Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPR Comm Packet 1.17.23 Agenda CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MEETING OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION TELECONFERENCE MEETING NOTICE Tuesday, January 17, 2023 7:00 p.m. Welcome to the Regular Meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission. If this is your first time, the following is a general outline of our procedures: Please note that due to the COVID-19 outbreak, this meeting is teleconference only, and will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the Governor’s Executive Order N29-20 issued on March 17, 2020, allowing for deviation of teleconference rules required by the Brown Act and pursuant to the Order of the Health Officer of San Mateo County dated March 31, 2020. The public may view or comment during this meeting from a computer, laptop, tablet, or smartphone: Join Zoom Meeting https://ssf-net.zoom.us/j/85848012442?pwd=dDR0TjJHWWp5Wmo2L1VxU2NXVGNVZz09 Meeting ID: 858 4801 2442 Passcode: 566792 The purpose of conducting the meeting as described in this notice is to provide the safest environment for staff and the public while allowing for public participation. Commissioners Battaglia, Burgo, Camacho, DeNardi, Firpo, Lock and Uy and essential City staff will participate via Teleconference. Members of the public may submit their comments on any agenda item or public comment via email or Parks & Recreation main line. PURSUANT TO RALPH M. BROWN ACT, GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54953, ALL VOTES SHALL BE BY ROLL CALL DUE TO COMMISSION MEMBERS PARTICIPATING BY TELECONFERENCE. In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5, any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an open session agenda item, and is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular meeting will be made available for public inspection at the Parks and Recreation Department in the Municipal Services Building. If, however, the document or writing is not distributed until the regular meeting to which it relates, then the document or writing will be made available to the public at the location of the meeting, as listed on this agenda. Public Comment: Please note that dialing in will only allow you to listen in on the meeting. To make a public comment during the Zoom session, join the meeting from your computer or mobile device, enter your name, and request to comment through the “Chat” function and a staff person will add you to the queue for comments and unmute your microphone during the comment period. In the alternative, you may also provide email comments received during the meeting will be read into the record. Please be sure to indicate the Agenda item number you wish to address or the topic of your public comment. California law prevents the Commission from taking action on any item not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a future Agenda for more comprehensive action or report. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation. Remote Public Comments: Members of the public wishing to participate are encouraged to submit public comments in writing in advance of the meeting. The email and phone line below will be monitored during the meeting and public comments received will be read into the record. The City encourages the submission of comments by 6:00pm on Tuesday, January 17, 2023, to facilitate inclusion in the meeting record. A maximum of 3 minutes per individual comment will be read into the record. Comments that are not in compliance the Commission’s rules of decorum may be summarized for the record rather than read verbatim. Email: [email protected] Electronic Comments received by email will be monitored during the meeting and read into the record. We ask that you limit your electronic comments so that they comply with the 3-minute time limitation for public comment. Parks & Recreation Hotline: (650) 829-3837 Voice messages will be monitored during the meeting, and read into the record. Your voicemail should be limited so that it complies with the 3-minute time limitation for public comment. If you have special questions, please contact the Director of Parks and Recreation. The Director will be pleased to answer your questions when the Commission is not in session. WILLIAM LOCK CHAIRPERSON STEPHEN FIRPO RUTH DeNARDI VICE CHAIR SECRETARY BETTY BATTAGLIA BRITTANY BURGO COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER KRISTY CAMACHO ROBERT UY COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER GREG MEDIATI DIRECTOR OF PARKS AND RECREATION Agenda CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MEETING Teleconference Meeting Tuesday, January 17, 2023 7:00 p.m. A G E N D A I. Call to Order II. Roll Call III. Pledge of Allegiance IV. Agenda Review V. Approval of Minutes of the November 15, 2022 Meeting VI. Citizen Participation (Citizen comment on items not agendized/informational only) VII. Old Business A. Elections of Officers B. Capital Projects Update VIII. New Business A. Lindenville Specific Plan Update B. SSFUSD Joint Use Agreement Update IX. Friends of Parks and Recreation X. Beautification Committee XI. Items from Commission XII. Items from Staff A. Calendar of Events B. 2023 Event Calendar C. Administrative Update XIII. Adjournment Next Meeting: Regular Meeting: Tuesday, February 21, 2023 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES FROM TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2022 I. CALL TO ORDER: 7:00 p.m. A regular meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission of the City of South San Francisco was held on Tuesday, November 15, 2022, via teleconference due to the COVID-19 pandemic and local health orders. II. ROLL CALL: Present: Commissioners Battaglia, Camacho, DeNardi, Uy, Vice Chair Firpo and Chair Lock Staff: Greg Mediati, Director of Parks and Recreation Angela Duldulao, Acting Deputy Director of Parks and Recreation Joshua Richardson, Parks Manager Kari Jung, Management Analyst I Laura Armanino, Recreation Supervisor Erin O’Brien, Business Manager Philip Vitale, Deputy Director of Capital Projects Kasey Jo Cullinan, Recreation Supervisor Jeanette Yoshida, Administrative Assistant II Sharon Ranals, Assistant City Manager Brian Noce, Aquatics Supervisor Michael Mulkerrins, Acting Recreation Manager III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: Skipped. IV. AGENDA REVIEW: There were no changes to the agenda. V. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF THE OCTOBER 18, 2022, MEETING: Approved by motion. Motion: Commissioner Firpo / Seconded: Commissioner Camacho VI. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: None were present. VII. Old Business A. Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park Master Plans Deputy Director Vitale introduces members off the consultant team from Callander Associates who are in attendance to provide updates on the Centennial Way Trail and Orange Memorial Park Master Plans. They will be presenting a few adjustments made to the projects with the intent of taking the Master Plans to City Council for formal adoption in 2023. Centennial Way Trail Brian Fletcher from Callander Associates shares a presentation and explains areas where items in the design process may have changed since the last time the plan was shared with the Commission. The design team wanted to make sure that the master plan accounted for all the new development along the trail. Also new is the availability, for Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of the Meeting of November 15, 2022 Page 2 the most part, of the entire width of the trail corridor. A new agreement was approved between BART and the City that made lands that weren’t previously available now accessible for trail improvements. The team had a robust community and stakeholder process to obtain feedback and held individual stakeholder and committee meetings throughout the process to get more specific input. Brain Fletcher from Callander Associates said that he and his team first identified all the current planned improvement projects and then identified three distinct areas with more potential than others. The areas are from Huntington to Spruce, from Spruce to Orange and then parallel to Mission Road toward the South San Francisco BART Station. He goes on to mention that there will be some basic additions for example improved lighting, more benches and resting areas along the corridor of the trail. They received input from the skating community with a unique idea of having smaller skate spaces / plazas along the trail corridor, instead of one large skate park. Preferred Plan within the Master Plan: • Huntington Avenue to Spruce Avenue: The team wants to ensure that the trail has good connectivity to future developments. They are proposing a bike pump track, the first of several skate spaces, a traditional park with age separated play, open turf, picnicking and gaming areas as well as a pollinator garden and outdoor classroom. The City received grant funding to make this segment a reality. They are moving forward for additional community outreach to refine this design then moving into the construction documents to implement this section. • Spruce Avenue to Orange Avenue: This segment is not showing much on the plan as of right now. The land is owned by San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) and discussions are currently on-going with the SFPUC about what can and can’t be done in that area. As details are finalized in discussions the Master Plan will be amended with elements that can be implemented. • Orange Avenue to Chestnut Avenue: Enhancements to the existing trail by widening the trail by two feet of asphalt and two shoulders of decomposed granite on either side to accommodate scooter and bikes. • Chestnut Avenue along Antoinette Lane and continuing along Colma Creek: Opportunity for pause points, small planting areas, picnic areas for people to rest while on the trail. Some of the enhancements here are part of the new Civic Campus. There have been talks about a future pedestrian bridge from Kaiser over the creek onto the trail. There are other opportunities for pause points, fitness stations and picnic areas. Looking for opportunities to connect to Mission Road for people to filter through new and existing developments and be able to get to the trail form adjacent neighborhoods. Opportunities for small dog parks, children’s play areas, open turf, and a community garden to support the adjacent neighborhoods. They are also looking at opportunities at the BART Station Plaza to better activate that space with additional seating, landscape screening and other additional amenities. This will also be an opportunity to look for programming it for farmers markets, events, and possible food truck events. Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of the Meeting of November 15, 2022 Page 3 Vice Chair Firpo asked how far the dog park and community garden will be from the new developments in the area. Brian Fletcher explained using the slideshow the distance in question, and how close the trail comes to Mission Road. All the improvements would be really close to the residential neighborhood. Chair Lock asked if they’ve reached out to the people from Sunshine Gardens to see if they were comfortable with all the amenities being proposed. Deputy Director Vitale responded that the outreach process for Centennial Trail and Orange Park were done with workshops, mailers, e-blasts and collected email addresses of people interested. Staff did our best to reach these areas and we mailed to the adjacent properties. Chair Lock asked if the response was good from the area around Sunshine Garden, to which Deputy Director Vitale responded that they didn’t ask people to identify their home address or location during outreach events. Chair Lock also asked about the restrooms on the trail that Commissioner Burgo had expressed was needed in past meetings. Deputy Director Vitale responded that they were looking at a potential location farther down by Spruce Avenue, as suggested by the Commission. Brain Fletcher adds in that the new Civic Campus will be along the trail which will help provide restrooms that weren’t there before. There is also a potential restroom location in the segment from Mission Road to BART between the play area and dog park. Brian Fletcher added that it is imperative that our plan indicate these connections between trails so that when properties come up for development the plan can guide those necessary connections. Orange Memorial Park Brian Fletcher gave update on the Master Plan for Orange Memorial Park. Goals and objectives are to develop a master plan to guide future park improvements, engage the community and stakeholders to understand desired improvements, and to incorporate these needs and improvements within the plan. The master plan includes the future planned improvements and the current projects underway with the fields, pool and storm water capture project. There was a very similar process in reaching out to the community, stakeholders and having pop up events to receive feedback. Alternatives were brought forth based on public input. Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of the Meeting of November 15, 2022 Page 4 Alternative 1: Some of the key amenities included the bike pump track and the skate park, retaining a portion of the artist studios, restoration of Colma Creek, a park maintenance facility and parking lot. Alternative 2: Instead of a skate park and pump track, they propose a multi-purpose sports field, a flexible space that could accommodate a farmers’ market but could also be used for other community events or picnicking. Also included are community gardens, sculpture garden expansion and reconfiguration of the parking lot. Brian Fletcher shares slides with images of the proposed alternative in master plan. He breaks it up sections, starting with the area north of Colma Creek to the left of the tennis courts. He talks about connectivity for neighborhoods adjacent to the area having access to the park and the facilities. This section will include the multi-purpose fields, and a new parking lot. The loop road that goes from Tennis Drive, along the tennis courts and along Colma Creek has been eliminated to allow for more pedestrian and recreation opportunities, like six pickleball courts, a picnic area, restroom, concession stand and an outdoor group gathering area. Pedestrian bridges across Colma Creek are also being proposed in that area. Brian Fletcher moves on to the side north of Colma Creek. This master plan reflects both the indoor and outdoor pool, which is going through its own design process. There will be a new small parking lot and drop off zone, which will serve the new aquatic center as well as a new universally accessible play area. The current parking lot will remain the same but a there is a market/event walking area has been programmed into the area in front of the lot. The relocation of the Veterans Memorial is also being proposed to a more front and center location on the corner of the park. Near the universally accessible play area there will be a multi-purpose shade structure / community stage. Brian Fletcher explains about the aspirational notion of Colma Creek restoration. With the elimination of the loop road that goes by the tennis courts, it allows the removal of the concrete channel walls along Colma Creek. By doing this, the site will be able to handle additional storm water and we would be able to restore to a more natural state and bring secondary trails down to the lower areas of the creek. There could also be additional seating areas and other amenities along the creek edge. This concept is just a rendering of what the creek restoration could look like. Brian Fletcher moves onto the lower section of the park, south of Colma Creek, where the athletic field is currently under construction. He goes over the new plan for minor renovation to the existing turf, picnic shelter and play areas. He pointed out where the new park maintenance facilities would be and a smaller cluster of artist studios. He goes on to mention that the plan developed a signage program, not just for Orange Park but also for park facilities throughout the city. Brian Fletcher concludes his presentation with the next steps and where we are currently in the master plan. Feedback is welcome and the plan will be presented to City Council in 2023 for adoption. Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of the Meeting of November 15, 2022 Page 5 Commissioner Camacho suggested that when this master plan is presented to City Council that the design team will indicate in the plan the parts of the project that are already being worked on and how much funding would be needed and/or used. The breakdown would be helpful to see where things currently stand and help prioritize which parts they’ll want to fund first. Commissioner DeNardi comments that she believes that the plan captured the community’s priorities and suggested the plan is revisited in the future. Deputy Director Vitale shared that the master plan is a guiding document so over the next several years the plan can be reevaluated to update any new priorities. He also adds that it is good to have these plans because as grants and funding become available, we can apply for those quickly because of the plan that shows community engagement. Commissioner Uy believes the preferred plan concept meets the needs of the community. He like the idea of the pickleball court eventually coming in and having more fields. He’s not sure that having an event walk will attract more people to the farmer’s market. The Colma Creek Restoration design is beautiful but wants to know how much it would cost to do something like that and is it even realistic to do. Brian Fletcher notes that part of the feasibility of the Colma Creek restoration is not just the cost but the willingness of the Flood Control District to look at a different flood mitigation models. The cost estimate for the Colma Creek Restoration is estimated at just over ten million dollars. He adds that this plan is very conceptual, and further engineering would be needed. Vice Chair Firpo states that he remembers working on this plan about ten years ago and his priorities then compared to now have changed. He appreciated the process. He likes the creek restoration idea but is not sure if it would be safe. Chair Lock thinks the plan is great. He suggests that the new playground have different areas for different age groups like the current one has. He adds that the population is going to grow significantly which means that the utilization of the parks will be heavier and additional fields will be critical and to consider turf fields versus natural grass fields. He then asked how far along the creek are they envisioning the restoration. Deputy Director Vitale responded that we won’t have the opportunity to do it the entire distance. They looked at the master plan where there was room to spread wider without impacting the other amenities or in areas with opportunities where other projects are up for being refreshed. Brian Fletcher also added that they’re looking at areas where a complete restoration can be done and areas where softening of the concrete channel could be done. Chair Locks opinion on the farmers market is that it won’t draw enough people because of the size and the small number of vendors. Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of the Meeting of November 15, 2022 Page 6 B. Library | Park and Recreation Center Update: FF&E Manager O’Brien gave a brief overview of the furniture, fixtures and equipment for the library, parks and recreation facility. She shared pictures starting with the first floor of the facility which will have the lobby as well as the social hall, kitchens, Council Chambers as well as Council Chambers pre-functioned space. Pictures of tables and chairs staff have picked out were shared as Manager O’Brien explains that there were multiple meetings, samples tested as well as the communities needs taken into consideration when selecting these. Factors taken into consideration in spaces like the social and banquet halls is capacity, how many tables and chairs can fit, how do they store and having enough storage space. Manager O’Brien moves to the second floor where she shows where the dance and fitness studios, changing rooms, music classrooms, children’s classroom and exercise studio are located and associated furnishings. Manager O’Brien shares that in the exercise studio staff have been exploring equipping this room with a TRX type fitness system. On the third floor, there is a lobby area, Creator’s Studio, Gallery Room, and offices. Pictures of furnishings were shared. Commissioner DeNardi asked if the chairs are going to be fabric or wipeable and easy to clean. Manager O’Brien responded that the staff have lobbied for chairs to be very durable and able to easily clean. Commissioner Camacho asked if there was a way to get chairs for the banquet hall that didn’t look so office-like and would be more appropriate for parties and weddings. She will share examples with Manager O’Brien. Manager O’Brien responded that she understands what Commissioner Camacho is saying and will look at the examples sent over. Director Mediati added that they have looked at and been back and forth on sled bases chairs versus the four-legged chairs and most of the high-density stackers have sled bases. Commissioner Uy likes the TRX option in the exercise room and liked seeing potentially have weights. Spaces like the creator’s space are great to provide to the community and offered an idea integrating more tech equipment like 3D printers. Director Mediati added that Parks and Recreation was able to get a $1.5 million federal grant earlier this year that is helping to fund a lot of these furnishings and equipment. Robert Uy adds that if there will be a 3D printer maybe looking into laser etchers or Cricut machines. People can etch things into wood, glass or metal. It can be used in a lot of different crafts. Commissioner Firpo comments to make sure the chairs are functional and durable. He asks about the power supply in the creator’s studio since the table can be moved around Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of the Meeting of November 15, 2022 Page 7 and in different configurations. Manager O’Brien responded that the power will be coming from the ceiling. Commissioner Battaglia asked if the creator’s studio would also be used for events. Manager O’Brien responded that the creator’s studio is where a lot of our classes will take place. It is more like an industrial kind of working space that is meant to get a little bit dirty. Not to say you couldn’t have an event here if that fit your needs but wouldn’t be a pristine meeting space. Chair Lock asked if there was going to be audio built into the rooms and if the noise level was going to be managed. Manager O’Brien responded that all the rooms are equipped with the proper A/V for the sizes of the room. One of the things expressed, up front with the design of the building was to be able to increase the music in the rooms without disturbing adjacent spaces. Chair Lock asked about a press release he had seen regarding the library receiving four million dollars and wanted to know if any of that funding would be used for any of the equipment. Director Mediati and Assistant City Manager Ranals respond that the $4 million is going to the overall budget. VIII. New Business A. Age-Friendly Communities Initiative Assistant City Manager Ranals shared that the County wants to get every city in the county to be certified as age friendly by the end of next year. Currently the City is at the focus group phase and is trying to recruit 60 individuals ages 55 and over to meet with the consultant that the county and AARP are paying for. They’ll focus on the following areas: outdoor spaces, transportation, housing, social participation, respect and social inclusion, civic engagement, employment, communication and community support, and health services. Once the report comes from the consultant with ideas from the seniors, we will pick three pilot projects to help seniors. Commissioner Camacho asked about the length of this program and if the task force does become permanent if it would be possible to have one or two Parks and Recreation representatives since it is closely related to Parks and Recreation. Assistant City Manager Ranals responded that she thinks that would be a great idea. IX. Friends of Parks and Recreation: Acting Deputy Director Duldulao reported there are no updates at this time X. Beautification Committee: Director Mediati reported that there are no updates at this time. XI. Items from Commission: Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of the Meeting of November 15, 2022 Page 8 Vice Chair Firpo shares that he noticed trucks removing dirt at Oyster Point and believes they must be getting ready to start additional work at the site. He also shares that PG&E has been out there to the power on, but the bathrooms are still not open. He adds that the area there is beautiful and can’t wait to for it to be showcased during the Fun Run event this weekend. Director Mediati shared that there will be some grading in the area where the dirt is being removed as part of the future hotel site improvements but there won’t be any construction for at least 2-3 years. PG&E is largely done but they are still commissioning bathrooms and they might be opening in early to mid-December. Commissioner Camacho shares that Halloween Extravaganza was a hit and that staff did an amazing job. She talks about the upcoming Fun Run event and the Wreath Workshop for IPP. Commissioner DeNardi she shares her experience at the Holiday Boutique and likes that they opened a second room to accommodate more vendors. She also shares enjoying being part of trunk or treat at the Halloween Extravaganza and hopes to see it again. She shares some comments from the community regarding the pumpkin patch. Having a reservation system was a great idea but suggested having signage so people would know that the line forming is for people who have reserved times. Chair Lock thanked Manager Richardson for getting the slide fixed at Alta Loma Park. He asked if Alta Loma tennis courts were going to be repaved like the other ones. Manager Richardson said he’s had a couple of courts repaved each year and Alta Loma should be getting at least a new surface seal if not rebuilt entirely. Chair Lock asked about the agreement between the City and the school district and keeping the fields open for public use. He stated that Parkway Middle School has their field locked up. Director Mediati believes Parkway may have been one of the schools excluded but said he would double check the updated joint use agreement. XII. Items from Staff: A. Calendar of Events Director Mediati provided a brief update of the Calendar of Events. B. Administrative Updates Acting Manager Mulkerrins gives update on winter camp. It will be open December 19, 20, 21, 27, 28 and 29 at Terrabay Gymnasium and is open to the public. Applications are available on the Child Care website or available for pick up at the Fernekes Building. He also shares that the recreation office will be closed to the public and all classes and events December 23 through January 2. Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes of the Meeting of November 15, 2022 Page 9 Manager Richardson gives update on the tennis courts at Buri Buri and Brentwood Parks. They were repaved with asphalt at the end of October and have been curing for thirty days. Final surfacing, coloring and striping will be put on at the end of this month if weather allows. Brentwood Park will be strictly tennis courts and Buri Buri will have pickleball lines repainted as it had previously. Brentwood may eventually have pickleball lines added but for now stay strictly tennis courts due to the close proximity of neighboring homes. XIII. Adjournment: 9:10 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Jeanette Yoshida, Administrative Assistant II Next Meeting: January 17, 2023 Staff Report DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Greg Mediati, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: Election of Officers RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Parks and Recreation Commission elect officers for 2023. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Consistent with the City's Ordinance, the annual election of officers is to be held in January of each year. It is recommended that the current Chair ask for nominations from among the Commission to elect a new Chairperson. Following an election of the new Chair, the newly elected Chair shall conduct elections for the new Chair Pro-Tem and Secretary. Staff Report DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Philip Vitale, Deputy Director of Capital Projects SUBJECT: Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Design Update RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Parks and Recreation Commission receive an update and provide feedback on the new Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center schematic design to inform final design decisions. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Orange Pool is South San Francisco’s only indoor municipal swimming pool. Opened in 1970, it continues to serve as a community-wide destination for residents of all ages. Despite the City’s attentive custodianship of the building, overall, the building’s age and heavy use have resulted in very worn condition of the shell and interior. The facility is well beyond the point of meriting replacement. In August 2022, staff presented the Aquatic Center conceptual design to the Parks and Recreation Commission. The design presented included a 26,000 square foot building with two sets of men’s and women’s locker rooms, three family changing rooms, an activity room, swimmers lounge, staff offices, lobby and mechanical rooms. The design also included a 25-yard indoor pool with 7-lanes and a zero-beach entry as well as a 25-yard by 25-meter outdoor pool with 10-lanes sized to accommodate water polo and competition swimming events. To address wind concerns, a windscreen wrapped the south and west sides of the outdoor pool deck. A multipurpose room was included in the conceptual design, but at an estimated cost of $3 million, this amenity was beyond the project budget and considered as an alternate to be explored further in the next phase of design. At the recommendation of the Parks and Recreation Commission, the concept design was then presented to City Council on September 28, 2022. City Council supported the conceptual design with requests to further explore the multipurpose room as an alternate, provide a study to develop an all-electric facility, and complete an operations cost study. Staff Report To: Parks and Recreation Commission Date: January 17, 2023 Subject: Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Page 3 Since the September presentation to City Council, the project has advanced through the schematic design phase of the project. During this phase staff engaged consultants to prepare an operations study and life cycle cost report for an all-electric facility. Operations Study Consultants from BerryDunn prepared the initial operations study which compared the cost of operation, fees and services of the existing Orange Pool to the proposed Aquatic Center. The initial study results provide two operations scenarios: one at 77% cost recovery and the other at 86% cost recovery. Cost recovery for both scenarios is achieved through modest fee increases to programs across the board. The larger aquatics facility allows for an increase of programs and services, nearly double that of the existing Orange Pool. Of course, staff understands any fee changes are policy decisions that will be further studied and discussed with the Commission prior to opening the facility. While the new facility will require additional staff, the more efficient building systems along with increased revenue opportunity should result in lower overall operational costs. All-Electric Life Cycle Cost Report The base design for the new aquatic center uses electric powered mechanical systems to condition the building, while utilizing a natural gas-powered mechanical system to heat and operate the pools. Gas-powered mechanical systems have been the traditional approach for pool mechanical systems, while use of electric powered pool systems are increasing being implemented. The consulting firm Guttmann & Blaevot developed two options for utilizing all-electric mechanical systems for the entire facility, including both pools. Option 1 utilizes photovoltaic (PV) systems mounted to the building roof combined with the purchase of electricity for the balance of electricity demand. Option 1 has an initial increased capital cost of $672,000, resulting in yearly estimated operational costs of $282,000. Option 2 utilizes a combined photovoltaic and solar thermal system (PVT). Option 2 has an initial increased capital cost of $2,265,750 with estimated yearly operation costs of $165,400. Geotechnical Study Working from the conceptual design, engineers developed a geotechnical study of the project site. The study identified potentially liquefiable soils. To address these concerns, engineers are exploring the most appropriate and cost-effective approach to mitigate soil conditions to improve soil stability and/or use foundations piers to support both the pool and buildings. Initial cost estimates for these mitigation approaches range between $1 million and $4 million. The engineering team is working to determine the best approach and better understand the cost implications to the overall project budget. These soil mitigation costs are beyond the project construction budget. Project Budget The project budget for construction is $36,000,000 with an additional $4,000,000 construction contingency. Cost estimates of the schematic design have the project construction costs at $39,360,000 resulting in a delta of $3,360,000. Staff and the project team have identified a number of potential value engineering savings to address the estimated cost overage. The potential savings can come from a combination of reduced pool lane widths, reduce site landscape area, deletion of the trellis at the outdoor pool deck, replace portions of the outdoor pool deck “hardscape” with Staff Report To: Parks and Recreation Commission Date: January 17, 2023 Subject: Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Page 3 “softscape” and mechanical/electrical system refinements. Through these value engineering efforts, staff is confident the necessary savings can be achieved to align the project budget while continuing to deliver aquatic programs identified through concept design. Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center South San Francisco Parks and Recreation Commission January 17, 2023 Schematic Design Presentation 2 AGENDA •Project Scope •Budget Review •Community Engagement •Design Review & Update •Key Decision Points •All Electric Study •Veterans Memorial •Multipurpose Room •Operations Study •Schedule o Construct a new 24,000 sf facility o Two pools •Outdoor, 10-lane cool-water lap pool •Indoor, 7-lane warm-water teaching/recreation pool o Activity Room o Swimmer's Lounge o Wind Screen o Maintain operation of existing pool throughout construction of the new pool facility PROJECT SCOPE 4 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT SCHEMATIC DESIGN •Stakeholder Meeting (SSF Aquatics Club) •Tabling at Orange Pool (January 8-20, 2023) •Eblasts •Webpage (Presentation Materials & FAQ) •Parks and Recreation Commission Update (January 17, 2023) 5 PROJECT BUDGET Soft Costs (design, permits, fees)$9M Hard Costs (construction)$40M ($36M + $4M Contingency) Total Project Budget $49M SCHEMATIC DESIGN COST ESTIMATE –ANALYSIS Schematic Design 9% over budget $3,360,000 Value Engineering Exercise TBD Soil Stabilization / Mitigation (Geotechnical Report)$1M to $4M Additional Project Scope •All Electric (PV) –Option 1 $700K •All Electric (PV + PVT) –Option 1A $2.66M •Veterans Memorial Plaza $1.5 to $2M •Multipurpose Room $3.5M END OF SCHEMATIC DESIGN……..WHERE WE ARE 7 BASELINE DESIGN 13 BASELINE DESIGN -INDOOR POOL –7 LANES AT 8’ WIDTHS -COMP POOL –25M (10 LANES AT 8’ WIDTHS) -TRELLIS AND SEATING BASELINE –SCHEMATIC DESIGN SITE REDUCTIONS 26% REDUCTION IN DEVELOPED AREA $850,000 VE SAVINGS POTENTIAL SAVINGS -SMALLER INDOOR POOL –6 LANES AT 7’ WIDTHS -NATAORIUM REDUCES -DELETE TRELLIS AND SEATING (SLOPED LAWN SEATING) -SOFTSCAPE FOR HARDSCAPE $3.8 MM (Site + Building + Pools) VE MEASURE –OPTION 1 -SMALLER INDOOR POOL –7 LANES AT 7’ WIDTHS -NATAORIUM REDUCES -SMALLER COMP POOL –10 LANES AT 7’ WIDTHS -DELETE TRELLIS AND SEATING (SLOPED LAWN SEATING) -SOFTSCAPE FOR HARDSCAPE $3.0 MM (Site + Building + Pools) VE MEASURE –OPTION 2 South San Francisco Orange Memorial Park Aquatic Center Life Cycle Cost Report $3.38 MM SAVINGS 25 YEARS $2.40 MM SAVINGS 25 YEARS Summary BASE DESIGN: ELECTRIFIED BUILDING POOLS ALL GAS HEATED BASE DESIGN $0 Initial Incremental Cost ELECTRIFIED BUILDING + ELECTRIC POOLS OPTION 1 $672,000 Initial Incremental Cost BASE DESIGN Yearly Operational Cost $255,800/Yr ELECTRIFIED POOLS & ELECTRIC BUILDING NO RENEWABLE ENERGY Yearly Operational Cost $282,000/Yr OPTION:2 ELECTRIFIED BUILDING + ELECTRIC POOLS + SOLAR THERMAL & PV (PVT) OPTION 2 $2,265,750 Initial Incremental Cost ALL ELECTRIC Yearly Operational Cost $165,400/Yr $135,062 $120,769 $282,059 $165,340 $- $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 Building Annual Energy Cost ($) Schematic Design Energy Estimates POOL HEATING & PUMPING ENERGY= 80% of TOTAL SITE ENERGY Energy Cost Estimates & Offset by On-Site Renewable 41% PVT BASE DESIGN OPTION-1 OPTION-2 $3.38 MM SAVINGS 25 YEARS $2.40 MM SAVINGS 25 YEARS Fuel Escalation Gas Escalation 2018 high to 2022 high = 200% in 4 years (50% year over year volatility) California Electricity Escalation 2001 high to 2019 high = 22.9% higher over 9 years (2.5% year over year escalation) 22 VETERANS MEMORIAL Option 1 –Entry Plaza (Within Project Budget) Option 2 –Entry Drive (Within Project Budget) Option 3 –New Plaza (Estimated Cost $1.5-2M) 23 OPERATIONS STUDY Existing Scenario 1 (Minor Fee Increase) Scenario 2 (Higher Fee Increase) Estimated Annual Visits 100,000 190,750 190,750 Total Revenue $374,074 $1,987,261 $2,237,011 Total Net -$898,162 -$595,991 -$352,485 Cost Recovery 29%77%86% 24 SCHEDULE Parks and Recreation Commission Update January 17 City Council Meeting Schematic Design Update January 25 Design Review Board Presentation February Planning Commission March City Council Meeting –Design Development Update Spring 2023 Design Documents Complete Summer 2023 Bid/Award/Start Construction Fall 2023 Pool Opening Spring 2025 Staff Report DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Billy Gross, Principal Planner SUBJECT: Lindenville Specific Plan Update RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Parks and Recreation Commission receive a presentation on the Draft Lindenville Specific Plan Alternatives and provide feedback. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In October 2022, the City adopted a comprehensive update of the General Plan, Zoning Code and Climate Action Plan, providing an updated vision for the city. The new General Plan identifies the Lindenville sub-area as an important opportunity to add housing adjacent to the downtown transit- rich core, to support a creative arts and maker community, and to continue the city’s industrial heritage. To ensure that new development proceeds in an organized and well-planned manner and includes new housing opportunities, the City Council authorized the preparation of a Lindenville Specific Plan and associated environmental analysis. While the General Plan is a required document for each city in California, a specific plan is an optional planning and zoning tool that implements the goals and policies of the General Plan in a particular geographic area. It takes the community’s vision developed during the General Plan process and defines the detailed policies, City programs, and development standards to implement that vision for the area. Typically, the plan addresses areas of change that need special attention and integrated/holistic planning. Like the General Plan, a specific plan covers a 10-15 year timeline, and includes land use guidance, design and development standards, necessary infrastructure investment, financing tools, and implementation schedules and phasing. The City has adopted several specific plans in the past including the Downtown Station Area Specific Plan, El Camino Real/Chestnut Avenue Area Plan, South El Camino Real Plan, BART Transit Village Plan, and private development plans, such as the Genentech Master Plan and Oyster Point Specific Plan. The Raimi + Associates consultant team has started work on background reports and community outreach on the vision and land use alternatives. City staff and the consultant team will provide an update on the Lindenville Specific Plan process and an overview of the following: Staff Report To: Parks and Recreation Commission Date: January 17, 2023 Subject: Lindenville Specific Plan Update Page 2 • General Plan vision for Lindenville and overview of Lindenville Specific Plan process • Review Lindenville existing conditions, opportunities, and challenges • Review Initial Frameworks for Lindenville, with an emphasis on parks and open space and blue-green infrastructure • Discuss ideas for Lindenville’s future The project timeline includes the following key milestones: • Select Lindenville Preferred Plan – Winter 2023 • Public Draft Lindenville Specific Plan – Spring 2023 • Final Lindenville Specific Plan – Summer 2023 Parks and Recreation Commission January 17, 2022 Give an overview of the Lindenville Specific Plan Review existing conditions, opportunities, and challenges Discuss General Plan direction Discuss ideas for how to achieve the vision described in the GPU The Purpose of Today’s Meeting is… Parks and Recreation Commission /2 Lindenville Specific Plan FAQ Parks and Recreation Commission /3 What is a Specific Plan? What it is? •A comprehensive planning and zoning tool for a small area •Refines the vision and guiding principles •Defines policy and development standards •Strong focus on implementation What’s Required? •Distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land, including open space •Proposed distribution, location, and extent and intensity of major components of transportation and infrastructure •Development standards •A program of implementation measures •A statement of the relationship of the specific plan to the general plan Parks and Recreation Commission /4 What Existing Plans and Studies Will We Build Off of? •2022 General Plan, Zoning Code, Climate Action Plan, and EIR •Resilient South City •Public Arts Master Plan (in progress) •Urban Forest Master Plan •Parks and Recreation Master Plan (looking to update soon) •Active South City •Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan •Sewer System Management Plan •Urban Water Management Plan •San Mateo County Green Infrastructure Plan Parks and Recreation Commission /5 What Technical Studies are Being Completed? Infrastructure Water Supply Assessment Utility Master Plan Update Transportation Bike and Pedestrian Circulation/Complete Streets Plan Traffic Impact Analysis Parking Demand/Transportation Demand Management Level of Service (LOS) Analysis Equity Equity, Health, + Environmental Justice Analysis Economics Market Analysis + Affordable Housing Strategy Economic Impact Analysis Climate Change Sea Level Rise + Adaptation Study Climate Adaptation Analysis Evaluation of Community Assets and Analysis of Colma Creek Environmental Air Quality + Greenhouse Gas Assessment Evaluation of Airport Land Use Compatibility Plan Parks and Recreation Commission /6 When will the Specific Plan be Done? Existing Conditions Summer 2022 Alternatives Fall 2022 Preferred Plan Winter 2023 Technical Analysis Winter 2023 Specific Plan Winter – Summer 2023 Adoption August 2023 We are here! Parks and Recreation Commission /7 Who will be Engaged in the Process? •Stakeholder and focus group meetings •Technical Working Group meetings •Pop-Up meetings •Community workshops •Online surveys •Boards and commission meetings •Project website: https://shapessf.com/plan-lindenville Parks and Recreation Commission /8 What Did We Hear in Round 1? •Strong desire for new parks, open spaces and revitalization of Colma Creek •Promote the growth of arts, culture and a creative economy •Evaluate current fee structures to incentivize new affordable housing developments that the Lindenville workforce can afford •Lindenville has a rich history that should be preserved as an industrialized area that continues to evolve and meet the needs of local communities, residents and biotechnology business needs •Create a balance between incoming tech/life sciences and brick & mortar businesses Parks and Recreation Commission /9 What Round 2 Activities Are Planned? •Online survey (launched 12/12) •Community workshop @ SSF Emergency Operations Center (12/12) •Colma Creek CAC (12/13) •Pop-up event @ 47 Hills Brewery (12/13, 4-6pm) •Virtual stakeholder meeting (12/14) •Planning Commission (12/15) •Parks and Recreation Commission (1/17) •Cultural Arts Commission (1/19) •Bicycle and Pedestrian Commission (2/1) •Planning Commission (2/2) •City Council (2/22) Parks and Recreation Commission /10 Lindenville Today Overview Parks and Recreation Commission /11 History •Originally inhabited by the Ramaytush Ohlone people •Later used for cattle grazing, dairies, and packing plants •1890, SSF Land and Improvement Company acquired land to develop town next to packing plants •Industrial uses arrived early part of 20th century •Residential uses until the late 1950s •Industrial legacy remains today 1894 map of SSF Source: Historical Society of South San Francisco South City Lumber office in 1910 Parks and Recreation Commission /12 Existing Land Use (Acres) 77% 12% 4% 3%2%1%1% Industrial Transportation, Utilities, Vacant Retail and Services Office, R&D, Biotech Public and Institutional Parks and Common Greens Stormwater Channels Parks and Recreation Commission /13 Limited Access to Parks and Green Spaces •No parks •Few street trees •Paved surfaces •Lack of recreational opportunity along Colma Creek Community Workshop #1 /14 Impervious Surfaces (highlighted in orange) and permeable surfaces (highlighted in teal) Environmental Challenges •Sea level rise •Ground contamination •Residential/industrial land use compatibility •Particulate matter •Noise •Odors Community Workshop #1 /15 General Plan Direction Vision and Key Policies Parks and Recreation Commission /16 Lindenville is a vibrant and inclusive neighborhood that maintains a base of job opportunities, promotes the creative economy, and creates a new residential neighborhood where all people can thrive. Vision Statement Parks and Recreation Commission /17 Land Use Policy •Creates new complete mixed use residential neighborhood along Colma Creek •Retains a large portion of its land area for service, transportation, and industrial uses •Provides buffer of lower intensity industrial uses between higher intensity industrial uses and adjacent residential neighborhoods •Facilitates creation of a mixed use corridor on South Spruce Avenue •Level of Service •System of community, neighborhood, mini, linear, and special use parks that achieves a standard of 3.0 acres of improved parkland per 1,000 residents •All residents within a 10-minute walk access to parks •Plan for new parks in Lindenville; co-locate park and open space patches along Colma Creek •Quality amenities and programming •Connectivity •Connect parks, recreational facilities, and open spaces to the trail network and Class 1 bicycle connections identified in the Active South City Plan •Create a trail along Colma Creek from the Bay Trail to Orange Memorial Park, incorporating lighting, public art, and native and high-value landscaping •Ecology and Stormwater Management •Enhance Colma Creek as an ecological corridor •Use green infrastructure to reduce flooding Parks and Recreation Commission /19 Current General Plan Policy 1.Colma Creek* 2.Orange Memorial Park* 3.Centennial Way Trail* 4.San Francisco Bay and Bay Trail Open Space Context Orange Memorial Park San Francisco Bay / Trail 2 3 4 1 *Planning and improvements underway 1.Centennial Way Trail 2.South Spruce Avenue 3.South Linden Avenue 4.Canal Street 5.Railroad Avenue 6.San Mateo Avenue Active Transportation Connections Orange Memorial Park San Francisco Bay / Trail1 2 3 4 5 6 Source: Active South City Plan Open Space & Blue-Green Infrastructure Lindenville Specific Plan Parks and Recreation Commission /22 •Mixed-use residential •Open space and blue-green infrastructure •Life sciences, office, and retail/services •Industrial •Arts and makers •Mobility Kit of Parts Parks and Recreation Commission /23 •Spaces that enhance the quality of life, improve ecology, and support resilience •Builds on existing City typologies •Landscapes contribute to stormwater management as an overlay Parks and Recreation Commission /24 Open Space and Blue-Green Infrastructure Neighborhood Parks Mini Park Linear Parks Plazas Trails & Paths Green Streets Example Alternatives Parks and Recreation Commission /25 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 3 Industrial/ Commercial Industrial/ CommercialIndustrial/ Commercial Business Tech Park/ Office/ R&D Business Tech Park/ Office/ R&D Business Tech Park/ Office/ R&D •Connect Lindenville to adjacent parks and destinations through trails and paths •Establish a network of linear parks, open spaces, and trails that are an integral part of the active transportation network •Facilitate the transfer of development away from Colma Creek to naturalize the channel, create active transportation, and manage flooding •Provide tot-lots and / or inclusive play spaces •Design open spaces to support stormwater management, e.g. floodable parks •Manage open spaces to support ecology •Design open spaces to be sustainable and resilient through strategies like water-efficient landscaping Colma Creek Citizens Advisory Committee /26 Policy / Program Ideas for Consideration Discussion Parks and Recreation Commission /27 Discussion •Are these the correct open space and blue-green infrastructure approaches for our toolkit? Are we missing anything? •How can we best serve the park and recreation needs of employees and residents in this area?Are there specific amenities and functional needs, e.g. urban ecology, dog park floodable park? •Other comments or ideas Parks and Recreation Commission /28 Next Steps •Visit the project website, https://shapessf.com/plan-lindenville/, to get involved! •Take the online survey on Alternatives on here:https://shapessf.com/plan- feedback/.Survey closes February 5th! •Learn more about upcoming events here:https://shapessf.com/events/ •You may also follow up with City staff if you have additional ideas. Cultural Arts Commission /29 Staff Report DATE: January 17, 2023 TO: Parks and Recreation Commission FROM: Greg Mediati, Director of Parks and Recreation SUBJECT: SSFUSD Joint Use Agreement Update RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Parks and Recreation Commission be apprised of on-going negotiations related to the Joint Use Agreement between the City of South San Francisco (City) and South San Francisco Unified School District (District). BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION Government Code Section 37350 authorizes municipalities and school districts to establish agreements to make their respective grounds and facilities available for community and student use. This recognizes the fact that taxpayers have funded schools and public buildings, and that parks, schools, sports fields, and civic facilities are scarce resources that should be shared to maximize community benefit and avoid duplication. The current Joint Use Agreement, attached to this report, has been in place since 2008. However, the foundational philosophy of the agreement has been in place since at least 1995 and requires that each agency make their facilities available to the other without a rental charge. Fees may be collected to cover some direct, out of pocket costs incurred associated with overtime, chemicals needed for operation of one of the district’s high school pools, and so forth. In some cases where there is a great deal of community use of a District owned field, the City has assumed maintenance. Over the years, many shared uses have been established. Some significant examples include the City’s investment to purchase and install portable classrooms on elementary school campuses to house before and after school child care, the City’s use of a school campus as one of several locations for Summer Camp, and use of a high school theater for dance performances by the Department’s Civic Ballet, among others. The Parks and Recreation Department has also historically facilitated on behalf of the District the scheduling and use of available District fields by co-sponsored groups through a permit process. Examples include the use of school fields for youth baseball and soccer. Staff Report To: Parks and Recreation Commission Date: January 17, 2023 Subject: SSFUSD Joint Use Agreement Update Page 2 The District uses City facilities such as the Municipal Services Building for fundraisers, award banquets, and dances. Picnic areas and Orange Pool are used for field trips and class activities. And until recently, the ballfield at Orange Memorial Park served as the home field for the South San Francisco varsity baseball team. At the request of School District staff, Department and School District have been renegotiating the Joint Use Agreement that has been in place since 2008. Fortunately, in recent discussions the basic philosophy of the agreement remains unchanged. Additionally, the updates do not impact any matters related to child care. The Child Care Memorandum of Understanding is expected to be revisited following adoption of the updated Joint Use Agreement. At this time, it is staff’s understanding that the District does not plan to assess fees for use of District facilities for child care programs. A summary of suggested changes / clarifying language are as follows: • The new agreement should be in effect for 10 years through June 2032. Both parties will have the option to request the agreement be terminated or renegotiated with a one-year notice period. • The agreement should clarify responsibilities related to capital improvements of City and District facilities. The City shall be responsible for improvements of City facilities. The District shall be responsible for improvements of District facilities. Damage experienced outside of normal wear and tear would be repaired by the party causing said damage. • The agreement should update each party’s inventory of facilities that are available for joint use. This should be updated as some facilities listed in the 2008 agreement are no longer in existence (such as the ballfield at Spruce Elementary School which was removed during bond-measure funded projects). Additionally, new sites should be added for shared use that were not contemplated in 2008, such as the new Library | Parks and Recreation Center and South San Francisco High School’s synthetic fields. • The agreement should memorialize any fees assessed by either party associated with additional custodial or facility services outside of normal operating hours. Said fees will be payable to each agency providing this service based on direct costs only, and increases should be capped at 3% per year. • The new agreement should clearly define groups co-sponsored by the City and memorializes that it extends to them free use of District fields as available, similar to those offered to the City. • The agreement should clarify that facility users that are not City sponsored or co-sponsored groups (i.e. parochial schools or other neighborhood groups) will need to directly work with the District to schedule and pay for use of facilities. • The agreement should note that the City and District staff will meet on an annual basis in March or April to review this agreement and permit requests for the next year. A draft agreement will be shared with the Commission once available. Prior to adoption, the agreement will be presented before the City Council – School District Liaison Committee, the District’s Board of Trustees, and the City Council. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT EVENT CALENDAR Month: January 2023 Day Date Event Time Location Sunday 01 Monday 02 New Year’s Day (Observed)/Programs Closed All Programs Closed Tuesday 03 Wednesday 04 Thursday 05 Friday 06 Saturday 07 Sunday 08 Monday 09 Winter Classes Begin All Facilities Tuesday 10 Wednesday 11 City Council Meeting 6:00 p.m. Online and MSB Council Chambers Thursday 12 Friday 13 Saturday 14 Sunday 15 Monday 16 Martin Luther King Jr. Holiday/Programs Closed Tuesday 17 Seniors Chinese New Year Celebration 10:00 a.m. MSB Social Hall Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting 7:00 p.m. Online Wednesday 18 Seniors – Valentine’s for the Troops 9:30 a.m. Roberta Cerri Teglia Center Thursday 19 Cultural Arts Commission Meeting 6:30 p.m. Online Friday 20 Saturday 21 Sunday 22 Monday 23 Tuesday 24 Wednesday 25 City Council Meeting 6:00 p.m. Online and MSB Council Chambers Thursday 26 Friday 27 “Abundance” 2D Art Show 6:00 p.m. MSB Saturday 28 “Abundance” 2D Art Show 10:00 a.m. MSB Sunday 29 Monday 30 Tuesday 31 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT EVENT CALENDAR Month: February 2023 Day Date Event Time Location Wednesday 01 Thursday 02 Friday 03 Saturday 04 Sunday 05 Monday 06 Tuesday 07 Wednesday 08 City Council Meeting 6:00 p.m. Online and MSB Council Chambers Thursday 09 Friday 10 Saturday 11 Sunday 12 Monday 13 AARP Foundation Tax-Aide appointments begin (by appointment only, February 13 – April 10, 2023) Roberta Cerri Teglia Center Tuesday 14 Seniors Valentine’s Day Celebration 9:30 a.m. Roberta Cerri Teglia Center Wednesday 15 Thursday 16 Cultural Arts Commission Meeting 6:30 p.m. Online Friday 17 Saturday 18 Sunday 19 Monday 20 Presidents Day – All Programs Closed Tuesday 21 Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting 7:00 p.m. Online Wednesday 22 City Council Meeting 6:00 p.m. Online and MSB Council Chambers Thursday 23 Friday 24 Saturday 25 Sunday 26 Monday 27 Spring Resident Registration Begins – Recreation Classes Online/Rec. Office Tuesday 28 PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT EVENT CALENDAR Month: March 2023 Day Date Event Time Location Wednesday 01 Thursday 02 Friday 03 Saturday 04 Sunday 05 Monday 06 Improving Public Places Zoom Tuesday 07 Wednesday 08 City Council Meeting 6:00 p.m. Online and MSB Council Chambers Thursday 09 Friday 10 Youth Art Show 6:00 p.m. MSB Saturday 11 Youth Baseball Celebration and Parade 9:30 a.m. Alta Loma Park Youth Art Show 10:00 a.m. MSB Sunday 12 Monday 13 Non-resident Class Registration Online/Rec. Tuesday 14 Senior Health Fair 8:00 a.m. MSB-All Rooms Wednesday 15 Thursday 16 Cultural Arts Commission Meeting 6:30 p.m. TBD Friday 17 SF Opera @ Orange Park Orange Park Saturday 18 SF Opera @ Orange Park Orange Park Sunday 19 SF Opera @ Orange Park Orange Park Monday 20 Tuesday 21 Parks & Recreation Commission Meeting 7:00 p.m. TBD Wednesday 22 City Council Meeting 6:00 p.m. Online and MSB Council Chambers Thursday 23 Friday 24 Saturday 25 Sunday 26 Monday 27 Spring Classes Begin Spring Camp 7:30 a.m. All Facilities JFRB Tuesday 28 Spring Camp 7:30 a.m. JFRB Wednesday 29 Spring Camp 7:30 a.m. JFRB Thursday 30 Spring Camp 7:30 a.m. JFRB Friday 31 Spring Camp 7:30 a.m. JFRB