Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/12/1972 MrNUTES June 12, 1972 of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission TIME: 8:00 p.m. DATE: June 12, 1972 PLACE: Council Chambers, City Hall South San Francisco, California MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice Chairman Botieff, Commissioners Campredon, Gardner, Lazzari, Zlatunich, and Chairman Raffaelli MEMBERS ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: City Planner and Secretary to the South San Francisco Planning Commission, Daniel Me Pass Assistant Planner William A. Timmons Planning Aide Surendra N. Amin Building Inspector Roy Ghilardi MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of May 8, 1972 Commissioner Lazzari moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission of May 8, 1972 be approved; seconded by Commissioner Zlatunich, passed by the following roll calf vot e : AYES: Vice Chairman Botieff, Commissioners Campredon, Gardner, Lazzari, Zlatunich, and Chairman Raffaelli NOES: None ABSENT: None ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING TAPE RECORDING OF MEETING Chairman Raffaelli announced that this meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission would be recorded on tape, but that anyone who wished to come before the Commission in order to be heard, but objected to having his voice recorded in this manner, could request the Chairman to order the tape recorder turned "off" for the duration of the time that he is speak- ing or is heard. - 3lS2 - UP-2l8 June 12, 1972 UP-218i~ use-permit request of the Beverly-Glenwood Corporation to establish Residential Planned Unit Development "G" on the easterly side of Carter Drive, and at the westerly terminus of Farnee Court, in the Westborough-West Park No.1 Planned Community District. (continued from meeting of May 8, 1972.) Secretiary Pass read the following letter into the record. Letter dated June 9, 1972 from Henry L. Richman, Beverly-Glenwood Corporation, South San FranciscO, Ca. "I respectfully request that this Use Permit Application be postponed until the meeting of July 10, 1972, as the Earthquake Report from the City Consultant is not ready and I want to have it in hand so that we can discuss it during the Us e Permit Application hearing." The Commissioners unanimously agreed that the ihearing be postponed until the meeting of July 10, 1972, as requested by the applicant. UP-220 UP-220, use-permit request of the Great Western Savings and Loan Association to modify the site plan, land use, and building eleva- tions of the Greenview Commons Planned Unit Development, located at the most southerly corner of Westborough and Gellert Boulevards, in theR-2 District. (47 single-family townhouses) Secretary Pass read the following report and letters into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner, Daniel M. Pass "FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, operation or the use of the building or lands for which the permit is sought will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to propertyiand improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. 2. The approval of the requested use permit meets the require- ments of Section 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. "Findings" embodied in the "Joint Report of the City's Department Heads". -3lS3 - UP-220 continued June 12, 1972 IlCONDITIONS: "Requirements" recommended in the "Joint Report of the City's Department Heads"." "The undersigned department heads have individually and jointly studied the subject request to modify Greenview Commons Planned Unit Development, and recommend that the Commission accept the following findings and order the instant use permit to stand approved upon the applicant's compliance with the following requirements. FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, operation or the use of the buildings and lands for which the use permit is sought will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, peace, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to property or improvements in the neighborhood, or to the general welfare of the city. 2. The applicant has filed the verified petition, plot plans, floor plans, building elevation plans, and Common green plans required by Section S.71(a) of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed plans conform to the provisions of Sections S.72 and S.73 of the Zoning Ordinance. 4. The proposed, modified planned-unit development is designed to produce an orderly, stable and desirable. environment. S. The approval of the proposed modifications would tend to effectuate the City's adopted General Plan. 6. The proposed townhouse development would harmoniously blend with the existing townhouses in Westborough-West Park Units No.1, No.2, and No.3. 7. That the proposed development, as modified, includes pro- vision for recreation areas to meet the anticipated needs of the population thereof. 8. That an enforceable adequate method and program for con- struction, installation and maintenance of landscaped open areas has been developed and presented. 9. The applicant's submitted plans and building elevations indicate that the proposed planned unit development would not adversely affect the nature, character ,and design of the Westborough Community, or its constituent neighborhoods. - 3lS4 - UP-220 continued June 12, 1972 "10. The proposed, modified planned unit development would con- sist of 47, single....family townhouses in lieu of the 94 duplex units approved under Commission Resolution 1836, and Council Resolution No. 4160. II. The modified plans for the development of Greenview Commons would decrease the population density, and improve the site planning, aesthetic quality, traffic flow, and urban texture thereof. 12. The proposed, modified planned unit development would tend to keep the ultimate population of the Westborough Community within the holding-capacity guidelines of the Planning Commission. REQUI REMENTS I. The applicant shall submit amended plans, specifications, and drawings which reflect its compliance with the requirements of the Planning Commission. 2. The applicant shall convey the common greens in the subject planned-unit development to the City of South San Francisco. Said applicant shall, at the time of the conveyance of the common greens, submit to the City Attorney a title insurance policy which assures the said Attorney that title to the said common greens vests in the City of South San Francisco, and that said title is free and clear of all liens, taxes, and encumbrances. 3. The applicant shall annex the subject planned-unit develop- ment to the West Park Parks and Parkways Maintenance District, or similar municipal district. 4. The applicant shall file with the Landscape Specialist the necessary documents providing for the construction, installa- tion, and maintenance of the subject common greens in accordance with the approved plans and specifications thereof. S. The applicant shall file with the City Planner a corporate surety bond guaranteeing the construction and installation of the said common greens in accordance with the related plans and specifications, and pursuant to City Resolution No. 4S83. 6. The applicant shall file with the City Planner an agreement under which it undertakes the maintenance of the subject common greens, from the time of their development to the time of their acceptance for maintenance by the City. This agreement shall be secured by a corporate surety bond in the principal sum approved by the City Landscape Specialist and City Attorney. 7 . All garages shall have minimum depths of 22'. Where swinging, overhead garage doors are employed, the distance between the face of the door and the inner edge of the sidewalk shall be a minimum of 22'. Where sliding or roll-type doors are used, the said distance shall be a minimum of 19'. - 315,5 - UP-220 Continued June 12, 1972 S. 'Street lights shall meet the design and location requirements of the Director of Public Works and the Chief of Police. 9. Traffic-control markings, signs, and devices shall be provided by the applicant and shall meet the standards and specifications of the Director of Public Works and the Chief of Police. 10. The applicant shall locate mlnlmum 4"-high illuminated house numbers on each townhouse. These numbers shall have a minimum ground clearance of 7', and be clearly visible from adjacent travel ways . II. The applicant shall provide at least one street tree for each ,lot, but not less than one street tree per 2S' of street abutment, in the proposed planned unit development. The appli- cant's street-tree selections and planting program shall comply wi th the standards and specifications of the Recreation and Parks Director, and the Landscape Specialist. 12. The submitted common-green plans shall be considered "preliminary" . Prior to the issuance of the use permit the applicant shall submit revised common-green 'plans which reflect its compliance with the requirements of the City's department heads. These plans shall include, but not be limited to the following. a. Drainage patterns, including storm drains and catch basins. b. Common-green furniture, including lighting, benches, fountains, fencing, kiosks, gates, and. recreation facilities. 13. Detailed rear-yard drainage plans shall be prepared and sub- mitted for the approval of the Director of Public Works prior to the issuance of the use permit. 14. No townhouse shall be occupied prior to the Landscape Specialist's issuance of a certificate which indicates that the adjoining common green has been constructed and planted to the City's standards. IS. All fences, partitions, and walls shall conform to the standards and specifications of the City of South San Francisco. 16. Cable TV lines are to be installed to the front of each townhouse prior to the installation of any landscaping. 17. The applicant shall comply with the subsequent requirements of the Planning Commission's Architectural Committee. IS. All surface-mounted transformers and other public-utility structures shall be screen-planted to the requirements of the Landscape Specialist. - 3lS6 - UP-220 continued June 12, 1972 19. The landscaped islands in the cul-de-sac streets shall be maintained by the West Park Parks and Parkways Maintenance District, or similar district. 20. The seismic safety of the proposed planned unit develop- ment shall be certified by a geological engineer. The appli- cant shall submit this certification to the City Engineer. 21. All surety bonds, maintenance agreements, plans, specifica- tions, and drawings will be subject to final review by the Department of Ecological Development." Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponent Robert Chang, AIA, Architect 1001 Heinz Avenue, Berkeley, Ca. the agent of the applicant Speakers: Wesley Slade, Westborough Homeowners' Association 2SSS Donegal Avenue, South San Francisco Staff Report on Proposed Developments to be Reviewed by A.L.U.C. (Airport Land Use Committee) "42} Use permit request for modifications to plans for 47 single- family townhouses at S.W. corner of Westborough and Gellert Boulevards - Within 3S NEF - ABAG criteria indicates the proposed use should not be developed here. Recommend analysis of noise impact on site and necessary noise insulation features be included in the design of any residential uses permitted." Letter dated June 8, 1972 from Donald F. Gamma, Chairman, West Park Homeowners' Association, 3790 Cork Place, South San Francisco, addressed to City Manager and Copy to Mayor and City Planner "I have been in conversation recently with the Directors and Attorney for Westborough Homeowners' Association concerning the various building permits, rezoning, and variance requests before the Planning Commission. We feel very strongly that all action concerning the Westborough-West Park area of development by this body (Agenda for June 12, 1972), be suspended until the following takes place: 1. Our meeting with you and the City Planner on Wednesday, June IS, 1972, to review our differences. 2. A report by the Administrator of the City's Ecological Development Staff concerning the advisability of allowing these developments to progress without anyon-street parking. - 3lS7 - UP-220 continued June 12, 1972 "I respectfully request that these items be removed from the Agenda for the June 12, 1972, meeting of the Planning Commis- sion until the above two items are accomplished. We feel that planning for additional developments in South San Francisco should all be reviewed by the City's new Organizational Staff prior to the time the Council must face these issues without the proper groundwork having been accomplished." Secretary Pass informed the Commission that the applicant should get in touch with A.L.U.C. regarding the development when the use permit is approved. Chairman Raffaelli mentioned that it was agreed in study session to consider UP-220, not to postpone it. Mr. Robert Chang explained the project with the aid of colored elevations and a landscape drawing. Upon enquiry from Wesley Slade, Secretary Pass informed Mr. Slade that there will be more than S parking spaces per pnit (2 in garage, 2 in driveways and one off-street). Commissioner Zlatunich expressed concern regarding inadequate lighting in common greens. Secretary Pass informed the Commis- sion of the plan is general and the Architectural Committee will see that sufficient lighting is provided in common greens. At the conclusion of its consideration of the proposed 47 town- house project, Chairman Raffaelli asked the Commission for a motion. Commissioner Zlatunich moved that the Planning Commission adopt the finding and conditions,as set forth in the Joint Department Heads Report, and approve UP-220, upon the condition that the applicant comply with the requirements of Landscape Specialist and the Police 'Department regarding adequate lighting in the common green. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Campredon and passed unanimously. - 3lS 8 - UP-22l June 12, 1972 UP-22l, use-permit request of Fortunato Calegari to construct a second single-family dwelling on a building site, which fronts upon a public street and rears upon a public alley, at 743 Baden Avenue, in the R-2 District. Secretary Pass read the following report and letters into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass The Planning Department respectfully recommends that the Planning Com- mission adopt the "findings" and action indicated in the attached, preliminary "Official Action Report". "FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, operation or the use of the b}2l.mJl:dill.ng i>1' Thands fi>r wgmc.gtge perm.mt IDS sought wi 11 not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to property and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. 2. The approval of the requested use permit meets the require- ments of Section 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed, second single-family dwelling would be characterized by aesthetic design. 4. The applicant's plot plan indicates that the applicant pro- poses to improve the landscaping of the entire building site. S. Similar use-permit requests have been approved by the Planning Commission. (See UP-84, Angelo Dappollonio, 812 Baden Avenue UP-8S3, Barberis & Paganucci, 836 Olive Avenue UP-1164, Percy H. McNutt, 818 Olive Avenue UPp1232, A. J. McMahan, 847 Olive Ave.) CONDITIONS: The applicant shall meet the attached requirements of the reporting department heads, and the subsequent requirements of the Architectural Committee. Inter-office Memorandum dated June 1, 1972 from Landscape Specialist, John E. Hoffman. "The landscape plan for subj ect use permit application has been reviewed by this office and a site inspection has been made. I find the plan e for use permit application with the - 3lS9 - UP-22l continued June 12, 1972 "following recommendations: I. Two (2) street tre.es as approved by Park Department to be planted on the Baden Avenue frontage in four foot square open- ings cut into the existing concrete paving between sidewalk and curb. 2. Street trees on Baden Avenue and Second Lane are to be IS gallon size. 3. "Existing landscaped area", shown between existing building and proposed building is now grownup in weeds, is to be improved with lawn and/or other plknting. 4. A sprinkler system to be installed in all planted areas. Staff Report on Proposed Developments to be Reviewed by A.L.U.C. "4S) Use permit request for second dwelling.unit at 743 Baden Avenue in R-2 district. All three requests. (43, 44 & 4S) within 30 NEF - ABAG criteria indicates new construction or development should be undertaken only after an analysis of noise reduction requirements is made and needed sound insulation features are included in the design." Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponents Proponents: Al Martin, 724 Circle Court, SSF, Cal., Agent of the Applicant Opponents: None Secretary Pass informed the applicant that he should get in touch with A.L.U.C. regarding this development when the use permit is approved. Commissioner Lazzari moved that the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions, as set forth in the preliminary Official Action Report, and approve UP-22l upon the condition that the applicant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads; seconded by Vice Chairman Botieff. The motion was passed unanimously. UP-222 UP-222 , use-permit request of Robert Barbetti to re-establish and redevelop a service station (ARCO), at No. 294 Hillside Boulevard, in the C-3 District. - 3160 - UP-222 continued June 12, 1972 Secretary Pass read the following report and letters into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass "The Office of the City Planner respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the "findings" and action indicated in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report. FINDINGS: 1. The establishment, maintenance, operation or the use of the building or lands for which the permit is sought will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety, morals, comfort and general welfare of persons residing or working in the area of such proposed use, and will not be detrimental or injurious to property. and improvements in the neighborhood or the general welfare of the city. 2. The approval of the requested use permit meets the require- ments of Section 6.23 of the Zoning Ordinance. 3. The proposed re-establishment and redevelopment would sub- stantiallyimprove the order and the amenity of the subject site. 4. The proposed new station would be characterized by much sign restraint. CONDITIONS: I. The applicant shall comply with the submitted requirements of the City's department heads, and the subsequent requirements of the Planning C.mmission's Architectural Committee. 2. No permanent or temporary signs, other than those indicated in the attached submitted application, shall be located on the subj ect premises." Interoffice Memorandum dated June 1, 1972 from Acting Fire Chief, D. Zylker "The Fire Department requests a more detailed plot plan, detailing location of proposed gasoline tanks. Approval of plan hinges on a) Location of tanks b) Proposed cover of tanks c)Physical construction material of tanks d) Inspection of tank installation, including all necessary piping thereto, prior to covering the tanks" Staff report on proposed development to be reviewed by A.L.U.C. "46) Use permit request to re-establish service station at 294 Hillside Blvd. - Outside 30 NEF - ABAG criteria indicates the proposed use will require no special sound insulation from aircraft noise." - 316l - UP-222 continued June 12, 1972 Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponent Proponents: S. J. Balopulos Bayco Construction Co., Inc. 2S3 San Felipe Avenue, SF, Ca Agent of the applicant Opponents: None Commissioner Gardner moved that the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions, as set forth in the preliminary Official Action Report, and approve UP-222 upon the condition that the applicant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads; seconded by Commissioner Lazzari. The motion was passed unanimously. V-137 V-137, variance request of James L. Datzman to construct a one-story addition to a one-story, single-family dwelling in the required, "level" rear yard of No. 732 Palm Avenue, in the R-l District. Secretary Pass read the following report and letters into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass "The Planning Office respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the "findings" and action indicated in the attached, preliminary Official Action Report. FINDINGS: 1. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or con- ditions applying to the land or building referred to in the application, which circumstances or conditions do not apply generally to land or buildings in the same district. 2. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights of the petitioner. 3. That the granting of the application will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the property of the applicant, and will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in said neighborhood. - 3162 - V-137 continued June 12, 1972 "v. The granting of the requested variance will be in harmony with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. S. The requested variance is necessary to prevent practical difficulties, unnecessary hardships, and results inconsistent with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The applicant's terracing of his rear yard to a S% grade would serve no substantial purpose, and could create a soil- erosion problem. 7. The Planning Commission has recommended that the City Council repeal the "level rear yard requirements" of this municipality. 8. The Planning Commission has granted similar variances. Examples: V-36, R. C. Colombe (209 Brentwood Drive); V-S3, M. E. Mattice (3S4 Rockwood Drive); V-lOS, William E. Sylvia (749 Almond Avenue); V-114, Edward P. Lucett (30S Valverde Drive). Staff report on proposed development to be reviewed by A.L.U.C. "43) Variance request for addition to single-family home in the required rear yard at 732 Palm Avenue. Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponents Proponents: James Datzman, 732 Palm Ave., SSF, Cal., the applicant Al Martin informed the Commission that James Datzman is in the Police Depart- ment on duty and would call him if required. Opponents: None Commissioner Lazzari moved that the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions, as set forth in the preliminary Official Action Report, and approve V-137 upon the condition that the applicant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads; seconded by Vice-Chairman Botieff. The motion was passed unanimously. - 3163 - V-138 June 12, 1972 V-.138, variance request of Philip J . Minsky to construct a one-story addition to a one-story, single-family dwelling in the required "level" rear yard of No. 724 Cottonwood Avenue, in the R-l District. Secretary Pass read the following report and letters into the record. Report and recommendation of City Planner Daniel M. Pass "The Planning Department respectfully recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the "findings" listed in the attached, preliminary "Official Action Report", and grant the requested variance. FINDINGS: 1. There are exceptions or extraordinary circumstances or conditions applying to the land or building referred to in the application, which circumstances or conditions do not apply generally to land or buildings in the same district. 2. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of substantial property rights of the petitioner. 3. That the granting of the application II not, under the circumstances of the particular case, materially affect adversely the health or safety of persons residing or working in the neighborhood of the property of the applicant, and will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be materially detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in said neighborhood. 4. The granting of the requested variance will be in harmony with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. S. The requested variance is necessary to prevent practical difficulties, unnecessary hardships, and results inconsistent with the general purpose of the Zoning Ordinance. 6. The applicant's compliance with the level rear-yard require- ments of Sec. 3.16(c) would serve no substantial purpose. The Planning Commission, under its proposed Comprehensive Revampment to the Zoning Ordinance, recommended that the level rear-yard requirements in the R-l District re~llations be deleted therefrom. 7. The Planning Commission has granted similar varianc~to free- holders in the Parkway-Sterling Neighborhood. References: V-1902, A. Stagnaro (737 Almond Avenue) V-14, F. A. Drake (S24 Cortesi Avenue) V-43, Rosalie Hare (732 Cottonwood Avenue) V-S4, Richard Fall (712 Almond Avenue) V-lOS, William E. Sylvia (749 Almond Avenue) - 3164 - V-138 continued June 12, 1972 Staff report on proposed developments to be reviewed by A.L.U.C. "44) Variance requests for additions to single-family home in the required rear yards at 724 Cottonwood Avenue." Names and addresses of Proponents and Opponents Proponents: Philip J. Minsky 724 Cottonwood Ave., SSF, Cal. the applicant Opponents: None Commissioner Campredon moved that the Planning Commission adopt the findings and conditions, as set forth in the preliminary Official Action Report, and approve V-138 upon the condition that the appli- cant comply with the submitted requirements of the City's reporting department heads; seconded by Commissioner Zlatunich. The motion was passed unanimously. RZ-24 RZ-24, proposed rezoning of a certain IO.36-acre parcel of land, located at the southwesterly corner of Westborough Boulevard and Oakmont Drive, from "R-3"" restricted Multiple Family Residential District, to "R-2"" Duplex Residential District. Letter dated June 12, 1972 from Ronald J. Mulcare, Attorney "This is to confirm our telephone conference today continuing the Planning Commission's hearing regarding rezoning of the Callan' 10.36 acre parcel of land located at the southwesterly corner of Westborough Boulevard and Oakmont Drive from June 12, 1972 to July 24, 1972. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter." The Commission unanimously agreed that the hearing be put off until July 24, 1972, as requested by the representative of the owners. - 316S - June 12, 1972 SPECIAL REPORT Historical Profile and Plan: The City of South San Francisco's Trusteeship of the State of California's Salt Marshes, Tide Lands, and Submerged Territory. Secretary Pass read the following letter and report into the record. "Pursuant to Section 6374, Chapter 4.S, Part 1, Division 6 of the State Public Resources Code, each political subdivision which has been granted title to submerged lands in trust from the State of California must submit a report to the State Legislature and the Lands Commission on its past and present use of its trust territories. Each grantee, on or before January 1, 1973 must adopt a general plan for the ultimate use and development of the said territories. The attached "Historical Profile: The City of South San Fran- cisco's Trusteeship of the State of California's Salt Marshes" Tidelands, and Submerged Territory," the General Plan: 1969, entitled "Orderly Growth," and the "Preliminary Plan for the South San Francisco Shoreline Regional Park" should substantially meet the requirements of the State of California. The Planning Office therefore respectfully recommends that the Planning Com- mission instruct its Secretary to transmit the following recom- mendation to the Honorable City Council. RECO~~NDATION: The Planning Commission respectfully recommends that the City Council order the submittal of the following documents to the State Legislature and the State Lands Commission as the City of South San Francisco's compliance with the require- ments of Section 6374 of the State Public Resources Code. 1. "Historical Profile: The City of South San Francisco's Trusteeship of the State of California's Salt Marshes" Tidelands, and Submerged Territory" 2. The General Plan: 1969, entitled "Orderly Growth" 3. "Preliminary Plan for the South San Francisco Shoreline Regional Park" 4. Inter-Office Memorandum from John Noonan" Esquire, City Attorney. This memorandum embodies a recitation of Chapter S6, Statute of 1925." All of the above items are available for examination in the Office of the City Planner. At the conclusion of its consideration, Commissioner Gardner moved that the Planning Commission instruct its Secretary to transmit the recommendation to the City Council, that the City Council order the - 3166 - Special Report continued June 12, 1972 the submittaill of the respective documents containing all 4 items to the State Legislature and the State Lands Commission as the City of South San Francisco's compliance with the requirements of Section 6374 of the State Public Resource Code. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Lazzari and was passed unanimously. GOOD AND WELFARE Mr. Louis Fornaciari, 4lS Fairway, South San Francisco, expressed his concern for not maintaining landscaped areas at Rotary Plaza. At this point Mr. Fred Hull, Director of Ecological Development was introduced. Mr. Hull explained the functions of his depart- ment and other divisions. Al Martin, 724 Circle Court, South San Francisco, mentioned that the City requires good plans when submitting for landscaping, parking, signs, etc., but then are not maintained regularly. Commissioner Campredon expressed that the relocated corner house (Mr . Poletti's) on Arlington Drive appears to be too much above existing grade. Secretary Pass informed the Commission he would check with the Building Inspector Rex Greene. There being nothing further to be considered under Good and Welfare, and there being no further communicatmfiRs or other matters of interest for the Planning Commission, Chairman Raffaelli announced that the next regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission would be held on June 26, 1972 at 8:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers of City Hall, South San Francisco, California. The meeting was adjourned at 9:18 p.m. ~~~ DanielM. Pass, Secretary Planning Commission City of South San Francisco 1'",/ Mario Raffaelli, alrman Planning Commission City of South San Francisco sna - 3167 -