HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1982-02-03Mayor Gus Nicolopulos
Vice Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia
Council:
Ronald G. Acosta
Mark N. Addiego
Emanuele N. Damonte
M I N U T E S
CITY COUNCIL
Municipal Services Building
Community Room
February 3, 1982
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government
Code of the State of California, that the City Council of the City of South
San Francisco will hold a Special Meeting on Wednesday, the 3rd day of February,
1982, at 6:30 p.m., in the Community Room, Municipal Services Building, 33
Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California.
Purpose of the meeting - Closed Session:
Litigation and personnel matters.
Dated:
January 29, 1982
Gus~ Nicolopulos, Mac, b-F-
City of South San Francisco
AGENDA
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CALL TO ORDER
CLOSED SESSION:
RECALL TO ORDER:
ACTION TAKEN
Recited.
6:40 p.m. Mayor Nicolopulos presiding.
Council present: Damonte, Acosta and
Nicolopulos.
Council absent: Teglia and Addiego.
Council adjourned to a Closed Session
at 6:41 p.m.
Vice Mayor Teglia arrived at 6:42 p.m.
Councilman Addiego arrived at 6:43 p.m.
The meeting was recalled to order at
7:38 p.m., all Council present, no
action taken.
M/S Damonte/Acosta - That the meeting
be adjourned.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
2/3/82
Page 1
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
ADJOURNMENT:
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
City of South San Francisco
Time of adjournment 7:39 p.m.
APPROVED:
colopul os, Ma~or
City of South San Francisco
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council
to dispose of the item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are
recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file
in the office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and
copying.
2/3/82
Page 2
Mayor Gus Nicolopulos
Vice Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia
Council:
Ronald G. Acosta
Mark N. Addiego
Emanuele N. Damonte
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
Municipal Services Building
Community Room
February 3, 1982
258
AGENDA
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
CALL TO ORDER
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Birkelo requested:
- Closed Session for Personnel and
Litigation at the end of the meeting.
- Add Item No. 8a Acceptance of the
Appian Village Unit #1 Condo Sub-
division Public Improvements as com-
plete.
- Add Item 18 Discussion of the Magnolia
Center Grant Application.
- Add Item 19 consideration of a letter
from the City of Half Moon Bay request-
ing concurrence of their reaction to
CALTRANS handling of Highway 1 and 92.
PRESENTATION
PROCLAMATION IN RECOGNITION OF NATIONAL
CRIME PREVENTION WEEK - FEBRUARY 7 - 13,
1982
ACTION TAKEN
Recited.
7:40 p.m. Mayor Nicolopulos presiding.
Council present: Damonte, Acosta,
Teglia, Addiego and
Nicolopulos.
Council absent: None.
City Manager Birkelo commented that
the regular meeting of the Redevelopment
Agency had been cancelled indicating
that the discussions with Homart re-
garding the Precise Plan were still
in progress.
AGENDA REVIEW
So ordered.
PRESENTATION
Mayor Nicolopulos presented the
Proclamation to Police Chief
Datzman, after which Mayor Nicolopulos
read the Proclamation in its entirety.
Police Chief Datzman explained that
in honor of National Crime Prevention
Week the Police Department would be
having an open house for the public
on Wednesday, February 10, 1982
2/3/82
Page 1
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
PRESENTATION
PROCLAMATION - Continued.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes of the Special Meeting
of 9/30/81, Special Meeting of
10/13/81, Special Meeting of
10/14/81, Special Meeting of
10/20/81 and the Special Meeting
of 10/21/81.
e
Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending
adoption of a Resolution making
applicable the provisions of the
Code of Civil Procedure Section
1094.6.
A RESOLUTION MAKING APPLICABLE
THE PROVISIONS OF CODE OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE SECTION 1094.6 PROVID-
ING FOR THE JUDICIAL REVIEW OF
ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS
Staff Re?ort 2/3/82 recommending
adoption of a Resolution declar-
ing a termination of the local
emergency.
A RESOLUTION DECLARING TERMINATION
OF LOCAL EMERGENCY
Adoption of a Resolution commending
John Penna, a former Parking Place
Commissioner.
PRESENTATION
between 7:00 and lO:O0 p.m., at which
time there would be tours of the
facility, a range and dog demonstrations,
etc.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Doris Agee, 819 Ridge Court,
commented on a recent letter written
by Charles Getz concerning various
problems at Stonegate and asked when
this matter would be scheduled for a
hearing.
City Manager Birkelo responded that
he would meet with Mr. Getz and return
to Council after that meeting for
direction.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approved.
RESOLUTION NO. 18-82
Removed from Consent Calendar for
discussion by Councilman Acosta.
2/3/82
Page 2
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
4. Adoption of a Resolution - Continued.
Be
A RESOLUTION COMMENDING JOHN PENNA
Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending
by Motion to accept the Purchase
of equipment and installation of
equipment for the Public Address
System as complete. ~~,_~
Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending
by Motion to award the bid for one
diesel powered 7-gang lawn mower
to H.V. Carter & Company.~:~,.~
7. Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending
by Motion final acceptance of Pine
Terrace Sewer Replacement Project
No. SS-81-1 as complete in accord-
ance with the approved plans and
specifications, authorizing the
filing of the Notice of Completion,
make final payment to the contractor
and release the 10% retention fee
after the 30 day lien period. ~
8. Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending
by Motion authorization to replace
a traffic signal controller at
Westborough and Gellert Boulevard
with a full activated volume
density controller. ~-~
8a. A request that the Appian Village
Unit No. 1 Condominium Subdivision
Public Improvements be accepted as
complete.
Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending
adoption of a Resolution declaring
a termination of the local emergency.
A RESOLUTION DECLARING TERMINATION
OF LOCAL EMERGENCY
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESOLUTION NO. 19-82
Approved.
Approved.
Approved.
Approved.
Approved.
M/S Addiego/Damonte - Consent Calendar
be approved with the exception of Item
No. 3.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilman Acosta asked if the ending
of the declaration of local emergency
would preclude anyone from filing
with federal and/or state for disaster
assistance - would persons have the
option of coming back at a later date
and filing for assistance.
2/3/82
Page 3
AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Staff Report 2/3/82 - Continued.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
9. Approval of the Regular Bills of
2/3/82.
CITY MANAGER
10.
Staff Report 2/3/82 recon~nending
by Motion to authorize Staff to
proceed with the selection of an
architect for the development of
a Corporation Yard.
ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
City Manager Birkelo stated that to
his knowledge this action would not
preclude persons from filing or
receiving assistance from circum-
stances occuring during the emergency.
City Attorney Rogers stated that
the law required that once a local
emergency is declared, that it be
reviewed every 14 days to see if it
is still a condition of emergency and
that at the earliest possible time
a resolution be passed terminating
that emergency.
Discussion followed regarding the
time element in filing for assistance
and that the passing of this proposed
Resolution would not preclude persons
from filing for aid within required
state and federal time limits.
M/S Acosta/Damonte - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 20-82
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
M/S Damonte/Acosta - To approve the
Regular Bills.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilman Addiego did not participate
or vote in the matter of the claim of
Brentwood Market.
CITY MANAGER
City Manager Birkelo explained that
in response to Council's instructions
a task force had been set up consisting
of Staff members to study the develop-
ment of a new Corporation Yard. He
indicated that the Task Force had reviewed
the needs of the users of the proposed
facility, visited other City Corporation
Yards in the Bay Area and determined
the space requirements for those
2/3/82
Page 4
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CITY MANAGER
10. Staff Report 2/3/82 - Continued.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
11.
Public Hearing - UP-81-609/Kirk
Lassiter - An appeal of the denial
of a Use Permit to establish an
auto repair, auto body and paint prim-
ing facility located in an existing
building at 612 Cypress Avenue.
Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending:
1) Open the P~iblic Hearing; 2) Close
the Public Hearing; 3) Motion to deny
the appeal and uphold the decision of
the Planning Commission.
CITY MANAGER
using the facility. He indicated that
the Task Force felt that they could not
proceed further without competent
architectural services in terms of
preliminary designs and cost estimates.
Discussion followed relative to the
scope of architectural services; the
types of structures necessary for the
Corporation Yard and the need for
architectural services versus those
of a designer. Also discussed was
the need for a subcommittee from
Council to assist in this matter.
Mayor Nicolopulos appointed Councilman
Addiego and Councilman Damonte to
be Subcommittee to assist in the de-
velopment of a Corporation Yard.
Consensus of Council to continue
this matter to the Special Meeting
of 2/10/82.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela explained that the build-
ing which was approximately 610 square
feet located on a lot which include
an auto detailing operation and a
body shop. He indicated that the
application had not provided for
parking spaces and stated that
the proposed business would require
4 off-street parking spaces and that
a variance had not been applied for.
He commented that the concerns of
the Planning Commission and Staff
were that the business was too in-
tense for the site and that it re-
quired off-street parking and none
was being provided and it would
create additional problems in that
particular area.
Mayor Nicolopulos declared the Public
Hearing open and invited those who
wished to speak in favor of the
appellant to step to the dais.
Kirk Lassiter, 3621 Sunset Drive,
2/3/82
Page 5
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ll. Public Hearing - Continued.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
San Bruno, stated that when he
had originally applied for the Use
Permit there had been no off-street
parking, however, in the interim he
had leased the property adjacent to
612 Cypress in order to provide the
parking. He indicated his desire
to comply with the fire, building
and safety codes of the City and
to conform with the conditions re-
quired for the subject Use Permit as
required by the Planning Commission.
Discussion followed concerning the
lease presented by Mr. Lassiter,
with a comment by Director of
Community Development Dell'Angela
stating the concerns of Staff
that the document's wording was
"so loose and it is so indefinite
that the we felt it wasn't really
a guarantee that parking was going
to be provided. What we had proposed
to Al's Body Shop or at least the
applicant, was that he sit down with
A1 and fence off a specific area of
the particular frontage, have a
separate gate along Cypress and
allow enough parking to be able
to go in and out of -- so it is
a realistic adjoining parking lot
and that it would be a covenant,
a restriction on that property."
City Attorney Rogers in response
to a request for clarification
by Mayor Nicolopulos stated,"I
certainly wouldn't base a decision
on that - that you approve or deny
this appeal on this document. I
think the issue of whether sufficient
off-street parking is provided or not
is better handled through the
Department of Community Development
in terms of working on an actual
parking scheme -- if this was an
issue before the Planning Commission
at the time the decision was to be
made they obviously agreed to that
approach, that there should be some
specific parking scheme worked out.
They didn't see that scheme in the
2/3/82
Page 6
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ll. Public Hearing - Continued.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
plan that was attached to the Staff
Report so as I understood it there
has bee~no actual parking plan
worked out with Community Development
and that is possibly part of what
they based their decision on."
Discussion followed concerning the
possibility of the parking require-
ment as requested by Staff and the
Planning Commission could become
a Condition to the Use Permit rather
than a covenant or restriction on
the property. Also discussed was
the parking problem in the area of
Cypress and Airport and the need
to address the situation.
Omar Perez, 205 Arlington, presented
a petition signed by residents of the
area of the proposed business in-
dicating their acceptance of the
business.
Linda Kerns, 611 Cypress, commented
on the prior business located at
the subject address and indicated
the parking and other problems which
they had created. She stated that
since they had moved~their operation
there had been no parking or related
problems.
Jim Swopiou, 1535 40th Avenue, San
Francisco, commented on the parking
situation at the proposed business,
and stated that whenever he had been
to the business there had been only
one car at a time at the establishment.
Mayor Nicolopulos then invited those
wishing to speak in opposition to
step to the dais - no one chose to
speak.
Mayor Nicolopulos declared the
Public Hearing closed.
M/S Teglia/Acosta - To send back to
Staff to work out the required parking
with four spaces in some sort of more
2/3/82
Page 7
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ll. Public Hearing - Continued.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
definitive way so that we know in
fact that we have four spaces and
that something be done about that so
that we know these four parking spaces
go in that business and it does remain.
Discussion followed regarding the
parking area gate, fence and the
options available.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela stated that there were
other issues of concern besides the
parking to be considered regarding
the subject Use Permit relative to
the intensity of the use for the
site.
Discussion ensued concerning the
findings of the Planning Commission;
zoning of the area; parking, etc.
City Attorney Rogers suggested that
Council not defer making a decision on the
matter at this timej unless a continuance
was requested by the appellant.
Discussion followed regarding the amount
of time necessary for Staff if the
matter were continued, Director of
Community Development Dell'Angela
indicated that it would be approximately
three months.
City Attorney Rogers stated "I suggest
either you act on the issue tonight or
the appellant should request a con-
tinuance of the second ruling." He
then explained the options available
to Mr. Lassiter with respect to
his request for a continuance.
Mr. Lassiter requested a continuance
of the matter in order to
address the parking problems.
An in-depth discussion followed per-
tinent to the time element involved.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela indicated that the matter
2/3/82
Page 8
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ll. Public Hearing - Continued.
12.
Public Hearing - RPD-81-25/Milan
Jurkota - An appeal of the denial
of a Residential Planned Development
Permit to construct three duplexes
with related parking and landcaping
and remodel an existing single family
dwelling at 111 Chestnut Avenue.
Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending:
l) Open the Public Hearing; 2) Close
the Public Hearing; 3) Motion to deny
the appeal and uphold the decision of
the Planning Commission.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
could be heard by the Planning
commission in April and brought
to Council in May.
M/S Teglia/Acosta - That the Motion
be amended tolstate "To send back
to Staff and the Planning Commission
(the Planning process) to work out
the required parking with four spaces
in some sort of more definitive way
so that we know in fact that we have
four spaces and that something be
done about that so that we know these
four parking spaces go in that business
and it does remain.
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
Vice Mayor Teglia stated that her
principle place of residence was within
300 feet of the proposed development
and that she had consulted the
City Attorney and had been advised
that since there was no evidence
that as a property owner she would
be affected - more or any less than
anyone else in that area, that it was
not necessary that she refrain -and
that she did not need to step down.
City Attorney Rogers in response
to Mayor Nicolopulos's inquiry
stated "She has no financial
interest in the project, it doesn't
affect her in any other way."
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela explained the history
of the proposed development, citing
the revisions which had been pre-
sented by the applicant as the re-
sult of a petition submitted by
neighborhood residents and con-
cerns of the Planning Commisssion.
Mayor Nicolopulos declared the
Public Hearing open and invited
those wishing to speak in favor
of the appellant to step to the
dais.
2/3/82
Page 9
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
12. Public Hearing - Continued.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Daniel Modena, Attorney at Law,
421 Grand Avenue, addressed the
issues as presented regarding the
proposed development at lll Chestnut
Avenue. He stated that after the
presentation of the petition ob-
jecting to the nine (9) unit
development, Mr. Jurkota had met
with Staff to resolve the con-
cerns expressed by revising the
plans and submitted the revised
plan for a 7 unit project for con-
sideration; once again opposition
was expressed and it was stated that
a 6 unit project would be acceptable.
He indicated his client's desire to
work with the City in order to pro-
vide housing for the residents.
He said that in regard to the traffic
concerns the proposed development
would contain 2.6 parking spaces
per unit and have a proposed area
to be used for an additional 2 parking
spaces. He explained that Mr. Jurkota
had complied with the requests made
by Staff and the Planning Commission
in connection with the project.
Mayor Nicolopulos invited those
who wished to speak in opposition
to step to the dais.
Doris Agee, 819 Ridge Court, expressed
concern with traffic conditions on
Chestnut Avenue and the impact of
future developments on these conditions.
Bill Dondero, lO1 Chestnut Avenue,
explained that he was representing
other concerned residents in the
area and expressed their opposition
to the construction of any more than
6 units at 111 Chestnut Avenue. He
addressed three concerns expressed
by the residents relative to density,
traffic and the maintenance of the
area as a predominently single family
residential area.
2/3/82
Page 10
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
12. Public Hearing - Continued.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Mrs. Bolano, 106 Chestnut Avenue,
expressed concern regarding the
proposed project and indicated that
she felt that the area should remain
the same.
Mayor Nicolopulos declared the
Public Hearing closed.
Discussion followed concerning the
applicant's possible options which
included subdividing the land into
three separate lots and building
three separate duplexes, at which
time it was indicated that a variance
would be required for the third lot;
the opposition of the residents of
the area, etc.
M/S Teglia/Addigeo - To deny the appeal
and uphold the decision of the Planning
Commission On RPD-81-25 and Negative
Declaration No. 342., based on the 5
findings within the Staff Report.
An in-depth discussion followed con-
cerning the zoning of the area;
the placing of restrictions on build-
ing in the neighborhood; characteristics
of the area; visual impact of the
height of the proposed buildings,
which was followed by the presentation
of scale drawings of the proposed pro-
ject.
Mr. Modena stated that the petitioners
had not seen the new designs which
he felt had addressed the concerns of
the residents in lowering the height
of the buildings, decreased the number
of units proposed and the size of the
units.
Discussion followed concerning the
landscaping, parking and other re-
quirements of the RPD.
Mr. Dondero reiterated his concerns
and other residents in the area and
commented that there was no objection
to the construction of a 6 unit pro-
2/3/82
Page 11
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
12. Public Hearing - Continued.
RECESS:
RECALL TO ORDER:
13.
14.
Public Hearing - V-81-251/Sam
Leonetti - An appeal of the denial
of a Variance to construct a
storage building having no off-
street parking at 776 E1 Camino
Real.
Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending:
1) Open the Public Hearing and hear
testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearing;
3) Motion to deny the appeal and
uphold the decision of the Planning
Commission. ~~
Public Hearing - UP-81-6OO/Sam
Leonetti - An appeal of the denial
of a Use Permit to construct a 2,044
square foot concrete building for
the storage and reconditioning of
antique cars at 776 E1Camino Real.
Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending:
l) Open the Public Hearing and hear
testimony; 2) Close the PUblic Hearing;
3) Motion to deny the appeal and up-
hold the decision of the Planning
Commission.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
ject in the area.
Discussion followed relative to the
Planning Commission's approval of the
6 unit concept and the concerns of
the residents of the area.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Mayor Nicolopulos declared a recess
at 9:50 p.m.
The meeting was recalled to order
at 10:lO p.m., all Council present.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela requested that Items
13 and 14 be heard together and
that Council take separate action
on each Item.
Consensus of Council to concur
with request.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela explained the prior
history of the project and indicated
the actions taken by the Planning
Commission. He said that it was
the position of the Planning Commission
and Staff on the particular Variance
reques~which is an 11 space variance,
that the variance was self-imposed
by the Applicant because he chose
to propose too large of a building
on the particular site in question
and if he would reduce the size
of the building and perhaps obtain
an access easement over the adjoining
property he could conceivably develop
a 1000 square foot building on the lot and
still provide parking. He stated that
the Use Permit had been~denied by the
Planning Co~mlission based on findings
which indicated that the proposed building
and use would be too intensive for the
small lot and related matters.
2/3/82
Page 12
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
13. Public Hearing - Continued.
14. Public Hearing - Continued.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Vice Mayor Teglia asked if there
was information available indicating
the last time the City granted a
parking variance.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela replied that he was not
aware of any prior action involving
the granting of a parking variance
by the City.
Mayor Nicolopulos requested a legal
clarification from the City Attorney
concerning the Mayor's participation
in this matter due to the fact that
a relative owned the lot next to the
subject property.
City Attorney Rogers responded that
he would need further information
in order to advise the Mayor that
he should or should not participate,
but indicated that if the Mayor was
concerned over the possible conflict
he could step down.
Mayor Nicolopulos stepped down
from the podium at 10:20 p.m.
Vice Mayor Teglia declared the Public
Hearing open and invited those wishing
to speak in favor of the appellant to
step to the dais.
Mr. Sam Leonetti, 143 Oakridge Drive,
Daly City, stated that he felt that the
reasons given by the Planning Commission
for the denial of the variance and use
permit were unfair. He stated that he
had purchased the lot in order to
securely store antique vehicles he had
possessed for a number of years. He
commented on the C-2 zoning of the
lot; size of the proposed building and
the parking requirements. He said that
the use which he proposed for the
property would not generate the need
for parking and would be used solely
for the storage and maintenance of the
antique vehicles.
2/3/82
Page 13
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 27!
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
13. Public Hearing - Continued.
14. Public Hearing - Continued.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Joe Hart, 405 Grand Avenue, stated
that he was the designer of the pro-
ject. He then presented copies of
the revised plans of the project to
Council and explained the changes
which had been made. He proceeded
to show a sketch indicating further
revisions which addressed the egress
and ingress issue.
Mr. Leonetti said that there was
property within a block of the pro-
posed site which had a garage and
that there was no off-street parking
provided.
Vice Mayor Teglia invited those
wishing to speak in opposition
to the appeal to step to the
dais - no one chose to speak.
Vice Mayor Teglia declared the
Public Hearing closed.
An in-depth discussion followed
relative to other uses in the area;
the size of the automobiles to be
stored; dimensions of the lot;
possible future uses of the
building; options involving the
use of an access easement, etc.
Vice Mayor Teglia expressed concern
with the proposed use in a commercial
area and indicated that the City
should preserve that property for
commercial activity; and the
fact that the issue of off-street
parking had not been addressed by
the applicant.
City Attorney Rogers spoke of the
requirements within the State Code
regulating the granting of variances.
M/S Damonte/Addiego - To deny the
appeal on V-81-251 and uphold the
decision of the Planning Commission
based on the 5 findings within the
Staff Report.
2/3/82
Page 14
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
13. Public Hearing - Continued.
14. Public Hearing - Continued.
15.
Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending:
l) Motion to waive further reading
of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to
adopt the Ordinance.
2nd Reading/Adoption
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 10.20
OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL
CODE AND ORDINANCE NO. 852 ENTITLED
"ADULT ENTERTAINMENT BUSINESS MORA-
TORIUM'' AND ADDING CHAPTER 20.38
ENTITLED "ADULT ENTERTAINMENT BUSIN-
ESSES REGULATED" TO THE SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
M/S Addiego/Damonte - To deny the
appeal on UP-81-600 and Negative
Declaration No. 336 and uphold the
decision of the Planning Commission
based on the 6 findings within the
Staff Report.
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
Mayor Nicolopulos returned to the
podium.
City Clerk Battaya read the Ordinance
title in its entirety.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela commented on the studies
presented at the prior meeting re-
lated to the effect of adult enter-
tainment establishments on the
community. He said that Council
at that time had heard testimony
from the Chief of Police, business
people in the community, and a resi-
dent of the community who were
establishing certain findings, the
purpose which is stated in the
proposed Ordinance affected conditions
in the City. He requested clarification
on whether it was Council's intent
to make the findings that particular
conditions as set forth in Section
20.38.010 existed in South San Francisco
and that this was the basis for
introduction of the Ordinance. He
then read the findings and asked
Council i~ it was their intention, when
introducing the Ordinanc~ to make
these findings in relation to South
San Francisco.
Consensus of Council that it was
their intent to make the findings.
M/S Acosta/Damonte - To waive further
reading of the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous, voice vote.
2/3/82
Page 15
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
15.
Staff Report 2/3/82 - Continued.
POLICE
16.
Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending:
l) Motion to waive further reading
of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to intro-
duce the Ordinance.
1st Reading/Introduction
AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 10.10
ENTITLED "REGULATIONS PROHIBITING
CERTAIN EXPOSURES OF THE HUMAN BODY"
TO THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL
CODE
17.
Staff Report 2/3/82 recommending:
l) Motion to waive further reading
of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to
introduce the Ordinance.
1st Reading/Introduction
AN ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER lO.16
ENTITLED "REGULATIONS FOR MASSAGE
PARLORS, MASSAGE SERVICES AND PUBLIC
BATHHOUSES" TO THE SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE
ITEMS FROM STAFF
18. Discussion of the Magnolia Center
Grant Application.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
M/S Acosta/Damonte - That the Ordinance
be passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 889-82
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
POLICE
City Clerk Battaya read the Ordinance
title in its entirety.
Sergeant Haskins presented a brief
description of the Ordinance.
M/S Acosta/Addiego - To waive further
reading of the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Acosta/Addiego - To introduce
the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
City Clerk Battaya read the Ordinance
title in its entirety.
Sergeant Haskins explained the
provisions of the Ordinance related
to the operation of massage parlors,
massage services and public bathhouses.
M/S Damonte/Acosta - To waive further
reading of the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Teglia/Addiego - To introduce
the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ITEMS FROM STAFF
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela explained that the
City had filed an application
with the County for a$50,000 grant
HCD Federal Block Grant funds for
an architectural feasibility study
Qf the Magnolia Center Building in
2/3/82
Page 16
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ITEMS FROM STAFF
18. Magnolia Center - Continued.
19.
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
TO INITIATE THE DEVIL'S SLIDE BYPASS
PROJECT
ITEMS FROM STAFF
December of 1981. He said that the
intention of the study was to analyze
the feasibility of converting Magnolia
Center into a combined senior citizen
center and a senior housing project.
He further explained that he had been
advised that'it was the County's policy
not to support funding of feasibility
studies. He stated that he had
spoke to the'County's Program Coordinator
Mark Nelson who had indicated that
State and Federal funding programs for the
elderly housing were limited and that
he would suggest that the City pay for
feasibility study and if the project
proved to be feasible the City could
apply to the County for construction
funds.
Discussion followed relative to the
County's concerns regarding the
proposal. It was stated that the
Board of Supervisors would consider
the matter of funding on March 16, 1982.
Councilman Addiego suggested that the
matter be discussed at the special
meeting of February 10, 1982.
Consensus of Council to concur.
City Manager Birkelo asked if
Council wished to concur with the
City of Half Moon Bay's resolution
concerning Highways 1 and 92.
Discussion followed concerning
the City's support of the resolution
regarding the improvements o~ Highway
92and the bypass on Highway 1.
M/S Damonte/Addiego - To adopt the
Resolution[
RESOLUTION NO. 21-82
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
2/3/82
Page 1 7
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Vice Mayor Teglia:
Councilman Addiego:
A RESOLUTION URGING THE NATIONAL PARK
SERVICE TO ACQUIRE SWEENEY RIDGE AND TO
MAKE IT A PART OF THE GOLDEN GATE
NATIONAL RECREATION AREA ~.~g:~/____~
GOOD AND WELFARE
CLOSED SESSION:
RECALL TO ORDER:
ADJOURNMENT:
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
/Barbara A. Batt~ya, City CTerk City of South San Francisco
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Requested a status report on the
word processing equipment before
the purchase of the equpment.
City Attorney Rogers explained that
the purchasing of the equipment was
proceeding in accordance with the
City's purchasing ordinance. ~he
bids had been opened, and were being
evaluated to determine the lowest bid.
Stated that a letter had been received
from Congressman Lantos office with
an attached Resolution adopted by the
City of San Mateo supporting the
acquisition of Sweeney Ridge. He then
read the Resolution and requested that
the City adopt a similar resolution.
M/S Addiego/Teglia - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 22-82
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
GOOD AND WELFARE
No one chose to speak.
Council adjourned to a Closed Session
at 11:25 p.m.
The meeting was recalled to order at
12:05 a.m., all Council present, no
action taken.
M/S Damonte/Acosta - That the meeting
be adjourned.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
The meeting was adjourned at 12:06 a.m.
APPROVED:
Gus Nicolopulos, Maydr~
City of South San Francisco
2/3/82
Page 18
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to
dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on
tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the-office of
the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying.
2/3/82
Page 19