Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Minutes 1982-10-06 ~'NUT£$ SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Regular Meeting October 6, 1982 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Community Room, Municipal Services Building CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Roberta Cerri Teglia called the South San Francisco Redevelop- ment meeting to order at 7:16 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Roberta Cerri Teglia, Vice Chairman Mark N. Addiego; Members Ronald G. Acosta, Emanuele N. Damonte, and Gus Nicolopulos Also present: Executive Director/Secretary C. Walter Birkelo; Assistant Secretary Louis Dell'Angela; Agency Treasurer Barry Lipton; Director of Public Services Robert Yee; Agency Counsel Herman Fitzgerald; representative from Bartle Wells, Laura Stovall; Bond Counsel Stephen Cassaleggio; representatives from Wilsey & Ham, George Homolka and Dayo Sowunmi; from Homart Development Company, John Aguilar and Charles Berling. A( CY REVIEW: Executive Director Birkelo stated that there was nothing to add to the evening's agenda. APPROVAL OF Member Damonte moved, seconded by Vice Chairman Addiego, that the Minutes MINUTES: of the Regular Meeting of September 15, 1982, be approved. Motion, as made and seconded, was unanimously approved. APPROVAL OF ~.lember Nicolopulos moved, seconded by Vice Chairman Addiego, that the claims BILLS: as submitted for payment, be approved. Motion, as made and seconded, was unanimously approved. ENGINEER'S REPORT Executive Director Birkelo stated that this item also appears on Council's GATEWAY ASSESS- agenda this evening for action. This item is on the Agency's agenda as MENT DISTRICT and informational item for the Board's review. ST-82-2 Mr. Birkelo stated that back in 1981, the Redevelopment Agency received a report regarding funding concepts which were embodied in the Owner Parti- cipation Agreement. One concept called for the use of an assessment district to cover the costs of providing offsite improvements for the Gateway Project, with the exception of the East Grand Avenue Grade Sepa- ration Project the funding for which was authorized separately. Mr. Birkelo further explained that the Engineer's Report contained updated and refined estimates and, in addition, some additional work, i.e., the auxiliary lane on Bayshore Freeway and the Gateway Boulevard Extension Project. It has not yet been decided to go forward with the latter project. It is, however, ENGINEER'S REPORT included in the scope of work for the Gateway Assessment District, He G,'-~.WAY ASSESS- explained that the potential figures were somewhat higher for the Gateway Mi 'DISTRICT Boulevard Extension Project than was previously anticipated. S° ~2-2 (Continued) After a detailed explanation of the Owner Participation Agreement which sets forth the Agency's funding mechanism, Mr. Yee, Director of Public Services, traced the progress which has been made since July 7, 1982, when resolutions were adopted to create an assessment district and appoint Wilsey & Ham, consulting engineers, to undertake the project. He stated that the engineer's Report, as well as Phase I Plan, had been completed and were ready for authorization to go to bid. He detailed the improve- ments and amount of assessable acreage in the first phase. He commented that the second phase which includes the auxiliary lane and Gateway Ex- tension will be ready for consideration within a year. Mr. George Homolka, Design Engineer for the Assessment District, explained the proposed improvements which would be funded by the District. In answer to the Board's inquiry, Mr. Homolka explained that net buildable area was used for spreading the assessment. He stated that in cases where parcels are heavily encumbered by landscaping, the total assessment cost was less since the net buildable area was less. The Board addressed the matter of the maintenance of on-site landscaping which would become the responSibility of the land owners' association. The medians on East Grand Avenue and Oyster Point Boulevard would be the City's maintenance responsibility. Homart has agreed in the Owner Participation Agreement to maintain the median on Gateway Boulevard. REVIE OF PARCEL Executive Director Birkelo explained that the assessment district map MAPS NOS. 82-201, reflects parcel map splits which have not yet been approved by the City. 82-202, 82-293 GATEWAY PROJECT Assistant Secretary Dell'Angela indicated that there appeared to be no problem with the two parcel maps' splitting Lots 3 and 8. He added that the parcel map affecting Lot 5 has been withdrawn, and the assessment district map should be corrected accordingly. COMMENTS RE Mr. Yee briefly informed the Board of the November 10 date for bids to be AWARDS OF BIDS received, and December 1 for the hearing date and tentative award date. AND FUNDING Executive Director Birkelo commented on the overall funding. He stated that the $26 million shown was the upper limit of what was expected to be considered given the scope of work. He assured the Board that that many bonds would not be sold in the first phase to do the work. He remarked on the restrictions of Proposition 13 and stated that the City's share of the assessment district would be approximately 30 percent. Mr. Birkelo next requested that the following City Council meeting be adjourned to Tuesday, October 12, 1982, 4:30 p.m. to receive the bids for the East Grand Avenue Overcrossing Project. 10/6/82 Page 2 GOOD AND WELFARE: Chairman Teglia invited anyone to speak under Good and Welfare. No one offered to speak. A! }URNMENT: Member Acosta moved, seconded by Member Damonte~ that the meeting be adjourned, Motion, as made and seconded, was unanimously carried. Time of adjournment: 7:45 p.m. -'R~erta Cerri Teglia, Ch~i~nan South San Francisco Redeve?opment Agency RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, C. Walter Executive Director/Secretary South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency The entries of this Redevelopment Agency meeting show the action taken by the Board to dispose of the item. Oral presentations, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the office of the City Manager and available fe-=-inspection, review, and copying. 10/6/82 Page 3