Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1984-07-25Mayor Mark N. Addiego Vice Mayor Richard A. Haffey Council: Emanuele N. Damonte Gus Ni col opul os Roberta Cerri Teglia MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room July 25, 1984 190 A G E N D A CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) ROLL CALL: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: PRESENTATIONS -- Proclamation: Yol anda Swindel 1 A RESOLUTION COMMENDING ALFRED BANFI. E]~) AGENDA REVIEW City Manager Birkelo requested: - A Closed Session on Item No. 31 before the Consent Calendar and hear a matter of litigation with outside attorneys. - Remove Item No. 17 from the Agenda. - Remove Item No. 20 from the Agenda. ACTION TAKEN 7:55 p.m. Mayor Addiego presiding. Council present: Council absent: Nicolopulos, Haffey, Damonte, Teglia and. Addiego. None. The presentation of colors was made by Boy Scout Troop No. 272 and the pledge of allegiance was recited. Reverend Donald Pitts of the Good News Chapel, gave the invocation. Director of Parks and Recreation Norton introduced Yolanda Swindell, who won the regional 400 event in the local Arco/Jesse Owens meet and would be flying to San Diego to compete in the national championships. Mayor Addiego presented a Proclamation to Yolanda Swindell in recognition of her achievement. Recreation Chairman Jackson presented Mr. Banfield with a framed photograph of various projects he had been involved in while serving on the Recreation Commission. Mayor Addiego read the Resolution com- mending Mr. Banfield for his services to the City. AGENDA REVIEW So ordered. 7/25/84 Page 1 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mrs. Doris Agee, 719 Ridge Court, spoke of the cul-de-sac behind Stonegate No. 4 with a rash of burglaries and other problems due to the delay of building Units 5 and 6 and access from the cul-de- sac; that the area is a dumping ground; building a barricade to bar access; having traffic control or a traffic stop to slow traffic in the area and suggested a meeting be held with Mr. Yee's depart- ment and the Police. Mr. Don Mulvihill, 57A Appian Way, congratulated Councilpersons Teglia and Haffey and Mr. Yee for having served as delegates to the democratic convention. He expressed concern about homeowner associations not being informed of Planning Commission Agenda items that affect homeowner associations, such as the one year extension for the final map for Stonegate; one month later the bulldozers are moving earth on the hill, causing dust problems. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that an extension is not subject to a hearing or a notice. He stated that he would check into the grading work and report back to the home owners. Mayor Addiego questioned if the permits to move earth included the control of dust. Director of Public Services Yee stated that he lived next door to the project and monitored the operation daily. He stated that when the earth is being moved a water truck is used to control the dust, however in the evening when the wind comes up that is when the problem arises. Mr. Lawrence Pera, 758 Baden Avenue, spoke of opening a new church for evolu- tionists which he said was a new word for peace. 7/25/84 Page 2 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY FORUM CLOSED SESSION: RECALL TO ORDER: CONSENT CALENDAR Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 6/13/84 and Adjourned Regular Meeting of 6/19/84. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending by Motion to deny and refer the following claims to the City's Insurance Adjuster and to the Office of the City Attorney: a) Claim as filed by Herbert W. Yanowitz, Esq., on behalf of Martha Reynosa, a minor, alleging bodily injury due to an improperly marked inter- section. b) Claim as filed by California Automobile Association on behalf of George Jacobs, alleging damage to insured's automobile when an officer offered his assistance in pushing his vehicle which was blocking traffic and causing damage. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending by Motion to set a Public Hearing for 8/22/84 to consider adoption of an Ordinance adding Section 20.08.115 and Subsection 20.66.045D tO the South San Francisco Municipal Code (Uses Permitted in the PCM Zone - Restaurants). Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending by Motion to accept the installa- tion of the Orange Pool Dehumidi- COMMUNITY FORUM No one chose to speak. Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 8:30 p.m. for the discussion of labor relations and litigation. Mayor Addiego recalled the meeting to order at 8:55 p.m., all Council present, no action, taken. CONSENT CALENDAR Approved. So ordered. Public Hearing set for 8/22/84. Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Vice Mayor Haffey. Page 3 AGE,D^ ACTIO, TAKE, !93 CONSENT CALENDAR 4. Staff Report - Continued fiers as complete in accordance with the approved plans and speci- fications. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution approving plans and specifications, authorizing the work and cal 1 lng for bids for the Franklin and Hill side Sanitary/Storm Drain Improvement Project, Project No. SD/SS-83-4. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR FRANKLIN AND HILLSIDE SANITARY/STORM DRAIN ~MPROVEMENT PROJECT, PROJECT NO. SD/SS-83-4 Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution approving plans and specification, author- izing the work and calling for bids for the East Grand Avenue Improvement Project, Project No. ST-83-3. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR EAST GRANT AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT, PROJECT NO. ST-83-3 ® Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution of award of contract for the Linden & Miller Avenues Signal Modifications Project', Project No. TR-83-2. A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT LINDEN & MILLER AVENUES SIGNAL MODIFICATIONS PROJECT, PROJECT NO. TR-83-2. ® Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending by Motion to accept as complete the Municipal Parking Lot #12, Project No. PB-82-2 in accordance with approved plans and specifications. CONSENT CALENDAR RESOLUTION NO. 94-84 RESOLUTION NO. 95-84 RESOLUTION NO. 96-84 Approved. 7/25/84 Page 4 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CONSENT CALENDAR ge Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending by Motion to accept the public improvements for the Hillside Estate Subdivision as complete in accordance with the Subdivision Agreement. 10. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending by Motion to approve building per- mit determinations (landmarks) of 7/16/84. 11. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution approving plans and specifications, author- izing the work and calling bids for the Yosemite and Shasta Storm Drain Improvement Project No. SD -83-6. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE YOSEMITE AT SHASTA COURT STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. SD-83-6 12. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution~approving plans and specifications, author- izing the work and calling bids for the 1984-85 Catch Basin Modi- fication Project No. SD-84-1. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE 1984-85 CATCH BASIN MODIFICATION PROJECT NO. SD-84-1 13. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution approving plans and specifications, author- izing the work and calling bids for the Hickey and Hilton Pedestrian Overcrossing Crossing Bridge. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE HICKEY AND HILTON PEDESTRIAN OVERCROSSING CROSSING BRIDGE CONSENT CALENDAR Approved. Approved. RESOLUTION NO. 97-84 Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Councilman Nicolopulos. RESOLUTION NO. 98-84 7/25/84 Page 5 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CONSENT CALENDAR 14. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending by Motion to accept the dedication of easement for the Pearson and Swanson Industrial Tract No. 4 (Parcel Map No. PM-82-198). 15. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending by Motion to set a Public Hearing date for 8/22/84 for consideration of the adoption of the 1982 Uniform Building Code. 16,¸ Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution that establishes a tax rate for the financing of the Municipal Services Building. A RESOLUTION FIXING A SPECIAL TAX RATE FOR FISCAL YEAR 1984-85 17. Staff Report 7/25/84 ~ecommendin~ adoption of a Resolution indicating compliance with the expenditures of the Area Agency on Aging. A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHOR- IZING EXECUTION OF AN AREA AGENCY ON AGING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO AS THE AREA AGENCY ON AGING OF THE COUNTY OF SAN MATEO 18. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution for the award of contract for the Cuesta to Arroyo Storm Drain Construction Project~ Project No. SD-83-5. A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT CUESTA TO ARROYO STORM DRAIN CONSTRUCTION PROJECT, PROJECT NO. SD-83-5 19. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution author- izing the Purchasing Officer to advertise for the purchase of a photo copier machine for City Hall on the main floor. CONSENT CALENDAR Approved. Public Hearing set for 8/22/84. RESOLUTION NO. 99-84 Removed from Agenda under Agenda Review by City Manager Birkel o. Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Vice Mayor Haffey. 7/25/84 Page 6 AGE,DA ACTIO, TAKE, 19G CONSENT CALENDAR 19. Staff Report - Continued. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASING OFFICER TO ADVERTISE FOR THE PURCHASE OF A PHOTO COPIER MACHINE 20. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution approving the specifications and authorizing the Purchasing Officer to call for bids for the maintenance of the Common Green Districts. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE COMMON GREEN DISTRICTS 21. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution awarding the bid for two Riding Mower Tractors to H. V. Carter Co., Inc. in the amount of $15,380.25 as the lowest responsible bidder. A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT TWO (2) RIDING MOWER TRACTORS BID 1603-2 22. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution awarding the bid for Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning at various City buildings excluding City Hall to South City Sheet Metal Works as the lowest responsible bidder. A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING AT VARIOUS CITY BUILDINGS (EXCLUDING CITY HALL) BID NO. 1618-1 23. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution awarding the bid for one High Pressure Sewer Cleaner to San Rafael Equipment Co. CONSENT CALENDAR RESOLUTION NO. 100-84 Removed from the Agenda under Agenda Review by City Manager Birkelo. RESOLUTION NO. 101-84 Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Vice Mayor Haffey. 7/25/84 Page 7 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 197 CONSENT CALENDAR 23. Staff Report - Continued. in the amount of $57,784.73 as the lowest responsible bidder. A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR ONE (1) HIGH PRESSURE SEWER CLEANER BID NO. 1604 24. Adoption of a Resolution commending Frank J. Bertucelli on his services to the City for over forty years. A RESOLUTION COMMENDING FRANK J. BERTUCELLI 25. Adoption of a Resolution commending Alden Vincent Borserio upon his retirement from the Police Depart- ment after twenty years of service. A RESOLUTION COMMMENDING ALDEN VINCENT BORSERIO Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending by Motion to accept the installa- tion of the Orange Pool Dehumidi- fiers as complete in accordance with the approved plans and speci- fications. CONSENT CALENDAR RESOLUTION NO. 102-84 RESOLUTION NO. 103-84 RESOLUTION NO. 104-84 M/S Teglia/Haffey - To approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items No. 4, 12, 18 and 22. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Vice Mayor Haffey asked to discuss Item 4 and 22 at the same time, and asked when the City accepted the dehumidifier what was the cost of the project. Director of Parks & Recreation Norton stated it was approximately $12,000. Vice Mayor Haffey stated that in reviewing Item No. 22 there were no ser- vice contracts for those pieces of equip- ment. He stated that he would think that in spending $12,000 the City should have a service contract to maintain the dehumidifier. City Manager Birkelo stated that that could be looked at and if appropriate could be included later. 7/25/84 Page 8 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 12. 18. 22. Staff Report- Continued. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution approving plans and specifications, author- izing the work and calling bids for the 1984-85 Catch Basin Modi- fication Project No. SD-84-1. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE 1984-85 CATCH BASIN MODIFICATION~-) PROJECT NO. SD-84-1 Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution for the award of contract for the Cuesta to Arroyo Sewer Construction Project, Project No. SD-83-5 to Range Pipeline for $73,140.00 as the lowest responsible bidder. A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT CUESTA TO ARROYO SEWER CONSTRUCTIONA PROJECT, PROJECT NO. SD-83-5 AoC~ Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution awarding the bid for Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning at various ~r~ Director of Parks & Recreation Norton stated that the old dehumidifier had had a service contract, but they had reached a point of deterioration wherein the ser- vice contract was no longer valid. He stated that the new dehumidifier had a 140 day warranty and it would be a good idea to have a service contract. M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To accept the installation of the dehumidifiers as complete. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Councilman Nicolopulos questioned the cost of the work. Director of Public Services Yee stated that this was an on-going yearly repair of the old catch basins. He stated that whether it would be 20 or 25 different catch basins depended on the bids received and that $50,000 had been allo- cated. M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 105-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. Vice Mayor Haffey expressed concern that when the pipeline was laid it would tear up the new asphalt that had been laid. Director of Public Services Yee stated that the construction would not be in the street area in that the storm system was behind the houses. M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 106-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. Discussion was held with Item No. 4. M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adopt the Resol uti on. 7/25/84 Page 9 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 22. Staff Report - Continued. City buildings excluding City Hall to South City Sheet Metal Works as the lowest responsible bidder. A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT HEATING, VENTILATION AND AIR CONDITIONING AT VARIOUS CITY BUILDINGS (EXCLUDING CITY HALL) BID NO. 1618-1 APPROVAL OF BILLS 26. Approval of the Regular Bills of 7/11/84 and 7/25/84. CITY ATTORNEY 27. Public Hearing - Consideration of an amendment to Section VI.A.5.b of the Agreement with Respect to the San Bruno Mountain Area Habitat Conservation Plan relating to the amount a landowner must contribute to a fund for preliminary operation and enhancement of the Conserved Habitat. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending: 1) Open the Public Hearing and hear testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearin~ 3) Adoption of a Resolution authorizing execution of an amendment to the San Bruno Mountain Area Habitat Conservation Plan to correct monetary term. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO SAN BRUNO MOUNTAIN AREA HABITAT CONSERVATION PLAN TO CORRECT MONETARY TERM RESOLUTION NO. 107-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Damonte/Haffey - To approve the Regular Bills of 7/11/84 and 7/25/84 in the total amount of $2,412,926.73. Carried by unanimous voice vote, Addiego did not participate or vote in the matter of the claim of Brentwood Market. CITY ATTORNEY Mayor Addiego opened the Public Hearing and called for a Staff Report. City Attorney Rogers stated that this item came before the Council as the result of a request from the District Attorney's Office on behalf of the County Board of Supervisors as an amendment to the HCP and that another amendment would be coming forward later. He stated that when the plan was drafted there were pro- visions for a monitoring and consultation program regarding the grading on San Bruno Mountain with respect to the pro- ject within the habitate area. He con- tinued, the funding had been set up so that the land owner had to pay 133% of actual salary paid to employees or contractors for performing this moni- toring and consultation service which covered the actual salary plus overhead. He stated that the following paragraph listed in the Staff Report says, it will also pay another 150% of that amount for preliminary operation of the habitate 7/25/84 Page 10 I I I I AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY 27. Public Hearing - Continued. ACTION TAKEN CITY ATTORNEY area to cover the expenses of that. He stated that the word from the County was that this was a mistake, that the inten- tion was for that to read 50%. He stated that when you work out the math it com- puted to 300% of the cost of the moni- toring consultation program that the Developer is paying now; and if the Council amends the HCP to reflect what the attorney had been told was the origi- nal intention, the Developer would be paying about 200% of the cost of the monitoring and consultation program which is more in line with what the intent of the agreement was. City Manager Birkelo stated that at the June meeting the Trustees of the Habitat Conservation Plan met with the three City Managers, County Manager, who are assisted by the plan operators staff and the Plan Manager. He stated that it was indicated at that time that questions were raised as to whether or not that was in fact an error and should have been 50% or 150%. He stated that the indications given at that time were that at least two members of the three member subcommittee, who did the original drafting, had indi- cated that the intent was to recover the cost of performing of the monitoring ser- vice which is done by a biologist and is paid for by the Trustees out of the trust fund established by the Developer. He stated that the Trustees discussed it and none of them had actually participated in that initial drafting themselves, from information given to us there was some general consensus that it probably was an error; because for every $10,000 of moni- toring performed the Developer would pay $33,000 into the Trust Fund and some felt that was excessive in terms of the normal overhead charges applied to this kind of public work. He stated that late last week one member of the original group that had worked on the draft had some apparent different recollections of intent, and at that point it was too late to do the type of review of documents including drafts that led up to the final document to be able to present the 7/25/84 Page 11 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CITY ATTORNEY 27. Public Hearing - Continued. CITY ATTORNEY Council with clear cut factual data tonight on that point. He stated that he had checked through the minutes of the Board of Trustees and no formal action was taken by the Board to make recommen- dations to the cities. He suggested the Council go ahead with the public hearing and following that, request the Board of Trustees to investigate further and determine in their minds that they are prepared to say that this was a typographical error rather than a change of intent at this point. He stated that the City Attorney had indicated that another amendment would be coming before the Council probably in September and this matter could be held over to September and the Council would have written documentation if it can be produced. Mayor Addiego invited those wishing to speak in favor of the amendment to step to the dais - no one chose to speak. He then invited those wishing to speak against the amendment to step to the dais. Mr. Doug Butler, 133 Adrian Ave., stated that the amendment was two years old - and now Council was being asked to amend it because of a typographical error. He stated that after all of these months and the number of attorneys that had thoroughly scrutinized the document before it was approved and now a typographical error was found -- to him this was an idea without merit. He spoke of all of the extended hearings held on the concept plan and specific plan and the testimony given on the geotech- nical problems involved: EIR, slope instability, slope failure, etc. He stated that now there were serious questions as to whether these problems could be mitigated without danger to life and property; little heed had been given to the public concerns raised and now these concerns were being authenticated in new geotechnical studies undertaken at the City and County levels. He stated that the County forwarded to the Fish and 7/25/84 Page 12 ^GE,O^ ACTIO. TAKE, CITY ATTORNEY 27. Public Hearing - Continued. CITY ATTORNEY Wild Life this monetary amendment and the geotechnical site specific amendment relating to the grading work in the HCP, however the County did not send the sup- portive data along with the amendments because such data is not at present available. He stated that the proper procedure would be to get the geotech- nical report and then structure the miti- gation to the information gained from the studies. He stated that perhaps the geotechnical studies will show how overwhelmingly unsafe it is to disturb the natural configuration of the slopes, then the proposed site's specific amend- ment would be meaningless in addition to the proposal before the Council tonight. He stated that the Developer knew from the beginning what the agreement meant and what it would cost and he agreed to the terms completely. He stated that without funding there would be an HCP and the funding had been part of the package voted on by four of the five Council. He stressed the fact that a signed agreement is an agreement, to change the document would be a violation of the agreement. He requested the Mayor to read into the record the letter received from Thomas R. Adams, Esq., of July 18, 1984. Mayor Addiego read the 7/18/84 letter into the record from Thomas R. Adams, Esq., (the letter is attached and a per- manent part of the record of this meeting). Ms. Quenby Smith, Committee to Save San Bruno Mountain, stated that Thomas Adams, Esq. had stated that the 150% was not an error. She stated that the five page document had been reviewed by seven agen- cies and a battery of attorneys. She stated that she was not an attorney, however the language had been very clearly defined in the document. She requested that the Council reject the amendment. 7/25/84 Page 13 THOMAS R. ADAMS* ANN BI~OADWELL* E~I~UCE J. I~USSELL~ LOUISE J, ROSEN-C~ARCIA z03 ADAMS. BROADWELL ~ R. UssEk, i~C,~? July 18, 1984 O~: Mark Addiego, Mayor City of South San Francisco City Hall 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94080 Dear Mayor Addiego: I am writing on behalf of the Committee to Save San Bruno Mountain regarding the hearing to consider a proposed amendment to paragraph VI(A) (5) (b) of the Agreement with Respect to the San Bruno Mountain Habitat Conservation Plan. I am sending this letter because I will be out of town at the time of your hearing. I understand that this amendment is being urged on the ground that the present language of the Agreement is a mistake. I was present when this particular language was negotiated and I can personally testify that it is not a mistake. The present language provides that a developer must pay a fee of 150% of the cost of monitoring. That fee is to be used for habitat management purposes during the preliminary phases of the Plan. There is no question in my mind that the developer's representative who was present at the time fully understood the amounts involved and how the fee would be calculated. Furthermore, the landowners and developers on San Bruno Moun- tain employed numerous attorneys to review this Agreement, particu- larly the portions dealing with the fees they would be required to pay. Their lawyers reviewed this document thoroughly and compe- tently. The current language was not added at the very end of the negotiations; it was included in several drafts. There was ample time to review the language carefully and I feel certain that no misunderstanding on this point can be justified. The funding provided by this fee is important. This entire Agreement is based on the benefits to the species from habitat management compared to the detriment suffered by loss of some habitat. Once construction is completed, habitat management will be funded by assessments. During the construction phase, however, it is essential to create various sources of revenue to provide adequate management. The Agreement makes provision for this both in the form of direct interim payments and from the fee created by 7/25/84 Page 13a AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY 27. Public Hearing - Continued. ACTION TAKEN £05 CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Ken Floyd, 249 Martin Dr., Daly City, reiterated that the commitment to pay 150% was not a mistake and if the Council authorized the change then next would be a request to change the constraints of the EIR. He recommended that subsequent changes to the HCP be approved by the voters through the initiative process and let the citizens be the ones to decide. He stated that the Attorney for this pro- posed change had represented the fact that this is going to amount to a commit- ment of $10,000-15,000 to the Developer who had promised millions of dollars of goodies to the City. He stated that the Council should ask itself if this amend- ment would help the butterflies - the answer is obviously no, and the amendment should be rejected. Mr. Michael Addiego, 98 Irving St., stated that one third of the people involved in finishing the plan do not agree that this is in error. He con- tinued, the three people chiefly involved in finishing up the plan were William Rosas, County Planner, Mr. Adams and a representative from Mr. Dean. He stated that these three people do not believe this is an error. He stated that the Board of Trustees was not involved in the drafting of the plan, which had been told to him by the Brisbane City Manager today; so there is no merit in the com- ment that the Board of Trustees said that the change should be made. He recommended that the Council pass on this amendment and to vote it down, otherwise the Council would stir up all the bad feelings on this sensitive subject. He stated that the document would come up for review after three years and that this matter could be held over until that time for complete review. He stated that if the Developer was concerned about $10,000-15,000 a year, then certainty he was not going to give the City a park and a swimming pool. He urged the Council to show they are in control over the pro- ject and vote the amendment down and give the citizens a vote of support by that action. 7/25/84 Page 14 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CITY ATTORNEY 27. Public Hearing - Continued. (Cassette No. 2) CITY ATTORNEY Mrs. Doris Agee, 819 Ridge Court, stated that she was in support of everything that had been said by the speakers. She stated that she had attended all meetings on this subject and watched the Developer say, no problem we will take care of it - on whatever question that was raised because he figured he could always come back and have the condition changed. Mrs. Marie Cox, 466 Holly St., stated her continued preference for open space on San Bruno Mountain, but if it was going to be developed do it with credibility. She stated that it was an insult to one's intelligence to be expected to believe there was a typographical error after this habitat document was scrutinized by hordes of attorneys. She stated that she understood that $500,000 had been spent on legal fees to assure the accuracy of the agreement. Mrs. Margaret Warren, 790 Stonegate Dr., stated that if the City wanted to raise the percentage to 250%, wouldn't the Developer hold the City to the commitment regardless of a typographical error. Mr. Arthur Feinstein, Golden Gate Audubun Society, stated that this agreement offered some hope for the ecology in this area and to see that balance being jeopardized bothered him. Mr. David School ey, 509 Walnut Ave., spoke in favor of the need for the pro- tection of endangered species on San Bruno Mountain and stated that life could not be compromised. Mrs. Pat Martinson, 1288 Morningside Ave., stated that once this Habitat Conservation Plan lost its virginity that is the end of it because it is compromised. Ms. Sylvia Gregory, 141 Madison Ave.j San Bruno, stated that this was not a question of a typographical error but more of an idea of reneging. 7/25/84 Page 15 AGENDA CITY ATTORNEY 27. Public Hearing - Continued. RECESS: RECALL TO ORDER: ACTION TAKEN CITY ATTORNEY Mrs. Jane Kemper, 1321 Hillside, stated that in all of the earlier hearings the statement was always made - that will be taken care of at a later date, and at a later date you blame the secretary. She stated that she had been a secretary for a number of years and been responsible for the typing and review of many contracts which are read and reread by typists, proofreaders, administrative assistants, by the people who sign the documents and are always returned for misspellings, transpositions, punctuation and numerous other reasons. She stated that she did not believe that with all of the scrutiny that this document received that there could be a typographical error. Ms. Ellie Larson, Sierra Club, stated that habitat management funding was very new and unusual and not at all like public works funds. She stated that this was not an error because of the need for the on-going habitat management and urged the Council to turn the amendment down. Mr. Jim Keegan, 1244 Crestwood Drive, stated that the City had the opportunity tonight to exercise its control and vote against the amendment. He stated that the charge that this was a typographical error was as blatant an excuse as was Rosemary Woods trying to explain the eighteen minute gap on the Nixon tape. M/S Teglia/Damonte - To reject the pro- posed amendment and so inform the Board of Supervisors and the District Attorney's Office. Carried by unanimous roll call vote. Mayor Addiego recessed the meeting at 10:08 p.m. Mayor Addiego recalled the meeting to order at 10:29 p.m., all Council present. 7/25/84 Page 16 AGE,DA ACTIO, TAKE, 208 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 35. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution to adopt the 1984 Revised Housing Element to the General Plan for the City of South San Francisco. A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT NO. GP-84-25 AMENDING THE HOUSING ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION NO. 451 RELATED THERETO 33. Public Hearing - Consideration of the Supplemental Draft Environ- mental Impact Report for the Gateway Redevelopment Project which proposed project involves construc- tion of 700 additional hotel rooms in the Gateway Redevelopment Project area and the proposed Gateway Boulevard extension located between East Grand Avenue and South Airport Boulevard. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending: 1) Open the Public Hearing and hear testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearing; 3) Authorize Staff to prepare the final E.I.R. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that the Council at its last hearing on the Housing Element had referred five changes to the Housing Element back to the Planning Commission as suggested by the Department of State Housing Community Development and the Legal Aid Society. He stated that the changes had been referred to the Planning Commission and been approved and the Housing Element was now before the Council for final adoption. He stated that the recommendation was that the Council adopt the Resolution approving the Housing Element and Negative Declaration No. 451. M/S Damonte/Nicolopulos - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 108-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. Director of Community Development Dell' Angel a stated that this Supplement Draft E.I.R. by EIP, a consultant for the City, had been circulated to the State Clearing House and the affected property owners in the area. He stated that the Planning Commission had for- warded to the Council a list of concerns and questions which it was felt should be addressed by the Consultant before the final E.I.R. is prepared. He stated that in the Council packet were letters from con- cerned property owners and State regional agencies about certain issues to be addressed before the E.I.R. is finally cer- tified by the Redevelopment Agency. He stated that Doug Donaldson, EIP, was pre- sent to give an over view of the impacts of the two issues discussed in the E.I.R. He recommended Council take testimony and discuss other issues after the close of the hearing and direct Staff to prepare the final E.I.R. for Council consideration. Mr. Doug Donaldson, EIP, stated the docu- ment before Council was the E.I.R. supplement 7/25/84 Page 17 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 209 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 33. Public Hearing - Continued. I I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT to the E.I.R. certified by the City in 1981 and that there were two aspects to the Redevelopment plan that were being focused on within the document: 1) the addition of 700 hotel rooms to the overall redevelopment plan which are not site specific as a land use change; 2) the development of the Gateway Boulevard Extension Project. He spoke in detail of the six key issues identified by City Staff as being potential concerns of environmental impacts. He stated that for hotel rooms the E.I.R. does not address land use, hydrology, drainage,air quality, noise and changes in traffic. He spoke of the many benefits from the Gateway Extension to alleviate the congestion at Airport and Grand, East Grand and Harbor and South Airport and Produce. Mayor Addiego opened the Public Hearing and invited those wishing to speak in favor of the E.I.R. to step to the dais. Mr. William Ryan, PG&E, stated that all of his firm's concerns had been expressed except for his letter to Mr. Yee on 11/30/83 emphasizing that this is a major utility relocation in this project; that it would take one year to engineer and relocate these facilities after receiving authorization from the City to proceed. Mayor Addiego invited those wishing to speak against the E.I.R. to step to the dais - no one chose to speak and he closed the Public Hearing. M/S Haffey/Damonte - To authorize Staff to prepare the final E.I.R. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Director of Community Development Dell'Angela stated that he hoped to have the final E.I.R. before Council at the 8/22/84 meeting. 7/25/84 Page 18 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 2i0 CITY MANAGER 28. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution modifying Unit No. 1 to include a Program Recreation Coordinator classifica- tion. A RESOLUTION APPROVING UNIT DETERMINATIONS AND MODIFICATIONS AS MADE BY THE CITY MANAGER PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 3.08 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISO MUNICIPAL CODE 29. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution amending the M.O.U. with AFSCME Unit No. 3 and No. 9 to correct certain language incorrectly incorporated into the document. A RESOLUTION INCORPORATING AGREED UPON LANGUAGE IN ARTICLE 6, SECTION 3, I, PARAGRAPH 1 OF THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND THE AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES, UNITS #3 & 9 FOR THE PERIOD JANUARY 1, 1984 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1985 30. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution which designates the City Manager as the administrative entity responsible for information concerning the status of all permits or applica- tions for development in the City. A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING THE CITY MANAGER AS THE ADMINISTRATIVE ENTITY RESPONSIBLE TO COORDINATE THE REVIEW AND DECISION MAKING AND TO PROVIDE INFORMATION CONCERNING THE STATUS OF ALL PERMITS OR APPLI- CATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT REQUIRED BY THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO (G.C. 65913.3) CITY MANAGER M/S Teglia/Haffey - To adopt the Resol uti on RESOLUTION NO. 109-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Haffey/Oamonte - To adopt the Resol uti on. RESOLUTION NO. 110-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. City Manager Bi rkelo stated that this was not part of the cooperative discussions relating to the promotion program of the 101 Corrider as an inducement to quality businesses to locate there. He stated that the plan was to facilitate major project review and approval and that State law provides for this type of coor- dination which had been used for the Granada Royal e. Vice Mayor Haffey stated that he was very supportive but would like an eva- luation in six months to see how it is working. M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 111-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. 7/25/84 Page 19 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 21i CITY MANAGER 31. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending adoption of a Resolution accepting and approving a Memorandum of Understanding between the City of South San Francisco and the Mid-Management employees included in Unit No. 1 for the period July 1, 1984 through June 30, 1985. A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDER- STANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND THE MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES REPRESENTED IN UNIT NO. 1 FOR THE PERIOD JULY 1, 1984 THROUGH JUNE 30, 1985 32. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending: 1) Motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to introduce an Ordinance adding Chapter 9.04 to the South San Francisco Municipal Code entitled "Animal Licensing and Control." 1st Reading/Introduction AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 9.04 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICI- PAL CODE AND ADDING CHAPTER 9.04 ENTITLED "ANIMAL LICENSING AND ~(~ CONTROL"THERETO ~x/ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 34. Public. Hearing - Propose~ extension for 101~ months of Interim Ordinance No. 952-84, which prohibits uses which may conflict with zoning pro- posals related to General Plan Amendments (Grand, Orange Tamarack and Spruce Avenues) Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending: 1) O~en the Public Hearing and hear testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearing; 3) Motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; 4) Motion to adopt the Ordinance as an Urgency Ordinance to take effect /~ immediately. ~~ CITY MANAGER M/S Haffey/Damonte - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 112-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. City Clerk Battaya read the title of the Ordinance in its entirety. M/S Teglia/Haffey - To waive further reading of the Ordinance. Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Teglia/Haffey - To introduce the Ordinance. Carried by unanimous voice vote. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Director of Community Development Del l'Angela stated that the 101/2 month extension would allow Staff to continue its study of a lower density for the area in the General Plan. Mayor Addiego opened the Public Hearing and invited those wishing to speak for or against the extension to step to the dais - no one chose to speak. He then closed the Public Hearing. City Clerk Battaya read the title of the Ordinance in its entirety. M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To waive further 7/25/84 Page 20 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 34. Staff Report 7/25/84 - Continued. 36. 1st Reading/Adoption AN ORDINANCE E~IENDING ORDINANCE NO. 952 ENTITLED "AN INTERIM ORDINANCE PROHIBITING USES WHICH MAY CONFLICT WITH ZONING PROPOSALS RELATED TO GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENTS" Public Hearing - UP-84-688/Syufy Enterprises/Pay'nPak, appeal of James W. Basin on 6/14/84 decision of the Planning Commission approv- ing UP-84-688, to construct a 2000 seat movie theatre and a 50,000 square foot retail store with 8400 square foot open garden supply shop with related signs and landscaping on two parcels with reciprocal parking the north side of Noor Avenue, between E1Camino Real and Huntington Avenue. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending: 1) Open the Public Hearing and hear testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearing; 3) Motion to accept the withdrawal of the appeal from James W. Basin, Tragoutsis, Elchinoff, and Basin. FINANCE 37. Public Hearing - Sewer Rental Charges. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending: 1) O~en the Public Hearing and hear testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearing; 3) Adoption of a Reso- lution ratifying the Sewer Rental Report for 1984-85. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING REPORT OF ANNUAL SEWER RENTALS AND CHARGES FOR 1984-85 PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 14.12 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO _j MUNICIPAL CODE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT reading of the Ordinance. Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Teglia/Haffey - To adopt the Ordinance as an Urgency Ordinance to take effect immediately. ORDINANCE NO. 956-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. Mayor Addiego opened the Public Hearing and there being no one present who wished to speak, he closed the Public Hearing. M/S Teglia/Haffey - To accept the withdrawal of the appeal from James W. Basin, Tragoutsis and Basin. Carried by unanimous voice vote. 5o5 FINANCE Mayor Addiego opened the Public Hearing and invited those wishing to speak to step to the dais. Director of Finance Lipton stated that a report of sewer charges had been filed with the City Clerk and that this was the third year in a row that the City had not raised sewer rental charges. Mayor Addiego closed the Public Hearing. M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To adopt the Resol uti on. 7/25/84 Page 21 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN FINANCE 37. 38. Staff Report 7/25/84 - Conti~tq Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending by Motion to accept the Parking Place Commission' s recommendation that a Parking Study of the down- town area be completed and propo- sals be solicited. 39. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending: 1) Adoption of a Resolution author- izing execution of an agreement between the City of South San Francisco and United California Bank Realty Corp. (Land Exchange); 2) Adoption of a Resolution author- izing execution of an agreement be- tween the City of South San Francisco and First Interstate Bank of California (Extension of lease). A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF , ,c sco (LAND EXCHANGE) A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND FIRST INTERSTATE BANK OF CALIFORNIA (EXTENSION OF LEASE) FINANCE RESOLUTION NO. 113-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. Director of Finance Lipton stated that the Parking District's initial bond issuance that had constructed and purchased the lots in the area had retired on July 2nd and lifted many of the restrictions that the Parking District was working under in so far as use, sale, trade, swap , and the Parking District boundary itself. He stated that the Parking Place Commission had worked closely with Community Development, the Police Department and Public Services for a parking study of the downtown area be completed and proposals be solicited. He stated that the Parking Place Commission had budgeted $10,000; but was willing to spend up to $40,000. M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To accept the Parking Place Commission's recommendation that a parking study of the downtown area be completed and proposals be solicited. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Director of Finance Lipton stated that since 1974 the City and the Bank have leased each other's property for parking and the intention was that at the end of the lease to convey each parcel to the other party for $10.00 M/S Teglia/Haffey - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 114-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Teglia/Haffey - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 115-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. 7/25/84 Page 22 AGENDA ACTION TAKE, Si4 POLICE 40. Staff Report 7/25/84 recommending: 1) Motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to adopt an Ordinance amending Section 11.44.110 and Section 12.10 which specifies the size of signs that are posted at the entrances to pri- vate property authorizing vehicles ~ to be towed off of the property.~! 2nd Reading/Adoption ~1~ AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 11.44.110 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE AND SECTION 12.10 OF ORDINANCE NO. 491 ENTITLED "TRAFFIC ORDINANCE, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO" (PARKING ON PRIVATE PROPERTY) PUBLIC SERVICES 41. Westborough Townhouse repairs waiver of fees. POLICE City Clerk Battaya read the title of the Ordinance in its entirety. M/S Nicolopulos/Damonte - To waive further reading of the Ordinance. Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Nicolopulos/Damonte - To adopt the Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 957-84 Carried by unanimous voice vote. PUBLIC SERVICES Director of Public Services Yee stated that this item was continued from the last Council meeting related to the Westborough townhouse building permit fees. He stated that Staff's recommen- dation was that the building permit fee be waived provided that the Homeowners Association hire a competent inspector to certify that the contractor, who will be doing the work, complies with the plans and specifications as approved by the City's Building Department. He stated that the Homeowners Association should pay all the out of pocket costs which amounts to $1,700.00. He stated that he had received a letter from the attorney for the Homeowners Association and the attorney had no problem with the recommendation. Councilwoman Teglia stated that the Association would save over $100,000 by the waiving of the fees and that that money would go towards the continued maintenance of the program. Director of Public Services Yee stated that the documents from the court indi- cated that any money left over had to go 7/25/84 Page 23 AGENDA PUBLIC SERVICES 41. Westborough Townhouse repairs waiver of fees - Continued. ACTION TAKEN PUBLIC SERVICES for civic improvements with the Homeowners Association area. Councilwoman Teglia requested clarifica- tion because the term civic improvement could be a lot of things, because she thought this money was going to be added for the maintenance of improvements being installed. Michael Hardy, Esq., whose firm repre- sented the Homeowners in their litigation and was working with them to effectuate repairs that are required by the Court orders as part of the settlement agreement. He stated that this was controlled by several legal documents including the settlement agreement itself, the orders of the San Mateo Superior Court and the fact that they have to continue to make reports to the Court on how the money was used. He stated that Judge Jenkins has maintained jurisdiction over the disbursement of the funds until all of the repairs are complete. He continued, these documents require that all funds are used for the necessary repairs and if there is any money left over it will be used for civic improvements which will be directed in advance by the Court. He stated that a five year maintenance program was being set up which would be renegotiated back five years depending on the money remaining. He stated that the $111,000 would be used for structure and fire pro- tection improvements which includes main- tenance as an important part of the program. He stated that there were 842 homes that were affected and the work was soon to be done and the inspector would be subject to approval by the City. M/S Teglia/Nicolopulos - To Modify the building fees as outlined in the report and request only the out of pocket fees. Carried by unanimous voice vote. 7/25/84 Page 24 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNICATIONS 42. Request from Theodore F. Bayer for a rehearing/reconsideration - Use Permit No. 78-448 - Units 5 and 6 (Modifications No. 5) Stonegate Ridge Planned Community District. --ITEMS FROM STAFF 43. Consideration of a joint marketing program agreement. 44. Report on the School District bungalow. I I I I COMMUNICATIONS Richard H. Schwartz, Esq., stated that he was representing Bayland Properties in the request for rehearing/reconsideration of UP-78-448 that the hearing be con- tinued to 8/22/84. City Attorney Rogers stated that this was a request for the Council to review its yrevious decision and mentioned his etter to the Council that strongly recommended Council not reconsider the matter. M/S Haffey/Teglia - To deny the request. City Attorney Rogers stated that the Ordinance does not provide for recon- sideration or rehearing. Carried by majority voice vote, Nicol opul os voted no. ITEMS FROM STAFF City Manager Birkelo requested that the matter be carried over to the next meeting to allow Staff time to work out some better mechanisms for working out the cooperative relationship in this pro- ject including discussion with the other parties involved. Consensus of Council - To continue to the next regular meeting. Director of Parks and Recreation Norton spoke of a preliminary cost estimate by the City for the restoration, moving, restrooms, renovating the interior and exterior of the bungalow which was dif- ferent than the School District's figures. He spoke of moving the bungalow to Orange Park and the resultant site preparation. Councilman Damonte spoke of moving the bungalow to the Southwood location which would be on school property and the District would be responsible for maintenance. 7/25/84 Page 25 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 2i7 ITEMS FROM STAFF 44. Report on the School District bungal ow. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL 45. Subcommittee Report on Magnolia Center. ~)~ 46. Consideration of suggested modifications to the Grand Avenue Library. Councilwoman Tegl ia: ITEMS FROM STAFF Vice Mayor Haffey stated that the on- going maintenance should be negotiated with the School District for whatever location is selected for the bungalow because the City should not accept that responsibility. Consensus of Council - The Subcommittee should meet again to discuss Southwood as the location. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Vice Mayor Haffey discussed a 7/25/84 summary of a study (which is attached and a permanent part of the record of this meeting) of Magnolia Center and stated that Council should have a study session on this item. Councilwoman Teglia stated that the study session should be widely advertised and held in the Municipal Services Building. City Manager Birkelo stated that at the adjourned regular meeting of 8/6/84 after discussion of the performance pay plan he would offer a list of suggested meeting dates. Discussion followed on new carpeting and paint; window treatments; Staff to get estimates of the anticipated costs for the Library. Stated concern that Park Way was becoming a speedway; Staff to find funds to restore the balustrade at City Hall through State historical funds or by pri, vate donations. Director of Parks & Recreation Norton stated that information was needed from the National Registry on points of local interest; need authorization from the Board of Supervisors; Proposition 18 states that a project must meet the cri- teria with documentation from the Historical Society and Council must authorize. 7/25/84 Page 26 Group 4/Architecture, ' Research and Planning, Inc. 457 Forbes Boulevard South San Francisco California 94080 USA (415) 871-0709 451 College Avenue Santa Rosa California 95401 USA (707) 575-7508 MAGNOLIA CENTER STUDY City of South San Francisco 25 July 1984 SUMMARY OF STUDY Three Phases of Study I Real Estate Appraisal and Preliminary Structural Analysis (November 1983) II Architectural and Economic Analysis (April 1984) III Master Plan and Implementation Strategies (June 1984) Development Options OPTION. 1 o Development of City land and School District land together o 150 units of seniors housing for rent built by private developer o Common dining and laundry facilities o Remodeling of front portion of former Magnolia School as senior and community center by the City o Shared use of senior center with City and senior housing residents o Incentives offered to the developer o 20 to 40% of seniors housing would be made available to low and moderate income seniors 7/25/84 Page 26a OPTION 2 O Development by the City of a senior and community center in the front portion of the former school building o School district to sell their land for R3 uses OPTION 3 o City to sell land and building for R3 uses o School district to sell their land for R3 uses Recommendations 1. City adopt the Planning and Design Criteria in the report as guidelines for development on the site. 2. City adopt a policy of encouraging seniors housing on the site. 3. City should pursue the implementation of Development Option 1. 7/25/84 Page 26b AGENDA ACTION TAKEN GOOD AND WELFARE CLOSED SESSION 47. Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel mat- ters, labor relations and liti- gation. ADJ OU RNMENT: RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED: City of South San Francisco GOOD AND WELFARE Mr. Lawrence Pera stated that the City should stop future construction and take care of the animals; keep San Bruno Mountain as open space. CLOSED SESSION A Closed Session was held earlier in the meeting. M/S Teglia/Haffey- To adjourn the meeting to Monday, 8/6/84, 4:30 p.m.~ in the City Council Conference Room, 400 Grand Avenue to discuss the performance pay pl an. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Time of adjournment 11:45 p.m. APPROVED: Mark N. Addie)g~, City of South San Francisco The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 7/25/84 Page 27