Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1969-10-06R£GULAR t4~ETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCIS[D HELD ~ONDAY, OCTOB£R 6, 1969 TIME: PLAC£: CALL TO ORDERs PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE AND INVOCATION: ROLL CALL MINUTES CLAIMS PARKING DISTRICT NO. 1 CLAIMS: CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK, UNIT NO. 1 CLAIM: CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PA~K, UNIT NO. lA CLAIM: CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK, UNIT NO. 2 CLAIMS~ CABOT, CABOT,& FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK, UNIT NO. 2A CLAIMS.' 8:00 p.m. Council Chambers, City Hall. The meeting was called to order by Mayor Bertucelli at 8~03 p.m. The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was recited. In the absence of Reverend Carl £rickson of the Brentwood Orthodox Presbyterian Church, the Invocation was given by Reverend Gilbert Vieira of Aldersgate Methodist Church who was present in the audience. Present~ Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammint, Andrew Rocca and Warren Stetnkamp. Absent: None. Mayor Bertucellt asked if there was a motion approving the Minutes of the regular meeting of September 1§, 1969. Councilman Ahern moved, seconded by Councilman Mammtni and regularly carried, that the Minutes of the regular mee~ng of September 15, 1969, be approved as submitted. Mayor Bertucelli then asked if there was a motion approving the regular claims as submitted for payment. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that the regular claims, totaling $74,204.31, be approved for payment. Mayor Bertucelli asked if there was a motion approving the claims for Parking District No. 1 as submitted for payment. Councilman Mammini moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for Parking District No. 1, totaling $1,581.09, be approved for payment. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 1 Claims Southern Pacific Company claim dated April 22, 1969 in the amount of $6,989.79 for expense incurred in connection with installation of crossing gates and flashing light signals at Forbes Boulevard Crossing No. E-10.64-C. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded hy Councilman Mammint and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 1, be approved for payment. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. iA Claims Southern Pacific Company claim dated April 22,1969 in the amount of $6,341.79 for expense incurred in connection with installation of crossing gates and flashing light signals at Forbes Boulevard Crossing No. E-10.73-C. Councilman Steinkamp moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. lA, be approved for payment. Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2 Claims~ (a) Sasakt, ~alker'Associates, Inc., claim dated June 26, 1969 in the amount of $62.50 for reviewing and revising Landscape Specifications. (b) Green Valley Weed and Pest Control, Inc., claim dated August 31, 1969 in the amount of $34.39 for Weed Control. (c) Cooper-Clark & Associates claim dated September 8, 1969 in the amount of $1,332.49 for Soils Engineering Services. (d) Cooper-Clark & Associates claim dated Septenber 9, 1969 in the amount of $900.18 for Soils Engineering Services. (e) Title Insurance and Trust Company claim dated September.15, 1969 in the amount of $18.00 for Recording Services. Councilman Ma~mini moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the claims as submitted for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2, be approved for payment. Cabot. Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park. Unit No. 2A Claims~ (a) Sasaki, Walker Associates, Inc., claim dated June 26, 1969 in the amount of $62.50 for reviewing and revising Landscape Specifications. (h) Green Valley Weed and Pest Control, Inc., claim dated August 31, 1969 in the amount of $34.38 for Weed Control. CABOT, CABOT & FORBES INDUSTRIAL PARK, UNIT NO. 2A CLAIMS ~ (CONTINUED) 1969 SEWER REVENUE BONDS SO. AIRPORT BLVD. ARRA CLAIM; STONEGATE RIDGE INVESTMPaNT DISTRICT CLAIM: PUBLIC HRARING APPEAL FBOM UP-126 (BOTIEFF APPLICATION) _~0 _Go Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2A Claims; (Continued) (c) Cooper-Clark & Associates claim dated September 5, 1969 in the amount of $500.18 for Soils Engineering Services. (d) Cooper-Clark & Associates claim dated September 8, 1969 in the amount of $1,332.49 for Soils Engineering Services. Councilman Rocca moved, seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that the claims as submitte4 for Cabot, Cabot & Forbes Industrial Park, Unit No. 2A, be approved for payment. 1969 Sewer Revenue Bonds - South Airport Boulevard Area Claim; L.C. Smith Company claim dated August 29, 1969 in the amount of $8,605.35 for work completed through August 29, 1969. Councilman Steinkamp moved, seconded by Councilman Mammtnl and regularly carried, that the claim as submitted for 1969 Sewer Revenue Bonds - South Airport Boulevard Area, he approved for payment. Councilman Rocca abstained from voting. Stoneqate Ridqe Assessment District Claim; Request of Stonegate Ridge developers for deposit of construction funds in interest-bearing account. In reply to Councilman Ahern's inquiry for more information, City Clerk Arthur Rodondt replied that the funds remaining in the account were not being used at this time for construction and that the developers had requested that $20,000 of these funds he placed in an interest-bearing account; that the only thing remaining was for the developers to determine how long a period they wished these funds invested. He further remarked that this was a special district and that the City Council acts as an administrative body in this regard. Councilman Ahern then moved that the funds be invested as requested. In answer to Councilman Stetnkamp's inquiry as to the time limit, the City Clerk replied that this had been requested of the developers and upon receipt of this information, they would he so invested. Councilman Stetnkamp then seconded the motion which was regularly carried. The next item was the continued Public Hearing on the appeal from Use Permit UP-126 of the South San Francisco Planning Commission conditionally approving an 18-unit dwelling group (cluster of 9 duplexes) terminus of Camaritas Avenue - Botieff Application. In reply to Mayor Bertucelli's inquiry if any written~otests had been received, City Clerk Rodondi replied that no more protests had been received since the original communications of protest. Mayor Bertucelli then asked if anyone present in the audience wished to speak on the matter. Reverend Vleira, Pastor of Aldersgate Methodist Church, requested to know why, after reading in the newspaper that he was to have received an explanation of why two commissioners had changed their votes, he had not received such a letter. In response to Mayor Bertucelli, Planning Commissioner Nello Lazzari stated that the Mayor, City Manager and City Attorney were aware of his reason for his change of vote and felt that a letter should be forthcoming from them. Mayor Bertucelll then asked if anyone else wished to be heard. Councilman Mammtni asked if the City Staff had reviewed this since the last meeting so that Council could proceed and if not, this matter should he referred back to the City Staff for a complete review of the matter. City Manager McKenzie replied that since the last meeting, there has been no contact with the applicant but ~Lr. Botteff and the School District have had a meeting hut that he did not know the outcome. He remarked that he felt the City Staff was not prepared at this time to indicate in any way about the proposed changes in the matter. He further suggested hearing the discussions this evening and referring the Use Permit back to the City Staff for further study. Councilman Rocca concurred in Councilman Mammtni's recommendation that the matter should be referred back to the City Staff for review. Councilman Stetnkamp remarked that Mr. Botteff was to have met with the School District and he would like to know the result of that meeting. In response to Mayor Bertucelli, Mr. Botieff replied that they had met with the School District and that he had agreed to grant the District an egress and ingress if and when they build the school. Dr. Paul Nielsen, Superintendent of the South San Francisco Unified School District, stated that the District had only one objection and that was the ingress and egress for the 500 children who would be using the proposed school site and that this was acoomplished. City Manager McKenzie remarked that the Ctty Staff have had no meetings with either Mr. Botieff or school representatives and would like the opportunity to review it before City Council renders a decision. Mr. David Morgan, Attorney for Mr. Botieff, stated that since the school was only a proposed installation, no definite comments had been made along this line. He further remarked that PUBLIC. HSARING. APP=~AL FROm UP-126 (BOTI~FF APPLICATION) (CONTINUED) PUBLIC HEARING FORMATION OF ARMOUR- LINDEN STORM DRAIN ASSESS~F. NT DISTRICT: the ruling of the Planning Commission should not be disturbed by the City Council and he further took issue on the allegations leveled at the Commissioners and developer which he felt put the matter out of context. He requested the City Council to confirm the recommendation of the Planning Commission and permit the development of this property. Reverend Vieira again repeated his arguments in '~:his concern for the community as a whole. He further commented on the resubmittal of the Use Permit with no changes from the previously denied Permit, and again requested to know why he had not been advised as to the reasons for the Planning Commissioners' reversal. Councilman Ahem concurred in mayor Bertucelli's defense of the Chairman of the Planning Commission and mayor Bertucelli requested City Planner Daniel Pass to report on the matter City Planner Pass stated that there was no discussion on this matter during its consid- eration, at the first or second consideration. He stated that the law does not require discussion; however, the law requires that the Chairman and membership considmr all sides of the controversy including a discipline report of the City Planner and then it makes its decision; and in its opinion, a reversal was in order. The findings of the Planning Commission were that the use would not be detrimental to the health of the area, would not materially he injurious to the community or neighborhood in which the' use was proposed and would not adversely affect the zoning of the City's General welfare. City Planner Pass replied to mayor Bertucelli's question as to whether it was a zoning or use matter, that it was a Use Permit in a rezoning matter over which the Use Permit has jurisdiction. He further explained the control the City has concerning the pro- curement of Use Permits; the designations of a '~" classification; and the responsibility of the Planning Commission when it examines a proposed use of such a parcel. Councilman mammini requested City Planner Pass to explain the Use Permit in this regard. City Planner Pass stated that this was a matter of text and anything over 9 dwelling units would tend to put a spot zoning in an R-1 area. He further described the possible undesirable effects if the Permit were approved. Discussion follows4 concerning the mcClellan property and its present planned use as a par~ area and the possiblity of its being zoned for apartment complex in the event UP-126 were granted. Further discussion followed concerning the parallei of the zoning requests of the Botieff and Giannini's parcels, and the densities of the surrounding areas. Councilman Steinkamp commented on the future of the area as it was concerned with the recognized arrival of Rapid Transit and how it would lend itself to the land use now. City Planner Pass explained how the General Plan took Rapid Transit into consideration along with open space and the protection of the natural environment. Councilman Rocca stated that it was his understanding that the matter would go back to the School District, applicant, City Planner and City Staff to work out a solution and if this was not the case, it should go back for such action. Mayor Bertucelli concurred and requested to know why the City Planner had accepted the plans the second time without any changes. City Planner Pass stated that he did tell Mr. Botteff that there would be a recommendation against it, but hy law, when an applicant pays his fe~ he is entitled to be on the agenda. mayor Bertucelli expressed hts disappointment that a study had not been made. Councilman mammini made the motion to refer the matter back to City Staff and that it be corrected once and for all. mayor Bertucelli requested a time limit. Mr. Botieff spoke in behalf of the Use Permit, stating that his plans were well designed; the people in the surrounding area were in favor of the project; and this evidence was brought to the Planning Commission. He explained the reversal of the vote from 4 to 3 against the project to 4 to 2 in favor of it. He further stated that Reverend Vieira was not present at the time of the first consideration hut only now objects to the complex. Discussion foll~.ed concerning the resubmittal of the application for the Use Permit. Further discussion followed concerning a definite meeting time convenient to the City Manager, City Attorney, City Planner and developer. Reverend Vteira wa~ invited to be present, together with representatives of the School District. Councilman mammini moved that this matter be referred back to the City Staff, including all interested parties to meet on Thursday, October 9, 1969, at 7:30 p.m. Councilman Rocca seconded the motion which was regularly carried. The next item was the Public Hearing for the Formation of Armour-Linden Storm Drain Assessment District. mayor Bertucelli declared the Public Hearing opened. In response to Mayor Bertucelli's inquiry if any protests had been received, City Clerk Rodondi replied that one of the Notices for Parcel 012-102-290 had been returned hy mail and a telegram had been received this evening at 7540 p.m. addressed to the City Clerk protesting the project. PUBLIC HEARING FOR~TION OF APJ~OUR- LINDEN STORM DRAIN ASSESS~AENT DISTRICT: (CONTINUED) RESOLUTIONS - AP~UR-LINDEN STORM DRAIN ASSESSMENT DIST.: RESOLUTION NO. 5173 RESO. OF DETERMINATION UNDER DIVISION 4 OF STREETS & HIGHWAYS CODE: RESOLUTION NO. 5174 OVERRULING PROTESTS ON RESO. OF INTENTION~ RESOLUTION NO. 5175 ORDERING REDUCTION OF ASSESSMENTS: RESOLUTION NO. 5176 AND ORDER ADOPTING ENGINEER'S REPORT, CONFIRMING ASSESSMENT, ORDERING WORK: RESOLUTION NO. 5177 AWARD OF CONTRACT: RESOLUTION NO. 5178 DESIGNATING COLLECTION OFFICER: PROCLAMATION FIRE PREVENTION WEEK OCTOBER 6 -11, 1969: PROCLAMATION PENINSULA SYMPHONY WEEK OCTOBER 12 - 18, 1969: q'7 Mr. Richard Hargrove of the law firm of ~ilson, Jones, Morton & Lynch, stated that, in his opinion, the telegram was not a proper protest but thought it best to consider it as one. Mayor Bertucelli asked if anyone present in the audience wished to speak on the matter. A resident of 239 Armour Avenue spoke briefly in behalf of the project. Director of Public Works Louis Goss described the area to be improved which was requested by approximately 80% of the property owners who were willing to pay half of the cost. NLrs. Yvonne Petrucci, 236 Armour Avenue, spoke in favor of the project, stating that her and other properties were being undermined and sliding into the ditch. Councilman Steinkamp commented that this area was a public eye-sore and should be started immediately before the winter rains. Mayor Bertucelli and Councilman Ahern complimented Ntrs. Petrucci for her efforts in bringing this project to a reality. There being no more responses, Mayor Bertucellt declared the Publtc Hearing closed. Mr. Richard Hargrove of the law firm of Wilson, Jones, Morton & Lynch, Attorneys for the District, explained the resolutions which were to follow, concerning the Armour-Linden Storm Drain Assessment District. The first resolution was explained by ,~r. Hargrove, that a report had been filed in accordance with Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code for the construction of the improvements after which Councilman Steinkamp introduced the resolution entitled: "A RRSOLUTION OF DETER~INATION, UNDER DIVISION 4 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE, TO PROCEED WITH P~OCEEDINGS FOR I~tPROVF.~TS APJ~OUR-LIND~-N STORM DRAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT." Roi1 call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E.' Ahern, F. Frank Mammint, Andrew Rocca and ~arren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. Mr. Hargrove stated that the telegram received would be considered as a F~otest, one to be overruled and he further explained the resolution after which Councilman Rocca intro- duced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OVERRULING PROTESTS ON P~SOLUTION OF INTP~NTION NO. 5156 ARMOUR-LINDEN STORM DRAIN ASSESS~NT DISTRICT." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. Director of Public Works Louis Goss declared the bids received, stating that the lowest responsible bidder was D. Venturini Trucking and Grading with a bid of $23,197. Mr. Hargrove stated that, in light of the bids received and recommendation of the Director of Public Works, it was in order to proceed with the reduction of assessments in the estimated cost of the project after which Councilman Ahern introduced the resolution en- title~ "A RESOLUTION ORDERING REDUCTION OF ASSESSMENTS APJ4OUR-LINDEN STORM DRAIN ASSESS- MiNT DISTRICT." Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick £. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. NLr. Hargrove explained the next resolution and order adopting the engineer's report and ordering the work after which Councilman Ahern introduced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION AND ORDER ADOPTING 5NGINEER'S REPORT, OONFIRMING THE ASSESSMENT AND ORDERING THE ~RK APJ~OUR-LINDEN STORM DRAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick 5. Ahem, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. Mr. Richard Hargrove explained the next resolution awarding the contract to the lowest bidder, D. Venturini Trucking and Grading, after which Councilman Mamznini introduced the resolution entitled~ "A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT ARMOUR-LINDEN STORM DRAIN ASSESSNE~NT DISTRICT." Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucellt, Patrick ~,~ Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and ~arren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. Mr. Hargrove stated that the next resolution was ready for introduction which designated the City Treasurer as the person to whom payments of assessments shall be made, after which Councilman Steinkamp introduced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING COLLEC- TION OFFICER ARNDUR-LINDEN STORM DRAIN ASSESSNF. NT DISTRICT." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan at this time presented for Council's consideration the Proclamation designating the week of October 6 - 11, 1969 as FIRE PREVENTION WEEK. Mayor Bertucelli so proclaimed. The Proclamation designating October 12 - 18, 1969 as PENINSULA SYMPHONY WE~. IN SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO was the next item for Council's attention. Mayor Bertucelli so proclaimed. 12 m RESOLUTION NO. 5179 AWARD OF CONTRACT DREDGING COLNLA CREEK NW DRAGLIN£: RESOLUTION NO. 5180 AWARD OF CONTRACT DREDGING COLMA CREEK MOBILE TRUCK CRANE: ~01~ RESOLUTION NO. 5181 ACCEPTING GRANT DEED FROM C.C. & F.: RESOLUTION NO. 5182 ACCEPTING GRANT DEED FROM MERCK & CO., INC.: RESOLUTION NO. 5183 APPROVING PI~S & SPECS AUTHORIZING THE ~ORK CALLING BIDS FOR 1969 CORPORATION YARD ROOF RECONSTRUCTION: RESOLUTION NO. 5184 APPROVING PLANS & SPECS AUTHORIZING THE WORK CALLING BIDS FOR FIRE ALARM UNDERGROUNDING: RESOLUTION NO. 5185 CORRECTING CERTAIN CLERICAL ERRORS IN SEWER RENTAL CHARGES: ll~e next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 24, 1969 from the Director of Publlc Works sutxnlttlng compilation of bids and recommendation for award of contracts for the rental of dragltne (NW-6 or equal) with 2-yard bucket and the mobile truck crane with 3/4-yard bucket - Dredging Sand from Colma Creek and Tributaries. Director of Public Works declared the bids received and recommended that the second lowest bidder, L. C. Smith Company with a bid of $5,260 be awarded the contract since the lowest bidder, Charles H. Page, did not have a proper Contractor's License for this type of work. City Attorney Noonan explained the resolution after which Councilman Steinkamp intro- duced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR DREDGING COLMA CREEK AND TRIBUTARIES - 1969." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. AherO, F. Frank Ma.mini, and~Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. Abstaining, Councilman Andrew Rocca. Director of Public Works Louis Goss declared the bids received for the rental of the mobile truck crane with 3/4-yard bucket, stating that the lowest responsible bidder was Barton Construction Company with the bid of $4,320. In asnwer to Councilman Ahern's question as to when the work would begin, the Director of Public Works replied that it would start i.mediately to clear debris in the creek bottom before the early rains. He further explained the cost of the dredging during the rainy season, based upon approximate number of yards in the fiscal year 1969-70. Councilman Ahem requested to know if there was a time limit on the project. Director of Public Works Goss stated that the drag line is usually used all winter to remove material as requested. Mayor Bertucelli requested that a record of the yardage of silt removal be kept for information to be presented to the Army Corps of Engineers. After an explanation of the resolution by City Attorney Noona, Councilman Steinkamp introduced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS FOR DREDGING COLNg% CREEK AlfD TRIBUTARIES - 1969." Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammtnt, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 22, 1969 from the City Attorney concerning the matter of the Final Map and acceptance of a Grant Deed from Cabot, Cabot & Forbes California Properties, Inc., in Unit No. 2. City Attorney Noonan explained that this resolution accepts a right of way for a road area after which Councilman Steinkamp introduced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A ORANT DEED FROM CABOT, CABOT & FORBES CALIFORNIA PROPERTIES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION." Roi1 call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammint, Andrew Rocca and Warren Stelnkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan stated that this resolution accepts the other parcel of property for that right of way after which Councilman Stetnkamp introduced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED FROM MERCK & CO., INC., A NEW JERSEY CORPORATION." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucellt, Patrick E. Ahem, F. Frank Mammtni, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. The next item for Council's~ consideration was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 23, 1969 from the Director of Public Works recommending approval of plans and specifications and requesting authorization to advertise for bids for the 1969 Corporation Yard Roof Reconstruction. City Attorney Noonan explained the resolution which had been prepared after which Council- man Rocca introduced the resolution entitled: "A P~SOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFI:, CATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE ~ORK AND CALLING BIDS FOR 1969 CORPORATION YARD ROOF R~CONSTRUCTION Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick ~. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. The Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 25, 1969 from the Director of Public Works recommending approval of plans and specifications and requesting authorization to advertise for bids for the Fire Alarm Undergroundtng in the £1Camino Real Widening - Orange Avenue to South San Francisco City limits~ was the next matter for consideration. After an explanation by City Attorney Noonan, Councilman Mammtnt introduced the resolution entitled~ "A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK AND CALLING BIDS POR EL CAMINO UNDERGROUND FIRE ALARM." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammint, Andrew Rocca and Werren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. The next item was the communication dated July 28, 1969 from ~trs. Edith C. Ferrari requesting sewer rental refund. City Attorney Noonan explained that this resolution would correct certain clerical errors am approve a refund after which Councilman Ahern introduced the resolution entitled~ "A RESO- LUTION CORRECTING CERTAIN CLERICAL ERRORS IN SEWER RENTAL CHARGES AND APPROVING REFUNDS," 123 RESOLUTION NO. 5185: (CONTINUED) RESOLUTION NO. 5186 AUTHORIZING RELEASE OF PARCELS 12, 13, 13-A FROM SECURITY AGREEMENT: RESOLUTION NO. 5187 APPROVING PLANS & SPECS AUTHORIZING THE WORK, CALLING BIDS FOR WESTBOROUGH BLVD. IN~ROVE- MSNT: RESOLUIION NO. 5188 CANCF. LLATION OF TAXES WESTBOROUGH BLVD. STREET AND HIGHWAYS RASEN~NT: RESOLUTION NO. 5189 COMMENDING POLICE CHIEF JOHN FABBRI: RESOLUTION NO. 5190 FIXING TIME & PLACE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF LAND OF SAN BRUNO PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SITE: RESOLUTION NO. 5191 APPROVING FINAL NIAP, WESTBOROUGH-WEST PARK NO. 3A-~: R£VOCABLE PERMIT PYRAMID VAN LINES, INC.~ FINAL MAP WESTBOROUGH- WEST PARK NO. 3A-£: Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahem, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained that the next resolution is related to the Westborough Security Agreement and releases Parcels 12, 13 and 13-A. He stated that it reserves the right of the City ~D use the temporary park site and this is in compliance with the terms of the Agreement. Councilman Steinkamp introduced the resolution entitled~ "A R~SOLUTION AUTHORIZING RF. LEASE OF PARCELS 12, 13 AND 13-A FROM THE SECURITY AGREF3~NT AND P~LATED ACTS." Discussion followed between City Attorney Noonan and Mr. David Friedenberg, resident of Westborough, concerning the Parcels and the basis upon which the temporary park site is being released from the Security Agreement. Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucellf, Patrick 5. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum from the Director of Public Works concerning approval of plans and specifications for the improvement of Westborough Boulevard between Junipero Serra and Skyline Boulevards. (Item not received by this office.) Councilman Steinkamp requested to know if the resolution contained the recommendations of the Director of Public ~orks and stated that he would be pleased to introduce the resolution entitled= "A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS, AUTHORIZING THE WORK, CALLING FOR BIDS FOR ;~ESTBOHOUGH BOULEVARD I~PROV~ENT JUNIPERO SERRA BOULEVARD TO SKYLINE BOULEVARD." Councilman Mammini suggested an alternate rather than a deletion to the contract con- cerning the matter of planting or fencing on the center island. Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Manlmini, Andrew Rocca and ~arren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution which would cancel taxes on Westborough Boulevard right of way granted hy Caesar Callan, Inc., after which Councilman Ahern introduced the resolution entitled~ "A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY ATTORNEY'S CONSENT TO CANCELLATION OF TAXES ON PROPERTY AC~UIRED FOR PUBLIC PURPOSES (WESTBONOUGH BOULEVARD STREET AND HIGHWAYS EASF~T) AND REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO AUTHORIZE THB CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXfS AND THf DISTRICT ATTORNEY TO CONSENT THERETO." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Stetnkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan presented for Council's attention the resolution commending Police Chief John Fabbri. Councilman Mammini introduced the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION COM}&?NDING CHItF 30HN FABBRI." Roll call vote was as follows: Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick E. Ahern, F. Frank Mammini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained that the next resolution, while not appearing on the agenda, concerned the annexation of a portion of San Bruno School lands and this resolution would start the proceedings for the City. Councilman Rocca introduded the resolution entitled: "A RESOLUTION FIXING TI~L~ AND PLAC~ OF HEARING ON THE PROPOSED ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OF CONTIGUOUS UNINHABITiD TfRRITORY DfSIGNATHD AS A PORTION OF THf SAN BRUNO PARK UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT SITf." Roll call vote was as followst Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick 2. Ahern, F. Frank Mammtni, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. City Attorney Noonan explained the next resolution regarding Westborough 3A-E which would authorize execution of an Agreement providing for construction of public improvements, the filing of plans and construction of landscape improvements after which Councilman Rocca introduced the resolution entitled~ '% RESOLUTION APPROVING THf FINAL MAP, ~ESTBOROUGH- WEST PARK NO. 3A-E, AND AUTHORIZING ACTS RELATED THERETO.,' Roll call vote was as follows~ Ayes, Councilmen Frank J. Bertucelli, Patrick £. Ahern, F. Frank Ma,mini, Andrew Rocca and Warren Steinkamp. Noes, none. Absent, none. The next matter for consideration was the Revocable Permit - Use of a Parcel of Land Owned hy the City of South San Francisco (Pyramid Van Lines, Inc.). Mayor Bertucelli stated that if there were no objections, this item would be continued to the next regular meeting. There being no objections, it was so ordered. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated July 29, 1969 from the City Planner recommending approval of the instant final map SA-13, final map of Westhorough-West Park No. 3A-E, representing the suhdivisbn of certain acreage located at the southeasterly corner of Greendale Drive and Baldwin Hills Court, in Westhorough-West Park No. 3 Planned Community. This item was acted upon under Resolutions and required no further action from Council. UP-126 WILLIAM BOTIEFF: fATHWAY LIGHTING IN WESTBOROUGH 10-ACRE M£TF.R SERVICE BY ~.~STBOROUGH WATER DISTRICT FOR 2~-ACRE PARK, 10-ACRE PARK.. ood GALWAY DRIVE IMPROVE~-NTS P~ELEASE OF $55,000 BOND.. ~_XTENSION OF T!Y~ REQUEST NK)DIFICATION TO PUMP STATION NO. 8.. CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 GP£WAY DRIVE IMPROVFJ~ENT: REPORT CONCERNING PAYMPJtT TO E.O.C. CENTER.' The next item was the Use Permit UP-126 - William Botieff - Request to establish an 18-unit dwelling group at northerly terminus of Camaritas Avenue. Since this matter was related to the Public Hearing which was ordered continued, no further Council action was necessary. The Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 23, 1969 from the Superintendent of Recreation and Parks regarding the matter of Pathway Lighting in the ~estborough lO-acre park was the next item for Council's consideration. City Manager McKenzie requested the matter be referred to his office so that the installa- tion could be done by private contractor since the Pacific Gas and ~lectric Company's plans and specifications did not conform with the City's building code an~ standards. There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli so ordered. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 23, 1969 from the Superin- tendent of Recreation and Parks regarding the matter of Meter Service by the Westborough Water District for the 2~--acre park, 10-acre park and future landscaped areas in the Westborough District. Mayor Bertucelli requested the matter be continued. City Manager McKenzie inquired if Council wished the City Staff to determine if the Westborough ~ater District was in line with the policies of the California ~ater Service. Councilman Steinkamp stated that the City was being charged several hundred dollars for water meters for the parks to be used by the residents of that district and invited the residents of Westborough to speak on the matter. Mr. Bruce Rosengren, 2684 Duhallow Way, stated that he could understand the charge of water meters, having been through it himself and inquired if the cost of the California Water Company's running of lines to service this area would offset the charges of the Westborough Water District. Councilman Rocca stated that this could be a matter for the Public Utilities Commission tO consider. Brief discussion followed concerning the high cost of the installation after which Mayor Ber~ucelli requested City Manager McKenzie to investigate the matter and report back to Council.' The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated August 25, 1969 from the Director of Public ~orks recommending the release of $55,000 bond - Galway Drive Improvements. Accompanying was the communication dated August 21, 1969 from Mr. Henry Richma~ of J. H. Snyder Company, requesting the release of the bond. Councilman Ahem moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works be approved and accepted. The next matter for Council's attention was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 22, 1969 from the Director of Public Works recommending extension of time for the completion of the Modification to Pump Station No. 8 and Relief Sewer. Accompanying was the communication dated September 19, 1969 from L. C. Smith Company concerning the matter. Director of Public Works Louis Goss stated that he recommended the time be extended to October 15, 1969 as the contractor had a difficult time in securing the 96-inch concrete pipe for the pump modification. Councilman Stetnkamp moved, seconded by Councilman Ahern and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works be approved and accepted. Councilman Rocca abstained from voting. The next item was the Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 15, 1969 from the Director of Public Works recommending approval of Change Order No. 3. Accompanying was the communication dated September 11, 1969 from Theodore V. Tronoff, £ngineers, recommending approval of Change Order No. 3. Councilman Mammini moved, seconded by Councilman Rocca and regula¥1y carried, that the recommendation of the Director of Public Works be approved and accepted. The next matter was the Report from the City Manager concerning payment to the Economic Opportunity Center. City Manager McKenzie stated that Council had approved the payment of $5,0C0of the current year's budget to the E.O.C. for services provided to the community and the County was to provide $20,000 for the operation of the Center. He further stated that he had not time to completely review the operation of the Cemter and recommended that no payment be made at this time. City Manager McKenzie further recommended that payments be made on a quarterly 'basis and that a request be made to have quarterly reports submitted of their operation so that the City Council would be advised of their activities. Councilman Steinkmap moved, seconded by Councilman Mammini and regularly carried, that the recommendation of the City Manager be approved and accepted. FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF CALLAN & WESTBOROUGH BLVD$. INTF_RSECTION IMPROVEMENTS: NDNTHLY R~PORTS: BOOKLET "YOUR CITY AND OURS" BY LEA(~J£ OF WOMEN VOTERS:' CHANGE OF STRHET NA~ES WILLOW GARDiNS: GOOD AND ]I'iF~J. FARE: P~R~ISSION REQUEST TO ATTEND SOUND ABATE~NT CONF£R~NCE: COi~,.~NT CONCERNING B-~AUTI FICATION OF $UBDiVI SION ~NTRANCES The Inter-Office Memorandum dated September 3, 1969 from the Director of Public ~orks recommending finai acceptance of CaiIan and Westborough Boulevards Intersection Improve- ments was the next item for Councii's attention. Accompanying were the foIiowing communications, . (a) Communication dated September 2, i969 from Gene NeviiIe, Project Engineer for Theodore V. Tronoff, Civil Engineers. (b) Communication dated September 2, 1969 from Theodore V. Tronoff, Civil ~ngtneer, forwarding HOURLY CHARGES. (c) Inter-Office Memorandum dated August 26, 1969 from A1Dellepiane, Public Works Inspector. (d) Communication dated August 21, 1969 from ~ne Neville, Project Engineer for Theodore V. Tronoff, Civil Engineers. (e) Com. munication dated August 18, 1969 from The Lowrte Pav~ng Co., Inc., forwarding DIARY OF WORK. (f) Communication dated August 19, 1969 from Grtbaldo, Jones and Associates, Soils ~ngineers, submitting SUN~{ARY OF LABORATORY COMPACTION TESTS DATA. N[~. David Friedenberg, attorney represent~%g the ~estborough Homeowners Improvement Asso- ciation, requested information concerning the extensions of time granted to the contrac- tor for the completion of this work and inquired as to when and by whom the authorization was given. City Manager McKenzie explained that the delay was caused by the movement of earth from school property. Lengthy discussion followed between Director of Public Works Louis Goss and NI~. Friedenberg concerning the area from which the earth was moved and the areas where it was deposited. Director of Public Works Goss stated that more information would be available before the end of this week. There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli continued the matter. Monthly Reports were received from the followings Building Inspection Department - Aug~ t 1969 Library - Au. gUst 1969 There being no objections, Mayor Bertucelli ordered the Reports accepted and placed on file The next item was the co~unication dated September 13, 1969 from the League of ~omen Voters of North San Mateo Council concerning the release of a 49-page booklet entitled: "Your City and Ours." Mrs. Ruth Knotek, representative of the League of Women Voters, briefly spoke on the three years' preparation of the booklet and what it covered, after which she presented a booklet to each of the City Council and department heads. Mayor Bertucelli requested to know what was requested in this regard. Nl~s. Knotek stated that they wished to be allowed to place the booklets throughout the City for sale and that their organization was non-profit. City Attorney Noonan suggested that the request be referred to the office of the City Manager for further information. There being no objections, ~ayor Bertucelli so ordered. The next item for Council's attention was the communication dated September 12, 1969 from Lyons & Morgan, Attorneys at Law, regarding change of street names in Willow Gardens. City ~anager McKenzte remarked! that when this matter came up in the Study Session, Council had expressed dissatisfaction with the progress of the project with regard to the land- scaping and a complete report was requested on this property. Mayor Bertucelli stated that before any changes in street names were granted, landscaping should be completed and this had been repeatedly requested by the resident-of that area. N[~. Morgan, attorney, stated that he believed the problem was being resolved as quickly as possible. 'Brief discussion followed concerning a convenient time for a scheduled meeting to discuss the matter and it was decided to be held on October 29, 1969 at 7530 p.m. There being nothing further, Mayor Bertucelli asked if any member of the City Council had anything they ~shed to offer under Good and Welfares Councilman Mamenlnl requested permission of the City Council to leave the City to attend a Sound Abatement Conference in Washington D.C. Councilman Ahem moved~ seconded by Councilman Steinkamp and regularly carried, that per- mission be grahted. Councilman Ahem commented on the continuation of the bea'atification projects for the entrances to the subdivisions within the City. C~ty ~anager ~cKenzie ~tated that plans were being submitted for approval for the reno- vation or renewal of e~trances which would include lighting in some cases. GOOD AND WELFARE~ COM,%~NTS CONCERNING W~ATH~R CONDITIONS: DI.qCU$,~3I ON CONCERNING SUBMITTAL OF LIST,OF SUB- CONTRACTORS ~ DISCUSSION CONCEP~ING OCCUPANCY OF SIEBEC~ER CENTER BYCROUPS~ There being nothing further from the City Council, Mayor Bertucelli asked if any member of the audience wished to speak under Good and Welfare. Mrs. Antoinette Fraschieri, 478 Avalon Drive, requested to know if the grading on Junipero Serra and (~llert Boulevards would affect the weather in their area. She stated that she was told the area could be graded down thirty feet for the construction of the apartment buildings. Mayor Bertucelli explained the like conditions as a result of grading in his neighborhood. Brief discussion followed concerning the passages in which the fog descends to South San Francisco from Pacifica and the influence on it from construction. Mr. John O'Leary of the Peninsula Registry Service spoke concerning a lack of commu- nication between the City of South San Francisco and the people who prepare the speci- fications for bids. He commented that State law required the submittal of the list of subcontractors along with the bids and bids were accepted for the Orange Memorial Swtmmi, ng Pool and Westborough Park project without these lists. He further commented on the legislation governing this. City Attorney Noonan read the sections of the Government Code regulating this procedure. He further remarked that he would like the opportunity to discuss the matter with the members of Council concerning the rights of the contractors and subcontractors, the proper bidding procedure and come back with a final report. Mr. John Marsh spoke briefly that he was the second bidder on the Municipal Swimming Pool and felt he was the lowest responsible bidder and should be awarded the contract. Mayor Bertucelli ordered the matter referred to the office of the City Attorney for a report back to the City Council. Discussion followed between Councilman Mammlni and l~r. O'Leary concerning the manner of the letting of contracts to subcontractors. Mr. Robert Bridges, Chairman of the Arts and Cultural Committee, stated that he had been in Sacramento the previous week at an Arts Commission meeting and the City of South San Francisco was highly commended for their art performances of the past twelve months. ~. Bridges read from a prepared statement concerning'the committee. Lengthy discussion followed between the City Council and ~r. Bridges concerning the availability of school facilities for square dancing groups, the $3500 grant by the City Council to the Arts and Cultural Committee, and the possibility of using Magnolia Center auditorium stage for the theater group. Mayor Bertucelli commented that he felt no group should be removed from a recreational facility who had had prior occupancy. In response, Mr. Bridges remarked that they had not requested anyone's removal, but only consideration for their group. Further discussion followed concerning the nights the square dancing group and other groups used the Siehecker Center. Mayor Bertucelli requested the City Manager to investigate and report back to the Council. There being nothing further, Mayor Bertucelli aqlourned the meeting to an Executive Personnel Session. Time of adjournment: 10:37 p.m. APP ROVED = /~>" Mayor RESPECTFULLY SUBMI TI'ED, *The discussion contained herein are excerpts and not Verbatim.