The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2003-09-24 e-packetAGENDA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM SEPTEMBER 24, 2003 7:00 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Agency business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the Redevelopment Agency are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to the Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE GENERALLY LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. In the event that there are more than six persons desiring to speak, the Chair may reduce the amount of time per speaker to three (3) minutes. Thank you for your cooperation. The Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Board action. KARYL MATSUMOTO Vice Chair RICHARD A. GARBARINO, SR. Boardmember BEVERLY BONALANZA-FORD Investment Officer MICHAEL A. WILSON Executive Director PEDRO GONZALEZ Chairman JOSEPH A. FERNEKES Boardmember RAYMOND L. GREEN Boardmember SYLVIA M. PAYNE Clerk STEVEN T. MATTAS Counsel PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT IS AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING-IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of September 10, 2003 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of September 24, 2003 ADJOURNMENT REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING SEPTEMBER 24, 2003 AGENDA PAGE 2 AGENDA CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGULAR MEETING MUNICIPAL SERVICE BUILDING COMMUNITY ROOM SEPTEMBER 24, 2003 7:30 P.M. PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting Council business, we proceed as follows: The regular meetings of the City Council are held on the second and fourth Wednesday of each month at 7:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Public Comment: For those wishing to address the City Council on any Agenda or non-Agendized item, please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Council Chamber's and submit it to the City Clerk. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents the City Council from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come to the podium, state your name and address for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE GENERALLY LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. In the event that there are more than six persons desiring to speak, the Mayor may reduce the amount of time per speaker to three (3) minutes. Thank you for your cooperation. The City Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes reading an item, it will be ready for Council action. PEDRO GONZALEZ Mayor KARYL MATSUMOTO Mayor Pro Tem JOSEPH A. FERNEKES Councilman RICHARD A GARBARINO, SR. Councilman RAYMOND L. GREEN Councilman BEVERLY BONALANZA-FORD City Treasurer SYLVIA M. PAYNE City Clerk MICHAEL A. WILSON City Manager STEVEN T. MATTAS City Attorney PLEASE TURN OFF CELL PHONES AND PAGERS HEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING IMPAIRED AT CITY COUNCIL MEETINGS CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE INVOCATION PRESENTATIONS · Beautification Awards - Committee member Saundra Nichols · Families on Track - Ms. Julene Hunter Johnson, Executive Director · Colma Creek Update - Public Works Director John Gibbs · Caltrain Station and Linden Grade Separation Project Update - Public Works Director John Gibbs AGENDA REVIEW PUBLIC COMMENTS ITEMS FROM COUNCIL · Community Forum · Subcommittee Reports CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Motion to approve the minutes of September 10, 2003 2. Motion to confirm expense claims of September 24, 2003 Motion to approve recommendation for loan art pieces at the Orange Memorial Park Sculpture Garden Motion to approve ordinance to amend the contract with the Board of Administration, California Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS), to provide Section 21354.5 (2.7% at 55 full and modified formula) for local miscellaneous members o Acknowledgement of proclamation issued to Rose C. (Sousa) Kennedy, 98th birthday, September 9, 2003 PUBLIC HEARING Resolution authorizing submittal of the 2002-2003 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluations Report to the Department of Housing and Urban Development ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS 7. Discussion: Noise Analysis Report for Sister Cities Boulevard and sound wall design REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA SEPTEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 2 Resolution supporting AB 1546 to support programs that address the impact of automobiles o Reimbursement resolution authorizing the Wet Weather Program (Phases 1 through 5) for the approved $45 million State Revolving Fund (SRF) loan as required by the State Water Resources Control Board 10. Motion to approve an addendum to the John Carollo Engineers contract to design and produce all contract documents for the Lindenville Storm Drain Rehabilitation Project in the amount of $400,000 ADJOURNMENT REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA SEPTEMBER 24, 2003 PAGE 3 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO INFORMATION MEETING WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 24, 2003 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD (JPB) CALTRAIN CALTRAIN SERVICE IMPROVEMENTS - NEXT 5 YEARS · 8 to 12 Daily Express Trains (Baby Bullets) · Improved Schedule Of All Other Trains · New Express Train Rolling Stock (Cars and Locomotives) · 82 to 92 Daily Trains (78 Currently) · Resume Weekend Service · New Schedule, Express Service, Weekend Service - Spring 2004 CALTRAIN INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS- NEXT 5 YEARS North and South CTX - Complete (by Spring 2004) · New Stations at Bayshore and Lawrence · Lengthen and Widen Colma Creek Bridge · North and South 4-Track Segment For Overtakes · New Signal System (Remote Controlled Dispatch, and Switches) · Rehabilitate, Reconstruct Existing Tracks · Replace all Jointed Rail with Continuous Welded Rail (by Spring 2004) South San Francisco, South Linden, San Bruno Grade Separations · Extend North CTX 4-Track Segment through South San Francisco to San Bruno · Grade Separate South Linden, Scott, San Bruno, San Mateo, and Angus · New Stations at South San Francisco and San Bruno 2 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATION LOOKING TOWARD PARKING SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO LOOKING SOUTH 3 II SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE LOOKING EAST SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE LOOKING WEST 5 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE LOOKING SOUTH Project Study Report - A report that summarizes the project scope, budget, schedule, and key relevant issues to construct the station, grade separation, 4- track alignment including all other associated work. The report documents the outcome of collaboration between JPB and various stake holders including the City of South San Francisco, businesses, community and others. 6 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATION · Station access improvements · Grade separated pedestrian crossing (undercrossing or overcrossing) · Other improvements (Safety, Parking, Station Amenities) · Incorporates City's long term plan · Stakeholders (UPRR, Caltrans Maintenance Facility) SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION · Grade Separation Alternatives · Scott Street grade separated pedestrian crossing (City of San Bruno) 4-TRACK ALIGNMENT · 4-Track alignment from Tunnel Avenue (Brisbane) to Scott Street (San Bruno) - 4 miles · UPRR yard tracks rearrangement (SSF yard) · UPRR tracks reconfiguration (Colma Creek to South Linden Avenue) · UPRR team tracks relocation (Dubuque Avenue to UPRR property at Colma Creek) 7 BAYSHORE STATION & 4-TRACK ALIGNMENT (SAN FRANCISCO- BRISBANE) NORTH END PROJECT LIMIT (BRISBANE) PROPOSED 4-TRACK ALIGNMENT (BRISBANE) PROPOSED 4-TRACK ALIGNMENT (BRISBANE) PROPOSED 4-TRACK ALIGNMENT (BRISBANE / South San Francisco) PROPOSED 4-TRACK ALIGNMENT (South San Francisco) PROPOSED 4-TRACK ALIGNMENT (SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO) PROPOSED 4-TRACK ALIGNMENT (SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO) UPPR YARD TRACKS (SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO) SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATION SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATION LOOKING SOUTH PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE TO PROPOSED SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATION 22 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATION SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATION ACCESS IMPROVEMENT · Pedestrians through Caltrans Maintenance Facility (Corner of Grand Ave and South Airport Blvd) · Shuttle Bay/Drop-Offs on the east side adjacent to Executive Drive · Grade Separated Pedestrian Crossing (Underpass or Overpass) · Ease of access and connected to downtown STATION AMENITIES · 700' long outboard platforms with center fence · Well lit, canopies, TMV, PA, VMS · More parking, paved PEDESTRIAN CROSSING · Underpass or overpass crossings · Underpass: 20' Wide, 10' high, well lit · Overpass: over 25' high, 350 ft long ramp each side JPB MINI SURVEY(JULY '03) · Overwhelming support for new station at new location, and for modern with grade separated crossing · 40% preference for overpass, 30% for underpass; remaining no preference 24 NEW SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO STATION ' T 25 COMFORT SUITI=$ /-- 'SIDEWALK EXECUTIVE DR. PETRINI VAN STORAGiE . ~. EAST GRAND AVENUE MODIFICATION - ALTERNATIVE 2 NO LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED 26 PEDESTRIAN OVERPA55 ' /--CENTER FENCE N ORTHBOUNO --J SOU TH BOUND'-~ pLA'R='ORM 131 A'F'FORM ' ,'- PLATFORM CANOPY SIDEWALK ~---STAIRS I OOKING SOUTH GRADE SEPARATED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OVERPASS OPTION 28 EXECUTIVE DRIVE ADA RAMP /--PLATFORM LIGHTING / fPLATFORM CANOPY / / ~--NORTHBOUND PLA~TORM :^NOPY / / /t' 1§°'' I' 20' I' 15'. I --~SO~B/~ND ~ / /UT3 u~ MT2 MT4 r~ ..... . :.' '~'-r-ii r'-:~-:i i .... ! ~- ~ i- ....... i ~- .... i i t ! ADA - ·; i i. - - ~---C-~'N'~'. · KI~$ I~ ,1~ PEDESTRIAN LII~I)~:tPASS LIGHT (TYP) STAIRS LOOKING SOUTH SCALE:: 1' = 40' GRADE SEPARATED PEDESTRIAN CROSSING UNDERPASS OPTION 29 PROPOSED 4-TRACK ALIGNMENT (SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO) PROPOSED LOCATION FOR UPRR TEAM TRACKS (SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO) UPRR Team Tracks/Dock - Proposed Location ~POA BEALE - t I ! I 32 ENTRANCE TO PROPOSED UPRR TEAM TRACKS / DOCK 33 EXIT OF PROPOSED UPRR TEAM TRACKS / DOCK 34 PRPOSED 4-TRACK ALIGNMENT (SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO) UPRR SPUR TRACKS (SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO) SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE (SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO) SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION Alternatives Investigated: Alternative No. I - Underpass (Railroad at grade, Lower Roadway 30 ft) Not Feasible: - Major impacts to driveways - Ground water Alternative No. ;2 - Overpass (Railroad at grade, Raise Roadway 30 ft) Not feasible: - Loss of adjacent businesses and other properties - Appearance of Freeway Alternative No. 3 - Underpass (Roadway at grade, Raise Railroad 20 ft) Not Feasible: - Major impacts to UPRR spur tracks - Additional road bed load to Colma Creek Bridge Alternative No. 4 - Overpass (Roadway at grade, Lower Railroad 30 ft) Not Feasible: - Can not lower Colma Creek Bridge - Impact Scott Street - Ground water Alternative No. 5 - Combination (Raise Railroad 3 ft, Lower roadway 17 ft) Currently under consideration - Minimal impacts to some driveways - Potential ground water Alternative No. 6- Combination (Raise Railroad 9-12 ft, Lower roadway 8-11 ft) Currently under consideration - No impacts to driveways or businesses - Walls - Additional property take (UPRR on west side) is required - Above ground water table [Note: The roadway has about 4 ft hump across the tracks] POTENTIAL IMPACTS DURING CONSTRUCTION - Temporary closure of South Linden Avenue - UPRR spur tracks - Some driveways 38 STRUCTURAL ................ ~-' ...... i;;;~ L~ P~T LOW ~T ~ ~k - ~11~ ~ 7~ 5+00 ~ 1~ ll+DO ~ POINT BEV - 13.60 HI,~t POINT 5'rA = PM STA = 12,68.45 PM ~ - 13.77 t. 9~,<X2 V~ .t 134-(:0 SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION ALTERNATIVE NO. 5 39 OF' RAIL 50.02: o BRIDGE: o ~ ST~UCru~^~ ,~ e -1.fl ~,00%. e ,,,' ~ ~POINTELEV- g,l~ ~ ~ ~m ~ ~ o d m ~ ~W POINT ~A = g+11.61 ~ ~' ~ - P'vl STA - 6+4.1,87 PVI ELEV - 9.74 PVI STA - PV1 ELEV- 9379 HIGH POINT EI..EV = 14.,~7 HIGH P~NT S'fA = 11+2D.91~i PVI $'I'A - 11..t-02,85 P'vl ELEV- 1.5.02 '--PII~6P,6zE[~ z'TI~EET ~EN'I'BI, LI',E 9-1-00 1CH-OD 11-kgO SOUTH LINDEN AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION ALTERNATIVE NO. 6 40 PROPOSED 4-TRACK ALIGNMENT (SSF - SAN BRUNO) CONNECT TO SAN BRUNO GRADE SEPARATION AND STATION PROJECT PSR SCHEDULE 1. KICK-OFF 2. 35% PROJECT STUDY REPORT 3. 65% PROJECT STUDY REPORT 4. SSF CHAMBER OF COMMERCE-INFORMATION MEETING 5. SSF CITY COUNCIL & BUSINESSES- INFORMATION MEETING 6. 95% PROJECT STUDY REPORT 7. FINAL PROJECT STUDY REPORT MAY, 2003 JUNE 25, 2003 AUGUST 8, 2003 SEPTEMBER 8, 2003 SEPTEMBER 24, 2003 OCTOBER, 2003 NOVEMBER, 2003 43 DRAFT STAFF REPORT FOR. DISCUSSION PURPOSES DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: XXXXXX Honorable Mayor and City Council Caltrain Safety Ad Hoc Committee (Ruane, Ibarra) Caltrain Grade Separation RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council: 1. Support the Joint Powers Board staff proposal for a grade separation, new station, and additional tracks as described in the final Project Study Report (PSR). 2. Request that the Joint Powers Board staff proceed expeditiously with developing and obtaining any agency or regulatory approval or permits for the project described in the final PSR. 3. Request that the Joint Powers Board proceed expeditiously with the development of final Plans Specifications and Estimates (PS&E) for the project described in the final PSR. 4. Request that the Joint Powers Board work with the City and other appropriate parties to develop the necessary inter-agency agreements addressing all pertinent issues including right-of-way, utility relocations, construction, and maintenance of the project described in the final PSR. 5. Request that the Joint Powers Board develop a comprehensive funding plan for the grade separation and new station project in conjunction with the development of the final PS&E and cooperative agreements. 6. Extend the role of the existing Citizens Advisory Committee or form a new Citizens Advisory Committee to provide input and guidance to the Joint Powers Board PS&E development team and City staff on the further development and refinement of the project described in the final PSR. DISCUSSION: .... by City ...... ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: .... to be determined before or during the development of plans, specifications, and estimates (PS&E). FISCAL IMPACT: .... to be determined in conjunction with the development of the final PS&E and cooperative agreements. DATE PREPARED: .... RESOLUTION NO. 2003-77 RESOLUTION OF SAN BRUNO CITY COUNCIL SUPPORTING THE PENINSULA CORRIDOR JOINT POWERS BOARD PROJECT STUDY REPORT RECOMMENDING GRADE SEPARATION OF CALTRAIN TRACKS IN SAN BRUNO, RELOCATION OF THE SAN BRUNO RAIL STATION, AND ADDITIONAL TRACKS WHEREAS, in order to completely eliminate the hazard or risk of a vehicular or pedestrian accident with a railroad train, intersections of railroad corridors with roadways and pedestrian pathways must be completely separated; and WHEREAS, the grade crossings in San Bruno have experienced several. accidents in recent years resulting in both vehicular accidents and pedestrian fatalities; and WHEREAS, following a fatal accident on March 4, 2000, citizens concerned with safety at the crossings requested the that City Council address the safety hazard associated with the at-grade crossings at San Bruno Avenue; and WHEREAS, the City Council formed a Caltrain Safety Ad Hoc Committee to investigate ways to make the crossing safer; and WHEREAS, at the August 13, 2002, City Council meeting, the Caltrain Safety Ad Hoc Committee recommended, and the City Council approved, support for the concept of the grade separation and selected Alternative 5 as the preferred alternative; and WHEREAS, at the September 24, 2002, City Council meeting, the Council took action to form a Citizens Advisory Committee to work with the staff of the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (JPB) and City staff to refine details of the preferred Alternative 5; and WHEREAS, the Citizens Advisory Committee held a total of ten meetings between October 1,2002 and March 13, 2003, with an additional meeting on June 19, 2003, to review, receive and consider comments to the draft Project Study Report; and WHEREAS, JPB incorporated many of the comments from the Citizens Advisory Committee and City staff, and issued the final Project Study Report dated July 7, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Project Study Report was thoroughly discussed by Council and citizens at a meeting of this City Council held on August 12, 2003 following a 21-day public review and comment period. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of San Bruno, as follows: That the City Council supports the Peninsula Corridor Joint Powers Board (Joint Powers Board) proposal for a grade separation, new station, and additional tracks as described in the final Project Study Report ("Project") date July 7, 2003. That the City Council requests the Joint Powers Board to proceed expeditiously with developing and obtaining any agency or regulatory approval or permits for the Project. That the City Council further requests that the Joint Powers Board proceed expeditiously with the development of final Plans, Specifications and Estimates for the Project. That the City Council further requests that the Joint Powers Board work with the City and other appropriate parties to develop the necessary inter-agency agreements addressing all pertinent issues including right-of-way, utility relocations, construction, and maintenance of the Project. That the City Council further requests that the Joint Powers Board develop a comprehensive funding plan for the Project in conjunction with the development of the final Plans, Specifications and Estimates and cooperative agreements. That it is the intent of this Council to extend the role of the existing Citizens Advisory Committee to provide input and guidance to th~ Joint Powers Board, City staff and the City Council.:pn the further~ ~ § -~ development and refinement of the Project. ':~ '" ~ o ~ .-~- ~. Q .,~ -.. _. · o ~ ---oOo--- :" I hereby certify that foregoing Resolution No. 2003+77 was introduced and adopted by the San Bruno City COuncil .~' at a regular meeting on September 9, 2003 by the followings, vot~ AYES: NOES: ABSENT: · :? ~. ~' /~ ~,"~:.,~,~ ..¢. L' ,..".~ ',:~.' t:!.: :..",% .: ::: ~ L'.'.',,.,';,'."_ tj ',J Councilmembers: Ibarra, Ruane, Mayor Franzella Councilmembers: Pallas Councilmembers: O'Connell StaffXeport DATE: September 24, 2003 TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: Director of Recreation and Community Services SUBJECT: Recommendation for Loan Art Pieces at Orange Memorial Park Sculpture Garden RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, approve one sculpture, Circumfusion by Esmoreit Koetsier, and a pair of sculptures, Yin and Yang by Keith Bush for the Loan Art Program at the Orange Park Sculpture Garden, as recommended by the Cultural Arts Commission. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: The Loan Art Program was approved by the City Council in February of 2003. The goal of the Cultural Arts Commission in recommending the program was to stretch limited funds available for the purchase of public art by "renting" pieces for a limited time. A competition was sponsored for artists willing to install a sculpture "on loan" in the Orange Park Sculpture Garden. The competition was well advertised, with one extension of the application period. The submittal deadline was July 31, 2003. A total of fourteen (14) sculpture pieces submitted by nine (9) artists were reviewed by the Loan Art sub-committee, comprised of Commissioners Dennis Crossland, Andrew Lee, Karen Ochsenhirt, and Joy-Ann Wendler. The sub-committee recommended three (3) pieces of sculpture for the Sculpture Garden: Circumfusion by Esmoreit Koetsier, and a pair of sculptures, Yin and Yang.by Keith Bush. These recommendations were approved by the full Commission at their August meeting, and are being forwarded to the City Council for approval as required by the conditions of the Loan Art Program. Staffhave reviewed the pieces recommended for installation, spoken with the mists to ensure that they understand their obligations under this program, and discussed installation and safety concerns with the Maintenance Services Department. Staff feels the sculptures do not present a hazard to the public, or present any installation or maintenance issues that would cause us not to support the Commission's recommendation. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: September 24, 2003 Subject: Recommendation for Loan Art Pieces Page 2 The sculpture sub-committee recommends placement of the Circumfusion sculpture at the west end of the garden, near the bocce ball courts. They recommend placement of the pair Yin and Yang at the east end of the garden toward Tennis Drive. Staff will work with the sub-committee and the artists to place the pieces attractively. The terms of the loan arrangement are defined in the attached Loan Art Agreement. Specific items of note are listed below. 1. The length of exhibit recommended by the Commission is two (2) years. However, there is flexibility to define a shorter or longer exhibit period. Display requirements for each of these three pieces of sculpture are unique, varying from a flat surface mount on the ground to a raised pedestal. The city will work with the artist's recommendations to prepare the sites for each piece, including installation of a base, if required. Given the design of the Sculpture Garden with viewing "pads" already constructed, the cost of site preparation using in-house crews should be minimal. 3. The artists are responsible for delivery of the pieces to the site, and mounting the pieces to the base in conformance with the city's specification. The artists are responsible for maintenance of the sculptures, including removal of graffiti, and repair of damage or vandalism. The city would maintain the site, as it currently does for the Sculpture Garden. o Property insurance may be provided by the artist, if desired. The city is not responsible for reimbursement to the artist for damage or theft of the sculpture. It is anticipated that liability for injury associated with the sculpture would be determined on a case by case basis depending on the circumstances. The city assumes some liability as a result of exhibiting any sculpture in a public place, whether it is on loan or purchased by the city. Staff believes due care has been taken of public slfety considerations in recommending these pieces for display. At the end of the loan period, the artists must reclaim the pieces unless an agreement is renewed. In the event an artist offers to donate a piece rather than reclaim it, the city has the option of accepting or not accepting the donation. The compensation to each artist is $1500. It should be noted that the artist bears the full cost of submitting the application, constructing the piece, delivering it to the site, travel to be on site for installation, removing the sculpture at the conclusion of the loan term, and providing property insurance if desired for the length of the display. To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Date: September 24, 2003 Subject: Recommendation for Loan Art Pieces Page 3 FUNDING: There are sufficient funds in the Commission's Art Fund to cover the costs of the cash award to the artists and the installation of the sculpture and pair of sculptures being recommended for approval. By: ~,,'f~ ~ Approved: Sharon Ranals Director of Recreation and Community Services Michael A. Wilson City Manager Attachments: 1. Circumfusion, by Esmoreit Koetsier 2. Yin and Yang, by Keith Bush 3. Loan Art Program Agreement YIN Keith Bush Keith Bush City of South San Francisco Orange Memorial Park Sculpture Garden Loan Art Program Agreement This Agreement, made and entered into on 200__, by and between the CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, a municipal corporation (hereinafter "CITY"), 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California, and of (hereinafter "ARTIS T"). 1. PURPOSE ARTIST agrees to temporarily loan to CITY, and CITY agrees to grant ARTIST, a temporary exhibition permit to display ARTIST'S sculpture entitled (hereinafter "SCULPTURE") at a public location, the Sculpture Garden in Orange Memorial Park, South San Francisco, California (hereinafter "SCULPTURE GARDEN"). 2. EXHIBITION SITE The said referenced exhibition site is specifically area # in the SCULPTURE GARDEN. , located at 3. TERM The exhibition dates shall be from 200__ through ARTIST shall remove SCULPTUR~ on or before exact date for removal shall be arranged between CITY and ARTIST. 200~. 200__. The 4. BASE SCULPTURE shall be installed on a base (hereinafter "BASE") agreed to and designed by ARTIST and CITY. BASE will be constructed and installed by CITY. 5. PREPARATION OF SITE Installation will not be performed until the preparation and construction of any BASE required from CITY is complete. CITY is responsible for preparing SCULPTURE site according to the instructions supplied by ARTIST and agreed to by CITY. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event CITY is unable to construct or is delayed in the construction of BASE or preparation of SCULPTURE site due to budgetary constraints, inadequate available staffing, natural disaster or any other cause, ARTIST shall not have any right to bring action or make any claim against CITY as a result of such inability or delay. 6. INSTALLATION AND REMOVAL CITY shall coordinate the installation and removal of SCULPTUR]~ and shall assist ARTIST or ARTIST'S representative with installation, with a minimal workforce, to the degree that the site is a safe and workable environment. ARTIST will be responsible for the delivery of SCULPTURE to the site, and for the on-site installation, and shall be responsible for SCULPTURE on site during the installation. ARTIST will be responsible for, and cover all expenses concerning the delivery and installation of SCULPTURE to the site. 7. IDENTIFICATION PLAQUE CITY shall provide and install an identification plaque at the site of SCULPTURE to identify title, artist's name, year of creation, and construction material. Design of the plaque shall be at the full discretion of CITY. 8. MAINTENANCE ARTIST shall maintain the SCULPTURE at ARTIST'S sole cost and expense. CITY shall maintain SCULPTURE site, but will not provide reimbursement for ARTIST'S maintenance costs. In the event of defacing of or damage to SCULPTURE, whether by vandalism or act of God, ARTIST shall make such repairs as are necessary within 72 hours of receiving notice from CITY of damage, or in the event repairs cannot be completed within that time, provide CITY a written plan and timetable for the repairs within that time. If the nature of the damage renders SCULPTURE hazardous to the public and SCULPTURE is determined not safe to remain in said location, SCULPTURE must be repaired to a condition not considered hazardous to the public within a 12 - 24 hour time window after ARTIST receives notification from CITY or SCULPTURE shall be removed from exhibition by ARTIST or by CITY at expense of ARTIST. Failure to comply with this section shall be deemed grounds for termination of this Agreement. 9. COMPENSATION Compensation to ARTIST for being chosen to exhibit SCULPTURE within the City of South San Francisco shall be provided by the City of South San Francisco. ARTIST will receive $1,500 in cash as well as exposure in a brochure publicizing the public art of South San Francisco. ARTIST will also receive exposure by having SCULPTURE exhibited in the prominent and publicly accessible SCULPTURE GARDEN. 10. NOTICE OF TERMINATION ARTIST acknowledges that permission to exhibit the aforesaid SCULPTURE may be revoked at any time by CITY, and ARTIST further acknowledges that said SCULPTURE may be removed. If ARTIST does not reclaim the aforesaid SCULPTURE within (30) days of Notice of Termination, CITY or any of its agents, servants, officers or employees may dispose of said SCULPTURE as they see fit. For purposes of the foregoing sentence, it is further agreed that a written request to reclaim the aforesaid SCULPTURE executed by CITY and mailed to ARTIST by United States registered or certified mail, or other form of mail which offers proof of mailing and postage prepaid shall constitute '2qotice of Termination". 11. INSURANCE If desired, ARTIST shall provide property insurance on the artwork at ARTIST'S sole cost and expense. CITY will not provide reimbursement for property insurance. 2 12. HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNITY PROVISION ARTIST shall defend, save, keep and hold harmless CITY, their officers, agents, employees and volunteers from all damages, costs or expenses in law or equity that may at any time arise or be asserted because of injury to property or bodily or personal injury (including death) occasioned by any willful negligent act or omissions of ARTIST or any of ARTIST'S agents, employees and volunteers. CITY will not be held liable for any accident, theft, vandalism, or damage to SCULPTURE from any and all causes. 13. APPLICABLE LAWS AND ATTORNEY'S FEES. This Agreement shall be interpreted and enforced pursuant to California law. Any action to enforce or interpret this Agreement shall be brought in a court of competent jurisdiction in San Mateo County, California. Should any legal action be brought by a party for breach of this Agreement or to enforce any provision of this Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled reasonable attorney's fees, court costs, and other such costs as may be affixed by the Court. 14. AMENDMENT This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement of parties and may only be amended by written Agreement signed by both parties. 15. NOTICE Unless otherwise provided herein, all notices required hereunder shall be given by United States registered or certified mail, or other form of mail which offers proof of mailing, postage prepaid and addressed to the party at the address below: If to CITY: City of South San Francisco City Manager P.O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083 If to ARTIST: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date written above. APPROVED AS TO FORM: City Attorney CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO City Manager Artist Print Name F:kFile CabinetWIy SSF Documents~greements and Contracts 2003kArt Loan Agreement Final. DOC Staff Report DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 24, 2003 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney Adoption of an ordinance amending the PERS Contract.to provide Section 21354.5 (2.7 @ Full and Modified Formula) for Local Miscellaneous Members. RECOMMENDATION: Adopting of an ordinance amending the PERS Contract to provide Section 21354.5 (2.7 @ Full and Modified Formula) for Local Miscellaneous Members. B ACKGROLIND/DISCUS SION: Council has previously waived reading and introduced the following ordinance. The Ordinance is now ready for adoption. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CALI:FORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO (Introduced 9/10/03, Vote 5-0) Steven ~ Mattas, City Attorney Michael A. Wilson, City Manager Enclosure: Ordinance ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION CALIFORNIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM AND THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco has agreed to provide enhancements to the City's retirement system as part of negotiations with members of AFSCME, Teamsters (confidential), POA (non-sworn), Operating Engineers, Mid-Management and Executive Management; and WHEREAS, The California Public Employees' Retirement System staff have prepared the attached Amendment to Contract to implement this enhanced retirement benefit (Section 21362.3 [2.7% @ 55 Modified and Full]; and NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of South San Francisco does ORDAIN as follows: The City Council of the City of South San Francisco does hereby approve Amendment to Contract Between the Board of Administration California Public Employees' Retirement System and the City Council of the City of South San Francisco attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the Agreement on behalf of the City. 1. PUBLICATION AND EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall be published once, with the names of those City Councilmembers voting for or against it, in the San Mateo Times, a newspaper of general circulation in the City of South San Francisco, as required by law, and shall become effective thirty (30) days from and after its adoption. 2. SEVERAB~ITY In the event any section or portion of this ordinance shall be determined invalid or unconstitutional, such section or portion shall be deemed severable and all other sections or portions hereof shall remain in full force and effect. Introduced and adopted at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, held the __ day of ,2003. Adopted as an Ordinance of the City of South San Francisco at a regular meeting of the City Council held the day of, 2003 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk As Mayor of the City of South San Francisco, I do hereby approve the foregoing Ordinance this __ day of 2003. Mayor S :\Current Ord's\9-10-03 PERS.ord.doc StaffReport DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 24, 2003 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Assistant City Manager RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF THE 2002-2003 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PEaFOaMANCE nm) EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) TO THE DEPAaTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT (HUD) RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that City Council: 1) Hold a public hearing on the 2002-2003 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER), and 2) Adopt the attached Resolution authorizing the City Manager to execute all required documents for submittal to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. BACKGROUND: The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires communities receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to submit a year-end Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER). The report describes the City's housing and community development accomplishments during the 2002-2003 Fiscal Year and includes a financial summary of CDBG expenditures. This year the report also includes a final description of the City's accomplishments during the five-year 1998-2003 Consolidated Plan period. Prior to submitting the report the City must give the public an oppommity to review the CAPER and give testimony at a public hearing. CAPER reports are due to HUD 60 days after the completion of jurisdiction's fiscal year. In fiscal year 2002-2003, a total of $ 921,493 in CDBG funding was available for a broad range of community development activities. The CDBG program is the primary funding source for many services the City provides including housing rehabilitation, commercial fagade improvements, childcare, adult day care, emergency food assistance, homeless services, and tutoring. On April 22, 1998, the City Council authorized the submittal of the City's five-year Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development for fiscal years 1998-99 through 2002-03. The Consolidated Plan identified the housing and non-housing priorities the City would address during 1998-2003. In April 2002, the City Council authorized the submittal of the fourth One-Year Action Plan for 2002-2003. The 2002-2003 CAPER describes City's accomplishments and compares them to the goals set in 2002-2003 One Year Plan. Attached as Exhibit A is a summary of the CAPER report. STAFF REPORT TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council SUBJECT: Submittal of the 2002-2003 Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) to the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) DATE: September 24, 2003 Page 2 CAPER FINANCIAL REPORTING MECHANISM: In addition to the activity summary report, the CAPER provides a comprehensive accounting of all CDBG funds allocated, expended, encumbered, or reprogrammed during the fiscal year. The Department of Housing and Urban Development has developed special computer sot'tware that allows the tracking of multi-year activities and expenditures for accurate financial monitoring of individual CDBG projects and programs. The Finance and Housing and Community Development Departments use the new sol,are system to request regular reimbursements from the U.S. Treasury for CDBG activities. CONCLUSION: The CAPER has been available for public review in the Office of Economic and Community Development since September 9, 2003, when the public comment period began. Any comments received during the comment period or at the public hearing will be forwarded to HUD upon submittal of the report on September 30, 2003, a federally mandated deadline. Approved: Michael A. Wilson City Manager MAW:MVD:NF:AFSA Attachment: Resolution Exhibit A - CAPER Summary Report Exhibit A City of South San Francisco Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER) Summary Report 2002- 2003 Housing Activities A. Priority: Increase the supply of decent, affordable housing through the acquisition and/or rehabilitation of existing housing units. 1. Owner-Occupied Housing The City sponsors a variety of housing rehabilitation programs to assist residents maintain their homes in good condition. They are the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program, the Code Enforcement Voucher Program, and the House Helpers Program through North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center (NPNSC). The Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program assists low- and moderate-income homeowners with housing repairs by providing low interest loans. During 2002-2003 the City assisted three households with housing rehabilitation loans. Over the five-year Consolidated Plan period the City assisted twelve households with rehabilitation loans. The City administers a Code Enforcement Voucher Program that makes grants available to low- income homeowners in the downtown central area and citywide. The Voucher program is a grant subprogram of the Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program and is used to help residents correct emergency code violations. Currently there are two types of Vouchers available: Emergency Code Violation Vouchers and Debris Box Vouchers. During 2002-2003 the City issued three Emergency Code Vouchers and eight Debris Box Vouchers. Over the five-year Consolidated Plan period the City the City provided a total of 124 vouchers. The City funded North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center (NPNSC) to implement the House Helpers Program, which provides minor home repairs for iow-income homeowners in the downtown target area and citywide. In 2002-2003, NPNSC assisted 40 families. Of these 34 were senior heads of household. Over the five-year Consolidated Plan period NPNSC completed home repairs for 250 households. In 2001-2002 the City Council approved a first time homebuyer program for the City of South San Francisco. During 2002-2003 the City made the necessary arrangements to administer the program and begin making first time homebuyer loans. To fund this program the City allocated $191,043 in CDBG and $250,000 in RDA. In 2002-2003, the City successfully made its first loan to low-income buyer to help them purchase a below market rate unit. Under the leadership of the Mayor and City Council, the City pasSed a housing inclusionary ordinance in 2001-2002. Housing developers are required to make 20 percent of all new units developed affordable to low- and moderate-income families. Eight percent (8%) of units must be City of South San Francisco 2002-2003 CAPER Executive Summary, Page i RESOLUTION CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMIqTAL OF THE 20()2- 2003 CONSOLIDATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION REPORT (CAPER) TO THE DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) requires communities receiving Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds to submit a year-end Consolidated Annual Performance and Evaluation Report (CAPER); and WHEREAS, this years report also includes a final description of the City's accomplishments during the five-year 1998-2003 Consolidated Plan period; and WHEREAS, in fiscal year 2002-2003, a total of $921,493 in CDBG funding was available for a broad range of community development activities; and WHEREAS, the Consolidated Annual Performance hnd Evaluation Report (CAPER) has been available for public review in the office of Economic and Community Development, City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue since September 30, 2003. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to submit the CAPER and execute all required documents for submittal to the Department of Housing and Urban Development. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, held on the __ day of ,2003, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: .. ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk S:\Current Reso's\9-24CAPER.res.doc affordable to families at or below 80 percent median income and 12 percent must be affordable to families at or below 120 percent median income. In 2002-2003 the City negotiated one agreement to create eight affordable rental units at 206 Grand Avenue (the former Escape Bar). Finally, the City worked with the County of San Mateo, various other cities on the peninsula, financial institutions and lenders, and other interested parties to develop a uniform County-wide first time homebuyer program. The Consortium also prepared loan documents for the uniform program. In an effort to maintain and increase intergovernmental collaboration, the City of South San Francisco has modeled it's first time homebuyer to adhere to the standards developed by the Consortium will use its loans documents. 2. Rental Housing Acquisition and Rehabilitation The Rental Housing Acquisition and Rehabilitation Program purchases blighted or substandard homes in the community (or in specially designated target areas), rehabilitates the homes, and converts them into affordable rental housing. The program is available citywide and funded by CDBG, HOME and Redevelopment Agency Housing Set-Aside. The City leverages the federal funds with Redevelopment Agency Housing funds. During 2002-2003 the City worked with Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition to purchase four buildings (16 units total) in the Willow Gardens neighborhood project area. Rehabilitation of the units occurs in the months following the purchase of each unit. Phase I work includes new paint, new hearers, new flooring, and new windows in the units. In 2002-2003 the City also negotiated with several property owners to purchase housing in or near the downtown. City efforts included negotiating with owners and conducing property appraisals. Efforts to purchase property during 2002-2003, however, were not successful. In 2003 a new family from Shelter Network's Bridges program for homeless families moved into the City's rental property at 109 Longford Avenue. The previous homeless family living there successfully graduated from the program and moved into regular rental housing in March 2003. Additional accomplishments during the five-year Consolidated Period included Assisting with $1.2 million for the rehabilitation of a 16-unit SRO hotel and 8-unit apartment building at the Grand Hotel, Completing a multi-million dollar rehabilitation of 65 SRO units at the Metropolitan Hotel, and Purchasing 2 duplexes (4 units total) and rehabilitating them for occupancy by for low-income families. B. Priority: Increase the supply of affordable rental housing by constructing new rental units. 1. Chestnut Creek In 1998-99 the City negotiated a purchase option for the vacant site located at Old Mission Road and Chestnut Avenue. Under contract with the Redevelopment Agency, BRIDGE Housing Corporation, a nonprofit housing developer, completed construction of 40 affordable senior housing units. Tenants moved into Chestnut Creek in April 2003. City of South San Francisco 2002-2003 CAPER Executive Summary, Page ii Other accomplishments during the five-year Consolidated Plan period include the development of 33 affordable family housing units at Greenridge Apartments. The developer for this project was Mid-Peninsula Housing Coalition. The City also acquired and banked land at 905 Linden Avenue for a future housing development. C. Priority: Provide service-enriched shelter and transitional housing for homeless people and families. Funding for Homeless Assistance Programs The City funded several agencies and homeless shelters providing housing and services for Homeless people. This included Shelter Network who received $14,000 in Redevelopment Agency funds for the Family Crossroads Shelter and $10,000 for the Maple Street Shelter. These transitional housing facilities are available to homeless families and individuals in the City of South San Francisco. During 2002-2003, five (5) South San Francisco families stayed at Family Crossroads and 37 individuals stayed at the Maple Street Shelter. Over the five-year Consolidated Plan period Shelter Network housed 174 South San Francisco households. The City also provided $7,000 in RDA funds through Samaritan House for the operation of the North County Homeless Shelter. The North County Emergency Shelter is located in South San Francisco and provides 90 beds for homeless men and women. Eighty-one South San Francisco residents were served in 2002-03. Other homeless shelters and service providers the City funded included: $8,000 to the Center for Domestic Violence Prevention for providing shelter to battered women and their children, and $25,000 to the Human Investment Project (HIP). NPNSC's social service program also helped homeless individuals and families fred temporary and permanent housing. Over the five-year Consolidated Plan period the Center for Domestic Violence Prevention has provided shelter for 57 South San Francisco Households. HIP has provided referrals to 437 households seeking housing. D. Priority: Provide housing opportunities for the disabled Funding for Housing Accessibility Programs The City provided $13,000 in CDBG funds to the Center for the Independence of the Disabled to complete housing modifications for disabled residents, enabling residents to remain in their homes in a safe and accessible manner. The program is available citywide to low-income residents. CID served 31 disabled residents during 2002-2003. Over thc five-year Consolidated Plan period CID has served 148 disabled households. NPNSC's House Helpers Program also provided housing accessibility modifications for disabled residents. City of South San Francisco 2002-2003 CAPER Executive Summary, Page iii Non-Housing Community Development Activities Priority: Core public service activities to improve the quality of life for City residents and provide minimal levels of prevention assistance to keep families at risk from becoming homeless. Social Services. The City funded 15 programs to provide crucial social services to the community in 2002-2003. These included pre-school and after school childcare for 184 children, adult day care for 47 seniors, general social services for 758 residents, counseling and advocacy for 229 battered women and children, counseling and other assistance for 49 disabled people, tutoring to adults through project read for 44 individuals, new clothing for 314 very low-income youth, and weekly grocery bag deliveries to 279 senior and disabled households. The City's nonprofit agencies have leveraged their small CDBG grants of $2,000 to $20,000 to maximize the services they offer South San Francisco residents. They have enriched the lives of many low-income residents through the services they provide. B. Priority: Rehabilitation assistance for non-housing activities including institutional, commercial, and historic structures. 1. Commercial Facade Improvement Program The Commercial Facade Improvement Program provides financial and technical assistance to property owners undertaking structural and facade improvements to their buildings. These improvements help owners increase the use of their commercial buildings and improve the appearance of the downtown. The program is available in the Historic Downtown district and is funded through CDBG and leveraged by the owners' funds. In 2002-2003, the City allocated $175,000 for the Downtown Commercial Rehabilitation Program. The following projects were completed or underway during the 2002-2003 fiscal year: · Crimpers Bizzare, 312-314 Linden Avenue, $5,000 grant · Mazatlan Restaurant, 203 Linden Avenue, $5,000 grant · Bogy's Restaurant, 207 Linden Avenue, $5,000 grant Over the five-year Consolidated Plan period the City has completed 17 facade improvements, 2 awning installation, and 10 sign improvements, benefiting a total of 33 businesses. 2. Other Rehabilitation Projects The City also provided funding to address the rehabilitation needs of public and private community buildings serving South San Francisco residents. Rehabilitation projects completed during 2002-2003 includes · Completed the renonvations of the restrooms at the Boys and Girls Club, including ADA accessibility. · Completed replacement of playground equipment with new accessible equipment including the addition of disabled access ramps and new playground surfacing at various city locations. City of South San Francisco 2002-2003 CAPER Executive Summary, Page iv Over the five-year Consolidated Plan the City has completed the rehabilitation of several public and private community building serving South San Francisco residents. Among them are the Community Learning Center, several playgrounds, Community Gatepath's center, North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center's office, the Historic Society Museum, and various school district facilitates being used for the Families on Track Program serving low-income children. Lead Based Paint Abatement Through this program the City identifies potential lead-based paint hazards in housing rehabilitation projects. In 2002-2003, the City continued to work with the County of San Mateo and other jurisdictions in the county to implement the new federal lead-based paint regulations for housing. Actions included offering training to contractors, performing outreach, and cooperating and sharing information with other entitlement jurisdictions. Fair Housing Activities (Actions to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing) In 2002-2003 the City supported numerous activities to ensure fair housing in the City of South San Francisco. Programs included funding Project Sentinel and La Raza Ccntro Legal to conduct fair housing education and advocacy. In 2002-2003, Project Sentinel assisted thirteen (13) South San Francisco households facing housing discrimination and handled 602 telephone calls requesting fair housing information. La Raza Centro Legal provided legal representation, counseling, and information and referral for 154 households. City of South San Francisco 2002-2003 CAPER Executive Summary, Page v 2002 - 20032 CAPER & Five-Year Consolidated Plan Summary of Accomplishments I. Housing Activities housing units. Program Activity Priority: Increase the supply of decent, affordable housing through the acquisition and/or rehabilitation of existing Owner-Occupied City-Sponsored Housing Rehabilitation Loan Program Voucher Program Emergency Code Violation Vouchers Debris Box Vouchers Minor Home Repair (House Helpers) North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center (NPNSC) 2002-2003 Objectives Assist low- and moderate-income homeowners with housing repairs in the Neighborhood Strategy Area and citywide. Three to five (3-5) very low- income households will be assisted with low interest and/or deferred loans of up to $25,000. Most households will be very low-income, elderly, and female heads-of-household. Assist and additional 22 families with vouchers. Provide grants to low-income homeowners in the downtown central area and citywide for emergency repairs. Provide homeowners grants of up to $2,500 to 12 low-income residents to clear up code violations in their homes. Help 10 low- and moderate-income residents in the CDBG target area remove accumulated debris and yard waste from their properties. Provide free, minor home repairs to 50 very low- income homeowners in the Neighborhood Strategy Area and citywide. The majority of households assisted will be large families with small children, disabled residents and elderly, and female heads- of-household. 2002-2003 Accomplishments Provided CDBG rehabilitation loans funds in the amount of $24,130 for the rehabilitation of 3 affordable units. City found it is more effective to use vouchers to take care of immediate home repair needs. Provided $6,244 in CDBG vouchers to assist a total of 11 low-income households correct code violations. The City issued 3 emergency code violation vouchers and 8 debris box vouchers. Provided fi-ee, minor home repairs to the homes of 40 households. Five-Year CP Accomplishments Provided 12 rehabilitation loans to low-income homeowners. Completed rehabilitation of Commercial Avenue project. Provided 124 vouchers (grants) to low-income homeowners. Over the past five years NPNSC has provided free, minor home repairs for 250 households. A. Priority: Increase the supply of decent, affordable housing through the acquisition and/or rehabilitation of existing housing units - continued. Program Activity Owner-Occupied -Continued- First-time Homebuyer Loan Program 2002'2003 Objectives Develop program guidelines for a new first-time homebuyer loan program. Goal is to place 3-5 First time homebuyer first time homebuyer loans. 2002-2003 Accomplishments Adopted policies and established a new First Time Homebuyer Program. Assisted 1 family move into a below market rate tmit. Allocated $191,043 in CDBG and $250,000 in RDA for first time homebuyer loans. Negotiated for 8 inclusionary housing units at 206 Grand Avenue. Five- Year CP Accomplishments - Created a new First Time Homebuyer Program and placed 1 family in a below market rate unit - City adopted a first time homebuyer prograrr[ - City adopted a 20% inclusionary housing ordinance - City has negotiated for a total of 16 inclusionary housing units Program Activity Rental Acquisition and Rehabilitation Willow Gardens Downtown Affordable Housing Program 2002.2003 Objectives Five-year objective is to acquire and rehabilitate 64 units at Willow Gardens to convert into affordable rental units. The goal for the year was to purchase 1-2 buildings as they become available. Establish housing fund to provide affordable rental housing through the acquisition and rehabilitation of dilapidated housing stock. Goal during fiscal year 02-03 is to purchase and rehabilitate an unoccupied Single Room Occupancy Hotel or a 4- 6 unit apartment building in or near the downtown. 2002-2003 AccomPlishments Purchased four four-plex building (16 units total). The City negotiated with several property owners to purchase housing in or near the downtown. Efforts to purchase units during 2002-2003 were not successful. Five-Year CP Accomplishments - The City has acquired and rehabihtated 7 four-plex building (28 units total) in the Willow Gardens Neighborhood. - Neighborhood concept design and Supplemental EIR complete. - Willow Gardens neighborhood added to the E1 Camino Redevelopment Project Area. The City has not purchased additional housing in the downtown.. Program Activity Rental Acquisition and Rehabilitation -Continued- 339-341 Commercial Avenue 2002-2003 Objectives No action listed for 2002-2003. 2002-2003 AccOmplishments Four low-income families continue to occupy four affordable housing units. 109 Longford Avenue Grand Hotel No action listed for 2002-2003 No action listed for 2002-2003 - New family from Shelter Network's Bridges Program for homeless families moved into the unit. The family consists of a single mother with three children. Previous occupant family successfully moved into regular rental housing. No action listed for 2002-2003 Metropolitan Hotel No action listed for 2002-2003 No action listed for 2002-2003 B. Priority: Program Activity New Rental Housing Construction Chestnut Creek (Mission/Chestnut) Greenridge Increase the supply of affordable rental housing by constructing new rental units. 2002-2003 Objectives 2002,2003 Accomplishments Construction of 40 new affordable rental apartment units for seniors. Project scheduled to be completed by Fall 2002. No action listed for 2002-2003 Completed construction of 40 affordable housing units for seniors. Tenants moved into the new units in April 2003. No action listed for 2002-2003 905 Linden Avenue No action listed for 2002-2003 No action listed for 2002-2003 Five-Year CP ACcomplishments Purchased 2 duplexes (4 units total), relocated eligible tenants, completed lead-paint hazard reduction, completed rehabilitation, and occupied units with Iow-income families. Purchased blighted home and completed rehabilitation. Three families from Shelter Network's Bridges program for homeless have occupied the housing unit. Assisted with $1.2 million rehabilitation of a 16-unit SRO hotel and 8-unit apartment building. Completed in 1999. Completed a multi-million dollar rehabilitation of 65 SRO units in the downtown. Five. Year CP Accomplishments Completed the development and occupancy of 40 new affordable units for seniors. Completed development and occupancy of 33 affordable housing units. Acquired and land banked for future housing development. C. Priority: Provide service-enriched shelter and transitional housing for homeless people and families. Program Activity 2002-2003 Objectives 2002-2003 Accomplishments Shelter Network - Family Crossroads and Maple Street Provide transitional housing to 10 homeless families at Family Crossroads and 10 individuals at the Maple Street shelter. Provided transitional housing to a total of 42 households. Five (5) families received housing at Family Crossroads and 37 individuals received housing at the Maple Street shelter. Center for Domestic Violence Prevention Provide shelter and services to 5 battered women and their families. Provided shelter and services to 14 women and children. Samaritan House - Safe Harbor (North County Homeless Shelter) Provide continued support to the North County Homeless Shelter located in South San Francisco. The goal is to serve 90 South San Francisco residents. Provided $7,000 in Redevelopment Agency funding for continued shelter operation. Eighty- one South San Francisco residents were served in 2002-03. Human Investment Project Provide shared housing referrals to 80 households. Provided referrals to 86 households looking for shared housing. Five-Year CP Accomplishments Over the past four years, Shelter Network has provided transitional housing to 174 South San Francisco clients To date, the Center for Domestic Violence Prevention has provided transitional housing to 57 South San Francisco battered women and children. Contributed to the construction of and operation of an emergency 90-bed winter shelter in South San Francisco. Eighty-one South San Francisco residents were served in 2002-03. HIP has provided referrals to 437 households seeking shared housing. D. Priority: Provide housing opportunities for elderly and disabled people Program Activity 2002-2003 Objectives 2002-2003 Accomplishments Center for Independence of the Disabled (CID) Housing Accessibility Program Provide housing accessibility modifications to the homes of 30 people with disabilities. Provided accessibility modifications to the homes of 31 households. Five-Year CP Accomplishments CID has provided housing accessibility modifications to the homes of 148 disabled and elderly people. H. Non-Housing Community Development Activities A. Priority: Provide core public service activities to improve the quality of life for low-income residents and provide preventive assistance to families at risk of becoming homeless. Program Activity 2002-2003 Objectives Childcare Child Care Coordinating Council Provide emergency childcare for up to 10 children from families in crisis. City-Sponsored Child Care Friends to Parents Provide fee assistance to 15-30 families for childcare. Provide affordable childcare to 62 children SSFUSD - Children's Center Provide activities for 90 children. Senior Services Second Harvest- Food Bank - Brown Bag City-Sponsored Adtfit Day Care Provide 300-400 households of seniors and disabled residents with food. Provide day care to 50 seniors. General Social Services North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center The Tooth Mobile Project READ Provide social services for 450 households (1,200 people) with immediate needs. On site dental services for students of the Families on Track program. 250 individuals will be served. Train volunteer tutors to provide free tutoring in reading to 25-50 adults. Satike Counseling Provide substance abuse counseling 2002-2003 Accomplishments Provided childcare for 5 children for extended periods of time. Provided childcare fee assistance to 18 families. Provided childcare for 61 children. Center provided childcare for 100 children and CDBG funds were used for field trips and supplies. Provided 279 senior and disabled households with food on a monthly basis. Provided day care to 47 seniors. Five-Year CP A ccotnplishments Over the past four years CCCC has provided extended childcare for 27 low-income families. To date the City's program has provided childcare fee assistance to 102 families. Friends to Parents has provided childcare for 436 children The SSFUSD Children's Center leveraged City funds to provide childcare for 465 households. Over the past four years Second Harvest has provided 1,204 senior and disabled households with food. In three years, the City's progran~ has provided day care for 293 frail and elderly residents. Provided social services to 758 clients. Provided services to 246 students Tutored 44 adults in reading. Provided counseling to 64individuals Provided social services to 4,124 clients. Provided dental services to 246 students. In four years Project READ has trained tutors and provided tutoring to 183 adults Counseled 64 individuals A. Priority: Provide core public service activities to improve the quality of life for low-income residents and provide preventive assistance to families at risk of becoming homeless - continued. Program Activity Battered Women's Services Center for Domestic Violence Prevention Sor Juana Ines - Abused Women Advocacy Rape Trauma Services Center Disabled Services C.I.D. - Social Services ELLIPSE Peninsula Aids Program PARCA - Project REACH Poplar ReCare Youth Services John's Closet North Peninsula Family Alternatives (NPFA) Boys & Girls Club 2002,2003 Objectives 2002-2003 Accomplishments (See Housing Activities - Priority C: Shelter and Transitional Housing for the Homeless) Provide emergency services such as counseling Assisted 229 women and children with emergency and shelter to 100-200 battered women and their services. children. Provide information, resources, and support to sexual assault survivors. Approximately 50 - 100 individuals will be served. Provide counseling and assistance to 30 disabled people. Provide in-home support services to up to 11 households with HIV/AIDS. No action listed for 2002-2003 Provided information and services to 676 South San Francisco individuals. Counseled and assisted 37 disabled people. Served 12 households with HIV/AIDS. No action listed for 2002-2003 No action listed for 2002-2003 No action listed for 2002-2003 Provide new clothing to 150 schoolchildren. Provided new clothing to 314 children. Provide parenting skills to monolingual Spanish- speaking parents; will assist 20 monolingual Spanish-speaking households (70 parents and children). Provided parenting skills and services to 153 clients. See Priority B: Rehabilitation assistance for non-housing structures Five-Year CP Accomplishments In five years, Sor Juana Ines has provided shelter and emergency services to 878 battered women and their children. In one year provided services to 676 individuals. CID has provided counseling and assistance to 298 disabled residents. ELLIPSE has provided support services to 54 clients with HIV/AIDS. Parca-Project Reach has provided after school childcare to 26 developmentally disabled children. Provided childcare for 15 developmentally disabled children. John's Closet has provided clothing to 961 children Over the past four years Family Alternatives has provided parenting skills to 497 monolingual Spanish- speaking clients. B. Priority: Rehabilitation assistance for non-housing structures including public, commercial, and historic buildings. Program Activity SSFUSD - Families on Track City Sponsored Commercial Facade Improvement Program ADA Playground Renovation Community Learning Center Boys & Girls Club Community Gatepath (formerly Poplar Re- Care Center) Rehabilitation North Peninsula Neighborhood Services Center Office Remodel South San Francisco Unified School District Historic Rehabilitation 2002-2003 Objectives Acquisition and installation of a modular unit to expand existing facility. Approximately serving 160-260 Households. Provide fmancial and technical assistance to property owners undertaking exterior business improvements, which can include signs, awnings and exterior painting. These improvements help owners increase the use of their commercial buildings and improve the appearance of the Historic Downtown district. Goal: to assist 5-8 businesses Remove outdated playground equipment and replace with new accessible equipment including disabled access ramps and new playground surfacing at various city locations. No action listed for 2002-03. Provide fimding from previous years to renovate the restroom at the Boys & Girls Club. Project had been delayed due to BART construction. No action listed for 2002-03. No action listed for 2002-03. No action listed for 2002-03. No action listed for 2002-2003 2002-2003 Accomplishments Project postponed until next fiscal year. City completed 1 facade improvement and 2 sign installations, benefiting a total of 3 businesses. Completed replacement of playground equipment with new accessible equipment including the addition of disabled access ramps and new playground surfacing at various city locations. No action listed for 2002-03. Completed renovation ofrestrooms at Boys & Girls Club No action listed for 2002-03. No action listed for 2002-03. No action listed for 2002-03. No action listed for 2002-2003 Five-Year CP Accomplishments Project postponed until next fiscal year. City completed 17 facade improvements, 2 awning installation, and 10 sign improvements, benefiting a total of 33 businesses. Completed ADA accessibility of playground with new equipment and ramps at various playgrounds throughout the City Completed rehabilitation of and a gynmasium to open the Community Learning Center. Funded rehabilitation of new site with $1.5 million Section 108 Loan Guarantee. Completed renovations of restrooms at Boys & Girls Club, including ADA accessibility. Remodel Center to improve services for South San Francisco residents served at the Center. Remodeled Community Agency's office for accessibility and to provide better client services. Installed emergency £zre exit door to a portable classroom. Completed renovation of Historical Society Museum. III. Lead-Based Paint Abatement Program Activity 2002-2003 Objectives Lead-Based Paint Abatement Program Continued to apply federal regulations into abatement procedures to reduce lead-based paint hazards in rehabilitation projects. Collaborate with the County of San Mateo and other county jurisdictions to coordinate educational. 2002-2003 Accomplishments Continue to collaborate with the County of San Mateo and other jurisdictions in the county to implement new federal lead-based paint regulations for housing. Actions included offering training to contractors, performing outreach, and cooperating and sharing information with other entitlement jurisdictions. Five-Year CP Accomplishments Screened projects for lead- based paint hazards and performed necessary risk reduction. Cooperated and coordinated with the County of San Mateo and other jurisdictions to prepared and implemented a lead-based paint Transition Plan to meet new federal regulations. IV. Fair Housing - Program Activity Project Sentinel La Raza Centro Legal Fair Housing Brochure Actions to Affirmatively Further Fair Housing 2002-2003 Objectives Provide fair housing counseling and advocacy casework for 12 households and respond to 140 telephone inquiries from residents requesting fair housing information. Provide 200 households with services including information and referral, legal advice and counseling, and legal representation. 2002-2003 Accomplishments Provided case management for 13 households and responded to 140 phone inquiries. Provided legal advice, information and counseling to 154 households. No action planned. Brochure availability continues Five- Year CP Accomplishments Over the past two years Project Sentinel has provided case management for 61 households and responded to 602 phone inquiries. La Raza Centro Legal has provided legal advice, information and counseling to 714 households. Prepared and distributed fair housing brochures to City residents. 7. Discussion: Noise Analysis Report for Sister Cities Boulevard and sound wall design StaffReport DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 24, 2003 Honorable Mayor and City Council Assistant City Manager Reconsideration of a Request from C/CAG to Support Assembly Bill 1546 RECOMMENDATION C/CAG recommends that the City Council adopt a resolution supporting Assembly Bill (AB) 1546. BACKGROUND/DISCUS SION The City Couhcil will recall that at the regular meeting of April 9, 2003, Richard Napier requested Council's support of AB 1546, however, the City Council took no action on the item. AB 1546 has been sponsored by C/CAG and will authorize the C/CAG Board to levy an assessment of up to four dollars on the motor vehicle registration fee to support two types of programs that address the impacts of automobiles. The first program is to deal with traffic congestion. The funding will be used for a wide range of transportation services throughout the County. Some of these projects could include more shuttle services, implementing intelligent transportation systems, and enhancements to our transit network. The second program is to address the storm water pollution that is directly the result of automobiles. The copper residue from brake pads and the condensation of mercury fi:om vehicle exhaust are major sources of pollution in storm drains and ultimately in the Bay, the Ocean, and local streams and creeks. Funding from this bill will be available to support Countywide efforts to manage storm water pollution and also to provide grants to the cities and the County for its locally managed programs. This bill has the potential to raise nearly $3 million dollars per year for these programs. On September 10, 2003, C/CAG representatives once again approached the City Council requesting a letter of support for AB 1546. It should be noted that 95% (5% C/CAG administrative fee) of the fees collected from vehicles registered in South San Francisco are utilized in the City for the aforementioned programs. The fee would terminate on January 1, 2009. Respectfully submitted, Approved: Michael A. Wilson City Manager RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING ASSEMBLY BILL AB 1546 TO SUPPORT PROGRAMS THAT ADDRESS THE. IMPACT OF AUTOMOBILES WHEREAS, AB 1546 has been sponsored by C/CAG and will authorize the C/CAG Board to levy an assessment of up to four dollars on the motor vehicle registration fee to support two types of programs that address the impact of automobiles; and WHEREAS, the first program is to deal with traffic congestion; and WHEREAS, the funding will be used for a wide range of transportation services throughout the County; and WHEREAS, the second program is to address the storm water pollution that is directly the result of automobiles; and WHEREAS, funding from this bill will be available to support Countywide efforts to manage storm water pollution and also to provide grants to the cities and the County for its locally managed storm water programs; and WHEREAS, this bill has the potential to raise nearly $3 millf0n dollars per year for these programs. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco that the City Council hereby supports Assembly Bill AB '1546. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the __ day of ,2003 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk S:\Cun'ent Reso's\9-24.assembly,bill1546.res.doc CONGESTIO!~ ~ PILOT T~ ac~vit~s f-u:~d by th: pmg~m sho~Id b: b~'~ ~ nm~w thc fee for ~noth= fo= yeau. the ~s~m= of the, f~c by ~c C~/C~ Asso~m/oa of =~am=es mM h'~d. ge: m~s~: b= dev~ol~ ~ approved by th~ C~ty/Coumy AB 1546 Assembly Bill - AMENDEr BILL NUMBER: AB 1546 AMENDED BILL TEXT AMENDED IN SENATE AUGUST 18, 2003 AMENDED IN SENATE JULY 22, 2003 AMENDED IN SENATE JUNE 24, 2003 AMENDED IN ASSEMBLY APRIL 22, 2003 INTRODUCED BY Assembly Member Simitian (Coauthors: Assembly Members Mullin and Yee) FEBRUARY 21, 2003 An ac% rclatin~ tc local ~cvcrnmcnt. An act to add Chapter 2.65 (commencing with Section 65089.11) to Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, and to add Section 9250.5 to the Vehicle Code, relating to local government. Page 1 of 3 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1546, as amended, Simitian. Local governments: vehicle fee for congestion and stormwater management programs. Existing law provides for the imposition by air districts and other local agencies of fees on the registration of motor vehicles in certain areas of the state that are in addition to the basic vehicle registration fee collected by the Department of Motor Vehicles. This bill wcu!d state thc !ntcnt cf the Lcgis!aturc tc c~p!crc thc c~ncc~ cf a~IcT,~ng thc ~cvcrnin~ body of a city, ccunty, city and county, or jcint Fcwcrz m££c¢izti~n actin~ ~r ~n a~£cciati~n cf gcvcrnmontu tc imFcrc an annual fcc cn motor vchic!cs rc~i£tcrcd within thc j~rir~ic~i~n fe~ a F~rcgram for thc m~nz~cmcnt cf traffic ccngc£ticn, £tcrmwatcr pc!!uticn, and cthcr aut~mcbi!c-rc!atcd impact ab,utcmcnt a~tiviticr. This bill would authorize the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County to impose an annual fee of up to $4 on motor vehicles registered within San Mateo County for a program for the management of traffic congestion and stormwater pollution within that county. The bill would require the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County to have an independent audit performed on the program and to provide its findings to the Legislature. The bill would require a program with performance measures and a budget before the fee may be imposed. The bill would require the Department of Motor Vehicles, if requested, to collect the fee and distribute the proceeds, after deduction of specified administrative costs, to the association. The bill would require that the fees collected may only be used to pay for programs bearing a relationship or benefit to the motor vehicles paying the fee, and would require the board of the association to make a specified finding of fact by a 2/3 vote. The fee would terminate on January 1, 2009. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: no. State-mandated local program: no. THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS: $ZCTI~N !. I~ iv tho in~ent cf the Lcgi£1atu~c tc oxFlcrc thc SECTION 1. Chapter 2.65 (commencing with Section 65089.11) is added to Division 1 of Title 7 of the Government Code, to read: http://www, leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asm/ab_l 501 - 155 O/ab_1546_bi11_20030818_amended_sen.html 9/12/03 AB 1546 Assembly Bill - AMENDEr Page 2 of 3 CHAPTER 2.65. MANAGEMENT OF TRAFFIC CONGESTION AND STORMWATER POLLUTION IN SAN MATEO COUNTY 65089.11. (a) The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County, which has been formed by the resolutions of the board of supervisors within San Mateo County and a majority of the city councils within the county that represent a majority of the population in the incorporated area of San Mateo County, may impose a fee of up to four dollars ($4) on motor vehicles registered within San Mateo County. The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County may impose the fee only if the board of the association adopts a resolution providing for both the fee and a corresponding program for the management of traffic congestion and stormwater pollution within San Mateo County as set forth in Sections 65089.12 to 65089.15, inclusive. Adoption by the board requires a vote of approval by board members representing two-thirds of the population of San Mateo County. (b) A fee imposed pursuant to this section shall not become operative until July 1, 2004, pursuant to the resolution adopted by the board in subdivision (a). (c) The fee shall terminate on January 1, 2009, unless reauthorized by the Legislature. 65089.12. (a) The fees distributed to the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County pursuant to Section 9250.5 of the Vehicle Code shall be used for purposes of congestion management and stormwater pollution prevention as specified in its adopted congestion management program, pursuant to Section 65089, and its approved National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit issued pursuant to the federal Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C. Sec. 1251 et seq.). (b) (1) The fees collected may be used to pay for those programs with a relationship or benefit to the motor vehicles that are paying the fee. (2) Prior to imposing the fee, the board of the association shall make a finding of fact by a 2/3 vote that those programs bear a relationship or benefit to the motor vehicles that will pay the fee. (c) The purpose of the Congestion Management Program is to address motor vehicle congestion. (d) Only the stormwater pollution prevention programs that directly address the negative impact on creeks, streams, bays, and the ocean caused by motor vehicles and the infrastructure supporting motor vehicle travel are eligible for funding. (e) Not more than 5 percent of the fees distributed to the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County shall be used by the association for its administrative costs associated with the program. 65089.13. Prior to the imposition of the fee by the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County, a specific program with performance measures and a budget shall first be developed and adopted by the association at a noticed public hearing. 65089.14. The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County shall have an independent audit performed on the program with the review and report provided to the board at a noticed public hearing. 65089.15. The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County shall provide a report to the Legislature on the program by July 1, 2006. SEC. 2. Section 9250.5 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read: 9250.5. (a) The department shall, if requested by the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County, collect the fee imposed pursuant to Section 65089.11 of the Government Code upon the registration or renewal of registration of any motor vehicle http://www, leginfo.ca, gov/pub/bill/asrn/ab_1501-1550/ab 1546 bill 20030818 amended sen.html 9/12/03 AB 1546 Assembly Bill - AMENDEr` registered in the county, except those vehicles that are expressly exempted under this code from the payment of registration fees. (b) The City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County shall pay for the initial setup and programming costs identified by the Department of Motor Vehicles through a direct contract with the department. Any direct contract payment by the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County shall be repaid, with no restriction on the funds, to the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County as part of the initial revenues distributed. Regular Department of Motor Vehicles collection costs shall be in accordance with subdivision (c). These costs shall not be counted against the five per cent administration cost limit specified in subdivision (c) of Section 65089.12. (c) After deducting all costs incurred pursuant to this section, the department shall distribute the revenues to the City/County Association of Governments of San Mateo County. ccx~_cc~t cf zllcwing thc gcvcrning body cf ~ city, county, city and county, cr jcint Fcwcrg agcncy 2cting 2£ an a~rcciaticn cf gcvcrnmcntr kc im~c~c a fcc e.n mctcr vuhiclor rcgirtcNc~ within thc jurisdictions., fcr thc FurFc~c cf funding cc~ngcrticn mznagcmcnt 2ctivitie£, ~t~rm~,&2tcr Fe~l~tie.n F~rcvcnticx~-, 2nd cthcr kutc~.e~i!c-rcl2~c~ imFx2ct ab~toment activi%ic£. Page 3 of 3 http ://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/asrrdab_ 1501-1550/ab_1546_bi11_20030818_amended_sen.html 9/12/03 StaffReport DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: September 24, 2003 The Honorable Mayor and City Council The Director of Public Works WET WEATHER PROGRAM (PHASES 1 THROUGH 5) PROJECT NO. 71-13235-0351, BII) NO. 2323 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council adopt a resolution for the Wet Weather Program a reimbursement resolution for the approved $45 million State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan as required by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). BACKGROUND/DISCUS SION: The Wet Weather Program consists of improvements to the wastewater collection system and pump stations to control sewer system overflows. This project is required to comply with the Cease and Desist Order (CDO) that was issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Compliance is required by November 1, 2007. The City will use revolving funds to finance the project. The Wet Weather Project consists of five phases: Phase 1 - Pump Station Improvements, Parallel Force Mains and Effluent Storage Pond Phase 2 - Sewer Rehabilitation and Relief Sewers Phase 3 - Colma Creek Bank Protection at the WQCP Phase 4 - East of 101 Sewer System Improvements Phase 5 - South Linden Storm & Sewer Rehabilitation The city has received a preliminary funding commitment from the State Water Resources Control Board for $45 million through the State's Revolving Loan Program. Phase 1 of the project will start construction in October 2003. Staff Report To: Re: Date: The Honorable Mayor and City Council Wet Weather Program (Phases 1 thru 5) September 24, 2003 Page 2 FUNDING: Total Project Cost Phases 1 through 5 Approved SRF Loan City's Share $48,500,000 $45,000,000 $ 3,5OO,OOO John Gibbs Director of Public Works Approved: Michael A. Wilson City Manager ATTACHMENT: Reimbursement Resolution RB/JG/ed REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION NO. CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA A REIMBURSEMENT RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE WET WEATHER PROGRAM FOR THE APPROVED $45 MILLION STATE REVOLVING FUND LOAN AS REQUIRED BY THE STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD WHEREAS, the City of South San Francisco (the "Agency") desires to finance the costs of constructing and/or reconstructing certain public facilities and improvements relating to its water and wastewater system, including certain treatment facilities, pipelines and other infrastructure (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, the Agency intends to finance the construction and/or reconstruction of the Project or portions of the Project with moneys ("Project Funds") provided by the State of California, acting by and through the State Water Resources Control Board (the "Board"); and WHEREAS, the Board may fund the Project Funds with proceeds from the sale of obligations the interest upon which is excluded from gross income for federal income tax purposes (the "Obligations"); and WHEREAS, prior to either the issuance of the Obligations or the approval by the Board of the Project Funds the Agency desires to incur certain capital expenditures (the "Expenditures") with respect to the Project from available moneys of the Agency; and WHEREAS, the Agency has determined that those moneys to be advanced on and after the date hereof to pay the Expenditures are available only for a temporary period and it is necessary to reimburse the Agency for the Expenditures from the proceeds of the Obligations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco as follows: Section 1. The Agency hereby states its intention and reasonably expects to reimburse Expenditures paid prior to the issuance of the Obligations or the approval by the Board of the Project Funds. Section 2. The reasonably expected maximum principal amount of the Project Funds is $45,000,000. Section 3. This resolution is being adopted no later than 60 days after the date on which the Agency will expend moneys for the portion of the Project costs to be reimbursed with Project Funds. Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. Section 7. Each Expenditure by the Agency will be of a type properly chargeable to a capital account under general federal income tax principles. To the best of our knowledge, this Agency is not aware of the previous adoption of official intents by the Agency that have been made as a matter of course for the purpose of reimbursing expenditures and for which tax-exempt obligations have not been issued. This resolution is adopted as official intent of the Agency in order to comply with Treasury Regulation § 1.150-2 and any other regulations of the Internal Revenue Service relating to the qualification for reimbursement of Project costs. All the recitals in this Resolution are true and correct and this Agency so finds, determines and represents. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco at a meeting held on the _ day of ,2003 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: City Clerk &\Current Reso's\9-24wet.weather.program.res.doc DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Staff Report September 24, 2003 The Honorable Mayor and City Council The Director of Public Works LINDENVII J,E STORM DRAIN REHABILITATION RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council, by motion, approve an addendum to the John Carollo Engineers contract in the amount of $400,000 to design and produce all contract documents (including environmental) for the Lindenville storm drain rehabilitation. B ACKGROUND/DIS CUS SION: The South Linden area has been subject to flooding during heavy storms for some 80 years; causes are either the creek overflowing or floodgates broken storm drain settlement high tides or a combination of all. Since the severe flooding of November 2002, Public Works has retained Carollo Engineers to study the area and together with staff find a solution to the problem (Carollo is retained by the City of South San Francisco for the Wet Weather Program). Two solutions are required an immediate to help with this years projected floods (temporary) and a permanent solution to be constructed beginning May 2004. The area has been surveyed and the design parameter established. This staff report requests approval of the addendum to the contract to enable the contract documents to be completed. FUNDING: Funding will be included in the State Revolving Loan (Wet Weather Program) with the estimated costs having been approved by the state as an addition to their previous commitment. BY: ~'~~ ~?pproved: John Gibbs Michael A. Wils Director of Public Works City Manager ATTACHMENT: Carollo Proposal SG/ed September 11, 2003 Mr. John Gibbs Director of Public Works City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco, CA 94083 Subject: Dear Mr. Gibbs: Proposal to Provide Professional Engineering Services - Wet Weather Program Phase 5 - Linden Avenue Stormwater Improvements Thank you for requesting our proposal to provide final design services for the City of South San Francisco (City) Wet Weather Program, Phase 5 - Linden Avenue Stormwater Improvements. The following is our proposed scope of work, schedule, and hours/cost estimate. UNDERSTANDING The City wants to address the recurring wet weather flooding problems occurring in the area south of Colma Creek. Specifically, Linden Avenue between South Canal Street and Victory Avenue has been identified as the most heavily affected area and needs to be addressed as the highest priority. Deficiencies in the area's stormwater drainage system and required improvements have been discussed with the City and include the following: · Replacing the existing storm drainage pipeline on Linden Avenue (between South Canal Street and Victory Avenue) with a new storm drainage pipeline. · Replacing the existing storm drainage pipeline from the low point on Victory Avenue (about 500 feet west of Linden Avenue) to Linden Avenue. · Adding an interceptor pipeline along Maple Avenue and South Canal Street, connecting the low point on Maple Avenue (about 500 feet south of South Canal Street) to the new pump station. · Adding a pump station near the corner of Linden Avenue and South Canal Street to collect the new pipeline and interceptor storm drainage flows. · Adding two forcemains from the new pump station to Colma Creek. The forcemains will discharge to Colma Creek through a box structure that will be constructed by change order as part of the ongoing San Mateo County Co[ma Creek Channel Improvements Project. The estimated construction cost for these improvements is $5.4 million. SCOPE OF WORK A detailed Scope of Work is attached. Engineering design services will be provided out of our Walnut Creek office. PROJECT TEAM Our project team will include Mike Britten as Partner in Charge/Project Manager and Elaine Chiu as Project Engineer. Mike is intimately familiar with the City's Water Quality Control Plant (WQCP) and V:\ClientS0\So uthSFkLP\LindenStrmWtr [mps\Docs~Letter.doc 2700 YGNACIO VALLEY ROAD, SUITE 300 · WALNUT CREEK, CALIFORNIA 94598 · (925) 932-1710' FAX (925) 930-0208 Mr. John Gibbs City of South San Francisco September 11, 2003 Page 2 the City's sewer and stormwater systems, having completed the final design for the 1998 WQCP Improvements Project. Elaine is also intimately familiar with the City's WQCP, having developed the Operations and Maintenance Manual for the 1998 WQCP Improvements Project. Mike will be the primary contact for this project. He will allocate resources as needed to complete the project and will manage the project scope, schedule, and budget. Elaine will coordinate the preliminary and final design engineering activities. SCHEDULE Our services will be completed according to the following proposed schedule: Task Completion Date Notice to Proceed September 29, 2003 (assumed) Task 1 - Project Management Services Ongoing Task 3 - Preliminary Engineering November 28, 2003 Task 4 - Final Design 30 Percent Submittal January 2, 2004 90 Percent Submittal January 30, 2004 Final Submittal February 13, 2004 Task 5 - VE Coordination January 30, 2004 Task 7 - Bidding Services Print Bid Documents February 27, 2004 COST ESTIMATE The attached table (Exhibit A) provides a breakdown of costs and hours by task and labor classification. Our labor estimates are based on Carollo Engineer's Fee Schedule dated March 1, 2003, which is attached. Thank you for the opportunity to provide engineering services for the City. We would be happy to meet with you to review the proposed scope and estimated costs. We look forward to assisting you in completing this important project. Sincerely, CAROLLO ENGINEERS, P.C~. Michael J. Britten,' ~.E. Partner MJB:jl Enclosures: Scope of Work Labor Cost Estimate Fee Schedule Rasumds Letter.doc SCOPE OF WORK The scope of services for the City of South San Francisco Wet Weather Program, Phase 5 - Linden Avenue Stormwater Improvements includes the following tasks. TASK 1.0 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES Under Phase 1 of the Wet Weather Program (WWP), Carollo assisted the City in preparing an SRF loan application for the overall WWP (Phases 1-4). The required support information, including a mitigated negative declaration, draft revenue program, facility plan, and other planning documents, were submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) along with the application. All of the required support information, including final design documents for review, must be prepared for the Phase 5 loan application. 1.1 - State Revolving Fund (SRF) Loan assistance. Prepare a separate SRF loan application for the Phase 5 work and coordinate the preparation of support information as described under the following tasks. Meet with the SWRCB staff to coordinate the loan application process. One (1) meeting with the SWRCB is assumed. 1.2. Coordination with environmental impact analysis consultant. Provide technical information and coordinate with an environmental consultant (Jerry Haag) contracted with the City for preparation of the amended CEQA documents for Phase 5. It is assumed that a Mitigated Negative Declaration will be required. 1.3 - Coordination with Section 106 federal requirements. Additional work to fulfill Section 106 federal requirements for Phase 5 of the WWP will be required to obtain loan approval for this phase of the WWP. It is our understanding that the City will contract directly with a subconsultant (Holman Associates) to perform the Section 106 work. Carollo's responsibilities for this subtask will consist of the following: Answer questions from the subconsultant regarding limits of construction, proposed methods of construction, and anticipated areas to be disturbed by construction. } Prepare Area of Potential Effect (APE) paaps for the pump station site and for the pipeline alignments. } Prepare written descriptions of the Phase 5 projects. 1.4 - Financing coordination/updates. Coordinate with the financing subconsultant (Bartle Wells Associates) to prepare for and conduct quarterly update meetings with City staff to discuss the status of the SRF loan for the WWP, funding, revenue, etc. It is anticipated that two (2) meetings will be held. They will also be available to answer questions from City staff. V:\Client80\SouthSP, LP\LMdenStrmWtrlmps\Docs\Scope.doc Carollo's responsibilities for this subtask will consist of attending meetings, submitting updated cost estimate information to the subconsultant, and preparing exhibits for the meetings. 1.5 - Hazardous material sampling. Due to the proximity of the project site to Olympian Oil Company, petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in the soil and/or groundwater may exist. Soil and groundwater sampling at the soil boring sites will be conducted by a subconsultant, Bonkowski & Associates, to test for the presence of hazardous materials. 1.6 - Facility plan update. Prepare a Facility Plan for SRF approval based on the existing Master Plan. TASK 2.0 - PERMITTING It is assumed that permitting will be conducted by the City. TASK 3.0 - PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING AND DATA ACQUISITION 3.1 - Develop design criteria. Develop the design criteria for the following improvements to Linden Avenue, Victory Avenue, and South Canal Street identified in the Storm Drainage System Master Plan: Replacing the existing storm drainage pipeline on Linden Avenue (between South Canal Street and Victory Avenue) with a new storm drainage pipeline. · Replacing the existing storm drainage pipeline from the low point on Victory Avenue about 500 feet west of Linden Avenue) to Linden Avenue. Adding an interceptor pipeline along Maple Avenue and South Canal Street, connecting the low point on Maple Avenue (about 500 feet south of South Canal Street) to the new pm-np station. · Adding a pump station near the comer of Linden Avenue and South Canal Street to collect the new pipeline and interceptor storm drainage flows. · Adding two forcemains from the new pump station to Colma Creek. The forcemains will discharge to Colma Creek through a box structure that will be constructed by change order as part of the ongoing San Mateo County Colma Creek Channel Improvements Project. 3.2 - Evaluate pump station location. Finalize the site location for pump station and identify constructability issues. 3.3 - Identify street improvements. Identify existing street features (manholes, gutters, storm drain inlets, interceptor drain pipes, pavement grading, etc.) that will be incorporated into the new system and determine new features that need to be added. 3.4 - Review background information. Obtain and review available background information provided by the City, including storm drainage system maps, utility maps, property maps, and geotechnical data. V:\ClientS0\SouthS ~LP\LindenStrmWtdmps\Docs\Scope.doc 3.5. Field surveying. Obtain supplemental information on existing street features, including invert elevations of manholes, interceptors, etc. Field surveying will be conducted by a subconsultant, Hydmet. 3.6 - Utility search. Obtain locations of sewer, water, electrical, and telecommunications systems based on available utility drawings. 3.7 - Geotectmical field investigation. Conduct soil borings at the pump station and pipeline sites to determine subsurface soil conditions and to provide recommendations for building foundation design criteria (including special pile foundation recommendations) and pipeline trench foundation design. Geotechnical field investigation will be conducted by a subconsultant, DCM JoyaI. TASK 4.0 - FINAL DESIGN 4.1 - Prepare final design documents. Final design drawings and specifications will be prepared for the elements discussed in Task 3.0, Preliminary Engineering and Data Acquisition. It is assumed that Carollo's front-end specifications will be used on the project. Design progress submittals will be made at the 30 percent and 90 percent design stages. Three (3) copies of half-size drawings and specifications will be submitted for City review. TASK 5.0 - VALUE ENGINEERING COORDINATION Coordination with City's value engineering (VE) subconsultant to have 90 percent design drawings and specifications reviewed, incorporate VE recommendations into the final design drawings and specifications. TASK 6.0 - MEETING ATTENDANCE 6.1 - Progress meetings. Attend five progress meetings. Prepare agenda and meeting notes. The purpose of the meetings will be to update the status of design, budget, and schedule and discuss design issues. The meeting notes will serve as progress reports for the City. 6.2 - Presentation to City Council. Attend one City Council meeting to present a description of the final project. Prepare graphics materials for the presentation and handouts for the Council Members. TASK 7.0 - BIDDING SERVICES 7.1 - Print Bid Documents. Print thirty (30) sets of plans and specifications for the bidding process. Costs for more than 30 sets will be provided at additional cost. 7.2- Answer questions from bidders. 7.3- Attend pre.bid meeting and prepare meeting notes. V:\ClientSO\SouthS F\LP\LindenStrmWtrlmps\Docs\Scope.doc 3 7.4- Prepare addenda and distribute to bidders. 7.5- Attend bid opening and review bids. 7.6- Bid award deliverables. 7.7- Conformed drawings and specifications. Prepare conformed drawings and specifications (updated design drawings and specifications to include revisions contained in the addendum~. Three (3) sets of half-size drawings and specifications will be provided to the City. TASK 8.0 - PROJECT CERTIFICATION Prepare a project certification report and conduct facility field testing for SRF reqmrements. DELIVERABLES Progress Meeting Notes 30% Design Submittal 90% Design Submittal Final Bid Documents (Drawings and Specifications) Addenda Bid Results Summary Draft Revenue Program Final Revenue Program SRF Loan Application Number of Copies 3 3 3 30 30 3 10 10 3 SERVICES NOT INCLUDED INTHIS SCOPE 1. Preparation of amended CEQA documents for Phase 5 and any related studies (e.g. a hazardous materials, characterization study), it is assumed that the City will contract with an environmental consultant to perform tl~is work. 2. Design of additional project elements beyond the items listed under Task 3. 3. Construction support and inspection services (to be included under a separate task order if desired by the City). 4. Acquisition of any necessary permits. It is anticipated that the following permits may be required: BCDC, San Mateo County Flood Control District, and Air Quality Management District. It is assumed that permit acquisition will be conducted by the City. V:\Client80\SouthSF\LP\LindenStrmWtrtmps\Docs\Scope.doc 4 5. Additional copies of final drawings and specifications beyond the thirty (30) sets. 6. Property acquisition or condemnation proceedings. V:\Client80\SouthS F~LP\LindenStrmWtrlmps\Docs\Scope.d°c 5 Carollo Labor Hour Estimate: Task Task Description 1.0 Project Management Services 1.1 SRF loan assistance 1.2 Environmental Impact Analysis Coordination 1.3 Coordination pertaining to Section 106 federal requirements 1.4 Financing coordination/updates 1.5 Hazardous Material Sampling Coordination 1.6 Facility Plan 2.0 Permitting 3.0 Preliminary Engineering 4.0 Final Design 5.0 Coordination with City's VE subconsultant 6.0 Meeting attendance 7.0 Bidding services 8.0 Project Certification Report Budget Estimate: Exhibit A LABOR COST ESTIMATE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO WET WEATHER PROGRAM Phase 5 - Linden Avenue Stormwater Improvements Total = 16 8 32 8 8 40 4 8 8 24 16 8 16 2 4 16 32 96 24 by city 8 16 96 21 64 448 277 8 16 8 4 30 24 24 4 8 32 40 16 8 16 4O 143 234 852 349 Labor Costs Classification Hours Partner in Charge (PIC) 143 Project Manager (PM) lEVI) 234 Project Engineer (PE) (EIII) 852 Engineer (E) (EIII) 349 Structural Engineer (SE) lEV) 169 Electrical Engineer lEE) lEV) 229 Drafting (D) (ET VI) 945 Word Processing (W P) 195 Labor Totals = 3,116 S_.~E 24 24 8 8 24 149 213 853 169 8 20 229 945 4 4 24 4 107 4 12 20 8 195 Rate $ 189.00 $ 159.00 $ 131.oo $ 97.00 $ 159.oo $ 159.00 $ 89.00 $ 68.00 Total Amonn~. 64 84 72 40 6 192 164 2,132 40 98 152 72 3,116 27,027 37,206 111,612 33,853 26,871 36,411 84,105 13,260 370,345 Subconsultants Finance/Revenue Program (Barge Wells) Surveying/Hydrology (Hydmet- Jack Humphrey) Geotechnicat (DCM Joyal) Environmental investigation (BonkowskJ & Assoc) Subtotal Fee on Subconsultatnts (10%) Other DJrecl Costs Printing PECE* Mileage Subtotal Fee on ODC's (lO%) 3,116 8 * Project Equipment Communication Expense Subconsugants Total = hrs @ 6.00/hr trips @ 70 mi/trip x $0.36/mi.= ODCs Total Total Proiect = $ $ $ $ $ $ 10,000 20,000 20,000 57,000 ~,700 62,700 7,000 18,696 2O2 25,898 2,590 28,487 461,532 h:\client\southsf_wco\6399a.10\contract~esginPr2.xls 9/12/2003 4:12 PM CAROLLO ENGINEERS, PC FEE SCHEDULE As of March 1, 2003 Northern California Engineers/Scientists Assistant Professional Professional Project Professional Lead Project Professional Senior Professional Technicians Technicians Senior Technicians Support Staff Word Processing / Clerical Project Equipment Communication Expense (PECE) Per DL Hour Other Direct Expenses Travel and Subsistence Mileage Subconsultant Other Direct Cost Expert Witness Hourlv Rate $ 97.00 131.00 159.00 174.00 189.00 69.00 108.00 68.00 6.00 at cost .36/mile cost + 10% cost + 10% Rate x 2.0 This fee schedule is subject to annual revisions due to labor adjustments. H:~KMAN UAL\FEE~Standard~NCAL03.doc Michael J. Britten Education BS Civil Engineering, Arizona State University, 1974 Registration Civil, CaJifornia Professional Affiliations Water Environment Federation American Society of Civil Engineers American Water Workx Association Mr.Britten is a with Carollo partaker Engineers and has ~0 years of experience in master planning, design, and construction management of wastewater facilities. His experience includes: Construction Management · Partner-in-charge for the Daly City Tertiary Recycled Water Facilities project. Carollo completed the design services and is currently providing construction management services for the $6-million project. · Project manager for third-party construction management services for the $29-million Salinas Valley Reclamation Project. The project consisted of a full California Title 22 unrestricted use reclamation facility, an irrigation water storage basin, and a two-mile, 3 I-inch irrigation water supply pipeline. The project provides growers in the Salinas Valley with 30 mgd of irrigation water for crops. Work included maintaining excellent communications with the MRWPCA staff, the contractor, the crop growers, and the wastewater treatment plant staff. Wastewater Treatment · Project manager for planning, permitting and design services for the South San Francisco/San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant Improvement Project. The $42 million project consisted of expanding the existing capacity from 9 mgd to 13 mgd average dry weather flow and providing for wet weather treatment capacity of 62 mgd. Key elements of the project included adding one 110-foot- diameter secondary clarifier, a RAS pumping system, and a bar screen for wet weather flow. · Partner-in-charge for the City of Burlingame, California, wastewater treatment plant improvements project. The project, totaling about $8 million, will include replacement of the aeration system, new blowers, and a sludge dewatering building. Carollo design the project and will be serving as construction managers. - Partner-in-charge/project manager for the City of Turlock, California, nitrification facilities design project. This $8.1 million project included evaluation of alternatives to expand the trickling filter/activated sludge process to permit nitrification. The plant will be expanded to 15.5 mgd by constructing two new aeration basins. In addition, the design converts three existing aeration basins from floating covers to fine bubble aeration. The project also includes the addition of four new 400-hp centrifugal blowers to supply air to the existing aeration basins. · Project manager for master planning, final design, and construction management services for the Sewer Authority Mid- Coastside wastewater treatment plant in Half Moon Bay, California. This project, totaling $17 million, consists of an expansion of the plant to 4 mgd by adding activated sludge, sludge thickening and dewatering, two 55-foot-diameter anaerobic digesters, a new chlorine contact tank, and hypochlorite/bisulfite disinfection system. The project involves a major retrofit of the existing plant and includes providing for full odor control. Work included a desk-top capacity study, full-scale capacity stress testing, and assisting SAM in obtaining a permit from the Coastal Development Commission. · Project manager for the design of the $36 million Union Sanitary District Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade Project in Union City. The project, consisting of activated sludge processes, an 88-foot- diameter anaerobic digester, and sludge thickening facilities, increased plant capacity to 30 mgd. Responsibilities included obtaining State Revolving Fund loans, negotiations with Pacific Gas and Electric to relocate high voltage lines, and obtaining permits from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District · Project manager for the design and construction management services for the $24 million East Bay Municipal Utility District wastewater treatment plant 11- million-gallon wet weather storage basin Michael J. Britten Pa~e ~ project. The project consists of an ! 1-million-gallon storage basin, 120-mgd flow diversion facilities, and an 80-mgd submersible pump station. Constructed on a congested site near the base of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, this project required that over 2,000 piles be driven in poor soils and insitu soil cement shoring systems be used. Responsibilities included overseeing the construction manager and coordinating with the design team. The project received the Design Honor Award by the California Consulting Engineers Council in 1992. · Project manager for the design of a $16 million plant expansion for the North San Mateo County Sanitation District in Daly City, California. The project provides 2.8 million gallons of flow equalization storage basins and new primary sedimentation basins to expand the activated sludge plant from 8 mgd to 10.3 mgd. The equalization basins also provide wet weather flow storage. The project also included a new chlorine contact tank and chlorination/dechlorination system improvements. Because of severe space limitations, the primary sedimentation basins and equalization basins were buried 50 feet underground and covered with a baseball park. An activated carbon scrubber provides odor control for exhaust air. The project received the Engineering and Research Award by the California Water Pollution Control Association, San Francisco Section in 1992. · Project manager for the addition of a 140-foot- diameter secondary clarifier and a new PAS pump station for the City of Turlock, California. The project also included evaluation of the trickling filters for future treatment capacity. · Project enghaeer for design of a $5 million WAS thickening facility and modifications to the primary sedimemation basin influent channels and prechlorination system for EBMUD's main wastewater treatment plant. · Project/construction manager for the City of Sunnyvale's $12.5 million multi-project wastewater plant expansion, including construction of a 30-mgd pump station, primary clarifiers, a dissolved air flotation thickener, a cogeneration system, and dual media filter. As an extension of the City's staff, administrated five construction contracts and three design contracts. Responsible for design review and working closely with the design f'mn to minimize conflicts. Work also included obtaining local building permits and a permit from the Bay Conservation and Development Commission. · Project engineer for design of a $4.5 million, 3.3-mgd oxidation ditch wastewater plant for the City of Magna, Utah. This project included a chlorine contact tank and chlorination facilities. · Project engineer for the City of Phoenix, Arizona, Water Pollution Control Plant 60-mgd conversion to fine bubble diffusion aeration. · Project engineer for design of a 12-mgd, activated sludge secondary treatment facility for the West County Wastewater District, California. · Project engineer for the predesign for expansion of the City of San Diego, California, Point Loma wastewater plant. Facility/Master Planning · Partner-in-charge/project manager for the City of Turlock recycled water feasibility study. The study identified potential uses for recycled water including groundwater recharge and crop/rrigation. The study also developed the required treatment facilities for a 20-mgd recycled plant. · Paxtner-in-charge for the City of Burlingame, California, Wastewater Treatment Facility Study. The study evaluated alternatives for upgrading and expanding the plant to accommodate wet weather flows. The study included a capacity evaluation and a reliability audit of the existing facilities. · Project manager for the wet weather program for the City of South San Francisco. This included an infiltration/inflow analyses and development ora capital improvements program for the collection system and main pump stations. · Project manager for the Sewer Authority Mid- Coastside (SAM) Wet Weather Management Program. The project included monitoring wet weather flows and rainfall in Half Moon Bay, E1 Granada, and Montara to evaluate the wet weather capacity of the intertie pipeline system. The intertie system conveys wastewater from these communities to the SAM treatment plant. Carollo prepared a facility plan that identifies some $8 million in capital improvements. The recommended V:\Re~ume\WCO\Britt craM. doc e rlGi ne e r s Michael J. Britten Pa~e 3 improvements include wet weather storage basins, a parallel force main, and increased capacity for a major pump station. · Project manager for the $9 million City of Fort Bragg Water Source Development Project. The project studied the feasibility of installing a new river intake and raw water pumping station, new raw water transmission pipelines and a 1,500-acre- foot reservoir. Also included in the scope was a recycled.water feasibility study. These facilities would allow Fort Bragg eliminate river diversions ~ from the river in the dry season when flows are low and mum fish bypass flows cannot be maintained. Pumping would occur only during the wet season and excess flow would be stored in the reservoir to satisfy summer demands. Recycled Water · Partner-in-charge for design of the City of Turlock, California, water recycling project. The $ 5 O-million project will consist of tertiary treatment facilities to provide 20 mgd of recycled water meeting Title 22 tertiary requirements. Recycled water will be distributed to growers via a 60-inch, six mile long pipeline. Publications/Presentations Reddy, S.P., Swanback, S.G., and Britten, M.J. "Using Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis to Increase Disinfection Capacity of Wastewater Reclamation Plants." Paper presented at the California Section of the WateKeuse Association 2003 Annual Conference, San Francisco, CA, February 26-28, 2003. Petit, J-M., Vanier, S.M., and Britten, M.J. "Use of High Rate Flocculation/Sedimentation and Cloth Disk Filtration for Water Reuse." Paper presented at the Rocky Mountain Section of the American Water Works Association/Rocky Mountain Water Environment Association 2002 Annual Conference, Steamboat Springs. CO, September 15-18, 2002. Britten, M.J., Bourgeous, K.N., and Petit, J-M. "Evaluation of Enhanced Flocculation and Cloth Disk Filter for California Title 22 Reuse." Paper presented at the 2002 WateReuse Symposium, Orlando, FL, September 8-11, 2002. Britten, M.J., and Madden, D. "Adding Nitrification to An Existing Trickling Filter/Activated Sludge Process at the City of Tm:lock." Paper presented at the California Water Environment Association 2001 Annual Conference, Palm Springs, CA, April l 8-20, 2001. Britten, M.J., and Parlin, L.G. "Interim Capital and Operational Improvements for Increased Treatment Reliability at the South San Francisco/San Bruno Water Quality Control Plant." Paper presented at the Nevada Water Pollution Control Association Annual Conference, Reno, NV, March 6-8, 1996. Br/tten, M.J. "Determining Treatment Capacity at Sewer Authority Mid-Coastside." Paper presented at the Water Environment Federation Conference, Anaheim, CA, October I993. Britten, M. J. "Design and Construction of the East Bay Municipal Utility District Wet Weather Storage Basin." Paper presented at the Water Environment Federation Wet Weather Specialty Conference, Indianapolis, IN, 1992. Britten, M.J. "Put It Under the Park - Design Features of the Daly City Underground Wastewater Treatment Facility." Paper presented at the Water Environment Federation Conference, October 1989. Britten, M.J. "Odor Control for Sludge Processing." Paper presented at the 1st Annual Water Pollution Control Residuals Conference, Los Angeles, CA, 1987. Elaine Chiu Education BS Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 1998 MS Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2000 Registration Professional Engineer, California Professional Affiliations California V~ater Environment Association Water Environment Federation Ms. Chiu is experienced at planning and designing water and wastewater treatment facilities. Project experience includes: Wastewater Treatment · Project engineer for the $8 million Wastewater Treatment Plant Improvements Project for the City of Burlingame, California. Responsibilities include design ora new aeration system, new blowers, and a new waste gas flare. Currently project engineer for the construction management services provided by Carollo Engineers. · Project engineer for the City of Cambria, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant Biosolids Dewatering Project preliminary design. Responsibilities include preparing preliminary design drawings, preliminary prequalification specifications, and a cost analysis. · Project engineer for the City of Atwater, California, Wastewater Treatment Plant dechlorination facilities. Responsibilities include designing a 21,000-gallon contact basin for dechlorination of plant effluem with calcium thiosulfate. · Engineer for the Cities of South San Francisco and San Bruno, California, $42 million Water Quality Control Plant Improvement Project. Responsible for preparation of the operation and maintenance manual. Previous Experience · While with another firm, Ms. Chiu served as an engineer completing env/ronmental, civil, and geotechnical projects for various clients. Analyzed pH impact on disinfection by-product formation in the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC), California, distribution system. Prepared recommendations and a conceptual cost estimate for a pump station upgrade. Designed the drainage collection system and utility connections for a San Francisco Zoo building. Compiled, huput, and analyzed water quality data for Information Collection Rule and Lead and Copper Rule Compliance for the SFPUC. Performed geotechnical investigations, deep foundation capacity analysis, and pavement design reconamendations. · Environmental engineering student trainee for the City and County of San Francisco, California, Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant. Assisted in planning and coordinating City construction and design projects. Prepared a scope of work for upgrading plant odor control units. Researched and prepared a draft protocol for an odor sampling study. Revised an Odor Control Unit guidance document. Conducted odor sampling surveys in nearby residential community. · Co-op student for the Delta Diablo Sanitation District, California, Engineering Department. Assisted in plant evaluation studies and analysis of disinfection problem. Coordinated the interdepartmental implementation of a plant capacity study. Prepared an evaluation report of plant chlorination system. Assisted in developing a protocol for evaluating trial chlorination equipment. Performed laboratory analyses of District wastewater. v:xR .... xwcoxcu~E.doc ~ cor'oI..I..O,,.,,,,~..,,.,