HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1993-11-03Mayor Roberta Cerri Teglia
Council:
Jack Drago
Joseph A. Fernekes
'John R. Penna
Robert Yee
MINUTES
City Council
City Council Conference Room
City Hall
November 3, 1993
VOL,
AGENDA
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1)
ROLL CALL:
Closed Session for the purpose of the discussion of
personnel matters on the appeal of John Beazor, labor
relations for police and operating engineers, property
negotiations and litigation.
ECALL TO ORDER:
ACTION TAKEN
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
6:10 p.m. Mayor Teglia presiding.
Council Present: Drago, Fernekes, Yee and Teglia.
Council Absent: Penna.
Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 6:11 p.m.
on a personnel matter pursuant to G 54957 - appeal
of John Beazor, labor relations pursuant to
G 54957.6 - police and operating engineers, proper-
ty acquisition pursuant to G 54956.8 - lot on the
corner of Noor Ave. and El Camino Real.
Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 7:55
p.m., all Council was present.
M/S Fernekes/Yee - To deny the appeal, not extend
the leave or grant additional leave and direct place-
ment on the reinstatement list if requested by the
Applicant.
Carried by unanimous roll call vote.
Mr. Beazor asked if that had to be in writing or if
the request to be put on the reinstatement list could
be a verbal request.
Mayor Teglia thought he needed to put it in writing
even though it was on the record.
Mr. Beazor questioned if there were a specific
amount of time in which he had to do this.
City Attorney O'Toole advised Mr. Beazor to do it
as soon as possible and that a handwritten note,
delivered to Personnel Director Gonzales, would be
sufficient.
11/3/93
Page 1
AQENDA A~!!QN TAKEN
1. Closed Session - Continued.
ECESS:
Councilman Penna Arrived:
11/3/93
Page 2
Mr. Beazor stated that at this particular time, at this
moment in time, he was terminated from City em-
ployment.
City Attorney O'Toole stated that the City would
contact Mr. Beazor tomorrow.
Mayor Teglia stated that Mr. Beazor had mentioned
what he felt he was entitled to in leaving City em-
ployment and she presumed Mr. Beazor's Attorney
could speak to staff about that.
Mr. Beazor comment that, to the best of his knowl-
edge - according to the Labor Commission of the
State of California, all information on benefits,
vacation and any accrued pay that he is entitled to
must be given immediately at the time and place of
discharge.
City Attorney O'Toole stated he was not sure that
applied to public entities, however, if it does, it
would be addressed.
Mr. Beazor stated that the question that was impor-
tant to him was if his benefits were done now - in
that he had surgery scheduled in two weeks.
Director of Personnel Gonzales stated that the bene-
fits would run through the remainder of this month
then, effective 12/1/93, Mr. Beazor would no longer
be covered.
Mr. Beazor stated he would handwrite a note for
reinstatement and give it to the Personnel Director
tonight.
Personnel Director Gonzales stated that, in benefits
beyond 12/1/93, Mr. Beazor would have the option
of COBRA and she would mail him all literature
dealing with the rates and coverage over an 18
month period. She stated that the Federal Govern-
ment had provided COBRA so individuals would
have extended coverage. She stated that it would be
the same plan, however, Mr. Beazor would have to
pay for medical, vision and dental coverage.
Council adjourned to a recess at 8:00 p.m.
Councilman Penna arrived at the meeting at 8:03
p.m.
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
._RECALL TO ORDER:
East of 101 Area Plan.
11/3/93
Page 3
030
Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 8:10
p.m., all Council was present.
Councilman Yee introduced newly elected Council-
man and high vote getter Peter Yee from Foster
City, who is employed by Genentech.
Acting Director of Economic & Community Devel-
opment Solomon stated that last Thursday night the
Planning Commission had completed the first round
of the East of 101 Area Plan and gave staff direction
on the changes to be accomplished. He stated
that tonight's meeting was a study session for the
Council to give comments to the Commission on the
draft Area Plan to assist them in their deliberations
before it is brought back to Council.
He proceeded to give an overview on the changes
listed in the staff report and stated that he was also
prepared to go over the goals, which had remained
the same, with one exception. He stated that the
goals were summarized in a handout on the land use
policies.
Discussion followed: what was meant by a traffic
count; the traffic count is looked at for a ratio of the
number of cars in an intersection divided by the
capacity of the intersection; various A-F ratings for
intersections; cost to improve intersections unless
they were left as D ratings; what levels were
considered acceptable; Brisbane was looking at C as
a minimum level; that the levels were policy deci-
sions of the Council; updating the sewage system
when capacities are reached; asking commercial
developers for parking in-lieu fees; potential of a
newly discovered earthquake fault in the East of 101
area and to make sure building does not take place
on top of the fault through the requirement of
geological trenching; that trenching was a costly
operation for developers; the City shall attempt to
do appropriate studies to determine the location of
the fault; location of the fault comes along Hillside
Blvd. and into the bay.
Mr. Early, Consultant, stated that the policy sug-
gested was that the City, for a reasonable mount of
money - like $50,000, could locate the area where
the fault trace is likely to be found. Then, only in
that zone, would trenching be required. He stated
that, according to the geologists, it is not inactive
and was as likely as any other to experience ground
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
.-2,. East of 101 Area Plan - Continued.
11/3/93
Page 4
. 031
rupture. He stated that the geologists believe the
fault was in the bay and was believed to exist on
land; no one has developed the bay bottom and the
natural configuration; accepting the existing
Shearwater Plan, which has been superseded and
should be rescinded; there were four different policy
changes in land use - allow auto storage and auto
related uses, simplify policies affecting the Koll
site for greater flexibility in developing road access,
establish locational and design policies for fast-food
restaurants and direct the establishment of locational
requirements for recyclers; land use diagram - redes-
ignate the Haskin site from Coastal Commercial/
Planned Industrial to Coastal Commercial/Light
Industrial, redesignate the Wind Chime site from
Planned Industrial to Open Space, designate the bay
as open space and designate US Highway 101, State
Route 380 and the railroad mainline track as trans-
portation; that the owners of the Haskin site had re-
quested the possibility of an auto storage use on
their property in the proposed light industrial area;
Councilman Penna had a concern over using prime
property for auto storage; auto storage uses do not
generate sales tax; what were the impacts of this use
to adjacent sites and was it desirable; due to the
economics, the Homart site had not built out since
its inception fifteen years ago; Councilman Yee felt
it was better to have something on the site and limit
the time frame for the use, such as for 15 or 20
years; the site was a landfill site; this was a clean
site without toxic waste, as opposed to the
Shearwater and other properties, which made a
difference for a company wanting to locate in
S.S.F.; Councilman Penna suggested designating
auto storage uses in areas not good for anything else
until cleaned up and they could not be allowed to go
on a clean site that could accommodate hotels, office
buildings or biotechnical companies; Mayor Teglia
agreed, why turn a clean site into this use - unless
you say for five years you will allow the use;
Councilman Yee questioned the viability of this
clean land when the site had been vacant for many
years; his point was he did not want pie in the sky
and the City to end up with nothing; Vice Mayor
Fernekes remarked that having a parking lot on the
site would not change the soil; the use would be
more acceptable if it generated revenue for the City;
Councilman Drago felt it should be sent back to the
Planning Commission with a suggested five year
limit on the use; the site was on the shoreline access
and under BCDC regulations; why would the owner
AGENDA ACTION TAKEN
_.2. East of 101 Area Plan - Continued.
1 I/3/93
Page 5
spend a good deal of money for use of the land for
five years; Councilman Drago remembered the auto
storage use for Mercedes Benz that the City had
authorized; Vice Mayor Fernekes felt something
could be worked out on an interim basis of five to
ten years for the use, even though it did not produce
revenue; Mayor Teglia wanted the word interim to
be used and that it not exceed five to ten years.
Mr. Early stated that the Council did not have to
take action tonight because their concerns had been
flagged and notes had been taken on the revenue
generation of uses.
Further discussion followed: circulation policy;
simplify policies affecting the Koll site to provide
greater flexibility in developing road access;
selected bridges over the waterways; the Koll site
has to provide a fly-over ramp or a bridge connected
to the Shearwater site without access to Brisbane -
which Brisbane was concerned about and wanted to
review the environmental documents; this site has
been accessed through Brisbane because they had
formed an assessment district for the whole area,
which include sewer and water and Brisbane wanted
this City to relinquish jurisdiction and this City gave
up that right; staff felt the interjurisdictional agree-
ment did not cover police and fire services to the
site; this City had made an agreement with Brisbane
to provide roadway services; the site does not cur-
rently have southbound access from 101, so the only
way the police and fire can serve the site is through
an improved roadway to and from S.S.F.; the agree-
ment could be modified to solve the access problem;
with the new Hillside fire station there was closer
access; fast food restaurants could only be in a
commercial center and drive through restaurants
should not be built to stand alone; request for
specifics on where drive through restaurants could
be located; Planning Commission had asked the
Consultant to redefine the fast food policy, LU-20,
not limit them to commercial centers, have design
criteria, identify certain areas where they are not
appropriate and exclude or place a limit on the
number of areas appropriate; there were many di-
verse opinions from the Commission on what areas
were appropriate for fast food restaurants; a prior
Council had felt a fast food restaurant was not ap-
propriate as you come off the freeway onto South
Airport, however, down further, towards the Price
Club, the Council said they could deal with the use;
AQENDA A~!!Q~ TAKEN
_ 2. East of 101 Area Plan - Continued.
Discussion and direction regarding negotiations with
BART/Samtrans on the undergrounding of the BART
Extension.
. 033
the issue was being raised again because of the
Conference Center; Blue Line Transfer belonged
next to the WQCP; Council had tried relocating the
Company to that site and it did not work because of
the acreage; improvements should have a value four
times that of the land they are built on - the Com-
mission felt this was too high and felt two times
would be better; the ratio had been developed from
the County Assessor; there have been many property
reassessments; the policies were a set of guide-
lines not a set of standards; at the public hearings
staff would, bring a list of new construction per
square footage and land values; redesignate the
Haskin site from Coastal Commercial/Light Indus-
trial to allow parking of the cars on the Haskin
site; there was a slough and open space on the Full-
er O'Brien property that was not developable and
cars could not be parked there for auto storage;
there were two separate issue - what is allowed in a
specific land use category and whether to allow
auto storage as a use in the light industrial category
- and, if so, the draft plan had to be changed and the
designation of the Haskin site; designate the wind
chime site from Planned Industrial to Open Space;
Planning Commission wanted the current designa-
tion of the Koll site as Planned Industrial changed to
Mixed Uses of Planned Commercial and Industrial.
Interim Director of Economic & Community Devel-
opment Solomon related: when staff redoes the
document the public hearings would start and there
was still time for changes; staff was just beginning
the environmental documents; staff had received
significant comments to include in the EIR; etc.
City Manager Wohlenberg related information on
BART: City trying to put together a cash flow to
match the available funds for the construction needs
to underground BART; after meetings with BART
and Samtrans, there is no real plan forthcoming; the
clock was running out and the City needed to know
that they are going to put together an interim cash
flow that will work, however, there was little en-
couragement from BART's staff on this; the City
had been using $23 million and BART is supposed
to give us a new number for the incremental cost to
put it in the tube for the needed figure for the rede-
velopment plan; he wanted to do work to take the
increment base and level through tax allocation
bonds - how much can it generate in the next five
years or five to ten years; the tax increment starts
11/3/93
Page 6
A~ENDA ACTION TAKEN
Discussion- Continued.
11/3/93
Page 7
034
at $200,000 and it must be leveraged; after the
money was together go to BART with a definitive
plan and say, can you give us the balance as a loan;
in order to cover the cash flow, the City had to have
the money in the first year; needed to look at other
ways to get the money up-front; he was not sure that
an assessment district was a viable option in this
community; there was a $7 million right-of-way cost
for the Hickey Blvd. extension and that could round
up the expense to $30 million for the project.
Discussion followed: the right-of-way was in Colma
and why were they not paying for it; the County
acquired the right of way; Mayor Teglia was getting
close to the point to revisit the issue of BART at
grade because we are looking at money we don't
have, she was uncomfortable and it would be easy to
say undue it and we can take care of Hickey; Coun-
cilman Penna stated the City didn't have to do any-
thing right now and maybe they should slow down
the project; how the Hickey Blvd. Project had gone
from $3 million to $7 million for that strip; the
difference was in buying the property and taking the
realistic approach that you could not take a cut
through people's land; there was $1.3 million avail-
able from Measure A; the Council had said three
years ago what they were going to do; the City had
tried to get Federal grants under the old program for
Hickey and it was below the funding level; the City
would not have a shot for a couple of years for the
Federal Transportation portion; the City had to get a
commitment from the County and the City Manager
was directed to do this and get back to the Council;
the Council could use all of their Proposition A
money and leverage it; BART is the Agency saying
they see value for the project, but the City was not
ready for that at this point; Mayor Teglia stated she
was not willing to bond and did not want to put this
community in risk; City Manager Wohlenberg stated
that these bonds are not a risk and only had the 2%
rate a year; Councilman Yee had expressed concern
over spending our own money, if we are not going
forward with it; he had asked Ms. Costello, before
she left City employment, where we would get the
money and she had told him there was a verbal
discussion that BART would front the money; Coun-
cilman Penna felt there was an implied contract, the
City had acted and it cost us; the Bart General Man-
ager had never been in on any of the discussions;
Assistant City Manager Martel related that the Gen-
eral Managers of BART and Samtrans, during the
AQENDA A~!!Q~ TAKEN
Discussion - Continued.
11/3/93
Page 8
commencement of negotiations to develop the fi-
nancing plan, which was in April, had implied that
through some type of a loan - most likely through
Samtrans, because BART can not spend money out-
side the District and it would not be possible to lend
money, Samtrans could provide the up-front costs;
Samtrans Manager did not say it was possible or
impossible, but implied he was in agreement with
what Frank Wilson suggested; he also suggested that
if BART could assist us in a short term bridge loan
and provide a portion of the cost for construction,
we would talk about it later; so they went to the
staff level to develop the option that would be pre-
sented to the policy makers; in subsequent meetings
it was clear to the Assistant City Manager that what-
ever understanding was reached had not trickled
down to the staff level and they were not coming up
with the cash.
Councilman Drago stated that the City had a com-
mitment from BART and Samtrans on the strip
behind Treasure Island Trailer Court to under-
ground, yet he had never seen any confirmation
from anyone in the alternative at grade and it always
shows that it includes Treasure Island.
Discussion followed: get a formal determination
that we provide the financing and they provide the
undergrounding; without money from Samtrans the
City had nothing; the City had to get to the Board of
Directors to make it happen; the City Manager
would work on the executives but he needed the
Council to work on the BART Boardmembers and
apply pressure; if the City accepts BART in the
trench, there was a separate decision on whether the
station will be at Chestnut or Hickey; Councilman
Yee didn't want to talk about that at this time be-
cause this had to be understood before we get to that
point; Councilman Penna did not want it in S.S.F.
and felt the Council had the right to chose the right
of way; Mayor Teglia stated that we don't - they
have the right to condemn properties outside of their
jurisdiction.
Councilman Yee stated that, at some point, he want-
ed an update on the Oyster Point Project because it
was an important project and he did not want the
Council to lose sight of it. He felt that John Gibbs
should sit down with us and give us an update.
Vice Mayor Fernekes felt the Council should be
A~ENDA
r 3. Discussion- Continued.
1. Closed Session - Continued.
RECALL TO ORDER:
ADJOURNMENT:
ESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED,
~ City C~
Barbara A. Battaya,
City of South San Francisco
ACTION TAKEN
036-
more involved in talking to the BART members and
should stay on top of it all.
Mayor Teglia stated that BART called a time out
when they started the business with San Bruno and
questioned what was happening with the alternatives.
Interim Director of Economic & Community Devel-
opment Solomon stated that BART was going to take
all three alternatives through the environmental
process. He stated that BART was saying, "we will
study it, but you pay for it."
Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 10:40 p.m.
Mayor Teglia recalled the meeting to order at 11:08
p.m., all Council was present, no action was taken.
MIS Penna/Yee - To adjourn the meeting.
Carried by unanimous voice vote.
Time of adjournment was 11:09 p.m.
APPROVED.
~Ro~erta Cerri eg ia, ~
City of South San Francisco
The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to dispose of an item. Oral communica-
tions, arguments, and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the
Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying.
11/3/93
Page 9