Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 1995-01-18Mayor Robert Yee Council: Jack Drago Joseph A. Fernekes ~ohn R. Penna Roberta Cerri Teglia M!_NUIE_8 City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room 281 January 18, 1995 CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO JANUARY 18, 1995 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California, that the City Council of the City of South San Francisco will hold a Special Meeting on Wednesday, the 18th day of January 1995, at 6:00 p.m. in the Municipal Services Building, Community Room, 33 Arroyo Drive, South San Francisco, California. Purpose of the meeting: Closed Session: pursuant to GC 54957.6, to meet with its designated representatives - Acting City Manager, Director of Personnel, City Attorney and Labor Negotiations Consultant on labor relations matters and the employee organizations are: AFSCME, Police, Fire, Operating Engineers, Management and Confidential Group and Public Safety Managers. Dated: CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALL: January 17, 1995 AGE_ND_A (Cassette No. 1) Closed Session: pursuant to GC 54957.6, to meet with "-; designated representatives - Acting City Manager, irector of Personnel, City Attorney and Labor Negotia- ,.ons Consultant on labor relations matters and the em- ployee organizations are: AFSCME, Police, Fire, Oper- City Clerk City of South San Francisco ACIIQN TAKE_N. 6:39 p.m. Mayor Yee presiding. Council Present: Drago, Fernekes and Yee. Council Absent: Penna and Teglia. City Clerk Battaya stated Councilwoman Teglia had peridontal work done and was unable to attend the meeting. Council adjourned to a Closed Session to discuss the item noticed. 1/18/95 Page 1 AGENDA A~!ON TAKE_N 282 ,..~losed Session - Continued. :ing Engineers, Management and Confidential Group and rublic Safety Managers. RECALL TO ORDER: ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Yee recalled the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m., all Council was present, no action was taken and direction was given. M/S Femekes/Drago - To adjourn the meeting. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Time of adjournment was 7:09 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, APPROVED. B arbaraA. B~a~ya, Ci~ty~ City of South San Francisco Robert Yee, Mayor City of South San Francisco ' ~ ne entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Council to lispose of an item. Oral communica- tions, arguments and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 1/18/95 Page 2 Mayor Robert Yee Council: Jack Drago Joseph A. Fernekes .... John R. Penna Roberta Cerri Teglia AGENDA ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING CALL TO ORDER: (Cassette No. 1) ROLL CALL: Study Session - Terrabay Project. 1/18/95 Page 1 MINUTES City Council Municipal Services Building Community Room January 18, 1995 283 ACI!QN TAKEN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING 7:10 p.m. Mayor Fernekes presiding. Council Present: Drago, Fernekes and Yee. Council Absent: Penna and Teglia. City Clerk Battaya stated Councilwoman Teglia had periodontal work done and was unable to attend the meeting. Acting City Manager Mattel stated there was a request from the representatives of Sunchase to extend the current entitlements on the property and chronologically gave background information: in April 1993 the City received information that Sunchase purchased the property from the RTC; the purchase was secured by the deed of trust; the Property Manager began an inquiry regarding the existing entitlements of the Terrabay Project, the Development Agreement and the Specific Plan; in May 1994 representatives of Sunchase met with the former City Manager to discuss the Project and the status of the entitlements; in July of 1994 the City received information from Sunchase on their foreclo- sure of the Terrabay property, were in control and had secured title to the property; the City, after verifying that title was secured, began discussions on the future development of Terrabay; in. August of 1994 Sterling Pacific began moving to identify the outstanding obligations and resolutions needed to proceed; in Sept. of 1994 a plan was outlined on how they intended to address outstanding issues with a time frame to move forward; in Oct. of 1994 staff met with representatives on the development of a master plan; met last month with representatives of Sterling Pacific in reference to cleaning the site, repair of catch basins and to move forward and deal with the landslides; Sterling Pacific representatives Vice President Mary Berry, Director of Legal Ser- A~_E_ND A ,~ ~tudy Session - Terrabay Project. 1/18/95 Page 2 284 vices Dennis Breen, Project Manager Morlin Fayline, Vice President Dwane Grisson and former San Mateo County Supervisor John Ward will give a slide presentation; etc. Ms. Mary Berry presented a slide show on selected real estate projects of Sterling Pacific. Acting City Manager Martel related: request for additional time in order to proceed with the obliga- tions under the Specific Plan; deadline for the De- velopment Plan and the Specific Plan is 3/14/95; the extension request is based on litigation involving Terrabay; staff wants to provide the basis to grant the extension; the litigation was filed on 4/28/83 and the Court of Appeals made a decision on 8/7/85 but that judgement was not finalized until filed by San Marco County Superior Court on January 7, 1986; therefore, the tolling period for the litigation was actually 984 days and results in an extension to 8112/95; staff is in agreement with the interpre- tation, specifically as it applies to the language in the Development Agreement and recommends that the Council consider affirmatively the request. She explained the 1/12/95 letter from Sterling Pacif- ic Management Services, Inc. attached to the staff report: the new property owners intend to move forward, identify home builders and proceed with Phase I; they will need an extension that goes be- yond the extension date; it is the assessment of the City Attorney that, in order for the Council to take discretionary action to extend the agreement beyond the extended date, there is a need for the City and the property holder to commence with an environmental review to determine if any changes have arisen in the ten years which will be analyzed by staff; staff will make a recommendation as to the extension of time that the applicant has requested; the tolling period would be the first step in the process to the extent that the initial environmental review indicates we don't need further study and the Developer would be in a position to come forward sooner to ask for a further extension; if further studies were needed the Developer would have the August date to complete that; if Council directs, staff will come back with a resolution for the tolling period at the next meeting for an extension to Au- gust 12th. Mayor Yee reiterated that the request is for Council AGENDA ACTIO_N TAKEN Study Session - Terrabay Project. 1118195 Page 3 285 to agree with staff that the new expiration is in August rather than in March and a resolution will be presented at the next meeting for action. Ms. Jan Pont, 111 Belmont Ave., wanted to see public hearings on this issue for more public input. She has been against this Project all along but wants to see the general public be able to speak. She wants tighter restrictions, lower density, more open space and more environmental studies on the proper- ty. Mayor Yee stated that, if they go beyond August, we will have to look at the environmental issues and perhaps reassess. However, between now and Au- gust - that is the legal date, whether we like it or not, we must accept it. He felt Ms. Pont is asking to see this particular project reviewed and certain changes made, but that would only be if the Council extends beyond August 12th. Acting City Manager Martel stated it is possible that' subsequent to this meeting further information may be available on the litigation that may extend the August date Out further. Ms. Pont wants more input from the general public if this is extended beyond August 12th regarding tighter restrictions and a lesser number of homes. Acting City Manager Martel stated the anticipated Council actions are not discretionary, due to the tolling previously agreed to. However, to extend the project for ten years would require public hear- ings. She stated the recent letter from Sterling Pacific says there could be other litigation that could further extend the date which is non-discretionary. Mayor Yee stated if the Council does not approve the extension tonight, which is not discretionary, they can get it through the Court anyway. If the approval is given for the extension and, if it is ex- tended beyond August 12th, we have to open it to the public. Councilwoman Teglia related: the project has a date and the date is coming up; it is to the benefit of all concerned for the date to be extended because of the lawsuit; the lawyers may be searching around for other reasons why the date can go beyond August 12th, which is ~ignificant; etc. Study Session - Terrabay Project. 1/18/95 Page 4 ACTION TAKEN 2861 Discussion followed: 8/12/95 is the date on which the Development Agreement and Specific Plan would terminate, that the land use entitlement would terminate; any request would require discretionary action and if not we have no project and whoever owns the project is back to square zero and will start with the whole public hearing and environmental process at ground zero; the Developer could be back in July and say there is a legal definition that the approvals must be extended to October; the August 12th date is not in cement, because this is based on legal interpretation; the Acting City Manager should come back to Council with information on legal interpretations to further extend the approvals when it agendizes the resolution to extend the approvals to 8/12/95; what would be accomplished by 8/12/95; the preliminary environmental assessment needs longer than 60 days to complete; computation of the tolling period and definition; market conditions affecting the project; an initial environmental assessment could lead to some changes in the pro- ject; why didn't the Developer pull a permit before, because the project is alive and does not need an initial EIR at this time; Councilwoman Teglia is willing to extend the date to August, but not to a further date; she wanted all of the amenities in the project and did not want more units; Sterling Pacific has stated there is no need to change the develop- ment from the way it was envisioned, other than to update the Plan for the Building Code, and have indicated a desire to fulfill the obligations of the amenities; Sterling Pacific may request an exten- sion of the Development Agreement for upwards to ten years; if the Council decides not to extend be- yond 8/12/95, then there is no need to do an envi- ronmental assessment; there is no way to provide a ten year extension without knowing the kind of project it is going to be; to extend for the ten year period will be a discretionary action; ten years is too big a commitment to make; ete, Mr. David Schooley, Bay Area Land Watch, ques- tioned if the City received his letter. Mayor Yee stated the Council had received his letter. Mr. Schooley stated his group has been in opposi- tion of the Terrabay Plan and the changing of the Endangered Species Act in the United States. Terrabay has been an example of the HCP that is A~ENDA Study Session - Terrabay Project. 1/18/95 Page 5 ACTION TA_KE_N -. 287 frightening not just for here but in America because of what we are doing to the air and land around us. He stated that there have been ten years of games, the project is a failure and now they are going to bring it back in various ways and destroy the habitat for growth, money and power. He stated he has taken children hiking on the Moun- tain to see the butterflies and this has become ruined in the last four years. He wanted the Council and young children growing up here to be thoughtful about what is the so-called habitat and our future. He stated the group will check everything that hap- pens on this project. He stated that Shearwater is also something impor- tant because of its relationship to the bay. Ms. Berry stated it is not Sterling Pacific's intention to disregard the agreement and realizes it is a con- tract. However, when they drafted their letter they were asked to make an affirmative statement. We did not want to come to you with a list of scenar- ios, but changes will occur in the market place and we are anxious to promote homes on the mountain and we have builders ready to do that. She stated any builder will require an agreement of time for the development, be that two or five years, and will not make a commitment to the models without the gift of time. That is what they seek not a material change, not a downsizing nor a reduction in the amenities. Discussion followed: Sterling Pacific foreclosed on the property in July of 1994; legal ramifications in denying the extension; if the Council denied the ten year extension, the City would not be subject to any legal ramifications if there is a reasonable basis; if the City refuses to toll the date and there is legal evidence that it should be tolled, there may be po- tential liability to the City; there is a reasonable basis to grant the extension of the tolling period; the Developer has to pay for the environmental analysis; the staff report indicates Sterling Pacific will not be the home builders and there may be several builders; Sterling Pacific has owned the property for a year and a half - why haven't they pulled a permit and started the project; now they say extend to August and then to October, which can go on for ten years; if Council lets this expire it does not prevent them from coming back and resubmit- 289 ._~tudy Session - Terrabay Project. '2assette No. 2) Closed Session - To discuss the tolling extension of the Terrabay Project. ECALL TO ORDER: RECESS: RECALL TO ORDER: Study Session Shearwater Site Redevelopment Proposal. .K I E3 ting the plan because tho infrastructure is already built; this will allow the public to give input; the project does not have tentative map approval; under tho terms of tho agreement, all permits would have to be.pulled and have a life of one year; not every permit has to bo pulled because tho recreation center has to be built; Councilman Drago did not have a problem with the August 12, 1995 extension, but did not want to see it go beyond that stated date and they must comply with what is on the books; Coun- cil- woman Teglia wants to give them the extension to go forward on tho project even though tho homes cannot bo built by August - it will move from phase to phase and, if it takes ton years, each phase will be completed; Councilwoman Teglia wants to know how much money tho City has advanced for the project; staff will provide a full accounting of City expenses and Sterling Pacific has indicated they intend to provide reimbursement for tho ex- penses; etc. Council adjourned to a Closed Session at 8:57 p.m. Mayor Yee recalled the meeting to order at 9:07 p.m., all Council was present, no action was taken and direction was given. Consensus of Council - Staff to bring documents to the next meeting for the extension. Mayor Yee declared a recess at 9:10 p.m. Mayor Yoo recalled the meeting to order at 9:23 p.m. Councilman Penna left the podium due to a conflict of interest and did not take part in the discussion nor vote on the item. Acting City Manager Mattel spoke of a proposal from Mr. Bill Poland, Bay West, expressing interest for the property called Shearwater, which has 45 acres and is located in a project area. She pro- ceeded in detail on how this proposal may fit into the redevelopment plan: the redevelopment plan for Shearwater established a program for the redevelop- ment goals, i.e., removing blight, handling toxic soil, storm drains and any public improvements and brings revenue to the City. 1/18/95 Page 6 AGENDA ACI!QN IAKEN Study Session Shearwater Site Redevelopment Proposal. She stated that Councilman Penna's conflict of inter- est stemmed from two letters received by him in 1991 and 1992 on the Shearwater potential develop- ment and this development is similar to the earlier one. She stated that Mr. Poland will present his Proposal for the Shearwater site. Mr. Poland, Bay West Group, stated that he had been involved in 1972 with the development of the industrial park in S.S.F. He stated the Council has before it a window of opportunity to do something that is good for everybody, because the old U. S. Steel property is the number one toxic hot spot in the bay area and there is pollution on the land and water site. He and his colleagues have spent con- siderable time with the various agencies that will be involved, Regional Water Quality Control, A,r?y Corps. of Engineers and City staff, to discuss many of the issues regarding the remediation of the site. He related: the basic plan is a mixed use without residential; developing the entire site over a two to three year period; he has presented several alter- native site plans that indicate a number of retailers, free standing restaurants and a card room casino that would be developed in a venture with himself and Hollywood Park; he had, from the Acting City Manager, letters of interest from several retail users in these early stages and felt confident they will be developed; it is a considerable amount of work to clean the soil and the water sites and they have laid out a good plan for everything; etc. Samuel D. Porter, Atty., stated he was representing the Pasco family, who have been involved in card- rooms in S.S.F. for decades. He stated the Pasco family wants to go on record that they are interested in exploring opportunities with the Developer in the new casino but have not been able to reach an agree- ment. They want to go on record that any ordinance that changes gaming also affects the cardrooms operated by the Pascos currently. Acting City Manager Mattel suggested directing staff: to do additional research on the process that would be involved in further consideration of the proposal; procedures for amending the East of 101 Plan; what is needed to facilitate an application of this type; any other requirements are environmental 1/18/95 Page 7 Study Session Shearwater Site Redevelopment Proposal. - pursuant to CEQA; what would be necessary for an ordinance for the development proposed; any necessary agreements for the Redevelopment Agency and the Developer on any related tasks that are necessary for Council to take into consideration before deciding what direction to move in; etc. Mayor Yee stated the only reason for the research to change the East of 101 is because of the casino. Discussion followed on Mr. Poland's concerns: the East of 101 Area Plan calls for a band around the basin that would eliminate ten acres; retailers who were going to go into the Brisbane site are con- cerned as to where to relocate because of the ballot measure failing; the overpass has created 'havoc for egress, now it is being completed, the property is primed for development and he will work with the former U. S. Steel site owners to bring this site into shape. His comment about this being a window of oppor- tunity meant that for retail users, as well as the cardroom the timing of this was right for the acquir- ing of the property and cleaning up so it does not get caught up in a ten year thing. However, maybe the wrong term was used. Mr. Dave Schooley stated his group has been very concerned about the Shearwater Project and the area because San Bruno Mountain comes down to the Bayshore to an area that can accommodate a hotel. He stated this opens a possibility of a small piece of the property being the last chance in the whole peninsula area to have a place of native life and endangered species and he wanted this piece of land. This is the area where they made ships and is a rocky area with bay fill with two creeks going to the bay that he wanted dedicated for open space. Councilman Drago suggested the open space be incorporated into the setbacks, if it is compatible with what Bay West wants to do and it could be a win win situation, if Mr. Schooley is not talking about a lot of land. Mayor Yee stated maybe it could be part of the BCDC permit. Councilman Drago stated he liked Mr. Poland's "window of opportunity", perhaps selfishly, because 1118/95 Page 8 291 Study Session Shearwater Site Redevelopment Proposal. he went through the proposal and, after looking at certain parts of Grand Avenue we have been trying to change by getting rid of cardrooms, this is a window of opportunity. He is interested in the Shearwater property if that area falls under the Redevelopment Agency and asked the City Attorney if the property being in a redevelopment area chang- es the application process and would it go through the Planning Commission. lie also asked if a card- room is permissible in a redevelopment area. Acting City Manager Martel stated various elements of the project would go through the Planning even though it is redevelopment. However for East of 101, if you are going to develop, you must do it under a specific plan or master plan and that goes through the Planning Commission. She stated a redevelopment area neither prohibits nor allows cardrooms. General Plan Policy 47 says they are not permitted, however, the East of 101 Area Plan does not say they are or are not included. In her opinion it would have to be set down in the land use document and that would come back to the Council. Councilwoman Teglia stated this was like Mary Poppins' spoon full of sugar, which was what the cardroom is whether legally permitted or not. She stated cardrooms have always been a contention with the Council and they have always had consistent positions on cardrooms over the years. The other side of that is the issue of Shearwater sitting there as an ugly duckling and the impediments on that from not being developed. She spoke of the proposal's income to the City and she knows cities are entertaining cardrooms but we, at this time, do not have any ordinance to cover anything. So, if we go in this direction, we need more information on cardrooms and the legislation needed to allow eardrooms. She stated, in reference to Councilman Drago's comments about Grand Avenue, this City has. never permitted cardrooms or licensed them but we do have two legal, non-eon- forming uses on Grand Avenue and that has not been inspiring. Our General Plan has talked about they can stay there but we don't want them expand- ed and we want to see them moved because we feel it is impeding Grand Avenue. So, do we end up with a proliferation or do we make an omelet ap- pealing to everyone. She has not seen anyone come forward, yet she sees the Pasco family in the 1/18/95 Page 9 292 Study Session Shearwater Site Redevelopment Proposal. audience. She hoped we end up with one entity and somehow we take care of everyone's interest and not have cardrooms everywhere. She recognized in the proposal there are participants who are financially very solid and that has always been a concern to her and we need to know that their strength is real, not illusionary, with money in the bank and no debts. She did not see that infor- mation here in what staff presented. She stated it was also important to know who the players are. We talk about Bay West Group - who are they, for they would .be the Developer and it has been defined that Hollywood Park will build the cardroom. Mr. Poland stated he is the principal owner of Bay West Group and owns a number of real estates in San Francisco, other bay area cities and Seattle and is heavily involved in development. He stated the firm has been investigating the opportunity of going into the cardroom business, which they had planned two years ago with Hollywood Park on this particu- lar site - which he felt dovetailed for both opportuni- ties because he knew he needed the expertise of a company like Hollywood Park for an entertainment center in the development. He is the Developer of the land in its entirety and plans to take it from the present to a site ready condition for building and then, in a separate ven- ture, he will buy 15 to 20 acres for the cardroom. Discussion followed: Hollywood Park is a public corporation and has more financial disclosures, which is a plus, but how does this organization plan to operate; want to know who the people in Bay West Group are; Mr. Poland has a junior parmer in the Bay West Group and Mr. Poland owns 100% of Bay West DevelOpment Services; Mr. Poland has 90 employees in San Francisco and Bay West Develop- ment Services is a holding company that does pri- marily real estate; Mr. Poland will have a law firm helping his firm in the land use, a man is involved in map preparation and Mr. Dave Rathy is involved in finance, construction and the technical aspects of construction; Mr. Poland will be engaging other experts for the habitat as the Project goes along; etc. Councilwoman Teglia stated Mr. Poland is aware of 1/18/95 Page 10 Study Session Shearwater Site Redevelopment Proposal. the Pasco family and their interests and she under- stands there are some sort of negotiations going on. Mr. Poland felt they were approaching agreement, they have been negotiating for a period of time and felt they are at a point here soon where decisions will be made. Councilwoman Teglia noted there is a comment on the City owned GSA property would be a major player in determining what develops and there are negotiations in terms of acquisition or lease by the Developer. Mr. Poland felt it is in both interests to tie the prop- erty into what they are doing and he would look forward to acquiring the site or a long term lease. Discussion followed: Mr. Poland's concerns over the Oyster Point Overpass formula for the Project; Mr. Poland plans to negotiate towards a satisfactory agreement or figure how to complete the financing of needed improvements, such as widening the streets and the issue of sewers; Councilwoman Teglia has always been opposed to cardroom expan- sions in the community but recognizes there are things happening outside of Council's control in the State; neighboring communities are looking for general fund revenues; etc. Councilwoman Teglia is aware of the negative as- pects of cardrooms and is willing to pursue this in order to make an intelligent decision, but wants all of the information up front first. She felt what the developer is telling Council does not scratch the surface. Mayor Yee read in the papers that Hollywood Park is also interested in the site at Bay Meadows. Mr. Poland stated Hollywood Park is not involved in Bay Meadows. He stated this will not be the old style of cardroom, but will be an entertainment cen- ter as is seen in Las Vegas. He stated there are significant revenues that can go down the street to another town, but this site has a nice barrier between the Bayshore Freeway and separates the residential from where the casino will be. Councilman Femekes stated that initially there was another group who came before Council a year or 1/18/95 Page 11 294 Study Session Shearwater Site Redevelopment Proposal. Councilman Fernekes Left the Podium: two ago and he was in opposition to this form of entertainment introduced into the community. He asked the Assistant City Manager what she was asking of Council. Acting City Manager Martel stated if the Council is interested in taking the proposal any further then staff recommends that there is a considerable amount of additional information that is needed to weigh on the proposal. She recommended Council direct staff to research and come back with a detailed plan and time frame covering all the aspects of what would be involved if the Council chooses to move in that direction. Councilman Fernekes stated he is not in favor nor against more information but wants detailed infor- mation from police, fire and streets on the ups and the downs. He wanted to know what it is going to cost the City, because he heard that, in future, the State is going to legalize gaming. He felt there should also be citizen input on the proposal before any decision is made. Where is the revenue going to go. Will it go to the police and fire. It has to be identified and there be some kind of a commitment that is on-going. Mayor Yee stated it was not surprising that he op- posed the cardroom casino especially on this site. He has taken a position, does not believe the City's image will be served with another cardroom and is opposed to the proposal regardless of information coming forth. Councilman Fernekes also wanted information on 'the process for this to go to a ballot issue. Acting City Manager Mattel stated that would be outlined in the report to the Council. Councilman Fernekes left the podium at 10:10 p.m. and did not return to the meeting. Ms. Jan Pont, 111 Belmont Ave., asked if the infor- mation will be available to the public. Councilwoman Teglia stated there are a lot of things that have to be done and, secondly, there is the option, at the end, if the public should vote on this. If the information shows it is more of a drain, then it is a matter of lining up the pluses and minuses, 1/18/95 Page 12 ~AG_END A _ACI!Q_N IAK~N 295 Study Session Shearwater Site Redevelopment Proposal. but there is room for public input. She wanted to know what other cities are doing 'for income and what guaranties there are for the revenues. She stated the City struck a deal with the Price Club, a different situation, there was a guarantee and there was other income coming into the City be- fore the deal took place. Mayor Yee asked if the Council directs staff to go ahead with further study should staff outline a study before moving ahead with details and send it to Council. Acting City Manager Martel stated staff suggested putting together a detailed plan on the issues and the timeframes and then pass that along to the Council, to ensure staff has covered all the bases. She stated if there is additional information we will incorporat- ed that and, if you want to proceed, we will conduct the next step analysis of revenue and expenditures. Former Police Chief Datzman stated that, because of the holidays, there may not have been public notice. He recognized that this is a study session but, in looking over the brief report, it says the casino will provide security and manpower and it is not specific on what that means. The proposal says it will gen- erate a tremendous amOunt of revenue to the City. He would suggest historically that public confidence will be higher if everything is done to make every- thing available to the public for people to review. He asked that the City go back ten years ago. There was a lot of time spent'in public meetings talking about the future of eardrooms and he wanted to see if that can be made public to enhance public confi- dence. Councilwoman Teglia stated she was very much opposed but what changed is that Colma is going to have a cardroom. You don't stop it at the border. When it begins to crowd into your home neighbor- hood how do you deal with it from Colma. She stated that staff has to do an analysis, develop data and then Council has to make a decision. She stated it was similar to Price Club and Costco stores, where some communities did not want to have them and the business and income go to San Bruno and perhaps we should get the income to offset declining revenues. 1/18/95 Page 13 AGENDA ACTION TAKEN Study Session Shearwater Site Redevelopment Proposal. ADJOURNMENT: 29E Mr. Datzman stated that, as a resident, he appreciat- ed Councilwoman Teglia's comments about the mar- keting and has a memory of two K-Marts coming in and discussion on whether the City could support two K-Marts. He stated that if, there is that kind of marketing information developed, he would like to see that made a part of the information package. Consensus of Council - To direct staff to do the information gathering. .MIS Teglia/Drago - To adjourn the meeting. Carried by unanimous voice vote. Time of adjournment was 10:20 p.m. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED, Barbara A. Battaya, City Clerk ~/' '""ity of South San Francisco APPROVED. Robert Ye~, Mayor City of South San Francisco The entries of this Council meeting show the action taken by the City Counci[to dispose of an item. Oral communica- tions, arguments and comments are recorded on tape. The tape and documents related to the items are on file in the Office of the City Clerk and are available for inspection, review and copying. 1/18/95 Page 14