Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017-08-07 e-packet@3:00Monday, August 7, 2017 3:00 PM City of South San Francisco P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA City Hall, City Manager's Conference Room 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, CA Housing Standing Committee of the City Council and Planning Commission Special Meeting Agenda August 7, 2017Housing Standing Committee of the City Council and Planning Commission Special Meeting Agenda NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, pursuant to Section 54956 of the Government Code of the State of California, the City Council and the Planning Commission Housing Standing Committee of the City of South San Francisco will hold a Special Meeting on Monday, August 7, 2017, at 3:00 p.m., at City Hall, City Manager's Conference Room, 400 Grand Avenue, South San Francisco, California. Purpose of the meeting: Call To Order. Roll Call. Public Comments. MATTERS FOR CONSIDERATION Motion to approve the Minutes from the meetings of February 6, 2017, March 13, 2017 and May 1, 2017. 1. Report regarding Housing Standing Committee study session of the proposed Oyster Point Residential Development project. (Alex Greenwood, Director Economic and Community Development) 2. Report regarding Housing Standing Committee study session of the proposed mixed-use development at 988 El Camino Real. (Adena Friedman, Senior Planner) 3. Adjournment. Page 2 City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/30/2017 City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:17-791 Agenda Date:8/7/2017 Version:1 Item #:1. Motion to approve the Minutes from the meetings of February 6, 2017, March 13, 2017 and May 1, 2017. City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/30/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:17-800 Agenda Date:8/7/2017 Version:1 Item #:2. Report regarding Housing Standing Committee study session of the proposed Oyster Point Residential Development project.(Alex Greenwood, Director Economic and Community Development) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Housing Standing Committee receive this staff report and provide input regarding the proposed residential components of the Oyster Point Redevelopment project. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In 2011,the City Council approved the Oyster Point Development project,which,as currently approved,includes approximately 2.25 million square feet of office/R&D space,a wide range of open space improvements,as well as extensive improvements to the City’s right-of-way and infrastructure.The project was envisioned to be completed in four phases.Phases 1-2 would continue to be constructed as office/R&D space,with a total of approximately 1.5 million square feet. In March 2017,the developer submitted a preliminary application that envisions Phases 3-4 as a residential development, which is referenced as the 2017 Oyster Point Specific Plan Update (2017 OPSP Update).The 2017 OPSP Update would include the following physical improvements related to the residential development: ·1,191 residential units o Mixture of studio/one-bedroom, two-bedroom and three-bedroom o Both for-sale and rental units ·22,000 SF of retail/flex space ·~1,700 parking stalls ·Bay Trail and open space improvements Conceptual drawings of the proposed residential project are included in Attachment 1. Planning Approvals The 2017 OPSP Update will require the following entitlements:General Plan Amendment (to allow residential uses in the Oyster Point Specific Plan area);Zoning Ordinance Amendment (to incorporate residential uses in the Oyster Point Specific Plan District);Amendment to the Oyster Point Specific Plan Appendix +Design Guidelines;Precise Plan for Phase 3D-A (which will include a minimum of 450 residential units and 11,000 SF of retail/flex space);Transportation Demand Management (TDM)Program;Design Review;Affordable Housing Agreement;and a Development Agreement. Following is a brief discussion of some of the key entitlement actions that would be required: Amendment to the Specific Plan Appendix + Design Guidelines The approved 2011 project included a Specific Plan Appendix +Design Guidelines document that was intended to establish site planning and design guidelines to be incorporated into the zoning regulations for the Oyster Point Specific Plan District.The document includes six broad design goals related to sustainability,outdoor spaces,use of alternative transportation modes,integration of private and public spaces,provision of economically viable uses,and provision of a more desirable and usable public realm.In support of these goals,the document also establishes design guidelines related to Urban Design, Built Form, Circulation, and Open Space. Because the original project only included Office/R&D buildings within Phases 1-4 of the developer’s project area,the applicant is proposing an amendment to incorporate design guidelines related to residential uses within City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/30/2017Page 1 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:17-800 Agenda Date:8/7/2017 Version:1 Item #:2. area,the applicant is proposing an amendment to incorporate design guidelines related to residential uses within the OPSP area.Revisions are being considered throughout the document,but the primary new guidelines will deal with Residential Buildings. Following are the basic guidelines for residential buildings: 1.Four-Sided Architecture 2.Multiplicity of Architectural Expressions 3.Buildings that Provide Strong Spatial Definition 4.Ground Floor Residential Units 5.Towers that Punctuate the Urban Landscapes The Residential Building guidelines also include parameters for roofs,tower location and massing,parking, building facades and building materials.The full text of the proposed Residential Building Guidelines can be found in Attachment 2. Precise Plan for Phase 3D-A The applicant has also submitted Precise Plan drawings for the first phase of the residential project,which is considered Phase 3D-A.This phase would contain a minimum of 450 units split between two building areas, “Marina North”and “Park View”,as well as 11,000sf of retail/flex space,557 parking stalls,and the development of landscaping and other improvements to the Oyster Cove Marina Shoreline in order to incorporate park uses, recreational facilities and Bay Trail improvements across approximately 5.8 acres. The Design Review Board (DRB)has reviewed the Precise Plan on two occasions.The first hearing was held on April 18,2017,at which the DRB members expressed interest in the overall project,but expressed concerns with the preliminary architectural design and requested additional information related to wind impacts,building design details, recreational opportunities, landscaping, sea level rise/high tide impacts, and other areas. The second DRB hearing was held on July 18,2017.The DRB members expressed their overall approval with the direction of the building architecture,and were generally of the opinion that the resubmittal addressed their previous concerns/information requests.The DRB did request that the final landscape palette be submitted for additional review prior to the issuance of building permits.The latest presentation drawings that were reviewed by the DRB are shown in Attachment 3.The minutes for both the April 18th and July 18th DRB meetings are attached (Attachments 4 and 5). Affordable Housing Agreement Per the City’s Zoning Ordinance,all new “for-sale”housing projects with four or more residential units are subject to the inclusionary housing requirements of Chapter 20.380 “Inclusionary Housing Regulations”.In such cases,not less than 20 percent of the total units approved shall be constructed and restricted both as to occupancy and affordability to low-and moderate-income households.For the 2017 OPSP Update,the applicant is proposing to provide the full amount of affordable units required by the City’s Inclusionary Housing Regulations,with the following details: ·The units would all be rental,set at the affordability levels prescribed in the City’s Inclusionary Housing Regulations (which provide for a range from 50 to 110 percent of Area Mean Income). ·The first 30 affordable units would be built within the first phase of the residential project.All of the remaining required units (up to 69 units,depending on the final buildout of the project)would be provided off-site in South San Francisco. Fees, Development Agreement Obligations & Community Benefits The proposed project would comply with all relevant City fees and Development Agreement (DA)obligations,and would also include a package of proposed community benefits.A summary of all fees,DA obligations and proposed community benefits is shown in Attachment 6. City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/30/2017Page 2 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:17-800 Agenda Date:8/7/2017 Version:1 Item #:2. In general,the fees and DA obligations are calculated using the City’s standard calculation,either per City ordinance or per the Oyster Point DA. The one exception, however, is for the park fee for for-sale units. Park Fee (For Sale Projects) Per SSFMC Chapter 19.24,all subdivision residential projects are required to either 1)dedicate land for park and recreation uses,or 2)pay a fee in-lieu of land dedication.The applicant is currently proposing a total of 495 for- sale units,which would require a land dedication of 2.64 acres or an in-lieu payment of $7,929,900.The applicant is proposing to dedicate the BCDC open space adjacent to Phases 3-4,which totals 4.32 acres in size.At $3,000,000/acre,the total value of the proposed dedication is $12,960,000.The BCDC open space would be designated and constructed as public open space,and the applicant will agree to provide on-going maintenance as part of the larger development.Under the 2011 OPSP approvals,the estimated cost of the improvements to the BCDC open space was $4,000,000.Under the proposed 2017 OPSP Update,the estimated cost of improvements to the BCDC open space would increase to approximately $8,000,000. In addition to the BCDC open space,the project would provide additional areas of public access and open space around the proposed residential buildings;it is anticipated that the private open space located on the podium level of each residential building will result in an additional 3.0 acres of private open space. Other Contributions In addition to fees and DA obligations,the applicant would agree to support a community facilities district (CFD) to help fund operations and maintenance costs for the Oyster Point area.This CFD is estimated to have a net present value (NPV)of 27,965,843.The applicant is also proposing to pay community benefits,including $5 million towards the land and construction costs for a new fire station, as well as $100,000 for public art. Consultant Analyses Underway The potential introduction of residential uses into the East of 101 Area -which traditionally has been reserved for industrial,retail,and commercial uses -presents complex land use,environmental,infrastructure,and logistical issues that must be carefully studied and considered.Accordingly,several consultant analyses are currently underway, including:a comprehensive environmental analysis associated with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) review process;an update to the City’s East of 101 Traffic model;an analysis of bicycle and pedestrian needs for the area; and an analysis of municipal services impacts. Next Steps The review of this project will involve a significant number of community meetings and public hearings, including: August/September Housing Standing Committee Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Commission Parks & Recreation Commission October/November Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) published Housing Standing Committee (Mtg #2) Planning Commission Study Session & SEIR Comments December/January Planning Commission - SEIR & Entitlements Recommendations City Council - SEIR & Entitlements Actions Airport Land Use Commission & C/CAG Board February/March City Council - Additional public hearings if necessary City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/30/2017Page 3 of 4 powered by Legistar™ File #:17-800 Agenda Date:8/7/2017 Version:1 Item #:2. CONCLUSION Staff requests that the Housing Subcommittee provide input regarding the proposed amendments to the Specific Plan Appendix +Design Guidelines,the Precise Plan submittal (including project architecture and overall physical improvements),the preliminary Affordable Housing Agreement proposal,and the preliminary Community Benefits package for the 2017 OPSP Update. ATTACHMENTS 1.Concept Drawings of Proposed Residential Project 2.Update to Specific Plan Appendix + Design Guidelines (dated July 11, 2017) 3.OPD Precise Plan Presentation to Design Review Board 4.Minutes of the April 18, 2017 Design Review Board meeting 5.Minutes of the July 18, 2017 Design Review Board meeting 6.Proposed Community Benefits and Estimated Fees City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/30/2017Page 4 of 4 powered by Legistar™ PUBLIC REALM –WATERFRONT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS IV. RENDERINGS –MARINA NORTH WATERFRONT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS IV. RENDERINGS -URBAN PLAZA OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS IV. RENDERINGS –PARK VIEW CLUB HOUSE OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS IV. RENDERINGS –PARK VIEW WATERFRONT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS Foreword Relationship between 2011 Specific Plan and 2017 Update Existing Oyster Point Specific Plan In 2011. the Oyster Point Specific Plan (OPSP) and related entitlements were approved to allow for the development of 2.25 million square feet of Office/R&D uses across an approximately 41.4 acre developer-owned site to be built out in four Phases (ID. 110. 1110, and IVD). In addition. two phases of infrastructure and open space improvements were approved throughout the site and across the adjacent 40-acre site owned by the City of South San Francisco (Phases IC and I IC). •Phase ID is proposed to include approximately 508.000 square feet of Office/R&D buildings on a site of approximately 10 acres and Phase IC is proposed to include infrastructure and open space improvements across approximately 25 acres. The Phase I Precise Plan. which outlined the detailed design of Phase ID and Phase IC. was approved at the same time as the OPSP in 2011. •Phases 110 through IVD were proposed to include a total of approximately 1.750.000 square feet of Office/R&D buildings at a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 1.25 (calculated across the remaining 31.4 acre site. including open space). Phases 110 through IVD would also include new infrastructure and open space improvements consisting of the continuation of the new streets. sidewalks and utilities from Phase IC, a new sewer pump station. bicycle facilities. shuttle bus stops. and new open spaces including courtyards. plazas. pocket parks. and Bay Trail improvements along the Oyster Cove Marina shoreline (subject to BCDC guidelines and approval). Precise Plans for Phases 110 through IVD with detailed building design had not been developed at the time the OPSP was approved in 2011. •Phase IIC at the eastern portion of the Oyster Point Specific Plan was conceptually developed in 2011 to include some landscape, parking and landfill cap improvements. Detailed design of these improvements had not yet been developed at the time the time the OPSP was approved in 2011. Revised Oyster Point Specific Plan OPD proposed modifications to Phases 1110 and IVD of the OPSP and related entitlements to include Residential and Retail/Commercial Mixed-use development ("Residential"). Phase 110 remains consistent with the OPSP adopted in 2011. •Phase 110 of the project is proposed to include approximately 1.070,000 square feet of Office/R&D buildings including approximately 28.000 square feet of retail. amenity and/or flex-use space at an FAR,;;1.25 across a total of 20.2 acres. including adjacent open space. Phase 110 is proposed to include a partially below grade parking garage to accommodate a parking ratio of 2.5 stalls/1.000 square feet of Office/R&D space. Phase 110 would be consistent with the OPSP (as adopted in 2011). Phase I ID will require a Precise Plan that outlines the detailed design of the improvements. • Phases 1110 and IVD are proposed to include approximately 1.472,000 square feet of mixed-use program including approximately 1.191 residential units and 22.000 square feet of retail. amenity and flex-use space. The maximum dwelling unit density of Phases 1110 and IVD would be approximately 100 units/acre across the combined site of 12.4 acres. The proposed parking ratios for Phases 1110 and IVD are 1.4 stalls/residential unit and 2.5 stalls/1.000 square feet of retail/amenity space. Public realm improvements for Phases 1110 and IVD are consistent with those approved in the OPSP in 2011. The proposed uses for Phases 1110 and IVD require amendments to the General Plan and OPSP. In addition, Phases 1110 and IVD will each require a Precise Plan that outlines the detailed design of the improvements within that phase. The intention is to allow the sequence of construction of Phase 110. 1110 and IVD to be flexible. however, the first of these phases will include the infrastructure and open space improvements noted above. Section 2 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT New Mixed-Use Development The proposed private redevelopment of the western portion of the Specific Plan District will include the following: •The office development consists of 1.55 million square feet of Office/R&D and accessory uses with a maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 1.25 on approximately 30.17 acres. These 30.17 acres include the 4.0 acre parcel to be dedicated as open space along the beach at Oyster Point Marina and the Bay Trail Improvements. •A residential neighborhood program consisting of approximately 1.47 millon square feet, including approximately 1. 191 residential units and 22,000 square feet of retail, amenity and flex-use space. The maximum dwelling unit density would be approximately 100 units/acre across the 12.4 acres. •The development will likely occur in four phases. See Section 5 Implementation. •The north end of the site provides the option for taller buildings that can serve as landmarks anchoring the project's skyline. •The commercial office - R & D buildings will range in height from five to seven floors depending upon the anticipated tenants' needs while the Residential development will range from 4 stories above a parking podium up to twenty-four stories at the northern end of the Residential neighborhood. •Residential building mass should be typically expressed by unit-sized vertical increments. Office building mass should be typically expressed by clean horizontal massing. Recreation and Open Space The proposed Recreation and Open Space will include the following: •An open space field immediately to the east of the Phase ID Office/R&D development. •Improvement of the Bay Trail and surrounding open space throughout Oyster Point Marina and the Mixed-Use development per the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission Bay Plan and Design Guidelines. •Continuation of current uses at the eastern portion of Oyster Point Marina including parking, open space and boat ramp facilities. This land will undergo cosmetic landscape improvements and isolated modifications to the landfill closure. •Possible changes to two of the docks in Oyster Point Marina, which could include removal and replacement Future Hotel Site The proposed future hotel site will accommodate the following: •A future hotel with up to 350 guest rooms and conference center. Oyster Point : : Specific Plan Appendix + Design Guidelines July 11, 2017 •Approximately 40,000 square feet of retail and/or restaurant use located in the vicinity of the Ferry Te rminal. Infrastructure The new road configuration in the Specific Plan District that will include the following: •New roadways that will be designed for safe circulation of pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular traffic. •Shuttle bus stops and turn arounds serving the Mixed-Use development open space and the Ferry Te rminal. •Reconfigured parking adjacent to the new Ferry Te rminal (described below). •New utilities necessary to service the proposed redevelopment. •As a separate project, a ferry terminal will be constructed at Oyster Point Marina to allow for ferry service provided by Water Emergency Transportation Authority. This project has previously been studied and approved under its own EIR 15 Section 4 DESIGN GUIDELINES Residential Building Guidelines The vision for the Residential neighborhood of Oyster Point strives for an integration of the inhabitants within the larger context of the development. Buildings emphasize this integration by directing and articulating its massing toward the waterfront and open space. Building massing will take advantage of the views, wind, and the site's great gathering spaces. Building Guidelines 1. Four-Sided Architecture Although Oyster Point is a waterfront community, the waterfront fagades are not given priority over any other fagade in the design of the buildings. This strategy ensures strong integration of the building with the urban context. Each building facade is given equal priority. 2.Multiplicity of Architectural Expressions. The Oyster Point mixed-use community encompasses several building types and this diversity creates a unique urban environment. Oyster Point will benefit from having a range of architectural expression, creating a vibrant urban place not restricted to any specific architectural style as a means of enhancing the urban character of the community. Each development project will, by use of massing, articulation, materials and detail contribute to a coherent form and structure of this new community. 3. Buildings That Provide Strong Spatial Definition Individual buildings are not conceived as isolated or stand-alone projects, but instrumental in shaping and defining the public spaces, streets and open space of the community. Buildings generally should be built to the property lines of streets, mews and parks to provide such definition except when a setback is required for a ground level residential unit. Building massing and articulation should be designed to avoid the creation of an undifferentiated and monolithic environment. Building walls should be lively and have a positive edge to streets and open spaces with variation in building materials, planes, and the introduction of architectural elements like balconies. Buildings should have an active ground level frontage - either residential units or retail spaces to enliven streets and public spaces. Residential building mass should be typically expressed by unit-sized vertical increments, exterior balconies and terraces, bay windows, and 46 varied architectural design treatments. Oyster Point : : Specific Plan Appendix + Design Guidelines July 11, 2017 Terraces Ground Floor Activity Section 4 DESIGN GUIDELINES 4.Ground Floor Residential Unit The character of a neighborhood is most visible in the activity on the street. It is highly encouraged to locate ground level residential units - townhouses - along the perimeter of the Residential development to activate the public realm and to screen the parking garages from public views. The units should be set back from the public right-of-way, to create a physical separation from the public realm and be raised approximately 3 feet above grade to maintain privacy into the ground level residential units by avoiding direct eye-level views into the units. If units cannot be raised above grade, the setback should be increased to a minimum of 10 feet to ensure privacy. Porches, patios and private gardens within the setback area will provide variety and interest along the public right of way. 5. Optional: Towers That Punctuate The Urban Landscapes Special design considerations should be given for potential buildings that exceed the height of the predominant neighborhood fabric. When designed without proper attention to proportion, articulation and human comfort, towers can be oppressive and have a distorted sense of scale. They may also disregard the surrounding context, look uncomfortably over the public realm, and generate uncomfortable downdraft wind conditions at the podium and ground level.The placement of the towers at the northern end of the site provide a landmark feature for the overall Oyster Point community. The towers should be designed to provide an interesting silhouette, profile and volumetric form on the skyline through variation of building material, shape, planes and step backs. The base of the tower should complement the scale and proportion of neighboring buildings. Oyster Point : : Specific Plan Appendix + Design Guidelines July 11, 2017 Stoops Bring Privacy to The Ground Floor Unit Tower Punctuating the Urban Landscape 47 Section 4 DESIGN GUIDELINES Roof Guidelines •Open Spaces and terraces for the use and enjoyment of residents are encouraged •Roof should add to the character of the building and complement the fa9ade •Roof projections and mechanical equipment should be clustered and/or placed away from view corridors. •Rainwater catchment systems are highly encouraged Optional Towers: Location and Massing •The tower locations should be at the northern end of the site. •The towers should be sited and shaped to maximize the views to the bay. •The placement and configuration of the towers should consider wind mitigation techniques to ensure a comfortable urban environment for the residents on the podium and at grade level. •The towers should be designed to provide an interesting silhouette, profile and volumetric form on the skyline through variation of building material, shape, planes and step backs. •The towers should be architecturally integrated with the perimeter block architecture as its base. •The height must comply with the airport restrictions for building height. Parking •Parking garages should be screened from public views with active ground level uses. •If a garage cannot be screened from public views with active uses, architectural design coupled with a strong landscape buffer are required to mitigate the visual impact of the garage on the public realm. •Building materials should be similar as those utilized in the occupied portion of the building. 48 Oyster Point : : Specific Plan Appendix + Design Guidelines July 11, 2017 Tower Should be a Landmark in the Skyline Tower and Podium Relation Encapsulated Parking Structure Garage Podium used as Courtyard Section 4 DESIGN GUIDELINES Retail Design Guidelines Oyster Point should incorporate retail and food service uses with the intent of reducing traffic during the work day by providing essential services on site, including but not limited to uses such as grocery stores, pharmacies, restaurants, dry cleaners, convenience stores and other neighborhood support uses. Restaurants, cafes and service retail will also create destinations where people can interact and have a sense of community during office hours as well as weekends and evenings. The retail locations will be as shown in Fig. 01, which include spaces along the East-West Corridor and locations in plazas or social hubs. Retail Design Guidelines •Retail facades should utilize the palette of building materials and treatments to create visual interest to the pedestrian. To enhance the pedestrian experience, ground floor retail spaces should achieve maximum transparency. East-West Corridor Fig.01 50 •The use of canvas awnings and metal canopies are encouraged to provide shelter and shade to the pedestrian, and color and life to the building fa9ad •Blank walls (i.e. those areas where there are not entries or windows) should be minimized along the retail frontage. •Ground level uses should be accessible to the public, and as such generally level with the elevation of the adjacent sidewalk or promenade. •Ground floor uses should have their primary access from the street or public space. Oyster Point : : Specific Plan Appendix + Design Guidelines July 11, 2017 Incorporation of Awnings to Provide Shade Transparency Enhances Pedestrian Experience Integration of Retail and Building Materials Palette 2017 PROPOSED SPECIFIC PLAN OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS 2017 PRECISE PLAN OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PUBLIC REALM –“PLACES” OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PHASE 3D -MASTERPLAN OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PHASE 3D -PRECISE PLAN OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PUBLIC REALM –WATERFRONT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PUBLIC REALM –WATERFRONT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PUBLIC REALM –EAST-WEST CONNECTOR OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PUBLIC REALM –EAST-WEST CONNECTOR OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PUBLIC REALM –THE MEWS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PUBLIC REALM –THE BOULEVARD OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PHASE 3D -PRECISE PLAN OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PHASE 3D -PRECISE PLAN OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO | 2017.07.18 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS ARCHITECTURE DESIGN OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS I II III IV BUILDING DESIGN UPDATE THREE WIND MITIGATION STRATEGY BUILDING PLANS ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS I. BUILDING DESIGN UPDATE OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS ARCHITECTURE DESIGN OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS I II III IV BUILDING DESIGN UPDATE THREE WIND MITIGATION STRATEGY BUILDING PLANS ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS STRAIGHT MEWS: ACCELERATED WIND PROPOSED BUILDING BENDS: ACCELERATION RELIEF WIDENING THE MEWS A 60 ’ B II. WIND MITIGATION STRATEGY 1 –MEWS WIDTH OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS -PREVIOUS MASSING STEP 2 -SET BACK FROM PODIUM 0 1 2 3 STEP 1 -LOWER ONE BUILDING STEP 3 -BEND THE BUILDING II. WIND MITIGATION STRATEGY 1 –MEWS WIDTH OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS II. WIND MITIGATION STRATEGY 2 –STEPPED LEADING EDGE FLAT EDGES: INCREASED DOWNWASH WIND STEPPED LEADING EDGES: CREATES DOWNWASH RELIEF A B OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS II. WIND MITIGATION STRATEGY 2 –STEPPED LEADING EDGE OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS II. WIND MITIGATION STRATEGY 3 –LANDSCAPE SCREENING DISTRIBUTED TREES: SOMEWHAT HELFPUL A B STAGGERED FORMATION: BLOCKS WIND AT MEWS ENTRY OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS MARINA NORTH MEWS STUDYII. WIND MITIGATION STRATEGY 3 –LANDSCAPE SCREENING OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS ARCHITECTURE DESIGN OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS I II III IV BUILDING DESIGN UPDATE THREE WIND MITIGATION STRATEGY BUILDING PLANS ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS III. BUILDING PLAN –GROUND LEVEL PARKING PARKING RETAIL LOBBY LOBBY LEASING FITNESS FITNESS OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS III. BUILDING PLAN –PODIUM LEVEL PODIUM COURYARD PODIUM COURYARD CLUB CLUB OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS III. BUILDING PLAN –LEVEL 7 ROOF ROOF OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS ARCHITECTURE DESIGN OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS I II III IV BUILDING DESIGN UPDATE THREE WIND MITIGATION STRATEGY BUILDING PLANS ELEVATIONS AND RENDERINGS 1. WEST ELEVATION IV. ELEVATIONS –MARINA NORTH 1 1 2 3 5 4 1 5324 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS 1.Wood Character / Texture 2.Fiber Cement Shingle 3.Stucco 4.Fiber Cement Smooth Panel 5. Concrete 1. WEST ELEVATION IV. ELEVATION DETAILS –MARINA NORTH 1 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS SECTIONSECTION IV. ELEVATIONS –PARK VIEW 1 1. WEST ELEVATION 1 2 3 d e 4 1.Wood Character / Texture 2.Stucco -Color 2 3.Stucco -Color 3 4. Stucco -Color 4 1 3 24 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS IV. ELEVATION DETAILS –PARK VIEW 1 1. WEST ELEVATION OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS SECTIONSECTION IV. RENDERINGS –MARINA NORTH WATERFRONT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS IV. RENDERINGS -URBAN PLAZA OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS IV. RENDERINGS –PARK VIEW CLUB HOUSE OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS IV. RENDERINGS –PARK VIEW WATERFRONT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS ARCHITECTURE APPENDIX OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS 1. WEST ELEVATION IV. ELEVATIONS –MARINA NORTH 1 1 2 3 5 4 1 5324 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS 1.Wood Character / Texture 2.Fiber Cement Shingle 3.Stucco 4.Fiber Cement Smooth Panel 5. Concrete 1. WEST ELEVATION IV. ELEVATION DETAILS –MARINA NORTH 1 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS SECTIONSECTION 4. NORTH ELEVATION IV. ELEVATIONS –MARINA NORTH 2. SOUTH ELEVATION 3 4 2 3. EAST ELEVATION OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS 6. INTERIOR ELEVATION 5. INTERIOR ELEVATION IV. ELEVATIONS –MARINA NORTH 6 5 PARKING PARKING CLUB LOBBY PARKING PARKING CLUB TOWN HOME OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS IV. ELEVATIONS –PARK VIEW 1 1. WEST ELEVATION 1 2 3 d e 4 1.Wood Character / Texture 2.Stucco -Color 2 3.Stucco -Color 3 4. Stucco -Color 4 1 3 24 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS IV. ELEVATION DETAILS –PARK VIEW 1 1. WEST ELEVATION OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS SECTIONSECTION 3. SOUTH ELEVATION 2. EAST ELEVATION IV. ELEVATIONS –PARK VIEW 2 3 OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS 5. INTERIOR ELEVATION 4. INTERIOR ELEVATION IV. ELEVATIONS –PARK VIEW 4 5 PARKING PARKING PARKING PARKING RETAIL RETAIL OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PODIUM LANDSCAPE DESIGN –MARINA NORTH OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS PODIUM LANDSCAPE DESIGN –PARK VIEW OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT OYSTER POINT DEVELOPMENT LLC | SOM | STEINBERG | DGA | JAMES CORNER FIELD OPERATIONS MINUTES SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting of April 18, 2017 TIME: 4:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Nilmeyer, Nelson, Ruiz and Williams MEMBERS ABSENT: Harris STAFF PRESENT: Billy Gross, Senior Planner Tony Rozzi, Senior Planner Ryan Wassum, Associate Planner Patricia Cotla, Planning Technician 1.  Administrative Business: - None 2. OWNER: Oyster Point Development LLC APPLICANT: Greenland USA ADDRESS: 375-389 & 384-386 Oyster Point Blvd PROJECT NUMBER: P09-0085: GPA17-0001, ZA17-0001, SPA17-0001, DA17-0001, PP17-0001, TDM17-0001 & DR17-0004 PROJECT NAME: Oyster Point Development LLC (Case Planner: Billy Gross) DESCRIPTION: General Plan Amendment, Oyster Point Specific Plan Amendment, Zoning Text Amendment, Development Agreement, Precise Plan, Transportation Demand Program and Design Review to amend Phases III and IV of the OPSP to allow approximately 1,472,000 square feet of mixed-use, including approximately 1,200 residential units and 22,000 square feet of retail and/or amenity space. The Board had the following comments: Building Design 1. Provide background information on wind studies of the project area and potential solutions to mitigate wind impacts. 2. Provide details on building design within the mews and along the street level/bay trail; consider breaking up the building massing within the mews to assist with wind mitigation. 3. Provide more architectural variation in the building facades. 4. Revise the project plans to indicate recreational opportunities for residential tenants and for public users. Public Spaces/Landscaping 5. Provide proposed solutions for wind mitigation in open areas; consider wind screens,earth berms, hedges, etc. 6. Provide elevations to indicate how sea level rise/high tide will impact the site. 7. Provide details showing transition from public open space to private residential areas along the Bay Trail frontage. 8. Show how public recreational opportunities, such as playgrounds, and raised residential areas will be screened from wind. 9. Revise the proposed landscape plan to Remove species that will not survive the SSF micro-climate, and include species that will survive in the proposed project site; certain species will only be appropriate on the non-windy sides of buildings. 10. Provide sub-drainage for trees at low elevations. Study tidal elevations and proposed site elevations to be sure bottom of tree holes are above tidal elevations, to avoid salt water inundation of tree planting holes. Select species that will survive salty soils at lower elevations. 11. Provide information on how the proposed Bay Trail improvements, specifically the rip rap slope proposed adjacent to the trail, will be safe and not conflict with accessibility requirements. 3. OWNER: SMPO ELS LLC APPLICANT: SMPO ELS LLC ADDRESS: 560 Eccles Avenue PROJECT NUMBER: P17-0029: DR17-0027 & PM17-0001 PROJECT NAME: New R&D Building (Case Planner: Billy Gross) DESCRIPTION: Design Review, Transportation Demand Plan and Tentative Parcel Map to construct a new 21,807 square foot R&D building at 560 Eccles Avenue in the Business Technology Park (BTP) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Muncipical Code. MINUTES SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO DESIGN REVIEW BOARD Meeting of July 18, 2017 TIME: 4:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Nilmeyer, Harris, Nelson, Vieira and Williams MEMBERS ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: Billy Gross, Senior Planner Tony Rozzi, Senior Planner Adena Friedman, Senior Planner Rozalynne Thompson, Associate Planner Patricia Cotla, Planning Technician 1.  Administrative Business: - 670 Gateway Minor Use Permit to install a new wireless telecommunication facility at 670 Gateway Blvd in the Gateway Specific Plan District (GSPD) in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and determination that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA per Class 1, Section 15301 (a). Approved as submitted 2. OWNER City of South San Francisco APPLICANT Costco Wholesale ADDRESS 479 South Airport Blvd. PROJECT NUMBER P17-0044: UPM17-0005 & DR17-0035 PROJECT NAME UPM - Costco Gas Station (Case Planner: Rozalynne Thompson) DESCRIPTION Use Permit Modification and Design Review to expand the Costco Gasoline Facility at 479 South Airport Boulevard in the Freeway Commercial (FC) Zoning District in accordance with Title 20 of the South San Francisco Municipal Code and determination that the project is categorically exempt from CEQA. The Board had the following comments: 1. The Board liked the design concept. 2. Consider adding a five foot evergreen hedge to screen the equipment enclosure adjacent to the exit onto South Airport Boulevard. Recommend Approval with Conditions. Miscellenous: Oyster Point Development – Residential - The Board liked the residential design concept. - Remove the following species from the landscape plan: Ceanothus X ‘Ray Hartman’ (Ray Hartman Wild Lilac); Aesculus Californica (California Buckeye); Carpinus Betulus ‘Frans Fontaine’ (Columnar Hornbeam); and Quercus Ilex (Holly Oak). Consider incorporating Cupressus macrocarpa (Monterey Cypress). - Revise the landscape plan to include a total of three species that will grow up to 40-feet in height in South San Francisco. - Tree planting details should include a custom tree anchoring option, as root ball anchors will likely not work in the windy environs. - Provide a detail of the transition from the Bay Trail to the rip-rap edge; a shoulder should be provided along the Bay Trail. OPD DRAFT IMPACT FEES AND COMMUNITY BENEFITS Phase I - II assumption: 1,578,000 sq. ft. R&D Phase III - IV assumptions: 695 rental units, 495 for sale units IMPACT FEES (BY ORDINANCE)Phase I - II R&D Phase III - IV Residential TOTAL Notes East of 101 Traffic Impact Fee 8,397,860 1,428,976 9,826,836 Oyster Point Grade Separation Fee 2,146,236 1,178,523 3,324,759 East of 101 Sewer Impact Fee 2,571,891 704,014 3,275,905 $1,152,000 sewer pump credit Sewer Capacity Fee 2,488,564 3,763,099 6,251,663 Child Care Fee 1,342,323 2,085,009 3,427,332 General Plan Maintenance Fee 710,550 625,722 1,336,272 Public Safety Impact Fee 622,824 614,006 1,236,830 Bicycle/Ped Capacity Fee n/a 202,470 202,470 Mass Decontamination Fee 134,232 n/a 134,232 Parkland Acquisition (Rental)n/a 5,566,950 5,566,950 Parkland Construction (Rental)n/a 1,820,857 1,820,857 Park Fee (For Sale)n/a land dedication land dedication IMPACT FEE TOTAL 18,414,480 17,989,626 36,404,106 Existing DA/DDA Phase I - II OBLIGATIONS Public Art/Transit Enhancement 1,342,323 n/a 1,342,323 Payment before 1st building 1,100,000 n/a 1,100,000 Land Purchase 4,500,000 n/a 4,500,000 Phased payment: $2,250,000 close of escrow; $2,250,000 first building permit for Phase III New DA TBD Phase II - IV (COMMUNITY BENEFITS) Fire Station / Public Infrastructure n/a 5,000,000 5,000,000 Public Art / Civic Improvement n/a 100,000 100,000 Community Facilities District (CFD)n/a 27,965,843 Net present value - Estimated annual income of $1,000,000 GRAND TOTAL 25,356,803 51,055,469 76,412,272 OPD Residential Affordable Housing Requirement - Provide 30 rental affordable units on site - Provide 69 affordable units off site (city help with land; open to extra credit for 3 bedroom units; trigger linked to "oyster point north"; deferral request (value TBD); in lieu if things don't work out (amount TBD) Oyster Point Marina CFD Agreement - 32 cents for O&M (annual); lesser of 5% CPI or actual - 7 cents for fuel system (through 2030); 2% CPI OPD Residential CEQA MMRP - OPD commits to meeting all CEQA requirements and 100% funding City of South San Francisco Legislation Text P.O. Box 711 (City Hall, 400 Grand Avenue) South San Francisco, CA File #:17-817 Agenda Date:8/7/2017 Version:1 Item #:3. Report regarding Housing Standing Committee study session of the proposed mixed-use development at 988 El Camino Real.(Adena Friedman, Senior Planner) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Housing Standing Committee receive this staff report and provide input regarding the proposed mixed-use development at 988 El Camino Real. BACKGROUND/DISCUSSION In July 2017,SummerHill Apartment Communities submitted an application for a mixed-use development at 988 El Camino Real.The 1.67 acre site is located at the intersection of Chestnut Avenue and El Camino Real,and is currently the site of the South City Car Wash.The project site is located within the El Camino Real /Chestnut Avenue Plan Area,and the proposed development will help to activate this corridor,and will also help to support the future development of City’s Community Civic Campus. The applicant’s project narrative and plans are attached,outlining the design,architectural and landscape concepts (Attachments 1 and 2 to this staff report). The proposed project includes: ·172 for-rent residential units (mix of studio, one- and two-bedroom units) ·11,130 square feet (sq. ft.) of ground-floor retail space on El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue ·Active community areas along Centennial Way,including a publicly accessible outdoor fitness park,connections to the trail, bike parking, and landscaping ·Residential amenities such as outdoor recreation areas, a pool, a clubroom, outdoor kitchen, and lounge areas ·Parking spaces for residents, visitors, and retail ·Sidewalk and streetscape improvements The applicant has also submitted technical reports to support the environmental review process,and will be submitting a Transportation Demand Management (TDM)Plan,which will include measures to support trip reduction and encourage alternate transportation modes,and capitalize on the project’s location proximate to BART,bus routes on El Camino,and Centennial Way. CONCLUSION Staff requests that the Housing Subcommittee provide input and direction regarding the proposed mixed-use residential project at 988 El Camino Real. ATTACHMENTS 1.988 El Camino Real Project Narrative 2.988 El Camino Real Plan Overview City of South San Francisco Printed on 8/30/2017Page 1 of 1 powered by Legistar™ PROJECT DESCRIPTION 988 El Camino Real July 5 2017 Location & Setting The 988 El Camino Real project is a four-parcel assemblage located at the intersection of El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue in the City of South San Francisco. The “ECR” property is approximately 1.67 acres. The site is currently being occupied by South City Car Wash. The property is surrounded by Centennial Way Trail to the east, a vacant lot to the North, El Camino Real to the west, and Burger King fast food restaurant immediately adjacent to the south. The vacant lot is the future site of the City of South San Francisco’s civic center. The site is located less than a mile from the South San Francisco BART station and is served by SamTrans Bus 37, 122 which connect to the station. Centennial Way has a Class I bike lane, which provides a safe, easy connection to the South San Francisco BART station to the north. Project Description • Enhance the vibrancy of this mixed used corner by optimizing the double-frontage nature of the site and utilizing 4-sided design to create a village-like, pedestrian friendly environment from both El Camino Real, Chestnut Drive, and direct pedestrian connection to Centennial Way Trail. • Extend the Grand Boulevard Initiative to include pedestrian-oriented mixed use tree-lined streetscape along El Camino Real and Chestnut. • Provide a highly walkable mixed-use 6-story building with below grade parking, fronted by retail with residential above, which is consistent with the City of South San Francisco’s El Camino Real/Chestnut Area Plan, with the following components: o 172 studio, one and two bedroom units, with an average unit size of approximately 722 square feet o 11,130 square feet of retail space on El Camino Real and Chestnut Avenue with associated infrastructure and o Active community areas along El Camino Real, including pedestrian lobbies on two sides, a leasing office/lounge, a fitness studio, a bike “hub”, and other resident services o Active community areas along Centennial Way Trail, including publicly accessible outdoor fitness park connecting to Centennial Way Trails, guest bike parking, pedestrian connections to the retail and to Centennial Way, and landscaping. o Additional outdoor recreation amenities and adjacent clubroom, privately located above ground, includes a resort-style courtyard with pool and spa, a separate fireplace courtyard with outdoor kitchen and lounge areas, and landscaped paseos o Vehicular access will be provided via a two-way entrance at the southern end of El Camino with a second one-way entrance on El Camino near Chestnut Avenue. o 254 total parking spaces, including 206 spaces for residents, 10 spaces for resident guests/future residents, and 38 spaces for retail and outdoor dining Entitlements • A Conditional Use Permit for increase FAR from 2.0 to 2.5 and a density increase from 80 DU/acre to 103 DU/acre per ECR/C-MXH sub-district. • Design Review • CEQA review and environmental consistency analysis for ECR/Chestnut areas EIR. • An abandonment of a public utility easement, also known as, ‘Mission Road PUE’ • Exception approval of less than 65-ft commercial depth. • Exception approval of surface parking within 40-ft of Centennial Way Trail • Parcel merger through a Vesting Tentative Parcel Map. El Camino Real Design & Improvements The community will have an active retail presence along El Camino Real including: • Class “A” Retail with a large, artistic corner plaza will allow for multiple commercial opportunities. • A pedestrian lobby lounge, fitness studio, and bike hub, featuring storefront glass • A new 8’-0” wide sidewalk with street trees in tree wells, and landscaping along the building frontage extending the City’s Grand Boulevard Improvement Plans along El Camino. • Pedestrian-scale lighting, retail and community signage (to be developed) • Decorative entry paving demarks vehicular access. Chestnut Avenue & Improvements The community will also have an active retail presence on Chestnut including: • Class “A” Retail with outdoor bistro-style seating will serve walk-in clientele and help to contribute to a high level of pedestrian activity on the ground floor. • A new 10’-0” wide sidewalk with street trees in tree wells, and landscaping along Chestnut Avenue C entennial Way Trail Activation & Improvements The community will further activate the Centennial Way Trail by: • Extending the park setting along the trail, to include an outdoor fitness park with exercise pods and bike parking. The outdoor fitness park will be accessible to the general public and will further enhance the amenities provided along the trail. Circulation & Parking Vehicular access into the building will be via a two-way southern entrance on El Camino Real. There is an additional opportunity to enter the site via a one-way northern driveway near Chestnut Avenue. Resident parking is located in two levels of subterranean parking. There are parking for the retail and for leasing available in the ground floor level at the garage. There are ten additional spaces for visitors and commercial accessed through the garage. Pedestrian access is available through either of the driveways along El Camino, through the public open space that connect to Centennial Way along Chestnut Avenue, and open to all along Centennial Way. Residents will also be able to access through gates available on the south, west, and east side of the project. There are three elevators serving the buildings and three stair wells. There are 253 parking spaces provided onsite. For the residential uses, a ratio of 1 space per bedroom, totaling 216 spaces. There are 38 spaces provided for retail use. The resident parking is secured from the guest and retail parking. Community Amenities & Landscaping The project amenities and landscaping will unite residents into an active community, including: • Two courtyards, privately located above ground level, will be provided for residents use. One with pool and spa amenities, offers residents the ability to lounge by the pool while taking in the scenic views of San Bruno Mountain to the east. The second courtyard offers a more quiet escape with multiple seating areas, an outdoor kitchen and fire-pit. • Clubroom, located adjacent and accessible to the pool, with kitchen, media, and recreation • Fitness studio • Leasing/lobby lounge • Landscaped paseos with pedestrian paths and architectural seating areas • Bike “hub” with secure bike storage and repair facilities Locational amenities include: • Mixed-use project with new resident-serving walk-to retail uses • Walk to existing grocery stores, restaurants, bank, dry cleaning, beauty, retail, etc. • SamTrans ECR 37 and 122 bus lines access • South San Francisco Station, Bay Area Rapid Transit Station (BART) • Class I bike lanes along Centennial Way Trail Recycling & Garbage Garbage removal and recycling pick-up service will be provided from El Camino with dumpster staging area within the loading zone. The new building will be equipped with refuse and recycling chutes at each level. Provisions will be made for cardboard box recycling as well. Trans portation Demand Management We are further developing our transportation demand management amenities, but at a minimum will be included in the project: • 43 secure resident bicycle parking spaces (Class I) and a bike repair “hub” • 14 guest bicycle parking rack spaces (Class II) located at pedestrian lobbies • 9 electric vehicle charging spaces • Preparation for additional electric vehicle charging stations • Provide free new resident (upon request) “welcome” trial transit passes • Onsite Transportation Coordinator • Community web portal to facilitate resident carpooling Utilities, Storm Water Quality Management & Fire Protection The following public utility connections and improvements are proposed as part of the project: • Domestic water and fire service for the building is proposing to connect into a main line extension in El Camino Real. • The Antoinette Lane Underground Utility District included the undergrounding of four poles located within this project site. We would take on the monetary and implementation responsibility of undergrounding the four poles within our project site. • Sanitary sewer will connect to the existing sewer lines at Chestnut Avenue and rerouted around the project site along the Chesnut and El Camino frontage. • Storm water will be treated on site as required to meet C3 utilizing a combination of landscape area at site perimeter, flow thru planters, and limited mechanical means. • Storm drainage will be provided by connecting to the existing storm line in Chestnut Avenue. • Electric service for the new residential building will connect to existing joint trench facilities located on El Camino Real and Antoinette Lane • Utility service for Burger King, currently within the project site, will be relocated towards El Camino as part of the project. • Gas service for the building will connect into the existing gas line located in El Camino Real • Fire trucks will have access from El Camino, Chestnut Avenue, and Antoinette Lane. Two additional hydrants have been provided within the project frontage along El Camino. The project will provide an alternate means and methods program to address the fire hose reach gap on site which may include addition of standpipes, located at strategic locations. Architecture The architectural design intent is aimed at creating a timeless building that references the industrial past of South San Francisco and adds character to this vital urban corridor. The street walls along El Camino Real and Chestnut Ave are comprised of a two- to three-story brick façade with recessed storefront glazing at the ground level and residential sun decks open to the sky on the upper levels. This brick façade is designed to resemble a traditional commercial storefront in terms of scale, materials, and detailing, with a taller massing stepped back on the floors above. The brick street walls are tied back to the primary structure with steel beams and adorned with metal anchor plates, giving the impression of a historic façade that had been preserved with a more contemporary structure erected behind. At the corner of El Camino Real and Chestnut is a 45-degree storefront at ground level which promotes visibility and pedestrian movement around the corner plaza, and the projecting floors above are detailed with traditional contrasting trim around windows to add emphasis. The remaining 3 corners of the building are anchored with tower elements which house the building’s vertical circulation and are clad in blue metal panels with edge trim detailing. The longest building side facing El Camino Real is further broken up into two massings by a recess in the building and a material change from stucco to metal cladding, where the residential lobby entrance is located with a common deck above overlooking the street. The brick base continues around the south and east sides of the building up to the podium level. The 5 levels of residential above the podium are finished in varying subtle gray tones with both smooth and sand finish stucco, desaturated shades which complement the red brick and blue metal without competing for attention. The primary residential massing is stepped back from the brick street wall façade by more than eleven feet with a continuous cornice detail at the parapet. Projections from the primary massing offer a contemporary take on the San Francisco bay window while adding interest and relief to the building design. Residential vinyl windows will either be recessed or encased in trim, with vertical groupings of windows that reinforce the bay window concept. On the quieter, non-street-facing elevations, projecting balconies are provided for residents with a railing design consisting of perforated metal panels behind horizontal fins, a design that adds contrast and industrial reference. Along the east building elevation, a landscaped public open space area will be provided as an active frontage and extension of Centennial Way, with two pedestrian connections from the building to the trail, short-term bicycle parking, an outdoor fitness park, and seating areas. Metal green-screens/vine trellises will be installed along the building edge at ground level to screen visibility of the parking structure and soften the pedestrian interface. The pool deck on the podium level above will have a view over the Centennial Way trail and further reinforce the active nature of this public open space amenity. SITE 1/2 MI RADIUSCITY OFSOUTH SANFRANCISCOCentennial Way Trail VICINITY MAPBIRD'S EYE VIEW CONCEPTUAL PERSPECTIVE CI V I L C1 . 0 V E S T I N G T E N T A T I V E P A R C E L M A P C2 . 0 B O U N D A R Y A N D E X I S T I N G C O N D I T I O N S C3 . 0 P R E L I M I N A R Y S I T E P L A N C4 . 0 P R E L I M I N A R Y G R A D I N G P L A N C5 . 0 PR E L I M I N A R Y U T I L I T Y P L A N C6 . 0 P R E L I M I N A R Y S T O R M W A T E R C O N T R O L P L A N DR Y U T I L I T I E S IN T 1 J O I N T T R E N C H I N T E N T T I T L E S H E E T IN T 2 J O I N T T R E N C H I N T E N T Applicant:SummerHill Aparment CommunitiesContact: Elaine Breeze777 S. California AvenuePalo Alto, CA 94304(605) [email protected] Architect:KTGY Architecture + PlanningContact: Sara Fernandez12555 West Jefferson Blvd, Suite 100Los Angeles, CA 90066(310) [email protected] Landscape Archi t e c t : April Phillips Des i g n W o r k s , I n c . Contact: April Ph i l l i p s , P L A , F A S L A 1530 Fifth Avenu e , S u i t e A San Rafael, CA 9 4 9 0 1 (415) [email protected] o m Ci v i l E n g i n e e r : Ca r l s o n , B a r b e e & G i b s o n , I n c . Co n t a c t : R y a n H a n s e n , P . E . 26 3 3 C a m i n o R a m o n , S u i t e 3 5 0 Sa n R a m o n , C A 9 4 5 4 8 (9 2 5 ) 8 6 6 - 0 3 2 2 RH a n s e n @ c b a n d g . c o m Dr y U t i l i t y D e s i g n : Gi a c a l o n e D e s i g n S e r v i c e s , I n c . Co n t a c t : P a u l G i a c a l o n e 58 2 0 S t o n e r i d g e M a l l R o a d , S u i t e 3 4 5 Pl e a s a n t o n , C A 9 4 5 8 8 (9 2 5 ) 4 6 7 - 1 7 4 0 Pa u l G @ D r y U t i l i t y D e s i g n . c o m PROJECT DEVELOPER:PROJECT DESIGN TEAM:988 EL CAMINO REAL | S O U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , C A Submittal Date: 07-05-2017PARCEL 1 A P N 0 1 1 - 3 2 5 - 0 3 0 PARCEL 2 A P N 0 1 1 - 3 2 5 - 0 7 0 PA R C E L 3 A P N 0 1 4 - 0 1 1 - 2 6 0 PA R C E L 4 A P N 0 1 4 - 0 1 1 - 2 8 0 SH E E T I N D E X Sh e e t Nu m b e r Sh e e t T i t l e T. 0 CO V E R S H E E T SP . 1 S I T E P H O T O S SP . 2 C O N C E P T U A L S I T E P L A N SP . 3 C O N C E P T U A L S I T E P L A N SP . 4 P R O J E C T C A L C U L A T I O N S SP . 5 F I R E A C C E S S P L A N SP . 6 F I R E A C C E S S P L A N A. 1 . 1 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E A. 1 . 2 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E A. 1 . 3 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E A. 1 . 4 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E A1 . 5 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E A. 1 . 6 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E A. 1 . 7 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E A. 2 . 1 CO N C E P T U A L E L E V A T I O N S A. 2 . 2 CO N C E P T U A L E L E V A T I O N S A. 3 . 1 FL O O R P L A N - L E V E L G A. 3 . 2 FL O O R P L A N - L E V E L R 1 A. 3 . 3 FL O O R P L A N - L E V E L R 2 A. 3 . 4 FL O O R P L A N - L E V E L R 3 A. 3 . 5 FL O O R P L A N - L E V E L R 4 A. 3 . 6 FL O O R P L A N - L E V E L R 5 A. 3 . 7 RO O F P L A N A. 3 . 8 FL O O R P L A N - L E V E L P 1 A. 3 . 9 FL O O R P L A N - L E V E L P 2 A. 4 . 1 CR O S S S E C T I O N S A. 4 . 2 CR O S S S E C T I O N S A. 5 . 1 UN I T 1 J R , S , S - A L T F L O O R P L A N S A. 5 . 2 UN I T 1 A , 1 A - A L T F L O O R P L A N S A. 5 . 3 UN I T 1 B , 1 C F L O O R P L A N S A. 5 . 4 UN I T 1 D F L O O R P L A N A. 5 . 5 UN I T 2 A , 2 B F L O O R P L A N S A. 5 . 6 UN I T 2 C , 2 D F L O O R P L A N S A. 6 . 1 MA T E R I A L B O A R D A. 6 . 2 SC H E M A T I C D E T A I L S SH E E T I N D E X C O N T I N U E D LA N D S C A P E L1 . 0 IL L U S T R A T I V E P L A N L2 . 0 DE T A I L E N L A R G E M E N T S L3 . 0 LA N D S C A P E A N D M A T E R I A L S P L A N L4 . 0 PR E C E D E N T I M A G E R Y L5 . 0 SE C T I O N S A N D D E T A I L S Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , CA # 20 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. SP . 1 SI T E P H O T O S NT S KE Y M A P SI T E 0102 03 04 0605 0807 08 07 06 01 03 04 02 05 11 09 091110 12 12 13 13 10 EL CAMINO REAL CH E S T N U T AV E N U E ANTION E T T E L A N E CENTEN N I A L W A Y T R A I L TWELVE MILE CREEK DATE: APRIL 18, 2017 0'90'30'120' 1" = 30'SCALE: EXISTING UTILITY BASE MAP 988 EL CAMINO REAL CITY OF SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO SAN MATEO COUNTY CALIFORNIA F:\2718-000\ACAD\EXHIBIT\XB-001_BASE MAP.DWG 4/ 2 0 / 2 0 1 7 3 : 5 9 P M SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA SAN RAMON, CALIFORNIA CIVIL ENGINEERS SURVEYORS PLANNERS (925) 866 - 0322 www.cbandg.com (916) 375 - 1877 Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. NOTES:ABBREVIATIONS LEGEND 10' 15' 1 0 ' 5' 50' 5'-6" 5'-6" Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , CA # 20 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. 0 20 40 10 PR O J E C T S U M M A R Y EX I S T I N G Z O N I N G EC R / C - M X H SI T E A R E A 1. 6 7 A C , 7 2 , 6 0 3 S F CO M M E R C I A L A R E A 12 , 1 1 0 S F RE S I D E N T I A L A R E A 16 6 , 0 0 0 S F GR O S S F L O O R A R E A 17 8 , 1 1 0 S F FL O O R A R E A R A T I O 2. 5 F A R TO T A L U N I T S 17 2 DE N S I T Y 10 3 D U / A C PR O P O S E D D E V E L O P M E N T S T A N D A R D S BU I L D I N G H E I G H T 6 S T O R I E S , 8 0 ' M A X I M U M + 2 L E V E L S S U B - T P A R K I N G CO M M E R C I A L D E P T H 48 ' T O 5 6 ' P R O P O S E D CO M M E R C I A L H E I G H T 17 . 5 ' M I N . ( 1 6 ' M I N . C E I L I N G ) ST R E E T W A L L H E I G H T 31 ' M I N . O N E L C A M I N O R E A L 41 ' M I N . O N C H E S T N U T A V E YA R D S ( S E T B A C K S ) EL C A M I N O R E A L 10 ' F R O M P L , 1 8 ' F R O M C U R B CH E S T N U T A V E 15 ' F R O M P L , 2 0 ' F R O M C U R B IN T E R I O R S I D E 5' M I N . , 1 0 ' M I N . T O L I V I N G RE A R 15 ' M I N . , 5 0 ' M A X . A T P G & E E S M T . BU I L D I N G C O V E R A G E AT G R O U N D L E V E L 48 , 0 0 0 S F @ 6 6 % AB O V E 4 5 ' 36 , 0 0 0 S F @ 5 0 % US A B L E O P E N S P A C E R E Q U I R E D 15 0 S F / D U X 1 7 2 D U = 25 , 8 0 0 S F R E Q U I R E D US A B L E O P E N S P A C E P R O V I D E D PU B L I C O P E N S P A C E 9 , 4 1 3 S F CO M M O N O P E N S P A C E 10 , 3 5 0 S F ( 2 0 ' M I N . D I M E N S I O N ) PR I V A T E O P E N S P A C E 6 , 0 5 0 S F ( 6 ' M I N . D I M E N S I O N ) TO T A L U S A B L E O . S . 25 , 8 1 3 S F P R O V I D E D AD D I T I O N A L A M E N I T I E S / C O M M O N A R E A S P R O V I D E D FI T N E S S 1 , 3 1 5 S F LO B B Y / W I F I L O U N G E 2 , 8 3 5 S F CL U B R O O M 1 , 0 7 5 S F DE C K A T L E V E L R 1 3 2 0 S F PA R K I N G P R O V I D E D SE C U R E R E S I D E N T I A L 20 6 S P A C E S ( 9 ' X 1 8 ' ) FU T U R E R E S I D E N T 4 S P A C E S ( 9 ' X 1 8 ' ) CO M M E R C I A L , G A R A G E 3 3 S P A C E S ( 9 ' X 1 8 ' ) CO M M E R C I A L / V I S I T O R 1 0 S P A C E S ( 9 ' X 1 6 ' + 2' O V E R H A N G ) TO T A L P A R K I N G 25 3 S P A C E S P R O V I D E D ( 8 A D A ) BI K E P A R K I N G LO N G - T E R M 43 S P A C E S R E Q U I R E D @ 1 / 4 D U 43 S P A C E S P R O V I D E D , BI K E R O O M + 2 3 A D D I T I O N A L V E R T . S P A C E S SH O R T - T E R M 25 S P A C E S R E Q U I R E D @ 10 % A U T O 26 S P A C E S P R O V I D E D , B I K E RA C K S SP . 3 CO N C E P T U A L S I T E P L A N P O D I U M L E V E L DN UP DNUP DN UP UP UP UP DN DNUP UP DN U P UP C C C C C C C C FR FR F R C C C C FR C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C C PA R K I N G L E V E L P 1 GR O U N D L E V E L PA R K I N G L E V E L P 2 DN UP UP DN D N UP UP DN RE S I D E N T I A L L E V E L R 1 TR DN UP UP DN UP DN RE S I D E N T I A L L E V E L R 2 RE S I D E N T I A L L E V E L R 3 TR UP DN UP DN DN UP TRUPDN UP DNDNUPRESIDENTIAL LEVEL R4 TRDN DNDNRESIDENTIAL LEVEL R5 OP E N T O BE L O W DE C K 1A1A1A1A1A S1B2A2A1B1C1AS1C1B1C2D2CS1A1A1A 2A2A 1D1D1D1D1D1D1A-alt S-alt1JR1B 2B 1A1A1A1A1A S1B2A2A1B1C1AS1C1B1C2D2CS1A1A1A 2A2A 1D1D1D1D1D1D1A-alt S-alt1JR1B 2B 1A 1 A 1A 1A 1A S 1B 2A 2 A 1B 1C 1A S 1C 1B 1C 2D 2C S 1A 1A 1A 2A 2A 1D 1D 1D 1D 1D 1D 1A - a l t S- a l t 1J R 1B 2B 1A 1 A 1A 1A 1A S 1B 2A 2 A 1B 1C 1A S 1C 1B 1C 2D 2C S 1A 1A 1A 2A 2A 1D 1D 1D 1D 1D 1D 1A - a l t S- a l t 1J R 1B 1A 1 A 1A 1A 1A S 1B 2A 2 A 1B 1C 1A S 1C 1C 2D 2C S 1A 1A 1A 2A 2A 1D 1D 1D 1D 1D 1D 1A - a l t S- a l t 1J R 1B CO U R T Y A R D PO O L D E C K SE C U R E R E S I D E N T P A R K I N G SE C U R E R E S I D E N T P A R K I N G CO M M E R C I A L & F U T U R E RE S I D E N T P A R K I N G C O M M E R C I A L & V I S I T O R P A R K I N G CO M M E R C I A L CO M M E R C I A L RE S . TR . CO M . TR . LOADING LOAD I N G GA T E PU B L I C OP E N S P A C E FI T N E S S CL U B RO O M PL A Z A RE S . L E A S I N G , LO B B Y , & W I F I LO U N G E BI K E S 30 ' 20' Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , C A # 2 0 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. SP . 4 PR O J E C T C A L C U L A T I O N S 0 50 10 0 25 Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , CA # 20 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. A. 1 . 1 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E CORNER OF EL CAMINO REAL AND CHESTNUT AVENUE Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , C A # 2 0 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. A. 1 . 2 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E CORNER OF CHESTNUT AVENUE AND CENTENNIAL WAY Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , CA # 20 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. A. 1 . 3 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E AERIAL VIEW OF EL CAMINO REAL STREET WALL Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , C A # 2 0 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. A. 1 . 4 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E SOUTH CORNER AT EL CAMINO REAL Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , CA # 20 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. A1 . 5 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E EAST PERSPECTIVE Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , CA # 20 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. A. 1 . 6 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E STREET WALL VIEW FROM EL CAMINO REAL Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , C A # 2 0 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. A. 1 . 7 CO N C E P T U A L P E R S P E C T I V E SUN DECKS BE H I N D S T R E E T W A L L PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE OFF CENTENNIAL WAY TRAIL BA L C O N Y R A I L I N G D E T A I L PL CH E S T N U T AV E . PL CO M M E R C I A L RE S . TR A . RE S . LO B B Y BI K E RE P A I R CCCC C CCC CO M M E R C I A L PO D I U M CO U R T Y A R D UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T PA R K I N G PA R K I N G PA R K I N G PA R K I N G R2 R3 R4 R5 ROOFR1P1P2AVG. GRADE 40.9' DR I V E DR I V E 80 ' L I M I T SE C T I O N A - LO N G I T U D I N A L SC A L E : 1 " = 2 0 ' - 0 " C UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T C CO M M . TR A . UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T UN I T 17'-6"10'-3"12'-1"10'-8"9'-8"80'-0"(OVERALL BLDG.HEIGHT)10'-3"10'-3"10'-3" 16'-0" min. 41' min. 59'-10"EG HIGH 43.6' EG L O W 3 8 . 2 ' G RE S T RO O M ST O R A G E ST O R A G E R2 R3 R4 R5 ROOFR1P1P2WALL SECTIONSCALE: 1/16" = 1'-0"16'9'-1"9'-1"10'-8"9'-8"80'(OVERALL BLDG.HEIGHT)9'-1"9'-1"9'-1"41'-6"min.36"42"10'9'18"14"TYP.59'-10"G B B CC KE Y P L A N NT S PO O L D E C K CO U R T Y A R D EL C A M I N O R E A L CHESTN U T A V E A A B CC KE Y P L A N NT S Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , C A # 2 0 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. A. 4 . 1 CR O S S S E C T I O N S Architecture + Planning JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , CA # 20 1 6 0 9 8 6 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. A. 6 . 1 MA T E R I A L B O A R D BA L C O N Y R A I L I N G S A N D D I V I D E R S C R E E N S AI R L I N E P E R F O R A T E D M E T A L A L U M I N U M Mc N I C H O L S PRIMARY STUCCO COLOR 2OMEGA - SMOOTH COAT FINISH ; S A N D F I N I S H * SW 7071 GRAY SCREEN MU L T I - P U R P O S E P A N E L S M P N 1 2 " W I D E AT A S SL A T E B L U E ME T A L A N C H O R P L A T E S , H A N D R A I L S , AN D M E T A L A W N I N G S SW 7 0 6 9 I R O N O R E NO T E : M a n u f a c t u r e r s m a y b e s u b s t i t u t e d d u r i n g f i n a l d e s i g n f o r e q u i v a l e n t s . VI N Y L W I N D O W S Y S T E M VP I E N D U R A N C E S E R I E S BR I C K V E N E E R H. C . M U D D O X PRIMARY STUCCO COLOR 1OMEGA - SMOOTH COAT FINISH; SAND FINISH*SW 7067 CITYSCAPE SM O O T H C O A T S T U C C O F I N I S H O V E R F O A M FO A M C O N C E P T S SW 7 6 7 2 K N I T T I N G N E E D L E S HA R D I E B O A R D T R I M B O A R D 4 / 4 AN D F I B E R C E M E N T P A N E L SM O O T H F I N I S H SW 7 0 6 9 I R O N O R E SECONDARY STUCCO COLOR 3OMEGA- SAND FINISHSW 7066 GRAY MATTERSNOTE: REFER TO EXTERIORELEVATIONS FOR STUCCOSMOOTH AND SAND FINISHMATERIAL APPLICATIONS EX T E R I O R L E D W A L L L I G H KI C H L E R - E S T E L L A 2 C O L L E C T I O N AR C H I T E C T U R A L B R O N Z E 2 L5.0 1 L5 . 0 5'-0"9'-10 12 "17'-0"4'-0"31'-9" 3 0 ' - 0 " 4'- 0 " 4'-0" 4'-0"7'-111 4"13'-71 2" 7 B I K E R A C K S (1 4 S P A C E S ) 38 " D E E P I N F I L T R A T I O N P L A N T E R CO U R T Y A R D FU R N I S H I N G S , T Y P . PE R M E A B L E PA V I N G 38" D E E P I N F I L T R A T I O N PLAN T E R 5' T A L L G L A S S P O O L EN C L O S U R E , T Y P . PL A N T E R P O T , T Y P . SPECIAL PAVING, TYP. 38 " D E E P I N F I L T R A T I O N PL A N T E R PLANTER POT, TYP. SP E C I A L E N T R Y PA V I N G , T Y P . POOLFURNISHINGS,TYP.BENCHES(TOTAL 3) 31 ' - 9 " VARIES RE M O V E A N D R E P L A C E EX I S T I N G F E N C E W I T H 6' F E N C E LOAD I N G SPA PO O L ( 1 5 ' X 3 0 ' ) PROPERTY LINE C E N T E N N I A L W A Y T R A I L CHESTNUT AVEEL C A M I N O R E A L TYP. T Y P . T Y P . RI G H T O F W A Y PRO P E R T Y L I N E 24 " D E E P P L A N T E R 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L OUTDOOR DINING8'-0" 8'- 0 " 9 ' - 1 1 " 8'-0"OU T D O O R FI T N E S S P O D S WI T H E Q U I P M E N T 18 " D E E P I N T E N S I V E P L A N T E R 6 BIKE RACKS(12 SPACES)PLAZA SCULPTURAL SEATING, TYP. BE N C H E S (T O T A L 3 ) GR E E N S C R E E N EA S E M E N T F O R ST R E E T D E D I C A T I O N JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , C A 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 0 50 10 0 25 Architecture + Planning CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. IL L U S T R A T I V E P L A N L1 . 0 0 7 . 5 1 5 30 JU L Y 5 , 2 0 1 7 SO U T H S A N F R A N C I S C O , C A 98 8 E L C A M I N O R E A L SummerHill Apartment Communities777 S. California Ave.Palo Alto, CA 94304 0 50 10 0 25 Architecture + Planning CIVIL ENGINEERSSURVEYORSPLANNERSwww.cbandg.com Carlson, Barbee & Gibson, Inc. L2 . 0 DE T A I L E N L A R G E M E N T S PO D I U M C O U R T Y A R D E N L A R G E M E N T 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 1 FI T N E S S P A R K E N L A R G E M E N T 1" = 1 0 ' - 0 " 2 PODIUM POOL DECK ENLARGEMENT1" = 10'-0"3 EL CAMINO REAL / CHESTNUT PLAZA ENLARGEMENT1" = 10'-0"4 0 5 1 0 20 C E N T E N N I A L W A Y T R A I L OUTDOOR DININGCONCRETE SIDEWALKACCENT PLANTER, TYP.SCULPTURAL SEATINGSPECIAL PAVING, TYP.EL CAMINO REAL CHESTNUT AVEPOOL ENTRYFIRE LOUNGE WITHCUSHIONED SEATINGCHAISE LOUNGESEATING, TYP.ACCEN T T R E E S IN POT S , T Y P . POOL E N T R Y 5' TALL GLASS POOLENCLOSURE, TYP.38" DEEP INFILTRATIONPLANTERPOOL (15'X30)SPA 38 " D E E P I N F I L T R A T I O N PL A N T E R SE A T W A L L W I T H T A B L E S AN D C H A I R S , T Y P . FI R E L O U N G E W I T H CU S H I O N E D S E A T I N G 18 " D E E P P L A N T E R OU T D O O R SE A T I N G PI N G P O N G GA M E A R E A MO V E A B L E S E A T I N G UN I T P A V E R S BB Q S T A T I O N 24 " D E E P P L A N T E R AC C E N T T R E E S I N PO T S , T Y P . CO U R T Y A R D FU R N I S H I N G S , T Y P . CE N T E N N I A L W A Y TR A I L C O N N E C T I O N AR C H I T E C T U A L G R E E N S C R E E N WI T H V I N E S , T Y P . PE R V I O U S U N I T PA V E R S , T Y P . BE N C H , T Y P . FI T N E S S E Q U I P M E N T /A T H L E T I C S U R F A C I N G , T Y P . AR T I F I C I A L T U R F 8'-0" 6 B I K E R A C K S (1 2 S P A C E S ) 38 " D E E P I N F I L T R A T I O N PL A N T E R GL A S S P A R A P E T W A L L