HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1986-10-08Mayor Roberta Cerri Te§lia
Vice Mayor Mark N. Addiego
Counci 1:
John "Jack" Drago
Richard A. Haffey
Gus Nicolopulos
MINUTES
City Council
Municipal Services Building
Community Room
October 8, 1986
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1)
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
PRESENTATIONS:
PROCLAMATION:
ITAL I AN-AMER I CAN
MONTH IN SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO OCTOBER,
1986
PROCLAMATION: VERY SPECIAL ARTS
FESTIVAL DAY
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Birkelo Requested:
- A Motion to allow the City Clerk
to cancel the 10/22/86 meeting
and reschedule the meeting to
10/29/86 and to allow Council
attendance at the League of
CA Cities Los Angeles meeting
of that date, and direct that
all Public Hearings for the
10/22/86 meeting be continued
to the meeting of 10/29/86
- Delete Item No. 10, Records
Retention Schedule Resolution.
- Add Item 19a., Resolution for
1986-87 Capital Improvement
Program.
ACTION TAKEN
7:34 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding.
Council present:
Council absent:
Nicolopulos, Halley,
Addiego and Teglia.
Drago.
The pledge of allegiance was recited.
Mayor Teglia presented Proclamations for
the Italian American Games held in this
City to Mr. Alvaro Bettucchi and Mr.
Vincent Forano. She also presented the
Proclamation to Miss Karen Bonanno who is
to preside over the Columbus Day
Festivities in San Francisco as Queen
Isabella.
She read the Proclamation aloud and
stated that the affair would be held at
the Hillsdale Mall in San Mateo on
10/18/86 to celebrate the artistic skills
and activities of children and adults
with disabilities.
AGENDA REVIEW
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To cancel the
meeting of 10/22/86 and direct that all
Public Hearings for the 10/22/86 meeting
be continued to the meeting of 10/29/86.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
So ordered.
So ordered.
10/8/86
Page I
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
00010
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
No one chose to speak.
COMMUNITY FORUM
COMMUNITY FORUM
Vice Mayor Addiego encouraged the com-
~_/'/munity to attend the Mater Dolorosa
Festival to be held from 10/23/86 -
10/26/86.
Mayor Teglia encouraged the community to
attend the All Souls Festival over the
weekend, and make reservation for the
polenta dinner to be cooked by Caroline
Fregosi.
CONSENT CALENDAR
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of 9/10/86,
Adjourned Regular Meeting of
9/17/86 and the Special Meeting of
9/24/86.
Approved.
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending
by Motion that the City Council
deny and refer the following claim
against the City to the Insurance
Adjuster and the City Attorney:
Claim as filed by Kathleen S.
Vigil, Esq. on behalf of Ricardo De
La Torre alleging a dangerous
condition of City property.
So ordered.
®
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending:
a) Adoption of a Resolution to
reject the non-responsive bid for
the replacement of existing
steel frame and windows at Central
Fire Station; b) Adoption of a
Resolution to award the contract
for the replacement of existing
steel frame and windows at Central
Fire Station, Project No.
PB-83-10.5, Bid No. 1722-1, to
I.D.M. Glass Co. in the amount of
$18,600 as the lowest responsible
bidder.
a) A RESOLUTION TO REJECT THE NON-
RESPONSIVE BID FOR THE REPLACE-
10/8/86
Page 2
AGENDA
ACTION
TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Staff Report - Continued.
MENT OF EXISTING STEEL FRAME
AND WINDOWS AT CENTRAL FIRE
STATION, PROJECT NO. ~
PB-83-10.5, BID NO. 1722-1
b)
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF
CONTRACT FOR REPLACEMENT OF
EXISTING STEEL FRAME AND
WINDOWS AT CENTRAL FIRE ~ ~/~
STATION, PROJECT NO.
PB-83-10.5, BID NO. 1722-1
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending
adoption of a Resolution of
Intention to vacate a portion of a
sanitary sewer and storm drainage
easement at 362 Alida Way and set a
Public Hearing for 11/12/86.
A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO VACATE
A PORTION OF A SANITARY SEWER AND
STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT AT 362
ALIDA WAY AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING
FOR NOVEMBER 12, 1986
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending
by Motion to accept as complete the
roof replacement at Fire Station
No. 2, Project No. PB-83-10.3 as
complete in accordance with the
approved plans and specifications.
0
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending
adoption of a Resolution author-
izing the execution of Supplement
No. 7 to Local Agency State
Agreement No. 04-5177 (Federal Aid
Safety Improvement Project) for the
railroad crossing protection work
at East Grand Avenue at Southern
Pacific Railroad Grade Crossing
No. E-10.55-C.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF SUPPLEMENT NO. 7 TO LOCAL AGENCY
STATE AGREEMENT NO. 04-5177
(FEDERAL AID SAFETY IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT)
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESOLUTION NO. 158-86
RESOLUTION NO. 159-86
RESOLUTION NO. 160-86
So ordered.
Removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion by Councilman Nicolopulos.
10/8/86
Page 3
AG E N D A A C T I O N T A K E N~)~[~'~-~'
CONSENT CALENDAR
CONSENT CALENDAR
Request from Mater Dolorosa Church
that Council by Motion waive the
carnival fees for the festivities
on 10/23-26/86.
So ordered.
0
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending Public Hearing set for 10/22/86.
by Motion to set a Public Hearing
date of 10/22/86 for consideration ~0~'37~;~
of the Master Fee Schedule.
0
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending
by Motion to set a Public Hearing
date of 10/22/86 for the 1986-87
Special District Augmentation Fund
Distribution.
Public Hearing set for 10/22/86.
10.
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommendation
of a Resolution establishing a
record retention schedule.
Removed from the Consent Calendar under
Agenda Review by the City Manager.
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A RECORDS
RETENTION SCHEDULE AND AUTHORIZING
PERIODIC DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN
RECORDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
GOVERNMENT CODE 34090 ET SEQ
11.
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending
by Motion to accept the Orange
Memorial Park Picnic Area, Paradise
Valley Park and Winston Manor 1
Park Playground Equipment
Installation Project PR-85-4 as
complete in accordance with the
plans and specifications.
Removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion by Mayor Teglia.
12.
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending
adoption of a Resolution to
authorize an agreement with the San
Mateo Housing Authority in relation
to Rental Rehabilitation Program.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL
AND EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF
UNDERSTANDING FOR THE THE PROVISION
OF HOUSING VOUCHERS UNDER THE
RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM
RESOLUTION NO. 161-86
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To approve the
Consent Calendar with the exception of
Items 6, 10 and 11.
10/8/86
Page 4
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending
adoption of a Resolution author-
izing the execution of Supplement
No. 7 to Local Agency State
Agreement No. 04-5177 (Federal Aid
Safety Improvement Project) for the
railroad crossing protection work
at East Grand Avenue at Southern
Pacific Railroad Grade Crossing
No. E-10.55-C.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF SUPPLEMENT NO. 7 TO LOCAL AGENCY
STATE AGREEMENT NO. 04-5177
(FEDERAL AID SAFETY IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT)
11.
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending
by Motion to accept the Orange
Memorial Park Picnic Area, Paradise
Valley Park and Winston Manor 1
Park Playground Equipment
Installation Project PR-85-4 as
complete in accordance with the
plans and specifications.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilman Nicolopulos questioned why the
covenant was still in the agreement - that
~othe local agency would perform the
maintenance.
Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee
stated that it was a State requirement
that had nothing to do with the railroad.
He stated that the PUC gave the money and
Southern Pacific maintained the track. He
stated that the master agreement spells
out that Southern Pacific will do the
maintenance.
M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 162-86
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
Mayor Teglia stated that the original
equipment in Winston Manor I had disap-
peared, and then much later new equipment
had been poorly installed.
Director of Recreation & Community
Development Norton stated that the equip-
ment had been received three weeks late,
and three weeks after that construction
had begun. He spoke of there being wrong
size poles, however the equipment had
been functional since the end of July.
He stated that four swings had been
removed and replaced by two swings.
Mayor Teglia questioned if the two swings
could be brought back or if another unit
could be purchased.
Councilman Halley questioned if a survey
of a neighborhood was done before
playground equipment was replaced.
Director of Recreation & Community
Services Norton stated that he had met
with six residents in Winston Manor
10/8/86
Page 5
AGENDA
000:1 .3
ACTION TAKEN
11. Staff Report - Continued.
eighteen months before the equipment was
purchased. He stated that the residents
had seen the design blueprints before the
equipment had been purchased.
Mayor Teglia stated that she had received
a letter from a citizen who was not only
concerned over the equipment, but also in
the lack of supervision in the park.
Director of Recreation & Community
Services Norton stated that supervisors
at Winston Manor and Buri Buri Park had
resigned, however the positions were now
filled.
M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To accept the
Project as complete in accordance with
the plans and specifications.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Approval of the Regular Bills of
10/8/86. ~'d9 / ~
M/S Addiego/Haffey - To approve the
Regular Bills in the amount of
$2,336,875.47.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
14.
(Standard Building Co., South San
Francisco Unified School District,
owner).
Hearing - Consideration of SA-86-94 Director of Planning Smith stated that
and Negative Declaration No. 561 to the recommendation from the Planning
allow a 47 lot, detached, single- Commission was to approve SA-86-94 sub-
family residential development on ject to the conditions and based on the
7.9 acres of land along the findings in the staff report. She stated
easterly side of Chestnut Ave
northerly of Tamarack Lane ., ~~ that the project was located on the
south western 7.8 acres of vacant former
Parkway Junior High School property. She
continued, it was on the east side of
Chestnut Avenue and immediately north of
Tamarack Lane.
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending:
1) Hear testimony; 2) Motion to
approve SA-86-94.
She proceeded to give the specifics of
the project: that it was directly related
to residential planned development;
that the Subdivision Map would create 47
single family lots; that access would be
provided by way of Chestnut Avenue
approximately 100' north of Tamarack
10/8/86
Page 6
AGENDA
000 .4
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
14. Staff Report - Continued.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
Lane; square feet of the various units;
that the density was within the unit per
net acre required by the General Plan;
that all of the lots would be served by
two public cul-de-sac streets; that there
would not be any public facilities; that
there would be some covenants and
restrictions to provide the joint main-
tenance required for the post drainage
easement located on the easterly side of
the site.
She stated that the Planning Commission
also recommended that the Council and
School Board work on parking mitigation
for the baseball games played on the
adjoining ball field.
Councilman Nicolopulos questioned if
there had been any serious opposition to
this project.
Director of Planning Smith stated that
the only concern had been access, which
originally had been planned on Laurel
Avenue. She stated that there had been
concern expressed for an alternate access
off Chestnut, which had been approved by
the Planning Commission.
Councilman Nicolopulos questioned if
anticipated future developments across
the street could create conflicts within
the traffic control. He questioned if
there was to be a signal installed at
Chestnut.
Director of Planning Smith stated that
there would be a stop signal for this
development on Chestnut.
Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee
stated that this subject had been
discussed at length at the Planning
Commission and the subject property
potentially could have an intersection if
the property is not integrated with the
City in the future development.
10/8/86
Page 7
AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
14. Staff Report - Continued.
00011
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
Vice Mayor Addiego questioned if Mr. Yee
was referring to the City's property at
Chestnut and Grand.
Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee
stated that a proposed development was
not before the City at this time.
Vice Mayor Addiego stated that there was
to be a second stop light on Chestnut,
however he did not want it as close to
Grand and Chestnut as this plan showed.
He suggested reversing the plan and have
the stop light at the other end of the
development - higher up to have more
space.
Councilman Nicolopulos stated that Mr.
Mantegani had made reference to a pro-
posed inside road on the Laurel property
that would extend to the present homes.
Mr. Mantegani, 113 James Court, stated
that the exit that came from the
Sunstream property would not line up with
the road that he would put in if he deve-
loped his property separately it would be
an off intersection by about 50'. He
stated that his contention was that it
would not have to take place if and when
the City developed it took into con-
sideration the entire valley as a whole
and put dead-ends on each property. He
continued, then he could use it to deve-
lop his property and then there would
only be three entrances: one off Grand
and Oak, one off of Miller coming into
the property; and one at the top.
Vice Mayor Addiego stated that the School
District did not realize that a developer
had to dedicate a significant amount of
property if they were going to end up
with a parallel interior street. He
questioned if the City would ever realize
the widening of Chestnut.
Mr. Mantegani stated that from a planning
10/8/86
Page 8
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
14. Staff Report - Continued.
Public Hearing - Appeal of the
Planning Commission decision on
8/24/86 regarding UP-86-768,
Negative Declaration No. 558 for
Shaw Business Center and an
environmental determination of same
to allow multi-tenant buildings,
off-street parking, landscaping and
related site improvements at an
existing light industrial facility
at 212-214 Shaw Road - appeal as
made by San Bruno City Attorney
Stan Gustavson - Continued from
9/24/86.
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending:
1) Continue the Public Hearing and
hear testimony; 2) Close the
Public Hearing; 3) Motion to deny
the appeal.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
standpoint it was the most logical way,
in that the storm drains and sewers run
down hill. He continued, it runs down
hill you pick the lowest spot which is in
the middle of the valley, rather than
fill the property.
Mayor Teglia complimented the applicant
on the project, and stated that it would
be an asset to the City.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To approve
SA-86-94 subject to the conditions and
the eleven findings in the Staff Report.
Mayor Teglia stated that the issue of
parking should be investigated by the
Liaison of Council and the School
District.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Director of Planning Smith recommended
~_~~ that the Council uphold the decision of
the Planning Commission approving
Negative Declaration No. 558 and
UP-86-768, based on findings and subject
to certain conditions; and deny the
appeal.
She proceeded to negate the allegations
made in the appeal: that slight
increases were expected in traffic and
storm drainage but that no resultant
problems were expected; that the volume
of only 86 trips were less than the
threshold criteria established by San
Bruno; that if there was an increase in
storm drainage, it should be a decrease
due to the addition of nearly one acre of
landscaping; that there was no increase
in storm water from this site.
Mayor Teglia stated that she and Vice
Mayor Addiego had met with Mayor Marshall
and Councilman Simon, the respective City
Managers, City Attorneys and the Public
Works Director on the appeal yesterday.
10/8/86
Page 9
AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
15. Staff Report - Continued.
O00 q.?
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
She stated that the concern was not so
much this site, but that the site pro-
vided a vehicle to gain this City's
attention as to what was perceived to be
some mounting problems in that area,
i.e., regional traffic from all of the
developments taking place; how that
impacted the area with further develop-
ment in both cities as they exist today.
She stated that San Bruno had real con-
cern in respect to the storm drainage
system, because some years back San Bruno
designed and installed some improvements
in this area in South San Francisco. She
stated that San Bruno at that time had
paid a third of the cost of those
improvements to support a thirty year
storm. She stated that San Bruno con-
tended that today, by refined engineering
methods, it was questionable whether it
would even sustain a ten year storm -
rather a three to five year storm type
system.
She stated that this had been referred
back to South San Francisco's staff for
further analysis and presentation to the
Council, which was forthcoming.
She stated that San Bruno wanted this
City's participation in examining this
area because if the flooding occurred it
would happen in South San Francisco. She
stated that San Bruno had a major deve-
lopment being considered, Downey Savings,
which could very well impact this area
significantly.
Vice Mayor Addiego stated that San Bruno,
at the joint meeting, had not been in a
position to withdraw the appeal. He
stated that both Councils were looking
for potential investment in the area, and
if there was a lack in the standards of
storm drain run-off, then it warranted
some kind of improvement on a joint
basis.
10/8/86
Page 10
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
15. Staff Report - Continued.
RECESS:
RECALL TO ORDER:
16.
Public Hearing - Consideration of
an increase in garbage rates by the
So. San Francisco Scavenger Company
- Continued from the 8/13/86,
9/10/86 and 9/24/86 meetings. ~5~,
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending:
1) Open the Public Hearing and hear
testimony; 2) Close the Public
Hearing.
17.
Public Hearing - Consideration of
the Revised Zoning Ordinance -
Continued from the 8/13/86, ~'~9<r?
8/27/86, 9/10/86 and 9/24/86
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
City Manager Birkelo stated that there
had been a tentative conclusion of the
Subcommittee: that for this specific
piece of property, there was no clear
evidence of adding fuel to the fire or
water to the system; and it would be dif-
ficult to solicit a substantial contribu-
tion to a plan that had not been agreed
upon by the two municipalities.
Mayor Teglia stated that the bottom line
was that if the system had to be
improved, someone would have to pay for
it; that there were no calculations at
this time to determine who was going to
share in that cost of levies or
assessments.
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To uphold the deci-
sion of the Planning Commission,
approving Negative Declaration No. 558
and UP-86-768.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Mayor Teglia declared a recess at 8:40
p.m.
Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to
order at 8:52 p.m., all Council present.
Mayor Teglia stated that the Subcommittee
was still not ready to make their report
after an initial meeting with the
Scavengers. She proceeded to read a
letter into the record from Mr. Douglas
Button, dated 10/7/86 (a copy is attached
and a permanent part of the record of
this meeting)~ requesting that the rate
increase be removed from the agenda.
Mayor Teglia stated that this item would
be temporarily taken off the calendar.
Director of Planning Smith stated that
the staff report had been divided into
three sections: 1) Sign provisions
having been referred back to the Planning
10/8/86
Page 11
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
SCAVENGER, INC.
P.O. BOX 348
, 69 SO. LINDEN AVE. * SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. 94080 * (415) 589-4020
0001 9
October 7, 1986
City of South San Francisco,
City Council]Sub-Committee On South
San Francisco Scavenger Company's
Request For Rate Increase
C/O City Manager, Mr. ~.W. Birkelo
City Hall
P.O. Box 711
South San Francisco, CA 94080
Dear Mro Birkelo,
We would like to apologize for the delay in our response to the
Sub-Committee's concerns as were laid out in our first meeting. This
delay has been primarily due to the unavailability of our accountant,
Mr. Charles Joerg. He has been on a business/pleasure trip to the
_ Far East for some time now, and should return next week. it is our
intention to meet with the Sub-Coi%~L~ittee as soon as possible after
his return in order to enter into serious negotiations over the
issues involved.
In the meantime, we ask that the rate increase request be removed
from the City Council agenda until negotiations have been completed
and the subcommittee is prepared to return our request to the agenda.
We will make arrangements with Mr. Joerg upon his return to give
his full attention to these negotiations and will contact the Sub-Committee
as soon as possible to set up a meeting. Thank you, for your understanding
and patience.
Sincerely,
Douglas/~utto~,
Offic~
10/8/86
Page 11a.
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
17. Public Hearing - Continued.
meetings - Public Hearing
closed.
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending:
1) Continued discussion of various
input; 2) Motion to waive full
reading of the Zoning Ordinance;
3) Motion to introduce the
0 rdi nance.
1st Reading/Introduction
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING TITLE 17 AND
Commission who would hold a public
hearing on 10/23/86; 2) Antenna provi-
sions were modified by staff to address
the concerns of amateur radio operators
which the Commission approved except for
having changed the permitted height limit
of antennas to 60' from 40' in a residen-
tial area without the requirement of a
use permit; 3) Expiration of use permits
- reaffirmation of the Commission that a
use permit expires if that use is aban-
doned for a period of at least six
months; 4) Adult entertainment - recom-
mends an overlay district to restrict the
TITLE 20, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF use to an area on the east side of So
CHAPTERS 20.57, 20.59, 20.61 AND ~-~/~ ~ '
Spruce Ave. from So. Canal to 300' south
20.63, OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
MUNICIPAL CODE (ORDINANCES NO. 353
AND NO. 455, AS AMENDED) AND
ADOPTING A NEW TITLE 20 ENTITLED
"ZONING"
of Victory Ave. with resultant restric-
tions, i.e., not within a P-C District
that is 500' of any area zoned for resi-
dential use, and not within 1,000' of any
public park, religious institution or
school.
She discussed other items of concern
raised at the public hearings: in-lieu
parking fees had been eliminated in the
Downtown Parking District; twenty acres
northeast of Sign Hill; zoning designa-
tion of Mazzanti property - resolved by
adopting the General Plan Amendment;
zoning designation on Oak Farm property;
new residential dwelling units; additions
to dwellings; elimination of present
chapters dealing with Planned Commercial
Districts which affect those units not
governed by CC&Rs; a memo responding to
various citizen concerns and their indi-
vidual letters to Council (all documents
are attached to and a part of the staff
report, Exhibit 1-4, on file in the City
Clerk's Office as a permanent file
record).
Discussion followed: concern over elimi-
nation of restriction to Planned
Commercial Districts concerning single-
family exteriors; whether the homeowners
were aware that this condition would be
relaxed; that the homeowners had not
10/8/86
Page 12
AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
17. Public Hearing - Continued.
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
been notified; that Council prior goals
and objectives had been to improve the
liaison between City Government and
homeowners groups and trying to establish
relations with those neighborhoods that
might want to form homeowners asso-
ciations; that that portion of
Westborough with townhouses did not have
homeowner associations, and when the
structures had been found to be defective
the City had come to their assistance in
filing lawsuits; elimination of the con-
dition could affect colors of shared com-
mon walls, as well as radically altering
the architectural character of the indi-
vidual units; that only upon application
for a building permit would there be a
way to keep track of changes to the area
if the condition was removed, etc.
Mayor Teglia questioned the 40' in a
residential neighborhood requiring a use
permit, and the Commission citing the
lack of criteria to evaluate the need for
a given height of antenna.
Director of Planning Smith stated that a
representative of the amateur radio
operators actually had wanted a 55'
antenna without a use permit, and staff
had felt that 40' was sufficient. She
stated that staff had made that recommen-
dation to the Commission and they had had
difficulty in evaluating a request for
going higher than the 40'. She stated
that Daryl Jones' opinion was that 60'
would take care of 95% of amateur radio
operators antenna needs.
Discussion followed: whether 60' anten-
nas would be tolerated in neighborhoods;
that a building permit would have to be
acquired for a 60' antenna; FPC regula-
tions not being precise as to the
authority of local governments in regu-
lating amateur radio operators.
10/8/86
Page 13
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
17. Public Hearing - Continued.
(Cassette No. 2)
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
City Attorney Armento stated that the FPC
had said they were not going to come out
with any specific rules and regulations
with regard to heights or other limita-
tions that a locality might choose to put
on things. She continued, it essentially
said that it hopes that local government
takes into account the concerns of the
amateur radio operator, and doesn't do
anything that would unduly restrict them;
it does not say that the locality had to
abide by certain limitations or that the
locality was prohibited from imposing any
restrictions.
She stated that the restrictions the
Ordinance would impose, were similar to
other communities' ordinances. She stated
that staff did not believe that the ordi-
nance was out of line or would cause
problems for the FPC.
Discussion followed: 40' antenna vs. 60'
antenna; that staff would review the need
for antenna height over 40'; establishing
a notification process for a neighborhood
when a request was made for an antenna
over 40', etc.
Mr. Bob Flinkinger, 351 Arroyo Dr.,
stated that the length of an antenna was
not something that was arbitrary, but was
based on scientific law. He proceeded to
describe the minimum lengths of an effi-
cient antenna.
He suggested allowing 40' antennas just
by applying for a permit; from 45' - 60'
the person must provide the documentation
to the Building Dept. stating the calcu-
lations that necessitate the additional
footage.
He stated that there were retractable
towers available that were 22' high, and
could be cranked down. He urged the
Council to stay away from a use permit
procedure.
10/8/86
Page 14
AGENDA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
17. Public Hearing - Continued.
000 .
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
Mayor Teglia instructed staff to come up
with new language, "of between 40' - 65'
and encourage the use of retractable
towers ."
Discussion followed: on the six month
expiration of use permits; adult enter-
tainment in the overlay zone; abandoning
in-lieu parking fees; 20 acres north east
of Sign Hill.
Director of Planning Smith stated that
Exhibit 3 addressed the Bills' 20 acres
being designated as open space which
allowed one unit per acre. She stated
that if there was sufficient argument for
more units with access, then the burden
would be upon the Bills' to ask for a
General Plan Amendment for additional
units.
Councilman Nicolopulos questioned who
and how the determination had been made
that there was soil instability on the 20
acres o
Mayor Teglia stated that the City had put
that property on notice with respect to
the soil in that area.
Councilman Nicolopulos questioned if and
what engineering studies had been done on
the 20 acres.
Vice Mayor Addiego stated that only when
the land was developed would the
Developer hire soils engineers to deter-
mine the stability of the property -
which had not been done.
Director of Planning Smith stated that
the Council at the last meeting had made
the decision on the Mazzanti property to
have it remain partly high density and
partly open space.
Councilman Haffey stated that west of
Colma Creek would be the high density
residential, and east of the Creek would
be open space.
10/8/86
Page 15
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION
17. Public Hearing - Continued.
Discussion followed: the designation of
the Oak Farm property, opposite Santo
Christo Hall, was medium density; new
residential dwelling units must go before
the Design Review Board; additions to
dwellings; parking requirements in a new
development with already existing parking
problems, and whether the Commission had
the latitude to require more parking spa-
ces; staff was to look into the latitude
in that it was not in the ordinance;
further concern over Westborough and of
not removing the restriction.
Deputy City Manager/CD&A Lewis stated
that staff would incorporate the changes
discussed into the zoning ordinance.
Vice Mayor Addiego requested that staff
respond at the next meeting to the con-
cerns expressed in Mr. John Penna's
letter of 10/7/86 regarding building
situations in the down zoned area between
Grand and Railroad Avenues.
Consensus of Council - To continue the
item to the next meeting.
POLICE
POLICE
18.
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending Police Chief Datzman stated that this
adoption of a Resolution that ~/~ item would increase the number of Parking
authorizes the transfer of funds ~f'~/~/ Enforcement Officers by one, and that
from the Parking District for the p. ~ item 19 was an enabling resolution to
purpose of creating an additional incorporate the money into the budget.
position of a Parking Enforcement
Officer in the Police Department.
A RESOLUTION PERMITTING THE
TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE PARKING
DISTRICT TO THE APPROPRIATE
ACCOUNTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF
CREATING AN ADDITIONAL POSITION OF
PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER AND
AUTHORIZING ONE ADDITIONAL POSITION
OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IN
THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
Councilman Nicolopulos questioned if this
meant that the Parking District would
provide the money each year to perpetuate
the new officer, in that the District was
not that affluent.
Police Chief Datzman stated that the
current Parking Enforcement Officer was
in the Police budget and that the
District had agreed to fund the new
officer. He stated that currently PSTs
were being used for duties that would be
assumed by the new officer exclusively in
the downtown area.
10/8/86
Page 16
AGENDA
0001
ACTION TAKEN
POLICE
18. Staff Report - Continued.
ITEMS FROM STAFF
19.
Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending
adoption of a Resolution that
amends the 1986-87 Operating Budget
to include the new position of
Parking Enforcement Officer and
allocates those funds into the
current budget.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT
0-1 TO THE 1986-87 OPERATING BUDGET
19a. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending
adoption of a Resolution that
adopts the 1986-87 Capital ~4~/~(2
Improvement Program.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR
1986-87
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
20.
Status Report on the criteria for
the homes to be insulated in the
Aircraft Noise Insulation Program.
POLICE
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 163-86
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ITEMS FROM STAFF
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To adopt the
Resol uti on.
RESOLUTION NO. 164-86
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
City Manager Birkelo pointed up the
changes in the 1986-87 Capital
Improvement Program that were not
reflected in the resolution: page 17 (1)
$25,000 for an arterial traffic study was
being advanced to 1987-88; page 15 (21)
Forbes medians had been reduced to
$25,000; page 12 (10) increased Magnolia
Center appropriation to $3,055,342 and
raised the capital improvement funding to
$2,194,300; page ii increases to
$3,202,749 and reduces the estimated
balance on 6/30/87 from $223,971 to
$87,171. He stated that the resolution
would have to be amended to make the
total amount of $10,821,181 to correspond
to the summary total.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the
amended Resolution that will read
$10,821,181 in total.
RESOLUTION NO. 165-86
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee
stated that the important thing was
whether the Council agrees with the staff
10/8/86
Page 17
AGENDA
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
20. Status Report - Continued.
ACTION TAKEN
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
recommendations on whether the homes
should be owner occupied and to define
the high priority within contour zones 70
down to 69.0 CNELs.
Discussion followed: the issue of owner
occupied homes would mean that rental
homes would not be excluded, but would
have to wait until the other homes were
completed in this phase; doing owner
occupied homes first and pursue further
funding to insulate all homes in the
impacted area; that there were 187 homes
in the contour line zones; to recanvas
rental units in the next phase after the
69 CNEL was completed; arrange a meeting
with everyone in the 70 CNEL zone to
inform the people of the criteria and
funding program; direction given to staff
to go ahead with the million dollar pro-
ject with owner occupied homes; that
staff was to present proposals on the
prioritization of properties for future
projects; soliciting future 20% funding;
that there were 40 homes to be insulated
in the 70 CNEL zone and the second phase
would cover 147 homes in the 69 CNEL
zone.
Mayor Teglia stated that she had received
a letter from a citizen requesting the
Council consider an ordinance regulating
smoking in the work place.
She requested the City Manager to canvas
the Council for a joint meeting with the
Historic Preservation Commission.
She stated that she had received a letter
from John Henry Kubba, Esq., who had
expressed concern over yearly flooding in
the Treasure Island Trailer Court.
Councilman Nicolopulos expressed concern
over the appointment of applicants to
openings on Boards and Commissions.
Mayor Teglia directed the City Clerk to
advertise for applicants for Boards and
Commission in the Leisure Brochure and
the Enterprise Journal.
10/8/86
Page 18
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
GOOD AND WELFARE
CLOSED SESSION
21.
Closed Session for the purpose of
the discussion of personnel mat-
ters, labor relations and litiga-
tion.
RECALL TO ORDER:
ADJOURNMENT
GOOD AND WELFARE
No one chose to speak.
CLOSED SESSION
Council adjourned to a Closed Session to
discuss the items noticed at 10:47 p.m.
Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to
order at 11:10 p.m., all Council present,
no action taken.
M/S Addiego/Haffey - To adjourn the
meeting.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:11 p.m.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
City of South San Francisco
.~ity of South San Franccl~c.o
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose
of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape
and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are
available for inspection, review and copying.
10/8/86
Page 19