HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1989-02-22Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia
Counci 1:
Mark N. Addiego
Jack Dra§o
Richard A. Haffey
Gus Nicolopulos
MINUTES
City Council
Municipal Services Building
Community Room
February 22, 1989
0152
AGENDA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1)
ROLL CALL:
Closed Session for the purpose of
the discussion of personnel matters,
labor relations, property
negotiations and litigation.
RECALL TO ORDER:
ADJOURNMENT:
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Barbara A. Battaya, City CJ~rk
City of South San Francisco
ACTION TAKEN
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
6:35 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding.
Council present:
Council absent:
Addiego, Drago, Halley,
Nicolopulos, and
Teglia.
None.
Council adjourned to a Closed Session at
6:36 p.m. to discuss the items noticed.
Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to
order at 7:21 p.m., all Council present,
no action taken.
M/S Addiego/Haffey - To adjourn the
meeting.
Time of adjournment was 7:22 p.m.
VED.
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose
of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape
and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are
available for inspection, review and copying.
2/22/89
Page I
Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia
Counci 1:
Mark N. Addiego
Jack Drago
Richard A. Haffey
- . Gus Nicolopulos
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1)
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
INVOCATION
PRESENTATIONS
Proclamation - Beat the Backup
Bay Area Mountain Watch Re: Terrabay~g~
Development
MINUTES
City Council
Municipal Services Building
Community Room
February 22, 1989
ACTION TAKEN
7:34 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding.
Council present:
Council absent:
Addiego, Drago, Haffey,
Nicolopulos, Teglia.
None.
The colors were presented by Boy Scout
Troop No. 281, and the pledge was
recited.
The invocation was given by Reverend
Neely, Grand Avenue Baptist Church.
Mayor Teglia requested a moment of
silence in memory of the recent deaths of
two gentlemen who had. contributed to the
betterment of the community for many
years: Frank J. Bertucelli (former
Councilman and five time Mayor); and
Robert Minucciani (former Chairman of a
Citizen Committee for the public facili-
ties complex).
PRESENTATIONS
Councilman Nicolopulos read the
Proclamation aloud on transportation.
Mayor Teglia stated that the Terrabay
Developer had made a presentation two
meetings ago, and a request had been
granted to the opponents of the Project
to make this presentation.
City Manager Armas stated that there
would be a Public Hearing for citizen
input before the Planning Commission on
2/23/89, and before the Council on
3/22/89.
Ms. Lorraine Berksloff, President of Bay
Area Mountain Watch, stated that she had
appeared before the Council last May, and
had asked for an endorsement for the
Parks and Wildlife Initiative which would
2/22/89
Page i
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
PRESENTATIONS
Bay Area Mountain Watch - Continued.
PRESENTATIONS
provide funds to acquire and preserve
portions of the State's natural heritage.
She stated that the endorsement had
helped to effect its success at the
polls.
She spoke of San Bruno Mountain being one
of the natural areas of the State and the
world with its unique ecological and
distinctive landmark. She hoped that the
Council would work with her group to pre-
serve South Slope for the community.
She stated that Mr. Don Mahoney had
received his P.H.D. in Wild Life Resour-
ces Science from U.C. Berkeley in 1984,
and was Chairman of the San Bruno
Committee for Yerba Buena Chapter of the
California Native Plants Society. She
stated that he was conducting an on-going
vegetation survey on all parts of the
Mountain.
Mr. Don Mahoney showed slides, and
discussed the biological features of the
South Slope, and the ramifications of
development.
He described the following: that
benching on one spot would go up 500' or
~2 way up the Mountain to take care of
slide problems; that other benching would
go up 1/3 of the Mountain; the species of
butterflies on the Slope; the HCP Plan; a
decrease of butterflies on the Mountain
due to the drought years; that there was
an ancient indian burial site where a
hotel was to be built; the varieties of
wild flowers on the slope; the rare spe-
cies of rare and endangered plants on the
Slope; that the enhancement activity by
the Developer yielded gorse that would
take over the lupin that the butterflies
fed on; how the benching would look on
the Mountain, etc.
He summed up his presentation with the
following points: that no kernel vegeta-
tion analysis had been made of the South
2/22/89
Page 2
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
O±55
PRESENTATION
Bay Area Mountain Watch - Continued.
PRESENTATION
Slope; that the mitigation measures
through enhancement techniques legally
required by Amendment iOA of the
Endangered Species Act was severely
underfunded, and believed it was grounds
for non-compliance of the Act; that inde-
pendent monitoring was needed to facili-
tate the revegetation process, and an
independent vegetation survey was required;
that dust produced by the development
would be devastating to the butterflies;
that the South Slope should not be
destroyed, but preserved for future
generations as open space.
Ms. Sandy Madeira stated that she lived
on Randolph Ave., and her family enjoyed
the Mountain and its open space and
natural beauty. She stated that the
quality of life in her neighborhood would
be greatly devastated by the loss of
parkland in her backyard. She stated
that people were concerned with the pres-
ent drought, and bringing another 2,000
homes to the City would not help the
water situation in the City.
Mr. Dave Schmidt stated that he was a
writer on conservation issues, and spoke
of the City's referendum on this develop-
ment. He stated that San Bruno Mountain
was one of five of the most dense
endangered species in the State, and the
Slope could be destroyed by this develop-
ment, etc.
He stated that present problems in the
bay area were traffic congestion, air
pollution, toxic run-off into the bay,
reduction of open space and water shor-
tage in drought years, and that building
single family homes on the Slope would
not help these problems.
He presented alternatives to restore the
damaged habitat: using volunteer groups
such as the Sierra Club, Bay Area
Mountain Watch, and the California
Conservation Corps; that Proposition 70
had funds available to acquire the Slope.
2/22/89
Page 3
PRESENTATION
Bay Area Mountain Watch - Continued.
RECESS:
RECALL TO ORDER:
AGENDA REVIEW
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNITY FORUM
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Approval of the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of 1/25/89.
2. Approval of the Regular Bills of ~oi~
2/22/89.
®
Resolution awarding contract for
construction to G.E. Chen
Construction Inc. in the amount of
$386,816.00 as the lowest respon-
sible bidder; Resolution author-
izing execution of agreement to
furnish contract construction
administration services with
Wilson, Ihrig & Associates.
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
PRESENTATION
He presented the following options:
disapprove the project, and place a five
year moratorium to see if the restoration
was working; appoint an independent moni-
tor to gauge the success of the HCP
rather than someone paid by the Developer
monitoring the mitigation measures;
work with the group and the County to
acquire funds from Proposition 73 for
acquisition of the property.
Mayor Teglia declared a recess at 8:39
p.m.
Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to
order at 8:45 p.m.
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Armas stated that he had
nothing to add or delete from the Agenda.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
No one chose to speak.
COMMUNITY FORUM
No one chose to speak.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approved.
Approved in the amount of $1,078,395.49.
RESOLUTION NO. 23-89
2/22/89
Page 4
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
3. Resolution - Continued.
FOR CONSTRUCTION SERVICES FOR THE
AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION PROJECT -
PHASE IV
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF A CONTRACT FOR PROVIDING
CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT
ADMINISTRATION SERVICES IN
CONNECTION WITH THE AIRCRAFT NOISE
INSULATION PROJECT - PHASE IV
e
Resolution authorizing execution of
a design services contract with ~
Wilson, Ihrig & Associates for
the Aircraft Noise Insulation
Project - Phase V.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF A CONTRACT FOR PROFESSIONAL
CONSULTING SERVICES IN CONNECTION
WITH THE AIRCRAFT NOISE INSULATION
PROJECT - PHASE V
e
Resolution authorizing the City
Manager to execute an agreement-- ~°~0
with DKS Associates for profess-
ional traffic engineering services
for the 1989 Fuel Efficient Traffic
Signals Management Program.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AN AGREEMENT WITH DKS ASSOCIATES
FOR PROFESSIONAL TRAFFIC
ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR 1989 FUEL
EFFICIENT TRAFFIC SIGNALS
MANAGEMENT (FETSIM) PROGRAM
®
Resolution authorizing execution of
Amendment No. i to the Agreement to
furnish engineering services for~o~
Shaw Road/San Mateo Avenue Pump
Station Improvements.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AMENDMENT NO. i TO THE AGREEMENT
TO FURNISH ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
THE SHAW ROAD/SAN MATEO AVENUE PUMP
STATIONS INTERTIE PROJECT
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESOLUTION NO. 24-89
RESOLUTION NO. 25-89
RESOLUTION NO. 26-89
RESOLUTION NO. 27-89
2/22/89
Page 5
AGENDA
CONSENT CALENDAR
Resolution authorizing installation
of stop signs at Eccles Avenue and
Point Boulevard. ~o
Oyster
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 3812, AS AMENDED, WHICH
ESTABLISHES CERTAIN TRAFFIC
REGULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
CHAPTER 11.28 OF THE SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE
®
Resolution adjusting salary rates
for the positions of Operator II,
Operator I and Operator Apprentice
in the Water Quality Control Plant
retroactive to 7/1/88; Resolution F.a
appropriating the funds.
A RESOLUTION ADJUSTING THE SALARY
RATES FOR THE POSITIONS OF OPERATOR
II, OPERATOR I AND OPERATOR
APPRENTICE IN THE WATER QUALITY
CONTROL PLANT
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT ~
0-5 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
OPERATING BUDGET
Resolution authorizing the City
Manager to execute documents for an
exchange of property in settlement ~
of Gateway Blvd. Extension Right-
Of-Way, Gateway Assessment
District.
A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING EXCHANGE OF
PARCELS BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH
SAN FRANCISCO AND POLETTI TRUST
10.
Reappointment of Gloria Maltoni to
the Parking Place Commission to a
second term (her name was inadver-
tently omitted from the 1/25/89
list of Commissioners eligible for
reappointment).
A C T I 0 N T A K E N (]ii~
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESOLUTION NO. 28-89
RESOLUTION NO. 29-89
RESOLUTION NO. 30-89
RESOLUTION NO. 31-89
Reappointed Gloria Maltoni to the Parking
Place Commission.
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To approve the
Consent Calendar.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
2/22/89
Page 6
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
--- ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
11. Receive the San Mateo County ~o~
Hazardous Waste Management Plan,
and indicate any areas of concern.
12.
Report on the Planning Commission
interpretation of Policy 47 in
reference to cardrooms: a) Motion
to accept and file the interpre-
tation of the Planning Commission
that the issues of an increase in
tables and extension of hours for
cardrooms are subject to General
Plan Policy 47; b) Motion to deny
the request for expansion of
cardroom hours and the number of
tables.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
Mayor Teglia stated that this item would
be a thirty minute presentation, and in
that there were people in the audience
that wished to speak on Item No. 12, that
item would be dealt with first.
Director of Planning Smith stated that
the Council had sent this item to the
Planning Commission on 1/25/89 for review
and clarification as they were affected
by Policy 47 of the General Plan. She
stated that the Commission had determined
the following: that the two existing
cardrooms can continue to operate in the
same manner they have for years but any
increase in number of tables, square
footage, hours or any other aspect of
their current operations which would
change the basic nature, intensity or
impact of these existing facilities is
subject to the provisions of Policy 47.
She stated that the Commission also added
its intent to amend Policy 47 to specifi-
cally include operating hours in the list
of prohibited expansion so that this
question should not arise again.
Dan J. Modena, Esq. stated that he repre-
sented the only two cardrooms in the City,
and did not understand why the Planning
Commission was making a determination
when the Council alone made policy for
the City. He stated that there were
other 24 hour uses in the City that he
was sure did not have to come before the
City to beg and plead to stay open - such
as coffee shops, grocery stores and the
like.
He stated that a service station operator
had told him that his business had
increased 15 or 20% due to the 24 hour
operation, and had used the term "comfort
zone" to describe the additional business
because of the increased hours of opera-
tion. He stated that people that wanted
to come in and play cards in the
cardrooms wanted to feel comfortable, and
did feel comfortable in San Bruno
2/22/89
Page 7
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
12. Report on the Planning Commission
interpretation - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
cardrooms because they are not going to
close them down. He stated that this was
a comfort zone, wherein the cardrooms
could operate and make money. He asked
that the Council allow the cardrooms to
operate on a 24 hour basis on Friday and
Saturday nights on a trial basis to
prove that there would not be any impact
on lower Grand Avenue through the
increased hours of operation.
He stated that the cardroom owners would
do anything the City wanted to help
effect the downtown revitalization.
Mr. George Bugnatto, 216 Juniper Ave.,
stated that he represented the Oldtown
Homeowners Assn. who were in full support
of the Planning Commission interpretation
of Policy 47. He stated that Policy 47,
and the spirit of the law, was to phase
out cardrooms. He su§yested that the
Council rescind their prior actions on
the cardrooms.
Mr. Jack Stewart stated that there had
been a unanimous vote of the Planning
Commission on their interpretation of
Policy 47 regarding the expansion of
cardrooms and the hours. He reiterated
Mr. Bugnatto's earlier comments on
Council prior actions.
Discussion followed: on the current
hours of operation and how they were set;
that the hours described in the ordinance
were the existing hours at the time the
ordinance was adopted; ABC hours of
operation for bars.
Motion made by Councilman Nicolopulos -
Not to extend the cardroom tables, and
set the cardroom hours from 6:00 a.m. to
2:00 a.m. to coincide with the ABC liquor
hours.
Motion died for lack of a Second.
Motion made by Vice Mayor Haffey - To
2/22/89
Page 8
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
12. Report on the Planning Commission
interpretation - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
accept and file the interpretation of the
Planning Commission that the issues of an
increase in tables and extension of hours
for cardrooms are subject to General Plan
Pol icy 47.
Motion died for lack of a Second.
Councilman Addiego stated that to accept
the Planning Commission interpretation
was probably further than the Council
wanted to go at this time. He stated
that when the Council acted the last
time, it was on the number of games and
raising the betting limits. He stated
that the Council had asked the Planning
Commission what they thought, and now
knew, however, he did not like to preju-
dice any future application by accepting
that interpretation.
Vice Mayor Haffey stated that Council had
asked the opinion of the Commission and
they had listened to testimony and
reviewed the General Plan, and he was
surprised that the Council did not want
to act for or against their recommen-
dation. He questioned why the Council
had wasted the Planning Commission's
time.
He stated that the whole thing had
started because the cardroom operators
had felt they were being hurt because
they could not play Texas Hold'em and the
other game, then they came forward with
a laundry list upon which the staff and
Council had made compromises.
Councilman Addiego stated that some of
of Council was in sink with the Planning
Commission and valued their opinion,
however, he did not feel that was the
whole picture when an amendment would be
forthcoming from the Commission to
tighten up the language of Policy 47.
Mayor Teglia stated that something was
missing in the way of an agenda, plan or
2/22/89
Page 9
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
12. Report on the Planning Commission
interpretation - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
consensus that was not being expressed
tonight, and perhaps the people in the
community should decide the matter rather
than have a politica~ majority decide the
issue.
She stated that she might be wrong but it
had been her belief for a number of years
that there was a consensus to see Grand
Avenue cleaned up and a thinning out of
the bars and cardrooms - that element
on Grand Avenue. She stated that she
wanted to see a majority decision, and
thought this should go on the next
ballot to see if the community wanted
this allowed; and perhaps the Council
should not limit the use to a monopoly.
She stated that the Council had turned
big operators away and protected the
monopoly in the hopes of containing it
and then diminishing and finally elimi-
nating the use.
Councilman Addiego stated that he had
read the Mayor's comments in the newspa-
pers, and heard her threaten a ballot
measure at the last meeting to send this
to the voters. He stated that there is
a consensus in the community to clean up
the downtown, however, he did not feel
that the Council should turn the guns on
these two operators when other uses in
the area were unsavory.
Mayor Teglia stated that she was not
afraid of taking the issue to the voters,
and would support the outcome of that
vote.
Councilman Addiego stated that the
Commission was taking a stronger stance
than a majority of this Council was
willing to do at this time. He stated
that the Commission was goiny to draft an
amendment to Policy 47, and that would be
coming to the Council for adoption.
Vice Mayor Haffey stated that the
Commission was going to draft an amend-
2/22/89
Page 10
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
~.. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
12. Report on the Plannin§ Commission
interpretation - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
ment to the General Plan, however, the
Council did not have the courage this
evening to act on the Commission's pre-
vious recommendation. He stated that he
understood election year game playing,
and felt that the Council should move on
to discussion of the Hazardous Waste
Management Plan without wasting more
time.
Councilman Drago stated that if the
Council was to accept the interpretation
on Policy 47, then this would be contrary
to the intent of the General Plan,
so what the Council was trying to deal
with is a cardroom ordinance.
He stated that the reason it was sent
back to the Commission, on his part, was
to see if in their interpretation it
violated Policy 47 - apparently it does,
but there are other things in the report
he could not accept. He stated that if
he was to accept this, which he did - the
interpretation, then he did not feel that
the Council could act at all tonight on
removing something from the cardroom
ordinance - that did not pertain to the
ordinance. He stated that it said in the
Commission report that this matter will
come before the Council probably in a
month or two when they put this into the
General Plan. He continued, then at that
time the Council can decide on the 24
hour use or not - and with the denial of
it, it opens the door for them to just
apply for whatever. He stated that the
Commission mentioned that they intend to
change or recommend to the Council to
amend Policy 47 to initiate putting into
the Policy definitely no 24 hour opera-
tion. He stated that when this came
back, at that time, the Council will
either vote or not vote for the
amendment.
Vice Mayor Halley questioned, if a motion
was made to accept and file the interpre-
tation, then Councilman Dra§o could sup-
2/22/89
Page 11
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
.--ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
12. Report on the Planning Commission
interpretation - Continued.
(Cassette No. 2)
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
port the motion in that he said he agreed
with the interpretation.
Councilman Drago stated that if the
Council held the interpretation to an
increase in tables, extension of hours
subject to General Plan Policy 47 -- yes,
he did support it; but felt that it was a
moot point in that the whole thing was
coming back for an amendment.
He stated that some of the confusion
going on had to do with transfer of
ownership of the cardrooms, and he had
heard that they could not transfer; and
that they could transfer ownership out-
side of the family. He stated that he
had asked the City Attorney two
questions: can the ownership of the
cardrooms be transferred by the current
owners to others; and can the cardrooms
be transferred by current or future
owners to other locations. He stated
that it came out that the cardrooms can
be transferred to any person. He stated
that this was contrary to what two mem-
bers of Council had been talking about,
they felt that when this original
ordinance was written that it stayed
within the family - that it was a family
affair. He stated that that was not true
according to our City Attorney's ruling.
He stated that opens the door to outside
interests, so called bigger casinos,
which have been knocking on the door of
the City in the past three or four
months. He questioned what would happen
when the owner sells to a so called
casino, and the City ends up with a
casino on Grand Avenue.
Mayor Teglia stated that was not what it
meant, that it means that they will have
the same number of tables under the same
hours of operation.
Councilman Drago stated that the business
was not as appetizing wherein it closes
at 2:00 a.m. to one that might stay open
2/22/89
Page 12
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
12. Report on the Planning Commission
interpretation - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
24 hours. He stated that there was no
way that a large casino will be coming
into this City based on the existing
operating conditions.
Discussion followed: conversations that
took place in 1983 on the intent of
Policy 47, and whether it was legal or
not; and did plan to consider expansion
of hours as an expansion of business,
therefore a violation of the General
Plan; that Councilman Drago would not
vote on a change to the cardroom ordi-
nance, etc.
M/S Haffey/Teglia - To accept and file
the interpretation of the Planning
Commission that the issue of increase of
tables and extension of hours for
cardrooms are subject to General Plan
Policy 47.
Councilman Dra§o stated that he wanted to
be sure that this was the intent of the
General Plan, since legally it does not
say that - which the City Attorney has
the City Attorney has already told us,
that in her opinion it is not specific.
City Attorney Armento stated that the
language of Policy 47 did not address
hours - the language of Policy 47 only
addressed location.
Amended Motion and Second M/S Halley/
Teglia - To add to the motion the intent
that we will have a change in the
General Plan.
Councilman Drago stated that the fact
that the Planning Commission realized
that it was not written up - they intend
to submit to the Council, at a later
date, puttin~ the hours into it. He
questioned why the Council would not wait
until then.
Mayor Teglia stated that with respect to
the word intent, what the Council was
dealing with is that the Commission felt
2/22/89
Page 13
--- ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
12. Report on the Planning Commission
interpretation - Continued.
11.
Receive the San Mateo County
Hazardous Waste Management Plan,
and indicate any areas of concern.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
that Policy 47 as it is written -- that
the intent of that covered this issue.
She continued, but to make it that much
more specific they plan to offer us an
amendment to the General Plan, specifi-
cally to speak to the hours; what they
have done now is to say that in their
interpretation the General Plan 47 covers
by intent this issue.
Carried by majority roll call vote,
Councilman Addiego voted no.
Mr. George Bergman, San Mateo County
Dept. of Environmental Health, stated
that throughout the State, siting hazar-
dous waste management facilities have
become a constrain to effective hazardous
waste management, which was primarily due
to vigorous public opposition and the
ability of local government to reject
needed facilities for reasons other than
technical safety. He continued, the
State legislature in 1986 enacted AB
2948, known as the Tanner Bill, which was
the culmination of a lengthy study by the
California Hazardous Waste Management
Council which concluded that hazardous
waste management was a responsibility
which must be shared by all communities.
He stated that a comprehensive planning
effort must be undertaken at the local
level to identify the need for the loca-
tion of feasible sites for hazardous
waste facilities; and the State should be
granted limited power to approve projects
rejected at the local level. He stated
that the Tanner Bill assures these ends
by establishing both a planning process
for counties to prepare comprehensive
local hazardous waste management plans,
and a limited appeals process for local
decisions on hazardous waste management
facilities. He stated that the facili-
ties provided for by this plan would
involve carefully controlled industrial
operations that pose no greater risks to
a community than many of the manufac-
turing processes currently found in
2/22/89
Page 14
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
11. Receive the San Mateo County Hazardous
Waste Management Plan - Continued.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
13. Public Hearing - Abandonment of a ~
Public Utility Easement within
Parcel 4, Block 1, Westborough-West
Park Unit No. 1.
Conduct the Public Hearing;
Resolution ordering the vacation of
a public utility easement.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
industrial zones through the County.
He and Ms. Delores Lutter presented a
twenty minute slide show (a copy of the
Plan is on the permanent file in the City
Clerk's Office for public review).
Discussion followed: on the amount of
waste generated in San Mateo County was
35,000 tons; that by the year 2000 it
would be 54,000 tons generated; that East
Palo Alto and San Carlos have had commer-
cial recycling for hazardous waste; if
the East Palo A1 to plant stayed in
existence there was no need for other
plants in the County; siting criteria;
that household hazardous wastes came from
household chemicals and motor oils; a
fair share requirement; price tag; that
there was a 30 day comment period for
cities before forwarding the document to
the County; Board of Supervisors would
hold a meeting to hear the cities com-
ments; that the cities would be the ones
paying, etc.
District Attorney Fox stated that enfor-
cement of this Plan was his respon-
sibility, and that a specialized trainin§
program was needed to handle a prosecu-
tion investigation. He stated that under
the Tanner Act, if the cities and coun-
ties can not resolve this issue then the
State will take it over.
City Manager Armas stated that tonight's
comments would be before the Council at
their next meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing.
Acting Deputy City Manager/City Engineer
Wong stated that a request had been
received from Mr. Yuzon to vacate the
easement, because it conflicted with the
location of a proposed bakery shop. He
stated that Mr. Yuzon had proposed a new
2/22/89
Page 15
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
PUBLIC HEARINGS
13. Public Hearing - Continued.
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE VACATION
OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT WITHIN
PARCEL 4, BLOCK 1, WESTBOROUGH-WEST
PARK UNIT NO. 1, LANDS OF CAESAR
CALLAN HOMES, INC., SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO, CALIFORNIA
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
GOOD AND WELFARE
CLOSED SESSION
14.
Closed Session for the purpose of
discussion of personnel matters,
labor relations, property
negotiations and litigation.
ADJOURNMENT
15.
Request to adjourn the meeting to
Wednesday, 3/1/89, at 7:00 p.m., in
the City Council Conference Room,
City Hall, for the discussion of
the following: Oyster Point Blvd.
Interchange-Status Report; Hickey
Blvd. Extension Review Concept;
Proposed Pathway between E1 Camino
and Mission.
ADJOURNMENT:
PUBLIC HEARINGS
alignment which would reroute the storm
drain around the building.
Mayor Teglia invited those wishing to
speak for or against the abandonment to
step to the dais - no one chose to speak,
and she closed the Public Hearing.
M/S Haffey/Drago - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 32-89
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Mayor Teglia related that there had been a
request from the Subcommittee on the
County Jail Site to ask the Board of
Supervisors to hold one meeting in South
San Francisco at night. She stated that
the Board had made that commitment.
GOOD AND WELFARE
No one chose to speak.
CLOSED SESSION
The Council chose not to hold a Closed
Session.
M/S Nicolopulos/Haffey - To adjourn the
meeting to 3/1/89 at 7:00 p.m. in the
City Council conference Room, City Hall,
for consideration of the items noticed.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Time of adjournment was 10:27 p.m.
2/22/89
Page 16
~-. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
~Barbara A. Battaya, Cit~f/Cler
City of South San Francisco
The entries of this Council meetin§ show the action taken by the City Council to dispose
of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape
and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are
available for inspection, review and copying.
2/22/89
Page 17