HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 2088-1954ltESO~ON NO. 2O88
A ~SOLUT~ON OF T~ CITY COUWC~. OF T~ CITY OF SO~a
SA~ FeANCXSCO co~n~o cE~u~ CLE~CAL mm0~s A~D
OmSSZOSS ~ ~E ASS~SS~ ~0LL AS AD~D ~Y SA~D
WHEP~ certain clerical errors and omaisetmm have appeared with respect to the assessment
roll as approved and adopted by the City Council for the fiscal y~ar 19~ - 1955; and
WHEREAS sach errors and c~issions should Be corrected by the makiu6 of certain adJus~?~_nts to
said assessment roll,
NC~, .l..~m~ORE, BE IT RESOLVED by +.he City Council of the etty of South San Francisco +_Mt the
assessment roll as heretofore adopted by said City Council for the ~ year 19~ - 1955 Be corrected
as follows:
1. With respect to Bill No. ~670.(James L. McDonald, 303 Orange Avenue, South San Franciseo)~
An error in assessing personal property in the amount of $2310.00 Be eliminated and a credit in the amount
of $38.35 Be
2. With respect to Bill No. 2~72 (Manuel and Juanita Ruiz, 851 Maple Avenue, South San Francisco);
To be eorrected to show real estate in the assessed value of $7~0.00 rather that $~0.00. As corrected said
tilX~ shall read as follows:
$7~0.00 Real Estate
5~O .00 Ib~~nts
5790.00 Assessed Value
$~6.11 Taxes due
15.00 Sewer Rental
$111.11 Total correcte~ tax bill
3. With respect to Bill No. 18~ (Earl R. and ~zel O. Norse, 53 Page Street, San Francisco, California)
Personal property of the value of $22,120.00 was assessed to said taxpayers instead of to the real owner,
Shop Towel Service and Supply Company. As corrected said bill should read as follows:
$1,3~0.00 Real Estate
12,~0.00 Improvements
$13,7~0.00 Total Assessed Value Credit due: $371.0~
~. With respect to Bill No ~ (Chrles Fracchia, San Mateo, California): Through error ~
assessed as owning personal property against wK~iha tax ~as usessed in the amount of $3.~9. No such personal
property owned by taxpayer. Because tax ~as already paid; a refUn~ is to be ordered paid to said taXl~yer in
the ot
5. With respect to Bills No. ~3, ~'5~I~ (Italo Ferrari): Thro~ error only ~ of f-~ Veteraas'
ex~mptioa granted. 1~,~ amount of t~x already paid, there Being an overcharge of $7.8~. l~aftmd to Be allo~
said taxpayer in the fo~ amount of $7.89.
6. With respect to Bill No. 3~02 (Caroline ~a~d, Parkway Terrace, South San Francisco): Assessed
for personal property in the amount of $2~75.00, whereas the assessed value should be $17~0.00. Said bill
should be corrected to show a credit in the saint of $12.0~.
7. With respect to Bill No. 72 (California Water Service co., Miller Avenue, South San Framcisco):
Through cuiseloa said taxpayer was not assessed for impxx~;e~ents to real estate, having an assessed value
of $18,~00.00. As corrected, said tax bill shall show additional taxes tn the amount of $303.78.
8. With respect to Bill No. 213 (Marlo Packing Co., 1955 Carroll Avenue, San Francisco): Through
error, assessed as the owner of personal property having an assessed value of $375.00. Said Tax bill
should Be corrected to show the taxpayer as the owaer of no personal property and a credit in the amount of
$6.23 is to Be allowed.
9. With respect to Bill No. ~1~ (Shell Oil Cce~m~y, San l~rancisco, California): This bill is a
duplicate charge, said taxpayer alread~ being eha~ under bill No ~27. Tax bill No. ~1~ to be cancelled.
10. On or about July 20th, 19~ the South 8an l~'aacisco U~lfled School District, a pul~lic body,
became the owner of the property ~asignate~ by tax bills ~,m~ered 3~0, 353, ~9, ~0, ~651, 6652, ~53,
66~, 6655, 6656, and 66~7, with respect to which a request for cancellation of taxes has been made. The
taxes designated by said bills should be cancelled in full.
11. With respect to Bill, No. 200 (Standard Oil Co., .~5 Bush Street, San Francisco, California):
Throngh error, assessed as having personal property of the value of $6,290.00, whereas it should have teen
$3,790.00, and assessed as having B,~]~ plant ~ersonal ~ro~erty of the value of $1~.~gO.00. whereas it sheeld
1. With respect to Bill No. ~670.(James L. McDonald, ~O3 Orange Avenue, South San Franciseo):
An error in assessing personal property in the amomnt of $2~10.00 Be eliminated and a credit in the amomnt
of $38.35 be shown.
2. With respect to Bill No. 2572 (Manuel and Juanita Rmiz, 851 Maple Avenue, Somth San Francisco);
To be corrected to show real estate in the assessed value of $750.00 rather that $~0.00. As corrected said
Bill; Shall read aa follows:
$750.00 Real Estate
.%)lt, O.O0 I~,,A'%,v~ :ntb
57 0.00 Assessed Value
$96.11 Ta~as due
15.00 Sewer Rental
$111.11 Total corrected tax bill
3- With respect to Bill No. 189 (Earl R. and Nazel 0. Morse, 53 Pa~e Street, San Francisco, California)
Personal property of the value of $22,120.00 was assessed to said taxpayers instead of to the real owner,
Shop Towel Service and Sul~lY Cc~Y. As Correete~ said Bill shomld read aa follows:
$1,350.00 Real Estate
12,~O0.00 I=~'o~ :uts
$13,750.00 Total Assessed Value Credit due: $371.0~
~. With respect to Bill No 5069 (Chrles Pracchia, San Mateo, California): Through error was
assessed aa owning personal property a~aiuet will.ha tax ~ assessed in the am~mt of $3.~9. No such personal
property owned by taxpayer. Because tax ~ already paid; a refund is to be ordered paid to said taXlmyer in
the adopt of
5- With re,peet to Bills No. ~563, ~56~ (Italo Ferrari): Through error only part of fall Yeteraa~'
exemptiom granted. 1~,1~ amount of tax already paid, there Being an overcharge of $7.89. l~efemd to be allowe~
said taxpayer in the full amount of $7.89.
6. With respect to Bill No. 3502 (Caroline ~ld, Parkway Terrace, So~th San Francisco): Assessed
for personal property in the amomnt of $2~75.00, whereas the assessed ~tns shonld be $1750.00. Said bill
shoul~ Be corrected to show a ere&it in the amcmat of $12.0~.
7. With respect to Bill No. 72 (California Water Service Co., M~!-ler Avenme, Somth San Francisco):
Thrca~gh cmdseloa said tax.yet vas not assessed for improvements to real estate, having an assessed value
of $18,~00.00. As coe~eeted, said tax bill shall show a&litioual taxes in the amount of $303.78.
8. With re,peet to Bill No. 213 (Marlo Packing Co., 1955 Carroll Avenue, Sau Francisco): Thremgh
error, assessed as the owner of personal property having au assessed value of $375.00. Said Tax bill
should Be corrected to show the tex~ayer aa the owner of no personal property and a credit in the amount of
$6.23 is to Be
9. With respect to Bill No. ~l~ (Shell Oil Ccm~emy, San Pfanciseo, California): This bill is a
duplicate charge, sai~ taxpayer already Being charged miller bill No ~27. Tax bill No. ~1~ to be cancelled.
10. On or about July 20th, 19~ the $omth San Francisco Unified School District, a pu~lie body,
became the career of the property designated By tax bills numbered 350, ~53, 66~, 66~0, 66~1, 6652, 66~3,
665~, 6655, 665~, and 6657, with respect to which a request for cancellation of taxes has been made. The
taxes designated by said bills should be cancelled in f,,!~.
11. With re,peet to Bill~No. 200 (8tandma~ Oil Co., .225 Bm~h Street, San Francisco, California):
Throngh error, assesse~ as. having personal property of the valse of $6,290.00, whereas it shonl~ have ~een
$3,790.00, and assessed as having b,~ plant personal property of the vmlue of $19,990.00, whereas it
be in the amount of $~,320.00. Said Taxpayer is to be allowed a credit of $218.62.
12. With respect to Bill No. ~28 (Staudar~ 0il Co., 2~5 Brash Street, San Francisco, California):
Thromgh error, assessed aa having personal property of the value of $190.00, $90.00 and $190.00, whereas
it shottld ha-~e been in the values of SilO.00, $150.00, and $90°00. Said taxpayer is to be allowed a ere&it
or
13. With respect to Bill No. ~29 (Standard 0il Co., 225 Ba~h Street, ~an Francisco, Califernia):
Through error, assessed aa having personal property of the value of $~80.00, whereas it shoald have been
in the value of $290.00. Said taxpayer is to Be allowed a credit of $3.15.
1~. Thromgh error, San Mateo County Title Co., Redwood City, California, w~s not assessed as the
owner of lot 51, Pecks Heights No. 1, having au as~e~ed value of $100.00. Said property is to be added to
the assessment roll and a tax in the amount of $1,66 is to be assessed a~ainst said property.
BE IT l~ii~__~ RESOL~ that with respect to Item No. 3 above it is hereby ordered that SlI~P T0~EL
SERVICE AND ~JPPLY COMPANY be aasessad as the owners of personal property having an assessed value of
The City Clerk of said City, as the ex-officio Assessor thereof, is hereby instructed to make the
above designated corrections to the official assessment roll for the fiscal year 195~-1955.
I hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was regularly introduced and adopted by the City Council
of the City off $omth San Francisco at a regular meeting held this 6th d~y of December, 195~, by the following vote
3?O
AYES: COUNC~ Andrew Rotc&, Franc~s Lucchio, Telfor(1 Smith, Richa.vxt C, amlen
NOES: " N~
~: " ~o C~si
ATTEST:
AR'f~UR A. RODONDI, CITY CLER~