HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1965-04-12ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
O[ THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
HELD MONDAY, APRIL 12, 1965
TIME:
PLACE:
GALL TO ORDER:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE:
ROLL GALL:
PUBLIC HEARING -
STONEGATE RIDGE
57.9 ACRES:
RESOLUTION NO. 4186
R EZON I NG -
STONEGATE RIDGE:
ORDINANCE -
ESTABLISHING STONEGATE
RI.ZXDE AS A PLANNED
CO~W~UNITY: (REZONING)
1st Reading/Introduction
5:30 p.m.
Souncil Chambers, City Hall
T~e meeting was called to order by Mayor Frank J. Bertucelli at 5:40 p.m.
Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was reciteC.
:resent:
ADsent:
Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, Andrew Rocca, and
Guido J. Rozzi.
Councilman Emilio Cortesi.
Mayor Bertucelli at this time declared the Public Hearing opened on the following
PLanning Commission resolutions:
PLanning Commission Resolution No. 1773 entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
CONFLISSION OF TH2 CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISOD RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE 'FIND-
_-NGS OF FACT' ON THE AMENDMENT PETITION OF .~YER & YOUNG CORPORATION TO REZONE
57.9 ACRES OF LAND (ON SIGN HILL) FROM AN R-1 DISTRICT TO A PLANNED GO~RJNITY".
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1774 entitled: "A RZSOLUYION OF THE PLA~3NING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RECOff~IENDING APPROVAL:OF THE AMEND-
~ENT OF THE MEYER & YOUNG CORPORATION TO REZONE 57.9 ACRES OF LAND (ON SIGN HILL)
FROM AN R-1 DISTRICT TO A PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT".
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1862 entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF /HE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE R~SO-
LEIION OF INTENTION OF THH CIIY COUNCIL OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TO REZONE 57.9
ACRES OF LAND (ON SIGN HILL) FROM AN R-1 DISTRICT TO A PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT".
Accompanied by Summary of Hearings and Planning Officer's Report.
Planning Commission Resolution No. 1863 entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RECOMMENDING APPROVAL~OF THE 'FIND-
INGS OF FACT' ON THE RESOLUTION OF INTENTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF.THE CITY OF
SOOTH SAN FRANCISCO TO REZONE 57.9 ACRES OF LAND (STONEGATH RIDGE) FRO~ AN R-1
DISTRICT TO A PLANNED COMMUNITY".
City Attorney Noonan commented that the resolutio~had been received from the
Planning Commission and that a resolution hag been prepared to complete the matter
if Council so desired.
Mayor Bertucelli asked if any written protests had been received, to which the
Cizy Clerk replied none had been received by his office since receipt of the Plan-
ning Commission documents. Mayor Bertucelli then asked if anyone present wished
to register an oral protest. None were registered.
Brief discussion followed concerning the matter of streets, street piatterns and
sCreet widths, after which Mayor Bertucelli declared the Public Hearing closed.
City Attorney Noonan then explained the resolntion, after which Coun,cilman Rozzi
introduced: "CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA - A
RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE AS RECOMMENDED BY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION
NO. 1772, PASSED AUGUST 24, 1964, AND APPROVING THE REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
SET FORTH IN PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NOS. 1862 AND 1863 AND ORDERING
DORSEMENTS AFFIXED TO SAID REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS".
Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E.
AHem, Andrew Rocca, and Guido 3. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Emilio
Certesi.
City Attorney Noonan next explained the ordinance which had been prepared concern-
ir~ the rezoning for Stonegate Ridge, after which the Director of Public Works re-
qrested that the ordinance contain no parking of vehicles on the 22 foot wide
streets. The City Attorney replied that this would be incorporated in the ordi-
nance.
City Attorney Noonan then stated the ordinance was ready for its first reading and
introduction and if Council wished a motion ceuld be adopted that reading of the
ozxJinance in its entirety be waived and that ~t have its first reading and intro-
duction by the reading of title only. Councilman Rocca so moved, seconded by
Councilman Ahem and regularly carried.
City Attorney Noonan then stated that a motior could be adopted that an ordinance
entitled: "AN ORDINANCE ~STABLISHING A PLANNED COMMUNITY DISTRICT (REFERRED TO
AS STONEGAT~ RIDGE); PROVIDING REGULATIONS THTREFOR FOR THE DISTRICTS THEREIN CON-
TAIUED AND AMENDING ORDINANCE ~. 353 AS AMENCED ENTITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO' ADOPTED AUGUST lC, 1954" be introduced~ reading in
its entirety having been duly waived. Councilman Ahem so moved, seconded by
Councilman Rocca.
Roil call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E.
Ahem, Andrew Rocca, and Guido 3. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Emilio
Co~5esi.
74:
RESOLUTION NO. 4187
AWARD OF CONTRACT
LIBRARY SITE:
TWO PER G~RNT GROSS
TAX LEVY -
T~LEPHONE COMPANIES:
RESOLUTION NO. 4188
OPPOSING ASSEMBLY
BILL NO. 346 - GRADE
CROSSING PROT£CIION:
DISCUSSION -
TAX LBVY FOR
T~LEPHONE COMPANIES:
R£SOLUTION NO. 4189
/WO PER CENT GROSS
/AX LEVY -
TELEPHONE COMPANIES:
VICE-~AYOR APPOINTMENT
GUIOO J. ROZZI:
ADJOURNMENT:
Souncil next took up the matter of the Awarc of Contract for the construction of
the Public Library building and Emergency Overating Center.
Zity Manager Aiello declared the bids which had been received, giving the total of
each bidder. Mr. Paul Markling, Architect, then requested the computation of bids
which his office had prepared be corrected to show the bid of Herman Christensen
& Sons in the total amount of $545,900.00 instead of $545,000.00 since this was a
cypographical error. It was recommended by the City Manager that the award be made
~o Herman Christensen & Sons, the low bidder.
City Attorney Noonan then explained the resolution, after which Councilman Rozzi
introduced: "CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOUTH SA.~ FRANCISCO, STAT2 OF CALIFORNIA - A
RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT - PUBLIC LIBRARY BUILDING AND EMERGENCY OPERATING
C£NT~CR''.
Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, CounciLmen Frank J. Bertucelll, Patrick ~.
Ahem, Andrew Rocca, and Guido 3. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, CounCilman Emilio
Cortesi.
City Attorney Noonan then brought up the matter of the resolution which had been
prepared which would allow cities to levy a two per cent (2%) gross receipts tax
on telephone companies doing business within the City. He commented that the ~ana-
get of the local telephone office stated tha~ he would appear to presen± arguments
in opposition to the matter. He suggested tPat if Council so desired the matter
could be held over'provided the time element for presentation of the resolution did
not expire.
Discussion concerning a motion was then held, after which Councilman Rozzi moved,
seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly ca~ried, that if a hearing is to be held
prior to the next Council meeting a letter be authorized registering the City's in-
tent to the proposed tax.
City Attorney Moonan next brought to Council's attention the matter .of Assembly
BiLl No. 346 concerninq the cos% of grade crossing protection by the cities which
was to be heard by the Public Utilities Committee ~of the State Senate on April 14,
1965. He explained the resolution which had Peen prepared to be sent to the Interim
Committee along with the copy of the resolution of the City of Fresno which opposed
this cost. Director of Public horks Louis Goss explained the matter~ also recom-
merding that the City oppose passage of this 3i11.
Councilman Rozzi then introduced a resolution entitled: "CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF
SC[/H SAN FRANCISCO, STAT2 OF CALIFORNIA - A RESOLUTION DECLARING TH~ CITY COUNCIL'S
OFPOSITION TO ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 346 RHGARDING GRADE CROSSING PROTECTION WORKS AND
DHVICES".
Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Council,'en Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E.
Ahem, Andrew Rocca, and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Emilio
Cortesi.
At this time Mr. Phil Raineri, Manager of the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Com-
pany appeared present and registered oppositicn to the adoption by the Council of
a resolution which would impose a two per cent gross receipts tax, stating this was
unfair to both the telephone company and the telephone users. Further discussion
followed, at which time Mr. Raineri asked for Council support in opposition to this
bi.iL. Mention was made by the Council members that it was the City'sl feeling that
the telephone company was being asked to assist in paying their fair share. After
discussion, Mayor Bertucelli asked if a motion was necessary to rescind Council's
earlier motion, to which the City Attorney replied that the introduction of a reso-
lution would supercede the motion.
Cit:y Attorney Noonan then explained the resoluEion, after which Councilman Rozzi
introduced: "CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF SOU/H SAN 3RANCISCO, STATf OF CALIFORNIA - A
RHSCLUTION URGING SUPPORT OF A CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT WHICH WILL PERMIT CITIES
IN CALIFORNIA TO LEVY A /~0 PERCENT GROSS R£CHZP/S TAX ON THLEPHONH COMPANIES DOING
BUSINHSS THEREIN".
Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick
Ahem, Andrew Rocca, and Guido 3. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Emilio
Cortesi.
There being nothing further, Mayor Bertucelli altered for Council confirmation the
appointment of Councilman Guido J. Rozzi as Vice-Mayor. Councilman Rocca moved,
seconded by Councilman Ahem and regularly carried, that the Mayor's appointment
be confirmed.
Mayor Bertucelli a~ this time adjourned the meeting to Monday, April 19, 1965,
at 8:00 p.m. Time of adjournment: 6:].0 p.m.
~C
R HSP.~CTFULLY SUBMITTED,
City Clerk
APPROVED:
-~,layor