Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 2000-04-24 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SPECIAL MEETING APRIL 24, 2000 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM 33 ARROYO DRIVE 1. Call to Order 2. Roll Call 5:38 p.m. Present: Councilmembers Mullin, Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes and Mayor Matsumoto Absent: Councilmembers Datzman and Penna Staff Present: City Manager Wilson, City Attorney Mattas, Assistant City Manager Moss, ECD Director Van Duyn, Public Works Director Gibbs, Finance Director Steele, Chief Planner Sparks, Senior Planner Kalkin and Project Planner Knapp 3. Terrabay Phase III - Presentation given by Myers Development Mr. Jack Myers, Myers Development, gave an overview of what has occurred since last year's study session. He reviewed the community meetings that were held, concerns expressed, and his appreciation for San Bruno Mountain. He introduced his design and development team members. Mr. Craig Hartman, architect, reviewed several design schemes and considerations that were integrated into the proposed development (a scale model of San Bruno Mountain and the Terrabay Development was on display). Mr. Myers reflected on public commentary and stated that he had offered an interpretive center or plaque be placed at the sacred burial ground site. He concluded his presentation asking Council for guidance and to express their likes and dislikes about the project. Mayor Matsumoto opened the study session to the public for comments. Mr. Mike Gallegos thanked Mr. Meyers for his efforts and stated his appreciation for the approach he has taken with the community. Ms. Marie Blackowl thanked Mr. Meyers for working with the community and felt he deserves a successful project. She stated her opposition to an interpretative center and felt the sacred Indian ground's location should not be exploited. Mr. Saud Mifattah stated he was given short notice and was not informed of the community meetings. He asked if this was the last phase of the development and Mr. Myers stated it was. Councilman Mullin stated that this was the last development that came under the sphere of influence for South San Francisco. Mr. Robert Vetter stated his concern for the area of development and felt there would be significant drainage problems. Another concern is public access to the mountain, but overall felt if Native Americans were happy with the proposal he was satisfied. Mr. Dan Shattuc stated his concern with the notification of the study session and previous meetings. He questioned the number of people who attended the community meetings at the Terrabay Recreation Building and stated his concerns regarding the project that he has followed since its inception. He reminded Mr. Myers of the numerous mitigation measures and the potential for earth slippage and earthquakes in the area. He asked if the proper permits have been obtained from the water control board. Mr. Myers stated that there had'been a mix-up on the location of the meeting and would take full responsibility for the confusion. He also informed Mr. Shattuc that permits are premature, and his staff is aware of issues. Mayor Matsumoto stated the basis for the meeting and fi~ture meetings. She suggested interested parties submit their names to the Clerk for future meeting notices. Ms. Jackie Williams stated her appreciation for the way Myers Development conducted themselves and worked with the community. Councilman Mullin asked for copies of the comments and concerns that were discussed at the community meetings and copies of drawings/maps. In response to his questions, Mr. Hartman stated the square footage of the commercial structure is 440,000 square feet and the residential component will be 300,000 square feet. There was further discussion of the condominium structure and its design concept. Mayor Pro Tem Fernekes discussed the parking element, and Mr. Hartman explained it will be terraced and concealed by landscaping. Mr. Myers explained how the "Point" will be repaired to cover scaring and plans to make the base of the "Point" a dominant feature that will be symbolic for the City. In response to Mayor Matsumoto, Mr. Myers explained the buffer zone, it setbacks, and purpose. Mr. Myers stated 228 units are proposed at this time for the condominium structure, and it will be 200' high. Mr. Myers agreed to explore affordable housing. They further discussed a signature building and landscaping that will hold up to the prevailing winds. (Cassette Tape No. 2) Councilman Mullin asked to have the location of similar developments provided where the step down feature is used. His comments concerned shuttles, child care, affordable housing, higher density in exchange for affordable housing. He stated his support for the concept and suggested that the community outreach continue. Mr. Michael Scott, architect, explained his part in designing the residential component. Mayor Pro Tern Fernekes expressed his support for the proposal and stated his concerns for the "Point" area. He stated that transportation/shuttles, childcare, affordable housing, and massing the development are issues of interest to him. Mr. Myers stated that detailed scale models will be created for the benefit of Council and the community to help envision the project. In response to Mayor Matsumoto, he stated he hoped to break ground in April, 2001. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 2 Mayor Matsumoto thanked Mr. Myers and his development team for their presentation. (Recess: 7:25 p.m. - 7:39 p.m.) 4. Joint meeting with Planning Commission Planning Commission Roll Call: Present: Commissioners Baldocchi, D'Angelo, Honan, Teglia, Vice Chair Meloni and Chair Sim Absent: Commissioner Romero Council covered the following areas with the Planning Commission: · Customer service aspect of City employees Council discussed its concern regarding the Commission working uncooperatively with staff and developers. Commission members felt they demand the best product and that this may be taken negatively by developers. The Commission stated its support for staff and discussed staff's workload. Council/Commission entered into a discussion regarding the applicant process, recurring problems, and how it can be improved. It was suggested that a measurable standard be adopted that would guide applicants, make the process uniform and less frustrating for the Commission, staff and applicants. Mayor Matsumoto reiterated her concern that staff is treated with respect in public and if there are problems they be dealt with privately. · Relationships among Commission members Council discussed its concern that factions have formed on the Commission and personalities have become an issue. Commissioners felt that there are strong differences of opinion that are questioned by one another, but overall appreciated. It was suggested that retreats be conducted for Commissioners to discuss issues and strengthen inter-personal skills. Council felt it would be beneficial to: have a session on the Statement of Economic Interest Form 700; have department heads conduct a presentation for new Commissioners; take new Commissioners on a tour of the City; provide Commissioners with an information packet, and have newly appointed Commissioners sit-in on a meeting before actually serving. · General process questions The Commission agreed that the Chairperson speaks for the Commission and that this is now in the Commission by-laws. Mayor Matsumoto explained Council protocol. The Council/Commission discussed individual rights, how the public perceives a Commissioner even when speaking as an individual, and how the press may misrepresent an individual's opinion. Relationships between Council and Commission Commissioners felt communication with Council was important and felt joint meetings should be held more often. Council and Commissioners working on subcommittees together is also helpful. It was stressed that the Commission needs to know what Council's vision is, and it will also provide SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 3 direction to staff. Council/Commission discussed the possibility of hostility between the two bodies and it was agreed that communication and interaction on land use subcommittees will be beneficial. (Cassette Tape No. 3) Council briefly discussed its vision for a transit and pedestrian oriented development for the El Camino Corridor and downtown core areas, and maintaining open space. · Decision making activities Council further discussed meeting semi-annually, and for the Commission to focus on quality public art in developments. Council/Commission discussed the Desai development and how it was presented to the Commission. Council stated that this project will be further explored when the applicant returns from abroad. Mayor Matsumoto concluded the meeting, stated her concern that the Commission hold themselves to a higher standard, another joint meeting will be scheduled, and Council will look at subcommittee assignments. Information regarding the recent Council study session on housing will be forwarded to the Commission by staff. 5. Adjournment Motion-Mullin/Second-Fernekes: To adjourn the meeting at 9:18 p.m. Approved by voice vote. Submitted by: · Payne, City City of South San Francisco Approved: ~ 1 City of South San Francisco The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING APRIL 24, 2000 MINUTES PAGE 4