Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 11/23/1967 - 1 - M I NUT E S of meet the Francisco Commiss 8:00 P'l>M.. November , 1967 , South San Francisco, Cal Council Chambers, MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Mammin,i, Commissioners Bob1 Gardner, Lazzari Roisati, Zlatunich and Chairman i MEMBERS .. .. None PRESENT: City Planner and isco Planning stan t to the South sion, Daniel M.. I \I> VanSteen Building Inspector MINUTES PREVIOUS of meeting of October 23, 1967 Commissioner Z1atunich moved that the minutes of the meeting of the South Francisco Planning Commission of 23, 1967 be Commissioner Lazzari; passed by the fo t, i None ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING RECORDING OF .. to Chairman to ion the time - 304 - 2 on from A.. a t the SECTIONS 4..ll D 4. AMENDED, 'ZONING SCOfH which appeared on the agenda at ir meeting held Tuesday, October 24, 67.. At by mot duly adopt matter was referred to Commission a and recomrnendat to the SAN Council that time, n read the proposed t, to AMENDING SECTIONS 4.. 4..48 AMENDED, ENTITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE SAN .. .. the c san franc co AMENDMENT SECTION 4..l1(a) of Ordinance No.. 353 as amended, entitled City South Francisco,' Sect amended to : commerc , industry--minimum one and not less, (1) teen hundred (1500) square of or for warehousing, storage, manufacture, uses.. AMENDMENT OF SECTION 4.l1( SUBSECT ion 4.1l(a) hereby amended by adding 0 following ion 4.11)- 1 -street lots 1 with the standard requirements. The Architectural Committee may approve maximum ten ( ) percent in and standard requirements where deviations would clearly and materially improve the aesthet ical plants or uses, where mat ly impair the off-street parking AMEHDMENT OF 4. off-street parking lots 1 comply with f s requirements.. The Architectural Committee may maximum ten (lO) percent deviations in s requirements where deviations would clearly and material improve the aesthetics of the ical or uses, and where said deviations would not mat ly impair the f- street parking capacity thereof. EFFECTIVE DATE AND PUBLICATION: ordinance 1 be in full force and effect days from and the date of final passage and approval. The Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and cause the same to be publi,shed in the Enterprise-Journal as by law \I> " Planner Pass further read findings made by his office concerning the instant matter with the analysis thereof and the recommendations of his off ,to wit: "TijE INSTANT MATTER. The City Counc meeting in regular seSSl.on on Tuesday, October 24, 1967, idered the. Planning Commission's recommendation that the proposed amendments to Sections 4.11 and 4.48 of the Zoning Ordinance, pertaining to off-street regulations in the City's ., C-3, -M, 1, M-2, and H Districts, be enacted into ordinance. The Council, during its consideration of the proposed legislation, suggested changes therein, and referred the tant matter and suggested changes to the Commission for s report and recommendations thereon. The said suggested changes were embodied in the attached, proposed ordinances prepared by John Noonan, Esq. While the City Counc finds that the Commission's proposed 'standards' are tenable, this body does suggest that the parking requirements for industrial uses be established on the basis of one -street parking space per 1500 sq.ft. of floor area thereof, and one space for each two persons employed there Under the original proposal, one space for each three employees, and one space for each 1000 sq. ft. of area would be required. Furthermore, under the suggestions of the Council, Archi- Committee would be empowered to approve maximum ten percent, not twenty-five percent deviations. ANALYSIS. The City Council's suggestions are designed to improve off-street parking patterns in the City's industrial and quasi-industrial areas.. Said suggestions recognize the need to increase the. amount of off-street parking required for warehouses and industrial uses which are characterized by small employment. These suggestions, however, manifest the Coune 's recognition of a greater problem-- the industr plant which manned by many employees. The Councilfs studies have indicated that the eroding parking patterns of some of the area's industrial complexes are not caused by material storage, but by employees in processing and manu- facturing goods. The writer feels that Council's proposals are city-planning wise. These proposals, which place emphasis upon employment, are harmonious with legislat ,. orderly California cities, includ Mateo, Redwood ,Petaluma and the ion is recommended City Caunc that a modif of the ions 4.ll and 4.48 of no one further to or t amendment, Chairman Raffae declared public on this matter closed and solicited~ comments from the Commissioners. further comments by any of the i asked for the introduct 1 vote thereon. Commiss of a mot on Commiss to the C as a Mammini moved, findings the Council that of the 4.ll and 4.48 of the seconded by Commissioner City Planner to recommend to quest be ed amendments to inance .. The mot was passed by the following call vote: .. .. Mammini, and Raffae Gardner, ati, ich Noes: None Absent: - 3 - 3 - 8 recommendat or to land or building circumstances or condit or the same dist the application is necessary for substantial property rights tances or con- to not 4. with the 5 & The diff with 6.. the applicat wi not, icular case, materially affect adverse persons residing or working of the applicant, and of particular case, welfare or to neighborhood. the requested variance will be harmony e of the Zoning Ordinance.. is necessary to prevent hardships and results of the alley along infeasible, have been granted the South meet the - 4 - 9 , 1967 Request , to permit the construct of a two story, s unit apartment house on a building site which has less than the required area therefore, located at 553, Miller Avenue, the R-3 District. City Planner Daniel M. Pass, read a report from his office, with the llowing findings, to wit: "Since the applicant has more than half of the area required for his sixth unit, and the approval of the variance would not constitute a material detriment to the immediate area ques- tion, is recommended that the Commission grant the instant request.. This grant would serve the cause of land economy in the City's Central Community, and prevent an unnecessary hard- ship..u Present was the applicant, Mr.. Robert Pioli of 1384 Alemany Blvd.., Francisco, California.. There hein,g: no one else further to speak for or as:z:ainst the . requesf, Gna1.rman Raf:taeli1. aeclarea the puol1.c h?:!ar1.ng on thJ.s matter closed and solicited comments from the Commissioners.. There being no further comments by any of the other Commissioners, Chairman Raffaelli asked for a motion on the matter and a roll call vote thereon. Commissioner Mammini moved, seconded by Commissioner Lazzari, to adopt the findings of the City Planning Office and to approve the application as requested. The motion was passed by the following roll call vote: Ayes: Mammini, Boblitt, Gardner, Lazzari, Rosati, Zlatunich and Raffaelli Noes: None Absent: None - 309 - .... 5 .... PM-22 , 1967 Parcel Map of Joseph Ragni and Sons, representing a subdivis approximately 22,500 sq.. ft.., at 187 Country Drive, the District, into two lots. City Planner Daniel M. Pass read the report of his office the fo find, to wit: UThe proposed rearrangement of two lots would create two, usable 'fR_3'f building sites. Said rearrangement meets the minimum requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, and would not affect adjoining lands.. The proposed lots meet the R....3 District regulations. light the above factors, it is recommended that the parcel map question be approved, subject to the requirements of the Chief Building Inspector, and the City Engineer.." City Planner Pass next read an Interoffice Memorandum from Assistant Public Works Engineer, Joseph E.. Neville, October 27, 1967, to wit: "The Tentat cel Map as submitted is a proposed subdivision of Lots & l2, Block HAn which is actually a resubdivision Parcel ich was recorded on August 7, 1967, Volume 3 Page 30" The northerly dimension of socalled lot #13 should show one dimens 168,,50'0 Adjacent lot #9 shown dotted is correct but also shown dotted should be Block A, Map No.. 1 County Club Park as shown on previous Pa.reel Map.. recommended that the full width of Alida Street be shown indicating the new centerline and dimensions and a 0 the complete width of Country Club Drive be drawn in.. shmvn on Parcel Map previously approved Volume 3 page 30 recorded August 7th 1967, it recommended that again the monuments, such as pipe, chisel marks and etc.. established or found should again be shown on the final Parcel Map when it is submitted approval by the Director of Public Works." City Planner Pass read next a further communication from Mr. Neville, dated November l, 1967, to wit: nSupplement to Memo to Planning Commission dated October 27, 1967. In discussion with Louis Arata, the engineer who tentative map for the above-listed subject, with the requirements of the memo but requested the.se incorporated the This satisfactory this office; and, therefore, recommended that the Planning Commission map subject to the changes being made on n City then read an Building Inspector G. L.. Roz Memorandum from Chief dated October 26, 1967, to have reviewe.d Plat No. Al-692A dated October 19, 1967 for the resubdivision of 11 and l2, Block A as shown on Parcel Map 1 3, Page 30 a resubdivis 8, Block , No. 1 Count Club Park and recommend the following correct made Map. 2 to 15. 2. t lett , and subdivision 13 and Lot 9 respect lot dimens ,86.50' property line 3& 4", 82.. 00 f , and 5. Block indicate Map.u and Page of Mr.. was J.. Ragni, l34 on Street, Daly City, . one e e Raffael so ited i , to mot 1 vote: .. .. i, 1 i .. .. - 311 - 6 - 'll \l!I and cons Welfare or other matters erest, that next regular meet co Planning Commission would he , 1967 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers South San Francisco, Californiae The meeting was adjourned at 8:34 P.M. t Chairman Commission San Francisco niel M. , Secretary Planning Commission City of South San Franc co fvs - 312 -