HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1985-08-28Mayor Richard A. Halley
Vice Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia
Counci 1:
Mark N. Addie§o
Emanuele N. Damonte
Gus Nicolopulos
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1)
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
INVOCATION:
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Birkelo requested:
- That the letter from Jeremiah
Lynch, Esq., on behalf of the
Poletti Trusts dated 8/14/85
related to the proposed refunding of
Gateway Assessment Bonds, which
the Council did not act upon at
its 8/21/85 meeting, be entered
into the record.
- Delete Item 3, a Resolution auth-
orizing execution of an agreement
for motorcycle training for peace
officers.
- Delete Item 5, a Resolution auth-
orizing execution of an agreement
for public improvements at 800-890
Dubuque Avenue.
- Continue Item 12, Consideration of
Civic Center Renovation Project
Amendments.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
MINUTES
City Council
Municipal Services Building
'Community Room
August 28, 1985
ACTION TAKEN
7:39 p.m. Mayor Haffey presiding.
Council present:
Council absent:
Nicolopulos, Addiego,
Teglia, Damonte and
Halley.
None.
The pledge of allegiance was recited.
Reverend Donald Pitts, Good News Chapel,
gave the invocation.
AGENDA REVIEW
So ordered. (A copy of the letter is
attached and a permanent part of the
record of this meeting.)
So ordered.
So ordered.
So ordered.
ORAL COMMUNICATI·ONS
Ms. Nancy Nielsen and Ms. Kerry Forni,
former members of the Youth Advisory
Board, presented a proposal containing
recommendations for use in interacting
with future members of the Board.
28
MAILING ADDRE~8:
POST OI='F'ICIE BOX 208
LAW OI='~'ICE:
JEREMIAH J. LYncH
A'rI'ORN~ AT ~W
1220 HOWARD AVENUE, ~UITE 2~0
B~LINGAME, CALI~ ~1~421
August 14, 1985
City Council of the City of
South San Francisco
Redevelopment Agency of the
City of South San Francisco
City Hall
400 Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Re:
Gateway Assessment District No. ST-82-2;
Resolution Preliminarily Approving Reassessment
Report, Appointing Time and Place of Hearing
Protests and Directing Notice Thereof; and
Resolution of Intention to Issue Refunding
Bonds and Levy Reassessments for the Security
Thereof; Agenda Ttem ~8
Dear Council Members and Redevelopment Agency Members:
The undersigned represents the Poletti Trust. The
Poletti Trust is the owner of certain real property located
along, upon and adjacent to the proposed Gateway Boulevard
Extension at its intersection with Mitchell Avenue and South
Airport Boulevard. The street addresses are 191 and 111
Mitchell Avenue.
The Poletti Trust objects to the adoption of any
resolutions authorizing in any way the sale of any bonds in
connection with the Gateway Redevelopment Project.
The certified and approved FEIR for the Gateway
Redevelopment Project forecasts an "F" rating for traffic
conditions in the after condition at the intersection of
South Airport Boulevard, Mitchell Avenue, and Gateway
Boulevard (Extension). An "F" rating is defined in the FEIR
June 1984 Supplement, p. 48, as a "jammed condition." The
Gateway Redevelopment FEIR did not consider the cumulative
traffic impacts including dust, fumes, noise and air
pollution that will be generated at the same intersection by
the U.S. Steel Plant Site Redevelopment Project and the
Shearwater Project. Interestingly, the U.S. Steel and
Shearwater FEIRs ignored their cumulative adverse traffic
impacts on the same intersection on the Gateway Project.
8~28/85
Page la
City Council
Redevelopment Agency
August 14, 1985
Page 2
The undersigned respectfully requests the City and the
Redevelopment Agency to take judicial notice of the U.S.
Steel and Shearwater FEIRs which projects anticipate
construction of 2,000,000 square feet of new buildings,
6,000 employees and 9,000 visitors per day. When the
traffic, noise, dust, fumes and air pollution impacts of
these projects are superimposed on the main north/south
corridor of South Airport Boulevard, Mitchell Avenue and
Gateway Extension Boulevard, which already has an
rating, the greatest physical and economic blight in history
of the State of California will be visited upon the Poletti
Trust Properties, including the Super 8 Motel, Budget Rent-
A-Car, and Hungry Hunter, and all other existing businesses
fronting along and upon South Airport Boulevard and the
surrounding street network system.
Secondly, the Gateway FEIR. also ignores the cumulative
adverse traffic impacts that will be generated by the Frice
Company Project on the South Airport Boulevard, Mitchell
Avenue, Gateway Boulevard Extension intersection.
It is respectfully requested that the Redevelopment
Agency conduct a new Subsequent and/or Supplemental Draft
EIR for the Gateway Redevelopment Project to address the
cumulative impacts of the several projects named herein
which were ignored. Said request is made pursuant to Public
Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and in particular,
California Administrative Code (CEQA Guidelines, Sections
15162 and 15163), which provisions mandate a new EIR when
new information of substantial importance to the project
becomes available or subsequent changes of a substantial
nature occur which impact the circumstances under which the
project was undertaken.
In the event that the aforementioned cumulative impacts
are not addressed in either a Subsquent or Supplemental EIR,
the Poletti Trust will have no other recourse but to take
appropriate legal action.
Kindly have the Clerk enter this letter as part the
record for the public hearing.
Respectfully submitted,
JEREMIAH J. LYNCH
Attorney for the Poletti Trust
8~28~85
Page lb
JJL:jaa
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNITY FORUM
CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff Report 8/28/85 recommending
by Motion to deny and refer the
following claim to the City's
Insurance Adjuster and to the
office of the City Attorney: Claim
as filed by Mariano Casals alleging
personal injuries sustained as the
result of negligence and care-
lessness on 6ehalf of a City
Building Inspector.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
An in-depth discussion followed: on the
proposal presented; the purpose of
forming the Youth Advisory Board; setting
goals and future objectives for the
Board; if the two former members would
work with the Recreation Department;
raising the age limit of members of the
Board; forming a community involvement
committee for candidates nights; con-
tacting other prior members of the Board
for feedback; appointing new members in a
timely fashion, etc.
Ms. Gloria Maltoni, President of the
Downtown Merchants Association,
questioned the police services for the
Art & Wine Festival which were billed at
$1,456 when $1,008 had been the agreed
upon amount.
She requested Council assistance in a 50%
defrayment in costs for Christmas
decorations for Grand Avenue.
Police Chief Datzman explained that the
$1,456 accounted for five posts and one
over-night security and that he had
contributed a Watch Commander which
amounted to 91 manhours.
Discussion followed: that perhaps the
Association should not be billed for all
of the manhours in that the service was
performed for the community at large;
that Ms. Maltoni's requests should be
agendized for the next regular meeting.
COMMUNITY FORUM
No one chose to speak.
CONSENT CALENDAR
So ordered.
8/28/85
Page 2
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff Report 8/28/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution awarding
the bid for the Municipal Services
Building Expansion Project to Nibbi
Brothers in the amount of $384,361
as the lowest responsible bidder.
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
EXPANSION PROJECT
Staff Report 8/28/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution author-
izing execution of an indemnity
and hold harmless agreement and
release, in favor of City of San
Mateo for an 82-hour motorcycle
training course for peace officers.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF INDEMNITY AND HOLD HARMLESS
AGREEMENT AND RELEASE, IN FAVOR OF
CITY OF SAN MATEO
®
Staff Report 8/28/84 recommending
adoption of a Resolution author-
izing execution of an agreement
with Group 4/Architecture, Research
& Planning, Inc. for architectural
services for Magnolia Center.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHOR-
IZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT TO
FURNISH ARCHITECTURAL AND RELATED
DESIGN SERVICES TO THE CITY OF
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
Se
Staff Report 8/28/85 recommending
adoption of a Resolution author-
izing execution of an agreement for
construction of off-site public
improvements with Crop-Spieker-
Singleton, for the construction of
storm drains and sanitary sewers at
800-890 Dubuque Avenue.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHOR-
IZING EXECUTION OF A DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT FOR THE DUBUQUE AVENUE
PROJECT
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESOLUTION NO. 181-85
Removed from the agenda under Agenda
Review.
RESOLUTION NO. 182-85
Removed from the Agenda during Agenda
Review.
8/28/85
Page 3
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff Report 8/28/85 recommending
by Motion to approve building per-
mit determinations of landmarks of
7/9/85 - 740 Larch Avenue and 406
Baden Avenue.
Staff Report 8/28/85 recommending
by Motion to set 9/11/85 as a
Public Hearing date to consider
extension of Interim Ordinance No.
962-84 relative to conflicts
between General Plan provisions and
existing zoning city wide.
Staff Report 8/28/85 recommending
by Motion to approve building per-
mit determinations of landmarks of
7/9/85 - 740 Larch Avenue and 406
Baden Avenue· ~)~
CONSENT CALENDAR
Removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion by Councilman Addiego.
Public Hearing set for 9/11/85.
M/S Teglia/Addiego - To approve the
Consent Calendar with the exception of
Item No. 6.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilman Addiego inquired that since
the 15 days had expired, was Council
action required.
Planning Director Smith stated that
Staff had neglected to send the item
to Council in a timely manner, and the
property owners had not gone ahead with
the work, it would be appropriate for
Council to take action.
Councilman Addiego stated that it was his
understanding that this was merely a
procedural matter. He explained that
when the Ordinance was originally set up
it was City wide and had since been
reduced to include only the downtown area
where the City was anticipating homes
within a certain age range. He commented
that the Paradise Valley, Pecks Lot and
Sterling Terrace areas would not have any
homes within the historical range.
M/S Addiego/Teglia - To concur with the
Planning Director's findings.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
8/28/85
Page 4
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
APPROVAL OF BILLS
8. Approval of the Regular Bills of
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
Staff Report 8/28/85 recommending:
1) Adoption of a Resolution approv-
ing and authorizing execution of an
agreement entitled "Joint Powers
Agreement between the City of South
San Francisco and the Redevelopment
Agency of the City of South San
Francisco; 2) Adoption of a joint
Resolution of the City Council of
the City of South San Francisco and
the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of South San Francisco
(Southern Pacific Land Company);
~ ~P~i~uounc~.°f a ~oi~ ~o~o~f
South San Francisco and the
R dee velopment Agency of the City of
South San Francisco (Budget Rent-a-
Car/Traverse Corporation); 4)
Adoption of a joint Resolution of
the City Council of the City of
South San Francisco and the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of
South San Francisco (Poletti Trust
Properties); 5) Adoption of a joint
Resolution of the City Council of
~ ~v~o~ ~n[~a~i~ and
City of South San Francisco
(Poletti Trust Properties); 6)
Adoption of a joint Resolution of
the City Council of the City of
South San Francisco and the
Redevelopment Agency of the City of
South San Francisco (Poletti Trust
Properties); 7) Adoption of a joint
Resolbtion of the City Council of
the City of South San Francisco and
the Redevelopment Agency of the
APPROVAL OF BILLS
M/S Teglia/Addiego - To approve the
Regular Bills of 8/28/85 in the amount of
$1,144,866.28
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilman Addiego did not participate or
vote in the mater of the claim of
Brentwood Market.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMNISTRATION
City Attorney Rogers suggested, "that the
City Council incorporate in the record of
your consideration of these resolutions
the Supplemental EIR that covered the
Gateway Boulevard Extension Project, the
traffic studies related to that, the
letter dated 8/28/85 which was received
from Attorney Lynch related to the
Poletti Trust Properties which essen-
tially they are protesting the resolu-
tions related to Poletti Trust
Properties." (A copy of the letter is
attached and a permanent part of the
record of this meeting.)
City Manager Birkelo stated that the
resolution having to do with the Joint
Powers Agreement sets forth the deter-
mination of both the City Council and the
Redevelopment Agency to exercise their
respective powers in the acquisition of
the needed properties to carry through
the Gateway Extension Project. That the
following six resolutions have to do with
the individual properties. He stated
that adoption of the resolutions would
w o n
proceedings if necessary.
Discussion followed on the letter from
Mr. Lynch in protest of the adoption of
the Resolutions; that Mr. Lynch was pro-
testing the action of the passing of the
Resolutions of Intention and taking the
property based upon his evaluation of the
Final EIR being inadequate and that it
doesn't consider cumulative impacts; that
further discussion regarding this matter
8/28/85
Page 5
~ OP'F'ICIr BOX
.~LIN~AIM~='. CALJF'OFtJ~A
LAW Ol='~lCl=' O~
J.
BURLINGAME. CALIFORNIA 9401~4211
August 28, 1985
Mr. Walter Birkelo
City Manager
City of South San Francisco
City Hall,~ 400 Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Mr. Walter Birkelo
Executive Director
Redevelopment Agency of the City
of South San Francisco
City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Re= Resolution of Necessity Authorizing
Acauisition of the I.ands of the Poletti Trust
Dear Council Members and Redevelopment Agency Members=
The undersigned represents the Poletti Trust. The
Poletti Trust is the owner of certain real property located
along, upon and adjacent to the proposed Gateway Boulevard
Extension at its intersection with Mitchell Avenue and South
Airport Boulevard. (Acquisition parcels 1, 2 and 4)
The Poletti Trust objects to the adoption of a
Resolution of Necessity authorizing the acquisition of the
lands of the Poletti Trust for the following reasons=
A. The'Public Interest And Necessity Do Not Require
The Project.
The certified and approved FEIR for the Gateway
Redevelopment Project forecasts an "F" rating for traffic
conditions in the after condition at the intersection of
South Airport Boulevard, Mitchell Avenue, and Gateway
Boulevard (Extension). An 'F" rating is defined in the FEI~
June 1984 Supplement, p. 48, as a "jammed condition." The
Gateway Redevelopment FEIR did not consider the cumulative
traffic impacts including dust, fumes, noise and air
P°llution that will be generated at the same intersection by
the U.S. Steel Plant Site Redevelopment Project and the
Shearwater Project. Interestingly, the U.S. Steel and
Shearwater FEIRs ignored their cumulative adverse traffic
impacts on the same intersection.
8/28/85
Page 5a
City Council
Redevelopment Agency
August 28, 1985
Page 2
The undersigned respectfully requests the City and
the Redevelopment'Agency to take judicial notice of the U.S.
Steel and Shearwater FEIRs which, projects anticipate
construction of 2,000,000 square feet of new buildings,
6,000 employees and 9,000 visitors per day. When the
traffic, noise, dust, fumes and air pollution impacts of
these projects are superimposed On the main north/south
corridor of South Airport Boulevard, Mitchell Avenue and
Gateway Extension Boulevard, which already has an "F"
rating, the greatest physical and economic blight in history
of the State. of California will be visited upon the Poletti
Trust Properties, including the Super 8 Motel, Budget Rent-
A-Car, and Hungry Hunter, and all other existing businesses
fronting along and upon South Airport Boulevard and the
surrounding street network system.
Secondly, the Gateway FEIR also ignores the
cumulative adverse traffic impacts that will be generated by
the Price Company Project on the South Airport Boulevard,
Mitchell Avenue, Gateway Boulevard Extension intersection.
The undersigned requests the City and Agency to take
judicial notice of the purported "Negative Declaration" on
the Price Club Project and the 6,000 vehicles per day that
will visit that project.
It is respectfully requested that the Redevelopment
Agency conduct a new Subsequent and/or Supplemental Draft
EIR for the Gateway Redevelopment Project to address the
cumulative impacts of the several projects named herein
which were ignored. Said request is made pursuant to Public
Resources Code Section 21000 et seq., and in particular,
California Administrative Code (CEQA Guidelines, Sections
15162 and 15163), which provisions mandate a new EIR when
new information of substantial importance to the project
becomes available or subsequent changes of a substantial
nature occur which impact the circumstances under which the
project was undertaken.
B. The Project Is Not Planned And/Or T,ocated Tn The
~anner That Will Be Mo~t Compatible With The Greatest Public
~ood And The Least Private Tniur¥.
The acquisition of the Poletti Trust properties and
the construction of the street extension improvements in the
manner proposed will create no less than 6 separate and
distinct remainder parcels.
The Project, if constructed in the manner proposed,
will relegate the Super 8 Motel to a non-conforming sub-
standard use contrary to the zoning ordinances of the City.
8/28/85
Page 5b
City Council
Redevelopment Agency
August 28, 1985
Page 3
The Project, as designed, conceived, and
constructed, will create massive traffic jams at the
intersection of South Airport Boulevard, Mitchell Avenue,
and Gateway BouleVard Extension, which will result in
physical and economic blight on all lands and existing
businesses located south, east.and west of the Gateway
Redevelopment Project.
The public interest and necessity does not require
massive traffic jams in order to accommodate the exigencies
of the redeveloper and the Agency.
C. The Poletti Trust Property Ts Not Necessary For The
pro~ect.
For the reasons stated under headings A and B,
above, the Poletti Trust real property is not necessary for
the Project.
D. There ~oes Not ~xist An 'Approved Appraisal' With
Respect To The Lands Of The Poletti Trust.
The appraiser for the Redevelopment Agency
incorrectly assumed that PG&E was the owner of Acquisition
Parcel 2 which contains approximately 1.461 acres. Parcel 2
is a fully improved piece of real property that has been
filled, culverted, paved, striped, landscaped, improved with
parking lot lights, and fenced. It is presently leased for
$.12 a square foot. However, Parcel 2 has been incorrectly
appraised as part of a larger parcel of land owned by PG&E
containing 7 acres, which larger parcel can be considered
undeveloped swamp land requiring 8 or 10 feet of fill. The
vice of the Agency's appraisal theory of eValuating Parcel 2
as part of a larger undeveloped piece of real property owned
by PG&E is to reduce the overall average price of Parcel 2.
Such appraisal theory is incorrect.
The proper method of appraisal is to appraise
Parcel 2 either as a separate and distinct parcel owned by
the Poletti Trust or as part of a larger parcel or parcels
owned by the Poletti Trust, whichever theory will give
Parcel 2 its highest price in terms of fair market value.
(people v. Silveira, 236 C.A.2d 604, at 616)
As regards Acquisition Parcel 4, the Agency
appraiser must have assumed that Parcel 4 was unuseable and
land-locked. Such is not the case. Parcel 4 contains 5771
square feet. The Agency has offered $1,000 for Parcel 4, or
approximately $.17 per square foot, for the full fee value.
8/28/85
Pa~ 5c
City Council
Redevelopment Agency
August 28, 1985
Page 4
A portion of Parcel 4 is presently rented at $.12 a square
foot per month.. Such appra,isal is insulting.
The undersigned' contends that the RedevelOpment
Agency's appraisal is not a bona fide approved appraisal, in
'that it is predicated upon improper assumptions as regards
ownership; it incorrectly assumes that Parcel 2 is part of a
larger parcel of real property owned by PG&E; and it fails
to consider the income approach as regards fair market
value. Finally, the appraisal of acquisition Parcels 2 and
4 are inconsistent with the Agency's appraisal of PG&E
Acquisition Parcel No. I containing 1.082 acres or 47,262
square feet.
E. The Redevelopment Agency Ha- Not Furnished The
Trustees of The Poletti Trust With A Rummary Of The Aj~prove8
Appraisal.
Aside from the fact that the Agency's "approved
appraisal" is predicated upon improper assumptions, the
purported appraisal summary is not a summary of the basis
for the amount it established as just compensation.
It cannot be ascertained if acquisition Parcels 1,
2 and 4 were appraised as separate and distinct parcels or
were appraised as part of a larger parcel or parcels owned
by the Poletti Trust. It cannot be ascertained whether the
6 remainders have been diminished in value as a result of
severing the part from the whole. It cannot be ascertained
what value, if any, the appraiser had on the subject
property in the before condition. It cannot be ascertained
what value, if any, the appraiser fixed as the fair market
value of Acquisition Parcels 1, 2 and 4. It cannot be
ascertained what value, if any, the appraiser placed upon
the 6 remainders in the after condition. There is no
summary of any comparable sales or mention of any sales, or
range of comparable sales the appraiser considered in
arriving at his "opinion of value".
In a word, the purported "Rummary of the masis of
the Appraisal" is merely a lump sum offer to purchase the
aforementioned acquisition parcels.
For the reasons set forth under headings D and E,
above, the underszgned contends that the Redevelopment
Agency has violated the provisions of Government Code
Section 7267.2.
8/ 8/8s
Page
City Council
Redevelopment Agency
August 28, 1985
Page 5
It is respectfully requested that this letter be made
part of the record at the public hearing
Respectfully submitted,
0 - 0
~-.torney for the Poletti Trust
JJL:jaa
8/28/85
Page 5e
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
9. Staff Report 8/28/85 - Continued.
City of South San Francisco
(Pacific Gas & Electric Company).
1)
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT ENTITLED "JOINT
POWERS AGREEMENT" BETWEEN THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF
THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
2)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ~1.~
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
(SOUTHERN PACIFIC LAND COMPANY)
3)
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
(BUDGET RENT-A-CAR/TRAVERSE
CORPORATION)
4) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
(POLETTI TRUST PROPERTIES)
5) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
(POLETTI TRUST PROPERTIES)
6) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH ~
SAN FRANCISCO AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
(POLETTI TRUST PROPERTIES)
7) A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMNISTRATION
would take place in a Joint Closed
Session with the Redevelopment Agency.
Mayor Haffey asked those wishing to speak
either for or against this matter to step
to the dais - no one chose to speak.
M/S Addiego/Damonte - To adopt the
Resolution on the Joint Powers Agreement.
RESOLUTION NO. 183-85
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Teglia/Addiego - To adopt the
Resolution on the Southern Pacific Land
Company property.
RESOLUTION NO. 184-85
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Teglia/Addiego - To adopt the
Resoltuion on the Budget
Rent-a-Car/Traverse Corporation property.
RESOLUTION NO. 185-85
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Teglia/Addiego - To adopt the
Resolution on Poletti Trust Properties.
RESOLUTION NO. 186-85
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Te§lia/Addiego - To adopt the
Resolution on Poletti Trust Properties.
RESOLUTION NO. 187-85
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Teglia/Addiego - To adopt the
Resolution on Poletti Trust Properties.
RESOLUTION NO. 188-85
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
8/28/85
Page 6
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
9. Staff Report 8/28/85 - Continued.
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO AND THE
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
(PACIFIC GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY
RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES
10.
Public Hearing - 1985-86 Community
Development Block Grant Budget -
continued from 8/14/85 and the
8/21/85 meetings.
Staff Report 8/21/85 recommending:
1) Continue the Public Hearing and
hear testimony; 2) Close the
Public Hearing; 3) Adoption of a
Resolution authorizing the submittal
of the Final Statement of
Objectives and Projected Use of
Community Block Grant Funds for
Fiscal Year 1985-86.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE SUB-
MITTAL OF THE FINAL STATEMENT OF
OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF
COMMUNITY BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1985-86
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMNISTRATION
M/S Teglia/Addiego - To adopt the
Resolution on Pacific Gas & Electric
Company property.
RESOLUTION NO. 189-85
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES
Director of Recreation and Community
Development Norton stated that the
requested action was to adopt the final
statement and proposed use of funds so
that it could be submitted to the Federal
Government. He stated that the budget
remained the same and that the shared
housing project would contain a general
title, and that Staff would investigate
ways of administering the program
in-house.
Mayor Haffey closed the Public Hearing.
Discussion followed concerning costs for
administering the program; that there was
a current federal regulation indicating
that the administration costs associated
with the program must be within the
program; that $15,000 of the $90,000 of
the housing rehabilitation funds were for
administration; etc.
Vice Mayor Teglia expressed concern that
$15,000 of the $90,000 would be used for
administrative fees and that the costs
for administering the program should come
out of the $103,000 for administration.
An in-depth discussion followed con-
cerning the transferring of funds from
the administration program to the rehabi-
litation program; that the transfer of
funds would have no effect on the
program; impact on city funds; that there
was a flexibility to move funds around if
they did not exceed $50,000, otherwise it
would require a public hearing, etc.
Mayor Haffey closed the Public Hearing.
8/28/85
Page 7
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
RECREATION&COMMUNITY SERVICES
10. Public Hearing-Continued.
TECHNICAL AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES
11. Hearing - Show Cause Hearing
regarding violations of Chapters
14.04 and 14.08 of the South San
Francisco Municipal Code occurring
at 1410 E1 Camino Real South San
Francisco, California - continued
from 5/8/85, 5/13/85, 5/22/85 and
6/12/85, 6/26/85, 7/10/85 and~D~
8/14/85 meetings.
ITEMS FROM STAFF
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES
M/S Damonte/Addiego - To adopt the
Resol uti on.
RESOLUTION NO. 190-85
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
TECHNICAL AND MAINTENANCE SERVICES
City Manager Birkelo stated that the
owners of the property Harmonious
Holdings had indicated that that they had
approval from the County Health
Department to put in a new septic tank
system at that location. He stated that
the firm had indicated today that they
intend to enter into an agreement for
that on the 7th of September and hope-
fully have the work completed by the end
of September. He recommended that the
hearing be held open until the work is
complete and continue the hearing until
the first meeting in November.
Councilman Addiego questioned the suita-
bility of this type of a system within
the City limits.
City Manager Birkelo stated that the pro-
perty had been through the testing
program with the County and the soils
were adequate and the County felt that it
was a remedial step to be taken,
and the City did not see the availability
of a sewer system there for at least two
years.
Discussion followed: that under existing
ordinance the City can force hook ups to
the City's sewer system; and that if a
sewer is available within a certain
distance of one's property then a connec-
tion had to be made; that there was a
exception found in the plumbing code, but
it did not talk in terms of distance from
a sewer system; that once a sewer system
becomes available the City can order
hook ups; conflicting ordinances between
the Municipal Code and the Plumbing Code;
to continue the hearing to 11/13/85.
8/28/85
Page 8
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
12.
Consideration of Civic Center
Renovation Project Amendments -
continued from 8/21/85.
GOOD AND WELFARE
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
City Manager Birkelo stated that at the
last meeting the Council had had dif-
ferences of opinion as to whether or not
~m~ ~o~lm~d~°~r~h~i~s~8~i~
of the balustrade, cupola, painting and
further work in the manager's office area
and the conference room. He stated that
he was looking for direction.
Mayor Haffey stated that that there was
a split in the Council and some members
wished to move forward and others did
not. He stated that he felt that at this
point there were too many capital
improvements and other priorities and
· ° a '
~ ~r~e~sW~t~ ~n~u~ng
~8~i~ ~~ment budgets and held off
Concurrence of Council - To have this
matter considered during the 1986-87
Capital Improvement Budget.
Mayor Haffey stated that he had received
a request from a member of the Personnel
Board for a joint meeting of the Board
and the Council. He requested that City
Manager Birkelo put this item on
Council's calendar in the near future.
GOOD AND WELFARE
Mr. Frank Conrad, 536 Grand Ave.,
expressed concern over parking on
sidewalks, driveways, as well as cars
parked for long periods of time on
the street. He requested better control
from the Police Department in enforcing
parking regulations in the area.
Councilman Addiego stated that the
parking on the 500 block of Grand was
impacted by the downtown area and
suggested that the downtown parking
enforcement be extended to the 500 block.
Discussion followed: that the police were
dealing with the problem; that daily
recordings were being made of every event
taking place by patrol cars; that the
8/28/85
Page 9
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
GOOD AND WELFARE
13.
Closed Session for the purpose of
the discussion of personnel mat-
ters, labor relations and
litigation.
RECALL TO ORDER:
ADJOURNMENT
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Battaya, City
City of South San Francisco
GOOD AND WELFARE
Police Chief would forward the report to
the Council and Mr. Conrad; the burden
being on the Police to prove over parking
and the resultant towing; the car behind
Wardrobe Cleaners that had been parked
there since 7/1/85.
Council adjourned to a joint Closed
Session at 9:00 p.m., with the
Redevelopment Agency to confer with the
Agency's Attorney regarding the procedure
as to whether to initiate eminent domain
litigation concerning property located in
the general area of East Grant Avenue,
South Airport Blvd. and Mitchell Avenue
for the Gateway Extension Project on the
following properties: 1) Poletti's
Trust, Assessor's Parcel No. 15-12-62,
northwest corner of Mitchell & West
Harris; 2) Poletti Trust, Mitchell Avenue
at South Airport Boulevard; 3) Budget
Rent-A-Car, Assessor's Parcel No.
15-121-02, 7 South Airport Boulevard; 4)
Poletti's Trust, Assessor's Parcel No.
15-123-54; 5) Southern Pacific Railroad
Company, a 1.197 acre parcel off East
Grand Avenue which is a part of a larger
Southern Pacific ownership; and 6)
Pacific Gas & Electric property located
directly on East Grand Avenue near
Highway 101.
Mayor Haffey recalled the meeting to
order at 9:40 p.m., all Council present,
no action taken.
M/S Addiego/Teglia - To adjourn the
meeting.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Time of adjournment was 9:41 p.m.
APPROVED:
Richard' A. H~fK~y,~M~.'or ~
City of South San Fra ciao
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
~The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of
an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and
documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are
available for inspection, review and copying.
8128/85
Page 11