Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 08/14/1970 MINUTES August 24, 1970 of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission TIME: 8:00 P.M. DATE: August 24, 1970 PLACE: Council Chambers, City Hall South San Francisco, California MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Campredon, Commissioners Boblitt, Raffaelli, Rosati, and Chairman Lazzari MEMBERS ABSENT: Gardner and Zlatunich ALSO PRESENT: City Planner and Secretary to the South San Francisco Planning Commission, Daniel M. Pass Assistant Planner William A. Timmons Assistant City Engineer Raymond Maxwell Building Inspector Austin Lynch MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting ofA.isrqJ,1s,t 10, 1970. Commissioner Rosati moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission of August 10, 1970, be approved; seconded by Vice Chairman Campredon; passed by the following roll call vote: AYES: Campredon, Boblitt, Raffaelli, Rosati, and Lazzari NOES: None ABSENT: Gardner and Zlatunich ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING TAPE RECORDING OF MEETING Chairman Lazzari announced that this meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission would be recorded on ~apeF but that anyone who wished to come before the Commission in order to be heard, but objected to having his voice recorded in this manner, could request the Chairman to order the tape recorder turned "off" for the duration of the time that he is speaking or is heard. - 1186 - UP-101 August 24, 1970 UP-101, use-permit request of Rotary Plaza to establish a senior-citizen, retirement center on the southwesterly side of Alida Way, between Country Club Drive and Ponderosa Road, in the "U" District. Secretary Pass read the following reports and letter into the record. Report and recommended "Findings and Condi ti ons" of Ci ty Planner Pass. "It is respectfully recommended that the Planning Commission adopt the findings embodied in the attached, Official Action Report, and approve the requested use permit upon the condition that the applicant comply with the attached requirements of the reporting department heads, and the subsequent requirements of the Archi tectura1 Commi ttee. " FINDINGS: "1. The establishment, maintenance, operation or the use of the building or lands for which the permit is sought will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. "2. The approval of the requested use permi t meets the require- ments of Section 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance. "3. The development of the proposed center would help meet the growing need of local seni~r citizens for low-rental, well-designed housing. "4. The said proposed center would be characteri zed by sound si te planning, and served by ample landscaped open space." CONDITIONS: "The applicant shall comply wi th the attached requirements of the reporting department heads, and the subsequent requirements of the Archi tectura1 Commi ttee . " Report, dated August 17, 1970, of Robert L. Maxey, Superintendent, Recreation and Park Department "UP-101 has been reviewed by those in this department who work most closely with Senior Citizens, individuals and groups. Upon review of the structure the feeling was expressed that the apart- ments are adequate and the hope is held by all that rents can be held within reason for the Senior Citizens. This department has no other comments concerning UP-101." Report, dated August 17, 1970, of Louis H. Goss, Director of Public Works "It is recommended that approval of this permit be subject to the review and approval by this office of the complete improvement plans. Said plans should contain, but not be limited to, plot and grade plans showing drainage, sanitary sewer, and all other necessary utility connections." - 1187 - UP-101 August 24, 1970 Letter, dated August 20, 1970, from Joseph Vestuto, 141 West 3rd Avenue, San Mateo, California. "Attention: City Planner - Mr. Daniel Pass "Re: Rotary Plaza Senior Citizens Retirement Center "Gent1emen: Since I will not be able to attend the Planning Commission meeting on Monday, August 24 I would like to express a favorable vote for this project. "As I'm sure you are aware, my property abuts this project on over 500 feet of common frontage and it is my opinion that this development will upgrade the area in general and my property in particular. "Very truly yours, Is! Joseph Vestuto" Mr. Paul Mark1ing, AIA, and agent of the applicant was present and presented a colored rendering of the proposed Rotary Plaza Senior Citizens Retirement Center. The Commission was further advised by Mr. Mark1ing, that the Rotary Plaza Center would consist of 181 units, with 43 one-bedroom units and 138 studio units. All units, he stated, would be equipped with kitchens. Mr. Mark1ing noted, that the 3 AC+ p~rce1 would be covered 21% by buildings and include 79% of open, landscaped areas, which alone would cost between $25 to $35,000. He further advised the Commission, that there would be a common dining room, game rooms, private garden areas, 60 parking stalls, and that he did not feel that the density of the proposed development was excessive. Chairman-Lazzari then opened the public hearing thereon. Mr. E. M. Schaffran, Housing Consultant for Rotary Plaza, and advocate of the project, spoke at length regarding the proposed senior-citizen retirement center. Mr. Schaffran advised the Commission, that funds have been reserved by the Federal Government, under Section 236 of the National Housing Act, and the total expected cost of the project is $3,421,900. He further noted, that it is a community project, and to date some $61,000 has been spent to bring the project up to this point. The Housing Consultant noted that there is a great neeD for a projeQt such as Rotary Plaza for the elderly and physically-handicapped in the community. Mr. Schaffran advised the Commission, that the minimum age limit would be 62 years for a single person, or 62 years for one member of a married couple. He further noted that the minimum age limit would not apply to the physically handicapped. Income limits, Mr. Schaffran noted would be $4,500 per annum for a single person and $5,400 per annum for a married couple. The Housing Consultant noted, that the project would receive an interest reduction subsidy, under Section 236 from the Federal Government, and - 1188 - UP-10l August 24, 1970 the rents would be about cut in half. Mr. Schraffran advised the Commission that the expected rental costs are as follows: 1. 123 Studio units - $89 per month 2. 15 Studio units (with sleeping alcoves) - $98 per month 3. 43 One-bedroom units - $112 per month Mr. Schraffran further noted, that there is an additional subsidy avacblab}.e tp a prpffiect pftlJu:bs Jt.dJIfld,emtmt}.ed "The Rent Supplement Program", for possibly 40% of the units whereby the rents will be in the $30 to $40 per month range. The Housing Consultant presented the Commission with a parking study of 16 similar projects in the State of Qalifornia and noted that the average ratio of autos owned was 20.8% of the total units. He further advised that Commission that Mr. Markling had provided 60 parking spaces, a ratio of one to three, which is more than adequa~e. Mr. Bill Meehan, President of the Board of Directors of Rotary Plaza, advised the Commission of the considerable time and expense that had been put into the project, and asked the Commission for its whole- hearted support of the project. Since no one appeared to speak against the proposed project, Chairman Lazzari closed the public hearing thereon and solicited comments from the Commission. Upon questions by Commissioner Rosati and Vice Chairman Campredon, Mr. Schaffran advised the Commission, that in addition to a kitchen in each unit, one nutritional meal on a non-profit basis would be served in the dining room. The Housing Consultant further noted, that no medical or nursing facilities are incorporated in the Rotary Plaza Center. Secretary Pass, upon a question by Commissioner Boblitt, advised the Commission that the City and County of San Francisco underground water easement provides the landscaping and parking for the project. The Secretary, also noted, that Rotary Plaza had been annexed into the City. Upon a query by Commissioner Rosati, Mr. Schaffran advised the Commis- sion, that a Supreme Court Ruling prohibits residency requirements for the project; however most local people have filed applications for Rotary Plaza. Mr. R. L. Maxey, upon a question by Vice Chairman Campredon, advised the Commission, that since the project is a private development, no public park facilities are included within Rotary Plaza. City Planner Pass expressed concern regarding the availability of nearby shopping areas for the residents, and Mr. Schaffran advised the Commission, that Rotary Plaza would have a Manager, adequate staff and he anticipated that delivery service could be made available from stores in the area to the residents therein. - 1189 - UP-10l August 24, 1970 Mr. Pass advised the Commission, that after considerable studies of similar projects, the Planning Department would prefer to see the residents who own autos in Rotary Plaza, limited to 40; thus leaving 20 parking spaces for staff and guests. Mr. Schaffran concurred wi th the City Planner and noted that he had no objection to this condition. Upon a query by vice Chairman Campredon, City Planner Pass advised the Commission, that under the "u" District there is no set parking requirements, and the Planning Commission must tailor make everything; and that the U District is the most planned of all districts. Mr. Pass further noted that the density of the 3 AC~ parcel has an extremely high density which is 60 units per acre and is higher than the density allowable under the R-3 District. There being no further comments by the Comrrdssion, Chairman Lazzari asked the Comrrdssion for a motion. Commissioner Rosati moved, that the Planning Commission adopt the "Findings" and "Conditions" as set forth in the preliminary Official Action Report, and approve UP-10l, upon the conditions that the appli- cant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads,and the subsequent requirements of the Architectural Committee, and also that the applicant shall limit the number of residents with cars to 40; the motion was seconded by Comrrdssioner Boblitt; passed by the following roll call vote; Bgss.: Campredon, Boblitt, Raffaelli, Rosati, and Lazzari Noes: None Absent: Gardner and Zlatunich - 1190 - UP-162 August 24, 1970 UP-162, use-permit request of Park 'n Fly to locate an appurtenant, 600 square-foot sign at No. 101 Terminal Court, in the M-2-H District. Secretary Pass read the fo1wowing reports into the record. Report and recommended "Findings" of Ci ty Planner Daniel M. Pass "The Planning Department respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the findings listed in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report, and approve the requested use permit." FINDINGS: 1/1. The establishment, maintenance)' operation or the use of the building or lands for which the permit is sought will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improve- ments in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. "2. The approval of the requested use pf2;J?tmit meets the require- ments of Section 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance. " 3. The instant reques t is supported by the 1573' of Bayshore Freeway frontage of the locus in quo, and the eight-acre size thereof. "4. The applicant's land use requires considerable freer",ay identification for survival. "5. The existing signs on the subject premises are partially obscured by the proliferation of signs on the adjacent Barrett complex. "6. The sign copy of the proposed appurtenant sign would be aesthetic in character. Report, dated August 4, 1970, of Chief of Police Salvatore Rosano HReference noted subject, this Department foresees no police problem incidental to this installation. Therefore, we have no objection at this time. 11 Present for the applicant was Mr. George Britt, QRS Neon)' agent of the app1icanty who advised the Commission that he would be pleased to answer any questions pertaining to UP-162. There being no one to speak for or against the proposed use permit, Chairman Lazzari closed the public hearing and solicited comments from the Commission. Commissioner Raffaelli expressed concern that the proposed sign f",ou1d be approximately in the same location as the billboard denied recently by the Planning Commission. City Planner Pass advised the Commission that the proposed sign was an appurtenant sign and not a billboard. Upon a query by Vice Chairman Campredon, Mr. Britt advised the Commission that the sign would not have a "Reader Board" and ~1/ou1d be "Permanent Copy". Mr. Britt also noted that the sign would be located 22' westerly of the indicated location on the plot plan, because the State would be taking more land for freeway purposes. - 1191 - UP-162 August 24, 1970 The proposed sign, Mr. Britt noted, would be 527'+ southerly of Park 'n Fly's entrance sign. He further noted, that no landscaping would be removed from the parking area. The City Planner advised the COmnUssion, that with the approval of the proposed appurtenant sign, Park 'n Fly's total sign area would approxi- mate 900 to 950 square feet, and that this amount would be tenable with Park ' n Fly's 1573' of Freeway frontage and their 8 AC:!:.. parcel of land. There being no further discussion by the Commission, Chairman Lazzari asked the Commission for a motion. Commissioner Boblitt moved that the Planning Commission adopt the "Findings" embodied in the preliminary Official Action Report, and locate the proposed sign 22' to the West of the sign site indicated on the plot plan attached thereto; and approve UP-162; seconded by Commissioner Rosati and approved by the following roll call vote: Ayes: Boblitt, Rosati and Lazzari Noes: Vice Chairman Campredon and Raffaelli Absent: Gardner and Zlatunich - 1192 - UP-:-163 August 24, 1970 UP-163, use-permit request of Texaco, Inc., to redevelop an existing service station at the southeasterly corner of Mission Road and Holly Avenue, in the "u" District. Report and recommended "Findings" of City Planner Daniel M. Pass "The Planning Department respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the findings and action embodied in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report." "FINDINGS: "1. The establishment, maintenance, operation or the use of the building or lands for which the permit is sought will, under the ci~cumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. "2. The approval of the requested use permit would not meet the requirements of Section 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance. "3. The proposed, redeveloped station would not be consonant with the orderly and aesthetic character of its residential service area - the Sunshine Gardens Neighborhood. "4. The proposed, redeveloped service station would not be consistent with the land-use and aesthetic standards of the service stations recently approved for establishment in this municipality." Report, dated August 13, 1970, of Augustine Terragno, Captain of Police "We hereby recommend that the new driveway approach onto Holly Avenue not be permitted due to the following: "1. Dangerous for pedestrians from apartment house walkway which would be in center "2. Dangerous for two-way vehicular traffic. Egress is upgrade, causing even more problems due to vision with present con- crete [",all from apartment house." Report, dated August 17, 1970, Landscape Specialist John E. Hoffman If The landscape plan for subject property does not conform to the Ci ty' s minimum design standards for landscaping. To conform the plan should inc1 ude : "1. Six foot wide planters extended the length of the northwest and southwest property lines. This will eliminate the proposed northerly driveway on Holly Street. "2. Additional street trees. "3. C'hange of sidewalk on Mission Street to conform to existing sidew-a1ks on adjoining properties, with planting areas extended to edge of new sidewalk." Mr. Timothy J. Hearst, agent of the applicant, was present, and advised the Commission that Texaco, Inc., has a nationwide plan to remodel their service stations, with landscaping, paint and fieldstone facing. - 1193 - UP-163 August 24, 1970 Since there was no one to speak for or against the proposed use permit, Chairman Lazzari closed the public hearing thereon and solicited comments from the Commission Considerable discussion ensued among the Commissioners regarding the proposed new driveway, in the easement area, adjacent to the apartment house complex. Vice Chairman Campredon noted, that by adding the proposed driveway on Holly Avenue, there would be two lanes of traffic from the apartments, two lanes from the service station, plus two sidewalks involved and this would create a hazardous situation in the area. City Planner Pass concurred with the Vice Chairman and the Police Department's report, and further noted that the Landscape Specialist desired to see the planter areas increased in size and also include landscaping in the easement area. Mr. Pass advised the Commission, that the phony stone facing and the phony mansard facade would not be consonant with the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Hearst advised the Commission, upon a question by Commissioner Rosati, that he could not personally approve the requested design requirements, and circulatory studies, but would prefer, with the concurrence of the Planning Commission, to restudy the City's requirements with his superiors, and asked that the proposed use permit be held over until a future meeting of the Planning Commission. with the concurrence of the Commission, Chairman Lazzari instructed the Secretary to hold the proposed use permit over; until Texaco, Inc., could restudy their design, the circulatory problem, and resubmit new plans for the site at a future meeting of the Planning Comndssione - 1194 - Tentative Map of Serramonte unit No. 14, Daly City, Calif. August 24, 1970 After considerable discussion,among the Commission, regarding Daly Ci ty' s Tentative Map of Serramonte No. 14, the Planning Commission made the following motion: COmrrUssioner Rosati moved, that the Secretary be ordered to transmit the following letter to the Daly City Planning Commission: "August 24, 1970 "Mr. John Walker, City Planner, City of Daly City "Dear Mr. Walker: Thank you for referring the Tentative Map of Serramonte unit No. 14 to the City of South San Francisco for its perusal and commentary. "The South San Francisco Planning Commission, meeting in regular session on Monday, August 24, 1970, considered the instant tentative subdivision map. The COmrrUssioners unanimously felt that said map failed to indicate those residential amenities which are currently standard to modern, American subdivisions. The COmrrUssioners noticed, wi th regret, the lack of common open space, and the substandard lot widths which would characterize proposed Serramonte Unit No. 14. "At the close of its consideration, the South San Francisco Planning COmrrUssion recommended that the City of Daly City refer the tentative map in question back to its planning staff for a full city-planning analysis of the grim environment proposed under Serramonte Uni t No. 14. "Thank you for Daly Ci ty' s continuing co-operation." "Very truly yours, /s/ Daniel M. Pass, AIP, Secretary" The motion was seconded by Vice Chairman Campredon; passed by the following roll call vo te : AYES: Campredon, Boblitt, Raffaelli, Rosati and Lazzari NOES: None ABSENT: Gardner and Zlatunich - 1195 - GOOD AND WELFARE, OTHER AND COMMUNICATIONS August 24, 1970 Considerable discussion ensued among the COrrmllssion, regarding the deplorable state of landscaping in various areas of South San Francisco. wi th the concurrence of the COrrmllssion, Chairman Lazzari instructed the Secretary to transmit the following letter to Mr. John Hoffman, Landscape Specialist of the City of South San Francisco. "The South San Francisco Planning Commission, meeting in regular session on Mondqy, August 24, 1970, expressed considerable concern over the state of landscaping maintenance in the City of South San Francisco. The Commission expressed especial concern over the neglected landscaping of uses permitted through the use-permit process. Several of the Commissioners noted the poor landscaping of U.S.E. and White Front department stores, and untenable condition of the Bonanza restaurant site. "At the conclusion of its discussion on the instant matter, the Com- mission instructed its Secretary to request your office's immediate attention to the correction of this municipality's landscaping neglect. The Planning COrrmllssion also requested that your office propose specific, Commission act~on where the failure of landscaping maintenance con- stitutes a violation of the terms, provisions, or conditions of a use permit or architectural approv.al. cc: The Honorable Planning Commission" There being nothing further to be considered under Good and Welfare, and there being no further communications or other matters of interest for the Planning COrrmllssion, Chairman Lazzari announced that the next regular meeting of the South San Francisco PlanningCorrmllssion would be held on September 14, 1970 at 8:00 P.M., in the Council Chambers of City Hall, South San Francisco, California. The meeting ~as adjourned at 9:25 P.M. Planning Commission City of South San Francisco Daniel M. Pass, Secretary Planning Commission City of South San Francisco wat - 1196 -