HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1984-07-25Mayor Mark N. Addiego
Vice Mayor Richard A. Haffey
Council:
Emanuele N. Damonte
Gus Ni col opul os
Roberta Cerri Teglia
MINUTES
City Council
Municipal Services Building
Community Room
July 25, 1984
190
A G E N D A
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1)
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
INVOCATION:
PRESENTATIONS
-- Proclamation:
Yol anda Swindel 1
A RESOLUTION COMMENDING ALFRED BANFI. E]~)
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Birkelo requested:
- A Closed Session on Item No. 31
before the Consent Calendar and
hear a matter of litigation with
outside attorneys.
- Remove Item No. 17 from the Agenda.
- Remove Item No. 20 from the Agenda.
ACTION TAKEN
7:55 p.m. Mayor Addiego presiding.
Council present:
Council absent:
Nicolopulos, Haffey,
Damonte, Teglia and.
Addiego.
None.
The presentation of colors was made by
Boy Scout Troop No. 272 and the pledge of
allegiance was recited.
Reverend Donald Pitts of the Good News
Chapel, gave the invocation.
Director of Parks and Recreation Norton
introduced Yolanda Swindell, who won the
regional 400 event in the local
Arco/Jesse Owens meet and would be flying
to San Diego to compete in the national
championships.
Mayor Addiego presented a Proclamation to
Yolanda Swindell in recognition of her
achievement.
Recreation Chairman Jackson presented Mr.
Banfield with a framed photograph of
various projects he had been involved in
while serving on the Recreation
Commission.
Mayor Addiego read the Resolution com-
mending Mr. Banfield for his services to
the City.
AGENDA REVIEW
So ordered.
7/25/84
Page 1
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mrs. Doris Agee, 719 Ridge Court, spoke
of the cul-de-sac behind Stonegate No. 4
with a rash of burglaries and other
problems due to the delay of building
Units 5 and 6 and access from the cul-de-
sac; that the area is a dumping ground;
building a barricade to bar access;
having traffic control or a traffic stop
to slow traffic in the area and suggested
a meeting be held with Mr. Yee's depart-
ment and the Police.
Mr. Don Mulvihill, 57A Appian Way,
congratulated Councilpersons Teglia and
Haffey and Mr. Yee for having served as
delegates to the democratic convention.
He expressed concern about homeowner
associations not being informed of
Planning Commission Agenda items that
affect homeowner associations, such as
the one year extension for the final map
for Stonegate; one month later the
bulldozers are moving earth on the hill,
causing dust problems.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela stated that an extension is
not subject to a hearing or a notice. He
stated that he would check into the
grading work and report back to the
home owners.
Mayor Addiego questioned if the permits
to move earth included the control of
dust.
Director of Public Services Yee stated
that he lived next door to the project
and monitored the operation daily. He
stated that when the earth is being moved
a water truck is used to control the
dust, however in the evening when the
wind comes up that is when the problem
arises.
Mr. Lawrence Pera, 758 Baden Avenue,
spoke of opening a new church for evolu-
tionists which he said was a new word for
peace.
7/25/84
Page 2
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY FORUM
CLOSED SESSION:
RECALL TO ORDER:
CONSENT CALENDAR
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of
6/13/84 and Adjourned Regular
Meeting of 6/19/84.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
by Motion to deny and refer the
following claims to the City's
Insurance Adjuster and to the
Office of the City Attorney:
a)
Claim as filed by Herbert W.
Yanowitz, Esq., on behalf of
Martha Reynosa, a minor,
alleging bodily injury due to
an improperly marked inter-
section.
b)
Claim as filed by California
Automobile Association on
behalf of George Jacobs,
alleging damage to insured's
automobile when an officer
offered his assistance in
pushing his vehicle which was
blocking traffic and causing
damage.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
by Motion to set a Public Hearing
for 8/22/84 to consider adoption of
an Ordinance adding Section
20.08.115 and Subsection 20.66.045D
tO the South San Francisco
Municipal Code (Uses Permitted in
the PCM Zone - Restaurants).
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
by Motion to accept the installa-
tion of the Orange Pool Dehumidi-
COMMUNITY FORUM
No one chose to speak.
Council adjourned to a Closed Session at
8:30 p.m. for the discussion of labor
relations and litigation.
Mayor Addiego recalled the meeting to
order at 8:55 p.m., all Council present,
no action, taken.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approved.
So ordered.
Public Hearing set for 8/22/84.
Removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion by Vice Mayor Haffey.
Page 3
AGE,D^ ACTIO, TAKE, !93
CONSENT CALENDAR
4. Staff Report - Continued
fiers as complete in accordance
with the approved plans and speci-
fications.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
plans and specifications,
authorizing the work and cal 1 lng
for bids for the Franklin and
Hill side Sanitary/Storm Drain
Improvement Project, Project No.
SD/SS-83-4.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE
WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR FRANKLIN
AND HILLSIDE SANITARY/STORM DRAIN
~MPROVEMENT PROJECT, PROJECT NO.
SD/SS-83-4
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
plans and specification, author-
izing the work and calling for
bids for the East Grand Avenue
Improvement Project, Project No.
ST-83-3.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE
WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR EAST
GRANT AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT,
PROJECT NO. ST-83-3
®
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution of award
of contract for the Linden & Miller
Avenues Signal Modifications
Project', Project No. TR-83-2.
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
LINDEN & MILLER AVENUES SIGNAL
MODIFICATIONS PROJECT, PROJECT NO.
TR-83-2.
®
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
by Motion to accept as complete the
Municipal Parking Lot #12, Project
No. PB-82-2 in accordance with
approved plans and specifications.
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESOLUTION NO. 94-84
RESOLUTION NO. 95-84
RESOLUTION NO. 96-84
Approved.
7/25/84
Page 4
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
ge
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
by Motion to accept the public
improvements for the Hillside
Estate Subdivision as complete in
accordance with the Subdivision
Agreement.
10.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
by Motion to approve building per-
mit determinations (landmarks) of
7/16/84.
11.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
plans and specifications, author-
izing the work and calling bids
for the Yosemite and Shasta Storm
Drain Improvement Project No.
SD -83-6.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE
WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE
YOSEMITE AT SHASTA COURT STORM
DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. SD-83-6
12.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution~approving
plans and specifications, author-
izing the work and calling bids
for the 1984-85 Catch Basin Modi-
fication Project No. SD-84-1.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE
WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE
1984-85 CATCH BASIN MODIFICATION
PROJECT NO. SD-84-1
13.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
plans and specifications, author-
izing the work and calling bids
for the Hickey and Hilton
Pedestrian Overcrossing Crossing
Bridge.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE
WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE
HICKEY AND HILTON PEDESTRIAN
OVERCROSSING CROSSING BRIDGE
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approved.
Approved.
RESOLUTION NO. 97-84
Removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion by Councilman Nicolopulos.
RESOLUTION NO. 98-84
7/25/84
Page 5
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
14.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
by Motion to accept the dedication
of easement for the Pearson and
Swanson Industrial Tract No. 4
(Parcel Map No. PM-82-198).
15.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
by Motion to set a Public Hearing
date for 8/22/84 for consideration
of the adoption of the 1982 Uniform
Building Code.
16,¸
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution that
establishes a tax rate for the
financing of the Municipal Services
Building.
A RESOLUTION FIXING A SPECIAL TAX
RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1984-85
17.
Staff Report 7/25/84 ~ecommendin~
adoption of a Resolution indicating
compliance with the expenditures of
the Area Agency on Aging.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHOR-
IZING EXECUTION OF AN AREA AGENCY
ON AGING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND THE
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY
OF SAN MATEO AS THE AREA AGENCY ON
AGING OF THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO
18.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution for the
award of contract for the Cuesta to
Arroyo Storm Drain Construction
Project~ Project No. SD-83-5.
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
CUESTA TO ARROYO STORM DRAIN
CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, PROJECT NO.
SD-83-5
19.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution author-
izing the Purchasing Officer to
advertise for the purchase of a
photo copier machine for City Hall
on the main floor.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approved.
Public Hearing set for 8/22/84.
RESOLUTION NO. 99-84
Removed from Agenda under Agenda Review
by City Manager Birkel o.
Removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion by Vice Mayor Haffey.
7/25/84
Page 6
AGE,DA ACTIO, TAKE, 19G
CONSENT CALENDAR
19. Staff Report - Continued.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
PURCHASING OFFICER TO ADVERTISE
FOR THE PURCHASE OF A PHOTO
COPIER MACHINE
20.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
the specifications and authorizing
the Purchasing Officer to call for
bids for the maintenance of the
Common Green Districts.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE
WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE
MAINTENANCE OF THE COMMON GREEN
DISTRICTS
21.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution awarding
the bid for two Riding Mower
Tractors to H. V. Carter Co., Inc.
in the amount of $15,380.25 as the
lowest responsible bidder.
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
TWO (2) RIDING MOWER TRACTORS BID
1603-2
22.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution awarding
the bid for Heating, Ventilation
and Air Conditioning at various
City buildings excluding City Hall
to South City Sheet Metal Works as
the lowest responsible bidder.
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR
CONDITIONING AT VARIOUS CITY
BUILDINGS (EXCLUDING CITY HALL) BID
NO. 1618-1
23.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution awarding
the bid for one High Pressure Sewer
Cleaner to San Rafael Equipment Co.
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESOLUTION NO. 100-84
Removed from the Agenda under Agenda
Review by City Manager Birkelo.
RESOLUTION NO. 101-84
Removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion by Vice Mayor Haffey.
7/25/84
Page 7
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 197
CONSENT CALENDAR
23. Staff Report - Continued.
in the amount of $57,784.73 as the
lowest responsible bidder.
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
FOR ONE (1) HIGH PRESSURE SEWER
CLEANER BID NO. 1604
24.
Adoption of a Resolution commending
Frank J. Bertucelli on his services
to the City for over forty years.
A RESOLUTION COMMENDING FRANK J.
BERTUCELLI
25.
Adoption of a Resolution commending
Alden Vincent Borserio upon his
retirement from the Police Depart-
ment after twenty years of service.
A RESOLUTION COMMMENDING ALDEN
VINCENT BORSERIO
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
by Motion to accept the installa-
tion of the Orange Pool Dehumidi-
fiers as complete in accordance
with the approved plans and speci-
fications.
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESOLUTION NO. 102-84
RESOLUTION NO. 103-84
RESOLUTION NO. 104-84
M/S Teglia/Haffey - To approve the
Consent Calendar with the exception of
Items No. 4, 12, 18 and 22.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Vice Mayor Haffey asked to discuss Item 4
and 22 at the same time, and asked when
the City accepted the dehumidifier
what was the cost of the project.
Director of Parks & Recreation Norton
stated it was approximately $12,000.
Vice Mayor Haffey stated that in
reviewing Item No. 22 there were no ser-
vice contracts for those pieces of equip-
ment. He stated that he would think that
in spending $12,000 the City should have
a service contract to maintain the
dehumidifier.
City Manager Birkelo stated that that
could be looked at and if appropriate
could be included later.
7/25/84
Page 8
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
12.
18.
22.
Staff Report- Continued.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
plans and specifications, author-
izing the work and calling bids
for the 1984-85 Catch Basin Modi-
fication Project No. SD-84-1.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND
SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE
WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE
1984-85 CATCH BASIN MODIFICATION~-)
PROJECT NO. SD-84-1
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution for the
award of contract for the Cuesta
to Arroyo Sewer Construction
Project, Project No. SD-83-5 to
Range Pipeline for $73,140.00
as the lowest responsible bidder.
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
CUESTA TO ARROYO SEWER CONSTRUCTIONA
PROJECT, PROJECT NO. SD-83-5 AoC~
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution awarding
the bid for Heating, Ventilation
and Air Conditioning at various ~r~
Director of Parks & Recreation Norton
stated that the old dehumidifier had had
a service contract, but they had reached
a point of deterioration wherein the ser-
vice contract was no longer valid. He
stated that the new dehumidifier had a
140 day warranty and it would be a good
idea to have a service contract.
M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To accept the
installation of the dehumidifiers as
complete.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilman Nicolopulos questioned the
cost of the work.
Director of Public Services Yee stated
that this was an on-going yearly repair
of the old catch basins. He stated that
whether it would be 20 or 25 different
catch basins depended on the bids
received and that $50,000 had been allo-
cated.
M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 105-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Vice Mayor Haffey expressed concern that
when the pipeline was laid it would tear
up the new asphalt that had been laid.
Director of Public Services Yee stated
that the construction would not be in the
street area in that the storm system was
behind the houses.
M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 106-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Discussion was held with Item No. 4.
M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adopt the
Resol uti on.
7/25/84
Page 9
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
22. Staff Report - Continued.
City buildings excluding City Hall
to South City Sheet Metal Works as
the lowest responsible bidder.
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR
CONDITIONING AT VARIOUS CITY
BUILDINGS (EXCLUDING CITY HALL) BID
NO. 1618-1
APPROVAL OF BILLS
26.
Approval of the Regular Bills of
7/11/84 and 7/25/84.
CITY ATTORNEY
27.
Public Hearing - Consideration of
an amendment to Section VI.A.5.b of
the Agreement with Respect to the
San Bruno Mountain Area Habitat
Conservation Plan relating to the
amount a landowner must contribute
to a fund for preliminary operation
and enhancement of the Conserved
Habitat.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending:
1) Open the Public Hearing and hear
testimony; 2) Close the Public
Hearin~ 3) Adoption of a
Resolution authorizing execution of
an amendment to the San Bruno
Mountain Area Habitat Conservation
Plan to correct monetary term.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AN AMENDMENT TO SAN BRUNO
MOUNTAIN AREA HABITAT CONSERVATION
PLAN TO CORRECT MONETARY TERM
RESOLUTION NO. 107-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Damonte/Haffey - To approve the
Regular Bills of 7/11/84 and 7/25/84 in
the total amount of $2,412,926.73.
Carried by unanimous voice vote, Addiego
did not participate or vote in the matter
of the claim of Brentwood Market.
CITY ATTORNEY
Mayor Addiego opened the Public Hearing
and called for a Staff Report.
City Attorney Rogers stated that this
item came before the Council as the
result of a request from the District
Attorney's Office on behalf of the County
Board of Supervisors as an amendment to
the HCP and that another amendment would
be coming forward later. He stated that
when the plan was drafted there were pro-
visions for a monitoring and consultation
program regarding the grading on San
Bruno Mountain with respect to the pro-
ject within the habitate area. He con-
tinued, the funding had been set up so
that the land owner had to pay 133% of
actual salary paid to employees or
contractors for performing this moni-
toring and consultation service which
covered the actual salary plus overhead.
He stated that the following paragraph
listed in the Staff Report says, it will
also pay another 150% of that amount for
preliminary operation of the habitate
7/25/84
Page 10
I
I
I
I
AGENDA
CITY ATTORNEY
27. Public Hearing - Continued.
ACTION TAKEN
CITY ATTORNEY
area to cover the expenses of that. He
stated that the word from the County was
that this was a mistake, that the inten-
tion was for that to read 50%. He stated
that when you work out the math it com-
puted to 300% of the cost of the moni-
toring consultation program that the
Developer is paying now; and if the
Council amends the HCP to reflect what
the attorney had been told was the origi-
nal intention, the Developer would be
paying about 200% of the cost of the
monitoring and consultation program which
is more in line with what the intent of
the agreement was.
City Manager Birkelo stated that at the
June meeting the Trustees of the Habitat
Conservation Plan met with the three City
Managers, County Manager, who are
assisted by the plan operators staff and
the Plan Manager. He stated that it was
indicated at that time that questions
were raised as to whether or not that was
in fact an error and should have been 50%
or 150%. He stated that the indications
given at that time were that at least two
members of the three member subcommittee,
who did the original drafting, had indi-
cated that the intent was to recover the
cost of performing of the monitoring ser-
vice which is done by a biologist and is
paid for by the Trustees out of the trust
fund established by the Developer. He
stated that the Trustees discussed it and
none of them had actually participated in
that initial drafting themselves, from
information given to us there was some
general consensus that it probably was an
error; because for every $10,000 of moni-
toring performed the Developer would pay
$33,000 into the Trust Fund and some felt
that was excessive in terms of the normal
overhead charges applied to this kind of
public work. He stated that late last
week one member of the original group
that had worked on the draft had some
apparent different recollections of
intent, and at that point it was too late
to do the type of review of documents
including drafts that led up to the final
document to be able to present the
7/25/84
Page 11
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CITY ATTORNEY
27. Public Hearing - Continued.
CITY ATTORNEY
Council with clear cut factual data
tonight on that point. He stated that he
had checked through the minutes of the
Board of Trustees and no formal action
was taken by the Board to make recommen-
dations to the cities. He suggested the
Council go ahead with the public hearing
and following that, request the Board of
Trustees to investigate further and
determine in their minds that they are
prepared to say that this was a
typographical error rather than a change
of intent at this point. He stated that
the City Attorney had indicated that
another amendment would be coming before
the Council probably in September and
this matter could be held over to
September and the Council would have
written documentation if it can be
produced.
Mayor Addiego invited those wishing to
speak in favor of the amendment to step
to the dais - no one chose to speak. He
then invited those wishing to speak
against the amendment to step to the
dais.
Mr. Doug Butler, 133 Adrian Ave., stated
that the amendment was two years old -
and now Council was being asked to amend
it because of a typographical error. He
stated that after all of these months and
the number of attorneys that had
thoroughly scrutinized the document
before it was approved and now a
typographical error was found -- to him
this was an idea without merit. He
spoke of all of the extended hearings
held on the concept plan and specific plan
and the testimony given on the geotech-
nical problems involved: EIR, slope
instability, slope failure, etc. He
stated that now there were serious
questions as to whether these problems
could be mitigated without danger to life
and property; little heed had been given
to the public concerns raised and now
these concerns were being authenticated
in new geotechnical studies undertaken at
the City and County levels. He stated
that the County forwarded to the Fish and
7/25/84
Page 12
^GE,O^ ACTIO. TAKE,
CITY ATTORNEY
27. Public Hearing - Continued.
CITY ATTORNEY
Wild Life this monetary amendment and the
geotechnical site specific amendment
relating to the grading work in the HCP,
however the County did not send the sup-
portive data along with the amendments
because such data is not at present
available. He stated that the proper
procedure would be to get the geotech-
nical report and then structure the miti-
gation to the information gained from the
studies. He stated that perhaps the
geotechnical studies will show how
overwhelmingly unsafe it is to disturb
the natural configuration of the slopes,
then the proposed site's specific amend-
ment would be meaningless in addition to
the proposal before the Council tonight.
He stated that the Developer knew from
the beginning what the agreement meant
and what it would cost and he agreed to
the terms completely. He stated that
without funding there would be an HCP and
the funding had been part of the package
voted on by four of the five Council. He
stressed the fact that a signed agreement
is an agreement, to change the document
would be a violation of the agreement.
He requested the Mayor to read into the
record the letter received from Thomas R.
Adams, Esq., of July 18, 1984.
Mayor Addiego read the 7/18/84 letter
into the record from Thomas R. Adams,
Esq., (the letter is attached and a per-
manent part of the record of this
meeting).
Ms. Quenby Smith, Committee to Save San
Bruno Mountain, stated that Thomas Adams,
Esq. had stated that the 150% was not an
error. She stated that the five page
document had been reviewed by seven agen-
cies and a battery of attorneys. She
stated that she was not an attorney,
however the language had been very
clearly defined in the document.
She requested that the Council reject
the amendment.
7/25/84
Page 13
THOMAS R. ADAMS*
ANN BI~OADWELL*
E~I~UCE J. I~USSELL~
LOUISE J, ROSEN-C~ARCIA
z03
ADAMS. BROADWELL ~ R. UssEk, i~C,~?
July 18, 1984 O~:
Mark Addiego, Mayor
City of South San Francisco
City Hall
400 Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Dear Mayor Addiego:
I am writing on behalf of the Committee to Save San Bruno
Mountain regarding the hearing to consider a proposed amendment to
paragraph VI(A) (5) (b) of the Agreement with Respect to the San
Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan. I am sending this letter
because I will be out of town at the time of your hearing. I
understand that this amendment is being urged on the ground that
the present language of the Agreement is a mistake.
I was present when this particular language was negotiated and
I can personally testify that it is not a mistake. The present
language provides that a developer must pay a fee of 150% of the
cost of monitoring. That fee is to be used for habitat management
purposes during the preliminary phases of the Plan. There is no
question in my mind that the developer's representative who was
present at the time fully understood the amounts involved and how
the fee would be calculated.
Furthermore, the landowners and developers on San Bruno Moun-
tain employed numerous attorneys to review this Agreement, particu-
larly the portions dealing with the fees they would be required to
pay. Their lawyers reviewed this document thoroughly and compe-
tently. The current language was not added at the very end of the
negotiations; it was included in several drafts. There was ample
time to review the language carefully and I feel certain that no
misunderstanding on this point can be justified.
The funding provided by this fee is important. This entire
Agreement is based on the benefits to the species from habitat
management compared to the detriment suffered by loss of some
habitat. Once construction is completed, habitat management will
be funded by assessments. During the construction phase, however,
it is essential to create various sources of revenue to provide
adequate management. The Agreement makes provision for this both
in the form of direct interim payments and from the fee created by
7/25/84
Page 13a
AGENDA
CITY ATTORNEY
27. Public Hearing - Continued.
ACTION TAKEN
£05
CITY ATTORNEY
Mr. Ken Floyd, 249 Martin Dr., Daly City,
reiterated that the commitment to pay
150% was not a mistake and if the Council
authorized the change then next would be
a request to change the constraints of
the EIR. He recommended that subsequent
changes to the HCP be approved by the
voters through the initiative process and
let the citizens be the ones to decide.
He stated that the Attorney for this pro-
posed change had represented the fact
that this is going to amount to a commit-
ment of $10,000-15,000 to the Developer
who had promised millions of dollars of
goodies to the City. He stated that the
Council should ask itself if this amend-
ment would help the butterflies - the
answer is obviously no, and the amendment
should be rejected.
Mr. Michael Addiego, 98 Irving St.,
stated that one third of the people
involved in finishing the plan do not
agree that this is in error. He con-
tinued, the three people chiefly involved
in finishing up the plan were William
Rosas, County Planner, Mr. Adams and a
representative from Mr. Dean. He stated
that these three people do not believe
this is an error. He stated that the
Board of Trustees was not involved in the
drafting of the plan, which had been told
to him by the Brisbane City Manager
today; so there is no merit in the com-
ment that the Board of Trustees said
that the change should be made. He
recommended that the Council pass on this
amendment and to vote it down, otherwise
the Council would stir up all the bad
feelings on this sensitive subject. He
stated that the document would come up
for review after three years and that
this matter could be held over until that
time for complete review. He stated that
if the Developer was concerned about
$10,000-15,000 a year, then certainty he
was not going to give the City a park
and a swimming pool. He urged the Council
to show they are in control over the pro-
ject and vote the amendment down and give
the citizens a vote of support by that
action.
7/25/84
Page 14
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CITY ATTORNEY
27. Public Hearing - Continued.
(Cassette No. 2)
CITY ATTORNEY
Mrs. Doris Agee, 819 Ridge Court, stated
that she was in support of everything
that had been said by the speakers. She
stated that she had attended all meetings
on this subject and watched the Developer
say, no problem we will take care of it -
on whatever question that was raised
because he figured he could always come
back and have the condition changed.
Mrs. Marie Cox, 466 Holly St., stated her
continued preference for open space on
San Bruno Mountain, but if it was going
to be developed do it with credibility.
She stated that it was an insult to one's
intelligence to be expected to believe
there was a typographical error after
this habitat document was scrutinized by
hordes of attorneys. She stated that she
understood that $500,000 had been spent
on legal fees to assure the accuracy of
the agreement.
Mrs. Margaret Warren, 790 Stonegate Dr.,
stated that if the City wanted to raise
the percentage to 250%, wouldn't the
Developer hold the City to the commitment
regardless of a typographical error.
Mr. Arthur Feinstein, Golden Gate Audubun
Society, stated that this agreement
offered some hope for the ecology in this
area and to see that balance being
jeopardized bothered him.
Mr. David School ey, 509 Walnut Ave.,
spoke in favor of the need for the pro-
tection of endangered species on San
Bruno Mountain and stated that life could
not be compromised.
Mrs. Pat Martinson, 1288 Morningside
Ave., stated that once this Habitat
Conservation Plan lost its virginity that
is the end of it because it is
compromised.
Ms. Sylvia Gregory, 141 Madison Ave.j San
Bruno, stated that this was not a
question of a typographical error but
more of an idea of reneging.
7/25/84
Page 15
AGENDA
CITY ATTORNEY
27. Public Hearing - Continued.
RECESS:
RECALL TO ORDER:
ACTION TAKEN
CITY ATTORNEY
Mrs. Jane Kemper, 1321 Hillside, stated
that in all of the earlier hearings the
statement was always made - that will be
taken care of at a later date, and at a
later date you blame the secretary. She
stated that she had been a secretary for
a number of years and been responsible
for the typing and review of many
contracts which are read and reread by
typists, proofreaders, administrative
assistants, by the people who sign the
documents and are always returned for
misspellings, transpositions, punctuation
and numerous other reasons. She stated
that she did not believe that with all of
the scrutiny that this document received
that there could be a typographical
error.
Ms. Ellie Larson, Sierra Club, stated
that habitat management funding was very
new and unusual and not at all like
public works funds. She stated that this
was not an error because of the need for
the on-going habitat management and
urged the Council to turn the amendment
down.
Mr. Jim Keegan, 1244 Crestwood Drive,
stated that the City had the opportunity
tonight to exercise its control and vote
against the amendment. He stated that
the charge that this was a typographical
error was as blatant an excuse as was
Rosemary Woods trying to explain the
eighteen minute gap on the Nixon tape.
M/S Teglia/Damonte - To reject the pro-
posed amendment and so inform the Board
of Supervisors and the District
Attorney's Office.
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
Mayor Addiego recessed the meeting at
10:08 p.m.
Mayor Addiego recalled the meeting to
order at 10:29 p.m., all Council present.
7/25/84
Page 16
AGE,DA ACTIO, TAKE, 208
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
35.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution to adopt
the 1984 Revised Housing Element to
the General Plan for the City of
South San Francisco.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT
NO. GP-84-25 AMENDING THE HOUSING
ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 451
RELATED THERETO
33.
Public Hearing - Consideration of
the Supplemental Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report for the
Gateway Redevelopment Project which
proposed project involves construc-
tion of 700 additional hotel rooms
in the Gateway Redevelopment
Project area and the proposed
Gateway Boulevard extension located
between East Grand Avenue and South
Airport Boulevard.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending:
1) Open the Public Hearing and hear
testimony; 2) Close the Public
Hearing; 3) Authorize Staff to
prepare the final E.I.R.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela stated that the Council at
its last hearing on the Housing Element
had referred five changes to the Housing
Element back to the Planning Commission
as suggested by the Department of State
Housing Community Development and the
Legal Aid Society. He stated that the
changes had been referred to the Planning
Commission and been approved and the
Housing Element was now before the
Council for final adoption. He stated
that the recommendation was that the
Council adopt the Resolution approving
the Housing Element and Negative
Declaration No. 451.
M/S Damonte/Nicolopulos - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 108-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Director of Community Development
Dell' Angel a stated that this Supplement
Draft E.I.R. by EIP, a consultant for the
City, had been circulated to the
State Clearing House and the affected
property owners in the area. He stated
that the Planning Commission had for-
warded to the Council a list of concerns
and questions which it was felt should be
addressed by the Consultant before the
final E.I.R. is prepared. He stated that
in the Council packet were letters from con-
cerned property owners and State regional
agencies about certain issues to be
addressed before the E.I.R. is finally cer-
tified by the Redevelopment Agency. He
stated that Doug Donaldson, EIP, was pre-
sent to give an over view of the impacts
of the two issues discussed in the E.I.R.
He recommended Council take testimony and
discuss other issues after the close of
the hearing and direct Staff to prepare
the final E.I.R. for Council consideration.
Mr. Doug Donaldson, EIP, stated the docu-
ment before Council was the E.I.R. supplement
7/25/84
Page 17
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 209
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
33. Public Hearing - Continued.
I
I
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
to the E.I.R. certified by the City in
1981 and that there were two aspects to
the Redevelopment plan that were being
focused on within the document: 1) the
addition of 700 hotel rooms to the
overall redevelopment plan which are not
site specific as a land use change; 2)
the development of the Gateway Boulevard
Extension Project. He spoke in detail of
the six key issues identified by City
Staff as being potential concerns of
environmental impacts. He stated that
for hotel rooms the E.I.R. does not
address land use, hydrology, drainage,air
quality, noise and changes in traffic.
He spoke of the many benefits from the
Gateway Extension to alleviate the
congestion at Airport and Grand, East
Grand and Harbor and South Airport and
Produce.
Mayor Addiego opened the Public Hearing
and invited those wishing to speak in
favor of the E.I.R. to step to the dais.
Mr. William Ryan, PG&E, stated that all
of his firm's concerns had been expressed
except for his letter to Mr. Yee on
11/30/83 emphasizing that this is a major
utility relocation in this project; that
it would take one year to engineer and
relocate these facilities after receiving
authorization from the City to proceed.
Mayor Addiego invited those wishing to
speak against the E.I.R. to step to the dais
- no one chose to speak and he closed the
Public Hearing.
M/S Haffey/Damonte - To authorize Staff
to prepare the final E.I.R.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Director of Community Development
Dell'Angela stated that he hoped to have
the final E.I.R. before Council at the
8/22/84 meeting.
7/25/84
Page 18
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
2i0
CITY MANAGER
28.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution modifying
Unit No. 1 to include a Program
Recreation Coordinator classifica-
tion.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING UNIT
DETERMINATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS AS
MADE BY THE CITY MANAGER PURSUANT
TO CHAPTER 3.08 OF THE SOUTH SAN
FRANCISO MUNICIPAL CODE
29.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution amending
the M.O.U. with AFSCME Unit No. 3
and No. 9 to correct certain
language incorrectly incorporated
into the document.
A RESOLUTION INCORPORATING AGREED
UPON LANGUAGE IN ARTICLE 6, SECTION
3, I, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE MEMORANDUM
OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY
OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND THE
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY
AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, UNITS #3 &
9 FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1984
THROUGH JUNE 30, 1985
30.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution which
designates the City Manager as the
administrative entity responsible
for information concerning the
status of all permits or applica-
tions for development in the City.
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CITY
MANAGER AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE
ENTITY RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE
THE REVIEW AND DECISION MAKING AND
TO PROVIDE INFORMATION CONCERNING
THE STATUS OF ALL PERMITS OR APPLI-
CATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT REQUIRED BY
THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
(G.C. 65913.3)
CITY MANAGER
M/S Teglia/Haffey - To adopt the
Resol uti on
RESOLUTION NO. 109-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Haffey/Oamonte - To adopt the
Resol uti on.
RESOLUTION NO. 110-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
City Manager Bi rkelo stated that this was
not part of the cooperative discussions
relating to the promotion program of the
101 Corrider as an inducement to quality
businesses to locate there. He stated
that the plan was to facilitate major
project review and approval and that
State law provides for this type of coor-
dination which had been used for the
Granada Royal e.
Vice Mayor Haffey stated that he was
very supportive but would like an eva-
luation in six months to see how it is
working.
M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 111-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
7/25/84
Page 19
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 21i
CITY MANAGER
31.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution accepting
and approving a Memorandum of
Understanding between the City of
South San Francisco and the
Mid-Management employees included
in Unit No. 1 for the period July
1, 1984 through June 30, 1985.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND
APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDER-
STANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO AND THE MANAGEMENT
EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED IN UNIT NO. 1
FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 1984 THROUGH
JUNE 30, 1985
32.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending:
1) Motion to waive further reading
of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to
introduce an Ordinance adding
Chapter 9.04 to the South San
Francisco Municipal Code entitled
"Animal Licensing and Control."
1st Reading/Introduction
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 9.04
OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICI-
PAL CODE AND ADDING CHAPTER 9.04
ENTITLED "ANIMAL LICENSING AND ~(~
CONTROL"THERETO ~x/
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
34.
Public. Hearing - Propose~ extension
for 101~ months of Interim Ordinance
No. 952-84, which prohibits uses
which may conflict with zoning pro-
posals related to General Plan
Amendments (Grand, Orange Tamarack
and Spruce Avenues)
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending:
1) O~en the Public Hearing and hear
testimony; 2) Close the Public
Hearing; 3) Motion to waive further
reading of the Ordinance; 4) Motion
to adopt the Ordinance as an
Urgency Ordinance to take effect /~
immediately. ~~
CITY MANAGER
M/S Haffey/Damonte - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 112-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
City Clerk Battaya read the title of the
Ordinance in its entirety.
M/S Teglia/Haffey - To waive further
reading of the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Teglia/Haffey - To introduce the
Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Director of Community Development
Del l'Angela stated that the 101/2 month
extension would allow Staff to continue
its study of a lower density for the area
in the General Plan.
Mayor Addiego opened the Public Hearing
and invited those wishing to speak for or
against the extension to step to the dais
- no one chose to speak. He then closed
the Public Hearing.
City Clerk Battaya read the title of the
Ordinance in its entirety.
M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To waive further
7/25/84
Page 20
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
34. Staff Report 7/25/84 - Continued.
36.
1st Reading/Adoption
AN ORDINANCE E~IENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 952 ENTITLED "AN INTERIM
ORDINANCE PROHIBITING USES WHICH
MAY CONFLICT WITH ZONING PROPOSALS
RELATED TO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS"
Public Hearing - UP-84-688/Syufy
Enterprises/Pay'nPak, appeal of
James W. Basin on 6/14/84 decision
of the Planning Commission approv-
ing UP-84-688, to construct a 2000
seat movie theatre and a 50,000
square foot retail store with 8400
square foot open garden supply shop
with related signs and landscaping
on two parcels with reciprocal
parking the north side of Noor
Avenue, between E1Camino Real and
Huntington Avenue.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending:
1) Open the Public Hearing and hear
testimony; 2) Close the Public
Hearing; 3) Motion to accept the
withdrawal of the appeal from
James W. Basin, Tragoutsis,
Elchinoff, and Basin.
FINANCE
37. Public Hearing - Sewer Rental
Charges.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending:
1) O~en the Public Hearing and hear
testimony; 2) Close the Public
Hearing; 3) Adoption of a Reso-
lution ratifying the Sewer Rental
Report for 1984-85.
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING REPORT OF
ANNUAL SEWER RENTALS AND CHARGES
FOR 1984-85 PURSUANT TO CHAPTER
14.12 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO _j
MUNICIPAL CODE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
reading of the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Teglia/Haffey - To adopt the
Ordinance as an Urgency Ordinance to take
effect immediately.
ORDINANCE NO. 956-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Mayor Addiego opened the Public Hearing
and there being no one present who wished
to speak, he closed the Public Hearing.
M/S Teglia/Haffey - To accept the
withdrawal of the appeal from James W.
Basin, Tragoutsis and Basin.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
5o5
FINANCE
Mayor Addiego opened the Public Hearing
and invited those wishing to speak to
step to the dais.
Director of Finance Lipton stated that a
report of sewer charges had been filed
with the City Clerk and that this was the
third year in a row that the City had not
raised sewer rental charges.
Mayor Addiego closed the Public Hearing.
M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To adopt the
Resol uti on.
7/25/84
Page 21
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
FINANCE
37.
38.
Staff Report 7/25/84 - Conti~tq
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending
by Motion to accept the Parking
Place Commission' s recommendation
that a Parking Study of the down-
town area be completed and propo-
sals be solicited.
39.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending:
1) Adoption of a Resolution author-
izing execution of an agreement
between the City of South San
Francisco and United California
Bank Realty Corp. (Land Exchange);
2) Adoption of a Resolution author-
izing execution of an agreement be-
tween the City of South San
Francisco and First Interstate Bank
of California (Extension of lease).
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
, ,c sco
(LAND EXCHANGE)
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND
FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF CALIFORNIA
(EXTENSION OF LEASE)
FINANCE
RESOLUTION NO. 113-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Director of Finance Lipton stated that
the Parking District's initial bond
issuance that had constructed and
purchased the lots in the area had
retired on July 2nd and lifted many of
the restrictions that the Parking
District was working under in so far as
use, sale, trade, swap , and the Parking
District boundary itself. He stated that
the Parking Place Commission had worked
closely with Community Development, the
Police Department and Public Services for
a parking study of the downtown area be
completed and proposals be solicited. He
stated that the Parking Place Commission
had budgeted $10,000; but was willing to
spend up to $40,000.
M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To accept the
Parking Place Commission's recommendation
that a parking study of the downtown area
be completed and proposals be solicited.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Director of Finance Lipton stated that
since 1974 the City and the Bank have
leased each other's property for parking
and the intention was that at the end of
the lease to convey each parcel to the
other party for $10.00
M/S Teglia/Haffey - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 114-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Teglia/Haffey - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 115-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
7/25/84
Page 22
AGENDA ACTION TAKE, Si4
POLICE
40.
Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending:
1) Motion to waive further reading
of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to
adopt an Ordinance amending Section
11.44.110 and Section 12.10 which
specifies the size of signs that
are posted at the entrances to pri-
vate property authorizing vehicles ~
to be towed off of the property.~!
2nd Reading/Adoption ~1~
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION
11.44.110 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND SECTION 12.10 OF
ORDINANCE NO. 491 ENTITLED "TRAFFIC
ORDINANCE, CITY OF SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO" (PARKING ON PRIVATE
PROPERTY)
PUBLIC SERVICES
41.
Westborough Townhouse repairs
waiver of fees.
POLICE
City Clerk Battaya read the title of the
Ordinance in its entirety.
M/S Nicolopulos/Damonte - To waive
further reading of the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Nicolopulos/Damonte - To adopt the
Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. 957-84
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
PUBLIC SERVICES
Director of Public Services Yee stated
that this item was continued from the
last Council meeting related to the
Westborough townhouse building permit
fees. He stated that Staff's recommen-
dation was that the building permit fee be
waived provided that the Homeowners
Association hire a competent inspector to
certify that the contractor, who will be
doing the work, complies with the plans
and specifications as approved by the
City's Building Department. He stated
that the Homeowners Association should
pay all the out of pocket costs which
amounts to $1,700.00. He stated that he
had received a letter from the attorney
for the Homeowners Association and the
attorney had no problem with the
recommendation.
Councilwoman Teglia stated that the
Association would save over $100,000 by
the waiving of the fees and that that
money would go towards the continued
maintenance of the program.
Director of Public Services Yee stated
that the documents from the court indi-
cated that any money left over had to go
7/25/84
Page 23
AGENDA
PUBLIC SERVICES
41. Westborough Townhouse repairs
waiver of fees - Continued.
ACTION TAKEN
PUBLIC SERVICES
for civic improvements with the
Homeowners Association area.
Councilwoman Teglia requested clarifica-
tion because the term civic improvement
could be a lot of things, because she
thought this money was going to be added
for the maintenance of improvements being
installed.
Michael Hardy, Esq., whose firm repre-
sented the Homeowners in their litigation
and was working with them to effectuate
repairs that are required by the Court
orders as part of the settlement
agreement. He stated that this was
controlled by several legal documents
including the settlement agreement
itself, the orders of the San Mateo
Superior Court and the fact that they
have to continue to make reports to the
Court on how the money was used. He
stated that Judge Jenkins has maintained
jurisdiction over the disbursement of the
funds until all of the repairs are
complete. He continued, these documents
require that all funds are used for the
necessary repairs and if there is any
money left over it will be used for civic
improvements which will be directed in
advance by the Court. He stated that a
five year maintenance program was being
set up which would be renegotiated back
five years depending on the money
remaining. He stated that the $111,000
would be used for structure and fire pro-
tection improvements which includes main-
tenance as an important part of the
program. He stated that there were 842
homes that were affected and the work was
soon to be done and the inspector would
be subject to approval by the City.
M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To Modify the
building fees as outlined in the report
and request only the out of pocket fees.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
7/25/84
Page 24
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNICATIONS
42.
Request from Theodore F. Bayer for
a rehearing/reconsideration - Use
Permit No. 78-448 - Units 5 and 6
(Modifications No. 5) Stonegate
Ridge Planned Community District.
--ITEMS FROM STAFF
43.
Consideration of a joint marketing
program agreement.
44.
Report on the School District
bungalow.
I
I
I
I
COMMUNICATIONS
Richard H. Schwartz, Esq., stated that
he was representing Bayland Properties in
the request for rehearing/reconsideration
of UP-78-448 that the hearing be con-
tinued to 8/22/84.
City Attorney Rogers stated that this was
a request for the Council to review its
yrevious decision and mentioned his
etter to the Council that strongly
recommended Council not reconsider the
matter.
M/S Haffey/Teglia - To deny the request.
City Attorney Rogers stated that the
Ordinance does not provide for recon-
sideration or rehearing.
Carried by majority voice vote,
Nicol opul os voted no.
ITEMS FROM STAFF
City Manager Birkelo requested that the
matter be carried over to the next
meeting to allow Staff time to work out
some better mechanisms for working out
the cooperative relationship in this pro-
ject including discussion with the other
parties involved.
Consensus of Council - To continue to the
next regular meeting.
Director of Parks and Recreation Norton
spoke of a preliminary cost estimate by
the City for the restoration, moving,
restrooms, renovating the interior and
exterior of the bungalow which was dif-
ferent than the School District's
figures. He spoke of moving the bungalow
to Orange Park and the resultant site
preparation.
Councilman Damonte spoke of moving the
bungalow to the Southwood location which
would be on school property and the
District would be responsible for
maintenance.
7/25/84
Page 25
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 2i7
ITEMS FROM STAFF
44.
Report on the School District
bungal ow.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
45. Subcommittee Report on Magnolia
Center. ~)~
46. Consideration of suggested
modifications to the Grand Avenue
Library.
Councilwoman Tegl ia:
ITEMS FROM STAFF
Vice Mayor Haffey stated that the on-
going maintenance should be negotiated
with the School District for whatever
location is selected for the bungalow
because the City should not accept that
responsibility.
Consensus of Council - The Subcommittee
should meet again to discuss Southwood as
the location.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Vice Mayor Haffey discussed a 7/25/84
summary of a study (which is attached and
a permanent part of the record of this
meeting) of Magnolia Center and stated
that Council should have a study session
on this item.
Councilwoman Teglia stated that the study
session should be widely advertised and
held in the Municipal Services Building.
City Manager Birkelo stated that at the
adjourned regular meeting of 8/6/84 after
discussion of the performance pay plan he
would offer a list of suggested meeting
dates.
Discussion followed on new carpeting and
paint; window treatments; Staff to get
estimates of the anticipated costs for
the Library.
Stated concern that Park Way was becoming
a speedway; Staff to find funds to
restore the balustrade at City Hall
through State historical funds or by pri,
vate donations.
Director of Parks & Recreation Norton
stated that information was needed from
the National Registry on points of local
interest; need authorization from the
Board of Supervisors; Proposition 18
states that a project must meet the cri-
teria with documentation from the
Historical Society and Council must
authorize.
7/25/84
Page 26
Group 4/Architecture, '
Research and Planning, Inc.
457 Forbes Boulevard
South San Francisco
California 94080 USA
(415) 871-0709
451 College Avenue
Santa Rosa
California 95401 USA
(707) 575-7508
MAGNOLIA CENTER STUDY
City of South San Francisco
25 July 1984
SUMMARY OF STUDY
Three Phases of Study
I Real Estate Appraisal and Preliminary Structural Analysis (November 1983)
II Architectural and Economic Analysis (April 1984)
III Master Plan and Implementation Strategies (June 1984)
Development Options
OPTION. 1
o Development of City land and School District land together
o 150 units of seniors housing for rent built by private developer
o Common dining and laundry facilities
o Remodeling of front portion of former Magnolia School as senior and
community center by the City
o Shared use of senior center with City and senior housing residents
o Incentives offered to the developer
o 20 to 40% of seniors housing would be made available to low and moderate
income seniors
7/25/84
Page 26a
OPTION 2
O
Development by the City of a senior and community center in the front
portion of the former school building
o School district to sell their land for R3 uses
OPTION 3
o City to sell land and building for R3 uses
o School district to sell their land for R3 uses
Recommendations
1. City adopt the Planning and Design Criteria in the report as guidelines
for development on the site.
2. City adopt a policy of encouraging seniors housing on the site.
3. City should pursue the implementation of Development Option 1.
7/25/84
Page 26b
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
GOOD AND WELFARE
CLOSED SESSION
47.
Closed Session for the purpose of
the discussion of personnel mat-
ters, labor relations and liti-
gation.
ADJ OU RNMENT:
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED:
City of South San Francisco
GOOD AND WELFARE
Mr. Lawrence Pera stated that the City
should stop future construction and take
care of the animals; keep San Bruno
Mountain as open space.
CLOSED SESSION
A Closed Session was held earlier in the
meeting.
M/S Teglia/Haffey- To adjourn the
meeting to Monday, 8/6/84, 4:30 p.m.~ in
the City Council Conference Room, 400
Grand Avenue to discuss the performance
pay pl an.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Time of adjournment 11:45 p.m.
APPROVED:
Mark N. Addie)g~,
City of South San Francisco
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose
of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape
and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are
available for inspection, review and copying.
7/25/84
Page 27