Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1989-03-08Mayor Roberta Cerri Te§lia Council: Mark N. Addiego Jack Drago Richard A. Haffey Gus Nicolopulos MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room March 8, 1989 AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) ROLL CALL: Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel matters, labor relations, property negotiations and litigation. Mayor Teglia arrived at the meeting. :~"iRECALL TO ORDER: ADJOURNMENT: RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, City of South San Francisco ACTION TAKEN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING 6:35 p.m. Mayor Pro Tem Haffey pre- siding. Council present: Council absent: Addiego, Drago, Nicolopulos, and Haffey. Teglia. Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 6:36 p.m. to discuss the items noticed. Mayor Te§lia arrived at the meeting at 6:45 p.m. Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 7:16 p.m., all Council present, no action taken. M/S Addiego/Drago - To adjourn the meeting. Time of adjournment was 7:16 p.m. The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 3/8/89 Page I Mayor Roberta Cerri Te§lia Counci 1: Mark N. Addiego Jack Dra§o Richard A. Haffey Gus Nicolopulos AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) ROLL CALL: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS Cultural Arts Commission of San Mateo County AGENDA REVIEW Traffic Concerns on Spruce Avenue. MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room March 8, 1989 01 ? 9 ACTION TAKEN 7:35 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding. Council present: Council absent: Addiego, Drago, Halley, Nicolopulos, Te§lia. None. The colors were presented by Boy Scout Troop No. 183, the pledge was recited, and a camp song was sung. The invocation was given by Reverend Lockley, Al dersgate Methodist Church. PRESENTATIONS Ms. Joan Donovan presented a slide show on the economic, social and cultural benefits from the arts. She encouraged the Council to adopt a cultural element for the General Plan as a step towards a partnership between Government, business and the community. Mayor Teglia stated that she and the Vice Mayor served on a Subcommittee that would pursue the development of a cultural action plan for a cultural element for the General Plan. She stated that the City of San Mateo was hosting a second County wide Arts Conference and wanted to be informed for perhaps a level of City participation. Ms. Donovan stated that it would be held on 9/15/89, with a morning and afternoon session, and a letter would be going out to cities for a co-sponsorship. AGENDA REVIEW City Manager Armas stated that he had nothing to add or delete from the Agenda. Vice Mayor Haffey stated that the Council 3/8/89 Page i AGENDA ACTION TAKEN AGENDA REVIEW Traffic Concerns on Spruce Avenue - Continued. Traffic Concerns on Grand and Magnolia Avenues. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AGENDA REVIEW was in receipt of a letter from the City Clerk regarding a traffic situation on the 600-700 block of Spruce Avenue. He stated that Mrs. Battaya had passed the memo to the full Council and had indi- cated that she requests, because of some unsafe situations up there, that the Council agendize this action for a stop sign on Spruce Ave. He asked that staff consider this item at the next Council meeting. Councilman Nicolopulos stated that there was an intersection problem at Grand and Magnolia, wherein seniors have difficulty crossing the intersection to attend Magnolia Senior Center. He gave some background on the site and various inci- dents that needed to be addressed. He suggested that a 4-way stop sign be installed to slow vehicles, and that the matter be agendized. He stated that a stop sign was also needed at Grand and Orange Avenues. Vice Mayor Halley stated that the items should be referred to the Police and Engineering Departments for review and a report at a future Council meeting. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Richard Nofts§er, Chamber of Commerce, introduced the new Executive Director Carol Feuerstein. Executive Director Feuerstein thanked the Council for their continuing support of the Chamber, and looked forward to working with the Council. Mr. James Elmore spoke of his use permit being appealed, and the Council upholding the use permit. He questioned if staff and the Planning Commission could now reword the use permit, and make changes that he had not agreed with. He stated that the matter would be before the 3/8/89 Page 2 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ORAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNITY FORUM CONSENT CALENDAR Approval of the Minutes of the Special Meeting of 2/8/89 and the Regular Meeting of 2/8/89, Adjourned Regular Meeting of 2/22/89. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Planning Commission tomorrow night, and they were threatening to revoke the per- mit. Mayor Teglia suggested that Mr. Elmore call the City Manager tomorrow, and get advise on the matter. She stated that in general the Planning Commission could not over rule the City Council. Mr. Elmore questioned if his item on the Commission agenda could be postponed until he received advice from the City Manager. Councilman Addiego stated that the Council heard all appeals of Commission decisions, and if Mr. Elmore disagreed with the Commission's finding it could be appealed to the Council. Mr. Elmore stated that he had presented pictures at an earlier meeting on ordi- nance violations, and questioned what had been determined. Mayor Te§lia stated that she had the pic- tures to return to Mr. Elmore, and related that in some instances there were violations which were being pursued, and others were not violations. COMMUNITY FORUM Mayor Teglia stated that she had met with representatives of the Lions Club today, and related that they would be sponsoring a circus in May to benefit some local very worthwhile projects which she encouraged the community to attend. CONSENT CALENDAR Approved. 3/8/89 Page 3 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN L~±~ CONSENT CALENDAR 2. Approval of the Regular Bills of ~o1~ 3/8/89. ® Motion to set 4/12/89 as a Public Hearing to hear the appeal of the Historic Preservation Commission designation of the Giffra Building at 240-246 Grand Avenue as a Historic Resource. Motion to set a Public Hearing for ~] 4/26/89 to consider the appeal of the Planning Commission decision of 2/9/89 on UP-88-847, John Bacon, Sr. to limit the size of the project on the 1100 block of Airport Blvd. Resolution approving an Amendment to the 1988-89 Operating Budget for clean-up of waste oil contamination at the Recycling Center. A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT 0-6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 OPERATING BUDGET ® Resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit an application to the State of California Health Facilities Financing Authority for a $525,000 loan to complete the second floor at Magnolia Senior Center. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A LOAN APPLICATION TO THE STATE HEALTH FACILITIES FINANCING AUTHORITY TO COMPLETE MAGNOLIA SENIOR CENTER Resolution authorizing execution of Amendment No. i to the Agreement with P & D Technologies for preparation of the environmental document for the Oyster Point Grade Separation/Interchange Project. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION CONSENT CALENDAR Approved in the amount of $1,215,676.18. Public Hearing set for 4/12/89. Public Hearing set for 4/26/89. Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Councilman Addiego. Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Mayor Teglia. RESOLUTION NO. 33-89 3/8/89 Page 4 AGENDA ACTION TAt~E N L.~ ~"~ ~ CONSENT CALENDAR 7. Resolution - Continued. OF AMENDMENT NO. i TO THE AGREEMENT TO FURNISH GEOTECHNICAL SERVICES FOR THE OYSTER POINT GRADE SEPARATION/INTERCHANGE PROJECT 8. Resolution approving the 1988-89 ~lmo Capital Improvement Pro§ram. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR 1988-89 Motion to direct comments on the Hazardous Waste Management Plan to the San Mateo County Planning Department. 0 Resolution approving an Amendment to the 1988-89 Operating Budget for clean-up of waste oil contamination at the Recycling Center. A RESOLUTION APPROVING AMENDMENT 0-6 FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1988-89 OPERATING BUDGET ® Resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit an application to the State of California Health CONSENT CALENDAR RESOLUTION NO. 34-89 Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Councilman Drago. M/S Haffey/Addiego - To approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Items No. 5, 6 and 9. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Councilman Addiego cited the following concerns: that the City of San Mateo was looking at dropped oil, and it is not sufficient as an acceptable amount of spillage; that asphalt was needed to pre- pare the surface, however, this was the rainy season; that $6,000 was only for materials; that he and the Vice Mayor sat as the Subcommittee for recycling; that there was no power at the site; etc. He stated that he wanted the Council to not act on the matter in order to look at the whole picture, and what it would take to really get it on line as a larger City project. Mayor Teglia stated that the item would be continued to the next meeting to allow the Subcommittee more time for recommendations. Mayor Teglia requested a summary for public information, because many people were concerned about when the senior day 3/8/89 Page 5 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CONSENT CALENDAR 6. Resolution - Continued. Facilities Financing Authority for ~ a $525,000 loan to complete the goo second floor at Magnolia Senior Center. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING A LOAN APPLICATION TO THE STATE HEALTH FACILITIES FINANCING AUTHORITY TO COMPLETE MAGNOLIA SENIOR CENTER e Motion to direct comments on thex' ~°~y Hazardous Waste Management Plan to the San Mateo County Planning Department. CONSENT CALENDAR care center would be completed. Recreation Services Manager Alex Tsitovich spoke of the renovation of Magnolia Center, and the lack of funds to complete the second floor. He stated that the loan, if approved, could be paid off within three years and the interest rate was 7.5%. M/S Drago/Haffey - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 35-89 Carried by unanimous voice vote. Councilman Drago stated that he did not agree with the position taken in the draft letter for the following reasons: he had a problem with all the cities jockeying for the new positions; that the only other position he could see other than the Health Dept. was the District Attorney because of prosecutions. He suggested a language change after the first sentence in Section 3, delete the rest so the cities would not vie for the additional positions. He stated that this City should oppose any bureaucracy monitoring hazardous waste in the County. Councilman Halley suggested that staff draft appropriate language to reflect involvement of the D.A., and maybe another health inspector. Councilman Addiego stated that the language should be specific to address the concerns. City Manager Armas stated that after the third line, San Mateo County, you can just have a comma and conclude by saying, "but is supportive of the addition of a health inspector, and the D.A. to carry out the intent of this program. M/S Drago/Haffey - To direct the comments 3/8/89 Page 6 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN 9. Motion - Continued. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 10. Report on Myrtle Avenue traffic complaints. on the Hazardous Waste Management Plan to the San Mateo County Planning Dept. Carried by unanimous voice vote. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS Acting Deputy City Manager/City Engineer Won9 stated that a petition had been received in September 1988 from homeowners along Myrtle Avenue which requested a road closure, and stop signs at every intersection on Myrtle. He stated that staff had conducted three meetings with the homeowners and had discussed problems and solutions, as well as resulting impacts. He stated that after the engineering study was conducted, none of the inter- sections at justified multi-way stop signs, but an intersection at Mulberry and Mayfair did qualify under a sight distance problem. He stated that there was also discussion of installing stop signs at two locations at each end of Manzanita Avenue. He stated that the recommendation was to not approve the closure of Myrtle Ave., but to install a stop sign at Mulberry and Mayfair. Mayor Teglia read into the record a letter from Robert K. Rogers, Jr. dated 3/7/89 (a copy is attached and a per- manent part of the record of this meeting). Councilman Drago stated that he had attended the meetings, and felt that there were two basis concerns: speed, and the undeserved cross town traffic going through the neighborhood to get to Spruce Avenue. He offered the following suggestions: add a second stop on Mayfair and an additional two on Myrtle Avenue; and perhaps at every other stop sign put a drainage ditch with the stop sign to force people to stop at the signs; to not allow truck traffic in the 3/8/89 Page 7 KAS E 8 R. OGE ~?T01:tNr¥S AT LAW SAN MAT[O, CA 9~02-3128 SUNNYVALE, CA (408) 738-8824 (415) S78-8181 FAX: (4iS) 34g-1777 0t (~ :'; ,,, PLEAS~ REPLY TO March 7, 1989 CITY bi_?~ s.. SO. SAN City Council P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083 Re: Traffic Petition - Request to Close Myrtle Avenue Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers: This letter is written to support the recommendation of the Acting Deputy City Manager/City Engineer regarding action to be taken in the above entitled matter. As a resident of Mayfair Village, I attended a meeting conducted by Mr. Wong, with the assistance of members of the police department. Mr. Wong outlined several possible solutions to the situation, and police representatives discussed accidents and enforcement. Thereafter, for about thirty minutes a few vocal people dominated the discussion by bashing the city staff. Once a real discussion of the problem began, it became clear that several factions in the neighborhood were represented. None of them could agree with the other factions regarding a solution, because each solution meant a shifting of the traffic and its attendant problems at someone's expense. It was also evident, that any attempt to significantly alter the traffic flow through Mayfair Village by means of blocking streets would require an environmental impact report, because such a shift would have a significant adverse impact on one or more areas within the neighborhood with no mitigation in sight. This unfortunate situation is clearly a "no win" staff, can be for your and the suggestion mae by Mr. Wong is the only action that taken without major '~set in the neighborhood. / R~p~tfully, ROBE_~T K. ROGERS, JR. 3-8-89 Page 7a AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 10. Report on Myrtle - Continued. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS neighborhood; the City pursue the comple- tion of No. Canal. Mayor Teglia stated that Guy F. Atkinson was not ready to go ahead with the No. Canal Project. She stated that she had a problem with drainage ditches do to the hazard it places on the street. Discussion followed: that Mr. Rogers' letter indicated that a decision to block the street would require an EIR; Deputy City Attorney Ewing did not believe that to be true; viewpoints stated at the meeting with the residents; that 50-80 people attended the meetings; that the No. Canal Project could not proceed without the participation from Guy F. Atkinson Co.; that a meeting will be held with Guy F. Atkinson Co. in the immed- iate future; that Councilman Addiego felt - that the residents concern was that of through traffic; should put stop signs at Manzanita, Myrtle and Mayfair Avenues; that a temporary street closure should be in effect on Myrtle to reedu- cate the people; Vice Mayor Haffey was against a street closure on Myrtle; and had no problem with a stop sign at Mulberry and Mayfair Aves.; was against traffic control or storm drainage impro- vements, but was interested in seeing No. Canal improved and negotiations begun in the very near future with Guy F. Atkinson, etc. Ms. Wendy Marquez stated that cars do not stop at the existing stop signs, and suggested speed bumps for the safety of pedestrians and children. Police Chief Datzman stated that the speed bumps, as could be confirmed by the City Engineer, are not recognized in any community as a solution to controlling speed and as such would not be recom- mended by the City Engineer. Councilman Drago stated that he could see where that could be true with speed bumps out in the open, but questioned if speed 3/8/89 Page 8 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 10. Report on Myrtle - Continued. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS bumps at arterial stop signs would still create a problem. Police Chief Datzman stated that there had been three long meetings to effect some measures that the neighborhood would agree upon. He stated that whenever the City put up a arterial stop sign there was always the possibility that a driver would run through the sign without stopping, however, it was still a valid traffic control tool. Mayor Teglia stated that she would hope that the placement of the new stop signs would be accompanied by some additional enforcement until people got the message that they had to stop. Vice Mayor Halley stated that had been a problem in the neighborhood for a couple of years, and suggested putting special enforcement in the area. Police Chief Datzman stated that his Department had been citing violators since the signs had been placed in the area, and that since the complaints unmarked police cars did surveys of traf- fic flows on both streets. He stated that there had been some arterial stop sign violations. Discussion followed: that speed per hour was sometimes in the 4Os; that there were 1,500 cars during peak hours; that there would be periodic enforcement, plus increased traffic controls were felt would improve the situation and the quality of life in the area; Police Chief suggested installation of arterial stop signs on Manzanita at Mayfair Ave., and at Myrtle Ave. to act as a potential deterrent in terms of breaking up the length of the area where people might tend to increase speed. Vice Mayor Halley questioned why the Police recommendation had not been 3/8/89 Page 9 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS (Cassette No. 2) ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS included in the staff report. City Manager Armas stated that the staff report recommended a stop sign at Mulberry at Mayfair Ave., and the report observed that there were considerations that the Council might want to take into account, such as the residents feeling that stop signs potentially contributed in a positive way. M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To accept the staff recommendation regarding not closing Myrtle Ave. and accept their recommendation authorizing the installa- tion of a stop sign; and a desire to look to improvements to No. Canal and allev- iating Mayfair Village; and the kinds of negotiations that need to take place with Guy F. Atkinson to mitigate problems in Mayfair Village. Vice Mayor Halley stated that due to the concern on enforcement, maybe the Council needed to focus more on the kinds of traffic controls, and the kinds of violations that are occurring in that neighborhood. Councilman Drago stated that this whole issue was initiated by residents of Myrtle Avenue, and there was nothing in the Motion to address their concerns. Police Chief Datzman stated that the first and second meetings had been a no win situation, and then at the third meeting when there was discussion to install the arterial stop signs at Manzanita at both Mayfair and Myrtle to try to break up the flow of traffic - then only was there agreement. Motion and Second withdrawn by Vice Mayor Haffey and Councilman Nicolopulos. Discussion followed: that all of the 3/8/89 Page 10 ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 10. Report on Myrtle - Continued. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS components were on the table for Council consideration; to continue the item for two weeks; that it was not unusual for a Police Chief and a City Engineer to not necessarily agree at a given point and time on the best possible solution to something; that the police make a recom- mendation that is referred to the City Traffic Engineer, who historically in S.S.F. has had the final decision in terms of the recommendation from a staff standpoint if there was disagreement between Police and the City Engineer, and the Council made the final determination; if there were standards to divert and discourage traffic in an area; that geometry or length of distance was employed when a subdivision was origi- nally approved, etc. Major Robertson, 134 Manzanita Ave., stated that she did not believe that stop signs would relieve the problem, because cars do not stop at the existing signs, and when she stopped at a sign vehicles passed on her left without stopping. She commended the Police Chief's efforts, however, his men could not be there 24 hours a day. She spoke in favor of erecting slight drainage ditches because in winter there was severe flooding of intersections that the ditches would alleviate. Mr. Ray Stupi, 628 Myrtle Ave., stated that he wanted to see speed checked by radar, and trucks not allowed in the neighborhood. Mrs. Irene Mann, 103 Fir Ave., stated that if one access to Mayfair was closed there would be a danger to residents in the event of a catastrophic event. She stated that signs concerning trucks in the area were not enforced, and with the narrow streets the trucks were a danger to the children. Mr. Elias Galindo, 107 So. Magnolia Ave., 3/8/89 Page 11 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN .---- ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ~ 10. Report on Myrtle - Continued. 11. Resolution approving the 1989 Edition of the Solid Waste Management Plan. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SAN MATEO COUNTY (1989 EDITION) PUBLIC HEARINGS 12. Public Hearing - GP-89-35, General ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS did not feel that Myrtle should be closed, and suggested a sign on Spruce, "No left hand turns on Myrtle," or open up Canal Street to through traffic. Ms. Dolores Scott, Cherry and Myrtle Ave., stated that Mayfair Village had not intended to be a thoroughfare. Mr. Jim Parker, 642 Mayfair Ave., stated that stop signs would slow the traffic down to 25 mph, and explained that most of their traffic came from Orange Ave. Mr. Barney Scott, 608 Myrtle Ave., stated that the stop signs would slow the traf- fic, however, the stop sign on Mayfair Ave. would not help Myrtle, which is where the problem exists. He stated that there had been many speeding accidents that had resulted in broken fences and other property damage. Mrs. Kotoa, 674 Myrtle Ave., stated that her fence had been hit twice by speeding vehicles, but was more concerned that a car would hit one of her grandchildren. Mayor Teglia stated that the meeting would be continued to 4/12/89 for con- sideration of the multiple stop signs, and the enforcement that could be expected over the norm. Councilman Drago stated that he wanted a track record on stop signs using street bumps or drainage ditches in other cities in reference to liability and damage. M/S Drago/Nicolopulos-- To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 36-89 Carried by unanimous voice vote. PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing. 3/8/89 Page 12 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARINGS 12. Public Hearing - GP-89-35 - ~ag~ Continued. Plan A~nendment to consolidate and update downtown policies and Negative Declaration No. 654. Conduct the Public Hearing; Motion to approve Negative Declaration No. 654; Resolution approving GP-89-35. A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT TO CONSOLIDATE AND UPDATE POLICIES CONCERNING DOWNTOWN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARINGS Director of Planning Smith read her staff report and cited the four policy changes: 2-11 - New financial institutions should be encouraged; 2-28 - Independent auto repair businesses should be phased out along Airport Blvd; 2-35 and 2-38 - Encourage additional housing in the area; 2-45 - Density of residential units in Irish Town. Mayor Teglia invited those wishing to speak for or against the Amendment to step to the dais. Mr. George Bugnatto, 216 Juniper Ave., stated that he represented the Oldtown Homeowners Assn., which area amounted to 1/3 of the downtown. He questioned Policy 2-45 wherein most of the lots were 25' wide and an increased density in Irish Town would not address blight or substandard living conditions that currently exist. He stated that if the Council increased density, it should also increase parking in the program. Mayor Teglia stated that that issue was better addressed at the Planning Commission. Mayor Teglia closed the Public Hearing. Councilman Nicolopulos stated that in Policy 2-19 he wanted the following language added: "rapid water transit, and other forms." M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To approve Negative Declaration No. 654. Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To adopt the resolution approving GP-89-35 RESOLUTION NO. 37-89 3/8/89 Page 13 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARINGS 12. Public Hearing - GP-89-35 - Continued. 13. Public Hearing - ZA-89-48, Amending Chapter 20.11 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code regarding trucks associated with home occupa- tions and limiting auto repairs on residential premises, and Negative Declaration No. 653. Conduct the Public Hearing; Approve Negative Declaration No. 653; Motion to waive reading and introduce the Ordinance. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 20.06 AND CHAPTER 20.11 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO TRUCKS ASSOCIATED WITH HOME OCCUPATIONS AND AUTO REPAIRS ON RESIDENTIAL PREMISES ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS PUBLIC HEARINGS Councilman Addiego questioned the nega- tive way staff went about Policy 2-11 - why encourage banking institutions. He stated that he did not want negative direction when there is no direction to replace these businesses. Mayor Teglia stated that Policy 2-45, the issue of mid lot size, had to be addressed very carefully. Councilman Addiego stated that if Airport Blvd. was to become an auto row then some auxiliary uses should be identified, such as auto repair services. Carried by majority roll call vote, Councilman Addiego voted no. Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing. Director of Planning Smith read the staff report (a copy is on permanent record in the Clerk's Office). Mayor Teglia invited those wishing to speak for or against the item to step to the dais - no one chose to speak, and she closed the Public Hearing. M/S Addiego/Haffey - To approve Negative Declaration No. 653. Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Haffey/Addiego - To waive reading and introduce the Ordinance. Councilman Drago stated that he had a problem with a person not bein§ able to do major car repairs on his own property. He stated that he did not like ordinances that the City could not enforce. Mayor Teglia stated that there was only a problem in doing that when it bothered the neighbors. 3/8/89 Page 14 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 13. Public Hearing - ZA-89-48 - Continued. 14. Public Hearin§ - ZA-89-47, to correct errors and made changes in Title 20 of the Municipal Code that are necessary for consistency with State Law. Conduct the Public Hearing; Motion to waive reading and introduce the Ordinance. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 20 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE TO CLARIFY CERTAIN PROVISIONS AND TO MAKE CHANGES NECESSARY FOR CONSISTENCY WITH STATE LAW ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Report on School District Liaison Committee Meeting: Potential County Jail Site: ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS Mayor Teglia called for the vote. City Clerk Battaya requested that the Motion and Second be withdrawn in that the combined motion to waive reading and introduce the ordinance could not have discussion. Motion by Vice Mayor Halley and Second by Councilman Addiego were withdrawn. M/S Haffey/Addiego - To waive reading and introduce the Ordinance. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing. Director of Planning Smith read her staff report (a copy of the report is on per- manent file in the Clerk's Office). Mayor Teglia invited those wishing to speak for or against the Amendment to step to the dais - no one chose to speak, and she closed the Public Hearing. M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To waive reading and introduce the Ordinance. Carried by unanimous voice vote. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Vice Mayor Haffey stated that he and Councilman Nicolopulos had met with the School District Liaison Committee last week and reported on the topics of discussion: Joint Powers Agreement for maintenance of mutual facilities; the need to move forward on the Alta Loma site; the swap of land in reference to Foxridge School and the Avalon lots; the surplusing of School District property and the City's future master plan. Mayor Teglia related that the Draft EIR on two jail sites, on Mission Road and a bay front property, with four alter- 3/8/89 Page 15 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Potential Jail Site - Continued. GOOD AND WELFARE (Cassette No. 3) CLOSED SESSION 15. Closed Session for the purpose of discussion of personnel matters, labor relations, property negotiations and litigation. 16. Request to adjourn the meeting to Wednesday, 3/15/89, at 6:30 p.m., in the City Council Conference Room, City Hall, for the purpose of interviewing Personnel Board applicants; and a Joint Meeting with the Parking Place Commission at 8:00 p.m. ADJOURNMENT: RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Barbara A. Battaya, City~xClerk City of South San Francisco ITEMS FROM COUNCIL natives, was now available, and copies were obtainable for public inspection. She stated that the Subcommittee was meeting with each of the Supervisors to make sure that full weight was given to the alternatives on the bay front site, which was felt would answer all of the County's needs and provide leeway for future expansion. She stated that the comment period for the DEIR would close on 3/31/89. GOOD AND WELFARE Mr. James Elmore reiterated some of his concerns cited under Oral Communications. CLOSED SESSION Council chose not to hold a Closed Session. M/S Haffey/Addiego - To adjourn the meeting to Wednesday, 3/15/89, at 6:30 p.m., in the City Council Conference Room, City Hall, for the purpose of interviewing Personnel Board applicants; and a Joint Meeting with the Parking Place Commission at 8:00 p.m. for the discussion of items of mutual concern. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Time of adjournment was 10:30 p.m. The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 3/8/89 Page 16