HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Minutes 1991-09-11 Chairman Jack Drago M I N U T E S
Boardmembers:
Richard A. Haffey Redevelopment Agency
Gus Nicolopulos
John R. Penna Municipal Services Building
?-Roberta Cerri Teglia
Community Room
September 11, 1991
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) 7:25 p.m. Chairman Drago presiding.
ROLL CALL: Boardmembers present: Haffey,
Nicolopulos,
enna, and Drago.
Boardmembers absent: Tegl ia.
AGENDA REVIEW AGENDA REVIEW
Executive Director Armas stated that
there were no changes to the Agenda.
CONSENT CALENDAR CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Motion to approve the Minutes of the Approved.
Regular Meeting of 8/14/91.
2. Motion to confirm expense claims , Removed from the Consent Calendar for
of 9/11/91. discussion by Boardmember Penna.
M/S Haffey/Penna - To approve the
Consent Calendar with the exception of
Item 2..
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
2. Motion to confirm expense claims Boardmember Penna questioned the claim
of 9/11/91. of Kaysten Marsten & Assoc. for $14,300
for Price Club services.
Executive Director Armas stated that in
the past both Bodies had approved the
retaining of this firm to evaluate pro-
perty proposals and develop counter pro-
posals in the vicinity of Airport Blvd.
and Belle Air Road. He stated that the
primary tenant was looking at other pro-
perty, but had incurred this during the
preparati on.
Boardmember Penna expressed concern that
the City had not seen anything for the
expenditure of $14,300.00.
9/11/91
Page i
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
--2. Motion - Continued. Executive Director Armas stated that
$25,000-30,000 had been authorized for
the whole thing and the final stage had
not been reached. He stated that the
Agency should be careful of what was said
in open session because of the financial
ramifications, etc.
Boardmember Haffey questioned when the
Agency could expect to see a project or
an end result from this firm.
Executive Director Armas stated that it
would probably be in January.
Boardmember Penna stated that 1,430 hours
was represented, but he had not seen any
of the work.
Boardmember Haffey questioned if this
particular Boardmember would see anything
on this because of a conflict, but the
balance of the Board would.
Executive Director Armas stated that he
would embellish the work in writing for
the Boardmembers.
M/S Haffey/Nicolopulos - To confirm the
expense claims of 9/11/91 in the amount
of $16,068.50.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
Resolution authorizing agreement ~o~ Finance Director Margolis stated that
3.
with the City to create a joint this was an agreement with the City to
powers authority to serve as a create a joint powers authority to serve
vehicle for issuing bonds for con- as a vehicle for the conference center
ference center construction, financing which had to rely solely on
special T.O.T., and the bond holders
A RESOLUTION APPROVING JOINT would never have a call on the General
EXERCISE OF POWERS AGREEMENT WITH Fund. She explained the recommendation
THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND from the financial advisor to form the
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION THEREOF JPA to issue bonds, and the City has an
agreement and will pay the special
T.O.T. as required to meet the debt ser-
vices. She stated that staff would come
back in future meetings with more details
on the issuance of bonds.
Boardmember Haffey pointed out that the
9/11/91
Page 2
AGENDA ACTTON TAKEN
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
3. Resolution - Continued. City would need this vehicle for
financing regardless of where the con-
ference center is located or what it will
look like.
Director of Finance Margolis stated that
this only sets up the Agency that has
the authority to issue bonds.
Boardmember Teglia Arrived: Boardmember Teglia arrived at the meeting
at 7:18 p.m.
Boardmember Haffey stated that this was a
vote only for a conference center,
wherever it is located, and he felt the
last sentence in the staff report gave
a lot of latitude in the future in
reference to financing of other things,
and proceeded to compliment staff.
Boardmember Penna questioned what the
collateral was for the bonds.
Director of Finance Margolis responded
that there was none per se, and it was
the agreement that had the obligation to
pay future tax proceeds and rely on main-
taining that agreement between the City
and the JPA for the use of the facility.
She stated that the security was a piece
of paper saying we will pay you out of
the special tax for debt service as pri-
mary payment -- like lease financing, and
it does not create outstanding debt for
future proceeds from use of buildings,
and does not create outstanding debt for
individual members of the JPA.
Executive Director Armas stated that at
such time as authorization was given, the
owners of those bonds can look at only
one thing to pay them for their invest-
ment and that one thing is the hotel tax
associated with the $2.50 T.O.T. - that
is the only thing to which they can lay
claim.
Boardmember Penna questioned how this
affected bonding by the Agency for any
other project.
9/11/91
Page 3
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
--ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
3. Resolution - Continued. Finance Director Margolis stated that it
in no way created an obligation for
outstanding debt for the Agency, and that
under JPA laws the responsibility of cre-
dit for the JPA does not have any affect
on the individual members.
Boardmember Penna commented that the JPA
needed to repay the bond through the
funds it receives through the T.O.T. and
it receives from the hotels and the pro-
ceeds from the conference center.
Executive Director Armas stated no, it
was just from the hotel tax - the supple-
mental hotel tax - not the 8% T.O.T.
Boardmember Penna surmised that the hotel
tax would be somewhere over a million
dollars on an annual basis.
Director of Finance Margolis responded
yes with the debt service being a smaller
portion.
Boardmember Penna commented that there
would also be the expenses to run the
facility, and questioned what would hap-
pen if the City could not pay the
expenses.
Executive Director Armas stated that the
creation of this entity had nothing to do
with that question - the entity was
simply a vehicle to allow the bonds to be
sold. He stated that when the bonds are
sold they will advise the prospective
investors that there was only one claim,
which was the supplemental hotel tax.
Boardmember Penna commented that never
the less the City had the operation of
the entire facility which not only had to
do with the repayment of the bonds, but
had to do with the lease payments on the
property, plus parking lots to be leased
and the total liability.
Executive Director Armas stated that the
9/11/91
Page 4
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
--ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
3. Resolution - Continued. JPA the Agency was dealing with tonight
was not addressing those aspects.
Boardmember Penna stated that he
understood there were two issues here
tonight, one was the JPA that would
address the bonds, however, the money
that was going into the JPA was money
from the hotels - $2.50, and that money
was also being used to operate the
facility whether or not you have the JPA.
Finance Director Margolis stated that the
agreement would make the debt service
payment a primary obligation of the tax
payment, so the tax payment must go first
for the debt service payment.
Boardmember Penna stated that you are
saying the bonds will be guaranteed, that
the first amount off the top goes towards
paying them off, but you are not pro-
tecting the City in terms of any opera-
tional costs if there is a shortfall,
then the General Fund would still have to
make up the shortfall.
Director of Finance Margolis stated that
a bond issue is a contract saying you
will do it, and they were trying to pro-
tect the General Fund.
Boardmember Penna stated that you have a
full operation which the JPA is trying to
secure and was just one part of it, and
you still have a full operation that
operates the center - which means all the
expenses for salaries and operations
including lease payments for the land,
payments for the building and the bonds.
He stated that the only thing this
agreement was saying is that there will
De a joint powers agreement with
guaranteed payment of the bonds before
anything else gets paid. He again
expressed concern over who would pay
when there was a shortfall for the center
and the T.O.T., which is the $2.50 tax,
is not enough and the proceeds that come
in from the operations is not enough to
pay for all the costs.
9/11/91
Page 5
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
--ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
3. Resolution - Continued. Executive Director Armas stated that the
Council was presented a financial
analysis in January which projected three
things: the debt service, the lease for
the various facilities, and operational
expenses. He stated that balanced
against that was the revenue that was
coming in - both the income associated
with the hotel tax together with income
from the operating facility. He stated
that the analysis if carried out pre-
sented a positive situation, with income
exceeding expenses. He stated that the
condition was not being altered here,
and the Council on a split vote had
recognized that the analysis showed that
it continued to be positive. He stated
that the key question to come ultimately
would be dealt with in October, and that
was will we award the contract given the
bid you receive, and thereby authorize
the bonds which will influence what the
final numbers will be because the bids
will indicate whether they are attractive
or not; and the condition of the market
will indicate if the City was getting
good rates or not.
Boardmember Penna felt that the Executive
Director was skirting the issue because
the question was - how do you pick up and
pay for all the costs in that box called
conference center. He stated that the
Executive Director was saying that pro-
jected revenues were based on a skimpy
type of market analysis that was never
proven to be true. He stated that his
main question was, what happens if we end
up not having enough revenue coming in to
pay for all costs that are in the box
called conference center -- who picks it
up.
Executive Director Armas reiterated his
earlier remarks on the financial
analysis.
Boardmember Penna remembered that the
City had signed a contract saying it
9/11/91
Page 6
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
--ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
3. Resolution - Continued. would be the underwriter, and if there
wasn't enough money coming in to pay for
the total cost of this conference center,
then the City was the underwriter.
Finance Director Margolis stated she
could not see any instance wherein the
City could not repay the bonds, and the
City was obligating itself with the debt
service.
Vice Chairman Nicolopulos stated that he
also felt that Boardmember Penna's
question had not been addressed, and felt
that this was all predicated on assump-
tions.
Boardmember Haffey stated that the action
this evening was to adopt the resolution
that created a JPA for the conference
center, and all five Boardmembers had
agreed that they wanted the center.
M/S Haffey/Teglia - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 4-91
Carried by majority roll call vote,
Boardmembers Penna and Nicolopulos voted
no,
GOOD AND WELFARE GOOD AND WELFARE
No one chose to speak.
CLOSED SESSION CLOSED SESSION
4. Closed Session for the purpose of The Agency chose not to hold a Closed
the discussion of personnel Session.
matters, labor relations,
property negotiations and
litigation.
M/S Haffey/Teglia - To adjourn the
meeting.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
9/11/91
Page 7
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
--ADJOURNMENT Time of adjournment was 7:35 p.m.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, APPROVED.
Barbara A. Battaya, ~-~'ack Drago, Chair~n
Redevelopment Agency f /Redevelopment Agency
City of South San Francisco //City of South San Francisco
The entries of this Agency meeting show the action taken by the Redevelopment Agency to
dispose of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape.
The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk
and are available for inspection, review and copying.
g/ll/91
Page 8