HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1821-1952 RESOLUTION NO. 1821
DECLARING THAT INVESTIGATION PROCEEDINGS ARE NOT XEQUIRED IN
NORTHWEST DRAINAGE DISTRICT PROCEEDINGS.
17
RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of South San Francisco, California, that:
THEREAS, it is the intention of said City Co~mcil to make the following improvements
in and for said city, to-wit: the improvement of the Northwest Drairage District by the fur-
nishing of all material, l~bor, equipment, and supplies, and the doinf e~ all' work necessary
for the construction and installation of a storm drainage system, including the laying and
installing of concrete pipe, corrugated arch storm drains, catch basins, inlet and outlet
structures, ~11 excavation and backfill work and the repaying of streets, and the irstalling
of any and all necessary a ~purtena~ces, and the performance of al]. incidental work necessary
for such storm drainage system, which is to be located along Gran~ Avenue, Oak Avenue, along
an easement between Oak Avenue and Chestnut Avenue, along Old Mission Road, Ever~.reen Drive
and Crestwood Drive, and along an easement northerly from Crestwood Drive~, t.o,'!a location near
its northwesterly terminus, all of which streetS'and easements are situate within the confines of the
City of South San Francisco, and the performing of all work auxiliary to the foregoing v~ich may be
necessary to carry out the
~'~EREAS, the o~ners of more than 60% of all the property within the proposed assessment district have
signed and filed with this Council a written petition for the doing of said work and waiv, er of
proceedings under the "Special Assessment, Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Ave
of 1931",
NO'~f, THEREFORE, IT !e~ ORDERED, FOUND AND DP. mE,~%~T~n~.,:.~,,~.~.~, AS FOLLOJS'.
i. That none of the property owners of pr.oDerty within the area of the proposed assessment
district demanded the m~king of the investigation proceedings provided in the "Special Assess-
ment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of-1931" for the work and improvement
herein provided to be done.
2. That said Ucuncil proceed under the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911 and the
Improvement Bond Act of !915!~to carry through the contemplated proceedings without any further
restrictions whatsoever by reason of the terms and provisions of said "Special Assessment In-
vestigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931".
3. The boundaries of the lands and of the districts of lands proposed to be specially assessed
to pay the cost and expenses of such work and proposed ~m%provement are generally described as
follows, to-wit:
All that certain real property situate in the City of South San Francisco, County of San
Mateo, State of California, to-wit:
BEGINNING at an ang~ point in the corporate limits boundary of the City of South San Francisco,
said point lying also on the corporate limits boundary for ~he Town oi' Colma, and also being
the northerly corner of the 13,215 acre parcel of land conveyed to Antonio Scopesi and ~gife by
deed recorded January 9, 1936 in Book 673 of Official Records of San Mateo County at Page
(71767C); thence along said corporate limits boundary of the City of South San Francisco south-
easterly 950 feet, more or less, and northeasterly 100 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly
Line of'.~Hilt~ide B~levard; thence continuing along said corporate limits line of the City of
South San Francisco southeasterly 1800 feet, more or less, to the granite monument L-5 of the
Ilar Survey; thence continuing along said corporate limits line South 8~° 28' dO" East 758.11
feet, more or less, to a granite monument and northeasterly 600 feet, more or less, to the north-westerly
corner of Sterling Terrace No. 5 as shown upon that certain map recorded in Book 31 of Maps at
Page 2A, San Mateo County Eecords; thence along the westerly boundary of said Sterling Terrace
No. 5 South 30020' 20" East 708.01 I'eet to the southwesterly corner of said Sterling Terrace
No. 5; thence southwesterly 670I'eet, more or less, to the easterly corner to that certain 2.006
acre parcel of land belonging to the California Water Service Company; thence along the south-
easterly line of said 2.006 acre parcel of lana South Al° 3d' 2A" West 300 feet; thence south-
westerly A70 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly corner of that certain3.225 acre parcel
of land now, or formerly, owned by A. M. Gui~O? thence South 15° 33' 'Nest 1037.71 feet, more
or less, to the southerly li~e of Tamarack Lane as shown upon that certain map entitled "South
San Francisco Plat No. l", recorded in Book 2 of Maps at PaKe 52, San Mateo County Records;
thence along said southerly ldr~e of Tamarack Lane North 7A°27, West 100 feet, more or less, to
the westerly line of LaurelAvenue; thence alongsaid westerly line of Laurel Avenue South 15°33'
West 500, more or less, to the northerly lineof Grand Avenue; thence along said northerly lmne
of Grand Avenue North 7~° 27' West ~00 feet to the easterly line of Chestnut Avenue; thence southerly
and southwesterly along said easterly line of Chestnut Avenue 1050 I'eet, more or less, to a
point lying 3.50 feet northeasterly at right angles fromthe northeastsrly line of the Colma
Creek Drainage C~nal Eight-of Way; thence northwesterly along a line lying parallel to and
350 feet at right angles northeasterly fona said Right-of-Way line 670 feet, more or less, to
the southeasterly ldne oi' Oak Avenue; thence southwesterly, along said southeasterly line of
Oak Avenue and its prolongation southwesterly, ~60 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly
line of Mission Road and the corporate limits line of the City of South San Francisco; thence
northwesterly, along said southwesterly line of Mission goad and corporate limitsline, &,OAO
feet, more or less; thence continuing along said corporate limits line but leaving the south-
westerly line of Mission ~oad, morthwesterly 3270 I'eet, more or less, to the point of beginning,
as said boundaries and limits are shown ~nd set forth in that certain map or plat now on file
in the Office of the City Clerk of said City of South San Francisco entitled:"
~. That no portion of such proposed improvement is to be oaid /'rom any source other than
special assessments upon said benefited property.
~'~EREAS, the owners of more than 60% of all the property within the proposed assessment district have
signed and filed with this Council a wri~teri petition i'or the doing of said work and waiv. er of
proceedings under the "Specis1 Assessment, Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Ave
of 1931",
NO'~4 THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, FOX,ND AND DETE~I~ED AS FOLLOW?S:
1. That none of the property owners of prop(~.rty within the area of the proposed assessment
district de~anded the making of the investigation proceedings provided in the "Special Assess-
ment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of, 1931" for the work and improvement
herein provided to be done.
2. That said Council proceed under the provisions of the Improvement Act of 1911 and the
Improvement Bond Act of 191)!~to carry through the contemplated proceedings without any further
restrictions whatsoever by reason oi' the terms and provisions of said "Special Assessment In-
vestigation, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931".
3. The boundaries of the lands and of the districts oi' lands proposed to be specially assessed
to pay the cost and expenses of such work and proposed -~nprovement are generally described as
follows, to-wit:
All that certain real property situate in the City o1' South San Francisco, County oi' San
Mateo, State of California, to-wit:
BEGINNING at an ang~ point in the corporate limits boundary of the City of South San Francisco,
said point lying also on the corporate limits boundary for 5he Town oi' Colma, and also being
the northerly corner of the 13,215 acre parcel of land conveyed to Antonio Scopesi and Wife by
deed recorded January 9, 1936 in Book 673 oi' Official Ee~.ords of San Mateo CoUnty at Page 61
(71767C); th~nce along said corporate limits boundary oi' the City of South San Francisco south-
easterly 950 feet, more or less, and northeasterly 100 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly
line ef.~ilt~ide Boulevard; thence continuing along said corporate limits line of the City of
South San Francisco southeasterly 1800 i'eet, more or less, to the granite mon~ment L-5 oi' the
Iler Survey; thence continuing along said co~-porate limits line South 8~° 28' dO" East 758.11
feet, more or less, to a granite monument and northeasterly 600 feet, more or less, to the northwesterly
corner of Sterling Terrace No. 5 as shown upon that certain m~p recorded in Book 31 of Maps at
Page 2~, San Mateo County Eecords; thence along the westerly boundary oi' said Sterling Terrace
No. 5 South 30020' 20" East 708.01 I'eet to the southwesterly corner of said Sterling Terrace
No. 5; thence southwesterly 670I'eet, more or less, to the easterly corner to that certain 2.006
acre parcel of land bel6nging to the CaliI'ornia Water Service Company; thence along the south-
easterly line of said 2.006 acre parcel of lanG South Al° 3A' 2~" West 300 feet; thence south-
westerly A70 feet, more or less, to the north~westerly corner of that ce~'tain3.225 acre parcel
of land now, or formerly, owned by A. M. Gui~to$ thence South 15° 33' 'Nest 1037.71 feet, more
or less, to the so~.~therly li~e of Tamarack Lane as shown upon that certain map entitled "South
San Franc~.sco Plat No. l", recorded in Book 2 of Maps at Page 52, San Mateo County Records;
thence along said southerly ldr~e .of Tamarack Lane North 7~°27, West 100 feet, more or less, to
the westerly line of LaurelAvenue, thence alongsaid westerly line of Laurel Avenue South 15°33'
West 500, more or less, to the northerly lineof Grand Avenue; thence along said northerly lZne
of Grand Avenue North 7~° 27' West ~00 feet to the easterly line oi' Chestnut Avenue; thence southerly
and southwesterly along said easterly line of Chestnut Avenue 1050 I'eet, more or less, to a
point lying 350 feet northeasterly at right angles fromthe northeasterly line of the Colma
Creek Drainage Canal Eight-pi' Way; thence northwesterly along a line lying parallel to and
350 feet at right angles northeasterly fona said Right-of-Way line 670 feet, more or less, to
the southeasterly ldne oi' Oak Avenue; thence southwesterly, along said southeasterly line of
Oak Avenue and its prolongation southwesterly, d60 feet, more or less, to the southwesterly
line of }&ission Road and the corporate limits line of the City of South San Francisco; thence
northwesterly, along said southwesterly line of Mission Road and corporate limitsline, ~,0~0
feet, more or less; thence continuing along said corporate limits line but leaving the south-
westerly line of Mission Eoad, morthwesterly 3270 I'eet, more or less, to the point of begir~ning,
as said boundaries and limits are shown 8nd set forth in that certain map or plat now on file
in the Office of the City Clerk of said City of South San Francisco entitled:"
A. That no portion of such proposed improvement is to be ~aid i°rom any source other than
special assessments upon said benefited property.
5. The statute under which it is proposed to conduct proceedings for the proposed improve-
ment is the "Improvement Act of 1911" (Statute 1911, page 730 , as ~mended ) and it is proposed
to Day for said improvements by special ~ssessment upon adjacent property upon an area basis with bonds
to be issued as authorized under the ImproVement Bond Act of 1915 (Statutes 1915, p~ge l~A1).
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was duly and regularly adopted by the
City Council of the City of South San Francisco at and regular meeting thereof held on the
6th day of October, 1952, by the following vote:
Ayes, Councilmen Adolph Sani, Joseph Bracco, Emilio Cortesi,
Noes, Councilmen Telford Smith
Absent, Councilmen John Noonan
Arthur A. Eodondi
City Clerk