Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1989-04-26Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia Counci 1: Mark N. Addiego Jack Drago Richard A. Halley Gus Nicolopulos MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room April 26, 1989 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California, that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco will hold a Special Meeting on Wednesday, the 26th day of April, 1989 at 6:30 p.m., in the Municipal Services Building Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Purpose of the meeting: 1. Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel matters, labor relations, property negotiations and litigation. ~taya< C~~ City of South San Francisco Dated: April 20, 1989 AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) ROLL CALL: ACTION TAKEN 6:35 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding. Council present: Council absent: Addiego, Drago, Nicolopulos, and Teglia. Haffey. City Clerk Battaya stated that Vice Mayor Haffey would not be present until later in the evening. Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of personnel matters, labor relations, property negotiations and litigation. RECALL TO ORDER: ADJOURNMENT: Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 6:46 p.m. to discuss the items noticed. Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m., all Council present, no action taken. M/S Addiego/Nicolopulos - To adjourn the meeting. Time of adjournment was 7:31 p.m. 4/26/89 Page i Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia Council: Mark N. Addiego Jack Drago Richard A. Halley Gus Nicolopulos AGENDA CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) ROLL CALL: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS Commending Ray McDonald Commending Jim Mason Commending Leford McKenzie Proclamation - Santo Cristo Society In Honor of Small Business Week MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room April 26, 1989 ACTION TAKEN 7:30 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding. Council present: Council absent: Addiego, Drago, Nicolopulos, and Teglia. Haffey. City Clerk Battaya stated that Vice Mayor Haffey would not be present until later in the evening. The colors were presented by Boy Scout Troup No. 281, and the pledge was recited. Rev. Neeley, Grace Covenant Church, gave the invocation. Mayor Teglia announced that City Manager Armas' wife Jeanne had given birth to a 9 lb. son, Armando, on Sunday, 4/25/89. PRESENTATIONS Mayor Teglia presented the commendation to retired Fire Fighter Ray McDonald after reading it aloud. Councilman Nicolopulos presented the commendation to retired Fire Fighter Jim Mason after reading it aloud. Councilman Drago read aloud the commen- dation to retired Fire Fighter Leford McKen zi e. Mayor Teglia read the Proclamation aloud and presented it to Mr. Tony Martin of the Santo Cristo Society. Councilman Addie§o read aloud the Proclamation and presented it to Ms. Lee Trumbull of the Chamber of Commerce. Ms. Trumbull thanked the Council, and 4/26/89 Page i AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PRESENTATIONS By the Peninsula Water Agency on a Proposed Joint Powers Authority PRESENTATIONS invited the community to attend the Chamber of Commerce sponsored Business to Business Local Trade Show at the Holiday Inn on 5/11/89 at 5:30 p.m. She stated that over forty-three industries and ser- vices will be at the function. Mr. Ed McMorrey, President of the Peninsula Water Agency, stated that he was making this presentation before many Peninsula Councils, and the Council of Mayors would appoint a committee or the Regional Planning Commission would redraft the JPA. He stated that in 1992 or 1993 the peninsula water supply and demand will be a parity. He stated that there was not another source of water to look to for our needs beyond that point of time, and no one was doing anything to bring in additional water. He stated that the JPA was intended to give the Peninsula Water Agency or a new water agency, which was hoped to be the Bay Area Water Agency, the authority to search out any new supply of water. He stated that at the present time there was a supply available up in the Hetch Hetchy, however, the State wanted to use that water as a flush agent for the lower Delta. He spoke in detail of lobbying attempts on a congressional level to pull water development out of the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. He described in detail the current and projected usage of water in San Francisco and the Peninsula, and plans for bond measures on future water sources by the JPA. Mayor Teglia thought that San Francisco would recognize the need for additional water on the Peninsula and bring it into focus to the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors for some sort of bond measure. She stated that she did not understand why this Agency was par- ticularly necessary. 4/26/89 Page 2 AGENDA ---- PRESENTATIONS ACTION TAKEN PRESENTATIONS Mr. McMorrey stated that there were only three cities in the County that were not members of this Agency, and there was no intention to go to bonding that would supply water to Santa Clara County, as well as to San Francisco. He stated that the intent of the new agency was to bring in the thirty suburban users into the new agency, and there was an indication that San Francisco would join the agency. Councilman Addiego stated that he had a different understanding after having spoken to the Superintendent of the Watershed, which was that So. San Francisco and a couple of other northern Ca. cities were supplied by a northern most lake in that system which was not hooked into water from the Hetch Hetchy Reservoir in the Sierras. He stated that this City receives its water from a lake whose watershed in on the property right above us on the coastal range. He stated that he would like to know where this City's water came from, and how we fit into the Peninsula Water Agency before he would consider endorsing this proposal. Discussion followed: that the meetings of this Agency only occurred once a year; that Ca. Water supplied this City's water, and had the responsibility to plan for future water; Mr. McMorrey stated that this City's water came from the upper lake of the Crystal Springs Reservoir, which at the present time was being refilled from water from the Sierras; that the documentation would be referred to City staff for evaluation. Mayor Teglia stated that Water Awareness Week was coming as brought to Council attention by the Westborough Water District who had asked for a proclamation that was not read tonight, however, it showed that many people were working towards this same end. 4/26/89 Page 3 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN AGENDA REVIEW City Attorney Armento Requested: - Continue Item No. 11 at the request of Mr. Diodati. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS AGENDA REVIEW So o rde red. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Jack Brakes, Art Rise, publicly thanked Homart for their $1,000 donation to the arts. He stated that the next Art Rise production would run from 5/5/89 to 5/21/89 and the production was "On Golden Pond." Mr. Bob McKay, 1016 Grand Avenue, questioned the status of the proposed large jail in the residential area of Grand Avenue where he had recently bought a home. He understood it was to be constructed near the existing detention center. Mayor Teglia stated that two members of Council were working to develop an alter- native to the County proposal to place a jail facility at the Mission Road site. She stated that there was an EIR being finalized on various sites, and the Council Subcommittee was developing an alternative site out on the bay front which was felt would meet all of the County needs. She stated that the new County Manager was not convinced that a new jail was needed, and wanted to examine the entire concept of feasibility before proceeding. Mr. McKay questioned why this location was so desirable. Mayor Teglia stated that from the City's point of view there was none, but the County owns the property on Mission Road and therefor would not have to acquire additional land for a jail. Mr. McKay stated that he had only lived here for six weeks, and there had been a disturbing, violent jail incident that occurred after the second week of moving 4/26/89 Page 4 ..... ORAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMUNITY FORUM CONSENT CALENDAR Approval of the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of 3/22/89, and the Special Meeting of 4/12/89. 2. Approval of the Regular Bills of ~o~ 4/26/89. ® Resolution authorizing execution of loan and repayment agreement with Redevelopment Agency for Downtown/ Central Redevelopment Project. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A LOAN AND REPAYMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE DOWNTOWN/CENTRAL REDEVELOPMENT AREA ® Motion to consent to a Joint Public Hearing with Redevelopment Agency ~o on proposed Downtown/Central Redevelopment Plan on 6/14/89. Be Resolution consenting to the designation of Hillside Boulevard Extension as a County roadway. A RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO THE DESIGNATION OF PORTIONS OF HILLSIDE BOULEVARD AND BAYSHORE BOULEVARD WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AS A COUNTY HIGHWAY 0 Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign the Owner's Certificate of Parcel Map 89-262 resubdividing Parcel "D" of the Lands of Oyster Point Marina. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION ORAL COMMUNICATIONS into his home, after which he had learned about the new jail facility. COMMUNITY FORUM Councilman Nicolopulos reiterated pre- vious announcements of the South San Francisco Diamond Jubilee birthday party on 5/20/89. CONSENT CALENDAR Approved. Approved in the amount of $770,076.70. RESOLUTION NO. 58-89 Approved. Removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion by Councilman Addiego. RESOLUTION NO. 59-89 4/26/89 Page 5 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN CONSENT CALENDAR 6. Resolution - Continued. OF THE OWNER'S CERTIFICATE FOR PARCEL MAP 89-262 DIVIDING PARCEL "D" OF THE LANDS OF THE OYSTER POINT MARINA Resolution approving plans and spe- cifications, authorizing the work, and calling bids for the Rodent Control Program. A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR THE RODENT CONTROL PROGRAM Be Resolution consenting to the designation of Hillside Boulevard Extension as a County roadway. A RESOLUTION CONSENTING TO THE DESIGNATION OF PORTIONS OF HILLSIDE BOULEVARD AND BAYSHORE BOULEVARD WITHIN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AS A COUNTY HIGHWAY LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS ® Motion to waive reading and intro- duce ordinance pertaining to the selection and training of Dispatchers. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 2.68.050 AND 2.68.060 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO THE SELECTION AND TRAINING OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISPATCHERS CONSENT CALENDAR RESOLUTION NO. 60-89 M/S Addiego/Nicolopulos - To approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item No. 5. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Councilman Addiego stated that he had removed this item for discussion in that it accommodated the Terrabay Project, and he intended to vote no. M/S Nicolopulos/Drago - To adopt the Resolution. RESOLUTION NO. 61-89 Carried by majority voice vote, Councilman Addiego voted no. LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS City Clerk Battaya read the title of the ordinance in its entirety. Police Chief Datzman stated that this ordinance would permit the City to qualify for the selection and training reimbursement for peace officers stand- ards and training, and formalizes an agreement between the City and the Peace Officers Training to maintain standards for both hiring and training of public 4/26/89 Page 6 LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS 8. Motion - Continued. e Motion to adopt the ordinance on amusement arcades within hotels. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING TITLE 20 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW AMUSEMENT ARCADES WITHIN HOTELS PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. Public Hearing - Appeal of the Historic Preservation Commission ~oo~ decision of 2/8/89 to designate 240-246 Grand Avenue a Historic Resource - continued from the 4/12/89 meeting. Conduct the Public Hearing; Motion to deny the appeal and uphold the Historic Preservation Commission designation. LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS safety dispatchers with reimbursement. He stated that the City had passed a Resolution to this effect, but the action needed was the adoption of an ordinance. Councilman Nicolopulos questioned if it was fully reimbursed by POST. Police Chief Datzman stated that it was POST reimbursable, and the training called for an 80 hour basic course with subsistence, travel, and 30% reimburse- ment of salary. M/S Nicolopulos/Drago - To waive reading and introduce. Carried by unanimous voice vote. M/S Addiego/Nicolopulos - To adopt the ordinance on amusement arcades. ORDINANCE NO. 1051-89 Carried by unanimous voice vote. PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor Teglia stated that any testimony given on this item would be sworn testi- mony, and an oath would be administered. Director of Recreation & Community Services Jewell stated that the issue before the Council was one where the Historic Preservation Commission has deemed appropriate the designation of the property at 240-246 Grand Avenue as a historic resource - which was before the Council as an appeal. He stated that the procedure followed for the designation was consistent with the Municipal Code which gave the Commission the authority to make the designation. He explained that public hearings had been held, as well as meetings with'the property owners to further evaluate the 4/26/89 Page 7 ..... PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. Public Hearing - Continued. PUBLIC HEARINGS property and review the implications of the designation. He stated that there had not been a representative from the owners present during the public hearing, however, a letter had been received from the property owners, and had been con- sidered by the Commission during their deliberations. He stated that Mr. Giffra had indicated in his letter that there had been a selective designation in the process, and in his opinion was a discriminatory practice and unfair. He explained the three points the deci- sion had been based upon: 1) that the building had played an important role in the history of South San Francisco through several businesses, and most recently a market which had operated since 1911 with many original features maintained, i.e., original sales counter and antique fixtures; 2) the history of the Giffra family and its association with the building; 3) the building was constructed in 1907 and exemplified the Spanish colonial revival style. Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing and invited those wishing to speak in favor of the appeal to step to the dais. Councilman Addiego stated that the Commission's first finding seemed to rest on the long term operations of the site, and specifically talked about a sales counter and antique fixtures. He questioned if the current ordinance allowed the City to preserve fixtures and appurtenances to the business. Director of Recreation & Community Services Jewell stated that with respect to interior features - he did not believe that those were things that would necessarily be maintained. He stated that the focus of the designation dealt with the exterior of the building. 4/26/89 Page 8 Vice Mayor Halley arrived at 8:48 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. Public Hearing - Continued. Vice Mayor Haffey arrived at the meeting at 8:48 p.m. PUBLIC HEARINGS Henry Roux, Esq., Reynolds, Roux & Price, stated that he represented the various owners of the property, as well as the Giffra family partnership. Mayor Teglia swore in Mr. Roux before he gave testimony in the matter at hand. Henry Roux, Esq. stated that this designation was made by the Commission over the objection of the landowners, which had led to this appeal. He stated that his clients were asking the Council to consider this appeal and overrule decision findings of the Commission - in the alternative to remand the matter to the Commission for further consideration. He stated that it was important to iden- tify the fact that there are other pro- perties that have also been identified as potential historic sites in the survey of properties of South City, and they were contiguous to the property at 240-246 Grand Avenue. He continued, specifically talking about the properties at 232-238 Grand Ave., which altogether comprise three fifty foot frontages, which is 150' of frontage on the north side of the 200 block of Grand Avenue. He believed that from a straight forward standpoint that the Council had several problems with the designation made by the Commission: Chapter 2.58.120(e)2 of the Municipal Code requires, in his opinion, an independent finding that the designa- tion will not impose undue economic or financial hardship on the owner; that the Commission had not met that respon- sibility by simple review of the letters submitted by the owners; that the Commission had an independent obligation to investigate and must make, and submit an independent finding - they had not done so; that the finding has not taken 4/26/89 Page 9 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. Public Hearing - Continued. PUBLIC HEARINGS into account, with any sufficiency, the purposes in the Code setting forth as a purpose of the ordinance the enhancement of property values, increasing economic and financial opportunities for the City and its inhabitants. He believed that in fact quite the reverse has or will occur through this designation, that there would be adverse economic and financial conditions that result both to the owners and this community. He stated that designation of a historic site on this property: severely limited the potential use of that entire 150' frontage by the current owners; that it restricted potential development and construction of larger facilities on the premises, and thereby limited the availa- bility of leasehold interest for alter- native types of businesses that could be operated in that space at an increased economic opportunity to the owners. He stated that for the last few years it had been difficult to attract tenants into those facilities, and there were vacant spaces existing now. He stated that there had also been difficulty in obtaining approvals from the City and staff for prospective tenants. He stated that this designation prevented signifi- cant alterations of those premises, and would continue to create that kind of a lack of opportunity for rental. He further believed that his clients were in a situation wherein the designation diminished the value of their property, which had been indicated by real estate experts and appraisers, and that the value may be as such as two or three times its fair market value. He stated that in terms of numbers he was talking about a difference in value between the historic designation vs. a unrestricted nonhistoric site - at least hundreds of thousands of dollars, and maybe in excess of $2,000,000 according to their real estate experts and appraisers. 4/26/89 Page 10 AGENDA ACT ]' 0 N TAKEN ...... PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. Public Hearin~ - Continued. PUBLIC HEARINGS He stated that there was also a problem with the cost of restoration of this pro- perty to a historic condition, and it would be significant. He stated that the City estimated cost was in excess of $60,000, whereas his clients' architect felt that was a very conservative esti- mate, and that it would run closer to $85,000. He stated that this cost was not warranted by the present economics of the building, and was a cost that should not be imposed upon the owners of this building. He continued to refute the staff report: that the cost of restora- tion would be significant; that the cost was not warranted by the present econo- mics of the building; that there were no tax benefits from this designation. He stated that the Federal Tax laws only allowed two types of benefits: 1) which is available to this property or any other property of sufficient age regardless of whether or not it is designated a historic resource; 2) it would require a historic designation through the Department of Interior on the National Registry in compliance with cer- tain Federal laws. He stated that in order to benefit from either of these types of tax benefits the owner would be put in a position where they would have to incur restoration or renovation costs equal to or greater than their cost basis in these properties that may exceed the $60,000-85,000 estimate projected for restoration. He stated that there were older buildings in the downtown area that had not been designated - which showed an inconsistent pattern. He urged the Council to listen to the plight of the owners and not designate the property as a historic resource. Mayor Teglia invited those wishing to speak against the appeal to step to the ' dais -- no one did, and she closed the public hearing. 4/26/89 Page 11 AGENDA ACT]ION TAKEN ..... PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. Public Hearing - Continued. (Cassette No. 2) PUBLIC HEARINGS Councilman Addiego questioned if the Commission had the opportunity to hear Mr. Roux's discourse. Henry Roux, Esq. stated that they had, but he was not sure if it was well com- municated with anyone on staff or the Commission. Discussion followed: the Giffra's dif- ficulty in finding viable tenants; four or five incidents in the last few years where either the use was unacceptable to the City, and the tenant could not get a use permit; that the Giffra letter did not address the issue brought forth this evening; that the Commission did not receive information on the designation creating an undue hardship, and had ruled that there was no hardship; that the Giffra attorney did not feel that the Commission findings complied with the requirements of the Municipal Code; why the Commission had not investigated a hardship. Mayor Teglia swore in Mr. Richard Giffra. Mr. Richard Giffra, 139 Fernwood Dr., San Rafael, stated that a week before the Commission meeting there had been a meeting with Mr. Jewell, members of the Commission, and the Giffra family wherein they had expressed their con- cerns, and had followed it up with a letter in protest of the designation. Discussion followed: on the protest letter in reference to economic hardship; the three basic findings for the designa- tion; the Bamburg survey on historic sites, and its basis; the Commission pro- cess from that list to establish priori- ties and the legal Commission process; specific criteria of the ordinance that the Commission followed for the designation. 4/26/89 Page 12 AGENDA ACTZON TAKEN PUBLIC HEARINGS 10. Public Hearing - Continued. 11. Public Hearing - On appeal of the Planning Commission decision of ~ 6/9/88 to deny the elimination of Special Condition No. 3 of UP-84-705/MOD 2 at 338 North Canal (Rich Diodati), which would allow an open storage yard at an existing office/warehouse building at 338 PUBLIC HEARINGS Mayor Teglia swore in Historic Preservation Chairwoman Gookin. Chairwoman Gookin refutted the Giffra attorney: that there was no indication of undue hardship; that there was not an indication of a specific plan before the City on the three properties; that this designation was important to the revita- lization program because of its architec- tural, spiritual needs that were significant; that the designation had no bearing on the owner finding tenants; that the building had always been well maintained, and this would not impose more maintenance; that the interior was just an added charm to the building; that if in the future there was a hardship for the family it could then be reviewed; that this area could be a historic district, even though all of the buildings were not of the same historic significance. Discussion followed: the 20% tax credit; why only the one Giffra structure was designated, and not the other two buildings; whether the Giffra attorney could document that the building would be worth one quarter of its value through the designation; that the attorney did not choose to disclose that information, however, there might be a case of inverse condemnation based on the ruling. M/S Haffey/Addiego - To deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Historic Preservation Commission. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Continued to the next meeting under Agenda Review. 4/26/89 Page 13 PUBLIC HEARINGS 11. Public Hearing - Continued. North Canal Street in the P-I Zone District - continued from the 4/12/89 meeting. Continue the Public Hearing; Motion to deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission. 12. Public Hearing - Appeal of the Planning Commission conditions of approval for Use Permit UP-88-847 to allow construction of a three- story, 22-room motel with revised elevations at 1113 Airport Boulevard; John Bacon, Applicant. Conduct Public Hearing; Motion to deny the appeal and uphold the decision of the Planning Commission based on the findings in the staff report. PUBLIC HEARINGS Director of Planning Smith cited the history of the appeal, and stated that because of a problem with the circulation pattern the application was returned to the applicant. She stated that the plans were revised, however this involved major changes in the appearance of the motel structure. She stated that the Planning Commission had approved the variance, and the elimination of the two units. Mayor Teglia opened the Public Hearing, and questioned where the original ren- dering of the project was located. She stated that if the rendering was not available, the hearing could be continued. Mr. George Avanessian, Architect, stated that there never was an original ren- dering - only exterior elevations dimen- sional drawings, which had been reworked with the changes requested. He stated that the original drawing was a tracing that had been erased and redrawn with a change in the roof line as requested. Discussion followed: on the drawings; the recommendation to move the manager unit upstairs which had changed the architect, and shuffled the circulation. Mr. Lou Dell'Angela stated that after modifications were made to the original site plan and drawings at the meeting on 12/8/88, there had been a staff report that had recommended approval of the new design and the 24 units. He stated that the Planning Commission, at that meeting, 4/26/89 Page 14 PUBLIC HEARINGS 12. Public Hearing - Continued. RECESS: RECALL TO ORDER: PUBLIC HEARINGS had only been concerned that the Design Review Board had not had a chance to review it, as well as the wing walls, which they wanted tapered instead of pointed. Mayor Teglia requested that it be sent back to the Design Review Board for detailed comments. Mr. Avanessian stated that the Design Review Board's only problem was feeling that this was too massive. He stated that he did not agree because the building sat back 20' from the sidewalk; Airport Blvd. was 15' wide with a freeway behind it; many houses were that high when the roof peak was reached without a wide street, etc. Mayor Teglia declared a recess at 10:07. Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 10:17 p.m., all Council present. Mr. Bob Williams, Design Review Board, explained the original rendering with the three stories at the front, and the Board feeling it was too massive on a busy and important street. Mayor Teglia closed the Public Hearing. Vice Mayor Halley stated that the real bottom line was the difference of 24 rooms vs. 22 rooms. Mayor Teglia felt that this was one of the better designed buildings to go on that strip, and the landscaping was good. M/S Haffey/Addiego - To uphold the appeal. Councilman Drago stated that he believed the structure to be too massive, and would not support it. Amended M/S Haffey/Addiego - To grant the 4/26/89 Page 15 PUBLIC HEARINGS 12. Public Hearing - Continued. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL 13. Report from the Liaison Committee to the Chamber of Commerce. ~1~ 13a. Request report on the possible incorporation of Country Club Park to the City. CLOSED SESSION 14. Closed Session for the purpose of discussion of personnel matters, labor relations, property nego- tiations and litigation. ADJOURNMENT: PUBLIC HEARINGS appeal as only regards those two rooms, and to include the conditions. Carried by majority roll call vote, Councilman Drago voted no. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Mayor Teglia related the following: that the Chamber was to submit one publi- cation a month to its membership, to establish better communications; that the economic profile was being updated; that the City's business and economic new person should be on board by July, etc. Vice Mayor Haffey requested that staff investigate incorporation of Country Club Park, and prepare a report for a future agenda. Mayor Teglia stated that the Mayor of Osaki, Japan, wanted an affiliation with this City, and requested that staff agen- dize an intention for a sister city affiliation. Councilman Addiego stated that Atotonilco wanted the business community to visit their City for an exchange in August. CLOSED SESSION Council chose not to hold a Closed Session. M/S Haffey/Drago - To adjourn the meeting. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Time of adjournment was 10:50 p.m. 4/26/89 Page 16 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Bar ara A. attaya, City of South San Francisco A~_P-R~IV E D. -'--'~/R~berta ~rri Teg~i~/Mayor "City of South San Francisco The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 4/26/89 Page 17