Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1986-10-08Mayor Roberta Cerri Te§lia Vice Mayor Mark N. Addiego Counci 1: John "Jack" Drago Richard A. Haffey Gus Nicolopulos MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room October 8, 1986 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) ROLL CALL: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: PRESENTATIONS: PROCLAMATION: ITAL I AN-AMER I CAN MONTH IN SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OCTOBER, 1986 PROCLAMATION: VERY SPECIAL ARTS FESTIVAL DAY AGENDA REVIEW City Manager Birkelo Requested: - A Motion to allow the City Clerk to cancel the 10/22/86 meeting and reschedule the meeting to 10/29/86 and to allow Council attendance at the League of CA Cities Los Angeles meeting of that date, and direct that all Public Hearings for the 10/22/86 meeting be continued to the meeting of 10/29/86 - Delete Item No. 10, Records Retention Schedule Resolution. - Add Item 19a., Resolution for 1986-87 Capital Improvement Program. ACTION TAKEN 7:34 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding. Council present: Council absent: Nicolopulos, Halley, Addiego and Teglia. Drago. The pledge of allegiance was recited. Mayor Teglia presented Proclamations for the Italian American Games held in this City to Mr. Alvaro Bettucchi and Mr. Vincent Forano. She also presented the Proclamation to Miss Karen Bonanno who is to preside over the Columbus Day Festivities in San Francisco as Queen Isabella. She read the Proclamation aloud and stated that the affair would be held at the Hillsdale Mall in San Mateo on 10/18/86 to celebrate the artistic skills and activities of children and adults with disabilities. AGENDA REVIEW M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To cancel the meeting of 10/22/86 and direct that all Public Hearings for the 10/22/86 meeting be continued to the meeting of 10/29/86. Carried by unanimous voice vote. So ordered. So ordered. 10/8/86 Page I AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 00010 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS ORAL COMMUNICATIONS No one chose to speak. COMMUNITY FORUM COMMUNITY FORUM Vice Mayor Addiego encouraged the com- ~_/'/munity to attend the Mater Dolorosa Festival to be held from 10/23/86 - 10/26/86. Mayor Teglia encouraged the community to attend the All Souls Festival over the weekend, and make reservation for the polenta dinner to be cooked by Caroline Fregosi. CONSENT CALENDAR CONSENT CALENDAR Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 9/10/86, Adjourned Regular Meeting of 9/17/86 and the Special Meeting of 9/24/86. Approved. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending by Motion that the City Council deny and refer the following claim against the City to the Insurance Adjuster and the City Attorney: Claim as filed by Kathleen S. Vigil, Esq. on behalf of Ricardo De La Torre alleging a dangerous condition of City property. So ordered. ® Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending: a) Adoption of a Resolution to reject the non-responsive bid for the replacement of existing steel frame and windows at Central Fire Station; b) Adoption of a Resolution to award the contract for the replacement of existing steel frame and windows at Central Fire Station, Project No. PB-83-10.5, Bid No. 1722-1, to I.D.M. Glass Co. in the amount of $18,600 as the lowest responsible bidder. a) A RESOLUTION TO REJECT THE NON- RESPONSIVE BID FOR THE REPLACE- 10/8/86 Page 2 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CONSENT CALENDAR 3. Staff Report - Continued. MENT OF EXISTING STEEL FRAME AND WINDOWS AT CENTRAL FIRE STATION, PROJECT NO. ~ PB-83-10.5, BID NO. 1722-1 b) A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR REPLACEMENT OF EXISTING STEEL FRAME AND WINDOWS AT CENTRAL FIRE ~ ~/~ STATION, PROJECT NO. PB-83-10.5, BID NO. 1722-1 Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending adoption of a Resolution of Intention to vacate a portion of a sanitary sewer and storm drainage easement at 362 Alida Way and set a Public Hearing for 11/12/86. A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO VACATE A PORTION OF A SANITARY SEWER AND STORM DRAINAGE EASEMENT AT 362 ALIDA WAY AND SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR NOVEMBER 12, 1986 Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending by Motion to accept as complete the roof replacement at Fire Station No. 2, Project No. PB-83-10.3 as complete in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. 0 Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending adoption of a Resolution author- izing the execution of Supplement No. 7 to Local Agency State Agreement No. 04-5177 (Federal Aid Safety Improvement Project) for the railroad crossing protection work at East Grand Avenue at Southern Pacific Railroad Grade Crossing No. E-10.55-C. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENT NO. 7 TO LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 04-5177 (FEDERAL AID SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT) CONSENT CALENDAR RESOLUTION NO. 158-86 RESOLUTION NO. 159-86 RESOLUTION NO. 160-86 So ordered. Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Councilman Nicolopulos. 10/8/86 Page 3 AG E N D A A C T I O N T A K E N~)~[~'~-~' CONSENT CALENDAR CONSENT CALENDAR Request from Mater Dolorosa Church that Council by Motion waive the carnival fees for the festivities on 10/23-26/86. So ordered. 0 Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending Public Hearing set for 10/22/86. by Motion to set a Public Hearing date of 10/22/86 for consideration ~0~'37~;~ of the Master Fee Schedule. 0 Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending by Motion to set a Public Hearing date of 10/22/86 for the 1986-87 Special District Augmentation Fund Distribution. Public Hearing set for 10/22/86. 10. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommendation of a Resolution establishing a record retention schedule. Removed from the Consent Calendar under Agenda Review by the City Manager. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A RECORDS RETENTION SCHEDULE AND AUTHORIZING PERIODIC DESTRUCTION OF CERTAIN RECORDS IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE 34090 ET SEQ 11. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending by Motion to accept the Orange Memorial Park Picnic Area, Paradise Valley Park and Winston Manor 1 Park Playground Equipment Installation Project PR-85-4 as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications. Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Mayor Teglia. 12. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending adoption of a Resolution to authorize an agreement with the San Mateo Housing Authority in relation to Rental Rehabilitation Program. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROVAL AND EXECUTION OF A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR THE THE PROVISION OF HOUSING VOUCHERS UNDER THE RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM RESOLUTION NO. 161-86 M/S Haffey/Addiego - To approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items 6, 10 and 11. 10/8/86 Page 4 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CONSENT CALENDAR Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending adoption of a Resolution author- izing the execution of Supplement No. 7 to Local Agency State Agreement No. 04-5177 (Federal Aid Safety Improvement Project) for the railroad crossing protection work at East Grand Avenue at Southern Pacific Railroad Grade Crossing No. E-10.55-C. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENT NO. 7 TO LOCAL AGENCY STATE AGREEMENT NO. 04-5177 (FEDERAL AID SAFETY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT) 11. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending by Motion to accept the Orange Memorial Park Picnic Area, Paradise Valley Park and Winston Manor 1 Park Playground Equipment Installation Project PR-85-4 as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications. CONSENT CALENDAR Carried by unanimous voice vote. Councilman Nicolopulos questioned why the covenant was still in the agreement - that ~othe local agency would perform the maintenance. Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee stated that it was a State requirement that had nothing to do with the railroad. He stated that the PUC gave the money and Southern Pacific maintained the track. He stated that the master agreement spells out that Southern Pacific will do the maintenance. M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 162-86 Carried by unanimous roll call vote. Mayor Teglia stated that the original equipment in Winston Manor I had disap- peared, and then much later new equipment had been poorly installed. Director of Recreation & Community Development Norton stated that the equip- ment had been received three weeks late, and three weeks after that construction had begun. He spoke of there being wrong size poles, however the equipment had been functional since the end of July. He stated that four swings had been removed and replaced by two swings. Mayor Teglia questioned if the two swings could be brought back or if another unit could be purchased. Councilman Halley questioned if a survey of a neighborhood was done before playground equipment was replaced. Director of Recreation & Community Services Norton stated that he had met with six residents in Winston Manor 10/8/86 Page 5 AGENDA 000:1 .3 ACTION TAKEN 11. Staff Report - Continued. eighteen months before the equipment was purchased. He stated that the residents had seen the design blueprints before the equipment had been purchased. Mayor Teglia stated that she had received a letter from a citizen who was not only concerned over the equipment, but also in the lack of supervision in the park. Director of Recreation & Community Services Norton stated that supervisors at Winston Manor and Buri Buri Park had resigned, however the positions were now filled. M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To accept the Project as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications. Carried by unanimous voice vote. APPROVAL OF BILLS APPROVAL OF BILLS Approval of the Regular Bills of 10/8/86. ~'d9 / ~ M/S Addiego/Haffey - To approve the Regular Bills in the amount of $2,336,875.47. Carried by unanimous voice vote. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION 14. (Standard Building Co., South San Francisco Unified School District, owner). Hearing - Consideration of SA-86-94 Director of Planning Smith stated that and Negative Declaration No. 561 to the recommendation from the Planning allow a 47 lot, detached, single- Commission was to approve SA-86-94 sub- family residential development on ject to the conditions and based on the 7.9 acres of land along the findings in the staff report. She stated easterly side of Chestnut Ave northerly of Tamarack Lane ., ~~ that the project was located on the south western 7.8 acres of vacant former Parkway Junior High School property. She continued, it was on the east side of Chestnut Avenue and immediately north of Tamarack Lane. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending: 1) Hear testimony; 2) Motion to approve SA-86-94. She proceeded to give the specifics of the project: that it was directly related to residential planned development; that the Subdivision Map would create 47 single family lots; that access would be provided by way of Chestnut Avenue approximately 100' north of Tamarack 10/8/86 Page 6 AGENDA 000 .4 ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION 14. Staff Report - Continued. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION Lane; square feet of the various units; that the density was within the unit per net acre required by the General Plan; that all of the lots would be served by two public cul-de-sac streets; that there would not be any public facilities; that there would be some covenants and restrictions to provide the joint main- tenance required for the post drainage easement located on the easterly side of the site. She stated that the Planning Commission also recommended that the Council and School Board work on parking mitigation for the baseball games played on the adjoining ball field. Councilman Nicolopulos questioned if there had been any serious opposition to this project. Director of Planning Smith stated that the only concern had been access, which originally had been planned on Laurel Avenue. She stated that there had been concern expressed for an alternate access off Chestnut, which had been approved by the Planning Commission. Councilman Nicolopulos questioned if anticipated future developments across the street could create conflicts within the traffic control. He questioned if there was to be a signal installed at Chestnut. Director of Planning Smith stated that there would be a stop signal for this development on Chestnut. Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee stated that this subject had been discussed at length at the Planning Commission and the subject property potentially could have an intersection if the property is not integrated with the City in the future development. 10/8/86 Page 7 AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION 14. Staff Report - Continued. 00011 ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION Vice Mayor Addiego questioned if Mr. Yee was referring to the City's property at Chestnut and Grand. Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee stated that a proposed development was not before the City at this time. Vice Mayor Addiego stated that there was to be a second stop light on Chestnut, however he did not want it as close to Grand and Chestnut as this plan showed. He suggested reversing the plan and have the stop light at the other end of the development - higher up to have more space. Councilman Nicolopulos stated that Mr. Mantegani had made reference to a pro- posed inside road on the Laurel property that would extend to the present homes. Mr. Mantegani, 113 James Court, stated that the exit that came from the Sunstream property would not line up with the road that he would put in if he deve- loped his property separately it would be an off intersection by about 50'. He stated that his contention was that it would not have to take place if and when the City developed it took into con- sideration the entire valley as a whole and put dead-ends on each property. He continued, then he could use it to deve- lop his property and then there would only be three entrances: one off Grand and Oak, one off of Miller coming into the property; and one at the top. Vice Mayor Addiego stated that the School District did not realize that a developer had to dedicate a significant amount of property if they were going to end up with a parallel interior street. He questioned if the City would ever realize the widening of Chestnut. Mr. Mantegani stated that from a planning 10/8/86 Page 8 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION 14. Staff Report - Continued. Public Hearing - Appeal of the Planning Commission decision on 8/24/86 regarding UP-86-768, Negative Declaration No. 558 for Shaw Business Center and an environmental determination of same to allow multi-tenant buildings, off-street parking, landscaping and related site improvements at an existing light industrial facility at 212-214 Shaw Road - appeal as made by San Bruno City Attorney Stan Gustavson - Continued from 9/24/86. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending: 1) Continue the Public Hearing and hear testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearing; 3) Motion to deny the appeal. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION standpoint it was the most logical way, in that the storm drains and sewers run down hill. He continued, it runs down hill you pick the lowest spot which is in the middle of the valley, rather than fill the property. Mayor Teglia complimented the applicant on the project, and stated that it would be an asset to the City. M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To approve SA-86-94 subject to the conditions and the eleven findings in the Staff Report. Mayor Teglia stated that the issue of parking should be investigated by the Liaison of Council and the School District. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Director of Planning Smith recommended ~_~~ that the Council uphold the decision of the Planning Commission approving Negative Declaration No. 558 and UP-86-768, based on findings and subject to certain conditions; and deny the appeal. She proceeded to negate the allegations made in the appeal: that slight increases were expected in traffic and storm drainage but that no resultant problems were expected; that the volume of only 86 trips were less than the threshold criteria established by San Bruno; that if there was an increase in storm drainage, it should be a decrease due to the addition of nearly one acre of landscaping; that there was no increase in storm water from this site. Mayor Teglia stated that she and Vice Mayor Addiego had met with Mayor Marshall and Councilman Simon, the respective City Managers, City Attorneys and the Public Works Director on the appeal yesterday. 10/8/86 Page 9 AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION 15. Staff Report - Continued. O00 q.? ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION She stated that the concern was not so much this site, but that the site pro- vided a vehicle to gain this City's attention as to what was perceived to be some mounting problems in that area, i.e., regional traffic from all of the developments taking place; how that impacted the area with further develop- ment in both cities as they exist today. She stated that San Bruno had real con- cern in respect to the storm drainage system, because some years back San Bruno designed and installed some improvements in this area in South San Francisco. She stated that San Bruno at that time had paid a third of the cost of those improvements to support a thirty year storm. She stated that San Bruno con- tended that today, by refined engineering methods, it was questionable whether it would even sustain a ten year storm - rather a three to five year storm type system. She stated that this had been referred back to South San Francisco's staff for further analysis and presentation to the Council, which was forthcoming. She stated that San Bruno wanted this City's participation in examining this area because if the flooding occurred it would happen in South San Francisco. She stated that San Bruno had a major deve- lopment being considered, Downey Savings, which could very well impact this area significantly. Vice Mayor Addiego stated that San Bruno, at the joint meeting, had not been in a position to withdraw the appeal. He stated that both Councils were looking for potential investment in the area, and if there was a lack in the standards of storm drain run-off, then it warranted some kind of improvement on a joint basis. 10/8/86 Page 10 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION 15. Staff Report - Continued. RECESS: RECALL TO ORDER: 16. Public Hearing - Consideration of an increase in garbage rates by the So. San Francisco Scavenger Company - Continued from the 8/13/86, 9/10/86 and 9/24/86 meetings. ~5~, Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending: 1) Open the Public Hearing and hear testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearing. 17. Public Hearing - Consideration of the Revised Zoning Ordinance - Continued from the 8/13/86, ~'~9<r? 8/27/86, 9/10/86 and 9/24/86 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION City Manager Birkelo stated that there had been a tentative conclusion of the Subcommittee: that for this specific piece of property, there was no clear evidence of adding fuel to the fire or water to the system; and it would be dif- ficult to solicit a substantial contribu- tion to a plan that had not been agreed upon by the two municipalities. Mayor Teglia stated that the bottom line was that if the system had to be improved, someone would have to pay for it; that there were no calculations at this time to determine who was going to share in that cost of levies or assessments. M/S Haffey/Addiego - To uphold the deci- sion of the Planning Commission, approving Negative Declaration No. 558 and UP-86-768. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Mayor Teglia declared a recess at 8:40 p.m. Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 8:52 p.m., all Council present. Mayor Teglia stated that the Subcommittee was still not ready to make their report after an initial meeting with the Scavengers. She proceeded to read a letter into the record from Mr. Douglas Button, dated 10/7/86 (a copy is attached and a permanent part of the record of this meeting)~ requesting that the rate increase be removed from the agenda. Mayor Teglia stated that this item would be temporarily taken off the calendar. Director of Planning Smith stated that the staff report had been divided into three sections: 1) Sign provisions having been referred back to the Planning 10/8/86 Page 11 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SCAVENGER, INC. P.O. BOX 348 , 69 SO. LINDEN AVE. * SO. SAN FRANCISCO, CALIF. 94080 * (415) 589-4020 0001 9 October 7, 1986 City of South San Francisco, City Council]Sub-Committee On South San Francisco Scavenger Company's Request For Rate Increase C/O City Manager, Mr. ~.W. Birkelo City Hall P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94080 Dear Mro Birkelo, We would like to apologize for the delay in our response to the Sub-Committee's concerns as were laid out in our first meeting. This delay has been primarily due to the unavailability of our accountant, Mr. Charles Joerg. He has been on a business/pleasure trip to the _ Far East for some time now, and should return next week. it is our intention to meet with the Sub-Coi%~L~ittee as soon as possible after his return in order to enter into serious negotiations over the issues involved. In the meantime, we ask that the rate increase request be removed from the City Council agenda until negotiations have been completed and the subcommittee is prepared to return our request to the agenda. We will make arrangements with Mr. Joerg upon his return to give his full attention to these negotiations and will contact the Sub-Committee as soon as possible to set up a meeting. Thank you, for your understanding and patience. Sincerely, Douglas/~utto~, Offic~ 10/8/86 Page 11a. AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION 17. Public Hearing - Continued. meetings - Public Hearing closed. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending: 1) Continued discussion of various input; 2) Motion to waive full reading of the Zoning Ordinance; 3) Motion to introduce the 0 rdi nance. 1st Reading/Introduction AN ORDINANCE REPEALING TITLE 17 AND Commission who would hold a public hearing on 10/23/86; 2) Antenna provi- sions were modified by staff to address the concerns of amateur radio operators which the Commission approved except for having changed the permitted height limit of antennas to 60' from 40' in a residen- tial area without the requirement of a use permit; 3) Expiration of use permits - reaffirmation of the Commission that a use permit expires if that use is aban- doned for a period of at least six months; 4) Adult entertainment - recom- mends an overlay district to restrict the TITLE 20, WITH THE EXCEPTION OF use to an area on the east side of So CHAPTERS 20.57, 20.59, 20.61 AND ~-~/~ ~ ' Spruce Ave. from So. Canal to 300' south 20.63, OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE (ORDINANCES NO. 353 AND NO. 455, AS AMENDED) AND ADOPTING A NEW TITLE 20 ENTITLED "ZONING" of Victory Ave. with resultant restric- tions, i.e., not within a P-C District that is 500' of any area zoned for resi- dential use, and not within 1,000' of any public park, religious institution or school. She discussed other items of concern raised at the public hearings: in-lieu parking fees had been eliminated in the Downtown Parking District; twenty acres northeast of Sign Hill; zoning designa- tion of Mazzanti property - resolved by adopting the General Plan Amendment; zoning designation on Oak Farm property; new residential dwelling units; additions to dwellings; elimination of present chapters dealing with Planned Commercial Districts which affect those units not governed by CC&Rs; a memo responding to various citizen concerns and their indi- vidual letters to Council (all documents are attached to and a part of the staff report, Exhibit 1-4, on file in the City Clerk's Office as a permanent file record). Discussion followed: concern over elimi- nation of restriction to Planned Commercial Districts concerning single- family exteriors; whether the homeowners were aware that this condition would be relaxed; that the homeowners had not 10/8/86 Page 12 AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION 17. Public Hearing - Continued. ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION been notified; that Council prior goals and objectives had been to improve the liaison between City Government and homeowners groups and trying to establish relations with those neighborhoods that might want to form homeowners asso- ciations; that that portion of Westborough with townhouses did not have homeowner associations, and when the structures had been found to be defective the City had come to their assistance in filing lawsuits; elimination of the con- dition could affect colors of shared com- mon walls, as well as radically altering the architectural character of the indi- vidual units; that only upon application for a building permit would there be a way to keep track of changes to the area if the condition was removed, etc. Mayor Teglia questioned the 40' in a residential neighborhood requiring a use permit, and the Commission citing the lack of criteria to evaluate the need for a given height of antenna. Director of Planning Smith stated that a representative of the amateur radio operators actually had wanted a 55' antenna without a use permit, and staff had felt that 40' was sufficient. She stated that staff had made that recommen- dation to the Commission and they had had difficulty in evaluating a request for going higher than the 40'. She stated that Daryl Jones' opinion was that 60' would take care of 95% of amateur radio operators antenna needs. Discussion followed: whether 60' anten- nas would be tolerated in neighborhoods; that a building permit would have to be acquired for a 60' antenna; FPC regula- tions not being precise as to the authority of local governments in regu- lating amateur radio operators. 10/8/86 Page 13 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION 17. Public Hearing - Continued. (Cassette No. 2) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION City Attorney Armento stated that the FPC had said they were not going to come out with any specific rules and regulations with regard to heights or other limita- tions that a locality might choose to put on things. She continued, it essentially said that it hopes that local government takes into account the concerns of the amateur radio operator, and doesn't do anything that would unduly restrict them; it does not say that the locality had to abide by certain limitations or that the locality was prohibited from imposing any restrictions. She stated that the restrictions the Ordinance would impose, were similar to other communities' ordinances. She stated that staff did not believe that the ordi- nance was out of line or would cause problems for the FPC. Discussion followed: 40' antenna vs. 60' antenna; that staff would review the need for antenna height over 40'; establishing a notification process for a neighborhood when a request was made for an antenna over 40', etc. Mr. Bob Flinkinger, 351 Arroyo Dr., stated that the length of an antenna was not something that was arbitrary, but was based on scientific law. He proceeded to describe the minimum lengths of an effi- cient antenna. He suggested allowing 40' antennas just by applying for a permit; from 45' - 60' the person must provide the documentation to the Building Dept. stating the calcu- lations that necessitate the additional footage. He stated that there were retractable towers available that were 22' high, and could be cranked down. He urged the Council to stay away from a use permit procedure. 10/8/86 Page 14 AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION 17. Public Hearing - Continued. 000 . ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION Mayor Teglia instructed staff to come up with new language, "of between 40' - 65' and encourage the use of retractable towers ." Discussion followed: on the six month expiration of use permits; adult enter- tainment in the overlay zone; abandoning in-lieu parking fees; 20 acres north east of Sign Hill. Director of Planning Smith stated that Exhibit 3 addressed the Bills' 20 acres being designated as open space which allowed one unit per acre. She stated that if there was sufficient argument for more units with access, then the burden would be upon the Bills' to ask for a General Plan Amendment for additional units. Councilman Nicolopulos questioned who and how the determination had been made that there was soil instability on the 20 acres o Mayor Teglia stated that the City had put that property on notice with respect to the soil in that area. Councilman Nicolopulos questioned if and what engineering studies had been done on the 20 acres. Vice Mayor Addiego stated that only when the land was developed would the Developer hire soils engineers to deter- mine the stability of the property - which had not been done. Director of Planning Smith stated that the Council at the last meeting had made the decision on the Mazzanti property to have it remain partly high density and partly open space. Councilman Haffey stated that west of Colma Creek would be the high density residential, and east of the Creek would be open space. 10/8/86 Page 15 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ADMINISTRATION 17. Public Hearing - Continued. Discussion followed: the designation of the Oak Farm property, opposite Santo Christo Hall, was medium density; new residential dwelling units must go before the Design Review Board; additions to dwellings; parking requirements in a new development with already existing parking problems, and whether the Commission had the latitude to require more parking spa- ces; staff was to look into the latitude in that it was not in the ordinance; further concern over Westborough and of not removing the restriction. Deputy City Manager/CD&A Lewis stated that staff would incorporate the changes discussed into the zoning ordinance. Vice Mayor Addiego requested that staff respond at the next meeting to the con- cerns expressed in Mr. John Penna's letter of 10/7/86 regarding building situations in the down zoned area between Grand and Railroad Avenues. Consensus of Council - To continue the item to the next meeting. POLICE POLICE 18. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending Police Chief Datzman stated that this adoption of a Resolution that ~/~ item would increase the number of Parking authorizes the transfer of funds ~f'~/~/ Enforcement Officers by one, and that from the Parking District for the p. ~ item 19 was an enabling resolution to purpose of creating an additional incorporate the money into the budget. position of a Parking Enforcement Officer in the Police Department. A RESOLUTION PERMITTING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS FROM THE PARKING DISTRICT TO THE APPROPRIATE ACCOUNTS FOR THE PURPOSE OF CREATING AN ADDITIONAL POSITION OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER AND AUTHORIZING ONE ADDITIONAL POSITION OF PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT Councilman Nicolopulos questioned if this meant that the Parking District would provide the money each year to perpetuate the new officer, in that the District was not that affluent. Police Chief Datzman stated that the current Parking Enforcement Officer was in the Police budget and that the District had agreed to fund the new officer. He stated that currently PSTs were being used for duties that would be assumed by the new officer exclusively in the downtown area. 10/8/86 Page 16 AGENDA 0001 ACTION TAKEN POLICE 18. Staff Report - Continued. ITEMS FROM STAFF 19. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending adoption of a Resolution that amends the 1986-87 Operating Budget to include the new position of Parking Enforcement Officer and allocates those funds into the current budget. A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT 0-1 TO THE 1986-87 OPERATING BUDGET 19a. Staff Report 10/8/86 recommending adoption of a Resolution that adopts the 1986-87 Capital ~4~/~(2 Improvement Program. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR 1986-87 ITEMS FROM COUNCIL 20. Status Report on the criteria for the homes to be insulated in the Aircraft Noise Insulation Program. POLICE M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 163-86 Carried by unanimous voice vote. ITEMS FROM STAFF M/S Haffey/Addiego - To adopt the Resol uti on. RESOLUTION NO. 164-86 Carried by unanimous voice vote. City Manager Birkelo pointed up the changes in the 1986-87 Capital Improvement Program that were not reflected in the resolution: page 17 (1) $25,000 for an arterial traffic study was being advanced to 1987-88; page 15 (21) Forbes medians had been reduced to $25,000; page 12 (10) increased Magnolia Center appropriation to $3,055,342 and raised the capital improvement funding to $2,194,300; page ii increases to $3,202,749 and reduces the estimated balance on 6/30/87 from $223,971 to $87,171. He stated that the resolution would have to be amended to make the total amount of $10,821,181 to correspond to the summary total. M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the amended Resolution that will read $10,821,181 in total. RESOLUTION NO. 165-86 Carried by unanimous voice vote. Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee stated that the important thing was whether the Council agrees with the staff 10/8/86 Page 17 AGENDA ITEMS FROM COUNCIL 20. Status Report - Continued. ACTION TAKEN ITEMS FROM COUNCIL recommendations on whether the homes should be owner occupied and to define the high priority within contour zones 70 down to 69.0 CNELs. Discussion followed: the issue of owner occupied homes would mean that rental homes would not be excluded, but would have to wait until the other homes were completed in this phase; doing owner occupied homes first and pursue further funding to insulate all homes in the impacted area; that there were 187 homes in the contour line zones; to recanvas rental units in the next phase after the 69 CNEL was completed; arrange a meeting with everyone in the 70 CNEL zone to inform the people of the criteria and funding program; direction given to staff to go ahead with the million dollar pro- ject with owner occupied homes; that staff was to present proposals on the prioritization of properties for future projects; soliciting future 20% funding; that there were 40 homes to be insulated in the 70 CNEL zone and the second phase would cover 147 homes in the 69 CNEL zone. Mayor Teglia stated that she had received a letter from a citizen requesting the Council consider an ordinance regulating smoking in the work place. She requested the City Manager to canvas the Council for a joint meeting with the Historic Preservation Commission. She stated that she had received a letter from John Henry Kubba, Esq., who had expressed concern over yearly flooding in the Treasure Island Trailer Court. Councilman Nicolopulos expressed concern over the appointment of applicants to openings on Boards and Commissions. Mayor Teglia directed the City Clerk to advertise for applicants for Boards and Commission in the Leisure Brochure and the Enterprise Journal. 10/8/86 Page 18 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN GOOD AND WELFARE CLOSED SESSION 21. Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel mat- ters, labor relations and litiga- tion. RECALL TO ORDER: ADJOURNMENT GOOD AND WELFARE No one chose to speak. CLOSED SESSION Council adjourned to a Closed Session to discuss the items noticed at 10:47 p.m. Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 11:10 p.m., all Council present, no action taken. M/S Addiego/Haffey - To adjourn the meeting. Carried by unanimous voice vote. The meeting was adjourned at 11:11 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, City of South San Francisco .~ity of South San Franccl~c.o The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 10/8/86 Page 19