Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1968-12-02REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO HELD MONDAY, DECEMBER 2, 1968 TIME: PLACE: CALL TO ORDER: PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION: ROLL CALL: MINUTES: CLAIMS: PARKING DISTRICT NO. 1 CLAIMS: HARBOR WAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CLAIMS: PUBLIC HEARING AM~ND~DASSESSMENT LOT 3, BLOCK 1 PERSON & SWANSON INDUSTRIAL TRACT: RESOLUTION NO. 4994 CONFIRMING AMENDED ASSESSMENT LOT 3 BLOCK 1 PERSON & SWANSON~ RESOLUTION NO. 4995 AMENDING AG~RF~NT WITH SO. S.F. SCAVENGER CO.: RESOLUTION NO. 4996 AMENDING GRADING PERMIT SUNSET SCAVENGER CO.: 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bertucelli at 8:02 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited after which the Invocation was given by Reverend Harry H. Larson of the First Baptist Church. Present: Absents Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. None Mayor Bertucell! asked if there was a motion approving the Minutes of the regular meeting of November 18, 1968. Councilman Ahern moved, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that the Minutes of the regular meeting of November 18, 1968 he approved as submitted. Mayor Bertucelli then asked if there was a motion approving the regular claims as submitted for payment. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Mammini and regularly carried, that the regular claims, totaling $149,571.03, he approved for payment. Mayor Bertucelli asked if there was a motion approving the claims for Parking District No. 1 as submitted for payment. Councilman Steinkamp moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for Parking District No. 1, totaling $59.13, be approved for payment. Harbor Way Assessment District Claims: (a) Enterprise-Journal claims dated November 6 and 19, 1968, totaling $100.33, for legal advertising. (b) Herman Oliver Inc. claim dated November 5, 1968 in the amount of $284.79 for 3-fold Fire Alarm Box, Ground Rod Assembly and Flexmount for 3-fold Box for Central Fire Station. Councilman Mammini moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for Harbor Way Assessment District be approved for payment. The next item was the Notice of Hearing on the Amended Assessment of Lot 3, Block 1, Person & Swanson Industrial Tract. Mayor Bertucelli declared the Public Hearing opened, asking if any written protests had been received to which the City Clerk replied that none had been received by his office. Mayor Bertucelli then asked if anyone present in the audience wished to speak on the matter. There being none, Mayor Bertucelli declared the Public Hearing closed. City Attorney Noonan explained that the first resolution confirmed the amended assessment, subject of this evening's Public Hearing, and was ready for introduction, after which Councilman Steinkamp introduced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION CONFIRMING AN AMENDED ASSESSMENT - LOT 3, BLOCK 1, PERSON & SWANSON INDUSTRIAL TRACT (ASSESSMENT #53 - BOND SERIES #59)." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammtni, Andrew Rocca and Warren..~Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan remarked that the next three resolutions which did not appear on this evening's Agenda were related to the Scavenger operations and that the first of the three resolutions amended the agreement with the South San Francisco Scavenger Company which is effective on certain conditions which provides for the closing of the dump to the public at the Marina and the contemplated use of the 29 acres of the Sunset Scavenger ax Councilman RocCa; introduced the resolution? entitled: "A RESOLUTION AMENDING AGREEMENT WITH THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SCAVENGER COMPANY, EFFECTIVE ON CONDITIONS." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucellt, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Stetnkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained that the next resolution amended the Grading Permit of the Sunset Scavenger Company, effective on certain conditions after which Councilman Manwnini introduced the resolution entitied~ "A RESOLUTION AMENDING GRADING PERMIT - SUNSET ~CAVENGER OOMPANY, EFFECTIVE ON CDNDITIONS." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. RESOLUTION NO. 4997 MAKING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS REQUIRED BY ORD. NO. 353= RESOLUTION NO. 4998 AUTHORIZING AMENDNLE.NT TO GRADING PLAN - WESTBOROUGH UNIT NO. 4. '~ 0 ~ 0 ORDINANCE APPROVING ANNEXATION - ROTARY PLAZA ANNEXATION= 2nd Reading/Adopt,ion ORDINANCE NO. 581 AMENDING ORD. NO. 353 ( SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL ) ~ 1 st Reading/Adopti on CLAIM AS FILED BY WILLIAM & BARBARA BEITZ IN BEHALF OF MINOR SON= P.C. RESO. NO. 2098 RZ-11 ~ GIANNINI PARCEL= CITY PLANNER'S REPORT= WESTBOROUGH BOULEVARD EXTENSION= PRELIMINARY L~ILI TY PLAN & ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE FOR UTILITIES AND IMPROVFJ~TS GALWAY DRIVE: City Attorney Noonan explained that the next resolution making findings and determinations in accordance with the amendment to the ordinance which is to be presented, was ready for introduction after which Councilman Ahem introduced the resolution entitled~ "A RESO- LUTION N~ING FINDINGS AND DETERMINATIONS REQUIRED BY ORDINANCE NO. 353, AS AMENDED, AND IN PARTICULAR SECTION 3.81." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained that the next resolution authorized the amendment to the Grading Permit, Westborough Unit No..~4, and incorporates in that amendment all regu- lations set forth in the original permit and those recommended by the Director of Public Works. Councilman Steinkamp introduced the resolution entitled= "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AMENDMENT TO GRADING PLAN - WESTBOROUGH UNIT NO. 4." Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. The next item to be considered was the second reading and adoption of the ordinance entitled= "AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED 'ROTARY PLAZA ANNEXATION' TO THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO." At the request of the City Attorney that the ordinance be continued and there being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli so ordered. City Attorney Noonan described the ordinance and advised the Council that as an urgency ordinance, it was subject to passage immediately upon introduction. Mayor Bertucelli ordered the title of the ordinance and the Statement of Facts constitu- ting the urgency read. The title of the ordinance and the Statement of Facts constituting the urgency were read. Councilman Ahem moved that the reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived, seconded hy Councilman Steinkamp and passed by the following roll call vote= Roll call vote was as follows= Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick £. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. Councilman Rocca moved that the ordinance entitled= "AN ORDINANCE OF THE C]TY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 353, AS AMENDED, ENTITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO' (SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL)," be introduced and passed as an urgency ordinance, the reading in its entirety having been duly waived, said ordinance to be effective immediately as an urgency ordinance as authorized by the Government Code, seconded by Councilman Mammini and passed by the following ro~l call vote= Roll call vote was as follows= Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. The next matter for Council's attention was the claim as filed by William and Barbara Beitz in behalf of their minor son for alleged injuries as a result of a fall on August 16, 1968 at Orange Memorial Park. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the claim he denied and referred to the City's insurance carrier. The next item was the Planning Commission Resolution No. 2098 - RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO~tlSSION OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO RECON~ENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THEREOF THAT RZ-11, PETITION OF THE ESTATE OF ROSE GIANNINI, DECEASED, TO REZONE AN APPROXIMATELY 2.5- ACRE PARCEL OF LAND, LOCATED ON THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF HOLLY AVENUE, OPPOSITE WESTVIEW DRIVE, FROM "R-I" TO "U" BE GRANTED, AND THAT THE REQUESTED REZONING BE ENACTED INTO ORDINANCE. Accompanying were letters of appeal as received from Mr. James L. Holliday, dated November 1968; and as received from [&rs. Howard Stoltz, dated November 14, 15, 1968. Mayor Bertucelli stated that if there were no objections, a Public Hearing would be set for the regular meeting of January 6, 1969. No objections having been registered, it was so ordered. The next item was the City Planner's Report to the City Council with respect to Use Permit and Variance Requests considered on November 12, 25, 1968. There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli ordered the Report accepted and placed on file. The next matter for Council's attention was the Westhorough Boulevard Extension. Mayor Bertucelli commented that if there were no objections, this matter would be continued to the next regular meeting of December 16, 1968. No objections having been registered, it was so ordered. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated November 12, 1968 from the Director of Public Works submitting preliminary utility plan and engineer's estimate for utilities and improvement of Galway Drive to serve Westhorough park and fire station sites and requesting Council's authorization to advertise for bids upon approval of plans and specifications. Mayor Bertucelli stated that if there were no objections, this matter would be continued pending execution of an agreement between the developers in this regard. No objections having been registered, Mayor Bertucelli so ordered. ~ESTBOROUGH BOULEVARD EXTENSION ~ At this time, Mayor Bertucelli referred back to the matter of the Westborough Boulevard Extension and read the following press release: "The City has vigorously pursued a solution for Colma Creek--the Army Engineers' project. Why? Because it saves the taxpayers of this City and area a large capital outlay, somewhere in the vicinity of four to five million dollars, and it will provide a flood control facility capable of handling the flood water originating in the hills above South San Francisco and flowing into Colma Creek. Modified projects have been suggested, but we do not want a makeshift project in place of the Army Engineers' design. This is too important a matter to botch up. Silt control is the only remaining problem that I am aware of which is standing in the way of the Army Corpos of Engineers' proceeding with the plans. The Council has asked for regulations through the Flood Control District to control silt in the hills surrounding South San Francisco. It is our hope that the regulations will be adopted by the several juris- dictions and the County. When this is done, we intend to approach the Army Corps of 2ngineers with the advice that we have a regulatory method of controlling the silt, and, therefore, urge that they proceed with the project. Twelve Mile Creek is a major tributary to Colma Creek. The manner in which the water is brought from Junipero Serra to Colma Creek by way of Twelve Mile Creek or a pipe installed there affects the function of Colma Creek. It is not unreasonable to require the County to assume full jurisdiction of a pipe which affects the function of Colma Creek, using the Flood Control District as a vehicle. In fact, the pipe should go all the way to Colma Creek. The City's proposal will not only benefit the whole area but will save the special taxation discussed by the County Engineer and relieve Westborough and Serramonte of any special taxation, because in our original discussion the County was to contribute its share and the City contribute its share for the construction and installation of the pipe. This would leave only the maintenance cost and, as the County ~imer stated, such cost is minimal. When you spread this cost over 10,000 acres of land in the Colma Creek Flood Control Zone, minimal is too large a word to describe the cost. The Flood Control District was created to solve such problems and to solve them in an orderly way. It would not be in the best interest of the County or the cities of the North County to throw our hands up now and dissolve the District. The Flood Control District Act is a good law. It was passed in 1959 and amended after that. The Colma Creek Zone was established and gives us a method for solving the flood control problems in this area. We only need the willingness to carry on and make the act work for the benefit of the people in this area. We hear from time to time the plea for bay-area-wide leadership in the form of a regional government to handle those problems which are of Bay-area-wide concern and which cannot he well handled by one jurisdiction. Flood control is a similar problem within the County of San Mateo. If we as political leaders support a regional government concept for Bay Area problems, why can't we use the same principle within our own boundaries? Other counties in the State have similar flood control acts functioning for the benefit of the people in those counties. The County is taking over a natural waterway in Twelve Mile Creek and imtalling an artificial structure to accommodate a road development. The Westborough Extension serves the whole County of San Mateo as well as the City of South San Francisco. The County is undertaking the project for the benefit of the County as well as the City. It is reasonable to request that no drainage problem be created for South San Francisco. It is reasonable to say that the County through the Flood Control District should assume the full responsibility for the flood control function of Twelve Mile Creek and the pipe to be installed in Twelve Mile Creek. Twelve Mile Creek as a Flood Control District facility is not a new condition. In fact, it was first suggested in 1967 by the Council to the County, and then it became one of the main conditions for City approval of the project. In a letter dated April 24, 1968, I restated the Council's position requiring the operation and maintenance of the completed storm drainage system by the Flood Control District. On May 6, 1968, in Resolution 4844, the Council formally stated it as a condition for approval of the project. In a reply letter from the Chairman of the Board dated August 28, 1968, no objection was raised and the letter went on to discuss other matters related to the project. The Council cannot impose on the people of this City an obligation that belongs to others. The door is still open for completion of this project, it it proceeds as agreed. The Supervisors may desire to cancel the project for the present. In the future, if we are able to resolve the matter with the Board, we will proceed further to reach a satisfactory agreement. In the event the pipe does go to Burl Burl, there will be more flood and erosion and we'll be sued for a million or two. We would have to double taxes. I can't see it at this time. We have their letters and this was not a matter of disagreement." W ESTBOROU(Nt BOULEVARD EXTENSION ~ (CONTINUED) CORPORATION YARD ROOF RECONSTRUCTION - FINAL ACCEPTANCE & AUTHORIZATION TO FILE NOTICE OF COMPLETION: UNDERGROUND UTILITY DIST. NO. 2, PHASE A AND B~ AMENDMENT TO SUNSET SCAVENGER 29-ACRE FILL ' PERMIT & SO.$.F. SCAVENGER SOLID WASTE DISPOSAE.' MONTHLY REPORTS ~ GOOD AND WELFARE: DI SCU SS ION CONCERNING AREA NEAR EL RANCHO DRIVE- IN THEATER .' Brief discussion followed at which time Mrs. Mary Ortner, 32 Escanyo Drive, asked as to how much longer the residents would have to wait for a decision before making some improvements on their properties. She likewise asked why the County Engineer was allowed to spend money to improve the California Golf Course instead of the property rights of the people within the County. She commented as well on the increased cost to property owners in improving their properties by the delay of the project and ex- pressed opposition that there would be no longer delays in this regard. Mr. Dona~ Grimes, 123 Francisco Drive, remarked on the comment by the Chairman of the County Board of Supervisors relative to dissolving the Flood Control Zone and the withdrawing of funds, asking if the County could take such an action. Mayor Bertucelli briefly explained the source of water coming through the City from .other areas and that the City had to spend monies to alleviate this problem as a result. Councilman Rocca explained how the Flood Control District had been formed under the Flood Control Act and that it could not be summarily abandoned. Councilman Rocca requested the City Attorney for a further explanation to which he replied that it could not he done arbitrarily, that the statement made regarding the dissolution of the Flood Control Zone may have been quickly made. City Attorney Noonan then went on to explain the Flood Control Act and how it operated. Mr. Grimes concluded by stating that it was irritating to hear a statement made about dissolving a Flood Control Zone. Mr. Edward Toby, 2570 Bantry Lane, remarked on the article which appeared in the newspapers relative to the meeting of the Supervisors which was to be held on December 3, 1968, which further reported that if the matter were not settled by that date, funds would he diverted to other areas. He remarked that ~eir association attorney contacted Mr. Fitzgerald who stated that the matter would be placed over for two weeks. He requested Council to furnish the County with a final statement of what they desire in order that the matter could be resolved. Mayor Bertucelli remarked that this had already been done and information forwarded to the County agency through a communication and that the Council was looking out for the interest of the City's taxpayers. He briefly explained the method hy which the County proposed to install the pipe which would end at the edge of Burt Burl Park. He further commented that the pipe would he 7 ft. in size and would discharge a great volume of water in that location. Mr. Mario Gagliolo, 760 Grand Avenue, commended the Council for their action, requesting all interested citizens to appear at the County Board of Supervisors' meeting and inform them of our feelings. Discussion was concluded by a statement from Councilman Rocca that the final say remains with the Supervisors and not the County Engineer's office. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated November 14, 1968 from the Director of Public Works requesting final acceptance of Corporation Yard Roof Reconstruction and authorization to file Notice of Completion. Councilman Ahern moved, seconded by Councilman Mammtni and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Durector of Public Works he approved and accepted and Notice of Completion filed. The Inter-Office Memorandum dated November 14, 1968 from the Director of Public Works concerning Underground Utility District No. 2, Phase A and B - prior to construction of E1Camino Real Widening hy the Division of Highways was the next matter for Council's attent Councilman Aher~moved, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that the matter be referred to the Director of Public Works for the development of a plan of financing with the Pacific Gas and Electric Company and the Pacific Telephone Company and upon the filing of this report with the City Clerk, then the City Attorney draft the necessary documents to form this district. Tbe:next matter to be considered was the Amendment to the Sunset Scavenger Company 29-acre Fill Permit and South San Francisco Scavenger Solid Waste Disposal. Councilman Steinkamp moved, seconded by Councilman Mammini and regularly carried, that the Acting City Manager determine the requirements of the respective departments for solid waste disposal and file a report with City Council. Councilman Ahern moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the City Attorney be authorized to order a title report for the tide lots, including the South San Francisco Scavenger Company's 66 acres at an extimated cost of $275. Monthly Reports~were received from the followings Library - October 1968 San Mateo County - Public Health and Welfare - October 1968 There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli ordered the Reports accepted and placed on file. There being nothing further, Mayor Bertucelli asked if any member of the City Council had anything they wished to offer under Good and Welfare. Councilman Steinkamp brought to the attention of the City Council the large area adjacent to Hickey Boulevard near the E1 Rancho Drive-In Theater, stating that the easement belonged to the San Francisco Water Company, suggesting that the possibilities be in- vestigated of filling the area to he used for recreational purposes. GOOD AND WF. LFAR~ (CONTINUED) DRAIN PIPE - AVALON PARK.' CO~NDATION TO POLICE AND FIRE DEPTS. FOR PERPOR~NCE IN THEIR LINES OF DU3~Y: 5/03 COMMENTs CONCERNING MRS. ELIZABETH ROBBINS, DECEASED: CON~ENTS CONCERNING RECREATION & PARKS DEPT: Councilman Mammini in reply stated that this was a large water main from the San Francisco Water Department and the amount of fill which would be placed could be hazardous to this installation and suggested that, first, this be checked out with this agency. The Director of Public Works was so instructed. Councilman Rocca then asked the Director of Public Works as to what steps had been taken with regard to the drain pipe in Avalon Park. Director of Public Works Louis Goss replied that a new pipe was to be installed and that presently a grate had been installed over the opening of the present pipe to keep children from enteri~it. Mayor Bertucelli at this time read a letter which he had received, commending the members of the Police and Fire Departments which was as follows: "Dear Mr. Mayor: In these troubled days of unrest and the berating of our peace officers and others in the category of working for the Establishment, I would like to add my small voice "that in observing first hand how these loyal dedicated men-in-blue and our fire department operate I can really feel a sense of pride in my City." I found my father in a coma upon arriving at his home approximately 5~45 p.m. on Wednesday last. I immediately called the Fire Department for assistance. In what amounted to a matter of minutes the Fire Department's rescue team arrive accompanied by Police Officer Hooper. My wife in the interim received wonderful support from the South San Francisco telephone operator having a priest from Mater Dolorosa called. The ambulance arrived and was given a police escort to Kaiser, however, my father died en route. Our thanks also go out to Rev. Edward Allen of Matero Dolorosa Church who arrived in a matter of what seemed seconds to administer the last rites of the Church. Officer Hooper and Mr. Keegan of the Coroner's office of San Mateo County helped all of us in a most very trying situation. I feel a sense of pride and boastfulness about our City's "finest" Police and Fire Departments. Sincerely, /s/ William pOWers 324 Heather Way South San Francisco 94080." Mayor Bertucelli then expressed his thanks for the receipt of such a letter, commenting that the City was fortunate to have two such fine departments which he considered the best in the State. Mr. Antonio Gaudio, Attorney at Law, briefly spoke relative to the recent loss of Mrs. Elizabeth Robhins, a member of his staff who worked for him for the period of 1946 to 1968, remarking that she was a valued and good employee who had briefly worked for the City of South San Francisco as a member of the Library staff and requested Council, at such time as they were prepared to adjourn this evening's meeting, that it be adjourned in memory of Mrs. Robbins. Mr. Thomas Fee, 2501 Donegal Avenue, commented concerning the recent newspaper article relative to the Counci's taking issue with Mr. Robert Maxey, Superintendent of Recreation and Parks Department, concerning certain recreational activities and that just this evening, there was read a letter praising the Police and Fire Departments. He remarked that Mr. Maxey was doing an outstanding job in the field of recreation for the citizens of South San Francisco and did not feel the comments in the paper were due Mr. Maxey. Mayor Bertucelli at this time stated that Mr. Maxey was performing very good work, had a good budget, and then briefly commented on a tour which was taken shortly after April of this year to view the recreational facilities within the~City. He remarked that one of the items which was discussed at length at that time was the construction of the swimming pool for the residents of the City and that it was decided at that time that the tennis court side would be utilized. He commented on the delays which had taken place in this regard. Mayor Bertucelli also explained the objections;which.Mr. Maxey and Mr. Hoffman regis- tered at the time the Guy F. Atkinson Company wished to add additional stories to their building, the objections in the nature of the effect the shade would have on the park landscaping and that now, it was determined that &t~ was necessary in the pool in order to afford better visibility to those persons using the pool. Further discussion followed concerning the proposed ~imming pool and its size at which time Mr. Fee suggested the larger pool in order that younger children would not be crowded in the area which would be hazardous to them, illustrating this by the pool in San Francisco which his family used and which because of its smaller size, would have this hazard. Mr. Marlo Gagliolo asked if the plans included a wading pool for small children which would be kept separate and apart from the larger pool so that the children could use this facility and not be exposed to any dangers. GOOD AND WELFARE: (OONTINUED) RESOLUTION NO. 4999 IN MF~RY OF MRS. ELIZABETH ROBBINS, DECEASED: ~MENT OF SILENCE IN MEMORY OF MRS. ROBBINS: ADJOURNMENT: RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Further discussion followed at which time the Counctl commented that the City wished to construct a pool which would afford the residents of the City the facilities for good recreational activity. Mayor Bertucelli at this time requested the adoption of a resolution in memory of Mrs. Elizabeth Robbins. City Attorney Noonan explained the resolution after which Councilman Ahern introduced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION IN MEMORY OF MRS. ELIZABETH EOBBINS, DECEASED." Roll call vote Was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. There being nothing further, Mayor Bertucelli adjourned the meeting with a moment of silence in memory of Mrs. Elizabeth Robhins. Time of adjournment: 9:16 p.m. APPROVED: City Clerk *The discussions contained herein are excerpts and not verbatim.