Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1964-09-2165 . REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO HELD MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 21, 196£ TIME: PLACE: CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION: ROLL CALL: MINUTES: CLAIMS: PARKING DISTRICT NO. 1 CLAIMS: BUTLER ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CLAIMS: CABOT, CABOT & FORBES IND. PARK, UNIT NO. 1 CLAIM: PROCLAMATION -- NATIONAL PUBLIC WORKS WEEK - SEPT. 26 TO OCT. 4, 1964: RESOLUTION NO. 4052 1964 BAY AHEA CRUSADE: RESOLUTION NO. 4053 MUNI IMPR. BONDS 1963 CONSTRUCTION FUND: 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall The meeting was called to order by ~yor Patrick E. Ahern at 3:0? p.m. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited. The invocation was given by Reverend Carl E. Curtright of First Assembly of God Church in place of Reverend A1Bugelmauu of the Immanuel Baptist Church. Present: Absent: Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. None. Mayor Ahem at this time asked if there was a motion approvin~ ~he minutes of the adjourned regular meetin~ of August !31, 19~4, and the regular meeting of September 8, 196~. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Bertucelli and regularly carried, that the minutes of the adjourned regular meetin~ of August 31, 1964, and the regular meeting of September 8, 196~, be approved as submitted. Mayor Ahern then asked if there was a motion approving the regu- lar claims as submitted for payment. Councilman Bertucelli moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the regular claims totaling $25!,645.70 be approved for payment. Mayor Ahern then asked if there was a motion approving the claims for Parking District No. 1 as submitted for payment. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regu- Larly carried, that the claims as submitted for ParkingI District No. l, totaling $4,168.55, be approved for payment. Butler Road Assessment District Claims: ia) Southern Pacific Company claim dated September 16,1964, iu the amount of $13,500.00 for right of way acquisition - Butler Road. (b) Enterprise-Journal claim dated September 9, 1964, iu the amount of $19.40 for legal adve?tising. ~Councilman Bertucelli moved, seconded by Councilman RozZi and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for the~Butler Road Assessment District be approved for payment. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Parx, Unit No. 1 Claim: Enterprise-Journal claim dated September 2, 1964, in the amount of $12.50 for legal advertising. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by ~ouncilman Bertucelli and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 1 be approved for payment. The City Clerk announced that a Proclamation had been prepared declarin~ the week of September 26 to October 4, 1964, as "NATIONA~ PUBLIC WORKS WEE~'. The Mayor so proclaimed. City Attorney Noonan explained the first resolution which had been prepared for Council action, after which Councilman Rozzi introduced: "CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISC0~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE UNITED BAY AREA CRUSADE 1964". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, ~oue. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution, after which Councilman Bertucelli introduced: ".DITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ADVANCE FROM THE SEWER RENTAL RESERVE FUND TO THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT BONDS OF 1963 CONSTRUCTION FUND AND PROVIDING FOR REPAYMENT". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Aheru, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. 655 RESOLUTION NO. 4054 VICTOR S. SWANSON EASEMENT - SEWAGE PLANT: ~ity Attorney Noonau explained the next resolution, after which ~ouncilman Rocca introduced: "CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT FP.OM VICTOR S. SWANSON AND .ANNIE J. SWANSON, HIS WIFE". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Ahem, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and .3uido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. RESOLUTION NO. 4055 SOLOMON- AB ANNEXATION HEARING (COUNTRY CLUB PARK) City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution, after which Councilman Rozzi introduced: "CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A PESOLUTION GIVING NOTICE OF 2ROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO ~0F UNIN- HABITED TERRITORY DESCRIBED HEREIN AND DESIGNATED 'SOLOMON-MABIE ANNEXATION (COUNTRY CLUB PARK)' AND GIVING NOTICE OF TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING PROTESTS THERETO". RESOLUTION NO. 4056 SOLOMON-MA~IE ANNEXATION - PLANNING COMMISSION: Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen PatriCk E. /he,u, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, land Guido J. ROzzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained the text resolution, aft.er which Councilman Bertucelli introduced: "CITY COUNCIL, CITY ~0F SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A RESOLUTION REFERRING TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION FOR REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THE PRO- POSED ANNEXATION OF UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED 'SOLOMON- MABIE ANNF~XATION (COUNTRY CLUB PARK)'". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Aheru, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. RESOLUTION NO. 40~7 REASSESSMENTHEAR1NG INDUSTRIAL PARK NO. 3: ORDINANCE -- ~ ! ~ 7 REZONING BALBI ~ 0 ~ PROPERTY: 2nd Reading/Adoption City Attorney Noonan explained the ~ext resolution, after which Councilman Rocca introduced: "A RESOLUTION FIXING TIME. AND PLACE OF HEARING ON REASSESSMENT ANE PROVIDING NOTICE - INDUS- TRIAL PARK UNIT NO. 3". Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Patrick E. Aheru, Frank Bertucelli, Emilio Cort~si, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan commented that the Director of Public Works had prepared a cost figure for off site improvements with regard zo the following three ordinances, which were ready fori second reading and adoption: ORDINANCE -- ~ / ~ ~ "AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN AND KNOWN AS REZONING BRUSC0 & ~ 0 $9 THE BALBI PARCEL RESTRICTED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT CASSINELLI PROPERTY: OR R-3 DISTRICT AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 353 AS AMENDED EN- 2nd Reading/Adoption ORDINANCE -- ~ ~ ~ ~ REZONING GISELDINI PROPERTY: ~ 0 ~ ~ 2nd.~Re ading/Adop t ion TITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO' PASSED AND ADOPTED AUGUST lC, 1954" "AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PARCELS IiESCRIBED HEREIN AND KNOWN AS ~MiE BRUSC0 AND CASSINELLI PARCELS RESTRICTED MULTIPLE F~MILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OR R-3 DISTRICT AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 353 AS AMENDED ENTITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO' PASSED AND ADOPTED AUGUST 10, 195~" "AN ORDINANCE REZONING THE PARCELS IIESCRIBED HEREIN AND KNOWN AS THE GISELDINI PARCELS RESTRICTED MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT OR R-3 DISTRICT AND AMEND~ ORDINANCE NO. 353~ AS AMENDED ENTITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRAN- CISCO' PASSED AND ADOPTED AUGUST lC, 1954". He stated an agreement for each property owner had been prepared for execution and would be accompanied by their depositl. He further commented that it was his understanding these would be filed with the City the following day, Tuesday, September 22, 2964, and should precede the second meadiug and adoption of the respective ordinances. He requested that these items be con- tinued to au adjourned meeting at 7:30 p.m. ou Tuesday, Septem- ber 22, 1964. FRANK & LUISA VARO VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RES0. NO. 1768: There being no objections, Mayor AhePn so ordered. VARIANCE Resolution No. 1768 from the Planning COmmission recom- mending permission be granted for the request for a fence 2 feet in excess of the 3 foot height limit within the front and side setback at 793 Alta Loma Drive iu an R-1 district, subject to ~he condition that the applicant reach au agreement with the City oua "hold harmless clause". 656 VARO VARIANCE APPLICATION: ( CONTINUED ) CLAIM AGAINST CITY - MRS. BARBARA GOMEZ: MEYER & YOUNG CORP. PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTIONS NOS. 1772 - 1773 - 1774: o City Attorney Noonan remarked that the Variance could be granted with the provision that Mr. and Mrs. Varo execute an agreement holding the City harmless, ~ud that should it be necessary to service or replace the public utilities located underneath the fence such removal of the fence be made at the expense iof the ap- plicant. Councilman Rozzi so moved, seconded by Councilman BertUcelli and regularly carried. ~laim against the City in the amount of $40.50 as filed by Mrs. Barbara Gomez of 880 Schweriu Street, Raly City, alleging in- Juries as a result of a fall at the Oyster Point Marina. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Bertucelli and regularly carried, that the claim be denied and referred to the insurance carrier for the City. Council next took up the following Eesolutious and Memorandums as received from the Planning Commission, all of which concerned the same subject matter: Resolution No. 1772 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITg OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO P~COMMENDING APPROVAL TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE VARIANCE APPLICATION OF MEYER & YOUNG BUILD- ING CORPORATION. (Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 16, 1964, from the Planning Commission concerning Variance!Resolu- tion No. 1772). Resolution No 1773 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE C±Tg O~ SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO P~COMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE "FINDINGS OF FACT" ON THE AMENDMENT PETITION OW MEYER & Y01~NG CORPORATION TO REZONE 57.9 ACRES OF LAND (ON SIGN HILL) FROM AN R-1 DISTRICT TO A PLANNED COMMUNITY. Resolution No. 1774 - A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITg OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO P~COMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT OF THE MEYER & YOUNG CORPORATION TO REZONE 57.9 ACRES OF LAND (ON SIGN HILL) FROM AN R-1 DISTRICT TO A PLANNED COMMU- NITY DISTRICT. (Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 16, 196~, from the Planning Commission regarding transmittal of all material regarding the Meyer & Young rezoning; and Inter-Office .~emorandum dated September 16, 1964, from the Planning Commission regarding summary of hearings and PLanning Officer's report as contained in the complete transcript of hearings submigted. Mayor Ahem asked City Attorney Noonan for an opinion on the three resolutions and the memorauduns received. City Attorney Noonan commented that the three items concerned re- zoning, that they came iu the form of a report and notlas a rec- ommendation, and that his opinion was still that it needed four Planning Commission votes as three was not sufficient, i He re- marked ou the requirements of the setting of a Public Hearing if it was in order to do so iu accordance with the Zoning'0rdiuance. He then stated there was nothing before Council at this time and that it was his recommendation that the resolutions beireceived and filed and no hearing set. Mayor Ahem then remarked that in view of the City AttOrney's opinion it appeared that the City Council could not take further action ou this rezouing and suggested that Council therefor con- sider a motion to receive ~nd file nhe report from thelPlauning Commission and uo public hearing be set. Councilman Rocca so moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and reg- ularly carried. Councilman Cortesi commented that the!people had been subjected to this long enough, that he was fo~ the people and was voting "no" ou the matter. Brief discussion followed, at which time Mayor Ahem explained to Councilman Cortesi the Council's earlier action ou She matter. Mayor Ahem then made the following statement: "Members of the Council, ladies and gentlemen - This matter has been under con- sideration for many months at a great deal of expense,'with a loss to the City and developer. We don~t want to repeat this kind of a situation in the future and we know that some day we are going to face some kind of development on the hill, I sug- gest, therefore, that our staff, under the direction of the City Manager, confer with the developers and residents regarding de- velopment on the hill and at the s~ue time review the Master Plan objectives and this plan. After the conferences are completed, I would like to have a report filed with the Council. 657 MEYER & YOUNG CORP.: ( CONTINUED ) ~0'~o ROBERT A. GOMEZ VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RES0. NO. 1775: B. F. MAY VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RES0. NO. 1776: EVERSON & SMITH VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RES0. NO. 1777: ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF S.F. USE PERMIT P.C. RESO. NO. 1778: MRS. ALLISONtS COOKIE CO. USE PERMIT P.C. RES0. NO. 1779: PARK LANE APARTMENTS USE PERMIT P.C. RES0. NO. 1780: ~0~o Mr. Arthur Andreas, Attorney at Law ~ith offices at 633 Battery Street, San Francisco, representing the opponents to the plan, asked if he understood Council's action in that no action was being taken ou the application. The Mayor replied thatlCouncil had received and filed the report with no action to be taken but further study. Mr. Andreas then asked that he be advised by the City Clerk of any meeting and that iaformation be forwarded to him. VARIANCE Resolution No. 1775 was received from the Planning Com- uissiou recommending permission be g~auted for the request to erect five dwelling units on a 4,800 sq. ft. lot instead of the required 5,000 sq. ft. lot at 659 Commerdial Avenue, subject to the following conditions: (1) Careful review of building plans by Architectural Committee to insure new construction will not tend to downgrade the area; (2) Garage doors on street and lane. Councilman Bertucelli moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. VARIANCE Resolution No. 1776 was received from the Planning Com- w.ission recommendin~ permission be g~anted for the request to w.aiutain 45-1/3% lo~ coverage instead of permitted 40%, and a £½ foot encroachment into the required 20 foot rear yard at 371 Catherine Drive. Councilman Bertucelli moved, seconded by Councilman RozZi and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. VARIANCE Resolution No. 1777 was received from the Planning Com- w.ission recommending permission be g~anted for the request to encroach 15 feet into required 15 foot rear yard in an indus- trial district at 136 South Maple Avenue, subject to the follow- in~ conditions: (1) Metal building be painted or enamel finished; (2] Plans be presented to 'the Architectural Committee showing landscaping on the frQnt of the property. Councilman Bertucelli moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. USE PERMIT Resolution No. 1778 was received from the Planning Comm~issiou recommending permission be granted for the request to construct a convent on church proper:y at Willow and Miller Ave- ~ues. Councilman Bertucelli moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. USE PERMIT Resolution No. 1779 was received from the Planning Commission recommending permission be granted for the request to expand use in a P.C.M. district so as to allow the addition of a sugar tank at 513 Mayfair Avenue, subject to the following conditions: (1) The loading of the sugar tank be confined to the hours between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p~m.; (2) That theltank ~ot exceed 32 feet overall height from the ground level. Councilman Bertucelli moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. USE PERMIT Resolution No. 1780 was received from the Planning Commission recommending oermission be granted for the request to maintain existing directional si~n 3 feet by 2 feet, and to renew Use Permit No. 1634 for sign ~z Memorial Drive and Orange Avenue, subject to the followiu~ conditions: (1) That red and white Vacancy sign be removed; (2) Use Permit granted for a one year period only with right to renew. Councilman Bertucelli moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved:.and accepted. MONTHLY REPORTS: GOOD AND WELFARE: ADJOURNMENT: Monthly Reports for the month of August, 1964, were received from the following: Building Inspection Department Fire Department Library Police Department City Garage Work Schedule for the months of September, October, November, and December, 1964. There being no objections, Mayor Aheru ordered the reports accepted and placed on file. There being nothing further, Mayor A.~ern asked if any m~mber of the Council had anything they wished to offer under Good and ~'elfare. There being none, he then asked if anyone in the aud- ience had anything they wished to offer. Nothing was offered from the audience. Councilman Rozzi then moved, seconded by Councilman Bertucelli and regularly carried, that the meeting be adjourned to Tuesday, September 22, 1962, at 7:30 p.m. Time of adjournment: 8:30 p.m. REsp~.CTFULLY SUBMITTED,