HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 2000-01-26MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
SPECIAL MEETING
JANUARY 26, 2000
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
33 ARROYO DRIVE
1. Call to Order: 7:06 p.m.
(Cassette Tape No. 1)
2. Roll Call: Present:
Councilmembers Datzman, Mullin and
Penna, Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes and
Mayor Matsumoto
Absent: None
3. Oral Communications: None
4. Closed Session
a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, City of South San Francisco
vs. Union Pacific Railroad Company;
b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6, labor negotiations for City
Manager
Convened into Closed Session: 7:07 p.m.
Reconvened into Open Session: 7:30 p.m., all Councilmembers present.
Report from Closed Session:
City Attorney Mattas announced item 4a) City
Council approved a settlement of $375,000 to
purchase right-of-way for the widening of Oyster
Point Boulevard, and item 4b) direction given, no
action taken.
5. Adjournment
Motion-Fernekes/Second-Datzman:
approved by voice vote.
Respectfully Submitted:
Sylv~M. Payne, City
City of South San Francisco
To adjourn the meeting at 7:31 p.m. Unanimously
Approved:
City of South San Francisco
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral
communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on
file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying.
MINUTES
CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING
JANUARY 26, 2000
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
33 ARROYO DRIVE
CALL TO ORDER:
7:42 p.m.
(Cassette Tape No. 1)
ROLL CALL:
Present:
Councilmembers Datzman, Mullin and Penna,
Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes and Mayor Matsumoto.
Absent:
None
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
Led by Mayor Matsumoto
INVOCATION:
Pastor John Cantley, Grace Covenant Church
PRESENTATIONS
Proclamation: Voter Registration Week, January 31-February 7, 2000 - Mayor Matsumoto
presented proclamation to City Clerk Payne
Monthly BART Update - Ms. Jaymie Steen, BART Liaison Representative, gave a full
construction report and visual presentation. She announced that the BART line has now
crossed South San Francisco and is in San Bruno. She stated the South San Francisco BART
station has been given the approval to proceed-to-build and a kick off party will be
announced within two weeks. Although the project is slowing down, Council requested Ms.
Steen to continue with the monthly updates. In response to Mayor Matsumoto, Ms. Steen
indicated that full funding is in place for the South San Francisco station and she will have
the person who is more knowledgeable about the funding contact the Mayor.
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Wilson announced that Item No. 12 is pulled from
agenda.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Phil Weiss, South San Francisco School Board President, announced that the Serra Vista
School site is not for sale, it is surplus property, and it is to be used exclusively for lease
purposes to other educational institutions. The public notification process will be followed if it is
to be sold.
COMMUNITY FORUM/COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
Councilman Datzman clarified a mis-quote in the Peninsula Independent pertaining to a
statement made by City Engineer Kianpour at a recent West Winston Manor community
meeting. Although a retraction was printed in the Independent, he felt West Winston Manor
residents needed to be reassured that Serra Vista School has never been offered for sale to the
City.
Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes reported on the January 25, 2000 School Board Liaison Subcommittee
(Fernekes/Datzman) meeting to discuss the General Plan "S" designation for school sites. He
stated the subcommittee will be meeting next week to formulate a recommendation to Council.
Councilman Mullin reported on the most recent meeting of the Emergency Homeless Shelter
Task Force, and a list of possible sites is being compiled, including four sites at the GSA
building on San Mateo Avenue. He stated a funding formula involving all San Mateo County
cities for the shelter is also being discussed. He further reported on the recent meeting of
ABAG's Executive Board to discuss Smart Growth, and housing allocations from the State of
California. Councilman Mullin reported that the ABAG General Assembly will have a forum on
Smart Growth in April and a written report will be submitted to Council.
Councilman Penna stated that he and Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes will be attending the Conference
Center Authority meeting on January 27 to review four consulting proposals submitted for the
feasibility of a Conference Center expansion. A report will be brought back to Council.
Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes announced that the Day in the Park Subcommittee (Matsumoto/
Fernekes) met with staff, and this year's event will be held September 16.
Mayor Matsumoto reported that she attended a Census 2000 meeting and Community Outreach
Director Quinn is taking an active role for South San Francisco. She encouraged all citizens to
participate. She attended the Chamber of Commerce's installation dinner on January 14, the
Cultural Arts Commission mural dedication on January 15, and the Women's Club 100th
Anniversary tree planting ceremony on January 18, 2000.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion to approve the minutes of the January 12 special meeting, January 6 community
meeting and January 12, 2000 regular meeting
2. Motion to confirm expense claims of January 26, 2000 in the amount of $1,483,832.42
o
Resolution No. 4-2000, extending fundraising timeline for Westborough Community
Swimming Pool Fundraising and Advisory Committee
Resolution No. 5-2000, amending salary stipend for the Housing Authority
Commissioners
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000
MINUTES PAGE 2
o
o
o
10.
11.
Resolution No. 6-2000, approving the destruction of Police Department records
Resolution No. 7-2000, quitclaiming an existing 40' roadway access easement on lands
of Robert E. Simms for an alternate access easement across same property between North
Access Road and the Water Quality Control Plant
Motion to accept Municipal Services Building and Central Fire Station interior paint
project as complete in accordance with plans and specifications
Motion to accept the HVAC replacement project at the Municipal Services Building as
complete in accordance with plans and specifications
Motion to accept the seismic upgrade of the apparatus doors at Fire Station Nos. 2, 4, and
5 as complete in accordance with plans and specifications
Motion to accept the Colma Creek Linear Park project as complete in accordance with
plans and specifications
Resolution No. 8-2000, authorizing the installation of stop signs at two locations in South
San Francisco
12.
Resolution awarding contract to LC General Engineering and Construction for ANIP
Phase XIX C in the amount of $809,736
Item pulled from the agenda.
13.
Resolution No. 9-2000, awarding the construction contract to Golden Pacific
Construction Inc., for the Magnolia Avenue Storm Drain Project - Phase II, in the
amount of $217,716
14.
Resolution No. 10-2000, authorizing a lease agreement with H & T Produce Company
and Calabasas Inc., for use of sections of the City owned greenhouses at 810 Tennis
Drive
Motion-Fernekes/Second-Penna: To approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of
Item No. 12. Unanimously approved by voice vote.
PUBLIC HEARINGS
15.
Extension of interim ordinance prohibiting amendments to the Bay West Cove Specific
Plan and approval of precise plans or conditional use permits for Planning Areas 1, 2, and
3 of the Bay West Cove (Shearwater) Specific Plan
Public hearing opened.
Staff report presented by Economic and Community Development Director Van Duyn,
recommending that the ordinance be extended to July 30, 2000.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000
MINUTES PAGE 3
16.
Public hearing closed.
Motion-Mullin/Second-Fernekes: To introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 1265-00,
extending the moratorium prohibiting approval of specific plan amendments, precise
plans and conditional use permits for planning areas 1, 2, and 3 of the Bay West Cove
(Shearwater) Specific Plan Area. Unanimously approved by voice vote.
Councilman Datzman clarified that although his initial vote was in favor of the Wal-Mart
store, Council must move together in one direction for the development of Bay West
Cove.
Oakmont Vistas/Storage USA - Planned Unit Development GP, RZ, ZA, PUD, PM, SA,
UP and ND-98-054 to allow a 33-unit single family residential subdivision, a 4.9+ acre
mini storage facility with a resident caretaker's unit, and a. 173 acre single family
residential lot at the southwest corner of Westborough Boulevard and Oakmont Drive;
Owner: Thomas Callan, Jr. and Gilbert Anda; Applicant: John Hansen PSC
Public hearing opened.
Staff report and visual presentation by Chief Planner Sparks, recommending denial of the
five acre mini-storage facility. He noted that correspondence from Planning Commission
Chair Honan was distributed to Council for consideration of decreasing the commercial
area and increasing the recreational/parkland area.
Applicant presentations:
Mr. John Hansen, applicant, President of Hansen PSC, 99 Almaden Boulevard, San Jose,
provided a brief history of his involvement with the project that began almost four years
ago. He discussed the planning review process that included meetings with staff, the
Design Review Board, and Planning Commission public hearings.
Mr. Emie Gorrill, Bassenian Lagoni Architects, 2031 Orchard Drive, Newport Beach,
made a visual presentation of the residential units and their compatibility with the
community.
Mr. Paul Davis, Architect, 266 E1 Dorado Way, Monterey, reviewed the mini-storage
facility and how it will be terraced into the site and screened.
Mr. Jeff Harvey, Rose Landscaping Architects, reviewed the landscape drawings, plant
materials, and walls for screening purposes.
Speakers:
1. Ms. Georgette Sarles, 3001 Medina Drive, San Bruno, speaking against the
project, stated she has obtained 450 signatures from residents who are opposed to the
development. She discussed the inappropriateness of the mini-storage facility, the
drainage problems in the area, children's safety, noise and traffic. She suggested a study
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000
MINUTES PAGE 4
committee be formed to look at an appropriate use for the site or that it be open space, as
originally intended.
2. Mr. Mark DeVasanellos, 3451 Oakmont Drive, speaking in favor of the
development, stated he lives next door to the development and feels it will be a benefit to
the neighborhood; the mini-storage facility will be screened from view, and the
development will improve property values.
3. Ms. Kathryn Campbell, 2515 Tara Lane, speaking against the project, stated her
objection to the rezone amendment and that the area should stay residential.
4. Mr. Eric Hilario, 51A Appian Way, speaking in favor of the project, stated the
project will improve the area and increase property values.
5. Mr. Anthony Charvet, 3475 Oakmont Drive, speaking in favor of the project,
stated that a majority of property owners who live adjacent to the development support it
and feel it will improve the present condition of the property and the area.
6. Ms. Mary Sarantopulos, 3020 Oakmont Drive, San Bruno, speaking against the
project, stated that her concerns include water drainage and the development's high
density. She felt the development will crowd the area.
7. Ms. Ruth Sack, 2248 Shannon Drive, speaking against the project, stated she
wanted to see the environmental impact report for the proposed development, and that the
storm drainage system in the area does not properly work, encouraged Council to
consider a study committee and say no to the development.
8. Mr. Art Forrest, 3101 Oakmont Drive, San Bruno, speaking against the project,
stated his opposition to rezoning the parcel for a commercial use, that the storm drainage
system is inadequate, the storage facility will attract graffiti, and the storage facility will
decrease property values.
9. Mr. Gil Anda, 810 Dell Road, Pacifica, property owner, speaking in favor of the
project, stated he constantly cleans garbage from the property, that the development will
increase property values, and will significantly improve the area.
10. Ms. Esther Young, 2434 Bantry Lane, speaking against the project, stated she
opposed the mini storage facility, and her concerns include graffiti, children's safety, and
the sub-drainage system.
11. Mr. William Nack, 1153 Chess Drive, Foster City, speaking in favor of the
project, stated the development will satisfy the housing need in the County and that the
use is appropriate for the site.
12. Mr. Ronald Davis, 3673 Georgetown Court, speaking in favor of the project,
stated the development will increase property values and a storage facility is needed. He
felt those speaking in opposition to the development are misinformed.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000
MINUTES PAGE 5
13. Mr. Francisco J. Aviles, 3375 Oakmont Drive, speaking in favor of the project,
stated the development will clean up and improve the area.
14. Ms. Barbara Miller, 2300 Shannon Drive, speaking against the project, stated the
storage facility is a regional use and will significantly change the area, and the applicant
should build the storage facility in his own neighborhood.
15. Jesus, 2300 Shannon Drive, speaking against the project, stated the storage
facility is not the only use for the site, and that a storage facility will attract outsiders to
the area. He felt the storage facility will bring crime, rats, and more trucks to the
neighborhood.
16. Mr. B.J. Gasphar, 3440 Oakmont Drive, speaking against the project, stated the
storage facility is bad for the neighborhood. It is not the best use for the land, that it
should be built at Westborough and Junipero Serra Boulevard or where the developer
lives. He felt the storage facility will have a negative economic impact on the
neighborhood.
17. Mr. Jerry Twentyman, 2415 B antry Lane, president of the Westborough
Homeowners Improvement Association, speaking against the project, submitted photos
of storage facilities in San Mateo County that are painted with graffitti. He felt an
alternate use should be considered for the site, that something more significant should be
at the entrance to the city and the area should be kept residential.
(Recess: 10:05 p.m. - 10:20 p.m.)
18. Ms. Charlotte Chan, 2405 Bantry Lane, speaking against the project, disagreed
that a storage facility is needed in the community and that there are seven facilities
already in South San Francisco. She felt the development will have a negative affect on
traffic, and the size of the development should be restricted. She never received
notification from the developer and he hasn't met with the community.
19. Ms. Joice Chan, 2405 Bantry Lane, speaking against the project, stated her
concerns are the storage facility, the wall that will screen the facility, strangers coming in
and out of the neighborhood, and location of the bus stop. She felt the area should be
kept open space.
20. Ms. Rebeca Aguayo, 3275 Oakmont Drive, speaking against the project, stated
her concerns were the quality of life for her family, which will be effected by the storage
facility. She asked Council if they would want to live next door to a storage facility. She
was concerned for the children who catch the bus near the entrance to the development.
She urged Council to deny the project.
21. Ms. Lulu Cordero, 2430 Wren Court, speaking in support of the project, stated it
is a high quality project, that will complete the intended development in the area.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000
MINUTES PAGE 6
22. Ms. Mary Ann Narvarez, 2655 Famee Court, speaking in support of the project,
stated that there is a need for both elements of the project. All concerns, including traffic,
drainage and noise, have been addressed by independent consultants hired to evaluate the
project.
23. Ms. Johann Yuzon, 3569 Callan Boulevard, speaking in favor of the project,
stated that the City required that his restaurant, Goldilocks, be seismically built. There is
a storage facility near his restaurant that never has any graffiti or rodent problems.
24. Mr. George V. Rodriguez, 2409 Wexford Avenue, speaking in favor of the
project, stated his support for the storage facility, since it will not become a park. He
stated that drainage is a concern, but it will be corrected with the development. He felt
the owner should not have to maintain cleaning of other people's garbage on the
undeveloped property.
25. Mr. Charlie Santos, 307 Castile Way, speaking in favor of the project, stated his
support for the design of the storage facility, and that no one has mentioned an alternative
use for the site, and status quo is not a benefit to the community.
26. Mr. Gerry Palomo, 20 Chateau Court, speaking in favor of the project, responded
to the negative comments made regarding the storage facility and potential graffiti. He
stated that traffic is a way of life and property values will not go down.
(Cassette Tape No. 2)
27. Mr. Eric Snyder, 2218 Derry Way, speaking against the project, stated his
concerns include maintenance of property in his area, and a commercial business being
built on the south side of Westborough. Although he does not oppose the residential
development, he felt the property owner should look at the land he owns across from
Pak'n Save for the storage facility.
28. Mr. Ramon Cespedes, 3260 Oakmont Drive, speaking against the project, stated
his concerns include how the development will disrupt the neighborhood, decrease
property values, and if Council would like to have a storage facility in its back yard.
29. Mr. Jerry Cimmet, 3960 Fleetwood Drive, San Bruno, speaking against the
project, stated that all other storage facilities in the city are in commercial areas and that
this side of Westborough should be kept residential. He objected to the noise, strangers
camping out and grafitti that this type of commercial use will bring. He urged Council to
deny the project.
30. Mr. Chito Desuasido, 26 Vista Court, speaking in favor of the project, stated he
initially had reservations about the project, but now supports the use and that storage
facilities are needed in the area. He suggested several alternatives, including a cemetary,
but felt it would be preposterous.
31. Ms. Docey Chatterjee, 3301 Oakmont Drive, speaking against the project, stated
her doubts about people changing their mind who originally opposed the project. Her
concerns included storm drainage, traffic, trash, and rezoning for a commercial use.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000
MINUTES PAGE 7
32. Haverleen Howlett, 2621 Medina Drive, San Bruno, speaking against the project,
stated her concerns include the development turning into a shanty, that there must be a
reason for wanting to screen the mini-storage facility, and that three story homes should
not need storage. She asked for equal time if the opposition is allowed time for rebuttal.
33. Mr. Albert N. Waters, 2266 Shannon Drive, speaking against the project, stated
his concerns include a storage facility in his neighborhood that will bring additional
traffic, and the corrosion of storm drains that have caused two homes to sink into the
ground. He felt there were enough storage facilities in the area.
34. Mr. Julio Bolivar-Dillon, 2212 Derry Way, speaking against the project, stated his
concerns include the negative impact the storage facility will have on the quality of life
for his family. He stated that he does not oppose the residential portion of the
development.
(Recess: 11:20 p.m. - 11:30 p.m.)
Public hearing closed.
Council discussion:
Councilman Penna discussed with City Engineer Kianpour the drainage issues that
include the sub-drainage system that is 40-50 feet below the surface and collects at
Junipero Serra Boulevard; the surface mn-off system collects that runs down to Colma
Creek, and the storm water that collects around the homes and runs out to the City
drainage system. City Engineer Kianpour stated the hydro-geology of the area was
studied and there is a condition to intercept all subsurface drains and connect them to the
City's shallower drainage system that inter-connects to Westborough Boulevard or
Shannon Drive. He further explained the storm water detention basin proposed by the
applicant that will drain slowly into the Bantry or Shannon Drive storm drain systems.
The drainage system around the homes will be addressed when plans are submitted for
building permits. City Engineer Kianpour stated that storm drainage corrections have
been conditioned as part of the development.
Mr. Ted Tronoff, 345 Park Plaza Drive, Daly City, stated that he is in agreement with the
City Engineer and that development of the land will reduce drainage. He continued to
explain how storm water will drain to the line at Bantry Lane, which has been plugged
since the 1960's. This will take the burden off the Shannon Drive system. Councilman
Penna felt it was important for the Westborough residents to understand the system and
how development of the property was a way to have the 'drainage problems corrected.
In response to Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes, Chief Planner Sparks stated that landscaping
will be maintained by the homeowners association. Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes further
discussed with staff, and the applicant, questions concerning the storage facilities
operating hours, if the site was used as a park at one time, egress/ingress issues, state
laws requires fault disclosure, and landscaping along the solid wall to prevent graffiti.
Councilman Datzman supported the residential development, but opposed the mini-
storage facility in a residential area. He questioned staff, traffic consultant, applicant, and
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000
MINUTES PAGE 8
project consultants regarding the private streets, the sidewalks on one side of the street,
driveway aprons, access to the storage facility, development's ingress/egress, the
emergency access gates, evaluation of the development's driveway entrance on Oakmont
Drive, and the caretaker's residence being built near the fault line. In response to
Councilman Datzman's question regarding an expansion of the tot lot area, staff stated
there was no physical reason why the storage facility site could not be a park area for the
planned unit development.
Councilman Mullin felt there was no compelling reason why the zoning should be
changed for a commercial mini storage facility and did not support that aspect of the
proposal. He felt that an alternative to the storage facility should be studied.
Mayor Matsumoto discussed with staff the Planning Commission's action and
recommendation, the limited residential development of Parcel 1 due to the earthquake
fault, and commercial zoning only on the north side of Westborough. She questioned
whether she would want a mini-storage facility in her backyard.
Councilman Penna further discussed staff's recommendation that was made to the
Planning Commission and reiterated his concerns regarding the serious storm drainage
problems that will continue if the property remains undeveloped. He stated his concerns
also include traffic and having a storage facility in your backyard. He felt the project
would not impact the neighborhood and it would correct the drainage problem.
Council discussed designating Parcel 1 and 2 as open space and having it dedicated as
park land. City Manager Wilson stated that this question was asked by the Planning
Division and the response was that the current Capital Improvement Plan does not
address this item and it is not being considered at this time by the Park and Recreation
Commission or by Council.
There was a lengthy discussion of the drainage problems with City Engineer Kianpour
and whether or not the project needed to be approved to correct the drainage problems or
whether other options were available.
Councilman Penna stated that he was ready to make a motion to approve the entire
project. Mayor Matsumoto wanted clarification if this was an all or nothing situation.
City Attorney Mattas reviewed the options for Council's clarification and explained that
the staff recommendation is to approve the residential and deny the commercial re-
zoning.
Several Councilmembers voiced their concerns regarding the project, and another lengthy
discussion ensued. Councilmembers Datzman, Fernekes, Mullin and Matsumoto stated
they could only support the residential portion. Mayor Matsumoto asked that a
timeframe be implemented on the development of Parcel 1 and City Manager Wilson
stated that this would be contingent upon the property owner, and staff would work with
the applicant immediately. Director Van Duyn advised Council to not approve the parcel
map so the applicant is compelled to work with staff to develop Parcel 1. He felt there
were other options the applicant could consider. The applicant's attorney, Ms. Judy
Davidoff, Baker and McKenzie, responded to Mr. Van Duyn's comments and stated the
issue of separating the projects was discussed a long time ago. She stated there was a
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000
MINUTES PAGE 9
trade off to develop a residential project with reduced density as long as the parcel map
was approved. She urged Council to approve the residential development and the parcel
map tonight.
City Attorney Mattas responded to Ms. Davidoffs comments and agreed with staff's
recommendation to not act on the parcel map. He advised Council of the several options
that were before them tonight, including keeping the site as a ten-acre site or dividing it
into two or three parcels.
Councilman Penna further discussed the necessity of developing the entire project and
felt it was unrealistic to approve the residential and leave the other portion unresolved.
Councilman Datzman and Mayor Matsumoto stated their support for Director Van
Duyn's recommendation.
City Attorney Mattas advised Council of the option to deny the general plan amendment
and the rezone application, which would allow for the mini-storage facility. He further
suggested that Council direct staff to work with the applicant, expeditiously, on the
residential component of the application and come back to Council in two weeks.
City Manager Wilson requested that Council consider Agenda Item No. 17 while the City
Attorney prepares the resolution.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
17.
Resolution amending agreement with Tillo Products Co. for sewage sludge disposal
services in the amount of $116,000
Staff report presented by Public Works Director Gibbs.
Councilman Mullin's asked if this action helps to keep us on track with the 939 diversion
requirements and Director Gibbs indicated that sludge is looked at differently but credit is
given, and the City is on schedule with our goals at this time.
Motion-Datzman/Second-Fernekes: To approve Resolution No. 11-2000, authorizing an
addendum to amendment No. 3 to the agreement for sewer treatment plant sludge
removal with the Tillo Products Company. Unanimously approved by voice vote.
PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued)
16. Oakmont Vistas/Storage USA (continued)
Mr. Hansen requested that Council take no action tonight and continue the item for two
weeks.
Motion-Penna: To table item for two weeks. Motion died due to the lack of a second.
City Attorney Mattas read proposed resolution denying GP-98-054, ZA-98-054, RZ-98-
054, and UP-98-054, all items related to the mini-storage facility. He clarified that no
action is being taken on the residential component, and recommendation is to deny the
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING
MINUTES
JANUARY 26, 2000
PAGE 10
storage facility; staff is directed to work with the applicant and come back to Council in
two weeks with a recommendation for the 33 unit residential development, the option of
combining parcels 1 and 2, and to look at issues related to density with the possibility of
increasing the 33 units.
Motion-Mullin/Second-Datzman: To approve Resolution No. 12-2000, to deny GP-98-
054, ZA-98-054, and UP-98-054 which would have allowed a five acre mini-storage
facility with a resident caretaker unit. Approved by the following roll call vote: AYES:
Councilmembers Datzman and Mullin, Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes and Mayor Matsumoto.
NOES: Councilman Penna. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
Mayor Matsumoto distributed the Council subcommittee assignments for 2000.
GOOD AND WELFARE
Ms. Jackie Williams, 242 Longford Drive, asked for clarification on a document, seven
provisions of the Education Code, that was distributed at the January 25 School District Liaison
meeting. Councilman Datzman stated the subcommittee (Fernekes/Datzman) would not act on
the item unless they were satisfied with its contents. Mayor Matsumoto directed City Manager
Wilson to contact Ms. Williams to respond to her questions and concerns regarding the
document. Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes stated that when the subcommittee is ready to make a
recommendation to Council it will agendized the item and Ms. Williams will be advised.
ADJOURNMENT
Motion-Penna/Second-Femekes: To adjourn the meeting at 1:43 p.m. Unanimously approved by
voice vote.
Respectfully Submitted:
Payne, City Cl~yk
City of South San Francisco
Approved:
Kar3rt~Matsumoto, Mayor
City of South San Francisco
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral
communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are
on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying.
REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000
MINUTES PAGE 11