The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1992-6-2 ElectionCITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO South San Francisco, California CHECK REQUISITION P A Y E E F- L County of San MateD Hall of Justice and Records 401 Marshall St., Rm. A Redwood City, CA 94063 / DATE REQUISITIONED 8-14-92 AMOUNT $8,414. 86 AUTHORIZATION ACCOUNT I N FORMAT I ON 12-4402-102-022 PURPOSE Election Services in the conduct of South San Francisco Municipal Election consolidated with the June 2, 1992 Primary Election. APPROVAL REQUESTED City Clerk TITLE AMOUNT CERT I F l ED PRE AUDIT BY I$ ACCOUNTING DISTRIBUTION ACCOUNT NO. DR. AMOUNT CR. SPECIAL HANDLING: TUESDAY CHECK REQUIRED RETURN CMECK TO DEPARTMENT SEPARATE CHECKS SEND CHECK WITH ATTACHED FORM PAYMENT APPROVED DATE DIRECTOR OF FINANCE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY CLERK COUNTY OF SAN MATEO HALL OF JUSTICE AND RECORDS · 401 MARSHALL STREET, ROOM A REDWOOD CITY, CA 94063 · TELEPHONE: (415) 363-4711 · · Honorable Barbara Battaya, City Clerk · City of South San Francisco · 400 Grand Ave. · South San Francisco, CA 94080 August 10 114.71 Election Services in the conduct of South San Francisco Municipal Election consolidated with the June 2, 1992 Primary Election. $8,414. 86 per registered voter .38 requlree that fees shall be paid In advance and accounted for dally by the Clerk. ,!:~;r~ollectlon ia deferred by this office, it is expected that the courtesy will be appreciated an~re~ittance made promptly. WARREN SLOCUM '92 aUG 14 .~0:30 COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER SAN MATEO COUNTY Hall of Justice and Records · 401 Marshall Street Redwood City · California 94063-1636 · (415) 363-4711 FAX: (415) 363-4914 August 12, 1992 Honorable Barbara Battaya, City Clerk City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Ave. South San Francisco CA 94080 Dear Ms. Battaya: Kindly find enclosed Invoice # 11471 in the amount of $8,414.86 for services rendered by the Elections Office in the conduct of your Municipal Election consolidated with the June 2, 1992 Primary Elections. If you have any questions, regarding the billing, feel free to call Virginia Ejercito at 312-5278. Sincerely, / County Clerk-Recorder WS:ve Clerk Division Constance Carter Assistant Clerk-Recorder (415) 363-4711 Officium Populi--Office of the People. Recorder Division Registration-Election Division Terence Medina Maureen Grover Deputy Clerk-Recorder Deputy Clerk-Recorder (415) 363-4713 (415) 312-5222 SPECIAL MUN,.,,PAL ELECTION JUNE 2, 1992 - CITY CLERk, ~ SNAP TALLY Cmstwood/Edgewood/Fem( Crestwood/Evergree n/Garck Bimh/Crestwood/Momingsic Holly/Miller/Mission/Grand Hemlock/Hillside/Stonegate Drake/Franklin/Hemlock PecksLane/Marina Spruce/Beech/Maple Armour/Aspen/Leo/N. Spruc~ Lanes/Calif/Cyp mss/Linden Lanes/Baden/Cornm/Grand Baden/Comme mial/Lanes Cortesi/Diamond/Lux/Maple Elm/Lilac/Magnolia Almond/Eucyp/Laurel Acacia/Baden/Commemial A/B/C/ECR/Francisco Mayfair-Fir/Myrtle Antoinette/Cimle/Mission Brosnan/Brusco/Mission Formstv/Grand/Holly Trailer Court ECR Croffon/Galway/Geddes Fairway/Southw/Westb ro Alida/Haven/W. Orange Alta Loma/EI Campo Buri Alta Mesa/Cuesta Bud Arroyo/Capay Bud AltaMesa/Cuesta Buri Camaritas/Delmonte/Nyla DelMonte/Romney/Serra/Zit~ AltaLoma/Byron/Serra Callan/Carter/Shamrock Arlington/D uval/Greystone Alida/CountryClub/Pondero,, Adrian/Buxton/Dundee Brentwood/Hazelwood Appian/Archdale/D ublin Brentwood/Greenwood/Mar Altamont/King/SanFelipe Alhambra/Avalon/Valencia AltalVista/Granada/Zamora Athy/Callan/Carter/Erris Annapolis/Uberty/Unwin Adams/Callan/Greendale Ardee/Bantry/Galway/'l'ara Bourbon/Donegal/Dublin Donegal/Shannon/'lqpperary Delvin/Derry/Kenry Briarwood/Greenwood/Haze SUBTOTAL TOTAL CONSOL REG'D. VOTES MEASURE D PREC'T VOTERS CAST # YES % Yes # NO 01 369 149 57 38.255% 76 02 363 161 51 31.677% 91 03 398 160 68 42.500% 71 04 326 157 50 31.847% 74 05 505 191 74 38.743% 98 06 451 161 62 38.509% 81 07 507 171 55 32.164% 81 08 441 213 108 50.704% 81 09 426 166 65 39.157% 74 10 433 111 57 51.351 % 39 11 569 250 99 39.600% 77 12 442 142 65 45,775% 67 13 452 211 99 46.919% 97 14 440 217 118 54.378% 84 15 540 244 134 54.918% 94 16 416 211 66 31.280% 66 1719 693 243 61 25.103% 109 18 439 190 78 41.053% 92 20 376 126 58 46.032% 56 21 372 132 55 41.667% 51 22 388 157 74 47.134% 66 23 221 123 37 30.081% 52 24 484 159 68 42.767% 91 25 391 162 68 41.975% 68 26 361 180 78 43.333% 81 27 441 198 71 35,859% 86 28 414 201 90 44.776% 102 29 492 223 116 52.018% 95 30 435 221 87 39.367% 109 31 417 204 80 39.216% 104 3252 421 207 65 31.401% 126 33 712 262 83 31.679% 140 34 409 148 73 49.324% 76 35 457 173 51 29.480% 105 36 476 207 78 37.681% 80 3738 694 290 103 35.517% 164 39 379 176 64 36.364% 94 40 489 139 61 43.885% 62 41 368 145 42 28.966% 92 42 370 177 70 39.548% 90 43 474 225 90 40.000% 120 44 474 210 81 38.571% 114 45 498 170 56 32.941% 73 46 399 165 66 40.000% 67 47 477 167 60 35. 928% 77 48 446 160 61 38.125% 75 49 375 124 56 45.161% 54 50 398 163 70 42.945% 76 51 412 175 60 34.286% 86 53 337 193 58 30.052% 108 22,067 9,110 3,597 39.464% 4,292 ABSENTEES 1661 858 51.66% 803 % PREC. % No TURNOU 51.007% 0.4037 56.522% 0.4435 44.375% 0.4020 47.134% 0.3782 51.309% 0.3569 50.311% 0.3569 47.368% 0.3372 38.028% 0.482g 44.578% 0.3896 35.135% 0.2563 30.800% 0.4393 47.183% 0.3212 45.972% 0.4668 38.710% 0.4931 38.525% 0.4518 31.280% 0.5072 44.855% 0.3506 48.421% 0.4828 44.~.'H% 0.3351 38.636% 0.3548 42.038% 0.4048 42.276% 0.5565 57.233% 0.3265 41.975% 0.4143 45.000% 0.4986 43.434% 0.4489 50.748% 0.4855 42.601% 0.4532 49.321% 0.5080 50.980% 0.4892 60.870% 0.4916 53.435% 0.3679 51.351% 0.3618 60.694% 0.3785 38.647% 0.4348 56.552% 0.4178 53.409% 0.4843 44.604% 0.2842 63.448% 0.3940 50.847% 0.4783 53.333% 0.4748 54.286% 0.443O 42.941% 0.3413 40.606% 0.4135 46.108% 0.3501 46.875% 0.3587 43.548% 0.3306 46.626% 0.4095 49.143% 0.4247 55.959% 0.5727 47.11% 0.4128 48.34% PERCENT OF VOTE CAST COUNTY TOTALS MISSING PRCT. #42 48.81% TURNOUT 4, 071 46.300/0 4,720 53.7o%CENTRAI- R~'COR~ · o Date: To: From: Subject: November ~2~z~91~ The Honorable Mayor and City Council City Clerk Certification of the Election Results of the Special Municipal Election June 2, 1992 '~ 7-~ ~ RECOMMENDATION: That the Council adopt a resolution declaring the election results of the Special Municipal Election consolidated with the Primary Election held on June 2, 1992. DISCUSSION: In accordance with Section 17088 of the Elections Code, I respectfully submit the following certification of election results of the June 2, 1992 Special Municipal Election: The number of registered voters: The number of votes cast: Percentage of turn-out: 22,067 10,919 49.5% The votes cast for Measure D were were as follows: Yes 4,571 46.65% No 5,228 53.35% Barbara A. Battaya Attachments: County Clerk's Certificate and Statement of Result of Votes Cast Resolution with Exhibit A AS/SS 202 9/84 1M EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION NO. ~,-92 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION CONSOLIDATED WITH THE PRIMARY HELD TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 1992 NO. OF TOTAL REGISTERED VOTES PERCENT MEASURE D VOTERS CAST PRECINCT TURNOUT YES NO 369 149 01 40.4 57 76 363 161 02 44.4 51 91 398 160 03 40.2 68 71 326 140 04 42.9 50 74 505 191 05 37.8 74 98 451 161 06 35.7 62 81 507 161 07 31.8 55 81 441 204 08 46.3 108 81 426 166 09 39.0 65 74 433 111 10 25.6 57 39 569 204 11 35.9 99 77 442 142 12 32.1 65 67 452 211 13 46.7 99 97 440 217 14 49.1 118 84 540 244 15 45.2 134 94 416 139 16 33.4 66 66 693 239 17 34.5 105 109 439 190 18 43.3 78 92 376 126 20 33.5 58 56 372 132 21 35.5 55 51 388 157 22 40.5 57 82 -1- NO. OF REGISTERED VOTERS 221 484 391 361 441 414 492 435 417 421 712 409 457 476 694 379 439 368 370 474 474 498 399 477 446 375 TOTAL VOTES PERCENT MEASURE D CAST PRECINCT TURNOUT YES NO 123 23 55.7 37 52 178 24 36.8 68 91 162 25 41.4 68 68 180 26 49.9 78 81 185 27 42.0 71 86 217 28 50.0 90 102 223 29 45.3 116 95 216 30 49.7 87 109 204 31 48.9 80 104 207 32 49.2 65 126 262 33 36.8 83 140 167 34 40.8 73 76 173 35 37.9 51 105 207 36 43.5 78 80 290 37 41.8 103 164 176 39 46.4 64 94 139 40 28.4 61 62 145 41 39.4 42 92 176 42 47.6 70 90 225 43 47.5 90 120 210 44 44.3 81 114 161 45 32.3 56 73 143 46 35.8 66 67 156 47 32.7 60 77 158 48 35.4 61 75 NO. OF TOTA REGISTERED VOTES VOTERS CAST 398 163 412 160 337 187 (ABSENTEES) 2007 22067 10919 PRECINCT 5O 51 53 PERCENT MEASURE D TURNOUT YES NO 41.0 70 76 38.8 60 86 55.5 58 108 9.1 947 920 49.5 4571 5228 -3- WARREN SLOCUM COUNTY CLERK-RECORDER SAN MATEO COUNTY Hall of Justice and Records · 401 Marshall Street Redwood City · California 94063-1636 · (415)363-4711 FAX: (415) 363-4914 June 12, 1992 Honorable Barbara A. Battaya, City of South San Francisco 400 Grand Avenue South San Francisco CA 94080 City Clerk Dear Mrs. Battaya: Subject: Certified Statement of Result of Votes Cast for the City of South San Francisco Special Municipal Election held June 2, 1992. Attached hereto is the County Clerk's Certificate and Statement of Result of Votes Cast in connection with the subject Special Municipal Election consolidated with the Presidential Primary Election held June 2, 1992. The detailed breakdown by precincts will follow after the Abstract of the Presidential Primary Election is available. Warren Slocum County Clerk WS:jh Enclosures Clerk Division Constance Carter Assistant Clerk-Recorder (415) 363-4711 Officium Populi Office of the People. Recorder Division Registration-Election Division Terence Medina Maureen Grover Deputy Clerk-Recorder Deputy Clerk-Recorder (415) 363-4713 (415) 312-5222 CERTIFICATE OF COUNTY CLERK In the Matter of the CANVASS ) OF VOTES CAST AT THE CITY OF ) SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SPECIAL ) MUNICIPAL ELECTION consolidated ) with the PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ) ELECTION held on JUNE 2, 1992 ) I, WARREN SLOCUM, County Clerk of the County of San Mateo, State of California, do hereby certify; That pursuant to the CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO Resolution #18-92 dated March 4, 1992, a Special Municipal Election was held on June 2, 1992, whether or not to adopt Ordinance No. 1110-92 ; and That, after the closing of the polls and in accordance with Section 17081 of the Elections Code, I caused to have taken off and recorded from the voting machines used at said election the record of votes cast at said polling places and the results of the canvass of the voting machines and absentee ballots for and against the Measure, Measure D; and I HEREBY FURTHER CERTIFY that the results of said election were: YES NO MEASURE D 4,571 5,228 That Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is a full, true and correct recording which sets forth the result of the votes cast for and against the Measure at said Special Municipal Election, and that the figures in said recording indicating the result of the votes cast are identical to the figures set forth above. IN WITNESS W~EREOF, I hereunto affix my hand and seal of office this 12th day of JUNE, 1992, and file this date with the City Clerk of the CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO. WARREN SLOCUM County Clerk i i i i i i ~MGRAND TOTALS 38 SAN H~T[O COUNTY PRESIDENTIAL PRImaRY ELECTION, JUNE 2, 1992 ~E~SURE D 6/1[/92 335 I- F,- _J uJ Z r,,, I- 41-- 8TH SENATORIAl DIST - 1 2206'7 10917 ¢9.§ 457! 5228 5TH SUPERVISORIAL 19~2 12500 6331 50.6 2504 3188 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 22067 10719 ¢?.5 ¢571 5228 *#~ABSENIEE TOTALS 38 SAN MATEO COUNTY PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION, JUNE 2, MEASURE D Z 8TH SENATOR[AL DIST - I 22067 2007 ?.l 9~7 920 IgTH ASSEMBLY' DIST:~ iI?:': 220~7:..~::200~ ;':ii::' ::: :: :: ::::::::::::::::::::: :i?:::::~7 i::ii:i~::i::1920: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::?:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::!i[ii:ii::i:.i:.::::!!!:.il :.~:=.ii::i:i:.ii[:.!.!i;il== i~ i:: :::. · :: .::: .:::~:::~.::::: ' .' :::i:::~: i::!., :::.::' :-: ::i:::: ii:i '~i:ii~-::.:::'~:.i.-:' ': ::~:-~ '~:~ ::iii:i .'i::iiii:.ii~::~i:i:::::i i:i~iiiii:.::: i.~: :iiiiii:i::i:..~:i:i:i:~:i ~.i:i:!: :~ i:i:~::i:::i:~:.i:i.':i:~:::i:i:i'i:::i:: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ========================== IST SUPERV[SQE~' ~ ::" '~:'." :.::::~: ':~:~:' :~:'~:::'~;~:::~:~[~::~::~:~:;:~:::~::~ ::~::~;~;:3~::.?:::?:~?~;~:::~::~:.::~:~?:??~[~;~?:~:.?:::?:~:::~:~;:::~:::~ :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .......... ' :.:::'::::::::: '. 5TH SUPERVISORIAL 19~2 12500 11~7 9.2 ~ 573 SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO 22067 2007 ~.1 9~7 ~20 t38 0 [/1 u~ 0 r~. Ill F- Z Z C} hILL. SAN MATEO COUNTY PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY ELECTION, JUNE 2, 1992 MEASURE D ~ Z 6/11/92 337 I ! i i i76003-S0 SAN: FRAN ?!03:iii:::':::i:::::.:.~98ii-j:' i~&O: :~bi~:.!ii :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: iiii::&~:::::: i::ii::::~ i:: ::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::: iii::::!i :.::i: i :: :: :: :: : :: : :: :: : i i::::iii:: i:.ii:::::.iiii::i ::::ii:::.ii::::.i:: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: i:i :::-:::::.:,i ' 176004-S0 SAN FRAN 04 326 140 42.? 50 176005-S0 SAN FRAN 05 505 191 37.8 7¢ 98 176006-S0 SAN FRAN 06 451 161 35.7 176008-S0 SAN FeAN ~Oa :::~ 0~:::::: ~:~ ::~ 176010-S0 SAN FRAN 10 ~33 111 25.6 57 176011-S0 SAN FRAN 11 569 204 35.9 99 77 176012-S0 SAN FRAN 12 ~2 lq2 32.1 65 67 t ? 6013 - SO SAN FRAN ~ ~52: ~ :~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::~ ~::~::?::~::?:j~:. ~? :~::~ '?::?~::~ ? ::::~ ::~::~::~::?~?~::~ ~::~::~ :: :::::::::::::::::::::::: .~::~?~ :::~ ~:.~ ~?:~:~i?~ ~:~i~ ~?~?~ ~?~ ~; :~ ~ ~ 176oi~'SO SAN FeAa t~ ~ ~0 ~::~ ~:. :-~ii~ ::.:.::~:.::~ :: ~:~:: :: : ::::: ::::::::: :: :: :: : :~:::-~::~ ::~::::~ ~ :.~ :.::::::: ~:: ~::::~:. ::::~: :. ::.:::::.~ :. ~ 176016-S0 SAN FRAN 16 416 139 33.~ 66 66 176017-SSFR 17-C 693 239 3¢.5 105 109 176018-S0 SAN FRAN 18 *39 190 ~3.3 78 92 176020-S0 SAN FRAN ~20: ~.:.~37& [2& :33~:5;:~::*~:~:~::~:~:.~:~::::~]::~5~:~ 176022-$0 1760~-S0 SAN FRAN 23 ~21 i~ 5D.7 37 576024-S0 SAN FRAN 24 484 178 36.8 68 576025-S0 SAN FRAN 25 391 162 ~1.~ 68 68 5760~S'SO ~ ::: :~0~:::~ ~0 ~ 0 ~:: :.~::~ ?.::~j::~ [ :. ~ ~ ~0 [ ~ lO= :: ~ ~?~::~::~:: ::~::~::~::[::~:. 57602~-50 SAN FEAN 29 492 22~ 45.3 116 95 576030-50 SAN FRAN 30 q35 216 49.7 87 109 57603i-S0 SAN FRAN 31 qi7 20~ ¢8.9 80 s 7 ~ o ~ z- s s F ~: ~ ~; c [[::~ ~ ~ ~ & 576034-S0 SAN ~R~N ~ ~ i~7 [.~0 & [:.:.::~:::~:]:::::-:.[:~[ ~::[:::.~& ~ ::.~::~[. ~:~::::::[ : ~ ::~::[~ ~: [~::~ ~ 576035-S0 SAN FRAN 35 ~57 i73 37.? 5760~6-S0 SAN FRAN 36 ~76 207 ¢~.5 78 80 576037-SSFR 37-C 69¢ 290 ¢[.8 5760~0-S0 SANLF~AN~O: ~::.:::.:.~:8~]~ ~[3~[~ 28~::~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: .:::~::::]~:::: ::~::~::~::~J:::: ~::[::~::~::~:::: ~[~::~::::::::[:::~ [~::~:::.::~::~::~: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :~::: [ 57~0~[-S0 SAN:F~AN ~ ~ :::. ~68:~ :.::~S~::~:'39~[ 5760~2-S0 SAN FRAN ~2 370 [76 ¢7.6 ~0 ~0 576043-S0 SAN FRAN ~3 ¢7¢ 225 ¢7.5 90 [20 5760e~-S0 SAN FRAN e~ ~7~ 2[0 ¢~.3 5 ? 60 ~ ~-SO: SAN ~ FRAN :. ::~ ~ :::~::~:::.:::::: ~ ~:~:::::' ~ ~::::[ ~ ':3~ ~:~ ST~O~?,SO sAN:: ~AN ~ J~[~:.:::.::[[~::~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: :.J:'[[~[~[~7 ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~::~::[~::~::::~:~[~ ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: 576048-S0 SAN FRAN 48 4~ i58 35:~ 5760~9-S0 SAN FRAN ~9 375 Z2~ 33.1 56 576050-50 SAN FRAN 50 398 163 q[.O 70 76 ABSENTEE TOTALS 22067 2007 9.1 947 920 GRAND TOTALS 22067 10919 ¢9.5 ¢571 5228 ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT OF OR IN OPPOSITION TO THE PROPOSED LAWS ARE THE OPINIONS OF THE AUTHORS CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MEASURE D Shall the City of South San Francisco adopt Ordinance No. 1110-92 amending the Soulh San Franci:,co Municipal Code to alh)w the City Council rather than the City Manager to appoint and dismiss City Department Heads'? OI,tDINANCE NO. I 110-92 AN ORDINANCE OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF SOUTtl SAN FRANCISCO AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF TITLE 2 AND TITLE 3 OF 1;~4E SOUTIt SAN FRANCISCO MUNICi- PAL ('ODE RELATING TO THE POWER TO APPOIN'F (TI'Y DEPARTMENT HEADS THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO EN)ES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECHON 1. Section 2.36.040 Section 2.36.040, subsection B of the South San Francisco Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "B. To appoint, discipline and dismiss all appointed officers and etn ptoyees of the city, excepting the members of council-ap- pointed boards and commissions, the city attorney and city departmenl heads:" SECI'ION 2. Section 21.'t6.050 Section 2.36.050 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as lbllows: "Neither the cily council nor any of its members shall inter- fete with the execution by the city manager of the city man- ager's powers and duties. Except for the purpose of inquiry, the c~ty council ann its members shall deal with the administrative service solely through the city manager, and neither the council nor any m~mber thereof shall give orders to any subordinate of the city manager, either publicly or privately. The city manager shall take orders and instructions from the city council only when it is sitting in a lawfully hdd meeting." SECI'ION 3. Section ~.34.010 Section 3.24.010. sub~ections C and E of the South San Fran- cisco Mumcipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows: "C At.~Pomlment shall be made by the elly mamtger upon the recommendation of the department head. Appointment of ~.)cp~'~'~,e,! i~ead_~ and the city allornev ~ha,)bc made by "E. In the absence of appropriate employment-,lists, a pro- visional appointment may be made by the appoimtng author- ity of a person meeting the minimum training and experience qualifications for the position. Provisional appointments. except the city attorney and department heads, shall be made by the city manager. Provisional appointments to other post- nons shall be made by the appropriate department head. An employment list shall be established within six months for any permanent position filled by provisional appoimment. The personnel board may. by a four-fifths vote, extend the period tbr the list and provisional appointmeut for not more than thirty days, by any one action nol to exceed three such exten- slons. SECIION 4. L~ction Section 3.28.020 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code is hereby untended to read as follows: Employees may be discharged or detnoted for cause. The rules and regulations shall provide for the exercise of such powers of the city manager, upon recommendation of the department head. A discharged department head may be re,n- stated to the position in thc competitive ser~i~;e held by the gepartment head immediately prior to appointment as depart- ment head or to an equivalent posinon m thc classification. An employee discharged from a position uot m thc competitive service to which thc employee was advanced l'mm a positi,, in thc competitive service may bc rcin.~tated to thc position in thc competitive service held by thc cmplo.~ec ilnmediately prior to tile advancement or to an equivalent position~ in lhe classil'ica- t ion. SECF[ION 5. Severabilily. In the event any section or portion of this ordinance ~hall bc determined invalid or unconstitulional, such ~cction or por- tion shall bc deemed severable and all other sections or pof lions hereof shall remain in full tm'cc and cf feet. SECTION 6. Publication and Ellective Date. This ordinance shall bc published once with tile names of those City Councihncnlbcrs xoting for or against it. m thc Enter- prise Journal. a newspaper of general circulation in the Cit~ of South San Francisco. as required by law. and shall become ciI'cc- tivc thirty (30} days t'rorn and after its adoption. Introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of thc City of South San Francisco. held thc 8th da5' ol'January, 1992 Adopted as an Ordinance of thc City of South Sari Fran- cisco at a regular meeting of thc City Council of thc Cilv of South San Francisco. held thc 22nd day of Januar.~ 1992. by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembcrs Jack l)rago, Joseph A. Fcrnckcs. Gus Nicolopulos and Mayor John R. Pcuna NOES: Councihncmher Roberta ('crri Tcgha ABSTAIN: None ABSENT: None ATTkST: /s/ Barbara A. Batla~a ('i~x ('lcrk As Mayor of thc City of South San Francisco. I do hereby approve the foregoing Ordinance lhis 22nd da~ of January_ 1')92 /s/John R. Penna Mayor IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS BY CITY ATTORNEY Ballot Measure "D" proposes thc' adoption of an ordinance which would return thc power to appoint and dismiss ('~t) l.)cpari- ment Heads to the City Council. Since 1987. the ('il> has operated under ii I'orln of go~cin- ment where the City Council hi,cs the CitF Manager who in turn is responsible k)r the appointnien~ and dismissal ot' thc City's seven Department tleads. Thc Department tlcads ctnrently subjccl to the City Manager's authority to appoint and dismiss arc the Clncf of Police: Fire Chief: Director of Economic & Community Devel- opment: Di~'ector of Public Works: Director of Parks. Recreation & Community Services. D~rector of Finance and Library Director. Tile (.'it5 Attorney ~ appointed by Iht City ('ouncil and thc Clerk ~s elected. If the proposed ordHlallce i~, adoplcd, the ('il) would rettu'n h4 the form of government il operated under prior to 1987. 1 Itc ( Council. rather than thc City Manager. would bc responsible tile appointment and d~smissal of Cil5 Department I toads. The ordinance proposed by this ballot measure would be adopted if approved by a majority of the voters. A "Scs" vote returns the power lo htrc and fire Dcpartmcnl fiends to thc City Council. A "ilo" vote leaves thc authorily to appoint and dismis.~ Department t leads wilh thc ('it> Manager. Compiled by aa ,epara A. Battaya, City Clerk, City of South San Francisco ARGUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE D Measure D addresses at least lhre¢ basic concerns about our South San Francisco government: · The need lbr direct control of your tax dollars, · Thc need for £airness in hiring and firing city department heads and · Thc need to strengthen our city manager/council type of government. Five years ago three members of thc city council overturned a policy that had served South San Francisco well since 1949. In 1987, these three council members resigned their long-standing responsibility to take part in selecting the top level administra- tors who run our city. They handed all thc responsibility to the ' appointed city manager who never has to answer directly 'to you, the voter. Today's city council is saying, "It' you vote £or us because o£ the policies we support, give us the ability to share in the hiring of' the people best able to £ulfill these policies. The people have a right to.insist on accountability in the hiring of top level city administrators whose decisions affect our everyday lives and your tax dollars." Measure !) is important because it establishes, for the first time, an orderly, fair and professional process. Measure D sets a clear pro- cess £or recruiting, testing, evaluating and choosing applicants £or department head positions by the city manager with ralificalion by yom' cit~ coalR'i!! ~ Measure D corrects a serious imbalance by taking the hiring and £iring £rom one non-elected official and puts it where it belongs-- jointly with the city m~n~ger and the city com~cil! Four out of five members o£ your city council who serve you, voted for this ordinance. We urge you to vote Y. ES on Measure D to protect you and your rights to a responsive and represen- tative government! Vote YES an ~e D! /s/John R. Penna Mayor, City of South San Francisco /si Jack Drago Past Mayor, Councilmember Is/Joe Fernekes Councihncmbcr /s/Louis Dell'Angela Business/Urban Planner /s/Donald J. Arndt Historic Preservation Commissioner ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE D Measure D strips tile non~political ('il.,,' Manager t)f thc aulhorily to hire and fire ('ity l)cparlmcnJ Ilcads and pl;icc>, thai power in tile han~ of thc ('il3' ('om)cfi ..... a rcltlrn to tt~c days when South San FrallClbCO c~ly elnployccs were cxaltlalcd oil pohli- cai connections rather than on job pcrf~)rmlmce. Measure D proponenl~ argue lhcy l/ccd nlorc control Hall. The truth is, the proponent~ advocate increasing their polit- ical in£1ucncc in areas v~hcrc common sense would indicate thaJ such meddling is least desired. E~ery applicanl tBr a City g)b shotlld he able IO compete his or her merits and not on how well lhcy know thc current politicians in office. Keeping politics and patronage oul of our cmployn/cnl lion process attracts Ibc most qualified people Jo serve Currently, our City Council, like any corporate board of direc- tors, sets policy iBr our City and appoints and cmpowcr~ a pro£essional execulive officer to hire, disciplinc and discharge department heads in order lo implement Council goals. The City Council now ha~ the clear power to hold the ('it5 chief executive officer accounlablc for thc pcr£ormancc of thc cnm'c manage~nent team. A simple majority vole can remoxc a City Manager for failure to pcrlb~m. 'Ibc standard thus cslab- lished is one of clear lines of accountahility for job pcrl'ormancc and removes politics from the picture. You, tile voters, have a unique opporlunily Io' choose whether South San Francisco will continue to be a pro£essionally nlanagcd city, like the vast maJorily uf similar Cahl'ornia cities, OR return a tired and outdated process of hiring and promoting based political tics. A NO VOTE ON MEASURE D tell~ our politicians thal we do riel want to go backwards to thc days ,M~cn personal fricnd~, were tile ones besl served. Lel's keel) poln~cs out el' municipal em ploynlenl practices! /s/Gene Mullin Educator Is/Barbara Reich Homemaker /s/Paul l'ognetti SSF Ii:ire Capt.. Ret. /s/Jim Clam. }lousing Authority Commissioner /s/Mark Addiego Former Mayor IMP~RTII~ff., ~ALYSIS BY CITY ATTORNEY Ballot Measure "D" proposes the adoption of an ordinance which would return the power to appoint and dismiss City Department Heads to the City Council. Since 1987, the City has operated under a form of government where the City Council hires the City Manager who in turn is responsible for the appointment and dismissal of the City's seven Department Heads. The Department Heads currently subject to the City Manager's authority to appoint and dismiss are the Chief of Police; Fire Chief; Director of Economic & Community Development; Director of Public Works; Director of Parks, Recreation & Community Services, Director of Finance and Library Director. The City Attorney is appointed by the City Council and the City Clerk is elected. If the proposed ordinance is adopted, the City would return to the form of government it operated under prior to 1987. The city Council, rather than the City Manager, would be responsible for the appointment and dismissal of City Department Heads. The ordinance proposed by this ballot measure would be adopted if approved by a majority of the voters. A "yes" vote returns the power to hire and fire Department Heads to the City Council. A "no" vote leaves the authority to appoint and dismiss Department Heads with the City Manager ~GUMENT IN FAVOR OF MEASURE D Measure D addresses at least three basic concerns about our South San Francisco government: · The need for direct control of your tax dollars, · The need for fairness in hiring and firing city department heads and · The need to strengthen our city manager/council type of government. Five years ago three members of the city council overturned a policy that had served South San Francisco well since 1949. In 1987, these three council members resigned their long-standing responsibility to take part in selecting the top level administrators who run our city. They handed all the responsibility to the appointed city manager who never has to answer directly to you, the voter. Today's city council is saying, "If you vote for us because of the policies we support, give us the ability to share in the hiring of the people best able to fulfill these policies. The people have a right to insist on accountability in the hiring of top level city administrators whose decisions affect our everyday lives and your tax dollars." Measure D is important because it establishes, for the first time, an orderly, fair and professional process. Measure D sets a clear process for recruiting, testing, evaluating and choosing applicants for department head positions by the city manager with ratification by your city council! Measure D corrects a serious imbalance by taking the hiring and firing from one non-elected official and puts it where it belongs-jointly with the city manager and the city council! Four out of five members of your city council who serve you, voted for this ordinance. We urge you to vote YES on Measure D to protect you and your rights to a responsive and representative government! Vote YES on Measure D! I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I am a registered voter in the City of South San Francisco and that I consent to the use of my name and signature in ballot arguments and other materials published in favor of South San Francisco Measure "D" on the June 2, 1992 municipal election ballot. This measure removes the power to hire and fire department heads from the City Manager and places it with the City Council. Name as it appears Name as it appears atu Date~ on voter registration on ballot Name as it appears Name as it appears Signh~re/Date on voter registration 'Name as it appears Name as it appears Si re/Date .... ~ ....... on voter registration on ballot Name as it appears Name as it appears Signature/Date ........ ._oD_v_o~.9~ _r...e_~i__s..t_r_a_t io_n__ _o_n__ .b__a_~_l_O~ Name as it appears Name as it appears Signature/Da~ . .~. Yoter rgg.~str~_ti_0n _0n ballot ARGUMENT AGAINST MEASURE D Measure D strips the non-political City Manager of the authority to hire and fire City Department Heads and places that power in the hands of the City Council ..... a return to the days when South San Francisco city ~mployees were evaluated on political connections rather than on job performance. Measure D proponents argue they need more control of City Hall. The truth is, the proponents advocate increasing their political influence in areas where common sense would indicate that such meddling is least desired. Every applicant for a City job should be able to compete on his or her merits and not on how well they know the current politicians in office. Keeping politics and patronage out of our employment selection process attracts the most qualified people to serve us. Currently, our City Council, like any corporate board of directors, sets policy for our City and appoints and empowers a professional executive officer to hire, discipline and discharge department heads in order to implement Council goals. The City Council now has the clear power to hold the City's chief executive officer accountable for the performance of the entire management team. A simple majority vote can remove a City Manager for failure to perform. The standard thus established is one of clear lines of accountability for job performance and removes politics from the picture. You, the voters, have a unique opportunity to choose whether South San Francisco will continue to be a professionally managed city, like the vast majority of similar California cities, OR return to a tired and outdated process of hiring and promoting based on political ties. A NO VOTE ON MEASURE D tells our politicians that we do not want to go backwards to the days when personal friends were the ones best served. Let's keep politics out of municipal employment practices ! MULLIN, EDUCATOR RET. DARBARA REICH, H~EMAKER C IM CLAAR, HOUSING AUTHORITY OMMISSIONER I hereby declare under penalty of perjury that I am a registered voter in the City of South San Francisco and that I consent to the use of my name aHd signature in ballot arguments and other materials published in opposition of South San Francisco Measure "D" on the June 2, 1991 municipal election ballot. This measure removes the power to hire and fire department heads from the city Manager and places it.With the City Council. l) Name as it appears on voter Sig~akure ' 2) Name as it appears on voter registration Signature 3) Name as it appemrs on voter ~~~on · Signature ~ Name as it appears on voter ) gn~aturere,gistra~n~~ Name Ias it appears on voter registratio,~ Sign~t~:e ~~' ~ Name as it appears on ballot Date Name as it appears on ballot "' Name~as it a~pears on ballot Date Name as It appears on ba/llot Name as it appears on ba'llot Date SATURI ELECTION !NOTICE A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TO BE CONSOLIDATED WITH THE JUNE 2, 1992 PRIMARY ELECTION TO BE HELD TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE 1992 FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTERS TO VOTE ON A REFER- ENDUM AGAINST ORDINANCE NO. 1110-92 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL CONCERNING THE CITY COUNCIL'S AUTHORITY TO HIRE AND FIRE CITY DEPARTMENT HEADS. MEASURE D SHALL THE CITY OF SOUTH 'SAN FRANCISCO ADOPT ORDINANCE NOi nl0-92 AMENDING THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW THE CITY COUNCIL RATHER THAN THE CITY MANAGER TO APPOINT AND DIS- MISS CITY DEPARTMENT HEADS? The POLLS shall be opened at 7:00 a.m. and shall be kept open until 8:00 p.m. of said day When the polls shall be closed, except as otherwise provided in ~Section 14301 of the Elections COde. ARGUMENTS-in favor~ of the measure or ARGU- MENTS against the Measure shall be filed with the City Clerk on or before March 26, 1992 in Word length not to exceed 300 words. I By order of the City Council of the City of South San Fran- ~cisco, County of San Mateo, State of California, at an Ad- journed Regular Meeting held on March 4, 1992. Date: March 4, 1992 To: The Honorable Mayor and City Council From: City Clerk Subject: Certificate of Sufficiency for the Referendum Petition Against an Ordinance Passed by the South San Francisco City Council (Ordinance 1110-92) Removing the Power to Hire and Fire City Department Heads from the City Manager and Placing That Authority in the Hands of the City Council ~ lq~. -~E/?- ~ ;~-~ RECOMMENDATION: That the Council: 1) Motion to accept the Certificate of Sufficiency for the above-mentioned Referendum received in the City Clerk's Office on February 21, 1992, at 3:40 p.m., and after each signature was stamped with a sequential number there was a total of 2,571; 2) Consider the procedural options outlined in the City Attorney's staff report; 3) Motion to repeal Ordinance No. 1110-92; 4) Motion to adopt a resolution calling a special election to be consolidated with the June 2, 1992 Primary Election; and 5) Motion to adopt a resolution calling for election services from the County Clerk. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION: Attached is the Certificate of Sufficiency for the Referendum Against an Ordinance passed by the South San Francisco City Council (Ordinance 1110-92) removing the power to hire and fire City Department Heads from the City Manger and placing that authority in the hands of the City Council. The Referendum was filed in the City Clerk's Office on February 21, 1992, at 3:40 p.m, and after each signature was stamped with a sequential number there was a total of 2,571 signatures. County Clerk Warren Slocum reported 21,210 registered voters for South San Francisco to the Secretary of State on January 15, 1992. On March 3, 1992, I compiled and validated the following certification of signa- tures: 2,571 - 66 - 24 - 3 - 186 25 affidavits 3 Signatures altered with liquid paper 54 Signatures not sufficient i Signature and address illegible Invalid used P.O. Box Not registered voters 2,209 Signatures Invalid circulators counted as petition signers Duplicate signatures Invalid signatures due to circulator's incomplete Valid Referendum Signatures AS/SS 202 9/84 1M TO: SUBJECT: DATE: Honorable City Council Certificate of Sufficiency March 4, 1992 Ten percent of 21,210 = 2,121, and I submit that the 2,209 valid referendum signatures are greater than the 10% required for a referendum. In the event of an election being called the following time frame is applicable: Arguments close March 16, 1992; Rebuttals close March 27, 1992; public examina- tion closes April 6, 1992. Barbara A. Battaya City Clerk Attachments C-E-R-T-I-F-I-C-A-T-E O-F S-U-F-F-I-C-I-E-N-C-Y REFERENDUM PETITION AGAINST AN ORDINANCE PASSED BY THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITY COUNCIL (ORDINANCE 1110-92) REMOVING THE POWER TO HIRE AND FIRE CITY DEPARTMENT HEADS FROM THE CITY MANAGER AND PLACING THAT AUTHORITY IN THE HANDS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. (We, the undersigned, protest the adoption of City of South San Francisco Ordinance No. 1110-92 by the South San Francisco City Council. We request you to determine whether the petition has the requisite number of signatures and to certify the results to the City Council, so the Council may repeal the ordinance or submit it to the voters of South San Francisco.) Received in the City Clerk's Office February 21, 1992, at 3:40 p.m., and after each signature was stamped with a sequential number for a total of 2,571. County Clerk Warren Slocum reported 21,210 registered voters for South San Francisco to the Secretary of State on January 15, 1992. On Tuesday, March 3, 1992, I compiled and validated the following certification of signatures. 2,571 - 66 - 24 - 25 - 3 - 54 - 1 - 3 - 186 Signatures Invalid circulators counted as petition signers Duplicate signatures Invalid signatures due to circulator's incomplete affidavits Signatures altered with liquid paper Signatures not sufficient Signature and address illegible Invalid used P.O. Box Not registered voters 2,209 Valid Referendum Signatures Ten percent of 21,210 = 2,121, and I submit that the 2,209 valid referendum signatures are greater than the 10% required for a referendum. March 4, 1992 Barbara A. Battaya ~ City Clerk EXHIBIT A TO RESOLUTION 18-92 REFERENDUM PETITION AGAINST AN ORDINANCE PASSED BY THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITY COUNCIL (ORDINANCE 1110-92) REMOVING THE POWER TO HIRE AND FIRE CITY DEPARTMENT HEADS FROM THE CITY MANAGER AND PLACING THAT AUTHORITY IN THE HANDS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. On January 22, 1992, the South San Francisco City Council adopted Ordinance 1110-92. Ordinance 1110-92 amended various sections of Title 2 and Title 3 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code relating to the power to appoint city department heads, which prohibited the City Council from directly or indirectly ordering the appointment or removal, by the city manager or by any of the department heads, of any person to any position in the city service. Ordinance 1110-92 will be effective on February 21, 1992. If the required number of voters sign this petition and if this petition is timely presented to the City Council, Ordinance 1110-92 is suspended and the City Council shall reconsider the ordinance. If the City Council does not entirely repeal the ordinance, then the Council shall submit Ordinance 1110-92 to the voters of South San Francisco and the ordinance shall not become effective unless a majority of voters vote for it. TO THE HONORABLE CITY CLERK, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO We, the undersigned, protest the adoption of City of South San Francisco Ordinance No. 1110-92 by the South San Francisco City Council. We request you to determine whether the petition has the requisite number of signatures and to certify the results to the City Council, so the Council may repeal the ordinance or submit it to the voters of South San Francisco. ORDINANCE 1H0-92: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AMENDING VARIOUS SECTIONS OF TITLE 2 AND TITLE 3 OF THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE POWER TO APPOINT CITY DEPARTMENT HEADS. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. Section 2.36.040 Section 2.36.040, subsection B of the South San Francisco Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "B. To appoint, discipline and dismiss all appointed officers and employees of the city, excepting the members of council-appointed boards and commissions, the city attorney and city department heads;" SECTION 2. Section 2.36.050 Section 2.36.050 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Neither the city council nor any of its members shall interfere with the execution by the city manager of the city manager's powers and duties. Except for the purpose of inquiry, the city council and its members shall deal with the administrative service solely through the city manager, and neither the council nor any member thereof shall give orders to any subordinate of the city manager, either publicly or privately. The city manager shall take orders and instructions from the city council only when it is sitting in a lawfully held meeting." SECTION 3. Section 3.24.010 Section 3.24.010, subsections C and E of the South San Francisco Municipal Code are hereby amended to read as follows: "C. Appointment shall be made by the city manager upon the recommendation of the department head. Appoint- ment of department heads and the city attorney shall be made by the city council." "E. In the absence of appropriate employment lists, a provisional appointment may be made by the appointing authority of a person meeting the minimum training and experience qualifications for the position. Provisional appointments, except the city allorney and department heads, shall be made by the city manager. Provisional appoint- ments to other positions shall be made by the appropriate department head. An employment list shall be estab- lished within six months for any permanent position filled by provisional appointment. The personnel board may, by a four-fifths vote, extend the period for the list and provisional appointment for not more than thirty days, by any one ~ction not to exceed three such extensions." SECTION 4. Section 3.28.020 Section 3.28.020 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code is hereby amended to read as follows: "Employees may be discharged or demoted for cause. The rules and regulations shall provide for the exercise of such powers of the city manager, upon recommendation of the department head. A discharged department head may be reinstated to the position in the competitive service held by the department head immediately prior to appointment as department head or to an equivalent position in the classification. An employee discharged from a position not in the competitive service to which the employee was advanced from a position in the competitive service may be reinstated to the position in the competitve service held by the employee immediately prior to the advancement or tO an equivalent position in the ct,~sification." Sections 5. & 6. Not pertinent to this petition. All signers of this petition must be registered in South San Francisco. Your signature as registered to vote Print your name Residence address City Zip CIRCULATOR--BE SURE TO SIGN THE DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR ON REVERSE SIDE. REFERENDUM PETITION AGAINST AN ORDINANCE PASSED BY THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO CITY COUNCIL (ORDINANCE 1110-92) REMOVING THE POWER TO HIRE AND FIRE CITY DEPARTMENT HEADS FROM THE CITY MANAGER AND PLACING THAT AUTHORITY IN THE HANDS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. On January 22, 1992, the South San Francisco City Council adopted Ordinance 1110-92. Ordinance 1110-92 amended various sections of Title 2 and Title 3 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code relating to the power to appoint city department heads, which gave the City Manager the authority to hire and fire department heads. Ordinance 1110-92 gives the authority to hire and fire city department heads to the City Council. Ordinance 1110-92 will be effective on February 21, 1992. If the required number of voters sign this petition and if this petition is timely presented to the Council, Ordinance 1110-92 is suspended and the City Council shall reconsider the ordinance. If the Council does not entirely repeal the ordinance, then the Council shall submit Ordinance 1110-92 to the voters of South San Francisco and the ordinance shall not become effective unless a majority of voters vote for it. All signers of this petition must be registered in South San Francisco. Your signature as registered to vote Print your name Residence address City Zip 3. Your signature as registered to vote Print your name Residence address City Zip 4. Your signature as registered to vote Print your name Residence address City Zip 5. Your signature as registered to vote Print your name Residence address City Zip DECLARATION OF CIRCULATOR (To be completed after above signatures have been obtained) I am registered to vote in San Mateo County, California. I circulated this section of the petition and saw the appended signatures being written. Each oi the signatures to this petition w~s signed in my presence. Each signature of this petition is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the genuine signature of the person whose name it purports to be. All signatures to this document were obtained between and MONTH/DAY/YEAR MONTH/DAY/YEAR I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on: at DATE PLACE: City, County, State RESIDENCE ADDRESS: City, County, State, Zip staf zort DATE: March 4, 1992 TO: Honorable Mayor and city Council FROM: City Attorney SUBJECT: Referendum on Ordinance Allowing the City Council, Rather than the City Manager, to Appoint or Dismiss City Department Heads. The city Clerk has informed me that there are sufficient signatures to certify the above-referenced referendum. Therefore the following actions are necessary at this evening's meeting. A motion to accept the City Clerk's certification for the sufficiency of the referendum. A motion to repeal Ordinance No. 1110-92 is required. It may be as follows: "I move that Ordinance No. 1110-92, An Ordinance of the City Council of South San Francisco Amending Various Sections of Title 2 and Title 3 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code Relating to the Power to Appoint City Department Heads, be repealed in its entirety." If the Ordinance is not repealed, or the motion dies for lack of a second, a motion calling for a special election is required. Such motion can be made as follows: "I move that a Resolution calling for a Special Election to be consolidated with the June 2, 1992 Primary Election on the Referendum Against Adoption of Ordinance No. 1110-92 be adopted." After the adoption of the Resolution calling for a Special Election a second resolution requesting specified election services is appropriate. "I move the adoption of a Resolution calling for specified election services from the County Clerk for the June 2, 1992 Special Election." J. O'Toole ~ city Attorney MOT/mm ELECTION NOTICE A SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TO BE CONSOLIDATED WITH THE JUNE 2, 1992 PRIMARY ELECTION TO BE HELD TUESDAY, THE 2ND DAY OF JUNE, 1992 FOR THE PURPOSE OF VOTERS TO VOTE ON A REFERENDUM AGAINST ORDINANCE NO. 1110-92 ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL CONCERNING THE CITY COUNCIL'S AUTHORITY TO HIRE AND FIRE CITY DEPARTMENT HEADS MEASURE D SHALL THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ADOPT ORDINANCE NO. 1110-92 AMENDING THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE TO ALLOW THE CITY COUNCIL RATHER THAN THE CITY MANAGER TO APPOINT AND DISMISS CITY DEPARTMENT HEADS? The POLLS shall be opened at 7:00 a.m. and shall be kept open until 8:00 p.m. of said day when the polls shall be closed, except as otherwise provided in Section 14301 of the Elections Code. ARGUMENTS in favor of the measure or ARGUMENTS against the Measure shall be filed with the City Clerk on or before March 26, 1992 in word length not to exceed 300 words. By order of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, County of San Mateo, State of California, at an Adjourned Regular Meeting held on March 4, 1992. /s/ Barbara A. Battaya City Clerk City of South San Francisco Dated: March 5, 1992 INI.ER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM Date: TO: SUBJECT: FROM: February 28, 1992 Honorable Mayor and City Council Referendum Items on the Adjourned Regular Meeting of March 4, 1992 City Clerk Please be advised that the referendum signature checking is going very slow due to only two computers being available for our use due to the County's workload for the Primary Election, and I do not have the information at this date for a certification wherein normally I would have 30 days for the task. I hope to have a better idea Monday evening as to whether I will be close to a determination for Council action on March 4, 1992. Barbara A. Battaya CENTRAL R E:COFqD~, sta x t DATE: TO: FROM: SUBJECT: February 26, 1992 Honorable Mayor and City Council City Attorney Referendum on Ordinance Allowing the City Council, Rather than the City Manager, to Appoint or Dismiss City Department Heads BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION In anticipation of the February 21, 1992 submittal of a referendum petition calling for the repeal of Ordinance No. 1110- 92, we have placed the following items on your agenda: Item ~3 - Certification of the sufficiency of the Referendum Against Ordinance No. 1110-92, adopted 1/22/92. Item #4 - Reconsideration of Ordinance No. 1110-92 "An Ordinance of the City Council of South San Francisco Amending Various Sections of Title 2 and Title 3 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code Relating to the Power to Appoint City Department Heads". Item $5 - Resolution calling a Special Election to be consolidated with the 6/2/92 Primary Election on the Referendum Against adoption of Ordinance No. 1110-92. -- Item $6 - Resolution calling for election services from the County Clerk for the 6/2/92 Special Election. Since it will take until March 4th for the City Clerk to verify that the petition was signed by the requisite number of voters, no action on the above-listed items is required at your February 26th meeting. The matters should be continued, however, to March 4th for action. At the March 4th meeting, the following actions will be necessary: A motion to accept the City Clerk's certification for the sufficiency of the referendum. Honorable Mayor and City Council February 26, 1992 Staff Report Page 2 If there are sufficient signatures, a motion to repeal Ordinance No. 1110-92 is required. The following is the appropriate motion: "I move that Ordinance No. 1110-92, An Ordinance of the City Council of South San Francisco Amending Various Sections of Title 2 and Title 3 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code Relating to the Power to Appoint City Department Heads, be repealed in its entirety." If the Ordinance is not repealed, or the motion dies for lack of a second, a motion calling for a special election is required. Such motion can be made as follows: "I move that Resolution No. calling for a Special Election to be consolidated with the June 2, 1992 Primary Election on the Referendum Against Adoption of Ordinance No. 1110-92 be adopted." After the adoption of the Resolution calling for a Special Election a second resolution requesting specified election services is appropriate. "I move the adoption of Resolution No. calling for specified election services from the County Clerk for the June 2, 1992 Special Election." I submit this report to you simply to provide guidance in the actions required by the Elections Code. If you have any questions regarding this process, I encourage you to call me. Michael J. O'Toole city Attorney ~'[.~'~7.} Office of the Secretary of State March Fong Eu February 11, 1992 ' '' ' !~ '"~ ~-~' ~16) 445-0820 ~2~0 J Street ~ Sacramento. Califo~ 9~ J~ ~earing and Speech Impaired ~nly: 800) 83S-8683 TO: All County/City Clerks/Vendors FROM: Secretary of State, Debra Schultz Subject: Random alphabet for General Municipal Election to be held on April 14, 1992. In accordance with Elections Code §10217.5, the Secretary of State's office on this date conducted a drawing of the letters of the alphabet to determine the randomized alphabet for use in the April 14, 1992 Election. Listed below is the official order of letters for use in determining placement of candidates' names on the ballot as determined in today's drawing. Please note that this alphabet is to be applied THROUGHOUT the candidate's entire last name~ so if more than one candidate's surname begins with the same letter, the second letter of the surname determines who goes first, according to where the second ieCter of the name appears in the random alphabet. For example, if two candidates with the surname of Campbell and Carlson are running for the same office, their order on the ballot will depend on the order in which the letters "M" and "R" were drawn in the randomized alphabet drawing. 1. I 9. G 17. Q 2. V 10. D 18. N 3. H 11. A 19. Z 4. R 12. E 20. W 5. O 13. X 21. U 6. S 14. p 22. Y 7. B 15. L 23. C 8. M 16. K 24. F Sincerely, CAREN DANIELS-MEADE CHIEF, ELECTIONS DIVISION Elections Division 25. T 26. J CENTRAL INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM Date: TO: SUBJECT: FROM: January 29, 1992 Honorable Councilman Drago Election Costs City Clerk In response to your request for actual and projected election costs I submit the following: 1981 Special Election (Terrabay) 1983 General Municipal Election (two Council seats) 1985 General Municipal Election (three Council, Clerk and Treasurer) 1985 Special Referendum Election, signatures verified publications, and election was set aside by the Court 1986 Special Municipal Election for City Treasurer 1987 General Municipal Election (two Council seats) 1989 General Municipal Election (three Council, Clerk and Treasurer) 1991 General Municipal Election (two Council seats) $24,163.09 8,501.65 8,369.01 4,727.27 19,797.78 9,345.20 12,095.28 13,091.87 Projected cost of checking referendum signatures for three days by two people for five days " " " 1,012.32 1,687.20 June 1992 Primary Election consolidation for referendum 16,000.00 Special Election in 1992 unconsolidated with any other election $23,000.00-27,000.00 If this Office can be of further assistance please call. Barbara A. CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION NOVEMBER 5, 1989 CONSOLIDATED PRECINCT NUMBERS, ELECTION OFFICERS AND POLLING PLACES Consolidated No. I (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco I and 4) Polling Place: E1 Camino High Sch. Cafeteria 1320 Mission Road Inspector - Ermen J. Rozzi Judge - Ida A. Alonso Judge - F. Irene Rozzi Judge - James L. Gilchrist, Jr. Consolidated No. 2 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 2 and 3) Polling Place: Sunshine Garden Sch., Rm. 7 1200 Miller Avenue Inspector - Laurence V. Eriksen Judge - Mary A. Andersen Judge - Florence I. Eriksen Judge - Elenora M. Zipp Consolidated No. 3 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 41 & 53) Polling Place: Sunshine Gardens School, Rm. 7 1200 Miller Ave. Inspector - Lillian A. Kerrigan Judge - Ada Nicolopulos Judge - Barbara C. Klinker Judge - Virginia H. Woodard Consolidated No. 4 (consisting of County Precinct So. San Francisco 5) Polling Place: Hillside School Multi-Purpose Rm. 1400 Hillside Blvd. Inspector - Isabella Yahraes Judge - Armondo R. Barri Judge - Mary Franco Judge - M. Faye Johnson Consolidated No. 5 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 6 and 8) Polling Place: Martin School - Multi Purp. Rm. 35 School Street Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Margaret R. Mac Kenzie Dorma Bush Vincenzina Curti Jack F. Stuart -1- Consolidated No. 6 (cons~ing of County Precincts So. S~rancisco 15 and 16) Polling Place: Parkway Jr. High School Library 825 Park Way Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Gertrude H. Bignardi Rose Barsi Altha L. Dagler Mary A. Galeotti Consolidated No. 7 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 13 and 14) Polling Place: Spruce School - Gym 501 Spruce Avenue Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Rosanna Cesca Lydia Abriani Mildred Fanucchi Juanita Ruiz De Zordo Consolidated No. 8 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 10 and 12) Polling Place: So. San Francisco City Hall - Foyer Enter on Miller Avenue 400 Grand Avenue Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Antoinette L. Greco Emilio A. Fontana Mafalda Colombo John Zuffi Consolidated No. 9 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 7 and 9) Polling Place: Penna Garage 313 Aspen Avenue Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Vernon R. Capps Alio De Zordo Josephine E. Compani Ida F. Penna Consolidated No. 10 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 39 and 40) Polling Place: Magnolia Senior Center, MPR Rm. 2 601 Grand Ave. Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Leona E. Pizziconi Donna J. Sartori Louise Brusco Vivian M. Dantonio Consolidated No. 11 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 17 and 18 Polling Place: Good News Chapel, Foyer 215 West Orange Ave. Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Gertrude E. Capps Margaret L. Symonds Betty J. Walsh Norma Guglielmetti -2- Consolidated No. Polling Place: 12 (cor~ting of County Precincts So. ~Francisco 19 and 20) 224 Northwood Dr. Seubert Garage Miriam F. Repetto Wanda M. Stafford Betty R. Seubert Ruth W. Fink Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Consolidated No. 13 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 25 and 26) Polling Place: Baden High Sch., Multi Purpo Rm. Thomas J. Ragsdale Olga M. Morse Emma J. Ragsdale Diva M. Del Grande 825 Southwood Dr. Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Consolidated No. 14 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 23 and 44) Polling Place: Ponderosa Sch., Multi Purp. Rm. June S. Heise Norma J. Muniz Carolyn C. Damonte Elsie G. Beaubien Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - 295 Ponderosa Rd. Consolidated No. 15 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 36) Polling Place: Rotary Plaza, Game Room Helen I. Richardson Thelma J. Mills Edward T. Murphy Phyllis M. Hill Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - 433 Alida St. Consolidated No. 16 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 21 and 22) Polling Place: Nelson Garage Donald B. Nelson Marion H. Leitner Lorraine P. Davis Nancy D. Meintz Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - 420 Briarwood Dr. Consolidated No. 17 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 37 and 38) Polling Place: Serra Vista Sch., Multi Purp. Rm. Sandra K. Ahlbach Enoch W. Henderson Dorothy B. Jensen Gloria Ji§getts Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - 257 Longford Dr. -3- Consolidated No. 18 (consisting of County Precinct So. San Francisco 43) Polling Place: Treasure Island Trailer Ct. #3 Wash Rm. 1700 E1Camino Real Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Juanita J. Schneider Bernice Rodriguez Pauline M. Zalesky Dagner B. Alholm Consolidated No. 19 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 33 and 35) Polling Place: Alta Loma Jr. Hi. Sch. Library 116 Romney Avenue Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Maureen A. Dan Gloria A. Galli Connie Wills Benjamina L. Marte Consolidated No. 20 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 32 and 52) Polling Place: Grace Covenant Ch., Fellowship Hall 740 Del Monte Ave. Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Jeane A. Price William E. Godkin Margaret H. Jensen J. A. Ainslie Consolidated No. 21 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 31 and 42) Polling Place: Buri Buri Sch., Music Rm. 120 E1Campo Dr. Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Dorothy W. Dombroski Edith M. Bass Gertrude P. Mc Callum Enes L. Quinlan Consolidated No. 22 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 29 and 30) Polling Place: Aldersgate Un. Meth. Ch. Soc. Hall 115 E1Campo Dr. Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - John H. Lowe Vera Bassford Muriel Anderson Regina M. Beaubien Consolidated No. 23 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 27 and 28) Polling Place: Municipal Svc. Bldg., Open Rm. 33 Arroyo Dr. Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Dorothy M. Molloy Florence M. Rath Lonnie Guinn Emma D. Ruggiero -4- Consolidated No. 24 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 34 and 47) Polling Place: St. Augustine Ch. Main Hall 3700 Callan Blvd. Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Mary E. Laurenson Socorro H. Arroyo Elizabeth M. Mc Mahon Juanita B. Hilario Consolidated No. 25 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 45 and 48) Polling Place: St. Augustine Ch. Main Hall 3700 Callan Blvd. Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Joseph P. Armato Ann M. Armato Charles B. Vaughn Janet M. Saunders Consolidated No. 26 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 24 and 46) Polling Place: So. San Francisco Fire Sta. #4 2350 Galway Place Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Robert C. Bertolani Lola Picchi Guilio Picchi Rosa L. Bennett Consolidated No. 27 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 49 and 50) Polling Place: Foxridge School Multi Purp. Rm. 2525 Wexford Avenue Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Walter West Robert H. Clark Josephine M. Putkey Wei-Chin Chen Consolidated No. 28 (consisting of County Precincts So. San Francisco 11 and 51) Polling Place: Foxridge Sch., Multi Purp. Rm. 2525 Wexford Avenue Inspector - Judge - Judge - Judge - Helen J. Bertolani Alphonse A. Seubert Ruth M. Hansen Trinidad Tabaldo /s/ Barbara A. Battaya City Clerk City of South San Francisco -5-