HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 08/23/1971
August 23, 1971
MINUTES
of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission
TIME: 8 :00 p.m.
DATE: August 23, 1971
PLACE: Council Chambers, City Hall
South San Francisco, California
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Raffaelli j' Commissioners Bobli tt,
Borieff, Gardner, Zlatunich, and Chairman Campredon
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Lazzari
ALSO PRESENT: City Planner and Secretary to the South San
Francisco Planning Commission, Daniel M. Pass
Assistant Planner William A. Timmons
Assistant City Engineer Raymond Maxwell
Building Inspector Rex Greene
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of August 9, 1971
vice Chairman Raffaelli moved that the minutes of the regular meeting
of the South San Francisco Planning Commission of August 9, 1971 be
approved; seconded by Commi.ssioner GardneT; passed by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: vice Chairman Raffaelli, Commissioners Bob1i tt, Boti eff,
Gardner, Zlarunich, and Chairman Campredon
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Lazzari
ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING TAPE RECORDING OF MEETING
Chairman Campredon announced that this meeting of the South San
Francisco Planning Commission would be Tecordedon tape, but th.at
anyone who wished to come before the Commission in order to be
heard, but objected to having his voice recorded in this manner,
could request the Chairman to order the tape recorder turned "off"
for the durarion of the time that he is speaking or is heard.
-2954-
V-73
August 23, 1971
V- 73, vari ance reques t of L. Dani el Won to construct an addi ti on to an
existing single-family dwelling in the required westerly side yard of
No. 159 Escanyo Drive, in the R-1 District.
Secretary Pass read the following reports into the record.
Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass
"It is respectfully recommended that the Planning Commission
adopt the findings embodied in the attached, preliminary Official
Action Report, and approve the requested side-yard variance."
FINDINGS:
1 . There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or condi tions
applying to the land or building referred to in the application,
which circumstances or conditions do not ~pply generally to land or
buildings in the same di.strict.
2. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation
and enjoyment ~$ substantial property rights of the petitioner.
3. That the granting of the application will not, under the circum-
stances of the particular case,' materially affect adversely the health
or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the
property of the applicant, and will not, under the circumstances of
the particular case, be materially detrimental to the public welfare
or injurious to property or improvements in said. neighborhood.
4. Th.e granting of the requested variance will be in harmony wi th
the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
5. The requested variance is necessary to prevent practical diffi-
culties, unnecessary hardships, and results inconsistent with the
general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
6. The requested variance is supported by the irregular shape of the
subject building site.
7. The granting of the instant request would not create a new building
line, but would merely permit the extension of an existing one."
Names and Addresses of Proponents and Opponents:
Proponents: Mr. L. Daniel Won, 159 Escanyo Dri ve, South San Francisco,
th.e appli can t .
Opponents: None
Commissioner Zlatunich moved that the Planning Commission adopt the
findings and conditions, as set forth in the preliminary Offi cia1 Action
Report, and approve V-73 upon the condition th.atthe applicant comply
with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads;
seconded by Commissioner Gardner; passed by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Vice Chairman Raffaelli, Commissioners Boblitt, Botieff, Gardner,
Zlatunich, and Chairman Campredon
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Lazzari
- 2955-
V.....106
Au gus -t 23, 1971
V-l06, variance request of Hugh E. Robertson to construct a two-story,
six-unit apartment house in the required front and rear yards of the
building site located on the southerly side of Lewis Avenue, opposi te
Madrone A venue, in th.e R-] Dis trict.
Secretary Pass read -the following reports and letters into the record.
Report, and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass
"The Planning Department respectfully recommends that the
Planning Commission adop-t the "findings" and ac-tion indica-
ted in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report.."
FINDINGS:
"There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions
applying to the land or building referred to in the application,
which circumstances or conditions do not apply generally to land
or buildings in the same district.
2. The granting of the application is necessary for the preserva-
tion and enjoyment of subs-tan-tial property rights of the petitioner.
3. Tha-t -the granting of the application will not, under the cir-
cumstances of the particular case, ma-teria11y affect adversely
the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighbor-
hood of the property of the applicant, and will not, under the
circumstances of -the particular case, be materially detrimental
to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in
said neighborhood.
4. The granting of the requested variance will be in harmony with
the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
5. The requested variance is necessary to prevent practical
diffi.cul ties, unnecessary hardships, and resu1-ts inconsis tent wi th
the genra1 purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
6. The requested bulk variances are supported by the nonrectangu1ar
shape of the subject building site, and the resultant difficulty in
maintaini.ng the required rectangular yards -thereon."
CONDITIONS:
"The applicant shall comply with the stzbsequent requirements of
the Planning Commission's Architectural Committee."
Letter, dated August 13, 1971, from Mr. Hugh Rober-tson, the Applicant.
"In accordance with the requirements of the South San Francisco
Fire Department, I hereby agree to provide a minimum of twenty
feet (20') between buildings along the existing driveway located
on Lot 21,B1k U, Pecks Sub No 1.,S.S.F.
-2956-
V-106
August 23, 1971
Letter,dated August 14, 1971, from Paul Kilmartin, 7 Kipling Ave.
Ben Lomond
"In regard to your notice about variances requested by Hugh
Robertson on Lots 21, 22, and 23, Pecks Sub. No.1, I wish
to indicate my approval. I own property directly across the
street at 24 Lewis Avenue, S.S.F."
Letter, dated August 15, 1971, from Tony Ake1is
"I am in favor of the Variances requested by Mr. Hugh
Robertson on Lots 21-22-23, B1k U, Pecks Sub. No. 1
and Lot 10, Blk 1, Crestview Terrace, S.S.F. I own
property across the street at 46 Lewis Avenue.
Mr. Robertson's buildings and his interest in his other
improvements such as the paving of Lewis Ave . have
changed the entire area for the better. I am sure that
the proposed buildings will also improve Lewis Ave.
Thank you for your time in this matter."
Names and Addresses of Proponents and Opponents:
Proponents: Mr. Hugh E. Robertson, 35 Lookout Road, Hi1lsborough,Ca.,
the Appli cant.
Opponents: None
Vice-Chairman Raffaelli moved that the Planning Commission adopt the
findings and condi tions, as set forth in the preliminary Official
Action Report, and approve V-106 upon the condi tion that the appli-
cant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting
department heads; seconded by Commissioner Gardner; passed by the
following roll call vote:
AYES: Vice Chairman Raffaelli, Commissioners Bob1i tt, Botieff,
Gardner, Zlatunich, and Chairman Ci3l.mpredon
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Lazzari
-2957-
V-108
August 23, 1971
V-108, variance request of Hugh Robertson to construct a two-story,
eight-unit apartment house in the required side & rear yards of No. 21
Lewis Avenue (Lot 10, Block 1, Crestview Terrace), in the R-3 District.
Secretary Pass read the following report and letters into the record.
Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass
"The Planning Department respectfully recommends that the
Planning Commission adopt the Hfindings" embodied in the
attached, preliminary Official Action Report, and con-
di tiona11y grant the requested variances."
FINDINGS:
"1 . There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or
conditions applying to the land or building referred to in
the application, which circumstances or conditions do not
apply generally to land or buildings in the same district.
2 e The granting of the application is necessary for the
preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights
of the petitioner.
3 Q That the granting of the application will not, under the cir-
cumstances of the particular case, materially affect adversely
the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of the property of the applicant, and will not, under
the circumstances of the particm1ar case, be materially detri-
mental to the public welfare or injurious to property or
improvements in $;lid neighborhood.
4. The granting of the requested variance will be in harmony wi th
the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
5. The requested variance is necessary to prevent practical
difficulties, unnecessary hardships, and resuLts inconsistent
with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
6. The requested variances are supported by the irregular,
hexagonal shape of the subject building site.
7. The future residents of the proposed apartment house would
be served by ample on-site open space."
CONDITIONS:
"The applicant shall comply wi th the submi tted requirements of
the City's department heads, and the subsequent requirements of
the Planning Commission's Archi tectura1 Commi ttee . "
Letter, dated August 11, 1971, from Mr. David L. Dong, l30 Pecks
Lane, South San Francisco, California
"I have no objection to the plans for a two story Apte Building
to be constructed within the side and rear yards of Lot lO,
B1k. .l, Cres tvi ew Terrace, S.S.F"
- 2958-
V8l08
August 23, 1971
Letter, dated August 11, 1971, from Mr. David L. Dong, 130 Pecks Lane
South San Francisco, Ca. (continued)
"I feel that the proposed building since it only comes close
to our property on the one corner actually gives more light,
air, and total area then would a regular building which would
stretch across the entire 80' foot rear yard all within 10'
of the fence. We actually would welcome a building on this
location as we feel it would help clean up the area.
The proposed play area should be relocated to the front of
the proposed building to keep the noise level down in this
area.
Thank you, David L. Dong"
Letter, dated August 13, 1971, from Hugh Robertson, the Applicant
"In accordance wi th the requirements of the South San Francisco
Fire Department, I hereby agree to provide a minimum of twenty
feet (20') between buildings along the existing driveway
located on Lot 21, Blk U, Pecks Sub No 1., S.S.F."
Letter, dated August 15, 1971, from Mr. Tony Akelis
"I am in favor of the Variances requested by Mr. Hugh
Robertson on Lots 2l-2~-23, Blk U, Pecks Sub. No 1
and Lot 10, Blk l, Crestview Terrace, S.S.F. I own property
across the street at 46 Lewis Avenue. Mr. Robertson' build-
ings and his interest in other improvements such as the
paving of Lewis Ave have change the entire area for the
better. I am sure that the proposed buildings will also
improve Le.wis Ave. Thank you for your time in this matter."
Names and Addresses of Proponents and Opponents:
Proponents: Hugh Robertson, 35 Lookout Road, Hi1lsborough,
California, the Applicant
Opponents: None
commissioner Gardner moved that the Planning Commission adopt
the findings and conditions, as set forth in the preliminary Official
Action Report, and approve V-108 upon the condition that the appli-
cant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting
department heads, and that the disposal area not be located in the
front yard; seconded by Commissioner Botieff; passed by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Vice Chairman Raffaelli, Commissioners Boblitt, Botieff,
Gardner, Zlatunich, and Chairman Campredon
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Lazzari
- 2959-
V-109
August 23, 1971
V-109, variance request of the Diesel Supply Company to construct
an industrial building in the required rear yard of No. 122 Starlite
Street, in the M-1-H District.
Secretary Pass read the following reports into the record.
Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass
"The Planning Department respectfully recommends that the
Planning Commission adopt the "findings" and action indi cated
in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report."
FINDINGS:
"1 . There are excep ti ons or extraordinary ci rcums tances or condi-
tions applying to the land or building referred to in the
application, which circumstances or conditions do not apply
generally to land or buildings in the same district.
2. The granting of the application is necessary for the preserva-
tion and enjoyment of substantial property ghts of the
peti tioner.
3. That the granting of the application will not, under the cir-
cumstances of the particular case, materially affect adversely
the health or safety of persons residing or working in the
neighborhood of the property of the applicant, and will not,
under the circumstances of the particular case, be materially
detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or
improvements in said neighborhoodl
4. The granting of the requested variance will be in harmony
wi th the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
5. The requested variance is necessary to prevent practical
difficulties, unnecessary hardships, and results inconsistent
with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance.
6. The rear-yard requirements of the M-1-HDistrict are
designed to promote the establishment of alleys, where such
establishment would be desirable and practicable. In the
instant case, the establishment of an alley would be neither
desirable nor practicable.
7. Many similar variances have been granted."
CONDITIONS: "The applicant shall comply wi th the attached require-
ments of the reporting department heads, and the subsequent
requirements of the Architectural Committee."
Names and Addresses of Proponents and Opponents:
Proponents: Mr. R.L. Hennessy,122 Starlite St.,SSF, the Applicant
Opponents: None
Commissioner Zlatunich moved that the Planning Commission adopt the
findings and conditions as set forth in the preliminary Official
Action Report and approve V-109 upon the condition that the applicant
comply with the submitted requirements of the City 's reporting depart-
ment heads: seconded by V. Chrmn Raffaelli; passed by the following vote:
AYES: Vice Chairman Raffaelli, commissioners Boblitt, Botieff,Gardner
NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Lazzari
- 2960 -
SA-8
August 23, 1971
Request of Theodore V. Tronoff for the Extension of Time for
Recordation of Final Maps of Westborough No. 4
Secretary Pass read the following letter and reports into the record.
Letter, dated August 4, 1971, from Tronoff Engineers and Surveyors,
345 Park Plaza Drive, Daly City, California
"A1though grading work is being prosecuted vigorously on the
lands of GMT Investors, known as Westborough Unit 4, we do
not expect to be able to record the Final Map, or Maps, on
the site prior to the September 28, 1971, eead1ine on the
approved Tentati ve Map of Westborough Uni t 4. Approximately
two-thirds of the site has been graded in accordance with
the approved grading plans, based on the approved Tentati ve
Map and major storm drainage facilities, conforming to the
requirements of your Department of Ptzblic Works ,have also
beren iBsta1led on a significant portion of the si te.
Accordingly, pursuant to the provisions for time extension
in your Subdi vision Ordinance and the Stzbdi vision Map Act
of the State of California, we hereby respectfully request,
on behalf of GMT Investors, a time extension of one year to
September 28, 1972, on the Tentative Map of Westborough
unit 4. Our clients have advised us that every effort will
be made to record a Final Map, or Maps, on the area.prior to
September 28, 1972. Thank you for your assistance and co-
operation in this matter. Isl Frank W. Aitken Jr.
Senior Engineer"
Interoffice Memorandum, dated August 5, 1971 J' of City Planner Pass
"1. The South San Francisco Planning Commission, on March 10, 1969,
conditionally approved SA-8, tentative map of Westborough No.4,
representing the stzbdivision of an approximatelylOO-acre parcel
of land, located at the southeasterly corner of Westborough and
Gellert Boulevards, in the R-3 District. The City Council ratified
the Commission's action on March 18, 1969.
2. On July 13, 1970, the Planning Commission recommended that the
City Council conditionally approve the final map of Westborough
No. 4-A, which occupies about 30% of the parent parcel of Westborough
No.4. The subject final map was approved by the City Council on
July 20, 1970, under Resolution 535y, but was not recorded.
3. According to Section lO.03 of the Subdivision Ordinance of the
Ci ty of South San Francisco, "Any failure to record a final map
wi thin eighteen months from the approval or conditional approval
of the tentative map, or any extension thereof granted by the City
Council, shall termina te all proceedings. Before a final map may
thereafter be recorded, a new tentati ve map shall be submi tted. If
4. Section 10.02 of Ordinance No. 603 reads:
"Upon application of the stzbdivider an extension of not
exceeding two additional years may be granted by the Ci ty
Council, after review and recommendation of the Planning Commission."
- 2961 -
SA-B
,August 23, 1971
Request for Extension of Time for Recordation of Final Maps of
Westborough No. 4
"5. In its letter of August 31, 1970, Theodore V.. Tronoff Engineers,
civil engineer and agent of the st1bdivider, requested that the City
Council extend the time 1imi t for recording the final maps of West-
borough No.4 and its three units to September 18, .1971.
6. The South San Francisco Planning Commission, meeting in regular
session on Monday, September 28, 1970, respectfully recommended that
the Honorable City Council grant the requested time extension. The City
Council accepted the Commission's recommendation, and extended the
deadline for the filing of the final maps of the invol ved subdi vision
to the date requested by the st1bdivider's agent.
7. The attached letter embodies the subdivider's request for a second
time extension. Since the requested extension would .extend the time
limit for the recordation of the final maps of SA-8 to September 18,
1972, it would constitute the last permissible extension, according to
the provisions of the State St1bdi vision Map Act, and the Subdi vision
Ordinance of the Ci ty of South San Francisco.
8. The Planning Department is of the opinion that. the requested time
extension is supported by the large size of Westborough No.4, and
the complex problems involved in the establishment of a high-density
residential project therein. Since the st1bdi vi der and developer of
Wes tborough No. 4 wi 11 develop a nei ghborhood whi ch wi II ul timate1y
equal the population of Sausa1ito, the requested time extension is
reasonable. The fact that about t:.fMQ-thirds of Westborough No. 4 has
been graded in accordance wi th the tentati ve map of Wes tborough No. 4
tends to increase the tenability of the extension in question.
RECOMMENDATION
It is respectfully recommended that the Planning Commission recommend
to the Ci ty Council that the requested time extension of time be granted."
Names and Addresses of Proponents and Opponents:
Proponents: Theodore V. Tronoff, C.E., &45 Park Plaza Drive, Daly City
Opponents: None
vice Chairman Raffaelli moved that the Planning Commission recommend to
the Ci ty Council tha t the time limi t for the recordation of the final
maps of Wes tborough No. 4 be extended to September .18, 1972; seconded
by Commissioner Gardner; passed by the following roll call vote:
AYES: vi ce Chairman Raffaelli, .commissioners Bob1i tt, Boti eff,
Gardner, Zlatunich, and Chairman Campredon
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Lazzari
Special instructions to the Secretary
- 29 6 2-
SA-18 (Revised)
August 23, 1971
SA-18 (Revised), final map of Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park
Uni t No.3, representing the subdi vision of approximately 85 acres
of land, located at the easterly end of Cabot: Court, and on "Radio
Hill" in the Point San Bruno area, in the M-2-H District, into 13
lots and one sculpture common.
Secretary Pass read the following reports and letter into the record.
Report of City Planner Daniel M. Pass
"The final map of Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park Uni t No. 3
substantially conforms to the approved tentative stzbdivision map
thereof, and substantially complies with the Planning Commission's
conditions imposed thereon.
The Planning Department therefore respectfully recommends that the
Planning Commi ssion recommend to the Honorable City Council that
the instant final map be approved upon the condi tion that the sub-
divider comply with the stzbmitted requirements of the City's depart-
ment heads."
Letter, dated August 6, 1971, from Richard C. Smith, C.E., Wilsey & Ham,
1035 East Hil1sdale Blvd., San Mateo, Ca.
"In accordance with the Subdivision Map Act as amended and the Sub-
division Ordinance, City of South San Francisco, dated May 1968, we
hereby stzbmi t for your consideration the Final Map, Cabot, Cabot &
Forbes Industrial Park uni t No.. 3. As requested in Paragraph 10. Ok m
of the Subdi vision Ordinance, I am enclosing copies of letters to the
public utility companies involved. Also enclosed is a copy of Caobt,
Cabot & Forbes' covenants and restrictions for this unit.
Thank you very much for your consideration."
Letter, dated August 6, 1971, from Richard C.. Smi th, C.E., Wilsey & Ham,
1035 East Hi11sda1e Blvd., San Mateo, Ca., to Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
"I am enclosing two copies of the Final Map for Unit No.3, Cabot,
Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, South San Francisco, Cali forni a. As
you have requested in our meetings and in the letter from Pacific
Gas & Electric Company dated July 22, 1971, I have indicated on this
map the various easements you will require to serve this uni t.
will you please review this map for completeness and accuracy of these
easements.. Thank you very much for your cooperation. IF
Letter, dated August 6, 1971, from Richard C. Smith, C.E., Wilsey & Ham,
1035 E. Hi11sdale B1 vd., San Mateo,Ca.;' to Pacific. Telephone Company
"I am encdJosing two copies of the Final Map for Uni t No.. 3, Cabot,
Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, South San Francisco, California. As
you have requested in our meetings and in the letter from Pacifi c Gas
& Electric Company dated July 22, 1971, I have indicated on this map
the various easements you will require to serve this uni t.. will you
please review this map for completeness and accuracy of these ease-
ments. Thank you very much for your cooperation."
-2963-
SA-18 (Revised)
Aug:est 23, 1971
Letter, dated August 6, 1971, from Richard C. Smith, C.E., Wilsey & Ham
1035 E. Hi1lsda1e B1vd.,San Mateo,Ca., from California Water Service Co.
"I am enclosing two copies of the Final Map for Uni t No.3, Cabot,
Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, South San Francisco, California. In
our meeting of July 13, 1971, with your staff, we agreed upon the
easement requirements necessary to serve this unit. I have indicated
these easements on the map. will you please review this map for com-
pleteness and accuracy of the easements. Thank you very much for
your cooperation."
Report, dated August 13, 1971, of Assistant City Engineer Maxwell
"This office recommends approval of said map sUbject to our
technical review."
Report, dated Aug. 16, 1971, of Director of Public Works Louis Goss
"This memorandum is intended to supplement the memorandum of
August 13, 1971 from Raymond A. Maxwell, Assistant City
Engineer, same subject, in which approval was recommended subject
to reechnica1 review. Certain off-si te improvements will be
required to handle the increased sewage flow introduced by the
addition of this unit. Alterations and additions to Pump
Station #4 on Harbor Way and Pump Station #7 on Littlefield
Avenue will be needed. In addi tion, funds in the form of
Sewer Revenue Bonds should be established for future needed
improvements such as an additional sewer line in East Grand
Avenue. Approval is recommended subject to the above-mentioned
needs being fulfilled in addition to our technical map review."
Names and Addresses of Proponents and Opponents:
Proponents: Mr. Richard C. Smith, C.E., Wilsey & Ham, East Hi1lsda1e
Blvd., San Mateo, Ca., Agent of the Applicant.
Opponents:
Mr. Donald J. Bruzzone, C.E., Cabot, Cabot and Forbes,
100 California Street, San F~ancisco,Ca.
None
commissioner Botieff moved that the Planning Commission order SA-18
(Revised) to stand approved upon the subdi vider' s compliance wi th the
stzbmitted requirements of the City's reportin.g department head$,
seconded by Commissioner Zlatunich; passed by the following roll call
vote:
AYES: Vice-Chairman Raffaelli, Commissioners Bob2i tt, Botieff,
Gardner, Zlatunich, and Chairman Campredon
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Lazzari
-2964-
SA-19
August 23, 1971
SA-19, final map of Westborough-West Park Uni t No. 3D, representing
the st1bdivision of 10.737:... acres of land, located on the southerly side
of King Drive, about 820' easterly of Callan Boulevard, in the PC-SF
and PC-P zones of the Westborough-West Park No.3 Planned Community
District, into 112 lots.
Secretary Pass read the following reports,:~I:i1Iit&c~tJfJ.e:J:'!l!ecord.
Report, dated AugUst 6, 1971, of City Planner Daniel M. Pass
"The final map of Westborough-West Park Uni t No .3D st1bstantial1y
conforms to the approved tentative map thereof, and manifests
material compliance with the conditions the Planning Commission
imposed thereon. The Planning Department therefore respectfully
recommends that the Planning Commission recommend that the City
Council order the instant final subdivision map to stand approved
upon the subdivider's compliance with the submitted requirements
of the Ci ty , s department heads."
Report, dated August 9, 1971, of Assistant Fire Chief Alwin R. Brauns
"Before approval can be granted on the above subject, the sub-
division will have to conform to the utili ty Plan, Westborough-
West Park unit 3, drawing #WWP3-U-T, revision 5, dated 7/16/68."
Report, dated August 13, of Assistant City Engineer Raymond A. Maxwell
"This office recommends approval of said map subject to our
technical review."
~ames and Addresses of Proponents and Opponents:
Proponents: Theodore lIi'. Tronoff, C.E., 345 Park Plaza Dri ve, Daly Ci ty
Opponents: None
vice Chairman Raffaelli moved that the Planning Comrndssion order SA-19
to stand approved upon the st1bdivider's comp_Iiance with the submitted
requirements of the City's reporting department heads; seconded by
Commissioner Zlatunich; passed by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Vice-Chairman Raffaelli, Commissioners Bobli tt, Botieff,
Gardner, Zlatunich, and Chairman Campredon
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Lazzari
-2965-
A ugus t 23, 1971
ARCHITECTURAL COMMITTEE
Appointment of Committeemen (Continued from meeting of July 26, 1971)
Secretary Pass read the names and addresses of the following persons who
had expressed an interest to serve on the Architectural Committee of the
City of South San Francisco.
1. Jay Jacobs, Ritchie & Ritchie, 120 Bush Street, San Francisco
2. Mr. George Nakada, Certified Ornamental Horticu1tura1ist , 122 Fir Ave.
3. Mr. Charles E. Lewis, Graduate Engineer, 237 Manor Drive, SSF
4. Russell R. Brabec, 461 Dellbrook Avenue, SSF
5. Mr. George C. Avanessian, AIA, 914 Linden Avenue, SSF
Considerable discussion ensued amongst the Commission regarding the Val!l.':1.(j)QS1S
applicants and of the advisability of appointing John Hoffman, Landscape
Specialist of the City of South San Francisco, to the Architectural Committee,
as a voting member.
Commissioner Botieff moved; seconded by Commissioner Gardner that the follow-
ing persons be appointed to the Architectural Committee of the City of South
San Francisco:
Mr. George C. Avanessian, AIA, 914 Linden Avenue, SSF
Mr. John Hoffman, Landscape Specialist, City of South San Francisco
Mr. Charles E. Lewis, Gradua te Engineer, 237 Manor Dri ve, SSF
Mr. George Nakada, Certified Ornamental Horticultura1ist, 122 Fir Ave.,SSF
The motion was passed by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Vice Chairman Raffaelli, Commissioners Boblitt, Botieff, Gardner,
Zlatunich, and Chairman Campredon
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Lazzari
Special instructions to the Secretary.
- 2966 -
August 23, 1971
GOOD AND WELFARE, OTHER AND COMMUNICATIONS
Mr. Doug Wigton, Manager, Pacific Gas & Electric Company, 234 Miller
Avenue, South San Francisco, spoke at length regarding his concern
over the Planning Commission's discussion of P.G.&E. rights-of-way
and easements at their regular meeting of August 9, 1971.
Mr. Wigton advised the Commission that he was available at all times
to work wi th the Ci ty on the problem of keeping these parti cu1ar areas
in a clean and well kept condi tion. He further advised the Commission
that .he had been working with'Mr. Robert Maxey, Recreation and Parks
Superintendent to explore ways and means to utilize ,the areas for
recreation use and open space.
Mr. Wigton noted, that in many areas, the rights-of-ways were strewn
wi th garbage and debris by adjoining property owners. He also stated
that he would like to be notified of unsightly areas so that he could
have them cleaned up.
Chairman Campredon invited Mr. Wigton to the Planning CommissiDn's
study session on September 7, 1971, to further discuss the problem
when Mr. Robert Maxey, who has jurisdiction over the aforementioned
areas, would be in attendance. Mr. Wigton cordially accepted the
invi tation .
There being nothing further to be considered under Good and Welfare,
and there being no further communications or other matters of interest
for the Planning Commission, Chairman Campredon announced that the
next regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission
would be held on September 13, 1971 at 8:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers
of City Hall I' South San Francisco, California.
The meeting was adjourned
9:40 p.m.
Marcel Campredon,
Planning Commission
City of South San
~ed~. ~~
Daniel M. Pass, Secretary
Planning Commission
City of South San Francisco
wat
-2967-