Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 04/27/1959 The regular meet et the leutlt was called te erder br Council of the Francisco at 8 Francisco" Commission Roll Call: Present, Absent, Chairman Robertson omissions the , Wells correetiG'D.s or " CommiesiDaer to state , Paragraph 7, he 11 Dot prohibit r8volv- ordinance should be would like the that 08 the same pale, in the tenth the :first word should read "add" than ct There were DO or corrections to tlteMinutes.. ener Martinez the Minutes be Commissioner Seconded the mot all Commissioners present. Commission recemmendat were to with The objections to . lard! replied that when YQU provide tandem parking YQU create a hardship on the part of one of the tenants. the f tenant wisheste move his car he must first contact the person has parked behind him this ereates confusion unnecessary ship upon both tenants concerned. believes that be provided in such away as to prevent confusion en part of anyone of the tenants that each tenant should have direct aec~ss te the street. Chairman Robertson with. it Winslow if he enough te provide an garage for the unit which he was propesing to build. . Winslow replied that he thirty feet (30') of pavement back of his building line that some arrangement can be made for on the property. The Chairman asked . Winslow to work out some arrangement the situa.tioD reminded that the ord,inaace requires to one (1) space for each dwelling unit that she dues not that the parking spaces should tie se arranged as to baye one in of another. She ed. the applicant to work the parking IUl'angement out witb the Engineerfts InspectioD Departments. She then ordered that the application be held over censideration at the next meet of the Cemmission. C" Variance Application (continued) asked 10na1 The Planning Commission considered the of Oliver Gagliallli. Avenue, Francisco, fora five foot (5') separation n dwelling detached instead of required ten feet parts of Lots 9 t Viewmont Terrace. Cha Commissioner if he a chanee to loek at the property question. Commissioner Gardner replied tbt he could Det II since 1t is one of a series of \lnde\lloped lots. Robertson then asked if there was in represent the applicant. III replied. asked there was the against the applicant(ll ODe replied III replied that having studied the ion no objection to the variance being granted. Commission Braden moved to close the hearing. motion. mmis.ioner the application as present. Commissioners n Oliver Gagliani Va~lance Application the the Resolution III " , " Robertson , , required III presentG anyone the audience were application. one G was Commission lOf 1 ~ :3 PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued): Commissioner Martinez stated 'that this application was similar to these previously received the area wherein a three foot 9) sideyard was of common occurance that he saw no reason the applica- tion to maintain the exist sideyard sheuld not be GJ Commissioner .. meved that the pub11e heart be closed. Commissioaer Martinez secDnded the motion. Commissioner 1118Z intreduced Resolution granting tbe application aspresented. Roll Call: Ayes, Commissioners Noes t n Absent, to Stanley JI!I Hendzel Variance Application (continued) e , , .artiDez, None Christensen, Claar, Wells Francisco, to three (3) vehieles. Robertson Commission next opened the Public of Charlotte Nicholas, Avenue, South facilities for tWQ (2) instead of Charlotte Nicholas Variance audience. " N if MrsG Nicholas was in the replied that he was representing then speak lea- " that there is a double the rear of the provides space homes, one on rear the lot ODe on the front of , that the ieant wishes to build an additional dwelling unit on tile property without providing a parking space for it. .. Barrick replied the proposed dwell replace a portion of that shou.ld be The Chairman asked structure the front of the constructed as well. " replied that the retaining wall along the economically feasible for Commissioner Gardner said that that if the were you would merely be another car on t street not favor such aD that the Public seconded motion. eemmissioDer lDtreduced Resolution that the a.pplication be t Commissioners " closed" , Absent, , , " Christensen, Claar, lJ The the Public application Mateo, for a three foot (20") Pines there was the application. was representing audience there 'Was application" CommissioDer Pines Subdivision was the variaDces necessary The Chairman then for to grade the foot (20') level rear Commissioner were not a variance structure. irmatively. stated that at the t it was if this on an exist replied the 10D that all time. were RidgemoDt Builders, Inc. Variance Application (continued) twenty It .. replied that it be extremely difficult te SOe acres more lots were still to be developed It Griffin replied clear lots. stated before that they their land. G Neville stated subdivision was no more variances would. .be Commissioner inez variaeeeswere coatemplated. replied that about seven (7) subdividers should be aware undertake to develOp their to the Ordinance as they the time the t IDe",. after that time. Mr. Griffin requests that ODe more necessary to pointed out that more than total rear space preseat to the Commissio that the seeondedthe motion. Martinez iatroduced the application q) lommissloners " None u 01) t Wells of the applieat present. his the applicl.t (20 ') between that because there was enc was presentGl he was. 1rman wished to there was anyone the application. the one Warren Brentlinger Variance Applicat (continued) construct structure as a neath , Absent, " Noae Christensen, Claar, Is Application The the Application a series t City, on properties designated as Lots 9" Sterl Terrac80 Robertson to speak mas McCoy, some objections the differences between be settled between themselveso The City to 's was the audience the Francisco, , he icant could particular the City" the site Commissioner elasedo Commissioner be , Robertson , Page by Herbert The Commission then considered the tentative Terrace No. ,submitted Sterling terrace No. Tentative there been any received mit more t Chairman to the meet Robertson Request Cemmission then of there was anyone in the one replied. that both the Director approved of the re-subdi- constitute enough motioD that the submitted. Commiss all Commissioners fram the E.. F. Houghten Permit The the E. F.. Commission then cODsidered ion Street, , chemical plant at 1500 industrial oil District" to the Commission the that nO new construct was the enly reason the Use Permit was that the eils lammable materials is involved. G Gomez pointedout that the operations of the Company involved very lar to those of the on the a acent property. stated that the be stor metaleontainers Commissioner stated that the inspect the building premises before stated that aD iospeet the Department. the questiens materials oDe of the . t . n , , G enter the into the therefore will fJ n CommissioD of , (continued): Reno Julio i The Commission then Use Permit considered Use application of Reno Julio Donati, 599 West QraDge Avenue, Francisee., for the establishment of a cocktail lounge rest;auraDt enapertion of Parcel A, South. San Francisco Assesser's lIap . 11, Dear the seuthwest corner of :11 Oami"no Real Camaritas ,a C-l District. The Chairman if the .pplicaals were present. Ju.lie was present as well as his architect~ Robert . Commissioner only source ingress . Batchelor replied that it was al.o pi the alley by the side of the ieateasen Camaritas Avenue. CommiSSioner replied that be had investigated the the applicat that he found no objections. that some of bumper guard should be placed creek eo the rear the . '? Batehelor . It inquired about the City aDd County San Francisco Water Department nt of tneproperty. 8 Batchelor t beeo. secured the Water Department to use facilities area of easemeo.t. Robertson Real was the ble to use Liquors to 'Was ion COD- an excess two , t.. , the 3. secured OD the these facil1t Call: Ayes, Noes, Absent, , t , n ~ tinued): 100 Bush Street, from Lot 1, 1, to Lot 1, in aD Chairman comments to The then considered application Utah Construction Company, SaD Francisco, for the re-location of exist Block , South Francisco Industrial Block 2, South San District. Utah Construction Use Perm-it No. No. Commissioner Martinez . nez, n None ChristeDsen, Glaar, Wells CommissioD then took there-subdivision 1"e- Carbone, 11, of ic of the possession. e Carbone was audience. that he was represent the motion it was 10 Commission request of the West ising Company, six (6) outdoor of South San The eonsidered. Coast Street, Francisco, the erection tisingstructures on Parcel '7, AssereulJorfls FranciscG aoDis'tlict. West Coast Advert Company Use wished. to above if he , t Absent, u Christensen, Wells , e , the allow the 2 ~ 11 . & then sf Foster Street, to low Franci.sco, a minor Strueture near Airport their n ~ . , 12 the Director of that the portions above inter-office '8 request"the the Francisco ic 19 Inter ice , dated April 21, ~ Commission approve the Record , Bloc~,2, Regli Tract. The.Commisslon from. ,and the read the letter dated addressed to the City cancer.ad. . . the Ayes, Noes, Absent, n ,. , , plan No.3" filed CIl the Director tneCity Council South San 3. Letter Improvement Commission hospital 11, , from the Serra , suggesting act the the establishment of a second filed. South Meet District. 1 " , to write include street ....street y Conference Center, Street, . , , to Commission in the Master fileda Minutes 13 tJ Council accnouncement of anDual 's Capri , Baylor includes a on the . Tri meeting Friday, May 1, Street, San Francisco. De.sign" of Junipere "Director, Clara and f t Count Director, of the County . at the County to have a tbe prep.ration of a il, Legislative ice, . t County ) I 1 a 'letter oidental , con- eitber 1J , City Gl ,milt 10: p. m.