Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Minutes 1982-11-17 M I N U T E S SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Regular Meeting November 17, 1982 TIME: 7:00 p.m. PLACE: Community Room, Municipal Services Building CALL TO ORDER: Chairman Roberta Cerri Teglia called the South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency meeting to order at 7:19 p.m. ROLL CALL: Present: Chairman Roberta Cerri Teglia; Vice Chairman Mark N. Addiego; Members Ronald G. Acosta, Emanuele N. Damonte, Gus Nicolopulos Also present: Executive Director/Secretary C. Walter Birkelo, Assistant Secretary Louis Dell'Angela, Treasurer Barry Lipton, Director of Public Services Robert Yee, representatives from Homart Development Company and engineering firm, Wilsey & Ham. AGENDA REVIEW: Executive Director Birkelo stated that the agreement with Burns International Security Services was on Council's agenda for action and that it was appro- priate to discuss it at this Agency meeting. He suggested that this be added as 4 (a). He requested that an Item 4 (b) also be added: information on the bids received this afternoon for the Gateway Assessment District. As there were no objections, it was so ordered. APPROVAL OF Member Damonte moved, seconded by Member Nicolopulos, that the Minutes MINUTES: of the regular meetings of October 27 and November 3, 1982, be approved. Motion, as made and seconded, was unanimously carried. CONSTRUCTION Director of Public Services Yee recalled the negotiation of the contract MANAGEMENT FOR for the East Grand Avenue project and the Construction Management contract E. GRAND GRADE with CH2M Hill which would allow this firm to oversee the construction SEPARATION project. He stated that the total fee for Construction Management project PROJECT ST-80-3 was not to exceed $650,000 on a time-and-expenses basis. He addressed two matters before the Board: The first was a recommendation to adopt a resolution authorizing execu- tion of Supplement No. 2 to the agreement with CH2M Hill, not to exceed $650,000 for work up to and including September 14, 1984. Should the contractor complete the work before this'date, there would be no problem, Mr. Yee commented. He stated that should it extend beyond this date, the Agency would have to negotiate with the consultants for additional time and cost. The second issue concerned the manufacturing of the bridge itself in Japan. He stated that the $650,000 does not include expenses for the CONSTRUCTION consultant to 90 to Japan; however, under "Specifications," the contractor IvJABAGEMENT FOR will rebate to the City the amount of $60,000 to cover this expense. I GRAND AVE.GRADE Mr. Yee cautioned that this amount may or may not cover this additional ' 'ARATION expense but felt that Supplement No. 2 was no different from the previous i..JJECT ST-80-3 one. He remarked that the City Attorney had reviewed the contract, and (Continued) Mr. William O'Leary, CH2M Hill, was present to answer any questions. The Agency Board questioned the necessity of on-site inspections and was answered that it is the renuirement of the specifications. Vice Chairman Addiego next inquired about Task 4.0 on page 2 of the Supplement which noted that attendance of meetings was stipulated up to a total of ten. Mr. Yee remarked that Staff and the consultants did not feel there would be more than ten, and even less were anticipated. Next discussed was the formula of fabrication of steel beyond 3,000 miles and the charge per pound of steel to be rebated. Mr. Yee remarked about the satisfaction of Caltrans had with the construction of the Antioch Bridge by this Japanese firm. In answer to Member Acosta's request for information on possible delays in the completion of the project through "Acts of God," strikes, etc., Mr. William O'Leary, CH2M Hill, stated that there were provisions in the contract which would speak to that situation; that the amount of the contract would be no more than $650,000; and should circumstances neces- sitate their working beyond that date, they would negotiate with Staff for whatever reasonable costs would be involved. City Attorney Robert Rogers explained the provision in the contract which contains a termination clause of 15 days for any reason. RESO. NO. 38 Member Damonte moved, seconded by Vice Chairman Addiego, that the Reso- AUTHORIZING EXECU- lution entitled: "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF SUPPLEMENT NO. 2 TION OF SUPPLEMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH CH2M HILL FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RELATED TO NO. 2 - CH2M Hill EAST GRAND AVENUE GRADE SEPARATION," be approved and adopted. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Members Ronald G. Acosta, Mark N. Addiego, Emanuele N. Damonte, Gus Nicolopulos, and Roberta Cerri Teglia. Noes, none. Absent, none. DISCUSSION RE Executive Director Birkelo stated that the proposed contract for pro- BURNS INTERNA- fessional services with Burns Consulting Services, division of Burns TIONAL SECURITY International Security Services, Inc., required no Board action and was SERVICES, INC. fully explained in the Staff Report from the Chief of Police in Council's agenda. The Board was assured that this was not a reimbursable item to Homart Development Company.. RECEIPT OF BIDS Director of Public Services Yee commented on the'seven bids received this GATEWAY ASSESSMENT day on the Gateway Assessment District which ranged from $8.1 million to DISTRICT $10.2 million. He stated that there was a question with one of the bids, and he was consulting with the City Attorney to resolve the matter and -- proceed with the award of contract. 11/17/82 Page 2 i ~EIPT OF BIDS Executive Director Birkelo remarked that the bids were substantially i 'EWAY ASSESSMENT below the Engineer's estimate, that there were other estimated costs that DISTRICT are percentages of the contruction, and that the "ripple" effect would (Continued) bring the total of the first stage bo,d ~ale considerably below the amount previously discussed, ~probably, in the $16-17-million range. GOOD & WELFARE: Chairman Teglia invited anyone in the audience to speak. Mr. John Aguilar, Project Director of Homart Development Company, spoke concerning the Grade Separation project. He stated that he felt time was being lost from the August 1 date and hoped that the contract with Dan Caputo, low bidder, would be accelerated. He requested to know when the Notice of Proceed would be issued to Mr. Caputo. Mr. Yee replied that he felt no time had been lost. He stated that the official date would be Monday, November 22, 1982. He remarked that the contractors desired to start after Thanksgiving, but November 22 is the date set. He further spoke about the "behind-the-scenes" coordination and scheduling which had been taking place. ADJOURNMENT: As there were no further speakers, Member Damonte moved, seconded by Vice Chairman Addiego, that the meeting be adjourned. Motion, as made and seconded, was unanimously approved. Time of adjournment: 7:58 p.m. ~o~erta Cerri Teglia, Chairman South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, C. W~Tter Birkelo, Executive Director/Secretary South San Francisco Redevelopment Agency The entries of this Redevelopment AGency meeting show the action taken by the Board to dispose of the item. Oral presentations, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the office of the City Manager and available f~--inspections, review, and copying. 11 / 17/82 Page 3