The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMinutes 1954-03-24PLACE: TIME: CALL TO ROLL CALL: L. B. i~;ltD~w. USE PE~t~/T: TEXAS CO. USE PERMIT: FREEWAY ~d~TENANCE RESOLUTION NO. 1992 ISSUANCE OF BONDS S~JOND LANE I~P: 73 DEED City Th~ ~ting ~a~ called to °frier at 2:45 p. m. by Mayor Corte$i. Present: Councilman John Nooman, ~ailio 0ort~sit Telfoa~l Smith A~sen~: Councilman Adolph ~emi, Joseph Braces ~Couneil~mn Sani alspeared at 2:47 p. m.) Th~ firs% matter l~ng ~ the previous meeting w~ ~se ~ermit ~380 as appli~ for by L. B. ~ ~ ~eei~ ~ ~ Pi~ 0~i~, ~~i~ t~t ~ ~ ~~i~ ~ ~t a d~b~ f~ n~n st~ ~ x ~' ~ ~ p~ ~ t~ of the B~ ~t~1~, ~ ~ ai~ 1~ x ~" ~ ~e of ~di~, l~a~d at 2B7 ~ C~no Re~. C~i~ N~ ~, ~e~ by O~ci~ ~ ~ ~~ly c~ied, t~t t~ rece- Ption ~ ~ P~~ C~sai~ ~ ~o~. U~e Permit ~82 a~ applied f~r by the Texas Os. vms received fr~a the Planning Commission, gr~i~ t~ l~ex~i~ion to r~habilita~e their service station and relocate their banjo sign: located at tbs southeast corner of Baden & Airport Blvd. Co~ilman Noonan moved, seconded by Oouncitmmn S~ith a~d ~egmlarly carried, that th~ reecmaaendation of the Planning C_~mntssion tm accel. O~ieatio~ ~e r~eeived frem the office of the Oity Maker regarding the mew maintenance, a~&, -ut offered to the city by the Division of Hig~ya for the city's part of the freeway. Councilman Noo~an ~ek~d if it ~ in line with the ovex~J.1 plan of other cities to which City Manager N~Olu~ replied that no others '~re different. He remarked on the bids that the State wished to call for for the work on tke pillars. At 2:47 p. m. Councilman Sani appeare~ in the meeting amd was present for the duration. 0i~y Attorney L~ appeared at 2:50 la. m. ami was present for the ~zrati~. He was then given the maintenance agree~ent'which had been discussed f~r study and remarked that the council eeulA amthorism by oral motion lJ, assage of this a~nt and resolution to be drafted. ~. ~s ex~lained re~ng tbs maintenance a~ ~he city's obligation. City Attorney Lyons re~ t~t t~ city benefits so~t by this agreement. Councilman Nooman then moved that in vier of t~ fact tha~ ~ Cit~y Ma~ City Attorney, a~ Director of Public Works Goss lima mo e~Jeetion ~o th~s a~nt~ he moved ~h~ a~nt be entere~ into. Councilman Smi1~h ~eee~ded t~ motion, which was regularly cma-tied. Ci~y Att~mrney Lyoaa then brought mp the resolutien providing for the issuance of improvement bc~xlS f~ ~eeo~d La~e Improvement. After a brief explamatzion try the City Attorney, roll call vote w~s aa follows: Ayes, ~omm~ilmma Noonan, ~ani~ Cortesi~,Smlth; Noes, none; Absent, Councilman Braces. 01fy A~y Lyons next brought up the resolution regaxxling the acceptance of a deed for eer~n pro~r~ in Westview Terrace ~ubdivielou ~1 ~o be ~sed for the installation of storm drain facilities. I~e ex~laim~d the ~A' in which title wa~ to be held by the city. Mr. Goss ex.olained rega~i~ the si;rip of la~l obtain, that the li~e ha~ been put in last week. He i~r remarked ~hat ~he racoon it ha~ mot been lar~, in before was due to the fact t~_h~__t an easement ~ to ~e obtained. Oouneilman ~aith then a~sd rega~dl~ accepting the land for easement p~rpoees te which Mr. Go~s re~lie~ that it vms an cea. ~ut for pipe line and street. City Att~ Lyons remarked that the olty vomld owa the la~ outright. Councilman Smith 1~' inq~lire~ if the $10,~O0.~0 would be a sufficient amount for a line in the area to which Mr. Oo~s repli~ that it woal~. Mr. ~oas them e~plai~ the needed improvements of the streets in West~iew Terrace. Councilman Noenan stmted that a eompl~ picture in the subdi- vision shoald be obtained before acceptance. City Atto~ Lyens ex~lainad that this was the acceptance of an e~s~-.--;ut caxly ms the city ~ aoee~i~g title to the land. Councilman ~mith asked Direeter of Public Works Goss if when the street had been pat in,s.treet levels had-been eha~, was this easement on the high si~e of the street. Mr. Goss replied that it was not a~ it was e~ the east side or' level side of the street, explaining how the five foot emaement ea~e into being. 0o~ncilman Noonan then a~ked Mr. Ooss if he suggested the city follow this resolution to which he replied, yes. Oou~ilman Noenan introduced a reso-' lution of the City C~ucil of thru City of South San Francisco accepting a deed from Teresa Uccelli to certain proparty located in Westview Terre~e Sub. ~1 for the installation of storm drainage facilities in said City of South San Pr~ncisco. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilman Noonan, ~ani, Cortesi, Smith; Noes, none$ Absent, Councilman Bracco. RESOLUTION NO. 1994 ACCEPTING LYONS DRRD VICTORY AVE. IMP: VD, RESOLUTION NO. 1995 GRANTING D~ TO CALIF. WATER 8~VICE VICTORY AVE. IMP: INDUSTRIAL S~ERS: City Attorney Lyons next explained the resolution for an easement in the Victory Avenue Improvement of storm drain work. Councilman Suni iutr~ed a resolution of the City Council of the City of South San Francisco accepting a deed from William W. Lyons whereby said City is granted, in conjunction with the Housing Authority of the City of South San Francisco, a subsurface easement for the installation of storm drains~e facilities in connection with the improvement of Victory Avenue iu said City. CoUncilman Smith asked regarding the Joint deed between the city and the Liu~euville Housing Authority, if provisos had. been made as to who would be responsible for the maintenance. City Attorney Ly~as explained the pipe that was already in place and the survey which was made regarding the increase of width. He further remarked that the m~iutema~ce ~ to ~e taken care of by the persons who had their respective pipes in the easement. Roll ca~l vote w~s a~ follows: Ayes, Councilman Noonan, Sani, Cortesi, Smith; Noes, sons; Absent, Cem~t~au Brmcco. ' City Attormey Lyoz~ ~z~c.~ breught ap the resolution regarding t~ ~nting to t~ C~ifo~ia ~r Se~ ~y t~ Ci~ of ~th ~ F~i~o ~asion to ~e a subs~face ease~nt for p~es of ~~~ ~ to t~ Lind~~ ~i~ ~oJect a~ P~ Vi~e H~i~ P~J~t, ~~ t~ ~sol~iou in ~,11. Oome~ ~ ~ t~t ~ ~ like to s~ f~ ~ ~c~ ~t ~ dj6 u~ ~ or ~ ~aed ~i~ ~ ~c~tance of t~ Ho~i~ Am~~, t~t ~ ci~ ~d ~ to ~liuqulah ~ Amenity in t~e ~s, ~ain s~ting t~t ~ ~ not ~eu n~ifi~ of this ~tter. City Atto~ Lyes e~ine~ ~i~ t~ ~ ~wnt ~ ~ b~ en~d into in 1~9 ~~ ~ accep~nce of t~ H~i~ ~thorit2 ~ ~t t~ Go~~t ~ J~t got~ ~ to t~ ~t~r n~. He ~r e~imed ~- ~i~ t~ ~ti~ ~eh ~ ~n ~ld J~t ~eently ~n ~rs of ~ City Co~cil and ~ ~i~ Amt~. C~i~ ~ith a~d ~t t~a ~ ~ ~timg ~ ~fer~ to, at~ ~y ~. Rio~ ~ ~r~ of t~ Oi~ Council, in ~ch no ~ntion ~ ~e at t~t t~ ~t t~ city ~ ~ to ~lin~ t~a ~thori~ ~in ~e ~s. ~ ~r ~~ ~t It a~ it ~ ~ t~ city's obl~ti~ to ~ve t~ ~ldi~s ~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ itu ~~ a~. Ci~ Atto~ ~ ~~d on ~ ~ of m~y ~ch ~ to~ ~ ia ~~ f~ ~ ~ d~~. ~or 0o~i s~~ ~t an e~t~ ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~ ef ~ b~i~ ~f~ ~c~ti~ ~ ~~nt City ~r Me~l~ ~aid that ~me city ~ad an $1~ti~ ~ ~ti~ t~ p~oes. Ci~ A~ ~ ~id t~t ~ H~i~ ~ity ~ ~ ~uty of ~ati~ t~ ~eiden~. City Att~y ~ a~ ~t ~olition of ~e bmi~s ~ go ~ t~ hi~at bidder. O~i~ ~ t~n iu~ed a ~soluti~ ~f ~ City 0~il of ~ Ci~ of South ~n ~i.~ ~i~ to C~if~ia Wa~r ~~ ~~, a p~ eo~ti~, ~ission to ~e a s~a~e ~z ~at ~ f~ t~~ ~ i~i~ a~ ~in~ini~ a ~r ~in to ~ ~ f~ a~l~ ~r to ~ ~ ~ ~ "Li~~e N~i~ P~Ject" and "P~u Vi~ H~i~ P~Jeet" ~ a~~i~ ~ ~ ~i~ o~ny s~ deci~. C~ncil- ~m ~ ~~ ~i~ P~ V~ ~i~ ti~ ~ ~th ~m~e bat ~ infold ~t it did mot tie ~ ~ city f~ ~y ~t~ $1~ti~. ~ c~ vo~ ~ ~ fo~: ~a, O~i~ N~, ~mi, Co~ai, ~th; About, O~~ ~eco; N~a, None. Councilman Nooman then remar]m~ re~a~ding a resolution which was supposed to have been pre,eared for b~m~ sales in ~ industrial sewmr area, remarking relative to the engineer's fees o~ the work to be d~ae. 0o~ncilman Suni stated that t2~ meetings had been scheduled at 2:~0, 3:~0, a~d 4:~0 p. m. to take mp the~e matter~ an~ that the meeting should not be delay. Cemmeilman Noeuan re, masted to k~ h~w mash ~ attorney fees for this project w~re to ~aich Cil~ Att~A~ey ~e~lie~ ~ of the centrust ~riee. Councilman Noouan then re- qmeste~ to k~o~ if the manufacturers h~d agree~ to ~ this amount to w~ich City Attorney Ly~ re~aa~e~ that they had agreed to 2~ of t~e contract ~riee. After a discussion between the City A ~toruey a~d members of the co~il regarding ~a2ment of the attormey fees and the seriousness of the project, Councilman Noo~an moved that this matter be called to the atten- t-ion of the mamufaet~arers re~mA~Ling pa2ment of 2~ of the contract price for attorney fees, also .informing them t~at ~y had no obligatieu to ~ ~he ~ fee but that it could be subject to e~il ~eelelom. 0ouncilmaa Smith seeonde~ the .motion. Councilman ~ami remarked that this di~e~sieu w~ only a l~oli~ical move, asking Mr. G~ss if this w~a the usual procedure follY. Mr. Go~s replied regardimg ~he sehadule~ ehaa~s as c~rged by the engineers and that it w~e msmally c~etcmary for the attermey to receive ~. City Attorney Lyons again re- m~rked regarding the liability of the a~toruey om this project. Councilman Suni stated that ha felt t~m fees due ~o the l~er~ons doing the work ~re Just. Motion as ms~e and seconded warn r~a~ly carried. C~ilman ~ am~ ~r Cortesi did no~ cast their vote. Council- man S~ith r~markmd tha~ althe~gh he ~ not involved in the project and speakimg as a manu- faetmre~ and a c~il ~r, suggested that economy be practiced at all t~s. 0o~cilman ~ani moved, ~econded by Councilman Smith and regularly carried, that the meeting Time ~f A~Jo~rmmmut - 3:~8 p. m. Respectfully submitted, 0try Clerk