Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 2017-12-13 @7:01MINUTES SUCCESSOR AGENCY •o _-_,,; CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO r y b� SPECIAL MEETING MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING COUNCIL CHAMBERS 33 ARROYO DRIVE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, CA WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 13, 2017 7:01 P.M. CALL TO ORDER Time: 7:37 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Boardmembers Addiego, Garbarino and Gupta, Vice Chair Matsumoto and Chair Normandy. Absent: None. AGENDA REVIEW None. PUBLIC COMMENTS None. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION 1. Report regarding a resolution of the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco, reviewing and approving the submittal to the Successor Agency Oversight Board of a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) for the period July 2018 through June 2019. (Karen Miller, Financial Services Manager) 1 a. Resolution No. 4 -2017 of the Successor Agency to the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco reviewing and approving submittal to the Successor Agency Oversight Board of a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for the period July 2018 through June 2019, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(1). Assistant City Manager Lee presented the staff report recommending that the Successor Agency approve a resolution reviewing and approving submittal to the Successor Agency Oversight Board of a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) for the period July 2018 through June 2019, pursuant to the Health and Safety Code. Assistant Lee presented the draft ROPS and called the Agency's attention to a cost escalation issue related to the Oyster Point Development (OPD) Project. She provided a PowerPoint presentation to review the issue. She explained that as a result of cost escalation, the ROPS 18 -19 reflected a new request for $18,890,000. The project approved by the former Redevelopment Agency and San Mateo County Harbor District in 2011, identified $29.5M of Redevelopment funds for Phase IC and Phase IIC. Assistant Lee presented slides depicting the portion of the project funded by the Redevelopment Agency in Phases IC and IIC including public infrastructure, parking and public amenities. She explained that the cost estimates contained in the approved 2011 Development and Disposition Agreement (DDA), were based upon engineers' estimates based on conceptual plans. Following approval of the agreements in 2011, the project remained dormant for five (5) years until OPD acquired the project in 2016. Construction groundbreaking occurred on November 11, 2017, for Phase IC and Phase IIC. City staff, with approval from the City Manager and City Attorney, has and will be withdrawing funds from the established escrow accounts, which hold the $29.5M to pay for the Successor Agency share of the project cost. Since 2011, the cost of the development has increased. The DDA anticipated cost escalations for Phase IC and Phase IIC and assigns responsibility to the Successor Agency and OPD. Accordingly, included in the FY 2018 -19 ROPS is an additional need of $18.OM for Phase IC and $890K for Phase IIC Cap Repair. Assistant Lee noted that the Successor Agency is not paying all of the costs associated with the public infrastructure. The Developer is also contributing $25.8 million towards the cost of Phase IC. Assistant Lee advised the Agency that the request for additional funds conforms to the obligations of the Redevelopment Agency identified in the DDA. All cost information was prepared by the OPD construction management team, informed by preliminary bids from potential contractors, and peer reviewed by City staff /consultants. In response to a question from Vice Chair Matsumoto, Assistant Lee confirmed that the 2017 figures assume housing east of 101. Boardmember Addiego commented that while the cost escalation was not good news, it was anticipated given the current construction market. Boardmember Gupta commented that in reading through the document he was pleased that staff had accounted for future impacts such as sea level rise. Boardmember Garbarino commented on the expense of the project but noted costs of construction had gone up since 2011. Motion- Boardmember Garbarino /Second- Boardmember Gupta: to approve Resolution No. 4 -2017. Approved by the following roll call vote: AYES: Boardmembers Garbarino, Gupta and Addiego and Chair Normandy; NAYS: Vice Chair Matsumoto; ABSTAIN: None; ABSENT: None. ADJOURNMENT Being no further business, Chair Normandy adjourned the meeting at 8:11 p.m. ub itted: elli, erk City of South San Francisco SPECIAL SUCCESSSOR AGENCY MEETING MINUTES Approved: Liza �N&or2m� City of South San Francisco DECEMBER 13, 2017 PAGE 2