Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1966-09-06REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO HELD TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 6, 1966 TIME~ PLACE: CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION: ROLL CALL: NINUTRS: GLAINS ~ PARKING DISTRICT NO. 1 CLAINS = CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. 1 CLAINS: CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. lA GLAINSs SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC LIBRARY AND E.O.G. CENTER GLAINS: 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by ~ayor Bertucellt at 8~00 p.m. Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recitec, after which the invocation was given 3y Reverend Harry H. Larson of the First Baptist Church. 2resent~ Absent: Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Patrick E. Ahern. Aayor Bertucelli asked if there was a motior approving the minutes of the regular neeting of August 15, 1966; the adjourned regular meeting of August 22, 1966; and ~he special meeting of August 29, 1966. Councilman Rozzt moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that =he minutes of the regular meeting of August 15, 1966; the adjourned regular meeting of August 22, 1966; and the special meeting of August 29, 1966 he approved as submitted. · ~ayor Bertucelli then asked if there was a m~tion approving the regular claims as submitted for payment. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly carried, that ~he regular claims totaling $40,996.79 be aporoved for payment. ~ayor Bertucellt asked if there was a motion approving the claims for Parking District No. 1 as submitted for payment. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Council~n Rocca and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for Parking District No. 1 totaling $122.66 he approved for payment. Cabot. Cabot & Forbes. Industrial Park. Unit No. 1 Claims: (a) Wilsey, Ham & Blair claim dated August 16, 1966 in the amount of $81.66 for Contract Administration, Resident Engineering and Inspection Services. Wtlsey, Ham & Blair claim dated August 16, 1966 in the amount of $630.89 for Engineering Services in connection with the re-bid and construction - Forbes Boulevard widening. Claim dated August 15, 1966 in the amount of $16,507.82 due Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. lA - Carlton Court - to reimburse amounts paid for work performed in Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 1. (d) Cooper Clark & Associates claim dated August 5, 1966 in the amount of $158.00 for Inspection of Street Grading Forbes Boulevard widening. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 1 be approved for payment. Cabot. Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park. Unit ~o. lA Claims: (a) Wtlsey, Ham & Blair claim dated August 26, 1966 in the amount of $774.91 for Contract Administration, Resident Engineering and Inspection Services. (b) Cooper Clark and Associates claim dated August 5, 1966 in the amount of $263.20 for Inspection of Street Grading Proposed Carlton Court Improvements. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. lA be approved for payment. South San Francisco Public Library and E.O.C. Center Claims: (a) Garo Dorian, A.I.A., claim dated August 11, 1966 in the amount of $400.00 for work completed as of August 10, 1966 for Environmental Design on Library and E.O.C. (b) A. M. Hardy, General Contractor, claim dated August 9, 1966 in the amount of $3,013.27 for work completed on the Environmental Design on Public Library and E.O.C (c) A. M. Hardy & Company, Contractor, claim dated August 12, 1966 in the amount of $1,765.00 for 2 flag poles erected, Environmental Design on Public Library and E.O.C SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC LIBRARY AND E.O.C. CENTER CLAIMS ~ (Continued) STONEGATE RIII~ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 1CLAIMS~ PUBLIC HEARING P. C. RESO. NO. 20805 UNITED NATIONS DAY OCTOBER 24, 19665 UNION LABEL SEPT. 5-11, 1966s RESOLUTION NO. 4525 ENDORSING HIGHWAY WEEK SEPT. 18-24, 1966~ RESOLUTION NO. 4526 EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT A~ENDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY AND SCHOOL DISTRICTs RESOLUTION NO. 4527 AWARD OF CONTRACT DREDGING COL~IA CREEK AND TRI BUTARI ES s BARTON CONSTRUCTION CO. RESOLUTION NO. 4027.-_A. L. C. SMITH CO.ANY RESOLUTION NO. 4528 ADOPTING BUDGET FUNDS FROM STATE HIGflWAY TO CITIES; RESOLUTION NO. 4529 ORDERING FILING OF AN AMENDED ASSESS~NT LOWR I E - BO TH I N - S~ANSON: RESOLUTION NO. 4530 AMENDING RESO. NO. 45215 Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Council=an Rocca and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for the South San Francisco Public Library and E.O.C. Center '>e approved for payment. Stonecate Ridoe Assessment District No. 1 Claims= California Water Service Company claim dated August 22, 1966 in the amount of $108,377.00 for Utility's estimated cost of installing and connecting mains, appurtenances to Utility's existing main and constructing special facilities. City of South San Francisco claim date~ August 4, 1966 in the amount of $431.07 for Inspection Charges for Stonegate Ridge for the month of July, 1966. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly carried, that ~he claims as submitted for Stonegate Ridge Assessment District No. 1 be approved for payment. --he next item for Council's attention was the continued Public Hearing on Planning Co~ission Resolution No. 2080 entitled5 '~ RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COY~ilSSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGONNENRING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE AMENDMENT PETITION OF CAESAR-CALLAN HOMES INC., SO AS TO REZONE AN APPROXI- MATELY 180-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND FROM A "U" DISTRICT TO A "PC" DISTRICT." --here being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli continued the Public Hearing to the next regular meeting. 2roclamation designating October 24, 1966 as "UNITED NATIONS DAY" was the next item for Council's consideration. Mayor Bertucelli so proclaimed. --he next item was the Proclamation designatiag September 5-11, 1966 as "UNION LABEL WEEK." This Proclamation having been issued previoUSly by the Mayor, no further action was taken. City Attorney Noonan explained the first resolution after which Councilman Rozzi fntroduced5 '~ RESOLUTION ENDORSING NATIONAL HIGHWAY WEEK SEPTEMBER 18-24, 1966." Roll call vote was as follows5 Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Patrick Eo Ahem. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution after which Councilman Rocca introduced: "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT A~ENDING THE AGREEUENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT DATED THE 4TH DAY OF NOVEMBEa, 1963." Roll call vote was as follows5 Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Emilio Cortest, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Patrick E. Ahem. Director of Public Works Louis Goss read the bids received from his Inter-Office ~emorandum dated August 31, 1966 and recommended the award be made to L. C. Smith Company and Barton Construction Company. City Attorney Noonan explained the resolutio~ which had been prepared after which Councilman Rozzi introduced: "A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT DREDGING COLMA CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES - 1966." Councilman Rocca in voting, stated that he ~tshed to abstain in voting on the award to L. C. Smith Company only, and voted "Aye" on the award to Barton Construction Co. Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Patrick E. Ahern. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution after which Councilman Rozzi introduced~ "A RESOLUTION ADOPTING BUDGET FOR EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS ALLOCATED FROM _-HE STATE HIGHWAY FUND TO CITIES." ~oll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Council,man Patrick E. Ahem. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution which had been prepared for Council's consideration after which Councilman Rozzi introduced~ "A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE FILING OF AN AMENDED ASSESSMENT - LOWRIE-BOTHIN-SWANSON PROJECT." Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Patrick E. Ahem. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resotution after which Councilman Rozzi introduced: "A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 4521 ENTITLED 'A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING SALARY SCHEDULES AND INCREASES FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1966-67~" Roll call vote was as follows5 Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Patrick E. Ahern. ORDINANCE NO. 555 A~ENDING ORD. NO. 353 AND ESTABLISHING ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION: 2nd Reading/Adoption ORDINANCE A~ENDING ORD. NO. ~49= 1st Reading/Introduction REAPPORTIOI~ENT REQUEST OF G. LAGO~kRSINO COt REQUEST OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO BOYS'CLUB TO HOLD FESTIVAL ~ CITY OF SAN FRANCISCO AIRPORT GRADING P~gJ~IT APPLICATION= RESOLUTION NO. 4531 APPROVING NATURE AND SCOPE OF AIRPORT FILLs NOT£ = BIG-EYE, S0. SAN FRANCISCO USE PERNIT RESO. NO. 8~ Go MICHAEL KALEND PERIIIT REQUEST WITHDRAWAL~ ~ayor Bertucelli ordered the title of the ordinance read. The title of the ordinance was read. City Attorney Noonan then explained the ordinance and advised the Council regarding procedure for adoption and passage. Councilman Rocca moved reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and ;hat the ordinance be passed and adopted by reading title only, seconded by Councilma~ Rozzi and passed by unanimous vote. Councilman Rocca moved that the ordinance en=itled= "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO A/~ENDING ORDINANCE NO. 353 AS AMENDED, ENTITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF'SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO' PASSED AND ADOPTED AUGUST 10, 19§4, AND ESTAB- LISHING ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION FOR T~E PROPERTY HEREIN DESCRIBED," the entire reading of which has been duly waived, be passed and adopted, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and passed by the following roll call vote. ~oll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Patrick E. Ahern. Abstaining, Councilman ~milio Cortesi. ~ayor Bertucelli ordered the title of the ordinance read. The title of the ordinance was read. City Attorney Noonan then explained the ordinance and advised the Council regarding procedure for introduction. Counc£1man Rozzi moved that reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that the ordinance be introduced and read for the first time by reading title only, seconded by Councilman Rocca and passed by a unanimous vote. Councilman Rocca moved that the ordinance en=itled= "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 449 ENTITLED 'AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY CF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO REGREATING AND RE-ESTABLISHINGA PERSONNEL SYSTEJ~ FOR THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 216 AND ALL INCONSISTENT ORDINANCES," the entire reading of which has been duly waived, be introduced, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and passed by the followfng roll call vote. Roi1 call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Andrew Rocca, Emilio Cortesi and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Patrick E. Ahern. The next item was the communication from George Lagomarsino & Company dated August 17, 1966 requesting reapportionment of Assessmen~ No. 22, Series 60, dated June 7, 1961, on the Lowrie-Bothin-Swanson Project over five new parcels described as Bothin Sub- division ~2, Lots 21, 22, 23, 24 and 25. Action having been taken earlier under Resolutions, no further action was taken. The next item was the communication dated August 5, 1966 requesting permission for the South San Francisco Boys' Club, Dads' Club and Women's Auxiliary of the Boys' Club to hold a festival on September 30, October 1 and 2, 1966. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilm&n Cortesi and regularly carried, that the request as submitted be approved. The next item for Council's consideration was the communication dated August 23, 1966 from the San Francisco International Airport transmitting Application for a Pre- liminary Grading Permit to fill approximatel? 50 acres of tideland and submerged land in Bay waters to accommodate portion of the air cargo center at the San Fran- cisco International Airport. Accompanying was the Inter-Office ~emorandum dated August 25, 1966 from the Director of Public Works recommending tentative approval of Preliminary Grading Permit. City Attorney Noonan stated that a resolution had been prepared which would spell out the nature and scope of work to be performed. After the City Attorney explained the resolution, Councilman Rozzi introduced~ "A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE NA~JRE AND SCOPE OF THE SAN FRANCISCO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PROPOSED TIDELAND FILL." Roi1 call vote was as follows= Ayes, Counci]men Frank J. Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, A3drew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzi. Noes, none, Absent, Councilman Patrick E; Ahern Council considering the approval of Planning Commission items (a), (b), (c), (d) and (~) as a group, ~t. John Yantis, 115 Drake Avenue, requested discussion on Planning Commission item (f) Use Per, it 15 as it affected ~acy's. He was infoz~aed that this was not an item that was being included and would be discussed separately. This was satisfactory to Mm. Yantis. USE PERMIT Resolution No. 8 received from the Planning Commission recommending per- mission be granted for the placement of sever signs, with an aggregate area of approx. 413 sq. fi. on a service station canopy'and pump island and to the front and exterior side thereof in the P.C.~. district. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilm~n Rocca and regularly carried, that t~e recommendation of the Planning Comaissior be approved and accepted. The next item was the Inter-Office ~emorandum dated August 10, 1966 from the City Planner advising of the withdrawal of ~ichael Kalend's request to permit the establish- ment of a convalescent home at the southeatezly corner of Baden and Orange Avenues. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilm~n Rocca and regularly carried, that t~e recommendation of the Planning Commtssior be approved and accepted. SHELL OIL COMPANY USE PERMIT RESO. NO. 11~ NARSHALL-NEWALL USE PF_~4IT RESO. NO. 12= PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEC~gAPH COMPANY USE PF.~MIT RESO. NO.13~ ~ACY'S CALIFORNIA USE PEP~IT RESO. NO. 15= RECESS DECLARED~ RECALL TO ORDER~ The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated August 9, 1966 from the City Planner recommending approval to permit the establishment of a service station at the most southerly corner of South Spruce Avenue and Huntington Avenue in the P.C.M. district and to permit four signs wi=h an aggregate area of approximately 300 sq. ft. to be placed on the service sin=ion and to the front thereof, subject to the recordation of the final map of Tanforan Park No. 2, the requirements of the Director of Public Works and that Architectural Conmuittee. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Counctlrmn Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. The next item for Council's consideration w~s the Inter-Office Memorandum dated August 24, 1966 from the City Planner reconeuending approval to permit the place- ~ent of an approximately 250 sq. ft., illumLnated plastic sign on a warehouse located at 101 Utah Avenue in the M-2-H dis=rict. Councilman Rozzt moved, seconded by Counctlnan Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandcm from the City Planner dated August 24, 1966 recommending approval to the Use Permit request of Pacific Telephone and Tele- graph Company to permit the establishment of a telephone company business office on property located northeasterly of Huntington Avenue approximately 150' south- easterly of South Spruce Avenue in a P.C.M. district subject to the requirements of the Director of Public Works, the Fire Ck.ief, the Police Chief, and the Archi- =ectural Committee and also subject to the recordation of the final map of Tanforan ~ark Unit No. 2. A representative of the Pacific Telephone ard Telegraph Company was present in the audience and commented that this afternoon Ye was speaking to Mr. Robert Collins of the Tavares Construction Company and that due to the delays in dealing with the City and County of San Francisco, it is now their wish to file the map of Tanforan Park without the lands of the City and County of San Francisco and which was part of =he parcel on which they were to build. He further couunented that the plot plan, =herefore, would be incorrect with changes iq boundary lines to the north and south which would change the parking and landscapiqg. Discussion followed at which time the City Attorney explained the methods by which =he matter could be handled, in that the Council could grant the Use Permit with a condition that an amendment be made to the original Use Permit or referring it back to the Planning Commission if the applicant so desired. After further discussion, it was mutually agreed that the applicant would accept the Use Permit with an amendment to be applied for with the Planning Commission. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the recor~mendation of the Planning Commissio3 be approved and accepted and the modifications be worked out with the Planning Director. ]'he next item was the Inter-Office Memorandun dated August 24, 1966 from the City Planner recommending approval to the Use Permit request of Macy's California to permit the establishment of a department store chaih~*s administrative office and service center complex on property located o~ the easterly side of E1Camino is a C-1 district. The following represents excerpts of statements and comments made concerning the eatter of the Use Permit request of Macy's California:. Nayor Bertucelli asked if there was anyone present in the audience who wished to speak on the subject. A lengthy discussion followed at which time =he following persons spoke. ~r. Paul Kaufmann, 109 Longford Drive, objec=ed to the granting of the Use Permit since it affected the pathway to E1Camino High School as well as the extension of Hickey Boulevard to Mission Road, requesting to see the two routes proposed for this extension. A recess was declared at 8~29 p.m. in order =he the Director of Public Works ~ould obtain the maps. The meeting was recalled to order at 8=32 p.n. From the maps, the Director of Public Works explained the alternate routes "A" and ?B", one of which was in the vicinity of E1Camino High School and the other in the vicinity of the cemetery properties. F'Jrther discussion followed by Mr. Kaufmann ~t which time he mentioned the traffic problem which would be generated by the establishment of Macy's. He then asked Councilman Rozzf concerning the location of · Poletti Realty sign on the subject property Councilman Rozzi replied that the firm of Poletti Realty had signs placed throughout t:~e City and that Poletti Realty did not hancle 'this transaction. MACY'S CALIFORNIA USE PEI~IT RESO. NO. 15~ (com'z~r~) 5o -O kr. Daniel Pass, City Planner, then in detail explained the Hickey Boulevard Extension and how it would connect to Hillside Boulevard and Skyline Boulevard which would hake it the most important artery~i going east and west. He then explained the cevelopment which was to be made by Macy's, ~hat the area was properly zoned for such development and that there would be less traffic generated through this cevelopment than would be if a number of small stores or shops were located. ~ir. Kaufmann then remarked on the trucks whi=h would be entering and exiting onto the highway which would increase traffic conditions, especially left-hand turns. He · lso commented on the installation of a traf[ic signal to protect the residents of ~tnston Manor. Ar. Pass, City Planner, remarked that in all of the discussion at the time that the matter was before the Planning Commission, the item of truck traffic was discussed in detail. He further remarked that in these discussions, not only was the Chief of Police present, but the Fire Chief as well a~d that both department heads had approved the plan, that the use proposed would not gelerate more traffic. ~r. Kaufmann then discussed the matter of United Parcel trucks, both large vans &nd small trucks, going in and out to make deliveries from the warehouse to the tine Bay-area Macy's stores. ~r. Pass commented that the City was industr[al in nature, that the land had been laid out in the early development of the Cit'f for this function and that ever since the early days, E1Camino Real was a heavily-traveled street whose main function was to carry such traffic. kr. Kaufmann then commented that if this area were to be allowed to develop industrially, could not the McLellan property nearby be developed likewise, stating that other lands were available in the City to develop in this manner. Aayor Bertucelli briefly mentioned that prior to the establishment of E1Camino ~igh School, the area was then occupied by the Reichard Duck Farm which had a great ·mount of truck traffic in and out. kr. Kaufman then asked as to who would bear the cost of the relocation of Colma Creek &s well as the relocation of the San Francisco water main to which Mr. Egan, a representative of Macy's, stated that the cost would be borne by Macy's. Ar. Kaufmann then again asked concerning the location of a Poletti Realty sign on the property to which Councilman Rozzi again answered that the firm of Poletti Realty had permission to place such a sign not only on this property but others as well throughout the City, that the firm of Polett: Realty did not have the exclusive on the sale of this property and did not enter into this sale. hrs. L. Boning, 1056 Sunnyside Avenue, protested the granting since she did not feel the development of a warehouse was proper in the area and that there were many other areas within the City where such a developme3t could take place. ~r. Pass then remarked that this was not an industrial development but one of a commercial use, was not a warehouse but a service center in which the goods would be prepared prior to their shipment to the department stores. Ars. John Burke, 113 Lomitas Avenue, expressed her thanks to the Council for their recent assistance in solving a hillside problem on property which affected her home. She protested the granting, explaining from a map of the City on which she had indi- cated the effects such a development would have with regard to E1Camino High School, Treasure Island Trailer Court and the Boys' Club on Orange Avenue. She conwnented on the increased traffic which would be generated from the number of trucks going to ~nd from the building and the effect such an establishment would have on the new County buildings in the area, those which were proposed in the future and the recently constructed medical buildings on Mission Road. She likewise mentioned the walkway which was used by the children going to and from E1 Camino High School, remarking that the traffic would in some way endanger =his walkway. She remarked that she would prefer to see the area remain for the development of professional buildings and could rot see why the City would consider this type of development. ~arren Steinkamp, 43 Duval Drive, stated tha~ as a former member of the Planning Com- mission, wished to know why the City Council had zoned the area C-1 when the Planning Commission was opposed to such a zoning. ~ayor Bertucelli remarked that the area had been zoned when White Front first was interested in locating in the area. He further stated that the City had been offered the parcel of property hut that the price was more than could be paid for a park site. Councilman Rozzi stated that it was felt tha= the area fronting on E1 Camino Real should be commercial in development and was natural to this type of development. Ar. Steinkamp again stated that the Planning Commission at the time was unanimous in opposition, suggesting that Council consider initiating action to rezone to a pro- fessional development, asking as to where the Superior Court site would be built, to which the Mayor replied that it would be erected in the same area where the present court buildings now existed. ~r. Steinkamp stated that this was a misuse of land since it was surrounded by residential areas and was the worst piece of planning. I~I~CY' S CALIFORNIA USE PERMIT RE$O. NO. (CONTINUED) Councilman Rocca then asked concerning the m~tter of the walkway to which the City Planner replied that it shoeld be noted that all the school district had previously was a thirty-day license for a pathway and not an easement and that now, Macy's had given them a 180-day permit which was six times what the people had before. He further remarked that in the event Macy's decided to revoke the permit, they would neet with the school authorities and try to develop another route and that this had been satisfactory to the school authorities. Mr. Anthony Montoya, 1125 Miller Avenue, remarked on the proposed development of a drive-in theater sometime previous in the City of Colma and which was denied because of the assistance of the City of South San Francisco in objecting to the increased =raffic. He commented on the lack of communication between the City departments and =he people which resulted in the discussion this evening. Further discussion followed at which time Mr. Kaufmann spoke on the 180-day permit for the use of the pathway as well as inquiring of Mr. Egan as to the number of warehouse sales which might take place during the course of a year, the number of deliveries by rail which would be entering t~e location as well as the number of =rucks going in and out. Councilman Rocca then cowented that the City appreciated having high class people establishing within the City, commenting on the number of people who would be employed and the increased revenue hy taxes which the City would be paid. RESOLUTION NO. 4532: City Attorney Noonan then explained the course of action which the City could take in either approving or denying through the adoption of a resolution after which brief discussion followed hy Mrs. Burke concerning the 180-day permit for the pathway to the E1Camino High School. Councilman Rocca remarked that the Use Permit request would not be detrimental to the City and introduced a resolution granting the requests "A RESOLUTION GRANTING A USE PERMIT TO MACY'S CALII~)RNIA TO ESTABLISH THE PARTICULAR USE OF A 30-ACRE PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF EL CAMINO RBAL APPROXIMATELY 350 FT. SOUTHERLY OF HICKEY BOULEVARD IN A C-1 DISTRICT.' Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J.~Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and C~ido J. Rozzi. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Patrick E. Ahem BUDGET RENT-A-GAR USE PERMIT RESO. NO. 16~ ZO Zo The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandun from.the City Plannerdated August 24, 1966 recommending denial to the Use Permit r.=quest of Budget Rent-a-Car to permit the placement of two signs with an aggregate area of approximately 800 sq. ft. on the wall and to the front of an automobile renta, building in an M-2-H District. There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli setthe matter for Public Hearing on September 19, 1966. PLANNING COMMISSION RULES AND BY-LAWS~ The next item for Council's consideration was the Inter-Office Memorandum from the City Planner dated August 9, 1966 submitting Rules and By-Laws with a recoa~aendation for acceptance. Councilman Rozzt moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Planning Commission be approved and accepted. EXTENSION OF TIME IMPROVEMENTS ON CARLTON COURT AND FORBES BLVD. FAY IMPROVEMENT CO. ~ The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated August 24, 1966 from the Director of Public Works submitting letter dated August:IT, 1966 from the Fay!mprovement Co., requesting an extension of time ~:on contract for improvement of Carlton Court and Forbes Boulevard and recommending requested extension of time. ~ccompanying was communication dated August 24, 1966 from Wilsey & Ham recommending ~pproval of requested extension of time. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Cortesi and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works be approved and accepted. CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 SO. AIRPORT BLVD, WIDENING~ The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandun dated August 25, 1966 from the Director of Public Works recon~uendtng approval to the Change Order No. 2 to the Lowrie Paving Conqoany contract for the So. Airport Boulevard widening project. Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works be approved and accepted. FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF The next item for Council's attention was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 6, SO. AIRPORT BLVD. WIDENING 1966 from the Director of Public Works reco~nending acceptance of work on the So. PROJECT AND NOTICE OF FILING Airport Boulevard Widening Project and authorization to file Notice of Completion. OF GOMPLETION,~i ~ ~ 0 Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Rozzi and regularly carried, that the work be accepted and the filing of Notice of Completion be authorized. ~ONTMLY REPORTS ~ ~onthly Reports were received from the following~ Police Department - July, 1966 Library - July, 1966 San Mateo County Health Department - Sanitation Section - July, 1966 There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli ordered the reports accepted and placed on file. CLAIM AS FILED BY HAROLD $. DOBBS AND JOHN ALDEN DOTY IN BEHALF OF EVELYN KRUPP LEVIN= RESOLUTION NO. 453~r ALTA VISTA #3 - DIRECTING FILING OF EMINENT DOMAIN PRO- CEEDI NGS ~ GOOD AI~ WELFARE~ AD$OU~T~ The next item was the claim as filed by Harold S. Dobbs and John Alden Dory in behalf of their client, Evelyn Krupp Levin, a11eglng damages* as a result of a collis~.bn on March 29, 1966 at the intersection of King D~ive and Junipero Serra Boulevard. 3ouncilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilnan Rozzi and regularly carried, that the claim be denied and referred to the City's insurance carrier and to the City Attorne .tayor Bertucelli asked if any member of the City Council had anything they wished to offer. There was nothing further from any nember of the City Council City Attorney Noonan explained a resolution which had been prepared for Council's attention after which Councilman Rozzi introduced= wA RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT THE PUBLIC INTEREST AND NECESSITY REQUIRE T~R ACQUISITION OF CERTAIN LAND AND DIRECTING THE FILING OF EMINENT DOMAIN PROCEEDINGS." Roll call vote was as follows= Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Emilio Cortesi, Andrew Rocca and Guido J. Rozzt. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Patrick E. Ahern. 4ayor Bertucelli asked if any member of the audience had anything they wished to offer under Good and Welfare. ,-here being none, Councilman Rozzi moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried that the meeting be adjourned to September 12, 1966 at 5=30 p.m. Time of adjournments 9=35 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,