Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2013-02-14 e-packetP.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, California 94083 CITY HALL LARGE CONFERENCE ROOM, TOP FLOOR 400 GRAND AVENUE THURSDAY FEBRUARY 14, 2013 2:00 p.m. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 offlic Government Code of the State of' California, the Oversiglit Board for the Successor Agency to die City of' South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency will hold a Special Meeting on Wednesday, flie 23' day of January, 2013, at 2:00 pan., in the Large Conference Room, Top Floor at City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California. In accordance with California Government Code Section 54957.5, any writing or document that is a public record, relates to an open session agenda item, and is distributed less than 72 hours prior to a regular inecting will be made available for public inspection in die City Clerk's Office located at City Hall, If, however, die document or writing is not distributed until the regular inecting to which it relates, then the document or writing will be inade available to the public at the location oftlic meeting, as listed on this agenda. The address of City Hall is 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, Calffomia 94080, In compliance witli Americans with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this meeting, please contact the South San Francisco City Clerk's Office at (650) 877-8518. Notification 48 hours in adwince of the meeting will enable the City to inake reasonable arrangements to ensure accessibility to this meeting. Chairman.. Neil Cullen Selected by: Largest Special District of the type in H&R Code Section 34188 Vice Chair Denise Porterfield San Mateo County Superintendent of Schools Deputy Superintendent, Fiscal and Operational Services San Mateo County Office of Education Alternate, Patti Emsberger Assistant Superintendent, Business Services South San Francisco Unified School District Board Members: Mark Addiego Councilmember, City of South San Francisco Alternate: Barry Nagel City Manager, City of South San Francisco Gerry Beaudin Principal Planner, City of South San Francisco Barbara Christensen Director of Community /Government Relations, San Mateo County Community College District Reyna Farrales Deputy County Manager, San Mateo County Paul Scannell Counsel Craig Labadie Selected by- Mayor of the City of South San Francisco Mayor of the City of South San Francisco Chancellor of California Community College San Mateo County Board of Supervisors San Mateo County Board of Supervisors (Public Member) Advisers: Marty Van Duyn — Assistant City Manager, City of South San Francisco Jim Steele — Finance Director, City of South San Francisco Steve Mattas — City Attorney, City of South San Francisco Krista Martinelli — City Clerk, City of South San Francisco Armando Sanchez — Redevelopment Consultant, City of South San Francisco CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AGENDA REVIEW SPECIAL OVERSIGHT BOARD MEE'T'ING FFBRIJARY 14, 2013 AGENDA PAGE 2 PUBLIC COMMENTS Comments from members of the public on items not on this meeting agenda. The Chair may set time limit for speakers. Since these topics are non-agenda items, the Board may briefly respond to statements made or questions posed as allowed by the Brown Act (Government Code Section 54954.2). However, the Board may refer items to staff for attention, or have a matter placed on a future agenda for a more comprehensive action-report. Motion to approve the Minutes of the Special Meeting of January 23, 2013. 2. Resolution approving a Loan Agreement in the amount of $8,652 with the City of South San Francisco to allow the Successor Agency to make payments for two Non-housing Recognized Obligation Payment Expenses shown on RODS I but incurred during RODS 11. 3. Resolution approving a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (RODS) and Administrative Budget for the period July 1 — December 31, 2013, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(1). 4. Review of Former Redevelopment (RDA) Employee Staffing and Next Steps for Calculating RDA Share of Unfunded Retirement and Retiree Health Liabilities. RD M�kl amalah" Future Agenda Items. a) Long Range Property Management Plan. SPECIAL OVE RSIGHTBOARD ME 1,7ING FEBRUARY 14, 2013 AGENDA PAGE 3 [#1 Me V a '.j$jAj _Lin I[#] A L P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, California 94083 CITY HALL IARGrE CONFERENCE ROOM, TOP FLOOR 400 GRAND AVENUE WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 23, 2013 2:00 p.m. CALL TO ORDER Time: 2:00 p.m. ROLL CALL Present: Boardmembers Addiego, Beaudin, Christensen, Farrales and Scannell, Patti Emsberger as Alternate for Vice Chairperson Porterfield and Chairperson Cullen. AGENDA REVIEW None. PUBLIC COMMENTS None, 13VEWUMM40WORMOM-No - 1. Motion to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 11, 2012 and January 15, 2013. Motion- Boardmember Addiego/Second Boardmember Scannell- to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of December 11, 2012, Approved by the following voice vote: AYES: Boardmembers Addiego, Beaudin, Christensen, Farrales and Scannell, Patti Ernsberger as Alternate for Vice Chairperson Porterfield and Chairperson Cullen; NOES: None; ABSENT: None, ABSTAIN: None. Motion- Boardmember Addiego/Second- Boardmember Christensen- to approve the Minutes of the Regular Meeting of January 15, 2013. Approved by the following voice vote- AYES, Boardmembers Addiego, Beaudin, Christensen, Scannell, Patti Ernsberger as Alternate for Vice Chairperson Porterfield and Chairperson Cullen; NOES: None, ABSTAIN: Boardmember Farrales; ABSENT: None. 2. Resolution No. 4-2013 approving a Due Diligence Review ("DDR") of the Remaining Cash and Cash Equivalents Available for Disbursement to Taxing Entities from the Non-housing Funds of the Former Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco after such DDR was presented for Board Review and Public Comment at the Special Meeting of January 15, 2013.. Director of Finance Steele stated that as required by AB 1484 the Non-housing Funds DDR had been presented to the board at a public meeting on January 15, 2013 and no comments had been made from the public at that meeting or after. There were no changes to the report and the resolution was presented for consideration. Chairperson Cullen queried whether any members of the pubic had comments on the DDR. No comments were made. Motion- Boardmember Addiego/Second- Boardmember Scannell- to approve Resolution No. 4-2013 Unanimously approved by voice vote. 2, Resolution No. 5-2013 approving Contract Amendment for Brookwood Group for Property Disposition Analysis. Housing and Community Development Consultant Sanchez presented the staff report recommending approval of a Contract Amendment with Brookwood Group to perform analysis related to development of the Long Range Property Management Plan. Consultant Sanchez advised staff was in the process of developing the Plan and presented a map depicting a former Redevelopment Area commonly described as the El Camino Real/Chestnut/PUC property about which greater analysis to potentially increase land value was needed, Boardmember Christensen queried whether the referenced area would require rezoning. Consultant Sanchez noted that an extensive rezoning process had already been accomplished in this area, including enhanced development standards and a minimum base threshold and maximum. However, due to the oddly shaped parcels in the area and the affect of certain easements, solutions including possible road closures would need to be studied. He advised there might be similar and/or other recommendations for increasing land values in this and other redevelopment areas. Boardmember Addiego added that planning this unique piece of property carefully could maximize its potential. OVERSIGHT BOARD MEEXING JANUARY 23, 2013 MINUTES PAGE 2 Boardmember Scannell inquired as to the cost being added to the contract, as well as the amount that had already been paid, Consultant Sanchez stated that $25,000 was originally authorized. With the amendment, the total would be brought to $74,500. Chairperson Cullen queried whether the report would be concluded by the end of the Fiscal Year to avoid any ROPS issues. Consultant Sanchez stated this would be aimed for. City Attorney Mattas added that the Agency and Board would be somewhat constrained by the required 6 months from Certificate of Compliance date. Motion- Boardmember Christensen/Second- Boardmember Addiego- to approve Resolution 5-2013. Unanimously approved by voice vote. 3. Future Agenda Items. a) Property Disposition Plan. b) Presentation related to and Next Steps for Calculating RDA Share of Unfunded Retirement and Retiree Health Liabilities, b) RODS and Administrative Budget for the July 1, 2013 to December 31, 2,013 time period. No Future Agenda Items were added. 5. February Meeting Schedule. By consensus, the Board cancelled the regular meeting scheduled for Tuesday, February 2, 2.013 and scheduled a special meeting on February 14, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. This action would permit the Board to consider the ROPE after expected Successor Agency approval on February 13, 2013. ADJOURNMENT Motion- Boardmember Addiego/S,econd-Boardmember Scannell- to adjourn the meeting. Unanimously approved by voice vote. Pursuant to the above motion, Chairperson Cullen adjourned the meeting at 2-37 p.m. My,= Neil Cullen, Chairperson Oversight Board for the Successor Agency to the City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Ageno OWRSIGHT BOARD MEETING JANUARY 23, 201.3 MINITFES PAGE 3 DATE: February 14, 2013 TO: Members of the Oversight Board FROM: Jim Steele, Director of Finance 10112MUN: ffi NOW liffi 40 '1112k 40 It is recommended that the Oversight Board approve the attached resolution which approves a loan agreement in the total amount of $8,652 between the City and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of South San Francisco (SA) for two enforceable obligations of the Successor Agency (SA). BACKGROUND/DIS CUS SION The SA and Oversight Board have approved several enforceable obligations which, due to the timing of the payments, did not coincide with the Recognized Obligations Payment Schedules (ROPS) for their payments. This latest loan agreement covers $8,652 to fund former Redevelopment enforceable obligations shown on ROPS I but incurred during ROPS Il. The City Council and SA approved this loan agreement February 13, 2011 The loan agreement is for the following items: Line Line on on Project Named Description/ ROPS RO'E'S I JV Debt Obligation Payee Pro'ect Scope —__AT<)Unt Detail Remediation work expense shown on ROPS Train Station I with expenses Imprvmnts Ph TechAccutite/Wisley Conti-acted work-site coming due 28 21 1( 8002) Ham remediation $1,380,00 durin ROPs HI Final roll correction cost shown on ROPS Local Tax I with expenses Compliance/Rptg. Muni Financial Contracted roll coming due 56 44 Services Services correction work $7,272-00 Burin ROPs fi. 58,652.00 Total Staff Report Subject: Loan Agreement Between the City of South San Francisco and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of South San Francisco for Payment of Two Enforceable Obligations Page 2 FISCAL IMPACT The loan agreement totals $8,652 and funds had to be advanced froze the City to the SA to pay these Successor Agency obligations. If State Department of Finance (DOF) approves the loan agreement on the next-submitted ROPE (also on the current Oversight Board agenda) as enforceable obligations of the SA, staff expects that the loan will be fully repaid by August 1, 2013. The funds were also requested to be retained by the SA through the Non-Housing Due Diligence Review (DDR) process. CONCLUSION The attached loan agreement obligates the SA to pay the City back for funds the City had to advance to the SA to make ROPS payments that were expended in a different RAPS time period (ROPE II) than where they had been listed (RODS 1) By: Jim pele, Finance Director Attachments: Resolution Loan Agreement KR/JS/'N1VD:ed Approved: MaYiy Van Duyn-- Assistant City Manager and Director of Economic and Communit y Development 0 V 18PI'MAJ OWMI, INUMIK am ILT-,Iklala *fNIZINUM, WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(l), before each six-month fiscal period, the Successor Agency to a dissolved Redevelopment Agency is required to adopt a draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ("ROPS") that lists all of the obligations that are "enforceable obligations" within the meaning of Health and Safety Code Section 34177; and WHERE-AS, each RAPS must be approved by the Oversight Board for the Successor Agency and by the State Department of Finance in order for payment of listed obligations to be made; and WHEREAS, the timing of payment of various items identified and approved as enforceable obligations on ROPS I did not coincide with the payment dates listed on that c ROPS; and WHEREAS, timely payment of enforceable obligations of the Successor Agency was deemed essential and could not await approval of a ROPE submitted for the next six-month fiscal period; and WHEREAS, the Successor Agency had no other source of funding to make these payments for enforceable obligations on its own; and WHEREAS, the City therefore advanced, or is willing to advance, funds for the payment of said enforceable obligations; and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 34173(h) authorizes loans between the City and the Successor Agency for the purpose of funding enforceable obligations for which there are insufficient funds in the Real Property Tax Trust Fund; and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code Section 34173(h) further provides that a new enforceable obligation shall be created for the repayment of each such loan, provided that the receipt and use of the loan funds is reflected on a ROPS approved by the Oversight Board for the Successor Agency and submitted to the State Department of Finance for its review and approval; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34180(h) the Oversight Board may approve a request by the Successor Agency to enter into an agreement with the City; and WHEREAS, City and Successor Agency staff have negotiated a loan agreement covering these enforceable obligations for which there are insufficient funds available for timely payment by the Successor Agency; and WHEREAS, funds are available to be loaned by the City for such purpose, and the loan agreement does not violate the City's debt limit under the California Constitution, NOW, THEREFORE, the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco, a public entity, does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference, 2. The loan agreement, in the form attached hereto, is hereby approved, and the Assistant City Manager is hereby authorized to execute it on behalf of the Successor Agency and to take such other and further action as necessary and appropriate to implement the intent of this Resolution. 3. The loan agreement, along with the supporting calculations and references to prior ROPE are attached to this Resolution and are hereby incorporated herein, is for $8,652 to fund former Redevelopment enforceable obligations shown on ROPS I but incurred during ROPS 11. 4. The Successor Agency is directed to include this loan agreement, with such supporting documentation and other information as it deems necessary and appropriate, on the next ROPE to be submitted to the Oversight Board and the State Department of Finance. PASSED AND ADOPTED this 14th day of February, 2013, by the following vote: 0) ATTEST: City Clerk LOAN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND THE SUCCESSOR AGENCY TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO This Loan Agreement (Agreement) is entered into as of February 14, 2013 ("Effective Date"), by and between the City of South San Francisco, a municipal corporation ("City") and the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco, a public entity ("Successor Agency"). City and the Successor Agency are hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties''. WHE REAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco ("Redevelopment Agency") was established under the provisions of the Community Redevelopment Law (California Health and Safety Code § 33000 et seq.) ("CRL"); and WHEREAS, effective June 3 O�, 2011, the Governor signed into law ABx 1 26 which automatically suspended redevelopment activities, and on December 29, 2011, the California State Supreme Court upheld the provisions of ABx 126, thereby dissolving all redevelopment agencies on February 1, 2012; and WHEREAS, ABx 126 was modified by AB 1484, effective as of July 27, 2012, which together with ABx 126 is referred to herein as the "Dissolution Law"; and WHEREAS, as a result of the dissolution of the former Redevelopment Agency, the Successor Agency is now administering the daily operations of the former Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code § 3 417 1 (d)(1)(E) provides that any legally binding and enforceable contract that is not otherwise void as violating the debt limit or public policy constitutes an enforceable obligation authorized for payment from the Real Property Tax Trust Fund ("RPTTF") established pursuant to the Dissolution Law-, and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code § 34171(d)(1)(F) provides that contracts or agreements necessary for the administration or operation of a successor agency constitute enforceable obligations authorized for payment from the R.PTTF; and WHEREAS, enforceable obligations must be listed on a Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ("ROPS") and approved for payment by a successor agency's oversight board and the California Department of Finance ("DOF") in order for funds to be received therefore; and WHEREAS, two enforceable obligations pursuant to Health and Safety Code §§ 3 4171 (d)(1) (E) and 3417 l(d)(1)(F) were listed on the RODS for the period January-June 2012 ("ROPS I") as line items 28 and 56, in the total amount of Eight Thousand Six Hundred Fifty Two Dollars ($8,652.00) ("Non-Housing Obligations"), but the work for these projects was not completed until RODS II; and WHEREAS, accordingly, the City advanced funds for the payment of the Non-Housing Obligations upon the Successor Agency's receipt of invoices therefore; and N WHEREAS, at present there are insufficient funds in the RPTTF to permit repayment of the Non- Housing Obligations by the Successor Agency; and WHEREAS, Health and Safety Code § 34173(h) authorizes a loan between a city and the successor agency to the city's redevelopment agency for the purpose of funding enforceable obligations for which there are insufficient funds in the RPTTF; and WHER. AS, Health and Safety Code § 34173(h) further provides that a new enforceable obligation shall be created for the repayment of such a loan, provided that the receipt and use of the loan funds is reflected on a BOPS approved by the oversight board for the successor agency and submitted to the DOF for its review and approval; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code § 34180(h), an oversight board may approve a request by a successor agency to enter into an agreement with a city; and WHEREAS, the City and Successor Agency wish to enter into a loan agreement in the principal arnount of Fight Thousand Six Hundred Fifty Two Dollars ($8,652.00) for the purpose of enabling the Successor Agency to pay the Non-Housing Obligations; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2013, the Successor Agency and the City each respectively approved the Loan and authorized the execution of this Agreement, pursuant to Resolution No. and Resolution No. _, respectively; and WHEREAS, on February—, 2013, the Oversight Board for the Successor Agency approved the Successor Agency's request to enter into this Agreement, pursuant to Resolution No. — I NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties to this Agreement agree as follows: Ll Loan. (a) Loan Amount. City agrees to lend to Successor Agency, and Successor Agency agrees to borrow from and repay to City, a Loan in the principal amount of not to exceed Eight Thousand Six Hundred Fifty Two Dollars ($8,652.00). (b) Maturity..Date. The total outstanding Loan principal is due and payable by August 1, 2013, 1.2 Prepayment. Successor Agency may prepay the Loan, in whole or in part, at any time, without penalty or other charge. 13 P@3ment. The outstanding principal of the Loan is due and payable on the Maturity Date 1.4 Security for the Loan. As security for the repayment of the Loan, the Successor Agency hereby pledges certain Unrestricted Revenues (defined below) ("Pledged Revenues") that are received, accrued or held by the Successor Agency and are provided within or attributable to fiscal year 201213, and the principal of the Loan constitutes a first lien and charge on the Pledged Revenues, and is payable from the first moneys received by the Successor Agency from the Pledged Revenues. The term "Unrestricted Revenues" means property taxes assessed and levied by San Mateo County on behalf of the Successor Agency allocated to the Successor Agency in accordance with the !I Dissolution Law, together with any other income, revenue, cash receipts and any other moneys of the Successor Agency lawfully available for repayment of the Loan. ARTICLE 2 DISBURSEMENT AND ACCOUNTING; USE OF FUNDS 2.1 Disbursement, Loan proceeds may be disbursed to the Successor Agency in accordance with this Agreement upon approval of drawdown requests executed by the City Finance Director, 2.2 Use of Loan Proceeds. Successor Agency may use proceeds of the Loan exclusively for meeting the Non-Housing Obligations obligation as described herein. ARTICLE 3 3.1 Authorijy, Successor Agency warrants that it has authority, and has completed (or will complete, as applicable) all proceedings and obtain all approvals necessary to execute, deliver, and perform under this Agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. 12 Valid and Binding Obligations, Successor Agency warrants that, when duly executed by the Successor Agency, this Agreement shall constitute the legal, valid and binding obligations of Successor Agency enforceable in accordance with their respective terms. Successor Agency hereby waives any defense to the enforcement of the terms of this Agreement related to alleged invalidity of any provisions or conditions contained in this Agreement. 3.3 No Adverse Action. Successor Agency warrants that there is no action, suit or proceeding pending or threatened against it which might adversely affect the Successor Agency with respect to this Agreement. ARTICLE 4 SUCCESSOR AGENCY COVENANTS 4.1 Notification, Until the Loan is repaid in full, Successor Agency covenants that it will promptly notify City in writing of the occurrence of any event that. might materially and adversely affect its ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement, or that constitutes, or with the giving of notice or passage of time or both would constitute, an Event of Default wider this Agreement. 4.2 Legal CoLapliance. Successor Agency covenants that this Agreement does not violate the Constitutional debt limitation for municipal governments set forth in Article XV1, Section 18 of the California Constitution. ARTICLE 5 ........... 5.1 Indemnity. Successor Agency and City shall each defend, hold harmless and indemnify the other, its officers, employees and agents from and against all claims, liability, cost, expenses, loss or damages of any nature whatsoever, including reasonable attorneys' fees, arising out of or in any way connected with its failure to perform its covenants and obligations under this Agreement and any of its operations or activities related thereto, excluding the willful misconduct or the gross negligence of the person or entity seeking to be defended, indemnified, or held harmless, ARTICLE � 6 ill 'Iukbf� 6.1 Events of Default. Each of the following events will constitute an event of default ("Event of Default") under this Agreement: (a) Nonpayment. Successor Agency's failure to repay the Loan pursuant to Article I hereof. (b) Failure to Perform. Successor Agency's failure, neglect or refusal to perform any promise, agreement, covenant or obligation contained in this Agreement, after any applicable cure periods. 6,2 Declaring Default. Whenever any Event of Default has occurred, other than a failure to pay any sums due, City shall give written notice of default to Successor Agency. If the default is not cured within thirty (30) calendar days after the Date of Default (defined herein), or any extension approved in writing by City, City may enforce its rights and remedies under Section 6.3 below. Any default that has occurred shall be deemed to commence on the date that written notice of default is effective pursuant to Section 7.2 of this Agreement ("Date of Default"). In the event of a default in the payment of any installment payment when due, Successor Agency shall have ten (10) calendar days from the payment due date to cure such default, whether or not City gives written notice. 6.3 Remedies. Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default, City, in addition to any other remedies provided herein or by law, shall have the right, at its option without any further demand or notice, to take one or any combination of the following remedial steps: (a) declare that outstanding balance of the Loan and all other sums owing to City under this Agreement immediately due and payable, and (b) take whatever other action at law or in equity which may appear necessary or desirable to collect the amounts then due and thereafter to become due hereunder or to enforce any other of its rights hereunder. 6.4 Default Interest. Commencing on the Date of Default and continuing through the date that all indebtedness and other amounts payable under this Agreement are paid in full, interest on the Loan will accrue on the outstanding balance, at the rate equal to LAIF plus one percent (I%). 6.5 Disclaimer. If City elects to employ any of the remedies available to it in connection with any Event of Default, City will not be liable for: (1) the payment of any expenses incurred in connection with the exercise of any remedy available to City, and (2) the performance or nonperformance of any other obligations of Successor Agency. ARTICLE 7 MISCELLANEOUS 7.1 Conflict of Interest-, Interest of Employees, Agents, Consultants, Officers and Officials of City or Successor Agency. Except for approved eligible administrative or personnel costs, no employee, agent or consultant who is in a position to participate in a decision-making process or gain inside information with regard to such activities assisted under this Agreement, may obtain a personal or financial interest in or benefit from the activities assisted under this Agreement, or have an interest, direct or indirect, in any contract, subcontract or agreement with respect thereto, or in 0 the proceeds there under either for him/herself or for those with whom s/he has family or business ties, during his/her tenure and for one year thereafter. 7.2 Notices. Any notice, request or consent required pursuant to this Agreement shall be deemed given when delivered personally or three (3) business days after being deposited in the U.S, mail, addressed as follows: If to Successor Agency: Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of South San Francisco P. O. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083 Attention: Assistant City Manager With copy to Oversight Board for the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco If to City: City of South San Francisco RO. Box 711 South San Francisco, CA 94083 Attention, City Manager or to such other addresses as the Parties may designate by notice as set forth above. 73 Successors and Assigns, All of the terms of this Agreement shall apply to and be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of, the successors and permitted assigns of City and Successor Agency, respectively. 7.4 Attorneys' Fees, If any action is instituted by either Party to enforce this Agreement or to collect any sums due hereunder or pursuant to this Agreement, the prevailing party in such action shall be entitled to recover its costs and reasonable attorneys' fees as awarded by the court in that action. 7.5 Severability. If one or more provisions of this Agreement are found invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remaining provisions shall not in any way be affected, prejudiced, disturbed or impaired thereby, and all other provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 7.6 Amendments/Entire Agreement. City and Successor Agency reserve the right to amend this Agreement by mutual consent. It is mutually understood and agreed that no amendment, modification, altemation or variation of the terms of this Agreement shall be -valid unless in writing and signed and acknowledged and approved by both parties. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the Parties and no oral understandings or agreement not incorporated herein shall be binding on either Party. 7.7 Time, Time is of the essence in the performance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement. 7.8 Governing Law. The laws of the State of California govern this Agreement. 7.9 City's Rights and Con-sent. No forbearance, failure or delay by City in exercising any right, power, or remedy, nor any single or partial exercise of City or any right or remedy hereunder shall preclude the further exercise of such right, power or remedy. The consent of City to any act or omission by Successor Agency may not be construed as City consent to any other or subsequent 0 act or omission or as a waiver of the requirement to obtain City consent in any other instance. All of City's rights, powers and remedies are cumulative and shall continue in full force and effect until specifically waived in writing by the City. TtO Duration/Survival. This Agreement continues in full force and effect until the Loan is repaid in full. 7.11 Headings. The headings within this Agreement are for the purpose of reference only and do not limit or othcn,�isc affect any of the terms of this Agreement, 7.12 !Counter arts Facsimile Copies. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original, but all of which together constitute one and the same agreement. This Agreement is effective upon transmission by either Party to the other Part), of a fully signed facsimile copy of the Agreement after the formal approval by the governing body of the Successor Agency and the City Council. In case of any conflict, the counterpart maintained by the City Council will be deemed to be determinative. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and the Successor Agency have executed this Agreement as of the date first above written. City of South San Francisco In Attest: Barry M, Nagel, City Manager Krista J. Martinelli, City Clerk Approved as to Form: Steven T. Mattas, City Attorney 2012595.1 2044609.1 Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco in Marty Van Duyn, Assistant City Manager Krista J. Martinelli, Secretary Steven T. Mattas, Agency Counsel DATE: February 14, 2013 TO: Members of the Oversight Board FROM: Jim Steele, Finance Director It is recommended that the Oversight Board approve the attached draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPS) for the period July through December 2013. Attached please find the next six month period proposed ROPE IV (now called RAPS 13-14A by the State). This fourth ROPE will form the basis for the County's distribution of property taxes to the City as Successor Agency to pay enforceable obligations for the period July through December 2013. Assembly Bill 1484 requires the ROPE to be submitted to the State and County no later than March 1, 2013 in a form approved by the Oversight Board. The proposed RODS was approved by the City Council in its capacity as the governing board of the Successor Agency on February 13, 2011 True Up Process This RAPS, like the previous ROPE III, includes a true up process. The true up on this BOPS is between the estimated costs shown an the previous July through December 2012 BOPS 11 and the actual costs. The purpose of the true up is to be sure the Agency is not accumulating any excess funds. The attached true up shows the Agency received $8,985,327 in Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund (RPTTF) funding along with $269,560 in administrative cost RPTTF funding for a total of $9,254,887 which matches the total RPTTF requested on the July through December 2012 ROPS 11, This request was based on April 2012 estimated project expenses for the July through December 2012 time period. The attached true up also shows the actual expenses were nearly $6.7 million in RPTTF funding along with approximately $195,000 in administrative cost RPTTF. The primary difference between estimated expenditures and actual expenditures was the $2 million Harbor District funding, which did not end up occurring during this ROPS true up period. Since actual project expenses declined from the projected expenses, the administrative cost allowance (based on 3% of RPTTF costs) also declined. Staff Report Subject: Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule for July—December 2013 EM The Agency received the estimated RPTTF funding of $9.2 million from the County but only expended $6.9 million so the difference, $2,370,337 (shown on line K on the summary page of the ROPS) will be deducted from this current ROPS RPTTF request. This is how the true up process functions and keeps excess cash from being accumulated. If the Agency has any line items that are deficient in the true up process, meaning if the actual costs of any individual ROPS obligation was higher than the RPTTF requested or the estimate Other Revenue received, then the shortfall will appear on a future ROPS as an additional RPTTF request, and the Agency will enter into a loan agreement with the City of South San Francisco to cover the shortfall, There are no projected deficiencies on the attached true-up. CONCLUSION Adoption of this resolution and schedule will fulfill the requirements of Health and Safety Code Section 34177(l) regarding adoption of a ROPS for the period July through December 2013, Attachments: Resolution Exhibit A - Draft ROPS Exhibit B - Support for Administrative Costs Appearing on the Draft ROPS Exhibit C - Support for Other Revenues Appearing on the Draft ROPS KR/JS/BN;ed FK 11 W, 110511MVIM-119MMUM 9 I'l,"MA I WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 34177(1), before each Six-month fiscal period, the successor agency to a dissolved redevelopment agency is required to prepare a draft Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule ("ROPS") that lists all of the obligations that are "enforceable obligations" within the meaning of Health and Safety Code Section 34177, and which identifies a source of payment for each such obligation from among (i) bond proceeds, (ii) reserve balances, (iii) the administrative cost allowance, (iv) revenues from rents, concessions, interest earnings, loan repayments, or asset sales, or (v) the Redevelopment Property Tax Trust Fund established by the County Auditor-Controller to the extent no other source of funding is available or payment from property tax is contractually or statutorily required; and WHEREAS, the draft ROPE must be concurrently submitted to the County Administrative Officer, the County Auditor-Controller, the State Department of Finance and the Oversight Board established to review Successor Agency actions; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Health and Safety Code Section 341770), the Successor Agency also must prepare a proposed administrative budget and submit it to the Oversight Board for approval, including the estimated amounts for Successor Agency administrative costs for the upcoming six-month fiscal period and proposed sources of payment for those costs; and WHEREAS, once the ROPE is approved by the Oversight Board, the RODS must be posted on the Successor Agency's website and transmitted to the County Auditor-Controller, the State Department of Finance, and the State Controller, NOW, THEREFORE, the Oversight Board for the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco does hereby resolve as follows: 1. The Recitals set forth above are true and correct, and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. The Recognized Obligation Payment Schedule (ROPE) and administrative budget for the period July 1, 2013 through December 31, 2013 attached hereto as Exhibit A are hereby approved. 3. The Finance Director is authorized to modify the RODS to correct errors and provide clarifications consistent with requirements of the Department of Finance and the intent of this Resolution. 4. The City Manager or designee is authorized and directed to take all actions necessary to implement this Resolution, including without limitation, the submittal of the ROPS to the County Auditor-Controller, the County Administrative Officer, the State Department of Finance, and the State Controller, and the posting of this Resolution and the .OPS on the Successor Agency's website. 5. The Oversight Board Chairperson or Vice Chairperson in his absence is hereby authorized to certify the ROPE. I hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the Oversight Board of the Successor Agency to the Redevelopment Agency of the City of South San Francisco at a special meeting held on the 14th day of February, 2013 by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSTAIN: ABSENT: ATTEST: WTWMP� City Clerk P2 I ww I C3 fTM IlY ry o 4 ,g A Ap o o AD tl L cr 2 (u C C1 LL t c 11 e U t o , c CC 2L lzr - - m m m -L C7 Q I uj w : — — t, 5 Cli SC tz O GJ E m z ti I. 0 jm OIL " m It Lo m cn w Lo VL q aL ri (n U3 (n Pt C� ch M 01 w rm M m 0 4n 41� tl� o 4 ,g A Ap o o AD tl L cr 2 (u C C1 LL t c 11 e U t o , c CC 2L lzr - - m m m -L C7 Q I uj w : — — t, 5 Cli SC tz O GJ E m z ti I. 0 jm 9 ur . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . p.. u . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . P o . . aai 0-;e I t t .9 19 g g 2; 2 111 -1 Y. Nt" - WIMMM " E g i 2 a a I H I ®S �Z;l I b CS � es a a a � oSa d Ti ol T w pp J21 7E lo CII O. o o A A!, ❑ ❑ ❑ 10 Q F= S 8 El- ❑ 0 0 C Cl c 0 0 E 2 E EjaE a E E E NE�E E ml Ito E B B E RIZ E El.�2 E t1 GJ , 8 , F L9 E u 8,8 0,18 E Iz L .9 Ar x pj� E El f:, 0 t5l ol 0 3: 7:1 Hic �i 2:• alai ElEA12 2 0 , , = �� F tg, %: 3 F T �Z! z .12 0 1 0 9 '2. L=D �V -E g: 0 s 3: O'D 0�� W, u oj= =. -7 N IN o 10 5 8 E 6 E EIv l 0 o! �K, 3: 3: :E 2, S — I F ol T w pp J21 7E lo CII O. o o A A!, ❑ ❑ ❑ 10 Q F= S 8 El- ❑ 0 0 C Cl c 0 0 E 2 E EjaE a E E E NE�E E ml Ito E B B E RIZ E El.�2 E t1 GJ , 8 , F L9 E u 8,8 0,18 E Iz L .9 Ar x pj� E El f:, 0 t5l ol 0 3: 7:1 Hic �i 2:• alai ElEA12 2 0 , , = �� F tg, %: 3 F T �Z! z .12 0 1 0 9 '2. L=D �V -E g: 0 s 3: O'D 0�� W, u oj= =. -7 N IN rw m z V Ci w4 N N G =a a N a a w q �,� s� I l oc a ro Gu lna la i ���ql {o 1ni c a t un IQ m I o a o 's N { I tl II A I Y� o ip Ign �° " x al q! ° o ci y a ol o 15 N X I O M �, i fIn .onaa.n �bl.� ;EL ITT a°r Ip NAwo N°r olu I� 0I i�°m�ro�ti ! h o o o o a o c c as { e a w c c c c c c c m c a" a pc� o a Ire ®P uI 3 ro cr;E ua o1c Imola loA� �a �o a N Dual$ mlr m 'sy j��Io o° eo`al x ai a,r ra.f ami�ml.� °i.+l E�"'' 'CIE E a "'" .cr o c u H['1 u Cs kI°° 0, ra c cc ! w ® c9 P olio naV °R'"�x� �tlu a '' I ;,; N ( s 0iM .a aj al o I `Y � of o° o" me°S oE::' I eat�o w.. C. -T~ tl s'" cl c:, l rc,z I�°I4°,WI wu a�tl t'°.. i. c 0 3 i 3 aw 3 e a I oI o m +?h46 o Io, @ o'hy!� a {a cI c`�CBm "�"'is[haYollj.: rAO °era, o e "mr� of aIv 9 d I c 'uo o pa ja a a s°i o :l^a �b Gl. r� ccel cm ol.-.' L p w eo aei' r. al ~!c cI EI. aq� all am p. {a �1y rn °'rn'N'NC m`'a^sal cX m� .� �c w ula cpn e �1 �I v' ml ° 1 C.V V�+SI sY °atluY N.. an"N�N °Nt N wt "N V�1 VA�4p 4O 6 o, r. I N a h MI ry I I HIM L I IIIII WHI I I E 13x Egli I moll ii I I f I BE" f, X MIN a 5 a I We 9 t 'Nitt 19 1% 'A 'A r, t 6 A A A 8 A;A —9 IRR P9 [ OIN Successor Agency Administrative Budget ROPE 13-14A July — December 2013 :Position Title FTE Employee Costs FY13-14 (Sernk Annual) Director of Finance 10% $ 29,790.49 Adminstrative Assistant 11 5% $ 3,500.32 Assistant City Manager 9% $ 30,070.36 City Manager 9% $ 32,442.81 Sr Accountant 5% $ 8,575.6,5 ECD Coordinator 7% $ 13,673.61 Management Analyst 12% $ 19,384.01 RDA Manager 5% $ 11,087,91 Accounting Assistant 11 7% $ 7,750.36 Sr Financial Analyst 12% $ 21,370.53 Miscellain e ous staff 9% $ 19,958.23 Subtotal IGRAND TOTAL $298,964.28 Notes: I — Staff costs include payroll, benefits, and retirement costs 2 Payment source for six month period is from the Administrative Allowance 3 Maximum administrative costs are based on 3% the total estimated net new funding needs on the PROPS R:\Aguilar\Successor Agencies\EOPS and ROPS\13-14A ROPS\Admin Positions FY13-14 NO Exhibit C 1111 r giT.i HN, q :1 I Item, # I Source of Revenue E Interest on Investments 3) Ynterest from Business Loans 4) Wrincioal from Business Loans Estimated Other Revenue Six Month Total WiTiI WF.Yfi "14 1 13.988.00 1 5) IRepayment from Sewer Fund Interfund Loan $ 194,472.00 Estimated Repayment from Oyster Point Impact Fee 6) Interfund Loan 0.00 Difference between prior period estimated Other Revenue of $152,100 and Actual Revenue of 7) $991.478.92 for the Period July-Dec 2012 (RODS 11) 839,378.92 Totals $ 1,300,295-40 Rounded Total Used on ROPS $ 1,300,000.00 DATE. February 14, 2013 TO: Members of the Oversight Board FROM: Jim Steele, Finance Director SUBJECT: TRANSMITTAL OF FORMER REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY STAFFING I IN lie) 10606% NEW It is recommended that the Oversight Board review and discuss the information contained in this report and provide further direction to staff in order to come up with a fair cost of how much the former Redevelopment Agency contributed to the unfunded liabilities for retiree health and pension costs the City is required to pay over time. BACKGROUND/DISCUS SION A basic accounting concept, and prudent budgeting, states current costs ought to be matched to current revenues so future generations do not pay for the costs of services provided to taxpayers today, The City has incurred millions of dollars in costs for the pensions and retiree health obligations for those staff employed by the City. Some of those costs are unfunded liabilities, meaning costs have been incurred for employees, but dollars have not been adequately set aside, so their payment has been deferred, The City's practice is not uncommon for municipalities, in that it has only paid the out of pocket premium expenses for retiree health costs in the year that those premiums are paid. The proper way to pay for those charges, however, is to set aside additional dollars each pay period for each employee so by the time that employee retires, all of their retiree health costs have been set aside. In addition, the City Council has set aside $11 million out of the $82 million retirement health liability as a beginning toward paying that obligation off. For PERS retiree costs, while the City is current in paying PERS the required retirement costs, some of those costs (higher benefits negotiated in the year 2000, PERS losses during the recession) are amortized over a 20 year timeframe. Staff believes the bottom line is from a true cost of providing services, future taxpayers will be hit for paying for the cost of current and prior services unless we pay down those unfunded liabilities. There are two types of employee costs that have been historically charged to the Redevelopment Agency, The first was for direct charges by specific employees, and the second is an allocation of a group of employees. Each type is described below. Note that neither practice has been challenged by our external auditors nor, by the State in its annual review of the Redevelopment Agency, Staff Report Subject: Transmittal of Former Redevelopment Agency Staffing Information OW Staff had estimated a total of $6.2 million in unfunded PERS and retiree health costs attributable to the RDA services provided by City employees. This is only an estimate, and had always been intended by staff to be considered a placeholder until a detailed actuarial analysis could be done. Identifying and getting Board concurrence for staffing is the first step in more precisely estimating liability costs, Direct Staffing Charges The former Redevelopment Agency (RDA), as a smaller agency, did not have its own Finance, Property Maintenance, or Economic Development Departments separate from the City. That is to say, City staff charged the time they spent directly working on RDA activities and providing RDA services to their timecards. Those costs were therefore historically paid directly by the RDA prior to RDA's dissolution. For these direct services, such as the downtown bike patrol and the park maintenance worker that works downtown, it is relatively straightforward to have the impacted employees code their time to RDA directly. Allocations of Groupings of Employees A second type of employee charge to the former RDA was for those groupings of employees that provided services to the RDA is an allocation where it is impractical to track individual time spent on RDA. This could occur because a small portion of several employees' time would have to be charged to RDA and despite management's best efforts, employees do not always record their time on specific tasks in a reliable way. In those cases where it was not practical for the department to keep track of'specific RDA project work by specific employees, costs were all ' ocated across groupings of employees. An example of that is as follows: in the Finance Department, there are 3 Accounting Assistants. Each of them provided services to the RDA in the areas of payroll, paying bills, and collecting and recording rent payments on properties. Rather than have all 3 employees code some of their time to the City and some to RDA, it was more practical to make a reasonable estimation of the total time spent by the 3 Accounting Assistants on RDA activities. In this case, staff estimated that roughly 1/3 of the total workload was RDA related. For that reason, 1 FTE, or 1/3 of the total Accounting Assistants in the City, were allocated to RDA. Management believed this was a reasonable allocation, since the bulk of the complex financial transactions (land purchases, bond sales, etc.) involved the Redevelopment Agency, and a good share of the total City budget was also spent on RDA. (At the time the RDA was dissolved, it generated almost 60% of the revenue the entire General Fund generated). Staffing Attachment The attached report lists those employees who provide service to RDA, and whether the time charged was a Direct) charge or an A(llocation). The Board suggested Agency staff provide them with a listing of those former RDA staff who were charged to the Agency, along with a description of those staffing duties, the title of the position, an indication of how many total such positions exist in the City for comparison purposes, and the portion of each employee's time was spent on RDA activities. Staff has provided that information on the Attachment. Next S Once a Board approved listing of FTE is developed, the next step would be to obtain an actuarial calculation of these employees' unfunded PERS retirement liability and their unfunded retiree health Liability. For the PERS cost, CaIPERS can calculate that liability. For the retiree health obligation, an Staff Report Subject: Transmittal of Former Redevelopment Agency Staffing Information Page 3 outside actuai)° would have to be contracted with. There are several reputable actuaries that can be selected from, many cities in California use Bartel Associates for this purpose. Their Aebsite is http://bartel-associ.ates.com/abQt11-us, mid some information about their firm is attached to this staff report for the Board's information. FISCAL IMPACT The ultimate cost of unfunded liabilities generated by City employees providing former RDA services is to be determined actuarially. Once those costs are identified, a funding plan over time can be considered by the Board. I--- By: Jim *ele Finance Director Approved: Marty Van Duyn Assistant City Manager irector of Economic and Community Development Attachments: Exhibit 1. RDA Staffing Listing Exhibit 2: RDA Staffing Description Information on Bartel Associates JSdMVDjs Department Position Bal JCLIR - K CITY CLERK ASST CITY CLERK CrTy CITY MANAGER MANAGER ASST CITY MANAGER ACCOUNTANTI DIRECTOROF FINANCE FINANCE ACCOUNTING ASST SENIOR FINANCIAL ANALYST r1KC rmr_v C114 1 WIN FIRE OFFICER/CODE EFORCEMENT LIB LEARNING CTR ILITERACY LITERACY PROGRAM MANAGER PARKING ENFORCEMENT OFFICER POLICE CORPORAL EXHIBIT I RDA Services Provided by City 2011 Citywide Allocated (A) Jng Unit Description of Duties in RDA Positions Positions Direct Cost (I Prorated share of managing Redevelopment Agency Board's 0,50 103 (D) business pertaining to the Redevelopment Agency's activities, 0 1 13 100 (D) Responsibilities between different City Clerk staff varied from Sub-Total 063. 200. Prorated share of managing Redevelopment Agency . T--- --IF-- Redevelopment accounting, reviews General Ledger transactions, makes correcting journal entries, prepares financial statements, reviews bank statements and reconciles cash, pays bond debt service, prepares reports, etc, General RDA Financial oversight Preparation of accounts payable checks, purchase orders, payroll processing, payroll reporting, receipt of rent revenue and property. tux revenue payments, routine journal entries. Analytical work related to budget, finance and reporting: files state controller's report, reports internally on budget to actuals, assists RDA staff in running financial reports, prepares budget adjustments, prepares reports internally for Council, Successor Agency and Oversight Board Sub-TotaI Economic Blight, Section 33031 (b) - Identifying and addressing code violations and blight in the redevelopment areas. (Total �taMpg jnS;i_udes regular olus hourly staffing) Economic Blight, Section 33031 (b) - Spanish/English and Chinese /English bilingual staff worked with downtown merchants, landlords, chamber of commerce and realtors to disseminate information on downtown redevelopment and Improvements projects, organized, coordinated and led business education classes on business plans, marketing and other business function; worked with police department and merchants to reduce street crime, vandalism and litter . NOTE: work title is only for staff classification level within the City and does not relate to actual duties of the position. Economic Blight, Section 33031 (b) - Supervision of Services Coordinator, including assistance developing and carrying out work program of Literacy Services Manager, Sub-Total Economic Blight, Section 33031 (b) - Abandoned vehicles, ticketing vehicles, facilitates visits to downtown by ensuring efficient parking/traffic flow. (Total staffing include regular plus hQ r1y) Economic Blight, Section 33031 (b) - Assistance developing and carrying out work program as discussed below, plus supervision-. Page 1 of 3 - 0.201 -... 100 0.60 100 "l- , ' 01 1001 , 3 pm: � R 0.811 . ... I 091_ . _16001_ _ (D) PI P2 Page 2 of 3 2011l Citywide Allocated (A) Department p a ent Position Bargaining Unit Description of Duties in RDA Position s Positions Direct Cost (D) mi Econoc Blight, Section 33031 (b) - Police staff provide enhanced foot and bike patrol services, including opening a police substation in the downtown to increase services to the POLICE DEPT downtown district not generally provided by regular police patrol. Services included preemptive mitigation and resolution of problems caused by residential overcrowding in SRO hotels, social service providers, gang activity and an excess of bars and liquor stores. Worked with downtown merchants, Chamber of Commerce and Literacy Program Coordinator to improve business environment by promoting crime prevention measures and reducing crime and other serious threats to public safety and welfare, POLICE OFFICER 1 2001 44-00 (D) Sub-Total! 3.801 64.00 Responsible for the ongoing maintenance of the Redevelopment PUBLIC WORKS Agency's extensive property portfolio of 32 commercial and MAINT WORKER residential _rgpert1e& p 127 2.60 (D) -EQUIPME41 On as needed basis provided technical service support to Public' OPERATOR Works Maintenance Worker 001 2.00 (D) Same as PW Maint Worker above, plus supervision of maintenance workers including assessment of maintenance SR PUBLIC WORKS needs and carrying out repairs and supervision of hired MAINT WORKER oatra=n• 001 3.00 (D) -A0Vf1NfS1RA11VL Share of support staff for City Ensupervis ineers' work on projects in ASSISTANT I the redevelo ment areas, -p- 001 11 00 (D) Share of City Engineer's time for i ng staff reviewing and inspecting infrastructure improvements related to new housing and commercial development in the City's four redevelopment PUBLIC areas. Provides final approval allowing improvements to WORKS C I ITY I E - NGINEER proceed. 0�01 1 00, (D) Share of Engineering staff reviewing and inspecting infrastructure improvements related to new housing and ENGINEERING commercial development in the City's four redevelopment TECHNICIAN 003 1 00 (D) Share of support staff for City Engineers' work on projects in OFFICE SPECIALIST the redevelopment areas. 0.02 445 (D) Public works staff responsible for inspecting infrastructure PUBLIC WORKS improvements related to new housing and commercial INSPECTOR AevOgpLgot p r9I egts in the Qty's fb!,L�e de� eLo _ r ent areas. 0.39 100 (D) Prorated share Engineering staff reviewing and inspecting infrastructure improvements related to new housing and commercial development in the City's four redevelopment SR CIVIL ENGINEER areas. 1 00 3.00 (A) Sub -Total 275 28,95 As needed basis provided custodial services to Redevelopment CUSTODIAN Agency owned commercial properties. 0.02 400 D Sub-Total - -0-02 4.00 Economic Blight, Section 33031 (b) - Staff position responsible for the landscaping and cleanliness of the Redevelopment PARK MATNT PARK MAINT Agency's extensive property portfolio or 32 commercial and WORKER residprifial uronprties, . .. .. .. ... . ... 0.951 14.00 (D) Sub-Total 0961 1400 ECONOMIC & Managed Redevelopment Agency's housing and commercial COMMUNITY programs and projects. DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR 100 1 00 (D) Provided management, analysis and budgeting for MANAGEMENT Redevelopment Agency programs and projects and State ANALYST I reaorts 0.11 100 (D) 191ANAbr-K U- Supervised Redevelopment Agency staff, programs and projects HOUSING & and State reports, provide additional liaison work w/ downtown t- I REDEVEL merchants. I 0.26 1 -- 1�0 91 __ _._ _ (D) Page 2 of 3 Department Position Bargaining Unit Description or Duties In RDA Prorated share for reviewing housing and commercial ECON & COMM ASSOCIATE development projects in the City's four redevelopment areas, DEV including advanced planning and zoning tasks to promote PLANNE R rede-Yelooment, Prorated share for reviewing housing and commercial development projects in the City's four redevelopment areas, including advanced planning and zoning tasks to promote SENIOR PLANNER Planner responsible for reviewing housing and commercial development projects in the City's four redevelopment areas, PRINCIPAL including advanced planning and zoning tasks to promote PLANNER Lpdav_elopment, 4WYO SIHNIOR I3UICOI`W Prorated share of inspections to buildings in the redevelopment Allocated /Shifts Direct Charged Page 3 of 3 Positions IDirect Cost 1. 1 1 001 . _ 3.00 M® .11,3fl _ _. 1-PC 0201 1 OC 6.20 11.82 P3 P4 EXHIBIT 2 City Staffing of the Redevelopment Agency Below is a description of the City staff positions by department that staffed and supported the former City of South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency (RDA). The number of positions and time spent on RDA work responsibilities by City staff has been proportionate to the level of RDA activity over the past 20 years. During periods with more activity, staff spent more hours on RDA functions as more projects were underway, particularly in recent year. This was also true for the final year as the RDA worked to complete and finalize many projects ahead of dissolution. It should also be noted that the staff activities under the Police Department and the Literacy Learning Center were devoted to the elimination of blight as described in Health and Safety Code sections 33030 through 33037 which define the blighting conditions found in the Downtown. City Staffing of the Redevelopment Agency A. Staffing for the Department of Finance primarily consisted of an accountant responsible for maintaining the RDA's financial books. It also included an analyst responsible for preparing budgets and State mandated reports and a prorated share of the Director of Finance. B. The Fire Department staffing of the RDA was two Code Enforcement Officers. The work of the Code Enforcement Officers was related to elimination of physical blight in the four project areas, Code Enforcement officers dealt not only with the physical remediation of conditions that endangered health and safety but also visual blight and environmental blight in the project areas. C. The Literary Service Coordinator and Manager positions are classifications within the City's employment system; the titles do not reflect the work conducted by RDA staff. Rather than create a new position of Downtown Business Liaison (DBL), as the position was informally know, the City used existing classifications for the RDA staff, The work actually conducted by staff related to the elimination of economic blight as allowed by Section 33031 (b) of the Health and Safety code, The DBL worked with merchants to help them improve their businesses, reduce business failures and subsequent retail space vacancies and turnover. The DBL also worked with other city departments on downtown blighting issues such as crime, vandalism and litter. D. Two police officers from the Police Department were assigned to the Downtown to focus, on eliminating economic blighting conditions. As allowed by Section 33031 (b) and 33035 of the Health and Safety code, police officers provided enhanced foot and bike patrol services to reduce or eliminate economic blighting conditions and to improve the business environment. Services included preemptive mitigation and resolution of problems caused by residential overcrowding in SRO hotels, social service providers, gang activity and an excess of bars and liquor stores in the Downtown. The police officers also worked with downtown merchants, the Chamber of Commerce and Downtown Business Liaison to improve business environment by promoting crime prevention measures and reducing crime and other serious threats to public safety and welfare, PS E. There were numerous City staff members from the Public Works Department (PWD) that worked on RDA activities. One principal PWD worker was the position of Maintenance Worker that was responsible for assisting in maintaining the RDA's 32 property portfolio (including housing units at that time). Another key staff person was a PW Inspector responsible for inspecting infrastructure improvements, such as roads, sidewalks, public spaces, sewer connections, etc. related to new housing and commercial development in the City's four redevelopment areas. The majority of projects under review by the Inspector were projects directly funded by the RDA such as the housing project at 636 El Camino which required substantial street, sidewalk, sewer, fire hydrants and supply water line improvements. Additional staff members in PWD provided support to these primary positions and charged minimal amounts of time to the RDA. R In the Parks and Recreation Department, one key staff person was responsible for the exterior landscaping, cleanliness and maintenance of the Redevelopment Agency's property portfolio of 32 commercial and residential properties. Work included landscaping and maintaining the grounds, regular cleaning of spaces open to the public and removing refuse dumped by the public on RDA properties and in the Downtown project area. Minimal additional Park Maintenance staff supported this position. G. The City Manager and City Clerk charged a proportional amount of their staff time spent on management and support of redevelopment activities. H. Economic and Community Development Department had three RDA key positions. The Manager of Housing and Redevelopment was responsible for the management, operations and oversight of the Redevelopment Agency. The Economic and Community Development Coordinator was responsible for housing and commercial programs and projects. A Principal Planner was responsible for reviewing and shepherding development projects within the four redevelopment project areas through the approval planning approval process and for replying to public inquiries. It should be noted that many redevelopment agencies such as San Francisco had separate planning departments solely responsible for planning functions within project areas. All remaining positions charged minimal amounts of time to supporting redevelopment act ivies, P6 About Bartel Associates - Trusted for Public Agency Actuarial Services s1nce /-UVJ rat C Actuarial Services for the Public Sector ABOUT US SERVICES STAFF RESOURCES NEWS CONTACT Home >- About US About US E ifiel Asl50di;t% j, LLG' WJS tWoblisht,; (0 PrWdO ?W8111Y Shd C06"tteLl" actuarial ct"Sult"IG scNIC36 10 pubic $f� 45 Slu&eS for .,pproximalr.ly 250 California Bartel's Actuarial Services agellt;"s With over 40D "Sil.15 studi"S lnciud�rfg G,%, cities, , Ill 11111i freld, ,oUnjjqq, and special districts wr are , xPc its N"se '4(50 provide actumit VuWation, collSultifig, arid advisory Services to large and small retirement Syslems, Inducimli OPUB cOnsulting ssrrvir,-:s for apa�Ics paritr3p.ifing in Calf"ERS John Bartel was a war nber O� , the Spe -,:a! ,ask War WhIcli 1sSmOj r�ASP in dtafliog Slaleillenj No 45 and will -,Also be GaIPERS on the Advisory Task Force for the CiA. S 45 profect roy",sing G ,,Sli 45 that wall be stpri.fl, Yl .4 the sumv ul'r; -0 " 12, Bartel Associates rovas &rIabilshed Ill 2003 and IS rroonized as o Limited 1.11bilily Corperillon. Our offiw is 10117816d Tn pension Plans San Maloo. Callforma. VVE cxi'.PMIy have 19 ornp:oyees, inducing 6 senior scroiries, 9 aGtw3dal analy*I3, Ind 3 are eowE- SocTely of Acluarw?;, 10 are adminisiritNe SION members, Tan at our aCiu,-1 'es Flls of Associal us of tl) Retirement System AV011s h4embffs of the Amenc'u) Ac-10-111Y Of NcIuades 6 are -4nrollod A,:lvatoc-S, and A are Fellows Of Ih Cont, nonce of Corraultil V ArLuar-0- Consulting Support Bartel Associates, LLC Bartel's Actuaries GASB Database Bartel Research 411 Borarky(our, Suite to, 17 plWissmnlals to help YOU Ewer wonder how your OPEB Articles by garlefs fIGIL Mateo, Coliftxnia 94402 manage your olfancy'5 pension plan Blacks up furandalty experts on pension refs Ban and relzrve mo0c*1 bLildfill against othos allencitt? Chect, heatinmrc =ues, and Tolophont: 650-377-1600 obligations. out our GASB 45 Osivila", Important financial Wn- T.11 Free. 800-256-200 Our Staff 96 \Asft 1`11 Visit the GASS Dotaba so fWad Articles Contact Us 0 2D12 Ba"*( 1.ssociatts Horr, ; ront". I us I Sob M-M�o I irfo@b*rIr!-a6r.,o0nI8S OCIM Web DeYolopmeill. 4 PlOnetM8900 P7 OPEB Actuarial Consulting with GASB45 Valuations - Bartel Associates in San Mateo Page Actuarial SerVICOS for the Public Sector ABOUT US SERVICES STAFF RESOURCES NEWS CONTACT Home - Services OPEB Other Post Employment Benefits Valuations and Consulting Bartel's Artvarial Services 1N,c will or.j,r$land your cocowcA. and you ww unciersinrid ll-, rcauits of Ojr wort Bartel Research vii, prc-Adv OPEE aclu,r„.,l 2<,rvlces to blutvil, counfies cities and publi� ogenees This wcIlt h0ps apencI0 OPEB underivond the irripacl. of G. ,SO i,)' and includes a corrp-ir!xin of tavu resulls, to oil of 43--nUes ur-19 cKir GASB 45 Arlirles tyf 86,101's ac. Database. GaIPERS Our consulting semi ces for OPEB plans include: t:xPerls on pension re yr J lle, de ton r; jj.Amauvs pl-r decjn nnrilys-s ann, ctxo impact pro,"liun°. Pension Plans orivn am cris,7d nciijrjir,�, Annuli! OPE8 C10M (AOC) cost -IT10 c"Ish ftwltW� it hi, healthcare itstits an P,Vjcict`,=5 obl,100ns defint-, ,,-z d. ,I-il conintmij,)n rejlr, — designs nt jjj� .1fe plan dc, Retirement System Audits PrGl 1h,'- k inimurn tom'lil der rplirr, F Visit Our Staff Page "+*vndnj artal,.,,s!s if j cost proibc, 041— Consulting Supped CPEB Valuations ,ii%, b:Jw.v, that thefl ere hi,* LVOIS to .e GASB 45 ickiii-w wilu,itlion Sari:,l Associates will PrOI,JP services it eilh. 16VIII hi,, first level i,s le,,hntcol cornpir, f)CS Ykth G,',S8 4S Sorge PUMC (`nPk)Y-ET5 may h:,*e an aCTVM 10 ASS"ll only w0h cornpllanc^ vAlij GAKI 4r, lim,ting the scope of sorviccs to preparing a compliance-on,ty vit'lition Mal provld:,s thn ro%Nt=,,d fin, idaf ri pnoing and disclosure rriformalmn. 71.o second level jOeS L*Iliend rL poninq and disclosure lusues and asstSI.S ft Co0jity u rit, art rineiri(stanoing of GASE3 •5 IN, acivnnil rriaVmd , and as!"almrifa0115. tile valijit,on trip financial sYtiorriont s,11p.*10t furldim.1 policie s and trust optont, and ;, rr k m f lh- plan d ?J�vl. OP,Sk -;', delverab`[eri viclui,),': Rt sufts, pfusertEd In 3 1 Xe-tr, -fav: iT,0._lIng I,,,, ^,.q r1e•l easily understood tiin,2u, (ge 1c dal, )n of G�il SE 45 costs Jnd iat vlllr'S- our C- ASq •l5 ddi 1bjae shoyjr� fl a, , ,IrAal con;paf Sonq w1lh zD0 other California plorm FeviFAY and .;natyelS Of ftjncrj" alloniat-voii, Pre ,1Y)ratior of draft fin,*3116 )I 5jj:,j;jnflnj repoffr,,ig Ad disdosum infoTmetron Optional Eyricu&vo Summary or GoordlCo, incil ptcgirreirtion Roypeew,-And documentation at plan banelits per MQU Sr birgaining afire-n!ents. pP-1 Summenri-,, air, Rn,Aew of ;;an and setc.clion r 81.luilli`01 methods ard assurripitfins Annual OPER Cost (AOCg criel MW Wrl!"i PsYOUt P(Olo60,q Raw" and analyies of life Insural Ice C011MV& Contact Bartel Assiofates, to ticnIfil !roar our OPEB ochional Pxpi '1;6e Bartel Assocfates, LLC Bartel's Actuaries GAS8 Database Bartel Research A 11 Scirel Avanm, Suite 101 17 professionals 10 help you Evcf wonder how your OPEB Arlirles tyf 86,101's ac. San Mateo, California 1141402 morriV your awncy's pt::n"n plan matks up l nnclally t:xPerls on pension re Telffirione and rplirpo tneoltAl ticniAnt 302insk olhar ationc,"I Choc.X healthcare itstits an Tall Fret. 801),256-2090 obl,100ns aril our GAS13 45 Oalab"t. important linamol m Contact Us Visit Our Staff Page VUR the GAS5 Database Read Articles Actuarial Consulting and Govemment Agency Support - Bartel Associates LLC Page Actuarial Services for the Public sector ABOUTUS SERVICES STAFF RESOURCES NEWS CONTACT Horne 5 Services > Consulling Support Consulting Support Selma Of JI)o cojtuj°ang ptc;ects ooniplet, I by Bartel Assoc -Iles art, Pfovk. , w0cpPr-dem in pot,4m :Ofjrxj +°- lndep.lnd�n: Of the sysixn rmt,,isri or lnvustmont, dvawr Sk,)port clanis in th,: uniois nrgo,�akiol, process Pr,)V:dO a0t!LlOftall cast MUMOS and lCOMony at public awehnno to comply w,th Governmenlal Code Section ?bU Assist pub& aI;ion,ws %,4th rodeWnwi qXfl.;jlRg rajrMrnqnt plrr)SL and impirmonl new rotimmell b(IrIefil, programs calWel-A tho V-14V of benel't abline,ions for RDA ems oyess "ind F1Mrlrly06S DJ OLI150rJf0-J SeIVICeS Soda" Sewrity wpl:�co ni.nf plins for part -tInle and lenriporary ernployces DosiSpi of Iv,,nsiar, r.'an, tr ra:.` -nl PEMH(.A eli;Nljly !Rt Sectlan 415 l'n* ootuqrial teeft An-,-lysis Of plan changes or prolected plan costs Exp, Jcnc, sludL- s ani Uevinw of c)cp(,nonfe stuclio6 Piltseni,itions Jo Boa is or other Croup; 00 nOw dccownt; Q rules (GAS'S V;CS') ano Cal' orma pr nsmn rf?;ow, JPEPRA). if Wit s, prq,cl 1yp,•- are ') watch ")r jove public anicney's PFr-ds, contacting us is e;ivy i.,-id no- -btigalirjn) Bartel Associates, LL Bartel's Actuaries 4:t-1 Borel AYQrloe, Suk' 101 17 prafast;fonels to help you Son Mateo, Caldonrla 94402 manage your agency-S olInsiorl Telerphow 65&3ri -1600 ard rellren modical 4eliefit Tc" Free: W&25G-2%0 obhgaliors contact Us Visit Our Staff Page GOMEIIIIJ5 ; 61102,55,14,"Jl I'll, rftb-`I '-ASS 0CV04 I'= Web Development by PlanatMagpio GAB Database Fver WOI`I(10, haw your OPER plan lailck6 up financially against other agencies" ChtrA W our GASS 45 Dolabare, V4sR the GAsB Database Bartel's Actuarial Services OPES COPIERS Pension piatis Retirement System Audits Consulting Support Bartel Research Arlides by Barlarl OcL oxPP115 on p9nNIC-11 rare healthcare tissues, and lrnpOfiaot financial Wnr, Read Articles 0201, bariAAssoclex.i E8 John Bartel, President, ASA, FICA, MAAA ABOUT Us Home , Staff f Biography • tri r SERVICES STAFF RESOURCES John Bartel, President, ASA, FCA, MAAA M Actuarial Services for the Public Sector (650) 377-1601 1 Emall John :,Mh rvar 30 1 %--r5 :n r7irripinlico hvil'i1h Joan f-wusr C Oil P�,nk.on u -1st"Ill. I f7l", wide %Afe, ty cr I onq ': «Ind rriKlw sWkV r1or, s. Ile favrj.�d 3a. ,r9 rAr, its$ 4 s8rvi, ,)jbl,r. sWor a1IL scies. Prnphaoi, Ing n-johly, rrr•z ,Sr t! 011, (tei C` )svlwlderstxvatlemays 2ohnisfric-01 two ac[iu rare -Primlod rp, 1123) CRAP will fbrot;,jo irril.,irliat andindepowom inforrna,son on ond tosl prwIlloes to cal"onva put li4 anandivs Joan �%srtef sE�rved as win5u'li for Urie Catliform.,zi st.1f oificvorfin,oir, Is toTior govc6mof Schw.tr?v gf, --rS r wriv: virpltyilic r0sl- onployrrent bmiefils cc-rirni.sion, ctiargeri wlm r"lcw of policy regarding IN SiBIL'S public employee rotlremrn! benefits john 5orter was a menlm- e Ih.. spor; )I tss9. fo:c,° wriir)i iss:stcd (,ASB n driift;ng Sllioiw., it N"O, 43 in I w.11 sl,,o ty¢ (In the ad"scry task force for tho GAv a -,;.I pro,, I revising C.4&S .11A aAarhni the summ,:r of .012 John Srevalazies 01. Culi,,--RS isuolic agency consullng •10MI d0N7ls I FI MMJIO JMM i RI. -CNAI:109, Ono oSsui-S fleiii-e., hvarlincrr, plv) wWwOon. : 1,)dy and di: sign kelirrrrit nj P1,11 r, YdjUl .311on tno 1.mgn C.Mployce Irm) r'l m,' JrN ,Ile nct)l Sti.311 tskIZ-1; Publications (copies avallable upon request) :,003 critlifoT.ja Put -. jimireirr-ni .Iournal 'rxt,8B, Moe i Pensions) i 'niploynn,ill Sew 'kts Pion SporsQ, Rivoning and O,Sdo*;Wc* June 2001 Na6orwl Asa=<*11 o' SWO Retirement Administralora (NASRA) Is A DROP Plan frighl for roar Ov.4anization?'Y41h ChO, Bone, AaWs Chief Actuary 'hinualy 1,1101 wastern City 'Understanding the Impact of the Nrw CaIPERS Public 52][CtY Sellefits with Hi:i,M Commons, City of Fremont GP.S,3,'7 (pension, di*0i;sUr0) W,Ite P-:+per. C,;IlrbrnPa Corrtluilue on W,-I. ACCOL• brip. vrilin Glenn STeiribifink, City of Fullerton Speaking Engagements W�-.,"ngs III Enrolled. ctuan,' S. Sov-ly of Aouotws. Conference of Carillio'ling Aclulriws, I,CIgLh. Of California Cities. rnlilrfni l Spl,4ly r' CPAs a 3:00mfrl Ptlislic EMPIOyVe L„,tor Rclatmr- js!oriojjDn, end C.oliforri:a Society r.i k1un oral 'tm 1-, 0 1c, -> Affiliations/DesignationstEducaOon ACGccj.9Tt; of lhe, Scc,f ty cl ACNA10S bellow or ne Zon(-Apnce J Cc nstillinp Ac'uari-es .%mPoviri my cjfActv;,6 , NEWS CONTACT Bartel's Actuarial Services OPED GvIPERS Pension Plans Retirennalli System Audits Consulting Support P9 John Bartel, President, ASA, FCA, MAAA Bartel Asso6ates, LLC 411 FlorefAvenud. Sohe 101 San Malec, Call'orma 94402 Telephone: 660-377-16DO Tell Free, $00 256-2090 CoetAck Uc Herr -I I ConlaclUs I W02Z—ZOW1 Barlei's Actuaries 17 professionals to help you manoge, your agcrvy-% pension smd Vim medical trenollf obligoiions. Molt out Staff Page Web Deg elppmont by PlanotMogple GASB Database Ever WOrdhr how your OPES. WWI slockl up financially AGAInst OtnOf agandel? Check col our GASB 4a Crggohese Mill the GASO D*t*bbse Pic Page Bartel Research Articles by flaltit's WU expans on pensJon relo heelftare issues, and r imporiar4 rmonml cone Flood Articles Z01- BMW n$$Ocales'