HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1988-07-27Mayor Jack Dra§o
Counci 1:
Mark N. Addiego
Ri chard A. Haffey
Gus Nicol opulos
Roberta Cerri Teglia
MINUTES
City Council
Municipal Services Building
Community Room
July 27, 1988
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the
State of California, that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco will hold a
Special Meeting on Wednesday, the 27th day of July, 1988 at 6:30 p.m., in the Municipal
Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California.
Purpose of the meeting:
1. Closed session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel matters, labor
relations, property negotiations and litigation.
Dated: July 21, 1988
Barbara A. Battaya, City Cle~/
City of South San Francisco
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1)
ROLL CALL:
CLOSED SESSION
Closed Session for the purpose of
the discussion of personnel
matters, labor relations, property
negotiations and litigation.
Councilman Haffey Arrived:
RECALL TO ORDER:
ACTION TAKEN
6:35 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia pre-
siding.
City Clerk Battaya stated that Mayor
Drago had informed her Office that he was
unable to attend tonight's meeting.
Council present:
Council absent:
Addiego, Nicolopulos,
and Teglia.
Drago and Haffey.
CLOSED SESSION
Council adjourned to a Closed Session to
discuss the item listed at 6:35 p.m., and
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia stated that the
Closed Session would be held at Mayor
Drago's house at 122 Cuesta Drive and
the City Attorney would also be present.
Councilman Haffey arrived at 6:37 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia recalled the meeting
to order at 8:03 p.m., all Council pre-
sent, no action taken.
M/S Addiego/Haffey - To adjourn the
meeting.
7/27/88
Page i
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ADJOURNMENT:
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Time of Adjournment was 8:04 p.m.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
City of South San Francisco
APPROVED.
/J rag;, MaFor
//City of South San Francisco
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose
of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape
and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are
available for inspection, review and copying.
7/27/88
Page 2
Mayor Jack Drago
Council:
Mark N. Addiego
Richard A. Haffey
Gus Nicolopulos
.... Roberta Cerri Teglia
MINUTES
City Council
Municipal Services Building
Community Room
July 27, 1988
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No.1)
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
INVOCATION:
PRESENTATIONS
Mr. Art Sullivan, Bridge Housing, -
Magnolia Senior Center Project, its rent
structure, and what the project was foot,'
designed to accomplish.
Presentation from Katz-Hollis on
the preliminary financial analysis
on tax increment projection and
schedule for redevelopment plan for
the Downtown/Central Project.
ACTION TAKEN
8:04 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia pre-
siding.
Council present:
Council absent:
Addiego, Haffey,
Nicolopulos, and
Teglia.
Drago
City Clerk Battaya stated that Mayor
Drago had informed her Office that he was
unable to attend tonight's meeting.
The pledge was recited.
Rev. Richard Neely, Grand Ave. Baptist
Church, gave the invocation.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia apologized for the
delay in starting the meeting, however,
the Closed Session had been a matter of
great importance.
PRESENTATIONS
Mr. Arthur Sullivan, Bridge Housing,
chronicled the building of Magnolia
Plaza, and the resultant affordable
housing for seniors; the rent structure;
the Chevron Co. grant recently received
that lowered the subsidized rents; that
20% of the non-affordable units were
still available, etc.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia stated that there
would be a second presentation that had
been agendized on the Redevelopment
meeting agenda.
Ms. Martha Nessel, Katz-Hollis, spoke in
detail on the financial, and economic
feasibility of the redevelopment plan
documents (a copy of the summary of the
procedures is on file in the Clerk's
Office).
Discussion followed:
that discussion of
7/27/88
Page i
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
PRESENTATIONS
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Lewis Requested:
- Add Item No. 18a. Resolution for
an Amendment to the Joint
Exercise of Powers Agreement for
.Catchment Basins on San Bruno
Mountain.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
PRESENTATIONS
this item was appropriate for a Council
study session; the time schedule for the
project, etc.
Mr. Gary Jones, Katz-Hollis, spoke
briefly of the legal requirements of the
various documents involved with the
Project
AGENDA REVIEW
So ordered.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Diane Smith, 3900 Crofton Way, spoke
with concern over a newspaper article
about discussions to disband the
Westborough Water District and incor-
porate it into South San Francisco. She
questioned if the residents were resi-
dents of the City or only of the
District.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia stated that the
Westborough residents were citizens of
the City, however, in reference to sewage
and water they were residents of the
District.
She stated that there had been two recom-
mendations to incorporate the District
into the City, one from the Grand Jury
and the other from LAFCO.
Ms. Smith stated that many residents
thought that the District had outlived
its usefulness. She stated that she had
spoken to the new Manager Ken Wright, who
had only been in that position for two
months, and doubted that he knew of the
history of the creation of the Water
District.
7/27/88
Page 2
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNITY FORUM
'1
I
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia stated that the City
had stated that the Water District was a
legally constituted body, and as such the
City could not incorporate or absorb the
District. She stated that in view of
that, if the people were concerned they
must go to the Water District and make
their interests known.
Councilman Halley stated that the City
would like to absorb the Water District,
based on financial data, but why should
the City have to pay for the report. He
stated that it was important for the
citizens of Westborough to press upon the
Board to do the study in that they are
your elected representatives.
Ms. Smith stated that she had gone to
neighbors to make them aware of the
problem, however, most were
disinterested.
Councilman Addiego stated that Ms. Smith
was pointing out the general apathy of
the neighborhood, and perhaps the City
should take a more active role.
Vice Mayor Teglia suggested that Ms.
Smith approach the homeowners assoc-
iations in Westborough to seek support
of her position, along with her neigh-
bors. She stated that if she did not
receive satisfaction after approaching
the homeowners groups and the District,
she should then come to the Council.
Mr. Lou Dell'Angela stated that he was
representing the Chamber of Commerce and
proceeded to chronicle the forthcoming
Chamber events: lunch at the Grovesner
Hotel 7/28/88; lunch on 8/24/88 where
Congressman Lantos will speak on legisla-
tion at the Radisson Inn.
COMMUNITY FORUM
Councilman Nicolopulos reiterated his
announcement of the 75th Birthday
celebration of S.S.F. High School.
7/27/88
Page 3
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Motion to approve the Minutes of
the Regular Meeting of 6/22/88.
®
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending
adoption of a Resolution of award
of Contract for construction
services on the Aircraft Noise
Insulation Project Phase III,
Project No. PB-87-1, to M.
Gaehwiler Construction, Inc. in
the amount of $505,363.00 as the
lowest responsible bidder.
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AIRCRAFT NOISE
INSULATION PROGRAM PHASE III,
PROJECT NO. PB-87-1, BID NO. 1770
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending
adoption of a Resolution author-
izing execution of an agreement
with Wilson Ihrig & Assoc. to
furnish construction related sup-
port for Aircraft Noise Insulation
Project, Phase III, Project No.
PB-87-1.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMINISTRA-
TION SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH
THE AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION
PROJECT - PHASE III, PROJECT NO.
PB-87-1
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
the conceptual geometric con-
figuration of the Oyster Point
Blvd. Grade Separation/Hwy. 101
Interchange Project, Project No.
ST-86-3.
A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING CONCURRENCE
WITH THE CONCEPTUAL GEOMETRIC CON-
FIGURATION OF THE OYSTER POINT
BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION/HWY 101
INTERCHANGE PROJECT, PROJECT NO.
ST-86-3
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approved.
RESOLUTION NO. 96-88
RESOLUTION NO. 97-88
Removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion by Mayor Pro Tem Teglia.
7/27/88
Page 4
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
e
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending
adoption of a Resolution accepting
the grant offer from the Federal
Aviation Administration for the
Aircraft Noise Insulation Program
for Phase V implementation and
authorizing the Mayor to sign the
Grant Agreement.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREE-
MENT FOR FEDERAL FUNDING OF THE
OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AIRCRAFT
NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM PHASE V,
PROJECT NO. PB-88-1 TO INSTALL
SOUND-PROOFING IN RESIDENCES, AIP
PROJECT NO. 3-06-0221-N9
Ge
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending
adoption of a Resolution amending
the City's Disadvantaged Business
Enterprise Program.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF
SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO'S DISADVANTAGED
BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM IN
ACCORDANCE WITH THE SURFACE TRANS-
PORTATION AND UNIFORM RELOCATION
ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1987
®
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending
adoption of a Resolution to award
the contract for printing the
quarterly Leisure Activities
Brochure for 1988-89 to Alonzo
Printing, in the amount of $15,976
as the lowest responsible bidder.
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
LEISURE ACTIVITIES BROCHURE BID NO.
1772
e
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
specifications, authorizing the
purchase of supplies, equipment or
services and calling bids for
custodial paper supplies.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFI-
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESOLUTION NO. 98-88
RESOLUTION NO. 99-88
RESOLUTION NO. 100-88
RESOLUTION NO. 101-88
7/27/88
Page 5
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
0 ?0
~CONSENT CALENDAR
8. Staff Report - Continued.
CATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE
OF SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES
AND CALLING BIDS FOR CUSTODIAL
PAPER SUPPLIES, BID NO. 1779
®
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending
adoption of a Resolution approving
the conceptual geometric con- ~11(~
figuration of the Oyster Point
Blvd. Grade Separation/Hwy. 101
Interchange Project, Project No.
ST-86-3.
A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING CONCURRENCE
WITH THE CONCEPTUAL GEOMETRIC CON-
FIGURATION OF THE OYSTER POINT
BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION/HWY 101
INTERCHANGE PROJECT, PROJECT NO.
ST-86-3
APPROVAL OF BILLS
9. Motion to approve the Regular Bills
of 7/27/88. ~o~
CITY MANAGER - BUILDING
10.
Hearing - To consider approval of
the statement of cost for the sum-
mary abatement at 601 First Lane.
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending:
1) Open the Hearing and hear testi-
mony from the Owner of the
property; 2) Close the Hearing; 3)
Adoption of a Resolution on the
statement of costs for the
CONSENT CALENDAR
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To approve the
Consent Calendar with the exception of
Item No. 4.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia questioned if this
item had been approved by neighboring
cities.
City Manager Lewis stated that he and Mr.
Yee had met with Caltrans and the City of
Brisbane to effect this, and Brisbane
had indicated agreement.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 102-88
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To approve the
Regular Bills of 7/27/88 in the amount of
$1,331,951.55.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
CITY MANAGER - BUILDING
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia opened the Hearing,
and questioned if there were any objec-
tions or protests on this action.
Code Enforcement Officer Harris stated
there were not.
Councilman Nicolopulos questioned is a
amicable resol uti on had been
accompl i shed.
7/27/88
Page 6
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CITY MANAGER - BUILDING
10. Staff Report - Continued.
abatement.
A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE
STATEMENT OF COSTS FOR THE SUMMARY
ABATEMENT OF WEEDS AT 601 FIRST
LANE
CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL
11.
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending
adoption of a Resolution adopting~)~Ooo
job specifications and a salary
scale for the positions of Fire
Education Specialist and Fi re
Safety Specialist.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION
PLAN TO ESTABLISH THE POSITIONS OF
FIRE EDUCATION SPECIALIST AND FIRE
SAFETY SPECIALIST
CITY MANAGER - BUILDING
City Attorney Armento stated that the
Deputy City Attorney did have conver-
sations with the gentleman, and the
gentleman said he had attempted to
contract with someone to do the work for
approximately $400.00. She stated that
the gentleman had been informed that he
needed to get the work done by a certain
date or the City crews would do the work;
the City crews did the work and the cost
was less than the contracted price.
Councilman Halley stated that essentially
that meant that the gentleman had to pay
the City $340.00.
Councilman Addiego stated that perhaps
the Council should look at the rates used
for this type of abatement.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia closed the Hearing.
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 103-88
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL
Coordinator of Labor Relations Tolmacheff
stated that this item would approve two
new job specifications and their respec-
tive salary ranges. She stated that
through the budget process Council had
approved the elimination of one Deputy
Fire Marshal, and the creation of these
two non-sworn positions.
Councilman Halley stated that this was
consistent with the Subcommittee recom-
mendations, and allowed civilianization
of the two positions.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 104-88
7/27/88
Page 7
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
..... CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL
11. Staff Report - Continued.
CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL
Councilman Nicolopulos thanked the City
Clerk for her intensive research that
produced a document an employee list by
department and position. He related the
following from the document: there were
129 different classifications; Police
Dept. had 108 employees with 16 classifi-
cations; Fire Dept. had 78 employees with
10 classifications; the remainder of 222
employees had 103 classifications. He
questioned if the Council wanted to
proceed in this manner of adding new
titles when the five benchmark cities did
not have comparable positions. He
suggested standardization of positions
rather than becoming specialized.
Councilman Haffey stated that was a
respectful question due to Councilman
Nicolopulos' concerns, and perhaps there
were too many classifications. He
questioned if the Councilman had a solu-
tion, and could come up with solutions.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia requested that
Councilman Nicolopulos put together a
proposal for Council, however, she did
not have the same concerns.
Councilman Haffey stated that Council had
had discussions on this item, and
suggested that in future the question
should be brought forward before the
final hour of decision.
Councilman Nicolopulos stated that the
Council had set up a policy of five
benchmark cities, yet here were job spe-
cifications not comparable to those
cities. He stated that the positions
were becoming over classified, and that
staff should come up with titles used in
the benchmark cities.
Councilman Addiego stated that the Mayor
had an alternative to computing salaries
when the titles were not compatible,
however, he would be more concerned if
anyone in the Fire Dept. had wanted the
position or if the career ladders were
7/27/88
Page 8
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL
11. Staff Report - Continued.
CITY MANAGER - PLANNING
12.
Public Hearing - To consider the
appeal by Mr. Tom Saberi of the ~0
Planning Commission decision of
5/12/88 to approve UP-88-820/
Jailhouse Bait Shop (James Elmore,
Owner) - Continued from the 7/13/88
meeting.
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending:
1) Open the Public Hearing and hear
testimony; 2) Close the Public
Hearing; 3) Motion to deny the
appeal and uphold the decision of
the Planning Commission.
CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL
taken away from departments.
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
CITY MANAGER - PLANNING
Mayor Pro Tem reopened the Public
Hearing.
Director of Planning reiterated her staff
report given at the previous meeting, and
stated that the conditions on the Use
Permit were designed to remedy Mr.
Sabiri's concerns.
Mr. Sabiri stated that Mr. Elmore's
customers blocked his driveway six or
seven times a day; that delivery trucks
did not use the loading zone; that the
parking plan was not feasible for parking
and garbage pickups; that a green garden
hose spews water onto the sidewalk from
the baitshop, etc.
Philip Keith, Esq., stated that he had
represented another client in the area
before Council a year ago that had also
had parking problems with Mr. Elmore. He
stated that Mr. Sabiri had problems with
Mr. Elmore, who had opened the baitshop
two or three years ago without a permit,
and had just recently obtained a Use
Permit that had been approved.
He questioned who the two parking spaces
would be for - customers or the upstairs
tenant, and how that would alleviate the
parking problems. He felt that the
Council should uphold the appeal and deny
Mr. Elmore's Use Permit.
Mr. Lou Dell'Angela, Environmental Dev.
Group, stated that the staff report was
clear; that staff, the Planning
Commission and Mr. Elmore had achieved a
plan that responded to all complaints and
questioned raised.
He stated that Mr. Sabiri had an office
building with 7,500 sq. ft. of office
7/27/88
Page 9
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
~CITY MANAGER - PLANNING
12. Staff Report - Continued.
13.
Public Hearing - To consider the
appeal of the Planning Commission
decision of 6/9/88 in reference to
UP-84-705/Mod 2 (Rich Diodati,
Developer) special conditions for
an open construction yard at an
existing office/warehouse condo-
minium project at 338 North Canal
Street. (Cassette No. 2)
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending
CITY MANAGER - PLANNING
space, and that if that building was
built today it would require 25 parking
spaces - yet he has only three. He
stated that Mr. Elmore had a baitshop
with 250 sq. ft. and was providing two
parking spaces, a fenced area for gar-
bage, increased garbage collection of
three times a week.
He stated that Mr. Sabiri and his
Attorney had criticized Mr. Elmore for
not operating a baitshop with a Use
Permit, however, Mr. Elmore was now at
the point where he had a plan and a use
that was consistent with the City's
Zoning and General Plan that will not
adversely affect the area. He urged the
Council to deny the appeal.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia closed the Public
Hearing.
Discussion followed: that Mr. Elmore had
agreed to all conditions; that the appeal
appeared to be a harassment; that the
conditions were addressing the concerns;
that if the conditions were not met Mr.
Sabiri could come back to the Council;
that the sign, "Don't Block the
Driveway", had penalty provisions; that
there had been one call to the Police on
Butler Ave. in the past year wherein a
citation had been issued, etc.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To deny the
appeal and uphold the decision of the
Planning Commission.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
City Manager Lewis stated that it was his
understanding that Mr. Diodati and the
Planning Staff wanted to discuss the item
further before the item comes before
Council for a final appeal.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia questioned whether
the Council should open the Public
Hearing and continue it or simply carry
it off to some time when Mr. Diodati
decided that a hearing was necessary.
7/27/88
Page 10
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CITY MANAGER - PLANNING
13. Staff Report - Continued.
by Motion to continue the matter
off-calendar in consideration of
the letter from Mr. Mark A.
Wheeler, Project Manager, that
requests a continuance of the
Public Hearing.
POLICE
14. Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending:
1) Motion to waive further reading
of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to
adopt the Ordinance on Charitable
Sol icitations.
2nd Reading/Adoption
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 6.40
OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING A NEW
CHAPTER 6.40 ENTITLED "CHARITABLE
SOLICITATIONS"
CITY MANAGER - PLANNING
City Attorney Armento stated that since
they have requested it be continued off-
calendar and there is no date certain to
continue it to, there was no reason to
open the hearing because it will have to
be renoticed.
Consensus of Council - To continue the
matter off-calendar.
POLICE
City Clerk Battaya read the title of the
Ordinance in its entirety.
Police Captain Raffaelli stated that this
was the second reading of an ordinance
that would bring the Municipal Code up to
date pursuant to Court rulings and pro-
vides a permit process for everyone, and
would not have an impact on any chari-
table organizations or churches on the
way they conduct business in our City at
this time.
He stated that the hours and specifics
set forth in the ordinance would prevent
citizens from being bothered under cer-
tain conditions.
Councilman Haffey stated that it was
refreshing that the Council didn't have
someone read something they had already
read, and gave a synopses of the staff
report.
M/S Addiego/Haffey - To waive further
reading of the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To adopt the
Ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. 1036-88
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
7/27/88
Page 11
~POLICE
15.
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending:
1) Motion to waive further reading
of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to
introduce the Ordinance.
1st Reading/Introduction
AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION
6.16.170 F. TO THE SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE TO
REGULATE THE HOURS OF DOOR TO DOOR
SOLICITORS
16.
Staff Report 7/27/88 recomending:
1) Motion to waive further reading
of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to
introduce the Ordinance.
1st Reading/Introduction
AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION
11.40.170 TO THE SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE TO
PROHIBIT THE USE OF VEHICLES FOR
HUMAN HABITATION ON PUBLIC PROPERTY
POLICE
City Clerk Battaya read the title of the
Ordinance in its entirety.
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To waive further
reading of the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Addiego/Haffey - To introduce the
Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
City Clerk Battaya read the title of the
Ordinance in its entirety.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To waive further
reading of the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilman Addiego questioned if there
was a problem in the City which required
this type of ordinance.
Police Captain Raffaelli stated that
there was not at this time, however, this
ordinance provided a tool to deal with
transients from other cities.
Councilman Addiego stated that this City
had had done nothing on the homeless
situation and needed to do something on a
large plane to deal with the full issue
rather than move on this ordinance.
Councilman Haffey stated that he was
pleased that the Police Dept. was taking
definitive action through these ordinan-
ces, and he did not know that acting on
this ordinance would hurt the homeless.
Councilman Addiego stated that the
Council should wait until there were
complaints from citizens before acting on
such an ordinance.
Councilman Haffey stated that he wanted
this City to take a strong stand on this
issue because San Francisco was too
7/27/88
Page 12
--POLICE
16. Staff Report - Continued.
TECHNICAL & MAINTENANCE SERVICES
.,4'oo°°
'17. Public Hearing - To consider a
vacation of a portion of Ridgeview
Court within the boundaries of the
proposed Stonegate Units 5 and 6
Subdivision.
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending:
1) Open the Public Hearing and hear
testimony; 2) Close the Public
Hearing; 3) Adoption of a
Resol uti on.
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE VACATION
OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY PORTION OF
RIDGEVIEW COURT LOCATED WITHIN THE
BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED
STONEGATE UNITS 5 AND 6
SUBDIVISION
POLICE
liberal.
Councilman Nicolopulos stated that there
had always been problems with the home-
less, and police problems shouldn't
focus on the homeless.
Councilman Haffey stated that the home-
less should guided toward social services
not guided out of town.
Police Captain Raffaelli stated that some
people live in their vehicles rather than
pay rent.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To introduce the
Ordinance.
Carried by majority voice vote, Addiego
voted no.
TECHNICAL & MAINTENANCE SERVICES
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia opened the Public
Hearing.
Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee
stated that vacation of the easement
would accommodate the approved tentative
subdivision, and there were no objections
from the Utility Co. or City staff.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia invited those
wishing to speak for or against the item
to step to the dais.
Mr. Mark Heeley, Developer, stated that
he had worked with staff on this abandon-
ment and urged Council to adopt the
Resolution.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia closed the Public
Hearing.
M/S Addiego/Haffey - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 105-88
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
7/27/88
Page 13
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
--TECHNICAL & MAINTENANCE SERVICES
18. Public Hearing - To consider a ~
vacation of a public utility ease-
ment southeast of 333 Point San
Bruno Road.
Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending:
1) Open the Public Hearing and hear
testimony; 2) Close the Public
Hearing; 3) Adoption of a
Resol uti on.
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE VACATION
OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AT
333 POINT SAN BRUNO ROAD
ITEMS FROM STAFF
18a. Resolution for an Amendment to
the Joint Exercise of Powers
Agreement for Catchment Basins
on San Bruno Mountain.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS
AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF
CATCHMENT BASINS ON SAN BRUNO
MOUNTAIN
TECHNICAL & MAINTENANCE SERVICES
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia opened the Public
Hearing.
Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee
stated that vacation of this easement
would accommodate a building expansion,
and there were no objections from staff
or the Utility Co.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia invited those
wishing to speak for or against the aban-
donment to step to the dais - no one
chose to speak, and she closed the Public
Hearing.
M/S Addiego/Nicolopulos - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 106-88
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ITEMS FROM STAFF
City Attorney Armento stated the
following: that this was a one line
amendment to the existing JPA (Mr. Lewis
has copies that are being passed out),
but essentially it would provide (it is
underlined in red on second page of the
document you are getting), and would pro-
vide that the -- also enables additional
insureds that would be the three members
of governing board both in their official
and individual capacities; this was
acted upon last night or yesterday by the
County Board of Supervisors on behalf of
the County, and it is acceptable for you
to act on this although it was not on
your agenda; if you find under the provi-
sions of Government Code Section 54954.2
that the need to take action arose at a
late point. She stated that the reason
staff was asking Council to take care of
it at this meeting was that the JPA is
meeting again prior to your next City
Council meeting.
Councilman Addiego stated that this was
part of the item he had brought up at the
7/27/88
Page 14
AGENDA
ACTION TAKEN
---- ITEMS FROM STAFF
18a. Resolution - Continued.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
GOOD AND WELFARE
CLOSED SESSION
19.
Closed Session for the purpose of
the discussion of personnel
matters, labor relations, property
negotiations and litigation.
RECALL TO ORDER:
ADJOURNMENT:
ITEMS FROM STAFF
Council's last meeting, and that the next
JPA meeting is on the lOth, but earlier
in the day and this would make things
clearer because there were bigger
questions involved.
Councilman Halley stated that adoption of
the Resolution was being recommended by
Councilman Haffey.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 107-88
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
No one chose to speak.
GOOD AND WELFARE
No one chose to speak.
CLOSED SESSION
Council adjourned to a Closed Session to
discuss the items mentioned included an
offer being made to the City on property
acquisition at 9:50 p.m.
Mayor Pro Tem Teglia recalled the meeting
to order at 10:35 p.m., all Council pre-
sent, no action taken.
M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adjourn the
meeting.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Adjourned at 10:36 p.m.
7/27/88
Page 15
--- RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
arbara A. Battaya,
Gity of South San Francisco
J~6b-erta Cerri'~egl i a,/flj~r Pro Tem
,/City of South San Fra~n(J4co
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose
of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape
and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are
available for inspection, review and copying.
7/27/88
Page 16