HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1989-03-08Mayor Roberta Cerri Te§lia
Council:
Mark N. Addiego
Jack Drago
Richard A. Haffey
Gus Nicolopulos
MINUTES
City Council
Municipal Services Building
Community Room
March 8, 1989
AGENDA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1)
ROLL CALL:
Closed Session for the purpose of
the discussion of personnel matters,
labor relations, property
negotiations and litigation.
Mayor Teglia arrived at the meeting.
:~"iRECALL TO ORDER:
ADJOURNMENT:
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
City of South San Francisco
ACTION TAKEN
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
6:35 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Haffey pre-
siding.
Council present:
Council absent:
Addiego, Drago,
Nicolopulos, and
Haffey.
Teglia.
Council adjourned to a Closed Session at
6:36 p.m. to discuss the items noticed.
Mayor Te§lia arrived at the meeting at
6:45 p.m.
Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to
order at 7:16 p.m., all Council present,
no action taken.
M/S Addiego/Drago - To adjourn the
meeting.
Time of adjournment was 7:16 p.m.
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose
of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape
and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are
available for inspection, review and copying.
3/8/89
Page I
Mayor Roberta Cerri Te§lia
Counci 1:
Mark N. Addiego
Jack Dra§o
Richard A. Haffey
Gus Nicolopulos
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1)
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
INVOCATION
PRESENTATIONS
Cultural Arts Commission of San Mateo
County
AGENDA REVIEW
Traffic Concerns on Spruce Avenue.
MINUTES
City Council
Municipal Services Building
Community Room
March 8, 1989
01 ? 9
ACTION TAKEN
7:35 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding.
Council present:
Council absent:
Addiego, Drago, Halley,
Nicolopulos, Te§lia.
None.
The colors were presented by Boy Scout
Troop No. 183, the pledge was recited,
and a camp song was sung.
The invocation was given by Reverend
Lockley, Al dersgate Methodist Church.
PRESENTATIONS
Ms. Joan Donovan presented a slide show
on the economic, social and cultural
benefits from the arts. She encouraged
the Council to adopt a cultural element
for the General Plan as a step towards a
partnership between Government, business
and the community.
Mayor Teglia stated that she and the Vice
Mayor served on a Subcommittee that would
pursue the development of a cultural
action plan for a cultural element for
the General Plan.
She stated that the City of San Mateo was
hosting a second County wide Arts
Conference and wanted to be informed for
perhaps a level of City participation.
Ms. Donovan stated that it would be held
on 9/15/89, with a morning and afternoon
session, and a letter would be going out
to cities for a co-sponsorship.
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Armas stated that he had
nothing to add or delete from the Agenda.
Vice Mayor Haffey stated that the Council
3/8/89
Page i
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
AGENDA REVIEW
Traffic Concerns on Spruce Avenue -
Continued.
Traffic Concerns on Grand and
Magnolia Avenues.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
AGENDA REVIEW
was in receipt of a letter from the City
Clerk regarding a traffic situation on
the 600-700 block of Spruce Avenue. He
stated that Mrs. Battaya had passed the
memo to the full Council and had indi-
cated that she requests, because of some
unsafe situations up there, that the
Council agendize this action for a stop
sign on Spruce Ave. He asked that staff
consider this item at the next Council
meeting.
Councilman Nicolopulos stated that there
was an intersection problem at Grand and
Magnolia, wherein seniors have difficulty
crossing the intersection to attend
Magnolia Senior Center. He gave some
background on the site and various inci-
dents that needed to be addressed. He
suggested that a 4-way stop sign be
installed to slow vehicles, and that the
matter be agendized. He stated that a
stop sign was also needed at Grand and
Orange Avenues.
Vice Mayor Halley stated that the items
should be referred to the Police and
Engineering Departments for review and a
report at a future Council meeting.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Richard Nofts§er, Chamber of
Commerce, introduced the new Executive
Director Carol Feuerstein.
Executive Director Feuerstein thanked the
Council for their continuing support of
the Chamber, and looked forward to
working with the Council.
Mr. James Elmore spoke of his use permit
being appealed, and the Council upholding
the use permit. He questioned if staff
and the Planning Commission could now
reword the use permit, and make changes
that he had not agreed with. He stated
that the matter would be before the
3/8/89
Page 2
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNITY FORUM
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approval of the Minutes of the
Special Meeting of 2/8/89 and the
Regular Meeting of 2/8/89,
Adjourned Regular Meeting of
2/22/89.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Planning Commission tomorrow night, and
they were threatening to revoke the per-
mit.
Mayor Teglia suggested that Mr. Elmore
call the City Manager tomorrow, and get
advise on the matter.
She stated that in general the Planning
Commission could not over rule the City
Council.
Mr. Elmore questioned if his item on the
Commission agenda could be postponed
until he received advice from the City
Manager.
Councilman Addiego stated that the
Council heard all appeals of Commission
decisions, and if Mr. Elmore disagreed
with the Commission's finding it could
be appealed to the Council.
Mr. Elmore stated that he had presented
pictures at an earlier meeting on ordi-
nance violations, and questioned what had
been determined.
Mayor Te§lia stated that she had the pic-
tures to return to Mr. Elmore, and
related that in some instances there were
violations which were being pursued, and
others were not violations.
COMMUNITY FORUM
Mayor Teglia stated that she had met with
representatives of the Lions Club today,
and related that they would be sponsoring
a circus in May to benefit some local
very worthwhile projects which she
encouraged the community to attend.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approved.
3/8/89
Page 3
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
L~±~
CONSENT CALENDAR
2. Approval of the Regular Bills of ~o1~
3/8/89.
®
Motion to set 4/12/89 as a Public
Hearing to hear the appeal of the
Historic Preservation Commission
designation of the Giffra Building
at 240-246 Grand Avenue as a
Historic Resource.
Motion to set a Public Hearing for ~]
4/26/89 to consider the appeal of
the Planning Commission decision of
2/9/89 on UP-88-847, John Bacon,
Sr. to limit the size of the
project on the 1100 block of
Airport Blvd.
Resolution approving an Amendment
to the 1988-89 Operating Budget for
clean-up of waste oil contamination
at the Recycling Center.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT
0-6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
OPERATING BUDGET
®
Resolution authorizing the City
Manager to submit an application to
the State of California Health
Facilities Financing Authority for
a $525,000 loan to complete the
second floor at Magnolia Senior
Center.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A LOAN
APPLICATION TO THE STATE HEALTH
FACILITIES FINANCING AUTHORITY TO
COMPLETE MAGNOLIA SENIOR CENTER
Resolution authorizing execution of
Amendment No. i to the Agreement
with P & D Technologies for
preparation of the environmental
document for the Oyster Point
Grade Separation/Interchange
Project.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approved in the amount of $1,215,676.18.
Public Hearing set for 4/12/89.
Public Hearing set for 4/26/89.
Removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion by Councilman Addiego.
Removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion by Mayor Teglia.
RESOLUTION NO. 33-89
3/8/89
Page 4
AGENDA ACTION TAt~E N
L.~ ~"~ ~
CONSENT CALENDAR
7. Resolution - Continued.
OF AMENDMENT NO. i TO THE AGREEMENT
TO FURNISH GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES
FOR THE OYSTER POINT GRADE
SEPARATION/INTERCHANGE PROJECT
8. Resolution approving the 1988-89 ~lmo
Capital Improvement Pro§ram.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR 1988-89
Motion to direct comments on the
Hazardous Waste Management Plan to
the San Mateo County Planning
Department.
0
Resolution approving an Amendment
to the 1988-89 Operating Budget for
clean-up of waste oil contamination
at the Recycling Center.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT
0-6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89
OPERATING BUDGET
®
Resolution authorizing the City
Manager to submit an application to
the State of California Health
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESOLUTION NO. 34-89
Removed from the Consent Calendar for
discussion by Councilman Drago.
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To approve the
Consent Calendar with the exception of
Items No. 5, 6 and 9.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilman Addiego cited the following
concerns: that the City of San Mateo was
looking at dropped oil, and it is not
sufficient as an acceptable amount of
spillage; that asphalt was needed to pre-
pare the surface, however, this was the
rainy season; that $6,000 was only for
materials; that he and the Vice Mayor sat
as the Subcommittee for recycling; that
there was no power at the site; etc.
He stated that he wanted the Council to
not act on the matter in order to look at
the whole picture, and what it would take
to really get it on line as a larger City
project.
Mayor Teglia stated that the item would
be continued to the next meeting to allow
the Subcommittee more time for
recommendations.
Mayor Teglia requested a summary for
public information, because many people
were concerned about when the senior day
3/8/89
Page 5
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CONSENT CALENDAR
6. Resolution - Continued.
Facilities Financing Authority for ~
a $525,000 loan to complete the goo
second floor at Magnolia Senior
Center.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A LOAN
APPLICATION TO THE STATE HEALTH
FACILITIES FINANCING AUTHORITY TO
COMPLETE MAGNOLIA SENIOR CENTER
e
Motion to direct comments on thex' ~°~y
Hazardous Waste Management Plan to
the San Mateo County Planning
Department.
CONSENT CALENDAR
care center would be completed.
Recreation Services Manager Alex
Tsitovich spoke of the renovation of
Magnolia Center, and the lack of funds to
complete the second floor. He stated
that the loan, if approved, could be paid
off within three years and the interest
rate was 7.5%.
M/S Drago/Haffey - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 35-89
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Councilman Drago stated that he did not
agree with the position taken in the
draft letter for the following reasons:
he had a problem with all the cities
jockeying for the new positions; that the
only other position he could see other
than the Health Dept. was the District
Attorney because of prosecutions. He
suggested a language change after the
first sentence in Section 3, delete the
rest so the cities would not vie for the
additional positions. He stated that
this City should oppose any bureaucracy
monitoring hazardous waste in the County.
Councilman Halley suggested that staff
draft appropriate language to reflect
involvement of the D.A., and maybe another
health inspector.
Councilman Addiego stated that the
language should be specific to address
the concerns.
City Manager Armas stated that after the
third line, San Mateo County, you can
just have a comma and conclude by saying,
"but is supportive of the addition of a
health inspector, and the D.A. to carry
out the intent of this program.
M/S Drago/Haffey - To direct the comments
3/8/89
Page 6
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
9. Motion - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
10. Report on Myrtle Avenue traffic
complaints.
on the Hazardous Waste Management Plan to
the San Mateo County Planning Dept.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
Acting Deputy City Manager/City Engineer
Won9 stated that a petition had been
received in September 1988 from
homeowners along Myrtle Avenue which
requested a road closure, and stop signs
at every intersection on Myrtle. He
stated that staff had conducted three
meetings with the homeowners and had
discussed problems and solutions, as well
as resulting impacts.
He stated that after the engineering
study was conducted, none of the inter-
sections at justified multi-way stop
signs, but an intersection at Mulberry
and Mayfair did qualify under a sight
distance problem. He stated that there
was also discussion of installing stop
signs at two locations at each end of
Manzanita Avenue.
He stated that the recommendation was to
not approve the closure of Myrtle Ave.,
but to install a stop sign at Mulberry
and Mayfair.
Mayor Teglia read into the record a
letter from Robert K. Rogers, Jr. dated
3/7/89 (a copy is attached and a per-
manent part of the record of this
meeting).
Councilman Drago stated that he had
attended the meetings, and felt that
there were two basis concerns: speed,
and the undeserved cross town traffic
going through the neighborhood to get to
Spruce Avenue. He offered the following
suggestions: add a second stop on
Mayfair and an additional two on Myrtle
Avenue; and perhaps at every other stop
sign put a drainage ditch with the stop
sign to force people to stop at the
signs; to not allow truck traffic in the
3/8/89
Page 7
KAS E 8 R. OGE
~?T01:tNr¥S AT LAW
SAN MAT[O, CA 9~02-3128 SUNNYVALE, CA
(408) 738-8824
(415) S78-8181
FAX: (4iS) 34g-1777 0t (~ :'; ,,, PLEAS~ REPLY TO
March 7, 1989 CITY bi_?~ s..
SO. SAN
City Council
P.O. Box 711
South San Francisco, CA 94083
Re: Traffic Petition - Request to Close Myrtle Avenue
Honorable Mayor and
Councilmembers:
This letter is written to support the recommendation of the
Acting Deputy City Manager/City Engineer regarding action to be
taken in the above entitled matter.
As a resident of Mayfair Village, I attended a meeting
conducted by Mr. Wong, with the assistance of members of the police
department. Mr. Wong outlined several possible solutions to the
situation, and police representatives discussed accidents and
enforcement. Thereafter, for about thirty minutes a few vocal
people dominated the discussion by bashing the city staff.
Once a real discussion of the problem began, it became clear
that several factions in the neighborhood were represented. None
of them could agree with the other factions regarding a solution,
because each solution meant a shifting of the traffic and its
attendant problems at someone's expense. It was also evident, that
any attempt to significantly alter the traffic flow through Mayfair
Village by means of blocking streets would require an environmental
impact report, because such a shift would have a significant
adverse impact on one or more areas within the neighborhood with
no mitigation in sight.
This unfortunate situation is clearly a "no win"
staff,
can be
for your
and the suggestion mae by Mr. Wong is the only action that
taken without major '~set in the neighborhood.
/
R~p~tfully,
ROBE_~T K. ROGERS, JR.
3-8-89
Page 7a
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
10. Report on Myrtle - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
neighborhood; the City pursue the comple-
tion of No. Canal.
Mayor Teglia stated that Guy F. Atkinson
was not ready to go ahead with the No.
Canal Project. She stated that she had a
problem with drainage ditches do to the
hazard it places on the street.
Discussion followed: that Mr. Rogers'
letter indicated that a decision to block
the street would require an EIR; Deputy
City Attorney Ewing did not believe that
to be true; viewpoints stated at the
meeting with the residents; that 50-80
people attended the meetings; that the
No. Canal Project could not proceed
without the participation from Guy F.
Atkinson Co.; that a meeting will be held
with Guy F. Atkinson Co. in the immed-
iate future; that Councilman Addiego
felt - that the residents concern was
that of through traffic; should put stop
signs at Manzanita, Myrtle and Mayfair
Avenues; that a temporary street closure
should be in effect on Myrtle to reedu-
cate the people; Vice Mayor Haffey was
against a street closure on Myrtle; and
had no problem with a stop sign at
Mulberry and Mayfair Aves.; was against
traffic control or storm drainage impro-
vements, but was interested in seeing No.
Canal improved and negotiations begun in
the very near future with Guy F.
Atkinson, etc.
Ms. Wendy Marquez stated that cars do not
stop at the existing stop signs, and
suggested speed bumps for the safety of
pedestrians and children.
Police Chief Datzman stated that the
speed bumps, as could be confirmed by the
City Engineer, are not recognized in any
community as a solution to controlling
speed and as such would not be recom-
mended by the City Engineer.
Councilman Drago stated that he could see
where that could be true with speed bumps
out in the open, but questioned if speed
3/8/89
Page 8
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
10. Report on Myrtle - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
bumps at arterial stop signs would still
create a problem.
Police Chief Datzman stated that there
had been three long meetings to effect
some measures that the neighborhood would
agree upon. He stated that whenever the
City put up a arterial stop sign there
was always the possibility that a driver
would run through the sign without
stopping, however, it was still a valid
traffic control tool.
Mayor Teglia stated that she would hope
that the placement of the new stop signs
would be accompanied by some additional
enforcement until people got the message
that they had to stop.
Vice Mayor Halley stated that had been a
problem in the neighborhood for a couple
of years, and suggested putting special
enforcement in the area.
Police Chief Datzman stated that his
Department had been citing violators
since the signs had been placed in the
area, and that since the complaints
unmarked police cars did surveys of traf-
fic flows on both streets. He stated
that there had been some arterial stop
sign violations.
Discussion followed: that speed per hour
was sometimes in the 4Os; that there were
1,500 cars during peak hours; that there
would be periodic enforcement, plus
increased traffic controls were felt
would improve the situation and the
quality of life in the area; Police Chief
suggested installation of arterial stop
signs on Manzanita at Mayfair Ave., and
at Myrtle Ave. to act as a potential
deterrent in terms of breaking up the
length of the area where people might
tend to increase speed.
Vice Mayor Halley questioned why the
Police recommendation had not been
3/8/89
Page 9
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
(Cassette No. 2)
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
included in the staff report.
City Manager Armas stated that the staff
report recommended a stop sign at
Mulberry at Mayfair Ave., and the report
observed that there were considerations
that the Council might want to take into
account, such as the residents feeling
that stop signs potentially contributed
in a positive way.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To accept the
staff recommendation regarding not
closing Myrtle Ave. and accept their
recommendation authorizing the installa-
tion of a stop sign; and a desire to look
to improvements to No. Canal and allev-
iating Mayfair Village; and the kinds of
negotiations that need to take place with
Guy F. Atkinson to mitigate problems in
Mayfair Village.
Vice Mayor Halley stated that due to the
concern on enforcement, maybe the
Council needed to focus more on the kinds
of traffic controls, and the kinds of
violations that are occurring in that
neighborhood.
Councilman Drago stated that this whole
issue was initiated by residents of
Myrtle Avenue, and there was nothing in
the Motion to address their concerns.
Police Chief Datzman stated that the
first and second meetings had been a no
win situation, and then at the third
meeting when there was discussion to
install the arterial stop signs at
Manzanita at both Mayfair and Myrtle to
try to break up the flow of traffic -
then only was there agreement.
Motion and Second withdrawn by Vice Mayor
Haffey and Councilman Nicolopulos.
Discussion followed: that all of the
3/8/89
Page 10
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
10. Report on Myrtle - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
components were on the table for Council
consideration; to continue the item for
two weeks; that it was not unusual for a
Police Chief and a City Engineer to not
necessarily agree at a given point and
time on the best possible solution to
something; that the police make a recom-
mendation that is referred to the City
Traffic Engineer, who historically in
S.S.F. has had the final decision in
terms of the recommendation from a staff
standpoint if there was disagreement
between Police and the City Engineer, and
the Council made the final determination;
if there were standards to divert and
discourage traffic in an area; that
geometry or length of distance was
employed when a subdivision was origi-
nally approved, etc.
Major Robertson, 134 Manzanita Ave.,
stated that she did not believe that stop
signs would relieve the problem, because
cars do not stop at the existing signs,
and when she stopped at a sign vehicles
passed on her left without stopping. She
commended the Police Chief's efforts,
however, his men could not be there 24
hours a day.
She spoke in favor of erecting slight
drainage ditches because in winter there
was severe flooding of intersections that
the ditches would alleviate.
Mr. Ray Stupi, 628 Myrtle Ave., stated
that he wanted to see speed checked by
radar, and trucks not allowed in the
neighborhood.
Mrs. Irene Mann, 103 Fir Ave., stated
that if one access to Mayfair was closed
there would be a danger to residents in
the event of a catastrophic event. She
stated that signs concerning trucks in
the area were not enforced, and with the
narrow streets the trucks were a danger
to the children.
Mr. Elias Galindo, 107 So. Magnolia Ave.,
3/8/89
Page 11
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
.---- ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
~ 10. Report on Myrtle - Continued.
11. Resolution approving the 1989
Edition of the Solid Waste
Management Plan.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SOLID
WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SAN MATEO
COUNTY (1989 EDITION)
PUBLIC HEARINGS
12. Public Hearing - GP-89-35, General
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
did not feel that Myrtle should be
closed, and suggested a sign on Spruce,
"No left hand turns on Myrtle," or open
up Canal Street to through traffic.
Ms. Dolores Scott, Cherry and Myrtle
Ave., stated that Mayfair Village had not
intended to be a thoroughfare.
Mr. Jim Parker, 642 Mayfair Ave., stated
that stop signs would slow the traffic
down to 25 mph, and explained that most
of their traffic came from Orange Ave.
Mr. Barney Scott, 608 Myrtle Ave., stated
that the stop signs would slow the traf-
fic, however, the stop sign on Mayfair
Ave. would not help Myrtle, which is
where the problem exists. He stated that
there had been many speeding accidents
that had resulted in broken fences and
other property damage.
Mrs. Kotoa, 674 Myrtle Ave., stated that
her fence had been hit twice by speeding
vehicles, but was more concerned that a
car would hit one of her grandchildren.
Mayor Teglia stated that the meeting
would be continued to 4/12/89 for con-
sideration of the multiple stop signs,
and the enforcement that could be
expected over the norm.
Councilman Drago stated that he wanted a
track record on stop signs using street
bumps or drainage ditches in other cities
in reference to liability and damage.
M/S Drago/Nicolopulos-- To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 36-89
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing.
3/8/89
Page 12
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
12. Public Hearing - GP-89-35 - ~ag~
Continued.
Plan A~nendment to consolidate and
update downtown policies and
Negative Declaration No. 654.
Conduct the Public Hearing; Motion
to approve Negative Declaration No.
654; Resolution approving
GP-89-35.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GENERAL
PLAN AMENDMENT TO CONSOLIDATE AND
UPDATE POLICIES CONCERNING DOWNTOWN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Director of Planning Smith read her staff
report and cited the four policy changes:
2-11 - New financial institutions should
be encouraged; 2-28 - Independent auto
repair businesses should be phased out
along Airport Blvd; 2-35 and 2-38 -
Encourage additional housing in the area;
2-45 - Density of residential units in
Irish Town.
Mayor Teglia invited those wishing to
speak for or against the Amendment to
step to the dais.
Mr. George Bugnatto, 216 Juniper Ave.,
stated that he represented the Oldtown
Homeowners Assn., which area amounted to
1/3 of the downtown. He questioned
Policy 2-45 wherein most of the lots were
25' wide and an increased density in
Irish Town would not address blight or
substandard living conditions that
currently exist. He stated that if the
Council increased density, it should also
increase parking in the program.
Mayor Teglia stated that that issue was
better addressed at the Planning
Commission.
Mayor Teglia closed the Public Hearing.
Councilman Nicolopulos stated that in
Policy 2-19 he wanted the following
language added: "rapid water transit, and
other forms."
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To approve
Negative Declaration No. 654.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the
resolution approving GP-89-35
RESOLUTION NO. 37-89
3/8/89
Page 13
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
12. Public Hearing - GP-89-35 -
Continued.
13.
Public Hearing - ZA-89-48, Amending
Chapter 20.11 of the South San
Francisco Municipal Code regarding
trucks associated with home occupa-
tions and limiting auto repairs on
residential premises, and Negative
Declaration No. 653.
Conduct the Public Hearing;
Approve Negative Declaration No.
653; Motion to waive reading and
introduce the Ordinance.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20.06
AND CHAPTER 20.11 OF THE SOUTH SAN
FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING
TO TRUCKS ASSOCIATED WITH HOME
OCCUPATIONS AND AUTO REPAIRS ON
RESIDENTIAL PREMISES
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
PUBLIC HEARINGS
Councilman Addiego questioned the nega-
tive way staff went about Policy 2-11 -
why encourage banking institutions. He
stated that he did not want negative
direction when there is no direction to
replace these businesses.
Mayor Teglia stated that Policy 2-45, the
issue of mid lot size, had to be
addressed very carefully.
Councilman Addiego stated that if Airport
Blvd. was to become an auto row then
some auxiliary uses should be identified,
such as auto repair services.
Carried by majority roll call vote,
Councilman Addiego voted no.
Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing.
Director of Planning Smith read the staff
report (a copy is on permanent record in
the Clerk's Office).
Mayor Teglia invited those wishing to
speak for or against the item to step to
the dais - no one chose to speak, and she
closed the Public Hearing.
M/S Addiego/Haffey - To approve Negative
Declaration No. 653.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To waive reading and
introduce the Ordinance.
Councilman Drago stated that he had a
problem with a person not bein§ able to
do major car repairs on his own property.
He stated that he did not like ordinances
that the City could not enforce.
Mayor Teglia stated that there was only a
problem in doing that when it bothered
the neighbors.
3/8/89
Page 14
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
13. Public Hearing - ZA-89-48 -
Continued.
14.
Public Hearin§ - ZA-89-47, to
correct errors and made changes in
Title 20 of the Municipal Code
that are necessary for consistency
with State Law.
Conduct the Public Hearing; Motion
to waive reading and introduce the
Ordinance.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 20 OF
THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL
CODE TO CLARIFY CERTAIN PROVISIONS
AND TO MAKE CHANGES NECESSARY FOR
CONSISTENCY WITH STATE LAW
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Report on School District Liaison
Committee Meeting:
Potential County Jail Site:
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
Mayor Teglia called for the vote.
City Clerk Battaya requested that the
Motion and Second be withdrawn in that
the combined motion to waive reading and
introduce the ordinance could not have
discussion.
Motion by Vice Mayor Halley and Second by
Councilman Addiego were withdrawn.
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To waive reading and
introduce the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing.
Director of Planning Smith read her staff
report (a copy of the report is on per-
manent file in the Clerk's Office).
Mayor Teglia invited those wishing to
speak for or against the Amendment to
step to the dais - no one chose to speak,
and she closed the Public Hearing.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To waive reading
and introduce the Ordinance.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Vice Mayor Haffey stated that he and
Councilman Nicolopulos had met with the
School District Liaison Committee last
week and reported on the topics of
discussion: Joint Powers Agreement for
maintenance of mutual facilities; the
need to move forward on the Alta Loma
site; the swap of land in reference to
Foxridge School and the Avalon lots; the
surplusing of School District property
and the City's future master plan.
Mayor Teglia related that the Draft EIR
on two jail sites, on Mission Road and a
bay front property, with four alter-
3/8/89
Page 15
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Potential Jail Site - Continued.
GOOD AND WELFARE
(Cassette No. 3)
CLOSED SESSION
15.
Closed Session for the purpose of
discussion of personnel matters,
labor relations, property
negotiations and litigation.
16.
Request to adjourn the meeting to
Wednesday, 3/15/89, at 6:30 p.m.,
in the City Council Conference
Room, City Hall, for the purpose of
interviewing Personnel Board
applicants; and a Joint Meeting
with the Parking Place Commission
at 8:00 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT:
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Barbara A. Battaya, City~xClerk
City of South San Francisco
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
natives, was now available, and copies
were obtainable for public inspection.
She stated that the Subcommittee was
meeting with each of the Supervisors to
make sure that full weight was given to
the alternatives on the bay front site,
which was felt would answer all of the
County's needs and provide leeway for
future expansion. She stated that the
comment period for the DEIR would close
on 3/31/89.
GOOD AND WELFARE
Mr. James Elmore reiterated some of his
concerns cited under Oral Communications.
CLOSED SESSION
Council chose not to hold a Closed
Session.
M/S Haffey/Addiego - To adjourn the
meeting to Wednesday, 3/15/89, at 6:30
p.m., in the City Council Conference
Room, City Hall, for the purpose of
interviewing Personnel Board applicants;
and a Joint Meeting with the Parking
Place Commission at 8:00 p.m. for the
discussion of items of mutual concern.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Time of adjournment was 10:30 p.m.
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose
of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape
and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are
available for inspection, review and copying.
3/8/89
Page 16