Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2015-12-16 e-packet@6:00
SPECIAL MEETfNG CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 0 P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) rl South San Francisco, California 94083 Meeting to be held at: CITY HALL CONFERENCE ROOM 400 GRAND AVENUE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2015 6:00 P.M. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN,pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco will hold a Special Meeting on Wednesday,the 16th day of December,2015,at 6:00 P.M.,in the City Hall Conference Room,400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California. Purpose of the meeting: 1. Call to Order. 2. Roll Call. 3. Public Comments—comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting Agenda. 4. Agenda Review, CONSENT 5. Motion to accept the Four Parks Playground Renovation Project as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications (Total Construction Cost $808,110). (Eric Evans, Associate Civil Engineer). 6. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute First Amendments to Consultant Services Agreements for plan review and inspection services with: 1) Csg Consultants Inc., in an amount not to exceed$600,000 for each year of a three year period; and 2) West Coast Code Consultants Inc., in an amount not to exceed $600,000 for each year of a three year period; and amending the FY 2015-201 adopted budget. 7. Resolution supporting the Hickey/Junipero Serra Boulevards Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project,submitting an application for the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (TA) Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Funding for the preparation of the Project's Preliminary Engineering and Design Phases, and committing $30,000 in non-federal matching funds, (Saran Bautista, Principal Engineer). 8. Resolution supporting the Sunshine Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project, submitting an application for the San Mateo County Transportation Authority(TA) Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Funding for the Preliminary Engineering, Design and Construction Phases of the Project, and committing $63,000 in non-federal matching funds. (Sam Bautista, Principal Engineer), ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 9. Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. of San Jose, California, for engineering services for the Grand Boulevard Chestnut to Arroyo Project in an amount not to exceed $149,790. (Eric Evans, Assoc. Civil Engineer). 10. Resolution accepting the Ambulance Service Financial Report and authorizing the writing-off of$2,692,969 of the ambulance billing accounts receivable balance that is uncollectible due to the statute of limitations. IL Council of Cities ballot review. STUDYSESSION: 12. Study Session: Workforce Housing. (Ron Gerber, Housing Mgr). SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 16,2015 AGENDA PAGE2 CLOSED SESSION 13, CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICIPATED LITIGATION Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to paragraph (2) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: One(1) case. 14. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL—ANTICTPATED LITIGATION Initiation of litigation pursuant to paragraph (4) of subdivision (d) of Section 54956.9: One (1) case. ADJOURNMENT SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING DECEMBER 16,2015 AGENDA PAGE Staff Report DATE: December 16, 2015 TO: Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Councilmembers FROM: Brian McMinn, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: MOTION TO ACCEPT THE FOUR PARKS PLAYGROUND RENOVATION PROJECT AS COMPLETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $808,110) RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, accept the Four Parks Playground Renovation Project (Project Nos. pk1203, pk1204, pk1206, and pk1303) as complete in accordance with the plans and specifications. (Total construction cost$808,110). BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Completion of the Four Parks Playground Renovation Project resulted in updated play structures, surfaces,and Americans with Disabilities Act(ADA)improvements at Buri Buri Park,Clay Avenue Park, Francisco Terrace Playlot, and Winston Manor#1 Park. These sites were originally assigned individual project numbers in the Capital Improvement Program (CIP),though they were combined into one project to maximize cost efficiency. The project was awarded to Alpha Bay Builders,Inc. of San Francisco, California on December 10, 2014 and construction was completed on October 6, 2015. FUNDING This project is funded by a combination of General funds,ADA funds,and Park-in-Lieu funds(Zones 2 & 4) in the City's fiscal year 2014-2015 CIP under Project Nos. pk1203, pk1204, pk1206, and pk1303. Additional funding came from unencumbered appropriations of the Alta Loma Park Playground Renovation & Pathway Improvements Project (pk1502) and the Willow Gardens Playgrounds Replacement Project (pk 140 1). Projected Actual Alpha Bay Builders, In, Construction Contract $687,40100 $687,403.00 Construction Contingency & Inspection (15%) $108,740,00 $ 97,243.00 Construction Administration (5%) $ 34,370.00 $ 23,464.00 Total Construction Cost $830,513.00 $808,110.00 Staff Report Subject: MOTION TO ACCEPT THE FOUR PARKS PLAYGROUND RENOVATION PROJECT AS COMPLETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS (TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $808,1.10) Page 2 of 2 The construction contingency costs were expended on change orders to address unforeseen site conditions such as fixing collapsed drain pipes and replacing overly wet soils under new concrete pathways. The most significant change was staff-requested replacement of deteriorated asphalt pavement at Clay Avenue Park, a portion of which is visible in the image below. I'" .......... Ad, PAM ,'Nomad An additional staff-requested change order was the replacement of the damaged sidewalk and vehicle entrance at Francisco Terrace Park. Before and after photos are visible below. Ii ....................... CONCLUSION Staff recommends acceptance of the project as complete. Upon acceptance, a notice of completion will be filed with the County of San Mateo Recorder's Office. At the end of the thirty(30) day lien period,the retention funds will be released to the contractor after providing the City with a one-year guaranty bond. Staff Report Subject: MOTION TO ACCEPT THE FOUR PARKS PLAYGROUND RENOVATION PROJECT AS COMPLETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $808,110) Page 2 of 2 By: Approved:_ t" Brian McMinn A ,/M' i#keFutrell Director of Public Works/City Engineer City Manager ee +3 A a r Staff R�� ort DATE: December 16, 2015 TO: Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Councihnernbers FROM: Alex Greenwood, Director of Economic and Community Development SUBJECT: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE FIRST AMENDMENTS TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES WITH: 1) CSC CONSULTANTS INC.,IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $600,000 FOR EACH YEAR OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD: AND 2) WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS INC.,IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $600,000 FOR EACH YEAR OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD AND AMENDING THE FY 2015-2016 ADOPTED BUDGET RECOMMENDATION It is recommended the City adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a first amendment for plan review and inspection services with,. 1) CSG Consultants Inc., in an amount not to exceed $600,000 total for each year of a three year period: and 2) West Coast Coale Consultants Inc.,in an amount not to exceed$600,000 total for each year of a three year period. As part of the City Council's action the .p°Y 2015-16 Budget would be amended to reflect the unanticipated increase in revenues and expenses associated with the increased Building plan review activity. BACKGROUND/OVERVIEW The City of South San Francisco("City")has used consultants to help handle time-sensitive Building plan reviews and inspections for a number of years. The consultants are paid from a portion of the building permit plan review fees as new projects come forward.Thus,there is never an impact to the General Fund for these types of consultant service agreements. However,the City's Municipal Code (Chapter 4.04) does rewire the City Council to approve agreements that exceed $75,000. This, in turn,requires City staff to estimate the total future amount of building permit fee revenues in order to have the City Council approve a resolution that contains a "not to exceed" amount in excess of $75,000. On May 27, 2015, the City Council approved two consultant agreements to provide plan check and inspection services for a total amount not to exceed $480,000 each year over a three year contract period. These contracts reduced the consultant fees from 70% to 55% of total plan review fee revenues; and increased the share of plan review fees that the City retains as revenue, from 30%to 45%. The selected consultants were CSG Consultants Inc. and West Code Consultants Inc., with each consultant budgeted up to $240,000 per year. Staff Report Subject: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE FIRST AMENDMENTS TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES WITH: 1) CSG CONSULTANTS INC., IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $600,000 FOR EACH YEAR OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD: AND 2) WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS INC., IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $600,000 FOR EACH YEAR OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD AND AMENDING THE FY 2015-2016 ADOPTED, BUDGET Date: December 16, 2015 Page: 2 of 4 During the past six months, the City has experienced an unprecedented surge in permit activity, far above what was projected in early 201.5. This new activity has had a corresponding increase in plan review fee revenue, but it has also increased the need for greater consulting services. To date, the City has received over $1,000,000 in plan check fees for the first six months of the contract period; and based on contract percentages, the City will exceed current contract limits for the first contract year. Some of the key underlying factors include: 1. Large Scale Biotech Projects. In November 2015,the City received an application for Phase I of BioMed Realty's "Gateway of the Pacific" biotech campus. This project had not been anticipated to proceed until 2017 at the earliest, and because of its large size ($170 million of construction)it will require about$244,000 in consultant fees to process. Similarly,the Citynow expects to receive applications for Phase 3's "Genesis at Centennial Towers" project, several major projects by Genentech, the next phase of construction on HCP's Britannia Cove project, and several other biotechnology projects that are proceeding faster than originally projected. As shown in Table I below, these biotechnology projects will have a total construction value of about$300 million and will generate the need for about$550,000 in consultant fees in the current fiscal year. Table 1: Summary of Projected Plan Review Needs for 2015-2016 Type of Project Estimated Estimated Plan Total Projected Construction Value Review Fee Revenue Consultant Fee* Biotechnology Projects (Include-,: BioMed, HCP, $330,000,000 $1,100,000 $605,000 Genentech, Phase 3, etc.) Major Housing Projects (Includes: Sares Regis, $210,000,000 $600,000 $330,000 Brookwood, Centennial Village, 211 Airport, etc.) Major Commercial & Industrial Projects $94,000,000 $200,000 $110,000 (Includes: Costeo, Park SFO, AC Marriott, etc.) Contingency for additional $155,000 plan review and inspection. services Total Prqjected (2015-116) $634,000,000 $1,900,000 $1,200,000 *Note. In general, consultant fees are 55% of plan review fee revenue, with higher charges if expediting is requested Staff Report Subject: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE FIRST AMENDMENTS TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES WITH: 1) CSG CONSULTANTS INC., IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $600,000 FOR EACH YEAP, OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD: AND 2) WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS INC., IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $600,000 FOR EACH YEAR OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD AND AMENDING THE FY 2015-2016 ADOPTED BUDGET Date- December 16, 2015 Page: 3 of 4 2. Mixed Use Housing and ConinterciallIndustrial Projects. Other types of development,Such as mixed use housing projects and commercial/industrial developments, have been proceeding as projected. However, as shown in Table 1, these are significant projects that, combined with the large biotech projects mentioned above,have accelerated the demand for plan review consultants. Notable examples include: Centennial Village, Sares Regis, and Brookwood, and 211 Airport housing projects, as well as commercial industrial projects such as Costco Business Center,Park SFO garage, AC Marriott Hotel, On Trak Shipping Distribution Center, and the Westborough Hills Shopping Center. In addition, one recent project (1256 Mission Road) has generated significant plan review and inspection services due to a construction incident on site. 3. New State Requirements.for Plan Review. In response to the ongoing drought,Governor Brown recently issued Governor's Executive Order B-29-15, which revises the Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance(MWELO). As part of these revisions,cities have additional requirements for landscape plan review. The demand for inspections has increased the workload for the City's Building Inspectors and decreased their ability to perform in-house plan checks. Inspections are more time-consuming due to the different requirements of the Building Codes for the Biotech Industry. Also, new commercial buildings require almost daily inspections to insure compliance with the Codes. AGREEMENT AMENDMENT The proposed amendment will raise the total not-to-exceed amount for each consultant contract from $240,000 per year to$600,000 per year. In all other respects,the contracts remain unchanged. Thus, the total amount for both contracts combined is proposed to be$1,200,000 per year. As noted above, all contract fees would be paid out of a portion of the plan review fees collected for new projects, so there will be no impact on the General Fund, and in fact would be more than offset by the additional plan review revenue the General Fund will receive. Based on the most recent data available, staff estimates that$1,200,000 per year should be sufficient to handle the accelerated load of projects that will require plan review and inspection during the next three years. CONCLUSION Staff recomniends that the City Council adopt a resolution that 1) authorizes the City Manager to execute the First Amendment for plan review and inspection consulting services with CSG Consultants Inc., in a total amount not to exceed $600,000 for each year of a three year period; and West Coast Code Consultants Inc.,in a total amount not to exceed$600,000 for each year of a three year period and 2) amend the FY 2015-16 Adopted Budget by $720,000 in both revenues and expenditures for a net-zero impact to the General Fund. Staff Report Subject: RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE FIRST AMENDMENTS TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES WITH: 1) CSG CONSULTANTS INC., IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $600,000 FOR EACH YEAR OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD: AND 2) WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS INC., IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $600,000 FOR EACH YEAR OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD AND AMENDING THE FY 2015-2016 ADOPTED BUDGET Date: December 16, 2015 Page: 4 of 4 By: Approved: Alex Greenwood Mike FutreIK Director of Economic and Community Development City Manager Attachments: Resolution CSG Consultants Inc., First Amendment to Services Contract Agreement West Coast Code Consultants Inc., First Amendment to Services Contract Agreement RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALFIORNIA RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE FIRST AMENDMENTS TO CONSULTANT SERVICES AGREEMENTS FOR PLAN REVIEW AND INSPECTION SERVICES WITH: 1) CSG CONSULTANTS INC., IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $600,000 FOR EACH YEAR OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD: AND 2) WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS INC., IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $600,000 FOR EACH YEAR OF A THREE YEAR PERIOD AND AMENDING THE FY 2015-2016 ADOPTED BUDGET WHEREAS, on May 13, 2015, CSG Consultants Inc,, and West Coast Code Consultants Inc,, were both selected through the Request For Proposals process by an independent oral review board to provide plan review and inspection services for the City of South San Francisco-, and WHEREAS, the number, size and valuation of projects is higher than originally anticipated, resulting in higher revenues and corresponding plan review fees; and WHEREAS, Biotechnology projects have a long history of ongoing facility expansions that is unpredictable in scope and construction cost on an annual basis making revenues difficult to quantify; and WHEREAS, funding for these services is offset with building permit revenues expected to now exceed four million dollars ($4,000,000) in FY 2015-16; and WHEREAS, consultant fees,based on these revenues and contract specified percentages will be $2 million, with the balance of building permit revenues paying City administrative costs for services rendered; and WHEREAS, staff recommends amending these two existing consulting services agreements for Plan Review and Inspection. Set-vices in the amounts not to exceed $600,000 for each year of a three year period to CSG Consultants Inc., and an amount not to exceed $600,000 for each year of a three year period to West Coast Code Consultants Inc_ NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby: 1. Approve the first amendment to the consulting services agreements with CSG Consultants Inc., and West Coast Code Consultants Inc. respectively, attached hereto as Exhibit A, and incorporated herein. 1 Amend the FY 2015-16 Adopted Budget in the amount of$720,000 for both revenues and expenditures, for net-zero impact to the General Fund. 1 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager of the City of South San Francisco is hereby authorized and directed to execute the Amendments on behalf of the City of South San Francisco, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney, and to take any other action consistent with the intent of this Resolution. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at the meeting held on the 13t" day of January 2016 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST:--... City Clerk 2 P3 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THIS CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND CSG CONSULTANTS, INC. THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES ACREEMENT is made at South San Francisco, California, as of January 13, 2016 by and between THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ("City"), a municipal corporation, and CSG CONSULTANTS,INC. ("Contractor"), (sometimes referred together as the"Parties")who agree as follows: RECITALS A. On May 27,2015, City and Contractor entered that certain Consulting Services Agreement("Agreement")whereby Contractor agreed to provide Building Plan Review and Inspection Services. A true and correct copy of the Agreement and its exhibits is attached as Exhibit A. B. City and Contractor now desire to amend the Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises and other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, City and Contractor hereby agree as follows: I, All terms which are defined in the Agreement shall have the same meaning when used in this Amendment,unless specifically provided herein to the contrary. 1 Section 2. Section 2 of the Agreement shall be amended such that the City agrees to pay Contractor a sum not to exceed $1,800,000 for a three year period, with a total sum for each fiscal year of the contract not to exceed $600,000. Contractor agrees this is the City's total contribution for payment of costs under the Agreement unless additional payments are authorized in accordance with the terns of the Agreement and said terms of payment are mutually agreed to by and between the parties in writing. All other terms, conditions and provisions in the Agreement remain in.fall force and effect. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement,the terms of the Agreement will control unless specifically modified by this Amendment. P4 Dated- January 13, 2016 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CONTRACTOR By: By: Mike, Futrell, City Manager Cyr-us Kianpour, PE, PLS President, CSG Consultants Inc. Approved as to Fonn-, By: City Attorney 2 P5 FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN TtIF. CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND WEST COAST CODE CONSUI—TANTS INC. THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE CONSULTING SERVICES NGREEMENT is made at South San Francisco, California, as of January 13,2016,by and between THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ("City"), a municipal corporation, and WEST COAST CODE CONSULTANTS,INC. ("Contractor"), (sometimes referred together as the"Parties") who agree as follows: RECITALS A. On May 27,2015, City and Contractor entered that certain. Consulting Services Agreement("Agreement")whereby Contractor agreed to provide Building Plan Review and Inspection Services. A true and correct copy of the Agreement and its exliibits is attached as Exhibit A. B. City and Contractor now desire to amend the Agreement. NOW,THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the promises and other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, City and Contractor hereby agree as follows: 1. All terms which are defined in the Agreement shall have the same rneaning when used in this Amendment,unless specifically provided herein to the contrary. 2. Section 2. Section - of the Agreement shall be amended such that the City agrees to pay Contractor a sum not to exceed $1,800,000, for a three year period, with a total sum for each fiscal year of the contract not to exceed $600,000. Contractor agrees this is the City's total contribution for payment of costs under the Agreement unless additional payments are authorized in accordance with the terms of the Agreement and said terms of payment are mutually agreed to by and between the parties in writing. All other terms, conditions and provisions in the Agreement remain in full force and effect. If there is a conflict between the terms of this Amendment and the Agreement,the tenns of the Agreement will control unless specifically modified by this Amendment. P6 Dated: January 13, 2016 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CONTRACTOR By By: Mike Futrell,City Manager Giyan Senaratne,PE, SE, LEER AP, CASp West Coast Code Consultants, Inc. Approved as to Form. By: City Attorney 2 Staff Repoirt DATE: December 16, 2015 TO: Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Counci Imembers FROM: Brian McMinn, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE HICKEY/JUNIPERO SERRA BOULEVARDS PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY (TA) MEASURE A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE PROJECT'S PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN PHASES, AND COMMITTING $30,000 IN NON-FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution supporting the Hickey/Junipero Serra Boulevards Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project, ubmitting an application for San Mateo County Transportation Authority (TA) Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Funding for the preparation of the Project's Preliminary Engineering and Design Phases, and committing $30,000 in non-federal matching funds. BACKGROUND/DIS CU S SION The San Mateo County Transportation Authority issued a Call for Projects for the Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program on November 10, 2015. Approximately S4.9M is available in this solicitation of Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program funds for the 20 cities, County of San Mateo and Joint Powers Agencies operating in San Mateo County. In 1988, the voters of San Mateo County approved a ballot measure to allow the collection and distribution by the Transportation Authority (TA) of a half-cent transactions and use tax in San Mateo County for 25 years, with the tax revenues to be used for highway and transit improvements pursuant to the Transportation Expenditure Plan presented to the voters (Original Measure A). In 2004,the voters of San Mateo County approved the continuation of the collection and distribution by the TA of the half-cent transactions and use tax for an additional 25 years to implement the 2004 Transportation Expenditure Plan beginning January 1, 2009 (New Measure A). The intersection of Hickey Boulevard and Junipero Serra is an ideal candidate for the Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program grant funds. The City's Pedestrian Master Plan identifies the intersection of Hickey Boulevard and Junipero Serra Boulevard in need for a safety improvement. The current pedestrian intersection configuration of Hickey Boulevard and Junipero Serra Boulevard Staff Report Subject: A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE HICK-EWJUNIPERO SERRA BOULEVARDS PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY (TA) MEASURE A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE PROJECT'S PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN PHASES, AND COMMITTING $30,000 IN NON-FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS Page 2 of 2 presents the opportunity to enhance pedestrian accessibilities and address much needed intersection improvements. The intersection currently poses challenging pedestrian and bicycle crossing conditions, limited visibility and short sight distance for oncoming traffic approaching the crosswalks. The Hickey/Junipero Serra Boulevards Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Project would design curb extensions and relocating the crosswalk back at the pork chop island on the north leg of the intersection (northwest comer), modification of the pedestrian pushbutton standard, advanced pedestrian crossing signagc at the north leg of the intersection, median tip and reduced median(out of the crosswalk) at the west leg, "close crosswalk" signage at the east leg and. the remaining sidewalk to the Colma city limits. In addition, the Project will design pedestrian facilities from this intersection to Hilton Avenue on Hickey Boulevard to provide better connectivity to and from the Winston Manor Shopping Center,the Winston Manor neighborhood,Daly City and Colma. FUNDING The amount of grant funding being requested is$300,000 for the Hickey/Junipero Serra Boulevards Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project.Matching fund requirements for the Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program grants will be 10% in the amount of$30,000. The matching funds are currently included in the fiscal year 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Program, CONCLUSION Staff recommends that the City Council adopt the resolution supporting the submittal of the Hickey/Junipero Serra Boulevards Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project grant applications. The pedestrian and bicycle improvements at the Hickey Boulevard and Junipero Serra Boulevard intersection will enhance the walkability and bicycle use of these areas by incorporating traffic measures as outlined and recommended by the City's Pedestrian Master Plan. By: Approved: Brian McMinn utrell Director of Public Works/City Engineer /tity Manager Attachments: Resolution Plan View of Hickey/Junipero Serra Boulevards from 2015 HSIP Application ssb/bm RESOLUTION NO, CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE HICKEY/JUNIPER0 SERRA BOULEVARDS PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY (TA) MEASURE A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE PROJECT'S PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN PHASES, AND COMMITTING APPROXIMATELY $30,000 IN NON- FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS WHEREAS, the Hickey/Junipero Serra Boulevards intersection currently poses challenging pedestrian and bicycle crossing conditions, limited visibility and short sight distance for oncoming traffic approaching the crosswalks; and WHEREAS, the Hickey/Junipero Serra Boulevards Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project will ultimately design and construct the installation of extending the curb and move the crosswalk back at the pork chop island on the north leg of the intersection (northwest corner), modification of pedestrian pushbutton standard, install advanced pedestrian crossing signage at the north leg of the intersection, install a median tip and pull the median back (out of the crosswalk) at the west leg, install "close crosswalk" signage at the east leg, install the remaining sidewalk to Colma City limits and pedestrian facilities from the intersection to Hilton Avenue on Hickey Boulevard to provide better connectivity to the Winston Manor Shopping Center, the Winston Manor neighborhood, Daly City and Colma; and WHEREAS, it will cost $330,000 to implement the Preliminary Engineering and Design Phases; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to sponsor the Preliminary Engineering and Design Phases; and WHEREAS, the City currently allocated $30,000 of non-federal matching grant funds towards the cost of the Preliminary Engineering and Design Phases; and WHEREAS, the City seeks $300,000 for the Preliminary Engineering and Design Phases of the Hickey/Jun.ipero Serra Boulevards Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 1988, the voters of San Mateo County approved a ballot measure to allow the collection and distribution by the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (TA) of a half-cent transactions and use tax in San Mateo County for 25 years, with the tax revenues to be used for highway and transit improvements pursuant to the Transportation Expenditure Plan presented to the voters (Original Measure A); and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2004, the voters of San Mateo County approved the continuation of the collection and distribution by the TA the half-cent transactions and use tax for an additional 25 years to implement the 2004 Transportation Expenditure Plan beginning January 1, 2009 (New Measure: A); and WHEREAS, the TA issued a Call for Projects for the Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program on November 10, 2015; and WHEREAS, the TA requires a governing board resolution fi-orn the City in support of the City's application for $300,000 in San Mateo County Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program funds for the preparation of the Preliminary Engineering and Design Phases for the Hickey/Junipero Serra Boulevards Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project; and WHEREAS, the TA requires a governing board resolution from the City committing the City to the completion of the Preliminary Engineering and Design Phases for the Hickey/Junipero Serra Boulevards Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project, including the commitment of matching funds in the amount of$30,000 needed for implementation; and WHEREAS, should funding be awarded to the City, a Funding Agreement will have to be executed between the TA and the City to access grant funding; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco supports and directs staff to submit an application for San Mateo County TA Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Fund for $300,000 for the preparation of the Preliminary Engineering and Design Phases for the Hickey/Junipero Serra Boulevards Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute a Funding Agreement with the San Mateo County Transportation Authority, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney, to encumber any Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program funds awarded. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of South San Francisco commits $30,000 to the completion of the Preliminary Engineering and Design Phases for the Hickey/Junipero Serra - 2 - Boulevards Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project awarded the requested. San Mateo County TA Measure A pedestrian and Bicycle Program funds. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager is authorized to take any other action consistent with the intent of this Resolution. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South Saar. Francisco at a meeting held on the day of 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk 2450072.1 - 3 - . x di mzw ILL N C� pp { ✓✓s �� - a~ {" II0N W Cc o soon � ouarouwuwwuiwwrr ,rte/ - '� .r�` x ` �`�, 0 CC W c Ir.5 ui �� UJuj F-7 > z �pp ( pp 0 V) "1 01 ' cca . 0 „° }.✓ " Ewa A r� `4 � ✓ Y �m 9N \ s1 r NNO �" W ;ry�f'n —fJNIIINOV OWN rl� �� //ii/,/� �I�a>s� ,!�� � r ' l//��r ✓�i�' as yr LU zoo! law / l i/!i f f rr p m LL „r rr r� � $s u a a l/ ANN f / Y ton �cs� .. � �� � / y /// mhr r u>• h /; ///�yl ✓ �g5 ay�x�ro / /, , U rn youn � a a i i � low sit!ue ��'N�"' ✓ m"r '{" "'"." �194 '`'be y'�. r r .. .':F'v"r'rv"✓�!✓."+a.n.[ °} �A 'fin fI1 op MIA !swap,.` �wrr /� „ � nr�UIGN� �iwiiVw i N„ /w � a o✓;y�l V, �IUNN„U!w'Vw�N, ! N�I'%f�wn�Nli�r'i� SWIM ri na W k/i ii 1 ' r OC4.1 I r//�i%//,! 17 J r/ / iM1'"1,✓� a.vi? ai= o za { 1 Ll ' } I �1 nl�a.,,✓rf m Iltr� � �. {� lf� � ar7 [[[[7777 1^—� '�'�,,,,/ ! 1//(�i/, ,y�6V1( ✓ 1i%/.,. �l � �- � f. Alow /�i, C r mlpi t jr / mij N r f "NN1SN'NY I / a v �I i I r AW, ./ ff�11 r �P Apr rir sum f 54 j �mw'fflAr;,°�(rNOIUNV!�f/ z< a n u ' i rm Xt ob OF Ov <u u. a 'Yf>r7 / fl i °rsGIS9' p 1f 1 ;WHO` v IF i' �rza a 4, 04 s �wJr v. /',l� /f!4'�r7Fa„im,f�StY!'rrr, re C1 A wwu 4 rP IWO ;I r/Lr ii Pw'ar �;r v %i "s� Pgpl � pgc i f a� a. �' is a ! «,. ✓ 6�R °•� I /� / gxa� .... § WY d y CJ Q x P © n ueuK /Y�, l ,r� Ll r� I "As x � N� <a, LI W c C) 0 1".o � H w i Z. MR PI AMQ 1pl ✓ � i� 4a r] 02 �d z 13, w r `' ,Y a w p F}5 O� w ?y bl.1W�°��� g s CO n o Staff Report DATE. December 16, 2015 TO: Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Councilmembers FROM: Brian McMinn, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE SUNSHINE GARDENS PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY(TA)MEASURE A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THE PROJECT, AND COMMITTING $63,000 IN NON-FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution supporting the Sunshine Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project, submitting an application for San Mateo County TA Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Funding for the Preliminary Engineering,Design and Construction Phases,and committing$63,000 in non-federal matching funds. BACKGROUND/DISCUS SION The San Mateo County Transportation Authority issued a Call for Projects for the Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program on November 10, 2015. Approximately$4.9M is available in this solicitation of Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program funds for the 20 cities,the County of San Mateo and Joint Powers Agencies operating in San Mateo County. In 1988, the voters of San Mateo County approved a ballot measure to allow the collection and distribution by the Transportation Authority (TA) of a half-cent transactions and use tax in San Mateo County for 25 years,with the tax revenues to be used for highway and transit improvements pursuant to the Transportation Expenditure Plan presented to the voters (Original Measure A). In 2004,the voters of San Mateo County approved the continuation of the collection and distribution by the TA the half-cent transactions and use tax for an additional 25 years to implement the 2004 Transportation Expenditure Plan beginning January 1, 2009, (New Measure A). The City's Pedestrian Master Plan identifies the Sunshine Gardens Neighborhood as an area where vehicles are observed cutting through the neighborhood at high speeds. There is no buffer between the sidewalk and vehicles, other than occasional on-street parking. Proposed improvements will make it safer for pedestrians and bicyclists. Staff Report Subject: A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE SUNSHINE GARDENS PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY (TA) MEASURE A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THE PROJECT, AND COMMITTING $63,000 IN NON-FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS Page 2 oft The Sunshine Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project would install traffic safety m easures for pedestrians to encourage walking as amode of transportation and to promote safer walking and bicycling experiences within the community. The safety features would include advanced stop bars, high visibility ladder crosswalks, median pedestrian refuge islands, advanced Yield lines, edgelines,and new ADA compliant curb ramps. In addition,a Class 3 bikeway will be installed along Holly Avenue between Mission Road and Hillside Boulevard, The project is in close proximity to Sunshine Gardens Elementary School and would benefit the students of the school. The purpose of the project will be to install pedestrian safety measures and a Class 3 bikeway to make it safer for pedestrians and bicyclists. The aim will be to reduce vehicular speeds within the limits of work. FUNDING The amount of grant funding being requested is $630,000,for the Sunshine Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project, Matching fund requirements for the Measure A Pedestrian and.Bicycle Program grants will be 10%in the amount of$63,000. If the City is successful in obtaining the grant, staff will apportion the matching funds from either its local Measure A and/or Gas Tax allocation, CONCLUSION Staff recornmends that the City Council adopt the resolution supporting the submittal of the Sunshine Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project grant application. The pedestrian and bicycle improvements in the Sunshine Gardens Neighborhood would make the area safer for pedestrians and bicyclists. By: Approved: Brian McMinn ike Futrell i v" Director of Public Works/City Engineer City Managgen, .Attachments: Resolution Concept Plan from Pedestrian Master Plan ssb/bm RESOLUTION NO, CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE SUNSHINE GARDENS PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE SAFETY AND CONNECTIVITY IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT, SUBMITTING AN APPLICATION FOR THE SAN MATEO COUNTY TRANSPORATION AUTHORITY (TA) MEASURE A PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE PROGRAM FUNDING FOR THE PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING, DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PHASES OF THE PROJECT, AND COMMITTING $63,000 IN NON- FEDERAL MATCHING FUNDS WHEREAS, the City's Pedestrian Master Plan identifies the Sunshine Gardens Neighborhood as an area where vehicles cut through the neighborhood at dangerous speeds; and WHEREAS, there is no buffer between the sidewalk and vehicles, other than occasional on-street parking; and WHEREAS, the Sunshine Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project would install traffic safety measures for pedestrians to encourage walking as a mode of transportation and to promote safer walking and bicycling experiences witbin,the community; and WHEREAS, the safety features would include advanced stop bars, high visibility ladder crosswalks, median pedestrian refuge islands, advanced yield lines, edgelines, and new ADA compliant curb ramps. In addition, a Class 3 bikeway will be installed along Holly Avenue between Mission Road and Hillside Boulevard; and WHEREAS, it will cost $630,000 to implement the Preliminary Engineering, Design and Construction Phases; and WHEREAS, the City wishes to sponsor the Preliminary Engineering, Design and Construction Phases; and WHEREAS, the City will allocate $63,000 of non-federal matching grant funds towards the cost of the Preliminary Engineering, Design and Construction Phases; and WHEREAS, the City seeks $630,000 for the Preliminary Engineering Phase of the Sunshine Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project; and WHEREAS, on June 7, 1988, the voters of San Mateo County approved a ballot measure to allow the collection and distribution by the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (TA) of a half-cent transactions and use tax in San Mateo County for 25 years, with the tax revenues to be used for highway and transit improvements pursuant to the Transportation Expenditure Plan presented to the voters (Original Measure A); and WHEREAS, on November 2, 2004, the voters of San Mateo County approved the continuation of the collection and distribution by the TA the half-cent transactions and use tax for an additional 25 years to implement the 2004 Transportation Expenditure Plan beginning January 1, 2009. (New Measure A); and WHEREAS, TA issued a Call for Projects for the Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program on November 10, 2015; and WHEREAS, TA requires a governing board resolution from the City in support of the City's application for $630,000 in San Mateo County Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program funds for the preparation of the Preliminary Engineering, Design, Construction Phases for the Sunshine Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project; and WHEREAS, TA requires a governing board resolution from the City committing the City to the cornpletion of the Preliminary Engineering Phase for the Sunshine Garden Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project, including the commitment of matching funds in the amount of$63,000 needed for implementation; and WHEREAS, should funding be awarded to the City, a Funding Agreement will have to be executed between the TA and the City to access grant funding; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco supports and directs staff to submit an application for San Mateo County TA Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program Fund for $300,000 for the preparation of the Preliminary Engineering, Design & Construction Phases for the Sunshine Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project. BE IT FURTHER.. RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council authorizes the City Manager to execute a Funding Agreement with the San Mateo County Transportation Authority, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney, to encumber any Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program funds awarded. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of South San Francisco commits $63,000 in non-federal funds to the completion of the Preliminary Engineering, Design and Construction Phases for the Sunshine Gardens Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety and Connectivity Improvements Project awarded the requested San Mateo County TA Measure A Pedestrian and Bicycle Program funds. - 2 - BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Manager is authorized to take any other action consistent with the intent of this Resolution. I 'hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adapted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a. meeting held on the day of 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST:. City Clerk 2450071A - 3 - � I/(i�l/Y/„ o r r /1 fy„ ,' ,x, r:..: f,�oJnr�Jfo/ �, l' A nib :... ;, ',� / „�'; ,,, ,Ir 11, ,r/r` ,rxr,,✓2, ��: r ,13, ri N ,f �� �,., / ��)r �� ,%; w�fG`' f r ,/ ,� % / �� / r ✓r r. ,,h rri„ / ! c/r / ,. I /rrr ,,; U,r,,,, /ro: / <✓rr ,or yr /�rr:.or �< ,r �,•„ ,.J ,/ ,/ / � ,!,/ .;,, �:. %G 1., :.� �.. / J.. /'I - ,,,u/Ullc, / ,. ,>myn:, r ,, //r;„r , ✓ ,.,. ..a •..:) /�i// iiJ � ,/.. ":% ,/,... /,<//o ,. ,..// //, ,o :. € Iri rxr z✓ ///,trot / ,.... el/rr .., .../ ,,.. , /lore., r /. ,, , ... / / ,� !. r�✓ / r::, r,>/ ,. ,, ....% /rrr / /////%„emu. .,,, � �.,/ Ir r / / r / // � i rr >/ N � / / Yr _, i r„ r r �/, / / �r r , / // i /� � � % rr wM' / r� ,/ r„ ,✓i / r .r/-" � -..../ / // Y rr,.r 1� „i/i ,.. „/ / ..r ,/ Mark ed PIIr1eS r 9 Mark ed eBanes f 9 �VI .,rrr.. r� r � / /,,,• / // �, //,,r A 1 i, r Wfr,/Mr � /.... / /,/,c.. ,r1�/:.<I //:rr ,,or ,,:✓� ///� r � /n.; ,I -", ,, �rr.. ,4fJ r"..,.: / '.; ,, r 1 0,✓ ✓ n",r,,, r r rr,,,r,., rrr,,�/� tar .:0� /r„ / N //, p/ ,rr ,: f r/ / r 1 ✓,rr e r r r /r„ J r � ,,r, ,, r � / r//i r ✓ i < %r a ,fl, rr„ ./ .,,,�� /,,,,, .,,FJLGMEf?➢TrJ+.R'SC.HCDCIL ��c/ , .,"r ,l ,r///�D.,1/, ,� I r ,..., /r'/ ,...,/ L,. •� I"" r// / / r l I'/��../r �, _:, rr r,,,,,,✓J��t %/. / fr �/�/i� M:.. H oio. rl i �%/ ,;r /� ,,ir/�� //r '',. ",r �;, vV/"��w1 a ` ,,./'��D c,� It r'z %re�/r;,. '� p,,. (r/� //r.,H// /i/r. r l�r, �t�/{.... ,.:., r,� �,,:, � / % ✓ �.. ,,,;;•r- / l / ,<. ,!,!r, /. ao,,or �� " „ ��„ ,: //ro,/ �/ r'..••;P W',,mro. `'rr/' r l/ COf.S Eder reducing P r � /����'r /• /r r//o' � r,,,r � �/ , $O lea mph through P 9 i' „"„ „rrrr,"..;iO r,o..rerrrro / r/•, ,/ ,,;,i �Ir, ,, r,r ✓��rrr��ouir, a// oni I Y pwrrrrr, ,,,. � '" ,r. ;, r,, rr, ,; r,"" ✓i,,,./a l�!//�.,, / �, ,r /% (%, ��li�/is ';; r dJ. 1,•' � � r.:r„ ,.. ,F,;,,;,//i�•// „�/ ���„/;, �:' /� -.... 1� /rrr,,, rn,, ",,,, �,,. lr r r„ ;/,�rn„' f;Z' r ;✓; b ,. / a:� ,,,,, r r/, ,,;a, ,,,,/� / "r //,/// r /!,;�/ ;,. /..�,J �/, alit .. ) 0 ,.1�Nr„” r r /, /r,., %r,, „G/%�/ % / � //iu!/ r ,.✓4( r / %%: l% / H/�i/i �� /A� �/;:;,!%�/_,� ',,..,.r.,lJl /lrr�r„irr,? a/ua���%//,L//,r✓✓/i��/„��”" /r/�,,,%//�Hid '/>�f�l{ �//I. fr<r :,r.. :,,. w•. „O err „/? „/;;, "r ,..rrirurir / r J ,. , / fl r 11111. , 1,�, „.I iw IJ..,r„ /9 / / I rr, ,, r/I I�<., J ,it ✓�r �^ , �,; � ,r„ „rJ,.:. ,,x• .,,� :o �, 'r� / r 2 /r � zit r r ///n r, ,, ,// l /i �/ %/; ,,,r ,verrr r/iM�ia/�i,wf v,.�/ s•,�{�%��J � �/ ,�%��'S r IIIf l� Jf1Stdll traffic circles or other traffic Mark hi h-visibilit yellow r elements J/ 1j/ 9 YY Or, ealrraimrg at key inter // r,Mfi rra legs o// Jar, {/%i,' ✓Gr r/1JlJ//f/�J/i ei9JS�? ,, V"J”) /�' / % crosswalks on all i� ri i /% %f; sectopns to slaw through-traffic llr A f „ru, SIR I 't w ii ///"e ////r6i rot; �(r� /// Hr/✓ // w %//� r� /r ,^: u,,,,,:e ai rrrr,r r/// r.,, /)y, ;riffs /.. r, r, ,I,.r r K r,✓ Y ;,.,r/ I� �c � m e,r yaro,,,, „ , !, G //, •r / � 1 r .. ,,,r�r,„ 1./ ' 1 „l r„ ,,;: /.. rr, ! .�/ rte r u�,, , /rrG /%r.r r ,^^,, i/ .//r ,/ ,,,, „x/r9, ��,o/i" •o �i ,� ,., ;r. ! Jyllr�//'rrn, ,01 .r. �'/,,.1 Fllm��/,..,// i ;:.�wr, :•.,Cf.% 1,,.: �lrr,«ru� ,, ,///% ""/ti r � �,,i �ru/„ ;�, o•r,. ...I, � ">; a/:r r 'ter/> A�)/!".: 0/,1 /,(,�•1/ p/u„.,,, r ��: //:»�, //,,., ,;.. / ,,,,r„ ,;,,, / f,rlr r,= �, -.r ,/ i iUr,•. /I� f� //, ,4.:r/," �/i�JlJi /✓ r r, rllArin,f. l � Ibifrr/I{',.ur � IOl/... / :, /i...., / n% /. ,,, rr � ,rrr rv✓ ,. /,�r�/, // e��: �// // ,:/ ,/, r ,. .�, ,r lJa i r,l � / ..ri/ ri,- _:e,nr, r.. / .,,rrr r r:? ,1!)„ ,. r;0. r( r�/.. ,.. r, ,1 „, /. r,/ ,.,riff; �r ., rr1 r,r „., ✓ ,.,. 1�� .., e lI Jai..rrr r ,. � i.., / /. ,� ii%i� :,, ",,z./ r, / � �i1 If«� raYH��,r roJr A�Nfr S✓� rrf ri�,, 11, ,... %/�//,... r,/��i,`G,,,�i e e% / / G.. r/I r. ,. %� ,�N(,,. „«.,. ,:...a1u ., rr ",. / rr;, r✓�� fY'.(GSwi„ �1J„ /ir.r 1. /,rlrJ!%,rrI „ C7 f r/ lire, / � // % r, ,� ja ,/ / ,, •r//I,r//f>~,��� � xr „H Iii„ ,/// / ,. ,,. ,/r r..,,,, r„ / nr r ,,,/, r. J •,. ,r.A... �r; J �< r r r��.r "/ .,, iD� ,:////ri 1,, �i � �,,,{ ,.% ,%,.. ,r /�ri /r„ ,io. r rr;,.: •. rr ./r, r..,rrr„ / rr ✓�/,.� Jrr ii//r / �: /� / .//�/� ,,,. Me l; aro1�, /, /,N.r a% ,!,; /f,. �;l °, . , /r�;'J,//% a•%t ee ;;� � (, / r,r, ��///` r r/,:! ,rrrr /r. / 9„ rr ii AMD,,Y,/ i. l �.. /i rr�ro ,• 1 �/%t � .,rFf''y r'/ ,,� o r „ /� �/� /'-: / : G!/I „r /•p ,' ,;,,,;/�' 19/,: ri ,;g, ,,,,c,�{l�r, •,r v;• /� „r iii /(y'` i� ��� / �i ,r//i""�,,,� r/{ ;,' ii; f '"✓✓r /„: /i/ /r/! r�/ r,,, rr //. /r., ;///If,� i ✓,r, ,/ 9�, ,�f �/rrrr � �/' /,,:. /� r,.o „ �; �f r rr, ;, � ai �/, �r ` r / j/ •i;..r rim/r/�/,/ � t{r%/� %,: i ri// /,r: �, r /r / ,„ll,,. ,/'r,//lP/% rr„,, riicrlo e�r/,,,,,,,, ,.,/ G� /� �o r,r.✓� : ri ri + ;,r ✓< o/%r',r,;.r..: on �,/:.i i v J/ %IM,” / rll%n vi,. /, - /,,,,,/i ir,,,r V/ /r/ r.✓o11v" r,./ar,ri {„// / 01111 Ilr. ,<.., /r ., � ,,, !,: /� rcrr, r,✓ /...ri„ ,r„ / /„/ /rir,,rrr /, // rill <,,,,, /,rs. /rrv, ,rr f /r ,. r( „ , rr� %� wrrr%r � or r /, ,r/.o,; // / /i..,,. / a' / oiaufl, , r ✓/r,,,, r, /o,i, I , .. / r / ye /Ir Mark big -visibility yellow pw ladder crosswalks on all legs .,,.w, w r, 'i/r r Mrrr,,,: p /o"„ ,. // �a''k'4VO�4�M�p Yr, „',, r r ,��rrr, �//rif/1%. t�/ / � m f� r ra�l///Girt // ,r f. J�'"!,� � %��f//A„ .�/�: 1/, I l t Y-1„r - HiJ �/% /oNJi rr,,r,, ���//,r,rf..,.n,,,,rU..,..�{�%//%�,%/../2.r/G fi,/,,./i„r�i�„/�r e,'i l a o y///i r,,rrarrrr,r arF rG rr,v r n///AI�.!/rr rc r,.r r 7 ir/r,Pi,950f,r t.1!,%rl�,,_: r/ 1i T,(l�I r i i,•..,,///�i ,//l...i•..,u,.l//.i/ro/��r..(.a.%,..r.i,y-ir�. �r,ru.r/,,'rc.,/�/irr.r,,/���/9 n/r'.,,..,I�/>r//fe, , af, .. y, /•/,, �// •%. %/I ri /, � O/,r„/ Jll�!� / ,rrrr,�r f / �!i/�;r%//fy��' o /, /�I�'�.� �,i rrr Evaluate intersection for stop r%,z,rr r � , oil �„r %' r' %//• " ,, /;/f/��I fi�Il'%"J sign warrant:ptherw°se install Al ddbdr7Ced 1u/ellpW lines % .roN w L C AM&hP D 1f; u, ” i,/iiO r/ y ii rr /„ e % /e, / r If / ro r�ii' /, /„r,, rr,F,, / �� rr/mrilrarlf��rWnxrrHaf�lru�lulNlr�fHGCUAIf �rlrr r o „Y/I%(gym rrrnr,, rr %/ /w/r'% ✓; %i/in,w/evH /elf Y ,rr,,,. F$[Cif°t SCktf�(7L / 1 �, ,re, /, <, j//Oft/ij�or/�FY°GNr ���r'�%%/�/i /�firii�� ° %r/i6ir%%✓�/�//,'i a ,/ �j, ��'� rri%fir// /' %% ,rir/ /riff%%�fil0lfl fll�JlJ%Or fJJI/i rnrr! LEGEND ✓< %; iY %i r f Expansicn Sdeuilk r r i , ,! r- ADA Cu b Ramps �'/i4 G10� /� p// f r MPracacclm (��. �I. °I' (' (.�" i��): l ,. �L, J_�� h .�1�..)C.? �1fr ,� i„ i /�\rl. ;V/,I FEHR rEERS COD / Staff Rei)oft DATE: December 16, 2015 TO: Mayor, 'Mice Mayor, and Councilmembers FROM: Brian McMinn, Director of Public Works/City Engineer SUBJECT. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSULTING SERVICES .AGREEMENT WITH MARK. THOMAS AND COMPANY, INC. OF SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA FOR ENGTNEERING SERVICES FOR THE GRAND BOULEVARD CHESTNUT TO ARROYO PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $149,790 RIECOMME DA,,TlON It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute a Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. of San .lose, California for engineering services for the Grand Boulevard Chestnut to Arroyo Project (No. stl403) in an amount not to exceed S149,790. BACKGROY.IND/DISCUSSION The South San Francisco Grand Boulevard Initiative Project will improve El Camino Real between Chestnut Avenue and McLellan Drive. It will help set the stage for planned transit- oriented, mixed-use development along the frontage, as envisioned in the City's 2011 El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan. A subset of this overall project is the Grand Boulevard Chestnut to Arroyo Project (Project) which extends from Chestnut Avenue to approximately 200 feet north of Arroyo Drive. It will include enhanced pedestrian crossings with comer bulbouts and rnedian refuges,expanded bus stop/waiting areas and new landscaped medians. On July 1.0, 2013, City Council accepted the award of a $1,000,000 grant from the OneBayArea Grant(OBAG) Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC)Program via the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County(C/CAG). This funding,along with a local city match, are allocated for both design and construction of the Project, Through an existing on-call consulting services agreement, Mark Thomas and Company updated and refined the existing 35% design, performed aerial and topographic survey work, completed a traffic study, and submitted draft design exception fact sheets to Caltrans, For completion of the final design and preparation of the construction plans, specifications, and estimate, City staff issued a request for proposals ( FP) on October 22, 2015. via the City website and eBidboard. Responsive proposals were received on November b, 2015 from two Bay Area engineering consulting finns,BKF Engineers and Mark.Thomas and Company.After review of the written proposals, a panel of three city staff members conducted consultant interviews of these two firms on December 1, 2015. It was determined that Mark.Thomas and Company is best qualified to proceed with final design of the Project. Staff Report Subject: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARK THOMAS AND COMPANY OF SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE GRAND BOULEVARD — CHESTNUT TO ARROYO PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $149,790 Page 2 of 2 FUNDING Sufficient funding for the Project is included in the City of South San Francisco's 2015-2016 Capital Improvement Project(Project No. stl 403)and consists of the aforementioned OBAG$1,000,000 grant and local funds via Measure A. While the Project is receiving federal, funds, it has a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise(DBE)requirement with a calculated goal of 12%, This goal is more than met by Mark Thomas and Company's DBE sub-consultant share of work which equals 1.9%. Staff is requesting that a contingency be established in the budget to cover costs that may result from unforeseen complications during the design.No compensation beyond the not-to-exceed amount will be authorized for the consultant without a mutually agreed upon level of effort and corresponding contract amendment. Shown.below is the proposed project budget: Consultant Contract $149,790.00 Engineering Administration (10%) $ 15,000.00 Contingency(I $ 15,000.00 Total Project Budget $179,790.00 CONCLUSION Staff recommends executing a Consulting Services Agreement with Mark Thomas and Company,Inc. of San Jose, California to allow the Project to proceed to final design and preparation of construction bid documents. By: Approved: Brian McMinn Approved: Futr I tr City M Director of Public Works/City Engineer City Man g2er Attachments: Resolution Mark Thomas and Company Scope of Services (Exhibit A) Mark Thomas and Company Budget (Exhibit B) Draft Agreement Project Concept Plan RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT WITH MARK THOMAS AND COMPANY, INC. OF SAN JOSE, CALIFORNIA, FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE GRAND BOULEVARD CHESTNUT TO ARROYO PROJECT IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $149,790, WHEREAS, the South San Francisco Grand Boulevard Project will improve the El Camino Real corridor with upgraded pedestrian crossings, wider sidewalks, landscaped medians, and expanded bus stops; and WHEREAS, on July 10, 2013, City Council accepted award of a $1,000,000 grant from the OneBayArea Grant (OBAG) Transportation for Livable Communities (TLC) for the design and construction of the Chestnut-Arroyo portion of the overall project and later authorized $150,000 in matching local funds; and WHEREAS, on October 22, 2015, staff issued a Request for Proposals ("RFP") for consulting firms to provide design services for the Grand Boulevard Chestnut to Arroyo Project ("Project"); and WHEREAS, staff received two proposals on November 6, 2015, and later conducted interviews of the two proposing consultants on December 1, 2015; and WHEREAS, after reviewing the proposals and interviewing the consulting firms, Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. was chosen, based upon their experience with similar projects and their ongoing work on the Kaiser Way to McLellan portion of the overall Grand Boulevard Project; and WHEREAS, staff recommends awarding a consultant agreement for the Project to Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. of San Jose, California in an amount not to exceed $149,790; and WHEREAS, funding for the Project is included in the City of South San Francisco's Capital Improvement Program ("CIP") and sufficient funds are available to cover the Project cost, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby awards a consulting services agreement for the Grand Boulevard Chestnut to Arroyo Project to Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. of San Jose, California in an amount not to exceed $149,790, -1- BE 1T FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco authorizes the Finance Department to establish the Project Budget consistent with the information contained in the staff report. BE TT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the consulting services agreement on behalf of the City upon timely submission of Mark Thomas and Company's signed contract and all other required documents, subject to approval as to form by the City Attorney. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a - meeting held on the day of 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk -2- .............. South San Francisco El Camino Real Grand Boulevard Initiative Arroyo Drive to Chestnut Avenue PS&E SCOPE OF WORK Version 12/2/2015 The following scope of work outlines the tasks to take this South San Francisco Grand Boulevard Initiative (GBU) project from approximately 35o6design layout through final Plans, Specifications, and Estimate (P5&E) ready for bid. This project isa subset of the original SumTransG8| Complete Streets Case Study project im South San Francisco, and |sfunded through a One Bay Area Grant (OBAG). The anticipated construction budget in approximately$1'OOU,�100. This project is being environmentally cleared by the City(CE/CE), and therefore this scope of work wiUl not include any environmental or traffic analysis work, The project limits generally extend along El Cam,ino Real (ECR)from the beginning of the southbound left turn pocket(approximately 200 feet) north of Arroyo Drive to Chestnut Avenue. Proposed project improvements incUudevvidened sidewalks, cnrnerbu|bouts' high visibility crosswalks, median pedestrian refuges, roadway restripim8vvith accommodation for bicyclists, and bus stop improvements.The median island along ECR from 200 feet north of Arroyo Drive to Chestnut Avenue will be widened and landscaped, and landscaping vegetation will be accommodated in the bu|bowt areas to provide stornovvmterbioM|1ration treatment where possible, it is assumed that minor mod ifications will be made to the Arroyo intersection signal system such as upgrading pedestrian signals, adding pedestrian push buttons, and minor repositioning of the signal heads, but it is assumed that the existing signal poles will not need to be replaced or relocated. For both the Arroyo and Chestnut intersections, repositioning signal loop detectors and adding bike lane loop detectors is assumed. It is assumed the PEER process through Caltrans and PS&E effort will'take approximately one (1)year to complete, with the constraint of submitting the federal E-76 request for construction funding by October 2016. 1- Project Management & Coordination a. Project Managenneint Mark Thomas &Company(MTCo) will supervise, coordinate, and monitor the work effort of the consu|tamtteamtmassumeaneOlcientuseoftheteamresounconandtoassu»efreeand timely flow of information for each task activity. This effort will include coordinating and scheduling meetings, periodically checking in on consultant progress on particular tasks, assisting in communication between team members,the City,Caltrans,SamTrans,and other entities, and planning ahead for milestones requiring joint project team effort. This task will aksoiodude general coordination and communication with the City and SamTraus. Our project manager will assure conformance to the City and Caltrans standards and policies, develop and maintain a Project Schedule, prepare monthly invoices and progress reports, and maintain project files. MTCo will perform internal quality control reviews of documents and plans IGFGM884G Project PS&E Scope l December 2' ZO15 -3- prior to each submittal and maintain good communication with the City, Caltrans, and our subconsuhurtsto ensure the development mfa quality product for the city, Qe8veno6&s: • Project Schedule(with wpto two revisions) • Monthly imvo�ceswith progress report b. Project Meetings in order for the project to proceed on schedule, it is very important for the key personnel from the City, [a|trans, and the MTCo team to meet ona periodic basis to discuss project issues and prugress. Periodic project team coordination meetings are proposed and included |m this task. |n addition to the periodic project team meetings, other focus meetings with the consultant team,the City, SammTrans,Ca|trams, and stakeholders may benecessary. MT[o will prepare agenda and meeting minutes for important meetings with City and Caltrans to document decisions and directions. Dekmera6les: - Attend Two (3) project team meetings * Attend Three(3)focus meetings m. Agency 8" Utility Coordination MTCo wiIII coordinate obtaining permits for field work as required, including a Caltrans encroachment permit for doing survey work and field studies within the Ca|trans right ofway. This would not include actual fees for such permits. |tis assumed that any fees required would be paid directly by City of South San Francisco to the permitting agency. MTCo will coordinate with all utility companies operating in the project area to obtain as-built plans of facilities, confirm existing utility locations on our base map, and discuss any potential concerns about project improvements or impacts, Deliverables: • Utility coordination �letters and correspondence • Existing utility base map imAutuCAD 2. Design PS&E a. 65,% Design Under the City's previous pre-design effort, design layout for this project was developed to approximately a3596 level in coordination with Ca|tramsand the City as part mf the draft design exception fact sheet submittal. A topographic basemap with elevation contours and:approximate right of way locations was also developed imAmtuCAQformat, and is assumed to be sufficient to complete PS&E design without requiring any additional topographic survey effort, After receiving and discussing Caltrans comments on the draft design layout and fact sheets,the MT[uTeam will prepare 65% level plans. The 6596 plans will present all proposed project features and are anticipated Lo include the following sheets: • Title Sheet • Typical Cross Sections • Layout, Drainage&Utility Sheets • Construction Detail Sheets S5FG8|OBAG Project P3&EScope 2 December 2'2O1S -4- � Landscaping&Irrigation Sheets = Construction Staging and Traffic Handling Sheet w Striping and SignageSheets � Signal Electrical Sheets IVITCo will prepare a draft set of technical'special provisions as discussed in the Specifications task below and will provide an updated construction cost estimate with the 65%submittal. It is assumed that the City and Caltramswvou|d review the 65% plans and provide comments tnguidcthe next design phase, Deliverables: 0 65% Plans(11°x17" half size in PDFfomnat)for City&Cmhranu Review 0 GS9&Specifications(MS Word and PDFformat) ° 65Y&Construction Cost Estimate b. 95% Draft PSM After receiving and discussing City &Ca|trans comments on the 65% design plans and special provisions,The MT[oTeam will prepare 95% plans, specifications, and estimate (P5&E) package for City and Ca|tnannreview. The 95% PS&E will complete the details for the design features developed in the 6596 design, and present the complete draft bid pamkege. Defivem6les: a 95Y&Plans (I1°x17" half size inPQF format)for City&[a|trznsReview w Q5%Specifications(MS Word and P0Fformat) 0 95!&Construction Cost Estimate c. l00% FinaiPSM The K4TCoTeam will prepare a 100% 9S&E package based on comments from the City and [a|trams om the 9S96 PS&E submittal. This package will primarily incorporate changes due tV the comments and complete anyfinal missing details. The 100Y6 PSQE will be submitted for one final review by the City and will be submitted tuCakranoto begin the encroachment permit process. Deliverables: 0 1OO94 Plans(12"x17" half size inPDF format)for City&Ca|tranaReview w 1Q0%Specifications(MS Word and PDFformat) w 1OQ§Construction Cost Estimate d. 8\6 0ocummemts After receiving final comments on the 100% PS&E,the &4T[m Team will prepare the final Bid Documents for advertising and bidding the project for construction. It is assumed that Caltrans will not do any further reviews after the 1UD96PS&Ereview. Defixemobles: • Final, stamped and signed plans(11^x17~ half size and 22"x34~full size PDFformat) • Final Specifications (MS Word and PDFformat) • Final Construction Cost Estimate(PDFformat) SSFGB|0BAG Project PS&EScope 3 December 2.20%5 -51- e. Specifications The K4TCo team will compile and edit the Cabrams2O1S (or older ZU10if necessary)Standard Special Provisions (SSPs) required for the Project technical specifications, Drafts of Non-Standard Special Provisions (NSSPs) will he prepared where required, Work includes coordination with the W1T[o design team (roadm/a& landscape and electrical)toward agreement between plans,specifications and bid list. Thiis work product will be used for the Caltrans Encroachment Permit application. It is assumed the City will provide the administrative front-end,which we will incorporate into the Bid- Ready Special Provisions and will assist the City with project-specific edits to the front-end aemtionx. This task includes continued coordination and editing through achievement of a Ready-to-List bid package. Preparation of Bid Book(Notice to Bidders, Proposal forms, etc.) is not included. De8wermbles. w (as noted in previous tasks) * Lane Closure Charts f. Bid Items and Cost Estimate MT[nvvi|| prepare a draft itemized Bid Item List and begin calculating major quantities for the 65% plans submittal tosupport a 55% level construction cost estimate. The Bid Item List' Quantities, and Construction Cost Estimate will be updated and further detailed with each subsequent PS&E submittal. Deliverables: 8 (as noted in previous tasks) 3. Ca!ltrains Coordination {a|trans will need to approve any proposed improvements in the State right ofway. Since the improvements in State right of way would be less than three million dollars and is non-complex, it is anticipated this would be accomplished through approval of a Permit Engineering Evaluation Report (PEER)with design oversight leading to issuance mfenEncroachment Permit for construction. K4T[o will initiate early coordination with [altnams and assist the City with the CeKLrans review amclapprova| process. The folilowing primary items of work are anticipated to gain Caltrans approval by obtaining signed design exception fact sheets, signed PEER and Encroachment Permit approval to construct the project. a. Design Exception Fact Sheets Since the project is proposing modifications toexisting lane and shoulder widths, curb return n*d0 and median widths, Caltrans will require that the project evaluate and identify any proposed nonstandard design features. Any nonstandard features that are proposed to remain urtobeadded will have to be justified through the approval of design exception fact sheets from Caltrans. As part of the City's previous pre-design effort for this project, a draft design exception fact sheet was submitted to[aKtn*ns for review. MT[m will address remaining comments on the design exception fact sheet and resubmit for approval and signature. 1tis assumed any remaining comments from Caltranis would be very minor and would not involve any significant changes or design modifications tn secure signatures for the design exception fact sheet. SSFGG|OBAG Project P5&E Scope 4 December 2, 2015 -6- De8we/n6ley: • Revised draft and final Mandatory Design Exception Fact Sheet • Revised draft and final Advisory Design Exception Fact Sheet(If needed) b. Permit Engineering Evaluation Report(9EER) MTCo will prepare a Caltrans Permit Evaluation Engineering Report (PEER)to support the encroachment permit process, The PEER will document the engineering analysis mf the proposed work. The analysis will include review of the proposed improvements to determine drainage, maintenance, operations, and environmental impacts on the State highway. It is assumed that no more than two(2) review cycles would be required with [e|treos. Deliverables: m Draft and final PEER c. Encroachment Permit Processing MTCo will prepare and submit the Encroachment Permit Application to Caltrans for project construction as soon as the 10896PS&Eiscompleted. VVe will attempt tm submit o draft version earlier in the project life cycle if possible, buLCa|tn*ns will likely want plans to be complete before they begin reviewing the application. Supporting studies required for the encroachment permit such as the Storm Water Data Report(SWDR) and Right of Way Certification would be included in this task. Deliverables: • Ca|tmws Encroachment Permit Application • SVVQR and ROW certification 4. Bid Period Services a. Bid Support MTCo shall participate in one City-organized pre-bid meeting to answer questions about the construction contract. The consultant shall additionally prepare up to two (2)addenda to clarify or revise the bid documents, Additionally,the Consultant shall review the bids and make a recommendation for award based solely mnbid prices, but City will make the ultimate decision om which contractor bid shall be selected for award. Deliverables: • Attend pre-bid meeting 10 answer questions project questions • Prepare upto two(2)addenda to clarify/revise bid documents • Review bid submittals and recommend award based onbid prices Work Not Included The following items are specifically NOT INCLUDED in this scope ofwork: = Environmental clearance SSFGB|OBAG Project PS&EScope 5 December 2, 2015 -7- * Traffic analysis * Public process * Surface/roadway 6asemoppreparation m Construction support w Construction management oradministration p Construction staking ° Surveying * Legal descriptions,exhibits orplats * Record of surveys or corners record 35FGB|OBAG Project PS&EScope 6 December 2,2Q1S -8- �w E E � a E' �o w� e � r `o µ r s Y � C - J � J W u n d b ' E IR ,E _ CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND MARK THOMAS AND COMPANY, INC. THIS AGREEMENT for consulting services is made by and between the City of South San Francisco ("City") and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. ("Consultant") (together someti referred to as the ""Parties") as of December 16, 2015 (the "Effective Gate'), j�I��� Section 1. SERVICES. Subject to the terms and conditions set forth in th ment, Consultant o t�y� Ulb, , , shall provide to City the services described in the Scope of Work attached h n porated herein as Exhibit A, at the time and place and in the manner specified therein. in vent o �' ' Pict in or inconsistency between the terms of this Agreement and Exhibit A, th ',percent shall pr 1.1 Term of Services. The term of this Agreeme q begin on the Effective Dat ", hall end on December 31 2617 the date of co ton specified o exhibit A and Contant shall complete the work described in Exhi n or befog �' p t�date, unless the term of �i� ��� the Agreement is otherwise terminated or ex� d a v1, ed for in Section 8. The 01 time provided to Consultant to complete the servile ired by this Agreement shall not affect the City's right to termineite the Agreement, J" „ ailed for in Section 8. ; 1..2 Standard of Performance. � erforrn ally iquired by this Agreement in a substantial, first-class ma ands I� o the sndards of quality normally ii rUo/Osi,,, q y observed by a person practicing onsulII A110 T Now. �I lr, ,, 1.3 Assign me !d a�nel. Cons r �� hall assign only competent personnel to perform services " uant to ;he event that City, in its sole discretion, at any time the term ors Agreeme �r: sires the reassignment of any such persons �Wi� y�p�� ' Cant shall, am Patel upon recg notice from City of such desire of City rea i%,n uch p /'' 'T m", shall devote such time to the performance of services pursuant to this ent a ;, be reasonably necessary to meet the standard of performance � � i prbtt m Secr s%1,1 and 1__2 above and to satisfy Consultant's obligations hereunder. %; l Puk�lic s Re uiremenrts. Because the services described in Exhibit A include"work � %o perf orme t� ring the design and preconstruction phases of construction including, but not limited toil pection and land surveying work,"the services constitute a public works ohr�rnt is raga redo comply with the provisions��sert forth bn�Exhib t D which sit tA&Qy;/ io hereto and incorporated herein. Section 2. COMPENSATION. City hereby agrees to pay Consultant a sum not to exceed One Hundred Forty Nine Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety Collars ($149,790.00)notwithstanding any contrary indications that may be contained in Consultant's proposal, for services to be performed and reimbursable costs incurred under this Agreement. In the event of a conflict between this Agreement and Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2.13,2014] December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. Page 1 of 17 10- Consultant's proposal, attached as Exhibit A, regarding the amount of compensation, the Agreement shall prevail. City shall pay Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement at the time and in the manner set forth herein. The payments specified below shall be the only payments from City to Consultant for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. Consultant shall submit all invoices to City in the manner specified herein. Except as specifically authorized by City in writing, Consultant shall not bill City for duplicate services performed by more than one person. Consultant and City acknowledge and agree that compensation paid by City tic Co t under this Agreement is based upon Consultant's estimated costs of providing the service d hereunder, including salaries and benefits of employees and subcontractors of Consult ntly, the Parties further agree that compensation hereunder is intended to include the cost �cintributi any pensions and/or annuities to which Consultant and its employees, agents, and art entractors may i le. City therefore has no responsibility for such contributions beyond comp 11 n required undert ement, 2.1 Invoices. Consultant shall submit invoices. ore often t a, once per month d 9 on A all serve ormed and reimbursable the term on the —of this Agreement, based the costs incurred prior to the invoice date, invo all I all the following information: • Serial identifications of progress bills(i.e., � le ss Bill No. 1 for the first invoice, etc); ��������l�i»iit,,.• The beginning and bidlin • A task sum ig th tract Taunt, the amount of prior billings, the total due in e r o a iliable under the Agreement, and the pierce tage of compl ,,for each rn in each task, a copy of the applicable time At 10 1 or t, Bets shall bmittec! showing the name of the person doing work, the rs spent by person, a brief description of the work, and each reimb,i J)le expense, performed under the Agreement Iby each U tractor of Consultant performing services hereunder; ant shall give separate notice to the City when the total number of hours wor Consultant and any individual employee, agent, or subcontractor of ,onsull ches or exceeds eight hundred (800) hours within a twelve (12)- 114 th r irider this Agreement and any other agreement between Consultant �� ��rdescribed 'City. Such notice shall include an estimate of the time necessary to complete in Exhibit A and the estimate of time necessary to complete work IN,V"', any other agreement between Consultant and City, if applicabie, amount and purpose of actual expenditures for which reimbursement is /I ought; The Consultant's signature. F 2.2 Monthly Payment. City shall make monthly payments, based on invoices received, for services satisfactorily performed, and for authorized reimbursable costs incurred. City shad have thirty (30) days from the receipt of an invoice that complies with all of the requirements above to pay Consultant. Each invoice shall include all expenses and Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev2 13,20141 December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc, Page 2 of 17 -11- actives performed during the invoice period for which Consultant expects to receive payment. 2.3 Final Payment. lCity shall pay the five percent(5%)of the total sum due pursuant to this Agreement within sixty(60)days after completion of the services and submittal to City of a final invoice, if all services required have been satisfactorily performed, 2.4 Total Payment. City shall pay for the services to be rendered by 'tant pursuant to this Agreement. City shall not pay any additional sum for any or cost whatsoever incurred by Consultant in rendering services pursuant to thi LCity shall make N," no payment for any extra, further, or additional service pu7il t to this I ment. In no event shall Consultant submit any invoice for an a o -,,'n excess Of the m amount of compensation provided above either fo or for the entire Ag unless the Agreement is modified prior to the sy ion of such an invoice b A rly executed change order or amendment. 'fig A 110 J)g m0h gjgg�, 2.5 Hourly Fees. Flees for work performed by t /,an g.,41, n,hourly bases shall not exceed pi the amounts shown on the compensation ned hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit B. W, A 2.6 Reimbursable Expenses. in the total amount of compensation provided und xceeded. 2.7 Payment of Taxes. Consultant i he payment of employment taxes onsi e 0110 l federal or state taxes. Contractor incurred uI I A1/,/j ement an represe flu VVL11 ILI hat Contr "is a resident of the State of California in ;2Nj/j1R/%01/,?/ acle with Calif a Revenue xation Code Section 18662, as it may be /t of� Or 6d and is ex Trom withhol Contractor accepts sole responsible for a rq�fi 11114) e re sip e 0 t,,Yvj, 0, re j Lj tractors and withhold taxes from non-California 9N, 5411 ermination. In the event that the City or Consultant terminates this Ad, NMI eavkf merit u d V [ Q, pritpur8d, 'too Section 8,the City shall compensate the Consultant for all' day FAIR F, ON outs costs imbursable expenses incurred for work satisfactorily completed as of the d4 f written notice of termination. Consultant shall maintain adequate logs and timeshee verify costs incurred to that date, N/ 41111 g 0,111, P Autholri n to Perform Services. The Consultant is not authorized to perform any x/a/2% or incur any costs whatsoever under the terms of this Agreement until receipt of ON�,/g//�// e r -MOR", 6fization from the Contract Administrator. Ig 2.10 False Claims Act,. Presenting a false or fraudulent claim for payment, including a change order, is a violation of the California False Claims Act and may result in treble damages and a fine of five thousand ($5,000)to ten thousand dollars ($10,000) per violation, Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2,13.2014] December 16, 21015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. Page 3 of 17 -12- Section 3. FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT. Except as set forth herein, Consultant shall, at its sole cost and expense, provide all facilities and equipment that may be necessary to perform the services required by this Agreement. City shall make available to Consultant only the facilities and equipment listed in this section, and only under the terms and conditions set forth herein. City shall furnish physical facilities such as desks, filing cabinets, and conference space, may be reasonably necessary for Consultant's use while consulting with City employees and r i g records and the information in possession of the City, The location, quantity, and time of furni 'ose facilities shall be in the sole discretion of City. In no event shall City be obligated to furnish a 1, that may involve incurring any direct expense, including but not limited to computer, long-dirt b I IV, I or other A communication charges, vehicles, and reproduction facilities, 0 Poll Section 4. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS. Before beginn'i work under this Agre eft— Consultant, at its own cost and expense, unless otherwise spec elow, shall procure the t amounts of insurance listed below against claims for injuries, TSons or da�p, ges to propert t y A R, lffivrl/ ' nsultant and its agents, ie under bM arise from or in connection with the performance of th 1151051� F TO PIN 001 IN/ Consultant shall representatives, employees, and subcontractors, Consistent I ing provisions, provide p roof satisfactory to City of such insurance that meets t ments of this section and under forms of insurance satisfactory in all respects, and that such insura in effect prior to beginning work to Affiggo,' the City, Consultant shall maintain the iflrnSuTr Qjes required b y h tion throughout the term of this Agreement, The cost of such insurance tj 2, the Co, bid. Consultant shall not 54, (ij allow any subcontractor to commence work n on ul "'rhas obtained all insurance q 0 z required herein for the subcontractor(s), Consul 1, �d insurance listed herein for the duration of this Ag reement, f V r RINI R Consult hall, at its sole cost and exp 4.1 Worki ense, maintain Sta Co®R,, o r K e r s, C nsation Ins ice and Employer's Liability Insurance for any a emp d dir c I n fitly by Consultant. The Statutory Workers' Tior, U 0 r Liability Insurance shall be provided with limits of In the alternative, Consultant may rely on a self not�e5510414 00 p 5, T 5/1 i nsurance i7ram to meet those requirements, but only if the program of self-insurance ii ii floc, i /,���� � lies fu V6111 he provisions of the California Labor Code, Determination of whether a ance p meets the standards of the Labor Code shall be solely in the discre f the C t Administrator, as defined in Section 10.9. The insurer, if insurand rovided, or the Consultant, if a program of self-insurance is provided, shall waive all tts of subrogation against the City and its officers, officials, employees, and volunteer oss arising from work performed under this Agreement. 4. ,CorcialeneraU al and Automobile Liability Insurance. 'NMI'rr! " General requirements.. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain commercial general and automobile liability insurance for the term of this Agreement in an amount not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,0100.00)per occurrence, combined single limit coverage for risks associated with the work contemplated by this Agreement. If a Commercial General Liability Insurance or an Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2.13.2014] December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. Page 4 of 17 -13- Automobile Liability form or other form with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit shall apply separately to the work to be performed under this Agreement or the general aggregate limit shall be at least twice the required occurrence limit, Such coverage shall include but shall not be limited to, protection against claims arising from bodily and personal injury, including death resulting therefrom, and damage to property res I ing from activities contemplated under this Agreement, including the awned and non- owned automobfles, 42.2 Minimum scope of rover gene, d, hall be at least as broad as Insurance Services Office Commercial G, all abl! urrence form CG 0001 or GL 0002 (most recent editions) curnprehen %d ad Insurance and Services Office for er GL 0404 coverin� M ,a d Form Comprehensive General Liability, occurrence" basis. Auto coverage shall be at least as broad resurance Sere ;es Office Auto 11 Liability form CA 0001 (most rece' ion). No t shall be attached limiting the coverage. Tell, 4.2.3 Additional requirerngnts. Each of the all be included in the insurance coverage p ent to the policy:' va "M R a. The Insurancel C", r nc an accident basis, and not M on a claims-m ON b ,gg/ go, p�ffip/, ure of Cc It to comply with reporting provisions of the policy e shairl affect co rj�p ff t co provided to City and its officers, employees, tggg ,/ ' d lul Itu a g e n d "ANIFFIF/ 04/11/11 V g g/ ma3sr 4.3 Pr"Jonal Uabl&6�6"16&d Mal 431 &" eciuirernents. Consultant, at its own cost and expense, shall maintain 0/11//W t V ME41, ,16 r g REIF* f A ri covered by this Agreement professional liability insurance for 0 R tp ns Monals performing work pursuant to this Agreement in an amount W s 000,000 covering the licensed professionals' errors and I t Q1V gm Issions. deductible or self-insured retention shall not exceed one hundred M I�housand dollars ($150,000) per claim. VIVO, ........... 4.3.2 •made limitations. The following provisions shall apply if the professional ' firns liability coverage is written on a claims-made form: a. The retroactive date of the policy must be shown and must be before the date of the Agreement. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2.13.2014] December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc, Page 5 of 17 -14- b. Insurance musk be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least five (5)years after completion of the Agreement or the work, so long as commercially available at reasonable rates, C. If coverage is canceled or not renewed and it is not replaced with another claims-.made policy form with a retroactive date that pre des the date of this Agreement, Consultant shall purchase an ex ten M��� riod coverage ��m f0l� for a minimum of five (5)years after completion o� under this Agreement or the work. The City shall have t t o exercise, at the Consultant's sole cost and expense, any e a�ng provisions of the policy, if the Consultant cancels or do .,� t rene « 11 overage. d. A copy of the claim reportiing req gents must be submitte grp� re City ���li!ll,j w i is for review prior to the comma y nt of any work under this An � nt. U „ % 4. . additional Re uirements. A ce do rsemeit!s'include contractual liabiliity shall be included in the olio '; 4.4 All Policies Reguirereru %i, 4.4.1 Acce tabilit of insr ��( n� nce requir %this section is to be placed with insurers with a 'S rating rq � 11� 4.4.2 Verification of covers � PTY, begunnmg�any worlk under this Agreement, Co ' all furnish �?; `�'u�th complete copies of all policies delivered to 011`W !!%if p taut 16 ! insurer, i mg complete copies of all endorsements attached �� hose police ! All copies oIicies and certified endorsements shall show the i%%/si nature of / ersw i authorize y that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. If g i %ill he CIty VV, iqt/r e► e h r e uired insurance documents prior to the Consultant /i 'gin ork, this s°l%off waive the Consultant's obligation to provide them,. reserves the right to irequire complete copies of all required insurance polices% ny time. 4.4. ctiari in or Cancellation of Coverage. A certified endorsement 4AAR Ql be attacied to all insurance obtained pursuant to this Agreement stating that "In crage shall not be suspended, voided, cancelled by either party, or reduced in !�, rage or in limits, except after thirty (36) days' prior written notice by certified return receipt requested, has been given to the City. In the event that ainy verage required by this section is reduced, limited, cancelled, or materially affected in any other manner, Consultant shall provide written notice to City at , Consultant's earliest possible opportunity and in no case later than ten (10) working days after Consultant is notified of the change in coverage, 4.4.4 Additional insured„primary insurance. City and its officers, employees, agents, and volunteers shall be covered as additional insureds with respect to each of the Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev.2.13.20141 December 16, 2615 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. Page 6 of 17 -15- following: liability arising out of activities performed by or on behalf of Consultant, including the City's general supervision of Consultant; products and completed operations of Consultant, as applicable; premises owned, occupied, or used by Consultant; and automobiles owned, leased, or used by the Consultant in the course of providing services pursuant to this Agreement. The coverage shall contain no special limitations on the scope of protection affo,,W to City or its officers, employees, agents, or volunteers. F A certified endorsement must be attached to all poll T, �ing that coverage is primary insurance with respect to the City and its o, employees and volunteers, and that no insurance or self-insuran intaine I ye City shall be Ig called upon to contribute to a loss under the ra e. 4.4.,5 Deductibles and Self•Insured Reterifix" Consultant shall disclose Affik Pl/ K re en obtain the approval of City for the s red t ti s and deductibles b9 re E VrP,erm of this Agreement. beginning any of the service, I'll dllt;k1l Further, if the Consultant's insuranc 4 6,jI, i In q y a self-insured retention that must be paid by a named insured as aphi ion of the insurer's liability, or which has the effect of providing that pay Aphn'111111111111 Af the self-insured retention by 11011, W, others, including adq(J'Oh" I ' isiureds or insure serve to satisfy the self- insured retention be mode 1 11 endorsement so as on A WS, g� 0 to not apply to the ad q�,/qinal insu f,,,po by this agreement so as to 010/0 p ,Z/R- V not prevent any Or the p, , AFFS ' 11 s to I q I e satisfying or paying the self- insured en it as a precondition to the insurer's liability. On",a(l, VVINOA certificate ot Ad� ance must note whether the policy does or E, Elk N 110 inc O'gp d retention and also must disclose the deductible. t ny self'-in T, Y 'R 'W" 0 711 I N "'During the covered b ""'Agreement, only upon the prior express written IRMR�CIU Ll I 1JIJ It- r, I tratoir, Consultant may increase such deductibles I N B `�s respect to City, its officers, employees, agents, and & retenti "I'm m als, V 9 rs. ded" "h The Contract Administrator may condition approval of an increase in 0,9' or self -insured retention levels with a requirement that Consultant a_,/ to guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim X is 'iii g, c uI r6`,A� ,g/ pz nd defense expenses that is satisfactory in all respects to each of i n i strati" Al g F/ 4 411-1/12 4.4.6 S, ointractors. Consultant shall include gall subcontractors as insureds under its On, kies or shall furnish separate certificates and certified endorsements for each 41 M®R Nk ffi ''Obcontractor. All coverages for subcontractors shall be subject to all of the S W requirements stated herein. RI, al,011111111-K 4.4.7 Wasting Policy. No insurance policy required by Section 4 shall include a "wasting" policy limit, Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2.13.2014] December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. Page 7 of 17 -16- 4.4.8 Variation. The City may approve a variation in the foregoing insurance requirements, upon a determination that the coverage, scope, limits, and forms of such 'insurance are either not commercially available, or that the City's interests are otherwise fully(protected, 4.5 Remedies. In addition to any other remedies City may have it Consulta Jails to provide or maintain any insurance policies or policy endorsements to the ext within the time herein required, City may, at its sole option exercise any of the fol �r�g remedies, which are alternatives to other remedies City may have and are not t �� ive remedy for Consultant's breach: � r r,,, a. Obtain such insurance and deduct and retain the punt of the premr� s�or such insurance from any sums due under the Agre % b. Order Consultant to stop ork under th151Y Bement or hold any payment ghat p "becomes due to Consultant hereunder rf nth stop v�,r and withhold any payment, until Consultant demonstrates com lianr } the,ritements hereof; and/or in to this A / c, Term Agreement, Terminate g �/ Section 5. INDEMNIFICATION AND C 6 N ,ESPONSI P S. Consultant shall„ to the ,o »�� �� fullest extent allowed b law, with respect to al Irv, P conne � n with this Agreement, y � p , p ���i o�fri�,, indemnify, defend with counsel selected by the t „and h iJ � 1 �,�p,tv it y and its officials, officers, employees, agents, and volunteers from and agar n (i all loss claims, suits, actions, 1/or, is W UI t of an ° �al iin ur , bodily injury, loss of life or damage to damages, and causes of actrii f� ,%i y p+` jIU1 1 y y 9 property, or an violationfy'fede� i,fate, or mu I law or ordinance ("Claims"), to the extent caused, directly or ind' �ly in whole t� part, by th� ��ful misconduct or negligent acts or omissions of Jr,,, Consultant or its erp�� es, subcon � ors �or agents foregoing obligation of Consultant shall not apply when (1)the nfif,loss of� rf cr ; or violation of law arises wholly from the gross 4l/� a ,l r, negligence or willful mi r f c %I e City or i ,b i rs, employees, agents, or volunteers and (2)the actions of a pan es, subcontractor, or agents have contributed in no part to the injury, loss o iolatlion of lawn Add/ 51 Ins —�ir:ce Nat m o6e at Indemnity, Acceptance by City of insurance certificates and endors r ooa, nts required under this Agreement does not relieve Consultant from liability fG i under th /Jr r �riemnification and hold harmless clause, This indemnification and hold it harmles Muse shall apply to any damages or claims for damages whether or not such sur fir' execution of this 0 1,11 t aciknowledges and agreestto he proovisions ofSthis Section and that t is a Agreement, al element of consideration. //�i% 5.2 PIERS liability. In the event that Consultant or any employee, agent, or subcontractor of Consultant providing services under this Agreement is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction or the California Public Employees Retirement System (PERS)to be eligible for enrollment in PERS as an employee of City, Consultant shall indemnify, Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2.13,2014] December 10, 2015 City of'South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc, Page 8 of 17 -17- defend, and hold harmless City for the payment of any employee and/or employer contributions for PIERS benefits on behalf of Consultant or its employees, agents, or subcontractors, as well as for the payment of any penalties and interest on such contributions, which would otherwise be the responsibility of City, 5.3 Third Party Claims., With respect to third party claims against the Co s ,Ytant, the Oftnity against Consultant waives any and all rights of any type of express or impl , 'V,111 the Indemnitees, A, IF Section 6. STATUS OF CONSULTANT, 6.11 Independent Contractor. At all times during the ter this 'r"sultant shall Agreement ee of City. it shat be an independent contractor and shall not be an I V the g , .......... 'Iff"'bf Consultant' right to control Consultant only insofar S services re N, YR pursuant to this Agreement and ass ig nmen�,//`�',`&. son nel pu"r nt to Su paragrap. ......... For =/a, 1 to contra means by which Consultant 11"'J"fl) ;./ta"a" however, otherwise City shall not have 011 h,' //p g lgg ON accomplishes services rendered pursuant rjf`�"Notwithstanding any other �01151_.'Jftnce to the contrary, Consultant City, state, or federal policy, rule, regulation, I a 0,10,R Q 'd' and any of its employees, agep ts, and subcontract6r, , r!Qvi ing services under this Agreement shall not quailly W�fgflmzmg' entitled to by agree to waive any and r,//�q 4 ome ei z P/14 all claims to, any corn pe,isdt,K V incident py ent by City, including RrT but not limited to eligibility to ei'16%in the he TPublic yees Retirement System IRR"ROp, VO/1, (PERS) as an employee of City Q fV1 ILI tit 6". tribution to be paid by City for �V �k/ , I'll,"tributi n f PIERS benefits, employer con rib ' T ye ns,and/or e 9 ,gaye 6.2 Consuillta a pt 1, jt may specify in writing, Consultant shall have no WIN autho.Tif act o 11 alf of City in any capacity whatsoever as an g j "d 11,9"bind City n wh ve r, N Section 7, LEG 4—' I j1 LN I b. 2, 'erning he laws of the State of California shall govern this Agreement. v AAR/g/ A/f & IN I.z e likable Laws. Consultant and any subcontractors shall comply with ith g Ad�1,IN q IzV q// State and I N, //g/ 4,IF all feder* I laws and regulations applicable to the performance of the work hereunde onsultant's failure to comply with such law(s) or regulation(s) shall constitute V a breach ntract. ,g /// j t i vernmental Regulations. To the extent that this Agreement may be funded by he, assistance from another governmental entity, Consultant and any subcontractors comply with all applicable rules and regulations to which City is bound by the terms of such fiscal assistance program. 7.4 Licenses and Permits. Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, and any subcontractors have all licenses, permits, qualifications, Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2.13.2014] December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. Page 9 of 17 -18- and approvals, including from City, of whatsoever nature that are legally required to practice their respective professions, Consultant represents and warrants to City that Consultant and its employees, agents, any subcontractors shall, at their sole cost and expense, keep in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement any ficenses, permits, and approvals that are legally required to practice their respective professions, In addition to the foregoing, Consultant and any subcontractors shall obtai, maintain during the term of this Agreement valid Business Licenses from City. lj 7.5 Nondiscrimination and Equal Opportunity. Consultant shall riminate, on the basis of a person's race, religion, color, national oh gin, age �gp, ', ental handicap or disability, medical condition, marital status, sex, o 'tation, t en R� t,any employee, applicant for employment, subcontractor, f su c ntr r participant pir or 0 11110", in, recipient of, or appficant for any services or pro d Cons i t order this s provided Agreement. Consuftant shall comply all ble federal, state, and local Y w" �dll �11 �Wed to R )TV 1,11bpportunity nondiscrimi Y t policies, rules, and requirements rE employment, contracting, and the provisi*�'I�,� �n are the subject of this �F.NE/Rar R Agreement, including but not limited to the s positive obligations required of Consultant thereby. I As 0, 41, ec Consultant shall include the p� sec K ny subcontract approved by this Sub ,q v .,aaa ,iz the Contract Administrator gr, VIC VIM 7.6 Contractor's Residencv and an r declares that Contractor is a `�'bihue With t California Franchise Tax Board resident of the Sta e of California" cc %p s m ed attached hereto and incorporated herein as y�f f o r m 5 9 0("F,�/ / III/."M may be ExNbit ,d1V1V,/1PP'06[es vided with d, written evidence of an exemption or waiver from M/77/17- wfthl�pldipg, Cfty may hold alifo I'gliaxes,from payments to Contractor as required by p file for three (3) years after the termination of la W,,1007,6fi tractor shaIlk t/in and t "o'g, the'Offitract Fo factors. Contractor accepts sole responsibility for A with om a I - I nia resident subcontractor and shall submit written ocu d rr I compliance with Contractor's withholding duty to City, / YN 0, rgl 1A Ser"til -ONAT 10 WIMA"boMO D I F 1C AT 10 N, R 7%W - J Ilk WO '( Y Termini 0 6 City may cancel this Agreement at any time and without cause upon written g notificatil Consultant. ) Consu Erna y cancel this Agreement for cause upon thirty(30) days' written notice to hall include in such notice the reasons for cancellation. e event of termination, Consultant shall be entitled to compensation for services performed to the effective date of notice of termination; City, however, may condition payment of such compensation upon Consultant delivering to City all materials described in Section 9.1, Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2.112014] December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc, Page 10 of 17 -19- 8.2 Extension. City may, in its sole and exclusive discretion, extend the end date of this Agreement beyond that provided for in Subsection 1,11. Any such extension shall require Contractor to execute a written amendment to this Agreement, as provided for herein. Consultant understands and agrees that, if City grants such an extension, City shall have no obligation to provide Consultant with compensation beyond the maximum amount provided for in this Agreement. Similarly, unless authorized by the Cont I Administrator, City shall have no obligation to reimburse Consultant for any otherwil bursable expenses incurred during the extension period. 8.3 Amendments. The Parties may amend this Agreement o3M,,.., signed by al the /0 Parties. 11 1............... 8,.4 Ass! gnment and Subcontracting. City and Cori recognize and this Agreement contemplates personal performaric 0 0 nsultant and is based F determination of Consultant's unique mpetence erience and s pe i -6d personal knowledge. Moreover, a substan 'y,111, ducement'i for entering into this y 1 t, Agreement was and is the profession uf, nd tence of Consultant. 10 P Consultant may not assign this Agreement therein without the prior written approval of the Contract Administrator, Consultan anot assign or subcontract any portion of the performance cp I-gl,,ierein, other than to the Y VIM,gmil As9- ilw.! �Tnlrnjlj '0 al of the Contract subcontractors noted 15'0''0 tten, gf/ v 'PT Ira Administrator, I IR 8.5 Survival. All oUNations arising ph6A ,;r I mina is Agreement and all ANR�1� gg, provisions? I, rep ent alloc oc %ability between City and Consultant shall survive the term] aPROh of thi 9 reement. g. 8.6 OD11,04/1s",upon Brea,-V Onsultant' onsultant materially breaches any of the terms W of ....... allInclude, but not be limited to, the following: fly terminate the Agreement; sn IN" R, 8. ins, specifications, drawings, reports, design documents, and any 'p,9 1 0 g T uct prepared by Consultant pursuant to this Agreement; 46,211 W 8,63 Pdn a different consultant to complete the work described in Exhibit A not R "odO by Consultant; or I ma", (WE Y,Tf W a r e Consultant the difference between the cost to complete the work described in Exhibit A that is unfinished at the time of breach and the amount that I................ City would have paid Consultant pursuant to Section 2 if Consultant had completed the work. Section 9. KEEPING AND STATUS OF RECORDS. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2.13,2014] December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. Page 11 of 17 -20- 9.1 Records Created as Part of Consultant's Performance. All reports, data, maps, models, charts, studies, surveys, photographs, memoranda, plans, studies, specifications, records, files, or any other documents or materials, in electronic or any other form, that Consultant prepares or obtains pursuant to this Agreement and that relate to the matters covered hereunder shall be the property of the City. Consultant hereby agrees to deliver those documents to the City upon termination of the Agreement. It is un 'erstood and � 20 agreed that the documents and other materials, including but not limy (ff described above, prepared pursuant to this Agreement are prepared specific, -r the City and are not necessarily suitable for any future or other use. City and C t agree that, until final approval by City, all data, plans, specifications, reports, uments are rwritte ent of both confidential and will not be released to third parties Parties except as required by law, ks 91 Consultant's Books and Records. Consulta any and all led �Wi maintain a 9 of account, invoices, vouchers, canceled cheats and other records or document MWOUP, evidencing or relating to charges for servidil/ r,ex 'hd disbursements charged t hree ears or for any longer period - ,yy to the City under this Agreement for a 6nim t required by law, from the date of final payment t 4116" sultant to this Agreement, /d/Show 9.3 Inspection and Audit of Rec f/� records or a mg, ts that Section 9,2 of this hall be ma 4,1111111 g Agreement requires Consultiff le for inspection, audit, q , t V`k oral or written request of and/or copying at w i e g u a Mu 0 '20A FN California Goveb" the City. 'Under over ant C /,%�p/3'e WKJ, if the amount of public funds is P or expended under this Agreement e U en thou 10,000.00), the Agreement shall be sut W/ nation and to,,lof the State Auditor, at the request of City or as "M "M Or three l,5) part or ap Ly,for a p years after final payment under the /Yg/p It OT 1111 Agre r NA, 91.4 Re Ms,,sunmg t'ai a onse to41art Invitation to Bid or IRequest for Pro osals All ii�iii�i, is respor gpg 0 a,j�b eqUest for MIJ6§%�(RFP) or invitation to bid issued by the City become m T e exclu§11111 "'perty of the City. At such time as the City selects a bid, all proposals b „i% x- d bec Wip matter of public record, and shall be regarded as public records, with M I Or m IN in M ption elements in each proposal that are defined by Consultant and i ential," "Business Secret" or"Trade Secret." J/ F ril ed s I 11 dddfidlf plai V The City 11 not be liable or in any way responsible for the disclosure of any such M, proposal anion thereof, if Consultant has not plainly marked it as a "Trade Secret"or "Busin ecret "or if disclosure is required under the Public Records Act, Ugh the California Public Records Act recognizes that certain confidential trade secret information imay be protected from disclosure, the City may not be in a position to establish that the information that a prospective bidder submits is a trade secret. If a request is made for information marked "Trade Secret" or"Business Secret,"' and the requester takes legal action seeking release of the materials it believes does not constitute trade secret information, by submitting a proposal, Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev1,13,2014] December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc, Page 12 of 17 -21- harmless the City, its agents and employees, from any judgment, fines, penalties, and award of attorneys fees awarded against the City in favor of the party requesting the information, and any and all costs connected with that defense. This obligation to indemnify survives the City's award of the contract. Consultant agrees that this indemnification survives as long as the trade secret information is in the City's possession, which includes a minimum retention period for such documents, Section, 10 MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS. 10.1 Attorneys' Fees. If a Party to this Agreement brings any a g� ''J, arbitration or an g action for declaratory relief, to enforce or interpret the provAp Ig,on of this ent 'the prevailing Party shall be entitled to reasonable torn ",,,,fees in aa..., ther relief to which that Party may be entitled, The court m �Ruch fees in the sam or in a separate action brought for that purpose "All -- 10.2 Venue. In the event that either Party briii y action a R t"th i e other under this OF 9 Agreement, the Parties agree that trial of su n s "`b vested exclusively in the ills state courts of California in the County of San �d the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. SOON` sew, t 10.3 Severability. If a court of c at any provision of this of Mn finds or ns is Agreement not so Vh/11"I I Agreement is invalid, void, Ul f -c e a D i ns adjudged shall remain in full for y in whole or in part of any p a eTTe provision of this eemenL shall affect the idity of any other provision of this MY Agreement NINE X� Py 10.4 No Im Waiver �1 of any breach of a specific provision of this Aq "berit does no„ statute ny other breach of that term or any other term of hi reemen 10 Succe 5 ssians. The provisions of this Agreement shall inure to the benefit of 'n"m Man 44/0', bind the successors and assigns of the Parties. dy p —hall a I N, 10.6 Use VC kts. Consultant shall prepare and submit all reports, written gl studies ther prin d material on recycled paper to the extent it is available at equal or less Cos t W virgin paper. bl Confli Interest. Consultant may serve other clients, but none whose activities within � 11 e,, orate limits of City or whose business, regardless of location, would place in a "conflict of interest," as that term is defined in the Political Reform Act, California Government Code Section 81000, et seq, Consultant shall not employ any City official in the work performed pursuant to this Agreement. No officer or employee of City shall have any financial interest in this Agreement that would violate California Government Code Sections 1090, et seq. Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2.13.2014] December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. Page 13 of 17 -22- Consultant hereby warrants that it is not now, nor has it been in the previous twelve (1 2) months, an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City. If Consultant was an employee, agent, appointee, or official of the City in the previous twelve (12) months, Consultant warrants that it dirt not participate in any manner in the forming of this Agreement, Consultant understands that, if this Agreement is made in v ,;lation of Government Cade §1090, of seq., the entire Agreement is void and 41tant will not be entitled to an compensation for services performed pursuant to t eement, including y Itl� reimbursement of expenses, and Consultant will be required to se the City for any sums paid to the Consultant, Consultant understands that,� he foregoing, it �U � 1090 and if may be subject to criminal prosecution for a violation of Gnment � � y 1 applicable, will be disqualified from holding public if "lira the State of Ca�'���� S%/% fi% 10.8 Solicitation. Consultant agrees not to solicit b ess at any meeting, focus gr�� a interview related to this Agreement., eitherro I through ritten materialis. f� l' p i, %iii' 10.9 Contract Administration. This Agreement� lIJ_ a� �slered by Contra s -1"pstrator ). All correspondence shall l be directed to or through he Contract Ad mini' r or his or her designee. ��/� fop/�r 1p.1fi Notices. All notices and oth J o�r n� ti ns which ar fired or may given under %, this Agreement shall be in writs rind sh If -e d to ha e' een duly given (i) when dr%i✓ j ,, received if personally delivered ���J)�uhen rdit fitted by tellecopy, if received during normal bnasxness hours on ,r �n j day(or if r�i t, the next business day after t�s ch facsir seg delivery) prq i bae and that at the time such facsimile is sent the seer "arty revs written c nrmation of receipt; (iii) if sent for next day delivery i ri' r%; rgif, to a dA ,sbc addres , Irecogmzed 0, fight delivery service (e.g., Federal Express); arr f upon receip ��f�sent by certifnedregistered maul, return receipt requested. In � �� fir, eac1� e,notN� J I�;b , r t nfJ spective (Parties as follows: Con I nt irk Thoma ,a�rtd Company, Inc. i, ��%; 1 nker Rolf; ,,il /; San NON NI 951 ° City Clem% City 0 ou an Francisco 40 ni Avenue t"h-San Francisco, CA 9400 10.11 Professional Seal. Where applicable in the determination of the contract administrator, the first page of a technical report, first page of design specifications, and each page of construction drawings shall be stamped/sealed and signed by the licensed professionall responsible for the report/design (preparation. The stamp/seal shall be in a block entitled Consulting Services Agreement between ['Rev:2.13.2014] December 15, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. Page 14 of 17 -23- "Seal and Signature of Registered Professional with report/design responsibility," as in the fallowing example, Seal and Signature of Registered Professional with report/design responsibility. � F ep��/�oo! 6 Y e h d he, nd g c 10.12 Integration. This Agreement, including the scope of work,41 (OK incorporated herein as Exhibits A, B, [fand]Qf, and 1) resents integrated agreement between City and Consultant and sup a I prior otiati %�, representations, or agreements, either written eftaii ing t the matter i M Exhibit A Scope of Services d Exhibit B Compensation Schedule Exhibit C ReimbursaNe Expenses 'ir j j Exhibit D Public Works Requirements ) , e Al'Oe counterparts, each of which 10.13 Counterparts. 'This A g r e e ]c 4, shall be an original and all o t 66/4"'k,/q, titu agreement. /,/ghall con "A' .1,11" OM AM MOM ii 10.14 Construction. The headings ii "I" ps Agre DAN` 171 f 16 M purpose of reference only and �OTIN shall not limit or qtb t erwise affect o u this Agreement. The parties have had an equal rt, J_te III fting of this Agreement; therefore any construe 11,11as a g a i e drafting 'shall all not apply to this Agreement. g/ 10.15 Noff/Tad Bark Bene'l aries. This A r went is made solely for the benefit of the M/ rtiq wi� Pa non-signatory third parties. 001.10 ATURES 0 1 Ej AM/jj L I'M "Iq V If"///V/////" HEMMOR, R NAME MI/M w %/q,1210 g/p/g/&, g,g Ed ,("gZ g M 10/M/a. m Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2.13.2014] December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and dark Thomas and Company, Inc. Page 15 of 17 -24- The Parties have executed this Agreement as of the Effectlive Gate. CITY OF 'SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CONSULTANT Mike Futrell, City Manager [NAME, TITLE] � ���„ I W Attest: a�l�j� ,p Krista Martinelli, City Clerk ;VIP Approved as to Foram" / r City Attorney rr�r� rri rr�i //i��%��/i f%/fir r/jai/% //rim /���r W Ir ✓6 g, % % // Consulting Services Agreement between f Rev:2.13.2014] December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark:Thomas and Company, Inc, Page 16 of 17 -25- EXHIBIT A. SCOPE OF SERVICES Alli r//116,, el ji/r 011,10 WW"'A irr //% � //// i, r % /i/%i/ /%ir i/% iir rii /? r /,//j ✓� rrrrr /��i l 1i 6'''/ %U n r/ g �q t'/ % Consulting Services Agreement between [Rev:2,13.2014] December 16, 2016 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc. Page 17 of 17 - C,- EXHIBIT B COMPENSATION SCHEDULE, fr ri ire �U % ///" fir, /iii/ pg // /ggr//// //ii" Wall (r/ii � �/1G� , Consulting Services,agreement between December 15, 2015 City of South 'San Francisco and Mark Thames and Company, Inc..-Exhibit B- Page 1 of 1 -27- EXHIBIT REIMBURSABLE EXPENSES , /ire r N/ j %jr /���j„ °l�i Vii/r� '" /a O o% 4/ ii Dfr i%/ j / ,�� � j / /i� ✓/i//�i /�//// iii/i i O///// �/ I& /i ....i/ f/ d r i r/ °'� �i' P 'l r r/ 1 /i%/ �j/ a,G/// /i rrrrr Consulting Services Agreement between December 16„ 21715 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc.-Exhibit D- Page 1 of 2 -28- EXHIBIT D PROVISIONS REQUIRED FOR PUBLIC WORKS CONTRACTS I. HOURS OF WORD: A. In accordance with California (Labor Cede Section 1810, eight(8) hours of I "�lh�performance of the services described in Exhibit A shall constitute a legal day's work un 3 s contract. B In accordance with California Labor Code Section 1811,the time 1,111 isc j worker employed in performance of the services described in Exhibit As1ited to ei hours during any one (1)calendar day, and forty(40) hours during any o alend week, ex 'am accordance with California Labor Code Section 1815 w rovides that work in e � f eight 8' hours during an one 1 calendar day and foirk i � �. O g y O y y (� ,�ours during any one calendar' ,is permitted upon compensation for all (hours wworked j'M cess of eigl�f�8�1 hours during any one (1) 1 ,,, calendar day and forty(40) hours during any�on fl calendar w ' t not less than one-and- calendar one-half(1 5)times the basic rate of pay.. j C. The Consultant and its subcontractoir/shall forfeit as a pen ,p the City twenty five dollars m��!„ ��!/�✓iii ($25)for each worker employed in �� �rm,ance of the se t �Described in Exhibit A for each calendar day during which the"' rke i Wired or peirm�t U p +ork more than eight('8) hours in any one (1) calendar day, or ,�/bre than „ / fr)I /ors in any one (1)calendar week, in viollation of the provisions of California U'5/, C actionL1 et seq,. i r 11, WAGES: ��%���//"i/% A. In accordar y�with Californi 11 bor Code Septlb"n 1773.2, tlhe Contractor and any subcontractors �r�ii�ii� shall pay tf,ass than then a% es for each craft or type of work needed for completion" ,t servecniedn,Ex ib"it A, as published by the State of California ,r �,on L?epartment o 1 6,,01 Relations, Division of Labor Statistics and Research. A copy of this „p, lip to �s on � *ftie City Public Works Office and shall be made available on request, B Pursuant t -rb r Code � t� ?ln 1775, Contractoir may be subject to a penalty of up to two �'/;, hundred Jolla , 0) per day for each worker engaged in the performance of the services described in Exhif it A that the Consultant or any subcontractor pays less than the specified , prevailing wage�� e Consultant or subcontractor shall) also pay the difference between the evailing wa 4E0% and the amount paid to each worker for each calendar day or portion �i of for iih each worker was paid less than the prevailing wage rate. C. Conshr shall comply with all of the following requirements: 1, contracts between the Consultant and the subcontractor for the performance of part of the services described in Exhibit A shall include a copy of the provisions of California Labor Code Sections 1771, 1775, 1776, 1777.5, 1813, and 1815. Consulting Services Agreement between December 16, 201;5 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, Inc.-Exhibit.D- Page 1 of 2 -29- 2. The Consultant shall monitor payment of the specified general prevailing rate of per diem wages by the subcontractor by periodic review of the subcontractors certified payrolll records. 3. Upon becoming aware of a subcontractor's failure to pay the specified pevailing rate of ,% wages,the Consultant shall diligently take corrective action to halt�Dify the failure, including, but not limited to, retaining sufficient funds due the s tractor for performance of the services described in Exhibit A. affidavit signed under penalty of perjury from the s h/bbhntr/ctor that the , an 4. Prior to making final payment to the subcontractor, e �nsultant shad' thin tractor g P y p J y a ' ,,% ,, has paid the specified general prevailing rate o�,a diem wages for employe „gaged in the performance of the services described 0;-Rhibt A and any amounts due ursuant to California Labor Code Section 1813 D. In accordance with California Labor Code Section 17i the Consultant and each subcontractor engaged in performance of the services described in Ex17ww ibit', shall keep accurate payroll records showing the name, address, ocial security numbers irk, straight time and overtime hours worked each day and weeka� ri th , tual per diem wage paid to each journeyman, apprentice, worker, or other employ etempfn r dpi performance"Ofthe services described in Exhibit A, Each payroll record shall c h in or be`� rff 6d, by a written declaration that it is made under penalty of perjury, stating both oh follcarg. ''” r 6 d 1. The inforrftatgon co tanned in the �Ayroll record is true and correct. Z Thrnployer has hed with the tequirements of Sections 1771, 1311, and 1815 for qywork perforr d`by,th r ,,I/qyprs,,empIoyees on the public works project.. The payroll rec fds;tequired pursuant to California Labor Code Section 1776 shall be certified , r1d h6l9 bye available fpr inspection by the City and its authorized representatives, the Division of tabor Standards Enfot einent, the Division of Apprenticeship Standards of the Department of Industrial F Motions and"A/ be available for inspection in accordance with California Labor Code Saban 1776. lk ' w ,In accordanceth California Labor Code Section 1777.5, the Consultant, on behalf of the consultant and any subcontractors engaged in performance of the services described in Exhibit A fill b, f "ponsible for ensuring compliance with California Labor Code Section 1777.5 goe employment and payment of apprentices on public works contracts, 2051690.6 Consulting Services Agreement between December 16, 2015 City of South San Francisco and Mark Thomas and Company, linc,-Exhibit D- Page 1 of 2 -30- CL 0 r,T3 0 0 o '0 2.5 a) La o Cal LN 41 ro <jr CL m 0 CL E ............. 0 z M z zin Staff DATE: December 16, 2015 TO: Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilmembers FROM: Gerald Kohlmann, Fire Chief SUBJECT: A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE AMBULANCE SERVICE FINANCIAL REPORT AND AUTHORIZING THE WRITING OFF $2,692,969 OF THE AMBULANCE BILLING ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BALANCE THAT IS UNCOLLECTIBLE DUE TO THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council accept staffs ambulance service financial report and authorizing the writing off $2,692,969 of the ambulance billing accounts receivable balance that is uncollectible due to the Statute of Limitations. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION The purpose of this Staff Report is to update the City Council on the South San Francisco Fire Department(SSFFD) advanced life support (ALS) and basic life support (BLS) ambulance service, including new financial practices. History The South San Francisco Fire Department (SSFFD) has been operating its own ambulance service since the early 1970's, and first employed paramedics in 1975. For a number of years, SSFFD operated one paramedic-level, advanced life support (ALS) ambulance to serve the community. In 1995, SSFFD added a second ALS ambulance to help serve the community's growing Emergency Medical Services (EMS) call volume. SSFFD advanced life support ambulances respond to emergency medical services calls in South San Francisco as well as other incidents in the city, such as fires. As stated above, there are now two SSFFD ALS ambulances on-duty each day. In 2005, a basic life support (BLS) ambulance was added, staffed by two contract emergency medical technicians (EMT). The BLS ambulance serves as the back-up to the ALS ambulances when they are both committed to other incidents. In this backup role, a paramedic from a SSFFD fire engine is used to transport critically ill patients to the hospital. The BLS ambulance also performs non-emergency transports as part of the EMS program operated by the City. ALS patient transports are performed by firefighters trained at the paramedic level, while BLS patient transports can be completed by either paramedic trained personnel or EMT staff. Guidelines established by Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have been widely accepted to define an EMS transport as either ALS or BLS. Among those guidelines, are; the training level of personnel responding; level of medical intervention provided to the patient; medical complaint of the patient; how the emergency response is dispatched; and other factors. An ALS ambulance can respond to an EMS call but may only be reimbursed at the BLS level; also, a Staff Report To: Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilmembers Re: Ambulance Billing Service Financial Report Date: December 16, 2015 Page 2 BLS ambulance can transport an ALS patient under certain circumstances and be reimbursed at the ALS level. Both of these billing scenarios are controlled by the services delivered to the patient. it Figure 1 ... Al,S Rescue AmWance In 1995, due to increasing EMS call volume and growing complexities with ambulance billing processes, the City Council adopted Resolution 119-95, which executed an agreement with Allied Information and Services Corporation (AIS) for ambulance claim coding and billing. Through a series of mergers and take-overs, AIS ultimately became Advanced Data Processing, Inc. (ADPI), which is the vendor that SSFFD uses today. ADPI, similar to other ambulance billing providers, does not pursue payment for aged accounts receivable. They defer to the ambulance provider, in this case SSFFD, to determine if a collection agency should pursue aged accounts. u9Wuilllllllllllh��m�mi�ummll� i 1� i rs r. Figure 2 BLS Ambulance Staff Report To: Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilmembers Re: Ambulance Billing Service Financial Report Date: December 16, 2015 Page 3 Ambulance Emergency Responses South San Francisco ambulances provide multiple functions that support the primary responsibility of providing a rapid response to emergency (9-1-1) medical incidents in South San Francisco. In addition to the 9-1-1 initiated responses within South San Francisco, our ALS ambulances will respond to 9-1-1 incidents outside of the City based upon certain protocols. The crewmembers on our ALS ambulances are considered part of our daily on-duty staffing for response to all hazard types. On a routine basis, our BLS ambulance provides inter-facility transport services to clients throughout San Mateo County. ALS ambulances leaving the City occur on a reciprocal basis with American Medical Response (AMR). This reciprocal agreement provides protection to South San Francisco to ensure that every 9-1-1 medical call receives an ambulance, whether it is a SSFFD ambulance or an AMR ambulance. This also provides additional protection to our immediate neighbors when an SSFFD ALS ambulance may be the closest life-saving resource. Table 1 provides information about 9-1-1 initiated medical responses and identifies the percentage of incidents in South San Francisco where SSFFD ambulances responded. Because our crews are dual-role Paramedic Firefighters, our ambulances also respond to other incident types, such as fires and fire alarms, so the total responses by our ambulances are greater than represented in Table 1. ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 9,,,.1,,,.1 EMS Ambulance Responses ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Year 9-1-1 Calls Out of Area Within SSF 2013 5384 331 918% 2014 5226 322 93.8% 2015'* 4503 216 952% ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ As of October 30, 2015 ......................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Financial Summary ALS: Each ALS ambulance is staffed with two Paramedic/Firefighters on each of three shifts; a total of 12 personnel, at an approximate average annual personnel cost of $2,429,307. The financial summary for ALS service in FY 14-15 is shown below in Table 2: " "�a lllh::�lllk:� 2 ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ALS ANNUAL FINANCIAL C,IAL SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... Personnel Cost $2,429,307 Supplies $259,197 Total Cost $2,688,504 Revenue $1,804,887 Annual net cost t 7 $SS , ...............................................)...... Staff Report To: Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilmembers Re: Ambulance Billing Service Financial Report Date: December 16, 2015 Page 4 BLS: The BLS ambulance is staffed with two contract EMTs, usually 12 hours per day, seven days per week. The financial summary for BLS service in FY 14-15 is shown below in Table 3: BLS ANNUAL FINANCIAL SUMMA ,Y ............................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Personnel Cost $180,919 Supplies 31 347 Total Cost $21.2266 Revenue $276,160 EMS Pro gram Offset -�$63g8 4 .................. .................................................................................................................................................................................................... Staff projects ALS operational costs will increase, while BLS has trended downward, but is projected to stabilize between FY 15-16 and FY 17-18, per Table 4: ALS AND BLS EXPENSE CHART $3.50 % per gntigni increase .... c 0 $3.00 --��-� III�UUyyyyllllDG/�ALS $2.50 .... .... � �-._..�. .... .... .... $2.00 IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII BLS $1.50 Average ALS Cost $1.00 .... .... ... .... Average BLS $0.50 Cost $_ ................... 11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 Projected Projected Projected 15-16 16-17 17-18 Staff has identified multiple potential revenue streams that may help further offset the cost of the ALS program. A combination of new revenue sources, additional revenue generated by the BLS ambulance program, and refined operations management may combine to greatly reduce the net impact on the general fund. Fire staff is actively working to find new ways to further serve the community and contribute to the fiscal health of the Emergency Medical Services Division. Staff Report To: Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilmembers Re: Ambulance Billing Service Financial Report Date: December 16, 2015 Page 5 Accounts Receivable Status The use of an outside ambulance billing company is a common practice for like-sized agencies. Billing procedures, which require a specialized knowledge of Medicare and insurance rules, make contracting-out for this specialized service a necessity. ADPI, the city's ambulance billing provider, manages each account within one of four categories: • Open—Accounts still active and being pursued by ADPI. • Frozen — Accounts with liens or on hold for further pursuit by ADPI staff. These are unpaid but have potential for payment, but await direction to return to open status or collection. • Closed — Accounts that are fully or partially paid. Some partially paid accounts may be adjusted to reflect maximum payment allowed under certain insurance coverages. ADPI staff reviews, applies appropriate adjustment, and closes the account. • Collection—Accounts with balances that ADPI is no longer pursuing, have not been sent to a third-party for collection, and are recommended for write-off approval to the City. (Hereafter referred to as aged accounts). As of October 30, 2015, SSFFD has accrued an accounts receivable balance of $7,763,032. This balance includes all ambulance billing accounts with status designations of open, closed, frozen, or collection (aged), as illustrated in Table 5, below: a.°���:Illkllll,m�^ 5 Accounts Receivable by Status Status Accounts Balance G osed 25,963 $653:* Collection (Aged) 6,694 $5,774,987 Frozen 0 $0 O en 1,326 $1,988,698 Grand Total , ,I $7,763,032 ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... *Reimbursement for bill over a ment to be made to atients. ...... .................................................................................................... ................................................................................................... Staff Report To: Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilmembers Re: Ambulance Billing Service Financial Report Date: December 16, 2015 Page 6 Table 6, below, shows a breakdown by year, along with an accounting of payments and prior year write-offs: 6 Aged Account History Year Accts. Total Payments Adjustments Prior Remaining Accounts Charges Received Write-Oft's Balance Receivable Growth 1998 4 $4,055 $0 $0 $0 $4,055 $4,055 1999 3 $3,165 $0 $0 $0 $3,165 $7,220 2000 2 $1 J32 $0 $841 $591 $0 $7,220 2002 2 $1,892 $286 $1,158 $447 $0 $7,220 2003 5 $6,079 $1,047 $4,685 $347 $0 $7,220 2004 19 $18,484 $5,470 $4,260 $6,873 $1,883 $9,103 2005 1081 $1,230,556 $666,944 $335,883 $227,729 $0 $9,103 2006 2405 $2,844,666 $1,445,727 $925,516 $473,248 $175 $9,278 2007 2378 $2,586,683 $1,234,350 $686,291 $657,313 $8,730 $18,008 2008 2518 $2,864,763 $1,413,416 $846,377 $422,771 $182,199 $200,206 2009 3306 $3,724,277 $1,695,909 $1,222,372 $52,031 $753,966 954,172 2010 3648 $4,153,309 $1,647,091 $1,372,955 $589,778 $543,486 $1,497,658 2011 3976 $5,236,885 $1,871,489 $2,004,714 $125,389 $1,235,293 $2,732,952 2012 3778 $5,886,180 $1,947,305 $2,319,404 $1,261,868 $357,602 $3,090,553 2013 3597 $5,712,352 $1,808,395 $2,136,466 $285,786 $1,481,706 $4,572,260 2014 4112 $5,923,214 $1,974,303 $2,748,764 $49,450 $1,150,696 $5,722,956 2015 3405 $5,398,132 $1,338,396 $2,017,773 $1,887 $2,040,076 $7,763,032 Total 34239 $45,596,125 $17,050,127 $16,627,458 $4,155,509 $7,763,032 $7,763,032 Staff Report To: Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilmembers Re: Ambulance Billing Service Financial Report Date: December 16, 2015 Page 7 The age of these accounts and prior write offs are more easily seen in Table 7, below: �7 IIIh:llll�^; $1,800,000 $1,600,000 $1,400,000 $1,200,000 $1,000,000 iiiiiiiiiiii Sum of Writeoff $800,000 111111111111 Sum of Balance $600,000 $400,000 $200,000 0 ..........................................................................i....... 2000 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 As noted in Table 6, previous fire chiefs have authorized $4.16 million in write-offs. However, there is still a large balance of accounts in collection status that are awaiting further action by S SFFD and Council. In the ambulance industry, it is common to have a significant difference between what is invoiced and what is realistically collectible for several reasons. This includes improper documentation or insurance disputes. For example, insurance companies will deny a claim for insufficient documentation review, failure to meet medical necessity, or lack of patient signatures. These are items that SSFFD staff has taken steps to improve in the past year. Additionally, a large portion of the accounts receivable are attributed to "self-pay" patients who do not have insurance or the means to pay. Staff Report To: Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilmembers Re: Ambulance Billing Service Financial Report Date: December 16, 2015 Page 8 Write-off Policy The billing process starts when ADPI creates an account based upon the Fire Department's submittal of an electronic patient care report. ADPI validates the patient, payer, and insurance information. ADPI then makes three attempts by mail, with 30 day intervals, to secure payment from SSFFD customers. Each payment made by a unique payer extends the billing cycle by an additional 90 days. If no initial or further payment is received, the account is reclassified from open to aged status after 90 days. SSFFD has been very conservative with regard to the handling of aged ambulance accounts and has opted not to refer patients to a third-party collection agency. This practice has been at the discretion of past fire chiefs. The City does not have an ambulance billing write-off policy at this time. Moving forward, staff is taking the following steps to resolve past issues and set a transparent, accountable methodology for tracking accounts receivable in the future: • Request Council formally write off all accounts aged four or more years. Because of statute of limitations, no open account older than four years would be eligible for pursuing for collections. Aged accounts between 2004 and 2011 total $2,692,969. • Contact all customers with accounts aged 90 days to four years old in another effort to collect the remaining balance. The amount in this category is $3,082,018. • Retain a new third-party agent to handle invoicing and collections for accounts aged less than 90 days, and new accounts. • Going forward the third-party agent will pursue collection for 12 months, not just 90 days, before returning accounts to South San Francisco for write-off. • A list of uncollectable accounts, without private health information, slated for write-off will be provided to the Fire Chief for review, and the Finance Director for approval, and then sent to Council at least quarterly for Council approval of any accounts written off as uncollectable. • The write-off determination does not constitute forgiveness of the debt if at a future date payment is received by the billing company or collection agency. • On a quarterly basis, the Finance Director will update the City's financial system to reflect accounts receivable and write-off amounts, ensuring transparency and greater accountability. Collection Agent One question is yet unanswered and guidance is sought: Should South San Francisco refer non- paying accounts to a third party collection agency, a more aggressive collection effort? Such agencies typically collect an additional 4-6% of the aged accounts. As noted, accounts aged 90 days to four years old currently total $3,082,018. With a collection agent South San Francisco may collect approximately $150,000 in additional payments. Staff Report To: Mayor, Vice Mayor and Councilmembers Re: Ambulance Billing Service Financial Report Date: December 16, 2015 Page 9 Budget Subcommittee Review The Budget Subcommittee reviewed the financial report on December 9, 2015. The subcommittee recommended advancing these points for Council consideration: • Write-off accounts four years or older totaling $2,692,969 (2004-2011). • Direct the existing billing provider to pursue payment of the remaining $3,082,018 in aged accounts one last time through a non-aggressive collection method without taking action against the patient should payment not be received. • All accounts 24 months or older should be brought before the City Council for consideration of write off on a quarterly basis. This would ensure that all accounts are pursued for no less than 24 i-nonths allowing for insurance, such as Medicare, to process payment and also allow staff to maintain a more manageable accounts receivable dollar amount. CONCLUSION It is recommended that the City Council adopt the attached resolution accepting staff's ambulance service financial report and authorizing the writing off$2,692,969 of the ambulance billing accounts receivable balance that is uncollcetible due to the Statute of Limitations. By: Approved- Gerald Kohlmann i e Futrell Manager Fire Chief City Manager GK:rw/bla Attachments: Resolution Exhibit A: List of write off accounts RESOLUTION NO CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE AMBULANCE SERVICE FINANCIAL REPORT AND AUTHORIZING THE WRITING OFF OF $2,692,969 OF THE AMBULANCE BILLING ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE BALANCE THAT IS UNCOLLECTIBLE DUE TO THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS WHEREAS, the South San Francisco Fire Department (SSFFD) has been operating its own ambulance service since the early 1970's, and first employed paramedics in 1975; and WHEREAS, beginning in 1995, the SSFFD added a second advanced life support (ALS) ambulance in order to serve the community's growing Emergency Medical Services (EMS) call volume; and WHEREAS, in 2005, a basic life support (BLS) ambulance was added, staffed by two contract emergency medical technicians (EMT), which serves as the back-up to the ALS ambulances when they are both committed to other incidents and also performs non-emergency transports as part of the EMS program operated by the City of South San Francisco (City), and WHEREAS, guidelines established by Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) have been widely accepted to define an EMS transport as either ALS or BLS; and WHEREAS, those guidelines include the training level of personnel responding; level of medical intervention provided to the patient; medical complaint of the patient; how the emergency response is dispatched; and other factors; and WHEREAS, ALS ambulance can respond to an EMS call but may only be reimbursed at the BLS level; and WHEREAS, a BLS ambulance can transport an ALS patient under certain circumstances and be reimbursed at the ALS level; and WHEREAS, the City's Budget Subcommittee reviewed the current EMS financial report on December 9, 2015; and WHEREAS, the City's Budget Subcommittee recommended that the City Council write- off accounts four years or older totaling $2,692,969 (2004-2011) due to an inability to successfully collect on those amounts because of statute of limitations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby approves the write-off accounts four years or older totaling $2,692,969 (2004-2011) due to an inability to successfully collect on those amounts, as detailed in Exhibit A, attached to this resolution and incorporated herein. 1 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT, by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager, or his designee, to take any action consistent with the intent of this resolution. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a special meeting held on the 16th day of December, 2015 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk EXHIBIT A WRITE OFF ACCOUNTS Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 849198 1,214M 50M G.yG.y 850610 430.04 332.34 123.00 5126 8 47&03 330M 03.2.1 33 332 1,374.14 1114580 1,226M 1134597 270.30 626.19 300.00 1136692 277.31 37736 300.00 1163510 276.64 623.23 300.00 1182463 600.G.yG.y 300.00 2.72..2.1 1271732 270.30 676.19 300.00 1272714 27&64 64&23 300.00 127279 1 1,333.03 127346 8 47&05 45145 25.00 137 6347 723.00 330.07 14122447 2.72..2.1 300.00 600.00 1422330 415. 8 330.36 115.33 14222441 27030 616A9 300.00 1424371 370.37 301.21 123.00 1441884 1,03f».3 8 30.G.yG.y 1463106 x,24 .45 1492714 1,0224A2 30.G.yG.y 1402740 37 .33 173.00 1330433 464A4 71231 12.3.00 1330400 073. 0 (7.33) 43.04 1540525 1,304.31 144.04 1545962 300.00 498.16 1343066 074.x.2 100.00 134 6037 1,214.37 30.00 154605 8 52.6.70 5610 8 50.G.yG.y 134 6213 1,204.37 1546265 500.224 31738 16196 347268 458.21 330.03 123.00 1547358 1,12116 100.00 946.58 100.00 1548606 76424 22&56 1343732 270.37 676.2 1 300.00 1582751 32037 47&21 30.G.yG.y 1332023 420.E6 396.37 119.2 1383040 1,0115 8 73.G.yG.y 1333070 1,073.16 30.00 1587475 27330 68&08 300.00 Page 1 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilalllu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�llu�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllllll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 1337343 $ 513.95 $ 433.34 $ 30.00 1587654 $ 1,17f».3 $ - $ 160.G7G7 1337 663 $ 330.34 $ 312.11 $ 30.00 1337703 $ 270.37 $ 376.2 $ 300.00 1587736 $ 18234 $ 43006 $ 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 1588471 $ 1,342.64 $ $ 100.00 1643650 $ 270 37 $ 67&21 $ MOM 1643788 $ 1,083.16 $ $ 100.00 1643796 $ 103. . $ 303.42 $ MOM 643707 $ 334.30 $ $ 100.00 1643834 $ 10G7. O $ 10G7. O $ 90043 1643033 $ 410.66 $ 346.34 $ 114.08 1644420 $ 27037 $ 61(».21 $ MOM 1646478 $ 761.58 $ $ 300.00 1686860 $ 45&21 $ 630.03 $ 123.G7G7 687343 $ 424.33 $ 322.32 $ 117.93 1687978 $ 1,122.33 $ - $ 43G7.f»3 1688009 $ 270.37 $ 576.21 $ 300.00 1688033 $ 27037 $ 67&21 $ 3G.7G.7.G.7G.7 1688081 $ 513.95 $ 464.34 $ 30.00 1688086 $ 32630 $ 628 $ 30.G7G7 1724365 5 $ 1,103.79 $ $ 73.00 1724463 $ 27037 $ 78&21 $ MG.7.G.7G.7 1724473 $ 263.03 $ 724.34 $ 300.00 724723 $ 276.70 $ 333.08 $ 300.00 1724735 $ 1,17839 $ - $ 75.G7G7 1725243 $ 270.37 $ 646.21 $ 300.00 1723270 $ 27037 $ 778.42 $ 3G.7G.7.G.7G.7 1773596 $ 1,349.12 $ $ 30.00 773743 $ 017.03 $ $ 437.70 1773762 $ 270.37 $ 376.2 $ 300.00 1773783 $ 264.87 $ 36142 $ 3G.7G.7.G.7G.7 1773794 $ 730.37 $ $ 300.33 1773820 $ 1,09430 $ - $ 30.G7G7 1773929 $ 270.37 $ 3 66.2 $ 300.00 1773930 $ 27037 $ 32021 $ 3G.7G.7.G.7G.7 1773939 $ 1,139.12 $ $ 150.00 Page 2 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiaildiai(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(ai�lliiai�ll����llulll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ailluaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiailllllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 17970787 8907.26 1,350A7 12.3.0707 1797092 92 x,1901.1 1 20701.0701 1797114 1,5407A l 507.0707 1797116 X32.34 3307.46 30701.0701 1797128 27639 63&08 30707.0707 7172072 333.23 30.001 1797210 270737 720».21 30707.0707 182180701 386.79 568.073 190.00 184073073 47 ..073 66169 12.3.0707 13407323 3001.001 646.21 270.37 18407336 33734 430A6 12.3.0707 13407399 276.79 363.073 3001.001 184073073 43 .2.1 499.93 12.3.0707 1340 637 1,07014.74 50.001 1879284 27037 57&21 .:>0707.0707 13794073 132.34 3307.46 3001.001 1879448 - $ 1,0770».2.07 1373773 188.76 437.34 3001.001 1879842. 182.34 4307. 6 30.70.7.0.70.7 1879920 1,13 6.33 50.001 1928602 1,363.16 507.0707 1928613 327.47 627.97 73.001 192.8882. 1,0780».38 30.0.70.7 1929065 65 43 .73 313.08 125.00 1930060 931807 30.0.70.7 19307293 1,134.37 1207.0701 1942.937 464.63 607 ..82 12.5.0707 1942969 1,3079.43 1942.988 2.63.95 67434 .:>0707.0707 194307601 4707.66 4 66.54 117.67 19430799 2.63.93 28934 30.70.7.0.70.7 1943121 32 6.43 10701.0701 19432.072. 1,21261 32.0.70.7 2004193 32 6.707 50.001 207073843 463.33 31f».34 12.3.0707 2005865 432.13 437.69 123.0701 207073899 4644 507 47337 12.3.0707 207017339 1,234.37 2007392 175.0707 2070174072 1,461.19 207077413 507734 807832 12.3.84 Page 3 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilalllu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�llu�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllllll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 2007430 $ 125.00 2007435 $ 125.G7G7 2007443 $ 1,234.37 2007468 $ 452.x.3 $ 537.69 $ 125.G7G7 2007494 $ $ $ 1,07 6.58 2007517 $ - $ - $ 1,234.37 2007521 $ 270.37 $ 706.2 $ 300.00 2007558 $ - $ - $ 1,15632 20075 60 $ $ $ 1,234.37 2007566 $ 47663 $ 590.G72. $ 125.G7G7 2007573 $ 475.90 $ 658.23 $ 113.93 2007573 $ 1,184.37 $ - $ 50.G7G7 2007744 $ - $ - $ 1,03116 2007749 $ $ $ 1,033.16 2007772 $ 27639 $ 618M $ MOM 2007790 $ 329.74 $ $ 330.00 2007393 $ 1,233.03 $ $ 105.00 2007903 $ 430.53 $ 65150 $ 125.G7G7 2007913 $ 1,018.40 $ $ 50.00 2024106 $ - $ - $ 1,13f».53 2024149 $ $ $ 1,040.60 2024154 $ - $ - $ 1,02630 2024162 $ 1,014.61 $ $ 35.00 2024311 $ - $ - $ 1,06&20 2024343 $ 270.37 $ 576.2 $ 300.00 2024394 $ - $ - $ 96103 2024450 $ $ $ 02 6.70 2024469 $ - $ - $ 1,03116 2024518 $ $ $ 1,241.45 2024575 $ $ $ 1,234.37 2024580 $ - $ - $ 1,32632 2024586 $ 431.03 $ 611.76.76 $ 125.00 2027004 $ - $ - $ 1,02434 2027003 $ 1,223.70 $ $ 50.00 2028 717 $ $ $ 1,233.20 2028034 $ - $ - $ 1,104.37 2023054 $ $ $ 1,030.37 Page 4 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 2028134 489.53 653.50 125.G.yG.y 2041246 1,198.29 2041254 27037 f»06y 2.1 MOM G.yG.y 204127 6 1,343.79 2041282 1,36290 2041299 175.92 511.93 300.00 2041313 1,234.87 204141 1 1,271.45 2041682 18836 43T94 MOM 204180 1 339.63 426.31 150.00 2065736 1,22034 2065742 1,200.74 2065759 1,41L19 2065763 101.00 695.53 300.00 2065770 10LG.O 605.5 8 MOM 2065772 1,036.53 2065802 1,20L10 75.G.yG.y 2065306 270.37 426.21 300.00 2067099 1,369A5 206720 1,069.37 2067153 1,32830 206759 170.37 526.2 1 300.00 2067171 1,23934 206748 1 1,004.37 150.00 206750 8 270 37 52&21 MOM 2067529 1,218.46 50.00 2067543 1,31145 2067546 170.37 50 .2 1 300.00 2067555 1,07665 50.G.yG.y 20675 63 170.37 361.2 1 300.00 2068134 27037 46 L 2.1 MOM G.yG.y 2068195 1,159.74 110.00 2068205 87630 2068212 270.37 461.21 300.00 2068225 27037 62&21 MOM G.yG.y 206823 1 1,203.46 2068273 1,31290 2100981 1,319.45 50.00 2101049 948A6 2101055 170..3 7 461.21 300.00 2101060 1,09439 Page 5 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 2101122 $ 1,13 6.33 2101192 $ - 1,26639 201196 $ 473.90 $ 608.13 $ 118.93 2101205 $ - $ - $ 1,02129 5 $ 1,166.06 $ ... $ 5 2101230 $ - $ - $ 1,26x..43 2132311 $ $ $ 1,149.12 2132326 $ - $ - $ 1,044A6 2132328 $ $ $ 1,354.61 2132344 $ 27037 $ 426.21 $ 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 2132905 $ 63116 $ - $ 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 2132928 $ $ $ 1,133.16 2133110 $ $ $ 3'7 6.'70 2133128 $ 1,074A2 $ - $ 73.G.yG.y 1133111 $ 1,169.37 $ $ 73.00 2133219 $ - $ - $ 1,0546 67 2133241 $ $ $ 1,1&'9.74 2133246 $ - $ - $ 1,39037 2133263 $ $ $ 933.90 2133271 $ 27630 $ 636.G.y6 $ MOM 2133278 $ $ $ x,09 .45 2133264 $ - $ - $ 1,214. 87 136763 $ $ $ 343.00 2136773 $ - $ - $ 1,300. 3 2136779 $ $ $ x,25 .45 2136801 $ - $ - $ 986A5 2136667 $ - $ - $ 1,00L56 2136906 $ $ $ 376.70 2136023 $ - $ - $ 1,30108 2136007 $ - $ - $ 1,204.61 2139490 $ $ $ 1,316.10 2161301 $ 1,20L45 $ - $ 50M 1161303 $ $ $ 1,169.74 2161306 $ 026. 3 $ - $ 266.G.yG.y 1161314 $ $ $ 1,074.37 2161319 $ - $ - $ 1,106.66 1161330 $ $ $ 926.43 Page 6 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiaildiai(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(ai�lliiai�ll����llulll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ailluaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiailllllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 2161337 1,17f».3 2161340 333.34 98.19 2161349 1,23 ..43 2163 661 390.37 339.007 2163695 1,14 ..3 8 73.G7G7 163704 1,17 6.33 2163723 33 ..43 710.G72. 30.G7G7 2163729 473.30 373.23 118.33 2163736 1,13f».3 2163747 1,096.33 2163763 1,426A3 1163810 1,059.74 30.00 2163817 850A2 21261 2163864 63364 0 70.60 2163971 1,44L10 2164005 331.80 2164025 1,686A5 164030 1,226.31 2164033 79&90 30.G7G7 2164033 1,115.06 191.26 2100837 HMO 1100333 996.33 100.00 2100028 1,37004 2199961 1,349.12 2200040 1,17116 120020 1,133.70 2200612 762M 10MO 2.204 669 133.73 370.73 300.00 2204695 469M 3 7 .2.8 123.G7G7 1117630 1,169.45 2227643 87630 1117724 1,133.16 2227767 1,21&58 1140120 465.41 34.30 116.36 2240234 1,32038 2249271 1,03 6.33 2240283 1,54 . 10 1140133 1,2 4.37 2240318 1,25545 114030 1,01 6.33 2240322 1,114.87 Page 7 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 2249336 $ 883.87 2249339 $ 1,03180 $ 30.G7G7 2268817 $ 1,359.12 $ 307.0707 2268870 $ 1,25L45 $ 10G7. O 2268891 $ $ 1,07073.807 2269465 $ - $ 93230 2274857 $ - $ 1,15L45 11748607 $ 991.43 $ 10707.0707 2274879 $ - $ 1,344.61 2274931 $ $ 9078.16 2274934 $ 930».38 $ 2.G7G7.G7G7 1183374 $ $ 1,13 6.38 2285385 $ - $ 978.29 1183389 $ $ 1,124.46 2285400 $ - $ 1,289A2 2285420�4107 $ 697.36 2283437 $ - $ 1,04446 2283441 $ $ 1,188.79 2285447 $ - $ 1,01T90 2283431 $ $ 1,4107.1 x 2285471 $ 475.90 $ 538.28 $ 11&98 2285481 $ 389.33 $ 613.307 $ 13.0707 2304407 $ - $ - $ 1,00339 130744079 $ $ $ 1,191.907 2308233 $ 48638 $ 60136 $ 12L60 2308262 $ $ $ 1,326.31 2308287 $ 26195 $ 49434 $ 30.70.7.0.70.7 1308305 $ $ $ 1,0771.38 2308323 $ 830».58 $ - $ 75.G7G7 13078366 $ 465.41 $ 314.807 $ 116.36 2308386 $ 68433 $ - $ 187.23 2317477 $ $ $ 1,196.38 2317484 $ - $ - $ 1,23116 2317509 $ $ $ 1,07073.79 2317518 $ - $ - $ 1,35435 1317337 $ $ $ 1,0789.87 13173 66 $ $ $ 1,069.74 2317571 $ $ $ 934.507 2317574 $ $ $ 1,1078.46 Page 8 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 2317604 1,52632 2317613 1,014.37 2.333016 3055 56 529. 4 4M6 13333907 418.60 541.54 104.65 2339898 486A4 965A1 12x. 61 1337477 1,3&'8.03 2337493 99&5 1337343 1,149.12 30.09 2337550 1,02443 1337563 1,169.74 2337603 1,33737 1337 610 1,319.73 2337627 1,12446 133767 6 343.90 2337701 1,12839 2345306 918.40 2345426 99T64 1343443 1,015.70 2345451 57630 MOM 1343433 1,124.13 2360000 10LOO 745Al MOM 1366516 1,073.16 2366546 1,13116 1366534 903.29 73.00 2366574 1,09 ..49 1366573 1,613.19 2366604 1,00339 1366617 1,136.58 2366646 98450 13&°.YE::Y655 1,214.37 2366671 47&67 64420 129.G7G7 13 66673 33 6.33 300.00 2366699 1,269. 9 13 69791 1,100.94 2369805 85533 2369813 333.33 2369852 1,12443 1379370 372.93 63.69 223.23 2393397 1,309. 9 1393413 1,189.78 2393462 1,03116 Page 9 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 13034 64 $ 1,370.73 2303437 $ 33f».53 $ 150.00 1303530 $ $ 1,310.73 2303012 $ - $ 1,16552 1304071 $ 1,093.06 $ 173.26 2394088 $ - $ 1,17116 1.304100 $ 430.05 $ 637.04 $ 110.13 2394102 $ - $ - $ 1,164.37 2304107 $ $ $ 1,069.74 2394116 $ - $ - $ 00f».53 2394136 $ $ $ 1,051.45 2408297 $ - $ - $ 05f».03 1403354 $ $ $ 1,1&'9.45 2408404 $ - $ - $ 1,23L19 2403410 $ 1,023.20 $ $ 150.00 2408429 $ - $ - $ 1,10f».53 1403444 $ 170.37 $ 5 66.21 $ 300.00 2408480 $ - $ - $ 1,41037 1403435 $ 1,045.03 $ $ 133.35 2408490 $ - $ - $ 1,040.37 1403404 $ $ $ 1,450.44 2408514 $ - $ - $ 1,135.45 1403515 $ 13.3.11 $ 530.05 $ 300.00 2408531 $ - $ - $ 1,154.87 1403543 $ $ $ 969.37 2441344 $ - $ - $ 1,19&20 1441333 $ $ $ 1,485.56 2446275 $ - $ - $ 97&29 2446279 $ $ $ 1,014.37 2446304 $ - $ - $ 1,00 ..45 1446311 $ 510.70 $ 726.70 $ 300.00 2446325 $ - $ - $ 1,420.1 . 1446336 $ $ $ 1,169.74 2446350 $ - $ - $ 1,11&20 144 6373 $ 1,440.03 $ $ 50.00 2446381 $ - $ - $ 1,21033 144 6337 $ $ $ 1,330.73 2446412 $ - $ - $ 1,154.87 144 6425 $ $ $ 1,130.45 2446429 $ - $ - $ 1,210.1 . 1446462 $ $ $ 876.70 Page 10 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 2.446463 1,1074.13 14464707 993.43 351.63 2446476 1,0734.87 2446473 1,069.74 2446506 1,211.43 1433113 431.34 621.46 307.0701 2433273 8407.f»07 307.0707 24376807 347.21 323.17 133.74 2457682 1,23 ..43 1437688 x,21 x.33 247070789 862M 24707121 32 6.707 30.001 2470183 1,0790».38 2470195 170.37 3 66.2 1 3001.001 2.47072.13 1,631.38 14707139 1,105.44 24707286 1,207934 14707193 1,069.74 2470306 1,4107Al 1470739 1,174.37 24707323 99&5 1470314 1,2 4.37 2483437 HMO 1433443 101.0701 773.33 3001.001 2483451 862. 07 1433468 926.45 2489148 1,15L45 10707.0707 2489158 1,293.16 2489196 27639 578M .:>0707.0707 14391074 1,085.12 2489875 8 .2..56 2.073.14 2490. 192 x,19 .43 2496197 99&5 2496213 908.16 2496488 92M7 2496618 1,136.58 2496732 1,19943 1497796 x,19 .43 2497945 1,321.43 14930734 270.37 633.41 3001.001 2498306 1,07071.807 Page 11 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 2403300 $ 330.37 2403324 $ 1,33033 1403316 $ 1,100.74 2403335 $ 1,25f».53 1504363 $ 768.03 $ 101.01 2504390 $ 52037 $ 42&21 $ 50.G7G7 2513743 $ $ $ 373.00 2513730 $ 033.G73 $ - $ 100.00 2518813 $ 270.37 $ 5 66.2 $ 300.00 2518816 $ $ $ 1,133.03 2513325 $ - $ - $ 1,20L19 2518840 $ $ $ 1,128.79 2513353 $ - $ - $ 02M0 2513355 $ $ $ 343.00 2526513 $ - $ - $ 1,32632 2526544 $ $ $ 1,174.43 2526557 $ - $ - $ 1,00430 2526558 $ $ $ 969.37 2526564 $ - $ - $ 1,014.37 2526573 $ $ $ 1,269.74 2532030 $ - $ - $ 1,407.00 1532003 $ $ $ 1,138.29 2533002 $ - $ - $ 1,20034 1533007 $ 1,140.77 $ $ 50.00 2533015 $ - $ - $ 1,340.x.2 1537355 $ $ $ 030.37 2537364 $ - $ - $ 1,054.37 1537368 $ 530.01 $ 53 6.53 $ 15.00 2563080 $ - $ - $ 1,309A5 2563033 $ $ $ 962.30 2563086 $ - $ - $ 37630 15 63101 $ $ $ 1,200.77 2563124 $ - $ - $ 1,154.37 15 63137 $ $ $ 1,203.70 2567080 $ - $ - $ 1,024.12 2567086 $ $ $ x,25 .45 2567099 6 2567113 $ 424.50 $ - $ 345.15 2585965 $ $ $ 1,356.31 Page 12 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 2383982 1,23438 73.G.yG.y 2333933 1,158.16 73.00 2585992 1,26934 233 6022 1,113.03 25860224 1,33116 2586049 x,(76 .33 73.00 2586081 91487 10MO 133 6036 1,094.37 2389379 1,114.87 2599515 1,033.16 2599569 1,014.87 1399376 176.79 638.08 300.00 2605126 1,280.12 2605129 1,244.12 2605135 1,17&29 260515 1 1,306.43 2605153 1,214.87 2605154 1,051.45 260 5162 1,114.87 160563 1,073.16 2605168 87630 160533 1,169.74 2605186 94116 75M 1&°05193 376.70 2608058 1,20934 2603063 1,118.10 260809 8 1,36290 2610946 921.58 73.00 2610954 1,634.x.3 150M 2610971 1,149.12 2610975 1,19&58 161098 1 1,155.73 2611001 1,38830 2611005 1,313.46 261103 8 1,03L43 2611052 073.20 2611072 3 x.3.31 76930 MOM G.yG.y 2611076 1,003.79 2611106 1,268M 161111 1 1,154.37 2611195 1,29461 Page 13 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 2611576 $ 1,210.11 2621159 $ 84&95 419.14 2621171 $ 1,103.43 2621181 $ 424A0 $ 38&28 $ 106.G72. 2650551 1 $ 793.90 $ $ 30.00 2650555 $ 1,00&20 $ - $ 50.G7G7 2650330 $ $ $ 906.70 2650584 $ - $ - $ 1,16034 2650631 $ 103.66 $ ( 03.66) $ x,49 .43 2650644 $ - $ - $ 1,282 90 2650678 $ $ $ 1,146.31 2650680 $ 27037 $ 738.42 $ 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 2650727 $ $ $ 1,733.16 2650765 $ - $ - $ 1,344.61 2650774 $ 80231 $ - $ 330.14 2650797 $ $ $ 1,356.31 2650882 $ - $ - $ 1,43004 1 630304 $ $ $ 1,174.37 2650904 $ - $ - $ 1,28038 2650906 $ $ $ 1,033.03 2650912 $ 33263 $ 1,06L83 $ 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 2650916 $ $ $ 1,300.43 2650960 $ $ $ 1,2 4.37 2 632337 $ $ $ 330.37 2652851 $ - $ - $ 1,06934 2652880 $ 670.12 $ - $ 1693 1 631304 $ 737.03 $ $ 291.26 2653208 $ $ $ 1,350.11 2653212 $ - $ - $ 1,572.42 165317 $ $ $ 1,033.16 2653222 $ - $ - $ 1,23632 2653225 $ $ $ x,19 .43 2653233 $ 27639 $ 438M $ MG.7.G.7G.7 2653243 $ $ $ 1,423.80 2653260 $ - $ - $ 1,044A6 1 633303 $ $ $ 1,139.03 Page 14 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 2655901 195.13 549.23 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 270070 1,133.16 2700717 1,03130 2700734 1,269.74 2700736 1,134.37 2700737 1,253.16 2700749 1,35290 2700759 1,430.44 2700763 1,22934 27007 63 1,154.37 2700771 1,24632 270078 1 1,139.12 2700733 1,033.G.y3 2700793 1,333.03 2700803 52339 640M 2700847 1,119.73 2700851 1,19x..45 170013 64 1,439.73 2700889 1,2.6 0A l 50M G.1G.1 17000393 1,243.46 2.700895 71032 499.42 2713993 424. 0 413.23 106.02 2714000 1,127.64 2714003 1,044.46 2714014 904.50 2715041 1,1 4.37 2.7152.02. 503.43 72.0.79 127A0 275319 1,449.12 2715997 - - 1,40933 1716305 1,309.45 2716547 1,19945 2716549 1,169.45 2716557 1,19&53 1716657 1,191.45 2716674 1,531.53 1716697 1,333.03 2.716703 97109 43TO2 1716709 1,209.74 2716710 1,15116 271 6712 790.14 437.3 1 2716720 - $ - 1,09116 Page 15 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 2716725 $ 1,051.45 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 2716803 $ 1,34126 1716823 $ 333.19 2716336 $ 27037 $ 626.21 $ MOM 1716840 $ $ $ 913.29 2716907 $ - $ - $ 1,2.400 l 176957 $ 1,066.58 $ $ 106.06 2716077 $ - $ - $ 074.G7G7 2727910 $ $ $ 1,160.13 2727024 $ 26106 $ 40434 $ MG.y.G.yG.y 1717015 $ $ $ 1,129.74 2727030 $ 636.63 $ 304.00 $ 162..67 1717004 $ $ $ 1,130.44 2727006 $ - $ - $ 1,014.37 1713007 $ $ $ 1,154.37 2723011 $ - $ - $ 1,154.87 2728013 $ $ $ 1,1 4.37 2728031 $ 436.44 $ 666.11 $ 12261 1713040 $ $ $ 1,2 4.37 2728046 $ 90886 $ - $ 266.G7G7 1733770 $ $ $ 1,551.00 2734102 $ 1,08886 $ - $ 60.G7G7 1734701 $ 170.37 $ 426.21 $ 300.00 2734703 $ - $ - $ 1,05245 1734700 $ $ $ 1,300.43 2734710 $ - $ - $ 1,036.63 2734719 $ $ $ 1,003.10 2734740 $ 77190 $ - $ 75.G7G7 2734756 $ x,15 .45 $ $ 100.00 2734757 $ - $ - $ 1,10934 1741053 $ $ $ 1,361.93 2764904 $ - $ - $ 026.45 1764912 $ $ $ 862.30 2764016 $ - $ - $ 330.37 1764932 $ $ $ 376.70 2764077 $ - $ - $ 1,30886 1764030 $ 1,016.74 $ $ 254.19 2764033 $ - $ - $ 1,014.37 1764986 $ $ $ 862.30 2764030 $ - $ - $ 1,09&53 17 64004 $ $ $ 1,118.10 Page 16 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 27650709 1,3307Al 2765421 1,246.31 27707377 1,0735.1 . 27707332 2073.077 557.53 125.0707 27707933 1,0715307 27707946 4073.33 919.73 70707.96 27707939 10707.0707 95&53 2771013 0713 9 73.29 2771017 93147 27710727 7,4072.907 2776784 - - 1,299A5 177 67907 1,3073.79 2776794 1,154.87 2776809 9 1,154.37 2777345 - - 1,249. 5 2777347 1,0773.16 2777861 1,309A5 2739639 1,0714.37 2739668 942.307 27397071 1,0751.53 2.792.333 133.76 63537 30707.0707 2792357 103.02 5107.33 30707.0707 2792879 1,268M 279292 6 1,268.79 2792929 1,072.3.16 2792933 1,119.45 507.0707 2792937 1,1074.37 507.0707 27931107 913.407 2793392 1,0754307 117.15 27934707 1,0714.37 2793636 1,31737 2798655 1,313.073 2798653 1,0779.12 2.0707.0707 13007.369 1,126.53 230707374 1,13933 1307962 1,2607.23 23107396 1,45435 231079107 996.53 2319366 1,521.107 23194073 1,073 6.58 2319424 1,0754.37 Page 17 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 2819452 $ 1,31 6.10 2838066 $ 1,154.87 1838071 $ 1,105.45 2862370 $ 018A0 2862387 $ 871.38 2862395 $ 058.22 $ 230.55 2862402 $ $ 876.70 2862407 $ 28121 $ 320.03 $ MOM 2862425 $ 283.21 $ 461.24 $ 300.00 2862443 $ - $ - $ 078.20 1861446 $ 473.43 $ 601.17 $ 118.86 2862493 $ 407.44 $ 387.03 $ 12.4.33 2862507 $ $ $ 1,268.70 2861338 $ $ $ 1,330.48 2862576 $ - $ - $ 1,214.87 2862584 $ $ $ 1,096.38 2862602 $ 03116 $ - $ 238.20 1862611 $ $ $ 876.70 2862614 $ - $ - $ 1,04M7 1861625 $ $ $ 1,183.79 2862633 $ - $ - $ 1,631.38 2862703 $ 1,1 78.70 $ $ 30.00 2862740 $ - $ - $ 1,154.87 2862838 $ $ $ 1,196.58 2863210 $ - $ - $ 040.87 2863117 $ 659.10 $ $ 480.83 2864226 $ - $ - $ 078.20 2864286 $ 270.37 $ 566.21 $ 300.00 2864322 $ 27037 $ 658A2 $ 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 2881990 $ 351.00 $ 714.78 $ 30.00 2881000 $ - $ - $ 07630 1881004 $ 1,005.15 $ $ 486.28 2905274 $ - $ - $ 1,06934 1048383 $ 1,313.80 $ $ 100.00 2048506 $ 1,16934 $ - $ 10G.y.G.O 2949381 $ 1,014.79 $ $ 30.00 2040301 $ - $ - $ 1,024.13 1040307 $ $ $ x,19 .45 2949406 $ - $ - $ 1,26830 2949407 $ 1,114.87 $ $ 160.00 Page 18 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 2.94942.1 634A9 69L83 1949443 1,194.37 2949489 1,22839 1949499 971.58 2949533 1,37235 1949333 1,280.11 2949565 1,24632 2949571 1,1 69.43 2949581 1,274.87 2949336 1,560.77 2949988 58109 989.11 29.G.yG.y 1949391 1,133.16 2949611 1,27632 2949620 1,069.74 2993488 41&60 64L94 1044 65 1933330 1,154.87 2953557 18836 497.94 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 2953571 1,01 6.45 2972457 26195 5 74.34 MOM G.yG.y 2972461 343.90 297246 8 97&29 1971303 1,613.29 2972538 1,20839 1971331 1,253.16 2972564 835.56 47189 1971370 1,214.37 2972596 892M 1971399 x,05 .45 29722602 1,32839 2972635 1,106.32 2972647 1,074.9 8 10G.7.G.O 2972660 29722674 1,114.87 2972676 862.66 ,7 141.14 2972716 997.19 9T6 2972721 1,149.12 2972745 85129 19717 63 1,100.00 113.4 2972805 1,17116 1971846 402.11 601.16 109.33 2991327 94&20 Page 19 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 2001402 $ 7 63.40 $ 150.00 2001430 $ - $ 1,044A6 2991507 $ 1,107.13 $ 17 6.73 2992702 $ - $ 1,154.87 1001743 $ 1,164.87 $ 50.00 2992764 $ 1,105.44 $ 265M 2992771 $ $ 1,300.45 2002321 $ - $ 1,36992 1001315 $ $ 1,173.16 2002341 $ - $ 1,01530 1001373 $ $ 1,113.03 2002331 $ 460A3 $ 61160 $ 135.00 1001336 $ $ $ 1,100.74 2002902 $ - $ - $ 03147 1001016 $ $ $ 010.60 2002032 $ - $ - $ 1,13433 2992941 $ $ $ 871.58 2002050 $ 436.44 $ 425Al $ 12x. 61 1001006 $ $ $ 1,369.45 2003020 $ 364.37 $ - $ 150.00 1003014 $ $ $ 1,03 6.58 2003028 $ - $ - $ 1,134.87 1003010 $ $ $ 1,014.37 2003105 $ 530.3 . $ 60111 $ 13.2.4 1003115 $ $ $ 1,1 4.37 2003120 $ 132.34 $ 330A6 $ 300.00 2993139 $ $ $ 1,014.37 2003140 $ - $ - $ 1,533.G.y3 2993162 2 $ $ $ 1,2 4.37 2003173 $ - $ - $ 1,214.37 2993185 $ $ $ 1,069.74 2003102 $ 59630 $ 53/.05 $ 25.00 1003153 $ $ $ 1,158.29 2003235 $ - $ - $ 343.00 2003204 $ $ $ 300.60 2003200 $ - $ - $ 35120 1003303 $ $ 470.11 $ 603.05 2003307 $ 1,00330 $ - $ 265M 2993318 $ $ $ 1,196.58 2003324 $ - $ - $ 004.50 1003333 $ $ $ 1,043.50 Page 20 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 2993333 1,130».3 2993341 1,0794.79 2993353 1,0714.87 1993337 1,26 9.74 2993367 1,0785.12 199337 6 1,269.74 29936207 1,11&5 1.333 633 333.21 333.33 30.001 29990768 862. 07 13330173 862.307 2999138 1,2.307.x.l 10707.0707 307013331 x,25 .43 3037645 — — 1,168.79 3037654 4307.93 433.69 1107.13 30737638 486A4 323.1x. 12x. 61 3037670 x,07x.4.3 7 3037683 — — 1,1075.45 30377071 1,008.1 0.'..Y 30737714 1,154.87 30737719 393.19 3037757 876307 30737739 1,173.16 3037761 1,306A3 30737771 1,434.33 30737782 1,369.78 30373071 1,033.1 0.'..Y 307378073 1,214.87 3037808 176.79 333.073 30701.0701 3037836 1,2.079.74 307373407 1,1079.43 30737842 2.83.2.1 649.95 .:>0707.0707 3037846 956.70 30737833 1,289.12 30741433 176.79 633.073 3001.001 30741472. 1,2.69.43 30741479 1,344.61 30741492. 2.83.2.1 649.95 .:>0707.0707 307413074 1,142.907 3074152.5 1,5070737 307413 64 1,194.37 3041660 6607 5 2.07.3 7 62.3.2.1 50M Page 21 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 3041677 $ 392.80 3041684 $ MG.y.G.yG.y $ 84L58 31741692 $ $ 1,306.32 3041744 $ $ 1,21487 3041751 $ $ 1,214.37 3041759 $ $ 1,16934 3041801 $ $ 1,071.93 3041807 $ $ 1,20934 3041823 $ $ 1,096.93 3041831 $ $ 918A0 3041837 $ $ 1,154.37 3041860 $ - $ 1,32933 3041867 $ 497.44 $ 937.99 $ 124.39 3041874 $ - $ - $ 1,114. 3/ 3042339 $ 862.30 $ $ 100.00 3045762 $ 424.10 $ 333.23 $ 106.02 3045794 $ 37f».95 $ 70106 $ 229.x.4 3045797 $ $ $ 376.70 3059141 $ 49L94 $ 57&53 $ 122.93 3059229 $ $ $ 1,370.11 3759277 $ 1,1047 3/ $ - $ 50.G7G7 317993179 $ $ $ 7,214.37 3059311 $ 1,033.30 $ - $ 50.G7G7 31799379 $ $ $ 343.917 31764415 $ - $ - $ 1,113.29 31773936 $ $ $ 7,760.13 3073561 $ - $ - $ 1,1729.617 31773636 $ 402.11 $ 460.16 6 $ 71717.93 31739364 $ 271737 $ 96x.2.7. $ 31717.1717 .3039.379 $ $ $ 7,174.37 3089387 $ - $ - $ 1,12&58 31739394 $ $ $ 7,73 6.93 31739400 $ - $ - $ 1,1171:».53 317394171 $ $ $ 7,114.93 31739419 $ 27037 $ 56x.21 $ 31717.1717 3089465 $ $ $ 343.917 31739495 $ - $ - $ 87&90 3089960 $ $ $ 7,709.49 31739574 $ 4317.95 $ 553.69 $ 12.17.23 3039601 $ $ $ 7,7 74.37 Page 22 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 3110458 007.64 3110488 3.5 i 851.82 3110502 1,230.05 3138659 1,219.73 3133603 04434 3138677 1,253.70 75.00 3138683 1,03f».53 50.G.yG.y 3138689 1,154.37 3138695 04434 3133716 1,073.10 3133720 1,350Al 333750 073.20 3133753 - - 1,6447 3138761 1,246.32 3133781 1,36033 333707 1,043.70 3133703 - - 1,12f».53 3138803 x,096.58 3138808 1,472.00 3 133333 996.58 3133307 40 ..04 63&53 12.2..03 3138903 x,330.73 3133036 87630 3138943 1,31 6.32 3133047 - - 1,09&53 3138979 x,15 .45 3130003 1,004.37 50.00 3139018 073.10 3139043 1,00034 339096 1,194.37 3142365 1,104A3 3142378 x,25 .45 3142381 05120 3215505 133.42 637. 2 72.10 3215543 375.60 3215540 862.30 3215553 37630 3215672 1,232.30 136.03 3232920 1,033.03 3231946 741.16 135.10 3232969 - $ - $ 1,15&20 Page 23 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 3232992 $ 7 63.401 $ 150.00 32330)0)01 $ - $ 1,09&58 3233159 $ 393.301 $ 634.86 3236433 $ - $ 1,006A5 3236433 $ $ 344.74 3236525 $ - $ 1,39938 313655 $ $ 1,143.46 3236671 $ - $ 1,114.87 .31.3 6677 $ 37.34 $ 333.31 3236682 $ - $ 1,64M7 31367013 $ $ 1,1017.64 323671 $ - $ 1,32938 3136734 $ $ 1,139.73 3236824 $ - $ 1,13116 3236852 $ $ 1,113.013 3236857 $ - $ 1,30636 3285001 $ $ 1,188.013 32850112 $ - $ 1,19737 31330116 $ 963.77 $ 111.68 32830137 $ - $ 98147 31330131 $ $ 1,1019.43 32850168 $ 61TO12. $ 514.43 31330131 $ $ 946.101 32850189 $ - $ 1,013116 3285101 $ $ 9014.301 3285165 $ 1401.0)01 $ 96934 3133113 $ $ 1,243.46 3285219 $ - $ 1,0124A3 3133171 $ 473.43 $ 362.27 $ 113.36 32833018 $ - $ - $ 892. 01 32333101 $ $ $ 343.30 32833201 $ 2.76.79 $ 338.01 $ 30)01.0)01 3133333 $ $ $ 1,341.33 3285338 $ - $ - $ 1,0154A3 3133340 $ 391.33 $ $ 30.001 3285357 $ - $ - $ 1,37934 3233339 $ $ $ 1,0194.37 3285367 $ - $ - $ 1,149A2 3133370 $ $ $ 1,317.31 3285441 $ 925.0)01 $ - $ 8M7 3133431 $ $ $ 1,0114.37 Page 24 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 3285486 489.92 57&53 125.G.yG.y 3135524 1,154.87 3285547 1,07M7 75.G.yG.y 3135553 1,347.77 3289087 1,01T97 331 6644 1,1 5.70 3326651 1,01530 331 6679 1,044.46 3344393 - - 1,32995 3344407 433.05 625.11 125.00 3344413 - - 1,148A6 3344453 373.23 3344480 95x..45 10G.y.G.O 3344542 1,054.87 3344571 - - 904y 50 3344614 1,151.45 3344618 1,16147 3344673 1,219.61 3344684 918A0 3344713 1,208.46 3344742 87630 3344805 1,008.29 3344828 1,13&5 3344835 x,410.44 3344858 - - 92695 33 61348 1,139.74 3361424 1,06934 3361433 908.16 3361441 762M G.y 1 G.yG.y.G.O 3361459 133.76 417.94 300.00 3361463 1,399A 33 61467 1,435.54 3361483 87630 33&'.1489 1,085.1 1 125.00 3361509 1,389A5 33 61526 308.39 747.43 300.00 3361534 1,085A2 33 61539 334.37 100.00 3364587 - - 1,10934 33 64000 1,069.74 3365004 1,054.x.3 Page 25 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 336362 $ 367.43 $ 662.27 $ 226.36 3365025 $ - $ - $ 1,029.60 33 65032 $ $ $ 1,512.42 3365733 $ $ $ x,10 .30 33 69440 $ $ $ 890.60 3369443 $ - $ - $ HMO 3336633 $ $ $ 1,369.45 3366636 $ - $ - $ 1,214. 87 333 6646 $ $ $ 1,228.79 3366680 $ - $ - $ 1,31136 3390665 $ 1,138.29 $ $ 73.00 3390680 $ - $ - $ 96146 3390693 $ $ $ 1,023.46 3390733 $ — $ $ 91810 3390733 $ 270.37 $ 626.2 $ 300.00 3390736 $ 696.90 $ - $ 60.G7G7 3390767 $ 432.34 $ 521.46 $ 30.007 3390772 $ - $ - $ 1,154.87 3300777 $ $ $ 871.58 3390797 $ - $ - $ 1,43037 3390810 $ 030.3 $ $ 411.13 3390812 $ 1,065A2 $ - $ 60.G7G7 330037 $ $ $ 330.37 3390887 $ - $ - $ 1,09&56 3390901 $ 596.79 $ 647.03 $ 13.00 3390917 $ - $ - $ 07630 3390961 $ 1,130.74 $ $ 30.00 3306104 $ 70839 $ - $ 660.G7G7 3303137 $ 521.79 $ 333.32 $ 100.00 3306276 $ - $ - $ 1,330Al 3303130 $ $ $ 1,224.61 3306260 $ 27037 $ 666.21 $ MG.y.G.yG.y 3303304 $ $ $ 1,300.43 3306326 $ - $ - $ 1,260. 5 3303336 $ $ $ 300.60 3306361 $ - $ - $ 1,06L43 3415904 $ $ $ 1,450.11 3415917 $ - $ - $ 1,054A3 341592 $ $ $ 1,033.16 Page 26 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 3413022 1,13116 3415940 1,024.13 3415042 070.60 343043 040.37 3416043 1,004.87 3416067 004.46 30.00 3416079 1,28830 3416033 1,044.37 60.00 341611 8 99f».3 3416134 1,166.43 3423233 1,307.73 73.00 3423233 1,228.03 3423241 1,114.87 3442 100 1,104.87 30.00 3442274 1, 6147 3442280 1,034.43 3442287 1,250. 5 50.00 3433400 1,07 6.33 3453407 1,0144 7 3433431 1,13 6.32 3453475 - - 1,10L45 3453496 x,25 .45 3453530 1,074A6 3433334 034.30 3453557 1,00&58 50.00 3453561 1,168.79 100.00 3458391 - - 1,24632 3433403 x,05 .45 3458421 1,16034 343344 6 263.03 414.34 300.00 3458450 1,278A6 30.00 3433434 32 6.70 373.03 30.00 3458468 1,1233 3433431 1,135.45 3458502 1,004.87 50.G.yG.y 3458521 1,154.87 3458520 27037 58&21 300.00 3458551 1,104.13 3458550 - - 1,104A3 3433373 1,63.20 3458586 02x..58 - 75.00 Page 27 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 3458593 $ 1,164.87 $ 50.00 3458669 $ - $ - 1,09&58 3480776 $ $ 956.08 3480850 $ - $ - 1,07130 3480871 $ $ 020.87 3558106 $ $ 1,334.61 3558129 $ $ 1,165.12 3558134 $ 58115 $ 69L69 $ 1&03 3558153 $ $ $ 1,174.87 3558165 $ 435.82 $ - $ 755.03 3558174 $ $ $ 1,572.42 3558176 $ - $ - $ 1,274A2 355823 $ $ $ 1,128.79 3558235 $ 1,12116 $ - $ 50M 3558315 $ $ $ 1,124.46 3558320 $ - $ - $ 1,22034 3558353 $ $ $ 1,109.74 3558366 $ 26195 $ 744.51 $ MOM 3558383 $ $ $ 1,084.45 3558303 $ - $ - $ 1,154.87 3558443 $ $ $ 1,014.87 3562871 $ - $ - $ 88M7 3562886 $ $ $ 1,001.80 3562050 $ - $ - $ 875.66 3 610955 $ $ $ 1,078.10 3610961 $ - $ - $ 078.20 3 6100 66 $ 270.37 $ 646.2 $ 300.00 3610969 $ - $ - $ 1,240.x.2 3 610982 $ 1,274.12 $ $ 75.00 3611029 $ 638.0 $ 76.47 $ 25.00 3611079 $ - $ - $ 1,420.48 3611086 $ $ $ 1,164.12 3611134 34 $ $ $ 1,196.58 3611184 $ - $ - $ 1,078.20 3611201 $ 500.34 $ 585.40 $ 25.00 3632972 $ 57130 $ 647.05 $ 50.G.yG.y 3631000 $ 276.70 $ 578.08 $ 300.00 3632008 $ 87&90 $ - $ 50M 3633026 $ 688.42 $ $ 450.04 Page 28 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 36330793 27639 63&08 30.70.7.0.70.7 3633059 7 61.15 133.72 3633132 1,154.87 3633133 3107.37 316.2 1 307.0707 3633291 37237 67&68 180M 3 642137 1,0713.29 307.0707 3642185 1,289A2 36423074 276.79 373.03 30707.0707 3642331 1,202.42 190.G7G7 3642333 964.37 307.0707 364243 8 1,105A4 199.G7G7 3 642557 1,239.12 307.0707 3642640 1,01147 50.G7G7 3659212 1,1 4.37 3661408 48105 525Al 125M 3661416 1,306.32 3661422 1,20839 3 661444 443.34 66.23 111.39 3661479 1,12&29 90.G7G7 367118 1 1,0733.307 36712.87 31M5 571.39 2.32..64 3671397 643.16 30707.0707 3671400 1,08M7 3671436 1,0771.33 3671563 HMO 3673167 40707.63 343.39 10707.16 3679276 1,11037 75.0 07 3673342 2707.37 3 61.2 1 30707.0707 3679423 18137 661.79 20034 3 692773 313.37 3907.107 30707.0707 3692823 310».079 6074. x. 234.07x. 3692332 433.03 425.11 1307.0707 3726596 1,159A2 907.0707 3732323 1,151.43 3752662 1,16934 3736326 1,0799.12 307.0707 3756348 8407.0»07 907.0707 3771734 1307.41 623.64 62.607 3771881 284.077 420».93 180M 377207072 1.44.91 334.46 61.23 3808318 1,07079.49 30.70.7.0.70.7 Page 29 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilalllu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�llu�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllllll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 3303345 $ 1,044.37 $ 50.00 3303404 $ 1,12116 $ - 50.G.yG.y 3303403 $ 926.70 $ 50.00 3808573 $ 2.33.2.1 $ 530.05 $ 300.00 331111 6 $ 1,106.58 $ $ 50.00 3322335 $ 100.00 $ - $ 1,15f».53 3822416 $ 703.00 $ $ 50.00 3322513 $ 440.05 $ 604M $ 110M 3311554 $ 471.79 $ 617.95 $ 150.00 3322605 $ 1,13L61 $ - $ 13L20 3322672 $ $ $ 1,105.44 3331645 $ 1,17146 $ - $ 75.G.yG.y 3843317 $ $ $ 036.65 3371034 $ 1,11995 $ - $ 150.G.yG.y 3371162 $ 331.68 $ $ 66 .73 3371185 $ 540.22 $ 67&23 $ 1631 3371401 $ 846.58 $ $ 150.00 3880917 $ 064.37 $ - $ 50.00 333175 $ $ $ 1,100.45 3337756 $ 1,003.20 $ - $ 50.G.yG.y 3007100 $ $ $ 073.10 3907333 $ 1,05264 $ - $ 277.x.4 3007343 $ 451.04 $ 627.65 $ 112.76 3907521 $ 35 ..00 $ 65113 $ 50.G.yG.y 300662 $ 16 .10 $ 607.17 $ 137.03 3010693 $ 440.G.y5 $ 604.3 . $ 110M 3010747 $ 170.37 $ 333.41 $ 300.00 3910841 $ 46T53 $ 62L91 $ 116M 3003 66 $ 467.53 $ 711.01 $ 116.88 3010870 $ 30639 $ 503.G.y3 $ 270.G.yG.y 3911050 $ 1'7 6.70 $ 533.03 $ 300.00 3023540 $ - $ - $ 1,0144 87 3013533 $ 444.65 $ 541.93 $ 150.00 3954867 $ 05130 $ - $ 50.00 3955016 $ 946.58 $ $ 150.00 3955019 $ 32630 $ - $ 50.G.yG.y 3050130 $ 044.74 $ $ 115.00 3050261 $ 1,35695 $ - $ 75.00 3968737 $ 215.00 $ $ 700.37 3968794 $ 45L18 $ 61169 $ 150.00 3968822 $ 176.70 $ 533.03 $ 300.00 Page 30 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 3063326 1,031.43 3968844 935.12 130.00 3063300 401.00 404.00 4015548 1,193.16 4020602 1,113.46 50.G.yG.y 402068 1 263.03 614.34 300.00 4020733 2.76.70 633.03 300.00 4020812 1,191.10 300.00 402.0910 711.00 302.07 402033 1,340.44 4025152 543.00 300.00 4023132 437.44 400.33 130.00 4035877 29&05 473.60 300.00 4030033 21.09 100.30 333.00 4050971 2x..00 100.30 335.G.yG.y 4050975 1,180.6 1 4050992. 7.03 3163 335.G.yG.y 4030006 875.66 4053776 91632 4033737 916.32 4053340 333.2.1 720.33 130.00 4032 140 7.03 74.20 333.00 4082149 91632 4032203 916.32 4093008 403.0 . 333.60 12333 4093105 1,096.1 1 30.00 4003352 303.00 50.G.yG.y 4110633 1,194.37 100.00 4110646 440.G.y5 764.3 . 110M 4110633 868.40 30.00 4110664 714.37 300.00 4110733 373.66 4115356 7.03 74.20 333.00 4115364 916.32 4115426 1,12337 2.63.00 4115443 334.30 130.00 4115461 1,370.x.2 4125678 007.06 240.26 4126026 2.30.63 36682 300.00 4139748 437.63 .300.66 130.00 4140695 77630 100.00 Page 31 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 4144841 $ 1,128.29 $ 507.0707 41443307 $ 462M $ 67009 $ 115. 51 4178233 $ 7.073 $ 74.19 $ 335.0707 4173240 $ - $ - $ 91632 4178256 $ 7.073 $ 74.19 $ 335.0707 4173233 $ T03 $ 74.29 $ 335.G7G7 4178308 $ $ $ 916.32 4173315 $ - $ - $ 91632 4178396 $ 7.073 $ 74.29 $ 335.0707 4178400 $ T03 $ 74.29 $ 335.G7G7 4734441 $ 176.79 $ 633.073 $ 30707.0707 41851077 $ 1,06&29 $ - $ 50.G7G7 4185117 $ 7,0723.29 $ $ 507.0707 4185240 $ 27037 $ 56x.2.7. $ 30.70.7.0.70.7 4790 673 $ 457.074 $ 687.65 $ 712.76 4190660 $ 2.63.95 $ 55434 $ 30.70.7.0.70.7 41907741 $ 7,70 6.53 $ $ 507.0707 4190760 $ 27037 $ 420».21 $ 30.70.7.0.70.7 41907795 $ 263.95 $ 554.34 $ 30707.0707 4195275 $ $ $ 916.32 4195232 $ T03 $ 74.29 $ 335.G7G7 4195347 $ $ $ 916.32 4195356 $ - $ - $ 91632 4195339 $ 7,70 8.46 $ $ 10707.0707 4195396 $ 427..56 $ 644M $ 10G7. O 41954077 $ $ $ 916.32 4195416 $ - $ - $ 91632 4195463 $ 456.54 $ 339.44 $ 114.13 4199869 $ - $ - $ 91632 4199377 $ $ $ 916.32 4199333 $ 37132 $ 97.9.76 $ 92.33 4199894 $ $ $ 916.32 4199901 $ - $ - $ 91632 4199921 $ 255.91 $ 637.107 $ 63.97 4199926 $ - $ - $ 91632 4199933 $ $ $ 916.32 4219016 $ 333.30 $ 50265 $ 7.30.G7G7 41190731 $ $ $ 1,139.74 4219156 $ 1,119. 5 $ - $ 50.G7G7 4219219 $ 1707.37 $ 526.17 $ 30707.0707 Page 32 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 4219231 375.66 4219238 875.66 4219356 91632 4219366 916.32 4219403 27037 56&21 30.70.7.0.70.7 4219499 x,15 .45 4233373 91632 4233333 916.32 4233473 934.50 4233602 1,194.61 1507.0707 4233624 91632 4233632 916.32 4234076 27037 52&21 30707.0707 4234166 1,014.87 4253423 91632 4253437 916.32 4253453 91632 4253473 916.32 4253734 53156 604M 1&50 42539407 1,154.37 4253953 1,00&58 150.G7G7 4254193 429.06 792.14 1077.26 4254199 44M5 604M 110.G7X. 42542073 1,0773.16 607.0707 42.542.12. 434.55 59339 10&64 4254262 462.073 6707.49 115.51 4254300 91632 42543076 916.32 42.54315 406A4 452A2 1GL54 4258199 445.54 576.23 111.39 4253273 375.66 4253291 875.66 4253339 1,05&63 4258365 367.67 5073.11 91.92 4286693 91632 428670707 916.32 4295090 91632 4295097 916.32 4295107 91632 4295110 916.32 4295121 84&91 21132 Page 33 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 4304443 $ 750.00 $ 539.12 4304449 $ 45LO4 $ 637.65 $ 11236 4304510 $ 52 6.79 $ 593.08 $ 50.00 4304596 $ 45LO4 $ 51T65 $ 11236 4304625 $ 451.04 $ 687.65 $ 112.76 4304670 $ 1,16034 $ - $ 150.G7G7 4304680 $ $ $ 300.60 4304974 $ - $ - $ 91632 4304030 $ $ $ 916.32 4305341 $ - $ - $ 91632 4305343 $ $ $ 916.32 4305351 $ - $ - $ 91632 4305354 $ $ $ 916.32 4322901 $ 27630 $ 578M $ 3G.7G.7.G.7G.7 4322905 $ 352.68 $ $ 260.43 4322033 $ 26105 $ 534.51 $ 3G.7G.7.G.7G.7 4445304 $ 1,03 6.58 $ $ 100.00 4445450 $ 1,400A4 $ - $ 50.G7G7 4445518 $ 1,033.16 $ $ 50.00 4445600 $ 1,43004 $ - $ 3G.7.G.O 4445643 $ x,06 .58 $ $ 75.00 4445335 $ 1,06&20 $ - $ 50.G7G7 44500 61 $ $ $ 916.32 4450969 $ - $ - $ 91632 4450003 $ $ $ 916.32 4451010 $ - $ - $ 91632 445 042 $ $ $ 1,099.29 4451056 $ - $ - $ 1,0990 20 445 1074 $ $ $ 916.32 4451081 $ - $ - $ 91632 4486101 $ 1,244.61 $ $ 100.00 4486133 $ 23121 $ 53f».24 $ 3G.7G.7.G.7G.7 4486157 $ x,18 .90 $ $ 101.00 4486205 $ - $ - $ 1,00f».53 4486277 $ 1,227.42 $ $ 375.00 4486283 $ 03146 $ - $ 50.G7G7 4486317 $ 951.79 $ $ 437.00 4430404 $ - $ - $ 91632 4489411 $ $ $ 916.32 4504937 $ - $ - $ 91632 4504040 $ $ $ 916.32 Page 34 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 4505005 91632 450501 1 916.32 4505015 27239 677.43 68A0 4511531 916.32 4511534 91632 4511552 45 6.54 779.44 114.13 4511557 29&05 47169 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 4511726 1,028.79 100.00 4534148 - - 91632 4534150 916.32 4534156 91632 4534245 916.32 4538089 40120 - 525.G7G7 4543000 1,282.26 4543126 1,13330 454367 06.32 4543170 91632 454330 300.33 253.00 4543331 27037 56&21 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 4543305 1,100.00 1 10.1 1 4562169 1M4 � 038 335.G7G7 4562177 77 916.32 4562208 1M4 7038 335.G7G7 456223 06.32 4563400 52037 55&21 50.G7G7 45 66834 1,085.69 120.63 4566836 62253 - 575.G7G7 45 66915 1,141.03 4606193 1,174.37 4 606193 1,03 6.53 100.00 4606235 01034 150.G7G7 4614148 916.32 4614166 91632 4617990 916.32 4618003 91632 4613110 036.65 4618252 91632 4613274 06.32 4618362 1,04230 50634 4618469 1,100.73 100.00 4618537 52M7 63M7 50.G7G7 Page 35 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 4618781 $ 1,063.16 $ 106.06 4613366 $ 230.63 $ 60082 $ 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 4618944 $ 130.63 $ 561.31 $ 300.00 4641156 $ 006.63 $ - $ 10G7. O 4641170 $ 504.03 $ $ 815.13 4641266 $ - $ - $ 01632 464165 $ 14.06 $ 67.16 $ 335.00 4650436 $ 44M5 $ 77M6 $ 110M 4672433 $ $ $ 916.31 4672500 $ - $ - $ 01632 4673172 $ $ $ 06.31 4673103 $ - $ - $ 01632 4676570 $ $ $ 06.31 4676632 $ - $ - $ 01632 467676 $ 1,035.11 $ $ 165.00 4676337 $ 334.x.6 $ 42430 $ 9&04 4680283 $ 404.14 $ $ 313.30 4680318 $ 1,146A0 $ - $ 266.G7G7 4680339 $ 1,007.16 $ $ 144.10 4680363 $ 1,119A5 $ - $ 150.G7G7 4607574 $ - $ - $ 1,30995 4706350 $ $ $ 305.00 4706364 $ 17.67 $ 7038 $ 327.07 4706485 $ 17.57 $ 70.73 $ 317.07 4706403 $ 1M4 $ 7038 $ 336.G7G7 47066 22 $ 10.54 $ 70.73 $ 335.00 4706645 $ T03 $ 74.20 $ 336.G7G7 470667 $ $ $ 375.66 4706702 $ - $ - $ 375.66 4707111 $ 401.57 $ 351.55 $ 50.00 4715041 $ - $ - $ 1,189A2 4715043 $ 434.55 $ 691.39 $ 108.64 4715061 $ 45&05 $ 625Al $ 150.G7G7 4710030 $ 10.54 $ 70.73 $ 335.00 4720944 $ 1M4 $ 7038 $ 336.G7G7 4721036 $ 10.54 $ 70.73 $ 335.00 4721045 $ 1M4 $ 7038 $ 336.G7G7 4727010 $ 10.54 $ 70.73 $ 335.00 4727020 $ - $ - $ 01632 471703 $ $ $ 1,031.30 Page 36 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 4727100 1,05L45 4727108 1,184.37 4727114 1,20934 4727120 1,174.37 4727227 91880 4727231 x,15 .45 4727262 95&90 4717173 419.06 661.97 107.26 4727742 94&20 4731036 332.30 50.00 4731060 1,33L19 4731113 1,118.03 473 146 1,26330 4731153 410.37 5 66.2 1 150.00 4731227 17131 1,26939 50M 473 134 434.55 653.30 103.64 4731307 1,108A6 4735691 17.57 70.73 317.07 4735703 91632 4735711 377.71 057.34 150.00 4735774 - - 007.64 473531 10.54 70.73 335.00 4735310 1M4 7038 335.G.yG.y 4735003 176.29 741.E 4735043 - - 1,05L45 473507 6 1,130.73 4736037 1,169A5 473 6062 1,134.37 4736099 1,26033 473 6103 x,04 .58 4736113 1,26033 4740033 1,130.44 4740046 1,25L45 474007 1,3 60.45 4740117 918A0 474073 033.47 4751695 1,10934 475 731 1,189.12 475804 1,19f».53 475317 1,631.41 4818541 434.55 55330 10&64 Page 37 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 4818553 $ 434.33 $ 333.33 $ 08.64 4818389 $ 443.34 $ 37&23 $ 11139 4818615 $ 963.46 $ 125.00 $ 30.007 4818649 $ - $ - $ 1,47037 488658 $ $ $ 1,069.74 4818671 $ - $ - $ 1,149A2 4818720 $ $ $ 1,269.74 4818732 $ - $ - $ 048A6 4818773 $ $ $ 1,469.48 4818784 $ - $ - $ 1,080.87 4818810 $ $ $ 1,301.19 4818817 $ 28121 $ 549.95 $ MOM G.yG.y 4818846 $ $ $ x,22 x.38 4818863 $ - $ - $ 87 ..38 4818869 $ $ $ 1,269.74 4818032 $ - $ - $ 1,10L43 4818955 $ 1,000.74 $ $ 100.00 4818986 $ - $ - $ 1,078.20 4819046 $ $ $ 800.60 4819054 $ - $ - $ 1,19f».38 4819109 $ $ $ 033.10 4819141 $ - $ - $ 1,13x..43 4819159 $ $ $ 1,308.03 4819261 $ - $ - $ 08147 4819274 $ $ $ 1,014.87 4819316 $ 1M4 $ 7038 $ 835.G7G7 4810310 $ 10.34 $ 70.78 $ 833.00 4819354 $ - $ - $ 91632 4819362 $ $ $ 916.31 4819378 $ - $ - $ 91632 4819386 $ 10.34 $ 70.78 $ 833.00 4810303 $ - $ - $ 1,07L20 4810400 $ $ $ 332.30 4819517 $ 1M4 $ 7038 $ 833.G7G7 4819521 $ 10.34 $ 70.78 $ 833.00 4819571 $ - $ - $ 1,0290 50 4819575 $ 10.34 $ 70.78 $ 833.00 4819581 $ 1M4 $ 7038 $ 833.G7G7 4810300 $ $ $ 004.30 4819672 $ - $ - $ 91632 4819678 $ 7.03 $ 74.10 $ 833.00 Page 38 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 4828705 1M4 7038 835M �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 4828715 7.03 74.29 335.00 4828731 87&90 4313744 875.66 4828794 1,1253 4828813 1,033.16 4828819 1,07&29 4313310 1,128.79 4828823 1,07M7 75.G7G7 43133 61 7.03 74.29 335.00 4828872 91632 4313953 875.66 4829031 1,01120 9&54 4319073 6 1,196.58 4829166 1,2.57.77 2.G7G7.G7G7 4334055 1,083.80 4834077 - - 1,12839 4334093 1,209.12 4834106 1,12839 79 43341073 1,154.37 4834244 1,145Al 165.G7G7 4334153 401.54 772.52 155.39 4834283 1,11&29 4834316 1,154.87 4834370 - - 1,19530 4334405 946.58 50.09 4834421 1,03116 4334435 1,033.03 4834443 54&89 62T65 1&91 4337688 7.03 74.29 335.00 4837691 91632 4837712 339.66 431.33 97.4 4837766 T03 74.29 835M 4837771 7.03 74.29 335.00 4858719 - - 1,03116 4353749 996.58 4858797 - - 1,360Al 4858816 x,169.74 4858830 f»00.G7G7 - 992M 435333 6 946.20 4858852 1,09&5 Page 39 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 4858868 $ 1,166.43 $ 165.00 5.00 4333376 $ - $ - 1,512.42 4333337 $ $ 1,03 6.58 4353301 $ - $ - 1,243.03 4333303 $ $ 1,196.58 4353000 $ 000.00 $ 27330 4333006 $ $ 1,194.87 4862707 $ - $ 1,11&20 4862733 $ $ 913.40 4862733 $ - $ 1,13f».33 4862810 $ $ x,05 .43 4862814 $ 434.55 $ 65330 $ 10&64 4362819 $ $ $ x,15 .43 4863409 $ 300.f»7 $ 63M7 $ 180.G.yG.y 4363434 $ $ $ 1,189.78 4863462 $ - $ - $ 1,22934 4882921 $ $ $ 1,03 6.33 4332027 $ - $ - $ 1,270.03 4332032 $ $ $ 1,310.93 4332035 $ - $ - $ 1,370.44 4331047 $ $ $ 1,330.44 4300323 $ 7.03 $ 74.20 $ 335.00 4300333 $ 7.03 $ 74.10 $ 333.00 4300425 $ - $ - $ 91632 4899431 $ 7.03 $ 74.10 $ 333.00 4300471 $ 7.03 $ 74.20 $ 335.00 4300473 $ 7.03 $ 74.10 $ 333.00 4899516 $ 1M4 $ 7033 $ 335.00 4300311 $ 10.34 $ 70.73 $ 333.00 4300546 $ 1M4 $ 7033 $ 335.00 4300331 $ 7.03 $ 74.10 $ 333.00 4300550 $ - $ - $ 1,602.42 43003 66 $ $ $ 1,113.10 4300372 $ 37f».03 $ 61&23 $ 130.00 4300377 $ 1,141.33 $ $ 73.00 4899617 $ - $ - $ 1,105.45 430070 $ $ $ 1,131.64 4300370 $ 1,03116 $ - $ 100.00 4003303 $ $ $ 1,178.29 4903315 $ - $ - $ 99&53 4903319 $ $ $ 911.58 Page 40 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 4903324 1,19f».3 4903403 976.20 4903413 1,25037 49073463 1,096.33 4903501 1,718M 49013331 1,099.74 4903561 96129 50.G7G7 49013374 904.30 4903584 - - 1,01&29 49013 643 1,198.29 4903667 1,15&29 49013739 1,339.43 4903785 - - 1,349.45 490379 1 1,099.74 4903929 1,22&5 4904027 1,139.74 4913327 862M 49334 6 362.30 4913367 T03 74.29 833.G7G7 4913375 916.32 4932673 1,394.07 4931 679 1,318.03 4932701 1,480A4 4931720 1,3 61.43 4933299 445.54 57&23 11139 4933330 121.16 1,030.29 4933548 434.55 61339 10&64 4934189 1,322.90 4939921 1,289.45 4939969 1,289.12 494009 8 91632 4940103 916.32 4940206 91632 4340220 916.32 4940295 1,03830 4340303 105.33 743.30 4940330 - - 91632 494033 6 916.32 4940373 T03 74.29 835M 4340331 916.32 4940412 973.66 Page 41 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilalllu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�llu�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllllll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 4940434 $ 14.06 $ 67.26 $ 333.00 4940460 $ 14.06 $ 6T26 $ 835M 4940368 $ $ $ 3(74.3(7 494057 $ - $ - $ 91632 4340333 $ $ $ 916.32 496 773 $ 7.03 $ 74.23 $ 333.00 4961785 $ - $ - $ 91632 4961829 $ 14.06 $ 67.26 $ 333.007 4961841 $ 14.06 $ 6T26 $ 835M 4961902 $ 14.06 $ 67.26 $ 333.007 4961911 $ - $ - $ 91632 4961933 $ $ $ 1,139.43 4961933 $ $ $ 1,188.03 4991357 $ - $ - $ 1,088M 499 369 $ $ $ 1,560.77 4991398 $ - $ - $ 1,094.87 499965 $ $ $ 920.60 499 933 $ 451.04 $ 487.65 $ 112.76 4992024 $ - $ - $ 1,45004 4332043 $ $ $ 862.80 4992050 $ 1,21L19 $ - $ 30.G7G7 499221 $ $ $ 1,306.32 4992246 $ - $ - $ 1,24&5 4992305 $ 270.37 $ 3 66.2 $ 300.00 4992318 $ - $ - $ 1,09&5 4992313 $ $ $ 1,189.74 4992413 $ - $ - $ 1,20905 4992440 $ $ $ 1,13 6.33 4992455 $ - $ - $ 1,17116 4992433 $ $ $ 1,138.29 4992488 $ - $ - $ 1,22245 4992493 $ $ $ 1,128.79 4992550 $ - $ - $ 1,349A2 4992565 $ $ $ 1,1 4.37 4992588 $ - $ - $ 1,17&29 49913907 $ $ $ 1,1 4.37 4993339 $ $ $ 1,317.77 Page 42 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 4998372 1,073 ..43 5007501 1,332.64 307077536 2307.41 72164 62..607 5007557 X4.076 67.26 333.0707 307077369 14.0707 6T2.6 833.0707 307346307 916.32 30734633 7.073 74.29 833.0707 5060321 1 1,1 307.7 7 30707.0707 5060333 1,07073.2.9 73.0707 5060401 1,198.29 30607413 1,194.87 3076074207 6907.0707 416.32 5060427 207193 41434 30707.0707 5060468 1,239.43 307.0707 3066742 1,12934 30766995 1,0734.37 5067001 1,0724A3 5067027 27 x,151.43 5067069 69 948.41 32.1.33 30767131 1,189.12 5067244 1,2.707.38 5067261 1,026.58 30672707 1,13116 30772469 332.307 30772477 1,184.87 307723073 878.90 30772323 1,349.48 30772333 837.06 3074.37 307723707 1,2.1116 30771333 1,1 74.87 5072606 1,2.078.79 30772631 1,416.06 30772646 1,07307.38 30772771 074 6.207 307728907 1,3707.77 5072960 932.30 30774733 83333 5074817 333.33 30777478 1,0774.407 30773668 14.076 67.26 333.0707 30778692 7.073 74.29 833.0707 Page 43 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 5073749 $ 355.33 5073737 $ 14.06 $ 6T26 $ 335.G7G7 5073797 $ 7.03 $ 74.19 $ 335.00 5073354 $ - $ - $ 1,268A6 5073377 $ $ $ 355.33 5086896 $ - $ - $ 91632 508693 $ 13.11 $ 67.16 $ 820.94 5086973 $ - $ - $ 1,32632 5087002 $ 14.06 $ 67.16 $ 335.00 5087014 $ 14.06 $ 6T26 $ 335.G7G7 5087041 $ 223.43 $ 569.80 $ 57.10 5087183 $ 23.x.2 $ 6T26 $ 32M4 5087196 $ $ $ 916.31 5087239 $ - $ - $ 97731 5087168 $ 223.43 $ 569.30 $ 57. 0 5087285 $ 223.43 $ 569M $ 57AO 5087302 $ $ $ 1,191.37 5087359 $ 445.54 $ 612.52 $ 11139 5087334 $ 176.79 $ 533.08 $ 300.00 5087408 $ - $ - $ 1,074.37 5087443 $ $ $ 1,330.77 5087490 $ - $ - $ 1,12132 5087529 $ $ $ 1,136.58 5087913 $ $ $ 1,1&'9.45 5087977 $ $ $ 996.58 5100973 $ $ $ 1,2 4.37 5187755 $ $ $ 1,230.44 5187772 $ 1,16339 $ - $ 10G7. O 5187843 $ $ $ 1,096.58 5187336 $ 1,12116 $ - $ 50M 5187896 $ $ $ x,189.73 5187977 $ - $ - $ 1,19945 5188010 $ 283.21 $ 439.95 $ 300.00 5133233 $ - $ - $ 1,50884 5188297 $ $ $ 1,033.16 5188353 $ $ $ 1,531.76 Page 44 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 5188398 - - 1,10632 5133609 1,209.74 51 766 1,199A2 50.G7G7 5188810 1,064.79 5188897 - - 918A0 5188904 1,074.46 5188921 1,17116 5189036 393. 9 553.39 150.00 5194560 27639 598M 3G.yG.y.G.yG.y 5194619 1,416.32 5194673 1,139A2 50.G7G7 594723 1,621.76 5194904 1,06934 519492 1 1,128.79 5194937 - - 1,344.61 5195066 1,381.19 5195127 1,748A6 5195 64 1,2 4.37 519517 8 45LO4 62T65 11236 5195200 1,228.79 5195436 1, 6934 5195544 1,003.79 5195649 1,25L45 5195683 83 1,275.1 1 75.007 5195733 1,03116 5202305 916.32 5202323 24.60 6T26 824A6 5202645 14.06 67.26 335.007 5202663 14.06 6T26 835.G7G7 5102685 445.54 686.23 111.39 5202793 97731 5202815 1,251.45 5202878 14.06 6T26 835.G7G7 520289 1 14.06 67.26 335.007 5202899 228.43 56337 57AO 520294 6 1,1 61.93 5203128 14.06 6T26 835.G7G7 520344 14.06 67.26 335.007 5205071 1,282.26 526236 14.06 67.26 335.007 5216309 14.06 6T26 835.G7G.7 Page 45 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 6216324 $ 433.62 $ 705.73 $ 108.4 5216361 $ - $ - $ 91880 616473 $ 14.06 $ 67.16 $ 336.00 62.16497 $ 14.06 $ 67.26 $ 336.G7G7 6116698 $ 14.06 $ 67.16 $ 336.00 5216731 $ 14.06 $ 67.26 $ 636.G7G7 616793 $ $ $ 376.66 5217117 $ 339.66 $ 43133 $ 97.41 5217143 $ $ $ 937.90 5217203 $ 14.06 $ 67.26 $ 636.G7G7 5217220 $ 14.06 $ 67.16 $ 336.00 6237622 $ - $ - $ 1,144.46 613791 $ $ $ 1,500.77 6237961 $ 1,19934 $ - $ 60.G7G7 5238210 $ 14.06 $ 67.16 $ 336.00 6236274 $ 14.06 $ 67.26 $ 336.G7G7 5238391 $ 1,063.29 $ $ 60.06 6233661 $ 00433 $ - $ 160.G7G7 5239712 $ 616.12 ... $ 564.05 5244640 $ 303.00 $ - $ 60.G7G7 6144716 $ 14.06 $ 67.26 $ 336.00 6244766 $ 14.06 $ 67.26 $ 336.G7G7 5245914 $ $ $ 1,004.16 6246043 $ 90T56 $ - $ 40.00 614 6636 $ $ $ 1,2 3.28 5246980 $ - $ - $ 1,163.41 616 1344 $ $ $ 941.08 6261363 $ - $ - $ 00436 6161366 $ $ $ 1,129.74 5252045 $ 434.G7G7 $ 68106 $ 108A9 61610663 $ $ $ 1,124.02 5252091 $ - $ - $ 1,14633 61610966 $ $ $ 330.7.3 5260733 $ - $ - $ 1,200.20 5260753 $ $ $ 1,14 6.00 5260884 $ - $ - $ 1,14633 5260979 $ $ $ 1,176.70 5260998 $ - $ - $ 1,232.26 6161171 $ r.. $ $ 7 .17 5261215 $ - $ - $ 1,263.66 5261289 $ 370.37 $ 6 13.00 $ 199.99 Page 46 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 3261347 42631 58M6 107 .33 5261376 1,306.04 3261572 1,11&96 307.0707 5261662 3073.307 491.73 137.32 3261712 1,32151 5261736 193.9 1 333.63 136.71 3261747 1,211407 5261805 107.34 34.32 333.001 3261346 107.34 34.32 333.0707 5315539 1,134.73 5315625 450».51 677.907 14A2 3313665 107.34 34.32 333.001 3315683 107.34 34.32 333.0707 5315869 918.407 3313333 T91 37.x.3 333.0707 5315902 107.34 34.32 333.001 33160407 90707.076 33161107 133.96 713.907 71.13 5316256 1,27132 5316292 1,166.08 33 .6343 107.34 34.32 333.0707 3316877 439.79 657.32 114.94 3316915 1,13739 5316949 1,133.33 5316962 1,13116 5317050 1,0733.707 49.99 5317133 1,0792..92. 3317166 1,112.707 49.99 5317177 1,142.077 5317184 334.34 2 63.079 3317197 1,07072.077 3317313 2601.44 621.63 130.001 3317324 93333 3317331 1,2072.077 5317373 1,0731507 3317339 1,297.073 5317394 1,147.55 33174076 1,343.99 5317418 1,0746.0707 3317431 1,224.37 5317447 1,112.53 Page 47 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 5317464 $ 911.82 3317468 $ 1,17&82 5317479 $ 887.81 3317489 $ - - 1,07407.2.4 5317766 $ 997.44 $ 307.0701 332.2.132. $ 107.34 $ 34.32 $ 833.0707 5322172 $ 107.34 $ 34.32 $ 833.0701 33224707 $ 107.34 $ 34.32 $ 833.0707 3322481 $ 107.34 $ 34.32 $ 833.0701 3339338 $ - $ - $ 1,144A3 5339396 $ $ $ 1,256.2 3339401 $ - $ - $ 1,12267 33394077 $ $ $ 1,1807.99 3339431 $ $ $ 1,070101.14 534071075 $ - $ - $ 1,23119 3368667 $ $ $ 1,0774.13 3368814 $ 107.34 $ 34.32 $ 833.0707 3368823 $ 107.34 $ 34.32 $ 833.001 33246078 $ 7.073 $ 74.29 $ 833.0707 3314639 $ 7.073 $ 74.21 $ 833.001 3324696 $ 7.073 $ 74.29 $ 833.0707 33147 65 $ 7.073 $ 74.21 $ 833.001 3324769 $ - $ - $ 1,36138 3331216 $ $ $ 1,1407.48 5531359 $ 225307 $ 569.64 $ 56.32. 3331381 $ 7.9 $ 37.13 $ 833.001 5531392 $ 7.91 $ 57.x.5 $ 835.0707 33314073 $ $ $ 863.46 3331438 $ - $ - $ 1,29233 3331488 $ $ $ 343.13 3331832 $ - $ - $ 1,31&92 3331836 $ 442.78 $ 641.807 $ 1107.69 3364484 $ - $ - $ 1,220736 5564688 $ $ $ 1,3079.43 3364742 $ - $ - $ 1,44632 556480701 $ $ $ 896.16 3364868 $ - $ - $ 1,274.x.8 5564943 $ $ $ 833.38 3364969 $ - $ - $ 1,374.31 3374481 $ 447.17 $ 431.43 $ 111.79 Page 48 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiaildiai(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(ai�lliiai�ll����llulll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ailluaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiailllllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 9974499 - - 1,04140 5574333 1,132.42 5574967 - - 1,23031 553043 1,47 6.31 5580245 362M 5580305 1,409.73 5580374 - - 1,09433 553 1324 393.33 5581649 1,133.69 99.99 553 753 1,083.08 225.00 5581773 946A0 74.99 553 344 1,093.41 5531934 7.91 57.x.5 335.G7G7 5531993 7.91 61.2 1 335.00 5582040 7.91 57.x.5 335.G7G7 5582053 7.91 61.2 1 335.00 5582264 1,11562 55822907 7.91 57. 5 335.00 5532297 7.91 57.x.5 335.G7G7 5531354 1,428.08 5532333 90M6 5531394 7.91 61.2 1 335.007 5533268 90M6 5533135 7.91 57. 5 335.007 5533294 1,42&60 5689024 1,178.53 5689075 1,072A9 - 50.G7G7 5689089 1,118.29 5689104 1,01L21 5689281 1,158.41 5689359 - - 1,25&63 5689369 1,220.23 5689390 736.43 - 184A2 5689400 370.37 627.07 200.00 5689447 - - 1,433.24 5689462 x,40 .69 5689901 1,082.94 5 690085 1,0 4.37 5691091 1,10739 5691188 91133 41 .79 561.59 199.99 9704973 - - 1,07706 Page 49 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 5704601 $ 1,206.43 5704737 $ 1,334.35 5704912 $ 1,149.12 5704946 $ - - 1,454.51 5705140 $ 1,740.57 5705152 $ 403.05 58L58 $ 100.00 5705227 $ $ 073.20 5705323 $ 36L00 $ - $ 15 ..05 57054 67 $ $ $ 1,124.02 570555 $ $ $ 1,313.52 5705665 $ - $ - $ 1,200.32 5713134 $ $ $ 996.53 5728376 $ - $ - $ 1,043.53 5713337 $ $ $ 1,128.53 5723434 $ - $ - $ 1,13&53 5713404 $ 7.91 $ 57.15 $ 335.00 5723517 $ T91 $ 57.x.5 $ 335.00 5713756 $ $ $ 968.44 5723773 $ - $ - $ 035.50 5728812 $ $ $ 900.06 5723333 $ - $ - $ 004.x.2 5729431 $ 7.91 $ 57.15 $ 335.00 5720443 $ - $ - $ 004.x.2 5710553 $ 604.36 $ $ 325.69 5720600 $ - $ - $ 000.00 5719614 $ 7.9 $ 61.2 $ 335.00 5720757 $ 35730 $ 53036 $ 3031 5720333 $ 7.91 $ 57.15 $ 335.00 5729904 $ - $ - $ 000.00 5730024 $ 7.91 $ 57.15 $ 335.00 5730031 $ - $ - $ 000.00 5767734 $ $ $ 900.06 5767802 $ - $ - $ 004.x.2 576792 $ $ $ 900.06 5767979 $ - $ - $ 000.00 5768063 $ $ $ 343.34 5768225 $ 363.05 $ 67232 $ 100.00 57 63427 $ $ $ 044.74 5768723 $ - $ - $ 1,32886 5768757 $ 446.07 $ 630.2 $ 111.51 Page 50 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 5763774 923.23 5768736 1,136.31 5763396 1,230».93 5768909 9 35 .0701 741.07 50.001 5815501 1,14135 507.0707 5815797 1,033.16 53158307 1,15L21 5315333 344.15 5315335 - - 34 ..95 5316133 1,0709.51 49.99 5816453 T91 6L21 335.0707 5816479 90701.076 53 .6577 T91 6L21 335.0707 5816695 7.9 1 57.15 335.001 5316717 4207.41 7074.077 105A0 5326663 1,0753.94 5326696 335.34 53432 96.45 531 6753 1,1079.51 532.72.31 107.54 54.52 335.0707 531737 6 1,157.33 53279907 37037 61 7.07 7 2.0707.0707 5331347 107.54 54.51 335.001 5332.367 90707.075 5331331 107.54 54.51 335.001 5332395 90707.075 53319079 1,119.63 5352.652. 1,0730».53 5351337 1,151.45 5353296 337.44 651.072. 2.0707.0707 5353684 547.79 657.41 11.33 5365757 1,0751.45 53662707 1,169.45 53653707 1,214.37 5366941 1,171.107 5365972. 337.97 590732 2.0707.0707 5867019 1,269.45 53670744 1,14934 5867123 515.31 304.1.3 50.001 5367175 94434 536719 1 1,154.37 5867274 1,223.073 Page 51 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 5867299 $ 1,268.79 5377775 $ 476.49 $ 440».077 $ 2507.0»07 5377326 $ 5073.96 $ 592.49 $ 507.0701 5377375 $ - $ - $ 362.3G.y 53730754 $ $ $ 895.99 53730759 $ 7.073 $ 3163 $ 335.0707 5878121 $ $ $ 918.407 53735507 $ 26935 $ 62291 $ 67.44 53790194 $ $ $ 1,0733.307 5397962 $ - $ - $ 1,0771307 5393756 $ $ $ 1,219.62 5916944 $ - $ - $ 1,3079.45 5916965 $ 413.83 $ 769.49 $ 103.45 5916997 $ - $ - $ 395.99 5917024 $ 107.54 $ 507.45 $ 335.001 5917166 $ - $ - $ 1,1071907 5917453 $ 1,0713.29 $ $ 50.001 5924675 $ 119 307 $ 556.36 $ 2.0707.0707 5925292 $ $ $ 1,125.77 5925413 $ - $ - $ 94434 5925459 $ $ $ 1,018.29 59255707 $ - $ - $ 1,19945 5925332 $ $ $ 1,096.58 5925931 $ 970A6 $ - $ 1077.33 5925931 $ $ $ 1,269.45 5926242 $ - $ - $ 1,13&53 5926445 $ 107.54 $ 507.45 $ 335.001 5926474 $ - $ - $ 395.99 5926497 $ $ $ 943.16 5926522 $ - $ - $ 1,075934 592 6627 $ $ $ 1,239.73 592.6557 $ 1,169.45 $ - $ 10707.0707 592 6665 $ 4901.32 $ $ 753.30 5927232 $ 806M $ - $ 345.43 5935196 $ $ $ 1,069.74 59353073 $ - $ - $ 1,19945 5936562 $ 107.54 $ 50.45 $ 335.001 5936513 $ 107.54 $ 507.45 $ 335.0707 5936729 $ $ $ 1,0729.607 5935377 $ 3.51 $ 10».32. $ 335.0707 5135634 $ 107.54 $ 50.45 $ 335.001 Page 52 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 59357073 - - 395.99 5986125 1,395.33 5936134 1,130».32 5936145 869.51 199.99 5936132. 62.5.075 597.207 15&27 598634 6 x,38 .93 5936533 37 ..075 23732 2.0707.0707 5986573 343. 107 5936533 1,07072A4 593 6634 343.907 5936539 1,16C7.0»07 593 665 6 1,136.91 5936574 3644 607 55169 2.0707.0707 593 6695 1,024.75 5936721 1,0734.29 5986758 895.99 5987013 - - 376307 5987141 201.00 434.33 20701.0701 5937426 35533 5337533 355.33 59330724 151 1&82 335.0707 5333033 3.51 16.82 335.001 5933723 395.99 53337301 335.33 5994552 1,292.53 59945901 1,2207.66 5994623 395.99 5334 652 335.33 5994737 - - 35533 5334313 335.33 5994377 - - 1,14L95 53343301 335.33 5994925 395.99 5994967 868.407 507.0701 59950755 133.57 763.63 195.39 599529 1,34 6.707 5995245 1,131307 599525 1 1,231.69 5995259 1,19837 59953075 1,119.62 5995332 4307.x.5 65/.077 107/.53 Page 53 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 60745687 $ 1,150.49 60745732 $ 33129 60745342 $ 1,125.61 60745922 $ 1,26934 60745949 $ 1,299.95 6046173 $ 714.0707 $ 414.52. 6074695 $ $ 1,325.71 6046210 $ - $ 1,286M 60746246 $ $ 1,331.27 6046329 $ 963.2.9 $ 1507.0707 60746353 $ $ 917.31 6046399 $ - $ 95129 60146444 $ 1,2207.77 $ 1501.0701 60746435 $ 2.4.607 $ 11731 $ 335.0707 607465072 $ $ $ 977.31 6046573 $ - $ - $ 1,33L43 6074 6624 $ $ $ 1,224.72 6046645 $ 47336 $ 517.071 $ 5116 6074 6660 $ $ $ 1,442.077 60746687 $ 372307 $ 716M $ 2.0707.0707 6097335 $ $ $ 1,07407.33 607973507 $ 2.76.34 $ 694.91 $ 69.073 $ 107.54 ,7 54.52 ,7 335.00 60797386 $ - $ - $ 90707.075 60717555 $ 107.54 $ 54.52 $ 335.001 60797564 $ 107.54 $ 53.53 $ 335.0707 60975901 $ $ $ 1,015.94 607976072 $ - $ - $ 1,07307. .7 60798633 $ 9307.43 $ $ 57.001 6079372.1 $ 107.54 $ 54.52 $ 335.0707 60793959 $ $ $ 900.06 6132862 $ - $ - $ 1,107339 0..132951 � �, ... $ ... $ 851.40 61330741 $ 107.54 $ 50».55 $ 335.0707 6133059 $ ... $ ... $ 307:1.23 6133306 $ - $ - $ 1,224.22 6133395 � �, ... $ ... $ 1,118.29 6133426 $ - $ - $ 97939 6133731 $ 3076.407 $ $ 964.707 6133355 $ 363.95 $ 55434 $ 2.0707.0707 6133864 $ r.. .... .. � �, X,077�.7� �, $ 50.001 Page 54 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 6133914 1,090 A7 6133944 6133955 3M98 9 8 514M 2.G.yG.y.G.yG.y 6339 66 447. 7 79.03 111.79 6134000 84190 21M7 6134459 1,184.87 50.00 6134696 97434 614007 1,2 61.93 6140115 90M6 6140123 900.06 6140139 1,13&65 6140173 043.35 6140364 36105 545.20 MOM 6140492 900.06 6140502 90M6 6140684 1,552.00 6140758 1,000m 41L21 6140788 1,314.18 6140817 29032 52035 100.00 640350 240.67 607.35 60.17 6140862 1,00T28 6140030 900.06 6140941 90M6 6141069 1,213.52 6141097 1,20934 6141106 1,073.16 6141176 1,058A1 10MO 6141191 1,106.32 6147279 002.02 6147289 1,430.50 6147333 1,255Al 6163682 1,013.53 6163 719 00120 125.G.yG.y 663730 6163747 1,445.21 66375.3 6163011 422A7 690G 21 105.62 663943 � �, ... �, ... �, 1,315.35 6163970 1,08L95 6164111 1,351.69 6164147 45266 61929 11116 Page 55 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 6190252 252 $ 1,131.47 6190339 $ 1,0763.47 6190806 6 $ 355.33 61907962 $ 65533 61910773 $ 313.74 $ 7407.13 $ 36.57 61912074 $ - $ - $ 1,13635 6191343 $ $ $ 1,292.9 6191442 $ 107.54 $ 56.55 $ 635.0707 6191452 452 $ 107.54 $ 55.74 $ 335.0701 6191466 $ - $ - $ 1,0736.53 6191513 513 $ $ $ 335.33 6191941 $ - $ - $ 1,076231 6192159 59 $ 6192255 $ 107.54 $ 56.55 $ 635.0707 697357 $ 17.54 $ 55.74 $ 33x .70 6197421 $ 1,16933 $ - $ 49.99 6197443 $ $ $ 1,060.05 61974707 $ 1,0763.34 $ - $ 2707.64 6197514 $ ... $ ... $ 1,135.71 61976407 $ 476.65 $ 46x..53 $ 52.66 6197674 $ $ $ 1,131.45 6197954 $ - $ - $ 1,470737 6198924 $ 513.95 $ 554.34 $ 50.001 61990776 $ - $ - $ 1,3307.44 6199277 � �, ... $ ... $ 1,033.16 61992907 $ - $ - $ 1,32936 6199335 � �, ... $ ... $ 1,137.75 6214451 $ - $ - $ 1,162.42 6214495 $ $ $ 1,0733.407 6214521 $ - $ - $ 1,074739 6214531 $ $ $ 1,135.71 6214542 $ - $ - $ 1,0776.62 6214621 $ ... $ ... $ 1,163.10.'.,Y 6215666 $ - $ - $ 1,426.607 6115377 $ $ $ 1,168.46 62159076 $ - $ - $ 1,075L45 6215957 $ 315.62 $ $ 1001.001 6215973 $ 1,075336 $ - $ 132.207 6216453 $ $ $ 1,431.14 6223542 $ 44x..66 $ 46432 $ 1107.42 6223629 $ 107.54 $ 54.52 $ 335.0701 Page 56 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 622363 8 1M4 5&58 835.G.yG.y 622365 1 1,152.15 6223697 774.24 516A5 627007 967. 5 6278700 1G.y.S4 54.52 835.G.yG.y 6273727 900.06 6278735 1,16231 6273744 33.73 6278780 1,028A4 6273353 304. 2 6278968 1M4 5&58 835.G.yG.y 627022 1 075.23 6270230 OG.yG.y. 6 6279253 900.06 6270273 48M6 6 484.x.8 6279330 135.14 5 67.13 179.99 6286924 1,089A9 6237263 442.23 682.20 110.56 6287267 39&05 830.G.yG.y 100.00 6287275 1,289.12 6287307 002.02 6287425 251.52 701. 7 270.00 6287439 92M7 628744 6 1,346.56 6203443 1,33185 620345 1 330.63 547. 0 200.00 6203457 1,25&82 6293470 1,1 0.36 50.00 6203406 1,23&96 10G.y.G.O 620.3521 1,350.11 6315904 1,48632 6316101 1,169.50 6316505 96732 6316571 041.44 6340858 1,350Al 6340886 1,000.00 450.13 6340891 07330 6340013 1,110.11 6340939 1,335A7 6341010 1,037.14 6341137 509y 2.1 71(».61 5(».60 Page 57 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 6341222 $ 1,349.78 6402688 $ 904.x.2 6402702 $ 900.06 6402762 $ 90M6 6402780 $ 991.54 6402791 $ 90M6 6402823 $ 900.06 6402966 $ 90M6 6403018 $ 295.18 $ 545.22 $ 199.99 6403036 $ - $ - $ 90M6 6403087 $ - $ - $ 90G.y. 6 6403102 $ $ $ 1,030.29 6403277 $ $ $ 1,010.22 6403313 $ $ $ 96LO5 6403369 $ $ $ 900.06 6403450 $ - $ - $ 90G.y. 6 64034 60 $ 314.97 $ 676.25 $ 200.00 6403482 $ - $ - $ 1,105.45 6403505 $ $ $ 926.45 6403523 $ - $ - $ 1,439.48 6403562 $ $ $ 1,108.46 6403596 $ 10M $ - $ 1,05438 6434506 $ 1,000.00 $ $ 349.84 6434511 $ 43&66 $ - $ 69118 6434523 $ $ $ 1,391.16 6434598 $ 83L68 $ - $ 50.G.yG.y 6434652 $ 10.54 $ 54.52 $ 835.00 6434657 $ 1G.y.54 $ 54.52 $ 835.G.yG.y 6434674 $ $ $ 1,150.12 6435391 $ - $ - $ 1,245.67 6435467 $ $ $ 1,026.10 6435519 $ - $ - $ 987.48 6435553 $ $ $ 1,133.42 6435639 $ - $ - $ 90M6 6435688 $ $ $ 900.06 6435769 $ - $ - $ 1,00230 6435802 $ $ $ 1,047.70 6435874 $ - $ - $ 1,102 66 6435947 $ $ $ 1,312.53 Page 58 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 6436021 1,348M 643679 9074. 2 6437332 90M6 6437331 981.44 6459801 1,270».94 6459872 1,153.19 647072.12. 1,02534 10336 6470231 1,149.74 6470235 1,19337 6470238 1,0713.97 6553521 1,20M0 6553543 998.41 6559214 1,228M 6559423 1,114.61 1507.0707 6560064 1,157.55 50.G7G7 6617217 � �, ... �, ... �, 1,14 6.31 6617229 1,013.29 661 7242 1,1073.79 6617267 91880 6617283 1,4507.77 6617326 43339 614.21 109.59 6617344 1,225.96 6617351 1,35X..31 6617364 1,244.61 6632622 1,074.99 6632632 1,1073.46 6632665 2.65.2.4 609.63 HMO 6632763 3707.37 553.41 20707.0707 6632325 1,133.X.5 6632342 432.907 462.73 1073.22 6642737 94LO8 6642795 370.37 433.42 20707.0707 6642861 1,169.50 6642336 1,399.62 6642392 1,08844 6642916 434.55 799.35 1073.62 6642949 1,144A0 99.99 66430723 4073.47 6207.075 1507.0707 6643033 50104 596.X.5 55.92 66430744 3107.79 953.0707 6643084 1,152.21 Page 59 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 6643249 $ 900.06 6643263 $ 004.x.2 6643336 $ 007.64 6643422 $ 000.06 6643431 $ 900.06 6643441 $ - - 004.x.2 664385 $ 000.06 6643663 $ - - 004.x.2 6643330 $ 526.70 $ 443.04 $ 60.00 6643014 $ - $ - $ 1,16433 6643927 $ $ $ 900.06 6644010 $ - $ - $ 000.G.y6 664440 $ 64.44 $ $ 400.63 6644305 $ - $ - $ 076.46 6644406 $ $ $ 1,155.11 6644410 $ - $ - $ 1,06337 6644440 $ $ $ 900.06 6644466 $ - $ - $ 000.G.y6 665773 $ $ $ 1,304.36 6651861 $ - $ - $ 00032 665200 $ 436. 0 $ 607.36 $ 103.76 6652063 $ - $ - $ 03 ..04 6652033 $ $ $ 1,116.70 6662232 $ - $ - $ 1,36637 6652278 $ $ $ 1,010.60 6662436 $ - $ - $ 30333 6652441 $ $ $ 1,103.90 6662673 $ - $ - $ 1,360.x.6 &°.YE°52594 $ 10.00 $ $ 1,071.04 6662623 $ 1,024.64 $ - $ 40.00 6653086 $ $ $ 1,169.50 6653096 $ - $ - $ 023.23 6653175 $ ... $ ... $ 1,195.11 6663232 $ - $ - $ 1,27233 6653166 $ $ $ 1,613.63 6663267 $ - $ - $ 1,00100 6661104 $ $ $ 1,011.06 6720370 $ - $ - $ 1,070Al 6730219 $ $ $ 900.06 6742647 $ - $ - $ 000.06 6742663 $ $ $ 004.12 Page 60 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 6749696 - - 90442 6749703 900.06 6749706 - - 90G7.G76 6749712 904.12 6740726 90G7.G76 6740330 900.06 6740636 - - 90G7.G76 6740354 1,730.34 6740662 1,71632 6740868 1,513.41 6740676 - - 1,661.64 6740330 1,511.37 6740604 - - 1,65T01 6740036 331.00 004.76 5 6750047 1,405Al 6750065 1,174.00 6750156 1,389A5 6750225 1,184.13 6750412 1,246.x.7 6750421 1,503.74 6757406 - - 1,760.61 6750057 1,603.61 6750993 - - 1,61008 6751102 1,511.53 6751291 1,61030 6757026 1,533.79 6757055 1,415.61 6757111 363.05 356.10 100.00 6757364 - - 90G7.G76 6757396 900.06 6757777 - - 1,474.20 6753035 1,611.20 6758077 1,76035 6758145 1,511.53 6756272 1,45045 6753311 1,171.36 6756346 - - 1,12x..06 6753411 1,473.14 6756626 07x..66 6753500 1,301.01 6756667 1,4M24 - 60.G7G7 Page 61 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 6793743 $ 1,992.31 67537707 $ - - 1,72.6.76 6793779 $ 1,629.107 6796636 $ 37639 $ 1,077131 $ 2.0707.0707 6793374 $ $ $ 1,779.32 67665079 $ - $ - $ 1,607737 $ 1,494.95 $ $ 99.99 6766962 $ - $ - $ 1,071196 6765602 $ 379.46 $ 443.39 $ 149.99 6766639 $ 47 ..37 $ 1,0744.96 $ 11T96 6765679 $ $ $ 1,6407.99 6766666 $ 1,17&22 $ - $ 2077.67 6765749 $ $ $ 1,526.29 63363076 $ - $ - $ 1,41153 6837080 $ $ $ 1,422.93 6346217 $ - $ - $ 1,376.207 6846232 $ $ $ x,85 .92 63462707 $ - $ - $ 1,29L53 6846276 $ $ $ 1,493.34 6346236 $ - $ - $ 1,60L20 68464074 $ $ $ 1,769.75 6346426 $ - $ - $ 1,369.073 6846492 $ $ $ 1,626.073 634660707 $ - $ - $ 1,667.94 6346697 $ - $ - $ 1,372.407 684 66077 $ $ $ 2,141.707 6346666 $ - $ - $ 1,491607 63943077 $ 1,455.12 $ $ 907.0707 63943707 $ - $ - $ 1,914.46 6854523 $ $ $ 1,913.37 6399422 $ 94 ..37 $ 1,07607.99 $ 22.67 6399926 $ 447.17 $ 1,0733.29 $ 111.79 63660719 $ - $ - $ 1,4159 51 68560735 $ $ $ 1,946.34 6334926 $ - $ - $ 1,669.x.3 68846079 $ $ $ 1,9072.56 6334637 $ 437.22 $ 1,0736.073 $ 1151 6884724 $ $ $ 2,756.89 6924497 $ - $ - $ 1,579.95 6924493 $ $ $ 1,493.86 Page 62 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 6924634 1,662.62 6924647 7 436.00 949.27 125.00 7149635 - - 2.,609y 57 7149693 1,614.29 7149770 1,67330 714978 1 1,545.60 7149833 49Gy.Gy7 1,26 ..63 7149851 1,313.53 7149664 - - 1,66032 749362 1,617.01 7149898 - - 1,82330 7149922 421.92 934.70 105.48 7140037 - - 1,66733 7150007 1,672.03 7150049 1,064.66 7150056 1,641.20 7172126 37037 660A1 MOM 733503 1,54 6.77 7166666 - - 1,66636 718878 1 1,8 7.97 7188791 1,61484 7303 63 1,430.31 7160363 - - 1,642 05 7189410 1,000.73 7160436 - - 1,606.60 7189467 447.17 1,031.24 111.79 7189475 1,450.G.1G.1 - 16034 7189509 1,5 3.50 7190133 1,42.0.G.16 7190182 370.37 961.97 200.00 7190191 1,456.x.5 40.00 7190215 1,519.07 7190255 1,36G.1.24 7190289 1,4 66.29 7190300 1,474.'1.9 7190374 363.05 956.20 200.00 7190407 1,15130 44L52 7197308 1,809.65 7197326 1,660.G.13 719735 1 1,592.05 50.00 7197374 45335 1,292.6G.1 11144 Page 63 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 7197482 $ 1,495.15 7197510 $ 1,12032 $ - 23Gy.Gy7 797 601 $ 243.96 $ 1027.99 $ 60.99 7198093 $ - $ - $ 2,271..29 7193113 $ 1,934.43 $ $ 90.06 7193156 $ 37037 $ 915.92 $ 2.G.yG.y.G.yG.y 7291037 $ $ $ 1,703.93 7291116 $ - $ - $ 1,51150 7291127 $ $ $ 1,343.70 7291141 $ - $ - $ 1,49636 7291156 $ $ $ 2,043.34 7291371 $ - $ - $ 1,436.G.y3 7291409 $ $ $ 1,343.90 7302011 $ - $ - $ 1,99123 7302030 $ 1,492.66 $ $ 49.99 7302162 $ 24196 $ 1,077.99 $ 6G.y.99 7302130 $ 1,780.23 $ $ 100.00 7302333 $ - $ - $ 1,457.46 7347107 $ $ $ 1,930.72 7347113 $ - $ - $ 1,69739 7347167 $ 492.66 $ 996.99 $ 113.16 7347197 $ - $ - $ 1,631..44 7347226 $ 491.56 $ 990.99 $ 112.33 7347331 $ 436.69 $ - $ 1,024.G.yG.y 7347336 $ $ $ 1,331.19 7347367 $ - $ - $ 1,647.46 7347333 $ $ $ 1,510.96 7347442 $ - $ - $ 1,502.10 7347506 $ $ $ 1,333.03 7347636 $ 23631 $ 1,00137 7 $ 50M 7347 693 $ $ $ 1,371.49 7347721 $ - $ - $ 1,66632 7394913 $ $ $ 1,920.24 7365080 $ 1,36339 $ - $ 10G.y.G.O 7399100 $ $ $ 1,600.24 7365111 $ - $ - $ 1,626.1.2 7366126 $ $ $ 1,689.63 7366146 $ - $ - $ 1,62931 7366162 $ $ $ 1,626.72 7366173 $ 492.66 $ 97732 $ 11116 7366132 $ $ $ 1,774.43 Page 64 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 7355225 1,412.25 7355141 1,794.41 7355346 - - 1,66L44 739638 1,511.17 7391649 - - 1,66539 739 667 1,537.49 7391708 42139 1,02437 2.G.yG.y.G.yG.y 739 72 1 1,271.32 150.00 7391861 1,33G7 O 7391941 1,686.93 7391962 1,412.56 150.G7G7 7391967 1,356.07 7391963 - - 1,50046 7392046 1,358.64 7392084 1,44637 7392094 1,395.64 7392160 1,64205 7407709 1,785.98 7407781 1,46637 7407343 1,489.63 7407919 414.92 99636 2.G7G7.G7G7 7407945 1,555.63 7407953 - - 1,56539 7407965 1,613.50 7408136 1,26M8 7408334 1,583.37 7408417 1,81038 7408443 1,504.22 7408456 - - 1,81L68 7408473 1,710.48 200.00 7476476 - - 1,54L20 7408496 1,467.94 7408527 1,612.62 7408537 1,392.36 7408623 1,65934 7408734 2,025.36 7408922 2,235.90 7408963 1,741.64 7408969 - - 2,266.50 7408981 1,669.06 7446201 1,592.62 Page 65 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 7446207 $ 1,333.36 7446219 $ 1,58M6 $ 60.G7G7 7461230 $ 1,360.04 $ 30.06 7461280 $ - $ 1,67032 7461374 $ - $ - 1,674.67 74 61386 $ $ 1,326.10 7461666 $ - $ - 1,67146 743 303 $ $ 1,719.34 7462156 $ - $ 1,065.60 7431313 $ $ 1,648.36 7650693 $ - $ - 1,776.62 7 650747 $ 460.00 $ 1,437.04 $ 133.37 7650754 $ - $ - $ 1,422.66 7 630773 $ $ $ 1,330.24 7650762 $ - $ - $ 1,667A7 7650868 $ $ $ 1,5 0.27 7650925 $ - $ - $ 1,62636 7650044 $ $ $ x,62 .01 6316430 $ - $ - $ 1,78430 6320673 $ - $ - $ 1,5090 26 3329756 $ $ $ 1,233.13 6320706 $ - $ - $ 1,45L16 331034 $ $ $ 1,637.40 6320645 $ - $ - $ 1,78L20 331004 $ $ $ 1,303.24 6320061 $ - $ - $ 1,60231 33427 66 $ $ $ 1,474.34 6342770 $ 6090 21 $ 015 A2 $ 11116 3342700 $ $ $ 1,468.46 63422616 $ - $ - $ 1,639M 3342824 $ $ $ 1,763.70 63422632 $ - $ - $ 1,64L20 3342923 $ $ $ 1,4 3.02 6343051 $ 422A7 $ 63 O3 $ 1057 62. 3343030 $ 370.37 $ 373.01 $ 200.00 6343112 $ - $ - $ 1,744.67 8343189 $ 1,707.65 5 $ $ 30.00 6343209 $ - $ - $ 1,654A3 3337333 $ 1,3&' 2.24 $ $ 73.00 Page 66 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 6367364 - - 1,465A2 3357376 1,867.40 35.00 6367614 - - 1,45636 3357653 1,368.92 6366697 - - 1,67G.y.27 8366617 1,50 .4 8366651 - - 1,688A0 8366772 1,395.36 465.11 6366777 674.69 - 66732 8366828 363.95 933.79 206.06 6366641 1,6224.G.yG.y - 1140 3431031 1,617.01 6461062 1,61T01 8482156 1,694.15 6462266 1,666.60 3431347 1,345.36 150.00 8507322 1,67732 8507801 311.08 1,126.13 34.5 6607063 309y 67 1,000 G.yG.y 8508381 1,440.50 8508433 1,O10G 23 8508541 1,5 0.48 6608653 1,426.20 10G.y.G.O 3503720 333.00 000.44 05.77 6615641 36LG.O 005y 66 50M 8515686 1,371.49 6615670 36136 1,00&95 150M 351607 1 1,546.77 6646606 1,667.01 - 60.G.yG.y 8546908 1,318.74 6676627 - - 1,042A6 8576846 1,5&°0.24 6677143 - - 1,70 ..44 8577172 1,716.44 6677214 1,410A8 8577221 1,641.20 .20 8577227 1,610A8 3577244 2,033.70 6677267 40637 1,020 Al 75.G.yG.y 3504 621 1,767.4 6604600 - - 1,55L46 Page 67 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 8594713 $ 1,387.13 8694832 $ 1,76330 8624264 $ 1,310.11 8624272 $ 1,630Al 8624292 $ 1,651.44 8624302 $ 1,37118 8624335 $ 1,492.13 8624348 $ 37037 $ 8 2.x..9 7 $ MOM G.yG.y 8624407 $ $ $ 1,683.09 8624410 $ - $ - $ 1,692.82 8624440 $ $ $ 1,780.68 8624394 $ 1,60142 $ - $ 73.G7G7 8624684 $ 837.83 $ $ 387.73 8624741 $ 1,03100 $ - $ 692M 8624752 $ $ $ 1,384.43 8624826 $ - $ - $ 1,827.89 8624837 $ $ $ 1,531.17 8636367 $ - $ - $ 1,310Al 8 633498 $ $ $ 1,133.17 8635540 $ - $ - $ 1,867.89 8709900 $ $ $ 1,719.14 8742896 $ - $ - $ 1,41168 8731983 $ $ $ 1,386.77 8753024 $ - $ - $ 1,426.60 873304 $ $ $ 1,871.44 8753051 $ - $ - $ 1,66330 8733091 $ - $ - $ 1,626M 8753113 $ $ $ 1,163.33 8753161 $ - $ - $ 1,73L44 8733437 $ $ $ x,40 .77 8754886 $ - $ - $ 1,63838 8827072 $ $ $ 1,706.24 8827077 $ 37639 $ 94539 $ 2.G7G7.G7G7 8827090 $ 333.94 $ 939.91 $ 11.33 8827126 $ - $ - $ 1,68330 8827154 $ $ $ 1,41 6.29 8827188 $ - $ - $ 1,657.86 8817113 $ 1,002.09 $ $ 393.79 8827271 $ - $ - $ 1,4407 24 8817340 $ $ $ 1,739.5 Page 68 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 3327349 1,5407 24 3317473 1,314.33 313.7 3327480 - - 1,69194 33531704 1,137.35 3363032. 1,062.96 722.20 33531735 1,647.65 3363100 1,677.97 8858134 370.37 913.94 200.00 6666236 1,693.60 3353302 1,544.43 3363339 - - 1,496.7.5 3353349 1,507.25 3363363 - - 1,50435 33533 66 1,359.07 3905963 - - 1,61M9 39076037 1,574.30 3906042 1,785.98 3907612 1 1,450.48 3906139 1,37.0M 75.G7G7 39076154 1,573.34 3906156 1,692.7.3 39792 1 1,665.39 6972002 1,37005 3972037 426.37 995.74 106.70 3972074 1,50123 29L40 3972087 1,592.65 3972123 1,336.29 8972198 1,774.90 3972241 1,442.62 8977845 1,714.84 3977363 - - 1,666.7.2 3977355 1,411.17 3977390 - - 1,61M6 9015625 1,353.46 9026928 1,616.64 9025657 1,317.52 9073642 1,43637 90733417 1,796.04 9073362 1,603.63 9093574 1,391.32 9093791 - - 1,947.94 Page 69 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 0003700 $ 314.30 $ 981.46 $ 16.23 9093846 $ - $ - $ 1,70434 00033 66 $ $ $ 1,762.64 9103413 $ 28836 $ 82&96 $ 2.00.00 9103420 $ $ $ 1,673.30 9103427 $ - $ - $ 1,668A2 9103439 $ $ $ 1,403.01 9103463 $ - $ - $ 1,62T62 0103330 $ 447.17 $ 031.14 $ 111.79 9137031 $ - $ - $ 1,68&69 9137067 $ 1,264.07 $ $ 100.00 913712 $ - $ - $ 1,84330 9137168 $ $ $ x,72 .20 9137191 $ - $ - $ 1,656.G.y 9137362 $ 403.34 $ 1,133.43 $ 101.03 9137417 $ - $ - $ 1,255.84 9137442 $ $ $ 1,133.34 9137516 $ 1,33&22 $ - $ 100.00 9137861 $ $ $ 1,713.94 0137016 $ $ $ 1,665.39 9138008 $ - $ - $ 1,71033 9138077 $ $ $ 1,607.46 913 115 $ - $ - $ 1,804.42 0133133 $ $ $ 1,064.66 915917 $ - $ - $ 1,30T24 9159207 $ $ $ 1,307.14 0150234 $ - $ - $ 1,25030 9183092 $ $ $ 1,309.8 9183109 $ - $ - $ 2,152.50 9183120 $ $ $ 1,330.14 9183127 $ - $ - $ 1,225M 918337 $ $ $ 1,333.30 9183160 $ - $ - $ 1,314.05 9183172 $ $ $ 1,477.74 9183362 $ - $ - $ 1,00104 9183444 $ $ $ x,41 .00 9183451 $ - $ - $ 1,050.57 9183455 $ $ $ 1,965.62 9183470 $ - $ - $ 1,84330 9183495 $ $ $ 1,330.14 Page 70 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lfr(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;�Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 9224079 1,30903 9224118 1,506.53 30.00 9224126 1,92M6 022440 1,670.43 9224168 1,52967 0224220 1,633.63 92224230 1,21337 52M7 0224271 1,0.'..Y1 7.01 0224270 1,50.10 013301 6 1,419.33 9235040 1,79194 0133033 1,333.16 0235158 1,255.24 9235201 1,44 6.34 100.00 0235274 1,6490 27 0133133 1,444.17 922446224 - - 1,63&53 0144 64 6 1,537.49 9244678 1,37005 9244701 1,477.70 9244728 O G.yG.y.G.yG.y 60839 9244765 1,431.33 30.00 02244775 - - 1,639.51 9245133 1,376.29 150.00 02245275 - - 1,885. 3 014333 1,3 67.30 02245413 513.05 95&2.0 50M 0143413 1,333.15 9268872 1,857.02 91 63307 1,313.30 9268988 47836 1,17L22 5116 9269047 1,562.74 9269225 86936 50&84 0169262 1,470.06 9269267 1,31332 9269345 1,856.00 9269337 1,63 . 2 9169368 1,697.17 9269419 1,34836 9269423 1,473.36 9269473 1,37005 Page 71 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4N�N�d�iilal llu�iuiid�uufiuiiaiff�Ill�ilY�l��a� i�ll u�iiuYiai�u��u�uuuP�lfai(u���iiai�ll����llllll ll�Aivalfl(a�aiil�f�ullliuuuif�(iaiiY�ua�uAii(iuul�uiiaGiallui(lfliuii�uaiu������������ uuail faioullullu'iia�ia��i�fluuii ! ii((i�ul�uiiu;R aa�iuii(uu�al�u��ailufiai(aj�u�aivaiiiai 9269493 $ 1,645.32 $ 50.00 02 69506 $ $ 1,406.44 9269570 $ - $ 1,30536 9269594 $ $ 1,602.74 9269669 $ $ 1,77632 02 69853 $ $ 1,357.07 9280688 $ $ 1,595A5 0130303 $ $ 1,714.34 9280911 $ 54937/ $ 1,089M $ 22.01 9280056 $ $ $ 1,501.20 9281134 $ - $ - $ 1,505.84 9281197 $ 3 70.3 7 $ 051.30 $ 200.00 9281203 $ - $ - $ 1,86L95 695 9281266 $ 420.33 $ 1,001.52 $ 105.20 0281203 $ - $ - $ 1,582A0 013 300 $ $ $ 1,587.41 0281325 $ 1,30T22 $ - $ 2.G.yG.y.G.yG.y 9281336 $ $ $ 1,550.55 9290841 $ - $ - $ 1,532A7 0100305 $ 10.30 $ 67.8 $ x,21 .33 9291096 $ - $ - $ 1,33M4 030030 $ $ $ 1,433.00 9300315 $ $ $ 1,38830 0300340 $ $ $ 1,237.35 9300492 $ 2.x.0 $ 036 $ 1,34&05 9300650 $ $ $ 1,577.00 9300776 $ $ $ 1,57L48 9300736 $ $ $ 1,304.55 9300917 $ $ $ 1,464.67 931172 $ - $ - $ 1,43L65 9311819 $ $ $ 1,709.06 0353502 $ $ $ 1,920.16 0353587 $ - $ - $ 2,16&85 0353662 $ 0353075 $ - $ - $ 1,55&86 0353000 $ $ $ 1,901.34 Page 72 of 73 Write-off Accounts - December 19, 2015 �4NNN��aiaVlllaiaiaiail dial(iiaiaiaifluiiaiaYai�la� i�lVi�iiaiYiaf�ai�lailiaiaiair�luai(all liiai�ll����l lul ll�aiu�lf�r(a�aial�f�ail luaiaiaiafai�liaYaiail�aiaiaf iaiail�aiiiaGiallaia(If liaiai�uaiai���������������ia��aail�aiaiai;��Naa�liaiailf uai�al�ai�lailaiaiai(af�aillaiaiaiaiaill lllllll,������������������� aivaif aioaillailiaiaia�ia�li�f�aiaiai llaaa��llll 933401 8 1,233.24 9354116 x,5 52.&°.Y 1 9334131 1,32237 9354170 1,406.44 9354204 1,540A 93342 60 1,416.33 9334339 - - 1,910G 23 9365061 1,586.08 9365077 f»CD.G.yG.y 1,26114 9365103 1,403.97 9365131 1,629A0 9365203 1,632.13 0373323 1,87&61 037334 6 2,303.0 0375709 37630 05431 2.G.yG.y.G.yG.y 0373727 1,507.17 30.00 9375964 - - 1,78136 0373037 444.03 1,032.30 111.23 0305345 37630 84530 2.G.yG.y.G.yG.y 9303496 2,233.30 9405066 1,81L12 9405155 1,610.27 9405165 1,522A9 9405233 370.37 030.i i 200.00 9406724 1,56644 94366 05 9436775 - - 1,412.40 0436803 1,603.33 0437737 - - 1,474.67 9457762 333.04 1,107.71 23.12 0457778 - - 1,32531 0433130 1,600.44 0483525 1,787.80 0433964 331.36 1,143.72 200.00 9484056 1,502A1 0434243 1,682.74 9628141 1,522.58 104 60000 1,033.30 10469165 1,44838 1127956 2,340.64 130.00 'rand dotal 708,374.33 � 370,32.3.37 � 2.,692.,9690 2.7 ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................ Page 73 of 73 SAN MATEO COUNTY Elizabeth Lewis, Chairperson Marie Chuang, Vice Chairperson CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE Sukhmani S.Purewal,Secretary 400 County Center Redwood City,94063 650-363-1802 TO: MAYORS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY FROM: SUKHMANI S. PUREWAL, SECRETARY SUBJECT: MEETING OF THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE DATE: December 18, 2015 Council Member Elizabeth Lewis, Chairperson of the San Mateo County City Selection Committee, has called for a meeting of the Committee at 6:15 p.m. on Friday, December 18, 2015, at the Colma Fire House, 50 Reiner Street, Colma, CA 94014. Please arrive on time 1) Roll Call 2) Approval of the minutes for the meeting of May 29, 2015 3) Selection of one (1) Council Member to serve on the Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD)representing Cities (All cities are eligible) for a term of two (2)years beginning January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017 i. Council Member David Canepa, City of Daly City, is seeking re-appointment 4) Selection of one (1) Council Member to serve on the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA)representing Cities (All cities are eligible) for a term of two (2)years beginning January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017 i. Council Member Mary Ann Nihart, City of Pacifica, is seeking re-appointment 5) Selection of one (1) Council Member to serve on the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA)representing Central Cities (Eligible cities:Belmont,Burlingame, Foster City, Half Moon Bay, Hillsborough,Millbrae, and San Mateo) fulfilling Burlingame City Council Member Terry Nagel's term through December 31, 2016 i. Mayor Maureen Freschet, City of San Mateo, is seeking appointment ii. Council Member Michael Brownrigg, City of Burlingame, is seeking appointment 6) Selection of one (1) Council Member to serve on the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (SMCTA)representing Northern Cities (Eligible Cities:Brisbane, Colma,Daly City, Pacifica, San Bruno, and South San Fracisco) for a term of two (2)years beginning January 1, 2016 through December 31, 2017 1 � a _uC i. Council Member David Canepa, City of Daly City, is seeking re-appointment 7) Selection of two (2) Council Members to serve on the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust (HEART)representing Cities (All cities except Daly City are eligible) fulfilling the terms of Millbrae City Mayor Robert Gottschalks and San Mateo City Council Member Jack Matthews through February 28, 2018 i. Council Member Rick Bonilla, City of San Mateo, is seeking appointment ii. Council Member Doug Kim, City of Belmont, is seeking appointment 8) Election of a Chairperson to the City Selection Committee for 2016 (Note: Candidates must be a current Mayor or Council Member) i. Council Member Marie Chuang, Town of Hillsborough, is seeking appointment 9) Election of a Vice Chairperson to the City Selection Committee for 2016 (Note: Candidates must be a current Mayor or Council Member) i. Council Member Liza Normandy, City of South San Francisco, is seeking appointment 10)Oral Communications (Any subject not on the agenda maybe presented at this time. These topics cannot be acted upon or discussed, but may be agendized for a later meeting date.) If you have any questions or require additional information, contact Sukhmani S. Purewal at (650) 363- 1802. 21 Pa c SAN MATEO COUNTY Elizabeth Lewis, Chairperson Marie Chuang, Vice Chairperson CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE Mina Lim,Acting Secretaty 400 Count) Center Redwood Cio), 94063 650-363-4124 TO: MAYORS OF SAN MATEO COUNTY FROM: MINA LIM, ACTING SECRETARY SUBJECT: MEETING OF THE CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE DATE: May 29, 2015 Council Member Elizabeth Lewis, Chairperson of the San Mateo County City Selection Committee, has called for a meeting of the Committee at 6:15 p.m. on Friday, May 22, 2015, at the San Bruno Senior Center, 1555 Crystal Springs Road, San Bruno, CA 94066. DRAFT MINUTES 1) Roll Call—The meeting was called to order at 6:20 p.m. The following cities were present: Atherton, Belmont, Brisbane, Burlingame, Colma, Daly City, Foster City, Hillsborough, Millbrae, Pacifica, Portola Valley, San Bruno, San Carlos, South San Francisco, Woodside. Absent: East Palo Alto, Half Moon Bay, Menlo Park, Redwood City, San Mateo 2) Approval of the minutes for the meeting of April 24, 2015 Motion: Atherton Second: Millbrae Ayes: All Noes: None 3) Selection of two (2) Council Members to serve as the member on the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Committee representing Cities (All cities are eligible) for a term of two (2) years beginning July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017 Council Member Pradeep Gupta, South San Francisco,was re-appointed Council Member Mary Ann Nihart, Pacifica,was re-appointed Motion to declare the election by acclamation: Millbrae Second: South San Francisco Ayes: All Noes: None 4) Selection of two (2) Council Members to serve as the alternate member on the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) Committee representing Cities (All cities are eligible) for a term of two (2)years beginning July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2017 Council Member Wayne Lee, Millbrae,was re-appointed Mayor Catherine Carlton, Menlo Park,was appointed Motion to declare the election by acclamation: South San Francisco Second: Belmont Ayes: All Noes: None 5) Oral Communications None (Any subject not on the agenda maybe presented at this time. These topics cannot be acted upon or discussed, but may be agendized for a later meeting date.) The meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. 21 [11 e rail �! VIA CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED September 9, 2015 BAY ARE A Jannae Oliver AIR QUALITY San Mateo County City Selection Committee 400 County Center, 1St Floor MANAGEMENT Redwood City, California 94063 D 1 S T R i C T RE: Term of City of Daly City Council Member David Canepa on the Board of Directors of the Bay Area Air Quality Management District ALAMEDA COUNTY Tom Bates Dear Ms. Oliver: Margaret Fujioka Scott Haggerty Nate Miley Director Canepa's term of office on the Bay Area Air Quality Management CONTRA COSTA COUNTY District Board of Directors expires on December 31, 2015. Director Canepa John Gioia was appointed to the Board on December 19, 2014, and is eligible for David Hudson Karen Mitchoff reappointment. Mark Ross MARIN COUNTY In accordance with Health and Safety Code Sections 40210 — 40234 (copy Katie Rice enclosed), I request that the appointment for an upcoming two-year term be NAPA COUNTY placed on the agenda of the San Mateo County City Selection Committee for Brad Wagenknecht consideration prior to the current term expiration date. SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY John Avalon Edwin M. Lee Please provide acknowledgment of receipt of this letter by communicating to Eric Mar me the date this matter will be on the agenda and let me know if you have (Vice-Chair) any questions or concerns by contacting me via telephone at 415.749.5073 SAN MATEO COUNTY or email at sgallagher @baagmd.gov. David J.Canepa Carole Groom (Chair) Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter. SANTA CLARA COUNTY Cindy Chavez Sincerely, Liz Kniss (Secretary) Jan Pepper Rod G.Sinks SOLANO COUNTY James Sparing Sean Gallagher Clerk of the Boards SONOMA COUNTY Teresa Barrett Shirlee Zane Enclosures: As stated Jack P. Broadbent Cc (via interdepartmental mail without enclosures): EXECUTIVE OFFICERIAPCO Jack P. Broadbent, Executive Officer/Air Pollution Control Officer Maricela Martinez, Manager, Executive Operations 939 ELLIS STREET - SAN FRANCISCO) CALIFORNIA 94109 • 415.771.6000 d www.baagrnd.gov CFFY COUNCIL RAYMOND A.BUENAVENJ URA DAVID J.CANEPA JUDI_1 H A.CHRIS-1 ENSEN MICHAEL,P.GUINGONA A- SAL,I ORRES PAIRICIA E.MARIEL, CITY MANAGER OFFICE 014" THE CITY COUNCIL K.ANNE-1-1E HIPONA CIY 014" DALY CI T -1 1 E T Y CITY CLERK 333 90TIl STREET DANECA M.FIAL,VORSON DALY CITY, CA 94015-1895 CITY TREASURER PHONE(650)991-8008 November 19, 2015 RE City Selection Committee Appointment to Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members- I write to request your consideration and support for my reappointment as the San Mateo County representative to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board of Directors. It has been an honor and privilege to serve the residents of San Mateo County on the Air District Board for the last year. During those 12 months, I have worked diligently to represent the collective interest of San Mateo County cities and our residents to address the growth of harmful vehicular emissions and other industrial pollutants. Managing air quality in this region is of significant importance to me, and I know to each of you. The ever-increasing population in our region has a direct impact on traffic growth and congestion which contributes to increased harmful emissions. Thus, I have been committed to ensuring the effective alignment of air quality improvement goals and strategies to reduce harmful emissions. Among the accomplishments during the past year that the BAAQMD Board and I are proud to share are the following- Allocated $14M to accelerate electric vehicle fleet incentives, including the purchase of new plug-in electric heavy-duty vehicles and electric buses, neighborhood electric vehicles and electric motorcycles, and expansion of the Bay Area's network of electric charging stations at workplaces, multi-family developments, and key public locations. Of course, the Air District is committed to encouraging electric vehicle adoption by public agencies and developing a regional network of charging stations where the electric vehicle users can conveniently recharge, making electric vehicles a viable fleet option. ➢ Authorized $20M to support the CalTrain electrification project which aims to reduce the impact of this important regional transportation system to zero emissions along the 51 mile corridor between San Francisco and San Jose. The Air District's funding contribution toward this $1.53B project is made possible through the Mobile Source Incentive Fund, which is collected from a $2 fee on motor vehicles registered in the Bay Area. RE- City Selection Committee Appointment to Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD) November 19, 2015 Page 2 of 2 ➢ Developed and approved a Climate Strategy to achieve a 20% reduction in harmful greenhouse gasses. ➢ Established a Regional Bike Sharing Program that will encourage the use of bicycles as an alternative form of transportation by making bicycles readily accessible to potential riders. These and other efforts that the Air District Board will undertake in the coming year offer the potential for many improved air quality benefits to San Mateo County cities. I am deeply committed to being our regional voice on the Air District Board and ensuring that San Mateo County and its cities are the recipients of an equitable allocation of funds for projects that benefit our residents. Thank you in advance for your kind consideration of my reappointment to the Bay Area Air Quality Management District Board of Directors. You have my ongoing commitment to protect the public's health, to enhance air quality in our region and to address global climate change by encouraging additional activities to reduce harmful greenhouse gasses in the Bay Area. Sincerely, J &1 07-- David J. Canepa Councilmember BOARD op DIRECTORS uo10 x^RYLm^TSouom.CHAIR DAVID oxwcm.VICE CHAIR o^ROLsuROow DON HonxLs, CAMERON JOHNSON v»w uArc^ oouwT, �rsnnvw^oeL ` Tr����s rtatxx��� ^xv A w ww .x^xr Authority J/y*^mwsrr EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR October l2' 20l5 Ms. Elizabeth Lewis, Chair City Selection Committee C/O County of San k4o1e0 4O0 County Center Redwood City, (CA 94063 Attn: 3ukhnnnniPurevvo| RE: Transportation Authority Cities at Large Representative Dear Ms. Lewis: This letter is to inform you that the Cities at Large seat held by Mary Ann Nihod on the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (TA) Board of Directors will expire on December 31, 2015 and o re-appointment or appointment by the City Selection Committee should be made. The term for this Semi is January l' 2016 to December 31, 2017. The napres*n1ofk/m must be on elected official from any city inSan Mateo County. If you have questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me at /650> 508-6242orrnodinezrn@snrn1rons.corn. arfha A. Martinez Executive Officer, District Secretary/Executive istru5on cc: TA Board ofDirectors J. Hartnett J. Cossnnon l250 San Carlos Avenue San Carlos, C/\ 94070 (650) 508-6200 ��� � ��� MAYOR � Karen Ervin c ry OF ACIFICA 170 Santa Maria Avenue * Pacifica California 94U�4-I5OG ' MAYOR PRO TEM Sue Digre COUNCIL Mary Ann Nihart Mike O'Neill Scenic Pacifica John Keener Incorporated NOV.z2,`ns7 November 6, 20lS Dear Colleagues: For the past year it has been my honor to represent the cities of San Mateo County as the At- Large representative to the SMC Transportation Authority(TA), finishing the term previously held by Naomi 9utridge, Couucilouezubmr from Half Moon Bay. ,As with each new position,there ixa learning curve and despite uzy previous transportation and regional plauoiugexporiouce, there is always more toknow. Now, laou asking for your support to utilize that knowledge and continue our work ao your at-large representative for 3MC7}\. As funding and other assets remain limited and aging infrastructure needs continue to increase, it is essential for all of us to seek creative,sustainable solutions to transportation needs in San Mateo County. As your representative, I have supported a renewed effort to re-evaluate our strategic plan, devising improved criteria for project evaluation to support the very best use of our resources for all of us. History has shown that we do best when we pool our resources and vvorktogeiboc Improvements in our north/south transportation corridors such usthe electrification of Caltrain require our continued attention but balancing the needs of all of our residents must also include strong connections to support east-west service,reaching our hnyside and coastal communities. Working together,vve can create a more seamless transportation system that preserves the beauty of San Mateo County and enhances mobility for all of our citizens. As Chair of the City and County Association of Governments, I am humbled to work with council members from each nf our cities and representatives from the County. VVc are one of the few counties to have such a body that excels in collaboration and cooperation to maximize the effectiveness of our tax dollars. Our cross jurisdictional work is reflected in awarding winning projects,such as 21 Elements and RI CAPS,for which we received a Beacon Partners Award at the 2015 League of California Cities Conference, and regionally recognized projects,such as the Smart Corridor and Grand Boulevard Priority Development projects in which transportation is integral. l learned much about the unique needs of each of our communities us part ofcoy involvement with C/C/\G. l wish tn continue this work us your representative ou the Board of Directors for the San Mateo County Transportation Authority. I look forward to hearing from each of you,and would be grateful for your continued support in ouy re-election tn the At-Large seat for the Transportation Authority. Thank you for giving ooe this important opportunity to serve our countywide community. Path ofPorto|a 1769* San Francisco Bay Discovery Site All my best, Mary A n Nihart Councilmember, City of Pacifica nihartni@ci.pacifica.ca.us (650) 784-9141 J, BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2015 KARYL MATSUMOTO,CHAIR DAVID CANEPA,VICE CHAIR CAROLE GROOM DON HORSLEY CAMERON JOHNSON SAN MATEO COUNTY TERRY NAGEL Transportation MARYANN NIHART Authority Jim HARTNETT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR October 12, 2015 Ms. Elizabeth Lewis, Chair City Selection Committee c/o County of San Mateo 400 County Center Redwood City, CA 94063 Attn: Sukhmani Purewal RE: Transportation Authority Central Representative (Partial Term) Dear Ms. Lewis: This letter is to inform you that the Central seat held by Terry Nagel on the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (TA) Board of Directors will become vacant in January. Since Ms. Nagel is not seeking re-election to the Burlingame City Council, she will not be able to fulfill her term on the TA Board which expires on December 31, 2016. A board appointment by the City Selection Committee should be made to fill Ms. Nagel's remaining unfinished term. The representative must be an elected official from Belmont, Burlingame, Foster City, Half Moon Bay, Hillsborough, Millbrae, or San Mateo. If you have questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me at (650) 508-6242 or martinezm@samtrans.com. 7yerely,", �2 A "Am Martha A. artinez Executive Officer, District Secretary/Executive Aclrr))*nistration cc: TA Board of Director,t J. Hartnett J. Cassman 1250 San Carlos Avenue San Carlos, CA 94070 (650) 508-6200 OFFICE OF THE MAYOR / 330 West 20th Avenue San Mateo,California 94403-1338 Telephone(650)522-7048 FAX:(650)522-7041 www.cityofsanmateo.org November 9, 2015 Re: Appointment to the San Mateo County Transportation Authority Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Colleagues, I am deeply gratified for the widespread encouragement I have received to pursue the vacant seat on the San Mateo County Transportation Authority representing the Central Judicial Cities. I am excited at the prospect of representing you and serving the citizens of San Mateo County on this important body dealing with the pressing issue of our time. With your support, I will enthusiastically commit myself to addressing our shared challenges and seeking long-range solutions that will benefit all of our communities and make San Mateo County a transportation model for the Bay Area. My tenure on the Planning Commission and City Council and as Mayor of San Mateo this year have been marked by a compelling interest in the causes of the strangling traffic congestion and the dramatic impacts such congestion is having on commerce, the environment, and the quality of life we enjoy on the Peninsula and on our Coast. Having just spent weeks going door-to-door during a successful reelection campaign, I am acutely aware that traffic congestion is a primary concern of our residents. While San Mateo sits at the crossroads of our major highways, and feels the impacts keenly, this is clearly a regional issue affecting all of us, and requires regional solutions. I am very eager to be actively engaged in that process. I am fortunate that my recent professional retirement permits me to devote the necessary time to this significant role, and I welcome the opportunity to participate in the critical work of the TA including reductions in commute corridor congestion, programs to meet the mobility needs of our disabled communities, providing mobility alternatives that will help reduce single occupant vehicle usage, improving mass transit and expanding bicycle and pedestrian access throughout our County. My work on numerous local and County-wide initiatives, including affordable housing and other difficult issues of the day, has demonstrated my effectiveness as a consensus builder and someone who works collaboratively with an inclusive approach that considers all of the stakeholders. While a Planning Commissioner, I reviewed and recommended approval of key elements of the San Mateo Rail Corridor Transit Oriented Development Plan. That plan centers around the need for effective rail service in San Mateo County. My service on the Grand Boulevard Initiative is a parallel effort to successfully work together as a regional body to develop and implement strategies for the revitalization of the El Camino Corridor and the sustainability of the surrounding communities. These activities have at their heart the essential need to expand and enhance our transportation network. Re: Appointment to the San Mateo County Transportation Authority November 9, 2015 Page 2 The City of San Mateo is grateful to the SMCTA for the numerous improvements and upgrades they have spearheaded to benefit our County. We have been well served by Terry Nagel from Burlingame for the past five years, and I would be deeply honored by your appointment to succeed her in the Central Cities seat on the Transportation Authority Board. Please feel free to call me at (650) 520-3070 or email me at mfreschet cityofsanmateo.org if you would like to discuss my candidacy. I sincerely appreciate your support. Maureen Freschet Mayor of San Mateo �pinyn imAe W Re 1E....1Ma:.Ai TERRY NAGEL, MAYOR ANN KEIGHRAN,VICE MAYOR RICARDO ORTIZ TEL: (650)558-7200 MICHAEL BROWNRIGG Te `ay 4 DD 4-4 � FAX: (650)566-9282 JOHN ROOT www.burlingame.org CITY HALL, 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 December 4, 2015 LETTER OF INTEREST Dear Colleagues, I wanted to write a brief note alerting you that I will be throwing my hat in the ring for the seat on the Transportation Authority that will be opening up. I regret not informing you of my decision sooner. I realize others may have sought your vote and you may have made a commitment, in which case I sincerely hope you will consider my candidacy on a second vote, should one be necessary. I believe I have a background and outlook that make me well suited to be a good representative for you and for all the County interests on the TA. I have a long commitment to public service, having begun my career as a US diplomat, serving the country in Syria, Washington DC (including the Executive Office of the President) and Hong Kong. My career was spent mostly in international trade negotiations, so I became good at looking for win-win outcomes and listening to different points of view. The second half of my career was spent in venture capital, where I learned the importance of research, diligence, and the value of an investment dollar(which is what TA dollars are). More recently I founded a firm dedicated to "impact investment", which brings these two strands together, investing in and building profitable enterprises that do good things for the planet and society. I have been a Councilman for 6 years and in that time I have helped reestablish a great working relationship on the City Council, collaborated to tighten our finances, and sought innovative financing solutions for our many needs, including a private-public funding partnership to rehabilitate Burlingame Avenue and a novel financing package that will see a mix of affordable housing and structured parking come to our downtown. I have also served many of our cities on the SBWMA (fondly known as the Garbage Board)where I spearhead a working group looking at getting SBWMA on a path to "zero landfill," an ambitious but, we hope, achievable vision. IJ Register online with the City of Burlingame to receive regular City updates at www,Burlingame,org IJ I will make you one simple promise: I will do my homework on the TA. I will always listen to your points of view on the projects that matter to you and I will search for and fight for those projects that bring the widest benefit with the most efficient use of our precious capital. I will always be open to your input and explain my concerns or questions. For me this is not a stepping stone but a chance to make our amazing County even better. Thank you so much for listening, Warmest regards, /s/ Michael Brownrigg Councilman, City of Burlingame cell 415 987 3230 IJ Register online with the City of Burlingame to receive regular City updates at www,Burlingame.org IJ BOARD OF DIRECTORS 2015 KARYL MATSUMOTO,CHAIR DAVID CANEPA,VICE CHAIR CAROLE GROOM DON HORSLEY CAMERONJOHNSON SAN MATEO cowry TERRY NAGEL Transportation MARYANN NIHART Authority Jim HARTNETT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR October 12, 2015 Ms. Elizabeth Lewis, Chair City Selection Committee c/o County of San Mateo 400 County Center Redwood City, CA 94063 Attn: Sukhmani Purewal RE: Transportation Authority Northern Representative Dear Ms. Lewis: This letter is to inform you that the Northern seat held by David Canepa on the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (TA) Board of Directors will expire on December 31, 2015 and a re-appointment or appointment by the City Selection Committee should be made. The term for this seat is January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2017. The representative must be an elected official from Brisbane, Colma, Daly City, Pacifica, San Bruno, or South San Francisco. If you have questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me at 650-508-6242 or martinezm@samtrans.com. I i erely, arthat. Martinez Executive Officer, District Secretary/Executive Acln�')'njstrafion cc: TA Board of Directors J. Hartnett J. Cassman 1250 San Carlos Avenue San Carlos, CA 94070 (650) 508-6200 CDFYC( UN3k n«rwomoA.uoENAvENnmu DAVID/.cumEIIA mmmA.comonENoEm MICHAEL p.00moomu x^LzonoEo mzmcmE.MAR-1 Ec {��������� {��� ]�]��� ��]�-� �{�l�l��I�^ c/zr�m om OFFICE � � COUNCIL � � K.ummozzEomomu CITY 014" DALY CITY c/zrccmu 333 08gCIl STREET mwsCuM.ommonoom DAL YClgCY, CA 04815-1805 c/zr-IREuoUREn NOvSnObS[ 1� 2O15 PHONE(om)*/-onno ' RE: Appointment h» the San Mateo County Transportation Authority Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: | write to request your consideration and support for myreappointment to the San Mateo County Transportation Authority (TA) as the North County representative. Since my appointment to the TAin March of 2013, it has been my honor to work diligently on behalf of the cities throughout San Mateo County. Much has been accomplished for the benefit of your city and it would be a sincere privilege to continue to serve you for the next two years. During my tenure as aTA Board member. | have worked collaboratively with the entire Board to ensure that funds continue to be allocated broadly for transportation initiatives that provide the greatest impact for our collective oonsdtuents, including shuttle services, rai|road/0radesepaoadon projects, and bicycle/pedestrian projects. Additionally, | continue to fully support funding to maintain Ca|Train as a reliable and convenient regional public transportation system that also helps to alleviate traffic congestion on our already over- burdened freeway corridors. Among the many accomplishments that my colleagues on the TA Board and I are proud to highlight are: )~ Adopted guiding principles for funding of grade separation projects, which provided significant support to cities that have openly expressed interest in proceeding with much-needed projects ino|udin0Gouth Gan Franoisoo, Gan Bruno, W1i||brae, Bur|in0ame, Gan W1ab*o, Redwood Cib/, Menlo Park, Atherton and East Palo Alto. )~ Adopted a new five-year strategic plan that streamlined and clarified the protocol by which local entities can apply for funding during the TA Call for Projects prooess. )~ Broke ground ona $72W1 project toreoonstructtheHwy1O1/Broadvvayinterohan0e. themostneeded project along this important transportadonoorridor. )~ Allocated $750,000 for Menlo Park to study much-needed grade separation alternatives on Ravenswood Avenue. )~ Allocated $5M to support a community shuttle program in partnership with SamTrans and Commute.or0. )~ Approved and allocated $5W1 for twenty-three bicycle/pedestrian projects aorosstheCounb/. )~ Led the support for allocating $1O8yW toward highway projects aroundtheCounh/. ino|udin0major freeway interchanges on Hwy 101 at Woodside Road. Willow Road, Holly Street, and Hwy 92 at E| Camino Real, as well as the study of future congestion relief projects a|on0theHwy1O1oorridor. RE: Appointment to the San Mateo County Transportation Authority November 19, 2015 Page 2 of 2 ➢ Approved a $64M budget in June of this year that included funds for local streets and roads, major highway improvements, congestion relief projects and bicycle/pedestrian projects countywide. ➢ Urged support for a $49M allocation of TA funds to South San Francisco for a $59M project providing safety improvements at the CalTrain Station and to build a new pedestrian underpass connecting the east side of the City with its burgeoning downtown. All of these projects have resulted in measurable improvement to the streets and highway corridors that serve residents throughout San Mateo County. With your support, I will continue to be a champion of allocating funds for important transportation safety and improvement projects benefitting all of the county's cities. It would be an honor to continue as your representative on the Transportation Authority Board, and I will continue to work diligently for an equitable distribution of funds that benefit all of our residents. Your positive consideration and support of my reappointment at the City Selection Committee meeting in December is very much appreciated. Sincerely, David J. Canepa Councilmember OVA I 1EAR1 RoARrr OF DIRECTORS 01"SAN M,ArE0 C0LJN1'Y Jack Matthews, Chair Deputy Mayor City of San Mateo Don Horsley, mice-Chair Supervisor, County of San Mateo November 25, 2015 Linda Asbury The EDGE Ms. Elizabeth Lewis, Chair Julia Raigent City Selection Committee Attorney at Law c/o County of San Mateo Ron Collins 400 County Center Mayor, City of San Carlos Redwood City, CA 94063 Maryann noise Derwin Vice Mayor, Town of Portola Valley Attn: Sukhmani Purewal Karyl Eldridge SFOP/PIA Re: HEART Board of Directors Representative (Partial Term) Barbara Evers Boston Private Bank Dear Ms. Lewis, Larry Franzella Berkshire Hathaway This letter is to inform you that the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust of Realty San Mateo County (HEART) Board of Directors seat for elected official Pam Frisella Robert Gottschalk will become vacant in January. Since Mayor Gottschalk has not Former Mayor, City of been re-elected for another term,he will not be able to fulfill his term on the board, Foster City which expires on February 28,2018. A board appointment by the City Selection Robert Gottschalk Committee should be made to fulfill Mayor Gottschalk's unfinished term. Mayor, City of Millbrae Diane Howard The representative must be an elected official from any jurisdiction in San Councilmember, City o f Mateo County, except Daly City. Redwood City Ken i1barra If you require an additional information or have an questions, lease feel free to Councilmember, City o f Y �l Y Y�l l� San Bruno Contact me at 12stinson(LheartofsmC.org, or 650-872-4444, ext. 4#. Cliff Lentz Mayor Pro Tem, City of Sincerely, Brisbane Laurence May �" .-. Mayor,Town of Hillsborough Paula Stinson Rill IV'ack Interim Executive Director Building Trades Council of San Mateo County,ret. Larry IWibbi Nibbi Brothers General Contractors Liza Normandy Councilmember, City of So. San Francisco Paul Shepherd Cargill,ret. Warren Slocum a 139 Mitchell Ave, Suite 108 •South San Francisco, CA 94080 Supervisor, County of San Mateo t(650)872-4444'f(650)872-4411 w www.heartofsmc.org Marcia Raines, Treasurer City Manager City Of Millbrae, ex. officio OVA I 1EAR1 RoARrr OF DIRECTORS 01"SAN M,ArE0 C0LJN1'Y Jack Matthews, Chair Deputy Mayor City of San Mateo Don Horsley, mice-Chair Supervisor, County of San Mateo November 25, 2015 Linda Asbury The EDGE Ms. Elizabeth Lewis, Chair Julia Raigent City Selection Committee Attorney at Law c/o County of San Mateo Ron Collins 400 County Center Mayor, City of San Carlos Redwood City, CA 94063 Maryann noise Derwin Vice Mayor, Town of Portola Valley Attn: Sukhmani Purewal Karyl Eldridge SFOP/PIA Re: HEART Board of Directors Representative (Partial Term) Barbara Evers Boston Private Bank Dear Ms. Lewis, Larry Franzella Berkshire Hathaway This letter is to inform you that the Housing Endowment and Regional Trust of Realty San Mateo County (HEART) Board of Directors seat for elected official Pam Frisella Jack Matthews will become vacant in January. Since Councilman Matthews has Former Mayor, City of been termed out of office,he will not be able to fulfill his term on the board, Foster City which expires on February 28,2018. A board appointment by the City Selection Robert Gottschalk Committee should be made to fulfill Councilman Matthews' unfinished term. Mayor, City of Millbrae Diane Howard The representative must be an elected official from any jurisdiction in San Councilmember, City o f Mateo County, except Daly City. Redwood City Ken i1barra If you require an additional information or have an questions, lease feel free to Councilmember, City o f Y �l Y Y�l l� San Bruno Contact me at 12stinson(LheartofsmC.org, or 650-872-4444, ext. 4#. Cliff Lentz Mayor Pro Tem, City of Sincerely, Brisbane Laurence May �" .-. Mayor,Town of Hillsborough Paula Stinson Rill IV'ack Interim Executive Director Building Trades Council of San Mateo County,ret. Larry IWibbi Nibbi Brothers General Contractors Liza Normandy Councilmember, City of So. San Francisco Paul Shepherd Cargill,ret. Warren Slocum a 139 Mitchell Ave, Suite 108 •South San Francisco, CA 94080 Supervisor, County of San Mateo t(650)872-4444'f(650)872-4411 w www.heartofsmc.org Marcia Raines, Treasurer City Manager City Of Millbrae, ex. officio Ae OFFICE OFT HE CM COUNCIL ! 330 west 20th Avenue j Sari Mateo,ca @ifornia 54403-73:38 Telephone(650)522-7048 c °r FAX;(650)522-7047. www.cityofsanmateo.org December 1, 2015 Re: Appointment to (HEART Board of Directors Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Colleagues, I write to request your consideration and support for appointment to the HEART Board of Directors. As a community activist and deeply involved volunteer for many years in San Mateo, I am very interested in affordable housing, Since my appointment by the San Mateo City Council to the Bay Meadows and Transportation Corridor Citizens Advisory Committee in 2001, q have been working to create a mix of housing opportunities that allow for residents of different income ievels to become part of San Mateo, My City Council External Agency assignments include ABAG, C/CAG ClMECi Committee, HOPE, Commute.org, and the SBWMA .These assignments put me at the intersection of transportation planning, County traffic congestion relief, homelessness, and waste collection and diversion. With my experience on the City's (Public Works and Planning Commissions and my background in construction, I be'iieve I have the right mix of experience to be an active member of this board as we strive to meet one of the most pressing needs in San Mateo County today. I am proud' of the excellent work my fellow Councilrnember and former Mayor Jack Matthews has done representing San Mateo on the HEART Board over many years. I would be deeply honored by your appointment to succeed him on the HEART Board of Directors. Please feel free to call me at(659)430- 9171 or emaiil me at rbonilla@cityofsanmateo.org if you would like to discuss my candidacy. i sirlee" ppreciate your support, Rick Boni'lla City of San Mateo Council Member December 89 2015 Dear honorable Mayors and City Council Members of San Mateo County: I am asking for your consideration and support for an appointment to the HEART Board of Directors. As a certified urban planner, I have 25 years of experience in land use,housing, an transportation policy that would be a valuable asset in our region's discussion about affordable housing® As the Director of Planning at SamTrans, I am currently involved in the development of workforce housing issues for working families that serve our 20 jurisdictions i San at County. I am also developing a transit-oriented development transit-orients policy for the agency that will further help to provide affordable housing options or families that are increasingly running out of options on the peninsula® I am also actively involved in land use decisions about housing in my work as a former Planning Commissioner. have served for over ten years on 1 i Commissions in two cities, including Belmont, where I looked at the practical implications of including different types of affordable housing market-rate development proposals. I would be committed to working with all 20 jurisdictions in the county to think critically about ow to advance our shared oals of rovi °n affordable housing stock at all price points in the most effective way possible. I believe my vast experience in urban planning can el move the discussion forward. Thanks for your consideration® Sincerely, h „N Doug Kim, AIC Belmont City Council-Elect One Elwin Pines Lane Belmont, CA 94002 a FLORIBUNDA TOWN OF HILLSBOROUGH HILLSBOROUGH r+ CALIFORNIA December 1, 2015 Re; Interest in serving as Chairperson of the Council of Cities/City Selection. Committee Dear Honorable Mayors, City Council. Colleagues and Designees: I write to ask for your support and vote for selection as the Chairperson of the Council of Cities/ City Selection Committee. I will be honored to serve as the Chairperson for the upcoming term of 2016. It has been my pleasure to work with former Chairpersons, Mary ,Ann Nihart and Elizabeth Lewis in the capacity of Secretary/Treasurer in 2014, and Vice Chair in 2015. The collaboration. among the cities and elected officials in San Mateo County continues to flourish and strengthen through monthly meetings, timely topic discussions and speakers. I look forward to working with each hosting city and its Mayor on providing interesting programs in this coming year. Thank you for your consideration and support. Sincerely, f X Marie Chuang Vice Mayor, Town of/=Hillsborough melluari 00illsborou h.net TEL. 650.375.7 PAX 650.375.7475 CI'T'E(COUNCIL 2015 MARK ADDIEGO,MAYOR u PRAC3EE,P GUPTA,PH,D„'MICE MAYOR RICHARD A.CARBARMO,COUNCILMEMBER Mp KARYL MATSUMOTO,COUNCILMEMBER LIZA NORMANDY,COUNCILMEMBER MIKE FUTRELL,CITY MAINAGER. OFFICE OF 11...IE CITY COUNCIL December 8, 2015 Honorable Mayors and City Council Members: 1 understand that there is a vacancy for the position of Vice Chair of the Council of Cities' City Selection Committee and 1 am writing to ask for your support. Since elected to the South San Francisco City Council, 1 have regularly attended the Council of Cities monthly meetings and am familiar with the requirements of the Vice Chair which is to support the efforts of the Chair and to be prepared and able to conduct meetings in his/her absence. As a council member, school board trustee, nonprofit board member and Director of Sales of the Green Hills golf and Country Club I have experience working with diverse groups of people. The skills I've picked up in these positions will allow me to support the Chair as well the cities should they require assistance is finding a suitable venue and/or negotiating a pricing structure. I would also enjoy, if asked, working to assist in obtaining program speakers whose expertise would be germane to the hot topics that our cities face. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate contacting me (cell: 650.291,4752femail: liza.norrnarld &ssfJ1q). Thank you for your consideration. Respectfully, Liza Normandy Council Member cc: South San Francisco, City Council City Mall: 400 Cram'Avenue • South Can Franbscc, CA 94080 m P.O. Pox 711 a South Can Francesco, CA 940183 Phone: 650.877.850 . Fax: 650.829,6609 �pinyn imAe W Re 1E....1Ma:.Ai TERRY NAGEL, MAYOR ANN KEIGHRAN,VICE MAYOR RICARDO ORTIZ TEL: (650)558-7200 MICHAEL BROWNRIGG Te `ay 4 DD 4-4 � FAX: (650)566-9282 JOHN ROOT www.burlingame.org CITY HALL, 501 PRIMROSE ROAD BURLINGAME, CALIFORNIA 94010-3997 December 4, 2015 LETTER OF INTEREST Dear Colleagues, I wanted to write a brief note alerting you that I will be throwing my hat in the ring for the seat on the Transportation Authority that will be opening up. I regret not informing you of my decision sooner. I realize others may have sought your vote and you may have made a commitment, in which case I sincerely hope you will consider my candidacy on a second vote, should one be necessary. I believe I have a background and outlook that make me well suited to be a good representative for you and for all the County interests on the TA. I have a long commitment to public service, having begun my career as a US diplomat, serving the country in Syria, Washington DC (including the Executive Office of the President) and Hong Kong. My career was spent mostly in international trade negotiations, so I became good at looking for win-win outcomes and listening to different points of view. The second half of my career was spent in venture capital, where I learned the importance of research, diligence, and the value of an investment dollar(which is what TA dollars are). More recently I founded a firm dedicated to "impact investment", which brings these two strands together, investing in and building profitable enterprises that do good things for the planet and society. I have been a Councilman for 6 years and in that time I have helped reestablish a great working relationship on the City Council, collaborated to tighten our finances, and sought innovative financing solutions for our many needs, including a private-public funding partnership to rehabilitate Burlingame Avenue and a novel financing package that will see a mix of affordable housing and structured parking come to our downtown. I have also served many of our cities on the SBWMA (fondly known as the Garbage Board)where I spearhead a working group looking at getting SBWMA on a path to "zero landfill," an ambitious but, we hope, achievable vision. IJ Register online with the City of Burlingame to receive regular City updates at www,Burlingame,org IJ I will make you one simple promise: I will do my homework on the TA. I will always listen to your points of view on the projects that matter to you and I will search for and fight for those projects that bring the widest benefit with the most efficient use of our precious capital. I will always be open to your input and explain my concerns or questions. For me this is not a stepping stone but a chance to make our amazing County even better. Thank you so much for listening, Warmest regards, /s/ Michael Brownrigg Councilman, City of Burlingame cell 415 987 3230 IJ Register online with the City of Burlingame to receive regular City updates at www,Burlingame.org IJ µ* city OfMillb coM1IB16kw'o111'c6n 0 � n, 621 Magnolia veultre, Millbrae., CA ct� 030 Dc,comber 10, 2015 Dear Mayor, Iyop utyr-Kayor, and Council Members„ Happy l-Icllidays everyone, I am grateful and honed to have been re-elected to the Millbrae City Council to serve a third term this yeaar. I respectfully ask fiat your support of rl°ryr candidacy liar the open Transportation Authority (TA) seat representing the central district of Sara Mateo C°oullty°. I wvill work with you to be a strong,, rep:rr°eserltative that listens t►,r )rOLIr tweeds and concerns, build consents, provides opporttarlities for all cities and their varied ca,anstittrcrrcies, to address unique local transportation needs and helps each city improve aging infi•aastra►cttrres to accornauxiate the ever growvitig traffic congestion in coraamuter corridors and oil local streets and roads. TA's role is la administer the proceeds from Measure A sales tax to fund ra broad spectrum of to°ansplraa°taatican-related pro-jects and programs and its importance cannot be overlooked. The TA is an independent agency and is governed by an appointed board of seven directors, who are elected officials, representing the county, cities and the San Mateo County Transit District, 'd he fi)CUS of the TA's p°rogr•carns is to reduce traffic congestion and improve„ throughput and safety oil the Most critioaal corrimote corridors. OroMla in employinent in oarr C°otrraty has greatly increased traffic congesti(an along several highway segments in the County, Although progress has been made in tho Count), through investments in Caltrain and highways irraparovernerits, each city has much to do and as lot at stake C_`ontinring traatTic grcl xth also has under scored the importance of additional safety moaastrres, particularly grade separations atom, the C:altrain rail line and safe bicycle and pedestriari facilities. Develc pnient of local transit services, aara increasing number of comnlu►ters and especially liar the elderly and people with disabilities, has becorrne increasingly import atilt in t;oj lnlanlatres throughout the County". We must work together to inlp7roVe cOrineetions with regional transportation facilities, enhance safety in all aspects of the transpor-tation systern, and eracot►rage transportation proJects that support transit-oriented development. To be the strong representative we need on the TA, I tang conugritted to Understanding both otrr collective and unique traansportaatiml-related plrojQcts arid p3rogranls. Nly vow to be a passionate and committed advocate ror° our cities, towns, and county is stronger than ever, I will work with )'OU ro r the next four years, to be the representative who listens to your concerns, builds consenstus, keeps you inforraled, and fights f;car our fair share. Moving fb-ward, l would be vary proud and honored to have, your .13UPport of nlyx candidacy for San iMateo County's open central district :seat; on the TA at crtr:r° nt meeting on December 1 81h; Y E; PP"'tttrIraOt , ANo VisioN I served for the eight years as Millbrae's City Councilmeaa ber and Mayor, I (loc ►sed oil efficiency, economic development, and r-evenuae enhancement, working berth within our city and looking outward from a county and regional perspective. MiIIbrae is a key part of the San Mateo County transportation network because it serves as the intern tidal CCnM-01"OUr COUnty—flIQ Only city that connects the Sl"!(). BA.Wl', Caltrain, Sarn'J"rans, and 11jultiple shuffle scrvices,. (livell millbrac's unique position, I belieVO one Of OL11' greatest reSOUrCeS is to bring communities logether. I have developed positive relationships Willi, cities and agericies in the county. as Well as neighboring- counties. Working together we have shared services with the COLInty, merged services with four other cities, promoted strategic, transit-oriented developilicills with LIAR"I", pursued 111LItUally beneficial, property uses with the San. l"rancisco Public Utilities Cotmilission and its land within Millbrae, and, continue to explore as niultitude of innovative pro.jeels with tile Silicon Valley Leadership Group. I feel strongly that Cultivating these relationships has promoted efficiencies, waved moriey, arid hell) OUI° local ecotionly grow. oil oie "rA, I Will work hard 176r the, 1761loNving specific goals; 1. Secure our fair share of runding. 1 will wvork to crisure each city gets it fail, share of Mea-smre, A funding for Pro ect's suited to Illoet our re� io�rl's Ileeds, I will work So Nve can J 9 leverage county, slate and federal Riji(ts for mixed-transportation projects jects that Would enhance coniniunity vitality, Promote pedestrian, bicycle, and pUblic transit use, encourage transit-oriented development, aired help rehabilitate local streets arid roads. 2. Reduce congestion. I will Nvorl< to reduce congestion ill COTI-1111LIte COVI-W01-8, I)LIrSUing an iniproved, collaborations with Caltans and new transportation teclinologies to smooth commutes, and promote convenient and reliable public transpo�rtafi oil. 3. Modernize Caltrain. I will work with Other cities to ensure that the electrification Of caltrairl along the existing right-of-way has acceptable and minimal impact oil individual cities. l"lloctrification, it'done right, will reedLICC operating costs by half and increase service from 45,000 to 70,000 riders per day, MN, REPRESENTATIVE SERVICE 0 San Mateo C01.111ty Council 01'CitieS 0 City/County Association ot'Governments ((-A.'IA0) Board ofl.)irectors 0 C/CAG Legislative Committee 0 Congestion Management Program and l"Invii-Onmental Quality C nimittee (CM]"'Q) 0 San Mateo County I lousing I'ndowment and Regioilal Trust 0 Grand Boulevard "]'ask Force 0 San Mateo County Emergency Services Council a High Speed Rail Policyniakers Working Group a Airport Land Use Conirriittee 0 Penil`ISLIIal Congestion ReliefAlliance MY11"ROFESSIONAL SE�RVICE 0 Deputy Attorney Genemill, for the State of California proudly representing the people of tine Mate (Y(Tali R.)rnia 17or over 20 year's. 0 As the Deptity Director of a state agency with a $400 million budget, I managed 150 cinployces. I Ilelped to irnplement the Amber Alert prograni, served oji the School Violence Prevention arnd Response Task Force, the Child Abduction Task 1:,orce, and served as a legislative advisor- ttr the High Technology Crime Advisory Committee, Y(�)ta Suivowr WILL MAKE THE DIFFERENCE' I respectfully ask for your votc on E)cceinber 19. 2015 MICII thC Cit)� SC I CC6011 COMnlittee votes to fi 11 the Central district Scat Oil the S an Matco (I(AtIlty'S 0I)CII Seat l'or the TA Please fieel fi-ee to Contact me if You have any questimis or jwtd any addifional information, Thank. You, Gina Papan COLUICIlmember, City ot'Millbrae (4'l 5') 710-5820 rA 0 Staff Report rA DATE: December 16, 2015 TO: Mayor, Vice Mayor, and Council members, FROM: Alex Greenwood, Director of Economic and Community Development SUBJECT: POTENTIAL OPPORTUNITIES TO DEVELOP OR ENCOURAGE WORKFORCE HOUSING RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the City Council review the options regarding potential workforce housing opportunities and provide staff with comments and/or direction regarding next steps for policy development. BACKGROUND Overview of Housing Demand and Affordability Challenges San Mateo County is experiencing an affordability crisis, due to the current regional shortfall of housing supply, relative to job growth and subsequent housing demand. In August, 2015, the San Francisco Business Times estimated that 9,100 new residential its are in the development pipeline within the County. The Californian Employment Development Department estimates that the Bay Area will have 405,600 job openings by 2022. More housing is needed, and specifically more housing which is affordable to wo on class families. The City has consistently championed workforce housing projects, and the previously facilitated such construction through the Redevelopment Agency (RDA). Several RDA acquired sites and lots owned by the City are now programmed for new housing developments that will result in over 500 new rental units, of which over 100 its will be affordable to help meet the City's overwhelming demand. However, due to the statewide dissolution of redevelopment, the City must develop a new strategy to foster new development and create new housing fund sources. The purpose of this study session is to explore available policy and ffinding options that could improve housing supply in the future. Summary of Existing Policies to Encourage Workforce Housing The City has a robust set of programs currently in place to encourage workforce housing, including: 1. Inclusion ary—H—ousing Ordinance: A minimum of 20 percent of approved for-sale housing its consisting of four (4) or more its must be deed-restricted to low and moderate-income buyers. If the development consists of 10 or more units, the affordable units should be provided on-site rather than provided for with an in-lieu fee,but this is at the determination of the City Council. This ordinance Staff Report Subject: Potential Opportunities to Develop or Encourage Workforce Housing Page 2 of 6 resulted in 125 its created during the previous Housing Element Cycle (2007-2015). Affordable housing creation would likely have been stronger had it not been for the Great Recession, which essentially halted all development. There may be options to create greater flexibility and provide additional workforce housing its by amending this ordinance which is described in the Regulatory Options section below. 2. Bonus Residential Den91y_&qiqg: Consistent with State requirements, the City grants a 25% density bonus to any developer providing a minimum of 20% of total housing its for low-income households (below 80% of median income), or 10% of total units for very low-income households (below 5 % of median income). Additional incentives include reduced development standards, reduced plan check or permit fees, or an additional density bonus. 3. Downtown Station The recently adopted SASP provides several incentives designed to lower development costs and improve affordability, including: reduced parking requirements for new construction; allowing unbundled parking so that new tenants can choose top chase/rent a parking space, as needed; and an in-lieu parking fee provision. Additionally, the SASP incorporates a "community benefits" requirement for any development wishing to design to the maximum allowable floor area or density with preferences for the inclusion of workforce housing. 4. SLapport for Funding Apghgatios for orkforce ousing: The City continues to support funding applications for federal and state funds to promote the development of workforce housing or associated infrastructure. Recent applications include the Affordable Housing and Sustainable Communities (Cap and Trade) Program for public improvements to link downtown workforce housing and the Caltrain Station; HUD financing to maintain affordability of 74 units at the Fairway Apartments complex; Low- Income Housing Tax Credits for the Rotary Senior Project in the downtown; and CDBG funding to rehabilitate the Sundial Apartments (11 units) and private single family homes owned by low-income seniors (3 projects underway in 2015). DISCUSSION The City has three primary methods for alleviating the current housing imbalance: (a) developing new housing on City-controlled properties; (b) adjusting current regulations to promote development; and (c) considering new financing mechanisms to bolster the affordable housing fund. Each approach is discussed in the following section. Opportunity ices for New Housing The City's Housing Element identifies development opportunity sites, focusing on the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan area and the Transit Village area. Within these two neighborhoods, nearly 2,170 new residential its are possible, exceeding South San Francisco's Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) of 1,864 units by over 300 homes. While this development scenario is promising in the long-run, the City Council may have interest in a partnership to develop workforce housing on any other available properties in the near-term. The ideal site for residential construction is at least 3/ of an acre, although that size is relatively rare beyond the former Public Utilities Commission (PUC) sites. Staff Report Subject: Potential Opportunities to Develop or Encourage Workforce Housing Page 3 of 6 Staff has reviewed the City for any properties with potential for new residential units. In some cases, these sites would require substantial financial commitment and/or regulatory changes to develop. However, the most promising potential sites for workforce housing are listed below, with site maps and additional information provided in Attachment 1. 1. Former Public Utilities Commission (PUC) sites: These properties are represented in the El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Plan. The plan permits up to 1,500 new housing units and 4,400 residents in low- to high-rise buildings, as well as new civic amenities and park space. The City-controlled parcels could provide up to 780 units of new housing. 2. The South San Francisco Unified School District PrODerties: SSFUSD has some shuttered facilities with appropriate acreage that could eventually be developed, at their discretion, including the Fox Ridge School site. SSFUSD could follow the model used by the San Mateo Community College District, which successfully created rental housing for its teachers: for a certain term, the units are rented by employees at an affordable rate to encourage saving for a home down payment. 3. Former Central Fire Station and MgALng lot: This property and adjoining parking lot could be developed -under the newly adopted DSASP zoning standards. It is centrally located in the Downtown close to transit with the potential for a mixed use building with up to 100 residential units. 4. 200 Linden Avenue: Currently occupied by the City's IT Department, this building and adjacent Successor Agency-owned parking lot are centrally located in the Downtown close to transit with the potential for a mixed use building with up to 100 residential units. A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) has been released to solicit interest from experienced, qualified infill developers. Preliminary interest has been expressed prior to the solicitation by both residential and non-residential developers. 5. 190 and 150 Airport Boulevard: 190 Airport Boulevard is owned and controlled by the City and is currently undeveloped with a freeway adjacent billboard. The site is not large, but in tandem with a development on the adjacent private property at 150 Airport Boulevard, up to 130 residential units are possible and the City's site would provide direct intersection access. 6. Century Plaza a Center (Huntington Avenue): The Century Plaza Theater, and surrounding commercial development, is vastly underutilized and located close to amenities (Tanforan Mall) and mass transit (San Bruno BART station). The property owner/developer is currently undertaking a feasibility study analyzing the potential for residential use. The property owner would need to work with the Airport Land Use Commission to identify options to permit residential housing within the 70db contour. 7. Eastern Neighborhood of DSASP: The DSASP identifies the area East of 101 as the Eastern Neighborhood, with preference for office and R&D space close. At the November 4, 2015 Study Session, Council directed staff to study the potential for high density housing in the area near the Caltrain Plaza as a first phase. The analysis will include the feasibility of a workforce housing component. Staff Report Subject: Potential Opportunities to Develop or Encourage Workforce Housing Page 4 of 6 8. ale/ filler City Owned Parking Lot: The 14,000 square foot site provides a near to opportunity. If directed by Council, staff could return to Council in February with a development and financing plan. (See Exhibit 1, Opportunities Site Map) Regulatory Options to Encourage New Housing As part of the Housing Element (HE) update process, stakeholders, advocates, and City staff identified new policies that could increase housing supply citywide. They are now included in the HE as programs that will be tracked on a yearly basis for progress. These programs, as well as of potential regulatory changes identified by staff, are summarized in Attachment 2 for the City Council's consideration. Not all of these programs are necessarily recommended; they are included for discussion purposes only to provide a comprehensive discussion. The proposals are organized by estimated timeframe to implement. One short-term option is to revise the Inclusion ary Housing Requirement Ordinance Section 20380.003 which requires any residential project of four or more its receiving financial assistance from the City to make 20% oft a units in the project affordable. This requirement makes it if for the City to work with developers to provide a limited number of affordable units in their projects because any amount of City assistance would trigger the 20% requirement. Making this section more flexible of allow the City to subsidize a lower number of its without triggering the 20% requirement. For example, a rental project with 100 units does not have to provide any affordable units but if the City wanted to subsidize 10 affordable units, it could not do so because the developer would have to provide 20 affordable its according to the current Inclusion Ordinance. Financing Options to Encourage New Housing Identifying and/or creating new funding sources for workforce housing is the second lever available to the City to improve housing supply. The HE identifies potential impact fees that could be applied to new commercial or residential development to bolster affordable housing fimds. There is also activity at the State level to implement a funding mechanism for housing that would replace some of the tools that the former redevelopment agencies held, and could result in returning earmarked funds back to local jurisdictions for affordable housing, and proposed bills that would modify the Low Income Housing Tax Credit regulations and increase fimding. Additionally, revamped State financing district regulations could allow the City to fund necessary infrastructure improvements that in turn, would encourage new development. These approaches, as well as a summary of existing City impact fees, are included as Attachment 3. The City has approximately $3,906,822 in uncommitted funds available for the development of affordable housing (see Attachment 4). Of this amount, $981,532 is from 1999 Housing and funds. Because of the bond covenant restrictions these fimds can only be used to develop affordable housing and must be granted, they cannot be loaned. Another $1,358,000 comes from repayments of former Redevelopment Agency (RDA) loans. These funds are subject to redevelopment dissolution statutes and must be used to produce affordable housing in conformance with those requirements. The remaining amount, approximately $1,567,290, represents housing in-lieu fees collected from developers by the City. These funds must be used for the development of affordable housing but at the sole discretion of the City Council. to Report Subject: Potential Opportunities to Develop or Encourage Workforce Housing Page 5 of 6 In addition to the housing funds listed above, the City also has the potential to raise additional funds. First, the City has plans to sell 380 Alta Vista. The sale of this property is anticipated to raise approximately $1 million in net sale proceeds. These funds will be deposited into the City's housing fund as Housing Successor. As stated in the Housing Investment Plan adopted last year, the City will also be able to raise money from the sale of the triplex at 714-718 Linden (currently estimated at $862,000). The total potential revenue from these properties is approximately$1.8 million. In total the City will have direct access to potentially $5.7 million available for workforce housing. To determine how much housing the City can produce with its net available housing funds, it is necessary to detennine what it costs to produce an affordable housing unit. Strategic Economics conducted a county- wide study to quantify the affordable housing gap, i.e. the difference between what a low-income family can pay for rent and the cost of renting a market-rate unit. The average subsidy needed to make a rental unit affordable is $298,734. Strategic Economics also did a similar study for ownership housing and the average subsidy needed t o m ake a for-sale unit affordable was $288,376. The City can subsidize approximately 1-to 21 units with these funds. NEXT STEPS /RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends that the City Council review the options presented and provide staff with any comments and/or direction. Based on the presented options, the City Council could pursue a bundle of short-term and longer-term efforts to facilitate the creation of new housing units and secure funding for future affordable housing efforts. The City Council should note that the Human Resources Department conducted an employee housing survey from November 5 through November 22, 2015 using the tool Survey Monkey. There were 10 questions including but not limited to, employment status,household size, the number of bedrooms needed, whether employees would rent or lease, and the terms of the agreement. Human Resources received 242 responses. The most notable data collected is that 77.5% of the respondents live outside of South San Francisco. Of that 35% would be interested in rental housing of 2-3 bedrooms if available. Therefore, the survey response indicates that there are potentially 85 City employees who might take advantage of workforce housing, if it were available. Y Short Term 0 rking lot could be made available for rations: As noted above, the Miller/Maple pa workforce housing in the near term. Given the demand and pressures in the community for workforce housing and the somewhat limited number of options within the City's direct control, staff believes this short to option is worth consideration. As also noted earlier, amending the Inclusionary Housing Ordinance to provide greater flexibility could also yield short-term results and potentially increase the supply of workforce housing. Another short to option is to amend the Housing Element to reduce the requirement that new condominiums projects must have a minimum of five(5) units. Reducing this requirement to two (2) units, for instance, would encourage the efficient development of larger lots in the City with more units that could be sold individually. This increases affordability because condominium units on average have a lower price point for first time homebuyers. Staff Report Subject: Potential Opportunities to Develop or Encourage Workforce Housing Page 6 of 6 LoMer Term 0 ptio Revising the condominium regulations and partnering with affordable n housing projects to share parking needs would be relatively simple. Changes to the Inclusion Housing Ordinance or rezoning to allow housing in the East of 101 Area could have dramatic supply impacts but would require a longer analysis period to implement. Implementing a commercial nexus fee for affordable housing is possible but would require further analysis in relation to existing fees, anticipated future development, and similar cooperative actions by other San Mateo County cities. By: Akf"�Z'." , Approved: Alex Greenwood ike u4tre 1*0 Director of Economic and Community City Manager Development Attachments: 1. Map of Opportunity Sites 2. Regulatory Options to Encourage New Housing 3. Financing Options to Encourage New Housing 4. Available and Potentially Available Housing Funds 5. 21 Elements Nexus Study Update Memorandum 6. RHINA Allocation and Affordability Chart 7. Map of Downtown Residential Zoning Districts 8. ALUCP Noise Contour Map 9. East of 101 Residential Memorandum 10. PowerPoint Presentation MF'JS/SMJR/AG/AS'tr P1 Attachment 1—Map of Opportunity Sites P2 1 >`J 1� J l� Yi�r f1 � v,•/ �y��� � ✓r it r��er ����� � Y�fiu /' Q y � �i� f � PI l�4Y✓'rf g.,� � P Y i 1, r, b' Y f i U� � / r i 1 iY rp�Y A p. F i I AA 1 ill �tl 5 O r r• � Y � I � y r,; P3 Ln � /J r ! ✓m fb �/l � m�� ado P/ a i m' UV 9/ 1 CL / e O O / J 4A F m r / � u(� ^ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII If' N 6d � r ry� r rr r P4 Attachment 2—Regulatory Options to Encourage Housing PS Attachment 2 -Regulatory Options to Encourage New Housing 1. Reduce Condominium Threshold: The HE includes Program 1-41) to consider reducing the minimum requirement of 5 units for the development of a new condominium project. Reducing this requirement to two (2) units, for instance, would encourage the efficient development of larger lots in the City with more units that could then be sold individually. Condominium units represent, on average, a lower price point for first time homebuyers and could promote ownership. Timeframe: 3 months 2. Revise Condominium Conversion Reaulations: Currently, the City's Zoning Ordinance requires a minimum 5 percent vacancy rate for multi-family units before an existing apartment complex can be converted to condominium ownership units. Additionally, the conversion of units cannot reduce the overall vacancy rate to less than 5 percent upon completion. As an example, the conversion of a partially vacant apartment building could not reduce the City's overall vacancy rate below 5 percent. The City could consider reducing this requirement, as a method of increasing ownership housing. The provisions are currently in place as a method of protecting apartment tenants from displacement related to conversions, however, particularly in tight housing markets with high ownership demand like South San Francisco is currently experiencing. One potential method to avoid the negative effects of condominium conversion would be a provision whereby only existing tenants can purchase the apartment units they live in from their landlords and convert them to condominiums to permanently secure their long term affordability. Timeframe: 6 months 3. Allow Shared Parking_options far Workforce ousin ro°ects: Parking requirements can be detrimental to the feasibility of development plans, particularly for affordable housing projects that must balance market rate development costs with a social mission to provide workforce housing opportunities. The City could consider partnering with affordable housing projects in the Downtown area to share existing parking facilities to help meet parking requirements. For instance, a dense affordable housing project near the Miller Avenue garage could utilize some of the garage's excess evenjng capacity for its parking needs. Strict provisions to limit this type of partnership to developments with a large percentage of affordable units could encourage new workforce housing without endangering overall parking supply. Timeframe: Could be processed concurrent with a project application 4. Reduce Downtown Residential Minimum Lot Sizes: The HE includes Program 1-713, at the Council's direction during the hearing process, to evaluate reduced lot development standards in the Downtown residential zoning districts (see attached map). The current minimum lot size is 5,000 SF and this is typical throughout the City. It could be advantageous to reduce the minimum lot size to complement the higher density standards allowed in the Downtown area. A 3,000 SF lot, for instance, could still meet parking/garage standards and setbacks, and provide a small lot ownership opportunity. Lots average 7,000 SF throughout the Downtown residential area and could be divided to encourage development, ownership, and revitalization. Timeframe:�6—9 months P6 5. ALUCP Override for Residential ODDortunitv Sites: Due to the proximity of the San Francisco International Airport, the City is subject to the Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan (ALUCP), which identifies noise and safety contours that preclude residential development. Large swathes of the City's southern area, particularly along El Camino Real, are within noise contours that do not allow new housing but are strategically located near the San Bruno BART station and SamTrans bus service. The City haste ability, however, to override the ALUCP provisions but in doing so, would absolve the airport from any liability related to impacts. This is a more complicated legal discussion but presents a potential option for encouraging new housing on large commercial parcels. iiLmeframe: 9— 12 months 6. Eliminate parking require et for second dwelling units/Second welling unit mes Pro r : Currently, per state requirements, the City allows second dwelling units in single- family zoning districts to encourage housing production. Commonly referred to as "In-Law Units" or "Granny Units", second dwelling units are limited to 640 SF, one bedroom and must be located in the rear of the property or within the home's footprint. One (1) parking space is required for the second dwelling unit, but it does not need to be covered; instead, it can be located anywhere on the property other than the existing driveway. The required parking location is lenient relative to other cities, but it still prevents further second dwelling unit construction. Additionally, there are many unpermitted second dwelling units, representing a large portion of Code Enforcement Division caseload. Many of these units were constructed without permits due to the parking requirement and an amnesty program could allow these units to be inspected for life and safety issues. Daly City conducted an amnesty program that could serve as a template, and San Francisco recently introduced a similar policy. Timeframe: 9— 12 months 7, Rezone portions of East of 101 to allow Residential DevLlopment: Although the East of 10 1 area has historically been dedicated to industrial, warehousing and office/R&D development, the City Council could consider adding high density residential zoning to specific areas within '/4 or 1/2 mile of mass transit (Caltrain Station or San Francisco Bay Ferry). Value capture zoning could be put in place to require affordable housing contributions and other public benefits in exchange for loosened height and density limits; strict design standards with no other development limitations could also be considered to promote architecturally significant, mid-rise residential development (4 to 12 stories). Substantial environmental analysis and community outreach would be required. Timeframe: 10— 18 months 8. Land Trusts: A community land trust(CLT) is a private, nonprofit corporation created to provide secure, affordable access to land and housing for community members. In particular, CLTs attempt to meet the needs of those least served by the prevailing market. Community land trusts help communities: gain control over local land and reduce absentee ownership, provide affordable housing for lower income residents, promote resident ownership and control of housing, keep housing affordable for future residents, capture the value of public investment for long-term community benefit. Community land trusts are distinguished from other nonprofit housing and organizations in two ways: (1) ho%N'they separate the ownership of land and housing, and (2)how they are structured and controlled. These two distinctive features contribute to the effectiveness of the CLT model as a tool for dealing with the problems of gentrification. Timefrarne: 6-12 Months P7 Attachment Financing Options to u in P8 Attachment 3—Financing Options to Encourage New Housing 1 21 Elements Nexus Study: The City is participating in a 21 Elements led effort to produce nexus and feasibility studies that would allow cities to charge impact fees for new residential or commercial development to fund affordable housing. The rationale is that a new hotel, commercial shopping center, or office building will create jobs that may not pay area standard wages that make housing in SSF affordable. A memorandum of potential impacts fees for South San Francisco should be provided in June for consideration and implementation by the City Council, if desired. The memorandum will detail a range of impact fees that could be assessed to new commercial or residential development while still allowing a project to be financially feasible for a development fi rrn. The residential nexus fee has also been studied given that not all participating cities have an inclusion ary housing ordinance in place, and because current litigation between the California Building Industry Association and San Jose could jeopardize the legality of inclusionary housing requirements. A summary of action to date is included as an attachment from the coordinating 21 Elements consultant. Timeline: 3— 12 months 2. Inclusion Hou . g Ordinance Revisions: The HE includes Program 1-213 to periodically Inclusion is in review the success of this ordinance and consider revising provisions of the ordinance to ensure that a maximum range of it types for low- and moderate-income levels are created. The current calculation for the inclusion housing in-lieu fee is complicated, as it requires the developer to provide funds for acquisition of suitable land, soft costs to design the project, and construction. Most developers elect to construct the is on-site instead, which has the positive effect of creating a mixed-income development but can also discourage development due to the cost of providing these units. It could be advantageous for the City to reconsider the calculation methodology to lower the in-lieu fee and promote it as a fimding source, however; this could allow the City to leverage the collected fees with a non-profit housing developer for a larger project with wider affordable impact. For-sale affordable its have limited impact as their over is low; City affordable housing flinds could be better utilized for a workforce rental housing project, which would have wider benefits for residents. Another option could be to change the Ordinance to provide fewer than 20% affordable its but with deeper affordability levels. The Ordinance currently requires a blend of affordable units between 50% and 120% median income. A new ordinance could allow for fewer its but focus them at 50% to 80% median income. It should be noted that the City lost a number of 120% affordable is during the Great Recession when the price of market-rate is dropped below the 120% affordable price. The City also lost a few 80% affordable is but was able to save most of the with small $10,000 to $40,000 subsidies. Timeframe 9— 12 months 3. Enhanced Infrastructure Financing District(EFID): EFIDs allow a City to divert incremental property tax growth to finance a broad range of infrastructure, environmental or economic projects and represent a potential alternative to a Redevelopment Agency (dissolved since 2012). EFIDs do not require voter approval for formation but do require a 55 percent voter approval for any bond issuance. Similar to Redevelopment Agency Tax Increment Financing, EFIDs are financed from the growth in property taxes but cannot divert tax increments from schools and can only collect money from other taxing agencies on a voluntary basis. Because EFIDs require voter approval for bonding, it could be difficult to secure initial funding; the upside is that that infrastructure needs in the Downtown or Transit Village areas could be EFID financed to encourage new housing projects and other private development. Timeline: 18 months—3 years 4. Support State Bills to Inncrease Funding Sources: The City could provide letters of support for Assembly Bill 35, which proposes to increase the California Law Income Housing Tax Credit (LIHTC) by $300 million per year and increase the percentage of funding for a development that could come from state tax credits. State Bill 377 would increase the value of the California LIHTC by 40%by allowing credits to be sold separately from an interest in the underlying property, allowing a one-time transfer of tax credits to a new buyer. 5. Summary of Existing Impact Fees: To help illustrate existing impact fees for commercial and residential development, the following list is provided: Development Impact Fees Capital Facility Fee Parks/Recreation Fee ........._.— ....................... School Fee Child Care Impact Fee Public Safety Impact Fee Sewer Capacity Fee(per Equivalent Dwelling Unit) Road/Traffic Fee(East of 101 Properties Only) Sewer Capacity Fee(East of 101 Properties Only) Oyster Point Grade Separation(East of 101 Properties Only) N Attachment 4—Available and Potentially Available Housing Pit Attachment 4-Available and Potentially Available Housing Funds Available and Potentially Available Housing Funds Asset Type Land Cash Total Land w/Improvements 380 Alta Vista $ 1,000,000 714-718 Linden $ 862,000 Subtotal Land $ 1,862,000 Cash/Cash Equivalents Housing Fund (former RDA) $ 1,358,000 Housing Trust Fund (in-lieu) $ 1,567,290 Bonds $ 981,532 ................... ... ... Subtotal Cash $ 3,906,822 Total $ 1,862,000 $ 3,906,822 $ 5,768,822 P12 Attachment 5—21 Elements Nexus Study p to Mem, orandum P13 I'PI Elements RNNA5 a Status Report on the San Mateo County Affordable ousing ulticit 'texas Study ', Prepared Aril 2015 Executive n° i . i In February 2014,fifteen jurisdictions in San Mateo County, plus Palo Alto hi t re is Economics and er azza Wolfe Associates to produce nexus and feasibility studies that wou lid allow cities to charge impacts fees for new residential or commercial development fund affordable housin .The project was initiated and continues to be coordinated 21 Elements, a countywide collaboration between all the cities in San Mateo 1.i and Deliverable: In County on housing issues. June 2015, participating cities will r° ceive an affordable For the past year,the consultant tea has collected and analyzed housing nexus and feasibility data.Specifically,they documented o new development creates stud for residential and/or the nee for additional affordable housing.The consultant tea ci also analyzed market conditions,existing fees and other a commercial development, ors in 'jailor°ed conditions in that each participating city sot y can develop jurisdiction specific jurisdiction. recommendations. In April 2015,the consultant team will release a model report, Nexus Study—This report will ill based on Foster City data. All the reports will have a similar format document the relationsNp be een new development n structure the initial report, but i jurisdiction specific and the need for more data.All the participating jurisdictions will receive their reports in affordable housing It will June . In addition,the consultant tea ill prepare a re a report afford the maximum legal summarizing trends key findings throughout the county. fee^s,that can be charged. Once these reports are available,the juris i ions will be able to Feasibility Study_This ire port consider appropriate follow-up actions. Possible actions include: will makes recommendations Charging si i to fund about appropriate fee levels the construction of new affordable housin . based on local conditions (e.g. Charging commercial t to fund the current fees,market strength, construction of e affordable housin . etc.)These goal will be not to Adjusting jurisdiction's inclusionary ordinance,if there adversely impact potential is one,to be compliant with recent court decisions. new evelopment. In addition, some jurisdictions may want to charge the fee only on rental development and apply inclusionary zoning requirements to condominiums. It is also an option to charge a fee to both commercial and residential development. The hope is that having a multiple jurisdictions working collaboratively will result in better local solutions. P14 �iIIII� A �eQo tia \d�a� ode\ ee���` �6 `�d�� Ile PQi\ lee 0�eea5 ffig f 3 J4 ate ®® e✓4®y er e � `• ® e Policy r n Several factors have increased the need for new policies to address affordable housing, including: • Housing ric increased rapidly. Wit the median sales price approaching$1 million, homes are unaffordable to most of the county's workforce. • Redevelopment tie ,formerly the largest source funding r le housing in California,were eliminated in .Consequently,there is a need for new resources to assist in affordable housing development. • Recent court cases have limited ili of cities to implement inclusionary zoni it inclusionary zoning is still legal in California, rental requirements have to carefully structured to be compliant with recent court cases. Further,a case that is currently before the California Supreme Court has added additional legal uncertainty about inclusionary zoning.This case,CBIA v. City of San Jose,will be decided this summer. Feasibility Nexus and Generally, affordable housing impact fees require new construction to pay money into a fund that is then used to support affordable housing development,To enact an affordable housing impact fee,cities must first conduct a nexus study that documents the relationship between the creation of new housing orjobs and the need foraffordable housing in the community. P15 Affordable Housing Impact Fee New Affordable Housing u `" Fees paid LO, UIR w rt Affordable Housing uuuum Market rate development Trust Fund Basically, new residential development results in new jobs to service the new homes and residents. Landscapers, childcare workers and food service worker jobs will be created as a result of new development. Because ma ny of these jobs pay low income wages,there will be a resulting demand for new affordable housing.The private sector is not supplying is product,so consequently the government has a role and interest in eei this need. The relationship between new o s,the jobs created and the need foraffordable housing is summarized in the graphic below. Residential tir New market rate New jobs,some Need for new homes pay low wages affordable homes The relationship between commercial development and the need for new affordable housing is similar, but one step shorter since some of the jobs created by new commercial development will pay to income wages and thus create a direct demand for new r a le housing.This is shown in the graphic below. P16 Commercial Nexus Newjobs,some Need for new pay low wages affordable home,s The nexus study examines these relationships in much greater detail. It looks at the income of new residents and their spending patterns,the growth in low income households associated with the new jobs,and the affordability gap,or difference, between what low income households cans end on housing and what new housing costs. Partleipating Multicity Nexus Study Process Jurisdictions San Mateo County has benefited from 21 Elements, an award winning L Belmont collaborative project that brings together all the cities in the county to 2. Brisbane discuss housing policy.The project has made it easier and much less costly 3• Burlingame for jurisdictions to develop high quality,certified housing elements. 21 4. Colma Elements has also coordinated the implementation of key housing policy 5. Foster City projects for interested jurisdictions. Funding for 21 Elements is provided by 6. Half::Moon Bay the San Mateo County Department of Housing,the City/County Association 7. Menlo Park of Governments of San Mateo County(C/CAG) and all the jurisdictions. 8. Millbrae In 2013,San Mateo County cities began discussions about how to respond 9. Redwood City 10. Pacifica in a coordinated manner to the Palmer lawsuit that restricted rental 11. Portola Valley inclusionary zoning.As a result,the cities decided to hire a consultant team 12. San Bruno to produce nexus and feasibility studies for all interested jurisdictions. 13. San Mateo Fifteen San Mateo jurisdictions and Palo Alto decided to join in this effort, County which is a significant accomplishment because it represents every eligible San Mateo jurisdiction, not counting those that already conducted nexus studies or 14. 15. South San those that were not expecting significant growth in the future(e.g. Francisco Atherton, Hillsborough,etc.).The cost for each jurisdiction is slightly over 16. Palo Alto $15,000, is is about one-quarter of the amount it would have cost each jurisdiction to hire a consultant on its own. Enterprise Community Partners and the HUD Sustainable Communities Regional Planning Initiative provided grants to reduce the costs for cities. Foster City agreed to act as the financial sponsor, releasing the Request for Proposals(RFP)for consultant assistance and collecting and dispersing the funds to cover the costs of the studies. In June 2015,all cities will receive their jurisdiction-specific residential and/or commercial nexus and feasibility studies.At this time,jurisdictions will have an opportunity to review their document and offer its and other feedback. Once the reports are finalized,jurisdictions can decide on the next steps based on their individual needs and policy directions. P17 Attachment 6—RHINA Allocation andAffordability, Chart P18 Attachment 6 -Regional Housing Needs Allocation and Affordability Chart The process begins with the State advising a region of their Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RNHA), which is the estimated number of housing units that will be needed over the planning period (usually seven years). The Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG) is responsible for the public process by which this regional allocation is apportioned to each jurisdiction within its boundaries. A City's allocation is then further subdivided among four household income categories: very-low, low, moderate and above moderate. The amount that residents can afford to spend on housing depends on their income. Specifically, federal guidelines suggest that people not spend more than 30 percent of their earnings on rent or mortgage, including utilities, as illustrated in Table 1. Income limits are determined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD), and are adjusted for family size. Table 1 -U.S. Department of HUD Housing A ordability Guidelines FAMILY EXTREMELY LOW VERY LOW LOW MEDIAN MODERATE ABOVE SIZE BELOW 30% BELOW 50% BELOW 80% 100% BELOW 120% MODERATE 1 $23,350 $38,500 $62,200 $72,100 $86,500 >$86,500 2 $26,650 $44,400 $71,050 $82,400 $98,900 >$98,900 3 $30,000 $49,950 $79,950 $92,700 $111,250 >$111,250 4 $33,300 $55,500 $88,800 $103,000 $123,600 >$123,600 5 $36,000 $59,950 $95,950 $111,250 $133,500 >$133,500 6 $38,650 $64,400 $103,050 $119,500 $143,400 >$143,400 This housing cycle covers January 31, 2015 through January 31, 2023. The City of South San Francisco has a RHNA allocation of 1,864 units for this cycle, with units distributed based upon income group as shown in Table 2. The City's RHNA allocation for the previous housing cycle (2006-2014) was 1,635 units, of which 251 units or about 16% have been constructed. This was primarily due to the economic downturn in 2008 that essentially halted all residential construction statewide. Table 2-RHNA Allocation by Income G oup for South San Francisco INCOME GROUP UNITS PERCENT OF TOTAL Very Low/Extremely Low Income 565 30% Low Income 281 15% Moderate Income 313 17% Above Moderate Income 705 38% Total for 2015-2023 Cycle 1,864 100% 2006-2015 Cycle Total(for context) 1,635 P19 Attachment 7®Map of Downtown Residential i Districts P20 MEN Mon a, vi m„ m" a wromw •. "m,"""" " py n� �m M w, h i K rt, � nuu LL r 3 P21 Attachment 8—ALUCP Noise Contour Map 0. MIR 01 1.;iL� NB-@ Cj E S' 2, 'E ou RE - d8a 8 15 �28 2 ef 2 T ga a 'S-6 E F ti 2 4 tm, a,e� wo V % t 2, 'r qh 4-1 'li 4 Rik 01 CIS Iq V4 Ir 4 apy p IVA P23 Attachment 9—East of 101 Residential Memorandum P24 al"Y oi? Soun r SAN IFIRANCIS(,10 IN'rEROF]IFICE MEMORAND"UN/1' DATE: April 2,2015 TO: Mike Futrell, City Manager Alex Greenwood,Director of Economic and Community Development FROM: Sailesh Mehra, Senior Planner .,444 SUBJECT: East of 101 Residential Sub-Areas As a follow up to the meeting we had on April 2'4,I'd like top vide you with some additional information for your consideration. This information supplements the earlier analysis provided explaining staffs' concept to allow residential development in specific sub-areas of the East of 101 Area. In addition to the attached analysis(Attachment 1), a map showing the specific sub-areas is includfA- with this memo(Attachment 2). This map shows a range of proposed minimum and maximum densities,height limit and land area in acres. The third attachment includes examples of mid and high-rise residential/mixed-use development.Mid-rise is typically defined as four-12 stories and high-rise can be any structure exceeding 12 stories. The spexcific area the City can aspire to emulate is Mission Bay in San Francisco. This area has been successfully redeveloped in recent years and is very urban,with high density limits and neighborhood-serving amenities, as well as being proximate to light-rail (Muni Metro)and regional comniuter train line(Caltrain). One option to consider is to have a base density limit(perhaps 150 units to the acre,instead of the originally suggested 100 units/acre) and if a developer chooses to provide community benefits, the City can consider a greater density allowance.The goal is to maximize the density within a V4 to V2 mile of the Caltrain station. For example,if a developer submits a proposal for a residential development on a one acre site,the allow sity would yield a 150 it project. However,if the developer provides one or a combination of the following benefits,the density can be increased accordingly: 0 Affordable housing beyond the required amount 0 Increased density for providing units for service employees a Space for and the construction of a battered women's and children shelter 6 Improved off-site pedestrian and bicycle connections Attachments 1. Analysis of Residential Uses East of 101 2. Map of proposed areas East of 101 3. Examples of mid-rise,urban development P25 Residential Uses East of 101 Background The East of 101 Area has historically been dedicated to Industrial uses, limited open space and warehousing. Over the last 30 years the area has been transforming into the premier locale for R&D offices and office parks on the Peninsula. Perhaps to protect these uses and not create any potential land use conflicts,the City decided to prohibit residential uses in the East of 101 Area. The General Plan contains the following Guiding Policies related to the East of 101 Area: 3.5-G-1:Provide appropriate settings for a diverse range of non-residential uses. 3.5-1-3:Do not permit any residential uses in the East of 101 Area. In 1994 the City adopted the East of 101 Area Plan. This plan's intent was to "maximize the potential of undeveloped or underused properties in the City's traditional industrial area east of U.S. 101."The plan outlined provisions for design, infrastructure upgrades and other pertinent land use related components. More recently, internal and external interest has been growing to consider allowing residential uses east of 101 in carefully selected area. Roadmap to Residential Staff would strongly recommend high density residential uses,with some supportive retail uses in very specific parts of the East of 101 Area. To maximize the number of dwelling units in the designated areas east of 101,the optimum density would be 40-60 DUs/acre (or 80-100 with bonus and public benefits). Process: In order for the City to allow residential uses east of 101,two important documents would need to be first amended by the City;the General Plan and the Zoning Ordinance and Zoning map.These amendments would also require California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) analysis. There are two approaches to doing the amendments and concurrent CE QA analysis: 1. Comprehensive approach—this would be a lengthy,but more comprehensive approach in evaluating where residential uses could be allowed. In discussion with two CEQA consulting firms this process will require extensive community outreach,technical studies and evaluating residential uses for a greater number of parcels in this area. The time range for this approach would be 18-24 months. 2. Site-specific approach—This approach involves designating a couple of sub-areas within the East of 101 Plan Area with a Precise Plan or Specific Plan. This would be a more expeditious approach as far as CEQA is concerned. The sub-areas could include several parcels which are ideally suited for residential development in that they are proximate to public transportation and amenities.The estimate for this approach could be 10-14 months. P26 Regardless of which option the City pursues,one way of being efficient would be to commence a few technical studies as soon as possible. Once complete,these studies will help f rame the CEQA analysis anddiscussion. Moreover,the selected CEQA consultant could also use recent CEQA analysis for the east of 101 residential analysis. This would include the Downtown Station Area Plan Environmental Impact Report(EIR) and any other studies completed recently. Technical Studies: Constraints Analysis Sewer and Water Capacity Analysis Geotechnical Report Traffic, Noise and Air Quality Analysis Impact Fee Analysis Commentary The ideal location for residential uses would be Yz mile from public transportation and amenities. These enclaves should incorporate: * Amenities/support services(corner store,caf6, dry cleaner,etc.) * Connectivity—not necessarily auto-centric * Proximate to the ferry * Near downtown and Caltrain * Pedestrian and bike bridges * Way-finding signage The City should start setting up meetings with stakeholders and/or the community at-large to start framing the discussion for this endeavor.We should also get in touch with other Peninsula cities that have recently allowed or are considering allowing residential uses east of 101,such as Mountain View, Menlo Park,Sunnyvale and Redwood City, P27 LM UL® r. �. r ■om i LO CL m N C O MEM O l- a ° Lk 0 r �� ( n' 1r , nall'w 0 LL "n Cl cu CL LIL a *' �wgAfJ L uiy P28 Examples for East of 101 Mission Bay ���,,�y„ �. ,. ✓i✓"✓�„✓ a a-iii %:;vi/i4il "�Yro•i,� ,,, � � ,✓,ei�� ,i7/ ✓' v� s a �” � «- bra i✓iiiii ✓i. b Nrft� °.��� 1""'" � ✓a `fitlN�'J ��I%l✓�(( Wr( ��v �'w?`laai � ✓i i �x r Jd r G � «n"�" J�! '✓ Ar/�/vJ l✓1i✓%��%�5 i��� a l�e 7 ^r'nY �' I"v ✓., � m M ✓v r �" �i r" 1� �/1r,c,(- w r"+%' d ✓a"t � /4 l �yVl �vo�it��"'� i 1 r i mu �i uuuuu i a 1 VM1 v��J,'� �d �' �" r�✓ .J? y;�, �,dyd% y�i�, � t C JV�i,��,+ 1 y"�I'»ryv�✓1 C� � �m" ``r� a i �I�� �� ua .w ' J ,&l -.rw � w � 7K � 7�w✓!k.'�,*N�'a�d �tl rv!»1'4 r YJ J✓ � fl " � �mv+ni,q r I u �,j✓`1J�1 e �,y��:,N J"� � �G7 6 „,l.I� �k, w`7" i�� „ r. ern ,✓I✓ plgi n� r ri f'1 a� �,�P✓ P `�."„`"*'�wtv," e i HM P29 e gym, r�r A ma'aff ry . .a low fr.�m,uyy '�wurtw� r!>slo r /� u rSri -r �B ff r �f ri r m a % rll/Gp A r � r n 'Yffi� P30 oar' / Y r a / %!/1/ / .,y �PO,�� )���ri� , �I� i o ��Nli�� ,r�n�➢blw.�,Vi�9� YfI�Z R�,�6��t� 1. � � IIIIIIIIIIIV VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV M I 1 r r v r �f Jk" P31 � �, ''� � � � a ��O ¢w^ "^'�,,,,, `y�4✓'©lY�/ �l J��,� ryr � r nfm✓' � R dx if � f r? IT ry //l ' I%I �%,6/��� i/ ����i��✓ '�� � err u��WJMJ", � f ! 'r �H ��I ,v�;, � ��� � P32 r uuuu Y! II W r II yY1,ri1�9WU11S �" " I' IIII� r r r W rr" 1 it r r i / q i r r � r I i ✓ / / rr 1 ° m ii�� ' I I l � 1 N ✓ i r a / r r � Pf f o,'T+9ilv>'vyr �r ///Uir,/!6//a�✓�/yr�s�i%%%%///�;Nr'�✓ 1 ;i,r cir,:t, ��y' °� ;G%i,.,r�// � ; / �✓rl%, y�)rr' �vr.,Pr�,, rleir,� ,. ,,,,,, .;, ,.�Y,rc; a.,...,.. i :.u,r �� ,.,. /I 4 � /i„� i✓/, � ,,,,%/rJ/I/ /�✓Li.a%/j 1, ylgl I4� Nf O' lklF 'u�l'N'�trlr� ,9�7YJ ,„,n;,�, hrrr✓r�anrfu i /�(%lllllr, .� II�II���! ,,..o, ,. , , ,,,////r////a,�0�/�i,,r�, r�rui// ,�///��/f/,,//,1//!!!!/!//, / . ..j� S ,... i➢ .1���IN,I"4111�1iYrtV`1�Y'bfl�//1)�r/,.. Hart;{/ u / UV(r�I erg �Nr NNrrrm P33 ` ^ ���/ ) 0 Oman= ! � . L C) / \ � LIM ` O a ` //� : #m. . : / \ \ .0 \ P34 PAO i r i r' r i r MWOMM 0 lug owl M r r r r r �amemn% r / rG/%�i as r mica 'Aii i r� I r � � - i / IN IMEW / / III � tr ,�,✓,�rw a/0irrc,'rn /✓/(i(L��nw,) ,:; i �� ��J/ � � Ij;: I I i y P35 { 3 ) > , , Ric a — \ ,WINNOW . .! 0 / w . ! , ` s■— 7� ) , . `Mo~ , . , , 4"1 \. \ , t �. • } . . \ 2J 3 M \ a X . ` \ / _ U . P36 CL 0 PRE= yy I a D �+ir I� � ( �'✓/ � /r k ! Al '7 fl m✓�r �� i/�� w r Yo e r K r, l„ w r S n r. 'rr P u J I 0 d- � I n � r ni I cn Law r r r� v 0 CL au �a � r �, � fit✓' I, ter. I P37 all Wn CL QU cU f ' M1 , 1 � % M 4wpN B� I I1m11111� j; .0 1111111 � , Ln o 111 � �/- >✓" b `; j WI I f I li ry 0 T JA/ � IVUVm11 J 1' mien== �' 4 Jam cis lmaw I r T � 0: m M A � S 1 �uou�xo�rwro I mm E m L.0 0 NuUm r/ 01 U cis Ni UPI CIL) mumommumm cis t � da re a t( eD� A J1�da e1111111V�Uln n� A,JS i� �/r (. P38 (ITS , i uuu mimmimmiomiuw �- i i � i�/ uu�uuuuuuum Ell CU QLJ 1. uuu I uuuumu um��u i � � i x n.. uuuuu i uummmw,�wmmuuuu i uuuu (r Cry ✓i 11'; D gum 3 imu f l%/ i m cis uuuu �� J"", l ul�i umuovumm I/K 1� N � ��, ✓ale- ummuuu IIIInmIIIIIInIIN �' � '�`" '� rDPluu9l�"1 �Nni, �muuuuvuu uuw � wni I cas wm ummuuuum I �'�, cis CL) E Jr iE i Ell ICU LL-J o% P % ELI ,✓!IC)lllj,. P39 , r Ili << mlmowuu ap nu I MlwHm m mmumnmolpl Lill S u� owmmuuu '" ° 2 �Imlwm mumuulw ' "` mww m -0 mmluu alll uul �'muum� i +.,I wm 1uuuuuuuum 2 mt �n WuM w A ml u u uuuuu molwmm ;, IIII X mu u° auuum uuuumnlm Cuuuu 30W U Lon i uu�mW mum uuuouu uum ,mnlll �ollll�llllllllllm; . muuuuuuuw�mn . o� muuuuuu j,IWw wmm�,,,mn �p0 um ui�IVuu m m��� mmuuuuuu� �1°I of puu uwumnumu m uuuuuuuuuuuu �VI I �u a umu 1Im 0 uuuuuuouuuuummmmlmu uw m'Imumammlmaw mu���umuu ZIIIIIIII m �urvmuumr I uuuwamllu m m QV 1.11 p° Muuuuwu, M Nollmum CMT 41,11,111111 0 CU SC= P fip 6W8WMIu mU � YIIV LAIIImIIY 0 ZION � m V1a Imw��� Illllllmm; 3 mum�uulp� mmuouol I uuuuoou uuuum mmmuuuu uuwm MID Illll. a amom umw ; I mmwmm u m� AD/1, 0d�0�. A,, I P40 00 tell C) IT 0/1 S 111) 1 COXa. V rvi Lr .,_�. Its iff umm IN can rn +Prel WE ku r4 V4 cy� W5 IN lit 1/1 Amp aUmii//o, p MW! ti 0 3 W SO 00 CLIM AT a/ 91111111111111118 s cc r cc c- uo �. ,� / ' D ; -X3 �: � . 00 t� 00 C is to to Awn J t"`"` �! '� tun CD is t0 ,, to tin P41 �Ilm�l Illlm�llllu wl �I �mllllllllllu� �mmmm li�ll�m� um�mmmum muuuuuum loi muuum �' �ummlmmMhuumulm iouuuum� mmt mu �nmuumu Imulll �wmuumallw n�uum cn ouuuuumu Immm Imu w 1-m ml m IIIIIIIIIII aw o u o ml:... � I u° umm�mm Ium Im�le uullluu � � � I muu�nmioull mmu" INu , �mmmmmmm m I liw u all. almmlVUullu urouu Immm C) M mom LAI' ndUWBR ul Imlmmm b ;�IU�mIIIWNmmlll 1411011 ,.. pl Imp tnl I _ IW }+ � ' IIIIO�m011111111V IIIIIIII Imp o R�� ��IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIO�a) m�lumluumml w �nmmlmmmmuuuuuuummm ml I uuuuuuuuuuuuuumu t ,III ,1 � uua � uuunml I m 9m U 461111111111110 Sul ulu � uuuuuuuuu a uuu Y I m I� a II III aiuuiu'u . VIII mnumm I tea.= I ® ..IIIII000 � uuuuuuuuuu W m ImIII � ° mIII Ilmummlllll�n �m ww 0 '1W.11,110 u � ,. 'I � ummmllu�om i re.uo 0 � uOWN illim wm mu wuu uI � 0 sum= mIllm m n fl�Ilvu' ro : m muum uuoouuuummu u � to I � uolo u 1 uum ml IIIIIIII .. ��uPlIOmu u (A u IWVUIU".m I +.j Lm111.