Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1983-11-02Mayor Mark N. Addiego Vice Mayor Emanuele N. Damonte Council: Ronald G. Acosta Gus Nicolopulos Roberta Cerri Te§lia MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room November 2, 1983 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA REVIEW City Manager Birkelo requested: - Add Item 8a. - to authorize the Librarian to make application for a $1,000 grant for the computer education program. - Add to Items from Staff - Discussion of the Council meeting calendar. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ACTION TAKEN 7:55 p.m. Mayor Addiego presiding. Council present: Council absent: Nicolopulos, Teglia, Damonte, Acosta and Addiego. None. The presentation of colors was made by Cub Scout Troop No. 281. AGENDA REVIEW So ordered. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Lewis Eslick stated that that he handled the financial transactions for the buyers of the U.S. Steel Company in South San Francisco. He stated that when the architects complete drawings for the proposed development for office space, retail outlets, a hotel and convention center copies would be submitted to Council for their perusal. Mr. Lawrence Pera, 758 Baden Ave., gave Council the clothes he was wearing on the night he was arrested. He stated that the Progress Newspaper had an endorsement for Teglia/Haffey and that the Enterprise Journal had endorsed Acosta/Teglia - he urged the voters to vote for Lawrence Pera on 11/8/83. He stated that if elected he would perform as a Councilman to the best of his ability. 11/2/83 Page i AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ORAL COMMUNICATIONS CONSENT CALENDAR 2~ Minutes of the Adjourned Regular Meeting of 9/28/83, Regular Meeting of 10/5/83, Special Meeting of 10/19/83 and the Regular Meeting of 10/19/83. Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending by Motion to accept Sellick Park Development Project as complete in accordance with plans and specifi- cations. Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending adoption of a Resolution of Intention to provide for the sale of 822 W. Orange as surplus prop- erty and providing for notice thereof. A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO DISPOSE OF REAL PROPERTY BY SALE AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending by Motion to accept the Westborough Park Lighting Project as complete in accordance with plans and spec- ifications. Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending by Motion to accept the St. Veronica School Storm Drain Improvements, Project No. SD-83-1A ORAL COMMUNICATIONS He stated that citizens living on Hillside Boulevard want to know if the Council could stop the noise and vibra- tion caused by trucks hauling garbage. He suggested making the trucks use Oyster Point Boulevard so as not to disrupt the Hillside residents. He made a further suggestion on the land between Chestnut and Forest View which was planted by far- mers. He suggested that the farmers planting the crops keep 75% of the profit and give 25% to the City for the General Fund. He stated that he was concerned about over population and wanted the open space preserved in San Mateo County. CONSENT CALENDAR Approved. Approved. Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Councilman Nicolopulos. Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Councilwoman Teglia. Approved. 11/2/83 Page 2 AGENDA ACT1~ON TAKEN --CONSENT CALENDAR 5J Staff Report - Continued. as complete in accordance with approved plans and specifications. 6~ Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending adoption of a Resolution approving plans and specifications, author- izing the Purchasing Officer to advertise and receive sealed bids for San Mateo Avenue at Colma Creek Sanitary Sewer Replacement, Project No. SS-83-3. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR SAN MATEO AVENUE AT COLMA CREEK SANITARY SEWER REPLACEMENT, PROJECT NO. SS-83-3 e Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending by Motion to accept Catch Basin Modification Project No~ SD-83-3 as complete in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. 8~ Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending by Motion to authorize the Purchasing Officer to advertise for bids for equipment to enhance existing computer systems for the Police Department/Communications. Sa. Request for Motion authorizing the City Librarian to file an grant appli- cation for funds for an Adult Micro- computer Literacy Project. e Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending adoption of a Resolution of Intention to provide for the sale of 822 W. Orange as surplus prop- CONSENT CALENDAR RESOLUTION NO. 156-83 Approved. Approved. Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Councilman Nicolopulos, M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To approve the' Consent Calendar with the exception of Items No. 3, 4 and 8a, Carried by unanimous voice vote. 11/2/83 Page 3 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 8O 3. Staff Report- Continued. 8a~ erty and providing for notice thereof. A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO DISPOSE OF REAL PROPERTY BY SALE AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending by Motion to accept the Westborough Park Lighting Project as complete in accordance with plans and spec- ifications. Request for Motion authorizing the City Librarian to file an grant appl i- cation for funds for an Adult Micro- computer Literacy Project. Councilman Nicolopulos asked that this item be tabled so that a re-evaluation could be made of all City owned property. Mayor Addiego did not feel that the City could utilize a home in a residential area and that it would not relate to other City owned land. Councilwoman Teglia stated that this was jus~ the first piece of property that was being eliminated from the City owned pro- perty list. Discussion followed on the various alter- natives for the sale of the property, i.e., sealed bids, lottery, etc; method for the analysis of the market value of the property, etc. Motion by Nicolopulos - To table the item until an overall study can be made. Motion died for lack of a Second. M/S Teglia/Damonte - To adopt the Resol uti on, RESOLUTION NO. 157-83 Carried by unanimous roll call vote. Councilwoman Teglia questioned why the lights in the Park were being turned off at 9:00 p.m. rather than 10:00 p.m. City Manager Birkelo stated that he would investigate the matter. M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To accept the Westborough Park Lighting Project as complete. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Councilman Nicolopulos questioned whether after receiving a computer there would be additional costs. City Librarian Goodrich stated that there would not be any additional charges and described in detail the micro computer and its 64,000 storage capacity. 11/2/83 Page 4 AGE"DA ACTIO" TAKE" 8a. Request for Motion authorizing the City Librarian to file an grant appli- cation for funds for an Adult Micro- computer Literacy Project - Cont. APPROVAL OF BILLS ~7~l°~J e Approval of the Regul ar Bill s of 11/2/83. CITY CLERK 10. Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending adoption of a Resolution which establishes compensation for the City Clerk. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION FOR THE CITY CLERK M/S Nicolopulos/Teglia - To authorize application for the Grant for the micro computer. Carried by unanimous voice vote. APPROVAL OF BILLS M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - to approve the Regular Bills in the amount of $918,593.66. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Mayor Addiego did not participate or vote in the matter of the claim of Brentwood Market. ~ · CITY CLERK City Clerk Battaya stated that a new staff report had been provided this evening which contained an updated salary survey, and a survey of City Clerks bene- fits packages in San Mateo County which she had conducted. She stated that the updated salary survey indicated that this City's Clerk ranked 9th lowest in the ten comparable cities and that the average Clerk's salary was $2,853 per month compared to her salary of $2,356. She stated that in the overall package which included salary and benefits that she ranked 7th lowest. Councilwoman Teglia questioned where the material was that had been requested at the last meeting from the Personnel Director. Personnel Director Marshall stated that the salary information provided by the City Clerk had been checked for accuracy and that some figures had been found to be higher and some lower than reported. She stated that the time consuming task in progress was to identify the actual functions performed by people who hold the title City Clerk in all jurisdic- tions. 11/2/83 Page 5 AGENDA CITY CLERK 10. Staff Report 11/2/83 - Continued. ACTZO" TAKE" CITY CLERK She stated that in calling the various jurisdictions there had been a serious difference of opinion as to the functions of the City Clerk being comparable to the functions performed by this City's City Clerk. She stated that her office would not have the information compiled until the following week. City Clerk Battaya stated that the minu- tes read that the Motion which was Seconded by Councilman Nicolopulos had been for an accuracy check of the salary survey and a benefits package survey. She stated that a comparison of duties had not been a part of the motion. Mayor Addiego stated that that was correct. He had been interested in the duties, however it had not been incor- porated into the Motion. Director of Personnel Marshall stated that whenever she compared salaries she also compared duties for employees. City Clerk Battaya stated that she had received the benefits package percentage from the Director of Finance which did not include the City paid PERS. She stated that she had not had a problem in obtaining benefits package figures from other cities and did not understand why the Personnel Director could not as readily obtain the figures. Councilwoman Teglia questioned other items such as administrative leave not being a part of the benefits package. Director of Personnel Marshall stated that some cities included car allowances and compenation for attending confer- ences, however she was still in the process of compiling the data. 11/2/83 Page 6 AGENDA ACT'[ON TAKEN CITY CLERK 10. Staff Report 11/2/83 - Continued. CITY CLERK Councilwoman Teglia stated that Council had not yet dealt with the Executive Management Unit's requests for this year and she felt that dealing with the City Clerk first might set a precedent. City Clerk Battaya explained in detail the benefits packages in the San Mateo County Cities. Councilman Damonte felt that defining the duties of any position from one city to another was unnecessary and did not apply to the situation. He stated that a City Clerk in all jurisdictions must perform the same functions or could conceivably have more work. He stated that the sur- vey indicated that smaller cities such as Foster City, Belmont, Millbrae and San Bruno were paid almost as much or more than this City's City Clerk who performed a great deal of work as did the other department heads. He stated that the Council should not discriminate against the City Clerk and he would like to see the Clerk's salary brought up to the average of all the other cities. He stated that bringing the Clerk's salary up to the average would still make her salary lower than other City Clerks. Councilman Nicolopulos questioned if the Personnel Director could verify the accuracy of the benefits package survey; Personnel Director Marshall said she had a very preliminary report, which she pre- sented to Council, and stated that some of the salaries in the survey had been increased in the past week. Discussion followed on functions per- formed by other Clerks, i.e., personnel, payroll, word processing, annexations; future workload for the Clerk because of the increased growth of the City. Motion by Acosta - To increase the Clerk' s salary by $400.00. 11/2/83 Page 7 ^GEND^ ^CT ON T^KEN 84 .-- CiTY -CLERK 10~ Staff Report 11/2/83 - Continued. CITY CLERK Councilman Damonte asked why the Motion had not been for the median. Mayor Addiego stated that taking the median from the Personnel Director's report may not be fair to the City Clerk in that some cities had been dropped~ Second to the Motion by Damonte - for purposes of discussion~ Motion and Second withdrawn~ M/S Acosta/Damonte - To adopt the Resolution by title only to reflect that the City Clerk's salary is to be increased to $2,705 per month; which is a 14~8% increase and would include the Executive Management benefits package~ Discussion followed on the benefits received collectively by the City Manager, City Treasurer and City C1 erk; that the Clerk's salary increase was a salary increase pl us a salary adjustment which had been done previously for other personnel; that when the Executive Management Unit receives an increase it will exclude the City Clerk. RESOLUTION NO, 158-83 Carried by majority roll call vote, Addiego and Teglia voted no. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Public Hearing - UP-652/Robert Leech appeal of the Planning Commission's denial of an exemption request from Interim Ordinance No. 923-83 for the construction of a 6,085 square foot, 2 story automo- bile service and office building at 435 South Airport Boulevard - Continued from the 10/5/83 meeting~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mayor Addiego opened the Public Hearing and requested the Staff Report~ Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that the Planning Commission, at its meeting of 7/14/83~ denied an exemption from Interim Ordinance No. 923-83 based on the 11/2/83 Page 8 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 85 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 11. Public Hearing - Continued. Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending: 1) Reopen the Public Hearing and hear testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearing; 3) Motion to deny the appeal. AO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT proposal that it is inconsistent with and will materially adversely affect the zoning proposal related to the General Plan Amendment presently under con- sideration by the Council. He stated that since the exemption was denied the applicant's use permit application had not been considered. He stated that Mr. Leech had requested the exemption based on his contention that the proposed use of a two-story automobile service and office building at 435 South Airport would not generate 100 additional vehicle trips per day. He spoke in detail of the finding of incompatibility could be sup- ported by several sections of the pro- posed plan, i.e., the Land Use Map, Policy 1-11, General Plan Policy 1-13 that City owned property located along South Airport Boulevard should only be developed with an intensive commercial use such as a hotel and/or quality sit- down restaurant, etc. He stated that the Commission acted on the application - .that the use would have an adverse affect in attracting a hotel or convention center on adjoining property. He stated that the applicant had alleged at a hearing that in the past he had been given some approval to build a particular use, however at that time the City did not have a General Plan with policy stan- dards for this property. He stated that Staff had recommended that the Planning Commission approve the request for exemp- tion to the General Plan proposal and approve the Use Permit No. 83-652 and Negative Declaration No. 402 based on Staff' s findings for improvements, fencing and security. He stated that at the Planning Commission meeting Mr. Leech had objected to installing any of the improvements and that the Commission felt that without the improvements, such as fencing, that the use would be offensive to the surrounding area. He stated that the Planning Commission had denied the exemption and the use permit. 11/2/83 Page 9 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNII~f DEVELOPMENT 11~ Public'Hearing - Continued~ 8G COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Mayor Addiego invited those wishing to speak in favor of the appeal to step to the dais. Geoffrey Becker,.Esq,, spoke on behalf of the applicant Mr. Leech and refutted Policy 1-11 being applicable in that Mr~ Leech had been operating in that location for a number of years which is not a new auto, truck or equipment sales. He stated that the Planning Commission had asked MrJ Leech to fill out the form for an application for a development permit, which he did and which had been approved by the Commission without awareness of which Ordinance was in effect. He stated that according to the 1977 Zoning Ordinance there was no such thing as a development permit application. He stated that there was amap and a plan for the second building. He spoke of a report by City Planner Maureen Morton which stated that in 1978 a Development Permit had been issued for an auto rental facility with permission given to Mr~ Leech to build two buildings for which a permit had been given to Mr. Leech. He stated that the question tonight was not whether it may infringe upon a plan which may or may not come into existence. He continued, that the question is, is the City going to fulfill its promise of 1978 when it allowed Mr. Leech a development permit - not a building permit. He stated that Mr. Leech had bought the lot, bases upon the development permit and spent a lot of money to build the first building, believing that his development was approved~ He stated that Mr~ Leech now finds that he cannot build, which had he known that he would be involved with zoning changes he would not have spent $195,000 for the lot and $165,000 to build the first building and comply with the rules and regulations regarding dri- veways, paving, etc. He stated that he did not know whether the question was 11/2/83 Page 10 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 11. Public Hearing - Continued. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT that Mr. Leech balked at the improvements or that this could impinge on a plan that may not come to fruition. Director of Community Development Dell'Angel a stated that the pl an approved in 1978 by the Zoning Officer was not the same plan being considered tonight. Discussion followed on the report by City Planner Morton detailing the history of the development; whether the development would detract from a future hotel being developed on the site; that the 1977 Ordinance had been in effect when Mr. Leech applied for the development application; that the Planning Commission's position was that the current use was not the same as the deve- lopment permit approved in 1978; that there was a residential use on the pro- perty with kitchen facilities and a bathroom on the office site which had not been in the proposal made in 1978; that the bathroom and kitchen facilities were for the benefit of the office workers; that the Planning Commission should have placed conditions on the use which the Council could then have negotiated; that the use could be compatible with hotels if it was kept out of sight; to send the item back to the Planning Commission because the use is auxiliary to the existing use which has no bearing on the future General Plan; number of trips generated to determine whether the use was allowed; the question of whether a use permit was required; that if 100 trips per day were not generated by a use then the use falls under Ordinance No. 923; the Planning Commission making the use permit subject to conditions, etc. Mayor Addiego invited anyone wishing to speak against the appeal to step to the dais - no one chose to speak. He then closed the Public Hearing. 11/2/83 Page 11 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 11. Public Hearing - Continued. RECESS: RECALL TO ORDER: 12. Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending by Motion to revoke variance No. V-83-267/Ernest Maguire to allow an addition, already constructed, encroaching 5'6" into the required rear yard setback at 120 B Street. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT M/S Acosta/Damonte - To uphold the appeal. Carried by unanimous roll call vote. M/S Acosta/Teglia - To direct the Planning Commission to initiate pro- ceedings to amend the planned Unit Development and use permit previously issued for this project in 1978. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Mayor Addiego declared a recess at 9:35 p.m. Mayor Addiego recalled the meeting to order at 9:50 p.m., all Council present. City Clerk Battaya stated that at the last meeting the City Attorney had requested that this item be placed on tonight's agenda as a meeting date and not as a public hearing. City Attorney Rogers stated that the agenda was correct and that the staff report was incorrect in stating that this was a Public Hearing. He suggested that the Council review the record which was brief due to the fact that the applicant did not appear at the Planning Commission Public Hearing. He continued, Council should discuss the issue and allow argu- ments and consider the sworn record. Mayor Addiego stated that Council would conduct a hearing and allow all testimony. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that on April 14th the Planning Commission approved a variance for an illegally constructed addition to encroach 5' 6" into the required 20 foot rear yard setback at 120 B Street. He stated that through a complaint made to City Hall the Building Inspector and the Zoning Enforcement Officer had inspected 11/2/83 Page 12 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 12. Staff Report 11/2/83 - Continued. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT the property and advised Mr. Maguire that the addition required a building permit and a variance. He stated that sub- sequently Mr. Maguire applied for a variance based on the conditions imposed by the Building Department and other Staff. He stated that the Commission approved the variance and the applicant had done nothing to comply with the con- ditions of approval of the variance which included the requirement that he submit construction drawings and apply for a building permit to make the property legal. He continued, that at the last meeting Mr. Maguire notified the Commission that he was unable to do it for personal reasons and did not appear at the meeting to protest the revocation. He stated that the Planning Commission felt that Mr. Maguire had sufficient time to meet the conditions of approval and make the recommendation to Council to revoke the variance and take action to abate the violation. Chief Building Inspector Wittwer stated that the building had been constructed without permits and without inspection. He spoke in detail of the walls; that an electric cable was running through the ivy; that he had removed a fiberglass conduit on the second floor, etc. He stated that the drawings submitted by Mr. Maguire were inadequate to the Code and felt that the variance should die or should lapse. Mayor Addiego invited those wishing to speak on behalf of the applicant to step to the dais - no one chose to speak. Discussion followed: That Mr. Maguire had notified the Planning Commission by letter that he would be at the Public Hearing and would not blame them if they denied his request; that Mr. Maguire had been notified of the Hearing; Mr. Maguire's problems in complying with the conditions; violations that could impair 11/2/83 Page 13 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMbtUNITY DEVELOPMENT 12. Staff Report 11/2/83 - Continued. 13. Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending by Motion to approve Negative Declaration No. 419 and Tentative Subdivision Map SA-83-82 subject to the conditions contained in the attached exhibits and based on the ten findings in the Staff Report for a proposed 17 lot residential condominium project 1 ocated north of the northerly terminus of Eucalyptus Avenue southeasterly of Stonegate Drive (Renan Dominguez, Dominguez Assoc.). COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT public safety on the property; that the addition had been standing for six years. Mayor Addiego asked if there was any further testimony - no one chose to speak. He then closed the Hearing. Councilwoman Teglia stated that she was concerned that five and a half years ago an inspector came out and took pictures of the addition and told Mr. Maguire that he would take care of the permit. Chief Building Wittwer stated that he had questioned all of the inspectors and they had said that was not correct. He stated that he had gone to the house today and saw an electrical outlet trailing the ivy and going into a hot tub. He said this could electrify a child if one fell into the tub and felt it was a hazardous con- dition. M/S Damonte/Teglia - To revoke Variance No. V-83-267/Ernest Maguire. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that this item had been before Council and the Planning Commission for a long time and that Mr. Dominguez had submitted a revised Subdivision Map which had been approved; findings had been made; granted exception to the Subdivision Ordinance to accom- modate a lessor standard width streets. He stated that the Planning Commission received testimony from the surrounding residents and that the project will have common open space which will be main- tained by the home owners association. He spoke of an easement from the adjoining property owner for a connection of Viewmont Terrace to Stonegate Drive. He stated that a letter had been received from Mr. Dominguez requesting a change on 11/2/83 Page 14 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 13. Staff Report 11/2/83 - Continued. POLICE 14. Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending by Motion to authorize the City Manager to execute a personal ser- vices agreement with Felix Perez for cultural awareness training for the Police Department. PUBLIC SERVICES 15. Staff Report 11/2/83 recommending adoption of a Resolution authorizing work and calling bids for the demolition and disposal of the structure at 2310 Olympic Drive. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT the Tentative Subdivision Map in order to satisfy an agreement for utility ease- ments which necessitates a change in the language of the Subdivision Map. He stated that Mr. Yee appeared to have some concerns that the City did not know whether Mr. Crosariol was in agreement with the wording. City Attorney Rogers suggested adding a condition on the Tentative Map that it be approved with the change provided at a certain date with Mr. Crosariol's concurrence. M/S Acosta/Damonte - To approve Negative Declaration No. 419 and Tentative Subdivision Map SA-83-82 subject to the conditions contained in the exhibits and the ten findings in the Staff Report and that the language in the agreement on the Map is agreed to in writing by Mr. Crosariol. Carried by unanimous roll call vote. POLICE Police Chief Datzman stated that this training would allow understanding of the Department of other cultures and the cross section of this City. M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To authorize the City Manager to execute a personal ser- vices agreement with Felix Perez for cultural awareness training for the Pol ice Department. Carried by unanimous voice vote. PUBLIC SERVICES M/S Acosta/Damonte - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 159-83 Carried by unanimous voice vote. 11/2/83 Page 15 AGE"DA ACTI O" TAKE" PUBLIC SERVICES 15. Staff Report - Continued. WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR DEMOLITION AND DISPOSAL OF EXISTING STRUCTURE AT 2310 OLYMPIC DRIVE, PROJECT NO. PB-83-3 ITEMS FROM STAFF 16. Discussion of the Council meeting calendar. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Mayor Addiego: Councilman Acosta: Mayor Addiego: PUBLIC SERVICES ITEMS FROM STAFF City Manager Birkelo requested a Closed Session for labor relations on 11/14 or 11/15/83. Consensus of Council - To have a Special Meeting on Monday, 11/14/83, at 4:30 p.m. at City Hall for labor relations. Consensus of Council - To adjourn the 11/16/83 regular meeting to 11/18/83 at the Municipal Services Building at 7:30 p.m. for the certification of election results and the installation of the new Council; City Clerk Battaya was instructed to contact Cable TV to have the meeting televised; Cancel the joint meeting of 11/30/83 with the Planning Commission; that Revenue Sharing Funds allocation were to be released only on the guaranty of Congress acting on the Funding. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Saw many poorly maintained rental units during his campaigning and suggested that an Ordinance for Property Maintenance Standards be placed on the 11/30/83 meeting for a study session. Spoke of a piece of property on B Street which had become a junkyard and wanted it looked into by staff. Stated that the following donations have been made for the 75th Anniversary Ball: Mr. Diodati $1,000; Bank of America $600; Red Devil $500; Mr. Dean $1,600; D&M Liquor $250; Fuller O'Brien $200; Mr. 11/2/83 Page 16 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 93 ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Councilman Nicol opul os: Councilman Nicol opul os: GOOD AND WELFARE CLOSED SESSION 16. Request for a Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel matters, labor relations and 1 i ti gation. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Brosnan $100. Discussion followed: estimated printing $3,300; in-kind services; overtime hours Police and Fire; Homart has 300-400 memorative glasses to give to the City to sell to help the $2,900 deficit; $11,409 inventory; remaining liquor is locked up to be used for future functions, etc. Request by Mr. Nader Amen for sewer con- nection on several occasions - what can the City do for the gentleman. Discussion followed: Council had voted against the sewer hookup; County should take lead in dealing wi th Mr. Amen; that Mr. Amen had several options; City should not allow piecemeal hookups; the need to work with the Board of Supervisors to discuss Country Club sewer hookups and then write to Mr. Amen; that the initial cost for a resident sewer hookup was $500; that buying in for a non-resident, for a single resident had not been established in cost factor. Received complaints from residents on Delores from Route 26N SAMTRANS creating vibrations. Requested that Staff be directed to make a study on acceleration of the slope which creates the problem. GOOD AND WELFARE No one chose to speak. CLOSED SESSION Council adjourned to a Closed Session for the discussion of litigation at 11:10 p.m. Mayor Addiego recalled the meeting to order at 11:25, all Council present, no acti on taken. M/S Teglia/Damonte - To adjourn the meeting. Carried by unanimous voice vote. 11/2/83 Page 17 ADJOURNMENT: RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, City of South San Francisco The meeting was adjuorned at 11:26 p.m. APP ROVED: Mark N. Addiego', M?or . /J City of South San Francisco v The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and available for inspection, review and copying. 11/2/83 Page 18