usage
of the City Logo which would be placed
on a coin to be used for the Grand
Avenue Revitalization celebration of
its completion.
Discussion followed on the use of
the City Seal for promotional non-
City purposes and it was pointed out
that the request was for use of the
City logo not the City Seal.
Ms. Hazel Nastrini explained that
the coins would be distributed at
the Chamber of Commerce booth with-
out charge.
Consensus of Council - To approve
the use of the City logo.
10/15/80
Page 1
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 15][
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
(TF-047)
(TF-117)
PRESENTATIONS
1979 PEDESTRIAN SAFETY CITATION FOR
THE POLICE DEPARTMENT (TF-124)
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. James Elmore, 642 Commercial St.,
informed Council that he had attended
the Planning Commission meeting
the previous evening and had not
allowed to speak on an item. He
expressed concern in relation to
Use Permits and Variance violations
in the City of South San Francisco.
Councilwoman Teglia requested the
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela present the Commission's
packet of the meeting to Council
for their perusal.
Mr. Elmore continued to voice his
concerns over actions taken by the
Planning Commission and questioned
the issuance of a variance.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela stated that Staff and
the Commission's first obligation
was to encourage good design and
the proper use of property, as
well as look at hardship situations.
A discussion followed on the pro-
cedures used in issuing Use Permits
and zoning laws.
Mayor Acosta requested the Director
of Community Development Dell'Angela
to investigate the matter and
present a report to Council.
Mrs. Doris Agee, 819 Ridge Court,
expressed appreciation for the
removal of the bike racks at the
Library and the installation of
handicapped zone plus ramp and for
the installation of a public tele-
phone. She requested that the
outside lighting system remain lit
until after meetings had adjourned.
PRESENTATIONS
Mayor Acosta presented the Safety
Citation to Police Chief Datzman
in honor of the absence of fatalities
in 1979 for the City from the
California State Automobile Assn.
1 o/15/80
Page 2
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
8/20/80, Special Meeting of 8/27/80,
Regular Meeting of 9/3/80, Adjourned
Regular Meeting 9/4/80.
2. Claim as filed by Roger W. Stucky,
Attorney at Law, on behalf of Edgar
Ceron, alleging personal injuries
sustained as the result of an in-
cident involving members of the
South San Francisco Police Depart-
ment. Motion to deny and refer to
the City's Insurance Adjuster and
to the Office of the C~ty Attorney.
3. Claim as filed by Roger W. Stucky,
Attorney at kaw, on behalf of Carlos
Ceron, alleging personal injuries
sustained as the result of an in-
cident involving members of the
South San Francisco Po]ice Depart-
ment. Motion to deny and refer to
the City's Insurance Adjuster and
to the Office of the C~ty Attorney.
4. Staff Report 1-0/15-/~0 - recommending
a Motion to accept the Subdivision
Street Improvements of the Hillside
Terrace Subdivision.
5. Staff Report 10/15/80 - recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
the South Maple Avenue Condominium
Subdivision Final Map, authorize its
recording and provide for related
matters.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL
MAP ENTITLED "SOUTH MAPLE AVENUE
CONDOMINIUM SUBDIVISION" AND AUTHOR-
IZING RELATED A~~
Staff Report 10/15/80 - recommending
a Motion authorizing the Purchasing
Officer to solicit bids for a Turf
Sweeper. ~/~,~.~
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approved.
Motion to deny and refer to the
City's Insurance Adjuster and to
the Office of the City Attorney.
Motion to deny and refer to the
City's Insurance Adjuster and to
the Office of the City Attorney.
Approved.
Removed from the Consent Calendar by
Councilman Addiego.
Approved.
M/S Nicolopulos/Damonte - Consent
Calendar be approved. Carried by
unanimous voice vote.
10/15/80
Page 3
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 152
o
Staff Report 10/15/80 - recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
the South Maple Avenue Condominium
Subdivision Final Map, authorize
its recording and provide for related
matters.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL MAP
ENTITLED "SOUTH MAPLE AVENUE CONDO-
MINIUM SUBDIVISION" AND AUTHORIZING
RELATED ACTS (TF-146)
APPROVAL OF BILLS
7. Regular Bills of 10/15/80. (TF-181)
Councilman Addiego questioned the
wordage on the first page of the
Resolution, paragraph 3 which says,
"...and the Building Division may
withhold building permits until
the copies of the recorded documents
are so filed." He asked the reason
for the word "may" being used rather
than "will."
City Engineer Yee explained that
the wording is related to the Building
Permit rather than the map itself
and stated the Building Permit may
be withheld until the final map is
recorded and returned to the City.
Assistant City Attorney Rogers
explained that this wording provides
greater flexibility in issuing the
Building Permits.
Councilwoman Teglia asked why addresses
were not assigned to projects such
as this before they went to Council
for approval and requested that the
addresses be put on the Projects in
future.
Discussion followed on the use of
the word "may", possible substitutions,
flexibility of words and the Building
Permit process with recordation.
Motion by Councilman Addiego - To
adopt the Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 122-80
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Mayor Acosta questioned if funds
from Revenue Sharing for the Roof
Rat Abatement Program had been
expended.
Director of Finance Anderson replied
that he had reviewed the matter and
that the funds were held by the City
Manager's Office.
Mayor Acosta requested that the Rat
10/15/80
Page 4
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
APPROVAL OF BILLS
7. Regular Bills of 10/15/80 - Cont.
CITY MANAGER
8. Staff Report 10/15/80 - recommending
adoption of an Ordinance amending
the contract for Local Fire Members
between the Board of Administration
Public Employees' Retirement System
and the City Council of the City of
South San Francisco; 1) Waive the
reading of the Ordinance in its
entirety and that the Ordinance be
passed and adopted by reading title
only; 2) That it be passed and
adopted.
2nd Reading/Adoption
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CONTRACT
BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM
AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO (TF-206)
7
7
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Control Program be deleted and
action be taken at a later date.
Councilwoman Teglia asked if the
funds had been released for the-
Guadalupe Health Center and was
told by Director of Finance
Anderson that they had not been
released.
Councilman Addiego stated that he
had not voted for funds to be
distributed to the Neighborhood
Services Center and the Sister
Cities Program because he felt
the two requests would not be
a proper use of Revenue Sharing
Funds.
M/S Damonte/Nicolopulos - To approve
the bills.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilman Addiego did not parti-
cipate or vote in the matter of
the claim of Brentwood Market.
CITY MANAGER
City Manager Birkelo explained
that this item had been agreed
upon by Unit No. 6 in the negotia-
tions and that it would provide
a one year final compensation
option. He continued, once the
Ordinance was adopted it would
encompass all members of the
Fire Department, however Unit No. 1
was still in the negotiation process.
Councilwoman Teglia questioned how
this compared in benefits that the
Police Department received.
City Manager Birkelo explained that
the Police Department had been
awarded a 2% cash benefit in lieu
of the final year option which the
Firefighters had selected.
Consensus of Council - To defer this
item until after the Executive
Session.
10/15/80
Page 5
Ac'r ou 155
CITY MANAGER
Staff Report 10/15/80 - recommending
a Motion authorizing the City to
enter into an agreement with the
County of San Mateo regarding the
planning process for the possible
development of the South Slope/San
Bruno Mountain. (TF-235)
(TF-265)
CITY MANAGER
City Manager Birkelo explained
that for a number of years there
had been an agreement between
prior City Councils and the County
that stated that any planning for
a development on the South Slope of
San Bruno Mountain would be done
jointly between the City and County.
The Letter of Understanding will
formalize the agreement and would
allow a developer to proceed. He
further indicated that the proposed
Letter of Understanding was workable
and that the first step would be
to select a Task Force to set a
work program and solicit citizen
input in the planning process. He
recommended amending the last two
sentences of paragraph 10, "The
Board of Supervisors shall adopt
the Specific Plan. No Specific
Plan shall be deemed approved unless
and until both the County and the
City have approved it." He stated
that a reasonable question could
be raised on whether or not the
City should waive its legal rights
to be the final approving agency
for development within its own
jurisdictional boundaries.
A discussion followed on whether
the County would have to amend
its General Plan in order to have
a concept plan rather than a
specific plan, the City becoming
the lead agency with final approval,
sphere of influence, etc.
San Mateo County Supervisor
Bacciocco responded that it would
require an amendment of the County's
General Plan. He stated that the
Council would have to make a
decision on whether they wanted
development on the slope and if
so they should work with the County.
He continued, before annexation the
City would have the final approval,
however the County has to approve
the specific plan. He explained
in-depth the advantages of the County
being the lead agency, the Task
10/15/80
Page 6
AGENDA 156
CITY MANAGER
9. Staff Report 10/15/80 -Continued.
(TF-366)
ACTION TAKEN
CITY MANAGER
Force being comprised of a Council-
member, Planning Member, Mr.
Bacciocco, and a member of the
County Planning Commission, the fact
that both the County and the City
had equal veto power.
Vice Mayor Nicolopulos asked for a
clarification of a concept plan and
a specific plan.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela explained that the
County's plan will be analyzed and
reevaluated in light of current day
conditions and that this would be
one of the functions of the Task
Force and the Staff to look:at the
principles and conditions of that
plan to reevaluate and modify accord-
ingly. He continued elaborating on
the concept plan and explained
measures to protect the environ=
mentally sensitive portions of the
mountain. At a later point the
developer would be instructed to
prepare a concept plan with guide-
lines from the Task Force and there
would then be a series of public
hearings with guidelines and dis-
cussions and gradually these would
evolve into a specific plan.
An in-depth discussion followed on
the joint planning effort, work pro-
gram, public hearings with citizen
input, a fiscal feasibility study
prior to annexation; the City giving
up its right and allowing the County
to have the veto power by letting
the last sentence stand, further
legal research on the legal ramifica-
tions before acting on the Letter of
Understanding.
San Mateo County Supervisor
Bacciocco stated that the Board is
not going to abrogate its juris-
diction where the City of South San
Francisco has the sole, supreme veto
power - then he felt there was no
10/15/80
Page 7
^GEND^ ^CT ON T^KEN 157
CITY MANAGER
9. Staff Report 10/15/80 - Continued.
(TF-391)
(TF-412)
CITY MANAGER
reason for the Board to plan this
project with the City. He pleaded
that Council try to enter into this
Letter of Understanding with a
cooperative approach.
Councilwoman Teglia stated she would
feel more comfortable to have the
City Attorney research this matter
and protect the City's interests and
asked why the County did not proceed
with the development and the entire
plan without the City's involvement.
She stated that after annexation
the City through sphere of influence
could proceed with plans that would
contribute to the community by
development of the one segment of
the community.
San Mateo County Supervisor Bacciocco
responded that the Board made a
compromise not to put 24,000 people
on the saddle, only 3,500, and the
conservationists of the County are
supporting the development on the
north east ridge of the South Slope.
He stated that the Board will insist
on reserving 20% of the median low
cost housing in the development,
a lead agency for planning and to
share equally with the City whether
or not the plan that is developed
jointly will be accepted. He
spoke of the objection of the Down-
town Merchants of 100,000 square
feet being set aside for a super-
market and stated that the Board
would be flexible and encourage
the Downtown Merchants.
Mayor Acosta expressed concern
over a potential impasse with
the Board and the City having veto
power. He suggested accepting a
specific plan concurrently with
the City and Board and maybe modify-
ing the plan and not abrogate the
10/15/80
Page 8
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CITY MANAGER
9. Staff Report 10/15/80 - Continued.
(TF-428)
(TF-490)
CITY MANAGER
the general plan of the County.
He felt this would prevent pro-
blems after annexation because
there was a contract with the
County.
Vice Mayor Nicolopulos stated that
this item was not allowing any
building but was to execute a pro-
posed Letter of Understanding with
the County and nothing more.
City Manager Birkelo stated that
the Letter of Understanding would
then set in motion a planning pro-
cess which could lead to develop-
ment. He further stated that with
Council direction Staff could nego-
tiate with the County on those
items that require legal satis-
faction.
Discussion followed of this item
being on the Planning Commission's
Agenda at their last meeting, the
fact that this item was part of the
County General Plan and not the
City's General Plan.
Councilwoman Teglia stated that the
Planning Commission had been con-
cerned for a long time with the
planning process of the Mountain
and felt the Commission shoul!d be
involved from the initial~,planning
stages.
Ms. Mary Cox, 466 Holly Avenue,
Chairwoman of the Citizens Action
League San Bruno Mountain Committee,
stated that the citizenry in trying
to gain information on this issue
for months felt they were receiving
conflicts, lies and broken promises.
She stated that the CAL group would
be greatly affected by any develop-
ment on the Mountain and expressed
surprise that Council, Staff and
Mr. Bacciocco had been discussing
10/15/80
Page 9
AGENDA ACTION TA~<EN 159
CITY MANAGER
9. Staff Report 10/15/80 - Continued.
(TF-519)
(TF-534)
(TF-569)
CITY MANAGER
this item after promising the
group that this matter would be
aired at a Study Session before
any action would be taken. She
stated that because of the holiday
the libraries and City Hall were
closed and the citizens were un-
able to learn of the agenda items
until Tuesday, the day before the
Council Meeting. She stated con-
cern that this item was also placed
on the Planning Commission's Agenda
without the public being aware of
the subject being up for discussion
when the group had been promised
that they would be informed of any
discussion on this subject. She
asked that Council as Elected Offi-
cials live up to the promise made
to the CAb group by taking this
item off the agenda and place it
on a Study Session, to be held
at night in South San Francisco, and
notify the residents in ample time
so the citizens can state their
concerns and be a party to the
planning processes for the Mountain.
Mr. John Beckham, 1357 Hillside
Blvd., expressed concern over the
traffic problems on Hillside Blvd.,
and felt any development would
create further traffic hazards and
perhaps fatalities to the children
in the area going and coming from
the school.
Mayor Acosta reiterated that the
Letter of Understanding would begin
the planning process that would
dictate the traffic design and land-
scaping. He further stated that
this meeting was taking the form
of a Study Session and that the
formal Study Sessions would not take
place until.~a concept is agreed
upon.
Councilman Addiego recited the
various Council communications he
had received on this subject and
that from the beginning it had
10/15/80
Page 10
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CITY MANAGER
9. Staff Report 10/15/80 - Continued.
(TF-642)
CITY MANAGER
been stated that Study Sessions
would be held on this subject and
the item had been placed on the
continuing Study Session Agenda and
stated that now was a good time to
select a date for a Study Session.
He further stated that as a Council-
man he wanted to know how Council
felt on this issue before being
bound by an agreement with the
County and felt that the public
should be brought into the dis-
cussions at the early stages.
Vice Masor Nicolopulos stated that
Council% legislative role was to
make policy and then proceed with
the public input and was bothered
by the mistrust evident in the
discussion.
Mrs. Martha Jent, ll6 Green Avenue,
e~pressed concern that Council as
Elected Officials was not being
responsive to the residents of Peck's
Lot and Hillside Boulevard who must
contend with large trucks carrying
building supplies and dirt over
Hillside Boulevard. She stated
that there was a number of children
between the ages of two and ten and
the traffic flow was creating hazards
to their safety and was concerned
that the proposed development and
shopping center would increase the
traffic problems. She stated that
she was also concerned about the
proposed motel to be built on the
corner of Airport Boulevard and
Randolph which would attract un-
desirables to the neighborhood.
Ms. Jane Lee, 1321 Hillside Boulevard,
stated that she felt that Council
had been elected to represent the
people in the policies that they set
and the citizens want input before
the policies are set.
10/15/80
Page ll
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 161
CITY MANAGER
9. Staff Report 10/15/80 - Continued.
(TF-673)
RECESS:
RECALL TO ORDER:
(TF-703)
(TF-755)
CITY MANAGER
Ms. Beverly J. Totten, 125 Edison
Avenue, stated that she had addressed
Council during the Budget Study
Session and asked that the public
have a say in the letter being dis-
cussed tonight. She continued,
saying it made no difference
whether Council discussed general
plan, concept plan, specific plans -
it made no difference because she
did not want any type of development
on the Hountain.
Mr. Larry Casey, 363 Forestview
Drive, stated that he felt that
the Council should take no action
on the proposed letter of agree-
ment at this time and give closer
scrutiny to the wording in the
agreement.
Mayor Acosta declared a recess at
9:40 p.m.
Mayor Acosta recalled the meeting to
order at 9:57 p.m., all Council
present.
Mr. Tom Jent, ll6 Green Avenue, said
he had hiked the mountains in other
areas of the Peninsula that now
were covered with houses and the
open spaces were rapidly diminishing
and pleaded that the Mountain be
protected in its present state.
Councilwoman Teglia stated that
based on the testimony presented
this evening from the public, the
questions raised by the City Attorney
and the Planning Commissions request
to hold this matter over, suggested
setting a public hearing.
M/S Teglia/Damonte ~ To put the
item over to a Study Session with
the public, Planning Commmission
and the City Attorney.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
10/15/80
Page 12
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 16g
CITY MANAGER
9. Staff Report 10/15/80 - Continued.
EXECUTIVE SESSION:
RECALL TO ORDER:
ITEMS FROM STAFF
18. Progress Report on Country
Club Park Annexation.
(TF-780)
CITY MANAGER
Mr. James Keegan, 1244 Crestwood
Drive, asked that consideration
be given to the size of the hall
for the Study Session to accom-
modate the public who wished to
attend.
Council adjourned to an Executive
Session to discuss litigation at
10:07 p.m.
The Meeting was recalled to order at
ll:20 p.m., all Council present, no
action taken.
ITEMS FROM STAFF
City Manager Birkelo spoke of a
draft letter to the County Manager
regarding an agreement for the
sharing of tax revenue from the
Country Club area if and when it
is annexed. He continued, that
the City f~nds that the cost of
necessary public improvements
is so high in comparison to tax
revenue that the City does not
consider it economically feasible
to enter into such an agreement
at this time. He stated that
the County might want to find funds
to share a large part of that
capital cost or start ta]~king about
other ways in which the County
might provide services by contract
to the City to serve the area in
lieu of annexation. He asked if
Council wanted Staff to have a
meeting with the residents of
Country Club in early December to
apprise the residents of cost :
estimates on streets, lighting, etc.
Mayor Acosta stated there would be a
hearing with LAFCO, the Board of
Supervisors and concerned individuals
on October 24, 1980.
10/15/80
Page 13
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 162
ITEMS FROM STAFF
18. Progress Report on Country Club
Park Annexation - Continued.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
10.
Staff Report 10/15/80 - recommending
adoption of a Resolution confirming
the HCDA Housing Rehabilitation
Loans as necessary and appropriate
in the City during 1981/82.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
RECOMMENDING CERTAIN ACTIVITIES FOR
INCLUSION IN THE COUNTYWIDE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR FY 1981-82
(TF-845)
ITEMS FROM STAFF
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela stated the final agree-
ment for the annexation to take
place would have to be by the
Board of Supervisors, however the
tax question would still have to
be resolved between the City and
the County. He expected that the
County would have a hearing per-
haps late in November or early in
December.
.City Manager Birkelo asked if the
Council wanted to be represented
at these hearings and oppose the
annexation. He further stated
that if MORGA expires the residents
would always have the opportunity
of annexation by their own normal
annexation procedures requiring
consent of a majority of the pro-
perty owners. He said if the
City protested it would be on an
economical standpoint.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
City Planner Christians explained
that in January 1979 the County of
San Mateo approved a three year
plan for the City for a Housing and
Community Development Program and
at this point was looking for a
confirmation of the City continuing
in this Program.
Motion by Teglia - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 123-80
Carried by unanimous roll call
vote.
10/15/80
Page 14
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ll. Publi~ Hearing - General Plan
Amendment - Gateway Redevelopment
GP-80-13.
Staff Report 10/15/80 - recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving the
General Plan Amendment for the Gateway
Redevelopment Project No. GP-80-13.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT GP-80-13 PURSUANT TO PLAN-
ING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 2274 -
ADOPTED THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER,
1980
(TF-856)
PARK AND RECREATION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Mayor Acosta opened the Public
Hearing.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela explained that this
was a General Plan Amendment to
the Gateway Redevelopment Project
and Negative Declaration No. 279.
He continued by explaining that
this would change the zoning to
a heavy commercial.
Mayor Acosta invited those who
wished to speak in favor the of
General Plan Amendment for the Gate-
way Redevelopment Project No. GP-80-13
to step to the podium.
Mr. Larry Casey, 363 Forestview
Drive, spoke in favor of the General
Plan Amendment for the Gateway Re-
development Project and suggested
using shuttle buses to relieve the
parking problems.
Mayor Acosta invited those who
wished to speak against the General
Plan Amentment for the Gateway Re-
development Project to step to the
podium - no one spoke.
Mayor Acosta closed the Public
Hearing.
Motion by Nicolopulos - To adopt
the Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 124-80
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
PARK AND RECREATION
12.
Staff Report 10/15/80 - recommending
a Motion to approve the Cooperative
Agreement for the operation and
maintenance of the Oyster Point
Fishing Pier between the San Mateo
County Harbor District and the
California Wild Life Conservation
Board.
(TF-901) ~/~,
Director of Park and Recreati~on
Norton explained the transfer of
the grant responsibility in that
the City is the owner of the land.
10/15/80
Page 15
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 165
PARK AND RECRATION
12. Staff Report 10/15/80 - Cont?nued.
13.
Staff Report 10/15/80 - recommending
a Motion establishing designated
zones for utilization of park fees.
(TF-929)
PUBLIC SERVICES
14.
Staff Report 10/15/80 - recommending
a Motion to approve Change Order #2
for the Downtown Revitalization
Project, which is a proposal to
repair sections of Grand Avenue
with fabric reinforcing prior to
paving. ~~
COMMUNICATIONS
15.
Letter from Councilman Addiego
requesting a Public Hearing date
be set for 11/5/80 on UP-79-503/
SA-80-68, for a 48 unit condominium
project on the northeasterly side of
Mission Road, for the purpose of re-
view of this Use Permit by City Council.
PARKAND RECRATION
M/S Damonte/Addiego - To approve
the Cooperative Agreement for
the operation and maintenance of
the Oyster Point Fishing Pier be-
tween the San Mateo County Harbor
District and the California Wild
Life Conservation Board.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Director of Parks and Recreation
Norton explained that on July 16,
1980 Council adopted Ordinance No.
829-80 amending Ordinance No. 603
relating to the simplifiLCation of
the Park Fee process. He continued
by saying that the monies collected
would be spent for improvement -
5 areas were mentioned: 1) Westborough;
2) Buri Buri/Winston Manor; 3) Avalon/
Brentwood; 4) Sunshine Gardens;
5) Central - east of E1Camino ex-
cluding Sunshine Gardens.
M/S Teglia/Damonte - To combine 4
and 5 and accept 4 zones.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
PUBLIC SERVICES
Deleted.
COMMUNICATIONS
Consensus of Council to set Public
Hearing date for 11/5/80.
10/15/80
Page 16
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 166
ITEMS FROM STAFF
16. Report on vehicle purchases.
(TF-969)
17. Report on a rate adjustment by
Western TV Cable.
(TF-970)
19.
Roof rat report.
(TF-988)
20.
Discussion of microwave system -
moving.
(TF-1026)
ITEMS FROM STAFF
Informational only. No discussion.
City Manager Birkelo explained
that the present agreement allows
Cable TV to make unilateral adjust-
ments not more often than once a
year, not to exceed 75% of the
CPI for the prior fiscal year.
Vice Mayor Nicolopulos expressed a
desire for improved service.
City Manager Birkelo explained that
it would be advantageous to enter
into a written agreement specifying
services to be provided to satisfy
the Police Department.
Motion by Addiego - To authorize
the City Manager to enter into the
agreement on behalf of the City.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilwoman Teglia informed the
public that rat bait is still avail-
able at all Fire Departments without
charge.
Chief of Police Datzman stated that
pending approval of the signed agree-
ment, Peninsula Community Services,
Inc. should not solicit or con-
tact residents regarding the abate-
ment of rats.
Recommendation from Communications
Supervisor Williams that the micro-
wave system in the library be moved
and installed in the Municipal Ser-
vices Building and eliminate lease
lines at the estimated cost of
$1,750. He continued by saying
that later Staff will come back to
Council with a request for additional
IO/15/SO
Page 17
^CENDA ^CTZON T^KE, 167
ITEMS FROM STAFF
20. Discussion of microwave system - Cont,
21.
Request for Public Hearing date
for Special Districts Augmentation
Fund.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Mayor Acosta:
Mayor Acosta:
Mayor Acosta:
Mayor Acosta:
'ITEMS FROM STAFF
equipment for the upgrading of
the Police equipment.
City Manager Birkelo requested that
Council set a Public Hearing date of
10/29/80 at 4:30 p.m. for Special
Districts Augmentation Fund.
Consensus of Council to set Public
Hearing date of 10/29/80.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Informed Council of letter received
from Mr. Maurice Brosnan requesting
placement on the Agenda for con-
sideration of numbering of streets
on Willow and Grand Avenues.
City Manager Birkelo explained that
he would report back to Council
subsequent to his meeting with the
Chief of Police, Fire Chief and City
Attorney regarding this matter.
Informed Council of letter received from
Congressman Royer's representative,
Mr. Constantin~ concerning their in-
volvement in effecting a solution
to census figure problems.
Informed Council of a letter from
East Palo Alto Municipal Council
requesting endorsement by Resolu-
tion for incorporation as a City.
He requested that this item be
placed on the Agenda for the forth-
coming meeting after investigation.
Informed Council of a letter from
Mrs. Helen Young in regaed ~o
Mater Delorosa School crossing guards.
She requested that the Police Chief
investigate this matter.
Chief Datzman explained that he
had been contacted by Mrs. Quitter
the Principal of the Mater Delorosa
School and she ha~ been working with
Lt. Silvas on the problem and look-
ing at the traffic count.
1 o/15/80
Page 18
AGENDA
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Mayor Acosta:
Councilwoman Teglia:
Mayor Acosta.
GOOD AND WELFARE
Councilwoman Teglia:
Mr. Elmore:
ACTION TAKEN
168
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Read letter from concerned citizens
about garbage collecting
on sides of roads on E1Camino
and Junipera Serra, vandalized..
street signs, rented homes that are
derelict, City is becoming very
dirty.
Mayor Acosta continued by requesting
that these concerned citizens sign
their names, so that Council can
get back to them with a response.
Continued by saying that there are
many derelict neglected homes that
the City is aware of and an ordinance
is presently being drafted by the
City Attorney's Office and a Study
Session will be forthcomihg in the
future for discussion of the ordin-
ance. She further explained that
there will be signs posted so that
the streets will be free of parked
cars during the time for street
sweeping.
Requested a date be set for Study
Session on Maintenance Standard
Ordinance on derelict homes that
are untended.
GOOD AND WELFARE
Requested that Director of Community
Development Dell'Angela get the
Planning Commission Agenda packet
from the Library and present it at'
the next meeting to Mr. Elmore.
Questioned Council regarding vio-
lations in.refe~unce to use permits, and
who initiates litigation. He in-
quired if there was a .study ,going
on regardi~ng the violations within
the City.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela explained that the Plan-
ing Department was looking into the
matter and responding to leads on
possible violations but not can-
vassing the town for violations.
10/15/80
Page 19
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 169
GOOD AND WELFARE
Mr. Elmore - Cont.
Mrs. Gladys Beck:
EXECUTIVE SESSION: (TF-1208)
RECALL TO ORDER:
ADJOURNMENT:
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
GOOD AND WELFARE
However, if Mr. Elmore has addresses
where violations are taking place
it will be looked into.
Mr. Elmore inquired how far back
does Staff go for violations.
Assistant City Attorney Rogers
explained that it is by statute other
than for building code violations.
Resident of Country Club Park ex-
plained that she had drainage problems
in Country Club Park and the City
should give serious consideration
with the County on the drainage
problems. She further gave warning
that there would be a lawsuit.
Council adjourned to an Executive
Session at 12:20 a.m.
The Meeting was recalled to order
at 12:40 a.m., all Council present,
no action taken.
M/S Damonte/Teglia - To adjourn the
meeting to Friday, October 17, 1980
at 4:00 p.m.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Time of adjournment 12:42 a.m.
APPROVED:
Barbara A. Battaya, Ci~Clerk
City of South San Francisco
Ronald G. Acosta, Mayor
City of South San Francisco
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to
dispose of the item. Oral presentations, arguments, and comments are recorded on
tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the office of
the City Clerk and available for inspection, review and copying.
10/15/80
Page 20