Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1988-07-27Mayor Jack Dra§o Counci 1: Mark N. Addiego Ri chard A. Haffey Gus Nicol opulos Roberta Cerri Teglia MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room July 27, 1988 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California, that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco will hold a Special Meeting on Wednesday, the 27th day of July, 1988 at 6:30 p.m., in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Purpose of the meeting: 1. Closed session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel matters, labor relations, property negotiations and litigation. Dated: July 21, 1988 Barbara A. Battaya, City Cle~/ City of South San Francisco AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) ROLL CALL: CLOSED SESSION Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel matters, labor relations, property negotiations and litigation. Councilman Haffey Arrived: RECALL TO ORDER: ACTION TAKEN 6:35 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia pre- siding. City Clerk Battaya stated that Mayor Drago had informed her Office that he was unable to attend tonight's meeting. Council present: Council absent: Addiego, Nicolopulos, and Teglia. Drago and Haffey. CLOSED SESSION Council adjourned to a Closed Session to discuss the item listed at 6:35 p.m., and Mayor Pro Tem Teglia stated that the Closed Session would be held at Mayor Drago's house at 122 Cuesta Drive and the City Attorney would also be present. Councilman Haffey arrived at 6:37 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 8:03 p.m., all Council pre- sent, no action taken. M/S Addiego/Haffey - To adjourn the meeting. 7/27/88 Page i AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ADJOURNMENT: Carried by unanimous voice vote. Time of Adjournment was 8:04 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, City of South San Francisco APPROVED. /J rag;, MaFor //City of South San Francisco The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 7/27/88 Page 2 Mayor Jack Drago Council: Mark N. Addiego Richard A. Haffey Gus Nicolopulos .... Roberta Cerri Teglia MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room July 27, 1988 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No.1) ROLL CALL: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION: PRESENTATIONS Mr. Art Sullivan, Bridge Housing, - Magnolia Senior Center Project, its rent structure, and what the project was foot,' designed to accomplish. Presentation from Katz-Hollis on the preliminary financial analysis on tax increment projection and schedule for redevelopment plan for the Downtown/Central Project. ACTION TAKEN 8:04 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia pre- siding. Council present: Council absent: Addiego, Haffey, Nicolopulos, and Teglia. Drago City Clerk Battaya stated that Mayor Drago had informed her Office that he was unable to attend tonight's meeting. The pledge was recited. Rev. Richard Neely, Grand Ave. Baptist Church, gave the invocation. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia apologized for the delay in starting the meeting, however, the Closed Session had been a matter of great importance. PRESENTATIONS Mr. Arthur Sullivan, Bridge Housing, chronicled the building of Magnolia Plaza, and the resultant affordable housing for seniors; the rent structure; the Chevron Co. grant recently received that lowered the subsidized rents; that 20% of the non-affordable units were still available, etc. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia stated that there would be a second presentation that had been agendized on the Redevelopment meeting agenda. Ms. Martha Nessel, Katz-Hollis, spoke in detail on the financial, and economic feasibility of the redevelopment plan documents (a copy of the summary of the procedures is on file in the Clerk's Office). Discussion followed: that discussion of 7/27/88 Page i AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PRESENTATIONS AGENDA REVIEW City Manager Lewis Requested: - Add Item No. 18a. Resolution for an Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for .Catchment Basins on San Bruno Mountain. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS PRESENTATIONS this item was appropriate for a Council study session; the time schedule for the project, etc. Mr. Gary Jones, Katz-Hollis, spoke briefly of the legal requirements of the various documents involved with the Project AGENDA REVIEW So ordered. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Ms. Diane Smith, 3900 Crofton Way, spoke with concern over a newspaper article about discussions to disband the Westborough Water District and incor- porate it into South San Francisco. She questioned if the residents were resi- dents of the City or only of the District. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia stated that the Westborough residents were citizens of the City, however, in reference to sewage and water they were residents of the District. She stated that there had been two recom- mendations to incorporate the District into the City, one from the Grand Jury and the other from LAFCO. Ms. Smith stated that many residents thought that the District had outlived its usefulness. She stated that she had spoken to the new Manager Ken Wright, who had only been in that position for two months, and doubted that he knew of the history of the creation of the Water District. 7/27/88 Page 2 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ORAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNITY FORUM '1 I ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mayor Pro Tem Teglia stated that the City had stated that the Water District was a legally constituted body, and as such the City could not incorporate or absorb the District. She stated that in view of that, if the people were concerned they must go to the Water District and make their interests known. Councilman Halley stated that the City would like to absorb the Water District, based on financial data, but why should the City have to pay for the report. He stated that it was important for the citizens of Westborough to press upon the Board to do the study in that they are your elected representatives. Ms. Smith stated that she had gone to neighbors to make them aware of the problem, however, most were disinterested. Councilman Addiego stated that Ms. Smith was pointing out the general apathy of the neighborhood, and perhaps the City should take a more active role. Vice Mayor Teglia suggested that Ms. Smith approach the homeowners assoc- iations in Westborough to seek support of her position, along with her neigh- bors. She stated that if she did not receive satisfaction after approaching the homeowners groups and the District, she should then come to the Council. Mr. Lou Dell'Angela stated that he was representing the Chamber of Commerce and proceeded to chronicle the forthcoming Chamber events: lunch at the Grovesner Hotel 7/28/88; lunch on 8/24/88 where Congressman Lantos will speak on legisla- tion at the Radisson Inn. COMMUNITY FORUM Councilman Nicolopulos reiterated his announcement of the 75th Birthday celebration of S.S.F. High School. 7/27/88 Page 3 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 6/22/88. ® Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending adoption of a Resolution of award of Contract for construction services on the Aircraft Noise Insulation Project Phase III, Project No. PB-87-1, to M. Gaehwiler Construction, Inc. in the amount of $505,363.00 as the lowest responsible bidder. A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM PHASE III, PROJECT NO. PB-87-1, BID NO. 1770 Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending adoption of a Resolution author- izing execution of an agreement with Wilson Ihrig & Assoc. to furnish construction related sup- port for Aircraft Noise Insulation Project, Phase III, Project No. PB-87-1. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMINISTRA- TION SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROJECT - PHASE III, PROJECT NO. PB-87-1 Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending adoption of a Resolution approving the conceptual geometric con- figuration of the Oyster Point Blvd. Grade Separation/Hwy. 101 Interchange Project, Project No. ST-86-3. A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING CONCURRENCE WITH THE CONCEPTUAL GEOMETRIC CON- FIGURATION OF THE OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION/HWY 101 INTERCHANGE PROJECT, PROJECT NO. ST-86-3 CONSENT CALENDAR Approved. RESOLUTION NO. 96-88 RESOLUTION NO. 97-88 Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Mayor Pro Tem Teglia. 7/27/88 Page 4 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CONSENT CALENDAR e Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending adoption of a Resolution accepting the grant offer from the Federal Aviation Administration for the Aircraft Noise Insulation Program for Phase V implementation and authorizing the Mayor to sign the Grant Agreement. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AGREE- MENT FOR FEDERAL FUNDING OF THE OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROGRAM PHASE V, PROJECT NO. PB-88-1 TO INSTALL SOUND-PROOFING IN RESIDENCES, AIP PROJECT NO. 3-06-0221-N9 Ge Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending adoption of a Resolution amending the City's Disadvantaged Business Enterprise Program. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO'S DISADVANTAGED BUSINESS ENTERPRISE PROGRAM IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SURFACE TRANS- PORTATION AND UNIFORM RELOCATION ASSISTANCE ACT OF 1987 ® Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending adoption of a Resolution to award the contract for printing the quarterly Leisure Activities Brochure for 1988-89 to Alonzo Printing, in the amount of $15,976 as the lowest responsible bidder. A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT LEISURE ACTIVITIES BROCHURE BID NO. 1772 e Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending adoption of a Resolution approving specifications, authorizing the purchase of supplies, equipment or services and calling bids for custodial paper supplies. A RESOLUTION APPROVING SPECIFI- CONSENT CALENDAR RESOLUTION NO. 98-88 RESOLUTION NO. 99-88 RESOLUTION NO. 100-88 RESOLUTION NO. 101-88 7/27/88 Page 5 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 0 ?0 ~CONSENT CALENDAR 8. Staff Report - Continued. CATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE PURCHASE OF SUPPLIES, EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES AND CALLING BIDS FOR CUSTODIAL PAPER SUPPLIES, BID NO. 1779 ® Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending adoption of a Resolution approving the conceptual geometric con- ~11(~ figuration of the Oyster Point Blvd. Grade Separation/Hwy. 101 Interchange Project, Project No. ST-86-3. A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING CONCURRENCE WITH THE CONCEPTUAL GEOMETRIC CON- FIGURATION OF THE OYSTER POINT BOULEVARD GRADE SEPARATION/HWY 101 INTERCHANGE PROJECT, PROJECT NO. ST-86-3 APPROVAL OF BILLS 9. Motion to approve the Regular Bills of 7/27/88. ~o~ CITY MANAGER - BUILDING 10. Hearing - To consider approval of the statement of cost for the sum- mary abatement at 601 First Lane. Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending: 1) Open the Hearing and hear testi- mony from the Owner of the property; 2) Close the Hearing; 3) Adoption of a Resolution on the statement of costs for the CONSENT CALENDAR M/S Haffey/Addiego - To approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item No. 4. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia questioned if this item had been approved by neighboring cities. City Manager Lewis stated that he and Mr. Yee had met with Caltrans and the City of Brisbane to effect this, and Brisbane had indicated agreement. M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 102-88 Carried by unanimous voice vote. APPROVAL OF BILLS M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To approve the Regular Bills of 7/27/88 in the amount of $1,331,951.55. Carried by unanimous voice vote. CITY MANAGER - BUILDING Mayor Pro Tem Teglia opened the Hearing, and questioned if there were any objec- tions or protests on this action. Code Enforcement Officer Harris stated there were not. Councilman Nicolopulos questioned is a amicable resol uti on had been accompl i shed. 7/27/88 Page 6 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CITY MANAGER - BUILDING 10. Staff Report - Continued. abatement. A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE STATEMENT OF COSTS FOR THE SUMMARY ABATEMENT OF WEEDS AT 601 FIRST LANE CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL 11. Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending adoption of a Resolution adopting~)~Ooo job specifications and a salary scale for the positions of Fire Education Specialist and Fi re Safety Specialist. A RESOLUTION AMENDING THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO EMPLOYEE CLASSIFICATION PLAN TO ESTABLISH THE POSITIONS OF FIRE EDUCATION SPECIALIST AND FIRE SAFETY SPECIALIST CITY MANAGER - BUILDING City Attorney Armento stated that the Deputy City Attorney did have conver- sations with the gentleman, and the gentleman said he had attempted to contract with someone to do the work for approximately $400.00. She stated that the gentleman had been informed that he needed to get the work done by a certain date or the City crews would do the work; the City crews did the work and the cost was less than the contracted price. Councilman Halley stated that essentially that meant that the gentleman had to pay the City $340.00. Councilman Addiego stated that perhaps the Council should look at the rates used for this type of abatement. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia closed the Hearing. M/S Haffey/Addiego - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 103-88 Carried by unanimous voice vote. CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL Coordinator of Labor Relations Tolmacheff stated that this item would approve two new job specifications and their respec- tive salary ranges. She stated that through the budget process Council had approved the elimination of one Deputy Fire Marshal, and the creation of these two non-sworn positions. Councilman Halley stated that this was consistent with the Subcommittee recom- mendations, and allowed civilianization of the two positions. M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 104-88 7/27/88 Page 7 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ..... CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL 11. Staff Report - Continued. CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL Councilman Nicolopulos thanked the City Clerk for her intensive research that produced a document an employee list by department and position. He related the following from the document: there were 129 different classifications; Police Dept. had 108 employees with 16 classifi- cations; Fire Dept. had 78 employees with 10 classifications; the remainder of 222 employees had 103 classifications. He questioned if the Council wanted to proceed in this manner of adding new titles when the five benchmark cities did not have comparable positions. He suggested standardization of positions rather than becoming specialized. Councilman Haffey stated that was a respectful question due to Councilman Nicolopulos' concerns, and perhaps there were too many classifications. He questioned if the Councilman had a solu- tion, and could come up with solutions. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia requested that Councilman Nicolopulos put together a proposal for Council, however, she did not have the same concerns. Councilman Haffey stated that Council had had discussions on this item, and suggested that in future the question should be brought forward before the final hour of decision. Councilman Nicolopulos stated that the Council had set up a policy of five benchmark cities, yet here were job spe- cifications not comparable to those cities. He stated that the positions were becoming over classified, and that staff should come up with titles used in the benchmark cities. Councilman Addiego stated that the Mayor had an alternative to computing salaries when the titles were not compatible, however, he would be more concerned if anyone in the Fire Dept. had wanted the position or if the career ladders were 7/27/88 Page 8 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL 11. Staff Report - Continued. CITY MANAGER - PLANNING 12. Public Hearing - To consider the appeal by Mr. Tom Saberi of the ~0 Planning Commission decision of 5/12/88 to approve UP-88-820/ Jailhouse Bait Shop (James Elmore, Owner) - Continued from the 7/13/88 meeting. Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending: 1) Open the Public Hearing and hear testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearing; 3) Motion to deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. CITY MANAGER - PERSONNEL taken away from departments. Carried by unanimous roll call vote. CITY MANAGER - PLANNING Mayor Pro Tem reopened the Public Hearing. Director of Planning reiterated her staff report given at the previous meeting, and stated that the conditions on the Use Permit were designed to remedy Mr. Sabiri's concerns. Mr. Sabiri stated that Mr. Elmore's customers blocked his driveway six or seven times a day; that delivery trucks did not use the loading zone; that the parking plan was not feasible for parking and garbage pickups; that a green garden hose spews water onto the sidewalk from the baitshop, etc. Philip Keith, Esq., stated that he had represented another client in the area before Council a year ago that had also had parking problems with Mr. Elmore. He stated that Mr. Sabiri had problems with Mr. Elmore, who had opened the baitshop two or three years ago without a permit, and had just recently obtained a Use Permit that had been approved. He questioned who the two parking spaces would be for - customers or the upstairs tenant, and how that would alleviate the parking problems. He felt that the Council should uphold the appeal and deny Mr. Elmore's Use Permit. Mr. Lou Dell'Angela, Environmental Dev. Group, stated that the staff report was clear; that staff, the Planning Commission and Mr. Elmore had achieved a plan that responded to all complaints and questioned raised. He stated that Mr. Sabiri had an office building with 7,500 sq. ft. of office 7/27/88 Page 9 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ~CITY MANAGER - PLANNING 12. Staff Report - Continued. 13. Public Hearing - To consider the appeal of the Planning Commission decision of 6/9/88 in reference to UP-84-705/Mod 2 (Rich Diodati, Developer) special conditions for an open construction yard at an existing office/warehouse condo- minium project at 338 North Canal Street. (Cassette No. 2) Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending CITY MANAGER - PLANNING space, and that if that building was built today it would require 25 parking spaces - yet he has only three. He stated that Mr. Elmore had a baitshop with 250 sq. ft. and was providing two parking spaces, a fenced area for gar- bage, increased garbage collection of three times a week. He stated that Mr. Sabiri and his Attorney had criticized Mr. Elmore for not operating a baitshop with a Use Permit, however, Mr. Elmore was now at the point where he had a plan and a use that was consistent with the City's Zoning and General Plan that will not adversely affect the area. He urged the Council to deny the appeal. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia closed the Public Hearing. Discussion followed: that Mr. Elmore had agreed to all conditions; that the appeal appeared to be a harassment; that the conditions were addressing the concerns; that if the conditions were not met Mr. Sabiri could come back to the Council; that the sign, "Don't Block the Driveway", had penalty provisions; that there had been one call to the Police on Butler Ave. in the past year wherein a citation had been issued, etc. M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. Carried by unanimous voice vote. City Manager Lewis stated that it was his understanding that Mr. Diodati and the Planning Staff wanted to discuss the item further before the item comes before Council for a final appeal. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia questioned whether the Council should open the Public Hearing and continue it or simply carry it off to some time when Mr. Diodati decided that a hearing was necessary. 7/27/88 Page 10 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CITY MANAGER - PLANNING 13. Staff Report - Continued. by Motion to continue the matter off-calendar in consideration of the letter from Mr. Mark A. Wheeler, Project Manager, that requests a continuance of the Public Hearing. POLICE 14. Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending: 1) Motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to adopt the Ordinance on Charitable Sol icitations. 2nd Reading/Adoption AN ORDINANCE REPEALING CHAPTER 6.40 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING A NEW CHAPTER 6.40 ENTITLED "CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS" CITY MANAGER - PLANNING City Attorney Armento stated that since they have requested it be continued off- calendar and there is no date certain to continue it to, there was no reason to open the hearing because it will have to be renoticed. Consensus of Council - To continue the matter off-calendar. POLICE City Clerk Battaya read the title of the Ordinance in its entirety. Police Captain Raffaelli stated that this was the second reading of an ordinance that would bring the Municipal Code up to date pursuant to Court rulings and pro- vides a permit process for everyone, and would not have an impact on any chari- table organizations or churches on the way they conduct business in our City at this time. He stated that the hours and specifics set forth in the ordinance would prevent citizens from being bothered under cer- tain conditions. Councilman Haffey stated that it was refreshing that the Council didn't have someone read something they had already read, and gave a synopses of the staff report. M/S Addiego/Haffey - To waive further reading of the Ordinance. Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Haffey/Addiego - To adopt the Ordinance. ORDINANCE NO. 1036-88 Carried by unanimous voice vote. 7/27/88 Page 11 ~POLICE 15. Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending: 1) Motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to introduce the Ordinance. 1st Reading/Introduction AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 6.16.170 F. TO THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE TO REGULATE THE HOURS OF DOOR TO DOOR SOLICITORS 16. Staff Report 7/27/88 recomending: 1) Motion to waive further reading of the Ordinance; 2) Motion to introduce the Ordinance. 1st Reading/Introduction AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 11.40.170 TO THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT THE USE OF VEHICLES FOR HUMAN HABITATION ON PUBLIC PROPERTY POLICE City Clerk Battaya read the title of the Ordinance in its entirety. M/S Haffey/Addiego - To waive further reading of the Ordinance. Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Addiego/Haffey - To introduce the Ordinance. Carried by unanimous voice vote. City Clerk Battaya read the title of the Ordinance in its entirety. M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To waive further reading of the Ordinance. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Councilman Addiego questioned if there was a problem in the City which required this type of ordinance. Police Captain Raffaelli stated that there was not at this time, however, this ordinance provided a tool to deal with transients from other cities. Councilman Addiego stated that this City had had done nothing on the homeless situation and needed to do something on a large plane to deal with the full issue rather than move on this ordinance. Councilman Haffey stated that he was pleased that the Police Dept. was taking definitive action through these ordinan- ces, and he did not know that acting on this ordinance would hurt the homeless. Councilman Addiego stated that the Council should wait until there were complaints from citizens before acting on such an ordinance. Councilman Haffey stated that he wanted this City to take a strong stand on this issue because San Francisco was too 7/27/88 Page 12 --POLICE 16. Staff Report - Continued. TECHNICAL & MAINTENANCE SERVICES .,4'oo°° '17. Public Hearing - To consider a vacation of a portion of Ridgeview Court within the boundaries of the proposed Stonegate Units 5 and 6 Subdivision. Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending: 1) Open the Public Hearing and hear testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearing; 3) Adoption of a Resol uti on. A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE VACATION OF THE SOUTHWESTERLY PORTION OF RIDGEVIEW COURT LOCATED WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE PROPOSED STONEGATE UNITS 5 AND 6 SUBDIVISION POLICE liberal. Councilman Nicolopulos stated that there had always been problems with the home- less, and police problems shouldn't focus on the homeless. Councilman Haffey stated that the home- less should guided toward social services not guided out of town. Police Captain Raffaelli stated that some people live in their vehicles rather than pay rent. M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To introduce the Ordinance. Carried by majority voice vote, Addiego voted no. TECHNICAL & MAINTENANCE SERVICES Mayor Pro Tem Teglia opened the Public Hearing. Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee stated that vacation of the easement would accommodate the approved tentative subdivision, and there were no objections from the Utility Co. or City staff. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia invited those wishing to speak for or against the item to step to the dais. Mr. Mark Heeley, Developer, stated that he had worked with staff on this abandon- ment and urged Council to adopt the Resolution. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia closed the Public Hearing. M/S Addiego/Haffey - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 105-88 Carried by unanimous voice vote. 7/27/88 Page 13 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN --TECHNICAL & MAINTENANCE SERVICES 18. Public Hearing - To consider a ~ vacation of a public utility ease- ment southeast of 333 Point San Bruno Road. Staff Report 7/27/88 recommending: 1) Open the Public Hearing and hear testimony; 2) Close the Public Hearing; 3) Adoption of a Resol uti on. A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT AT 333 POINT SAN BRUNO ROAD ITEMS FROM STAFF 18a. Resolution for an Amendment to the Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement for Catchment Basins on San Bruno Mountain. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE JOINT EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT FOR MAINTENANCE OF CATCHMENT BASINS ON SAN BRUNO MOUNTAIN TECHNICAL & MAINTENANCE SERVICES Mayor Pro Tem Teglia opened the Public Hearing. Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Yee stated that vacation of this easement would accommodate a building expansion, and there were no objections from staff or the Utility Co. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia invited those wishing to speak for or against the aban- donment to step to the dais - no one chose to speak, and she closed the Public Hearing. M/S Addiego/Nicolopulos - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 106-88 Carried by unanimous voice vote. ITEMS FROM STAFF City Attorney Armento stated the following: that this was a one line amendment to the existing JPA (Mr. Lewis has copies that are being passed out), but essentially it would provide (it is underlined in red on second page of the document you are getting), and would pro- vide that the -- also enables additional insureds that would be the three members of governing board both in their official and individual capacities; this was acted upon last night or yesterday by the County Board of Supervisors on behalf of the County, and it is acceptable for you to act on this although it was not on your agenda; if you find under the provi- sions of Government Code Section 54954.2 that the need to take action arose at a late point. She stated that the reason staff was asking Council to take care of it at this meeting was that the JPA is meeting again prior to your next City Council meeting. Councilman Addiego stated that this was part of the item he had brought up at the 7/27/88 Page 14 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ---- ITEMS FROM STAFF 18a. Resolution - Continued. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL GOOD AND WELFARE CLOSED SESSION 19. Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel matters, labor relations, property negotiations and litigation. RECALL TO ORDER: ADJOURNMENT: ITEMS FROM STAFF Council's last meeting, and that the next JPA meeting is on the lOth, but earlier in the day and this would make things clearer because there were bigger questions involved. Councilman Halley stated that adoption of the Resolution was being recommended by Councilman Haffey. M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 107-88 Carried by unanimous voice vote. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL No one chose to speak. GOOD AND WELFARE No one chose to speak. CLOSED SESSION Council adjourned to a Closed Session to discuss the items mentioned included an offer being made to the City on property acquisition at 9:50 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 10:35 p.m., all Council pre- sent, no action taken. M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adjourn the meeting. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Adjourned at 10:36 p.m. 7/27/88 Page 15 --- RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, arbara A. Battaya, Gity of South San Francisco J~6b-erta Cerri'~egl i a,/flj~r Pro Tem ,/City of South San Fra~n(J4co The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 7/27/88 Page 16