Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1982-12-02Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia Vice Mayor Mark N. Addiego Council: Ronald G. Acosta Emanuele N. Damonte Gus Nicolopulos MINUTES CITY COUNCIL Municipal Services Building Community Room December 2, 1983 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California, that the Joint Special Meeting of the South San Francisco City Council and the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors on the 15th day of November, 1982, at 7:30 p.m., in the Community Room of the Municipal Services Building, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco was adjourned to Thursday, the 2nd day of December, 1982, at 7:30 p.m., in the Community Room of the Municipal Services Building, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Purpose of the meeting is a continued Public Hearing: To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower southeastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain. Consider proposed prezoning of the property hereinafter described, and amendment of Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code, entitled "Zoning" and of Zoning Ordinance No. 353, as amended, in particular Sections 2.1 and 2.2 thereof. (Terrabay Specific Plan Zoning District - Proposed Prezoning of Cross Hatched Area to Terrabay Specific Plan District - Continued to the regular City Council meeting of 12/15/82). Barbara A. Battaya, City Cl~ City of South San Francisco~ Dated: November 16, 1982 AGENDA ADJOURNED SPECIAL MEETING CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette l) Supervisor Speier arrived: ACTION TAKEN ADJOURNED SPECIAL MEETING 7:40 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding. Council present: Acosta, Nicolopulos, Addiego, Damonte and Teglia. Council absent: None. Supervisors present: Gregorio, Schumacher and Ward~ Supervisors absent: Speier and Bacciocco. Supervisor Speier arrived at 7:41 p.m. Vice Chairman Gregorio explained that Supervisor Baccoccio was recuperating 12/2/82 Page 1 AGENDA PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE To consider adoption of~the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE TERRABAY SPECIFIC PLAN ACTION TAKEN from surgery. Recited. City Clerk Battaya read the Agenda for the Special Meeting. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that at the prior joint meeting held November 15, 1982, the City Council had con- tinued the discussion of the prezoning to their regular meeting of December 15, 1982, based on Staff's recommendation Director of Community Development Dell'Angela commented on the issues which had arisen at the previous joint meeting regarding noise mitigation measures, legal issues regarding develop- ment agreements, and a request from Mr. Bill Dean, Developer, for changes and clarifications to four of the proposed amendments to the Plan. He stated,that these matters had been referred back to the City's Planning Commission . He explained that the Planning Commission had approved changes to the following amendments: Amendment No. 4 which dealt with the deletion of the term development agree- ment. He stated, the City intended to proceed with the development agreement but, on the recommendation of the City Attorney, the City in the event of a referendum issue would retain control under the new wording to dictate and determine the phasing out of the parti- cular project; Amendment No. 5, which dealt with the term of the Specific Plan document. He stated the ten year period would not start until any liti- gation which occurred reached a decision~ Amendment No. 11 dealt with recreational vehicles. He stated that the Planning Commission had decided rather than allow recreational vehicles in certain parking lots in the project, that on the recommendation ~f the developer the City would delete any recreational vehicles in the project through the DCC&Rs; Amendment No. 21 12/2/82 Page 2 A~iG E N D A ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lowe south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. dealt with wording suggested by the City Attorney relating to the develop- ment agreement insofar as COuncil determining prior to approval of a tentative map or precise plan the phasing out of the project; Amendment No. 32, which made reference to the development agreement and upon the recommendation of the City Attorney the reference to the development agreement was deleted; Amendment No. 43, dealt with a minor change to the 5% stipulation for disabled persons; Amendment No. 44, was a request by the City Engineer for the addition of new wording referring to the worst storm of record or a hundred year storm, whichever is worse. He explained that it would make the particular design of the storm drainage system more restrictive and specific; Amendment No. 45 dealt with a question of the noise issue. Director of Community Development Del~.l'Angela stated that the Planning Commission did not concur that avigation easements should be required in connection with the project, but that the property should have a disclosure statement and that potential purchasers should be provided with disclosure statements that there will be noise impacts on particular property; Amendment No. 46, which was a new amendment stated that "residential structures with the Specifi( Plan area shall be designed to insure that the interior noise levels do not exceed a CNEL of 45 decibels." Director of Community Development Dell'Angela con~nented on a letter which had been received from the City's Airport Consultant, Dr. Maurice Garbell, addressing issues related to the height'of the proposed hotel and mitigation measures to reduce noiseilevels in the project in the future. He stated that Dr. Garbell had concluded that the proposed height of the hotel was within the safe take off path and would not present any particular problem. He stated that Dr. Garbell had related in regard to the issue of mitigation 12/2/82 Page 3 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. measures to reduce noise levels in the project; that the 45 decibel level or standard could be achieved through standard insulation provided in the energy requirements of the Building Code and suggested that Council con- sider a slightly more restrictive requirement in terms of dealing with the night time noise levels from air- planes taking off by the San Bruno Mountain. He stated that Dr. Garbell had indicated through additional insulation measures which are not costly, that the decibel level could be reduced from 3 to 5 additional decibels. He explained that Dr. Garbell had con- cluded that the key area was the bed- room area and that Council and Board might want to establish a 40 decibel level as a standard in the bedroom area. He concluded by stating that it was the recommendation of Staff and the Planning Commission that the Resolution be adopted approving the Specific Plan based on the findings contained in the Staff Report. San Mateo County Director of Environmental Management Paul Koenig, presented a Staff Report and commented on the matters which had been referred back to the Planning Commissions of the City and County. He stated that the County's Planning Commission had made the following decisions: Amendment No. 5, which dealt with the extension of the expiration date of the project should the project be stalled by litigation, stating that the Planning Commission had no objection to the language; Amendment No. 11, regarding the parking of recreational vehicles and the proposal that they be pro- hibited. He stated that the Planning Commission felt that the parking of recreational vehicles is desirable; Amendment No. 21, which proposes to delete the requirement for the develop. ment agreement between the City and the Applicant. He stated that the Commission had no comment; Amendment No. 44, concerning the design of the storm drainage trunk system 12/2/82 Page 4 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Moutnain - Continued. RECESS: RECALL TO ORDER: and the wording referring to the worst storm of record or a hundred year storm, whichever is worse. He stated that the Commission had no objection to the proposed language; Amendment No. 45, which would require that a disclosure statement concerning airport related noise be attached to the title report and recorded with the deed transferring title in each sale and resale. He stated that the Commission commented that it might be appropriate to submit that language to the Airport Land Use Commission at such time as it is proposed ~nd placed on the deed; Amendment No. 46, requiring the noise insulation to reduce impacts to 45 decibels, to which he stated that the Commission had no objections; Amendment No. 47, Which dealt with affordable housing, he stated that the Planning Commission had found the language that the County had prepared for the last meeting acceptable, and suggested that the City might consider the use of Redevelopment funds to write down the cos of residential units and that it was possible that space could be made available within the hotel, which is~ going to ben.built, to house employees ? of the hotel. He stated that the County Planning Commission recommended that proper action be taken to approve the Environmental Impact Report and the Speci~c Plan. Mayor Teglia declared a recess at 7:53 p.m. The meeting was recalled to order at 8:00 p.m., all Council and the Board present. Mayor Teglia asked, in regard to the correspondence received from Dr. Garbell, if/there was a condition or a way in,which direction could be given to assure that in the early stages of construction, modest costs could achieve decided improve- ments with regard to noise mitigation measures. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that 1~/2/82 Page 5 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption o'f the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. it was his understanding that an acoustical report be done as a mitigation measure as a requirement of the EIR. An in-depth discussion followed regarding Dr. Garbell's letters of November 24, 1982, regarding the issues of climbout noise; low pitch vibrations; the City's ability to acc~mpli~sh the reco- mmendations off-Dr. Garbell ~by setting a standard of 40 decibels within the interiors of the proposed structures; a design which would cut down on the effects of low pitch frequency upon the buildings; Use of the Noise Element of the General Plan in regard to the mitigation of noise in the construction of the structUres. Supervisor Ward stated that during the construction phase of the project, assuming that the acoustical treat- ment reached 40 decibles during the first phase of construction, they could bring in the necessary equip- ment and test to see if it was effective and that whatever adjust- ments were necessary could be accomplishe during the next phase of construction. City Manager Birkelo stated that the decibel level might vary according to the location within the project. He stated that there would be a need for cooperation between the City's Building Division and the Developer in the design stages of the project to try and achieve the same level. City Attorney Rogers spoke o~ the standards which were to be set in relation to the General Plan. Discussion folloWed regarding the costs if the level was set at 40 decibels and that if they were to exceed the 40 decibel level the costs would go up dispro- portionately. Mr. Doug Dowling, Project Architect 12/2/82 Page 6 AGENDA To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. ACTION TAKEN and Land Planner for W. W. Dean, stated that ~here were somelchanges to Amendment No. 42 they would like to make in regard to the eliminatino the desirability for meeting rooms for each of the homeonwers associations. He Stated that the cost did not justify the use and commented that the Recreation Center had the capacity to accommodate the needs that would be required. He stated that he had contacted the City's Director of Parks and Recreation concerning the use of the proposed facility. Mr. Dowling stated that he had been advised by Director of Parks and Recreation Norton that the City currently made facilities available for private function~ at no cost. He stated that Amendment No. 42 could read that an additional room would be built that would provide a meeting room for the homeowner associations and provide a room for meetings, and other functions to be held. Mayor Teglia questioned the addition of another room to the existing design of the project. Councilman Acosta asked what size the additional room would be. Mr. Dowling stated that the additional room would be approximately 800 square feet in size. Discussion followed as to the number of people the proposed additional room would accommodate; the number of rooms currently planned for the recreation center; and~the importance of prioritizing the use the proposed room for members of homeowners associations. Supervisor Speier asked if there would be kitchen facilities available for use in the additional room. Mr. Dowling explained that the'deYeloper would like to design a connecting breeze- way to the recreation center in order to accommodate the ~needs for kitchen and bathroom facilities for the addi- 12/2/82 Page 7 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. tional room. Further discussion followed regarding the size of the proposed addition; uses which would be utilized for the room; location of the tot lot; etc. Mr. Dowling spoke regarding the nature of the Hillside Development with respect to handicapped persons. He explained that Mr. Dean recoanized that there were some problems with building units under .handicapped standards and indicated that there would be 40 units available for the handicapped - designed so that they would be fitted according to California's handicapped access stan- dards. He explained that When re- ferring to handicapped access it was whee~ chair access. He commented that the units would be held exclusively for handicapped persons for the first 60 days and after that they would be- come available for the general market. Vice Mayor Addiego asked if the specific language Was for a period of 60 days from the point of initiation of construction and asked when construction was considered to be initiated. Mr. Dowling stated t'hat construction would be considered from the date of pouring the foundation and explained that it would take approximately four months to complete the building. Discussion followed relative to the requirement that the units be provided for the handicapped; the potential that members of the handicapped com- munity would not be financially capable of handling the costs of the proposed units; and the criteria used in determining where the handi- capped units would be located, at which time a question was raised regarding the requirement that units ,be constructed for handicapped persons. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela explained that there were 12/2/82 Page 8 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. no requirements in the City's General Plan for the provision of handicapped units. He explained that it was an idea that had been conceived by the Planning Commission.~ Councilman Acosta asked if the developer would 'built one unit so that handicapped persons would be able to see what could take place if he/she were to purchase a unit. Discussion followed regarding keeping the 40 units for handicapped persons indefinitely rather than the proposed 60 days. Supervisor Speier stated that 60 days was a very short span of time and cOmmented on the specialized operation (handicapped housing) within the community and asked where the item had first originated. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela explained that the idea had originated at the County Planning Commission level. Mr. Dowling explained that there would be 40 units that will be identified for handicapped use and there will be 60 days from the time the 40 units are identified. He stated that it would probably be a year or more before the units would be sold. He explained that one unit would be outfitted and the other 39 would be designated as available. Councilman Damonte expressed con- cern that all of the handicapped units would be lcoated in one area of the development and asked if a handicapped person wished to purchase a detached single family unit would it possible. Mr. Dowling explained that all the other units in the development would be either two story units or units with access at levels other than ground floor. Mayor Teglia stated that if it was agreed that there should be a completed 12/2/82 Page 9 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. model in advance, then language needs to be worked into Amendment No. 43. Supervisor Speier asked if the handicapped units would be sold at a comparable price with other units with the same plans. Mr. Dowling indicated that they would be sold at the same price. Supervisor Speier asked that the language stating that the units would be sold at the same comparable price as similar units be included.. Mr. Dowling stated that it could state the planned alternate design at no additional cost. Discussion followed regarding the wording which spoke of the 60 days for the ~handicapped to purchase the special units being changed to read 60 days from the date of completion rather than 60 days from the date of initiation of construction. Mr. Dowling explained that the units if equipped for the handicapped would not be marketable for any other faction of society. Mrs. Doris Agee, 819 Ridge Court, stated that it would be advantageous to the' residents of the Terrabay Development if each homeowners association was to have its own meeting room. She spoke of the need for a room where the members of the various associations could meet to discuss their ideas and plans for their homes. Mayor Teglia stated that members of '' the South San Francisco community had facilities to use for their meetings and commented that she did not see a reason for duplicating a room 5 or 6 times. Mr. Dowling presented a map showing the proposed prOject. He commented on the proposed recreational center 12/2/82 Page 10 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 214 To consider adOption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. to be constructed and stated that a large meeting room would be available for the homeowners associations use. Discussion followed on the viable use of the community rooms and the total number of units to be constructed within the project; and the need for an activity room for use by members of the community. Supervisor Ward expressed concern regarding the actual need/demand for the community room. Mrs. Agee stated that if the members of the condominium units did not meet and discuss their concerns then the care and maintenance of the conomdiniums would begin to deteriorate. She stated that there was a need for the residents of the units to exchange ideas and goals in relation to the future of the condominiums. Councilman Nicolopulos stated that he felt Mrs. Agee ~as concerned that the condominium concept contained some unique problems which the other types of residential units did not have. Mrs. Agee commented on the repairs which were currently taking place at Stonegate with regard to rOof repairs. She spoke of the rules and regulations which were a part of the ownership of a condominium. Discussion followed concerning the number of units managed by Mrs. Agee at Stonegate; number of units within the Stonegate development and those persons involved in the associations. Mrs. Agee stated that in regard to Amendment No. 19 of the proposed Plan, there should be wording which stated that the developer shall provide all signs for traffic control inClud~ng those which indicate private property and numbering off,driveways to provide ready recognition of addresses for emergency situations. 12/2/82 Page 11 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain- Continued. Mayor Teglia asked Director of Community Development Dell'Angela if Amendment No. 19 would encompass the program addressed by Mrs. Agee. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that it was not the primary direction of Amendment No. 19, but that there was wording in Amendment No. 25 that talks about no parking signs being posted. He ex- plained that signing is a given con- dition any time the responsibility through the building permit process and through the precise plan process, is given to the developer. He ex- plained that Amendment No. 19 would encompass those areas addressed by Mrs. Agee. Further discussion followed regarding the proposed additional activity room as to location and size of the facility. Councilman Damonte indicated his approval of the addition of the activity room as recommended by the developer, including the 800 square foot size. Further discussion followed relative to the use of the additional room; costs to be incurred for use; and the possibility of ~dding a stipulation or provision that facilities be provided for light refreshments within the room. Council expressed concurrence with the Amendment No. 42 as recommended by Mr. Dean for the additional room with the stipulation that the room have a minimum floor area of 800 square feet. Vice Mayor Addiego asked if the Terrabay Master Association of Homeowner groups would be retaining ownership of the additional activity room and if it would be leased to the City. He asked who would be responsible for the maintenenace of that particular part of the overall structure. Mr. Dowling stated that it was the 12/2/82 .Page 12 AGENDA To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. ACTION TAKEN developers intent that the City would be responsible for tha+ portion of the structure and that the cost would be offset by the use of the additional space. Vice Mayor stated that in a lease arrangement the person who holds the lease is usually in charge of the maintenance of the property, but not responsible for the structure itself. He commented on the expenses which Mrs. Agee spoke of which were born by the homeowners association as the result of poor design which the City had allowed and now we find that the City is taking on additional responsibilities that would normally be the homeowners asso- ciations. Mayor Teglia stated that perhaps the Council would be wise to delineate exactly how much maintenance they would be willing to assume for the dollar a year use. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that it was planned that once the community center building and complex was completed, that it would be conveyed to the City. He stated that it did not make sense to have a separate owner- ship situation on an individual room when the bulk or 99% of the complex is going to be City owned. He suggested that if the City felt an additional'. room was necessary then the City should take ownership and title to it. Mayor Teglia asked what vehicle for guaranteeing priority use of the activity roomto homeowners association would be used. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that a policy could be set with the Director of Parks and Recreation in terms of the use of the facility. Mayor Teglia asked why the City couldn't share some of the costs with t~he Master ASsociation for the 12/2/82 Page 13 To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. City Attorney Rogers stated that if .the additional room was going to be an additional room for the Hillside 'Recreation complex, it is almost creating a type of condominium owner- ship between the City and the .Association. He indicated that .he could see complication arising in the future. He stated that the best icourse for the City in this regard would be to provide enough space at the Hillside Recreation Center complex so that a room could be made available in keeping with our ad- ministrative policies of running the City's recreational facilities. He said that that way the City could control it and charge for use of the facility. Mayor Teglia asked if it could be worked in that the associations would have a priority use of the facility. City Attorney Rogers stated that the City could work that into our own administrative policy. Mayor Teglia asked Mr. Dean if he would amenable to that. Mr. Dean responded that he would. Consensus of Council that an extra room would be provided in the recreation center, with a minimum of 800 square feet with facilities and that the City would own, maintain and give priority use to the homeowners associations for their meetings. Mr. Paul Koenig read Amendment No. 43, which had been edited. He stated that it would read "The developer shall provide within the Terrabay Commons Development, 40 residential units capable of being interior finished to meet the HUD Standards for adaptable dwellings. Th units shall be deSigned in such a manner as to allow easy construction or retro- fitting to serve the handicppaed. A planned alternate design shall be made available, at no additional cost for potential handicapped buyers. Handi- capped buyers shall be given preference in pruchasing the 40 identified units. A 12/2/82 Page t4 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. RECESS: RECALL TO ORDER: model shall be prepared in accordance with the alternate design, and all marketing literature shall prominently identify the available units. The unit shall be kept available for purchase for a period of 60 days from the completion of the model for exclusive purhcase of handicapped buyers." Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that Amendment No. 46 was proposed to read as follows: "Residential structures within the Specific Plan area shall be designed to assure that interior noise levels do not exceed a Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) of 40dBA and maximum noise levels of 60 dba. Said residential structures shall also be so designed and constructed as to miti- gate or suppress structural vibrations that are harmonically responsive to low pitch noise emanating from air- craft climbing over San Bruno Mountain on a northeast to southwest heading and emanating from aircraft spooling up their engines for takeoff from Rdnway 10." Discussion followed regarding the type of insulation to be used in reducing noise; costs for the insulation; and the affect on other cities in the area. Further~discussion followed regarding the ability to obtain lower noise levels at the proposed devel~.opment. Mayor Teglia declared a recess at 9:26 p.m. The meeting was recalled to order at 9:45 p.m.: all Council and the Board present. City Attorney Rogers read the new wording for Amendment No. 42, "The project sponsor shall construct as part of the presently designed Hillside Recreation Center Complex, an additional activity room having a minimum floor area of 800 square feet. Terrabay Association members ~hall be given priority use of this facility with 12/2/82 Page 15 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. a thirty day notice and upon payment of facility use fees as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule of the City of South San Francisco." Mayor Teglia asked if the City would have the right to waive payment of the fees. City Attorney Rogers stated that the City could within the Master Fee Schedule indicate that the fee was waiverable. City Attorney Rogers read the additional language to Amendment No. 46, "In order to reasonably achieve the objectives outlined above, measures imposed as a result of this amendment shall be implemented in the first phase of residential construction. Those measures shall then be tested and evaluated from the standpoint of cost effectiveness. To the extent that the measures imposed above are found, by the City, to be unreasonably expensive when weighed against the results achieved, they shall be waived by the City in subsequent residential construction phases." Supervisor Ward asked what the City's position was in respect to an avigation easement. Mayor Teglia stated that the City was not interested in tying in easements and indicated at Some point in the future they would be investigating the alternatives. She commented that the residents along the shoreline, if concerned by the flight patterns should protest. ~ Councilman Damonte stated that he did not feel an easement was necessary for this project. Mr. Douglas Butler, 133 Adrian Avenue, commented on notes which he had taken at the last Planning Commission meeting and indicated his concern that additional 12/2/82 Page 16 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. wording had been added to Amendment No. 4 regarding the buildout schedule. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that the additional wording came from the prior joint meeting of the City Council and the Board of Supervisors.on November 15, 1982. He explained that the development agreement was going to be pursued in terms of a time table for improvements in a buildout schedule for the project and indicated that a guarantee through a financial bond or cash deposit would be required. Discussion followed regarding the form of guarantee to be required; traffic as related to the proposed Oyster Point Interchange; etc. M/S Schumacher/Speier - That the Public Hearing be closed. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Mayor Teglia declared the Public Hearing closed. M/S Ward/Schumacher - To certify the EIR and that it include Items 3, 4 and 5 of the Report da~ed December 2, 1982. Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Schumacher/Ward - To approve Items 2, 6, 7 and 8 of the Report dated December 2, 1982. Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Ward/Schumacher - To adopt a Resolution approving the Specific Plan for the project including Amendments 42, 43, 46 and 47. Carried by unanimous roll call vote. M/S Acosta/Nicolopulos - To adopt the Resolution subject to the 7 findings contained in the Staff Report dated December 2, 1982 and incorporating the changes to 12/2/82 Page 17 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN To consider adoption of the Terrabay Specific Plan for the lower south- eastern slopes of San Bruno Mountain - Continued. ADJOURNMENT RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Ba..~aPa A. BatYta~yg~, City ClCeri~ '~' '~7 City of South San Francisco Amendments No. 42, 43 and 46, ex- cluding Amendment No. 47. RESOLUTION NO. 159-82 Carried by majority roll call vote. Councilman Addiego voted no. M/S Damonte/Add~ego - To adjourn the meeting. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Time of adjournment 10:05 p.m. APPROVED: City of South San Francisco The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral presentations, arguments, and comments are recorded on tpae. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 12/2/82 Page 18