Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1989-02-22Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia Counci 1: Mark N. Addiego Jack Dra§o Richard A. Haffey Gus Nicolopulos MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room February 22, 1989 0152 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) ROLL CALL: Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel matters, labor relations, property negotiations and litigation. RECALL TO ORDER: ADJOURNMENT: RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Barbara A. Battaya, City CJ~rk City of South San Francisco ACTION TAKEN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING 6:35 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding. Council present: Council absent: Addiego, Drago, Halley, Nicolopulos, and Teglia. None. Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 6:36 p.m. to discuss the items noticed. Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 7:21 p.m., all Council present, no action taken. M/S Addiego/Haffey - To adjourn the meeting. Time of adjournment was 7:22 p.m. VED. The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 2/22/89 Page I Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia Counci 1: Mark N. Addiego Jack Drago Richard A. Haffey - . Gus Nicolopulos AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) ROLL CALL: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS Proclamation - Beat the Backup Bay Area Mountain Watch Re: Terrabay~g~ Development MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room February 22, 1989 ACTION TAKEN 7:34 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding. Council present: Council absent: Addiego, Drago, Haffey, Nicolopulos, Teglia. None. The colors were presented by Boy Scout Troop No. 281, and the pledge was recited. The invocation was given by Reverend Neely, Grand Avenue Baptist Church. Mayor Teglia requested a moment of silence in memory of the recent deaths of two gentlemen who had. contributed to the betterment of the community for many years: Frank J. Bertucelli (former Councilman and five time Mayor); and Robert Minucciani (former Chairman of a Citizen Committee for the public facili- ties complex). PRESENTATIONS Councilman Nicolopulos read the Proclamation aloud on transportation. Mayor Teglia stated that the Terrabay Developer had made a presentation two meetings ago, and a request had been granted to the opponents of the Project to make this presentation. City Manager Armas stated that there would be a Public Hearing for citizen input before the Planning Commission on 2/23/89, and before the Council on 3/22/89. Ms. Lorraine Berksloff, President of Bay Area Mountain Watch, stated that she had appeared before the Council last May, and had asked for an endorsement for the Parks and Wildlife Initiative which would 2/22/89 Page i AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PRESENTATIONS Bay Area Mountain Watch - Continued. PRESENTATIONS provide funds to acquire and preserve portions of the State's natural heritage. She stated that the endorsement had helped to effect its success at the polls. She spoke of San Bruno Mountain being one of the natural areas of the State and the world with its unique ecological and distinctive landmark. She hoped that the Council would work with her group to pre- serve South Slope for the community. She stated that Mr. Don Mahoney had received his P.H.D. in Wild Life Resour- ces Science from U.C. Berkeley in 1984, and was Chairman of the San Bruno Committee for Yerba Buena Chapter of the California Native Plants Society. She stated that he was conducting an on-going vegetation survey on all parts of the Mountain. Mr. Don Mahoney showed slides, and discussed the biological features of the South Slope, and the ramifications of development. He described the following: that benching on one spot would go up 500' or ~2 way up the Mountain to take care of slide problems; that other benching would go up 1/3 of the Mountain; the species of butterflies on the Slope; the HCP Plan; a decrease of butterflies on the Mountain due to the drought years; that there was an ancient indian burial site where a hotel was to be built; the varieties of wild flowers on the slope; the rare spe- cies of rare and endangered plants on the Slope; that the enhancement activity by the Developer yielded gorse that would take over the lupin that the butterflies fed on; how the benching would look on the Mountain, etc. He summed up his presentation with the following points: that no kernel vegeta- tion analysis had been made of the South 2/22/89 Page 2 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN O±55 PRESENTATION Bay Area Mountain Watch - Continued. PRESENTATION Slope; that the mitigation measures through enhancement techniques legally required by Amendment iOA of the Endangered Species Act was severely underfunded, and believed it was grounds for non-compliance of the Act; that inde- pendent monitoring was needed to facili- tate the revegetation process, and an independent vegetation survey was required; that dust produced by the development would be devastating to the butterflies; that the South Slope should not be destroyed, but preserved for future generations as open space. Ms. Sandy Madeira stated that she lived on Randolph Ave., and her family enjoyed the Mountain and its open space and natural beauty. She stated that the quality of life in her neighborhood would be greatly devastated by the loss of parkland in her backyard. She stated that people were concerned with the pres- ent drought, and bringing another 2,000 homes to the City would not help the water situation in the City. Mr. Dave Schmidt stated that he was a writer on conservation issues, and spoke of the City's referendum on this develop- ment. He stated that San Bruno Mountain was one of five of the most dense endangered species in the State, and the Slope could be destroyed by this develop- ment, etc. He stated that present problems in the bay area were traffic congestion, air pollution, toxic run-off into the bay, reduction of open space and water shor- tage in drought years, and that building single family homes on the Slope would not help these problems. He presented alternatives to restore the damaged habitat: using volunteer groups such as the Sierra Club, Bay Area Mountain Watch, and the California Conservation Corps; that Proposition 70 had funds available to acquire the Slope. 2/22/89 Page 3 PRESENTATION Bay Area Mountain Watch - Continued. RECESS: RECALL TO ORDER: AGENDA REVIEW ORAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNITY FORUM CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 1/25/89. 2. Approval of the Regular Bills of ~oi~ 2/22/89. ® Resolution awarding contract for construction to G.E. Chen Construction Inc. in the amount of $386,816.00 as the lowest respon- sible bidder; Resolution author- izing execution of agreement to furnish contract construction administration services with Wilson, Ihrig & Associates. A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT PRESENTATION He presented the following options: disapprove the project, and place a five year moratorium to see if the restoration was working; appoint an independent moni- tor to gauge the success of the HCP rather than someone paid by the Developer monitoring the mitigation measures; work with the group and the County to acquire funds from Proposition 73 for acquisition of the property. Mayor Teglia declared a recess at 8:39 p.m. Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 8:45 p.m. AGENDA REVIEW City Manager Armas stated that he had nothing to add or delete from the Agenda. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS No one chose to speak. COMMUNITY FORUM No one chose to speak. CONSENT CALENDAR Approved. Approved in the amount of $1,078,395.49. RESOLUTION NO. 23-89 2/22/89 Page 4 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CONSENT CALENDAR 3. Resolution - Continued. FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROJECT - PHASE IV A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT FOR PROVIDING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROJECT - PHASE IV e Resolution authorizing execution of a design services contract with ~ Wilson, Ihrig & Associates for the Aircraft Noise Insulation Project - Phase V. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL CONSULTING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH THE AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROJECT - PHASE V e Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement-- ~°~0 with DKS Associates for profess- ional traffic engineering services for the 1989 Fuel Efficient Traffic Signals Management Program. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH DKS ASSOCIATES FOR PROFESSIONAL TRAFFIC ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR 1989 FUEL EFFICIENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS MANAGEMENT (FETSIM) PROGRAM ® Resolution authorizing execution of Amendment No. i to the Agreement to furnish engineering services for~o~ Shaw Road/San Mateo Avenue Pump Station Improvements. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT NO. i TO THE AGREEMENT TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE SHAW ROAD/SAN MATEO AVENUE PUMP STATIONS INTERTIE PROJECT CONSENT CALENDAR RESOLUTION NO. 24-89 RESOLUTION NO. 25-89 RESOLUTION NO. 26-89 RESOLUTION NO. 27-89 2/22/89 Page 5 AGENDA CONSENT CALENDAR Resolution authorizing installation of stop signs at Eccles Avenue and Point Boulevard. ~o Oyster A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 3812, AS AMENDED, WHICH ESTABLISHES CERTAIN TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 11.28 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE ® Resolution adjusting salary rates for the positions of Operator II, Operator I and Operator Apprentice in the Water Quality Control Plant retroactive to 7/1/88; Resolution F.a appropriating the funds. A RESOLUTION ADJUSTING THE SALARY RATES FOR THE POSITIONS OF OPERATOR II, OPERATOR I AND OPERATOR APPRENTICE IN THE WATER QUALITY CONTROL PLANT A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT ~ 0-5 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 OPERATING BUDGET Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute documents for an exchange of property in settlement ~ of Gateway Blvd. Extension Right- Of-Way, Gateway Assessment District. A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING EXCHANGE OF PARCELS BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND POLETTI TRUST 10. Reappointment of Gloria Maltoni to the Parking Place Commission to a second term (her name was inadver- tently omitted from the 1/25/89 list of Commissioners eligible for reappointment). A C T I 0 N T A K E N (]ii~ CONSENT CALENDAR RESOLUTION NO. 28-89 RESOLUTION NO. 29-89 RESOLUTION NO. 30-89 RESOLUTION NO. 31-89 Reappointed Gloria Maltoni to the Parking Place Commission. M/S Haffey/Addiego - To approve the Consent Calendar. Carried by unanimous voice vote. 2/22/89 Page 6 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN --- ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 11. Receive the San Mateo County ~o~ Hazardous Waste Management Plan, and indicate any areas of concern. 12. Report on the Planning Commission interpretation of Policy 47 in reference to cardrooms: a) Motion to accept and file the interpre- tation of the Planning Commission that the issues of an increase in tables and extension of hours for cardrooms are subject to General Plan Policy 47; b) Motion to deny the request for expansion of cardroom hours and the number of tables. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS Mayor Teglia stated that this item would be a thirty minute presentation, and in that there were people in the audience that wished to speak on Item No. 12, that item would be dealt with first. Director of Planning Smith stated that the Council had sent this item to the Planning Commission on 1/25/89 for review and clarification as they were affected by Policy 47 of the General Plan. She stated that the Commission had determined the following: that the two existing cardrooms can continue to operate in the same manner they have for years but any increase in number of tables, square footage, hours or any other aspect of their current operations which would change the basic nature, intensity or impact of these existing facilities is subject to the provisions of Policy 47. She stated that the Commission also added its intent to amend Policy 47 to specifi- cally include operating hours in the list of prohibited expansion so that this question should not arise again. Dan J. Modena, Esq. stated that he repre- sented the only two cardrooms in the City, and did not understand why the Planning Commission was making a determination when the Council alone made policy for the City. He stated that there were other 24 hour uses in the City that he was sure did not have to come before the City to beg and plead to stay open - such as coffee shops, grocery stores and the like. He stated that a service station operator had told him that his business had increased 15 or 20% due to the 24 hour operation, and had used the term "comfort zone" to describe the additional business because of the increased hours of opera- tion. He stated that people that wanted to come in and play cards in the cardrooms wanted to feel comfortable, and did feel comfortable in San Bruno 2/22/89 Page 7 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 12. Report on the Planning Commission interpretation - Continued. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS cardrooms because they are not going to close them down. He stated that this was a comfort zone, wherein the cardrooms could operate and make money. He asked that the Council allow the cardrooms to operate on a 24 hour basis on Friday and Saturday nights on a trial basis to prove that there would not be any impact on lower Grand Avenue through the increased hours of operation. He stated that the cardroom owners would do anything the City wanted to help effect the downtown revitalization. Mr. George Bugnatto, 216 Juniper Ave., stated that he represented the Oldtown Homeowners Assn. who were in full support of the Planning Commission interpretation of Policy 47. He stated that Policy 47, and the spirit of the law, was to phase out cardrooms. He su§yested that the Council rescind their prior actions on the cardrooms. Mr. Jack Stewart stated that there had been a unanimous vote of the Planning Commission on their interpretation of Policy 47 regarding the expansion of cardrooms and the hours. He reiterated Mr. Bugnatto's earlier comments on Council prior actions. Discussion followed: on the current hours of operation and how they were set; that the hours described in the ordinance were the existing hours at the time the ordinance was adopted; ABC hours of operation for bars. Motion made by Councilman Nicolopulos - Not to extend the cardroom tables, and set the cardroom hours from 6:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. to coincide with the ABC liquor hours. Motion died for lack of a Second. Motion made by Vice Mayor Haffey - To 2/22/89 Page 8 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 12. Report on the Planning Commission interpretation - Continued. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS accept and file the interpretation of the Planning Commission that the issues of an increase in tables and extension of hours for cardrooms are subject to General Plan Pol icy 47. Motion died for lack of a Second. Councilman Addiego stated that to accept the Planning Commission interpretation was probably further than the Council wanted to go at this time. He stated that when the Council acted the last time, it was on the number of games and raising the betting limits. He stated that the Council had asked the Planning Commission what they thought, and now knew, however, he did not like to preju- dice any future application by accepting that interpretation. Vice Mayor Haffey stated that Council had asked the opinion of the Commission and they had listened to testimony and reviewed the General Plan, and he was surprised that the Council did not want to act for or against their recommen- dation. He questioned why the Council had wasted the Planning Commission's time. He stated that the whole thing had started because the cardroom operators had felt they were being hurt because they could not play Texas Hold'em and the other game, then they came forward with a laundry list upon which the staff and Council had made compromises. Councilman Addiego stated that some of of Council was in sink with the Planning Commission and valued their opinion, however, he did not feel that was the whole picture when an amendment would be forthcoming from the Commission to tighten up the language of Policy 47. Mayor Teglia stated that something was missing in the way of an agenda, plan or 2/22/89 Page 9 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 12. Report on the Planning Commission interpretation - Continued. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS consensus that was not being expressed tonight, and perhaps the people in the community should decide the matter rather than have a politica~ majority decide the issue. She stated that she might be wrong but it had been her belief for a number of years that there was a consensus to see Grand Avenue cleaned up and a thinning out of the bars and cardrooms - that element on Grand Avenue. She stated that she wanted to see a majority decision, and thought this should go on the next ballot to see if the community wanted this allowed; and perhaps the Council should not limit the use to a monopoly. She stated that the Council had turned big operators away and protected the monopoly in the hopes of containing it and then diminishing and finally elimi- nating the use. Councilman Addiego stated that he had read the Mayor's comments in the newspa- pers, and heard her threaten a ballot measure at the last meeting to send this to the voters. He stated that there is a consensus in the community to clean up the downtown, however, he did not feel that the Council should turn the guns on these two operators when other uses in the area were unsavory. Mayor Teglia stated that she was not afraid of taking the issue to the voters, and would support the outcome of that vote. Councilman Addiego stated that the Commission was taking a stronger stance than a majority of this Council was willing to do at this time. He stated that the Commission was goiny to draft an amendment to Policy 47, and that would be coming to the Council for adoption. Vice Mayor Haffey stated that the Commission was going to draft an amend- 2/22/89 Page 10 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ~.. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 12. Report on the Plannin§ Commission interpretation - Continued. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ment to the General Plan, however, the Council did not have the courage this evening to act on the Commission's pre- vious recommendation. He stated that he understood election year game playing, and felt that the Council should move on to discussion of the Hazardous Waste Management Plan without wasting more time. Councilman Drago stated that if the Council was to accept the interpretation on Policy 47, then this would be contrary to the intent of the General Plan, so what the Council was trying to deal with is a cardroom ordinance. He stated that the reason it was sent back to the Commission, on his part, was to see if in their interpretation it violated Policy 47 - apparently it does, but there are other things in the report he could not accept. He stated that if he was to accept this, which he did - the interpretation, then he did not feel that the Council could act at all tonight on removing something from the cardroom ordinance - that did not pertain to the ordinance. He stated that it said in the Commission report that this matter will come before the Council probably in a month or two when they put this into the General Plan. He continued, then at that time the Council can decide on the 24 hour use or not - and with the denial of it, it opens the door for them to just apply for whatever. He stated that the Commission mentioned that they intend to change or recommend to the Council to amend Policy 47 to initiate putting into the Policy definitely no 24 hour opera- tion. He stated that when this came back, at that time, the Council will either vote or not vote for the amendment. Vice Mayor Halley questioned, if a motion was made to accept and file the interpre- tation, then Councilman Dra§o could sup- 2/22/89 Page 11 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN .--ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 12. Report on the Planning Commission interpretation - Continued. (Cassette No. 2) ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS port the motion in that he said he agreed with the interpretation. Councilman Drago stated that if the Council held the interpretation to an increase in tables, extension of hours subject to General Plan Policy 47 -- yes, he did support it; but felt that it was a moot point in that the whole thing was coming back for an amendment. He stated that some of the confusion going on had to do with transfer of ownership of the cardrooms, and he had heard that they could not transfer; and that they could transfer ownership out- side of the family. He stated that he had asked the City Attorney two questions: can the ownership of the cardrooms be transferred by the current owners to others; and can the cardrooms be transferred by current or future owners to other locations. He stated that it came out that the cardrooms can be transferred to any person. He stated that this was contrary to what two mem- bers of Council had been talking about, they felt that when this original ordinance was written that it stayed within the family - that it was a family affair. He stated that that was not true according to our City Attorney's ruling. He stated that opens the door to outside interests, so called bigger casinos, which have been knocking on the door of the City in the past three or four months. He questioned what would happen when the owner sells to a so called casino, and the City ends up with a casino on Grand Avenue. Mayor Teglia stated that was not what it meant, that it means that they will have the same number of tables under the same hours of operation. Councilman Drago stated that the business was not as appetizing wherein it closes at 2:00 a.m. to one that might stay open 2/22/89 Page 12 ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 12. Report on the Planning Commission interpretation - Continued. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 24 hours. He stated that there was no way that a large casino will be coming into this City based on the existing operating conditions. Discussion followed: conversations that took place in 1983 on the intent of Policy 47, and whether it was legal or not; and did plan to consider expansion of hours as an expansion of business, therefore a violation of the General Plan; that Councilman Drago would not vote on a change to the cardroom ordi- nance, etc. M/S Haffey/Teglia - To accept and file the interpretation of the Planning Commission that the issue of increase of tables and extension of hours for cardrooms are subject to General Plan Policy 47. Councilman Dra§o stated that he wanted to be sure that this was the intent of the General Plan, since legally it does not say that - which the City Attorney has the City Attorney has already told us, that in her opinion it is not specific. City Attorney Armento stated that the language of Policy 47 did not address hours - the language of Policy 47 only addressed location. Amended Motion and Second M/S Halley/ Teglia - To add to the motion the intent that we will have a change in the General Plan. Councilman Drago stated that the fact that the Planning Commission realized that it was not written up - they intend to submit to the Council, at a later date, puttin~ the hours into it. He questioned why the Council would not wait until then. Mayor Teglia stated that with respect to the word intent, what the Council was dealing with is that the Commission felt 2/22/89 Page 13 --- ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 12. Report on the Planning Commission interpretation - Continued. 11. Receive the San Mateo County Hazardous Waste Management Plan, and indicate any areas of concern. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS that Policy 47 as it is written -- that the intent of that covered this issue. She continued, but to make it that much more specific they plan to offer us an amendment to the General Plan, specifi- cally to speak to the hours; what they have done now is to say that in their interpretation the General Plan 47 covers by intent this issue. Carried by majority roll call vote, Councilman Addiego voted no. Mr. George Bergman, San Mateo County Dept. of Environmental Health, stated that throughout the State, siting hazar- dous waste management facilities have become a constrain to effective hazardous waste management, which was primarily due to vigorous public opposition and the ability of local government to reject needed facilities for reasons other than technical safety. He continued, the State legislature in 1986 enacted AB 2948, known as the Tanner Bill, which was the culmination of a lengthy study by the California Hazardous Waste Management Council which concluded that hazardous waste management was a responsibility which must be shared by all communities. He stated that a comprehensive planning effort must be undertaken at the local level to identify the need for the loca- tion of feasible sites for hazardous waste facilities; and the State should be granted limited power to approve projects rejected at the local level. He stated that the Tanner Bill assures these ends by establishing both a planning process for counties to prepare comprehensive local hazardous waste management plans, and a limited appeals process for local decisions on hazardous waste management facilities. He stated that the facili- ties provided for by this plan would involve carefully controlled industrial operations that pose no greater risks to a community than many of the manufac- turing processes currently found in 2/22/89 Page 14 ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 11. Receive the San Mateo County Hazardous Waste Management Plan - Continued. PUBLIC HEARINGS 13. Public Hearing - Abandonment of a ~ Public Utility Easement within Parcel 4, Block 1, Westborough-West Park Unit No. 1. Conduct the Public Hearing; Resolution ordering the vacation of a public utility easement. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS industrial zones through the County. He and Ms. Delores Lutter presented a twenty minute slide show (a copy of the Plan is on the permanent file in the City Clerk's Office for public review). Discussion followed: on the amount of waste generated in San Mateo County was 35,000 tons; that by the year 2000 it would be 54,000 tons generated; that East Palo Alto and San Carlos have had commer- cial recycling for hazardous waste; if the East Palo A1 to plant stayed in existence there was no need for other plants in the County; siting criteria; that household hazardous wastes came from household chemicals and motor oils; a fair share requirement; price tag; that there was a 30 day comment period for cities before forwarding the document to the County; Board of Supervisors would hold a meeting to hear the cities com- ments; that the cities would be the ones paying, etc. District Attorney Fox stated that enfor- cement of this Plan was his respon- sibility, and that a specialized trainin§ program was needed to handle a prosecu- tion investigation. He stated that under the Tanner Act, if the cities and coun- ties can not resolve this issue then the State will take it over. City Manager Armas stated that tonight's comments would be before the Council at their next meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing. Acting Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Wong stated that a request had been received from Mr. Yuzon to vacate the easement, because it conflicted with the location of a proposed bakery shop. He stated that Mr. Yuzon had proposed a new 2/22/89 Page 15 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PUBLIC HEARINGS 13. Public Hearing - Continued. A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN PARCEL 4, BLOCK 1, WESTBOROUGH-WEST PARK UNIT NO. 1, LANDS OF CAESAR CALLAN HOMES, INC., SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA ITEMS FROM COUNCIL GOOD AND WELFARE CLOSED SESSION 14. Closed Session for the purpose of discussion of personnel matters, labor relations, property negotiations and litigation. ADJOURNMENT 15. Request to adjourn the meeting to Wednesday, 3/1/89, at 7:00 p.m., in the City Council Conference Room, City Hall, for the discussion of the following: Oyster Point Blvd. Interchange-Status Report; Hickey Blvd. Extension Review Concept; Proposed Pathway between E1 Camino and Mission. ADJOURNMENT: PUBLIC HEARINGS alignment which would reroute the storm drain around the building. Mayor Teglia invited those wishing to speak for or against the abandonment to step to the dais - no one chose to speak, and she closed the Public Hearing. M/S Haffey/Drago - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 32-89 Carried by unanimous voice vote. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Mayor Teglia related that there had been a request from the Subcommittee on the County Jail Site to ask the Board of Supervisors to hold one meeting in South San Francisco at night. She stated that the Board had made that commitment. GOOD AND WELFARE No one chose to speak. CLOSED SESSION The Council chose not to hold a Closed Session. M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adjourn the meeting to 3/1/89 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council conference Room, City Hall, for consideration of the items noticed. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Time of adjournment was 10:27 p.m. 2/22/89 Page 16 ~-. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, ~Barbara A. Battaya, Cit~f/Cler City of South San Francisco The entries of this Council meetin§ show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 2/22/89 Page 17