Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 2000-01-26MINUTES CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SPECIAL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM 33 ARROYO DRIVE 1. Call to Order: 7:06 p.m. (Cassette Tape No. 1) 2. Roll Call: Present: Councilmembers Datzman, Mullin and Penna, Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes and Mayor Matsumoto Absent: None 3. Oral Communications: None 4. Closed Session a. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9, City of South San Francisco vs. Union Pacific Railroad Company; b. Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6, labor negotiations for City Manager Convened into Closed Session: 7:07 p.m. Reconvened into Open Session: 7:30 p.m., all Councilmembers present. Report from Closed Session: City Attorney Mattas announced item 4a) City Council approved a settlement of $375,000 to purchase right-of-way for the widening of Oyster Point Boulevard, and item 4b) direction given, no action taken. 5. Adjournment Motion-Fernekes/Second-Datzman: approved by voice vote. Respectfully Submitted: Sylv~M. Payne, City City of South San Francisco To adjourn the meeting at 7:31 p.m. Unanimously Approved: City of South San Francisco The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. MINUTES CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM 33 ARROYO DRIVE CALL TO ORDER: 7:42 p.m. (Cassette Tape No. 1) ROLL CALL: Present: Councilmembers Datzman, Mullin and Penna, Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes and Mayor Matsumoto. Absent: None PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Led by Mayor Matsumoto INVOCATION: Pastor John Cantley, Grace Covenant Church PRESENTATIONS Proclamation: Voter Registration Week, January 31-February 7, 2000 - Mayor Matsumoto presented proclamation to City Clerk Payne Monthly BART Update - Ms. Jaymie Steen, BART Liaison Representative, gave a full construction report and visual presentation. She announced that the BART line has now crossed South San Francisco and is in San Bruno. She stated the South San Francisco BART station has been given the approval to proceed-to-build and a kick off party will be announced within two weeks. Although the project is slowing down, Council requested Ms. Steen to continue with the monthly updates. In response to Mayor Matsumoto, Ms. Steen indicated that full funding is in place for the South San Francisco station and she will have the person who is more knowledgeable about the funding contact the Mayor. AGENDA REVIEW City Manager Wilson announced that Item No. 12 is pulled from agenda. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS Mr. Phil Weiss, South San Francisco School Board President, announced that the Serra Vista School site is not for sale, it is surplus property, and it is to be used exclusively for lease purposes to other educational institutions. The public notification process will be followed if it is to be sold. COMMUNITY FORUM/COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS Councilman Datzman clarified a mis-quote in the Peninsula Independent pertaining to a statement made by City Engineer Kianpour at a recent West Winston Manor community meeting. Although a retraction was printed in the Independent, he felt West Winston Manor residents needed to be reassured that Serra Vista School has never been offered for sale to the City. Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes reported on the January 25, 2000 School Board Liaison Subcommittee (Fernekes/Datzman) meeting to discuss the General Plan "S" designation for school sites. He stated the subcommittee will be meeting next week to formulate a recommendation to Council. Councilman Mullin reported on the most recent meeting of the Emergency Homeless Shelter Task Force, and a list of possible sites is being compiled, including four sites at the GSA building on San Mateo Avenue. He stated a funding formula involving all San Mateo County cities for the shelter is also being discussed. He further reported on the recent meeting of ABAG's Executive Board to discuss Smart Growth, and housing allocations from the State of California. Councilman Mullin reported that the ABAG General Assembly will have a forum on Smart Growth in April and a written report will be submitted to Council. Councilman Penna stated that he and Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes will be attending the Conference Center Authority meeting on January 27 to review four consulting proposals submitted for the feasibility of a Conference Center expansion. A report will be brought back to Council. Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes announced that the Day in the Park Subcommittee (Matsumoto/ Fernekes) met with staff, and this year's event will be held September 16. Mayor Matsumoto reported that she attended a Census 2000 meeting and Community Outreach Director Quinn is taking an active role for South San Francisco. She encouraged all citizens to participate. She attended the Chamber of Commerce's installation dinner on January 14, the Cultural Arts Commission mural dedication on January 15, and the Women's Club 100th Anniversary tree planting ceremony on January 18, 2000. CONSENT CALENDAR Motion to approve the minutes of the January 12 special meeting, January 6 community meeting and January 12, 2000 regular meeting 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of January 26, 2000 in the amount of $1,483,832.42 o Resolution No. 4-2000, extending fundraising timeline for Westborough Community Swimming Pool Fundraising and Advisory Committee Resolution No. 5-2000, amending salary stipend for the Housing Authority Commissioners REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 2 o o o 10. 11. Resolution No. 6-2000, approving the destruction of Police Department records Resolution No. 7-2000, quitclaiming an existing 40' roadway access easement on lands of Robert E. Simms for an alternate access easement across same property between North Access Road and the Water Quality Control Plant Motion to accept Municipal Services Building and Central Fire Station interior paint project as complete in accordance with plans and specifications Motion to accept the HVAC replacement project at the Municipal Services Building as complete in accordance with plans and specifications Motion to accept the seismic upgrade of the apparatus doors at Fire Station Nos. 2, 4, and 5 as complete in accordance with plans and specifications Motion to accept the Colma Creek Linear Park project as complete in accordance with plans and specifications Resolution No. 8-2000, authorizing the installation of stop signs at two locations in South San Francisco 12. Resolution awarding contract to LC General Engineering and Construction for ANIP Phase XIX C in the amount of $809,736 Item pulled from the agenda. 13. Resolution No. 9-2000, awarding the construction contract to Golden Pacific Construction Inc., for the Magnolia Avenue Storm Drain Project - Phase II, in the amount of $217,716 14. Resolution No. 10-2000, authorizing a lease agreement with H & T Produce Company and Calabasas Inc., for use of sections of the City owned greenhouses at 810 Tennis Drive Motion-Fernekes/Second-Penna: To approve the Consent Calendar with the exception of Item No. 12. Unanimously approved by voice vote. PUBLIC HEARINGS 15. Extension of interim ordinance prohibiting amendments to the Bay West Cove Specific Plan and approval of precise plans or conditional use permits for Planning Areas 1, 2, and 3 of the Bay West Cove (Shearwater) Specific Plan Public hearing opened. Staff report presented by Economic and Community Development Director Van Duyn, recommending that the ordinance be extended to July 30, 2000. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 3 16. Public hearing closed. Motion-Mullin/Second-Fernekes: To introduce and adopt Ordinance No. 1265-00, extending the moratorium prohibiting approval of specific plan amendments, precise plans and conditional use permits for planning areas 1, 2, and 3 of the Bay West Cove (Shearwater) Specific Plan Area. Unanimously approved by voice vote. Councilman Datzman clarified that although his initial vote was in favor of the Wal-Mart store, Council must move together in one direction for the development of Bay West Cove. Oakmont Vistas/Storage USA - Planned Unit Development GP, RZ, ZA, PUD, PM, SA, UP and ND-98-054 to allow a 33-unit single family residential subdivision, a 4.9+ acre mini storage facility with a resident caretaker's unit, and a. 173 acre single family residential lot at the southwest corner of Westborough Boulevard and Oakmont Drive; Owner: Thomas Callan, Jr. and Gilbert Anda; Applicant: John Hansen PSC Public hearing opened. Staff report and visual presentation by Chief Planner Sparks, recommending denial of the five acre mini-storage facility. He noted that correspondence from Planning Commission Chair Honan was distributed to Council for consideration of decreasing the commercial area and increasing the recreational/parkland area. Applicant presentations: Mr. John Hansen, applicant, President of Hansen PSC, 99 Almaden Boulevard, San Jose, provided a brief history of his involvement with the project that began almost four years ago. He discussed the planning review process that included meetings with staff, the Design Review Board, and Planning Commission public hearings. Mr. Emie Gorrill, Bassenian Lagoni Architects, 2031 Orchard Drive, Newport Beach, made a visual presentation of the residential units and their compatibility with the community. Mr. Paul Davis, Architect, 266 E1 Dorado Way, Monterey, reviewed the mini-storage facility and how it will be terraced into the site and screened. Mr. Jeff Harvey, Rose Landscaping Architects, reviewed the landscape drawings, plant materials, and walls for screening purposes. Speakers: 1. Ms. Georgette Sarles, 3001 Medina Drive, San Bruno, speaking against the project, stated she has obtained 450 signatures from residents who are opposed to the development. She discussed the inappropriateness of the mini-storage facility, the drainage problems in the area, children's safety, noise and traffic. She suggested a study REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 4 committee be formed to look at an appropriate use for the site or that it be open space, as originally intended. 2. Mr. Mark DeVasanellos, 3451 Oakmont Drive, speaking in favor of the development, stated he lives next door to the development and feels it will be a benefit to the neighborhood; the mini-storage facility will be screened from view, and the development will improve property values. 3. Ms. Kathryn Campbell, 2515 Tara Lane, speaking against the project, stated her objection to the rezone amendment and that the area should stay residential. 4. Mr. Eric Hilario, 51A Appian Way, speaking in favor of the project, stated the project will improve the area and increase property values. 5. Mr. Anthony Charvet, 3475 Oakmont Drive, speaking in favor of the project, stated that a majority of property owners who live adjacent to the development support it and feel it will improve the present condition of the property and the area. 6. Ms. Mary Sarantopulos, 3020 Oakmont Drive, San Bruno, speaking against the project, stated that her concerns include water drainage and the development's high density. She felt the development will crowd the area. 7. Ms. Ruth Sack, 2248 Shannon Drive, speaking against the project, stated she wanted to see the environmental impact report for the proposed development, and that the storm drainage system in the area does not properly work, encouraged Council to consider a study committee and say no to the development. 8. Mr. Art Forrest, 3101 Oakmont Drive, San Bruno, speaking against the project, stated his opposition to rezoning the parcel for a commercial use, that the storm drainage system is inadequate, the storage facility will attract graffiti, and the storage facility will decrease property values. 9. Mr. Gil Anda, 810 Dell Road, Pacifica, property owner, speaking in favor of the project, stated he constantly cleans garbage from the property, that the development will increase property values, and will significantly improve the area. 10. Ms. Esther Young, 2434 Bantry Lane, speaking against the project, stated she opposed the mini storage facility, and her concerns include graffiti, children's safety, and the sub-drainage system. 11. Mr. William Nack, 1153 Chess Drive, Foster City, speaking in favor of the project, stated the development will satisfy the housing need in the County and that the use is appropriate for the site. 12. Mr. Ronald Davis, 3673 Georgetown Court, speaking in favor of the project, stated the development will increase property values and a storage facility is needed. He felt those speaking in opposition to the development are misinformed. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 5 13. Mr. Francisco J. Aviles, 3375 Oakmont Drive, speaking in favor of the project, stated the development will clean up and improve the area. 14. Ms. Barbara Miller, 2300 Shannon Drive, speaking against the project, stated the storage facility is a regional use and will significantly change the area, and the applicant should build the storage facility in his own neighborhood. 15. Jesus, 2300 Shannon Drive, speaking against the project, stated the storage facility is not the only use for the site, and that a storage facility will attract outsiders to the area. He felt the storage facility will bring crime, rats, and more trucks to the neighborhood. 16. Mr. B.J. Gasphar, 3440 Oakmont Drive, speaking against the project, stated the storage facility is bad for the neighborhood. It is not the best use for the land, that it should be built at Westborough and Junipero Serra Boulevard or where the developer lives. He felt the storage facility will have a negative economic impact on the neighborhood. 17. Mr. Jerry Twentyman, 2415 B antry Lane, president of the Westborough Homeowners Improvement Association, speaking against the project, submitted photos of storage facilities in San Mateo County that are painted with graffitti. He felt an alternate use should be considered for the site, that something more significant should be at the entrance to the city and the area should be kept residential. (Recess: 10:05 p.m. - 10:20 p.m.) 18. Ms. Charlotte Chan, 2405 Bantry Lane, speaking against the project, disagreed that a storage facility is needed in the community and that there are seven facilities already in South San Francisco. She felt the development will have a negative affect on traffic, and the size of the development should be restricted. She never received notification from the developer and he hasn't met with the community. 19. Ms. Joice Chan, 2405 Bantry Lane, speaking against the project, stated her concerns are the storage facility, the wall that will screen the facility, strangers coming in and out of the neighborhood, and location of the bus stop. She felt the area should be kept open space. 20. Ms. Rebeca Aguayo, 3275 Oakmont Drive, speaking against the project, stated her concerns were the quality of life for her family, which will be effected by the storage facility. She asked Council if they would want to live next door to a storage facility. She was concerned for the children who catch the bus near the entrance to the development. She urged Council to deny the project. 21. Ms. Lulu Cordero, 2430 Wren Court, speaking in support of the project, stated it is a high quality project, that will complete the intended development in the area. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 6 22. Ms. Mary Ann Narvarez, 2655 Famee Court, speaking in support of the project, stated that there is a need for both elements of the project. All concerns, including traffic, drainage and noise, have been addressed by independent consultants hired to evaluate the project. 23. Ms. Johann Yuzon, 3569 Callan Boulevard, speaking in favor of the project, stated that the City required that his restaurant, Goldilocks, be seismically built. There is a storage facility near his restaurant that never has any graffiti or rodent problems. 24. Mr. George V. Rodriguez, 2409 Wexford Avenue, speaking in favor of the project, stated his support for the storage facility, since it will not become a park. He stated that drainage is a concern, but it will be corrected with the development. He felt the owner should not have to maintain cleaning of other people's garbage on the undeveloped property. 25. Mr. Charlie Santos, 307 Castile Way, speaking in favor of the project, stated his support for the design of the storage facility, and that no one has mentioned an alternative use for the site, and status quo is not a benefit to the community. 26. Mr. Gerry Palomo, 20 Chateau Court, speaking in favor of the project, responded to the negative comments made regarding the storage facility and potential graffiti. He stated that traffic is a way of life and property values will not go down. (Cassette Tape No. 2) 27. Mr. Eric Snyder, 2218 Derry Way, speaking against the project, stated his concerns include maintenance of property in his area, and a commercial business being built on the south side of Westborough. Although he does not oppose the residential development, he felt the property owner should look at the land he owns across from Pak'n Save for the storage facility. 28. Mr. Ramon Cespedes, 3260 Oakmont Drive, speaking against the project, stated his concerns include how the development will disrupt the neighborhood, decrease property values, and if Council would like to have a storage facility in its back yard. 29. Mr. Jerry Cimmet, 3960 Fleetwood Drive, San Bruno, speaking against the project, stated that all other storage facilities in the city are in commercial areas and that this side of Westborough should be kept residential. He objected to the noise, strangers camping out and grafitti that this type of commercial use will bring. He urged Council to deny the project. 30. Mr. Chito Desuasido, 26 Vista Court, speaking in favor of the project, stated he initially had reservations about the project, but now supports the use and that storage facilities are needed in the area. He suggested several alternatives, including a cemetary, but felt it would be preposterous. 31. Ms. Docey Chatterjee, 3301 Oakmont Drive, speaking against the project, stated her doubts about people changing their mind who originally opposed the project. Her concerns included storm drainage, traffic, trash, and rezoning for a commercial use. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 7 32. Haverleen Howlett, 2621 Medina Drive, San Bruno, speaking against the project, stated her concerns include the development turning into a shanty, that there must be a reason for wanting to screen the mini-storage facility, and that three story homes should not need storage. She asked for equal time if the opposition is allowed time for rebuttal. 33. Mr. Albert N. Waters, 2266 Shannon Drive, speaking against the project, stated his concerns include a storage facility in his neighborhood that will bring additional traffic, and the corrosion of storm drains that have caused two homes to sink into the ground. He felt there were enough storage facilities in the area. 34. Mr. Julio Bolivar-Dillon, 2212 Derry Way, speaking against the project, stated his concerns include the negative impact the storage facility will have on the quality of life for his family. He stated that he does not oppose the residential portion of the development. (Recess: 11:20 p.m. - 11:30 p.m.) Public hearing closed. Council discussion: Councilman Penna discussed with City Engineer Kianpour the drainage issues that include the sub-drainage system that is 40-50 feet below the surface and collects at Junipero Serra Boulevard; the surface mn-off system collects that runs down to Colma Creek, and the storm water that collects around the homes and runs out to the City drainage system. City Engineer Kianpour stated the hydro-geology of the area was studied and there is a condition to intercept all subsurface drains and connect them to the City's shallower drainage system that inter-connects to Westborough Boulevard or Shannon Drive. He further explained the storm water detention basin proposed by the applicant that will drain slowly into the Bantry or Shannon Drive storm drain systems. The drainage system around the homes will be addressed when plans are submitted for building permits. City Engineer Kianpour stated that storm drainage corrections have been conditioned as part of the development. Mr. Ted Tronoff, 345 Park Plaza Drive, Daly City, stated that he is in agreement with the City Engineer and that development of the land will reduce drainage. He continued to explain how storm water will drain to the line at Bantry Lane, which has been plugged since the 1960's. This will take the burden off the Shannon Drive system. Councilman Penna felt it was important for the Westborough residents to understand the system and how development of the property was a way to have the 'drainage problems corrected. In response to Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes, Chief Planner Sparks stated that landscaping will be maintained by the homeowners association. Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes further discussed with staff, and the applicant, questions concerning the storage facilities operating hours, if the site was used as a park at one time, egress/ingress issues, state laws requires fault disclosure, and landscaping along the solid wall to prevent graffiti. Councilman Datzman supported the residential development, but opposed the mini- storage facility in a residential area. He questioned staff, traffic consultant, applicant, and REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 8 project consultants regarding the private streets, the sidewalks on one side of the street, driveway aprons, access to the storage facility, development's ingress/egress, the emergency access gates, evaluation of the development's driveway entrance on Oakmont Drive, and the caretaker's residence being built near the fault line. In response to Councilman Datzman's question regarding an expansion of the tot lot area, staff stated there was no physical reason why the storage facility site could not be a park area for the planned unit development. Councilman Mullin felt there was no compelling reason why the zoning should be changed for a commercial mini storage facility and did not support that aspect of the proposal. He felt that an alternative to the storage facility should be studied. Mayor Matsumoto discussed with staff the Planning Commission's action and recommendation, the limited residential development of Parcel 1 due to the earthquake fault, and commercial zoning only on the north side of Westborough. She questioned whether she would want a mini-storage facility in her backyard. Councilman Penna further discussed staff's recommendation that was made to the Planning Commission and reiterated his concerns regarding the serious storm drainage problems that will continue if the property remains undeveloped. He stated his concerns also include traffic and having a storage facility in your backyard. He felt the project would not impact the neighborhood and it would correct the drainage problem. Council discussed designating Parcel 1 and 2 as open space and having it dedicated as park land. City Manager Wilson stated that this question was asked by the Planning Division and the response was that the current Capital Improvement Plan does not address this item and it is not being considered at this time by the Park and Recreation Commission or by Council. There was a lengthy discussion of the drainage problems with City Engineer Kianpour and whether or not the project needed to be approved to correct the drainage problems or whether other options were available. Councilman Penna stated that he was ready to make a motion to approve the entire project. Mayor Matsumoto wanted clarification if this was an all or nothing situation. City Attorney Mattas reviewed the options for Council's clarification and explained that the staff recommendation is to approve the residential and deny the commercial re- zoning. Several Councilmembers voiced their concerns regarding the project, and another lengthy discussion ensued. Councilmembers Datzman, Fernekes, Mullin and Matsumoto stated they could only support the residential portion. Mayor Matsumoto asked that a timeframe be implemented on the development of Parcel 1 and City Manager Wilson stated that this would be contingent upon the property owner, and staff would work with the applicant immediately. Director Van Duyn advised Council to not approve the parcel map so the applicant is compelled to work with staff to develop Parcel 1. He felt there were other options the applicant could consider. The applicant's attorney, Ms. Judy Davidoff, Baker and McKenzie, responded to Mr. Van Duyn's comments and stated the issue of separating the projects was discussed a long time ago. She stated there was a REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 9 trade off to develop a residential project with reduced density as long as the parcel map was approved. She urged Council to approve the residential development and the parcel map tonight. City Attorney Mattas responded to Ms. Davidoffs comments and agreed with staff's recommendation to not act on the parcel map. He advised Council of the several options that were before them tonight, including keeping the site as a ten-acre site or dividing it into two or three parcels. Councilman Penna further discussed the necessity of developing the entire project and felt it was unrealistic to approve the residential and leave the other portion unresolved. Councilman Datzman and Mayor Matsumoto stated their support for Director Van Duyn's recommendation. City Attorney Mattas advised Council of the option to deny the general plan amendment and the rezone application, which would allow for the mini-storage facility. He further suggested that Council direct staff to work with the applicant, expeditiously, on the residential component of the application and come back to Council in two weeks. City Manager Wilson requested that Council consider Agenda Item No. 17 while the City Attorney prepares the resolution. ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 17. Resolution amending agreement with Tillo Products Co. for sewage sludge disposal services in the amount of $116,000 Staff report presented by Public Works Director Gibbs. Councilman Mullin's asked if this action helps to keep us on track with the 939 diversion requirements and Director Gibbs indicated that sludge is looked at differently but credit is given, and the City is on schedule with our goals at this time. Motion-Datzman/Second-Fernekes: To approve Resolution No. 11-2000, authorizing an addendum to amendment No. 3 to the agreement for sewer treatment plant sludge removal with the Tillo Products Company. Unanimously approved by voice vote. PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) 16. Oakmont Vistas/Storage USA (continued) Mr. Hansen requested that Council take no action tonight and continue the item for two weeks. Motion-Penna: To table item for two weeks. Motion died due to the lack of a second. City Attorney Mattas read proposed resolution denying GP-98-054, ZA-98-054, RZ-98- 054, and UP-98-054, all items related to the mini-storage facility. He clarified that no action is being taken on the residential component, and recommendation is to deny the REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES JANUARY 26, 2000 PAGE 10 storage facility; staff is directed to work with the applicant and come back to Council in two weeks with a recommendation for the 33 unit residential development, the option of combining parcels 1 and 2, and to look at issues related to density with the possibility of increasing the 33 units. Motion-Mullin/Second-Datzman: To approve Resolution No. 12-2000, to deny GP-98- 054, ZA-98-054, and UP-98-054 which would have allowed a five acre mini-storage facility with a resident caretaker unit. Approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Councilmembers Datzman and Mullin, Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes and Mayor Matsumoto. NOES: Councilman Penna. ABSTAIN: None. ABSENT: None. ITEMS FROM COUNCIL Mayor Matsumoto distributed the Council subcommittee assignments for 2000. GOOD AND WELFARE Ms. Jackie Williams, 242 Longford Drive, asked for clarification on a document, seven provisions of the Education Code, that was distributed at the January 25 School District Liaison meeting. Councilman Datzman stated the subcommittee (Fernekes/Datzman) would not act on the item unless they were satisfied with its contents. Mayor Matsumoto directed City Manager Wilson to contact Ms. Williams to respond to her questions and concerns regarding the document. Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes stated that when the subcommittee is ready to make a recommendation to Council it will agendized the item and Ms. Williams will be advised. ADJOURNMENT Motion-Penna/Second-Femekes: To adjourn the meeting at 1:43 p.m. Unanimously approved by voice vote. Respectfully Submitted: Payne, City Cl~yk City of South San Francisco Approved: Kar3rt~Matsumoto, Mayor City of South San Francisco The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING JANUARY 26, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 11