HomeMy WebLinkAbout2009-01-14 e-packet~~H SAN AGENDA
~° , .;, ,p
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
,,,,,,~,~,;,:~ ~ CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
~'~LIFOR~~Q'
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 14, 2009
6:30 P.M.
PEOPLE OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
You are invited to offer your suggestions. In order that you may know our method of conducting
Agency business, we proceed as follows:
The regular meeting of the Redevelopment Agency is held on the second Wednesday of each
month at 6:30 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South
San Francisco, California.
Public Comment: For those wishing to address the Board on any Agenda or non-Agendized item,
please complete a Speaker Card located at the entrance to the Community Room and submit it to
the Clerk. Please be sure to indicate t:he Agenda Item # you wish to address or the topic of your
public comment. California law prevents Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any item
not on the Agenda (except in emergency circumstances). Your question or problem may be
referred to staff for investigation and/or action where appropriate or the matter may be placed on a
future Agenda for more comprehensive action or a report. When your name is called, please come
to the podium, state your name and address for the Minutes. COMMENTS ARE LIMITED TO
THREE (3) MINUTES PER SPEAKER. Thank you for your cooperation.
The Clerk will read successively the items of business appearing on the Agenda. As she completes
reading an item, ~t will be ready for Board action.
KARYL MATSUMOTO
Chair
MARK N. ADDIEGO
Vice Chair
PEDRO GONZALEZ
Boardmember
RICHARD A. GARBARINO
Boardmember
RICHARD BATTAGLIA
Investment Officer
BARRY M. NAGEL
Executive Director
KEVIN MULLIN
Boardmember
KRISTA MARTINELLI-CARSON
Clerk
STEVEN T. MATTAS
Counsel
PLEASE SILENCE CELL PHONES AND PAGERS
I TEARING ASSISTANCE EQUIPMENT 1S AVAILABLE FOR USE BY THE HEARING-IMPAIRED AT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETINGS
In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5, any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an
open session agenda item, arad is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular meeting will be niude available jor public
i~ispection in the City Clerk's Office located at City Hall. If, however, the document or writing is not distributed until the regular
meeting to which it relates, then the document ar writing will be made available to the public at the location of the meeting, as
listed on this agenda. The address of City Hall is 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California 94080.
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
AGENDA REVIEW
PUBLIC COMMENTS
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Motion to approve the minutes of the meetings of December 10, 2008 and
December 17, 2008.
2. Motion to approve the expense claims of January 14, 2009.
3. Resolution approving a contract with Interstate Grading and Paving, Inc., of South
San Francisco, California, for building demolition of 212 and 21.6 Baden Avenue
in an amount not to exceed $78,800.
PUBLIC HEARING
4. Type "C" Sign -Banners
Boston "roperties/Owner
Genentech, Inc./Applicant
P08-0079: PP08-0003 & SIGNS08-0048
Precise Plan to approve a Type C Sign Permit to allow installation of one employee
oriented banner sign at the Genentech Campus located at 651 Gateway Blvd.. in
accordance with South San Irancisco Municipal Code Sections 20.57, 20.76 and
20.86.
5. Hyatt Place Hotel
Vijay Patel/applicant
SRI Krishna Enterprises/owner
550 Gateway Blvd
P07-0073: PP07-0001, SIGN07-0047,
MND07-0003
VAR07-0004, TDM08-0003, DR07-0046 &
Precise Plan, Type "C" Sign. Permit, Design Review, Transportation Demand
Management Plan & Variance applications fora 166 room, eight-story Hyatt Place
Hotel, at 550 Gateway Boulevard, in the Gateway Specific Plan District in
accordance with SSFMC chapters 20.57, 20.85, 20.86 & 20.120.
Continued from Regular Meetings of November 12, 2008 and December 10, 2008.
ADJOURNMENT
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING JANUARY 14, 2009
AGENDA PAGE 2
O~'L x SAN F
a. 'i- u~
~- -
o
~ t~_--~
.,
X911 F~JRI"~~'
MINUTES
RDA AGENDA ITEM # 1
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
REGULAR MEETING
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BUILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
WEDNESDAY DECEMBER 10, 2008
CALL TO ORDER:
ROLL CALL:
AGENDA REVIEW
6:30 p.m.
DRAFT
Present: Boardmembers Garbarino, Gonzalez and Mullin,
Vice Chairman Addiego and Chairwoman
Matsumoto.
Absent: None.
The Executive Director recommendf;d moving closed session items 5, 6 and 7 to the
Special Meeting of Wednesday, December 17, 2008.
The Agency so agreed.
Chairwoman Matsumoto stated that with Consent of the Board she would like to move the
Public Hearing before the Consent Calendar.
The Agency so agreed.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
None.
PUBLIC HEARING
1. Hyatt Place Hotel -first
Vijay Patel/applicant
SRI Krishna Enterprises/ow:ner
550 Gateway Blvd
P07-0073: PP07-0001, SIGrJ07-0047,
MND07-0003
VAR07-0004, TDM08-0003, DR07-0046 &
Precise Plan, Type "C" Sign Permit, Design Review, Transportation Demand
Management Plan & Variance applications fora 166 room, eight-story Hyatt Place
Hotel, at 550 Gateway Boulevard, in the Gateway Specific Plan District in
accordance with SSFMC chapters 20.57, 20.85, 20.86 & 20.120.
Continued from regular meeting of ~fovember 12, 2008.
Public 1-Tearing Opened: 6:31 p.m.
Senior Planner Beaudin presented the staff report recommending that the Redevelopment
Agency approve application P07-00'73 including a precise plan, mitigated negative
declaration, setback variance, sign application, and transportation demand m~aiiagement
plan fora 166 room hotel at 550 Gateway Boulevard, which was a tv:~o (2) acre vacant site.
Several hotels had previously been approved at the location. The current proposal called
for construction of a nine (9} story hotel with 166 rooms, onsite amenities, swimming pool,
meeting area, dining area and food services. The hotel would come in under the Hyatt
Hotel Brand and would cater to business travelers. The project complied with all standards
outlined in the Gateway Specific Plan Area with the exception of the setback requirement.
The requested variance was to allow parking a minimum setback of 14 feet to the rear
facade of the building. The Agency had the authority to grant the variance which was
necessary due to the depth of the property. The Applicant proposed to generously
landscape the property and had agreed to place public art in area. Five (5) signs were
proposed as part of the project including one (1) on each building elevation and including a
monument sign at the entrance. Over the course of meetings before the Design Review
Board, the project evolved. The resulting building proposal is based on contemporary
architecture and employs a variety of materials. Circulation of a Mitigated Negative
Declaration was also part of the approval process. During the 30 day review/comment
period staff received letters from Caltrans and PG& E. Staff addressed and included its
responses in the staff report. Senior Planner Beaudin closed by highlighting the project's
incorporation of numerous green elements including environmentally friendly construction
among other elements.
Applicant Vijay Patel gave a power point presentation on the project. He explained the
Hyatt Place brand was developed a f:ew years ago to appeal to a higher end clientele and
incorporates a mid scale food and beverage service as well as select services, excluding
banquet facilities. The brand gives t:he customer the opportunity to select services
consistent with his or her needs and wants. Mr. Patel then presented a series of interior
shots of the hotel, including the gallery area with awine/coffee bar and grab-and-go food
service station. Guest rooms were also displayed. Mr. Patel explained the Hyatt Place
brand has 188 hotels in 39 states. He next presented renderings of the building including
elevation and entrance shots and views from multiple angles. He advised his company
operates hotels in the West and in Louisiana and hopes to make South San Francisco its
business headquarters for its California properties. Mr. Patel reviewed the materials that
would be used to construct the building and emphasized sustainability would be a priority.
He further advised he had been building hotels with his brother-in-law since the early
1980s. Their philosophy is to cross train employees and they plan to have over 40
employees at the location.
Public Hearing closed: 7:00 p.m.
Boardmember Gonzalez advised he had met with Mr. Patel two (2) weeks ago and Mr.
Patel had presented some of his ideas for the hotel. Boardmember Gonzalez had suggested
the idea of solar panels.
Mr. Patel advised the Company was still investigating to determine if solar made sense.
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DECEMBER 10, 2008
MINUTES PAGE 2
Boardmember Gonzalez encouraged Mr. Pa±el to look into hiring some of the City's high
school students and also noted the tourism industry might benefit from the Ferry Service
that is planned to come to Oyster Point.
Boardmember Garbarino disclosed he had met with Mr. Patel He stated he was excited
about the possibility of having a Hyatt Hotel in the City. He raised concerns over the
current economic situation for hotels, particularly given that this hotel was targeting
business travelers. He was concerned financing may dry up after construction began on the
hotel and sought reassurances in this regard. Boardmember Garbarino also stated it was
difficult to get a conceptual feel for the hotel without a table top model.
Boardmember Mullin disclosed he rriet with Mr. Patel. He stated he was excited about the
overall direction of the project. He questioned how long it might take the Company to
resolve the issue of whether the incorporation of solar energy was possible with respect to
the project.
Mr. Patel responded the solar investigation could possibly be complete by the time the
Company pulled permits. He also stated construction on the property would not begin until
financing was guarantied. Regarding the current state of the hotel business, he advised the
Company's numbers at the Hampton Inn which it operated in the Oyster Point Area were
strong.
Boardmember Mullin commented th.e interior of the building was beautiful but opined the
exterior was fairly standard. He questioned the origin of the design. Boardmember Mullin
further noted that PG&E expressed concern regarding future power line upgrades and the
potential impact on the project. He questioned whether Mr. Patel was confident such an
upgrade would not impact the hotel's operations.
Mr. Patel advised the design was ve~~y specific to this location. The Hyatt Place standard
building was constructed of stucco a.nd brick. This design was intended to be an
improvement. Regarding the power line issue, Mr. Patel advised the Hampton Inn next
door shared the same power line, so the Company was very sensitive to the issue..
However, he did not predict a problem.
Vice Chairman Addiego advised he met with Mr. Patel. At the time they met, the
renderings Mr. Patel presented were different and now seemed refined. He questioned how
many hotel properties the Company operated on the West Coast.
Mr. Patel advised the biggest differF;nce between the current and previous renderings was
that the new plan called for rounded. as opposed to flat stone. The balcony-like trim was
also downscaled. Regarding West Coast properties, Mr. Patel advised the Company
presently operated five (5) and was hoping to jump to 24.
Vice Chairman Addiego opined it might be a very good time to jump into the project. He
stated that in difficult economic times, the City often floats the idea of preferential hiring
for City residents.
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DECEMBER 10, 2008
MINUTES PAGE 3
Mr. Patel responded that in his experience operating the Hampton Hotel, local employees
are best. 80-90% of Hampton Hotel employees were South San Francisco residents.
Vice Chairman Addiego questioned Counsel as to whether preferential hiring could be
incorporated into the plan.
Counsel Mattas responded staff could work with Mr. Patel to come up with agreeable
language on the subject and bring it back before the Agency at a future date.
Chairwoman Matsumoto disclosed she met with Mr. Patel and appreciated that he took
some of her comments into consideration. She stated she would like to see local
construction companies utilized on the project. She questioned whether the edge on the
building lit up at night.
Mr. Patel responded it was Hyatt's intent to have it light up, but it became too difficult to
make happen.
Chairwoman Matsumoto stated she f=ound the transportation demand outline confusing.
She questioned whether the outline went before staff for review prior to inclusion in the
packet. She further questioned the number of employees referenced in the plan.
Senior Planner Beaudin advised staff reviewed the outline. He stated the employee number
referenced was part of the mitigation for a reduced parking requirement from 1.0-.93,
which met the intent of reduced trip generation for the East of 101 Area.
Boardmember Gonzalez requested Mr. Patel's cooperation with the Conference Center,
especially since the hotel did not plan to have banquet facilities. He also inquired as to
how Mr. Patel's Company could help with childcare activities.
Mr. Patel advised he planned to work with the Conference Center and would even look into
serving on the Authority. With regard to childcare, he commented the Company had put a
small fund aside to donate to childcare projects.
Senior Planner Beaudin advised the South San Francisco Municipal Code would require a
$20,000.00 childcare contribution from the Company.
Vice Chairman Addiego commented he liked Mr. Patel's overall plan and appreciated his
desire to build a hotel in South San 1rancisco during these difficult times. He stated he was
conflicted about approving the proposal until it addressed preferential hiring for South San
Francisco employees.
Boardmember Mullin concurred and added he would need more clarity on the solar piece
before moving forward.
Boardmember Garbarino stated Mr. Patel had addressed his concerns about the economic
situation, but he would like to see a table model of the proposed project before making a
determination.
Chairwoman Matsumoto stated the TDM needed to be corrected with respect to Caltrain.
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DECEMBER I0, 2008
MINUTES PAGE 4
Counsel Mattas advised staff could work with Mr. Patel to address the issues raised during
the meeting. However, due to provisions in the Gateway Specific Plan, the Agency would
need Mr. Patel's concurrence to a continuance.
Chairwoman Matsumoto requested N1r. Patel's agreement to a continuance of the public
hearing to the Agency's next regular meeting set for January 14, 2009.
Mr. Patel agreed to the continuance.
Recess: 7:45 p.m.
Meeting resumed: 9:23 p.m.
CONSENT CALENDAR
2. Motion to approve the minutE;s of November 3, 2008 and November 12, 2008.
3. Motion to approve the expen:>e claims of December 10, 2008 in the amount of
$4,957,286.77.
4. Resolution No. 21-2008 authorizing the City Manager to approve a consultant
agreement with Alta Planning + Design for the Bicycle Plan and appropriating
$55,000 from Redevelopment Agency funds and amending the 2008-2009 Capital
Improvement Program.
Item No. 4: Chairwoman Matsumoto questioned why RDA money was being used for this
purpose.
Counsel Mattas advised it was appropriate to use RDA funds because the program was
Capital Improvement related.
Boardmember Gonzalez questioned how bicyclists would be permitted to use the path.
Counsel Mattas advised the general rule is that bicyclists have the same rights to occupy
the roadways as motorists, with the exception of freeways and expressways. Any
restrictions on other types of roadways would have to apply uniformly to bicyclists and
motorists. He noted police officers could cite bicyclists for traffic violations.
Motion -Boardmember Garbarino/Second -Vice Chairman Addiego: to approve the
Consent Calendar. Unanimously approved by voice vote.
Recess: 9:31 p.m.
Meeting resumed: 9:40 p.m.
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DECEMBER I0, 2008
MINUTES PAGE 5
CLOSED SESSION
5. Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 real property negotiations related to
306 Miller Avenue. Company negotiator: Citi Residential Lending, Inc. Agency
negotiator: Marty Van Duyn.
Item not heard.
6. Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 real property negotiations related to
93 8 Linden Avenue. Company negotiator: CA Mortgage and Realty, Inc. Richard
Johnson V.P. Real Estate. Agency negotiator: Marty Van Duyn.
Item not heard.
7. Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 real property negotiations related to
323 Miller Avenue. Company negotiator: Rotary. Agency negotiator: Marty Van
Duyn.
Item not heard.
8. Conference with Legal Counsel: Existing litigation (Pursuant to Government Code
Section 54956.9(a)). South S,an Francisco Redevelopment Agency v. Clear Channel
Outdoor.
Closed Session began: 9:40 p.m.
Open Session resumed: 10:05 p.m.
Report out of Closed Session by Chairwoman Matsumoto: Direction given.
ADJOURNMENT
Being no further business Chairworrian Matsumoto adjourned the meeting at 10:05 p.m.
Submitted
,~>
r to Martinel '- arson, Clerk
City f South n Francisco
Approved:
Karyl Matsumoto, Chairwoman
City of South San Francisco
REGULAR REDEVELOPMENT AGENC'.Y MEETING
MINUTES
DECEMBER 10, 2008
PAGE 6
~zx S~ MINUTE ~
~o .,,,,.. ~ DRAFT
SPECIAL MEETING
° REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
c'~LIFOR~1~ OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
MUNICIPAL SERVICES BI:TILDING
COMMUNITY ROOM
33 ARROYO DRIVE
WEL>NESDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2008
CALLED TO ORDER: 6:35 p.m.
ROLL CALL Present: Boardmembers Garbarino, Gonzalez and
Mullin, Vice Chairman Addiego and
Chairwoman Matsumoto.
Absent: None.
1. Public Comments -comments are limited to items on the Special Meeting Agenda.
None.
2. Resolution No. 22-2008 approving a contract with Technology, Engineering &
Construction, Inc. ("TEC") for asbestos abatement, hazardous waster disposal, and
building demolition for the n.ew Caltrain Station Site located at 296 Airport Boulevard.
Director of Public Works White presented the staff report recommending approval of a
resolution authorizing a contract with TEC for $51,900. TEC would provide services
including removal of the current metal maintenance building that had sat on the site since the
1960s and clear the property for purhoses of relocating utilities and constructing the train
station. Due to the presence of minor hazardous materials on the site, asbestos abatement and
hazardous waster disposal were also part of the contract. JPB would be paying 50% of the
contract price pursuant to its agreement with the City.
Vice Chairman Addiego commented the proposal seemed to indicate a one (1) day project.
Director White responded the projec;t would likely take more than a day but would be fast.
Chairwoman Matsumoto noted TEC" s bid was substantially lower than the bid JPB had
obtained from its contractor. She questioned the precise amount of the bid JPB obtained.
Director White responded staff had lbeen in discussions with JPB over who would take the
lead on procuring a contract for clean-up on the site. JPB's estimate was in the neighborhood
of $130,000.00. Staff asked if JPB would have a problem with the City looking for bids and
JPB responded favorably to this proposal. Director White stated he would obtain the precise
amount of the bid JPB received.
Chairwoman Matsumoto recommended continuing to monitor bids and project costs incurred
by JPB and exercise caution with its economies of scale.
Motion- Vice Chairman Addiego/Second- Boardmember Garbarino: to approve Resolution
No. 22-2008. Unanimously approved by voice vote.
3 . Motion to accept the Lindenville Storm Drain Pump Station Project as complete in
accordance with plans and s~-ecifications.
Director of Public Works White pre;>ented the staff report explaining the project was the first
of a two (2) stage project. This stage was known as the "Lindenville Storm Drain Pump
Station Project" and included construction of a massive pump station and associated discharge
piping located at 27 South Linden Avenue. The project included clean-up of contaminated
soil, a new underground concrete storm drain. pump storage well, four pumps, installation of
new electrical equipment and an emf;rgency generator. The project met specific cost targets,
however a bit more money was spent on hazardous clean-up due to the fact that the site had
once supported a Battery Recycling ]Facility.
Chairwoman Matsumoto questioned a certain change-order.
Director White responded the change order related to toxic substance removal. He explained
that while digging the hole related toy the project, leakage of sewage was encountered due to a
sewer line crack. Repair work and ;shoring was necessary.
Motion -Boardmember Garbarino/ Second -Boardmember Gonzalez: to accept the
Lindenville Storm Drain Pump Station Project as complete in accordance with plans and
specifications. Unanimously approved by voice vote.
4. CLOSED SESSION: Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 real property
negotiations related to 306 M[i]ler Avenue. Company negotiator: Citi Residential
Lending, Inc. Agency negotiator: Marty Van Duyn.
Closed session began: 6:47 p.m.
Open session resumed: 7:01 p.m.
Report out of Closed Session by Chaiirwoman Matsumoto: Closed Session would resume at
the end of the City Council meeting.
Recess: 7:01 p.m.
Meeting resumed and Closed Session re-opened: 9:25 p.m.
Open session resumed: 10:14 p.m.
Report out of Closed Session by Chairwoman Matsumoto: The Agency, by a 5-0 vote,
directed that the Executive Director Yno longer pursue acquisition of 306 Miller Avenue.
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MEETING DECEMBER I7, 2008
AGENDA PAGE 2
5. CLOSED SESSION: Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 real property
negotiations related to 938 Linden Avenue. Company negotiator: CA Mortgage and
Realty, Inc. Richard Johnson V.P. Real Estate. Agency negotiator: Marty Van Duyn.
Report out of Closed Session by Chairwoman Matsumoto: Direction Given. Vice Chairman
Addiego abstained from this item due to a potential conflict of interest.
6. CLOSED SESSION: Pursuant to Government Code section 54956.8 real property
negotiations related to 323 Miller Avenue. Company negotiator: Rotary. Agency
negotiator: Marty Van Duyn.
Report out of Closed Session by Chairwoman Matsumoto: Direction given. Vice Chairman
Addiego abstained from this item du.e to a potential conflict of interest.
7. Adjournment.
Being no further business, Chairwoman Matsumoto adjourned the meeting at 10:15 p.m.
Subnutted b~
City of
>-'
~~--~~
.arson, Clerk
Francisco
Approved:
Karyl Matsumoto, Chairwoman
City of South San Francisco
SPECIAL REDEVELOPMENT AGENCX MEETING DECEMBER I7, 2008
AGENDA PAGE3
zx S~
,~,
0
~. ~
H
~J
I~
n
Oi
RDA AGENDA ITEM # 2
I certify that the demands set forth on this payment register are
accurate and funds are available fo=~ payment.* ,,~
P ' t
~ _
DATED: ~ ~ ~~ D Y '~:~~~o..S-~~
FINANCE DIRE OR
*Note: Items below do not include payroll related payments
Checks:
Date
12/10/08 $
12/17/08
12/24/08
12/31/08
01/07/09
Electronic Payments:
Date
12/22/08
Amount
21,583.22
129,923.03
101,183.09
76,278.79
520,522.67
Amount To Description
4,764.70 Deutsche Bank RDA Debt Service
Total Payments $ 854,255.50
This is to certify that the above bills were confirmed at the regular meeting
of the Redevelopment Agency of South San Francisco held January 14, 2009.
DATED:
CHAIR
W N W W OJ OJ O~ CO CO 0.~ W O W O W W W W O O O O
W 1 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~~ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \
~ d 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
q 1 H H H H H H H H H rl ,-~ H H H H ~-+ ri H H H H H
Q .'`G 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
d U 1 H H ,-+ r-I H r-I r-i H H rl ~-+ H H r-i ri rl rl H H H H H
a
~ Lfl N 07 d' l0 lD l0 l0 ~ ~O If1 N N N N d' m ¢) l0 d' N
O O~ L(1 l0 O m m m m m m o~ Lf1 Lf) Ifl U'1 O O Lh m ~ l0
~x 1 m m o o m o~ o~ w m m o~ o~ m m m o~ m m m co m o
1 In lIl Lh tf) L!1 LIl LI'1 L(1 Lf1 11') Lfl lf1 Lfl Lf1 ~f1 lfl to Ill L(1 Lf1 lf1 Ul
,Y, 1 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
U I H H H ri H .-I H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H
h
0 0
cn w
H w
Z ~
d H
~ z
ice. W
w
U_ ~
G W
Ji U)
H
G. Q
G
F+
r Z
f--I d
H R'.
U a
a
3
n
N
x
U' Q,' U H fx
H H a a
u
i w w ~ ~
d
O
x O W Q U U O
~ a
U
',~ W F W a lY. W W W la E~
w
Q d
Q a
H x
w a
a
~ w
a a
a ~
~; ~
~ F
a z
o z
H x
rx
z R', W a H r-I a H O G G H d W
H O O ~ ~ H £ U U H ~ ~ ~
a a: ~ a ~ ~ a U d E-1 w
O P, N a~ o m ~ W v] O ~ L~ ~ z G7
~ W d H H ~ ~, M ~r q w a a q o w [-.
M a ~ a M ~ ~+ M M M ~ U w d a M ~ cn
z I m u] "J W 1 1 M I , 1 ~ H CL ~ pa 1 ~
I 1 W u1 Ix ,~ U U I U U U W x a ~ W Q
~ 1 rl U Z O a ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ U C7 ~ ~ W
[~ 1 p~, H H CL H C/] if] 'J W Cn U] H W H '.`G C!) I!~ d
LL I a' .'~ z ~ W ,7 t` R'. U] U] a H V]
a~ ~
z a
w w
a w
U
~
~
~a
m
~
~
a~ x
w H
c d
w
F cn
w w
a F
H
d d x
U
U I x w H o ;~ U w U U U ~ I a z U a m U ~ o
to 1 to Q ~ r^ CY, in U W U I I
W I (~ H [x I ~ ~ ~ ~ £ h H ~ d Z cq W ~ H U
Q 1 a ~ w a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > a w w U ~
~ 1 d ~ I ~ d o o G o 0 0 a 1 o z a x x o r ~
w 1 ~ F d u? v v U U U U H d d a H z Q a U E~ ~
v l
H I H a
z Q
rx r
a H
~
~ w
r
~
~
~ a
x Q
a a
x w
5 ~ H
a
o a
~
m a
w o
U
p I ~ W LK ~ o 0 1 0 0 o U] W h G, o G1,
~ 1 w z u. d a ~ ~ Ei > ~ ~ z w w o a ~ ~ ~ ~ o H
1 P, O ~ W p+ O O U O O O O ~ ~ W d m u] o O u: m
H I d U cn r d z z O z z z U [q cn a U m U m z W E-I
E-I I o u1 0 0 o m m o m m m in o o ~ 0 0 o In [~ co H
"Z 1 O ~ L(1 O O f-i [~ dl M Lf) lfl t` In 1D t` In O O d+ H O N
1
Q i O ~ m 111 O ~ d' L(1 lf1 M r'1 l~ d' m N lD O lfl aD M N ~
1 O H t.h Lf1 O N M ~ l0 a' C' r-I N C' d' L(1 lf) t` O G H l0
1 111 rh <` L!1 H M d' ~O [+1 lD H M o~ N
H N (~i N H V+ M
U~ a U7 ~ 17
H H H F
Cn ~' ~S U] U U U U U U I-~ ^.. .'`4 .'~+ U] U U
r U r z z z z z z U U U U r z z
H H H H H H H
d Uj z d ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F
z z O O O O O z
~ O ~
~C Q a a d U Q ~ a ~ a
r ~a H r x x a a ~ x ~ ~ ~ - - r x o a
H ~ W E-I F W W W W W W ~ W W W W H W h H
I [>; n: ~ G w
d W z z z z z z d d d d d z z o
a z o a w w w w w w z z z z a U w H ~
z l o - rx o ~ ~ > ~ ~ 5 - o x z ~ w
I a N ~ a d d d d d d N - cl: Z H r~C f~ U
~ 1 p, W cn rs W U U U U U U W U] u] ul cn CL FC U '~7 H
0 1 x x - c~ cn cn rn cn cn x x x rx x w v cn x w
Q I d U W W d U W W W W d m H
I r F
~ w
U ~
~ W
~ w
W w w
a ~,
d r r r r rz~ cn z W
a w U
j ~ ~ uj ~ w c
i'.~ c
i~ c
r~ r~
c n r
n c
n ~ E £ E Q ~ Z c
n a a
lD H W lU N l~ N
m m m m ~o ~o w u1
O O O O L'1 Ill O ~
r-! H rl H H H H O
I
[x] I
O
r-I
l0
O
O I
O I
O I
O I
O I
O 1
O
H
l0
l0
1D
l0
O
O
O I
O
r~'1 1
N
a'., 1 ~ O O H a+ m m N N N N O O O O O a' H LO l~ f+'1 O
~ 1 N N N N N r'l r1 d' d' ~1' a' N N N N N N c+1 M M C" r"1
,7 ~' <t' d' d' d' d' V' d' d' cr a' <M a' ~ [f' a' d' V' c* d~ d' d+
~y I 1 1 I I I I i I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1
I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O H
t'1 I lD ~ N O M W CO OJ N of W l0 lD l0 LD 1D l0 l0 l0 ~ l0 M
2 I M W N N b N CC CO OJ N OJ Q1 ~ N O7 b O7 OJ CO OJ OJ N
I~ I O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M
G I ,~ fi H H H H H r! H H ri H H H H rl H '-i H H H H
U I I I I I I I I ~ I 1 i I 1 I I I I I 1 I
U I ~ lD lO l0 l0 ~I ~ ~ lO ~ ~ (` [~ h [~ ~ [~ ~ ~ ~ O
d I Ln Lfl Lfl Ifl ul l!1 Lfl Lfl Lll In U'1 Ln t11 L(1 Lfl tll L(1 In lfl Ln In LC1
C7 Z. z ~ 'I. Z Z Z z Z 2 L7 L7 C7 C7 C7 C7 C7 L7 C7 L ti
z H H H H H H H H H H z z Z z ZI 7-I zi z ~+ z U
H U] U1 U~ U] V] rn U1 U1 [/1 [/~ H H H H H H H H H H ',7
H ~ ~ ~ ~ D ~ ~ a a H h H H F H E-I H E-I E-1 ra:
d O O O O O O O 0 0 O d d d d d d d d d d E-1
cx x x x x x .^; .., ... .:; x x rx rx rx rx rx rx x a a cn
W W W W W W W W W W Cii d
w I a w w w w ra w w w w w a a a a a a a a a a rx
I O 'r H r i -I 'r-1 '- E-1 H i-I O O G O O O O G G O Cs+
~
z
a d
rx d
rx d
x d
rx d
~ (C
~ d
r>• d
a ~
n; d
a
a,
a,
a
a
a
a
a
a
a
a z
H
o w w w w w w w w w w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ 1 a Q g c Q a la g Q a Q a a a a a a a a a a a
I w o 0 0 o G o 0 0 0 o w w w w w w w w w w d
u I w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ •~. ~ w w w w w w w w w :~ w
O I Q S 3 3 ~ 3 3 3 3 3 3 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q q p z
tx I W O O O O C O O O O O W W w W W W W W W W W
G+ I Qi a a a a a a a I-~ ti a ~ Qi ~ ~ ~i Qi Qi ~ Q~i ~i
N
N
M
N
r-I
N
a
H
O
H
a
O
Q
z
w
N
N
M
O
11l
H
N
a
H
O
Ei
Q
Q
m
a
a
0
v
w
a
N
N
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
W ~ o O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c o
i--1 I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~~ \ \ \
~ ~ I r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r
Q I H ri H rl H H H r-I H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H
W I \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ~. \ \
L7 ~ ~ N N N N N N N N N !V N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
U ~ H H H H H H H H H H H H H r~ H H H H H H H H H H H H
N ifl O N O Lf1 Lh I11 LI'1 M l0 M r ri Ol 01 61 to Lf) d' d' o] N rl ~G l0
H l0 of H lD lD lD lD l0 r-1 Lfl O\ T O O O N V~ d' l0 r H V' O L(1 Ll1
Yk I H O O H O O O O O H H Q~ O O O O 01 H H H 01 H H O H H
I l0 l0 ~ lD l0 lO lD l0 l0 l0 lD lf1 lD lD l0 ~D IIl lD ~D l0 Lf) lD lD lD l0 l0
,"~.. ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N
U I H H H H H H H r r-I H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H
U O
Q I Q
w a r
F cn W U
~ a x z
a w
w w z v
w x a o x
p a H w
Z w H [-+ ~
Z F w
~ ~
~ w m x
w Q o
F o z z w
`~ a
H F v H w
m m ~ H ~ H U
a U
O x O C7 FC ~
x x U H m w w z U x
a Q w
~C Q ~ ~C 7~ ~o D H H 3 u
i ~C ~C
Q W U H Q a; o x cq W Ca Q
x W u] x `,' z z x x
O ~ H C7 v] O E~+
x
o x
w x
o ~ z
H a
w m
r x
o
G
C9 Q
0
~ w
rn x
o H
x x
o x
0
w a w Q ~C z a w ~ a U z o o cn a w w w w
H z x U] FC M r.G ~ H x W W M W r.~ W
Z I ~ Cq m cn ~ F ~ W Z H ~ 3 Cn C7 U U ~ U H to z F N
O ~ W O W W x a x U FC U H W Q E-~ H H la H LLB W H U U
H i U ~ U U U FC U H W x z W O z ~ ~ O ~ W U C7 W W
F I H H H U > x h o w F a w x x x x F H z h
~ z cn ~ ~ r ~ x x c~ o a x ~ ~ w w F w ~ > w o 0
~ ~ x w w x x r ~ ~ w p x w F w m cn z m ~ x ~ x x
x I w a H w w ~ Q w m o a x m w U w o w a cl a
U to a m cn ~ x a x ~ G a w z o F F U a z m ~
cn ~ q a ~ I U a x a a ~+ ~ w o z z ~ o x a a
w t E-I H P+ H H ri Cf) FC H ~ ~C ~ .~ ~7 x x H H H z H U` ~ FC FC
q I Z ~ ~ Z Z a+ U ~ x W ~ a+ W FC W FC FC cq O E-~ z E+ W W
~ I FC c/~ FC FC ~ W u] v] W m z W G.~ p.' E ~ W H U H U t/l c~
F w 1 F ~ F F ~ cn ~ z m N w x z o a cn p F w
o x U I a g w a a Q ca w ~ ~ ~ H x o f ~+ ~ m x a F :~ ~
U O H ~ U x U ~ Q x ~ x U a: x H xz a U ~C a a m W F ~ H x x
~ LL O ~ U] H C!] U] ~ x a U) GV ~ ~/ x x O w U) Cf] x x x
H w ~ I z w w z z w v w ~ w ~ w w w ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ o z z U ~ ~
U x z 1 o Cn w o o w w w g U a x x ~ o x a w w o x o o x a a
H I U cn o U U v~ a cn x u; cn a m m U U w ~+ ~+ 2. a U v r-C cn cn
z
x
w W ti I o 0 m o N o 0 0 o co m o 0 o In ~ ~ ~n o 0 o e+ in o ~ ~
~ 2 ~ o u1 N o In In o r m Irl m o o ~~ m ~ m H o it1 H m r o H co
z W D ~
~ cn O I ~ r H ~ m m M m m a~, H o m ~ a~ M r r m H m ~ M o o M
v.. x ~ 1 m d+ ~ m m ~ m ~ ~ M ~ o M M M N In ~-+ r m o m ~ o o H
," j ~(,' I M r M ^'1 N Gl rl l0 l0 M H N H H H H N ~.Il H N H a' 61
~ ~ ~ _ _ _ _ _
i!_` i/] M H M r". C' Lfl m H tf1 O 6l V~ N N
H H H H N N
c, q
f-+
H rx w ~ m H w w w U z z ti ~
U x ~ H ~ ~ U O H C.7 O O x x H H O O
~ .N, v~ ~ x ~ ~ ~; U rn cn "
y O O x x U U
~ U ~ U U U U H >-I z iy ,Y., x H H O U1 W
~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ a a o x ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ w
" w
z a
FC s
~
O W
H U O N 0.l
H W
H CA
H ~l
H U
,~, ~
W ~ H U
W W W z
H ~
a ~ FC r
w
a
Q
x
z
Q
w
x
x
x
x
H
cn ~ ~ a H C7 ~ ~
H ~ E' U a a o w w E v z
~ o~ _ _ _ _ a ~+ ~-I H R,' r1,' ~ U x u z w ~ ~
~ w F ~ m w w w w > x F z w z z a w w z H x x
w l x ~ o x ~ ~ ~ > ~ v~ x x x Q o o z a a F H F ~ w x x
I ~ ~ 0.1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Ff FC z Q W £ H H H O ~ ~ >C u1 >+ Q D q
z w z z z z o a a ~ F F a x a w a H o %n m
I
i
N
~ q
N _q
`
~
~
~
~ U cq O
x O
U z
3 ~C
z ~C
z ~
z
z
z
H
a w
a
x I w w w w ~ m cn m m a ~+ a o Q w w x x F o v ~ ~
o l x x U x x x x x x w w ~ H F F w u~ cn w w z ,~ w w
Q ~ U w H U ~ w w w w w a ~ z cn m H m cn F ~ z x z a a
z ~ z
~ ~ w z
~ a ~ ~ r. ~-I H a
~ t7
~ 3
O x
H x
H a
a r
x ~
x cn
W N
x v
H U
W z
H a
~ a
r~
W i
~ cn W
~ w
O cn U
~ W
E W
~ W
~ W
~ W
cn FC
~ Q x Q w w FC F F 3 U cn H a, ~
m m m ~o ,~ H o o H o
O O O N In Lfl N M ~ i N
O O O C r r M 61 C O
H H ,~ H O O O O O
~
a/ , I ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ~ I
W I H ~o H ~-+ ,~. ~n ~c ~o ~n o 0 o M M o 0 0 0 o c H H H o 0
[Sj I O O O O C O O O O H d" a' O O H N l0 lC l0 l0 O O O O H H
~ ~ N N M N N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M N N N N N N
7 ~ ~ ~ <r c« ~ rl ~ ~r c~ ~ ~ ~ a' ~ c a' ~r d+ a~ c r ~++ d~ d' a ~
Zy ~
~ ~
O ~
O I
O I
O I
G
O
O I
O
O
O ~
O ~
O I
O ~
O I
O I
O ~
O ~
O ~
O I
O I
,-I I
H I
N I
N I
N 1
N
(-i I OJ [O N lD lL L~ O lD l0 l0 ~O l0 ~D l0 ~D ~O ~0 l0 l0 l0 M M M M M M
Z I CO CO N OJ N M d~ CO O7 OJ O~ O~ W O7 CD M M N O M N N N N N N
",.J ~ O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O M M M M M M
Q I H H H ri H H H .~ H H H H H H H H H r-I H H rl H H H r-!
U I I I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I i I 1 I I I I
U ~ ~o ~ r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r m co m m a o~
q', I LC1 L(1 lfl LIl tf'.~ Lfl ~i Lf1 lf1 L(l L!1 lf1 to 111 tIl L(1 L(1 L(1 lf) Lfl lfl In Ul Lf) L(1 Lfl
C~ v v ~ ~ a a a a
z z Z, C7 U C7 C7 U' U :7 C7 C7 C7 r~ C7 L C7 C7 C7 U F c-I
H H H z z 2 ~. 2 ~-+ G. 7-. z `j-. ~/-I 7. z ~. z ~. Z C) U a a a s
C!) Cf] U] H F-~ H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H '~ ,7 ~, ~ F.~ ~
~ ~ a F F ~ F 'r F F F F F F F F F H F F x x F F ~ F
0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ F F H H ~ H
x x x x
w x.
w x
w x
w a:
w x
w x
w x
w x
w x
w x
w x
w x
w x
w x
w x
w x
w u;
~ cn
~ a
~ s
~ a,
~ ^
~
w I w w w c, a w a a a w a a a, a a a a a n, G x rx U U v U
~ I F F o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w w
~ I ~ ~ a z ~ ~ ~n ~
z I x x x c., a w w a a a w a a n, a s a, a a a H ~ w w w w
w
G I
I W
Q W
Q W
Q O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a O
a
a
a H
F H
F -{
F H
F
I ~
I C O O W W G] W W W W W W W :=] W W C.u W W W ti" ~ H H H H
r x I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ '~ ~ > > ~ > > > ~ > ~ x x a a .= a
,~ U I ~ ~ W WI W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w H H H H
O ~ 3 3 3 G G Q Q q Q Q Q Q la Q Q Q Q Q q q z 2, U U U U
;~ x i O O O W G-1 W G] W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W FC FC ~C FC
H G, i a s a x CY, x a: x x x
r x x x x x x x P; x x C~ C7 w w [:. w
M
O
r-,
N
m
m
N
H
a
F
0
F
x
0
z
W
M
O
M
N
m
rn
N
H
F
0
H
Q
C7
w 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
H , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
H ~ ~ ~ a~ a~ ~ ~r ~ ~ v~ a~ w c ~
w (~ I N
\ N
\ N
\ N
\ N
\ N
\ N
\ N
\ N
\ N
\ N
\ N
\
U'' ',~ I N N N N N N N N N N N N
!.~~ U I ri H H H H H ~-i H r-I H H .--I
a,
,-~ m ~o io ~o ~ ~ ~ o 0 0 ~
In m H ,~ ~ H r r ~--i ~ ~ r
Sk I N N M M M M N N N N N N
'.~; I N N N N N N N N N N N N
U , ~ ,~ H H H ~ H ~ ~ ~ H ~
W
a
a
H
z
w
~ z
~
H
cn W
a. W
a H
cn H
a
Q F F a a
o
H ~ ~
H o o
a te a x z Z w
a
, a
, i
H
~C FC G, G-. U
RS
O W W R'
O i i H
H H ~. ~ P,'
w m w w ~ ~ w
w a, a a, rq
o w w ~
o ~ ~
z rx F F a: a a w
,
O a, a: a a m o
H o o s ~ ~{ Z ~
~ w a
, a
, w i
H 7
~
"' z
H H o o ~-+ rx w ~ ~
, ~ E. cq cn tx
U w Q o ~ z z o
c
i] ~ a ~ >+
F W w
,X,' W H H H
~ ~ w a a
Q ~ w
F i
w w x D w
O C4 U i F U F ~ >+ F H L7 W ~a ~ ~
U p H I cq W a: U U cx a r•C cn I ~ F
cn a, o ~ z F O z z 0 a, w a: ~ ~ cn
H w >~ o o a+ w w a a a z ~ ~ z
~ a: H a o o a p H o ~ m o
H ~ f~ W O ~C FC O cr] ~ U ~-+ H U
z
x
~, w F ~ m o o r c. o M ~ o 0 0 0
g Z ~ o 0 o ao 0 0 0~ ~ o o r in
,
rC u] O ~ m u-i N M ~ co r r In w ~n ui
L!~ (Y, I L(1 N OJ O Ln CO H H r N 01 M
'
,7 ~
i M ~ M M N L(1 d' O ~ ~
1
O W
U] U]
F.{ ~ IP OJ
H C M m
M M
N
Cz, q
O
F
H rx a a a a w U
U x x o 0 0 0 o z
w a, a, as a H
3 z x
z ~n ~
n ~
] :
~~ ~a z z a
a U ~ ~
j
te ~j
µ j
w W H H N
r
-, -+
t i
H w w O
w w a a a F F a o o Q
F U a a a a ~ ~ ~ U U z
~ x x o ~
w ~ w 3 3 3 3 ~ ~
F
a w x a: a; x ai w z z h
z I a w w w w w w w ~ a: x
w z F F F F H H z w w Q
a ~ z o w w w w a a F F rx
O ~ z U ~ ~ ~ ~ z z F cn cn FC
Q U
~ w ~ ~ z m m rx a a
~ a ~ a a
~ i O u] 5 ~ ~ C~ ~ E a
N
N
r
O
I
W I
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
H
O ~
H
Gq I H ri N N N N G ri M C H O
~ , N N N N N N M M M CC 07 N
,"J i d' a' d' V' ti' C d' CI ~' C' d' a'
z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,
I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .-+
F-a , l0 lD ~D ~D ~D l0 l0 lD l0 l0 O M
z i W N CO OJ CO N 0.~ O W Q~ of N
"~ t O O O O O O O O O O O M
O , H H H ri H ri rl r-I r-i rl rl H
U ~ r r r r r r r r r ~~ r m
~ ~ in ~n ui ~n ui ~n ~r, ui ~n ~I ui in
D
L~ L~ .U L7 Ch C7 C? C7 L7 CI U F
z 2 z z z z z z z 2; z U
H H H H H H H H H F-I H 'a
F F F F F F F F F F~ F a
FC r-C FC FC w ~^ rC ~ FC aj ~C F
rx
w rx
w x
w rx
w ~
w G
w rx
w
w x
w a,
w x
w cn
~
w ~ a a, a a, a w a, a, a, a, w x
~~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o w
~ ~ z
z w w a, a, a, n, a, w a, a. a H
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o g o
I a a a a a a a a a a a a
i W W W W W W W W W W W r.~
M [x ~ > > > > ~ > J ~ ~ > tx
N C7 ~ W W W W W W w W W f] W W
O ~ Q Q q Q Q (~ Q q q q Q z
N a: ~ W W W W W W W W W Cz] W W
H w I A; cx rx cz x cx cz tX a: a: ca C7
m
a
M
~,
H
O
~a
a
F
0
F
x
O
Q
z
w
m
0
M
H
H
0
F
0
F
77Q
~4
x
c~
Q
a;
0
U
W
a.'
H
w
C~
W
O a
U O
cn a
H W
z
f, W
`~'
~ ~
O 0.l
cn c~
H
[~ q
O
H
E~
H a
U ~
3
0
M
N
H
W I o 0 0 0 0 0 0
F ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,~ I ~ ,~ H H H H H
q I M M M M M M M
1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \
'~ I N N N N N N N
U I ~ ,-i '-+ H ~ H H
N N CO [~ h h [~
O7 N N l0 l~ l0 lD
~ I M M d' M M M M
I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,Y, I N N N N N N N
U I H H H H H H H
W
z
H
a
a
w
3
w
c/~ cn m
F F
a a
o w w
rx m cn
w r.C FC
w w
w a F F a
U ~ ~
a a a z
o~ m w 2
H I ~ ~ P+ H H
I H H cA U W W C7
a l w w z m m z
r-I I P: (x ~o W FC FC w
p; I o W W
U I a w M w a a w
~ I x ~ I x a
w l w w o H x x H
q I (x k. U U W
~ o c~ x ~ ~
W I H F U Z fx rx
£ ~ F E-+
H I ~ H F
I U U O [Z W W
I cn cp m r~ rx c>~ ~
z l H H ~ a H H a
H I ~ ~ a m w ~. ~
[-+ I ~ v~ o r~ e+ ~ o
z I H M O Ql lD [~ O
] .
O I o a' u1 M u1 m o
I N M ~ C' Lf1 C~ 111
I N M rl N H O
r m N co
M H H
x x x x x
~
~a ~ a ~ ~
0.l W W 0.l
C7
z ~ ~ ~ ~;
H U] U] C11 U]
07 W W W W
~ ~ ,'7 H H H H
a ~
w l o o p ~ ~ '~-
~
l z z m co m w
I
a q
z I o m cn cn cn
I o 0 o z z z z
~ I cn m 3 w w w w
O I O O x N N N N
q I U' T' F H H H H
I
W
I p; O H H H H
~ I w w m u u U U
~ m
m o
0 0
~ H
[t'i i I I
W I 0 0 o H ~ 0 0
GQ I M M lD ~' ~' H H
I M M M L(1 Ln OJ N
'J I d~ d' d" d~ d' d' a'
z I I I I I I 1 I
1 O O O O O O O
E-1 I [O l0 ~O l0 l0 lD lD
z I m m m m m co 'S1
q I o 0 0 0 0 0 0
O I H ~ .-{ H H H H
U I i I I I I I I
U I ~ r r t [~ r [~
(,~ I Lll L(1 LI1 L('1 Lf1 Ln l11
U
2 z z z
z z z
U) H H H H H H
q E-I H H F F H
W W W W W W
w l w a a a a a,
E I F o 0 0 0 0 0
~ I ~
z I a a a a, a, a s
I w o 0 0 0 0 0
I g a a a a a a
I o w w w w w w
a ~ W W W W W W
C
l ~
O I 3 q q q q q q
x l o w w w w w w
w. a a x rx a s rx
m
r
0
N
Ul~
a
F
0
H
x
0
z
w
m
r
m
N
F
O
H
q
0
m
q
x
O
U
W
P.'
W ~ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
H ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
,~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~
q I o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
C7 x I H H H H H H H H H
r~ U i o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a
m o m m m ~-+ ~o ~ vi
m m ~ ~o m ~n co H o~
~ I to In 1f1 L(1 to lf1 l.l1 l0 lf7
x, i N N N N N N N N N
U I H H H H ~-1 rl rl H H
z o
w
~ ~
W U
~ z
o w
a ~
a a
~ W
H ~
W
z
o a
H o
H w
H a H W
cn F a U
w ~
o w z
x H o z a
[-i U H W
a o o ~ w z
a s a z z H
o a o w
~ ~
~r a m w
z Q U H
w a w o
~ I U O U q £ W C9
I H CL H z a a z
a I ~ cn cq ~ o o a w
H I a W W W a U H ~ ~
a I W U H H W cA z .7
o `~ `~ o ° F
G
v
, ~ > a a w a
w I H a a w H ~+ a H q
Q ~ ~ q ~ z
~ ~ H W U
~ I
1
w
a c
!]
a
~
w
H
I ~ w w z
~ O H I p ,.a U U q W a H
U] C4 O I Ul a H H U~ x. Q x
H W ~ ~
a ~
z O W w G, O ~C H o a
Z I
i I U ~I O O U 0.1 I-~ H ~C
C
c
rc
1" z
j.xw w [-1 I O O H (~ O O N h O
~ z i o o t~ ui o o ri o 0
w x
cn p I a In o in ~ I n r~ r m
cn a , ~
F ~ In .-~ H ~ ~ w H c
] a
i o o a~ a+ H m
O W
CIj U] N N \D 61 O O
H ~' In H
[z, q d'
h
a a ~ a
U a o
,~ U Z O
3
U O
cn H
a C~
H
° ° ~ u
n a z z n z
H H H
~ ~ C.7 CL
w O O W O
i FC F +
P P
i FC a (a
~ O z
~ Q Q ~ FC W
I N N H W I-7
a I W u] W W W a cn U
I x - U U x W HI z ~
~' o w ° z
z ~ H w
w w
w z
~ ~
w a z H
w I
> . u, w
a O O cn x w p a
O N N O
H ltl Ln r+1
O h h Ql
(-i O O O
a ~ i I I I
W I ri O H H H O O O H
[Q I O r-I O O O d~ ri H O
~,' i N N ~'1 M N N N N N
"Q i d' a' d' a' d' dl d' d' a'
z I ~ ~ 1 ~ I 1 ~ I 1
I O O O O O O .-i H N
F-I I N W W W l0 l0 f+l M f`'1
'z, I m ~ O ~ W N N N N
'.7 I O O O O O O r+1 M M
~ I H H H H .-i H '-i H H
U I I i i I I I i i
U I ~o io ~ ~o ~ [~ m w m
r.~ ~ In ~n In In ui ui ui in in
N N ~'
z z z z ~ :~
H H H H z z U U a
U1 Cn U] U) H H :~ ~ ~
o Q ~ H H H
0 0 0
.~, x x x a
w a
w cr
a cn
~ a
~
w l w w w w a a a a U
Cz a a a P, W H H W
m ~ W W W W O O HI
o I Q Q Q Q a a a F
~ ~ a ~ a
x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o U Z U
I
o S 3 3 3 Q Q z
H a I 0 0 O O W W W W r.~
o a ~ a a a a a a o o w
N
N
Lfl
O
N
U'1
a
E'-~
O
E-I
a
0
a
z
w
N
N
Ifl
O
N
L11
H
h
Q
c~
Q
a
0
U
w
a
m
°°~x~~s~'~~ Redevelo meat A enc
o ~ p g y
Sta R e o ~t
RDA AGENDA ITEM # 3
DATE: January 14, 2009
TO: Redevelopment Agency Board
FROM: Terry White, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH INTERSTATE GRADING
AND PAVING, INC. FOR BUILDING DEMOLITION OF 212 & 216 BADEN
AVENUE
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency Board adopt a resolution awarding a
contract to Interstate Grading and Paving, Inc., of South San Francisco, California, for
building demolition services at 212 and 216 Baden Avenue in an amount not to exceed $78,800.
BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION
The Redevelopment Agency Board purchased 212 Baden Avenue, previously known as Hot Shots
Coffee, and 216 Baden Avenue, a former furniture warehouse occupied by the Giorgi Brothers
Furniture Company. The proposal is to remove both buildings from the site. The work will include
minor asbestos abatement prior to demolition. The demolition work will conform to the City's
Construction and Demolition Waste Ordinance. Once demolition is complete, staff will come back. to
the Board with a bid for asphalt paving over the lot, allowing temporary use for parking until future
developments are completed.
On October 22, 2008, staff published the notice inviting sealed bids in the various Builders Exchange
entities in the Bay area. Staff held two on-site-pre-bid meetings on November 4, 2008 and November
11, 2008 to all contractors interested in bidding for the project. Ten bids were received and opener'
on November 18, 2008.
The lowest responsible bidder was Interstate Grading and Paving, Inc. of South San Francisco,
California. Listed below are the engineer's estimate and a summary of all bids received.
Engineer's Estimate $ 95,000
Interstate Grading and Paving, Inc. of South San Francisco, CA $ 78,800
Technology Engineering & Construction of South San Francisco, CA $ 90,790
Silverado Contractors of Oakland, CA $ 97,700
Cal Inc. of Vacaville, CA $ 102,973
Evans Brothers, Inc. of Danville, CA $ 109,700
Ryan Engineering, Inc. of South San Francisco, CA $ 112,543
Staff Report
Subject: RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH INTERSTATE GRADING
AND PAVING, INC.. FOR BUILDING DEMOLITION OF 212 & 216 BADEN
AVENUE
Page 2
LVI Environmental Services, Inc. of Hayward, CA $ 128,500
Rodan Builders, Inc. of Belmont, CA $ 130,000
Ferma Corporation of Mountain View, CA $ 151,000
Parc Services, Inc. of Livermore, CA $ 152,808
FUNDING
This project is included in the City of South San Francisco's 2008-2009 Capital Improvement
Program (CIP/58-13232-0920) and sufficient Redevelopment Agency funds are available to complete
the work. Shown below is the total estimated cost for this project:
Interstate Grading & Paving, Inc of South San Francisco, CA $ 78,800
20% Construction Contingency $ 15,760
10% Construction Administration & Staff Time $ 7,880
Project Total Cost $ 102,440
CONCLUSION
Award of the construction contract to Interstate Grading and Paving, Inc., of South San Francisco,
California, will allow for the asbestos abatement and building demolition of the existing buildings at
212 and 216 Baden Avenue.
~,
,;
y•
Terry White ~`
Public Works Di~ctor
Approve `' ~ ~
.Nagel
Executive Director
Attachment: Resolution
RESOLUTION NO.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONTRACT WITH
INTERSTATE GRADING AND PAVING, INC. FOR
BUILDING DEMOLITION OF 212 & 216 BADEN AVENUE
WHEREAS, on October 22, 2008, staff advertised the notice to invite sealed bids
for the project; and
WHEREAS, on November 18, 2008, staff opened bids and ten bids were
received, with Interstate Grading; and Paving as the lowest responsible bidder for the
amount of $78,800; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends authorizing a contract with Interstate Grading and
Paving, Inc. of South San Francisco, California, for the Building Demolition in an
amount not to exceed $78,800; and
WHEREAS, funding for the project is included in the City of South San
Francisco's 2008-2009 CIP and sufficient Redevelopment Agency funds are available to
cover the cost.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Redevelopment Agency of the
City of South San Francisco that the Agency hereby awards the 212 & 216 Baden
Avenue for Building Demolition Project to Interstate Grading and Paving Inc. of South
San Francisco, CA in the amount not to exceed $78,800.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Executive Director is hereby authorized
to execute the contract on behalf of the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San
Francisco.
~ ~ ~ ~
I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and
adopted by the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco at a
meeting held on the day of 2009 by the following vote:
AYES
NOES:
ABSTAIN:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
City Clerk
2
°~x~~s~~~ Redevelo ment A enc
p g ~
~.
j Sta Re o rt
c9LIFOR~~~ p RDA A GENDA ITEM #
4
DATE: January 14, 2009
TO: Redevelopment A€;ency Board
FROM: Marty Van Duyn, Assistant Executive Director
SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN TO APPROVE A TYPE C SIGN PERMIT TO ALLOW
INSTALLATION OF ONE EMPLOYEE ORIENTED BANNER SIGN AT THE
GENENTECH CAMPUS LOCATED AT 651 GATEWAY BOULEVARD IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL CODE
SECTIONS 20.57, 20.76, AND 20.86.
Owner: Boston Properties
Applicant: Genentech, Inc.
Case Nos.: P08-0079: PP08-0003 & SIGNS08-0048
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency, by motion, approve application P07-
0073, which includes a precise plan for a new sign at 651 Gateway Boulevard based on the
attached Findings and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
BACKGROUND:
In 2008, the City Council adopted a.n ordinance to amend Chapter 20.40 (Genentech Research
and Development Overlay District) to allow Genentech to install a "patient success story" banner
program on the main campus. At thf; same time, the City Council directed staff to amend the
City's sign ordinance to allow other property owners, business owners, and tenants to have the
ability to apply to erect similar employee-oriented sign programs. In response, Sign Ordinance
amendment application P08-0093 was reviewed by the Planning Commission on November 20,
2008 and the City Council waived first reading on December 17, 2008. Second reading and
adoption of the ordinance amendment is scheduled for January 14, 2009.
The applicant understands that the City's current zoning ordinance does not permit the subject
sign application. The Staff Report has a condition of approval that clearly states that any
approval related to the subject application is contingent upon successful adoption of the Sign
Ordinance amendment presently under consideration and on the City Council agenda for January
14, 2009.
The current application has been evaluated using the criteria included in application P08-0093, as
it was amended by the Planning Conunission on November 20, 2008. Should the City Council
Redevelopment Agency
Genentech -Precise Plan -Banners
January 14, 2009
Page 2 of 4
not approve or modify the text amendment (application P08-0093), the subject application would
have to be withdrawn or modified ac~;,ordingly.
DISCUSSION:
Per section 20.57 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code, sign programs in the Gateway
Specific Plan Area must be approved. as part of a Precise Plan application. Genentech has
applied to expand their main campus sign program to what is now referred to as the Gateway
Campus. For Genentech, the Gateway Campus consists of four buildings and two parking
structures.
Genentech is proposing one display location for the Gateway Campus - on the window area of
the building located at 651 Gateway Boulevard (Genentech Building Number 82), facing the
main/central walkway of the campus (see attached plans).
The sign is the same 3M (or equal) window mounted film that was approved as part of the main
campus banner program. The content of the sign is also consistent with the previous approval,
including a picture of a patient, the patient's name, the patient's story, the name of the drug they
are using, and a corporate logo.
Findings
The draft findings are attached to the Staff Report. The findings required for a Type "C" Special
Circumstances sign application as well as for a Precise Plan approval include neighborhood
compatibility, readability, architectural integration, Design Review Board support, and Zoning
and General Plan consistency. The required findings can be supported for the banner/sign
program being proposed for the Genentech Campus on Gateway Boulevard.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW:
Staff has determined that the proposed project is categorically exempt pursuant to the provisions
of Class 11, Accessory Structures, Section 15311(a) On-premise signs (CEQA Guidelines).
Therefore, no further environmental review is necessary.
CONCLUSION:
Pending the successful outcome of the sign ordinance text amendment (application P08-0093),
staff recommends that the Redevelopment Agency, by motion, approve application P07-0073,
which includes a Precise Plan for a new sign at 651 Gateway Boulevard based on the attached
Findings and subject to the attached Conditions of Approval.
Redevelopment Agency
Genentech -Precise Plan -Banners
January 14, 2009
Page 3 of 4
Marty Van Duyn ~/ ~
Assistant Executive erector
Attachments:
1. Draft Findings of Approval
2. Draft Conditions of Approval
3. Plans
~~~~
Approved'. ` ~~ ``
\~~-`` arty M. e
Executive Director
FINDINGS OF APPROVAL
GENENTECH -GATEWAY BANNER - 651 GATEWAY BOULEVARD
P08-0079: PP08-0003 & SIGNS08-0048
(As recommended b;y the Planning Division, January 14, 2009)
As required. by the "South San Francisco Municipal Code" (SSFMC Section 20.57), the
following findings based on the standards outlined in Section 20.57 of the SSFMC are made in
support of a Precise Plan Application for asign/banner program at 651 Gateway Boulevard, in
accordance with SSFMC Section 20.:57, based on the attached Conditions of Approval, the
attached project plans (completed by Propp + Guerin, dated November 7, 2008), and information
provided at the at the public hearing on January 14, 2009.
a) Neighborhood Compatibility - Tlhe proposed sign is consistent with the character and quality
of the buildings where they are mounted. The signs are oriented toward the interior of the
campus, along the main north/socith pedestrian corridor, and are not visible from public areas,
including public rights-of--way anal public open spaces.
b) Readability -The proposed sign is proposed to be at plaza level, to be pedestrian oriented in
nature, and visible from areas of 1:he campus that are well traveled by employees.
c) Integration with Architectural Features -The proposed sign is to be applied to existing
windows on the building. The ;graphic material will be applied in a manner that does not
require any frame structure or separate apparatus to attach the sign to the building.
d) Design Review Board Recommendation -The Design Review Board reviewed the proposed
sign at their October meeting. They supported the sign as it was submitted for the Gateway
Campus.
e) Special Circumstances
1. The banner program is designed to be employee oriented, focusing on people helped
by drugs created by Genentech employees.
2. The banner program is proposed for amulti-building, campus-like environment,
where the primary tenant is Genentech and Genentech occupies approximately
600,000 square feet of leasable area.
f) Compatible with the Gateway Specific Plan -The Banner proposed is compatible with the
intent and purpose of the Gateway Specific Plan because the banner program is designed to
motivate the employees of the research and development user (Genentech) occupying the
buildings.
g) Compliance with the development standards of the Gateway Specific Plan - The
development and construction standards proposed for the banner program comply with the
-1-
standards outlined in the Gateway Specific Plan because the sign/banner is consistent with
the findings required in the Sign (Jrdinance (outlined above).
h) Consistent with the Redevelopment Plan -The proposed banner program is consistent with
the Redevelopment Plan because it activates a pedestrian area within an existing
development.
i) Consistent with the General Plan -The proposed banner program is consistent with the
General Plan land use designation of Business Commercial. The banner program facilitates
an employee oriented program ghat is advocated by the current employer and the required
findings of approval for the banner/sign program can be supported.
-2-
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
GENENTECH -GATEWAY BANNER - 651 GATEWAY BOULEVARD
P08-0075-: PP08-0003 & SIGNS08-0048
(As recommended b;y the Planning Division, January 14, 2009)
A. Planning Division requirements shall be as follows:
1. The project shall be applied and erected substantially as indicated on the plans dated
11/21/2008, prepared by Lee (Jage & Associates, Inc.; the landscape plan dated 8/10/08,
prepared by Sierra Designs, Iric.; and the project renderings prepared by DES Architects
and included as an attachment ito the Staff Report dated 12/10/08.
2. The applicant shall follow the City of South San Francisco, Department of Economic and
Community Development, Planning Division, Standard Conditions and Limitations for
Commercial, Industrial and Multi-Family Residential Projects.
3. The applicant cannot install any signage/display associated with this application until the
Zoning Text Amendment (POl3-0093 & ZA08-0006) Resolution has been adopted by the
City Council and the applicable appeal period has expired.
4. All future sign content and or graphic changes shall be reviewed and approved by the
Chief Planner prior to installation. If, in the opinion of the Chief Planner, the sign format
changes substantially, the signs will be subject to the review and approval of the Planning
Commission (Type "C" Sign P'ermit).
5. The signs must be maintained in good condition as defined by the Chief Planner and shall
be replaced at the request of the Chief Planner.
6. The letters or logos on the sigriage shall not exceed 12-inches in height.
(Planning Division contact person:. Gerry Beaudin, Senior Planner (650) 877-8535)
-3-
0
^m
\/
v_
m
0
'~ ~,~~ ~
0 ~wo~ ~~
-a ooW~ N ~
'~ N ~ tlt y' ~ -Fn N
Q. ~ C ~ ~ rt ii / (gyp
~ ~ N
ro ~D
~' ~.
~ ~
0
~ ono 00 ~~
N~~~Z~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~~~
C ~
O ~ TI (p
3
'
3
f
1
N
0
~
n
Z
v
m
0
v
n
~_
Z
m
n
V
v_
N
~Nr
D
C
~ ~ ~
~~rn
o~~
n~
~r~
a ~
r
n
Z
n
Z
~P W N -~
~~~~
N (D ~ (~D
~~~x
~?~~~-~
~'~~o
~ ~ ~.
~~
~.-~ o
~~
~~
~' ~°
~ W
N W <
N n
~~
m3~~~ r
~ ~ ~ ~e ,
~, f
~' m t
3~z,
~~ ~, '.~
~~.;
~ r P' ~~ ~,
'_~ ..~
N ~ ,~",. ~ ~.~t
~.
4/ ~y
-~ ~~-
s ~~~
tt~ y t
1Y 1_
~'
111111
[~~11~)
~;,,
4."~1
v
r
1
N
_~
~~
N
m
~~
~rt
~~
r
'T1
m
Z
tlG
c
Z
m
ti
u~
~rt
Q
r
RI
N
rn
r
•~~~~
• f ry
Y~
/
~~
•
~
~~
~1
i l
~
•
~
~~ ~ .,.
•
~,
,, ~
,. .~
•~° - •
~ ~: ' 1 ~ c ~~
,~
* ; r~ i'~ .~
Y ~
~1
~
~ i to ^. "~i
. ~ n
t ~
~ 1~ A~
~ ~~
'a
CP ~
'
. ~
q
~
,
,
"'
'. s ,, 1
Cn
4
• ~ t, •~1
~
~
~ •
~ ~
~ ~ N
~~_ "~
~
M •
~
~~
~
n~
^
~~;~
~ _ ^
(dry •
~ - ^
~~~._ ~
~~~ ~
~~ , ,y
.
~~
•~
~ ~
~
~ i
r •
~ ^
~ ~
~.
~r,~~~rMtlrli~~~~~
'Y;
~~
h
~7~
A
~~
i
~: ~
v ~~
~~
~_,~..]
~, ,
M,i J)v
~ ~' ~ ~~ ~
'+~' (7
~ ~,
~W
,1
'"Yf ~ 'w~
7" i
,,a -
~ ~ ,~,m ~~
~ J ~ lfi r~
~~ ~ ~
~,
.~ ., ~ ;,1•fi ~~
,'
a ~} -a ~ ~
- ,~• ~r
/ } a
C.! .i... `~~ r J ~ ,,,1 t ~~ tiff ~~
,. .~ a `~ ' 7 . ins ~~ ^ ~ r 1
~ ~ J Y.
.r ~ i .. ,
2 ~ .~
D ~
»~` ' ~ ^ ~t~R'`
to ~ ~, .~
G ~ ~ _• O
,~ ~
~ >,
t°""?"~1/~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ Ln
~ ~ ~ w,
'~, ~.. ~'
~~ ~ ~
O t 1 ~ J ~ .,"~ a t~ J~ r, ~ W 'g ~~ ,~~~ ^y 1~
m ~'~ a, a- ~' ~,
X ~ , ~ ,, Y tb ~ ~ ~~ ,~i k _ ~~T'~ ~'
,r CG tT• ~J ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ?I, ~ I ~ `C t fi 1 -
~ ~ ?ti ~'~ ~ r ~ i P 11
'0 s ' ~ ~N •~~ t Q a ~~ "
~~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ ~ a,
~ ~•' :p
dv ~ ~x
~~~ ~y
!~ M +~' 4y
1~ ~. ~
a
"~
.~ _
-a
m
ro
~_
N
z n
~ ~iI
c
~~
~ A
m ~u
N
N
~rt
n~
~~
m
~' ?
Z
0
Q
~D
.s
N
O
O
I
m
n
v
N
r
a
m
3
n
r
n
a
0
Z
a
m
a
n
a
c
N
0
0
7
N
D
(~D
N
.~~~.
.. .,
•• ~~'
.' ~ . ~ •~~ ''o
•~
•~
~ ~ ~ ~~
'_:,
.~@ ~ ~ ,:
G+~ ~ ~
~^
~~ ~ ~1
H S
~ ~•
f ~" "~ ^ Y ~'"~
~ { , h k
th ~ ~•~
~a~ ~
~ ~ '`Sy ``e' ~ ~I ~ ~ .~~
LQ ~ `", a
j 1 +~.~ ~/
}3 ~ T1A~u ~~' F~'g ~~ ~ h'F
~.1 _ f~ - w. ., ~.
~j ~ ~
~ ~ ,
~ ~ •~ Er) ,
i. i .
~~ ~4 ~ ~~ ~° ' r
'~ ^
~~ . '-
~,+ ~ , . ^
•` ~ '. ~
~~: ~
. ~ s d ^
• r ~~' ~
1
W
_~
~~
c
~~
x
m
N
N
O
r
m
Z
0
3
N
O
O
m
n
v
N
r
D
m
r
n
0
Z
m
r
N
m
••
^~
`+
Z
N
RDA AGENDA ITEM # 5
~x S~
o°°~~~~~~~-- ~~ Redevelo went A enc
p 9' ~
~~° Sta Re o rt
'~LIFOR~
DATE: January 14, 2009
TO: Redevelopment Agency Board
FROM: Marty Van Duyn, .Assistant Executive Director
SUBJECT: PRECISE PLAN, T'YPC "C" SIGN PERMIT, TRANSPORTATION DEMAND
MANAGEMENT PLAN, & VARIANCE APPLICATIONS FORA 166 ROOM
HOTEL AT 550 GATEWAY BOULEVARD, IN THE GATEWAY SPECIFIC
PLAN DISTRICT P~1 ACCORDANCE WITH SSFMC CHAPTERS 20.57, 20.85,
20.86, & 20.120
Applicant: Vijay Patel, SRI Krishna Enterprise
Case Nos.: P07-0073: PP07-0001, ND07-0003, VAR07-0004, SIGNS07-
0047, TDM08-0003
RECOMMENDATION:
It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency continue application P07-0073 fora 166
room hotel at 550 Gateway Boulevard to the February 11, 2009 Redevelopment Agency
meeting.
DISCUSSION:
On December 30, 2008, the applicant; requested additional time to address the issues outlined by
the Redevelopment Agency during th.e December 10, 2008 meeting.
. ~ ~,
By: U ~, ~ _~ ~~~-k~l~'L-- Approved: ~ ` ~' ~`
Marty Van Duyn ~ arry M. Nagy
i ~ t r Executive Director
Assistant Execut ve fD rec o