Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1966-01-03REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY CO JNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCZSCO HELD MONDAY, JANUARY 3, 1966 TIME: PLACE: CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION: ROLL GALL: MI NUTES: CLAIMS: PARKING DISTRICT NO. 1 CLAIMS: CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. 1 CLAIMS: ~UBLIC HEARING - AMENDED ASSESSMENT HARBOR WAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT: PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED VACATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE EASFJ~ENT: PUBLIC HEARING - STONEGATE RIDGE: 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall. T~.e meeting was called to order by Mayor Bert'Jcelli at 8:01 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited, after which the invocation was given by Reverend Harry H. Larson, First Baptist Church. Present: Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi Absent: None Mayor Bertucelli at this time asked if there was a motion approving the minutes of tee adjourned reguiar meeting of December i4, I965 and the reguiar meeting of December 20, i965. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by GounciIman Rocca and reguiarIy carried, that tee minutes of the adjourned reguIar meeting of December I4, I965 and the reguiar meeting of December 20, i965 be approved as submitted. Mayor BertuceIIi then asked if there was a mozion approving the reguiar cIaims as submitted for payment. Gounciiman Ahern moved, seconded by CounciImam Gortesi and reguiariy carried, that t~e reguiar ciaims totaling $52,596.8? be approved for payment. Mayor Bertuceiii then asked if there was a mo~ion approving the ciaims for Parking District No. 1 as submitted for payment. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by CounciIman Rozzi and reguiarly carried, that the ciaims for Parking District No. I, totaiing $4??.?2, be approved for payment. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park. Unit No. 1 Claims: (a) Wilsey, Ham & Blair ciaim dated December I5, 1965 in the amount of for Contract Administration, Resident Engineering and Inspection Services. (b) Batista Landscape Service claim dated December 6, 1965 in the amount of $68.14 for Water Meter Charges. Gounciiman Rozzi moved, seconded by CounciImar. Rocca and regularly carried, that the cIaims as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industriai Park, Unit No. I be approved for payment. The next item was the Pubiic Hearing on Notice of Hearing on the Amended Assessment, Harbor Way Assessment District. Mayor Bertucelli declared the PubIic Hearing opened, asking if any written protests had been received, to which the City Clerk repIied none had been received by his office. He then asked if anyone present in the audience wished to register an oral protest. There being none, Mayor BertuceIIi declared the PubIic Hearing cIosed. T~e next item for Council's attention was the Pubiic Hearing on Notice of Proposed Vacation of a Pubiic Service Easement - iO-foot Sanitary Sewer Easement (Proposed Alta Vista Mayor Bertucelli declared the Pubiic Hearing opened, asking if any written protests had been received, to which the City GIerk repIied none had been received by his office. He then asked if anyone present in t~e audience wished to register an oral protest. There being none, Mayor Bertucelli deciared the Public Hearing closed. The next item was the Continued Public Hearin~ on Stonegate Ridge. Mayor BertuceiIi announced that this was the time to which the Pubiic Hearing on the Stonegate Ridge Project had been continued. The City Clerk reported that he had received ~ communication dated December ~, I965, from Ricco Lagomarsino, adjacent property owner, concerning drainage from Stonegate Ridge as it effects his property. The receipt of a communication answering Mr. Lago- marsino, from Brobeck, Phieger & Harrison, dated December 8, 1965, was also acknowledged. Th.~ City CIerk reported that he had received ene written protest, from Mr. Joe Crosariol through his attorney, ArIen Gregorio. 85 PUBLIC HEARING gTONEGATE RIDGE (CONTINUED) RESOLUTION NO. 4343 ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS: RESOLUTION NO. 4344 OVERRULING PROTESTS: Mayor Bertucelli asked if there was anyone in the audience to speak on the protest. Mr. Gregorio addressed the Council. He stated generally, that Mr. Crosariol was opposed to the construction of the road and to the inclusion of his property in the district. He had not asked for the project nor the inclusion of his property. He was using his lands for the growing of flowers and wished to continue to do so. He has a right-of-way for ingress and egress across the property of the Unified School District which is fully adequate for his needs, and the new road is not necessary for his purposes. The construction of the road would produce a higher value on his property which in turn would lead to higher taxes. The continued use of the property for the growing of flowers provides the City with a much- needed green area with considerable charm and color, and this is an asset which should not lightly be destroyed in this era of asphalt. He stated that there was no benefit whatsoever to Mr. Crosariol from tluis proceeding. Mr. L. M. Summey, Deputy District Attorney of the County of San Mateo, then addressed the Council. He stated that he had been provided with a copy of a proposed reso- lution for Council action which would reduce the School District's assessment to zero. He stated that this was the objective of the School District and that they were very pleased that the matter had been worked out. He then stated he wished to be sure there was no chance of the assessment being raised from zero to some o~her figure. Mr. Kenneth Jones, of Wilson, Jones, Morton & Lynch, special counsel for the City on the project, stated that the proposed resolution would reduce the School District assessment to zero and was made possible by rue written petition of the Stonegate Ridge Investment Co. agreeing to absorb the anount which would otherwise be assessed against the School District and to pay whatever the appraised value of the right-of- way over the School District property might be. He also stated that proceedings would be taken at the appropriate time for a change in the boundaries of the assess- ment district to eliminate the School District property entirely, but that this involved the preparation and filing of revised maps and the lapse of time and therefore was not proposed immediately. He stated he would not be a party to any increase in the assessment, and was certain t%at the Council felt the same way. Mr. Summey indicated that he was satisfied with the situation. Mr. Jones then asked the permission of the Council to present testimony regarding benefits. He called on Mr. Dominic Selmi, registered uivil engineer, representing Dan Coleman Associates who were appointed to act as Engineer of Work for the City on this project. Mr. Selmi stated, in response to questions from Mr. 3ones, that he was a registered civil engineer, that he represented the firm of Dan Coleman Associates, and that his firm had drawn the boundaries of the assessment district and spread the assessment. He also stated, in response to further questions, that in his opinion the properties of Mr. Crosariol were benefited at least to the extent of the amount of the assessment, and that in his opinion as a registered civil engineer, the assessment had been spread in proportion to benefits. Mr. Jones then called to the Council's attention the fact that the Engineer's Report on file in the office of the City Clerk and before the Council at this hearing, showed that Mr. Crosariol's property fronting on the proposed road ex- tension could be conveniently divided into t~elve residential lots of adequate size, aid that he was informed and believed that such lots would be worth in the neighbor- hood of $10,000 each in the current real estate market. There being no further appearances or testimcny, Mayor Bertucelli declared the Public Hearing closed. Mr. Kenneth Jones at this time presented for introduction and adoption a resolution ordering changes and modifications after which Councilman Rozzi introduced: "A RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGES AND NDDIFICATIONS - STONEGATE RIDGE UNIT NO. 1 AMD ADJACENT LANDS." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cot:esi, Andrew Rocca and Guido 3. Rozzl. Noes, none. Absent, none. Iu connection with the presentation of the Resolution overruling protests, Councilman Rozzi moved that any further action on the project be taken subject to the satisfaction of the following three conditions: (1) That there be no principal payments on Mr. Crosariol's assessment for a period of five years; (2) That there be a delay in the construction of the improvements across Mr. Crosariol's property for a period of one and one-half to two years in order to allow Mr. Crosariol the opportunity to harvest the current crop of flowers and bulbs in the proposed right-of-way and to puase this area out of future plantings; and (3) That the developers of Stonegate Ridge contribute, as part of the assessment against Diagram and Assessment No. A, to pay towards the cost of the acquisition of the right-of-way across Mr. Crosariol's property, an amount equal to one-half of the value per acre of said right-of-way which said developers paid for the acquisition of the property being developed as Stonegate Ridge, which contribution was estimated to be about $2,500. Tue motion was duly seconded by Councilman ALern and unanimously carried. Ntt. Kenneth Jones then explained the next resolution which had been prepared for Council's introduction and adoption and which was a resolution overruling protests after which Councilman Rocca introduced: "A RESOLUTION OVERRULING PROTESTS ON RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 4271 - STONEGATE RIDGE UNIT NO. 1 AND ADJACENT LANDS." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cot:esi, Andrew Rocca and Guido 3. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. RESOLUTION NO. 4345 ADOPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT; CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT! ORDERING WORK AND ACQUISITIONS: Mr. Kenneth Jones explained the next resolution which had been prepared for Council's introduction and adoption, after which Councilman Ahem introduced: "A RESOLUTION AND ORDER ADOPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT A~D ORDERING THE WORK AND ACQUISITIONS - STOKEGATE RIDGE UNIT NO. 1 AND ADJACENT LANDS." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido 3. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. RESOLUTIONS CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. P: There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli continued the following resolutions as they related to Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Indtstrial Park Unit No. 2 to the regular meeting of 3anuary 17, 1966 pending a report to be received from the District Securities Commission: (1) "A RESOLUTION A~ENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4236 ENTITLED 'A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ACQUIRE AND CONSTRUCT IMPROVEMENTS'- CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. 2" (2) "A RESOLUTION OF PRELIMINARY APPROVAL O? ENGINEER'S REPORT - CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. 2" (3) "A RESOLUTION DESCRIBING PROPOSED BOUNDARIES OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT, DIRECTING FILING OF NLAP AND DIRECTING RECORDATION OF NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT - CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NC. 2" (4) "A RESOLUTION APPOINTING TIME AND PLACE OF HEARING PROTESTS IN RELATICN TO PROPOSED ACQUISITIONS AND I~PROVEMENTS, AND DIREGTING NOTICE - CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK U~IT NO. 2." RESOLUTION NO. 4346 AUTHORIZATION TO DESTROY WESTBOROUGH ANNEXATION ELECTION ROSTERS: City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution for Council's attention after W~ich Councilman Rozzi introduced: "A RESOL[TION AUTHORIZING DESTRUCTION OF THE WHSTBOROUGH INHABITED AREA ANNEXATION ELECTICN ROSTERS, SUPPLIES AND RELATHD MATERIALS." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. RESOLUTION NO. 4347 CONFIRMING AMENDED ASSESSMENT - SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT ~f2B: RESOLUTION NO. 4348 VACATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE EASF~ENT: City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution after which Councilman Rozzi introduced: "A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING AN A~EkDED ASSESSMENT - LOTS 10 AMD 11 IN BLOCK 11, SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT ~2B." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido 3. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution which had been prepared for Council's attention after which Councilman Ahern introduced: "A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE VACATION OF A PUBLIC SERVICE EASEMENT - 10-FOOT SANITARY SEWER EASP~ENT (PROPOSED ALTA VISTA ~f2)." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido 3. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. RESOLUTION NO. 4349 STREET NA~E CHANGE: City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution after which Councilman Rozzi introduced: "A RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGE OF NA~E OF STREETS IN INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT #1 - HAAS WAY TO WATTIS WAY AND HAYNIE WAY TO GOREY WAY." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilnen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. RESOLUTION NO. 4350 ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED: City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution after which Councilman Rocca introduced: "A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED FROM E. G. GOOPMAN AND RUTH B. COOPMAN, HUSBAND AND WIFE (STONEGATE RIDGE)." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido 3. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. RESOLUTION NO. 4351 AMENDING PERSONNEL RULES CALL-BACK OVERTIME: City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolJtion which had been prepared for Council's consideration after which Councilma~ Ahem introduced: "A RESOLUTION AMENDING PERSONNEL RULES AND REGULATIONS, IN ~ARTICULAR SECTION 5.04(b) CALL- BACK OVERTIME." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. RESOLUTION NO. 4352 City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution after which Councilman Rozzi FILING OF AMENDED ASSESSMENT introduced: "A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE FILING OF AN AMENDED ASSESSMENT - LOT 2, PERSON & SWANSON INDUSTRIAL PERSON & SWANSON INDUSTRIAL TRACT (ASSESSMENT NO. 2 - BOND SERIES NO. 59)." TRACT: Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilnen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. ~0 ~ Ahern, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. RESOLUTION NO. 4353 AMENDING RESO. NO. 3812 TRAFFIC REGULATIONS: City Attorney Noonan explained the next resol'~tion after which Councilman Ahern introduced: "A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTIO~ NO. 3812, AS AMENDED, WHICH ESTABLISHES CERTAIN TRAFFIC REGULATIONS IN ACCORDANCE WIT1 ORDINANCE NO. 491." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilnen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, none. ORDINANCE - PARKING REGULATIONS: let Reading/Introduction Tie next item for Council's attention was the ordinance entitled: "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 353, AS AMENDED, ENTITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO." (Parking Regulations for C-2 and C-3 districts.) At the request of the City Attorney, Mayor Bertucelli deferred this matter to the ne~t regular meeting. 857 AMENDED ASSESSMENT PERSON & SWANSON INDUSTRIAL TRACT: CLAIM AS FILED BY HAZEL OWEN: CLAIM AS FILED BY HELEN NICORA: HILLSIDE-RANDOLPH EXTENSION: W. L. LA FOND VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RESO. NO. 2001: BRUNO ANDRIGHETTO VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RESO. NO. 2002: .S'o NEAL O. HOFFMAN VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RESO. NO. 2003: _6o 5o DAVID A. MINNICH VARIANCE APPLICATION P.C. RESO. NO. 2004: LOUIS J. POLETTI USE PERMIT P.C. RESO. NO. 2005: o5O PETROCCHI BROS. USE PERMIT P.C. RESO. NO. 2006: The next item for Council's attention was the communication dated December 21, 1965 as received from Kolvi Development Corporation requesting reassessment of bonded indebtedness on Lots 2 and 3, Block 2, Person & Swanson Industrial Tract. This matter having been acted on earlier under Resolutions, no further action was taken by the City Council. The next item was the claim of Hazel Owen alleging injuries as a result of a fall in front of 671 E1Camino Real. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly carried, that the claim be denied and referred to the City's insurance carrier. Claim as filed by Helen Nicora alleging injuries as a result of a fall in front of 671 E1Camino Real was next taken up. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Ahem and regularly carried, that the claim be denied and referred to the City's insurance carrier. The next item was the communication dated December 31, 1965 from Wilsey, Ham and Blair submitting proposal for Geometries and Engineering Works on Hillside- Randolph Expressway Extension over cmossing Old Bayshore, Bayshore Freeway and the Southern Pacific Trackage at Butler Road. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the City Manager be authorized to enter into an agreement with the firm of Wilsey, Ham and Blair to carry out the mentioned work. VARIANCE Resolution No. 2001 received from the ~lanning Commission recommending permission be granted for a 5' encroachment into required 15' front yard and 17' into required rear yard, for ~ duplex on Tamarack Lane, southern portion of Lot 19, Block 2, Parkway Terrace No. 2, subject to the condition that floor plan of the living area be reversed to put stairway adjacent to the garage. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman R6cca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission b9 aporoved and accepted. VAR]lANCE Resolution No. 2002 received from the Planning Commission recommending permission be denied for 58~ lot coverage and extension of 13.6' into rear yard at 200 Rainier Avenue in an R-] district. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman ;{occa and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. VARIANCE Resolution No. 2003 received from the ~lanning Commission recommending permission be granted to allow extension of existing three foot side yard for construction of 17'x25' family room and 44~ lot coverage at 157 Nyla Avenue in an R-1 district. Courcilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the reco~nendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. VARIANCE Resolution No. 2004 received from the Planning Commission recommending permission be denied to encroach 6' into required 15' front yard setback for a 5'x15' covered porch and walk addition at 700 Keats Avenue in an R-1 district in an R-1 district. Also received was an accompanying Inter-Office Memorandum from the City Attorney dated December 29, 1965 recommending that it be referred back to the Planning Commission at the request of Chairman Warren Steinkamp. There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli referred the matter back to the Planning Commission at its request. USE PERMIT Resoluti6n No. 2005 received from the Planning Commission recommending permission be granted to permit an additional 4~ stalls for use4 car display and to erect a 1260 sq. ft. building at 393 E1Camino Real, San Bruno Volkswagen in a C-1 district, subject to the following conditions: (1) All lights shall be located so that no direct light is visible from any portior of adjoining residential or U district zoned property fronting on Alida Way. (2) There shall be no repairs outside a building, and no outside storage of vehicles whose outward appearance has 3een damaged, for a period longer than 1~ censecutive hours. (3) All outside area not landscaped shall be paved to current city specifications for parking lots. (4) To be subject to architectural and landscaping approval, and maintenance of landscaping according to approved plan dated December 10, 1965. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. USE PERMIT Resolution No. 2006 received from the Planning Commission recommending permission be denied to move a 30'x56' building to a PCM district on So. Spruce Avenue - acreage located adjacent to northerly boundary Parcel 7 Assessor's No. _4-183-5. Accompanying was the communication dated December 22, 1965 over the signature of applicant, Charles J. Petrocchi, requesting the application be referred back to the Planning Commission. 858 P.C. RESO. NO. 2006: (CONTINUED) 0 TIDEWATER OIL CO. SIGN USE PER~IT P.C. RESO. NO. 2007: P.C. RESO. NO. 2008 ADOPTION OF SECTION 5.7 DOORS ON GARAGES/CARPORTS: P.O. RESO. NO. 2009 DELETION OF CONDITION NO. 2 FROM P.O. RESO. NO. 1963: P.O. RESO. NO. 2010 ACCEPTANCE OF ANTONETTE LANE: CABOT, CABOT & FORBES APPROVAL OF TENTATIVE MAP LOTS 1, 2, 3, 4, BLOCK 1 PERSON & SWANSON RESUBDIVISION LOTS 2 AND 3, BLOCK 2: SSF INDUSTRIAL PARK 2-E ACCEPTANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS RELEASE OF MAINTENANCE BOND: There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli referred the matter back to the Planning Commission at the request of the appli:ant. SIGN USE PERMIT Resolution No. 2007 received fr.pm the Planning Commission recom- mending permission be denied for a 10'x43' pain':ed sign copy on rear wall of service station at 264 So. Airport Boulevard. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman .{coca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission b9 approved and accepted. Resolution No. 2008 received from the Planning Zommission entitled: "A RESOLUTION RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO THE ADOPTION OF A NEW SECTION 5.7 AS AN AMENDMENT TO ORDINANZE NO. 353, ESTABLISHING REGULA- TIONS FOR GARAGES AND CARPORTS. Accompanying was a copy of the proposed ordinance. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. Resolution No. 2009 received from the Planning 3ommission entitled: "BEING A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE GIrT OF SOU/H SAN FRANCISCO RECOM- MENDING DELETION OF CONDITION NO. 2 FROM PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION NO. 1963." Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman ~occa and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. Resolution No. 2010 received from the Planning Sommission entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF '[HE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE ACCEPTANCE OF A REQUEST FOR THE WIDENING AND DEDICATION OF /HAT CERTAIN STREET NOW KNOWN AS ANTONETTE LANE." There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli continued the matter to the next regular meeting of January 17, 1966. The next item for Council's attention was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 15, 1965 as received from the Planning Commission recommending approval to ~he tentative map oF Lots 1, 2, 3 and 4, Block 1, Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Par'<, Units 1 and lA, subject to the following conditions: (1) Include Lots 5, 6 and 7 of Block 1, Unit 1 in this Subdivision, and renumber lots to avoid duplication. (2) Identify surrounding property. (3) No parking on Carlton Court. (4) Five-foot sidewalk on Carlton Court, with cement-treated base under sidewalk area. (5) Street section proposed is satisfactory, subj,ect to report of the Soils Engineer. (6) Street signs and stop signs are to be furnished and placed as required by the Police Chief and Superintendent of Public Works. (7) Water nain size, type of hydrants and location shall be as specified by the Fire Chief. (8) Type of catch basins and size of storm water pipe shall be shown on the improvement plans. (9) Sanitary sewers shall be vitrified clay pipe ASTM C278, with plastisol joints as required by ASTM C425. (10) Improvement plans to show detailed gradin~ plans, showing original and proposed grades, using SSF Datum. Fill slopes to be no steeper than 2:1, cut slopes 1~:1. Swales to be shown between buildings. (11) Type of electroliers to be determined by Director of Public Works. (This condition added at meeting of Planning Commission.) (12) Corner radius, Carlton Court and Forbes Blvd. to be recoranended and approved by Director of Public Works. (13) Street lightin~ plan to be approved by Director of Public Works. (14)Rear lot easements as required for overhead service and disposition of easement over proposed lots 26, 27, 28 and 29 as recommended by the Pacific Gas and Electric Company. (15) Extension agreement with subdivider, and deposit of estimated cost as recommended by California Water Service Compsny. Accompanying was Inter-Office Memorandum from the Director of Public Works dated December 9, 1965 submitting 12 recommendations. Accompanying also were Inter-Office Memorandum from the Fire Chief dated December 8, 1965; Chief of Police dated December 10, 1965; Chief Building Inspector dated December 10, 1965; communications dated December 13, 1965 from the California Water Service Company and Gas and Electric Company. Accompanying was a communication from Wilsey, Fam & Blair dated December 21, 1965 concerning the recommendations as submitted by the Director of Public Works in his memgrandum of December 9, 1965. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted with the deletion of lots 5, 6 and 7. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 15, 1965 as received frorn Acting Planning Director Edward Robinson recommending approval of the resub- division of Lots 2 and 3, Block 2, Person and Swanson Industrial Tract. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission he approved and accepted. The next item for Council's attention was the Inter-Office Memorandum from the Director of Public Works dated December 9, 1965 recommending final acceptance of improvements and release of maintenance bond ir South San Francisco Industrial Par( 2-E (2-C - Zone 3). SSF INDUSTRIAL pARK (CONn~UED) STEINY & MITCHEL CHANGE ORDER NO. 1: LOWRIE PAVING CO. REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME: MONTHLY REPORTS: DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROl,: o GOOD AND WELFARE: REAPPOINTMENT OF JOSEPH MANJARREZ, GEORGE COULTER AND JOHN SUSA: - 5/ i PROVISIONAL APPOINTMENT OF 30HN COLLINS TO SUPT. OF SANITATION: DISCUSSION DEVELOPMENT OF CROCKER HILLS FOR RECREATIONAL PURPOSES: ADJOURNMENT: RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, There being no objections, and at the request of the Director of Public Works, Mayor Bertucelli ordered the matter continued pending the installation of the fire hydrant and fire alarm boxes. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum from the Director of Public Works dated December 14, 1965 recommending approval for Change Order No. 1 for the 1965 Traffic Signal Installation. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Ahem and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works be approved and accepted. Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 21, 1965 was received from the Director of Pablic Works recommending the request of Lowrie Paving Company for an extension of time on the 1965 Street Improvement Project. Accompanying was a communication dated December 21, 1965 from the Lowrie Paving Company requesting an extension of time and setting forth the reasons for such a request. Councilman Ahem moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works be approved and accepted. Monthly Reports were received from the following: City Clerk - November, 1965 Parking District No. 1 - November, 1965 Police Department - November, 1965 Library - November, 1965 San Mateo County Department of Public Fealth and Welfare Sanitation Section - October and November, 1965 There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli ordered the reports accepted and placed on file. Department of Alcoholic Beveraqe Control: (a) Application as filed by SPEEDEE MART 456 (Delana M. Hatcher and Betty L. Hatcher) for Off Sale Beer g Wine at 1124 Mission Street. (b) Application as filed by 12 MILE HOUSE (Alfiero & Clara Bergamaschi) for On Sale General Public Premises at 1076 Missicn Road. There being no objections, Mayor Bertuce].li ordered the reports filed. There being nothing further, Mayor Bertucelli offered for Council's confirmation the following reappointments: 3oseph Manjarrez and George Coulter to succeed thenselves as m.gmbers of the Recreation Commission and 3ohr Susa to succeed himself as a member of tlne Parking Place Commission. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Ahem and regularly carried, that the IMayor's appointments be confirmed. Mayor Bertucelli, at this time, offered for Council's consideration the provisional appointment of John Collins to the position of Superintendent of Sanitation effective January 16, 1966. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Ahem and regularly carried, that the Mayor's appointment be confirmed and that John Collins be appointed on a provisional basis effective January 16, 1966 to the positior of Superintendent of Sanitation. There being nothing further, Mayor Bertucelli asked if any person in the audience had anything they wished to offer under Good and Welfare. Arthur Maguire of 114 Drake Avenue remarked that he was speaking in behalf of the Paradise Improvement Club concerning the matter of the development of Crocker hills for recreational purposes. He summarized in brief for Council the action which had already been taken by the County, asking if the City had received any word from the Cities of Colma, Daly City and Brisbane as to whether or not their Planning Commissions and Councils were in favor of supporting the development of the park site. Brief discussion followed at which time mention was made that the cities had been advised with a request that they meet collectively or individually concerning the matter and as yet, no word had been received. There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli requested that City Manager Aiello make a follow-up on the earlier requests. This was satisfactory to Mr. Maguire. There being nothing further, Mayor Bertucelli declared the meeting adjourned to Monday, January 17, 1966. Time of adjournment: 8:48 p.m. APPROVED: