Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1969-01-06 REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO HELD ~NDAY, JANUARY 6, 1969 TIMEs PLACE~ CALL TO ORDERs PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION s ROLL CALL~ MINUTES~ CI. AIMSs PARKING DISTRICT NO. 1CLAIMSs CABOT, CABOT & fORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. IA CLAIM~ CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. 2 CLAIMS~ CABOT, CABOT & fORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. 2A CLAIMSs HARBOR WAY ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CLAIMSs SO. AIRfi)RT BLVD. FIRE SERVICE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT CLAIM~ 8~00 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall, The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bertucelli at 8s05 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited after which, in the absence of Reverend Gilbert Ho Vieira of Aldersgate Methodist Church and at the request of Councilman Steinka~p, a moment of silence was observed. Present~ Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp Absents Councilman F. Frank Namini Mayor Bertucelli asked if there was a motion approving the Minutes of the regular meeting of December 16, 1968. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the Minutes of the regular meeting of December 16, 1968 be approved as submitted. Mayor Bertucelli then asked if there was a motion approving the regular claims as submitted for payment. Councilman Ahem moved, seconded by Councilman Steinka=p and regularly carried, that the regular claims, totaling $64,354.18, be approved for payment. Mayor Bertucelli asked if there was a motion approving the claims for Parking District No. 1 as sub~ttted for payment. Council=an Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Ahem and regularly carried, that the claims as Sub~ttted for Parking District No. 1, totaling $166.15, be approved for payment. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. IA Claim Wilsey & Ham claim dated December 12, 1968 in the amount of $41.91 for Modification to Street Light System. Councilman Steinka~p moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. lA be approved for payment. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2 Claims Wilsey & Hamclaim dated December 16, 1968 for Invoices Nos. 5022, 5023, 5024, 5025, 5026 and 5027, totaling $2,660.25, for Engineering Services through November 30, 1968. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Ahem and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2 be approved for payment. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2AClaim Wilsey & Ham claim dated December 16, 1968 for Invoices Nos. 5022, 5023, 5024, 5025, 5026 and 5027, totaling $2,660.24, for Engineering Services through November 30, 1968, Councilman Ahem moved, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2A be approved for payment. Harbor Way Assessment District Claimss (a) F. D. Sperry Company claim dated December 10, 1968 in the amount of $2,822.63 for Progress Payment No. 1. (b) Kennedy Electric Company claim dated November 22, 1968 in the amount of for Fire Alarm Box Installation. Councilman Ahem moved~ seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for Harbor Way Assessment District be approved for payment. South Airoort Boulevard Fire Service Assessment District Claim Underground Construction Co., Inc., claim dated December 4, 1968 in the amount of $43,596.67 for 12" Fire Main. Councilman Ahem moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for South Airport Boulevard Fire Service Assessment District be approved for payment. DISCUSSION CONCERNING "CLOSING" OF MAGNOLIA TEEN CENTERs PUBLIC H~ARING BOTIEFF ANNBXATION ~ PUBLIC HEARING REZONING FROM R-1 TO U GIANNINI PARCEL ~ Mayor Bertucelli at this time stated that there were teenagers present this evening who wished to take up a matter with the members of the City Council. He at this time asked for the spokesman of the organization to speak. Miss Jane Curley, 632 First Lane, stated that she represented the Magnolia Teen Center and wished to speak to someone in charge of the Recreation Department concerning whether or not it was correct that consideration was being given to the closing of the Teen Center, asking Mr. Maxey, present, if this was so to which Mr. Maxey replied that this was not correct. Miss Curley stated that as one of the active members, it was her understanding that it was to be closed since it was not receiving the activity as it previously had. Councilman Ahern asked Miss Curley if one of the directors gave her this information to which Miss Curley replied that she preferred not to answer this question. Superintendent of Recreation and Parks Maxey stated that possibly youngsters among themselves had requested others to attend these activities and, possibl~[~ may have made the comment that if they did not show an attendance, the Center would be closed. Miss Curley remarked that they would be willing to have fund-raising campaigns if financial assistance was necessary. Mr. Maxey suggested that rather than have a number of people acting as spokesman, suggested that they select from among themselves, three to ten teenagers and meet with him at his office at any convenient time for whatever problems they feel may exist. Mr. Eric Lind, 209 Acacia Avenue, spoke, stating that he mlso represented the Teen Center and that if more publicity were given the activities, there would be a larger attendance. Mr. Maxey then remarked that he did not understand what the teenagers meant by financial help; that the activities were well publiciz~d~fdtt~t'~2~e the numbers were not as large as they were six months to a year ago, a great deal of activity was~being promoted and considerable funds were being spent to improve some of the activities in accordance with the amount of people who could be accommodated at one time. He concluded by stating that more specific answers could be given when the meeting was held in his office. Mayor Bertucelli commended Miss Jane Curley, stating that if any of the youngsters wished to, could remain for the duration of the meeting or leave, if they so desired. The next item was the Public Hearing on the Notice of Hearing - Botieff Annexation. Mayor Bertucelli declared the Public Hearing opened, asking if the City had received the capacity interest payment. There being no information available at this time and there being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli declared the Public Hearing continued. The ~ublic Hearing on the Notice of Hearing - REZONING OF APPROXI~TELY 2.5 ACRE PARCEL REFF~EED TO AS THE GIANNINI PARCEL FROM AN R-1 TO A U CLASSIFICATION - was the next item. Mayor Bertucellt at this time declared opene~!';the..~f~ic Hearing on the rezoning of the Giannini parcel from an R-1 to a U classification. Council had before them petitions and lette~ from adjacent property owners objecting to the proposed rezoning. Mayor Bertucelli at this time asked if anyone present ~ished to speak concerning this matt~ Lengthy discussion followed at which time the following persons spokes Mr. Antonio Gaudio, Counsel for the estate of Rose Giannini, deceased, and the applicant in the rezoning application, prefaced his comments by remarking that it appeared that the objections to the proposed rezoning came from misconception on the proposed use of the property in that a good number of people were of the opinion that the property was to be used for a proposed ~rive-in commercial use, stating that this may have been the reason for residents subscribing to the petition circulated. At this time he read to Council a duplicate original petition which he had obtained this afternoon relative to this rezoning after which he presented the petition for filing with the City Attorney. He then commented on the Plan~ing Commission study on this matter, concluding that the owner of the property was a resident of long duration, that it was presently in an estate proceedings to be shared by eight indi~rl~u&~, that it is an substantial piece of property with substantial value to the tax rolls and that the property was entitled to be developed to the~ghest personal gain as soon as possible. He remarked that he was prepared to answer any questions which anyone might have. He then asked those persons present in the audience who were the principals involved in the estate to stand. Ur. Howard Stoltz, 251 Holly Avenue, registered objections to the rezoning, commenting that he had personally collected forty to forty-five signatures on the petition and that at no time, did he misrepresent anything to anyone regarding the development of this prop- erty. He stated that there were a number of people present this evening who wished to discuss the matter of traffic problems, parking problems, litter and things of this nature and that he had directed a letter to the C~ty Attorney several weeks ago, asking for legal advise in this regard. He stated that the lot was first posted on the day before the holiday, October 30, 1968, advertising it to be rezoned from R-1 to R-3 and that they were informed afterwards that it was to be from R-1 to U. He concluded by commenting that the published legal notice also indicated that the rezoning was from to R-3. PUBLIC HEARING RRZONING FRON R-1 TO U GIANNINI PARCEL ~ (CO~T~NU~) City Attorney Noonan stated the letter had been received and filed with the City Clerk in this proceeding, that it did raise a problem since the notices were to inform the people. He further stated that Council had received the notice from the recommending body and that an ambiguity of R-3 or U affecting the jurisdiction existed. He stated that if the Planning Commission was a granting body and the notice were ambiguous, it would call for a new notice and hearing. He indicated the notice should have spoken exactly as Mr. Stoltz remarked and that if Council were of the opinion that the people should have two full hearings in this matter, then the item could be referred back to the Planning Commission with the proper procedure for a proper notice. Mayor Bertucelli at this time asked Mr. Stoltz if he had a copy of the publ.icatto~,', to show the manner in which it was advertised to which he replied that in the November 1, 1968 issue of the Enterprise-Journal under the Notice of Hearing, it was shown as a proposed rezoning from R-1 to R-3 and that this was what was disturbing to him. City Attorney Noonan commented that this gave a confused picture and that Council had the right to ask for a new hearing before the Planning Commission; to accept the pro- posed amendment as a U classification or to reject the amendment as a U classification. Discussion then followed concerning the legal advert~sing at which time mention was again made by the City Attorney that the City COun~il::c~Uld~order this matter back to the Planning Commission with a request that a proper notice be made. Councilman Ahern commented that if a precedent were set in this case, it could happen again in another instance. Mr. Stoltz then remarked that a petition containing eighty-five signatures had been submitted to the Clerk of the Planning Commission and that no one had looked at them. He further stated that they were informed at the Commission meeting that the proposed plans were for forty units and that there was some excavation work to be done but that no plans were available at that time. He stated that they would like to be guaranteed in writing by the Planning Commission that a maximum of forty units were to be built on the property, asking for a legal interpretation tn this regard. Mr. Guadio stated that in this Public Hearing, it is the Planning Commission's rezoning that is before the City Council and not a Use Permit and that he did not feel it right that they should at this time go into apartment problems. Councilman Rocca mentioned that the matter before Council this evening was the matter of rezoning and that as explained by the City Attorney, there appeared to be some ambi- guities or error in the proceedings from the Planning Commission and that it was his opinion not to act upon the matter but, instead, moved that the matter be referred back to the Planning Co~nission for the proper procedure to be followed. Councilman Ahern stated that before seconding the motion, would like to know if the Council were going to delay the process. The City Attorney replied that a new hearing would be held in this regard. Councilman Ahern then stated that he did not wish the people to have the feeling that when something were delayed, it was being delayed on purpose. Mayor Bertucelli then asked if anyone else present wished to speak on this matter. Mr. John Lukowitz, 242 Holly Avenue, requested a clarification on a U classification to which City Planner Daniel Pass replied that a U District stands for 'Unclassified" and that it was restrictive in that everything established under a U District was approved through a Use Permit application. He in detail explained this form of classification, citing other areas within the City which were developed under the U classifcation, concluding by remarking that it was the feeling of the Planning Co~mission that a maxi- mum of forty units would be permitted if the zone were created and if the development met the tenants of Urban Planning. Lengthy discussion then followed between the members of the City Council and City Planner Daniel Pass relative to the matter of rezoning, the restrictions which could be employed, the proposed development of the property in question, and the rezoning hearing which had taken place with the Planning Commission in this regard. Mayor Bertucelli then remarked that Council could not take any action on the matter since the Planning Commission hearing was not legally conducted. City Attorney Noonan stated that it was his feeling that Councilman Roccats motion for referral back to the Planning Commission was to attempt to work out a solution agreeable to both sides. Mayor ~ertucelli then asked if anyone else wished to speak on the subject. Mr. Henry Marchi, 266 Holly Avenue, spoke on the matter of traffic which would be in- creased with the increased danger to children in the area. He then asked Mr. Goss why Holly Avenue had widths of fifty, fifty-five and sixty feet. Mr. Goss explained the development of Sunshine Gardens and how the widths varied as a resul of later developments. Mr. Marchi concluded by stating that traffic generated in the area was already bad and that parking was a problem. Mr. John Falsarella, 202 Westview Drive, stated that he resided only two hundred feet from the property which was proposed to be rezoned and received no notice of this rezoning, stating that it was the feeling at the Planning Coa~aission meeting that he should have read the notice in the paper, that his first notice came when he passed by the property and saw the area posted. He remarked that the Planning Commission meeting had been PU~IC HEARING REZONING FROM R-1 ~O U GIA~NINI PARCEL= (CONTI.UED) RESOLUTION NO. 5009 AUTHORIT-IN~ EXECUTION OF DAY-TO-DAY I~JTUAL AID AGRR RESOLUTION NO. 5010 GRANTING CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF EXTRA- TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TANFORAN AVENUE ASSESS- ~ENT DISTRICT= 0 RESOLUTION DECLARING NO ~JORITY PROTEST MADE BOTIEFF ANNEXATION = RESOLUTION NO. 5011 SETTING PUBLIC HEA~ING DISTRICTS EL CA~LINO REAL PHASE A & B~ RESOLUTION NO. 5012 VACATION OF PUBLIC UTILITY EASFJ4ENT LOTS 27 & 28, BLOCK 2, C.C.& F. NO. lB= hastily conducted and that a number of people did not know the meaning of a U classification. ~. Robert B6rdieu, 243 Holly Avenue, commented on the recent apartment developments in the area, making mention of Fernmar North and the Willow development, stating that in his opinion, these were not good developments. He concluded by stating that he had another petition to be added which he presented to the City Attorney. Discussion then followed by Mr. Guadio and the members of the City Council regarding how long the matter could be held before Council made its decision. Councilman Rocca then ~emarked that the proposed application was for a reclassification from R-1 to U, but that the notices showed the proposed application as being from R-1 to R-3. H· further stated that since there was ambiguity and not having come to the City Council in a proper manner, the Council's first* action was to see that anything submitted had been done so properly and in a legal manner. He, therefore, moved that the matter be referred back to the Planning Commission so that it may be returned to the City Council in proper form and give the Planning Commission an opportunity to correct any d~ficiency or error that has been made. Councilman Ahern seconded~motion which was regularly carried. City Attorney Noonan explained the first resolution which concerned mutual aid agree- ment with the City of Brisbane, remarking that the City already had such agreements with other cities after which Councilman Steinkamp introduced the resolution entitled= "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF DAY-TO-DAY MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO AND THE CITY OF BRISBANE." Roll call vote was as follows= Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank Mammini. The next item was the City of San Bruno Resolution No. 1968-81 entitleds "A RESOLUTION REC~JESTING CONSENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TO THE EXER- CISE OF EXTRA-TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TO UNDERTAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE ACC~JISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC I~PROVENENTS AND TO PROVIDE THAT THE COSTS SHALL BE ASSESSED UPON THE DISTRICT BENEFITED THEREBY UNDER APPROPRIATE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT AND ASSESSMENT BOND ACTS." City Attorney Noonan explained the resolution concerning the jurisdiction of the place- ment of certain public improvements and the charges for these public improvements would be against the properties in San Bruno and not against the properties in South San Francisco after which Councilman Steinkamp introduced the resolution entitled= "A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONSENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO TO THE EXERCISE OF EXTRA-TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION TO UNDERTAKE PROCEEDINGS FOR THE AC~JISITION AND CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC I~PROVENENTS AND TO PROVIDE THAT TH~ COSTS SHALL BE ASSESSED UFON THE DISTRICT BENEFITED THEREBY, UNDER APPROPRIATE SPECIAL ASSESSN~.NT AND ASSESSMENT BOND ACTS TANFORAN AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT." Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern~ Andrew Rocca and Warren $teinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank Mammini. The next resolution for Council's consideration was entitled= "RESOLUTION DECLARING THAT A NAJORITY PROTEST HAS NOT BEEN HAD~ TO THEPRO~OSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF F~Z~TH SAN FRANCISCO OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED BOTIEFF ANNEXATION." Since this matter was related to the continued Public Hearing and there being no objections, ~ayor Bertucelli ordered the resolution continued. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 19, 1968 from the Director of Public Works concerning E1Camtno Real Underground Utility District No. 2, together with the letter dated December 18, 1968 from the Pacific Gas and flectric Company concerning the same subject. Accompanying was a Memorandum dated December 3, 1968 from the State of California, Department of Public Works, Division of Highways, regarding the proposed project. After an explanation by the City Attorney, Councilman Steinkamp introduced the reso- lution entitled= "A RESOLUTION SETTING A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE WHETHER PUBLIC NECESSITY, HEALTH, SAFETY, OR WELFARE RE(~UIRES THE FOP, NATION OF AN UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT ON EL CANINO REAL FROM THE SOUTH CORPORATE LIMIT LINE TO THE NORTH CORPORATE LIMIT LINE 'UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 2 - PHASE A & B.'" Roll call vote was as follows= Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank Mammini. The next matter was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 19, 1968 from the Director of Public Works recommending abandonment of the southeast five feet of the existing fifteen foot PUE along the northwesterly property line of Lot 28, Block 2, Cabot, Cabot and Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. I-B, together with a letter dated December 17, 1968 from Wilsey & Ham concerning the same subject matter. Accompanying was the letter dated December 10, 1968 from the Pacific Gas and Electric Company approving the abandonment. City Attorney Noonan stated that the abandonment was recommended by the Director of Public Works and approved-by the Public Utilities and the resolution was ready for consideration after which Councilman Ahern introduced the resolution entitleds "A RESOLUTION VACATING A FIVE FOOT (5~) PORTION OF A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT OF LOTS 27 AND 28, BLOCK 2, CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT NO. Roll call vote was as follows= Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank Mammini. RESOLUTION NO. 5013 ESTABLISHING FEES FOR ANI~d~L SHELTER SERVICES~ RESOLUTION NO. 5014 RESCINDING NO. 4975 RESOLUTION NO. 5015 WESTERN PIPE LINE CASES FINAL SETTLENEN ~ RESOLUTION NO. 5016 AMENDING RESO. NO. 5004 SO. AIRPORT BLVD. AREAs RESOLUTION NO. 5017 APPROVING DREDGING PORTION OF SAN BRUNO CANAL ~ . 6o RESOLUTION NO. 5018 AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF PERMIT TO UNITED AIR LINES ~ ORDINANCE NO. 582 A~ENDING ORD. 353 SECTIONS 7.28 & 7.33 And Reading/Adoption ORDINANCE NO. 583 AJ~NDING ORD. 449 AS AllENDEDs 2nd Reading/Adoption ~'~-00 0 City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution which had been prepared for Councilts consideration after which Couacilman Ahern introduced the resolution entitled~ RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING FEES FOR ANI~AL SHELTER SERVICES IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION XIX OF ORDINANCE 564 OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO." Roll call vote was as followss Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman Fo Frank Mamaini. City Attorney Noonan explained that the next resolution rescinds Resolution No. 4975 which gave a City-owned vessel CF 0502 XC to the Sea Scouts of America. Achnintstrative Assistant Laurence Ross explained to Council the status of the vessel and the objections of the Boy Scouts of America organization to the acceptance of the boat. Councilman Ahern introduced the resolution entitled~ "A RESOLUTION RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 4975." Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank Man, mini. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution which would authorize execution of documents necessary to obtain the Cityts share in the final settlement of the American Pipe Line cases after which Councilman Rocca introduced the resolution entitled~ "A RESOLUTION REGARDING WESTERN PIPE LINE CASES." Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucellt, Patrick E. Ahern, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank Naamini. City Attorney Noonan explained that the next resolution amends Resolution No. 5004 concerning the installation of the sanitary sewer line, modification to the pump station, on South Airport Boulevard Area Sewer Project after which Councilman Ahern introduced the resolution entitled~ "A RESOLUTION ANENDING RESOLUTION NO. 5004 ENTITLED 'A RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO ISSUE SEWER REVENUE BONDS' SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD AREA SEWER PROJECT." Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank ~ammini. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution which was recommended by the Director of Public Works and the Soils Engineer. Councilman Rocca requested that the resolution embody all of the requirements protecting the City of South San Francisco in this regard after which he introduced the resolution entitled~ "A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DREDGING OF A PORTION OF SAN BRUNO CAILAL AS RELATED TO THE GRADING PERA~IT." Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Ber~ucelli, Patrick £. Ahern, &ndrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank ~ammint. After an explanation by the City Attorney, Councilman Steinkamp introduced the resolution entttledt "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE OF A PERNIT TO UNITED AIR LINES FOR USE OF A PORTION OF SOUTH AIRPORT BOULEVARD." Roll call vote was as followss Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucellt, Patrick E. Ahem., Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank Man~nini. 14ayor Bertucelli ordered the title of the ordinance read. The title of the ordinance was read. City Attorney Noonan explained the ordinance and advised the City Council regarding procedure for adoption and passage. Councilman $teinkamp moved reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that the ordinance be passed and adopted by reading title only, seconded by Councilman Rocca and passed by unanimous vote. Councilman Rocca moved that the ordinance entitled~ "AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO A~DING ORDINANCE NO. 353, AS A~ENDED, ENTITLED ~ZONINGORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO' PASSED ANDADOPTEDAUGUST 10, 1954, AND IN PARTICULAR A~ENDING SECTIONS 7.28 AND 7.33," the entire reading of which has been duly waived, be passed and adopted, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and passed by the following roll call vote. Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucellt, Patrick E. Ahern, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank Namint. F~%y:~A1~e~ney;R~aan`~st~ted`:~th~t~he~ra~namde~amer~dtng:Qrd~an~etNe~49!wa~:~re~dy~f~r t~he second reading and adoption. ~ayor Bertucelli ordered the title of the ordinance read. The title of the ordinance was read. City Attorney Noonan explained the ordinance and advised the City Council regarding procedure for adoption and passage. Councilman Ahern moved reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived and that the ordinance be passed and adopted by reading title only, seconded by Councilman Rocca and passed by unanimous vote. Councilman Stetnkamp moved that the ordinance entitleds "AN ORDINANCE ANENDING ORDINANCE 449, AS A~NDED," the entire reading of which has been duly waived, be passed and adopted, seconded by Councilman Ahern and passed by the following roll call vote. Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank Mammini. ORDINANCE NO. 585 PROVIDING FOR INCREASE IN LICENSE FEES; AND A~ENDING ORD. NO. 564~ 1st Reading/Adop~ ORDINANCE BOTIEFF ANNEXATIONs 1st Reading/Introduction INCREASE IN MONTHLY PREPAYMENT - KAl SiR FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN= CLAIM AS FILED BY ~S. LILLIE BOROSKY~ CLAIM AS FILED BY NRS, BERNICE PLACE IN BEHALF OF DAUGHTER= PLANNING DEPT. REPORT SURVEY & GEOGRAPHICAL TABULATION ~ CITY PLANNER'S REPORT= EXTENSION OF COI~LETION TIME - HARBOR WAY WIDEN- lNG PROJECT ~ EXTENSION OF CONPLETION TINE - C.C. & F. UNITS NOS. 2 & 2A II~ROVEI~NTS~ AWARD OF CONTRACT ASPHALT PAVING - PARADI SE VALLEY PARK City Attorney Noonan described the ordinance and advised the Council that as an urgency ordinance, it was subject to passage immediately upon introduction. Mayor Bertucelli ordered the title of the ordinance and the State of Facts con- stituting the urgency read. The title of the ordinance and the Statement of Facts constituting the urgency were read. Councilman Rocca moved that the reading of the ordinance in its entirety be waived, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and passed by the following roll call vote. Councilman Steinkamp moved that the ordinance entitled~ "AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING FOE AN INCREASE IN LICENSE FEES AND AMENDING SECTION VII OR ORDINANCE NO. 564 PASSED THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 1967," be introduced and passed as an urgency ordinance, the reading in its entirety having been duly waived, said ordinance to be effective immediately as an urgency ordinance as authorized by the Government Code, seconded by Councilman Rocca and passed by the following ro~l call vote. Roll call vote was as follows= Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, Councilman F. Frank Mammini. The next ordinance was entitled~ "AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED EOTIEFF ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO." Since this ordinance was related to the continued Public Hearing and there being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli ordered the ordinance continued. The next item was the communication dated December 5, 1968 concerning increase in monthly prepayment charges from Kaiser Foundation Health Plan, Inc., together with the Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 13, 1968 from Administrative Assistant Ross concerning the increase. City Attorney Noomn suggested that, if Council desired, they could adopt the motion that the increase in rates as set forth in the Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 13, 1968 from the Administrative Assistant to the Acting City Manager be approved and accepted. Councilman Rocca so moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried. The next matter for Council's attention was the claim as filed by Mrs. Lillie Borosky alleging personal injuries as a result of a fall at 310 Armour Avenue on October 7, 1968. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the claim be denied and referred to the City's insurance carrier. The next item was the claim as filed by Mrs. Bernice Place in behalf of her daughter alleging personal injuries as a result of a~thrown rock at the crosswalk on Hickey Blvd. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that the claim be denied and referred to the Cityts insurance carrier. The next matter was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 10, 1968 from the City Planner concerning "Survey and Geographical Tabulation of Dwelling Units - South San Francisco - November, 1968." Accompanying was the Planning Department's Report dated December 2, 1968 on the instant surveF, together with Survey and Geographical Tabulation of Dwelling Units. There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli ordered the Reports accepted and placed on file The next item was the City Planner's Report to the City Council with respect to Use Permit and Variance Requests considered on December 23, 1968. There being no~jections, Mayor Bertucelli ordered the Report accepted and placed on file. The Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 19, 1968 from the Director of Public Works recommending extension of time for completion of contract for the Harbor Way Widening Improvement, together with a communication dated December 16, 1968 from F. D. Sperry Company concerning the time extension, was the next matter for Council's attention. Councilman Ahern moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works be approved and accepted. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 19, 1968 from the Director of Public Works recommending extension of time for completion of Improvements for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Units No. 2 and No. 2A, together with the com- munication dated December 18, 1968 from Wilsey & Ham recommending extension of time. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works be approved and accepted. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 9, 1968 from the Superin- tendent of Recreation and Parks submitting compilation of bids and recommendation for additional work, asphalt paving, for Paradise Valley Park. Administrative Assistant Laurence Ross declared the bids received, stating that the low bidder was L. C. Smith Company. Councilman Ahem moved, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Superintendent of Recreation and Parks be approved and accepted. Councilman Rocca abstained from voting. AWARD OF CONTRACT TURF & SLOPE PLANTING PARADISE VALLEY PARKs MONTHLY REPORTS WESTBOROUGH BOULEVARD EXTENSIONs DEPARTMENT OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE. CONTROLs GOOD AND WELFAREs DISCUSSION CONCERNING SIGNS, SIGN POSTS AND PAINT SHACKS IN THE WESTBOROUGH · AREt s ADJOURNMENT s The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated December 18, 1968 from Superin- tendent of Recreation and Parks submitting compilation of bids and recommendation for turf and slope planting renovation in Paradise Valley Park. Administrative Assistant Laurence Ross delcared the bids received, stating that the low bidder was A. $. Shooter, Inc. Councilman Ahe~n moved, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Superintendent of Recreation and Parks be approved and ~ccepted.. Monthly Reports were received f~om the followings Fire Department - October, November 1968 Library - November 1968 San ~ateo County - Sanitation Section - November 1968 There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli ordered the Reports accepted and placed on file, The next item was the matter of the Westborough Boulevard Extension. Mayor Bertucelli stated he would like this item continued since the City was awaiting a report from the San Mateo County Engineer's office. There being no objections, it was so Ordered. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Controls (a) Application as filed by E Martinoni Company for Beer & Wine Wholesalers at 543 Forbes Boulevard. (b) Application as filed by The Southland Corporation for Off-Sale Beer & Wine at 645 E1Camino Real. (c) Application as filed by Officers of Oyster Point Yacht Club for Club License at Oyster Point Marina. (d) Application as filed by Leaning Tower Corporation for On Sale General Bona Fide Eating Place at 713 No. Linden Avenue. (e) Application as filed by William J. and Varti Patton for Off-Sale General at 249 Hillside Boulevard. There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli ordered the Reports placed on file. There being nothing further, Mayor Bertucelli asked if any member of the City Council had anything they wished to offer under Good and Welfare. There being none, Mayor Bertucelli then asked if any member of the audience had anything they wished to offer under Good and Welfare. Mr. Bruce Rosengren, 2684 DuhallowWay, brought to Council's attention the matter of signs in the Caesar Callan development of Westborough which had come before the Planning Commission and which was submitted to the City Council with a recommendation that the sign at the corner of Westborough and Callan Boulevards be allowed and other existing signs and sign posts be taken down. He remarked that the signs still remained and requested that some action be taken with regard to this matter. He also brought to the attention of the City Council two paint shacks in the area which were no longer being used and which presented a dangerous hazard to children in that empty paint cans and the like existed. Mayor Bertucelli asked if these items could be scheduled for the next Study meeting to whic the City Attorney replied that the matter of signs would be his responsibility and that he would follow through in this regard. Mayor Bertucelli instructed Mr. Rosengren that the matter of the paint ,shacks would be referred to the Building Department. Councilman Ahern moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the meeting be adjourned. Time of adjournments 9~,50 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SJBMITTED, APPEOVEDs !yor' Deputy City Clerk *The discussions contained herein are excerpts and not verbatim.