HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 06/14/1977
.MINUTES
~f the regular meeting of the South San Francisco Planning Commission
TIME: 7:33 p.m.
DATE: JUNE 14, 1977
PLACE: WEST ORANGE LIBRARY AUDITORIUM
MEMBERS PRESENT: Vice-Chairman Goldberg, Commissioners Bertucelli, Campredon,
Mullin, Slade and Chairman Teglia
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Mathewson
ALSO PRESENT:
City Planner
William Costanzo
Assistant Planner
Mark Wheeler
Senior Planner
Daniel Christians
City Engineer
Robert Yee
Chief Building Inspector
Planning Division' Secretary
Roy Ghilardi
Pamela Bayer
MINUTES OF PREVIOUS MEETING
Minutes of the Planning Commission meeting of May 24, 1977.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg moved that the minutes of the regular meeting of the
South San Francisco Planning Commission of May 24, 1977 be approved. The
motion was seconded by Commissioner Campredon and was passed by the following
roll call vote:
AYES: Vice-Chairman Goldberg, Commissioners Bertucelli, Campredon
Mullin and Chairman Teglia
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Mathewson
ABSTAINED: Commissioner Slade
ANNOUNCEMENT CONCERNING TAPE RECORDING OF MEETING
Chairman Teglia announced that this meeting of the South San Francisco Planning
Commission would be recorded on tape, but that anyone who wished to come before
the Commission to be heard, but who objected to having his or her voice recorded
in this manner, could request the Chairman to order the tape recorder turned
"off" for the duration of the time that he or she is speaking or is heard.
- 3777 -
June 14, 1977
UP-77-393, UP-77-388, V-77-199 & PM-77-145
UP-77-393, an application of Oyster Point Associates to establish a live-in
security quarters at #1 Oyster Point Boulevard.
UP-77-388, an application of Foster & Kleiser to relocate two off-site adver-
tising structures located east of and adjacent to the Bayshore Freeway, approxi-
mately 2600 feet north of Oyster Point Boulevard.
V-77-199, an application of Oyster Point Associates for a reduction of the
required minimum lot width for the parcel located at #1 Oyster Point Boulevard.
PM-77-145, an application of Oyster Point Associates to create one parcel from
two existing parcels on property located at #1 Oyster Point Boulevard.
Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report for the above mentioned applica-
tions, noting that Cal Trans has indicated the construction of the road adjacent
to this area, if possible, thus, a continuation of these matters would not be
necessary.
Proponents: Mr. Robert Smith
representing Oyster Point Associates
Mr. Walt Moreno
representing Foster & Kleiser
Opponents: None
Vice-Chairman Goldberg asked if Cal Trans had commttted themselves to this
road. Secretary Costanzo indicated that they have deemed this right-of-way
feasible, therefore, they are willing to dedicate this right~of-way to South
San Francisco. He indicated that their policy is that. they participate with
local jurisdictions in the construction of the road, but since they do not have
funds for this, they will provide services in lieu of the funds. He also noted
that the two off-ramps are under study, but that more study is needed on the
specific impacts and that something should be forthcoming within the next 30
to 45 days.
Commissioner Mullin asked if there possibly would be no direct access from
Oyster point Boulevard to Sierra Point. Secretary Costanzo said that just the
opposite is the case. He stated that the right-of-way is about 40 feet, curb
to curb, which is enough for two lanes in each direction, or a left turn stack-
ing lane. He stated that Oyster Point would be willing to dedicate 10 feet to
the City, making the right-of-way 50 feet instead of 40.
Commissioner Bertucelli asked for a time frame on the completion of the right-
of-way. Secretary Costanzo said improvements are not paid for by the City,
but by the developers. He stated that access to this property would be from
the new frontage road which would possibly take two years to complete. He
further noted that the frontage road would run parallel to Highway 101 but that
there had been a question as to who would pay for it. He noted this would be
the responsibility of the developers. Mr. Bob Smith stated that he is not
concerned if the road is constructed or not, but that if it is, he would pay
his fair share.
- 3778 -
UP-77-393, UP-77-388, V-77-199
& PM-77-145, continued
June 14, 1977
Commissioner Mullin noted that this type of development would not lend itself
to a substantial increase in traffic. He asked what type of traffic would be
generated with this type of warehouse. Secretary Costanzo said traffic would
be very minimal as there would be long term storage which would not generate
a constant flow of traffic.
Commissioner Mullin asked how closely tied the Foster & Kleiser application
for the signs was to the other applications. Secretary Costanzo indicated
that there are two signs on Highway 101 adjacent to Southern Pacific lines.
Now Foster & Kleiser was building two new permanent steel billboards that would
go up 55 feet into the air and cantilever over the S.P. lines which signs would
have an amortization of 55 to 65 years. He noted that if the City adopts a
strong sign ordinance or if Cal Trans landscapes the freeway or street, then
the City might have to buy the billboards under California state law. He felt
that the location of the billboards under the S.P. right-of-way is inconsistent
with what the City is trying to achieve.
Mr. Walt Moreno noted that'they had a 30 day lease with the Southern Pacific
Railroad Company which can be terminated with 30 days:notice, however, he noted
that they have good public relations with S.P. and he did not see this happening.
He further indicated that in San Francisco in 1965 many of the signs along 101
were grandfathered for life and some of theirs they had fought for to be grand-
fathered also. He did indicate that they removed around 137 signs at that time.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg asked what the cost of relocating the signs would be.
Mr. Moreno said about 35,000 to 40,000 dollars for each sign.
Mr. Moreno stated that if the billboards interfere in ,any way with a potential
project, the billboards would come down. Commissioner Goldberg noted that he
is more concerned with the signs being a sore thumb to the City sometime down
the road.
Chairman Teglia said she does not object to these signs because of what is there
now. She asked why a use permit could not be worked up giving a temporary stand-
ing to these signs. Secretary Costanzo said that that seems reasonable. He
noted that whenever a development of this magnitude is being proposed, there
should be overriding public benefits that come to the City besides the revenue
and if the Commission agrees, he would request that the copy of those billboards
be restricted to advertising services and businesses located within South San
Francisco. Mr. Moreno said he would be happy to put up anything the City wished.
He noted that they have other billboards in the City for public services and
noted that they have done many signs free of charge for any worthwhile cause.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg asked if the clause about removing the signs if they get
in the way applies also to these two existing signs. Mr. Moreno said it does
not, but that the two existing signs must be removed and that the purpose of
this use permit is to relocate them. Vice-Chairman Goldberg asked if the other
permits are contingent upon the approval of this permit, as he would like to
restrict the usage of these signs and would like staff to check with the City
Attorney on the legality of doing this. He further noted that he would like
strong conditions imposed on this permit, assuring the City can remove the signs
if they become a nuisance.
- 3779 -
UP-77-393, UP-77-388, V-77-199
& PM-77-145, continued
June 14, 1977
Chairman Teglia noted her agreement to check with the City Attorney on the
legality of restricting the usage of these signs. Secretary Costanzo said
the City would possibly have to contend with a restraining order if the City
tried to go onto the property to remove these signs, even with written per-
mission from the property owner.
Commissioner Mullin indicated that he had driven through this area and had
noted that the City is swamped with signs. He indicated that the Commission
would eventually have to vote "yes" or "no" on this permit and he would like to
do it at this meeting.
Commissioner Slade indicated that he felt a vote would be in order, but that
he could not see where the signs would adversely affect this area now or in
the future. He stated that when development of that area is discussed, it
could be 10 or 20 years down the road.
Chairman Teglia asked Mr. Moreno if he would object to a couple of weeks delay
in order to look at possible legal wording. Mr. Moreno said he would not.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg moved that UP-77-388 be continued to the Planning Com-
mission meeting of June 28 to allow enough time for staff to meet with the City
Attorney for legal counsel. Commissioner Bertucelli seconded the motion and
it was passed by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Vice-Chairman Goldberg, Commissioners Bertucelli, Campredon,
Slade and Chairman Teglia
NOES: Commissioner Mullin
ABSENT: Commissioner Mathewson
Vice-Chairman Goldberg moved that the Negative Declaration for PM-77-145 had
been 'reviewed and considered by the Planning Commission. Commissioner Campre-
don seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg moved that UP-77-393 for the live-in security quarters
be approved with the addition of Special Condition #2: "That this use permit
shall stand approved upon the completion of construction of the development
approved by the Architectural Committee under DP-76-112 and the removal of
the two off-site advertising structures." Commissioner Mullin seconded the
motion and it was approved unanimously.
Commissioner Campredon moved that V-77-199 for the reduction of the minimum
lot width be approved. Commissioner Bertucelli seconded the motion and it
was passed unanimously.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg moved that PM-77-145 to create one parcel from two be
approved with the addition of two special conditions: "That the property owner
shall dedicate up to 10 feet along the entire length of the westerly property
line when a future frontage road is developed between Oyster Point Boulevard
to that area known as "Sierra Point" adjacent to Highway 101"; and "That the
property owner shall pay his fair share of any road costs for said frontage
road and shall deposit with the City Engineer a cash depositor security bond
or other surety to guarantee the future installation of this road." Commissioner
- 3780 -
UP-77-393, UP-77-388, V-77-199
& PM-77-145, continued
June 14, 1977
Slade seconded the motion and it was approved unanimously.
UP-77-394
An application of San Francisco Neon for a Use Permit to install 160 square
feet of new sign copy to an existing freestanding sign and the addition of
30 square feet of sign copy to an existing pole structure at 264 South
Airport Boulevard.
Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report, reading into the record the
special conditions.
Proponent: Mr. Burton Lauderson
representing San Francisco Neon
Opponent: None
Mr. Lauderson noted that he agreed and accepted all of the conditions with
the exception of Special Condition #3 relating to the monument sign. He noted
that it would block the driveway to the pumps. It was agreed to strike the
second sentence ofSp~cial Condition #3, leaving the condition to read that
this sign shall not be permitted.
Commissioner Slade moved that the Planning Commission had reviewed and con-
sidered the Negative Declaration to UP-77-394. Commissioner Campredon
seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously.
Commissioner Slade moved that UP-77-394 be approved subject to the conditions
and limitations of the staff report, with the above noted change in Special
Condition #3. Commissioner Bertucelli seconded the motion and it was passed
uanimously.
RESOLUTION NO. 2213
UP-77-395, SA-77-39 & RZ-77-40
UP-77-395, an app'lication by Albert Seyranian to construct eight single family
homes and a 42 unit apartment complex on property located on Holly Avenue at
the terminus of Westview Drive, approximately 250 feet north of Mission Road.
SA-77-39, an application by Albert Seyranian to create eight R-l single family
parcels and three R-3 multiple family parcels on the same property as noted
above.
RZ-77-40, an application of Albert Seyranian to rezone one-half of the above noted
property from R-l single family residential to R-3 restricted multiple family
residential in the R-l single family zone district.
Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report, noting that the applicant has
elected to come in under a pun and that they could actually develop this with
- 3781 -
UP-77-395, SA-77-39 & RZ-77-40, cont'd
June 14, 1977
just the approval of the Subdivision Map and rezoning application. He read
into the record the special conditions for the use permit.
Proponents: Mr. Albert Seyranian
San Francisco, CA
Donald Seyranian
Daly City, CA
Leon Seyranian
Oakland, CA
Opponents: David Jerief
217 Westview Drive
South San Francisco, CA
Wayne Hess
1113 Sunnyside Drive
South San Francisco, CA
John Falsarella
282 Westview Drive
South San Francisco, CA
Douglas Butler
133 Adrian Avenue
South San Francisco, CA
James Keegan
1244 Crestwood Drive
South San Francisco, CA
Audrey Craig
230 Westview Drive
South San Francisco, CA
Mr. Jerief stated his opposition to these applications and presented a petition
to the Commission which had been circulated through the homeowners of Sunshine
Gardens opposing these applications. The basis for their objections was that
traffic congestion on Holly Avenue was already heavy and this development would
generate even more, as well as generating more on-street parking on Holly
Avenue. Mr. Jerief stated that apartments should not be allowed in an R-l
Zone. He noted that he felt the project would not blend with the existing neigh-
borhood.
Mr. Hess stated three objections to the proposed development: 1) that this
would generate additional congestion, both with traffic and people; 2) that
architecturally, it does not blend in with the community; and 3) that crime
would be a problem as in every apartment complex. He stated that Sunshine
Gardens does not want these units and they are not needed.
Mr. Butler stated that every vacant plot is subject to down grading as far as
zoning changes are concerned. He feels these apartments are proposed only
because of the existing apartments there now. He stated that an R~l neighbor-
hood should be kept R~l for those people who have put their savings and lives
- 3782 -
UP-77-395, SA-77-39 & RZ-77-40, cont'd
June 14, 1977
into tha t nei ghborhood. He felt changi ng this zon i ng
gradi'ng of the area.
Mr. Falsarella stated that there are a lot of apartment buildings being con-
structed and that somehow Sunshine Gardens has been picked as the area for
apartments. He stated that building codes in this City are not as tough as
in other cities. He stated that there are a number of property owners who
did not receive notices of the hearing and that he had not seen a posting on
the site. He felt the residents of Sunshine Gardens were being "sold down
the river." He felt absolutely nothing other than single family homes should
be put into that area. He stated that someday some developer will be able
to find a design for these single family units.
R-3 would be a down-
Mr. Keegan felt with so many apartment building being built in South San Fran-
cisco that there would soon be a case of over-building. He felt the building
of these apartments would severly impact the single family area in terms of
traffic generated and on-street parking. He stated that it would be worse to
live across from apartment buildings than to live abutting them.
Ms. Craig stated that the apartments already there do not have windows facing
on the proposed property, so that any single family home built there would not
have people from the apartment building looking down on them. She stated that
she does not need nor want these apartments.
Mr. Donald Seyranian stated that he believes this project will blend in with
the area and will be an improvement. He also stated that the construction
will occur in two phases, starting at the one end of the single family homes
and including one apartment building. After these are complete, construction
will begin on the other two apartment buildings. He stated that construction
would be continual, with no break, but that the single family homes would be
constructed first. Mr. Costanzo noted that he would not accept this as he did
not want single family home purchasers to be unaware that apartment houses were
being constructed across the cul-de-sac. Mr. Seyranian stated that there would
be a real estate report that each purchaser would have to sign before any monies
are collected for deposits stating that this is one project and that the apart-
ment buildings will be constructed there. He further stated that they are putting
a lot of energy into making these buildings aesthetically pleasing and of quality
workmanship.
Mr. Leon Seyanian stated that this particular area is designated as medium-
high density in the General Plan. He stated that the extreme depth of the
property makes a cul-de-sac the only economical approach to developing this
area. He further stated that parking has been adequat~ly designed into the
project, so that there shou-ld not be any overflow parking onto Holly Avenue.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg noted that there is a hole in the back of the property
and an eight to ten foot hill in the front. He asked what the developer is
planning to do with this. Al Seyranian stated that they are taking some of
the grade and spreading it across the property to the back to smooth it out,
which will put it below the southwesterly apartment unit. He noted that the
cul-de-sac street will drop at an even rate.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg asked what the highest height would be. Mr. Seyranian
stated about 32 feet.
- 3783 -
UP-77-395, SA-77-39 & RZ-77-40, cont'd
June 14, 1977
Vice-Chairman Goldberg noted that one condition imposed on the use permit
is that the developer eliminate five units and increase the parking by one-half
for each two-bedroom unit. Mr. Al Seyranian stated that this was acceptable.
He further stated that he would like to work with staff to reach a workable
solution to the parking.
Commissioner Slade requested to know why the idea was abandoned of all single
family units for that area. Don Seyranian stated that the cost of the land
and installation of the cul-de-sac were very high and that the General Plan
did not designate this area for only R-l. Al Seyranian stated that he knew
they would have some problems with this type of design, but that they were
suffering the impact of the apartments with the single family residences
across the cul-de-sac. Chairman Teglia asked if they would consider another
kind of mix, such as duplexes or triplexes. Don Seyranian said the property
only has a square foot frontage of 50 feet. Al Seyranian said duplex lots
would be economically totally infeasible. Secretary Costanzo noted that the
yield if triplexes were constructed would only be about 32 units.
Commissioner Slade noted that we are starting with a false premise in that
this area is zoned R-l and R-3 development is not permitted there. He stated
that because there are some there now does not necessarily mean that we have
to continue putting apartments there. He indicated that this same configura-
tion could be used for single family residences. He noted that there would
be additional traffic problems and congestion. He also noted that the exis-
ting apartment building in this area would lend itself to satisfying the medium
density requirements of the General Plan. Al Seyranian stated that economic-
ally they could not construct all single family residences.
Commissioner Bertucelli stated that when Sunshine Gardens was developed it
was supposed to be a single family area and he further stated that he does
not want to see apartment buildings built in an R-l single family area.
Don Seyranian stated that this area is zoned R-l, but that the General Plan
designation is medium to high density and that they did not intend to come
in and eliminate all R-l housing. He noted that their proposal was based on
the General Plan designation.
Commissioner Mullin asked if they owned the property. Don Seyranian said
they have an option on it.
Commissioner Mullin asked Secretary Costanzo if legal notices had been sent
out. He answered that the legal notice was put in the Enterprise-Journal,
posted on the site and mailed to the property owners within 300 feet of the
project. He stated that he could not confirm this evening if every property
owner had been mailed a notice.
Commissioner Mullin asked if the parking requirements were met, if there
would still be a spillover into Holly or Westview. Secretary Costanzo said
that the density has to be reduced by 5 units which will yield six additional
parking spaces and that a guest parking lot would have to be provided for a
total of around 90 spaces. He felt there would not be a spillover.
Commissioner Mullin stated that he did not feel we were headed for over-
building. He stated that HUD has indicated that apartment building is the
only economically feasible way to live and that people are crying for housing.
- 3784 -
June 14, 1
Secretary Costanzo said the study on San Bruno Mountai
housing units were needed in the Bay Area.
showed that 25,000
Chairman Teglia stated that she feels possibly the sel
is based on a high density and that the price could
it were kept at R-l. She also stated that she felt
problem with apartment buildings and that she would li
from the Police Department on the types of crimes and
to the existing apartments.
Don Seyranian asked what would the possibilities be townhouse units.
Chairman Teglia noted that this could not be discussed at this public hear-
ing, but she suggested that discuss this with the idents as his rst
step.
ing price of the land
ibly come down if
me was a definite
to see some data
f they are related
Secretary Costanzo suggested wording for findings if
deny the rezoning application:
1. That the Commission affirms that the density shall not exceed six
units to the gross acre and that zoning would not be changed to
R-3.
Commission chose to
2.& That additional density will create unmitigable parki
problems in and adjacent to Sunshine Gardens area.
3. That the introduction of apartment units in and adjacent to singl
family residential land uses is objectionable in that the life
style interrelationships between such uses create conflicts t
increase public service and police needs.
traffic
4. That the Planning staff is directed to address the problems of
the General Plan in this area to effectuate a modification to
low density land uses.
Commissioner Mullin suggested leaving out the IIparking" in
Commission agreed this.
ing #2. The
Commissioner Slade introduced Resolution #2213 and moved that RZ-77-40 be
den; based on the above listed findings. Commissioner Bertucelli seconded
the motion and this Resolution and rezoning were denied by the following roll
11
Vice-Chairman Goldberg, Commissioners
Slade and Chairman Teglia
1 i, ~1u 11 in,
NOES:
ABSENT:
None
Commissioner Mathewson
Commissioner Campredon
Seyranian s they would 1i
Commission accepted their withdrawal of
UP-77-395
tems.
SA-77-39
June 14, 1977
V-77-200
An application of Eugene Rossini to reduce the rear
feet to 11.5 feet on property located at 399 Holly
District.
setback from 20
in the R-l Zone
Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report.
Proponent: Eugene Rossini
399 Holly Avenue
South San Francisco, CA
Opponent: None
Secretary Costanzo explained that the applicant had been required to move the
wall in eight feet and that the area from the new wall to the originally
proposed wall would be an open covered patio, encroaching into the rear yard
setback. He also explained that the applicant did not feel the size of the
room would be sufficient for his needs if he had to move the wall back eight
feet to meet the 20 foot setback requirement, thus, the purpose of this
variance.
Commissioner Mullin asked the Chief Building Inspector if additions were not
planned to blend with the existing building Chief Inspector Ghilardi respon-
ded that this was encouraged, but was not mandated.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg moved to grant V-77-200 subject to all of the condi-
tions of the staff report. Commissioner Bertucelli seconded the motion and
it was passed unanimously.
V-77-201
An application of William Pelster for a reduction in rear yard setback
from 20 feet to 15 feet on property located at 517 Del Monte Avenue in the
R-l Single Family Zone District.
Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report.
Proponent: William Pelster
517 Del Monte Avenue
South San Francisco, CA
Opponent: None
Commissioner Campredon asked what kind of shingles
tion. Mr. Pelster stated he would be using compositi
on the existing house.
Commissioner Campredon moved that V-77-20l be granted
conditions of the staff report. Commissioner Bertucel
and it was passed unanimously.
d be used on addi-
shingles, the same as
to all of
seconded the motion
- 3786 -
June 14, 1977
PM-77-148
An application for a Tentative Parcel Map by Cabot, Cabot & Forbes to sub-
divide seven parcels into five on property located southeast of Grandview
Drive, between E. Grand Avenue and Point San Bruno Boulevard in the M-2-H
Zone District.
Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report.
Proponent: Mr. Don Bruzzone
Cabot, Cabot & Forbes
One Maritime Plaza
San Francisco, CA
Opponent: None
Mr. Bruzzone stated that the Commission has seen this same area before, but
that now they have a firm tenant and that development is beginning again.
Commissioner Mullin asked if lots of little businesses were going to be the
type of use in the future instead of large operations. Mr. Bruzzone explained
that they are trying to meet the market place. He stated that some years it
is large businesses and other years it is small businesses. He noted that
the Hilltop Business Center is finally'filled up.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg moved that the Negative Declaration for PM-77-148 had
been reviewed and considered by the Planning Commission. Commissioner
Bertucelli seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously.
Commissioner Mullin moved that PM-77-148 be approved subject to all of the
conditions of the staff report. Commissioner Campredon seconded the motion
and it was passed unanimously.
ZA-77-7
RESOLUTION NO. 2214
An application of the City of South San Francisco to amend the text of the
Zoning Ordinance of the City of South San Francisco to include an additional
provision to Section 4.131, subsection D, requirements for off-street parking.
Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report and read into the record the
proposed subsection D to Section 4.131 of the Zoning Ordinance relating to
off-street parking. Further, he read into the record the Negative Declara-
tion for this text change.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg noted that he had done some research into this and had
gotten a three year spread of motor vehicles in San Mateo County, licensed
drivers and population in San Mateo County. He noted that the basic results
of the study were that population was not increasing, but vehicles and drivers
have substantially increas~d.
- 3787 -
ZA-77-7, cont'd
dune 14, 1977
Commissioner Mullin asked if possibly this increase in drivers reflects the
baby boom which is now ending and that with the population control, there
might be a decrease in the future. He also asked if the City Attorney had
seen this proposed amendment. Secretary Costanzo said that he had seen it,
but that he has no comment from him.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg moved that Negative Declaration on this amendment
had been reviewed and considered by the Planning Commission. Commissioner
Mullin seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg introduced Resolution No. 2214 recommending to the City
Council that Zoning Ordinance No. 353, as amended, be further amended to
include an additional provision in Section 4.131 related to additional park-
ing requirements. This Resolution was adopted unanimously.
REPORTS
PM-76-138
Final Parcel Map by Stonegate Ridge Properties &E. G. Coopman to readjust
lot lines in the Stonegate Ridge Planned Community area corresponding with
the phase lines of the Stonegate Ridge Planned Community Zone District.
Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report, noting that this Parcel Map
was substantially in compliance with the Tentative Parcel Map previously
approved by the Commission.
Commissioner Campredon moved that PM-76-138 be approved subject to the'pre-
viously approved conditions and limitations. Commissioner Bertucelli
seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously.
SA-76-36
Final Subdivision Map by Stonegate Ridge Properties & E. G. Coopman creating
13 air space condominium lots on property located on the west side of Stone-
gate Drive, approximately 1000 feet south of Hillside Boulevard, in the Planned
Community Zone District.
Secretary Costanzo presented the staff report, noting that the final map is
substantially in compliance with the previously approved tentative map.
Commissioner Bertucelli moved that SA-76-36 be approved subject to all of the
previously approved conditions and limitations. Commissioner Campredon
seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously.
- 3788 -
June 14, 1
UP-76-370
Request of the applicant and the City Attorney for the Planning Commission
to untable and set a date for the continuance of this application to estab-
lish an automobile body and fender repair shop in the C-3 Zone District at
619 Airport Boulevard.
There was some discussion on untabling this matter and who had tabled it
originally. The Commission requested staff to determine which Commissioner
tabled this matter.
t1r. William Daley, attorney representing the applicant, stated that there
was a hearing where Brincat lost and he further requested that this matter
be heard as soon as possible.
The Commissioners unanimously agreed that this matter should be brought
back to the June 28, 1977, study session with a full report on the status
of this matter and with knowledge of who tabled this matter originally.
COMMUNICATION~
Secretary Costanzo presented a report to the Commission requesting that they
take action to abandon a storm sewer easement and readjust the alignment of
IIC" Street, and make this recommendation to the City Council.
After a brief discussion on this matter, Commissioner Campredon moved that
this abandonment and realignment take place and that their recommendation
be sent to the City Council. Vice-Chairman Goldberg seconded the motion and
it was passed unanimously.
Secretary Costanzo presented a report to the Commission requesting that they
find that the acquisition of a lot at the corner of Produce Avenue and Colma
Creek by the County Flood Control District is in keeping with the General
Plan of the City of South San Francisco.
Vice-Chairman Goldberg moved that this aGquisition is in keeping withr the
City1s General Plan. CommissionerSlade seconded the motion and it was passed
unanimously.
Secretary Costanzo made reference to a memo distributed to the Planning Com-
mission on Planning Fees. He noted that this ma would be on the June 28,
1977, meeting agenda for a recommendation back to the City Council.
Secretary Costanzo made reference to a letter from to the Crocker Bank
regarding repairing of their building en Grand Avenue. He noted that Crocker
will int the building and will stucco a window area.
- 3789 -
Communicat~?~ contld
June 14, 1977
Secretary Costanzo noted to the Commission that there is a possibility of a
grant through EDA only for those cities that have lost major manufacturing
plants like Bethlehem Steel. He stated that $50,000 may be available and
that staff was looking into the poss i bi 1 i ti es ofbbta.irri ng it.
Secretary Costanzo presented a brief history on the Snyder construction in
the Westborough/West Park #2 area. He stated that the Commission need not
take action, but that this would be a case for the Homeowners I Association
to alleviate the problems that exist there since they go against the C.C.& R. IS,
not the City's codes.
Secretary Costanzo gave the Commission an update on the Sphere of Influence
Study. He indicated that the County had ascribed the Sphere of Influence
to South San Francisco and that annexation would occur before the completion
of construction. He noted tha~ otherwise this could cause some problems since
the developers could put a lot of pressure on the County for occupancy before
the annexation occurred. He noted that if the City chose not to annex, this
development would still present a burden to South San Francisco.
Secretary Costanzo noted that the Draft Sign Ordinance would be brought to
the Commission at the June 28, 1977, study session.
He further noted that the General Plan update study was proposed to be
brought to the Commission at the June 28 study session.
GOOD AND WELFARE
Chairman Teglia presented a plaque mounted with the gavel used by the former
Chairman, Wesley Slade. The Commission also presented him with a Resolution
commending him for his services while Chairman and noted their deep apprecia-
t ion to him.
There being nothing further to be considered under Good and Welfare and no
other communications or matters of interest for the Commission, Chairman
Teglia announced that the next regular meeting of the Planning Commission
would be held on June 28, 1977, at 7:30 p.m., at the West Orange Library
Auditorium. ,
/i
I
I
Robert Teglia, Chairman
Planning Commission
City of South San Francisco
lliam Costanzo,
Planning Commission
City of South San Francisco
The meetil'lg was adjourmed at 1: 00 a. m.
- 3790 -
anning Commission
Oral presenta
are avail
items
are avail
on tape
Planner. Documents
office City
4
indica the on taken
arguments and documen are
in the office of the Ci
scuss are on file in
e for ic inspection.