HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1992-05-27 Mayor John R. Penna
Council:
Jack Drago
Joseph A. Fernekes
(Open Seat)
~--loberta Cerri Teglia
AGENDA
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1)
ROLL CALL:
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
INVOCATION:
AGENDA REVIEW
City Manager Armas Requested:
- Continue Item No. to 5/28/92.
__blayor Penna Requested:
- Continue Item No. 11 to 6/10/92
due to a potential conflict
because he has a client in the
neighborhood.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
MINUTES
City Council
Municipal Services Building
Community Room
May 27, 1992
ACTION TAKEN
7:30 p.m. Mayor Penna presiding.
Council present: Drago, Fernekes,
and Penna.
Council absent: Teglia.
The Pledge was recited.
Rev. Johnson, Our Redeemer Lutheran
Church, gave the invocation.
AGENDA REVIEW
So ordered.
So ordered.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Ms. Rosa Perez asked the Council to waive
fees for the use of Room A and B at the
MSB on 6/4/92 for the All Souls School's
graduating class.
Mayor Penna stated that this item came up
after the posting of the agenda, and a
Motion was necessary to add it to the
agenda.
M/S Fernekes/Drago - To add the item to
the Agenda.
Carried by unanimous voice voice.
M/S Fernekes/Drago - To waive fees.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Mr. Michael Leddy, 116 Cuesta Dr., stated
that he was much more comfortable behind
5/27/92
Page I
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
-"~RAL COMMUNICATIONS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
microphones rather than in front of them.
He stated that during the last several
Council meetings in this room there had
been allusions to the audio system, yet
the problem had never been declared or
defined.
He stated that as an audio system
designer he had analyzed the audio system
and had interviewed several of the users
and found a lot of unsatisfied needs to
be modified, and the machine is available
once the Council decided to look for the
solutions.
He stated that the citizens of S.S.F.
have a right to have the officials they
elect perform their promised duties
without distraction, but there is a
problem you have to take action on or
decide there isn't a problem and stop
wasting company time.
He requested that the City Clerk not be
mentioned in Council complaints because
he understood that the Council decided it
needed better microphones, and Mrs.
Battaya consented to handle the research
and purchase. He stated that as an audio
expert he could attest to the excellence
of the Sony BF7 microphone, and knew no
other expert would challenge his opinion.
He stated that Mrs. Battaya did adequate
research and had made a competent
purchase. He stated that a non-expert
opinion was expressed in a public forum,
that Ms. Battaya had made a bad purchase
and is therefor somewhat to blame for the
frustration with the audio system. He
stated that none of this was true, and up
to this point it had been a case of not
knowing - but now the facts had been
announced and any further expression of
this opinion would be a lie.
He stated that he was sorry that another
individual had to suffer this indigna-
tion, but Ms. Battaya will live and it
was not for him to see that she was free
5/27/92
Page 2
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN- 119
)RAL COMMUNICATIONS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
from such accidents. He continued, nor
was it his place to dictate the pro-
fessional environment you create for your-
selves when one of your colleagues went
the extra mile on behalf of the group but
instead of being thanked for the extra
effort and commended for a job well done,
she is being blamed for a perceived
failure of hers when in fact that problem
doesn't exist in your audio system. He
stated that knowing a volunteered effort
can backfire so easily, who among you
would be willing to take that risk the
next time.
He stated that in purchasing the
microphones Ms. Battaya was not acting as
a City Clerk because we had elected her
to handle the logistics of our public
records, and not for the maintenance of
public facilities.
He stated that the problem was in the box
and not with the people even though the
Mayor didn't use the mike properly, and
Councilman Fernekes mumbles. He stated
that the problem in the box or design
system had to be defined and if the
Council wanted to fix it then call him or
some other audio expert to come in and
speak with each of the users, and rede-
sign the system.
Fire Fighter Jim Selvitella, Fire Fighters
Local 1507, stated that his Union sup-
ported a no vote on Measure D.
Ms. Diane Smith, 3900 Crofton Way, stated
that she had received a leaflet on a no
vote on Measure D, and according to the
campaign statement filed by Mrs. Teglia
she had paid the same $250.00 for
printing that she had paid for her cam-
paign party. She stated that the leaflet
was on slick glossy paper, and felt that
it contained lies. She made reference to
Mrs. Teglia calling the Mayor a liar at a
public meeting, and talked at length of
Mrs. Teglia's efforts on behalf of her
5/27/92
Page 3
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN- 120
)RAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMUNITY FORUM
CONSENT CALENDAR
Motion to approve Minutes of the
Adjourned Regular Meeting of 5/6/92,
and the Special Meeting of 5/13/92.
2. Motion to confirm expense claims
of 5/27/92. S~
e
Resolution accepting dedication
of a 4' street and highway easement
on Parcel Map No. 92-285, Lands of
the San Francisco Basque Cultural
Center, Inc. at 599 Railroad Ave. 50~
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT
FOR STREET OR HIGHWAY PURPOSES
FROM THE LANDS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO
BASQUE CULTURAL CENTER, INC.
e
Resolutions awarding contract to
Community Electric, Inc. in the
amount of $141,462 as the lowest
responsible bidder, and approp-
riating $160,000 of gas tax funds
for Airport Boulevard Street Light_
Improvements. ~o~'~
A RESOLUTION OF AWARD OF CONTRACT
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
referendum and the election.
She stated that if people were still
willing to assist Mrs. Teglia, they
should vote no on the measure, but if the
people were for the return of good
government, they should vote yes on
Measure D.
She stated that the Fire Union had
contributed $1,500 to the no vote cam-
paign on Measure D, yet of the 83 firemen
in S.S.F. only 18 live in S.S.F. She
felt that the reason for the support from
the firemen was the pay package and perks.
COMMUNITY FORUM
No one chose to speak.
CONSENT CALENDAR
Approved.
Approved in the amount of $1,338,519.77.
RESOLUTION NO. 45-92
RESOLUTION NO. 46-92
Page 4
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
121
]ONSENT CALENDAR
4. Resolutions - Continued.
FOR THE AIRPORT BOULEVARD STREET
LIGHT IMPROVEMENTS
A RESOLUTION APPROVING BUDGET
AMENDMENT 92-8 TO THE 1991-1992
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT BUDGET
Be
Resolution authorizing an agreement
with Coopers & Lybrand for audit
services for the 1992, 1993 and
1994 fiscal years. _q-~7
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE
RETENTION OF COOPERS & LYBRAND TO
PROVIDE AUDIT SERVICES FOR FISCAL
YEARS 1992, 1993 AND 1994
0
Resolution designating C/CAG as
Program Manager for San Mateo
County for AB434 Funds.
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING C/CAG
AS PROGRAM MANAGER FOR SAN MATEO
COUNTY FOR ASSEMBLY BILL 434 FUNDS
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
e
Resolution authorizing supplemental
consulting services agreement with
Corlett, Skaer & DeVoto Architects
to add 53 homes to the Aircraft
Noise Insulation Project - Phase
vi.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF A SUPPLEMENTAL CONSULTING
SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR AIRCRAFT
NOISE INSULATION PROJECT - PHASE VI
'---8. Motion to adopt an ordinance allow-
ing an interim appointment, elec-
CONSENT CALENDAR
RESOLUTION NO. 47-92
RESOLUTION NO. 48-92
RESOLUTION NO. 49-92
M/S Fernekes/Drago - To approve the
Consent Calendar.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
City Engineer Van Dohren stated that the
engineering estimate for this project was
greater than the construction bid and
allowed 53 homes to be added to the
project.
M/S Fernekes/Drago - To adopt the
Resolution.
RESOLUTION NO. 50-92
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
City Attorney O'Toole stated that this
ordinance allows future Councils to make
5/27/92
Page 5
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN___. 122
~DMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
8. Motion - Continued.
tion or special election to fill
City Council vacancies.
AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION
2.18.040 TO THE SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO
MUNICIPAL CODE ALLOWING FOR AN
INTERIM APPOINTMENT, ELECTION OR
SPECIAL ELECTION TO FILL CITY
COUNCIL VACANCIES
Resolution stating the City's
intent to establish a redevelopment
area for the E1Camino Corridor to
help off-set the costs of locating
the BART extension in a subway. ~
A RESOLUTION EXPRESSING THE INTENT
TO ESTABLISH A REDEVELOPMENT AREA
FOR THE EL CAMINO CORRIDOR
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
an interim appointment if there is a
vacancy that occurs on the Council.
M/S Drago/Fernekes - To adopt the
ordinance.
ORDINANCE NO. 1114-92
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Mayor Penna stated that both he and
Councilman Drago were real estate agents
and by ruling of the FPPC could not par-
ticipate on this item which would leave
the Council without a quorum.
City Attorney O'Toole stated that the
resolution should be continued because
the resolution dealt with the creation of
a redevelopment area, but felt it was
important for the Council to listen for
input on other items dealing with the
BART Extension.
Mayor Penna stated that when the item was
continued and if the Council did not
appoint, there would still be a deadlock
because there would still be 2 out of 4
Councilmembers that cannot vote on the
item.
City Attorney O'Toole stated that the
Political Reform Act allowed for those
types of circumstances where more than
one member had a conflict, it allows for
a vote to be made by one Councilmember
for a majority vote of the item. He
stated that a name would be drawn out of
a hat for the Councilman who will vote on
the decision.
Mayor Penna asked if it was proper to sit
on the dais and listen to the staff
report.
City Attorney O'Toole stated that it was
because it was not dealing directly with
5/27/92
Page 6
AGENDA ACTION TAKE~i 123
DMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
9. Resolution - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
the establishment of the redevelopment
area.
City Manager Armas suggested Council
listen to the staff presentation and pose
questions with respect to BART con-
figuration and how it could be undertaken
in our City; and continue the resolution
to the next meeting.
Mayor Penna expressed strong objection to
this notion that because he is a realtor
he had a conflict of interest according
to FPPC attorneys, that a realtor would
have a potential because a redevelopment
area would increase his commission
through increase of property values. He
stated that he believed it to be a
fallacy, and a discrimination policy on
behalf of realtors by the FPPC, but he
would abide by it.
Councilman Drago stated that Councilwoman
Teglia also had a real estate license,
and if we were looking at anyone with
that license being eligible to vote on
redevelopment area how could they ever
get a quorum to vote on redevelopment.
City Attorney O'Toole stated that
possession of a real estate license does
not disqualify a member or give rise to a
potential conflict according to the FPPC,
but the usage of the license gives rise
to a potential conflict. He stated that
he had been informed that in Mrs.
Teglia's case, she has never used that
license.
Councilman Drago stated that he had been
prepared to remove Councilmembers from
the Redevelopment Agency and replace them
with residents, but questioned if that
would serve any purpose because any
action would still have to be approved by
Council.
City Attorney O'Toole stated that that
was a policy decision for the Council to
5/27/92
Page 7
A6ENDA ACTION TAKEN. 124
-'-~DMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
9. Resolution - Continued.
Mayor Penna Left the Podium:
RECESS:
RECALL TO ORDER:
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
make.
Councilman Drago stated that the City had
made some commitments to the MTC Policy
Board regarding developing a new redeve-
lopment area, and if we maintain a 4
member board where only 2 can vote it
made him very concerned.
City Attorney O'Toole stated that the
members with a conflict would have to draw
lots to see who would vote on the issue.
City Manager Armas stated that that was
under the Rule of Necessity, and one
would be allowed to vote as long as it
was under a random process to act on the
resolution.
City Attorney O'Toole stated that if the
action could be approved by a simple
majority of the quorum, it takes 2
votes, if it needs a majority of the
legislative body it would take 3 votes.
Mayor Penna stated that this was why he
was upset with the system because it pro-
hibited certain people from really par-
ticipating in the political process, and
if certain people cannot participate in
the process it was excluding certain
types of representation. He stated that
he would pursue it through the Calif.
Assn. of Realtors because he felt it
should be changed.
Director of Economic & Community
Development Costello began giving an
update on BART and some of the issues for
background information.
Mayor Penna left the podium at 8:08 p.m.
Due to the lack of a quorum the meeting
was recessed at 8:09 p.m.
Mayor Penna recalled the meeting to order
at 8:15 p.m., all Council present.
5/27/92
Page 8
AGENDA ACT~'ON TAKEN 125
'--~DMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
9. Resolution - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
Director of Economic & Community
Development Costello stated that the
decision making hearings on selecting a
preferred alternative on the BART
Extension had started, and tomorrow the
BART Bd. will be given direction to
members of the three agency committee on
the preferred alignment. She stated that
the preferred alignment of a subway to
So. Spruce Ave. with the Hickey Blvd.
Station appeared to have support, and in
the next 18 months there would be con-
tinual work on this to make sure there is
adequate financing. She stated that if
there the alternative is not selected,
then it would be a less expensive one.
Spoke at length: that the at-grade was
the worst scenario; to continue to
advocate the subway: the preferred
alternative would be selected by the end
of this month, but less expensive alter-
natives will continue to be looked at;
progress was being made on establishment
of the redevelopment area and its finan-
cing which will give the City more input
into the alignment; concern over the
alignment from Hickey to Mission because
it runs adjacent to the mobile homes and
Macy's Warehouse, but is in Colma; as a
City we need to support a subway for that
section of the alignment in Colma, and
the at-grade alternative eliminated; the
issue being raised of eliminating the
Tanforan Station; that the savings
could be used to help offset a more
expensive bypass; concern over parking;
the elimination of the station could have
severe parking and traffic impacts on the
Hickey Station, etc.
Mayor Penna stated that the City had made
a presentation several months ago with a
win win situation in regards to redeve-
lopment, and felt it was a compromise
situation when we are all being nickled
and dimed. He stated that Colma had
Street Car 40 running through it years
past and didn't seem to mind, yet now to
5/27/92
Page 9
AGENDA ACT]'ON TAKEN, 126
~DMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
9. Resolution - Continued.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
go underground in Colma with BART when
S.S.F. is faced with the possibility of
having to get redevelopment funds when
S.S.F.'s portion of BART was a very small
amount.
He stated that he was of the opinion that
if the Tanforan station was eliminated,
then he thought it should stop right
there, and he would prefer those funds
spent to extend Caltrain to Market Street
which would better serve S.S.F. and we
could use the money on existing redeve-
lopment areas.
He spoke at length: that the real pur-
pose of a transportation system was to
take cars off the road, and have people
take public transportation to their place
of employment and home; transportation
was needed along the Bayshore Freeway,
the 101 Corridor, the S.P. right-of-way
which would be much faster to the Airport
and would go all the way to Gilroy and
circle the entire bay with Caltrain, etc.
Councilman Drago spoke of the many
hours spent in meetings on BART, and of
being very close to getting what we want,
and if Tanforan was eliminated there
would have to be studies on the impacts on
the Hickey Station. He stated that he
had thought there would be 4
Councilmembers to take a position to
maintain in future meetings if BART, MTC,
and Samtrans insist on eliminating the
Tanforan Station, then a fall back posi-
tion to eliminate the Hickey Station and
go subway throughout. He stated that he
had managed to get that statement out to
them, and they were upset, but even
though he agreed with the Mayor they had
to wait and see what BART was going to
do.
Councilman Fernekes stated that he agreed
with Councilman Drago that they had to
wait and see.
5/27/92
Page 10
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN~ 127
iDMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
9. Resolution - Continued.
10.
Resolution calling a special elec-
tion in the event the Council
chooses not to appoint an Interim
City Councilmember.
11.
A RESOLUTION CALLING A SPECIAL
ELECTION TO BE CONSOLIDATED WITH
THE NOVEMBER 3, 1992 GENERAL
ELECTION TO FILL THE COUNCIL
VACANCY POSITION PURSUANT TO
GOVERNMENT CODE 36512
Request for sewer hookup at 226
Country Club Dr. (Frank Fabiano).
"~TEMS FROM COUNCIL
2. Oral Committee reports.
ADMINISTRATIVE BUSINESS
City Manager Armas stated that the origi-
nal BART plan for at-grade had been
detrimental to this City and through
staff and the Subcommittee arguing this
City's alternative and suggesting revenue
from establishing a redevelopment area,
had been to our advantage. He stated
that we should not be misled into
thinking a final decision had been made
on Tanforan, and we will wait until that
time to further emphasize this City's
position.
He stated that the dollars identified for
this project were coming from the Federal
Government because of efforts by our
legislators, and BART was competing with
a light rail project in San Jose for the
funds. He stated that if BART does not
go through, those funds were not for
Caltrain, but perhaps legislators could
include it in the BART Extension.
Discussion followed: that a different
source of revenue had to be considered
for Caltrain; no where in the BART system
does it have S.S.F. at-grade, yet that
has been the threat; belief that the at-
grade would be eliminated; attendance at
tomorrow's BART meeting by a Council-
member, etc.
Continued to the 5/28/92 meeting under
Agenda Review.
Continued to the 6/10/92 meeting under
Agenda Review.
ITEMS FROM COUNCIL
No one chose to speak.
5/27/92
Page 11
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN. 128
~OOD AND WELFARE
GOOD AND WELFARE
Mayor Penna stated that now will be good
and welfare.
Councilman Drago said no, he had some
things to say.
He related things that he first thought
were a set back on Measure D, but disco-
vered it was the opposite: the Judge's
ruling on the Fire Battalion Chief's
lawsuit against the City was that the
Manager's agreement was ambiguously writ-
ten or did he even need the 4/5 vote to
confirm, and ruled the way he did. He
stated that three observations by this
Judge showed him a change was needed:
the failure to recognize that your local
elected City Council by a 4-1 vote on
this ordinance was ignored, and it was no
different than any local land use deci-
sion or agreement that has nothing to do
with those that live outside our com-
munity; our City has survived for many
years outsiders telling us what we should
not do.
He stated that putting aside these exter-
nal influences, he was bothered by a 15
year 4th term politician so against the
yes on D, and the fact that the
Councilwoman is concealing her involve-
ment in D by the fact of not signing the
argument against D after initiating the
referendum. He stated that Roberta was
listed with the State as controlling the
Committee and could authorize yellow hit
sheets to be distributed by City
employees who don't even live in the
City, and yet still manage to keep her
name out of the picture.
He stated that he took issue with the
professional brochure on misleading
claims that it would do away with a city
manager, which is not true, and whether
the Council endorsed the yes vote when
the 4 Councilmembers names were on the
ballot argument; the ludicrous statement
that employees could not compete for top
5/27/92
Page 12
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN_ 129
]OOD AND WELFARE
CLOSED SESSION
13.
Closed Session for the purpose of
discussion of personnel matters,
labor relations, property nego-
tiations and litigation.
RECALL TO ORDER:
;OOD AND WELFARE
ADJOURNMENT
14.
Request to adjourn the meeting to
Thursday, 5/28/92, at 7:00 p.m.,
at the Municipal Building Community
Room, 33 Arroyo Drive for the
purpose of interviewing candidates
for an interim Council appointment,
and a Closed Session pursuant
to Government Code.
~DJOURNMENT:
GOOD AND WELFARE
jobs, when he had pushed for in-house
promotions since being on Council.
Mayor Penna stated that Council would now
go into a Closed Session.
City Clerk Battaya noted that the people
had not had an opportunity to speak under
Good and Welfare.
Mayor Penna stated that he had already
called for that.
CLOSED SESSION
Council adjourned to a Closed Session at
8:45 p.m. pursuant to G.C. 54956.9(sc) to
determine whether to initiate litigation.
Mayor Penna recalled the meeting to order
at 9:15 p.m., all Council present, no
action was taken.
GOOD AND WELFARE
Mr. Jake Jones urged the audience to vote
yes on Measure D and return City Hall to
the people.
He stated that right now there was a
problem with representation of only 4
Councilmembers, and urged the Council to
appoint to fill the vacancy.
ADJOURNMENT
M/S Drago/Fernekes - To adjourn the
meeting to Thursday, 5/28/92, at 7:00
p.m., at the Municipal Services Building
Community Room, 33 Arroyo Dr., for the
purpose of interviewing candidates for an
interim Council appoint; Resolution
calling a special election for November
1992; and a Closed Session pursuant to
Government Code.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Time of adjournment was 9:20 p.m
5/27/92
Page 13
~,ESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
Barbara A. Battaya, City Cl~p~
City of South San Francisco
Mayor
San Francisco
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose
of an item. Oral communications, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape
and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are
available for inspection, review and copying.
5/27/92
Page 14