Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1984-04-18Mayor Mark N. Addiego Vice Mayor Richard A. Haffey Council: Emanuele N. Damonte Gus Nicolopulos Roberta Cerri Teglia AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: AGENDA REVIEW J ORAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNITY FORUM Adoption of a Resolution approving the form of a grant of easement between the City and County of San Francisco and property owners seek- ing funding of the local share of participation in the Noise Insulation Program. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FORM OF A GRANT EASEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO AND PROPERTY OWNERS SEEKING FUNDING OF THE LOCAL SHARE OF PARTICIPATION IN THE NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM MINUTES City Council City Council Conference Room April 18, 1984 ACTION TAKEN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING 4:45 p.m. Mayor Addiego presiding. Council present: Council absent: Nicolopulos, Teglia, Haffey, and Addiego Damonte. Councilman Damonte had stated at the 3/14/84 meeting that he would not be in attendance at tonight's meeting. Recited. AGENDA REVIEW City Manager Birkelo stated that he had nothing to add. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS No one chose to speak. COMMUNITY FORUM No one chose to speak. City Attorney Rogers stated that this form was essentially what San Francisco sent back through the FAA to the City saying they could live with it. He con- tinued, the change over the last draft that the subcommittee had a chance to look at is in paragraph 5 which discusses the effects of over burdening the ease- ment. He stated that the approach now was that if they exceed the levels in paragraph 4, the formula for noise levels allowed on a property - the ratchet down formula, by the way, if they exceed those levels now for three consecutive map periods which is a period of eighteen months then the easement is over burdened to the extent that it is extinguished. He continued, they had added in on their own language about the easement not being in effect during any period of 4/18/84 Page i AGENDA ACTZON TAKEN Adoption of a Resolution - Continued. 2. Progress Report on Magnolia Center Study. noi se exceeding the al l owabl e level s i n paragraph 4 and included in their saying that this would stop at the point that they dropped back below that level or the easement is extinguished. He stated that they had not abrogated anything instead they had given the City a little more. Mayor Addiego questioned if they were in temporary violation would it allow the property owners to take whatever recour- ses without the easement being encumbered on their property. City Attorney Rogers stated, yes, as if there were no easement for the period of time they were in violation and if they went on for three consecutive map periods it was extinguished. He stated that the easement now had a life of twenty years, which was the period of the improvements. M/S Teglia/Haffey - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 49-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. Vice Mayor Haffey stated that he and Councilman Nicolopulos, as a subcommit- tee, had met with the consultant, the City Manager, and the Director of Parks and Recreation and had been presented with the work of phase two of this study. He stated that he had outlines of what Phase II included which are attached and a permanent part of this record. He con- tinued, the study takes a look at a number of types of uses of property which included the School District and City property looking at market rate housing. He stated that it had been found that the market rate housing was not a viable option because of the cost factors involved in the amount of money to pro- vide acquired property plus the type of parking density that would go on the pro- perty. He stated that it was noted that senior housing seemed to be a more viable alternative for the site in conjunction with rehabilitating the Magnolia Center. He stated that the options were: 1) Go with the senior housing and rehabilitate 4/18/84 Page 2 Group 4/Architecture, Research and Planning, Inc. 457 Forbes Boulevard South San Francisco California 94080 USA (415) 871-0709 451 College Avenue Santa Rosa California 95401 USA (707) 575-7508 Telex: 331431 MAGNOLIA CENTER STUDY City of South San Francisco 18 April 1984 8385 PHASE I II III IV V II REPORT OUTLINE Introduction and Summary Goals for Use of Site Market Area Demographic Background A. Definition of Market Area B. Population C. Employment D. Housing Stock (Include Statement about Seniors Housing) Market Area Housing Demand Trends (Address need for Seniors Housing) A. Historical Absorption of New Housing Units B. Absorption of New Seniors Housing Market Area Housing Supply Trends A. Currently Selling Residential Projects (Include Seniors Housing) 1. Number of Units 2. Unit Sizes 3. Unit Sales Price 4. Price per Square Foot 5. Monthly Absorption Minutes 4/18/84 Page 2a MAGNOLIA CENTER STUDY City of South San Francisco 18 April 1984 VI VII B. Projects Under Construction (Include Seniors Housing) 1. Number of Units 2. Unit Size 3. Unit Prices 4. Price Range per Square Foot C. Proposed Residential Projects (Include Seniors Housing) 1. Number of Units 2. Unit Size 3. Unit Prices 4. Price per Square Foot Development Recommendations A. Types of Development B. Types of Units C. Size of Units Planning Recommendations A. Neighborhood Context B. Site Plan C. Site Area Page two Minutes 4/18/84 Page 2b MAGNOLIA CENTER STUDY City of South San Francisco ~-18 April 1984 Page Three VIII IX Development Options A. General Discussion B. Specific Options 1. Sell Site 2. Seniors Housing with Community/ Seniors Center 3. Community/Seniors Center Alone. C. Construction Budgets Summary Append ix Additional Site Plan Alternates. Notes From Public Meetings. Minutes 4/18/84 Page 2c AGENDA ACTION TAKEN Progress Report on Magnolia Center Study - Continued. the Magnolia Center, which is a com- bination of School and City level; 2) Go with the Magnolia Center rehabilitation which would be a negative cash flow for the City and a financial burden; 3) Forget the whole thing and demolish the building and sell the land, which was the only option with a positive cash flow that meets none of the community goals. He stated that Phase III of the study was to move forward to explore positive uses of the land concentrating on senior housing. He stated that the study was divided into thirds, two-thirds of which were paid for by the City of South San Francisco and the last third would be paid for by the County of San Mateo. Me stated that the City next Thursday would be receiving from the consultants the completion of Phase II wi th greater detail and that Phase III would be completed in six weeks. He stated that in terms of financing the City was looking at redevelopment money and sour- ces of income other than the General Fund which was one of the major objectives of Phase III. He stated that Councilman Nicolopulos had a suggestion in the event that other sources of income were not found. Councilman Nicolopulos stated that there was a Mello/Ruiz Act which provides for the City to act as the agency and assessment bonds with a two-thirds vote of the electors of the City wherein the voters would be taxing themselves for the two million needed for senior housing. City Manager Birkelo stated that the Finance Director was doing an analysis which would be forthcoming in Council packets and would be used in Phase III. Director of Parks and Recreation Norton stated that the consultant would be doing a lot of research and would be talking to Herman Fitzgerald, Esq. and Ken Jones Esq., plus potential developers to come back to Council with a realistic package to implement the plan. Discussion followed on when there would 4/18/84 Page 3 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 2. Progress Report on Magnolia Center Study - Continued. Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel matters, labor relations and litigation. RECALL TO ORDER: RECESS: RECALL TO ORDER: 3. Police Department Goals and Obi ecti ves. be ads placed to attract people in any of the phases; that the School Board had been made aware of the phases through liaison meetings; whether the School pro- perty had been declared surplus; the dif- ference in appraisal of the property between the City and the School District; site plans showing the projected density on the site - 150 units of senior housing. City Manager Birkelo stated that the one- third payment of $25,000 funding comes from the County but was actually the City's share of Community Block Grant Funding allocated to the City and was not County Funds per se but HCDA funds allo- cated by the County. Council adjourned to a Closed Session for the discussion of labor relations at 5:00 p.m. The meeting was recalled to order at 6:00 p.m., all Council present, no action taken. Mayor Addiego declared a recess at 6:00 p.m. for dinner. The meeting was recalled to order at 6:45 p.m., all Council present. Mayor Addiego stated that the Council would begin with Communications in that the Chief of Police was not in attendance. Councilwoman Teglia questioned eleven dispatchers and stated that only ten had been authorized - not eleven; whether all positions had been filled; the personnel turn over. Discussion followed on the futures report; whether the Police Department's three year phases in the budget proposal was reasonable; that spending $642,859 over the three year period was not feasible; that Mayor Addiego wants an analysis of the calls for service; need a definition of calls for service; that the City had absorbed the PST Program, added three more officers and in total a gain 4/18/84 Page 4 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN m 3. Police Department Goals and Objectives - Continued. of twelve people in the department; trading some PSTs for more sworn officers; having a ratio of service calls to manhours; define the unit measure for calls; that the budget guideline was 4% increase in materials and supplies which does not allow for new positions for a hal?ced budget; City Manager prioritize Police Department§ futures budget and later see what new revenue could kick in at a later time; Items 1 - 17 the Council would contribute input where they wanted to spend money. Discussion followed: Item No. 3, page No. 5, use other groups rather than just the Neighborhood Services for the emergency language bank volunteer program; Item No. 4, cultural sensitivity training, City should pay more money for a professional package of instructors with Council control of the final selection process for one year at a time; Item No. 5, additional patrol beat, have two offi- cers rather than a full beat of 4.5 men - 1985-86 get two officers and in 1986-87 three additional men as there is no justification now for a full beat; sup- portive of Item No. 6. Council apprised Police Chief Datzman of the conversation on his futures report before he arrived. Discussion followed: Item No. 7 do with existing PSTs; Item No. 8 phase in one lieutenant in 1985-86 and one in 1986-87; supportive of Item No. 9; Item No. 10, perhaps have a 5% differential - questioned how to test and maintain the use of an additional language and the number of employees getting the benefit; Item No. 11 use a pure position rather than a PST such as a Police Clerk; sup- portive of Item No. 12 and No. 13 ; Item No. 14 look at on a Citywide basis; Item No. 15 and No. 16 would rather have a patrol street officer rather than an investigator or a crime analyst; Item No. 17 should be looked at Citywide; need to change time line with direction given by Council tonight and have it ready before Budget is ready with the 1985-86, 1986-87 projections showing the financial impacts 4/18/84 Page 5 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 3. Police Department Goals and Objectives - Continued. CLOSED SESSION 4. Closed Session for the discussion of property negotiations. RECALL TO ORDER: ADJOURNMENT: RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, City of South San Francisco that had been agreed to. Discussion followed on human sensitivity programs; Council goals and objectives; public relations problems with the canine program which the Chief stated had been solved by reinforcing cages in the cars; direction on abandoned vehicles had been taken care of; the need for a greater code enforcement presence in the downtown area; alternatives available in replacing the 'Parki.~n~g Enforcement Officer when he retires - use a PST for the industrial area and an Enforcement Officer downtown; Council agreed to having a PST do a sur- vey on types of deliveries and frequency in the downtown area, etc. City Manager Birkelo stated that Council was invited to an informational luncheon tomorrow at the Sierra Point Harbor Master's Office which was being sponsored by the Cole Company. CLOSED SESSION Council adjourned to a Closed Session for the discussion of property negotiations at 8:06 p.m. The meeting was recalled to order at 8:19 p.m., all Council present, no action taken. M/S Teglia/Haffey - That the meeting be adjourned. Carried by unanimous voice vote. The meeting was adjourned at 8.'20 p.m. APPROVED: City of South San FranciscO6 4/18/84 Page 6 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and available for inspection, review and copying 4/18/84 Page 7