HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 362-1931.350
No. ?3.
~F~itEA$ the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, ddd,
on the 10th day of Augus%, 1921, Da~,,~ its re~oiution of intention No.?Z to order
the certain street work in said resolution of intention des~cribed to be done, to
which resolution of intenti~n reference is hereby made for fdrth~r i:.articulars: and
,'~n~ma~ in s~id re~o!ution of intention T',~esday, the 8th day of
~eytember, 19Z1, at the hour of 7:~0 o'clock p, m. was fixed as the. lithe whe~ :~uy
and all ~rsons having sny~o-jections to said propose~ work ~nd imyrovements mi~ht
~,~:?'ear before ~-' ' ~ ~ ~
~ ~-~,~d City Council and ~how c~,u~,e why ~id imrrovements should not be
c~rried cut in accordance ?ith said resol~tiou of intention; and
WHEREA~t certain owners of roperty liable to be assessed have r:~sde
written rretests or objections u~.inst ~aid proDose8 w:~rk and have d~91ivered the
sar:e to tk,~ Cit~,, Clerk of s~id~. City; and
,,~ .... ~ said C~t~~ Council has du]y considered all s~id r, rotests s~d
ob~.~,ctions: and s:;id -~'~:tter..~ ~avi~' bee~ re~ulcrly ~,,,~*~,~inued to this time;
RE~OL~ED by said City Council of the City of ~oulh San Francisco that
raid .~ratests and objections aeainat a'cid proposed ;.,~ork and in~:rovements be,
~ .... same hereby are overruled and denied.
-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-
I hereb.~ certify that the foregoing reso]ulion was re~.u]arly in-
troduced and ado.r.,ted by 'the City C.'ouncil of the City of South ~an Francisco this
Igth day of Se~tamber, 19~1, by the follov;ina- vote:
Ayes, Councilmen. V. ~eido, M. ~in'~mciani, Joseph P. Quintan
Noes, Co uncilmen R, rfibbetts, R. Lloyd
f~bsent, Counci]men None
Attest:
Daniel McSweeney .
~- ~y --